HomeMy WebLinkAbout10B - Exterior Materials Zoning
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
AGENDA ITEM:
INTRODUCTION:
AUGUST 2, 2004
lO-B
DANETTE MOORE, PLANNING COORDINATOR
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CAST-IN-PLACE OR PRECAST
CONCRETE PANELS AS A CLASS I MATERIAL IN THE I-l
(INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT
History: On July 12,2004, the Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of an amendment to allow cast-in-place or
precast concrete panels as a Class I material in the 1-1 (Industrial)
district.
Background: The Deerfield Development filed an application for the
ordinance amendment to allow the same type of Architectural
Materials in both the C-5 (Business Office Park) district and the 1-1
(Industrial) district. The following building materials are currently
allowed in the C-5 district:
~ face brick;
~ stone;
~ glass;
~ architecturally treated concrete;
~ decorative concrete block whose color and texture is integral to the
material (if not more than 50% of the building elevation faces any
roadway). Plain, flat unpainted concrete block is not allowed, nor is
any type of painted concrete block;
~ cast-in-place or precast concrete panels;
~ metal panels with interlocking, concealed or tongue-and-groove
seams and concealed fasteners, if the exterior surface finish is
warranted by the manufacturer for twenty years against blistering,
peeling, cracking, flaking, checking or chipping (if not more than
50% of the building elevation faces any roadway).
~ stucco or other cementitious coating applied in a manner so as to
create a harmonious design with other exterior materials.
1:\04 files\04 ordin amend\04 zoning\industrial standards\cc report.doc
www.cityofpriorlake.com
Page 1
Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
In Section 1107.2200, cast-in-place or precast concrete panels are not
listed as a Class I material in the I-I district. Section 1107.2202 (6, d)
specifically lists the requirements for buildings in the 1-1 district as
follows:
Buildings in the General Industrial Use District: Class 1 materials
may be reduced to a minimum of 25% for buildings in the 1-1 Use
District which are not located on a principal arterial, minor arterial,
major collector, or adjacent to or across from any "R" Use District,
provided that the remaining materials are functionally and durably
equal to a Class 1 material as certified by the developer's architect or
the manufacturer.
Class 1 materials may be reduced to a minimum of 25% for building
walls in the "1-1" Use District facing on a principal arterial, minor
arterial or major collector, or adjacent to or across from any "R" Use
District, provided that the remaining materials are functionally and
durably equal to a Class 1 material as certified by the developer's
architect or the product manufacturer and that the architectural
design and site plan meet the following minimum criteria:
J;> The exposed height of the building wall shall not exceed 15 feet.
J;> The number of required plants shall be increased by 20% or the
size of 20% of the overs tory trees installed shall be increased to 3 112
caliper inches.
J;> A minimum of 10% of the building facade must be windows or
glass spandrels.
While this section allows some relief from the use of typical Class I
materials, it is not consistent with the requirements of the C-5 district.
The proposed amendment adds a qualifying sentence to the definition of
Class I materials to allow the use of the proposed materials in the I-I
district, as follows:
Class 1: Brick, marble, granite or other natural stone, textured cement or
synthetic stucco, copper, porcelain, and glass are Class 1 exterior
building materials on buildings other than those used as dwellings which
contain eight or fewer dwelling units. Synthetic stucco shall be installed
a minimum of four feet above the foundation of the building. Wood, fiber
cement or higher impact rated vinyl siding (at least .044 inches in
thickness and prefinished metal are Class 1 materials on residential
buildings containing eight or fewer dwelling units in addition to the other
Class 1 materials listed in this subsection. Cast-in-place or precast
panels are considered Class I materials in the 1-1 district in addition to
the other Class I materials listed in this subsection.
1:\04 files\04 ordin amend\04 zoning\industrial standards\cc report. doc
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
The purpose of this amendment is to allow a broader range of Class I
materials in the 1-1 district. The proposed amendment is consistent with
the architectural standards in the C-5 district, which is intended to have a
higher standard of construction and design.
