Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8A Jeffers Pond PUD/Motor Fuel Staton and Car Wash CR() 1.1 4646 Dakota Street SE msPrior Lake, MN 55372 CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 AGENDA #: 8A PREPARED BY: DAN ROGNESS, COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEV. DIRECTOR PRESENTED BY: DAN ROGNESS AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PLANNED UNIT DEVEL- OPMENT TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND DISCUSSION: Introduction The purpose of this agenda item is to consider an amendment to the Jeffers Pond PUD Plan to allow a Motor Fuel Station and Carwash for Super America. The original PUD Plan did not show this type of use as part of the mixed-use area of Outlots B and C. History The original Planned Unit Development Plan for Jeffers Pond was ap- proved in 2005. Since that time, nearly all the residential neighborhoods have been developed, as well as the streets, public park/trail system, the elementary school and the fire station. Two outlots remain undevel- oped for retail and mixed uses, including: • Outlot B —9.3 acres, designated as "future retail" in the Prelim- inary PUD Plan. • Outlot C —21.6 acres, designated as mixed-use for commercial and residential (114 condominium units) in the Preliminary PUD Plan. The Jeffers Pond PUD was designed as a lifecycle housing project which offers various types of housing in a range of density and models including small single family homes, large single family detached homes, attached one a two-story single family townhomes, and apart- ment condominiums. None of the commercial uses identified for Outlots B and C have been developed. However, a revised plan for those two outlots has now been approved the Planning Commission and City Council to include the fol- lowing mix (a combination of both outlots): • Outlot B: shows 10,000 square feet of commercial space and 48 multifamily housing units. • Outlot C: shows 77,000 square feet of commercial space and 270 multifamily housing units. A specific PUD Plan is being requested for a Super America (motor fuel station and carwash). Area residents have expressed concerns with this project not fitting the original PUD mixed-use concept, high traffic volumes, and safety concerns. Current Circumstances The City Council requested the applicant/developer to return with further information related to Outlots B and C, including: 1. A updated traffic study from the one done in 2004, including a review of safety issues, intersection impacts and interconnected streets within the mixed-use development area. 2. A phasing plan for the development. 3. Design guidelines for the mix of uses, including an incorporation of existing Downtown Building Design Guidelines. 4. A design of Super America that meets design guidelines. Conclusion In response to the Council's request, the Jeffers Foundation has com- pleted and submitted the following information: 1. An updated traffic study by SRF Consulting Group, dated Sep- tember 3, 2015, provides conclusions on traffic impacts and makes recommendations on safety measures. 2. A phasing plan for the development shows four phases of build- out within Outlots B and C. 3. Design guidelines from the foundation, and City staff's recom- mended (downtown) guidelines could be combined. 4. A redesign of Super America, shows elements that more closely match the colors/materials in Fire Station #2. This includes a standing seam metal roof, a stone base similar to the fire station, metal awnings over windows on the back side, and a pylon sign with a similar stone/brick base. The traffic study's conclusions show that nearly half of the traffic counts will relate to the new proposed development mix as compared to the development mix expected back in 2005 (8,525 versus 19,389 daily trips). That volume of traffic can be accommodated on the existing Fountain Hills Drive without adding another internal street connection. Two access points are now being shown on either side of Outlot C to help with the traffic flow and to allow two points of access for emergency vehicles. A pedestrian bridge is proposed to connect both sides of Out- lot C. The study proposes that the "extra" lane on Fountain Hills Drive at Highway 21 be striped for fire trucks to make left-turn lanes unob- structed by other vehicles in the left (or right) turn lanes. A proposed internal street would also remove from 20-25 percent of the developable land in Outlot C (see diagram in Attachment 1). That addi- tion would reduce the overall square footage of commercial and resi- dential uses, and reduce traffic volumes as well. The cost of that infra- structure, including a bridge, would greatly outweigh any benefits from connecting the two sides. The Police and Fire Chiefs have both indicated that the proposed mixed- use development plan is safe in terms of public safety, accessibility and response time. The addition of the center striped lane on Fountain Hills 2 Drive at Highway 21 should address concerns about fire trucks access- ing that highway until a signalized intersection is constructed. The Safety Committee also recommended two additional changes on Foun- tain Hills Drive at the point of access into the new commercial drive and Enclave Court (see diagram in Attachment 1). A phasing plan has been provided in Attachment 2 with the PUD Plan, showing a progression from the proposed Super America to the adja- cent commercial site. Then, development would progress to Outlot B with a mix of residential and commercial uses. The proposed design of Super America now incorporates design ele- ments of Fire Station#2, including: (1) a standing seam metal roof iden- tical to the fire station in colonial red; (2) a stone base around the build- ing identical to the fire station in a cedar color; (3) metal awnings over three windows on the north elevation of the building identical to the fire station in colonial red; and (4) a brick/stone base on the pylon sign that matches the building materials. Attachment 2 also provides information from the Foundation related to overall PUD commercial design guidelines. Staff has added statements from the 2007 Prior Lake Downtown Building Design Guidelines that could have some applications to the Jeffers PUD development areas in Outlots B and C. The Planning Commission recommended hours of operation to be be- tween 5:00 a.m. and 10:00 or 11:00 p.m. with the carwash limited to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Their recommendation included a City Council review after two years to evaluate those hours. A survey of existing gas stations in Prior Lake is provided in Attachment 3. Based on those re- sults, the proposed resolution allows normal business operations be- tween 5:00 a.m. — 11:00 p.m., carwash operations between 6:00 a.m. — 10:00 p.m., and pay at the pump 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The EDA reviewed the revised traffic study and design plans at its meet- ing on September 21. From an economic development standpoint, the EDA voted 4-1 in support of the proposed Super America project. It also recommended to the Council that it consider requiring that the outer fas- cia sides of the pump island canopy change from a white color to a more earth-tone color that matches the sign area on the building (as shown on the rendering drawing in Attachment 3). ISSUES: The original 2005 PUD "vision" for the Jeffers Pond mixed-use area de- picts large-scale commercial development with 3-5 story buildings at a walkable scale with numerous amenities. Now, ten years later, nothing has been built with a first proposed commercial project being Super America. Does this proposed amendment allowing Super America fit a commercial development reality that is no longer valid for the previous 2005 plan? NOTE: The previous staff report and public comments can be found on the City's website as follows: (1) Doc Center; (2) City of Prior Lake; (3) City Council, Planning Commission, EDA, Advisory Committees; (4) City Council; (5) City Council Agenda Packets; (6) 2015; (7) 7/27/15; (8) 9B (53 pages). 3 1. Motion and a second to approve a resolution amending the Jeffers ALTERNATIVES: Pond PUD to allow a motor fuel station and carwash in Outlot C of Jeffers Pond. 2. Motion and a second to approve a resolution denying the Jeffers Pond PUD amendment based on findings of fact (see Attachment 4). 3. Motion and a second to table action and request staff to provide further information. RECOMMENDED Alternative #1 MOTION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Updated traffic study by SRF dated 9/03/15 2. PUD Plan, Phasing Plan and Design Guidelines 3. Revised Super America Building Plans dated 9/21/15 4. Resolution in support of a denial of the PUD amendment 4 01 PRio� f� U txy 4646 Dakota Street SE `thvrvEsoiP Prior Lake, MN 55372 RESOLUTION 15-XXX A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND Motion By: Second By: WHEREAS, Kimley-Horn on behalf of C-Store Partners (the "Developer") has submitted an application for an amendment to the Jeffers Pond Planned Unit Development ("PUD") Plan to allow a Motor Fuel Station and Car Wash for Super America in Outlot C of Jeffers Pond; and WHEREAS, The Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 15, 2015 to consider the proposed amendment to the PUD; and WHEREAS, Notice of the public hearing on said PUD amendment has been duly published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake Ordinance; and WHEREAS, All persons interested in the proposed amendment to the PUD were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the Jeffers Pond PUD amendment for the record at the public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, The Prior Lake City Council considered the application for the proposed amendment to the PUD on September 28, 2015; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the amendment to the PUD according to the applicable provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; and WHEREAS, The City Council has the authority to impose reasonable conditions on an amendment to the PUD. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. Contingent on compliance with the conditions set out below in 3, the amendment to the PUD is found to be consistent with the provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and in general conformance with the original PUD Plan approved on January 18, 2005. 1 3. The amendment to the PUD Plan for Jeffers Pond to allow a Motor Fuel Station and Car Wash within Outlot C as a phase of a Final PUD Plan is hereby approved subject to the following conditions. The operational, design and site plans for Super America shall incorporate the following elements: a) Hours of operation for business operations shall be limited to 5 a.m. - 11 p.m. for two years at which time the City Council would review the project and choose to maintain or revise the hours of operation; hours of operation for the carwash shall be limited to 6:00 a.m.— 10:00 p.m.; and pay-at- the-pump shall be allowed 24 hours a day, 7 days per week. b) The project shall have the following design elements shown on plans dated 9/21/15: (a) the building shall have a colonial red color standing seam metal room; (b) the building shall have a cedar color stone base; (c) the building's north/rear elevation shall have colonial red awnings over three windows; and (d) the pylon sign shall have a brick/stone base matching the building. c) Landscaping along the southerly side of the site shall be enhanced to meet Bufferyard C standards as provided in Subsection 1107.2005 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance. d) Fountain Hills Drive shall be modified to include: (a) a striped center lane at the Highway 21 intersection for emergency vehicles; (b) a removal of the bump-out section of the center median near Enclave Court; and (c) a left-turn lane for vehicles traveling east to turn north into Super America. Vehicular access to/from Fountain Hills Drive to Super America should be changed to one lane of traffic entering and two lanes exiting the site. e) The Developer must obtain the required permits from any other state or local agency prior to any work on the site. f) The Developer shall revise the plans to address all of the comments in the memorandum from the City Engineering Department dated June 5, 2015. g) The Developer shall revise the plans to address all of the comments in the memorandum from the City Community & Economic Development Department dated June 5, 2015. h) The Developer shall revise the plans to address all of the comments in the memorandum from the Scott County Highway Department dated June 4, 2015. i) The City and/or Jeffers Foundation should work with the local School District to improve bus stop locations in the area. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015. VOTE Hedberg Keeney McGuire Morton Thompson Aye ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Nay ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Absent ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 Abstain 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 Frank Boyles, City Manager 2 1311°4?ger 4646 Dakota Street SE ,tNNESol.P' Prior Lake, MN 55372 RESOLUTION 15-XXX A RESOLUTION DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND Motion By: Second By: WHEREAS, Kimley-Horn on behalf of C-Store Partners (the "Developer") has submitted an application for an amendment to the Jeffers Pond Planned Unit Development("PUD") Plan to allow a Motor Fuel Station and Car Wash for Super America in Outlot C of Jeffers Pond; and WHEREAS, The Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 15, 2015 to consider the proposed amendment to the PUD; and WHEREAS, Notice of the public hearing on said PUD amendment has been duly published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake Ordinance; and WHEREAS, All persons interested in the proposed amendment to the PUD were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the Jeffers Pond PUD amendment for the record at the public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, The Prior Lake City Council considered the application for the proposed amendment to the PUD on September 28, 2015; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the amendment to the PUD according to the applicable provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and found said amendment to the PUD not to be consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT The City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. a) City Ordinance No. 105-03 (related to the Jeffers Pond PUD and adopted on January 18, 2005) states that the "elements of the plan will be as shown on the plans dated January 18, 2015, which shows a mix of residential and commercial uses in Outlots B and C including, condominiums,offices, retail and parking ramps in configurations that have 2+story buildings. The proposed Super America does not match the elements of the approved PUD plan with a 1-story design. b) City Ordinance No. 105-03 states that, "The PUD plan proposes trails, pedestrian elements to connect the residential and the commercial elements. The commercial area is also designed to be pedestrian-friendly, and to provide services to the neighborhoods." The proposed Super America is primarily auto-oriented and is not pedestrian-friendly. c) Resolution 05-17, adopted on January 18, 2005 includes a condition that states, "The overall theme must be refined and incorporated into the final plans." The materials provided for the residential areas related to landscape features, home features and monument signs. . The materials provided for the commercial area did not identify a stand-alone 1-story gasoline service station. The development of a stand-alone 1-story gasoline service station does not satisfy the requirement of Resolution 05-17. d) A narrative provided by the applicant for "The Village at Jeffers Pond" Preliminary Plat and PUD (dated October 25, 2004) represented the following: (1) The project is a combination of lifestyles, variety of housing price points, retail shopping opportunities, office space, restaurant choices, banking opportunities, transportation, pedestrian friendly walkways, pristine nature park with trails, elementary school and active recreational parks. (2) The commercial area's entire focus is on accessibility to shopping via plaza walks and centralized parking ramps. The commercial area is connected directly to the trail system and sidewalk system and adjacent to the transit location. Mixed-use building concepts have been incorporated in the proposal, which allows people to live, work and shop all within walking distance. (3) Increasing a diverse retail outlet will provide numerous opportunities for a variety of businesses. Traditional office space, banking, retail, food services, etc. will help increase the local job market within the community, and attract services that may have otherwise located in surrounding communities. (4) Each component of the project was designed to create a unique niche within the site but also to transition harmoniously to the surrounding area. Architectural design, landscape, ponds and natural buffers will be utilized to transition the different components. e.) Several type of retail uses were identified in the narrative for the Preliminary Plat and PUD. None of the materials submitted to the City Council and upon which the City Council relied and approved the Preliminary Plat and PUD contemplated a gasoline service station. The proposed Super America does not conform to any of the representations made in late 2004 related to the Jeffers Pond PUD. CONCLUSION AND ORDER BASED ON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDERS THAT:The amendment to the PUD Plan for Jeffers Pond to allow a Motor Fuel Station and Car Wash within Outlot C as a phase of a Final PUD Plan is hereby denied 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015. VOTE Hedberg Keeney McGuire Morton Thompson Aye ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Nay ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Absent ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Abstain ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Frank Boyles, City Manager 3 • (` f €cc e i AOS\oft tcrnhtool. fans'-Suite 13-1 F i)a N o A T i O N Plymouth,MInnesota 55447 Phone/lax:'J'2-471-9914 wAvi.Jcftrrsfnundation.org Info Jeffcrsfounrfation.orQ September 3,2015 City of Prior Lake Attn. Mr. Dan Rogness 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 Re: Jeffers Pond 9th Addition proposal—Super America To Whom It May Concern: The Prior Lake City Council gave direction to staff,property owner,and applicant at the July 27, 2015 City Council meeting some specific information they were looking for before considering the application before them. The specific requests were: 1. Updated Traffic Study,to include discussion on an additional east-west street. 