Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Retaining Wall 15-0810
DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED Z ifillco ADDRESS M ° 70 fI G P 4 ,24 OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. r5—. a 10 ❑ FOOTING 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EX/GRAD/FILLING ❑ FOUNDATION 0 MECH RI 0 COMPLAINT ❑ FRAMING 0 WATER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE RI ❑ INSULATION 0 SEWER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE FINAL ❑ FINAL 0 PLUMBING FINALASLINE AIR TST ❑ SITE INSPECTION 0 MECH FINAL �/p� COMMENTS: OP0.9-- O/K / � ORK SATISFACTORY,PROCEED CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED ❑ CORRECT W RK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector. Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH&c SAFETY! uvsNorI O* PRIp� CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, Date Rec'd TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE �� V&- A.0- x AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT U 16/ ti I. Pinke FiCit I PERMIT NO. y— g ID .....„.." ��NNES��� 2. City 3 Yellow Applicant (Please type or print and sign at bottom) Z NING(office use) ADDRESS _ �� l Li 10 pt JG-i e, le. c,t'' ' .eJ e'(�t r �t7�.V..�. LEGAL DESCRIPTIION office f.; 1: K-�C/)..,- �r LOT BLOCK ADDITIO! PID4R5"t041 O/ "7' rk. OWNER (Name) V�+ re Si- r-o\I\ (Phone) (Address) BUILDER Ad ta/evn G P..ir/4 (d (2,1 I S`'`�Cu�l�,r-e-s i1 (Phone) q Svc` 4(17 J 73 (Company Name) �-+ ^-�_[{'7�7 --rZt' - akt A►'tR 11 (Phone) (i Z.' 3 ' (Contact Name) �1 /�r � (Address) 5-6 5-0 SAWAI t Etre, �r tr . ar �--& C ! w cc r72 TYPE OF WORK ❑New Construction ['Deck ❑Porch ❑Re-Roofing ❑Re-Siding ❑Lower Level Finish D Fireplace ❑Addition ['Alteration ❑Utility Connection , . 1 cd I ,�w J ACLryk.ew CODE: R.C. ❑I.B.C. ,,J I Type of onstruction: 1 II III IV V A B PROJECT COST/VALUE $ Occupancy Group: ABE F HI MR SU (excluding land) Division: 1 2 3 4 5 I hereby certify hat I above-mentioned hprop'r% furnished that all consation oniction will conform to all existing stathis application which is to the e and loest of cal laws and will proceed in coma. accordance with[submitted plan owner I amauthorized that the building official can re permit for just us . Furthermore,I hereby agree that the city official or a designee ei upon the property to perform needed inspections. z Date X Contractor's License No. Signature Park Support Fee # $ Permit Valuation k is r O V© _ # $ $ t��.`c0 SAC Permit Fee $ Plan Check Fee ,$ 4 t" .A5 Water Meter Size 5/8"; 1"; / $ Pressure Reducer $ State Surcharge J 87' $ Penalty // $ Sewer/Water Connection Fee # $ Water Tower Fee # $ Plumbing Permit Fee $ Mechanical PermBuilder's Deposit it Fee $ $ Sewer&"Water Permit Fee $ Other Q Gas Fireplace Permit Fee $ TOTAL DUE $ ... 7.--0 . V ��/4Lv �f /S oved Paid 7 Re ipt No. 11 K0 I This App' 'ti i Becomes Ytour Building Permit en Ap, _ 1 I Date ? l L1 BtilditAiri b....._. Date This is to certify that the request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requested. This document when signed by the City Plan er consttutt temporary Certificate of Zoning compliance and allows construction to commence. Before occupancy,a Certificate of Occupancy must be issued Planning Dire or or ‘ - 1 Date Special Conditions,if any 24 hour notice for all inspections(952)447-9850,fax(952)447-4245 4646 Dakota Street Prior Lake,MN 55372 O1 PRIG H U Memo '4F YNEso* Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016 To: Janet Ringberg From: Lynda Allen Subject: Retaining Wall Permit #15-0810 14970 Pixie Point Circle The retaining wall at 14970 Pixie Point Circle has been completed and the file is closed. Please return the $3,375.00 wall escrow to: Greg Stroh 14970 Pixie Point Circle Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 Thank you. Lyn S. Allen Buil ing Services Assistant Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245/www.cityofpriorlake.com �'Wio �,, City of Prior Lake RECEIPT 4646 Dakota Street SE a03 A. , ,: Prior Lake MN 55372 0 952-447-9840 - /�a jltiTS 1 ,. Receipt: 1437 Received Of: Date: 05/26/15 G A And J A Stroh Customer: G A And J A Stroh J 'c ipt Items' - ,. .10 ipt Description s GL N9mker -, ' ''' T Demo Permit Escrow Wall Escrow/14970 Pixie Pt Demo Permit Escrow 3,375.00 Receipt Total 3,375.00 TENDERED: Checks 5426 3,375.00 Total:3,375.00 I 1 l e v r 1 . r 3 5., zea �y ( `a Y#, g M (. \I 1 "EXHIBIT A" ruts-a b FOR CITY USE ONLY 8 Ali _____ PERMIT# ',!,,,,L,-,Ntse B DATE EXCAVATING & GRADING PERMIT Applicant: xiV dy Aced. Lk)c,11 9-1-vA:. u c.c.s. iT►rv., Phone: (Pt Z, -361 -4161 Project/Development Name if Applicable: t-(S10 C kt,e SPC:A1" C►ira't Address: S&SJ Steurgie. w t ccv%e + Pru\-r 1,.,(► t W'") S-5372- Property 53'72Property Owner: G►rca3 S+rJ tN Phone: ,[7.--71 .-. 4/57 Address: `Aci GB g x.' a Pc>:".1.- Pct.()r i- e. MK) 55312. Contractor: <tc14are.ed U...)cA Si-rv-awres i l"c.. Phone: ttt 3 .: -410 Address: 5(,So SN-c,rv►ew L-."-c- Pet.-r Lalc-e- MK) C53-12-- Consultant Engineer/Surveyor: Ail tc i'* En ►y+ttr iv 3 Phone: bit- 1S-ti 3.3 G Address: 33 Pofjt Itv-e- 5.7sv.te 300 W ts . Vnh► 5V-its. Emergency Contact(24 HR): Te,rrki t t,s1r e.1I Phone: 61Z -321 -4'7,1 Location of the Property: twtio Q► ,l t co:4-1'r' C►a-c.A e 1 10(1.0r %-a i 'YYW 5S-372- Legal Description: Will the excavation or filling be in a: Watercourse Wetland Upland Purpose for the proposed excavating or filling: Re Lc. +,,"..bcr wa.l►s C3..%, tc.l ka. S'wNe wcgtic Estimated start date: - 8-15 Completion date: 5--I - 15 y What is the type of material to be removed or deposited? _ (5 ,,,aNs. C rvsv,e4 I►A.e-s-t-D,"(2.- What is the quantity of material to be removed or deposited? i ov [,V What is the total area disturbed for excavation or filling? In what manner will the material be removed and/or deposited? D w..p4romAc.. What highway,street or other public-way will material for removal or deposition be hauled or carried? Pixie Pt) 1504-1~,13 What, if any,street,avenue, lane,alley, highway, right-of-way,thoroughfare or public ground will be obstructed? No e. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY AND THE BURDEN OF THE APPLICANT TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE THAT THE PROPOSED EXCAVATION AND/OR FILLING COMPLIES WITH THE OVERALL CITY OF PRIOR LAKE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. SAID BURDEN SHALL INCLUDE THE FURNISHING OF A REPORT WITH SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS OF A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. Will proposed excavation or deposition affect the City of Prior Lake overall storm water management plan?Yes No X If yes,explain proposed effect "EXHIBIT A" SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: A. Completed application form B. Map or plat of the proposed filling or excavating showing location and amount of material proposed to be removed or deposited,with a description of the area C. The depth or heights to which such removal or deposition is proposed throughout the area and the proposed angle of all slopes to be shown on a 2' contour map at a scale of 1"=50' or larger. The proposed and original contours shall be shown including all property within 200' of proposed excavation or deposition and shall be signed by an engineer or surveyor registered in the State of Minnesota D. Erosion control plan E. Effect on existing utilities F. Application fee G. Amount of Letter of Credit, or deposit of monies in a sum sufficient to pay the cost of restoring a site. The extra ordinary costs of repairing, highways, streets or other public ways along designated routes of travel and to pay such expenses as the City may incur by reason of doing anything required to be done H. Public liability insurance CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. Applicant must call the Engineering Department for erosion control inspection at (952) 447-9830 prior to earth moving activities. B. Maximum 4:1 slopes are allowed in "maintained" areas except approved by City Engineer. Maximum 3:1 slopes are allowed adjacent natural resources. C. Slopes greater than or equal to 3:1 shall have approved erosion control Best Management Practices installed immediately after finished grading. D. Minimum grade for drainage swales shall be 2%or greater. E. Removal or depositing of material greater than 400 cubic yards requires a conditional use permit, unless it is part of a preliminary plat application. F. Applicant is responsible for obtaining and meeting the conditions outlined by other permitting agencies including but not limited to the following: DNR,Corps of Engineer, Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District,Scott County, Mn/DOT, MPCA. G. Applicant is responsible for all damages to other property or facilities as a result of work covered by this permit. H. Applicant must call the Engineering Department for final grading inspection at(952)447-9830 prior to release of grading security. I. Additional Conditions: THE UNDERSIGNED HEREIN CERTIFY THAT THEY HAVE READ SECTION 706 OF THE CITY CODE AND ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT AND AGREE TO FULLY COMPLY THEREWITH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OR ITS DESIGNATED AGENT. Applicant: Actva►.ceWJ.jt' Ji-rv.c. �rt-.� L , r€f'/ Q4n1jDate Property Owner: Date "EXHIBIT A" IMPORTANT- BEFORE STARTING WORK EXCAVATOR AND OPERATOR'S NOTICE This notice is to inform excavators and operators they must comply with Sections 216D.03 to 216D.07 of MINNESOTA STATUTES Call Gopher State One Call (800)252-1166 or 651-454-0002 Or go to www.gopherstateonecall.org • Smart Phone: http://mnticketentry.korterraweb.com FOR CITY USE ONLY AUTHORIZATION OF PERMIT Financial Guarantee Amount$ Financial Guarantee Type (Letter of Credit,Bond or Cash) Permit Fee$ Liability Insurance provided? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Insurance Certificate must name the City of Prior Lake as an additional insured party) In consideration of agreement to comply in all respects with the regulations of the City of Prior Lake covering such operations, and pursuant to authorization duly given by said City of Prior Lake, permission is hereby granted for the work to be done as described in the above application and submitted drawings,said work to be done in accordance with this application and submitted drawings. ENGINEERING OFFICIAL Date Permit is valid if signed by City Official PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(90 days from approval date) Planning Dept.Initials ti to .' CIVIL DESIGN II 1 I' I. sIoAI. S INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS REA DESIGN PLANS 10 CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200,Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 www.cdp-us.com 1111111111111111111." ." 1) LAI CIVIL DESIGN t,.., rROFESSIONALS JULY 13, 2015 Mr. Robert Hutchins—Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372-1714 RE: 14970 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE RETAINING WALL DESIGN REVIEW Dear Mr. Hutchins, I have reviewed the cross section plan provided by REA Associates for the retaining wall at 14970 Pixie Point Circle (Project#15-0223). The design meets all minimum safety requirements for internal, external, and global stability is thereby acceptable for construction. If you have any questions,please feel free to give me a call. Respectful!, If Michae ' ohnson, PE Civil Design Professionals • 8609 Lyndale Ave. S.,Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55420 • Office 952-303-5312 • www.cdp-us.com 1 60 23 3 6/24/2015 COPYRIGHT 0 2015 '� ; �p m T v i g or w N 1 EaIa _ y- p yy s {� $ 3 �Cc ,4 2mZ C ' si z Z PV z o r /D yam v,C)m m=z� '7" .+r0'- p C v'Smm ,, 3 W ,�• :. p 5r-6E Cp m1D 0 m n O; m ()zm QCZ >-4m c-,;cm ��..ySS L� O�� Z C O .q8 v^, �,O _S m P D ,Z.�2'zr.ati m OZ R. mm-. - r - yc z ((A 7r2 C)p.H-Zz 01 CO Op- - ZG Cr) pin P,y ZZm 8 azQ ,n pz zzY e . e e n°H c 0 a z n�ra zzzzogz , n, ",ai am� '-H aaZZ'ar+ 0 4 my G.. rt., -; ,,'i Z mm 52- r° iN 7 o o Umm p7 p S £' Z C�.f'n p m T '0a 3 '''-'e0 r c3, cH `Na co mmpr a mO 0 o b', , a ymp,"•G9 G > a3 ; 2rHC� �7 G o z n a mmmZv • Z 2" F Wc' C Zm m m c,/, z-„,';g z 7n" ,r._, O G r Nm m � G nCZ [y �p u O 3F �v, 2n H ��� 'C 7� p y ° I amy °ra ♦ . mz / / .f 1....r..4 >I< e. \ T / 4 0-4 ,,. , „ ,_ rr, ii----7,:!.4. ,\ . 5 6,, t Z 1X1 a 4, f 0 w `;'Y 2 x -A WV a 0/ i —wILI Z ,___AZ ;e6-- lir Z pv rrl n XRV)'Ct7 z rri ��xzO1i w rc rrlP;li IP; HPJ dli �Crocc y �ppH ZCZ Sr CC HHto'o m o„�� z ��z� b � r� o m OF roOr9- 1 ,-.Q8 r O�" il7�r �mr�g�r, fJ n w ZHO-i F, .. cn yrol°' n r' 2i,H rGZmCxi Ki cm ; '''''' n2HmCmy CG C�- T Corr- Z,ypD Cc y `LC p c� z or "1:,-,, >F10 o (7- JH . mq off °m c, ,i, (71m7pH GZC,T,w 'nmC) p F `.' �pKrL -C 3R, '<,am Dm mm c.+ mm •ot'a9n r ° ♦ J C'�_cpei r� Omr (^;Z � �'CF yr y Dpp.ro¢ mH�C YCi�! Q F<i, .z �, G nmKa ,-,4 H p-. m and Q2 p a m Z w-,,7.,. r m O myym C Z :it: O g� y> 5...3 pm C) m �.• -C° y �,Z� �(�Gv,� O OQ en ` OnzjH C, O 9°p- -mi my S Um� HrP H ZZg--tt CS=1+ , 896 dZC-I v:2 21('m H"' C�7 z°Ow Z°py�, ",;Zm no c.„,2.. z. Gm.„m 6z ° p nc› y x P OZ r O pm CCP- mZ°i zz 9c ,-- -i-km ownPD 'z0 - 11! ali ��� � o� z�3M �ycN o�zzo °�m�� :2: ya ���ZP-�'i>�>°� z��a� K'�2�r iz0 mOmN m C Nmm..m 53Z�-<r mr. ro �' m yC 'd�, `< mnC2. zc)Om cm �O mC'�, ,mmZ Ped C-1 .o zz. r0Civ,Z U�m2� O,<mC �K mSC '�•r+roOm ''CMP �"='n 44 �8a 41 o PGS z�F ; 4›.,T1'' 1 PO F ^ -4 Or4g,' TO m n... �Z.. 8E-.7d m. d 4 Sm ;a ,Fi O-Cm �.r �+.p Om rrnp GO•!"J 9r-i, 7cm0 i= 11 REA DESIGN PLANS LI 1 15-0133 6/24/2015 COPY5.50101 0)2015 • rt o 4 73 Al P 1 - m rxi-m yi� pi c��"r'I'..'• .... y Gm�'i�m` 2mS k $ m 3 7 �yy ?z _me m ,m-. z x 5_'�'c m PvC�,.`. �a oam mc AW MTm sz o ' �9 o<z z OUB M j �C) ,- • Oa F p C �x x, zyN D zp mT zzz ,o zzzu a�cc,oz root o ".F" '< x9 F' c' Coecum --.2 yz co 0 Y yam > M a • xriYm-. ro4x z ZC .. '„t" ,,f4 yEe mm� O.ROv_i Esa <mi3Oz Z t c mmz A Cr YZm T M ' KO£e - O p V^,mr' z m • Om P xm Ur w , r m •,-i,i Appr ,, zH WOZC nz / 8 8 z ,-'2 C3 -i C XC• C*t :4 n --1 j.y P y 7.00' r Pm- z Z m MH .-i ^i \ m r rm m C. c. ,, Or i \ I PIMP n A I :Y ,• ^` � , . y g M \ .' :1'..•';,;:.;;::',.0k 6.33' 4.33' y ( 1 D 4 rri 16 z \l-I O 2-xi m • mi i \d, at mor rt-ww004 GO aro 7d O O o z C .,.....,.; !��'a�:? �„!►.\ C zz v zCr r>m Q mzn orrom m • jro O te w V I '�<•...!•••••':•-,1.!.. O ice.' ,c \\ ° e\fit 21o o :...*.":•',"..•A,"i',':...''..• ra 11 -111 • Ili : li::::. a\i i \\ ;::..::...:!••••;-!:..:*.,".. a . cz \ w - o \ 12 m0le4 ar R. 2 m 15-0233 6/:1/2015 COPYRIGHT R3 2015 - •c cn w o L y ?c r z r C C`. ca a °m .. D D m i; a m .. 3 g tD �x my a as a o w� r- n.,- 7r OCa np z �b QG �Y Y �17 �,`�'zt 0 m nD Pz Si' ra0� z T m >6 CC),z v, m• nz nr*'' r0 -mi--z '',m=,z rZ�r iy G › r• s mz zpG >-9Ir, 'z5C' . Ym o z 'm g °' a z 2' o4 TH r� zr >8zr z , ab^ z 7+ 71 Ainn ��_ °G mo-ii? G p y .4 ymTn CZC C Cz YC 3 C ^C Hm> V•mz 2 rrl „„.t. (-)9Z cn 7' ,.. ;ia 2 r) n v, , AZ z Z w ' g 7 Ytr. yD C r-y a7 - ° ^^ >°m G9C Zn-Ia ,C.za >,ip r"} 'cy w $ $ w y nca T0z a0n C7 ^ 'c m;, Z Z J Mm 'n' y m£' •'C,.0 r2 cn rZ Z... ^r z m Z �i3t O 0 d r § 2 � m c6 ..z Nma b9 m °.^-> �, a �- m ry< ,aa 0 E R ' ° Gbc 4.- G ° v v:G r �C mr Z mC. c2, Sn m ° o- - O mH ? m 9 zPO and z£'� 7 C.-1 7� pn., x -2.0 'rra t-O^ z_rnC C cr^ Z^' O ' M z � cnc7 mm c>� to t0 +7'b Z pa 9• n,c) c0;-=,'0 m zzp a,na 7 i, �� a CF G ' TC z2�, C,.., r.. 9 yZ r0-`,,6� r..c�• Gx "2'4 '4 D>ym v,S v-4'Z chi. F2C�L. 5 'h Z z z^ D 00r) r�i 'z9 kF. E`6 F. Lz > mc> ~nm rr, , P. 7<71 � �? G 7 9 i' O V--,9 gp757ff m w v C m r r za- ,t T fifi� � n_m � � K y_� yy� <Y �m on zHy �z 9 m, m z^ 55°-1 Z, O7a0� , rlcm pC zz D9 mG C;vvr m r Z� 7. r pc:F yy pp> ry r^ m FCz Cm ZDn V nzy z0 Omn f�A ,ySZ r-• m� z ON m9 y� >° =apCE v: �m „7. C C '-Z C-im 4 a H1H, nD � �, "°� Z('; ^rt GC m'Z c�. " - yyC Qz Z "' .yp ^p +'1m C7� n^. p • �m zn ,r4 r'' z T O mz Ocr-; -�i,C v -I c.� dim ram H-Iz m C;S mmm yr G Z 1 Z3y cf .-1 44 7'X t+�,m Ste' Sx U., Z O aCc M 9 r. A'• up c^ Z 20, D 00 Cra m G Fr CC -r,; H 'Z ›c Gy2 -,-4 a H z a� Dz� m° '>y 3' a m co c sN nm h ;m ,En� z ° m zz Y pc- °CyS -zip m m dz mD yG '`'F mC Dn 07 vOFy rti CAC n �T•[•• ?