HomeMy WebLinkAboutBuilding Permit 04-0188
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT,
TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE
AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT
Date Rec'd
9.5,03
i ~;~:' ~:;y I PERMIT NO. OA_/;JOa
3. Yellow Applicant I r' V I (/ 0
<?lease ~e or print and sign at bottom)
ADDRESS
5CJl'1 Ii f!A-;,- C;'IiJ'C
/,F-
I. /Et"/ -1niJ~'
~IAE
ZONING (office use)
PuD
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only)
SZ -zs-
LOT BLOCK I ADDITION
-f~7C' ;Jt.L(~,r //Gttfi7s rMI'--
'/,I11BE'L UtlS/ ?,4~ PIDz5 4-02.052....0
OWNER .?
(Name) .T ui:rf.-
(Address) ?r!-<; 1I/()/2::1I1W~ ?l/uN
thME5
S tJ 1Tf-. / ~l)
(Phone) 65/- QS'z-S200
EA.-hfJrk.. V'JI\",.. 55121
BUILDER
(Name) ,SAm!: V.
(Contact Name} tug.,- i/:LA--~/u)
(Address)
(Phone) If,.sJ -q'SZ - ",ZOO
(Phone) v/Z-Z?/ -1/9~
TYPE OF WORK
o New Construction
DDeck
DPorch
DAddition
ORe-Roofing
ORe-Siding
DLower Level Finish
o Fireplace
DAlteration
4,
7.z.,C't>t?
DUtility Connection
Jli'j'Misc, gOUt. DElL /J/...u-S
PROJECT COST IV ALUE (excluding land) $
I hereby certify that I have furnished information on this application which is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent for the above-mentioned property and that all construction will conform to all existing state and local laws and will proceed in accordance with
submitted plans I am aware that the budding offioal can revoke thiS pemut for Just cause Furthermore, I hereby agree that the oty offiCial or a deSignee may
enter)Zuponthe :<-,.~ top~eededins~ns :>, M /.,
X /1//</ /?~~ /z-- /371 9. ~/{J.->
I' / " Signature Contractor's License No Date
I Permit Valuation lZ. OOd. 00 I Park Support Fee # $
1 Permit Fee $ '797.75"'1 SAC # $
1 Pian Check Fee $ 51!? 5'1 1 I Water Meter Size5/S"; 1"; $
I State Surcharge I $ 3" r (J 0 I I Pressure Reducer $
1 Penalty $ I I City SAC and WAC # $
1 Plumbing Permit Fee $ 1 I Water Tower Fee # $
I Mechanical Permit Fee $ I I Builder's Deposit $
I Sewer & Water Permit Fee $ I I Other $
1 Gas Fireplace Permit Fee $ I I TOTAL DUE $ /3 S Z. . z.. 9
Building Official
/4/7;6 Y
Date
Paid
Date
- -
1::J.6;J,q'1
Lt- ::l 3-CXi
.
I Receipt No~ro i/f9C.;
Bvg '--"
This Application Becomes Your Building Permit When Approved
Z~ "?~
This is to certify that the request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requested. This document
when signed by the City Planner constitutes a temporary Certificate of Zoning compliance and allows constrUction to commence. Before occupancy, a Certificate of Occupancy must be
issued.
'?'J,/a Ot}
Date Special Conditions, if any
24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447.9850, fax (952) 447-4245
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
INSPECTION NOTICE
(V Z~/ TIME
/6Y/S- 7..--6pr 6~c,/ ~
./p 70. ~')o..?t: I- ?,,9.7.2 LSd-I/',44 .,<.- /
./
SCHEDULED
ADDRESS
OWNER
CONTR,
o FOOTING
o FOUNDATION
o FRAMING
o INSULATION
.JiI'1'1!fAL
o SITE INSPECTION
o PLUMBING RI
o MECH RI
o WATER HOOKUP
o SEWER HOOKUP
o PLUMBING FINAL
o MECH FINAL
PERMIT NO&sI-'/Y,f' /P9 /?CJ 1-/9/
./ /
o EX/GRAD/FILLING
o COMPLAINT
o FIREPLACE RI
o FIREPLACE FINAL
o GASLINE AIR TST
o
PHONE NO.