2. Updated site plan showing minimum of 290 residential housing units and 87,000 square feet of commercial uses. 3. Updated Phasing Plan. 4. Construction design standards for commercial area, incorporating fire-station elements as a theme. 5. School bus safety. Attached to this cover letter is the additional information requested. Traffic Study Under direction of the Prior Lake City Council, and Prior Lake City Staff, SRF Consulting Group has updated the traffic study from the original study completed in 2004. SRF Consulting was given some general direction on what areas needed to be reviewed and updated by City Staff 1 Please note in the study that even with a high traffic motor fueling station, current modeling shows that the traffic may or may not generate enough volume to warrant a signal light at County Rd 21 and Fountain Hills Drive. In addition,an individual property owner does not have the legal authority to install a traffic light. Only the City of Prior Lake,working with Scott County,has the ability to facilitate the installation. Conditioning any approval on the installation of a traffic signal is,in our opinion,a regulatory taking of our property without due process of law. In June 2005, a$125,000 cash escrow was delivered to the City of Prior Lake for the future installation of a traffic signal, should traffic conditions warrant such. If the application for a motor fueling station is denied,then all traffic counts at the intersection of CSH 21 and Fountain Hills Drive will be significantly lowered, and the need for a signal would not be warranted. Therefore, as the property owner,we would request that the escrowed funds be returned to Jeffers Foundation. The Prior Lake City Council also requested that a study of the east-west traffic flow along Fountain Hills Drive be reviewed,with some discussion of the need for an additional interior street. This has been reviewed, from both a traffic impact and site plan impact. The proposed site plan has been modified to include a second ingress/egress access to each side of the development, keeping the walking areas internal to the development. As noted in the traffic study,the Jeffers Parkway design has the capacity to handle the development, and no east-west street is proposed. Update Site Plan It should be noted that previous site plans were noted and clearly marked as an artists'concept and were considered to be preliminary. These were supplied and marketed by Wensmann Realty,Inc.,the original developer,who is not currently involved with the project and has no interest in any of the property. The Jeffers Foundation updated the site plan to reflect current market conditions and the on-going work with Signet Development in designing a project that meets or exceeds the recent Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment which shows a minimum of 290 residential housing units,and 87,000 square feet of commercial. The current site plan included shows 330 housing units,and 91,000 square feet of commercial,which includes 18,000 square feet of high traffic-generating commercial. It should be noted, that a reduction in the housing units to 290 may or may not generate additional commercial square footage as the housing units are multi-story structures. Increasing commercial opportunities in this development will require vertical construction. There simply is not enough available ground area or allowable impervious surface to meet previous concepts. Updated Phasing Plan The new site plan has been updated to include a phasing plan that will allow for each phase of the development to develop independently from the other while keeping similar design elements to create a community feel. No specific time-table can be established on each phase.The willingness of the City Council to be receptive to the creative development of this site will be the major factor in determining the timing of any 2 potential development of this site, and, indeed,whether or not the site will be developed in the foreseeable future. Construction Design Standards The original design standards included as part of the original PUD have been revised slightly to address the commercial area. These are attached. It should be noted that the original design standards looked for a more rural feel to the architecture. In keeping with the desire of the City to follow the design 'feel'of Prior Lake Fire Station #2, we have revised yet retained some of the original language. These standards could be applied on a case by case basis as each phase will come before the Planning Commission and Prior Lake City Council as a PUD amendment. School Bus Safety The Prior Lake City Staff has contacted the transportation office of the school district to review the location. The director did not feel there was a concern related to the location of the drop off and pick up. It should be noted,that there is recessed parking that could be marked as a bus zone should the need arise,which would keep students off traveled lane. In closing,we would appreciate a complete review of the information provided, a consideration of the work prepared some ten years ago in developing a plan that worked with the property and all of the intricate details related to the shore-land development that seem to be overlooked. The current application before you meets the zoning,allowed uses and the commercial development intent, and is consistent with the PUD established in 2005. Sincerely, ) Paul W. Oberg,CEO 3 t;ig D[SIGNERS Consulting Group,Inc. M e mo ra nd u m SRF No.0158974 To: Kelly Johnson Jeffers Foundation From: Jordan Schwarze,PE,Senior Engineer Emily Gross,EIT,Engineer Date: September 3,2015 Subject: Jeffers Pond Traffic Study Update Introduction SRF has completed an update to the Jeffers Pond Traffic Study dated July 30, 2004. Much of the Jeffers Pond development in Prior Lake, MN has been constructed since completion of the traffic study in 2004. However, a mixed-use area located on the north side of the development has yet to develop. A revised site plan is proposed involving lower density land uses as compared to those originally planned. The main objectives of this update are to compare land use assumptions and trip generation estimates to those of the 2004 study and to determine whether additional traffic analysis or traffic control/geometric improvements are necessary.The following information summarizes the findings. Traffic Volumes Annual Average Daily Traffic(AADT)volumes were forecasted for year 2009"no build"and"build" scenarios in the J JJers Pond Traffic Study. A comparison between the forecasted and current AADT volumes shown in Table 1 indicates that traffic has grown at a slower pace than previously estimated. Current AADT volumes are generally lower than the forecasted year 2009 AADT volumes. Table 1. Daily Traffic Volume Comparison Forecasted Year 2009 MDT Volumes Year 2013/2014 Location No Build Build AADT Volumes(1) CSAH 42 west of McKenna Road 13,200 17,500 12,400 CSAH 42 east of CSAH 21 14,000 17,200 17,200 CSAH 21 north of CSAH 42 16,300 24,200 9,800 CSAH 21 south of Coachman Lane 14,000 20,100 11,200 (1) Source: MnDOT Traffic Forecasting&Analysis The no build scenario applied a background growth rate of five percent per year to the year 2003 daily traffic volumes and accounted for trips generated from proposed adjacent developments to the west and east of Jeffers Pond. While an annual growth rate of five percent was consistent with historical trends at the time of the 2004 traffic study,since the recession traffic volumes in the Twin Cities area have increased at a lower annual rate than anticipated.The build scenario includes the no build traffic and the projected traffic volumes with the full construction of the Jeffers Pond development. ONE CARLSON PARKWAY,SUITE 150 I MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55447 I 763.475.0010 I WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM Kelly Johnson September 3,2015 Jeffers Foundation Jeffers Pond Traffic Study Update Proposed Development The proposed development is located on the north side of the Jeffers Pond development,immediately south of County State-Aid Highway 42 (CSAH 42) and west of CSAH 21 in Prior Lake, MN. The current development proposal(shown in Figure 1) consists of a mixture of residential and commercial land uses at a lower density than those originally proposed. Land Use Assumptions and Trip Generation Estimates Trip generation estimates for the a.m.and p.m.peak hours and a daily basis were developed based on the current development proposal.The estimates were developed using the 11 E Trip Generation Manned, Ninth Edition and are shown in Table 2. Also presented in Table 2 for comparison purposes are the previous trip generation estimates from the Jeffers Pond Traffic Study. Table 2. Trip Generation Comparison A.M.Trips P.M.Trips Daily Land Use Type Size Trips In Out In Out Proposed Land Uses-Jeffers Pond Traffic Study(2004) Residential Condominiums 114 Dwelling Units 9 42 41 20 668 Senior Rental Apartments 204 Dwelling Units 7 9 14 9 710 General Office 174,290 Square Feet 238 32 44 224 1,919 Retail11> 265,845 Square Feet 103 66 269 343 10,015 Drive-In Bank(1) 14,200 Square Feet 83 66 276 276 2.975 High-Turnover Restauranttll 28,700 Square Feet 146 135 162 104 3,102 Proposed Site Trips 586 350 806 976 19,389 Proposed Land Uses-Current(2) Residential Condominiums 60 Dwelling Units 4 22 21 10 349 Senior Adult Housing 70 Dwelling Units 5 9 9 8 241 Single-Family Detached Housing 30 Dwelling Units 6 17 19 11 286 Apartments 200 Dwelling Units 20 82 81 43 1,330 Retail 87,000 Square Feet 52 32 155 168 3,715 Gas Station with Convenience Market 16 Fueling Positions 81 81 108 108 2,604 Proposed Site Trips 168 247 393 348 8,525 Net Change I (418) I (-107) I (-413) I (-628) I (-10,864) (1) The trip generation estimates from the Jeffers Pond Traffic Study applied a 15 percent multi-use reduction to the Retail, Drive-In Bank,and High-Turnover Restaurant land uses. (2) An approximate 15 percent multi-use/modal reduction could be expected for the currently proposed development. However, no multi-use/modal reduction was applied in order to present conservative current trip generation estimates. Page 2 /-co‘_) '_.Eiiivrr . h F ga} 42 /[ +f Air 11 Z k•)e�.t1v/ i L. HCl_lirWr-Jtd t2w) IlL' k_? _....