HomeMy WebLinkAbout9B - Emergency No Wake for Spring Lake � PRIp
Eva4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake,MN 55372
41INNEsc0P
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: JUNE 23, 2014
AGENDA#: 9B
PREPARED BY: Kelly Meyer, Asst. City Manager
PRESENTED BY: Frank Boyles, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
EMERGENCY NO WAKE RESTRICTIONS FOR SPRING LAKE.
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is to consider action to implement
emergency No Wake restrictions for the portion of Spring Lake within the
City of Prior Lake.
History
Prior Lake has a current ordinance that allows the City to implement Slow
No Wake restrictions on Prior Lake when the lake level reaches 904 feet.
The City has sole jurisdiction to implement restrictions because Upper and
Lower Prior Lake are wholly contained with the City limits. No Wake
restrictions have been in place on Prior Lake for approximately the last 10
days.
There is not currently a No Wake ordinance that authorizes implementation
of No Wake restrictions on Spring Lake. Although some Spring Lake
properties are within Prior Lake city limits, the County, Watershed District
and Township also have jurisdiction, and the implementation of permanent
restrictions is more complex.
Current Circumstances
The City of Prior Lake is experiencing its highest lake water levels since the
early 1980s. As of Friday, June 20, 2014 at 3pm, the Prior Lake —Spring
Lake Watershed District reported Prior Lake had reached a lake level of
905.22, and Spring Lake had reach 911.95.
Regardless of No Wake restrictions, Prior Lake lakeshore owners are still
dealing with erosion control issues on their shorelines. Spring lake
residents are dealing with similar issues without the benefit of Slow No
Wake restrictions.
On Wednesday, June 18, the MN Department of Natural Resources
declared a statewide emergency and authorized local units of government
to enact a 30-day temporary emergency slow no wake restriction when
water bodies met certain conditions (attached). At the same time, several
Spring Lake Township residents requested the local jurisdictions (Spring
Lake Township, Scott County, City of Prior Lake, and Prior Lake-Spring
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245/www.cityofpriorlake.com
Lake Watershed District) consider immediate restrictions to protect the
shoreline of Spring Lake.
This item was discussed at a Spring Lake Township Board meeting on June
19, 2014. Subsequently, County Administrator Gary Shelton has advised
the City that the County Board will conduct an emergency meeting on
Monday, June 23, 2014 at 8am to take action to implement restrictions for
Spring Lake, as well as discuss other Scott County water bodies. Upon
Board action on Monday, the County will advise the City of the details of
their action, and request the City Council take similar action.
Conclusion
In order to consistently implement restrictions for Spring Lake, it would be
appropriate for the City Council to consider a companion resolution as it
relates to Spring Lake. A resolution will be distributed at the meeting on
Monday.
ISSUES: If the County were imposing a permanent ordinance related to Slow No
Wake restrictions for Spring Lake, there would be a number of more
complex details to evaluate and coordinate between the jurisdictions. In this
emergency case, the issues focus on enforcement, marketing, and the
timing of the repeal of the restrictions).
Enforcement— It is presumed that the County will provide enforcement of
the emergency No Wake restrictions on Spring Lake just as they do for Prior
Lake.
Notice/Marketing —The County, Township and City would coordinate public
notification. Since the City is more accustomed to the process for notifying
local lake organizations, and posting signage at access points, we could
provide this assistance for Spring Lake.
Repeal of No Wake— It is the City's recommendation that the No Wake
restrictions on Spring Lake be repealed at the same time the restrictions are
repealed on Prior Lake regardless of the lake level on Spring Lake. Under
MN Rules, the emergency restrictions are limited to a maximum of 30 days.
To date, all jurisdictions have been willing to collaborate. We expect to
have more detailed information on these items at the meeting on Monday,
and after the County Board discusses the issues.
FINANCIAL None known at this time.
IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Emergency Slow No Wake
Restrictions for Spring Lake.
2. Take no action and provide staff with additional direction.
RECOMMENDED Alternative 1.
MOTION:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota
500 Lafayette Road • St. Paul,MN • 55155-40
June 18, 2014
DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES
Attention Local Units of Government:
STATEWIDE EMERGENCY WATER SURFACE USE RESTRICTION APROVAL
Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 6110.300-6110-3800
Due to historically high rainfall amounts across Minnesota, (pursuant to MN Rule 6610.3700
subp. 9), The Commissioner of Natural Resources has approved that local units of government
may enact a 30-day temporary emergency water surface use slow wake restrictions under the
following conditions:
1. The body of water must reach a level where damage to property is expected.
2. The elevation that triggers the slow no-wake restriction shall be the ordinary high water
level established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources or a lake elevation or
river stage where damage to property is expected.
3. The slow no-wake restriction shall be lifted once the water body has been 0.1 feet
below the elevation that triggers the slow no-wake for three days. The slow no-wake
restriction shall be lifted a maximum of 30 days from the first day it is enacted, unless the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources approves an extension.
4. The slow no-wake area may be set by the local unit of government at 150, 300, or 600
feet from the shore or across the entire water body with the goal of enacting the minimum
restriction on watercraft use needed to protect and minimize harm to natural resources.
5. Two or more local units of government must approve identical water surface use
restrictions to cover a shared body of water unless the impacted area is clearly within one
local unit of government's area of responsibility (example: a channel or bay).
6. The local unit of government will notify the Commissioner (via the DNR Boat and Water
Safety Unit) as soon as practicable from enactment.
7. The local unit of government will notify the public via their website, posted notices at
public water access sites, press releases, and other means they have available.
8. The local unit of government shall designate the primary enforcement agency (typically
the county sheriff) and note that other licensed peace officers may also enforce the
restriction.
www.dnr.slale.nm.us
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
t`F PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CONTAINING A MINIMUM OF 10%POST-CONSUMER WASTE
Emergency beyond 30 days:
The local unit of government may apply to the DNR Boat and Water Safety Unit for a
temporary extension of more than 30 days is expected to be needed. Provide an
opportunity for public comment to the extent practicable and provide a summary of
comments. Allow 5 days minimum for processing.
Permanent Water Surface Use Restrictions:
Local units of government are encouraged to apply for permanent approval of water
surface use slow no-wake trigger elevation (along with any other needed restrictions)to
avoid needing to request additional temporary approvals.
See http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/regulations/boatwater/surfaceusezoning.html
Questions?
Contact Margaret Bergsrud of MN DNR Boat and Water Safety at 651-259-5400 or
boatandwater.dnr@state.mn.us
Sincerely,
COL Ken Soring, Director
Enforcement Division
cc: Stan Linnell, State Boating Law Administrator
DNR Regional Administrators
DNR Regional Enforcement Captains
County Sheriff Water Patrols
Area PAT Supervisors