HomeMy WebLinkAboutMonitoring & Maintenance Agreement-Stormwater Mgmt MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 21 day of JUNE , 2013 , by
and between the City of Prior Lake, a Minnesota municipal corporation, organized under the
laws of the State of Minnesota("CITY") and Haynes Properties, a Minnesota LLC ("OWNER").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the OWNER has proposed construction of a commercial building for Honest 1 Auto
Care ("DEVELOPMENT") on property within the CITY; and
WHEREAS, in evaluating the design of the project, the CITY requires certain stormwater
management standards be met; and
WHEREAS, water quality, rate control, and volume control are important stormwater
management standards, required by the CITY; and
WHEREAS, the OWNER has submitted a plan for construction and maintenance of stormwater
management practices designed to meet CITY standards.
NOW THEREFORE, based on the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this AGREEMENT is to set forth the terms and conditions for the
construction, monitoring, and maintenance of the water quality, rate control, and volume
control stormwater management facilities for the DEVELOPMENT ("STORMWATER
FACILITIES").
2. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
3. STORMWATER FACILITIES Required. The OWNER will construct the
DEVELOPMENT on land legally described in Exhibit A. Exhibit A is incorporated herein as
if fully set forth. In connection with the construction of the DEVELOPMENT, the OWNER
is required to construct STORMWATER FACILITIES.
4. Design and Installation of STORMWATER FACILITIES.
4.1 The STORMWATER FACILITIES shall be constructed in accordance with the site
plan ("SITE PLAN") approved by the CITY. Said SITE PLAN is attached as Exhibit
B. Exhibit B is incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
4.2 The SITE PLAN of the STORMWATER FACILITIES will not be changed without
prior written approval of the CITY.
5. Monitoring and Maintenance of STORMWATER FACILITIES.
5.1 The OWNER is solely responsible for the monitoring and maintenance of the
STORMWATER FACILITIES to ensure that the STORMWATER FACILITIES
provide adequate capacity for water quality, rate control, and volume control
currently and in the future.
5.2 Monitoring and maintenance activities shall comply with the monitoring and
maintenance plan("MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN") prepared by a
professional engineer, registered in the State of Minnesota and approved by the
CITY. The MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, attached as Exhibit C,
shall include (but not be limited to) methods for cleaning, repairing, and other work
deemed necessary to ensure the proper function of the STORMWATER
FACILITIES. Exhibit C is incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
5.3 The OWNER must implement the MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN to
ensure that the STORMWATER FACILITIES continue to provide adequate capacity.
5.4 The OWNER must annually conduct at least one inspection of the STORMWATER
FACILITIES and submit an annual inspection report to the CITY on or before June
30th of each year. The annual inspection report must include enough information to
determine if the STORMWATER FACILITIES are providing adequate capacity.
6. Default. A failure to comply with the SITE PLAN or MONITORING AND
MAINTENANCE PLAN (collectively"PLANS") or with any of the terms and conditions of
this AGREEMENT shall constitute a default of this AGREEMENT. In the event of a default,
the CITY shall provide the OWNER with notice as provided for in Paragraph 7. The notice
shall set forth the nature of the default and the time within which the OWNER must cure the
default, which shall be not less than 2 weeks. Should OWNER fail to cure the default within
the time set forth in the notice, CITY shall have the right, but not the obligation to, enter
upon the property legally described in Exhibit A and perform the required work to cure the
default, except that in the event the nature of the default is such that, in the sole judgment of
the CITY, it may pose an imminent potential risk to the health, safety or welfare to persons
or property, the CITY may immediately and with no notice to OWNER enter the property
legally described in Exhibit A and perform the required work to cure the default. All costs
incurred by the CITY to cure the default, including administrative costs, shall be the sole
responsibility of the OWNER.
6.1 The CITY shall invoice the OWNER for the costs incurred to cure the default.
6.2 The OWNER shall pay said invoice within 30 days of receipt thereof.
6.3 The OWNER agrees that if OWNER fails to pay the invoiced amount within 30 days
of receipt thereof, the CITY may assess the invoiced amount against the property
described in Exhibit A.
