The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBuilding Permit 2006 additional info Metropolitan Council Environmental Services April 21, 2005 Bob Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. Prior Lake, MN 55372-1787 Dear Mr. Hutchins: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has reviewed the SAC assignment for the Deerfield Apartments to be located within the City of Prior Lake. This project should be charged 108 SAC Units, as determined below. SAC Units Charges: Apartments (w/washers) 108 units @ 1 SAC/Unit 108.00 If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1113. Sincerely, .i�) - 4, 66,,,xrda Jodi Edwards Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: (20) 050421SC cc: S. Selby, MCES t � 1„ iUV www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602-1888 230 East Fifth Street • St.Paul,Minnesota 55101-1626 • (651)602-1005 • Fax 602-1138 • TTY 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer of rRro�, ti g White -Building Canary -Engineering �INNES��P Pink -Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT !� -e w ►`�- bc� APPLICATION RECEIVED 2/i/0 CP The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: -3t) U6/.1_3 Accepted Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed By6:2--0 Date: 2/616C0 Comments: I 22,h J^ I Z Nps COIA1l.A.Ck•t`cA.n at) �� Q 6er "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." PRI°1 ti 9 U White -Building INNESO�P (tenant' -Enaineer3nc� Pink -Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT L C /<'_ /,..':/c_ ; r ct F2 C c . C APPLICATION RECEIVED /2 // -/ ' a 0 The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: 4l1J— l log; r4� —?°- Accepted � Accepted With Corrections �• Denied Reviewed By: Date: Va.% 6 L Comments: See Reverse Side for Additional Informationt vf/,'Yr 45,616 f i/or ?o T C. U Egsaw41- .r idol c1 mr,A m 's4- he &core r1v 1 perr►s'f btihj /sSvcl See Attachments: 1) Grading Plan, 2) Erosion Control Measures "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." a OF DPRIC)4; 4Ut=ihite - Buildin �INNEsooP W Canary -Engineering Pink -Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT LCC SetLtliG63 Geocip , i A . C , APPLICATION RECEIVED /21/9 l D — /'7O 9� 4 . .7 c: i The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: ...5-Yu."4.4t: a-VvLDWI/V-49 I/ /, , , , 3. ,, Accepted Accepted With Corrections 1/"-- Denied Denied Reviewed By: 3,t, %-4-:Z.1VeDate: //c71 /€7 4 Comments/) •Q-u-611.4-:66.A, A 1-WA! itt4P*4C / 9-rs ,/114•Y‘ifitt) agf-a.vs-.L., &C-14x4;o?/2s444 -afs.7 "4141%, ''A"" `°41 -84 .‘2°,"4 ' P ta) o. - .' .4. �.., ? i°i , , - 3) 41a-,4 y 0 /V-L-71:.6,0-e.Q R..4,. , 4 £ t4t ""' '403 u.Z. 4 C4 I 11/iFtA4-e-- A- 1' Er.i...i..¢. "0,44.A.d..1- b-42- 74-1-67..0eek . 5:-)/. .ft,,g _i_10.1 -t1-4X4.0.e...• .0-90-r( "2.1-re- , z d.t.c:4.e.co -7‘4.4,- .1-' "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." ,41 ( PR tri White -Building rivNESblP Cana r - n ineering Pink -Plan= BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT ¢F . , APPLICATION RECEIVED i The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: Accepted Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed By: /� /� Date: 3 3/-6f‘ Comments: /4f,T ,� rsinttz— de.- copy, az' " to 79,& .! CeL-TXic acc A44 ,bra / � y Zoe w;// 6e Iei/7c .:a ,/ ZtfrieZ,",,,y, G".017425-41 . "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." ti r71 White -Buildin lana=-Enain_ eerj `4NNEscio Pink -Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT L C e. 5 G 2_om u P . LA , C , APPLICATION RECEIVED iz/ I /O c The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: . , � , Accepted Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed By: Date: 3/ac / Comments: See Reverse Side for Additional Information!, S nsi s f viia,�r 4s.61iUs prior T L. U &tomtit 4r (#4' c'ra;., ows4' be Recor.4I pr;0 'o Pc, 4- ht; swel See Attachments: 1) Grading Plan, 2) Erosion Control Measure* "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FOR BUILDING CONTRACTORS Whenever grading or excavating for the purpose of constructing a building occurs, the City of Prior Lake erosion control standards must be applied. The standards will reduce the erosion of soils into the City's storm sewers, waterways and roads. This handout provides you with the information you need to comply with these standards. An erosion control plan will be created for the site as part of the permit review process. Failure to comply with the approved plan during construction will result in the loss of the $1,500.00 deposit, plus the builder will pay for the cost of the correction work. Build a rock construction entrance and erect silt fence. The silt fence will be in place prior to the footing inspection. The rock construction entrance will be constructed concurrently with the backfilling of the footings. Silt fence will be required, as needed, to intercept water flowing off the lot. Silt fence perpendicular to and across rear or side drainage swales shall be 20' long, centered on the swale, and spaced no more than 100' apart. Silt fence will be required behind all curb at a distance of five feet behind the curb, except at the rock construction entrance, and will extend 10' beyond the property line. The 10' extension may be waived when the adjacent lot is sodded and installation of silt fence would damage the sod. For spring construction, silt fence will be constructed as soon as the frost is out of the ground. Posts will be spaced at four feet or less and driven at least 2 feet in the ground. Posts will be two-inch square or heavier wood posts or standard T or U section steel posts. The rock construction entrance shall be 20'wide and 5'deep and be constructed of 1'—2' clear rock from the back of the curb to the front of the house. It will be the responsibility of the general contractor to: 1. Maintain the entrance and silt fence in working condition. 2. Ensure that all sub-contractors and suppliers use the rock construction entrance only. 3. Keep the silt fence and the rock construction entrance in operation until final grading and sodding have been completed and the driveway paved. Penalty for failing to comply with the Erosion Control Standards. If a deficiency is noted in erosion control on site, you will be given 24 hours to correct the deficiency. It is important that you inform the City as soon as correction is made, as the City will consider the work undone until so informed. Failure to correct the deficiency within this time will result in forfeiture of the Builder's Deposit and the City will direct a third party to correct the work. In addition to the forfeiture, you will be billed for the cost of corrective action. Inspections will not resume until a new Builder's Deposit has been submitted. TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FOR A STANDARD HOUSE LOT Silt Fence 1-4,1 Slope House slope Garage Temporary Rock Entrance