>C m1,+ Om F'-m 'Z� cC,.'! z� ,„ �H'U 7. zU' m K�Ca. 0 rn C z � r6 m> F 3 ^y a xm Om' 9m G 0Om �° H'9z 2 m K r. y> G bz 0. O (c z z� �� a 2 "T,o ? C4 c rm o� ',x nm �K zG Z zyy a•. a .^ "4 C z '2 y.{ pp O` yC O ,r' OH n-.; '0H Z •zn �J �m "rp r = w v,r1+ .. H a�4...,'....9 Zz ,TS, z cCc��H T zT '.Z �C C m CC: C 0 od „DS ZZZZ m� cy HY Uz ,<, cc .T C do SZ rx G C9 ^2 m mx z " j z V m' M F .z -y y za "'^ �2 . m� z� a CH ° zo v.V n" n m$ z y. Z V..'' Z f "F C OG r. y z yp 99 ° mJ 'yZ z P r-�yte "qz z Oz �, z a9 Si---ae 3 C m Cpm z o . FO DCcn z�i, 'Pym m CC m,. w p N p O ., O E r; ? YCy� ? „ ? „ az a am O C.my c.yr r O C mC'^ p TC(")C) < HC; ,^y^� 'c 3cz,. G ^( T z mzm Z' 'tumm y z K—G OO D OO v:5 m 0 G— Gr` O 7)>'''0-S *M � :a , �. Vc xmz . o zz y zy H-"•' o tiz m mH �m� ba7 mZc G a-fy'p z m z� c7� z'" z ='xP ya nnC O,i Z r�'c y9 •-7,F. z m7'9 p S m n Z Z < y v C7' 2 ,Z, <' -'' ',4 °,- > 8 C yF•`zyG9 `� r' r55 o50 NO mnCj z �,C z3 .O > c o 'Y G A ? m<�' C�`�p y p •ye ZrCZZM zC ap 9Y<a m ZNz, ar �ro SF Zmr Z .0 " r�� -„'"' `d` fl c, ''U r Z�.-' -s +' ;� � mX�i m Zzv, r 'n 3. m U> mH m xy .` d y �'pr > 2p m .� ° 2 •gF > ZZ a c�r� CC') mk_ Zrri c,.. - C zxm m(0r�s om ^ Ovyr ? CC yr ° `�y rn m h_ �Zm �a P $ g * n',v'- i?,• o ? 8 - m2 m g ."., ?, i .xi^. `^ r m m m ;,'Z m m H Yn ttb77 v, N m C C) a4 Om m Z'i �Ci OO 7.z D7" ym �' fir, Q yAcn / mz Ob 9 zyd �P r"1r.rF., Z•m �'� Yn mm rc k S n v=> E ° co a cmm GN z9c H�HC' yoz <O �r �' 3� 8> cgo cZ" Z� a m 9-{ nC m ° O,�i, O� �m ZK C „n z Z :� 7'� C Y .C w C C z Z n ,b m F G -i �g>OH '83 g r� aF', VY �P C Off, ZOa Y,m C zy � x w z z, Tii C .., s �• �mA 5 C � r2„r c% ti ro C C Z r -1 C? y ..{ 5 y m z m A r 7' C� 7�C PA oC Zp b C O m �m z O C_ CC'cn rn 77 y'�'+�'"m 3� � tonnt' z� yzz 2 T.' 'QTY, Y mxc0a k A - A� m � ° mm Hz zC zV rit O Yn' C °� CXb P z rt1Zv2mm b7,.o '5,4, 2 z OO 0 C „m� c. n , OZzSV' 4P H H • dH p mmn g CQ OZHr ZH 0 n P ra ? i ;a m O C) m p O n x m m n 5 > cn am La z =sZT ,P G -a�'•x�c c- p• rDc'aoCz'• zam 2Hcz Gc9yZpS�Fcnm,-8C7' m0f. pHZ g8 H m° n2 ! r v mmCzFO• C xC �DGoa �-A zic �yO^ � mazmC V� nHHo <m4. Zrwz -1P>-4'100• C � rr, nZy>man 0� p0 � oOm ^' Y -i � m -mrnr, mr w-5,. H m C ig om rt Cz7zmC K °• aSy Cy: ZO °oaC0..-i0yv� m � m .0Vy - GmG ° poCmzgm-"i <gZCOv. ymm vG mm,cE rte,r" mU C zm oa ya msc o 5.1,,, Poz o co �% 5� zGqF> Dx6'''P m cTzzGz °m om oD ° ~ H � ozPc mmH rmz ,:,0 � Gzdao 2 m a z71 • m offrHmz-vrmCG ' 7,— �C.. c*z `f OC4HmcO3vVCa . , `FRCr''''' m ° n 9 ° . ovmC7' n pZ M 'r' K oTZ 2 4x ��7 -1 G C CnCO ? n z mp ] � .0 .4z71cM°; c›-. m nw zOod 9LG • comcm MI moUz ° rCcT Hco e 9. E �� � G m rTm0.z -1.<a S Hv, G 2 m Dz yr. GrC n ZO <HrZ2 HN ^ F �C 9 e ^ .• K° 4 gC° m mX ap z zma a k r °H T ,7. 5'.'"' - � czRB r y ..*.Ps Hv, d ° �iC � CzrC ? O- Y Pt- 3-5 2. .1.5 rH m0 CT^ Om OCxz nOG.< C mA 2, 2 3 rz turv.m m rC ,n nG P DmT Race Engineering Associates 4851 Four Seasons Ct. Eagan, MN 55122 t: 612-670-7009 e: rrace@rea-Iic.com June 23, 2015 Terry Quinell Advanced Wall Structures RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Walls(15-0233) Prior Lake,Minnesota Design Assumptions: NCMA Safety Factors: Keystone Compac Units, 1.1°Wall Batter Sliding 1.50 NCMA Design Overturning-Reinforced 2.00 Live Load: 50 PSF Bearing 2.00 Dead Load: 0 PSF Toe Slope: None Back Slope: None Seismic: N/A Bearing Capacity: Approximately 1,500 PSF Soil Design Properties: y c Reinforced Soil 34° 120 PCF 0 PSF (Select Granular) Retained Soil 34° 120 PCF 0 PSF (Select Granular) Foundation Soil 26° 120 PCF 50 PSF (Sandy Lean Clay) Notes: No soils information was provided for this design.The onsite material is assumed to be a sandy lean clay with an internal friction angle of 26". Where unsuitable soils are found, a subcut may be required and structural fill shall be placed and compacted to provide an adequate bearing foundation. The above minimum soil strength parameters shall be verified prior to final design. REA shall be contacted if the above soil strength parameters cannot be met and a redesign may be required. We appreciate the opportunity of providing services to you. If you have any questions or comments regarding this project,please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Race Engineering Associates Robert J. Race, P.E. 14 CIVIL DESIGN " -4' PR c: lr 1 . INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS • SCOPE OF SERVICES 15 CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200,Bloomington,MN 55420 ° Office: 952-303-5312 ° www.cdp-us.com ow- CIVIL DESIGN 41111114 AMU. ISISw ....011111111111111 JUNE 22, 2015 Mr. Robert Hutchins—Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714 RE: 14970 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS Dear Mr.Hutchins, This letter is a response to a request for geotechnical,engineering review and field inspection services related to the design and construction of the SRW retaining wall at 14970 Pixie Point Circle,Prior Lake,MN. The information below outlines our scope of services,project understanding and estimated fees. Project The project consists of constructing three modular block retaining walls at a residence in Prior Lake on Pixie Point Circle. The City of Prior Lake requested a proposal to assist with the structural review,geotechnical review and testing,and construction observation of the retaining walls,as the city policy is any wall in a bluff requires engineering. The project includes reviewing the engineering drawings provided by the Contractor/Owner,on-site inspection of the retaining walls during construction and geotechnical analysis and testing of the soils supporting and being retained by the mechanically stabilized earth(MSE)retaining walls. Project Scope We propose to review the engineering design and review the geotechnical reports with in-house services. We propose to have the site field testing completed by a local geotechnical testing firm(Braun). PLAN REVIEW • Review plans provided by the Contractor. • Plan review completed by Professional Engineer licensed in Minnesota. • Provide comments on the plans as needed • Prepare a letter of recommendation upon completion of plan review and response to comments CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS • Provide periodic site inspection prior to placement of base units and during wall construction. Inspections will be done by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. • Provide final review report of the retaining walls based on: o Geotechnical inspection reports o Field observations o Final review of the walls GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW • Review local site conditions confirming the design assumptions are confirmed by local conditions (geometry,ground water conditions,and soil properties). 16 Civil Design Professionals • 8609 Lyndale Ave. S.,Suite 200 Bloomington,MN 55420 • Office 952-303-5312 • www.cdp-us.com • Review proctor densities of proposed and placed fill materials. • Provide final report summarizing field testing reports and observations. • No borings are anticipated or budgeted due to site access restrictions and MSE wall type. Project Schedule Below is a list of major work tasks and proposed dates for achievement. June 22,2015 Receive plans and calculations for review June22,2015 Provide City with Comments on Plans and calculations June 23,2015 Approve Revised Plans for Construction June 24 2015 Construction Begins July 1,2015 Construction Completed Review Team The review and inspection will be completed by Michael R.Johnson,P.E. MN PE#25493 Estimated Fees The estimated fees for this project are based on the items and time for items listed above. ENGINEERING REVIEW 1) Site visit confirming assumptions made in design I visit $300/ea. $300 2) Review of design layout and structural calculations 2 hrs. $150/hr. $300 i) MSE calculations,global review 3) Review design changes requested 1 hr. $150/hr. $150 4) Prepare letter of recommendation 1 hr. $150/hr. $150 5) Site inspections during construction )visits/wall(3) $600/ea. $1,800 6) Final Site Visit 1 visit $300/ea. $300 Subtotal $3,000 GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW 1) Review soil types(in visit 1 above) 0 hr. $150/hr. $0 2) Review Proctor curves 0.5 hr. $150/hr. $75 3) Review on-site testing Reports 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 4) Prepare final report 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 Subtotal $375 Total $3,375 If you have any questions,please feel free to give me a call. Respectful) Michae ohnson, PE 17 Civil Design Professionals • 8609 Lyndale Ave.S., Suite 200 Bloomington,MN 55420 • Office 952-303-5312 • www.cdp-us.com tint;.' CIvILDEsIGN - 01: S IO ALµ INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS PRIOR LAKE STANDARD AGREEMENT 18 CIVIL ENGINEERING 0 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 0 EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S., Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952.303-5312 ° uxuw.cdp-us.com Standard Agreement for Professional Services This Agreement ("Agreement") is made on the City will fill in day of June, 2015, between the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota (hereinafter "City"), whose business address is 4646 Dakota Street SE, Prior Lake, MN 55372, and Civil Design Professionals, a Minnesota company (hereinafter "Consultant") whose business address is 8609 Lyndale Avenue South, Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55420. Preliminary Statement The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide a variety of professional services for City projects. That policy requires that persons, firms or corporations providing such services enter into written agreements with the City. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of professional services by Consultant for geotechnical, engineering review and field inspections services for a retaining wall improvements at 14970 Pixie Point Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372_hereinafter referred to as the "Work". The City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. Scope of Work. The Consultant agrees to provide the professional services shown in Exhibit A (geotechnical, engineering review and field inspections services) in connection with the Work. The terms of this Agreement shall take precedence over any provisions of the Consultants proposal and/or general conditions. If the Consultants proposal is attached as the Exhibit A Scope of Work, City reserves the right to reject any general conditions in such proposal. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from City will fill in through December 31, 2015 the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate, and upon the terms and conditions as herein stated. 3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant on an hourly basis plus expenses in a total amount not to exceed $3375.00 for the services as described in Exhibit A. A. Any changes in the scope of the work which may result in an increase to the compensation due the Consultant shall require prior written approval by an authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional compensation for services that do not have prior written authorization. B. Special Consultants may be utilized by the Consultant when required by the complex or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City. C. If Consultant is delayed in performance due to any cause beyond its reasonable control, including but not limited to strikes, riots, fires, acts of God, governmental actions, actions of a third party, or actions or inactions of City, the time for 19 performance shall be extended by a period of time lost by reason of the delay. Consultant will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due to the delay. 4. City Information. The City agrees to provide the Consultant with the complete information concerning the Scope of the Work and to perform the following services: A. Access to the Area. Depending on the nature of the Work, Consultant may from time to time require access to public and private lands or property. As may be necessary, the City shall obtain access to and make all provisions for the Consultant to enter upon public and private lands or property as required for the Consultant to perform such services necessary to complete the Work. B. Consideration of the Consultant's Work. The City shall give thorough consideration to all reports, sketches, estimates, drawings, and other documents presented by the Consultant, and shall inform the Consultant of all decisions required of City within a reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the Consultant. C. Standards. The City shall furnish the Consultant with a copy of any standard or criteria, including but not limited to, design and construction standards that may be required in the preparation of the Work for the Project. D. City's Representative. A person shall be appointed to act as the City's representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. He or she shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret, and define the City's policy and decisions with respect to the services provided or materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the work covered by this Agreement. 5. Method of Payment. The Consultant shall submit to the City, on a monthly basis, an itemized invoice for professional services performed under this Agreement. Invoices submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City for: A. Progress Payment. For work reimbursed on an hourly basis, the Consultant shall indicate for each employee, his or her name, job title, the number of hours worked, rate of pay for each employee, a computation of amounts due for each employee, and the total amount due for each project task. Consultant shall verify all statements submitted for payment in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.38 and 471.391. For reimbursable expenses, if provided for in Exhibit A, the Consultant shall provide an itemized listing and such documentation as reasonably required by the City. Each invoice shall contain the City's project number and a progress summary showing the original (or amended) amount of the contract, current billing, past payments and unexpended balance of the contract. B. Suspended Work. If any work performed by the Consultant is suspended in whole or in part by the City, the Consultant shall be paid for any services set forth on Exhibit A performed prior to receipt of written notice from the City of such suspension. C. Payments for Special Consultants. The Consultant shall be reimbursed for the work of special consultants, as described herein, and for other items when authorized in writing by the City. 20 Standard Agreement for Professional Services 2014.04 D. Claims. To receive any payment on this Agreement, the invoice or bill must include the following signed and dated statement: "I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid." 6. Project Manager and Staffing. The Consultant has designated Robert Pace, P.E. to serve on the Project. They shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Work in accordance with the terms established herein. Consultant may not remove or replace the designated staff from the Project without the approval of the City. 7. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of its services as is ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar circumstances in Scott County, Minnesota. Consultant shall be liable to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss, or damages proximately caused by Consultant's breach of this standard of care. Consultant shall put forth reasonable efforts to complete its duties in a timely manner. Consultant shall not be responsible for delays caused by factors beyond its control or that could not be reasonably foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for costs, delays or damages arising from unreasonable delays in the performance of its duties. 