� I137%l+ �+I II akfiElflil i ;aft'-"sl fh`,.59�1 ;:.:!4!).:1.`,.:-..'',t • • /SJSJ , �0 ,:,..r.,_...„„,,,_,, • '�.. �r l __` .r,,.<.: f „u:� � a v� Q �> '_ i If it:i l r ,C19:latl +� :.T a r •en"al• , r.;.; " f ors at,;I�J7C �' ri amm I I , rMt =.m-FO— r I"-"ayr lir/I! 1_t,_l� I r— i i 11- II i t /' tt �'F4 Z4(45) Al"... } 1!'I.D- j1 .-4-11o. r' I �b I t '1 r:- ewm hne�rt.r� e (15) � lUl.:1�`•r i • lit4raail;Wfifa .._4,41,100• � �s1t �{`+ �� /!•-1 C��1, �„dt� �230_1..61;14* ®r id:'u �J )LL ` 6 0 /1 Aid 4:1 // e,, �I I ii, 1.,, --' ;I _.�) _ra '6y R/1` pow �.ntef a>mlu'»c.r �� I/I• -1'af{1 s 1_Id �. _ 44 ---� erci• a I_�_ ,.....m.,„„„„. ..---,;-.......,,,,,,,,,.,....,....••,,, : n rl g , 3(' = . •'�Qo Z.m Pi n ril ,...../ p °� 21 E \t�` rsaj3 '040 0 1St p • :.".o �� 2---1, 0h?,.s'. v e 7'0,, ", ., Brr° % 9' _v / , ` o .. C o LL LEGEND XX - A.M.Peak Hour Volumes ii_ Anticipated Commercial Counts: (XX) - P.M.Peak Hour Volumes Anticipated Housing Counts: CP; Commercial Area Rental THs: 60l Q - Side-Street Stop ControlApartments: 200 73,000sf „jam k;r one rn High-Traffic Commercial; LIFESTYLE S'g 1 9 .ei� O Roundabout Control coops 70 74,000sf+4,000sf One 1C O>i DI U N 11'I L S development 1, 20as Jeffers Pond Preliminary Concept-REVISED d ® wiIson rchitrrt Prior Lake,MN 8/07/2075 illi i Site Plan/Development Trips „�,� ;��G „r Inc Jeffers Pond Traffic Study Update Fig ure 1 CPrior Lake,MN 0158974 September 2015 Kelly Johnson September 3,2015 Jeffers Foundation Jeffers Pond Traffic Study Update Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 411 a.m. peak hour,741 p.m.peak hour,and 8,525 daily trips. It should be noted that the trip generation estimates are conservative, since they do not include typical multi-use/modal trip reductions. A distribution of the estimated a.m. and p.m. peak hour development trips is shown in Figure 1. The updated trip generation estimates represent an approximate 55 percent trip reduction compared to the previous trip generation estimates from the Jeffers Pond Traffic Study. This reduction, along with the lower average daily traffic volumes,indicates that further operational analysis would not be considered necessary. It should be noted that the 2004 study recommended the installation of a traffic signal at the CSAH 21/Fountain Hills Drive intersection. As a result, money was set aside in escrow to one day fund the installation of the traffic signal.The construction of high-traffic commercial businesses near the eastern portion of the development,such as the potential gas station/convenience market,could produce traffic volumes near the thresholds for meeting a traffic signal warrant.However,lower traffic generating general retail type land uses would not be expected to produce enough traffic to meet a traffic signal warrant. Therefore,the CSAH 21/Fountain Hills Drive intersection should continue to be monitored to determine if/when traffic volumes meet a signal warrant.Due to the ability of a traffic signal to accommodate significant side-street volumes in a timely manner,the future installation of a traffic signal at the CSAH 21/Fountain Hills Drive intersection is likely to have the desirable effect of drawing outbound motorists destined for westbound CSAH 42 away from residential neighborhoods along Jeffers Parkway and McKenna Road.No additional traffic control/geometric improvements are recommended. Build Daily Traffic Volumes To develop year 2016 no build daily traffic volumes an annual growth rate of one-percent per year was applied to the existing daily traffic volumes.The proposed development daily traffic volumes were distributed to the study area based on existing travel patterns and engineering judgment.A comparison between the year 2016 build traffic volumes and the previously evaluated year 2009 build traffic volumes shown in Table 3 indicates that generally the forecast traffic volumes for the study area are less than the traffic volumes analyzed in the Jeffers Pond Traffic Study. It should be noted that while CSAH 42 east of CSAH 21 has projected traffic volumes higher than the 2009 build traffic forecasts, CSAH 42,which is a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes,is expected to have sufficient capacity. Table 3. Build Daily Traffic Volumes Year 2016 Proposed Year 2016 Previous Year Location No Build Daily Development Build Traffic 2009 Build Traffic Volumes Daily Trips Volume Traffic Volumes CSAH 42 west of McKenna Road 12,650 2,130 14,780 17,500 CSAH 42 east of CSAH 21 17,550 2,560 20,110 17,200 CSAH 21 north of CSAH 42 10,000 2,130 12,130 24,200 CSAH 21 south of Coachman Lane 11,550 1,705 13,255 20,100 Page 4 Kelly Johnson September 3,2015 Jeffers Foundation Jeffers Pond Traffic Study Update Site Plan Review To encourage pedestrian/bicycle trips, it is recommended to provide appropriate sidewalks and shared-use paths within the proposed development, especially between residential and commercial parcels.Furthermore,it is recommended to make connections to existing pedestrian/bicycle facilities along the development perimeter.It should be noted that a pedestrian bridge is proposed in the east/ west direction over a stream separating parcels in the southwest quadrant of the CSAH 21/CSAH 42 intersection.While no additional roadway connections over this stream have been proposed,existing Fountain Hills Drive can adequately accommodate the added traffic from the proposed development. Upon completion of the proposed development,an AADT volume of 500 to 1,500 vehicles would be expected to utilize the existing Fountain Hills Drive bridge. These volumes are well below the daily capacity of a two-lane undivided urban roadway(i.e.bridge cross section)of 8,000 to 10,000 vehicles. Concerns have been expressed related to the impact added traffic could have on an existing fire station in the southeast quadrant of the Fountain Hills Drive/Enclave Court intersection.Data indicates the fire station responded to 404 emergency calls in the year 2014. Approximately 96 percent of these calls resulted in outbound fire trucks routing east along Fountain Hills Drive toward CSAFI 21,while the remaining four(4)percent were routed west along Fountain Hills Drive.Upon completion of the proposed development, the predominant movements at the Fountain Hills Drive/Enclave Court intersection are expected to be westbound right-turn and southbound left-turn maneuvers.While in theory the southbound left-turns could conflict with the predominant northbound right-turn • maneuver of fire trucks, the southbound stop condition and sirens/flashing lights of the fire trucks should allow a nearly free-flow exit for emergency personnel from Enclave Court. Increased queuing on eastbound Fountain Hills Drive at CSAH 21 could also potentially impact outbound fire trucks. The CSAH 21/Fountain Hills Drive intersection is expected to remain side-street stop controlled until traffic volumes warrant the installation of a traffic signal.With traffic added from the proposed development,the side-street stop condition could cause eastbound left-turn queues to form during peak traffic periods. However, the eastbound approach of the CSAH 21/ Fountain Hills Drive intersection is sufficiently wide to accommodate three traffic lanes(i.e.dedicated left-turn,future through,and right-turn lanes).Prior to the installation of a westbound approach,the center lane on the eastbound approach(i.e. future through lane)could be striped to prohibit vehides, thus allowing fire trucks a lane to pass eastbound left-turn queues. Upon traffic signal installation, emergency vehicle preemption is recommended to allow eastbound queued vehides to clear. Page 5 Jeffers Pond PUD - Fountain Hills/Enclave CtiHighway 21 Nk, . , tik R' ♦R J ty�. .. .1.,,,, i , ktr 4,r- .-, '. :--0,,,,f,PI:it!'''''''''.. :,4,,,,$;t1."-*., Ti..;-''''' —_ r P r s q t it : ry / S l A*: t t A h li�c @.�� $ i s' iY 1 . 4 1 . d . 4 C775f!•2tn7Er:i-127 2n�pa�.e�n2:2 ort =i!cV2�t•,:v`=,„urate,but 2ffL'r2Cy is n`.t auaraT:2ed. 71`i5 is ROta�2C�+a. Nap SCc�� �GCtl!:72.4t 3CCJ ShOL'i �5t L=_su$sLit:aed for a ttNe r_a c.}+,ap aisa._'G-v y,or F zsrir!g ver,'f.