HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 15 2014 PC meeting minutes
PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Monday, September 15, 2014
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance:
Commissioner Phelan called the Monday, September 15, 2014 Prior Lake Planning Commission meeting
to order at 6:00 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Jeff Phelan, Perri Hite, Adam Blahnik, Eric
Spieler and Wade Larson,Community and Economic Development Director Dan Rogness, Project
Engineer Seng Thongvanh and Development Service Assistant Sandra Woods.
2. Approval of Agenda:
MOTION BY SPIELER, SECONDED BY LARSON TO APPROVE THE MONDAY, SEPTMBER 15,
2014 PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
.
VOTE: Ayes by Phelan, Hite, Spieler, Blahnik and Larson The Motion carried.
3. Approval of Monday, August 4, 2014 Meeting Minutes:
MOTION BY BLAHNIK, SECONDED BY LARSON TO APPROVE THE MONDAY, AUGUST 4,
2014 PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.
.
VOTE: Ayes by Phelan, Hite, Spieler, Blahnik and Larson The Motion carried.
4. Public Hearings:
A.DEV14-000018B Maple Place Jeff Nycklemoe, on behalf of Maple Place, is requesting
approval of a preliminary plat of approximately 5.0 acres to be subdivided into 12 single family
th
lots on land located south of MN TH 13, directly southwest of Griggs Street and north of 176
Street. PID 25-910-023-0.
Director Rogness
introduced the proposed preliminary plat and explained the current circumstances,
issues, conclusion and alternatives. He stated staff is recommending to approve the Preliminary Plat
subject to conditions identified by the Planning Commission. He provided a location map, development
plans and Community Development Department memorandums. He noted that the applicant has changed
the original proposed layout of the lots to include the storm water pond at the northeast part of the plat.
They also changed the tear-drop cul-de-
recommendation, the applicant will then complete a full set of design plans based on the relocated storm
pond location. Rogness also noted that Lots 6 and 7 in the revised preliminary plat may require front lot
width setbacks due to the redesign of the pond the corresponding shift of lots on the northern end.
Therefore, staff has provided that as a condition of plat approval.
Engineer Thongvanh
explained the utilities, grading and the storm water plan.
Commission Comments/Questions:
Phelan
asked is this 12 single family lots on 5.38 acres or 10.5 acres?
Director Rogness
replied 5.38 acres.
1
Hite
asked about hydrology and the need to have both a filtration basin and a storm water pond in Outlot
A.
Engineer Thongvanh
explained the need for the filtration basin and the storm water pond related to
volume and rate control.
Spieler
asked why this is not listed as a sixth addition of Maple Glen or part of the master plan for Maple
Glen.
Rogness
replied that the Commission may want to ask the applicant. Staff cannot require that any specific
development be part of another prior subdivision; that decision is up to the applicant/owner.
Spieler
asked about the timing of development on land directly south from a City perspective.
Director Rogness
know of plans for that lot. He explained the desired
connectivity through that property with street and sidewalk, but that is based on a future development
proposal. Rogness mentioned the ghost plat; however, it is completely up to the homeowner if they want
to sell or develop in whole or in part.
Spieler
stated his concerns of new neighborhoods being developed on ghost plats and changes that impact
existing neighborhoods.
Larson
questioned the inlet protection.
Director Rogness
replied they would be submitting detailed plans of all the changes with the new pond
location.
Larson
asked were drainage is going? He questioned the filtration system inside the normal storm water
drainage.
Engineer Thongvanh
replied it is protection
storm sewer system. He said these get cleaned out with erosion control inspections.
Larson
asked if this is temporary while they are doing the grading operation.
Engineer Thongvanh
replied this would be for grading and construction; it is temporary until vegetation
and the site has been stabilized and established.
Larson
questioned Outlot C of the adjacent plat and how it fits into the Maple Place updated plans.
Director Rogness
replied that Outlot C with Maple Glen was platted as a remnant parcel to be used as
part of a future development parcel.
Larson
stated there is another lot on the east side of Outlot A and is wondering if this area is a whole lot,
or is it being cut apart.
2
Director Rogness
believes a home was built on that lot during this last year, and furthermore, the little
triangular piece does not impede the development of that property.