7. Notices. Required notices to the OWNER shall be in writing, and shall be either hand
delivered to the OWNER, its employees or agents,or mailed to the OWNER by certified
mail at the following address: ADDRESS. Notices to the CITY shall be in writing and shall
be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the CITY by certified mail in care
of the City Manager at the following address: City of Prior Lake, 4646 Dakota Street SE,
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372.
8. Right to Access. The OWNER grants the CITY the right to enter upon the property legally
described in Exhibit A for the purpose of inspection of the STORMWATER FACILITIES,
curing any default, or to prevent against any imminent potential threat to the health, safety or
welfare of persons or property.
9. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The OWNER shall indemnify, defend and hold the
CITY, its Council, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives harmless against and in
respect of any and all claims, demands, actions, suits,proceedings, liens, losses, costs,expenses,
obligations, liabilities, damages,recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest,penalties, and
attorneys' fees, that the CITY incurs or suffers,which arise out of,result from or relate to any
acts or omissions involved in the carrying out of the obligations or rights under this
AGREEMENT. The responsibility to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from claims
arising out of or resulting from the actions or inactions of the CITY, its Council, agents,
employees, and representatives does not extend to any willful or intentional misconduct on the
part of any of these individuals.
10. Recording. The OWNER shall cause this AGREEMENT to be recorded against the property
legally described in Exhibit A within 10 days of its execution. The OWNER shall provide
evidence of recording to the CITY within 10 days thereafter.
11. Heirs, Successors, and Assigns. This AGREEMENT shall run with the land legally
described in Exhibit A and shall be binding against all heirs, successors and assignees of the
OWNER.
12. Severability. In the event any provisions of this AGREEMENT shall be held invalid, illegal,
or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or
render unenforceable any other provision hereof, and the remaining provisions shall not in
any way be affected or impaired thereby.
13. Waiver. Failure of either party at any time to require performance of any provision of this
AGREEMENT shall not affect its right to require full performance thereof at any time
thereafter and the waiver by either party of a breach of any such provision shall not be taken
or held to be a waiver of any subsequent breach thereof or as nullifying the effectiveness of
such provision.
14. Reimbursement of Fees and Costs. Any fees or costs incurred by the CITY associated with
enforcing any of the terms and conditions set forth in this AGREEMENT, including but not
limited to CITY staff, engineering and attorney's fees, shall be the sole responsibility of the
OWNER. The OWNER agrees that if OWNER fails to pay any invoiced amount within 30
days of receipt thereof, the CITY may assess the invoiced amount against the property
described in Exhibit A.
15. Remedies. In addition to any other remedies available to the CITY at law or in equity,
including the remedies contained in Paragraph 6 herein, CITY may sue OWNER for
damages and/or may maintain a suit for specific performance of this AGREEMENT. All
rights and remedies provided to the CITY herein are cumulative and the exercise of one shall
not operate to bar the exercise of any other rights under this AGREEMENT or provided by
law.
16. Governing Law. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Executed by the parties hereto as of the day and date first above written
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
/
By: r By:
/ �' ►l..
Ken eth Hedberg, Mayor Frank Boyles, • an ger
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a day of abti ,
by Kenneth Hedberg, Mayor, and Frank Boyles, City Manager, of the City o Prior Lake on behalf
of the City and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.
ti *, s. CHARLOTTE R.GREEN alae2-7& ,,) /4)-12..e.—L._.
''=;'` NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires Jan.31,2015
1/4, ✓1./.11.././IJlIJJ../lfllJ✓fIJJ)
OWNER
By: h 4(7w----
Fred Haynes, President
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 21 day of JUNE , 2013,
by COLETTE SWANSON • i
cy"' 2ebeioik
NOTARY P1 J C:2, ,.