°Cation- 1 Inch=46 feet 9,!2/2015 Kelly Johnson September 3,2015 Jeffers Foundation Jeffers Pond Traffic Study Update Conclusions Based on the updated land use assumptions and trip generation estimates, the following conclusions are offered for your consideration: • Current daily traffic volumes in the study area are lower than the year 2009 build traffic forecasts in the 2004 J ffe1s Pond Tredic Study. • The revised development proposal land uses have lower density and will generate fewer trips compared to the previous trip generation estimates from the 2004 study. • Year 2016 build traffic volumes,which include trips generated by the proposed development, will generally continue to be lower than the forecasted volumes analyzed in the 2004 study. o While CSAH 42 east of CSAH 21 has projected traffic volumes higher than the 2009 build traffic forecast,CSAH 42 is expected to have sufficient capacity. • The 2004 study recommended the installation of a traffic signal at the CSAH 21/ Fountain Hills Drive intersection.As a result,money was set aside in escrow to one day fund the installation of the traffic signal.The construction of high traffic generating businesses near the eastern portion of the development,such as the potential gas station/convenience market, could produce traffic volumes near the thresholds for meeting a traffic signal warrant. However, lower traffic generating general retail type land uses would not be expected to produce enough traffic to meet a traffic signal warrant. o Therefore, the CSAH 21/Fountain Hills Drive intersection should continue to be monitored to determine if/when traffic volumes meet a signal warrant. o Fountain Hills Drive and other internal roadways have sufficient capacity to accommodate added traffic from the proposed development. No additional traffic control/geometric improvements are recommended. • To encourage pedestrian/bicycle trips, it is recommended to provide appropriate sidewalks and shared-use paths within the proposed development, especially between residential and commercial parcels. Furthermore, it is recommended to make connections to existing pedestrian/bicycle facilities along the perimeter of the proposed development. • Approximately 96 percent of emergency calls to the fire station in the southeast quadrant of the Fountain Hills Drive/Enclave Court intersection resulted in fire trucks routing east along Fountain Hills Drive toward CSAH 21. o Fire trucks are not expected to have difficulty completing the predominant northbound right-turn maneuver from Enclave Court to Fountain Hills Drive in a timely manner. o To minimize potential impacts from eastbound left-turn queues at the CSAH 21/ Fountain Hills Drive intersection, the center lane on the eastbound approach (i.e. future through lane)could be striped to prohibit vehicles,thus allowing fire trucks a lane to pass eastbound left-turn queued vehicles. Upon traffic signal installation at the CSAH 21/ Fountain Hills Drive intersection,emergency vehicle preemption is recommended to allow eastbound queued vehicles to clear. H:\Pwjeds\8974\TARspoa\8974.jogirsPondTS Update 150903.doo Page 6 • _ AL ....... ...,_ ,, ,,,,.. 8 �Y 1 rte-- "in,evNle ! a el Urn lAll— a'' "r� (Po,o �n e1o, a ��. --- , ,.:.111.1tri,.1�:.. .:. -e: t nlalrh7lMt 11 an. •-r' .. EAST SIDE ` '":gal ' I ' :•-es014-ritiii BUILDABLE AREA 9.13 ACRES ' • ) t ?{ •rXd ROW FOR EAST SIDE 0.97 ACRES 'e'der y 1)\ i 1 ' T _ �' . ° k awn �: ;. ' ADDITIONAL SETBACK AREA 0.97 ACRES 'iJutc '. _ 1'� ..: n ea /: '-�/ ; NET BUILDABLE AREA 7.19 ACRES �aw WEST SIDE • �l� �R �r �,1 � .t '1. }�i��yji BUILDABLE AREA 8.89 ACRES . 'l��ei �. - ,; r 3E ,Tiii r}3 ROW FOR EAST SIDE 1.09 ACRES 7 41i I '+++ "'+�•:r•. \ `k� &Itli;leb ADDITIONAL SETBACK AREA 1.09 ACRES 11 '. =-� '�` ,,._::::-.-_--.2,-.__ �- fl '',\ ` t �' il '' N: :ERT 6' ,�A \ I, r. 4 r__- :7' (1 j l I TOTAL1 ,,,* rei ' '` BUILDA802It . 1 = ' tg;, muil , EDUCTIONS ' / ,rte \ �� I I 'rj'akl1�'% ROW 2.06 ACRES F^ ��J \ ; �1 'I '"' +' SETBACK AREA 2.06 ACRES �, �`\' ,4* / \- 1 TOTAL REDUCTIONS 4.12 ACRES . �/ / rN\ /! (22.86 ) I� RAMS"; �lilo;' �� f ' 'S REMAINING BUILDABLE AREA 13.90 ACRES .� Rit ES ► �, �\ \.ter _PIZNEER "� H na.�..a.. '°"�"�^" JEFFERS FOUNDATION 1+� COMMERCIAL ROAD GRAPHIC ,b,1nmi VROCR WE 3U1111.1 IE RS 9TH I ,, I `� a". ... nnm1.wmmsorw,wr nude u�u"e.01, Print Preview Page 1 of 1 Jeffers Pond PUD - Fountain Hills Dr. Improvements k; 1 ,',I. . -:„L'. - '.4%---: - '''.1:t,;°. ,.,..-i*i. ...-°:.'--,-... .-; ",,'''' .. 1.--*,:::*,2„:‘';:riti`i, f,„t° ' , ,),4 i .# R ; ,.,' A"° L H ,m • I W I, i{ tli f i ,s , �, �' i 1 .iiiisliiistallyt ty . 4 .; ,'I' J,rT � _ n.:,/.'RI'-' ,✓ x?: rt € r Disclaimer:Flap and parte!lata are believed to be accurate Tir but accuracy is not guaranteed. This Is not a legal Map Scale document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal survey,or for zoning verifrcation. 1 inch=64 feet 9/16/2015 http://gis.co.scott.mn.us/ScottGIS2.0/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://gis.co.scott.mn.us/s... 9/16/2015 iQ O n' � , as,.war U- Q +l a.e: /seta/. ,°°° l rxed We,- elo°men 6..male is Cao rnercra1 �'+ plain4-1 .fp '��m1 1-ident:al r-a•.�,�;� a tom-9!°4.r t-ri;trif m 0 ers`Yj;i G ?':dve.rtl;,ir ,'5./';'' "Git_. sIgo ' -4� esideritidl , $�,'41 , e lde_idl rr- rA. ental a ents r. e'elidegat PAM ,.,.w,.:,7- `-�1 r- rrrr �� 0 ‘�. ( �� L?=1:.?rtSr t0'ritri a ea ,•he par7' g �.*"..---7 !Illcs \` \ ii rri ///i ``` \ 11' r,r y- • 9 nd-5thfloor rye / • J!J / amar La dr dt- it i x .. to'par 'Taft [ . ;ait•JJ t r x �� ' �_,,, y`=' ice,:..+ ,/S iG\\40. ,-1. arra /I, 1 •„: 3.7—____---...„,1r ,1 s us f r�ildvfXa 1 a ,.. ._ ,„4.;,10-,1,-------11 �" ,�'+-, :Zi „Iline � r1 ii ` ' rsom ar MUT / O. tivi n , ��. 1• u,u2,(Ow er-decuprej ,. t „,.,44 ra it o ' r� , v /-\�„. Note: Anticipated Commercial Counts: Ant upated Housing Counts: Walking paths and foot bridges shall be incorporated Commercial Area: .. ,, n Rental MI's: 60 QI IO appropriately in order to increase walkability 73,000 sf Apartments: "200 Q throughout the development. Coops: 70 High-Traffic Commercial: LIFESTYLE Or Qn8 14,000 sf+4,000 sf COMMUNITIES development .,. L IN ,j ' kaas Jeffers Pond Preli.minory Concept-REVISED Ison .r nit- Prior Lake,MN 6/07/2015 00,11, =F • O p o. T e Jr o o iv Z o �' v firm sio ru I. r14 ii 4 L..... ...F____,.. :',„'.:..'''''''111-'LI L 7,,,,,;., ' ` '' '1' }� a. n� a r.ell o , L H K Zi �1 oBo .. CCI a �t� --4,,,,,,'R3 � '"4" CD so c' 1 siis ti 3.� - • - Jeffers Pond Community Elements Jeffers Pond theme elements are designed to build a cohesive identity for the site as a whole, and to enhance the unique natural and cultural history of the Jeffers Pond site. Architectural styles and landscape features shall reflectthe dual nature of the site-each having unique styles and characteristics to tie them together. Commercial Features Architectural style,shall be influenced by rural/prairie architecture. Contrasting colors on structures are encouraged. Suggested color palette will follow the existing Prior Lake Fire Station#2, to include reds, and existing limestone colors. Textures on structures are suggested to be rock face block or stucco or limestone textures,with a minimum of two building product textures required to add interest to the structure. Pitched roofs are encouraged to be batten seam metal roofs. Pedestrian entrances to buildings are encouraged to have an awning, arbor, or portico type elements that continue the theme established with Fire Station#2. Residential Features (Low-Medium Density)Architectural style,building materials and color palettes shall be the colors provided as included in the Norman Rockwell series of vinyl siding. Siding will be a variety of vinyl shake,vinyl lap,James Hardie or LPSmart Side shake(aka Hardie or LP), Hardie or LP lap, cedar shake, cedar lap,and Hardie or LP board and batten. The Architectural style shall be influenced by rural vernacular architecture. Contrasting colored wide fascia boards and trim shall frame rooflines and large rectilinear openings for windows and doors. The use of squared inset windows on street facing garage doors will be encouraged. Angled trapezoid windows along eave- lines shall be avoided. Porches,front and back, screened and open are encouraged to promote experiencing the outdoors. Painted wood accents can enhance window openings and doors. (High Density)Residential components of the PUD contemplated in Outlots B and C shall incorporate where possible,the building materials, color palettes and contrasting features as outlined in the lower density housing. Stacked limestone,stacked flagstone will be the dominant accent materials for the high density residential building structures. Monument Signs Monument Signs shall incorporate dry limestone walls,either freestanding or to terrace plantings. Signage will be mounted to the face of the wall with the lettering highlighted by landscape up-lighting or landscaping backlighting. Entry monuments shall be accented with trees,shrubs and perennial plantings as suits each individual location. Landscape Features Alleys of trees create a formal entry,while grids of ornamental trees can create an orchard look. Mass plantings of grasses and classic prairie flowers to create small meadows filled with butterflies reminiscent of farm pastures. Asters,purple and yellow coneflowers,daisies,yarrow and blazing star will provide swaths of color to attract attention to landscape features at entries and trailheads Street lighting and accent lighting shall encourage the use of low-tech,simple detailing