8. Audit Disclosure and Data Practices. Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, or prepared or assembled by the Consultant under this Agreement which the City requests to be kept confidential, shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the City's prior written approval. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six (6) years after the effective date of this Agreement. This Agreement is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Data Practices Act). All government data, as defined in the Data Practices Act Section 13.02, Subd 7, which is created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant in performing any of the functions of the City during performance of this Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Data Practice Act and Consultant shall comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. All subcontracts entered into by Consultant in relation to this Agreement shall contain similar Data Practices Act compliance language. 9. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days written notice delivered to the other party at the address written above. Upon termination under this provision, if there is no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the City terminates the Agreement because the Consultant has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Consultant, and the City may retain another consultant to undertake or complete the Work identified herein. 10. Subcontractor. The Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement except as noted in the Scope of Work, without the express written consent of the City. The Consultant shall pay any subcontractor involved in the 21 Standard Agreement for Professional Services 2014.04 performance of this Agreement within ten (10) days of the Consultant's receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Consultant fails within that time to pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the Consultant has received payment by the City, the Consultant shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the rate of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the Consultant shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Consultant shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 11. Independent Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor engaged by City to perform the services described herein and as such (i) shall employ such persons as it shall deem necessary and appropriate for the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Agreement, who shall be employees, and under the direction, of Consultant and in no respect employees of City, and (ii) shall have no authority to employ persons, or make purchases of equipment on behalf of City, or otherwise bind or obligate City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of the City. 12. Insurance. a. General Liability. Prior to starting the Work, Consultant shall procure, maintain and pay for such insurance as will protect against claims or loss which may arise out of operations by Consultant or by any subcontractor or by anyone employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Such insurance shall include, but not be limited to, minimum coverages and limits of liability specified in this Paragraph, or required by law. b. Consultant shall procure and maintain the following minimum insurance coverages and limits of liability for the Work: Worker's Compensation Statutory Limits Employer's Liability $500,000 each accident $500,000 disease policy limit $500,000 disease each employee Commercial General Liability $1,500,000 property damage and bodily injury per occurrence $2,000,000 general aggregate $2,000,000 Products—Completed Operations Aggregate $100,000 fire legal liability each occurrence $5,000 medical expense Comprehensive Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit each accident (shall include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owed vehicles.) Umbrella or Excess Liability $1,000,000 22 Standard Agreement for Professional Services 2014.04 c. Commercial General Liability. The Commercial General Liability Policy shall be on ISO form CG 00 01 12 07 or CG 00 01 04 13, or the equivalent. Such insurance shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products-completed operations, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract). There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability form arising from pollution, explosion, collapse, underground property damage or work performed by subcontractors. d. Professional Liability Insurance. In addition to the coverages listed above, Consultant shall maintain a professional liability insurance policy in the amount of $2,000,000. Said policy need not name the City as an additional insured. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the professional liability insurance. Consultant agrees to maintain the professional liability insurance for a minimum of two (2) years following termination of this Agreement. e. Consultant shall maintain "stop gap" coverage if Consultant obtains Workers' Compensation coverage from any state fund if Employer's liability coverage is not available. f. All policies, except the Worker's Compensation Policy, Automobile Policy, and Professional Liability Policy, shall name the "City of Prior Lake" as an additional insured on ISO forms CG 20 10 07 04 or CG 20 10 04 13; and CG 20 37 07 04 or CG 20 37 04 13, or their equivalent. g. All policies, except the Professional Liability Policy, shall apply on a "per project" basis. h. All polices shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City. i. All policies, except for the Worker's Compensation Policy and the Professional Liability Policy, shall be primary and non-contributory. j. All polices, except the Worker's Compensation Policy, shall insure the defense and indemnity obligations assumed by Consultant under this Agreement. k. Consultant agrees to maintain all coverage required herein throughout the term of the Agreement and for a minimum of two (2) years following City's written acceptance of the Work. I. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the coverages required herein. m. All policies shall contain a provision or endorsement that coverages afforded thereunder shall not be cancelled or non-renewed or restrictive modifications added, without thirty (30) days' prior notice to the City, except that if the cancellation or non- renewal is due to non-payment, the coverages may not be terminated or non- renewed without ten (10) days' prior notice to the City. 23 Standard Agreement for Professional Services 2014.04 n. Consultant shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required under this Paragraph at Consultant's sole expense and with insurance companies licensed to do business in the state in Minnesota and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A-, unless specifically accepted by City in writing. o. A copy of the Consultant's Certificate of Insurance which evidences the compliance with this Paragraph, must be filed with City prior to the start of Consultant's Work. Upon request a copy of the Consultant's insurance declaration page, Rider and/or Endorsement, as applicable shall be provided. Such documents evidencing Insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide satisfactory evidence that Consultant has complied with all insurance requirements. Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of the required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such Certificate of Insurance, declaration page, Rider, Endorsement or certificates or other evidence of insurance, or to advise Consultant of any deficiencies in such documents and receipt thereof shall not relieve Consultant from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City's right to enforce the terms of Consultant's obligations hereunder. City reserves the right to examine any policy provided for under this paragraph. p. Effect of Consultant's Failure to Provide Insurance. If Consultant fails to provide the specified insurance, then Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City's officials, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability and expense (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation) to the extent necessary to afford the same protection as would have been provided by the specified insurance. Except to the extent prohibited by law, this indemnity applies regardless of any strict liability or negligence attributable to the City (including sole negligence) and regardless of the extent to which the underlying occurrence (i.e., the event giving rise to a claim which would have been covered by the specified insurance) is attributable to the negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission (including breach of contract) of Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees or delegates. Consultant agrees that this indemnity shall be construed and applied in favor of indemnification. Consultant also agrees that if applicable law limits or precludes any aspect of this indemnity, then the indemnity will be considered limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The stated indemnity continues until all applicable statutes of limitation have run. If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity, the City may require Consultant to: i. Furnish and pay for a surety bond, satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing performance of the indemnity obligation; or ii. Furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from Consultant's insurance company. Consultant will take the action required by the City within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice from the City. 13. Indemnification. Consultant will defend and indemnify City, its officers, agents, and employees and hold them harmless from and against all judgments, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including a reasonable amount as and for its attorney's fees paid, incurred or for which it may be liable resulting from any breach of this Agreement by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, or any negligent or intentional act or 24 Standard Agreement for Professional Services 2014.04 omission performed, taken or not performed or taken by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, relative to this Agreement. City will indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from and against any loss for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent acts of the City, its officers, agents or employees. 14. Ownership of Documents. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports and information generated in connection with the performance of the Agreement ("Information") shall become the property of the City, but Consultant may retain copies of such documents as records of the services provided. The City may use the Information for its purposes and the Consultant also may use the Information for its purposes. Use of the Information for the purposes of the project contemplated by this Agreement ("Project") does not relieve any liability on the part of the Consultant, but any use of the Information by the City or the Consultant beyond the scope of the Project is without liability to the other, and the party using the Information agrees to defend and indemnify the other from any claims or liability resulting therefrom. 15. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age. The Consultant shall post in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non-discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Consultant shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. The Consultant further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 16. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing services hereunder, the Consultant shall abide by statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. Any violation of statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the services to be provided shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to immediately terminate this Agreement 17. Mediation. Each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to this agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating arbitration or legal or equitable actions by either party. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration Association and the other party. No arbitration or legal or equitable action may be instituted for a period of 90 days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. Mediation shall be held in the City of Prior Lake unless another location is mutually agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall memorialize any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, which agreement shall be enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 18. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 25 Standard Agreement for Professional Services 2014.04 19. Services Not Provided For. No claim for services furnished by the Consultant not specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City. 20. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Agreement. 21. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 22. Waiver. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 24. Conflicts. No salaried officer or employee of the City and no member of the Council of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement. The violation of this provision renders the Agreement void. 25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original. Executed as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE Mayor City Manager Civil Design Pr essi 9 By: Michael R. Joh n, President, Its: 26 Standard Agreement for Professional Services 2014.04 j CIVIL DESIGN 41110' TN. INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS BRAUN INTERTEC FOUNDATION APPROVAL 27 CIVIL ENGINEERING ° STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ° GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING o EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200,Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 www.cdp-us.com Page of . BRAUN cmt-dson 4/07 I NTE BTEC Daily Soil Observation Notes { 5 � Project No.: %.‹... ` •••-„,' Dated a• Report No.; Project Name: ! g,,,° ,., i;.,. Project Location: f' -1 - t i' i '..i-" • i Client: i `.'•i v e ,,•44 'vi, 0, `:; "`'- , -_..., Temp/Weather: r - ; - ... Project Manager: .1. • , " 3=, Time Arrived: Departed: Soil ObsenArobon Areas Observed: 0 Building Pad 0 House Pad 0 Roadway O Pkng/walks 0 Footing D Proof Roll Other(describe) % , r 1i',,,, v,,-;? Y --�* - 4 ° -1�-.-y Soil report available? 0 Yes No Report reviewed? Ca`Yes C /1No Report prepared by: 4--_. '"— Get ropy Benchmark: ii 4:-r, - . . ,l,.:, Benchmark elevation: �`�;;y :. -.� Benchmark provided by: � ,.,i_ . . Finish floor elevation: ‘,,,,,) , Bottom of footing elevation: 'v{. Bottom of excavation elevation: k14',--,,,1,,._;, Approved plans available? \Jit Specified compaction: Fill source: Oversizing appears adequate? 0 NA (4Yes 0 No Soils observed agree with Soils report? 0 Yes 0 No Soils appear adequate for design loads? Yes 0 No Proposed project bearing capacity(psfj: Contractor notified of results? 9 Yes 0 No Name of person notified: • Was a copy of this report left on site? Yes 0 No If so,whom was it submitted to? r `` ir 4 �u , _. ti t{{ .j _f,......._..�.._ -- * ._ k TML ... .. ` �1-i'.? ,.240'f fit.( ._. , _i *4 ., ',✓ r i ,. Notes/Comments: ' .�_____: _, t ' b .,. - Sl � -Of O' 0i * '..".•,,E a�_..C LGt I . Performed By: O .- t Reviewed By: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and/or testing was performed. Observations and/or conclusions and/or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from,and shall take p�dence over,those indicated in a preliminary report. BRAUN FOUNDATION APPROVAL • Pro:ithng engineering and environmental solutions since I9 7 B RAU N Page of crnt-dson 4/07 I NTERTEC Daily Soil Observation Notes Project No.: Date: , , , Report No.