.
COMMENT~ /
/Ce ft;.~ ~
\
/H9
---i
LU~/~
4 I /'
(' r;;~ /) /",,7'-__ d
./-
.--,
~;;;--
----,--: ------ ----........
"'-
\
~ I
j'-/~
/
1.--, /'
vase
~ -------.
, ORK SATISFACTORY, PRv.....t:.r::.u
CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED
o CORRECT WORK. CAL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING
------
Inspector:
Owner/Contr:
CALL >441-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.
conE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH,{ SAFETY/
INSHOrt
~-_._-...__..".-.__.,._-~~-------_._--_."-
h r-./ .
,_.__ .'.'. _. 9;:>" ~ -"'" :~.-"''''' .,~ --"",~:II' A
h)9./ """ .' '. ' .. ..- <J'y. ___ --- .'_ . ~... "'Ill" ""..~ 'O~\l V"",..........V"',
~ %,./.,-<i ..' ,,' ~ lot.... ~ I \
~;~.:;..~' ..-- _:........ ..:~ .,' :.-':~.. '-'-/, $ ", ~f/ '~~. "" ~d
7~~4 __ /, ....' ___ ~~' / __ - ~ ~, I ,"J
, /.,' ..-:: ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ell . \)el\ ::- r I c
;:.~~<< . ~~ .'::- ,,~.:::: l <1' ,,~. ~ '~"! /. , ';
" ~ I .~ / ,.f ."'. 9,6- _--- -- ffi ~ c '
/ :;.., /,~; .....~ ----:. -..9'l1'&~; o}" ~ 1\ ~
% ..l....''''" "\~, /.... c ~\'I,- ..(iter .. 9'1: ,(, i?' .
'& /,' <"ell ' - , A ," r\l9 I ""o\er 5 0 ~ I ~ ....
rv,' . ,,0<((\"''' 9' ' ' ~ "" g: I T1<I.
/';:II~ " ' ~OJ 130\\0(\'\ ......~. 1Lr<l?~" J. '"
/ /., / 09 ,\ ~<$;;' .,.' ,- " ..,.... - ,. ~.~ ''''~. '
,/ / ./ ~~\~~~'!J___~9' ,f ~
_/ / /' . ~~OJI,~~ _~' .,--.....i~....y
" , . / 09$ ',e" , -,-\
, /' ,/ / ,_ .':6-
/ //// "'......... ~~':"-7
,/ ;;.jAr .."",,- -,
.". /' -10 ,/ . .__ .a;S~'" - - -
.- ~C?>J .// , "~_....~ ];... '-~~ --'" \
/~~~~~~'~'--7"~~ -T+--~ i ~
'-Y'8' -' -~
~"'..'..,~
~1>~
~~~
~ ~1>~~~
/
,
~..
,.,' V
A~<
V~
/
Cob
\.).()
~
\
~
~
1/ \
, il
:"~~ l \~\
~",I?J r'~' '" \, ........tJt-~ ~
, 1\, &. \ ~ '\{ ~
OJ~' ~.'~ \ ~b
I'> ~~ '- 'A, I r....
I ~~~~ \, . ~~\~ <
!l;> 1:11 .II I' .l" CO
,'" \ \ f:.:J ~
/ ' '!I'" Oll;" ' . ,~~ ~ ' ~
' / 1 !l:CJ:J ' ~ll;', I::. u ....
\'2 ~'" ' . ~ 'S:~ ...'rJ!.)l
'~i '~ 0/' ~ \'" cr. 'IV
~ ~rV.'t~ ' _~~O '!I'!Il ~. J.': ~y-'
-;# ~OJf:1J<V J. Lo ' ' ~~, 0' I.