to provide a strong visual accent both during the day and night. Individual mailboxes will complement the street lighting style to promote neighborhood continuity. SUMMARY - PRIOR LAKE DOWNTOWN BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES [Highlighted guidelines that may be applicable to the Jeffers Pond PUD] Buildings • Buildings should be sited to create a sense of enclosure through scale and massing. • Buildings should welcome pedestrians with planters, overhangs, etc. Facades • Facades should have: (1) a base that is greater than the height of 1-story; (2) a middle that is 1-story; and (3) a top that is finishing or capping the middle. • A high percent of the facade, especially for those facing public/private streets, should be transparent (glass). Building Materials • High quality finish materials. • Primarily brick and masonry for commercial buildings. • Primarily brick,wood and stucco/EIFS for residential buildings. Windows • Windows should be recessed or projecting at least 2 inches. • No continuous strip of windows is permitted,except first floor commercial. • No mirrored or highly reflected glass is permitted. Lighting • Illuminate the building facades. • Use direct lighting and avoid glare. Signage • Include signage at a scale both for vehicles and pedestrians. • Signs should be high-quality with internal or surface lighting. • All signs should complement each other. Service Areas • All service areas/docks should be screened or contained within buildings. Parking • Parking should have limited visual impact (i.e., behind buildings). • Parking for commercial should be provided by public parking structures. • parking.for residential, hould be provided underground. City of Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance (C-2, General Business Use District) P=Permitted Uses PUC=Uses Permitted With Conditions CUP=Uses Permitted With Conditional Use Permit AC=Accessory Uses Land Use Description C-2 Bank P Business Services P Business/Trade Schools P Copy Shop P Funeral Home P Library P Medical/Dental Office P Museums/Art Galleries P Office P Parks/Open Space P Police/Fire Stations/Ambulance P Private Entertainment(Indoor) P Service P Showroom P Studio P Retail P Adult Day Care PUC Appliance,Small Engine and Bicycle Repair PUC Club/Lodge(without liquor) PUC Dry Cleaning,Laundering with Route Pick-up and Delivery PUC Group Day Care/Nursery School PUC Hotel/Motel PUC In Vehicle Sales or Service PUC Medical/Dental Laboratories PUC Public Service Structure PUC Restaurants(without Liquor) PUC Senior Care Facility PUC Shopping Center PUC Utility Substations PUC Adult Uses(Sec. 1111) CUP Alternative School CUP Animal Handling CUP Car Wash CUP Club/Lodge(with liquor) CUP Convention and Exhibition Center CUP Marina,Commercial CUP Marina,Recreational CUP Motor Fuel Stations CUP Motor Vehicle Sales CUP Motor Vehicle Service and Repair CUP Outdoor Sales CUP Restaurants(with Liquor) CUP Shopping Center over 150,000 SF CUP Community Centers CUP Food Service AC Off-Street Parking/On-Site Parking AC Bar AC© Helistop AC Incidental Repair or Processing(25%) AC© Outdoor Seating AC© Warehouse/Storage/Distribution AL v Hours of Operation for Motor Fuel Stations in Prior Lake Holiday (Fountain Hills) • City restrictions: Car wash limited to 6:00 AM — 10:00 PM • Current Hours: M-F = 5:00 AM — 11:00 PM S&S = 6:00 AM — 10:00 PM • Pay at the Pump: 24 hours Holiday (Duluth Ave) • City restrictions: None • Current Hours: Open 24 hours, 7 days/week Shell (CSAH 13) • City restrictions: None • Current Hours: M-S = 5:00 AM — midnight • Shop Hours: M-F = 6:00 AM — 9:00 PM Sat. = 7:00 AM —4:30 PM, Sun. = 9:00 AM —4:00 PM • Pay at the Pump: 24 hours SDCS (CSAH 83) — Former Kwik Trip • City Restrictions: M-S = 5:00 AM — midnight Car wash = 6:00 AM — 10:00 PM Reviewed again by Planning Comm. in two years • Current Hours: M-S = 6:00 AM — 11:00 PM Car wash = 6:00 AM — 10:00 PM Reviewed in 2007 with no changes made • Pay at the Pump: None after hours Kwik Trip (Fish Point) — Eagle Creek Est. • City Restrictions: Car wash limited to 6:00 AM — 10:00 PM • Proposed Hours: Open 24 hours, 7 days/week r.111 .' •SSU EERicA . r. e A V' Proposed Super America in Jeffers Pond PUD, Prior Lake Design Elements (matches Fire Station): (1) Standing Seam Metal Roof—Colonial Red color (2) Stone Base (around building)—Cedar color (3) Metal Awnings (north elevation)—Colonial Red color , .� .µ y g I g IIII •i . tlh , - -_._ r' a8 Y < u EX •15 I f C . !;4g ! 11i o J IIX;11 t�i! a g ° g 2 z i 1 I Ifi=i f t'i I I I I- ,,. ti,,„ [ i k �,- r4\ iI f v '�� t i,_ • ,,r-- E Wp1 i W A lam,,,. A � A., ,q...:, � i 4 . . 0 . . i,;,,t,.., , ,i_i . , iii_ ,t.;r- Al r=. ! 1-' Iii•.F F ; t I ' •..�. ?,, ..r ,y _ t,s - I a .1 oliiq 1 I i•-,xi..qh 1 i'l 1 g 0 1 0 §g 1 a :g41.1. i §ofii,i I r j I g 4 i Z iblw I I I.f i ii i I 1 4 oithi 1 .: If !::1 0 :1 i 1 II 11 :1 : ; II : ; i fli IN Orli iiiiiiii 11 I il i II e 1. 1 I LW" 1 .1 ilibli 111 1 ; 11! i 1 • Iiiied • iiii 'll ii PilillIOr lq ! ihilill ' 01 2111010W e : 1 :111011111111 .°111#4111111611111411/011ig 6 6 k i itii!.1 ., 1 ( i 1311211/1 P pyre 511i MAI 1 I Iil I ,.., en it jrt7iii1 :1411:r711,1 '1 eo: illtitgl Nig 11I i:?;/.9I111 -• -is 111 IIII i; . . fli" 1 '1E1 II! . 1/1 a 1101.! ti. i wit 1 II a 11 "ha . i 1 . I 1 i 4.ill . . , . I Fit i' 1 ,- • Ili i V I . . . , 0 I '11E1' 1 : - 1 II t#u ,.. ., 11011iV ° i g ' A ir 'IniE wi'llnr! 11110 . i*V 0 qrl rr: .., . ril * ..._..f milYlr1111 _ * i''CzlecIPt e ii e II ,r Lis:. I 0.4 11;.<1414i. k 1 : 1 J I 111'4-•7, . - "1'4;y.'' , ' 14 ' 1- 0: 0 , 14 • 1 I FL, 0 V31...IT 41i'rt,t.4 0 git 1i' -' r.4,,j 1, J;k1 r'V 1167114,:e., ' L • A ,1.' c : ,1hri . 1 . H r , ., 0 „,. „. .._ , E,C , o tiq 7 Fl A qi .1;!ith i -, -in 1 ' - , . ,t ',..,15 iL.41.111 ?—: r z....._- Av.; . . ill'f Cla - , li ' ' - .1 § . ni iii * li .„- ,1,- - e.4 4 * • 00 ,II 11' z ' %V , .. ^ l'ii li e, . I r_ , L- ,. . , , _, '7 1!n inlilli liL I,.. i I cr, Pr , . Him i - C c :Iv�i'l fit o 2 0 .o II C !disi,, N ?< 3 0 I1411i I1 o �� a ai I s n 1 8 ° li , `.ii ;1 it i I II lr . III ill .1I 111 191 �g�rli ,i' ii I ! ile� I i � l } 9 .1 l r , 1 0 .° ! A r il I ° 1 HI diti09/9'1a t !• ° ! 11 ,l , iiIi1!tiih! ijIi I�tQ1ilaiii- ai. 1g6II0Mgd6��®06Iluedti®l ®®®L®® ?ffi g 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cr I^r-i.�.. - --- t 1 t. t I ----- E-oo - o 0 ob w n • Q -1. w 1 a. W i; eL. `I N ICE M e D v 11 _. Cr , .. a . 0 .s, z' o ,i z I 1M ° N a co 3 T t; ., ' 1 ,A 1 a- 1 , , ,. = o- , I ----- . , - . a E 4.44 ; INcew a-- _'L I. jl w • ; ao, o. )1 $, 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Z z' z _ a- ■v a U aF ,,� z o-- z a _ -- Z a J I en a a �• j a 0 1 JJ 1 4P c-i • J S • PROPOSED DA11dPSTER 2uuis\ PROPERTY UEE e` AREA SEEARCH PLANA \\ii . : FOR SCREENING AND - a a 1.1=e., cc a ® si-a ,Ilaalll r a a ® r® a s ® is a ells a s ^ems et i iSIZE COORDINATION. 4 I. I- c. . • + • . « . w , « • • k. •' •' • ' •' . ' ' ° • • ' 1U PAVEMENT SETBACK • ' L 4 e . f. • C+ 20'outwit*SETBACK il .... STAB FOR CAR • . . 'N i . - CAR WASH PANELSIG• \LASH HE101 DAR •' i N I CAR NY 09,49119 EXIT SIGN rrJJ/ CF'Fs • 7 1�.�_,s�] L:2—�: ��r r sr esr f r {� SUPERAMERICA ,sr� ■1a rl r `ry IY •4.'''.4-,,•:.;- %, 1`� CAR WASH t]Ss+_ I IK11 ►` 1__1 _ \, ( 7L. +_1 390 SF _ /'`, ''1'2'.111 .I' / 1 .•'�t Y+ /s -'yam F.F.E.882' .- , _ T,) •'! /�-.[ -1 ma IA It `.s1.- ,4�. x!_63•0• a .::. - COIN BOX . r elm :i:_ > 5 V .V t eatli•i1:y' ":•:.' GAS 61E7 ER WOODEN FENCE %, c . •1�/{/fr/4- SUPERAMERECALoSURE p� ; ly r . N•. 1 :I. 4 il�O lI} FUEL STATION caR SvasH} o < FUTURE ROAD.EXTENSION-� YY T' • ` *3,520 SF ENTFERNCE SIGN�. I r E 15.0' I' F.F.E.983' i;re ; ISP. • L tom E a TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSED SIGN---L' \ 1 I 'I . ( /� II ?:..:141%"_2(+D ll I• '30.0 �I if4C � `€ �� EIMERMSIMPZIArd ., I •r 4 .. ,.. • 4., t..4.. t I 1 9\\. .,o Y ,�, 'COROT ENTER' ITSP. ,,`,.rIa . r $ SIGN --I 9.0'1-- •. IOFF` (Ili © .I �4. - ',,/0I.:.1: _i I I 0 E tf'i TSP. b "- .T . TSP. 3 - ..J..',5 :., E OVERHEAD UNOPY a 2 . -I TSP. �IIII. _ fZA S -i $ 3010 idi ; •Q -:�N �Q e��i,� S L=1E91^R-115CC.l •es •.•'. ': �' .. 66 N I g a=elves I �, .• •'�.,:I :, ^'. +.: .'y „, ,I' ili O 'a .-; 1 61 c ..,::•.. U r 16.51'4)491.4 •!`'. '''_':•':'''':' :'•'-'-`..!'''''''„,.'•:r. 5 rt.,:fff.....':.:....':grA......... ,,.• ...fi-,...• rl .q ---_ I• .I \. STOP SIGN I ` a. •.i •� ei •I. ,•N • % (1/4:'...-'''' '1)- - , I r,.Ir .I nw.a in b �' UNDERGROUND o 'i I o ,STORAGE TANKS) n ., iAl Li) \ 1 5�0� 50.0 r 1: BUT 12 g. W a L40,14E,R=ZOOLA (/{(��� /5 a n_+3xr! tl.Res . 7 1 �1 IIL' I I .\ ►#���`y �` ,r . ~ ''N • 1 - ?�; p}I 0 3 . ..y /,—� �'+r J J v • ''- .I' .FUEL TANK5 .--.I: `q r s • . Is r f _ a o Ras. 30.0, ' N . •—J •J •—' �-' `. ;':2'8`.;;;':1V.: ::)34• : 'e} .r .:}0 •, L EI • I' / _ •• iii f/ :(� / r,• PROPOSED STORT,TATER ` la'•o !L Z - / l / t ,7 r•—' . TREATMENT'POND •_" i-•--' r. ' -- ' e--.. ... ' i--•` •2.OL i L • !'t L ` • C'—• r—' ' ' �—i „,----• „.._.7... „---/ i—' ,,---/ a . LI. AI.' ♦i ` �TTYre . •y E Q ' '' '' '' ' �' �� s ,.t/i. ♦ N5003t616Y d<9 .•a.4• i Et . .i OJt: ; 41.. . i � . .1a. w , ,I u St' • .1.i , 1. i 'r0 � . \ . .� . • XSSAGDOR ` ' . . - ( P. go t .`r v .'— TDREw' /1/4'4,0-4P ( '1. 4 S e _ 11 I ' = ' —`—' ? i '.ILry' erw • 1 I • q _ - 3 e 0 3 0 E - ` - - 1 1 LANDSCAPE BE. Wi ROCK MULCH a T„ _o _. .40 ( j.1.2_, l p_ u vu II ru .. _ .. s ' nnn.AAA n nom- _ VqV6€ruiij� _.1... _ SUPERAMERICA > - "�' LANDSCAPE BE• . 