- -, Project Name: ' -; ----- Project Location: ;'" ; ,-1:-`,, 'ti ;--1 1-:- ‘ Client: 1,1 v-‘i .,,, I -; Temp/Weather: ' - -- -- ` Project Manager: -, Time Arrived: Departed: i Soil Observation . Areas Observed: 0 Building Pad 0 House Pad 0 Roadway 0 Pkng/walks 0 Footing 0 Proof Roll , q Other(describe) ',/, 4-----, t, ', ',,. t,r... : Soil report available? 0 Yes 0 No Report reviewed? 0 Yes ET No 'Report prepared by: -. ----- - Get copy Benchmark: r';., _ vs, , I Benchmark elevation- i ' Benchmark provided by: if..'_ ',.. Finish floor elevation'.' N1.4, Bottom of footing elevation:, ' Bottom of excavation elevation: 'i. Approved plans available? Specified compaction: Fill source: Oversizing appears adequate? 0 NA co Yes 0 Na Soils observed agree with Soils report? 0 Yes 0 No Soils appear adequate for design loads? eg) Yes 0 No Proposed project bearing capacity(psf): , Contractor notified of results? a) Yes 0 No Name of person notified: Was a copy of this report left on site? 1) Yes 0 No If so,whom was it submitted to? N , 1 ! 1 , --c • , ,-1. . :_-_-------:-.`_4,',_2-4 4 , ,--,e ..;',...e. 4, : .' ,-,,..,, • • — — ' --4-. , V 1 In ' — - - . - 2'4 ft i I -7 ,•-- :---r-- ---; 1 -=''i '-, ° 1 " 'I ' ' -4 i '' 1. ' ' , I .---* ....„,...... , _,__ .-- '',.......,{ "4ft ' ...1 r.- ---4,1..:„4,,)\ ' ---7--------1-7 -----r------•---,-------------1— i I -- -- ---- ------„_.__....... ___. ___, ..- H , -,•*•:'.':''''''''',„ , ' --.4«.; i.----, , „,-, -.....--',---,,4'.-----L---...,---..,.,...---1---/«,----«....-4-- - -..,---,-,«,«,...,„,.. ..-.........: 7... ': ' ''''' ' : ..."....-' ".. ... '...-.' . ..- ....-.-...-...---.m.--..---......--.- ...'''. Notes/Comments: I ; : t _____ _ ris, d,..n,.. •,,,,:-.0,tuteci, 4-,,,,;....--s,z;r: unc 7).pe ot torre)r SCii3 7 la, 5,.e.:ci-s ) , Om/ Performed By: Reviewed By: Date: , .., This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observotim and/or testing was performed. Observations and/or conclusions and/or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from,and shall take preIence over,those indicated in a preliminary report. BRAUN FOUNDATION APPROVAL • Providing engineering and ent trownental solutions since 1957 BRAUN Page of cint-cision 4/07 INTERTEC Daily Soil Observation Notes Project No.: .',-.7 i 4:',, (2/i;'..1-i s I Date: l! LN, i ,-. Report No.: .- , , ..,--, Project Name: '9-1 I 0 Cc s, r LA ( „)C, "1-1 ,,s Project Location: 1°' ,c) :''A 't el ' (,- Client: 13,\,, i''.1 <- Temp/Weather: Project Manager: ft'-,-....-s.I 1 joi- Time Arrived: Departed: _ Sod observation Areas Observed: 0 Building Pad 0 House Pod 0 Roadway 0 Pkng/walks 0 Footing 0 Proof Roll Other (describe) f4 - Soil report available? 0 Yes No Report reviewed? 0 Yes p No Report prepared by: ------ Gc.copy Benchmark: .C.;:',;.yi.,4.--.. -•,. w: ki., Benchmark elevation: Ve.`, ,,°, ,, Benchmark provided by. • ..v.t.), i--, 14°..-i i . Finish floor elevation: OA Bottom of footing elevation:V Bottom of excavation elevation: V1/44 le efill" Approved plans available? ye .) Specified compaction: Fill source: Oversizing appears adequate? 0 NA t ) Yes 0 No Soils observed agree with Soils report? 0 Yes 0 No Soils appear adequate for design loads? t) Yes 0 No Proposed project bearing capacity(psf): Contractor notified of results? 'A Yes 0 No Name of person notified: Was a copy of this report left on site? 40 Yes 0 No If so,whom was it submitted to? ---: . --- -- -: -----,;,-- -------,--- -- . - -------- .-v---.0-------t-,---''--04- 0 c' 1-.R...zA-1-'-'. , P ' ,,_•'-',...,_ i1 la ___,..,_ , , . __ W. . ,. . .__ :‘,.._. .._.„ ' ' 4 ;- -__ ___._______.-___, _______-__ , _____ 4________:.____ — ...1 _ ... _ i ' j 4,.. ' 4,14 , it -,, x ;.• ....-A,i.,\ c i.----f-..---- : IN i-i- k 4_, , ' ,-.-' PS 4.)..„.^1 ! 1 : , '/ ..N. , e• V, -----i-----, : 1°. ' ''''-` \-•,„ ._. • , • , , • /,r , ,. 1 : ' --..., \--„, 1 • ,.',!----' : .,..--." , . ' •4,-.....i .;\;,L't t''...,- ./..1,1 :_, ,.... t.:,'i ..,,' i --- : i 1. --\.,,,,L . . ,. , 7 . , _ ..---,- ,,,,, _.,- --- - -- -,, ___ __________ __, : __, __ :________ _: \-- ..,?--- -,„. - ,,,....,. - _ - - - - ' - - ------ .L. _ ..., . .).7 ._,,,, __________ ,,,__ ___ - I----,--i--------- - - ---1---- :-:—...-.. : ...- : ....._....... ,_-_„_,_... _..,.._ .,.... , ....,..- _ . , . - -7-- 1.---.----;----.---------r— 1 --- -7-- : - •-- : ---- -------''''--- - ----------- ; • ! • ; • , ° . • ° , - Notes/Comments: : 1 ; ° • • 1 ! ; i ; • • , • , . ' ; ! ; ! ; ; • • ---------!--t----- , 1 boTt-:••T',,e'!.e. Performed By , ... ,,:..."---.- ; Reviewed By: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provideCI solely as evidence that field observations and/or testing was performed. Observations and/or conclusions and/or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from,and shall take pr4ence over,those indicated in a preliminary report. • Prot iding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN FOUNDATION APPROVAL • CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHS 31 CIVIL ENGINEERING ° STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ° GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals ° 8609 Lyndale Ave.S., Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 ° Office: 952-303-5312 ° www.cdp-us.com " ,.. t , t 'ti I' t*r'� .' y t4I' Tk�rtb94 .444 y� ''.1- 4...- ( �"4}„. R..:irrr � .�� a �. :t -: Middle Wall t � 1 ,,,,,.„3;;":7,::::,,,„:.4...„,,;:'gil:,K,'rti'1..',v1,:'k 1 ti,i r,,,,,'':",",1*.4'4',,,,;:(ji., 1.:,,, ::: ,..,.. ,...,:.4.drisot,,,,r;.4,4,, ,41.06,,,:‘,4t.,,,,,'N,,,,,,,h.,,,,.:::47„:,,,,,...,.:,.,,,,,,..i,,,,,,,,2",,,,,,,,,;:: '',..,,ft.';',...5',Ift:'',/,.../.,;::,:.,7,,::;///:,:, ',.:.-: * ' ' 1 - ' 4ipt:- .4. :.,,,,..,---.'e d r s..,, ,, ,,,,:„.,... ,,,,..,,z ,,,,.-_,,,......... . , 4 ' ' ( ' '' r �, } � y rrF 1 , as t" -4 `': ` 1'F7 . .!--, �+ a�, n � 1�',tr,�^>7�°v. c�;4..° ... x .��r shr,tr• � ,., Upper Wall 32 CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ° GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave. S., Suite 200,Bloomington,MN 55420 ° Office: 952.303-5312 uxuw.cdP• us.com #. .@,. '.AM . g�`" , , t ,tib - 2„,,, e a .�w ik �q,�� Y?4z }-d�. + f .- ✓, } ,, i A ti nt Po ' ate m4� • ,',,,,.7,i,''''4' 10 '''''',;,,,,:41'., .s� +, x Uer Wall pp Y • .-!..Y.'7...!,`:'::‘,..,1„: ✓ .p. •.,.V \ ''''' • \x.µ ms""0.4 / hk , ° * s:ax f I: # 4,--1,,;:g, ' 4' 4 r� r .'' r s Upper Wall 33 CIVIL ENGINEERING ° STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals. 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 . Office: 952.303-5312 uxuu.cdp us.com 15.0233 2/3/2010 COPYRIOHI 01 2011-2014 BY CIVIL DESIGN PROFESSIONALS.THIS DR-SWING IS SLING FURNISHED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY.COPY AND/OR REUSE NNTFH OE!1 THE CONSENT OF CIVIL DESIGN PROFESSIONALS IS PROHIBITED % I rm K il an .. l z� i1i c m— 101 7. tS I, ro ilZ A a r X Je O z c.r m RP >g3 /i ¢e 2:-:*' r CJ Y a.--, i. 5. P =u '` p ,R 1_I a n - kl I. ry,f ,J 7ym* cn >a tri71P3 w6 y, 2• Oo n Dm u24 2 � vX' - z~ r- O . E.,. Asa , • >mr k, t J ?N A e"g n s y'-. s L g. AS-BUILT RETAINING WALL SITE PLAN S °y2 2 2,1k 36 s 4 PR/6' (t." *7;1 Memomo „.„ t. To: Building, CDNR, and Engineering Staff From: Jane Kansier, Building and Transportation Services Director Date: March 31 2010 Re: Policy for Permits and Inspections of Retaining Walls Greater Than Four Feet in Height CC: Frank Boyles, City Manager Suesan Pace, City Attorney The construction of large retaining walls is becoming more common in new subdivisions. The larger the wall, the more the risk of serious damage should the wall fail. Our staff is not currently equipped to manage the review and inspection these walls require to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all retaining walls over four feet in height are designed and constructed properly. 1. BUILDING PERMITS A. All retaining walls over 4' in height require a building permit before construction. The building permit application will be submitted to the City of Prior Lake Building and Transportation Services Department. B. The permit application must be accompanied by a design certified by a registered engineer. C. The City will submit the plans to our consulting engineer for review. The applicant is responsible for the cost of this review. The fee will be collected with the building permit application. D. Once the City's consultant approves design, they will provide a cost estimate to complete the necessary inspections during the wall construction. This cost will be included with the building permit fee and paid at time the permit is issued. E. The contractor must coordinate the construction and inspections with the City's designated inspector. No construction may take place without the necessary inspections. jlhandouts\retaining wall permit policy.doc 1 F. Once construction is complete, the City's consultant will provides a letter stating the wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans. At that time, the City will issue a certificate of completion. G. This policy applies to all retaining walls more than 4' in height, whether part of a large development or a single lot, 2. WALL CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT A PERMIT Occasionally, we may learn of a retaining wall being constructed without the required permit. When that occurs: A. The City will issue an immediate "Stop Work" order. B. The contractor, property owner, or other responsible property owner must submit a building permit application to the City of Prior Lake Building and Transportation Services Department. C. The permit application must be accompanied by a design certified by a registered engineer. D. The City will submit the plans to our consulting engineer for review. The applicant is responsible for the cost of this review. The fee will be collected with the building permit application. E. Once the City's consultant approves design, the City and the City's consultant will work with the contractor, property owner or other party to determine what inspections may be required before work can begin again. The consultant will provide a cost estimate to complete the necessary inspections both before and during the wall construction. The applicant is responsible for these costs. This cost will be included with the building permit fee and paid at time the permit is issued. F. Once construction is allowed to begin again, the contractor must coordinate the construction and inspections with the City's designated inspector. No construction may take place without the necessary inspections. G. Once construction is complete, the City's consultant will provides a letter stating the wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans. At that time, the City will issue a certificate of completion. This policy is effective immediately. Please let me know if you have any questions. • Page 2 See• 4 8 CIVIL DESIGN oR. OFESSioNALS INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS Feb 3, 2016 Mr. Robert Hutchins - Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372-1714 RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle SE Retaining Wall Improvements Prior Lake, MN Dear Mr. Hutchins: The following report contains the full comprisal of services Civil Design Professionals (CDP) agreed to provide in our June 22, 2015, Scope of Services proposal to the City of Prior Lake (Appendix pages 15.17), with regards to the retaining wall improvements at 14970 Pixie Point Circle SE. The services CDP agreed to provide for the project are found in the following section(s): II. Retaining Wall Plan Review III. Geotechnical Review IV. Construction Observation V. Final Review Report All services were completed in general compliance with the City of Prior Lake's Standard Agreement for Professional Services form(Appendix pages 18-26). I. PROJECT INFORMATION CDP was provided the following information to use in our assessment: 1. Topographic Survey; created by Alliant Engineering; dated 03/26/15; emailed to CDP on 04/08/15 (Appendix page 8). 2. Existing Retaining Wall Photograph; taken by Terry Quinnel of Advanced Wall Structures; photo date unknown; emailed to CDP on 04/08/15 (Appendix page 7). 3. Proposed Retaining Wall Layout Plan;created by Terry Quinnel of Advanced Wall Structures(retaining wall contractor); creation date unknown; emailed to CDP on 04/08/15 (Appendix page 9). 4. Retaining Wall Cross Section Design Plans;created by Robert Race of Race Engineering Associates,LLC; dated 06/23/15; emailed to CDP on 06/25/15 (Appendix pages 10-14). There is a 3 story duplex that overlooks Prior Lake at 14970 Pixie Point Circle SE in Prior Lake, MN (see attached survey). There is a series of existing tiered retaining walls that support the slope as it descends downward to the lake from the north side of duplex. The retaining walls are constructed out of both timber and keystone modular units. Timber retaining walls also extend along the entire west side of the duplex up the driveway. The Proposed Retaining Wall Layout Plan prepared by the retaining wall contractor called for a maximum of three tiers of retaining walls on the north side of the duplex. The following parties were in involved with the retaining wall improvements: • Homeowner: Greg Stroh • Retaining Wall Contractor: Terry Quinnel,Advanced Wall Structures (AWS), Prior Lake,MN • Retaining Wall Design: Robert Race, Race Engineering Associates (REA), LLC, Eagan, MN • Surveyor: Dennis Olmstead,Alliant Engineering,Minneapolis,MN CIVIL ENGINEERING o STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING - EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 ° www.cdp-us.com II. RETAINING WALL PLAN REVIEW CDP was contracted to provide a structural review of the retaining wall plans prepared by Robert Race of Race Engineering Associates, LLC. The design plans were limited to a cross section generated from the Proposed Retaining Wall Layout Plan prepared by the retaining wall contractor. The cross section presented the critical section for the three tiered structure. The retaining walls were designed with Keystone Compac Units, reinforced with geogrid (Strata 200) with a maximum spacing of 2'. The minimum geogrid length requirements were 8' the lower wall, 9' on the middle wall, and 5' on the upper wall. The design required a select granular imported material in the reinforced and retained zones. This site soil was assumed to be a sandy lean clay with a friction angle of cp=26°and a cohesion of 50PSF. Michael R.Johnson,PE of CDP made an initial site visit to the property on July 8`''to review the site and soil conditions prior to conducting a review of the retaining wall design. A series of hand auger probes were conducted throughout the property to verify the design assumptions made by REA and Associates, including behind and directly in front of the retaining wall structures. A silty sand material was located behind the timber structures,while stiff,clayey sand soil was located throughout the rest of the property. The silty sand material appears to have been imported for the construction of the timber structures. The native stiff,clayey sand located throughout the property is typically a stronger soil than the sandy lean clay and the 26°degree friction and 50PSF cohesion assumed in the retaining wall design. Therefore it is the opinion of CDP that the material strengths assumed by REA and Associates are appropriate for the site conditions. Each of the retaining walls were checked for internal and external stability and safely met all minimum safety factors using the NCMA design methodology assumed for the design. In addition, the retaining walls were checked for global stability and had a minimum safety factor of 1.37,exceeding the minimum 1.30 requirement. The section analyzed was the critical wall section for the property. Therefore, the retaining wall design prepared by REA and Associates meets all minimum safety factors and is approved for construction. CDP subsequently notified Bob Hutchins (City of Prior Lake) on July 13, 2015 of our approval so the construction process could proceed. III. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW CDP was contracted to provide a geotechnical review of the project including reviewing local site conditions and soil types, reviewing and approving the proposed imported granular soil, and reviewing approving the field testing reports and observations (local soil types and conditions were discussed and approved in the Retaining Wall Plan Review). Terry Quinnel of AWS contacted CDP in July and indicated he would importing washed"sewer rock" from Kraemer Mining&Materials gravel quarry out of Burnsville,MN. This material is a crushed limestone material was light gray with jagged edges, ranging in size from 1 11/2" to V4". He indicated he would be using this material not only as the drainage stone but throughout the entire reinforced and retained zone as specified in REA's retaining wall design plans. This material is free draining, highly structural, and easily meets the minimum 34°degree friction angle requirement. However, it cannot be tested for density due to its lack of fine grained soil, and is virtually self-compacting on placement,but a minimum of three passes with compaction equipment is typically specified. This material was approved for use in construction of the wall. 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals s 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 ° wuw.cdp-us.com Braun Intertec(Braun)was contracted to verify adequate bearing capacity of the foundation soils at each of the three retaining wall footing locations. CDP was provided Braun's foundation inspection report for each wall(Appendix pages 2 7-30). The lower wall foundation was inspected for adequate bearing capacity on September 9th, 2015. Braun performed three (3)hand auger probes to determine the suitability of the subsurface soils for safely supporting the applied load from the lower retaining wall. Braun classified the subsurface soils as a stiff to dense silty sand/clayey sand(SM/SC) material. Braun stated it was their opinion that the foundations soils they discovered with their given in-situ densities were suitable for resisting the applied load of the lower retaining wall,which is approximately 1,000 PSF. The middle wall foundation was inspected for adequate bearing capacity on September 11`'', 2015. Braun performed three(3) hand auger probes to determine the suitability of the subsurface soils for safely supporting the applied load from the middle retaining wall. Braun classified the subsurface soils as a stiff to dense silty sand/clayey sand (SM/SC) material. Braun stated it was their opinion that the foundations soils they discovered with their given in-situ densities were suitable for resisting the applied load of the middle retaining wall,which is approximately 1,000 PSF. The upper wall foundation was inspected for adequate bearing capacity on September 21st, 2015. Braun performed three (3)hand auger probes to determine the suitability of the subsurface soils for safely supporting the applied load from the upper retaining wall. Braun classified the subsurface soils as a stiff to dense silty sand/clayey sand(SM/SC) material. Braun stated it was their opinion that the foundations soils they discovered with their given in-situ densities were suitable for resisting the applied load of the upper retaining wall,which is approximately 1,000 PSF. CDP is in agreement with Braun Intertec, that the wall foundation soils are fully capable of supporting the applied load from each retaining wall based on the soil type and their relative in-situ densities. IV. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS CDP was contracted to provide periodic inspection of the retaining wall construction. Michael R.Johnson, PE conducting three (3) inspections during the construction of the retaining walls and in addition to a final inspection. Inspection#1 The first inspection was conducted on Sep 10, 2015. The lower wall was approximately 75%constructed at the time of the inspection, with a maximum exposed height of 5.33' in the radius. The wall was being constructed with Keystone Compac Units, as per REA's design plans, and draintile outlets were visible along the base of the wall. The wall was being backfilled with the crushed limestone(as discussed in the geotechnical review), and compacted with a vibratory plate compactor. CDP instructed the project forearm to extend the plate compactor over the entire crushed stone backfill zone with a minimum of 3 passes at each lift. The Strata 200 geogrid being placed on the lower wall were measured(with a tape measure), and the 8' minimum geogrid length requirement was confirmed. The project foreman confirmed geogrid was being placed at 2' intervals, and that the wall foundation soil for the lower wall had been tested and approved for adequate bearing capacity and by Braun Intertec. A string line was being used to control the wall alignment which looked adequate. 3 CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 www.cdp-us.com Inspection#2 The second inspection was conducted on Sep 11, 2015. The foundation excavation for the middle wall was terminated near the house, to be continued alongside the house after completing the construction of the three walls at the backside of the property. The base row of units for the middle wall had placed on the crushed stone leveling pad at the time of the inspection(Appendix page 32). The soil embankment had been properly excavated back to accommodate the placement of the 9'geogrid specified in the construction of the middle wall. The project foreman confirmed that the wall foundation soil for the lower wall had been tested and',approved for adequate bearing capacity earlier that morning by Braun Intertec. The construction of the lowest wall was completed at the time on the inspection to a maximum overall height of 7.0' as per REA's cross section design. The wall alignment and construction were adequate and in general compliance with the retaining wall design plans. Inspection#3 The third inspection was conducted on Sep 30, 2015. The bottom four rows of units for the upper wall had placed at the time of the inspection(Appendix pages 32-33). A geogrid layer had been placed between the first and',second units, and three units were positioned on top of the base unit, as the contractor was preparing to place the crushed stone backfill behind the wall. The soil embankment had been properly excavated back to accommodate,the placement of the 5' geogrid specified in the construction of the upper wall. The project foreman confirmed that the wall foundation soil for the lower wall had been tested and approved for adequate bearing capacity previously by Braun Intertec. The construction of the middle wall was completed at the time on the inspection to a maximum overall height of 7.0',one course higher than specified in REA's cross section design to reduce the slope between the lower and middle wall. The wall alignment and construction were adequate and in general compliance with the retaining wall design plans. Fined Inspection The final inspection was conducted on Nov 10, 2015. All the retaining wall construction was completed at the time of the inspection. This includes the extension of the middle retaining wall running extending alongside of the house. There were pallets of pavers positioned above the upper wall that were be placed above the upper wall patio area at a future date. Top soil had been spread between the lower&middle walls, and between the middle & upper walls. The upper wall had be constructed to an overall height of 6.33', which is 1.33' higher than shown on the REA design plans. In addition, the draintile outlets were properly located along the base of each wall, and the overall appearance of the retaining construction was exceptional. Th¢finished geometry of the retaining walls differed from that originally proposed in the site plan provided by he retaining wall contractor(Appendix 34-35). The 90 degree angle in the staircase geometry was eliminated during the construction,so the staircase extends directly from the base of the lower wall to the finished grade at the top of the upper wall. This resulted in the repositioning of the retaining walls adjacent to the staircase. CIDP used a tape measure to locate the retaining walls and generate an as-built retaining wall site plan (Appendix page 36). V.' FINAL REVIEW REPORT Both the middle and upper walls were checked for both internal and external stability height, and both walls safely meet all minimum safety factor requirements as per NCMA at their respective increased, as-built heights. A height increase to the middle and upper walls was required to reduce the slope between the lower and middle walls to a near level condition,which effectively lowered the base elevation of both the upper and middle walls. The overall global stability safety factor is wall increased by lowering the base elevation of these 4 CIVIL ENGINEERING . STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 0 EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200,Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 www.cdp-us.com two retaining walls. Therefore, CDP approves both the initial design prepared by REA, and the as-built construction of the retaining walls. The retaining wall construction was periodically inspected by CDP during the project and the contractor was found to be compliant with the retaining wall design plans at each inspection. The foundation soil for each of the three retaining walls were tested by Braun Intertec and deemed fully capable of supporting the applied load from each retaining wall. The overall appearance of the finished construction is exceptional. VI. CONCLUSIONS It is my professional opinion that the three retaining walls at 14970 Pixie Point Circle SE were properly designed by REA, and were constructed by AWS in general compliance with REA's retaining wall design plans. The walls should function effectively for their design life. These conclusions retained are based on my professional opinion. These opinions are arrived in accordance with accepted engineering practices in this time and location. No other warranty is implied or intended. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Si cerely, Ji r Michael ohnson, P.E. Civil Design Professionals 5 CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 ° www.cdp-us.com rA 1411 v a = CIVIL DESIGN R n LS ; IONALS INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS APPENDIX 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTH RETENTION DESIGN Civil Design Professionals 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200, Bloomington,MN 55420 Office: 952-303-5312 www.cdp-us.com ,1 i i ' 11 I y Ir ."4c1.'' I ti • AA,'A ,1,41 i i, - * eiitp 943 II 4" •'il _.__ __ ... . .--— . -.. —..- - - .• /I) •1, I: -. .•. .,. .-LI 1 i • • II l• . , .. Ii tli • 41;31 0 4° • fitor LAHVL , , ... _ 14.. 4:I-'• tit 1 T' gill , 0314 .., . , I : 4 1 1 -rw i AR., 4' • • it.,,lk E — - ----erw 43''''', 7: --., , • , ,warrefrovre,,,,,, 1 . I „ -, 1 I 1 ‘ , p • ,• *. I .u....„. •4 /..”,.., .••••,,,,,,, .•..,,,,,,,, '''''''••••,.... !I' • q 31 ••••,..,,,,,, 4"N 1 1....-,.• .......,., ..,% ,,, ._... , _ _ ..„,„„, 4. •,., 4/ ..,,,v.t..., • ... . . APPROVED ,,• ), ' PLALNNiG DEPT , Signed '-'' _ /... .---: Datet74 ... 1 . , . It I, i N . \ DATA FILE NAME T: \ACAD Projects\Minnesota\2015\15-0233 14970 Pixie Pt\Final\Calcs\Global\15-0233 Global 043015.gsl Job Number 15-0233 Title 14970 Pixie Point Circle Date 4/30/2015 Label A Global Stability Label B Maximum Slice Width 1 Number of Soil Layers: (1 to 20) 5 Earthquake Acceleration: 0 No. of External Forces: (0 to 100) 5 Piezometric Surfaces: (0 to 9) 0 Unit weight of Water: 62.43 Reinforcement Layers: (0 to 100) 8 FoS against Pullout: 2 Material Unit Wt Cohesion Friction Min. Piezo Ru Interaction Angle c/p Surf. Coefficient 1 Dead Load 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Wall Face 145 750 40 0 0 0 1 3 Select Granular 120 0 34 0 0 0 .8 4 Retained 120 0 34 0 0 0 .8 5 Native Soil 120 50 26 0 0 0 .8 Upper Surface of Material # 1 (Dead Load) X-Coord Y-Coord -50 10 0 10 R - 91 Qd ,39.83 21.94 39.93 27. 94 41 27.97 48.22 28. 6 55.84 29.27 55.93 34. 94 57 34 .94 63.83 34.94 63.89 39.27 64. 95 39.27 69.16 39.27 72.83 39.27 72.84 40.27 94.24 40.27 120 40.27 Upper Surface of Material # 2 (Wall Face) X-Coord Y-Coord -50 10 0 10 35.83 21. 94 39.83 21.94 39.93 27. 94 41 27. 97 48.22 28.6 55.84 29.27 55.93 34. 94 57 34 .94 63.83 34 .94 63.89 39.27 64. 95 39.27 69.16 39.27 72.83 39.27 94 .24 39.27 120 39.27 tTnnar .4nrfanP of Mataria1 #k (.4a1art ( rannlarl X-Coord Y-Coord • -50 10 0 10 35.83 21.94 39.83 21. 94 39.84 20.94 40.81 20. 94 41 27.97 48.22 28.6 55.84 29.27 55.85 28.61 56.83 28. 61 57 34 .94 63.83 34. 94 63.84 34 .27 64 .83 34.27 64. 95 39.27 69.16 39.27 72.83 39.27 94.24 39.27 120 39.27 Upper Surface of Material # 4 (Retained) X-Coord Y-Coord -50 10 0 10 35.83 21.94 39.83 21.94 39.84 20. 94 40.81 20.94 47. 98 20.94 48.22 28.6 55.84 29.27 55.85 28. 61 56.83 28. 61 4 R7 2R F1 64.83 34 .27 69 34 .27 69.16 39.27 72.83 39.27 94.24 39.27 120 39.27 Upper Surface of Material # 5 (Native Soil) X-Coord Y-Coord -50 10 0 10 35.83 21. 94 39.83 21. 94 39.84 20. 94 40.81 20. 94 47.98 20.94 55.83 28.61 56.83 28.61 64.82 28.61 72.82 36.44 72.83 39.27 94 .24 39.27 120 39.27 Force No. X-coord. Y-coord Hor.comp Vert.comp Acts on slice No. 1 72.83 35.27 1 100 33 2 73.21 35.27 1 100 35 3 73.58 35.27 1 100 35 4 73.96 35.27 1 100 35 5 74.33 35.27 1 100 35 Reinforcement Tallowable Tconnection Layer Position per unit per unit No. X1 Length Elevation width width 1 39.82 8 21.61 1280 969 2 39.86 8 23.61 1280 969 ; 4 55.86 9 29.27 1280 969 • 5 55.88 8. 99 31.27 1280 969 6 55. 91 9.00 33.27 1280 969 7 63.87 5.00 35. 61 1280 969 8 63.93 5 37.61 1280 969 Summary of Reinforcement: Tallowable Total Length 1280 61 a N co a • O O 0 O � R5 N N (D a) m s III ! I I I I I I I I I I m "• a -na IQ cr)O O :0) 0. Ot = C N K 1 5 n > O V 0 a) _ y 01 D G) 3 N N N .A O.0 ) 9 0 0 0 (1T`..:. 3 Jm 3 o N m o — 01 D O 01 O,�O N_ 0 -n 0 Nb w _ N W W A O., 3 A V O -0 0- O O O O O C N ED- f,.. 0 d () 0 y O 0' N Ot ".1.3 W — W W co co .II. , i LI . . , . • 0. o _ y N J 0 m 01E. O J 00 cc* O,.p N Co • I' O O 3 — 5 m o J , Z N _,.4... OOOD.!• T 0 `0 -A. w p r€ N P1^ C7 CD N _ '0 O 0 N N O. 0 N v O • X O • m 3 CS N A O — („n„ rt — O Cil I I I I I IH I I I I I I 6 p n N = s n coK O N W �G (T CD G) Z 0 0 0 . Bob Hutchins From: Mike Johnson <mikej@cdp-us.com> Sent: Wednesday,June 17, 2015 11:14 AM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Curt Derichs; Robert Race Subject: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Attachments: 14970 Dixie Point Proposal.pdf; Resume - Mike 042914.pdf; Resume - Curt 042914.pdf Robert: Please find attached CDP's proposal for the wall inspection services on the 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements. Also find attached both Curt's Resume along with my own. Respectfully, MICHAEL R.JOHNSON,P.E. I PRESIDENT-CEO 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.Suite 200 I Bloomington,MN 55420 Office:952-303-5312 I Fax: 763-392-1989 Email:mikei@cdp-us.com I Website:www.cdp-us.com L DESIGN PROELSIO\ A.14, From: Robert Race [mailto:rrace@rea-Ilc.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 09,2015 12:52 PM To: Mike Johnson; Curt Derichs Cc: Denise McNamara Subject: FW: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Mike, The City of Prior lake is looking for a written proposal from CDP on this project and Curt's resume(or who-ever inspects the site). Robert Race, PE Race Engineering Assoc 4851 Four Seasons Ct Eagan, MN 55122 t: 612.670.7009 e: rracec rea-Ilc.com From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins@CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 09,2015 12:46 PM To: Robert Race Cc:Terry Quinnnell; mmacke@agencyl0.com; Larry Poppler;gstroh@cap-mgt.com Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Robert,Please provide the following items: 1 1. A written quote from CDP to the city for geotechnical, structural engineering and field observation. 