,y Q 0) ~/ CO ~ 4' I
...~$;Y CO I .1
~:.'" ,- . . ~o" : "'" 1;:/ j %~{JTr I' .~
.,,-J ~. ~~ 0 ""g, i, "1/ ~__.L ,/ b "o7ft.flIJ !J-
~~ j:S' ~~~~~/ ( :' 8 ,',~,€i",,~O). / / I
~ O"~ ~ -,. /
~ j'KCtr,' il>. "? fA...::: if~~ N / /j
~-f . ""'~ . ~ . ...t::!~f;, " ~ l~!-q ~ / J/;
@: :; ~~'!I<\J;.~, ~ /~ ~ / ~ ,/;, ~
/ /:;. . "f"-I..,......./ ~ J '1 /: . ,~~l, -
,,," b.../~ ' ~, > ,,-....,.r-.,:./I, I..<\/JI;.... -
5- "" r;>/ D.> ~_ ~ ' /, 0 >
~OJ;J>> .. '1'0)' ''!I1l> ~ ~i,.~' /\~ K ~ " " .
4: '~. . ~ 't?~'b
'J'-I.1!91/ ;tAl . ""
<Q '~ell b" ~/~/[ l~AI?J i,.p~~'
. ~/ &.\) \ .' ,;: ~l~ ' .' Cf ,,'fJ.Oj
r I' I:f!tll -I- I"
'. '!-:< / I: t;i>.'I ~ ~? /0-""';;
, ~:.;."',' /' ./ ,:';t/ / i" ~'" /5, / '/ /
!!:i I I ,.",' /' ~ ' I / / ,(y'
Ef _ '. 1/' ~~' , ',' , ~ I /, '/.] / I / ~ ~lO",
8 ~ _I: f ~ ; ~!~ ' 'ell/ ~; i I / JJ J I ,i /4ll.
c~o"" ' r-:--- ~ I I 1,' J ~ l 'I Y,I / 0 ~
, ~"l:,\~~-' I,., !2f". ~" ,'1-' /1 / '-." >,'1-" ,6 1:.4 / / . . 'lrD'l/~l'!l69J'
~OJOJ'V , -. u..: ~""&i..t) ;'-1 g"..<. "-J ,I / ' ,,,,OJ 0' t? /
;Y Q t:;' t~ 61,...."" I. I , ~
,,&~.... 'U/$}. /! ~ ~ ll'." ~ '1);:::;./1 "-J' I 0; ,
~o 'jgo , J-;;: '-/i r ~.~ .Ol Ol f . n.'!I /
~l.,O' Ilr} Ll-4 '!II II ' ,~ "'/
~~ ~~~' 1JJlt/~'~~1 ~/..~I ,J.''''', ,% ,v ~
=-><~ ill' ~ " J?rJ1 I /, i '1' I k' .CliI'P.i I.
= ell I I r~ i /fh I J r~ -" -v , ():~ ~7", I .
. ell J/A, / hJ.:' "; /. " "".!t-'~'!'-''j& (.. ~ ',' 'S.. / .. lIli,. I
r I' ('61 ,10 I"W ,.... 'Y.,' /' '/.
. ..1 I). ~ I,~i , ,: ii, ~~/)... . - " ,/ ,~~OJ?~~<O~ ~ . & OJ /I 1/ ~
K.- I tf! I " ' : I " i,,~Jo'/g,~ I~OJ I.. ~ \'i!.!;: : f/ 0 .~
t= _ IX> ~ ~" ;1'" ~'"O~" i ,.7 i? ' ell
~ _' I,.^. I,' ',\. ,I, I" ,.. 1tz.,.~Ci . . :' Ot, ~.~' qf
~ . _ ~1 : I/'). ' : l?lI:.. I ,;'-- _.l_i-........:.L ,~,,~,' J, ~
, -:01 Ol 0 oil!'""!' ~ 'i~' T ,1" I r\,"~
I
~~'If;' ;':. Jd.~~ ~ Ir-I)~<~ . i I: ~,' I~' / ~r",'l> \' .