+ 04:41di4,x,' I*?TkriY rt1' w .!, 1 ,,,
Reviewed . . o ,.n a, cut', k �, �.', ,
B /n, /'i..I // .�d1d '' » 1tz r ! r ' •,v,
J Rich. d Rosow iy / ttorney
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lot 2, Block 1, BUSSE FIRST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Scott
County,Minnesota
EXHIBIT B
SITE PLAN
/ iN ,P411 N ---ios
..
rTi C-‘ 1• '</
,,, ;--; •s/ /
/ •Jt).' 11%I .
. .........----...........
At i
..%''''' ..'..A..c, .....,
\ •c.a,...,-‘,
0i.f'%.).P-..C„'Av-'.5,3-0'..,.-,-,')."'-,4• 0
• ,-',--
0
2
A##
-o
li Ali.
*I0§
WAqlt.(. i
4
gI f a
•••-,--°-_
..h...
i•9
\ 2", :, ibl
0 • '
\ V/ __
k
\ "0
\ \ Atiti.4171/
\ -\ \
Eli
b.:,\
II 45
N't
‘ hill I ; (lia
$
.441111P ..,
\P \
4#,
cl.
...\\
.. ‘
VA \ I 0414 4.
tra. \ \Z.44Pik
\ \ ;$•'47 A ,
t'''' •-.!'.
C..- <
/ 7 .c: ,
-"F- /
\
‘',/,i,w•- - /
•\ / 4 ife
v Aft
Asz
cl\ ;lop
lap:
AIM
4.7...47.•
Z ri
ozzi \
,ccm
-I-I-I>
=007.
n,,n -1.•• \
mm=
-100 •
7.>
rn .
C 0 cn
H x 0
>>c
---.<-I
\ \
Lk,m Z
Fr,
g
r-
•,..
2
IND' IN
4 i .'i i ( i iino ze nriIII.
i w '1 i " MN i
' tili .171 f!
NA ril 1 1
-0 ! Iii
ANI4 '') M 0 0 n 6 110 ifi g
ml z 2 112
R', i
mr.coi
EXHIBIT C
MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
u)
E
w
1
t
>1C
0
+
w
4+
0)
0
V i Z
v = Z
NL N
RI U
0. L CO
i J
a) V " a, o
L
i V a
fa Di 0
L O W
C CA 1V) im
O
RI Q Q v
= i cn ; et
= a c Q c
CO (5 OL O c
a� a a I 451 a)
.I.+ C
C N 0) f
�
Ii) �= P � 1:1L > C
'W110 '> V RI
V) __ :17,
Q C
• a)RI < U V
C
.p 0 ea ap.
C u G) c
CO a C-
In wR
C - f til
r
to
a) .-1 N M
a
0
a 45
t cm
-O .6 m c
•_
n N - Fri
>. V) a
N N C ci)c > a)
C u) c0 E •C N
O
L ON O L O , L
a> a O O O 0 O
, ., co 0 7 06 N O �'cci N O N
C -C N C co - U r. C 'I'
a .- a) L v
0 o w a) O >, o o
w-
Ns , ' N cOQn c Q .:Do Q 2Q
3 oa 8 0 c a _c 0a) co a) C ° c co mcCo- Ccawm mca • c c a o c -c a
C '� C C t C C — CO ._
7r , "iii O C . Y� V C .0 3 C '— C
E > rn 2 E > 2 E Fir) 2 E c 2,
9- 0 a) N 4- a) u) a) a) O CD 0 `7. co 0 a)
— 1 r Z N O Z O Z a Z a
Y.,: u s
C C
Q p 744 O O
C 4.1
47, � -c„,, a > ac0n
i, " c L co 'Ir.� O TTSfL xCD
cO >' O> o
' n , coa� C a N V)„v ”. C co
Q > QV Q
— CO
•c 00
0m
N O (Q _
-o LN , aC L
, f' O cj O O O N O
o a) co 0
C a N 0- ,-
--
0_
0 CD
w- Co
N r c 1"E O v E L a a) Z' 0 a)
=k .r m L a
co
c .E c t
�`a E a c0 N 2 V 0 V) L —
a
; 0 'a U
H c c L O ,_
:1'044 C O N - U a) 2 L
�s ra A 3 E �+ U co U N U L
_ 0 a) a ++ 0- V c 0 0 0
7'' 0 C co O N L O co O
(> O C C C O O C O
C M
V V -a
m m