2. Credentials of Curtis Derichs. The city will investigate the background of the Mr. Derich. 3. Sealed drawings of the walls by Race Engineering. I will pass on the proposed city Standard Agreement for the proposed elimination of the Umbrella or Excess Liability coverage of$1,000,000.00 to the city attorney for their review and comment. Again I assume that much effort went into this standard agreement and that any changes would need to go to the city council for their approval. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851; Fax: 952.447.4245 Sign up for Email Updates. From: Robert Race [mailto:rrace@ rea-Ilc.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 11:17 AM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Terry Quinnnell; mmacke@ iagency10.com; Larry Poppler; gstroh@cap-mgt.com Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Robert, Reviewing the requirements for insurance, it would be expensive for me to acquire the coverage required by the City. We are proposing the Civil Design Professionals do the inspection, they have all the coverage except for the umbrella policy. (marked up in the contract). I have worked with Mike Johnson for 15 years and know he is very qualified, as is Curtis Derichs. Race Engineering Associates will do the design work for the project and seal the plans. CDP agreed the maximum billable for the project would be the same as the WSB revision, again so marked in the contract. If this is acceptable, the will return a signed agreement. Best regards Robert Race, PE Race Engineering Assoc 4851 Four Seasons Ct Eagan, MN 55122 t: 612.670.7009 e: rrace a(�rea-Ilc.com From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins@CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent: Monday,June 01, 2015 11:22 AM To: Robert Race Cc:Terry Quinnnell; mmacke@agencyl0.com; Larry Poppler Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements 2 Robert,Attached is the cities Standard Agreement for Professional Services. Please make the changes to the contract along with the reasons for the changes. Strike out the items to be eliminated and type in bold font the additions.After receiving the Agreement changes,I will forward on to the cities attorney for their review and comment. I assume that much effort went into this standard agreement and that any changes would need to go to the city council for their approval. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851; Fax: 952.447.4245 Sign up for Email Updates. From: Robert Race [mailto:rraceCarea-Ilc.com] Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 7:42 AM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Terry Quinnnell; mmacke@agencyl0.com Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Robert, Following up on our conversation and the contract with the City: 1. Workman's Comp: a. Per the statutes, we are a "Sole Proprietor"and exempt from WC. 2. General Liability: a. Race Engineering Associates does not have General Liability Coverage i. We do not perform construction or site management operations, or services are Engineering and design related. ii. We work from a home office covered by home owners insurance. 3. Professional Liability: a. We maintain a policy of$1M coverage for Professional liability. I look forward to your response on these items. Robert Race, PE Race Engineering Assoc 4851 Four Seasons Ct Eagan, MN 55122 t: 612.670.7009 e: rrace(a�rea-Ilc.com From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins@CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:39 AM To: Robert Race Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Received Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 3 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851; Fax: 952.447.4245 Sign up for Email Updates. From: Robert Race [mailto:rrace@rea-Ilc.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:36 AM To: Bob Hutchins Subject: FW: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Robert, Here is my certificate for$1M in Professional liability. I am getting a quote for a$2M policy as stated in the contract. Robert Race, PE Race Engineering Assoc 4851 Four Seasons Ct Eagan, MN 55122 t: 612.670.7009 e: rrace( rea-Ilc.com From: Mary Lanning [mailto:mlanning@agency10.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:06 AM To: Robert Race Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Robert (do you prefer "Bob", "Mr. Race"?) - Your professional liability policy has a limit of $1,000,000. The City of Prior Lake's contract indicates a requirement of $2,000,000. Attached is a certificate reflecting your current coverage. Would you like me to obtain a quote for increasing the limit to $2M? You probably have the other insurance coverage elsewhere, but if not, we can quote the coverage with the same insurance company that insures CDP -just let me know. Thank you, Mary L. L 6469 Sycamore Ct N Maple Grove, MN 55369 P: 763-450-9564 F: 763-559-1340 "Experience the Service" GENCY 1NSU CE 4 From: Marc Macke [mailto:MMacke@agencyl0.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 5:41 AM To: Robert Race Cc: Mary Lanning Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Thank you! I will review this morning and get this to them today—we will cc you with the documents. Congratulations. Marcus L Macke,CIC President Agency 10 Insurance 6469 Sycamore Ct N.Maple Grove,MN 55369 www.agencyl0insurance.com P: 763-551-1010 F: 763-559-1340 "Experience the Service" 0� � �I GENCY 'NSW i CE From: Robert Race [mailto:rrace@ rea-Ilc.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 5:01 AM To: Marc Macke Subject: FW: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Mark, I got a consulting job with the City of Prior Lake. They have specific insurance requirements that I need to see if I have. See attached. This was a surprise to me working for them. Robert Race, PE Race Engineering Assoc 4851 Four Seasons Ct Eagan, MN 55122 t: 612.670.7009 e: rrace(a�rea-Ilc.com From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins@CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2015 3:34 PM To: Robert Race; Danna Monnens Cc:Greg Stroh;Terry Quinnnell; Bryce Huemoeller Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements 5 Robert, The proposal is acceptable to the city. Please fill out the attached Standard Agreement and provide the information requested. Please contact me if there is further information or clarification needed. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851;Fax: 952.447.4245 Sign up for Email Updates. From: Robert Race [mailto:rrace@rea-Ilc.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:31 AM To: Bob Hutchins; Danna Monnens Cc: Greg Stroh; Terry Quinnnell; Bryce Huemoeller Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Mr. Hutchins, Attached is a proposal addressed to the City for the Pixie Point project as you indicated below. Thank you for the approval, we look forward to working with the City on this project. Best regards Robert Race, PE Race Engineering Assoc 4851 Four Seasons Ct Eagan, MN 55122 t: 612.670.7009 e: rrace(a�rea-Ilc.com From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins@CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:35 PM To: Danna Monnens Cc: Greg Stroh;Terry Quinnnell; Robert Race; Bryce Huemoeller Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Bryce, The Race Engineering proposal and qualifications is acceptable to the city. The quote from Race Engineering must be addressed to the city and the city will contract directly with Race Engineering.At a point before the building permit is issued please provide the soil testing companies name. WSB &Associates,Inc. supplied a new quote for the geotechnical review, structural engineering review and field observation for the project. They also supplied a quote for the soil testing. See attached quotes. An escrow check in the amount of the engineering services supplied by either Race Engineering or WSB &Associates, Inc. must be submitted to the city before the building permit is issued. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 6 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851; Fax: 952.447.4245 Sign up for Email Updates. From: Danna Monnens [mailto:dlm@priorlakelaw.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 2:35 PM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Greg Stroh; Terry Quinnnell; Robert Race; Bryce Huemoeller Subject: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements I am enclosing a Proposal, dated May 14, 2015,from Race Engineering Associates,for the engineering review and inspection services required for the SRW retaining wall project at the above property. This Proposal provides the City,the public, and Mr.Stroh with a higher quality professional service,for better value, than the WSB proposal previously received by the City.The qualifications of Mr. Race are superior and the amount is reasonable based on his considerable experience. The City has complete authority to accept the Race Proposal.The contract will be less than $25,000, so by statute it can be made on quotation or the open market.The City's Purchasing Policy would permit the City to act in this instance by purchase order or quotation . Even if quotations are required,the Race proposal is superior in quality because of Mr. Race's experience. Neither of the proposals needs to include the cost of the soil testing, since any testing will be done by an independent provider, acceptable to the City and reviewed by the engineer.The City will be provided with the name of the testing company for its approval of the building permit. Either Mr. Race or Terry Quinnell will supply the testing company information. Thank you for your help.We should be able to move forward quickly now that this inspection issue is resolved.Terry is anxious to get started. Bryce Huemoeller Danna Monnens, Legal Assistant Huemoeller&Gontarek PLC 16670 Franklin Trail SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 (952)447-2131 (952)447-5628 fax CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail is (1) SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE; (2) ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT; OR (3)CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity as designated above. Any distribution,copying, or use of or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e- mail by or to anyone other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately deleted. 7 Bob Hutchins From: Mike Johnson <mikej@cdp-us.com> Sent: Friday,June 19, 2015 2:08 PM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Curt Derichs; Robert Race Subject: RE: Pixie Point Bob: That is not a problem and it will not change our proposal. I will adjust the proposal,get the agreement signed, and will advise Race Engineering Associates to get their plans submitted. Respectfully, MICHAEL R.JOHNSON,P.E. I PRESIDENT-CEO 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.Suite 200 I Bloomington,MN 55420 Office:952-303-5312 I Fax: 763-392-1989 Email:mikej@cdp-us.com I Website:www.cdp-us.com " i CIVIL DESIGN . .et414; pi0ri,Ssi0 ; L From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins@CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent: Friday,June 19, 2015 9:29 AM To: Mike Johnson Subject: RE: Pixie Point Milo couple of items: �/ . Attached is the cities Standard Agreement for Professional Services. Please review and comment. This will need to be executed before the city can give permission for the plan review to start. 2. Please make the following change to your proposal: Project "The project consists of constructing three modular block retaining walls at a residence in Prior Lake on Pixie Point Circle.The City of Prior Lake requested a proposal to assist with the structural review,geotechnical review and testing,and cons ction observation of the retaining wallS for the portions greater than four feet(4 ft)in height."The city policy is any height wall n a bluff is required to be engineered. Will this requirement change the proposal cost? 3. Provide your State of MN licensed engineers number. Also Race Engineering Associates needs supply signed plans of the walls. I will send this email around to the parties with the items left to complete before the project review starts. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 1 952.447.9851; Fax: 952.447.4245 Sign up for Email Updates. From: Mike Johnson [mailto:mikej@cdp-us.com] ... ��. Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 4:28 PM To: Bob Hutchins Subject: Pixie Point Bob: I received your message as well as a call from Terry Quinnel at Advanced Wall Structures with respects to the same project. I have since modified the initial proposal to cover everything that was needed on the project and have attached our certificate of insurance which includes the additional $1M insurance umbrella that you were seeking. I think this should square everything away. I have included some pretty aggressive target dates on the proposal based on the contractor's desire to get the project started, but obviously the construction will begin only after all the necessary permit processes have been completed and approved. I the City of Prior Lake has a need for any consulting with any kind of earth structure, I have specialized in the design and construction of these type of structures specifically for over 20 years, and have extensive experience working with the most complex sites and structures. Much more so than the tiny little structure on Pixie Point. So please don't hesitate to contact me if the anything comes up in the future, or if you ever have a question on a similarly related project that you would like to get my opinion or feedback on,feel free to call me as well. Respectfully, MICHAEL R.JOHNSON,P.E. I PRESIDENT-CEO 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.Suite 200 I Bloomington,MN 55420 Office:952.303.5312 I Fax:763-392-1989 Email:mikei@cdp-us.com I Website:www.cdp-us.com q QLD GN 2 Bob Hutchins From: Jim Stremel <JStremel@wsbeng.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:12 PM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Carl Osberg; Barry Hentz Subject: RE: Greg Stroh/ Pixie Point Attachments: Prior Lake Wall Proposal Letter 05-20-15.pdf Hello Bob, See attached revised proposal for the retaining wall. We were able to sharpen up our structural plan review. From the standpoint of the geotechnical work we were not able to reduce the project scope due to the number of wall tier locations; we would need to provide testing at each of the tiers. With that said, we work on an hourly or per test basis. If there are fewer hours worked or less tests taken,we would only charge for the work completed. Jim Stremel, PE Project Manager S3 d: 3 d: 763-287-8532 I c: 612-419-1549 WSB&Associates, Inc. 1701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 I Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB solutions I design 61 •, Ar Stafribune�,n�nt ���� rxey�tM arse#�4�I* 70I9 7014 This email,and any files transmitted with it,is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee.If you are not the addressee,please delete this email from your system.Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB&Associates,Inc.does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission.If verification is required,please request a hard copy. From: Bob Hutchins [mailto:BHutchins@CityofPRIORLAKE.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 3:32 PM To: Jim Stremel Cc: strvw@aol.com Subject: FW: Greg Stroh / Pixie Point Jim,Please provide a quote to the City for reviewing the design and performing site compliance inspections for the attached retaining wall project.Also include a quote for conducting soil testing/evaluation.Let me know if further information is required.Terry Quinnell of Advanced Wall Structures is the contractor building the walls.Advanced Wall Structures or the homeowner must pay the fee for WSB's services before the City will issue a building permit for the project. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 1 dob Hutchins From: Bob Hutchins Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:36 PM To: 'Danna Monnens' Cc: Greg Stroh;Terry Quinnnell; Robert Race; Bryce Huemoeller Subject: RE: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Attachments: Prior Lake Wall Proposal Letter 05-21-15 - Structural.pdf; Prior Lake Wall Proposal Letter 05-21-15 - Geotechnical.pdf Bryce,The Race Engineering proposal and qualifications is acceptable to the city. The quote from Race Engineering must be addressed to the city and the city will contract directly with Race Engineering.At a point before the building permit is issued please provide the soil testing companies name. WSB &Associates,Inc. supplied a new quote for the geotechnical review, structural engineering review and field observation for the project. They also supplied a quote for the soil testing. See attached quotes. An escrow check in the amount of the engineering services supplied by either Race Engineering or WSB &Associates, Inc. must be submitted to the city before the building permit is issued. Thank you Robert D.Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372 952.447.9851; Fax: 952.447.4245 Sign up for Email Updates. From: Danna Monnens [mailto:dlm@priorlakelaw.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 2:35 PM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Greg Stroh; Terry Quinnnell; Robert Race; Bryce Huemoeller Subject: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements I am enclosing a Proposal, dated May 14, 2015,from Race Engineering Associates,for the engineering review and inspection services required for the SRW retaining wall project at the above property. This Proposal provides the City,the public, and Mr. Stroh with a higher quality professional service,for better value, than the WSB proposal previously received by the City.The qualifications of Mr. Race are superior and the amount is reasonable based on his considerable experience. The City has complete authority to accept the Race Proposal.The contract will be less than$25,000, so by statute it can be made on quotation or the open market.The City's Purchasing Policy would permit the City to act in this instance by purchase order or quotation . Even if quotations are required,the Race proposal is superior in quality because of Mr. Race's experience. Neither of the proposals needs to include the cost of the soil testing, since any testing will be done by an independent provider,acceptable to the City and reviewed by the engineer.The City will be provided with the name of the testing 1 any for its approval of the building permit. Either Mr. Race or Terry Quinnell will supply the testing company information. Thank you for your help.We should be able to move forward quickly now that this inspection issue is resolved.Terry is anxious to get started. Bryce Huemoeller Danna Monnens, Legal Assistant Huemoeller&Gontarek PLC 16670 Franklin Trail SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 (952)447-2131 (952)447-5628 fax CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail is(1) SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE; (2) ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT; OR (3) CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity as designated above. Any distribution,copying,or use of or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e- mail by or to anyone other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately deleted. TAX NOTICE To the extent this communication,or any attachment to it, addresses any tax matter, it was not intended to be relied upon, and may not be used,to avoid any federal or state tax penalties, or to promote,market, or recommend to anyone any transaction or matter addressed in this communication or any attachment. 2 Bob Hutchins From: Danna Monnens <dlm@priorlakelaw.com> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 2:35 PM To: Bob Hutchins Cc: Greg Stroh;Terry Quinnnell; Robert Race; Bryce Huemoeller Subject: 14970 Pixie Point Circle Retaining Wall Improvements Attachments: Race Engineering Associates Proposal dated May 14, 2015.pdf I am enclosing a Proposal, dated May 14, 2015,from Race Engineering Associates,for the engineering review and inspection services required for the SRW retaining wall project at the above property. This Proposal provides the City,the public, and Mr. Stroh with a higher quality professional service,for better value, than the WSB proposal previously received by the City.The qualifications of Mr. Race are superior and the amount is reasonable based on his considerable experience. The City has complete authority to accept the Race Proposal.The contract will be less than $25,000, so by statute it can be made on quotation or the open market.The City's Purchasing Policy would permit the City to act in this instance by purchase order or quotation . Even if quotations are required,the Race proposal is superior in quality because of Mr. Race's experience. Neither of the proposals needs to include the cost of the soil testing, since any testing will be done by an independent provider,acceptable to the City and reviewed by the engineer.The City will be provided with the name of the testing company for its approval of the building permit. Either Mr. Race or Terry Quinnell will supply the testing company information. Thank you for your help.We should be able to move forward quickly now that this inspection issue is resolved.Terry is anxious to get started. Bryce Huemoeller Danna Monnens, Legal Assistant Huemoeller&Gontarek PLC 16670 Franklin Trail SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 (952)447-2131 (952)447-5628 fax CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail is (1)SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE; (2) ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT; OR (3) CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity as designated above. Any distribution, copying, or use of or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e- mail by or to anyone other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately deleted. 1 Race Engineering Associates 1,010 Consulting Engineers MAY 14,2015 Terry Quinnell Advanced Wall Structures 5650 Starview Lane Prior Lake, MN 55372 RE: 14970 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS Dear Terry, This letter is a response to your request for geotechnical,engineering review and field inspection services related to the design and construction of the SRW retaining wall at 14970 Pixie Point Circle,Prior Lake,MN. The information below outlines our scope of services,project understanding and estimated fees. Project The project consists of constructing three modular block retaining walls at a residence in Prior Lake on Pixie Point Circle. The City of Prior Lake requested a proposal to assist with the structural review,geotechnical review and testing,and construction observation of the retaining wall for the portions greater than four feet(4 ft)in height. The project includes reviewing the engineering drawings provided by the Contractor/Owner,on-site inspection of the retaining walls during construction and geotechnical analysis and testing of the soils supporting and being retained by the mechanically stabilized earth(MSE)retaining walls. Project Scope We propose to review the engineering design and review the geotechnical reports with in-house services. We propose to have the site field testing completed by a local geotechnical testing firm(Braun). PLAN REVIEW • Review plans provided by the Contractor. • Plan review completed by Professional Engineer licensed in Minnesota. • Provide comments on the plans as needed • Prepare a letter of recommendation upon completion of plan review and response to comments CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS • Provide periodic site inspection prior to placement of base units and during wall construction. Inspections will be done by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. • Provide final review report of the retaining walls based on: o Geotechnical inspection reports o Field observations o Final review of the walls GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW • Review local site conditions confirming the design assumptions are confirmed by local conditions(geometry, ground water conditions,and soil properties). • Review proctor densities of proposed and placed fill materials. Race Engineering Assoc.,LLC • 4851 Four Seasons Ct • Eagan,MN 55122 • 612.670.7009 • www.rea-11c.com • Provide final report summarizing field testing reports and observations. • No borings are anticipated or budgeted due to site access restrictions and MSE wall type. Project Schedule Below is a list of major work tasks and proposed dates for achievement. May 22,2015 Receive plans and calculations for review May 29,2015 Provide City with Comments on Plans and calculations June 5,2015 Approve Revised Plans for Construction July 6,2015 Construction Begins July 27,2015 Construction Completed Review Team The review and inspection will be completed by Robert Race,P.E. Estimated Fees The estimated fees for this project are based on the items and time for items listed above. ENGINEERING REVIEW 1) Site visit confirming assumptions made in design 1 visit $300/ea. $300 2) Review of design layout and structural calculations 2 hrs. $150/hr. $300 i) MSE calculations,global review 3) Review design changes requested 1 hr. $150/ht; $150 4) Prepare letter of recommendation 1 hr. $150/hr. $150 5) Site inspections during construction 2 visits/wall(3) $300/ea. $1,800 6) Final Site Visit 1 visit $300/ea. $300. Subtotal $3,000 GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW 1) Review soil types(in visit 1 above) 0 hr. $150/hr. $0 2) Review Proctor curves 0.5 hr. $150/hr. $75 3) Review on-site testing Reports 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 4) Prepare final report 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 Subtotal $375 Total $3,375 Warm regards, Robert Race,P.E. Principle Engineer Page 2 Robert Race, P.E. Qualifications Mi:Race has over 30 years of experience in geotechnical engineering and MSE wall design. He was on the review committee for the NCMA Design manual,version 1 and on the committee for version 2 of the design manual. Mr.Race authored several papers on wall design: • Berg,RR,Anderson,R.P.,Race,R.J.and Chouery-Curtis,V,Reinforced Soil Highway Slopes,Transportation Research Board, Issue No 1288,1990, pp 99-108. • Race,R.and del Cid,H.,Seismic Performance of modular block retaining wall structures during the January 2001 El Salvador Earthquake,Proc.,Int.Geosynthetics Engineering Forum 2001,Taipei,Taiwan,125-144. • NCMA Publications • Ten paper series on SRW history,development,research,design,and construction,National Concrete Masonry Association,2012—2013. • Production History of SRW Systems • SRW Design-Historical Evolution • SRW Research-Historical Evolution • SRW Specifications-Historical Evolution • The Durability of Segmental Retaining Wall(SRW)Units • "Inspection,Repair and Maintenance of GRS-IBS/SRW Retaining Walls",NCMA 2014. • "Evaluation of THE KEYSTONETM I RETAINING WALL SYSTEM",CERF Report#40478,American Society of Civil Engineers,August 2000." Mr Race authors design software for segmental retaining walls(SRWs)and precast modular block walls(PMB). The software includes local,compound,and global stability analysis. Mr.Race participates and is a voting member on the NCMA and ASTM committees for geosynthetics,masonry concrete and precast concrete structures. EDUCATION Purdue University Master of Science,Geotechnical Engineering Georgia College Master's in Business Administration Cornell University Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Mr.Race is currently licensed in over 20 states as a licensed professional engineer. ... . ......._....... Page 3 11 Q 114 4 E4,4° zFlg w 3 a z 3 0 zz� 0- d3 a s „ E3J4 o,-wyo TOT, 9r ° o -wU gw a s wVG 'UOI 'L.h Ea A G"77, .UD� 1 )-Qz+w QO6wO �am, Zw w aF lii r¢w au. zzo x ASF aGU °z ud: 3 °p Gma ado �G Q �� Foz a08 amaaz g� zd� �V Z-, awo e7 zzG 0 oG� aw - HO ap ,. 1a '' K eGaa w-' 3Fm s wa me q 24 �wGw _g2 a $GF -w5`,awwa w VdV z „w w� rH ,iX,3 pg,A • qdF 42 W w GFA e Id gog, g n y�,4wS o h6e OA .0Fg g z <u i E ft o � � g )E 4 ,i , C.) UF . HIAG .Qme. a .'6ra Gaz za �,9, !wOa pw :u6o'qI WPruaa22o G3row u ou3o3a?E h8d2 an al' ga5oa 0.4c24 O U LO zz o ' ^ w vJ wY H cn- 0 Wa G Famil __7,,Z e� �a Z0$1- .• Sal 1 i ,:.;; bnli ir , , 11, w ,,, ‘,„ es t F, ° a 0 riilk w . ,_-El 6 Irill X /--4 �i ,�/ /..4„.�'I o O . O z u�v cL O ttea iu a a zs �,o a U 88o wg�%6 dR Q ^ u, 7 U L D Q 8 F z ��ij g {vi11—i—i 15 w u aFP o g 54 S F °ao Z . 3 a W ao KK3S3 � e. .-I K 2U z aW 6 W u w kzma N Q-moG 7 g F o <Z 2 F w aw �Kosaz ) '0 gi w a � Wo773 cr . G •EF 6 a5 5 O¢ p - MNlo ov ugoq 7--tg11d ao F = �� 3.0 0 o dM : €€ taw PV8 o a z Fe'd J , Yo. ww a p �G w❑ tz-E12 w''�,'Z}}44{{ a U FF 4 z t+ 2 R88 Fa 6ao3AOFad E„Ys F.air(6 2 -;j s: 'CaUff1HOVd SI SIVNOIS533011d X01530 TLV)10IMSNW3111.71101111.35,1313110/0\YMN'A"LNO13310Vd DUMB MIL V0303HSINWI30\1311 SI ONI1LYQ SiIL ST OISSii0/cI K34 TAD Afl510:•ITN V)77f.M.Id.S10i/hA[MO Y IL w I £ L^ 1 a y� til l \\ z» 'N \\pp t-5• ° f X5 his F LI Ti:6111rg o \ ESE ;\ \ z ,,V o A I$ Fi N fZ 4 • ¢ \ \ / ( o i E I >'. v \ ,' z 1 t G., 0 2 ? z , :.,,. 2wz cn *F1 "4111i4t[R4 � t=\ IH tL \\Ox z1-14 n w \ I {y \'i'�'s\. O \ I A fL �°.' ill W I \ 4 0 q 17i VV l's- 1 4. g C \ '' C3.a F, _a. U2 P Q .4.:0;-,2 %,7,,':-;',,:.; U Z J ''-' z1:\V:•;-a'7'1-::',...'"!'.::,'". '5' 1 o z \�I 1 R ,2FW ri r¢ ti O , An /y ag y� ew-.S wU '= - F / I^ i. 80. W v ii< a / . da w/0 02zmU a� F w :--, 'App U x v1 GG / , _,1n - P' 3 ' z' a zn — ' P,'.5 c ep G d p � Z o 0 ui @ 7 Avww a' 9 a >0 g k-'4 o0 ' W 0-R. '6'.‹. Q16—.0, ,b Zm v 6Pv 0 o /'� w tei z o ooh A 5�� Oz H ' a Lya > GQ ii F o° < au'ill 2 ""uE< aszd D t40 02 p o _ w u} rnp0 w',.p.<G �w2 � > y•�i, 'Z' A V ztF, �,, '6210-' U d • PP >'• -. ,, 11 a �! oaz �5' SQA m a ,-54,-„-: a� V "$r. r. w42 fzp-'Fc'A; �7aU cc CO 620 CSF E< ,Si. - Udpr,92w" d O OQ vEU, ' cS g' 4 wlF ',5'''za xww0ww 1---,F2,"-: aPdeCF FF Fw Oaf OG ._. N M V , .p a✓ s0 ''O311QICIowst S1T^.SOts533O1f.[\•OISMTAD 30L,B\0031111:•1O111Ly3Y13k YO/0\N AICb' INCe1J31O31 MIDIS 51NL9.^ia1RS ILII0.\IMIOVLISMISIRUSTNOM3aOfl1:0153CITAD.IQ HOZ•ItO:%LL]RLUCK,CIO:/Z.ZA-CUNT F:< -"LI U p zwz .. ,.. ZznzdQz_ cel:. ° w >w0 F �.+at.v F.e. ZZ 3 JJ wG ii< xJ- ZO~ mJ F•`' O(I'� ¢w0? Z2 fj ccUU S Z °��°� :9 t z2 F'2 8`.`+ :--1 F-o G t2 CZ;f: ',-2 iO ,c"Z wN - < t] g":'; > 1 po a x FG pgr- azi ' °tea a �a tv d� `s€o I-- < ,> zd3d < Z. Q "w Ot ''' TK 3 °aF 2 °a <Q c-` Z .J.ip d K c`' Cu arC� Em „_ pis,' m'Z O �w wz 8 O<z B,3 c1h o < '3< E° 0,2 C w� F- Z G°UAT Na O F rga2,.. ax O G .z `< " za <"'. '-' p a w p"v Ow a`a p o £- 3� Q° w yW 4d� s*.K,r zo G xa y�'pp Q,, z Ad I-x J4 �w ya •t a C O> g(j�j a da UF- G:�oF-'? ir.m z-S E_ s�'�c Q Z F w2 w_ 4a w 88 ,..,w �L� LI -4 cam% wu.. a Uz V �'w � . i J O at ❑ L4- - ,t ee0 ° 4 mOU 8 I:d ° ,Q`' Cc �° at <•3 oh. ca r10 3 O O (j'' 6U F- ww ,2,.: , ° 7. 7,wsS 3. zZ S-, vat G FO w '-.8't; �C uOU 0� J <y0 z < z -FCi u� 0 w2Z 1' -`-� J >y u z 6v: G Jk. A < 4UZG �Y Fp 'mid ZY�zw w O ?AVO wy •Et".1 Sp °2 HF, = z', •oJ �.z z° `8z °S ^G ° 4.UwmF FQ v `m,, c3 4> -. a EZ ,. '° o 4 0 "mac - 3USam QN 'x Po ,ti" wp a $✓p z'5 i �� "° w� �o G� �i F�-..'"w ��� Qa2C'C❑ 'do zxwdHdb �zf:, ^w{xj w xwyZa 4-p ,,< U°Fpa °2 w wt h F-<H Sa d P �oc�zmZ v°-� Z UO ° H NPJ w°c N0. ca.0 u~ amq 5.c m my '-.QF' O �< G�° . <^ hi1H GwV 'm (^ v;am 6GJ J Ow W Ga 1- IUFJ< sw <G � � tZf" �>w pa U� �uJJ FF¢y pZz °'p ° �0 �°1 <c:. z Ua ' S'4 •-• <= �J• !- i 1:-,< �❑ QoffOL `-'o°dox W , cxi ma ug."' z2 ° ,ri dQ Gc ZOv, <° m F<U up,Uw wFa wg ''' ',.-,1-1F =.•' - 2 <w,1'F ^ Z < a IN $0 w �U z w U �U , m. E� u£ 7- �..p .� U o;- a o Z w �zr- •ate "w o °oJo uy Jy ..JJ�> �-' � Q J < � ?