HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-02PC 1875 Shoreline Blvd NW VARDoc. No. A 958945
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Certified Filed and/or Recorded on
05-30-2014 at 08:00 Recpt: 1249180
James L. Hentges, County Recorder 01
Fee- $ 46.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF SCOTT
Doc. No. T 229156
Vol. 160 Page 52 Cert. 51399
CW 525 5-1 If 0 0
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Certified Filed on 05-30-2014 at 0$:00
James L. Hentges, Registrar of Titles 01
Fee- $ 66.00
The undersigned, duly qualified and Planner for the City of Prior Lake, hereby certifies the
attached hereto is the original true and correct copies of
RESOLUTION 14-02PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM LAKE SETBACK AND
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPERTY IN THE R-1 (LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT
Jeff MOzke
City of Prior Lake
Dated this 7'h day of April, 2014.
1875 Shoreline Boulevard NW, Prior Lake, MN 55372
PID 25-490-003-0
City Seal)
6 c
Please return document to:
City of Prior Lake
Community and Economic Development Department
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
no;o,
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior sake, MN 55372
RESOLUTION 14-02PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM LADE SETBACK AND
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPERTY IN THE R-1 (LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Linda Bigut is requesting variances to allow construction of a single family residential dwelling on a
property zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) at the following location, to wit;
1875 Shoreline Boulevard, Prior Lake, MN 55372
25-490-003-0:
e'''fOutlot A, Hilltop Addition, Scott County, Minnesota. , _0 -' '
And
Lot 3, Hilltop Addition, Scott County, Minnesota, except that part of Lot 3, described as follows,
4 Commencing at the most westerly corner of Lot 3; thence South 30 degrees 27 minutes 20
.,,seconds East along the southwesterly line of said Lot 3, a distance of 86.92 feet to the point of
'/�J beginning of the tract to be described; thence South 50 degrees 57 minutes East a distance of 33
feet, more or less, to the shore of Spring Lake; thence southwesterly along the shoreline 3 feet,
more or less, to the southwesterly line of said Lot 3; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly
line a distance of 33 feet, more or less to that point of beginning. ., 03
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variance as contained in Case DEV-
20'14-0008 and held a hearing thereon on April 7, 2014.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon, the !-health, safety,
and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of
fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of
the proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The irregular shape of the narrow property creates a practical difficulty for the property owner to
construct a house on this property in a reasonable manner. The applicant proposes a new home
which will not increase the existing nonconforming setback to the lake. Also, the practical difficulty
for the front yard setback is due to the abnormally large area of right-of-way along this Shoreline
Boulevard. Granting of the front yard setback variance would allow the house to still be located
over 40+ feet from the current roadway. With only an approximate 300 square foot irregularly
shaped buildable area, a home could not be constructed on site without the need for setback
variances from the Zoning Ordinance..
5. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes of the Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan. A purpose of the Zoning Ordinance to "Promote the most appropriate and
orderly development of the residential, business, industrial, public land, and ,public areas" and to
Phone 952.447M00 / Fax 952.447.4245 / N"vNv.cityofpriorlake.com
"Enhance the aesthetic character of the City." The granting of the variance will allow for the
construction of a modern lake home.
6. The practical difficulty is due to circumstances unique to the property areas which were created by
the narrow, irregular shape of the property.
7. The granting of the variances will not alter the existing character of the neighborhood. Many of the
riparian properties along Shoreline Boulevard are similar in limited lot depth running from the street
to Spring Lake. Therefore similar nonconforming lake and front yard setbacks exist in the area. In
addition, Shoreline Boulevard was recently reconstructed and the street lies over 45 feet from the
proposed house location due to an abnormally large right-of-way area.
8. A single family residential dwelling is an allowed use within the R-1 (Low Density Residential)
Zoning District.
9. The contents of Planning Case #DEV -2014-9008 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the following
variances to allow to construct a single family residential dwelling on a property zoned R-9 (Low
Density Residential):
O An 11.5 foot variance from the required minimum 50 foot structure setback from the Ordinary
High later (OHM elevation of ,Spring Lake using the average fake setbacks of adjacent
properties (Section 1904.308).
a A 15 foot variance from the required minimum 25 foot front yard structure setback (Section
9102.405 (3)).
The variance is subject to the following conditions:
9. The variance resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof
of recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shalt be submitted to the
Community & Economic Development Departmertt prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. In accordance with City Ordinance, the proposed driveway shall not exceed 24 feet in width
at the front property line or within the street right-of-way..
3. A deed restriction or covenants must be filed with the Scott County Recorder which requires
Outlot A to be under the same ownership in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. This deed
restriction or covenant must include provisions that restrict the resubdivision of the lot.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment ori April 7, 2414.
4-
�rfdiHite, Commission Vice -Chair
ATTEST: -
Dan Rogness, C mmunity Economic Development Director