The Council may want to consider including additional design standards
with the expanded use of materials. This might involve the use of
contrasting bands, colors or materials. The purpose of this would be to
avoid the appearance of large, blank concrete walls. If the Council wants
to add this option, we should also include it as part of the criteria in the
C-5 district to be consistent.
Zoning Ordinance Amendment Findings
Section 1108.600 of the Zoning Ordinance states that recommendations
of the Planning Commission and final determinations of the City Council
shall be supported by findings addressing the relationship of the proposed
amendment to the following policies:
1. There is a public need for the amendment.
There is a public need for the amendment. It expands and refines
minimum architectural standards for industrial uses, consistent with
the existing standards in the C-5 district.
2. The amendment will accomplish one or more of the purposes of
this Ordinance, the Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted plans
or policies of the City.
The provisions of the Zoning Ordinance are intended to:
. Protect the residential, business, industrial and public areas of the
community and maintain their stability.
. Enhance the aesthetic character and appearance of the City.
Objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan include:
. Maintain high standards in the promotion and development of
commerce and industry.
. Enact and maintain policies and ordinances to ensure the safety
and preservation of property.
The proposed amendment strives to accomplish the purpose of the
Zoning Ordinance and the objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan by adopting minimum architectural standards for
industrial structures.
3. The adoption of the amendment is consistent with State and/or
Federal requirements.
1:\04 files\04 ordin amend\04 zoning\industrial standards\cc report. doc
Page 3
This amendment is consistent with federal and state laws.
CONCI,lTSTO~. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan and the enabling legislation set forth in
Minnesota statutes. Based upon the findings set forth in this report, staff
recommends approval.
lfTSC t\ I. IMP A CT. There is no budget impact as a result of this action. Approval of the
project will facilitate development and increase the City tax base.
A T .TF~N A TTVFS: The City Council has three alternatives:
1. Adopt an ordinance amending the Zoning Code to allow cast-in-place
or precast concrete panels as a Class I material in the I-I (Industrial)
district.
2. Deny the ordinance amendment request to allow cast-in-place or
precast concrete panels as a Class I material in the 1-1 (Industrial)
district on the basis that the request is inconsistent with the purpose
and intent of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. In this case, the
Council should direct the staff to prepare a resolution with findings of
fact based in the record for the denial of the request.
3. Defer consideration of this item and provide staff with specific
direction.
QECOMMFNovn
MOTTO~.
The staff recommends Alternative # I. This action requires the following
motion:
A motion and second adopting an ordinance to amend Section 1107.2202
of the Zoning Ordinance to allow cast-in-place or precast concrete panels
as a Class I material in the I-I (Industrial) district.
4TTACHMFNTS. 1. Ordinance 04-XX
2. July 12, 2004 Planning Commission Minutes
REVmW1<;n RV: ~ !Jjatlay.ep_
1:\04 files\04 ordin amend\04 zoning\industrial standards\cc report. doc
Page 4
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
ORDINANCE NO. 04-XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1107.2202 (6, a) OF THE
PRIOR LAKE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Prior Lake does hereby ordain that:
1. Section 1107.2202 (6, a) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as
follows:
(6) Exterior surface materials of buildings shall be subject to the
following regulations:
a. Classes of Materials: For the purpose of this subsection,
materials shall be divided into Class I, Class la, Class II and Class
III categories as follows:
Class I: Brick, marble, granite or other natural stone, textured
cement or synthetic stucco, copper, porcelain, and glass are Class I
exterior building materials on buildings other than those used as
dwellings which contain eight or fewer dwelling units. Synthetic
stucco shall be installed a minimum of four feet above the
foundation of the building. Wood, fiber cement or higher impact
rated vinyl siding (at least .044 inches in thickness) and prefinished
metal are Class I materials on residential buildings containing eight
or fewer dwelling units in addition to the other Class I materials
listed in this subsection. Cast-in-place or precast panels are
considered Class I materials in the 1-1 district in addition to the
other Class I materials listed in this subsection.
Class la: Fiber cement siding.
Class II: Exposed aggregate concrete panels, burnished concrete
block, integral colored split face (rock face) and exposed aggregate
concrete block, cast-in-place concrete, artificial stone, and
prefinished metal.
