HomeMy WebLinkAbout4B 5352 Candy Cove Trail Agenda Packet Report
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2015
AGENDA #: 4B
PREPARED BY: JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER
PRESENTED BY: JEFF MATZKE
PUBLIC HEARING: YES
AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE FROM THE
MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETB ACK FOR A PROPERTY IN THE R-1 (LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT
DISCUSSION: Introduction
Dana Krakowski, the property owner, is requesting variances from the mini-
mum side yard setback on a property located at 5352 Candy Cove Trail. The
property is located along the southern shores of Lower Prior Lake, south of
north of Manor Road. The property currently contains a single family home
(cabin). The following variances are requested:
• A 1.2 foot variance from the minimum 5 foot side yard requirement
(Section 1101.502 (7))
Regulation Requirement Proposed Variance
Minimum Side Yard (a nonconforming lot) 5’ 3.8’ 1.2’
History
The property is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential), and is guided R-LD (Ur-
ban Low Density) on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The prop-
erty currently contains a single family home (cabin) which was constructed in
1923.
Current Circumstances
The applicant proposes to construct a new detached 2-car garage onsite with a
840 sq. ft. footprint.
The property is 43 feet wide and 8,683 square feet in total area thereby making
the property a nonconforming lot by width and area standards. The applicant
proposes a new garage on the property; no garage currently exists. The cur-
rent variance request relates to the existing setback of the cabin. Since the
proposed construction of the garage is greater than 50% of the current value of
the property, the entire lot features must be brought into compliance with the
current ordinance. While the proposed garage does meet current ordinance
standards, the only nonconforming ordinance standard on the property is the
existing 3.8 foot side yard setback for the existing cabin. This variance request
is therefore sought for this nonconforming setback.
In addition, the applicant proposes to reduce the overall impervious surface
2
from 32.1% existing to 28.1% proposed with the project.
ISSUES: This project includes a request for 1 variance. Section 1108.400 states that the
Board of Adjustment may grant a variance from the strict application of the pro-
visions of the Zoning Ordinance, provided that:
• There are practical difficulties in complying with the strict terms of
the Ordinance. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with
the granting of a Variance, means the property owner proposes to
use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the
Zoning Ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not
constitute practical difficulties.
It appears practical difficulties exist for the applicant in this case. This
residential property has some unique characteristics including the small
size of the property and the existing nonconforming side yard setback
which will remain unchanged.
• The granting of the Variance is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the City Subdivision and Zoning
Ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan.
Two purposes of the Zoning Ordinance are to “promote the most appro-
priate and orderly development of the residential, business, industrial, pub-
lic land and public areas” and “enhance the aesthetic character and ap-
pearance of the City.” The approval of the variances as requested would
allow the applicant to construct a reasonable residential garage on the
site in an orderly fashion within the confines of the center of the property.
• The practical difficulty is due to circumstances unique to the
property not resulting from actions of the owners of the property
and is not a mere convenience to the property owner and
applicant.
The practical difficulty does exist due to circumstances unique to the
property. This residential property has unique characteristics including a
small nonconforming lot area of 8,683 square feet and width of 43 feet in
which to construct a home and garage.
• The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character
of the neighborhood or be detrimental to the health and safety of
the public welfare.
The granting of the variances will not alter the existing character of the
neighborhood. The existing 3.8 foot side yard setback for the cabin and
the structural footprint of the cabin will remain unchanged. The proposed
detached garage will meet current ordinance structural setback.
• The granting of the Variance will not result in allowing any use of
the property that is not permitted in the zoning district where the
subject property is located.
3
A single family residential dwelling is an allowed use within the R-1 (Low
Density Residential) Zoning District.
Conclusion
City Staff believes the variance requested is warranted due to the lot con-
straints unique to the property and practical difficulties as stated above in the
findings. Therefore, City Staff recommends approval of the requested vari-
ances subject to the following conditions of approval:
• The variance resolution shall be recorded at Scott County. An
acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be submitted to the Community
& Economic Development Department prior to the issuance of a build-
ing permit
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and a second to approve a resolution approving the requested vari-
ance for 5352 Candy Cove Trail, or any variance the Planning Commission
deems appropriate in these circumstances.
2. Motion and a second to table or continue discussion of the item for specific
purpose.
3. Motion and a second to deny the variances because the Planning Commis-
sion finds a lack of demonstrated practical difficulties under the zoning code
criteria.
RECOMMENDED
MOTIONS:
Alternative #1
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 15-XXPC
2. Location Map
3. Existing Survey dated 7-22-15
4. Proposed Survey dated 8-19-15
1
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RESOLUTION 15-xx
A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPERTY IN THE R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SHORELAND) ZONING DISTRICT
Motion By: Second By:
WHEREAS, The Prior Lake Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing
on September 8, 2015, to consider a request from Dana Krakowski, the property owner, to approve a
side yard setback variance to allow construction of a detached garage in the R-1 (Low Density
Residential Shoreland) Zoning District at the following property:
5352 Candy Cove Trail, Prior Lake, MN 55372
Lot 3, CANDY COVE PARK, Scott County, Minnesota.
Torrens Property
(PID 25-027-003-0)
WHEREAS, Notice of the public hearing on said variance request was duly published in accordance with the
applicable Prior Lake Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in this variance request, and
persons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the
variance request; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for the variance as contained in Case #DEV-
2015-001017 and held a hearing thereon on September 8, 2015; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety,
and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of
fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. The Planning Commission hereby adopts the following findings:
a. There are practical difficulties in complying with the strict terms of the Ordinance. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a Variance, means the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
It appears practical difficulties exist for the applicant in this case. This residential property has some
unique characteristics including the small size of the property and the existing nonconforming side yard
setback which will remain unchanged.
2
b. The granting of the Variances are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan.
Two purposes of the Zoning Ordinance are to “promote the most appropriate and orderly development of
the residential, business, industrial, public land and public areas” and “enhance the aesthetic character and
appearance of the City.” The approval of the variances as requested would allow the applicant to
construct a reasonable residential garage on the site in an orderly fashion within the confines of the
center of the property
c. The practical difficulty is due to circumstances unique to the property not resulting from actions
of the owners of the property and is not a mere convenience to the property owner and
applicant.
The practical difficulty does exist due to circumstances unique to the property. This residential property
has unique characteristics including a small nonconforming lot area of 8,683 square feet and width of
43 feet in which to construct a home and garage.
d. The granting of the variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or be detrimental to the health and safety of the public welfare.
The granting of the variances will not alter the existing character of the neighborhood. The existing 3.8
foot side yard setback for the cabin and the structural footprint of the cabin will remain unchanged. The
proposed detached garage will meet current ordinance structural setback.
e. The granting of the Variances will not result in allowing any use of the property that is not
permitted in the zoning district where the subject property is located.
A single family residential dwelling is an allowed use within the R-1 (Low Density Residential) Zoning
District.
3. Based upon the findings set forth herein, the Planning Commission hereby approves the following variance
to allow a construction of a detached garage in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) Zoning District:
a. A 1.2 foot variance from the minimum 5 foot side yard requirement (Section 1101.502 (7))
4. The variances are subject to the following conditions of approval:
a. The variance resolution shall be recorded at Scott County. An acknowledged City Assent Form, shall
be submitted to the Community & Economic Development Department prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015.
_______________________________ Perri Hite, Commission Chair
ATTEST: _________________________________
Dan Rogness, Community & Economic Development Director
VOTE Hite Blahnik Fleming Larson Petersen
Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