4 a (.. HillCAR WASH --- _ 11,300 SF W(ROCK MULCH 1 1 LANDSCAPE BED .... L..!�.�,.� F.E.E.882' NE f�1 F— ��M.J l Nr �I Immo ?: W/ROCK MULCH �i►•� j�Il- iv: L••� •rl � ..1 :'� �. .. I ' Ill' SUPERAMERICA 4res. .•.•..-..-. 1 1�! x FUEL STATION C� � . ...... 'r r _ 13.8205E - �J����, - ' jll 5 { , - F.F.E.883' 4:•,,,,,++ )).1.1 •f l 4 .'©.'... .� �1 Sri/ •.,� ..:."•.•... 1� - ,,____. .........,.. 'z .g mel' ra�>•tsi . O.. II E S p, ; III i J Iii 9 ........1 11 wS U .... N 3 II .�..... 11 .0 6 ••••.•-•_• til a a il o . . .._ .._ e _"11 if X11 4 ci g t IIS I' I o �t.31 It FUEL PUMP f g� , I a, .. SHELTER j I I II a � U U n b 1it *It 11 0 I u „I _ ✓ , �1 a ¢ 1 11i PI 11 ‘ 1 n1 ,.. 1 V i / ♦ i'♦ 111 € . . 1 r I 10 I I 11 a)' 1 •�� "I 1 j z. o 41 I . 11 . 11 . 1 •......••••••..... ; 11 3. II i; ,u .. .... ..........'..'.'. ii s. ii I! 6;r i _� i......., 111 i 1. 7. a 1 S\ "/ `VJ` I' 994.... .•.. mitimor •�:'.�.r.-r..:.".....• !II .. ,' 1tS /A, kl� G:4f'H. CV 6. 5. S' tO \'` - i.. y`p.�j�C-j�. g I 10. i • -_. .... ..:4'--,J 1 4.'' - 1 I ! ��4,....z., _- 1 - !STING MONUMENT �•.' v 3 s ! \\�\\ ` .i,•= - ..:..�......... .y SIGN TO REMAIN 7, ti. , s / \\ •St 1 Si \�;T LANDSCAPE BED - -._ -.2./%i 12. I E 8, `fib. tee''.• W/ROCK MULCH tee°", ___ ' if - \' 2. `- -----" _`.tom: 13. I e. n� moi; - --z ( g• gg@ PETITION(DATED)9-15-2015 TO CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCILMEN/WOMEN,& MAYOR HEDBERG PURPOSE: TO REQUEST A DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION,CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND;WE REQUEST THIS DENIAL DUE TO THE FOLLLOWING ITEMS: A. AMENDMENT TO THE PUD (Planned Unit Development is not consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan;adopted January 18, 2005. B. The Super America or any similar use is not identified in the overall theme of"neighborhood friendly services" as described in the elements of the approved 2005 PUD plan; C. The Super America is primarily auto-oriented and not pedestrian-friendly; D. A(24) hour 16 pump service station is NOT harmonious to the surrounding area; in landscape, ponds,trails,and natural buffers. Placing this type of"Use" next to a Fire Station is not consistent with immediate life-saving EMS services; E. Beneficial Need: Another service station is not an identified NEED with(12)existing stations in a 5.5 mile radius of the proposed location. F. Mr.Jeffers VISION—he essentially"donated" his farm land to the City of Prior Lake for the betterment of the City,and the residents who are committed to the 2030-40 stated VISION; "High-quality retail and service shops, restaurants, a conference center and resort hotel in a mixed use environment with senior residential housing and parks and trails". The residents bought property based on his commitment to a neighborhood-friendly development as currently described in the marketing materials for Jeffers Waterfront website, www.iefferswaterfro,it.org;Click"Jeffers Pond". PETITION SUMMARY We the undersigned,request that the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota, DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&SuperAmerica(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 22rn y.*7 �'/r� "90- 2 (-N6., a 1474 , S (4. th c 014 SOS424-,0A a 3 OJ4 / it / i) i' �''►-• 4., 4 ,� 5A-17VAA),/ 11-Lb-) 7 l 9-256 PAekvicid L I M`SSrEN P AC. V A IOd. 83'47747841Vz`""7 ! Gvevnl L.-zflloa L�r!�P,► l��I 7� 9 /5`.3 vC.d .�-�, tic PAA-e-.__ /VW -55372._ 10 1/4_0714/1--- I PY0 C.Nc (avt /j''4" 16.4 N 01 PETITION SUMMARY We request the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&Super America(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD as it is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME t_.. ,/,),RADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 8 (20(4 N:Af '- ---YJZ-V-NC . • , 2 t (A ,.<< '4l iso i POC -'AS 5 01"." c--k.-1 e d eecc-,-e- c� 3c-e-eh. 1 [l f 'P... 'fa -1" CTO f>o ----( GI' .5.< Mf./ 5r\I; iGIe es' (6L0(414" 4 6i(- . 1/4( 'P. r_ uli 0--1 3 6- /6 o i IA 'I p N c.,v)vit&.,---\_,- 5 i, a S .t' -- 31O 'a S S kid 3r1/4) )r) cr t h li) zoil 6 (012,(Ari rt{f rt. ( `f 1/4(33 -fhdAtif C-4- id Vi C i--R -Ei prvw.ki. rpt,, 7 . , . 1 / 1133 e,tc/Ave 6 r ,thA) seA. Mord:Kam I G:" 8 1;ifff, l qqfo , 9 1�Q% .eKybtW. iY Zj G/ W �,. LAt1 Y l4.t�' L.�` �1• wA /44/0 of /go. Cry . Mv' - eur��n 11 .r --; r• /YY/.3 . c/.- - 1. .-<",. eL. `ft F 1 / 1 ' I 112 r 4 L: 1.it>� 1 / 1i ,, , _.....e.::42._..„.1.:,,,, / ..;„ 7157 £1�c/ ( G / / / 13 �C�S�'t��/�S'�jGIC'ICGt.CM? 14 / 4. C i A . - •-ds,!(I,C. .n t► rtio t- .."- l ,/ 4 1 1yt!�e� tf Gil ovC Nij nets. / 1 , 4,/....,,,,./.C.411 "'� • A -/ MP' 1 j -- 17 • '4/404r� N. • i ..3 1-) P) ',,,e- iz,t,e CI- PLI ' e ct '11.115'10:1 19 /_ L:... Ar %- ��_ ' fe-/1i/ S~4,4-e,eecv.,7/e 40/71 19 A/7,07-1717 4 d /1/46 :/. ,e : / AV. 20 :=: l.D :� 1 1 c1av CrM. 1 y 1 01Y 3 PETITION SUMMARY We request the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&Super America(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD as it is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 A4 /A — k r e ,/iN/J,4 3 7 ' � �r � 6fi ;(' m,477%e g c 2 Kt( If 5 clquatAct 3-3 3(3 1 o 1 if 'Ns (vscLe A+nt 9 Mali_c 011c, 3 WitbEA Ltecc kov) .+2 e,in-le Pass Nati fVy 1.- cQQ . Ci-)r3' 4 VQA'Nek- P6INe- S NVki C' If 'nr 4,Qk' ila. eiwk 5 c.. u Aft 3-105 Pc Nva Sarva, 12osz nn {w. c 01 6 4-E 646, 3(Dl Posraer /5 inftco f t` S X 7Z Av l� Eklftcb :3&''17 roe u'l€ PAss 1\1 * y 3t'7AD;�2 '� i-i�i'�+�A/L.C 8 Cha Pillecig t's•-•.- 363-i fi cn � p4S5 tii I es Lis c 9 U-1 e* L A-n5 3 LeIS fkyote Pass 10 5'i!'tA f Mt1, ifPq- 3.0 et3'1,14-e_ Pc-6S 11 G-e5'n)fl4,fir} � u1 Foote, 12,- 5- 12 ,r L L.' 1 J`r:ta.-1 rk. I Li 4/11-2. 1 `1,3 '4AJ PttilLtiWWI- El,/ 04/1 ✓ CI 14 Kiz 1--k M v <, l ! I ` '-� C-N(:6779/ Grt 7- j'/. /,J v fiE Mc--t V7D.C°G'zt rte. 15 ( iv f of)) fit' / fi 71 tin day( e.- A/IN) C Y!'iY 'yyahoo. Cart, 16 i14J' 141f10::-. /07V V ft/h/ clOq f ' .J 17 �-{�lv���t� � y� / e � Ai v � H -,98 I5& d., 010 04 18 gilly gor,4 `1Y17 6idati GT-Ai 0/ 19 AlteA,JCA 31401 ! L1Ll eliciay.e, &h rnpjbr h e t PETITION SUMMARY We request the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&Super America(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD as it is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 DAV 1 J) A. POs-2.44( /4-3)3 i=/JGi_4J:� Gdw13%Al .) A " a 1/ 2 01 Jc�K e_ /�{ ��o .* IC `' ? - 2 8 - (y1 t 3 1, ,.,,,.� 0(,,,,/4- (,,�.-/1,/ 'r, a .$f-44, IL els) - L/)--76,7/3 d 4 y c/� ,i1,6Z. AI 4/7/1 i.C:sQ ( , 5 iej 534 4J. s d i ,l Ai us f'(';-,e Atr►1utpo &mac 7 11.-) Si crlat a 11/30 ) Pa✓k cat t CA' 'al 111 •Shl 1c-2 69)o , .1•co, 8 o`'- s _t> ✓1' //OK(f //j ._c- W%1Z0?--t); 5. ?'11 W/. - 70/ 7&% s l4 /4/27 fI G 1 6.oS1� - 14. 7 44c,1"(4 .6 I LF I j (0 (� - ;� Si -- S ted-S�- 11 - - 1-1.3 t-f (4,4..s..s \( Cc. 612.. 3#0 - Se, ) 13 42ri rp :Dinneen I1/ilei £num e ilii rAdhrbnitellevetet 66770 14 All ()O.i k'i'd POW 190/u_cictt Cf Ajit) L LEvv/'16 0 grnetiiLem • : c _ I. a I - 16 iA ' ,) ' 4 i L `T .42p W\luo (‘co-Ant(0--cts9-3 17 Ti` t La i INA-k5,1, 61,4J40, 18 i431 ,,,g,,-,(4 r," , Apv . )ri tY' I aka Ani Ci x'11 Ite-i-rn-al'it ,0-7- is ( -1s fg343 C ,-1(' k �11/► 20 147 , v: _- 5 PETITION SUMMARY We request the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&Super America(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD as it is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 "11 P1 c,;(_,, ) ,- 1107_ Q,4---3i-cit- c, 0f 2-7_14- 7‘-'-i9 2 3 \ALcLdj t 1c\1dlO11Y /L/ 1O1 //If </d r' (t k/i)/rX /6 '/'%111.02).i. 4 a -i--.- eta �y`2 3i j/1 o%C�es/ ,�: 416v VC- � n-- L 3 3.. r' C t /�/1'L/ d'€;".�� 2 � f � � r ���Lr, laK. MA/ 6 4,744. 1Y Al7 )i iA /e/ Xi/ ./f=4, 7" 1 7 LJ A L- 1435. r LLE1- D :47, lade it/Oki 8 AttX1-01&04) `AAs -e- 6[ - Or N Fri; b ( L t, MAIV 95".77 ‘ A // '- 1 y357 5 Acrike c—r est L/`c t/,e P1 ov.. Lek., m 10 / a''� n,q, � 14313 �' (t�. c 1)w , ,(() irr,`©/Z 44-4 fv r "� 11 Alf leo bmi,A.1 14/313 ..Shore_ CrP5 T rive. N4) ?ri or LA Ke 70.1-W7-530.8 12 if ' SoRovsEN 14043 sli-oge cRE -i.D(L I' FZtw.“40(E fw ) td275-0-SL7c) 7 -, _gtc(/ 0 A ,14(P NIA/ _ C . .8.831 14 ,.- / ,e5/ aervi� eil ,k --p co,ct-ei-- -1,- OtO PZ- 6-5-57Z_ Tate- L1 � G d � / �1 r� /� t�4,1_.. 3(0L-) n I\ it I/ 17 A��- O.C.0 36 -71 5 Pic N J 18 3 7� t% gh d �7 �j4 s-s3?,Z i� 19 . 