if) co aa) ct3 a) (tea aL) co
CC C C C C C C
! k 1 - -0
.;; L cos- co L co L N
CL = LL = LL = LL m
A Y
,11 U U
, Pn dt{x = +J = — L L
yE vi E a a
76
L- = L- M m a)�
a U a c) cc cc
U
as a) O) > a) 0) > a) a)
d) aa" CO
.,k E E E E E s L (n
a?' ,re,, L _ L ++ (6 ate+ E 5
Oa) O U E 0
�,:. fn Y c (n Y c
Ii
v2 ONN aC-
at m 3 7 >, L C >, (p c
� E = E E = E a) O �' O
ii
U (a U U ca U O co ca O L C
^m > C (0 > C C C C C a C
—' a) a) —>' a) CE ' a) E
L
,, O U 'L O U L O a E O — E
E E °? a O a = Si
G1 r; a) >, ca m >, m m o U m b
L im F— 3 X I 3 0 U 2 0 n' 2
Q C
C
C `� no
,
c '.- C w
- a) O C O
i *7
Ih
3 - c c
E aal N4 N C C C
✓ Q a) m
L a L N �. a a
t 44 O D
. >. +' O O »•• 3 a) 0
aj >, c 2 >+ C 13 "C
N (aa) 0 WI a) U) a) a)
.0friffOE a) = E = CD C c
m C'a "O C la2
of Q N 7 Q N ..G Q Q
i kirU)
E E -
tt, O O c
•> �' - N `� aa)) co';4.' 2
,
Ta a)
✓ > a > �. .. °) (n
Q O 'Q O U U O O
2 a
L C L 7) U) 4) O Q-
✓ ' CO C = it C p a)
C a) a) L 7
(V E O E a C a O U
C Na
a> m w 0O a) ,-
cn = U) cn U U iY Cl)
c-,i ri 4
t
0
M
a)
C
z
1
C
O
N
C
Vc
O r
Q Zo
C.) ta y U
NCD a3
V) Ce L
L Q) .2,
= V y L.
i+ c g •o
= a) m
= CIL 70
NCD u w -
4+im c .�
12
C• r 0
c
co 2 • u L
g m c
O -0 m c ,;a
+
•� a I)
(/l t6 `a g
d L. C a
-, O — — n
o
3Q
V E 4,
yN RI
OH 4 0
0 O yi M
C s E .va) 10 a) In
Oa) jg C. N
4- E U1. IU 41.
Z
w U (I) J O
CRI Z
y N +, i p14..,
U L o c o
O ` ,L 1L Y Y
O RI to
L = y o O c � J
a) °' °
m v- ar ,^p1 d' O
wL v ° L *' c 1C 'E
W 0 ° 2 U c V W Tr a
c o
0
0 o a' Z
a)
Ai+ C.) 0 Q to) Q
W^ J J r > •
C
CI C k
a
L. E v
O. Z Z U .U) i
(A in 0 c
d d L
d .. = E a�
0.as in r0 0 e D 0 o O
L
G H c N d 0 U 0
C C C C N i
0 m C c c c c ft a)
C d d -o t E ° m a� m L
a. c y 0 y :a
C C C a O
m 0 5 c i- m Q 222
Report of Geotechnical Exploration
Honest 1 Auto Care
Prior Lake, Minnesota
August 27, 2012
Allied Project 12034
ITCO Allied Engineering Company
7125 West 126th Street, Suite 500
Savage, Minnesota 55378
•
Ph: 952-890-5909
Fax: 952-890-5883
FIELD EXPLORATION
Four Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings for the proposed building were each put down to a
depth of 20 feet. Two additional borings for the proposed parking lot were each put down to a
depth of 10 feet. The borings were put down in accordance with ASTM 1586-84: "Standard
Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils". Using this procedure. a 2" O.D.
split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140-lb weight falling a distance of 30 inches.
