Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdditional Info for 11.0017 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE B� ' G •E,RMIT PLAN REVIEW INSPECTOR • DATE PERMIT�O. /2- 0 a 0 ACCEPTED AS SUBMITTED r ®ACCEPTED WITH CORRECTIONS AS NOTED 0 NOT ACCEPTED-CORRECT& RESUBMIT Thom comments are for your information. All work shall be done in AIM Compliance with all applicable building&zoning code renuiremaMs including items not specifcatlynoted In this review. E144 kklitrPP THIS PLAN SET ON SITE AT ALL TIMES MEMORANDUM To: Highmark Builders I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report Attn: Jason Hoernke was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer Re: Rixman Residence under the laws of the+StOfe of`.iVlinnesota. 14291 Shady Beach Trail 7-7/(4:( /V `_r/i Prior Lake, MN Project No. 2.0165 Nick Hanson Date: 8-31-12 Minnesota Registration No.46665 The purpose of this memorandum is to report the findings of a structural engineering review of the proposed connections for the rear lake-side deck at the address above. The Hanson Group has reviewed the proposed framing and the following is noted regarding the connections: 1. The locations of the connections are redlined on the attached renderings that were provided to The Hanson Group for loading calculation purposes. 2. The positive connections specified on the attached sketch drawing are taken from Simpson Strong-Tie's Architectural Product Group and are galvanized, black-powder coating finished. Should the Builder desire to have specially fabricated connections in place of the Simpson callouts, 1/8" thick steel hot-rolled plating material and identical fastening patterns are to be used. All manufacturers fastening and connection requirements are to be closely followed. 3. A site visit by Nick Hanson, PE of The Hanson Group was performed on 8/23/12 to review the in place conditions and proposed framing. After our review of the above information and associated documentation, it is our professional engineering opinion that the proposed connections will be structurally adequate upon completion of the proper installation of the attached connections. This document applies to the review of the required connections. All other aspects of the project are outside the scope of this document. All construction is to be in accordance with this document, standard industry practice, and the requirements of the Code. Sincerely, The Hanson Group Attachment: Redlined Deck Renderings Sheet 1 and 2 Hanson Group Sketch Sheet 1 Connection Design ,,... . a, m ,... (I, tv a ro CU coo 6 ti ===="- 11 , MINIPMENkfi'.E' 14: —_ ..a.=.,,, li■�1 -- — mmimmigil .aiii 4a .. __ s 1 4`1- . — a�� .,..._,�� ..�,�._,._.,_a..»�....o ii __ aiarrtr.aa i' II iaaaf 03i rarlwrtaaatllrr Ai W+ e+ cs „.., (D 1\., ...„ ca j_ ilio.. A 114-61611"1.1—'aw'-'47: 0 oO 3 .11 111 vit4”ikffm =� taMiYWifiYMi� an t fi_-_.. t,.;t t4"11•"••• y lltlYCiat l 11Jr:. ,..- asrte_...,._...... "11161 Wr• .. ...11"."'"'"'"g*,..t I .. :ItillAWeir alr-- "`>— { talME aiilialii I 111111- IYflAalIIMRtRMti' 'tit1�111111 • t,. ....�: i vwlotrwrsM .. 6 _— m i 'S II*11111111111•111 If ,C -1=. i p 111111---- -S` i Ali . it Caitt-Wit :PLAN c III . ,. ,. , 0-0111 ` P CV 0.1 14. ` X 1t i A N 1 1L Vii . , i c,y o rn . '� �.; ipm al t I id lirl '0 tr.! :1 , di, 10111 WIWI IP! F ®` i sawj biko1 1r 0101101. , OOP � /T MOW WNW iarlr ; riiiiiiii mom taus (i AOC U.Y. 2:, 0.--'1 sumill MIN—i , i. -11140 MEM iii iii . 1 i i i7 A 1V3S NO ONI1:1d38.9 dO'NIW-Al8W2SSV 13315 DNI1VOO 1:13QMOd .,% SH2H10 A8 5L138W31A1HI`d03O ZIXZI 0 1 SH2H10 A8 SH38W3W HVQ2O ZIXZI i ., ' ! MS'd3 SM2HOS SOS NOSdWIS ON01 „%EXf„b/ /M Wd38 21-x21. 01 N31SVd SHOHONV aH N31I1 NOSdINIS.,17X0„%(9) /M 11VM 313E10N00 01 N31SVd 1SIOf dO 3Q15 3NO Sd110_71,. OdE91H HO 9CVHO NOSdWIS w c-SH3H10 S>13H1O.18 SlJ38W3W 'O'O AS 11VM 3131:10N00 'd•10„01. 91. S1SI0f X1030 H 03O XZ „fig SWt/3S 11V IV S013M 13111d '1NOO x��9/A18WRSSV 71331S ONIlVOO El2QMOd .,% S13SSf 0/M S31ONV 0 0 Od991H NOSdWIS(Z) SHV81VOill-J3A HO 9#(17)/M H31d 313HON00.09x0.VZ (3018 HOV3 313HONOO OINI 0381AJ3 „9 X SHOHONV 3NO) SNOIIO2NNOO OINI HOHONV 0„5 NWf110O-01-Wd38 (I)/M(3018 HOV3 3NO) Od1H91-91 Sdn10 1-1-EV NOSaWIS(Z) NOSdWIS(Z) 1:10 I3131:10N00H 01N1 S�IOHON d(t7„% _ ( )/M(3015 H 3N0) \ \. SdI10 99V NOSdWIS(Z) woa•uwdnoZuosueymmm ZLSC-90L-ZL9 lel L7799 NW'41nowAld SH2H10 7el!nS AS S1:128W2W HIVO30 ZIXZI 4LoNeue�,ewl!NL07£ SEI3H10A9 S1SOd HV03O ZIXZI I }o I :sTaagS 31--LC-9 :ewo 99I0'Z :JegwnN loefoad ., 3,,:M Jr, ,r • Q tv 4 ' IJlr in - - i,i�' — _ 44 w/ d1.. . 