"~,,. t=,;. ~-,~ . . ''9',~ ~ I,.' /~ ~,:~'! / , J
~I~~t- .~: ~./ ~'l? !i!>~~~ ,'~ ~~~
! ,,'.. "~ "'('ellk": ill .J::":,!~ J' i ~ 1/, I 0", ~J.... ~ ,".q ~' ..,
J ,~ 0' '60:.\0, ,II ~ :> . '~' . ~~ I 1 ",v,!i; a. . ~
! ::::J.I?J 0(."" 0 ,'I I I :II I ~'J "" ' P.i
<or-...... ~' I '-',??' O!:?--tt.;~ ~ I I ,f \ " ;;'J ' G 't
f:1J^J~:vryL," - _ ,~/i . ~~, ~]:,f;~ ' J@;ellJ I 09~" ",bb"'~~' fj~' J" V' !' r.
~ f:1J, ,_ I r ~~O'QJill /,' \ ~ ,..... I(
~~.~ ; , . ,I ~,,' ,.!tf'l;-'~ ~ ~ r-, \1 \ '1:.,:: ,1- '
~ .,. l' X-- . ~I I J '\ " I)....... ' ':j; ':(
, , -,,~: ~ > ,'.. I, I. ~ -"_ ..... ....... ,:~ ~" /\
"".
~~
..
,
~
~I
~
,")
';j-'
t/
II
~
t
_T
',"
y
'. '
~
%-
;
~
.
~
I
~~
~
~
~
'1\wp~~~
CITY'S COpy White -Buil!ling
~arv - Fnglneeiiiln-..
Pink - Plannrn-g
Thll' CIl'"lrr or th.. L.kf ("Ollnlry
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST
NAME OF APPLICANT
APPLICATION RECEIVED
PI ; I -/-T
U L- \--
, 'I
Li r;,,)
H ,- ~ 1{;C'
r) / --',
\,.,;. (. _",,--,I
('i'?
I ')
The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit
application for construction activity which is proposed at:
I-I ~! 6F: t2: i1)?'EST e.1\ t'..I~
Accepted
x
Accepted With Corrections
Denied
Reviewed By:
1Y1413
Date:
3~'i-oy
Comments: See Reverse Side for Additional Information!
t..1
~r"J
~
.AJ.
~,-,'~.
SPl': ~mpnt<;. 1) Grading Phm 2) Erosion Cc,1trol Measures
"The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and
computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of
any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid."
'.
. 4 .~
!,
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
FOR BUILDING CONTRACTORS
"
lMlenever gradIng or axcavalfng far the purpose of ctJllslnic/ing ,a' buDding occurs, the City of Prior
Lake's erosion' control standards mus/be apR/ied. The 'standards wm ,educe the erosion of so/7s "
into the cny's storm sewan, waterways, and:roads. This hat!cfqut prcvide3 you with the
infonnalion yqu need to CDITlply with /hese standards. : '
~
-. j. i
An erosion control plan wm be craafed for the site as part ot.thepermil review pr.ocess., Failure to
comply with the approved plan during Construction win result In the' loss ,of the $! ,500.00 deposil,
plus the builderwUl pay for Ihe cost oljhe corre<;ffon wo~ ; ..,' , ..