Blahnik
questioned the width of Lots 6 and 7; he asked if the original plan was to have all lots at 86 feet.
Director Rogness
replied yes.
MOTION BY PHELAN, SECONDED BY HITE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGAT 6:21 P.M.
.
VOTE: Ayes by Phelan, Hite, Spieler, Blahnik and Larson The Motion carried.
Applicant
:
Terry Snyder
, consultant at Project Developers representing the applicant, answered questions and
summarized changes that would benefit the lots. He mentioned the pond and the size of the lots, and the
revisions were based on city engineering comments. Since they are not the same developer as that for
Maple Glen, he stated it was common courtesy not to consider naming it as another addition. He talked
about their selection of this area and the lot placement.
Spieler
asked how construction vehicles would access the site.
Applicant Snyder
replied that since the main construction will be home builders, they will be coming in
on Griggs.
Spieler
asked if they have been working with the Maple Glen community to explain what they are
planning on this property.
Applicant Snyder
believes they are aware of what is going on.
Spieler
expressed his concerns for the adjacent neighborhood with heavy traffic during construction.
Applicant Snyder
said due to the smaller plat size, the truck hauling should be minimized during a more
concentrated time period.
Spieler
asked if Maple Glen has a Homeowners Association (HOA).
Director Rogness
replied yes.
Spieler
asked if this would be part of the HOA or if they would be working together with Maple Glen?
Applicant Snyder
replied they have not approached that issue. He stated the HOA of one development
does not typically cross over; they would already be involved in their own share of costs.
Spieler
asked about the type of houses to be built and the time schedule.
Applicant Snyder
replied the northern lots will have full basements with two stories; the ones on Highway
13 will be full walk-outs with a mix of 1-2 story buildings depending on price point and desires.
He stated that the final decision is up to the builder, and he is hopeful to have one to two different custom
builders on this site. They would like to get approval now so they have the option to get the final plat
recorded with some possible grading work this fall.
3
Public Comment
:
None.
MOTION BY PHELAN, SECONDED BY HITE TO CLOSE THE PUBLICHEARING AT 6:32 P.M.
.
VOTE: Ayes by Phelan, Hite, Spieler, Blahnik and Larson The Motion carried.
Commissions Comments/Questions:
Phelan
stated this is straightforward and appreciates that the developer is working closely with staff on
revising the lots and noting that these two lots may require a variances. He would like to note on record
that if this did not have a cul-de-sac, the variances may not be warranted; however, it does change on the
basis of having a temporary cul-de-sac. He mentioned that unless he sees something further in his fellow
Commissioners comments, he will be supporting this application.
Blahnik
stated he will be supporting this preliminary plat as it was originally approved in 2006, it is now
back again with City staff recommending the drainage pond be moved from the south to the north. He
also believes this is straightforward subdivision.
Larson
stated he agrees with Commissioner Blahnik comments.
Hite
is supportive of this, noting the applicant will need to come back to apply for any variances that will
be needed with the lots on the minimum lot width.
Spieler
supports this, but would like to recommend that the developer work closely with Maple Glen
HOA and neighborhood to make sure that the neighbors are not disturbed and that construction goes
smoothly.
MOTION BY BLAHNIK, SECONDED BY HITE TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AS
PROPOSED TO THE CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED BY STAFF.
.
VOTE: Ayes by Phelan, Hite, Spieler, Blahnik and Larson The Motion carried.
5. Old Business:
None.
6. New Business:
None.
7. Announcements:
A.Recent City Council Discussions/Decisions.
UPDATES (September 8, 2014)
PUD Crystal Bay Townhomes approved
Vacation Candy Cove Trail pulled based on input from the City
Attorney; right-of-way vacations are not property dispositions, and as
such, do not require Planning Commission review; Commissioners
agreed with this interpretation.
4
8. Adjournment:
MOTION BY SPIELER, SECONDED BY LARSON TO ADJORN THE SEPTEMBER 15, 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
.
VOTE: Ayes by Phelan, Hite, Spieler, Blahnik and Larson The Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 6:39 p.m.
Sandra Woods, Development Services Assistant
5