4c il I.V.A0,_.11 s ��c).- 1 „,.... 11f :// /1(3- „____ ,,„// �ilia ... ,„,....„„ ,, ._„, ,,,,,,,:,, 1 � it �,, r „ 3 ______L___ ..... /1;// I A 4,41 ow \'rn=ti -...._,I,*;1 (( amu. 177 ' i f inier'4"1111111.UT.azi.-.- If "..-114.‘.... / r, ..r., .,., 4,1: ``7c A !r 11 r mit mr CV (';', . 1 .p: ,/ ,, A ( .. ____ 2 vr,„ 'id Ad ....,_.. ,,,,..„. ; 8ean ..K'.-:1-7•\3 41 11I' c; ii Al?l#.tii3OItin1u1\A.„-._7 .....s.o. .\4.1 1111 1 0- ;� _\ 7am ��� LA 'r 11 0 - ,T1s 'moi moo i...... ...__�._.._ y :,� . 111 \ , 1M11 1 \ j H • 11111! , I //Oil • \ 11011=3 ,- 11 X11III Ai : al.1 It'c-w ,,,0, ,,,, it,-,,, -,,,, ca < ” I , !/CC If F -., gq(ygy _ t 1 SC ti cawuJi]. , � oo - iiiiii _ �` ��" _.....,..., _ 1o i ! it-i, NRIIiil lb. ' - II -IIII i'zi i ii 2 \,... tobx IN I ,, . ,..... ,.... ....: .,„„ 1N--N'I: I- , ,,, 1 , i I gOOOls .... a _ . . ,... ... ,. Workspace Webmail :: Print Page 1 of 1 'Print I Close Window Subject: FW: Rixmann From: Jason Hoernke<jason.hoernke@highmark-builders.com> Date: Wed,Aug 15,2012 12:41 pm To: "Nick@HansonGroupmn.com"<Nick@HansonGroupmn.com> Attach: Pegola plan.pdf Nick Below is an email I sent to Brian Schelling at Lyman. Please look at all of the information and get back to me about a site visit. Thanks From: Jason Hoernke Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:10 AM To: brian_schelling@lymanlumber.com Subject: Rixmann Brian I need some design work done at Rixmann. The city wants me to pull a permit on the pergola, back pool deck and stairs and walkways at the detach garage. I will attach the drawings for the pergola but the other areas I am waiting for the elevations. I am going to describe what I used for connections on the pergola, please try to keep the connections within what I did. If not, let me know what I need to do. -three 12x12 posts are sitting on 24"sonotubes,they are anchored with a Simpson A66 (3/8" redheads in concrete and simpson#9x1 1/2"screws in post) -other posts on sitting on 10" concrete wall connected with the same "L" brackets. -Posts 12 and beams 7 are half cuts notched together and lagged with 10" ledger locks -Beams 2 &3 are half cuts notched together and lagged with 1/2"x12"SPAX powerlags -Beams 7 sit on top of posts 11 and are lagged with 1/2"x12 SPAX powerlags -Beams 8 &9 sit on top and are lagged with 1/2"x12 SPAX powerlags -Purlins 10 are lagged to beams 8&9 with 10" ledger locks -Outside beams 8&9 are a mortise and tennon joint into posts 12 and toe lagged from top with 10" ledger locks (Tennon is 3"x10"x 3" deep) -Post 13 is a mortise and tennon joint to beam (Tennon is 10"x10"x2"deep) -Beam 4 sits on top of post 13 and is lagged with 1/2"x12 SPAX powerlags -Top chords are lagged with 10" ledger locks -Purlins 6 are lagged with 10" ledger locks Let me know if you need more information. thanks Copyright©2003-2012.All rights reserved. http://emaill6.secureserver.net/view print_multi.php?uidArray=9IINBOX.2012.20165&a... 8/31/2012 L Riot' 4. 14 4646 Dakota Street Southeast Prior Lake,MN 55372 411YNEsoil` December 7,2010 Mr. Jim Moras Highmark Builders 12237 Nicollet Ave. S Burnsville, Minnesota RE: Plan review for Rixman house Dear Mr. Moras, Following are the results of the building permit review for the Rixman house. The review was based on the 2007 Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) which adopted with amendments the 2006 International Residential Code (IRC). 1. Stairs leading to sport court: a 3'x3' landing is required at bottom of stairs. 2. Stairs leading to sport court: Page 2 indicates 10 risers and detail 2/8 shows 8 risers- explain. 3. A State of Minnesota licensed elevator contractor must install the elevator. 4. Windows that are larger than 9 square feet and less than 18" above the finished floor must be safety glazed. 5. Apply for a demolition permit. A $5000.00, with the payment in the form of a cashier's check or Letter of Credit ensuring compliance with erosion and city ordinances is followed. A is required before issuance. The deposit is returned at the time of footing inspection of the new house. This review is based on a survey that was submitted on November 29, 2010. The City Community Development/Natural Resources and Engineering Departments plan review comments are in separate documents. Questions,please call me at 952-447-9851. Sincerely Robert D. Hutchins Building Official www.cityofpriorlake.com Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4263 ,:-,.e .....