_... . . ,... i
-- .: . "; i
. ,. t
Build a rock construction entrance and erect slit fence" ;,
The sm fence wUl be in place prior to the [ootlng irnlp'~on. 1'\1e rock C;lnstruc'-\<in entiance will be
constructed concurrently with the baddiUing ofth~ fooUngs. Sill fence win be required, as needed"
to lnlercepl ..vater ftowing off the lot SUI fe~ce perpen~cul;qdil and a~oss rear or side drainage:
swales shall be 20' long, centered on the swaJe, and I1paa:d no more Ilian 100'apart SUt fence'
will be required behind aD curb at a diStanc,a cllive feel behind lI1e curo, except at the rock -
=nstructioJ:j enUance, and will extend la' beyond the, property Une. The 10' extension may be :
waived when the,~<f~! lot is,s,odded, and instaDation cl,;sutfence would damage the sod. For'
Spring constnJc!iqll, silt fence ~ he consiructed as soon, as ,the 6"osl !$'ou! ot the ground. Posts
will be'spaced at taur feel or leSs and, drlv.ep at lea~t 2 feel fnlo the ground. Posts Will he' two inch
,square or heaviewlwood posls,;o~ st~aj-d T 0( U ~~tion s;eel posllj. TlIe rock construction
enlranc~ shall b';: 20' wide and,S; deep and be con~ttucle<rof l' - 2' clear rock tram the back 01 :,
the curlllo'the frOnt or the' house. . ,.' : . I ' ,
. . . . i: ' _ ' ; .~. :: - . ..
It wiil be lh e responsibility or'th1Hienetal contr.i~lor to::' i .
1, Maintain the,enlrance and silt renee in working Condition: , " ' ,
\ . . .' -
2. Ensure that all sub-conlr.acllirs and suppliers us.e lI1e reck coils~ctioj1 entrance 'only.
3. Keep the sill fence anfllhe rode. construction entrance in opeiallon unbl final grading amj
sodcflIlg have bee/) completed ilIld the driveway,paved_: .'
-'
PenallY for failino to comolywifh the Erosion C'Onlrol Standards;
If a defidency is noted in erosion conlrol on site, you will be given 24 heurs to Correct the
deficienc:y. It is important that you irtfonn, the City as soon as correction is made as the City will
consider the work undone unlilso intonned. failure te correct the deficiency within this time will
result In forfeiture 01 the Builder's Deposit and the City WIll dJrect a third party-to ,correct the work.
In addition 10 the forfeiture, you will be billed for tI1e cost of corrective action. Inspections WIll nol
resyme ,unbl a n!'w BuRder's Deposll.!tas been submitted. :" .
" :
. .
He...
G.,.g.
-""':-------------- ---....-----
.1:
~
01 --l.( s.-
August 22, 2003
CITY'S-COPY
Randy West
WW Services
18440 Bums Parkway
Anoka, MN 55303
Re: Timbercrest Park Retaining Wall Investigation
Dear Mr. West:
As requested, MRJ Engineering has conducted a review of the existing boulder wall located
along the Northeast section of the wetlands at the Timbercrest Park Development, in Prior Lake.
The purpose ofthe site visit was to determine the long-tenn stability of the existing retaining
wall. The site review occurred on August 20,2002. The review consisted of the following:
Taking measurements and elevations of the existing retaining walls.
Obtaining background infonnation from wall contractor
Taking notes of the site conditions.
Site Observations:
The wall in question is a single boulder wall as shown on the attached ~e 3), The wall
is approximately 500' in l~gth and are is not directlv suppo~~y struc~t is located
approximatAly l' in fi:.~ffieaemleaIed wetlaitds. There is miniiit~8lope at the top and
bottom ofthe structure.- ~ ( /--b-v
According to the Randy West ofWW Services, the walls were originally designed and
constructed for a 6' exposed height. After initial construction of the wall, grading planrevisions
dictated an increase in the exposed height of the wall to 10.5', which is the maximum eXposed
height found by MRJ Engineering during our site inspection.