After an initial sct of 6". the number of blows required to drive the sampler an additional 12
inches is known as the standard penetration resistance or N-value. The N-value provides an
indication of the relative density of cohesionless (coarse grained) soils or of the consistency of
cohesive (fine-grained) soils.
As the samples were obtained in the field, they were visually and manually classified.
Representative portions of the samples were then sealed in clean glass soil jars and returned to
the laboratory for further examination and verification of the field classification. The recovered
soil samples were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, ASTM D:
2488-84. A chart illustrating this classification method is included in the appendix to this report.
Logs of the test borings indicating the depth and identification of the various strata, measured
penetration resistances, soil classifications and the results of water level checks are included in
the appendix to this report.
A bag sample was obtained from each of the parking Iot borings from material Iocated just below
the topsoil. A gradation test and plasticity index test were conducted on one of the samples.
Since the two samples were nearly the same material, a second set of tests was not conducted and
the sample containing the most fines was tested.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Boring 1
Boring 1 consisted of 12 inches of topsoil, underlaid by sand with sonic gravel and clay
to at least 2 feet of depth, sandy organic silt/clay from at least 2.5 feet to at least 4 feet of
depth, fine sand with clay from at least 5 feet to 7.5 feet of depth, clayey sand to 10 feet
of depth, and sandy clay with gravel to 11.5 feet of depth.
2
should be noted that sufficient time may not have elapsed for equilibrium conditions to have been
achieved in the open bore holes. Groundwater conditions may vary both seasonally and annually,
based on precipitation amounts,patterns and both surface and subsurface drainage in the local area.
• Included in the appendix to this report are logs of the test borings,which describe the conditions,
encountered at each drilling location. The depth of the individual strata of soil may vary at and
between the drilling locations due to unsampled intervals, the occurrence of transitions between
soil layers and the natural variability of the subsurface conditions.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Organic topsoil, peat, organic soils, and any soft soil layers, which may be encountered, should
not be relied upon for support of the proposed commercial footings, slabs or controlled fills that
will support these elements. These materials should be removed and replaced below the proposed
structure. A qualified soil technician should examine the excavated areas before suitable fill
material is placed. ITCO Allied Engineering can provide this service during construction.
It should be possible to provide support for the planned structure with conventional spread
footing foundation systems. If unsuitable soils are encountered, these can be corrected by using
excavation and controlled refilling procedures together with an observational approach. This
•
would require excavation in order to prepare for the placement of controlled fill to make grade
for concrete for footings or slabs.
The non-root infested and inorganic on-site soils would generally be suitable for reuse as
controlled and compacted fill material. The topsoil or other materials, which would not be
suitable for use as controlled fill, may be able to be used as surface fill in the lawn and
Iandscaping areas. Additional recommendations are presented in the following sections:
I. EXCAVATION
In general, grubbing and stripping operations should remove all significantly organic or root
infested soils from the areas to be worked. Frozen material, soft consistency clays or otherwise
unsuitable soil and debris should be removed. Where undocumented fill or otherwise unsuitable
4
2. FOUNDATIONS
It should be possible to provide support for spread footing foundations systems using excavation
and controlled filling procedures. As mentioned previously, the topsoil,peat, organic silt,organic
clay, soft clay, and any uncontrolled fill encountered during the excavation work should not be
relied upon for support of footings. slabs or controlled fills which will support these elements. It
will be important to monitor the conditions exposed in the excavations during the grading work
prior to the placement of fill to make grade for concrete for footings or slabs. I land auger borings
and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests should be done in the completed excavations and
the exposed conditions judged suitable by an experienced soil engineer or technician prior to the
placement of footings or fill. ITCO Allied Engineering Co. is capable of and available to do this
work.