2G 93 -IefFeak ?Jew ,' OIC.) JR!6, AAtdiLt►v S"S"3 )Z 0 74( i--% /1 & 9/ 3-4c=UOc Iltd Pt,y- 14 fitiv PETITION(DATED)9-15-2015 TO CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCILMEN/WOMEN,&MAYOR HEDBERG PURPOSE: TO REQUEST A DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION,CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND;WE REQUEST THIS DENIAL DUE TO THE FOLLLOWING ITEMS: A. AMENDMENT TO THE PUD(Planned Unit Development is not consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan;adopted January 18,2005. B. The Super America or any similar use is not identified in the overall theme of"neighborhood friendly services" as described in the elements of the approved 2005 PUD plan; C. The Super America is primarily auto-oriented and not pedestrian-friendly; D. A(24) hour 16 pump service station is NOT harmonious to the surrounding area; in landscape, ponds,trails,and natural buffers. Placing this type of"Use" next to a Fire Station is not consistent with immediate life-saving EMS services; E. Beneficial Need: Another service station is not an identified NEED with(12)existing stations in a 5.5 mile radius of the proposed location. F. Mr.Jeffers VISION—he essentially"donated" his farm land to the City of Prior Lake for the betterment of the City,and the residents who are committed to the 2030-40 stated VISION; "High-quality retail and service shops, restaurants, a conference center and resort hotel in a mixed use environment with senior residential housing and parks and traits". The residents bought property based on his commitment to a neighborhood-friendly development as currently described in the marketing materials for Jeffers Waterfront website, www.iefferswaterfront.org;Click"Jeffers Pond". PETITION SUMMARY We the undersigned,request that the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&SuperAmerica(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE j ZatkK. a tibi EAILC.AU6 Cr klb0 P Z-11-14 go @ 146,1. Coi-1 2 ;: 7 PETITION(DATED)9-15-2015 TO CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCILMEN/WOMEN,&MAYOR HEDBERG PURPOSE: TO REQUEST A DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION,CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND;WE REQUEST THIS DENIAL DUE TO THE FOLLLOWING ITEMS: A. AMENDMENT TO THE PUD(Planned Unit Development is not consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan;adopted January 18,2005. B. The Super America or any similar use is not identified in the overall theme of"neighborhood friendly services" as described in the elements of the approved 2005 PUD plan; C. The Super America is primarily auto-oriented and not pedestrian-friendly; D. A(24) hour 16 pump service station is NOT harmonious to the surrounding area; in landscape,ponds,trails,and natural buffers. Placing this type of"Use" next to a Fire Station is not consistent with immediate life-saving EMS services; E. Beneficial Need: Another service station is not an identified NEED with(12)existing stations in a 5.5 mile radius of the proposed location. F. Mr.Jeffers VISION—he essentially"donated" his farm land to the City of Prior Lake for the betterment of the City,and the residents who are committed to the 2030-40 stated VISION; "High-quality retail and service shops, restaurants, a conference center and resort hotel in a mixed use environment with senior residential housing and parks and trails". The residents bought property based on his commitment to a neighborhood-friendly development as currently described in the marketing materials for Jeffers Waterfront website, www.iefferswaterfront.org;Click"Jeffers Pond". PETITION SUMMARY We the undersigned,request that the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&SuperAmerica(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 71 1 7(474-- 7h->i Will eir .AV -Tali 16114 CY¢ IVIA# Pr / z� � � ` � %� /, ( ej i� % :i s 3' /IS 3 j.,,,C A- t n)6S--j 37/ (- 1 Milk Pr cit k Gil t mold..k 4 � � l) l 3 1-1( ivt / C(, ,ALJ,/,€), r 5 '' - /64.,p1 3?/;I--r; ) Pi —.' L ! i; �' "!i-iI 7 /T_ 124.; 1 �c�`.4 (-+;'-1L 144l D tvf/'l.r72.-5---i� c�t4rt_ 7( jill ft: (ti. /4,7 .-_,,,_ 8 &-kti c.t. ' y 44(f---_, YS10 6 F o 1H-ro.- Pa..ii IV V) r r l'e"" i-e4 k �t,r .�, D r Doi n +-€ Pce_5.5 ik; ,o l `// fit n 10 cmUr\L� fitY '1 C12 kz) timc. C'05% A!N) -('Lr 1 Ask!' PETITION SUMMARY We request the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&Super America(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD as it is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 Ul U S 3(ps9ci- RuolTh-Nlylitki D- uv)5 2 66 3447 t rs -w -,��1�� (�P, Ccv►� 3 � pe w 40 P ii),/ (czl-e. '11 p J 4'Sz �z3 5 F J 0/ PA-eW Qjt s 36,0 j- T { K-v--'y {` t t4L -C '-Q- `�-o 6 Jc°TT D'l/oot /gift". SHvti-Cels; ,✓rte ,, /vA. Lowe SIN t2- 1i3 .Zzzo 7 4frW p j.1oL - ' f6 ) 4..S C (OPP1%� t�����3— )15- 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PETITION(DATED)9-15-2015 TO CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCILMEN/WOMEN,&MAYOR HEDBERG PURPOSE: TO REQUEST A DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION,CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND;WE REQUEST THIS DENIAL DUE TO THE FOLLLOWING ITEMS: A. AMENDMENT TO THE PUD(Planned Unit Development is not consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan; adopted January 18, 2005. B. The Super America or any similar use is not identified in the overall theme of"neighborhood friendly services" as described in the elements of the approved 2005 PUD plan; C. The Super America is primarily auto-oriented and not pedestrian-friendly; D. A(24) hour 16 pump service station is NOT harmonious to the surrounding area; in landscape, ponds,trails,and natural buffers. Placing this type of"Use" next to a Fire Station is not consistent with immediate life-saving EMS services; E. Beneficial Need: Another service station is not an identified NEED with(12)existing stations in a 5.5 mile radius of the proposed location. F. Mr.Jeffers VISION—he essentially"donated" his farm land to the City of Prior Lake for the betterment of the City,and the residents who are committed to the 2030-40 stated VISION; "High-quality retail and service shops, restaurants, a conference center and resort hotel in a mixed use environment with senior residential housing and parks and trails". The residents bought property based on his commitment to a neighborhood-friendly development as currently described in the marketing materials for Jeffers Waterfront website, www.jefferswaterfront.org;Click"Jeffers Pond". PETITION SUMMARY We the undersigned,request that the City Council of Prior Lake, Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&SuperAmerica(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 KeJIq Far�u /L � fcLL Cf U4Cati P4.4Aside /ll w Ket(e Ka>Zzu , 1. co/y) 2 3 le61.111+5 d(4se (° I . t40 q - ( 3 4 LI---355 -Pax t rtP C- kit I) 5 Sa r n 114 Th rIce4 dc \10 ` go-22:7--F71 ti OMR D , 1111 l �rri. wfv_\1(1Q (A- my ve1210�- Xo75 7 -y % /eri 0 ?dot- r 8 9 10 /6 PETITION(DATED)9-15-2015 TO CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCILMEN/WOMEN,&MAYOR HEDBERG PURPOSE: TO REQUEST A DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE JEFFERS POND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A MOTOR FUEL STATION,CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH IN OUTLOT C OF JEFFERS POND;WE REQUEST THIS DENIAL DUE TO THE FOLLLOWING ITEMS: A. AMENDMENT TO THE PUD(Planned Unit Development is not consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan; adopted January 18,2005. B. The Super America or any similar use is not identified in the overall theme of"neighborhood friendly services" as described in the elements of the approved 2005 PUD plan; C. The Super America is primarily auto-oriented and not pedestrian-friendly; D. A(24) hour 16 pump service station is NOT harmonious to the surrounding area; in landscape, ponds,trails,and natural buffers. Placing this type of"Use" next to a Fire Station is not consistent with immediate life-saving EMS services; E. Beneficial Need: Another service station is not an identified NEED with (12)existing stations in a 5.5 mile radius of the proposed location. F. Mr.Jeffers VISION—he essentially"donated" his farm land to the City of Prior Lake for the betterment of the City,and the residents who are committed to the 2030-40 stated VISION; "High-quality retail and service shops, restaurants, a conference center and resort hotel in a mixed use environment with senior residential housing and parks and trails". The residents bought property based on his commitment to a neighborhood-friendly development as currently described in the marketing materials for Jeffers Waterfront website, www.iefferswaterfront.org; Click"Jeffers Pond". PETITION SUMMARY We the undersigned,request that the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota, DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&SuperAmerica(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME /^ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 ///7 /We7e-- 1 r -<< 3 � C (�{- __ 1010(i 'U-eh F2 r..ci AI `'t. 4 ` C� 1°'( aek $c 1 s; c A 5 `, -2 lO / s i `z1' ' iC >2(F;►�� Jnrhq1 . ?C(Sqa_Kitja.C611.h 6 <1.-';A 4' Li/A 4 7 ) "i(C. a 177' Ke Lc-2,2 c . ��`� i o 9 �y�!� gq3.2- 1,11! 115 fir/ C�ht(1 . I clivi-Pry q•,.6:1 .<� J , /iii •10 / C Y' �� / PETITION SUMMARY We request the City Council of Prior Lake,Minnesota,DENY the Application for an Amendment to the 2005 PUD submitted by Kimley-Horn,C-Store Partners&Super America(the Developer)according to the applicable provision of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances because this Amendment to the PUD as it is NOT consistent with the provisions of said Ordinances and not to be in general conformance with the original PUD Plan. NAME -) ADDRESS E-MAIL/PHONE 1 'Nk.--.1))4 51'n 2 l',r ie& 4 ka -\ /L i-mG B 1,,e..I NA TI-1 NE aj.,./e03`v' < ko-t--14,7.ca.4") 3 1\IA Odelt I -4(-10ta11141-114 /vim, -FvVJ 2-1Z-OZ-6) ctoa, Ce-)vrJN- 4 a OLI/1 I-4;3 AALebivddif-- dOloc4-cw-t)( tt-e •0,0fret_ 5 sgab -lJ C 10. I Li VS Ø/ 'r(J -Ti to L /`cab:©c lati &c_iirUk ti504. 6 �� 1b4 rio l 'ILL (7 ` (v�-kic pct I�� I- ����v-01. pw5 Pafir-Wrdal-ti/ �, 8 7 n iii eCV)are,A 4-1900-firlYoe.„ n rn vt oc- b Aare may ' 9 IA18 Faith,LiT evan .gea,i4.rz i Y 10 y1 ex_ ellAd a - I 3 7( Eke.L eOt; t i Ga 4e 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20