The boulders on the base of the wall were found to be range in approximate overall depth from
30 to 50". Even larger boulders were found on the upper two courses of the wall, as WW
Services properly increased the boulder depth in response to the increase in wall height
requirement. The overall setback was found to average approximately 160, based on three
different measurements taken by MRJ Engineering,
Fabric was clearly placed at the back of the retaining wall, as per the previous design prepared by
MRJ Engineering for a different boulder wall. There was evidence of crushed stone drainage
zone at the rear of the fabric at various locations. WW Services informed MRJ Engineering that
drainage stone was placed throughout the back of the wall as well as careful attention placed at
compacting the backfill near the rear of the wall. We were also informed that all compaction
tests taken were satisfactory.
There was very little embedment found at the base of the wall, as WW Services placed the
boulders near grade at the wetland location.
Conclusions:
The boulder size for the retaining wall given the maximum height, site geometry and soil
conditions is acceptable to meet minimum safety factors. There exista a few areas along the base
of the wall where the boulder depths are less than what would be required, but they were adjacent
to larger boulders, which will stabilize those of less than desirable depth. MRJ Engineering
found no areas of immediate concem, relative to boulder depths.
MRJ Engineering has informed WW Services to create a 3: I toe slope at the base ofthe wall,
terminating at the wetlands. This will provide the retaining wall with additional resistance to
sliding, and overturning failure. This toe slope material is to be compacted to 95% standard
proctor.
If these recommendations are followed, the wall will function safely as a gravity wall. This
statement is made under the assumption that the wall contractor used drainage stone throughout
the retaining wall construction and performed the required minimum compaction efforts at the
back of the wall.
The conclusions retained are based on my professional opinion. These opinions are arrived in
accordance with accepted engineering practices in this time and location. No other warranty is
implied or intended. Should additional information become available, this report may be
modified based on ,the new data.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call.
('#-
I
2
,
~~-_..__._.--_.__.._--_.~_.'.'-'-'----'-'~-----'
\~1
Tile ('rnler of the I..kt ('ounl~
~ite . Building..)
Canary . Engineering
Pink . Planning
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST
NAME OF APPLICANT
APPLICATION RECEIVED
PULTE HOMES
. q. 5 ()~
,
The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit
application for construction activity which is proposed at:
TIMBER. ~SI PA~~
~
Accepted
Accepted With Corrections
Denied
~
~~
8..,.~ 0>- ~
a J
..f- ~ ~j.,J )
Date: /t?/3ft:7
~ ~/~ ~t:-I--
u
y ~ ~/~t:..J.
, ;/
Reviewed By:
Comments:
.
"The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and
computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of
any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid."
G~\
White - Building
CanJlrv - E~~~~~ng
~ - "1aDiii
Tht C'fnluof Ihr L.bCoUnlf}'
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST
NAME OF APPLICANT
APPLICATION RECEIVED
PUL It H Otv/ES
. CJ.5 O~
f
The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit
application for construction activity which is proposed at:
TIr~1 BE l~ CAte~ 1-)f\K..I~
Accepted
v
, \
Accepted With Corrections
Denied
Reviewed By: OJ:<In V7 Ii. ~
J U ",\.)u
Date:
9::>-14.#
Comments:
"The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and
computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of
any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits
presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid."
~\~@~Q~,~r~1 ,-
~ SEP 0 5 Z003 J
D"t. R.o." U\\ . "t, R,,'.w,d
PEFW.4'11 1'(LQulr{t:Mt:.NT
Date: (~10
Request:
~ ~ t~ rJtO~
W~ c9fJ ~
~
Date:
Reply:
Date: /O(3(1l?' ~ fc, c.......r- Date:
Request:@. p~ ~ W ~ ~ R~PIY:
~ ~f~ f (!M.J..;j:-.t.o
f>J( ~ /lJ/~ +0 ~ -(t...- .
~.
Date:
Request:
Date:
Request:
B uilding/Planning/Eng ineering
Date:
Reply:
Date:
Reply:
Permit ;ompleteO
PERMREQU.DOC
Permit #
REPLY DATE
Accept 0
Decline 0
Accept 0
Decline 0
Accept 0
Decline 0
Accept 0
Decline 0
Permit Issued 0