•
Once the recomm,lations presented in this report have been implemented, a net allowable
bearing pressure f 250 pounds per square foot may be utilized for the proportioning of
individual footings. esigning the footings, it is recommended that they be designed to exert
R approximately equal pressures to the bearing strata. This should limit total and differential
settlements to I" and %z" respectively.
■ For frost protection, we recommend that footings in unheated areas be placed at a depth of 48
inches below finished grade. For decks and porches it is recommended that this be increased to
60 inches if the soil is frost susceptible. In heated portions of the buildings where frost
susceptible materials are absent, a depth of 42 inches would be adequate. Where full or partial
basements are utilized, frost depths for garage areas and porch structures should be maintained as
outlined above
3. FILL PLACEMENT
In the event that unsuitable soils are encountered and need to be replaced, the fill material should
• be mineral soil, preferably granular. and free of debris, boulders and organic material. The non-
organic on-site soils would be suitable for reuse as controlled fill material provided that they are
■ dry enough to meet compaction requirements. It may be difficult to dry wet soils sufficiently and
it may be necessary to replace some of this material with off site material.
6
5 aggregate(MnDOT 3138)would provide a G.E. that would exceed the required value.
In using the soil factor method for pavement design, it is essential that the subgrade be
constructed of uniform soil across the pavement section and compacted at a moisture content and
to a density in accordance with MN/DOT spec. 2105 and be capable of passing test roiling, in
accordance .with MN/DOT Spec. 2111. The completed subgrade should be observed and judged
suitable by an experienced individual prior to the placement of the aggregate base or paving.
Compaction of the upper 3 feet of the subgrade to a minimum of 100% of the standard proctor
density within appropriate moisture limits, (65 to IO2% of optimum), should provide the
necessary stability required for proof rolling.
5. FINAL SITE TOPOGRAPHY
The final soil surfaces should be graded to provide adequate drainage away from structures and
pavements in order to minimize deleterious effects associated with water infiltration. The areas
adjacent to footing walls should be adequately compacted(not loosely placed)and provided with
drainage outlets to avoid this zone acting as a "sump" and creating nuisance water conditions.
Compliance with the building code provision for positive surface drainage away from the
structure should also aid in reducing the quantity of infiltration into the backfill zones adjacent to
foundation walls.
STANDARD OF CARE
The recommendations contained in this report are professional opinions. These opinions were
arrived at in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices currently in use at this
time, Iocation and for projects of this type. Other than this, no warranty is implied or intended.
Soil samples recovered from the test borings will be retained in our offices for a period of thirty
days from the date of this report. After that time they will be discarded unless prior written
r instructions to the contrary are received.
8
s �,
{
it
yr
9
5
I
{x�
i'
b�
• ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY
PROJECT: Honest 1 Auto Care Site NUMBER: 12034
Adj To 16677 Duluth Ave SE PAGE 1 OF 1
SURFACE ELEVATION LOG OF BORING T —'
m% a ›- 8 103.54 SB#2 TEST
I m ac - - -
2 z o(-) RESULTS PENETRATIONA
z _3 - C.) DESCRIPTION AND I I AND 2 TEST DATA
a °' a CLASSIFICATION I OTHER „ (blowslfoot)
a "' OF MATERIALS (I REMARKS z
5 10 20 40 70
18"BROWN SANDY SILTY TOPSOIL 11
1 GRAS
-' - ` .5 102 01 1
2.0- f I II.