Class III: Unpainted or surface painted concrete block (scored or
unscored), unpainted or surface painted plain or ribbed concrete
panels, and unfinished or surface painted metal.
L:\04 FILES\04 GRDIN AMEND\04 ZQW~.bH;;nYN~A\!)~~rds\ordinance.doc
Phone 952.447.4230 1 Fax 952.447.4245
1
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Prior Lake this 2nd day of August, 2004.
ATTEST:
City Manager
Mayor
Published in the Prior Lake American on the 7th day of August, 2004.
Drafted By:
City of Prior Lake Planning Department
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
L:\04 FILES\04 ORDIN AMEND\04 ZONING\industrial standards\ordinance.doc
2
Planning Commission Meeting
July J 2, 2004
Comments from the Public:
Attorney Dale Moe, representing the applicants, explained the ori . al plat was conveyed
with vague descriptions. Dale also stated the original prope Id in fact go down to the
lake.
The public hearing was closed at 6:36 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Lemke/PerezlStamson:
· Agreed with staff and eir recommendations to approve.
· It meets the requi ents and is an appropriate way to handle this issue.
MOTION BY LE
APPROVE T
, SECOND BY PEREZ, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
GISTERED LAND SURVEY.
indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
item will go to the City Council on August 2, 2004.
~
B. Case #04-86 Deerfield Development is requesting an amendment to Section
ll07.2202 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow cast-in-place or precast concrete panels
as Class I materials in the I-l (Industrial) district.
Planning Director Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated July 12,2004, on
file in the office of the City Planning Department.
Deerfield Development has filed an application to amend Section 1107.2202 of the
Zoning Ordinance to allow cast-in-place or precast concrete panels as a Class I material
in the 1-1 (Industrial) district. Although the applicant has applied for this amendment in
order to develop the Deerfield Industrial Park, the amendment will apply to all Industrial
districts. The proposed amendment is consistent with the architectural standards in the C-
5 district, which is intended to have a higher standard of construction and design.
The Planning Commission may want to consider including additional design standards
with the expanded use of materials. This might involve the use of contrasting bands,
colors or materials. The purpose of this would be to avoid the appearance of large, blank
concrete walls. If the Planning Commission wants to add this option, it should be
included as part of the criteria in the C-5 district to be consistent.
The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan and the enabling legislation set forth in Minnesota statutes. Based
upon the findings set forth in this report, staff recommended approval.
L:\04 FILES\04 PLAN COMMIS\04 pc Minutes\MN071204.doc
2
Planning Commission Meeting
July 12, 2004
Stamson questioned if one could put up a metal building in the C5. Kansier responded a
pole barn would not meet the definition. There are some products that have interlocking
panels that do. It might be something that should be looked at again in the ordinance,
especially with the progression of the precast concrete.
Stamson said it did seem lower quality than required in the C5 District.
Comments from the Public: None
Comments from the Commissioners:
Perez:
· Agreed with staff, it makes sense.
· Community Development Director, John Sullivan notes this was an oversight.
· Agreed with the staffs Findings to maintain high standards.
. Approve.
Lemke:
. Agreed with staff s findings. It is a higher standard.
. I like the colored panels, it is very attractive and durable.
. Support.
Stamson:
· Agreed - the precast panels would be very attractive in the II District. They also
provide a reasonably priced alternative for construction. That can be important in
the II District where the buildings are more industrial in use than an office
showroom in the C5.
. Support.
MOTION BY LEMKE, SECOND BY PEREZ, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This item will go before the City Council on August 2, 2004.
6. Old Business:
A. Case #04-82 & 04-83 Tradition Development has applied for approval of a
Planned Unit Development Final Plan for the property located south of l70th Street
and north of Crystal Lake. The proposal calls for a townhouse development
consisting of 33 dwelling units on II acres.
Planning Director Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated July 12,2004, on
file in the office of the City Planning Department.
L:\04 FILES\04 PLAN COMMIS\04 pc Minutes\MN071204.doc
3