„.., .:.;r,hm.+Ya.Rni..Jµ:avRrnw ec.z..M1.1 _ .,,.•+.."S:".,tistpAe.-[:.......,.,. Page 1 of 2 Bob Hutchins From: Bob Hutchins Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:25 PM To: 'Jim Moras' Cc: Jeff Matzke; Larry Poppler Subject: RE: Rixmann Residence Jim,Item#4 in the CDNR comment is an fyi-Jeff wanted you to realize that a fence enclosing the pool is required at the time the pool is built. The lake shore is not allowed to be used for a pool barrier in lieu of a 5 foot high non-climbable fence. The pool requirements will be address at the time of pool permit application. Comment#5 is also an fyi,if the garage is moved back to an area that is behind the front of the house, additional uses such as a sport court is allowed. When a garage is located in-between the front of the house and the road(in the front yard)only storage type uses are allowed for the garage. Also CDNR and the Engineering department are making comments concerning the grading around the garage because the survey shows that you are planning on grading that area. If you are not planning on grading the garage area,the survey would need to reflect that the existing grade is not changing. The remaining items in our plan review letters will need to be addressed before the building permit is issued. It may be prudent to forward our plan review comments onto your clients so they are aware of city ordinances. See you tomorrow. Thank you Robert D. Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 952.447.9851 Fax 952.440.4263 City Email Updates.Sign up now. Original Message From: Jim Moras [mailto:jim.moras@highmark-builders.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:57 PM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Jeff Matzke; Larry Poppler Subject: RE: Rixmann Residence Bob, Just need to clarify a few of the items CDNR Review 4)We are not permitting for the pool. When we permit for the pool a fence will be included.The pool is shown because it affects the grading and retaining walls. Based on our meeting in October the fence is not a requirement of the house permit because we are not permitting or building the pool. 12/8/2010 Page 2 of 2 5) We are not permitting for the detached garage.The detached garage is shown because it affects the grading and retaining walls. When we permit for the garage that will be used for"storage of vehicles and other equipment incidental to residential uses" and located in its designed location that meets all setbacks and ordinances.At this time we are not permitting the garage, so I am not understanding what you would like on the survey for the house permit? Can you please provide some additional direction prior to the meeting, so we can expedite the changes on our end. Thanks Jinn From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins©CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:37 PM To: jim.moras©highmark-builders.com Cc: Jeff Matzke; Larry Poppler Subject: Rixman Residence Jim, See attached plan review comments for the Rixman residence. The review is based on the survey submitted on November 29,2010.All of the comments need to be addressed before the building permit can be issued. We have a meeting set up with you tomorrow at 1:30p at City Hall to review our comments. Surveyor Woody Brown left a message stating he would like to get a copy of the correction items,I do not have his email address, could you forward this on to him? Give me a call if any questions. Thank you ' ' 641 '' Robert D. Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851 Fax 952.440.4263 City Email Updates.Sign up now. 12/8/2010 Page 1 of 3 Bob Hutchins From: Bob Hutchins Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 9:09 AM To: 'Jim Moras' Cc: Jeff Matzke; Larry Poppler Subject: RE: Rixmann Residence Jim,See attached plan review comments for the Rixman residence.The review is based on the survey submitted on December 22,2010.All of the items need to be addressed before the building permit can be issued.Most of the items are related to the survey;such as missing contours and grades being too flat.The one easement needs to be moved to the proper location and that may effect the house location.We had spoke about eliminating the easement at our last meeting,have you researched that possibility?We would welcome you to meet and go over the comments for better clarification.The building plans can be redlined if desired.Give me a call if any questions.Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851 Fax 952.440.4263 City Email Updates.Sign up now. Original Message From: Bob Hutchins Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:25 PM To: 'Jim Moras' Cc: Jeff Matzke; Larry Poppler Subject: RE: Rixmann Residence Jim,Item#4 in the CDNR comment is an fyi-Jeff wanted you to realize that a fence enclosing the pool is required at the time the pool is built.The lake shore is not allowed to be used for a pool barrier in lieu of a 5 foot high non-climbable fence.The pool requirements will be address at the time of pool permit application. Comment#5 is also an fyi,if the garage is moved back to an area that is behind the front of the house,additional uses such as a sport court is allowed.When a garage is located in-between the front of the house and the road(in the front yard)only storage type uses are allowed for the garage. Also CDNR and the Engineering department are making comments concerning the grading around the garage because the survey shows that you are planning on grading that area.If you are not planning on grading the garage area,the survey would need to reflect that the existing grade is not changing. The remaining items in our plan review letters will need to be addressed before the building permit is issued.It may be prudent to forward our plan review comments onto your clients so they are aware of city ordinances. See you tomorrow. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins 12/29/2010 o* P�O�P N u I B u i 1 d i ng Permit Review Community Development& Natural Resources Department 4fINNESOiP Memo To: Bob Hutchins, Building Official From: Jeff Matzke, Planner CC: Date: 12/27/2010 Re: Review 3— 14291 Shady Beach Trail-Rixman The following is a list of comments from the CDNR Dept. review: 1) In accordance with City Ordinance, "The pool area shall be enclosed with a non-climbable type safety fence at least five feet (5') in height to prevent uncontrolled access to the pool area, and the fence shall have a gate self-closing, and self-latching with the latch inaccessible to small children and at least four feet(4')from the ground level. The fence shall be completely installed before filling the pool." 2) Per City ordinance detached garages in the front yard "may be used only for storage of vehicles and other equipment incidental to residential uses." One option would be to move the garage back behind the front building line of the house (out of the front yard) and reduce the slope against the neighboring property to eliminate the need for a retaining wall. 3) A statement must be provided by a Minnesota registered surveyor indicating proposed lowest floor elevation is a minimum 909.9 prior to foundation inspection approval. A FEMA report will be required prior to temporary certificate of occupancy issuance. 1 PERMIT TRACKING FORM Address: / 1 / Sid y eCx Description: Sh3 Application Received: /0, �` / d i iii '44 �ff 5 p e D to Days Elapsed Initial Review Conducted /o / /671 Applicant Called with Corrections &"✓1/1-( L Corrections Received a")el ii 13o n Corrections Reviewed Final Review Applicant Called PIan�nYng'Department ., s .a yux 7 Date Days Elapsed Date Reviewed Initial Review Completed ((J Corrections Received i� t Corrections Reviewed 7,/ Final Review Applicant Called Engineering Department —Date Days Elapsed Date Received Initial Review Completed / 7-ZO < Corrections Received /"A Corrections Reviewed ///h/ Final Review Applicant Called Initial Review Time Correction Review Time Initial Application Date Final Corrections Received: Applicant Called W/Corrections: Final Applicant Call Date: -1 Days Elapsed: Total Days Elapsed: DEPARTMENT OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING AND INSPECTION INSPECTION RECORD SITE ADDRESS ( z. `A. TYPE OF WORK f >,> t Tt(.3 USE OF BUILDING A- 0-- PERMIT NO. I I. 4-55. D aTE ISSUED f f BUILDERto+..., '- . PHONE # q NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT FOR ANY OF THE INSPECTIONS BELOW THE PERMIT IS BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT INSPECTOR DATE FOOTING PLACE NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED FRAMING l FINAL FOR ALL INSPECTIONS (952) 447-9850 YR;