_ BROWN CLAYEY SAND.SC ,
2 SS I 5
4.0
BROWN/GREY SANDY CLAY W/SOME
-
6.0- 3 SS GRAVEL,CL I 11
8.0-
4 SS 1 12
/
5 SS / I 10
I
12.0_
6 SS / 16
14.0--- -
-
16.0- 7 SS / 567 GREY SANDY CLAY.CL 87 67
10
/
18.0-
-
- /
20.0 /
8 SS / 12
!.'1.5 62 Oii
22.0- • -
_ _ WATER-LEVEL CHECKS 1 METHOD
4 SPT ^'
DATE TIME ' SAMPLED TO I CASING 1 CAVE-IN WATER
08/23/2012 9:50 ' 21.5' I 20' 1 none! I I 1- 08/23/2012 V. * -LETEEy - -
08/23/2012
_ I1 T I - Craig CME•55
--- — I- I PROVED - -
i
ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY
PROJECT: Honest 1 Auto Care Site NUMBER: 12034
Adj To 16677 Duluth Ave SE PAGE 1 OF 1
SURFACE ELEVATION LOG OF BORING I
I 1 l
'� ? 102.84 SB#4 I
TEST
z a it;
g s2 '1 RESULTS PENETRA ION
U DESCRIPTION AND AND TEST DATA
.e
a
o. 2 ccTRASTANDACC
TION
OTHER (blows/foot)
N OF MATERIALS REMARKS I'
5 10 2+) 40 10
1 s .4 75 BROWN SANDY SILTY TOPSOILNO 102.04
2.0MR
11.
: BROWN SAND W/CLAY&SOME GRAVEL,ss :f SW-SC , 154I\
4.0 UP I
EN
BROWN SAND W/GRAVEL, SW II
5d3 3 SS ` 25
•` . .B5 .
I
80 jig MOIST BROWN SANDY SILT. ML
a SS 28
•
01, 10.0 : I ,
- s SS iiI ( 42
id 11.5 91.34
" 12.0
-
BROWN SANDY CLAY,CL I
6 SS 20
m
14.0
' 5 MOIST GREY SANDY CLAY, CL 87la
"'
16.0 7 SS 10
I
I
II. 4 I
18.0 , I
4
20.0en
Yi
i
8 55 /�// I 11 •
Po
22.0
WATER-LEVEL CHECKS METHOD
DATE TIME [ SAMPLED TO CASING CAVE-IN WATER 1. MDT
08/23/2012 12:20 1 21.5' 2� none
... _ s !' TARTE08D 312012 COMPLEI 012
j •' DRILLER RIG
I Craig CME-55
S �_ ! DRAW i BY APPROVED--
1
I
ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY
PROJECT: Honest 1 Auto Care Site NUMBER: 12034
Adj To 16677 Duluth Ave SE PAGE 1 OF 1
SURFACE ELEVATION LOG OF BORING
w } CC SB#6
0 144.25
D r w TEST STANDARD
z j o c RESULTS PENETRATION
a "' a DESCRIPTION AND AND TEST DATA
5 i leci g CLASSIFICATION OTHER W (blows/foot)
OF MATERIALS i REMARKS z 5 10 40 70
IL! 15"BROWN SANDY SILTY TOPSOIL I
w I GRAB 1.25 1
/
� BROWN CLAYEY SAND,SC
2.0 %02
El
is
-
•17
DARK BROWN SEMI-ORGANIC SANDY
toa
2 SS CLAY,CL 1°
f 11
4.0 41 BROWN SANDY CLAY,CL 100.24'
ma
:66 BROWN SAND W/CLAY, SW-SC 99.95
6.0 3 Ss • BROWN SAND W/SOME GRAVEL,SW 10
p
Y.
0 8"6 4 SS 24
••3 95.2 I
4
•
an 10.0 ' ./ BROWN CLAYEY SAND,SC
5 SS / 26
•211.5 92.7
■e 12.1 i
im
14.0
■+ I
16.0
Pk
18.0-
0
20.0-
Am
22.0 1 •I -
WATER-LEVEL CHECKS I METHOD
sm.
DATE TIME SAMPLED TO CASING I CAVE-IN I WATER 1
�w ` 08124120/2, 9:50 11.5' 10' I none l t- ED _
I: 08/24/2012
asrzarrol2
_ I' Craig CME-55
•
I. I I I r-r. rr. --•► a— -
i
ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING CO.
AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING
Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal
7125 West 126th Street, Suite#500 - Savage, MN 55378
▪ Telephone: (952)890-7366 Fax: (952)890.5883
GRADATION TEST REPORT
Date Sampled: 8-24-2012 Reported: 8-24-2012
• Sample By: ITCO Allied Eng. Performed By: Tom Warner
Sampled from Boring#6 @ 18"
Lab.No.2012-99
Sieve Size %Passing
31.5mm=1 114" 100
•
25.0mm=1" 98.9
19.0mm=314" 98.4
•
12.5mm=1/2" 97.0
9.5mm=318" 95.2
4.75mm=#4 90.6
2.00mm=#10 83.5
850pm=#20 73.7
425pm=#40 62.8
180im=#80 40.1
75pm=#200 28.4
Liquid Limit 25
• Plastic Limit 20
Plasticity Index 5
t PASHTO Soil Classification A-2-4
Remarks:
Copies To:
Charge Codes: Fine Gradation #103- 1
Liquid and Plastic Limits#308 - 1
Signed:
Gordon.).Kopacck,Professional Engineer—Registration No. 7254
ALLIbll IiS-r DRILLING COMPANY
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS SYSTEMS
•
Unified Soil Classification
ASTM: b 2488 - 84
•
Group •
Major Divisions Symbol Typical Group Names
' COARSE- GRAVELS Clean Gravels OW Well graded gravels. Well graded gravel with sand'.
GRAINED SOILS <5% passing
More than 50% No. 200 sieve . GP Poorly-graded gravel. Poorly graded gravel with sand'.
More than 50% of coarse
retained on the fraction retained Gravel wI fines GM Silty gravel.Silty gravel with sand'.
No. 200 sieve. on Na. 4 sieve, >15% passing
No. 200 sieve GC Clayey gravel. Clayey gravel with sand'.
SANDS ' Clean Sands _ SW Well graded sand,Well graded sand with gravel'.
<5% using '
50% or more of No. 200 sieve SP Poorly graded sand. Poorly graded sand with gravel.
coarse fraction
passes No. 4 Sands with tines SM Silty sand. Silty sand with gravel-.
sieve. >.15 % passing
No. 20 sieve SC Clayey sand, Clayey sand with gravel`.
•
•▪ FINE-GRAINED SILTS AND CLAYS Mi.. Silt. Silt with sand'. Sandy silt".
SOILS �___.�.
Liquid Limit less than 50. CL Lean clay. Lean clay with sand'. Sandy lean clays"
• ; Cohesive soils 1 OL Organic silt. Organic clay i
---.1
50% or more SILTS AND CLAYS I NisiElastic silt. Elastic silt with sand'. Sandy elastic silt".
No.passes the o. 4
a 200 sieve. 1; Liquid Limit more than 50 CH Pat clay. Fat clay with sandal. Sandy at clay" 1
OH Organic clay, Organic silt_
' .1
•
• HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat. I
Boundary.lassitications ire designated h►• dual group symbols. For example(SP-SC). Poorly graded sand with :lay.
- - More 'hon.15% sand. -- - More than :5% sand. 1
I 1 - 15% to 30% retained cn No 200 Sieve. 00 - More than 30% retained on No 200 sieve
L
•
•
• AASHTO Soil Classification System
• .Granular Materials Silt-Clay Materials
(35% or less passing No. 200 sieve) ( >.35%c passing No 200)
•
A-i A-3 A-2 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8
A-I-a A-I-b A-2-4 A-2-5 A-2-6 A-2-7
lave Analysis:
•
96 Passing
No. Io 50 max
No.40 30 max 50 Max Si min
No.200 15 max 2.5 max 10 max 35max 35max 35max 35max 36min 36min 36min 36min
t - -
• haracteriades of
ruction Passing No 40:
liquid limit 40max 41min 40max 41 max 40max 41min 40max 4tmax
plasticir/index 6 max NP I Omax 1 Omax t 1 min 1 l min 1 Omax l Omax l l min1 t 1 min ��
sual Types of stone fragments fine -, peat'hillWY
ignif'scant Constituents 1 gavel and sand sand silty or clayey gravel and sand _ silty soils clayey soils organic was
1
a eneral Subgrade •
ling excellent to good fair to poor ..-..unsatisfactory
-