° W�' � W w ,nOx `,'-....8 G ��� J V. G_ �- ()y VA � G... G �� z U,1a r , 6Z a a F' aF- °OF ❑m0 F -. w^ 2N pF ,.F. ZaZSU °it 4 U -°" w(_, >3 � F' d a U°Uo d G09,0,v4; y r w z Gm UU a z ° � v.2 Q QS ..., GU F � . ,,;V-.)-1 `• � w o � zd z� t,, ,-. .6-� W ed3WJ de, awr-m aDil ti� x < ZvO,U p0 •o �z� wa4' w4a�waw Uw <� x acrr U< C Um p m a u`f0 �` �F- ''6o a¢2 ,ia 20 coi • ova a rx-, rao gac.6z¢o gU 0� ,gu 020 caP o LJia '',f. 02 �< d = . d d v •F•3, d m ti d d ,c d d w u: d ei d a O UI" `�a O A s ° °FW �GF- ° Op ��� 0x oo wz n r d0 Mz o--'' Ur°� t a0 '0 `> o. w F., z U .°iF g.G Ozp Za A� ui ° P. > 1 w^ z JG U ZZW>•. Pa (n sa a ''O UUZ l�f`�{a i3 r£L- 8-'° w U aU Q'pvt° a'a �� aFj zdo a ov; 3 o ,,-E1 = zc gU �p �� Qz a ay >oa� f °F. Ut 5z o o. .° 0ja e U !t` °W4 3 z f'i� F'�n a y< d°m° z• a8 oo •Q a° g a 2 °BZQZoa s 003v ah- �io ❑ .Z A> .O0 d0 G Q w2 °�¢ 0 U ..' wo 00 6 ° mo �k wG< °D 0 > G� gam„ < �� ill ray ° �D ° x s �, °El UU ..O '''�--I R '' F Z >5 > w° (1'-'°E p I ua. wp -P wF a po^ Qz o mz uPe, U t° m Gv <w U 2a U 1-.O�C U w O w -J F°o (.'-4 uw ° z Ha a� ❑ �4� a j �°c"i� w0W J '' G>' ; 8 .8 a a m ,z ; S . = 52 ]o 6zrZ- G°G �z , 5 h.16 rUZ z wU m �$ 1 F.Q w mG v E aG �-JOW '.- .'A'. ' 0 ao 1 x° a oo c5 $ d a a� <"' E az7w � gl t3° o <� 3z'a rv°xdo 'Wa lx' g-,4� r...p d rnw U C a w wZ ppT apm .0.: zvz <I- CI °Z z -Z g z � o o z �� N ' o d F �5�� Gay�� z op,., '" ° 21,7! "-4g co a� go ,,;0,9,.. i2-g2 �w3tizV ' yy MzzU51F °O 6o � Zu, ?gaYz = 21�,Iihi x o °a E, f? . AGO.' 2 �� i4".. F1 u° m Q>Q c°i°o3 0 2Ac a om •, ,,8A0 0 0 w t 2 J a ° %.s' - : d ' d wad ci U d 2d ,:d d d cd :, c. ".•.; M a UW AA yw G a h m°a A x rs WU t.'-', +± U a• ,k? Ca.- Z r a r zp �o mn - T� u° 8 dz mP < z Li A It �� zd¢ iey z A d g,., ,a _.z an Z°Z {z< d2 -z Q �a ki. UZ Ut2 00 O Q Q' w2 E R- z 6 ^ r4 00 . az - ° E0 si z �m ?� Us as To ❑ ,`',_1 ;; g: z v.w AO = U x0 2° 2 AF 7 G UQ � <FF <q OU 0, v 6 Z pU wu ° U U,3 Z =7d 2 do 3, �Z E-.,'.',a:''', to 2F S- z G ndW cF °~ aU <G 1--,,, 00 FQ aw ,,;.3 ,4 zU i Nal, a•-1 Z� UUP F-2 �F-7 �g °:L Qrj GO Ta 2a 5U �F' aM dd -{� z o E Q 6Sr pJ, € `'27 coif za .O ao K,°, Fg '� zr, <2 o° vut a� o 2 a a < z3 ,/.v ao d� , z o° F� am a0 >B H P l' g U d m _,-,9,, U0 < < ° a gh• ❑ " Y a liUil 0 Yw Li�, w - c-.��z k� °z z U''¢ urn wU °p _ HHHH Pq G CC <3 °6 K2,d U< n� -{p p• <.�� a Q z i-o 0G.4 . a'< 4a 2z= ac H U E"r.a U < U ',-.4. 0,0.4 .7.F) J < 2N �- �n O Z O .9v3 ��p zW 0 2 0 {Wv,ci&' oz 'an Gaa FQ• : 2c d wxxW c,°< 'ao t Gp W 6i� Za OWwh. ZF U U a� G H' -W a�w U a U tip. OF- 410. -0,,,traz p`ri' e i£ Uw t <Ovi o z 2 5 ap a $N r n d raip FW N gz z. z , ,,, Iii o ° pz yo 4 ° wQ zz�+ w< <� F d� J °& 1- wg _.'' zQ zp < < wa zW0 U cT p,, Jg "° U "w 4,q5 r'' w CQQppz p Jp Omp �< y - °`9 o2 a^ Ua :9-"26P`14 °,< z �0 ww F•Z u`U :TP 0 `' >. >. Z,. a10-F2 UG r•'°S Z�� S_2 5O u JO ]U "0 '3cE 1�C i `M 2°g wo" 3 '2 < o GP tJ ��-.. arw ,I r2. a dF t' w oQ of z z Zzb- ,3 -5g ,6• ..T.,-, ,, I:.�F, .-F.,.. -6 .,Z <" Zn� Er a <Z U°0 ��'r v g r g E. �m ° a <- ,uwJ G ..1 Y. 0' p .. 6t. li W c�• A �>o � a � � ° o J,nc�� z ,; � a 2 oho vw < z . (� ° Z tuZ OaZ � U w m W p2 ,'f.,0 J^� yup U2 a OU`i m<Z ,°r� ._-,w < � a U s 6 Jog Uo6i ❑ ,L ,r S U V.E. o Vi..,,‘ -• 2,A' U $4. an° Y4> u K zz og a 8Z -I U G c3''- '' 6 v Q p G r.,9 w w a 2za 2z. 2°w„ :-.;? ..f_ &. n � zcz ❑ <6 0,- oo¢ °d ° Jn a= °g ua. t z 0 xq Y x4 " EJ ci QC r� u zGU "w •w-z 2w <� , 0. aaa `ow Qp ° a° u oa< C a< a >'ii U a < a . - Jy6 cJuZa zaJ Fx ,3 wa yZ < 2 " -e. L, U G� G FF-� O-' UU ZU O 0 aU �S z �^S> G 00 � a a .. 08 5 o gWW tG .oto c,o< o'< WA Wo p< ,z Ow w0 3U a d d G < aU_ mQG gSa J U QJw m o aaa "� as �,m � xr.J t. .._66. 6- 0,-.8 . 0 E . U 6.4 ,: o rd U d ..i k: c; - u d W'� G a..< - � o CI")e. TrinetHO'4X SISM.'OISS33OYd\OIS3QIW04O1N3i\N 3HLlf101111S 3S113NVO/d\YAAO MO InafOYd MIDISSIHLYOi Q31i'L :13OZI3d SIOMIV1IQS1HL SIYNOGSCO`JJ\OIS3QTALI AEI HU'IIM('11HORLUCO SIO/&'RC{ZOSI Bob Hutchins From: Jeff Matzke Sent: Friday,June 26, 2015 9:41 AM To: Bob Hutchins Subject: FW: Bluff clarification Attachments: 14-1301set091514.pdf Bob, Here's Jennie's email regarding the retaining wall work on the Pixie Point lot. Jeff Matzke Planner Community& Economic Development Dept. City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 phone (952)447-9810 fax (952)447-4245 Email jmatzkecityofpriorlake.com Think Green.A Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.Thank you. From:Skancke,Jennie (DNR) [mailto:Jennie.Skancke@state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 8:40 AM To:Jeff Matzke Subject: RE: Bluff clarification Hi Jeff, Our rules state: Subp. lb. Bluff. "Bluff" means a topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having all of the following characteristics: A. part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; B. the slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody; C. the grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and the slope must drain toward the waterbody. An area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff. Thus,there's no distinction whether the bluff has been previously impacted. Slope is rise over run, regardless of whether there's a wall in there. We would support work on the bluff if it were an improvement over existing. Most important would be ensuring long- term function. Please see the attached plans for a project with some really good practices to ensure infiltration on a steep slope. Thank you, Jennie 1 m .C.3.N Qo 1 c 0 0 Z 5m O � 03 y U ODJ 5 c as O ° N E r m 1 ` da m c °c � 2 0. m _ • O o R ° 1 E 1-6 _� N n N � !.•. -94y� � .. h $ '94 �bryN O�N t Ip .2 yom ^` ° 3Cb S. \ S IO alal \t A \ a 2 I a0 R 1 \\ I— o g d \ 1 ` # 1 I 2 ( a & Attz, 3 I411 * # 1a W 1 0 I :f #\M1 a LLQ \ 9 m 11 CL j(. \* 44".', G m o ' ' 1 , ... g f°Y1 N ,I i °k I\ m$ib �� II I 11[1101:111 ta' O m i .I / / ^^,, lI= t' / // I x ri W m „• m / / // i r i90 I Gp° �L , 7 J // ....,06.---. -- I //,/ .� m Ci �a / r '906 —ms— ----9, y i - M � _0- ' , CO r i � '� 45 N- r/ � ",-,� /�.-- `-- � 1_ � cej ' „. i _ % //, • r _ -t �j 00 -j ice- "..�J' ''� �i�f�'�`'r r ,� / / / :f/ i 1111 o .�` 1 / - '--�`"m"_--_--_ _ —-- ..- ,-� -28g(2.- Q..- L c 0 c O ti �- � -1F- i,.,�. �'"r,,,�-''i —__L_— ..—._____.------ / .1 c ami'.�m'n a,- .-E- 0 C ,soca_ , �- - - a aZmm mo V -.�, ` — t ..-ms t----= - / .. m mn m .. k t --aCa— 4”` �''�otB l �� ,0 3 y v y O m '"L_� -''� ''-.-- E mtucm W e > > -ole=�.. -÷-._... "�.�^� /� 1 1.11aM.la m¢ U` V - _ _ / I Y•aa"X 001 p O-La Q J -'INHO `-__•Mm 0 1'•eµ1 y J g 0O o ti L. -mi cs° 9ge- .,«•-.,•.P0011.. K 001 S s ann ger•w w e'la w.�•01"0911-txla Q U Q .,4 7,4 sg�• �j WWF`§ �(37IJJ 3)1d7 �° W° Q> �la_I C -6 inn U` 3 < I X .n t 11.-- 4,- §i m .0 o 0 c l o vpc vmC.) as ti U 1 , OF O o J 8 r ❑❑¢Aa ti m7,'1 sZ F a�❑a0¢E i!E), J Ym by Jzf��.-1�pp6p U Jgo , 2AFE y?° o iy� o 9 ¢zzdmw"gN ° oN°a t�� o�z�d°w�iW!'o='maowz5z V• os zuooF mu"'z uuQJF gJuu ¢Fo �0 5 / 1c1,—.¢.vFiZLL>E:c16 aE6. FOYv,.I U_c.a U >it ori.n ¢OFOe Vm6V e t / Fencepost / I F/ o z a N Ann ism \ Pr \pill_ iii -V1 , 0�• Off`j ` Cl''''' xas a€% \ iii:. • ' •- E �\[ '� 4e A. N Q Ti- ,, qO o Q Qz a c a ,.. _ 43 dEG16X 3 a� n z • ao tx +..r 1:. ....\; *, .. 7, -. - \, + v Z H c . ., \\ 2::\ \ . ,u, a. .: g ) \\. \ 7 \ \, _ o H. , , H ,,,, ��• p : i ; W O�'M Oa \w cHi1 ,q� O .4. ,2�a �• .. Retai Qq +za 0o wa �/1, _ Qo owd ¢oo �" �:1� is v tin Q axodE q RetainingWall ���+1 _`�►�����,��•' 0 `� g U z `� 1-0.1 l a - o r�MM .smwc =X[L : n E ja' c a Oa kg`' F, P� O O4E aw z �¢ Fw du o • �: L a w> ¢ 3k do.rci, z,o z o n oo Wq Steps 0 2, E �¢o Via. az `` \ = E o N V) a¢ (:)., Lightpole \ \\\ q oF> °Q °xaz cto \ \ F > ¢a ¢mow r QuR ado �° az- 0o< U 3_ aaQ �W'z �> zHC7,1` mW 3UQ zw� >w 0. Wox a A = 0 - W a o .Y w .. a m (S WWfNMM�V V aNAN� E! LI, W Na ocED L.._ m d2 L6 d W-1 z zw W W 1=1-1 �o co.» z _I W sR 1 i WOno-V In 10 1••Co 01 0 :.N M 7 ME p 8;P S \ S5 �I �'`✓�, i- 'WEo V 1 L E?=iLe k) F_ ' a.. flHPft EL Om N q rn V W Z L. H Pr N O 33 o Z 0 xo 3 d U OK x c. d 3 10o 0 W 4(! RQ� y H a a w sa kygx 8za J N • c,� L giw O vA n 7 Z rh2o 0 30e0 5 � ZaQ W v �' °wa�1wzW W dr LI a X0/1 K `,`• gQ U�NJ n U U� w w h �w ‘•\ w i,, 1 _ 3 o W , ji N mz `• • u_ 11:1:11=1'.I w a° a 0 Nw, Fla .. Iw z zz o Oo>. o -11=11— o W • aWU o m �� No 11.11.11.1.11 woo o®- M �- 11.`.114 3W II: oo w J 3 LLI W o z3 '�� `' �Jlll.l ��= 111.1. a'oo U Wz Q o ' . ?'\' I.. ,11 6 mw w a z § dti ` ` ��m 1f ll' o 0 r � Vj � 1=11=1L 0 O r '``; O F U O U M .,,..„ z 11- Z w N o W „.. ,...:..,„„,,,,„„,w.,„. zZ �� a ° rn ° U z - I'� a Q. 11 o • � CL _ o 91 I mL ��`>�00 w g �� D v> ii ISI I i �•• n Z p 1 t` LI ff 1111: _ I >Zo N 'O F en 0> o ' 11 '11-III SO4 w c.,-. `^ w~ rcLD a oho i35a a �U II I _�� m0� a a cv¢2 F=� vi N I z J woo o '(r�-S-..7��I 5 orW �imw w o 8 Q z r:1 = W -w p0�m 'o uV° 9 U ce tzq cn d d m1'-b= L7', H_Le w wel p g r g W - O "vat a 2 I ¢N CD N 0. o1 U 9W- E t/ 'b 8 Jw Z �]I nG 0 c.xM x ug _ Q v) c .,- < .14 d• y W U GK4 30 zH 'jm Z=, .7,- A�® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE D6�ie�2o 5") THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT MaryLanning g Agency 10 Insurance PHONE No.Ext): (763)551-1010 FAX,o,/C No): (763)559-1340 6469 Sycamore Court N E-MAIL mlannin @a enc 10.com ADDRESS: g g y INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# Maple Grove MN 55369 INSURERA:West Bend Mutual 15350 INSURED Site Solutions ProfessionalsINSURERBAuto Owners Insurance 18988 DBA: Civil Design Professionals INSURERC: 8609 Lyndale Ave S INSURERD: Suite 200 INSURERE: Bloomington MN 55420 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:CL1561102437 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 2,000,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $ A CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR DAMAGETO RENTED PREMMISES(Ea occurrence) $ 300,000 A037149 6/8/2015 6/8/2016 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 2,000,000 GE 'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 PRO X POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 6,000,000 OTHER: Liability and Medical Expense $ 2,000,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED(SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 (EaA X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED A037149 6/8/2015 6/8/2016 BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS (Per accident) $ A X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR A037149 6/8/2015 6/8/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ _ DED RETENTION$ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X PER OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N STATUTE ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N/A B (Mandatory in NH) 08078579 12/25/2014 12/25/2015 E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) • CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Prior Lake THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 4646 Dakota St SE ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Prior Lake, MN 55372 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE '��/ -='—/�✓' Marc Macke/MARY ...0" .-7.----...............-... ,,.`�-'`.�7/' ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025(701401 t 1111111111P- .31 lasa IVIL DESIGN Lsdiui PRO 2 . c� ��- �' �� P JUNE 18, 2015t,\tc.l�rt--�mcs� "� 1:2„. Mr. Robert Hutchins—Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714 RE: 14970 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS Dear Mr.Hutchins, This letter is a response to a request for geotechnical,engineering review and field inspection services related to the design and construction of the SRW retaining wall at 14970 Pixie Point Circle,Prior Lake,MN. The information below outlines our scope of services,project understanding and estimated fees. Project The project consists of constructing three modular block retaining walls at a residence in Prior Lake on Pixie Point Circle. The City of Prior Lake requested a proposal to assist with the structural review,geotechnical review and testing,and construction observation of the retaining wallf ; = ---• - = • The project includes reviewing the engineering drawings provided by the Contractor/Owner,on-site inspection of the retaining walls during construction and geotechnical analysis and testing of the soils supporting and being retained by the mechanically stabilized earth(MSE)retaining walls. Project Scope We propose to review the engineering design and review the geotechnical reports with in-house services. We propose to have the site field testing completed by a local geotechnical testing firm(Braun). PLAN REVIEW • Review plans provided by the Contractor. • Plan review completed by Professional Engineer licensed in Minnesota. • Provide comments on the plans as needed • Prepare a letter of recommendation upon completion of plan review and response to comments CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS • Provide periodic site inspection prior to placement of base units and during wall construction. Inspections will be done by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. • Provide fmal review report of the retaining walls based on: o Geotechnical inspection reports o Field observations o Final review of the walls GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW • Review local site conditions confirming the design assumptions are confirmed by local conditions (geometry,ground water conditions,and soil properties). Civil Design Professionals • 8609 Lyndale Ave.S., Suite 200 Bloomington,MN 55420 • Office 952-303-5312 • www.cdp-us.com • Review proctor densities of proposed and placed fill materials. • Provide final report summarizing field testing reports and observations. • No borings are anticipated or budgeted due to site access restrictions and MSE wall type. Project Schedule Below is a list of major work tasks and proposed dates for achievement. June 22,2015 Receive plans and calculations for review June22,2015 Provide City with Comments on Plans and calculations June 23,2015 Approve Revised Plans for Construction June 24 2015 Construction Begins July 1,2015 Construction Completed Review Team The review and inspection will be completed by Michael R.Johnson,P.E. Estimated Fees The estimated fees for this project are based on the items and time for items listed above. ENGINEERING REVIEW 1) Site visit confirming assumptions made in design 1 visit $300/ea. $300 2) Review of design layout and structural calculations 2 hrs. $150/hr. $300 i) MSE calculations,global review 3) Review design changes requested 1 hr. $150/hr. $150 4) Prepare letter of recommendation 1 hr. $150/hr. $150 5) Site inspections during construction lvisits/wall(3) $600/ea. $1,800 6) Final Site Visit 1 visit $300/ea. $300 Subtotal $3,000 GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW 1) Review soil types(in visit 1 above) 0 hr. $150/hr. $0 2) Review Proctor curves 0.5 hr. $150/hr. $75 3) Review on-site testing Reports 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 4) Prepare final report 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 Subtotal $375 Total $3,375 If you have any questions,please feel free to give me a call. Respectfull, � I 0' Michae ' ohnson, PE 2 Civil Design Professionals • 8609 Lyndale Ave.S.,Suite 200 Bloomington,MN 55420 • Office 952-303-5312 • www.cdp-us.com saviar- 40, L, ESIGN Mit 'IP AMMO 01111111 -4� : PROFESSIONALS JUNE 22, 2015 Mr. Robert Hutchins—Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372-1714 RE: 14970 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS Dear Mr.Hutchins, This letter is a response to a request for geotechnical,engineering review and field inspection services related to the design and construction of the SRW retaining wall at 14970 Pixie Point Circle,Prior Lake,MN. The information below outlines our scope of services,project understanding and estimated fees. Project The project consists of constructing three modular block retaining walls at a residence in Prior Lake on Pixie Point Circle. The City of Prior Lake requested a proposal to assist with the structural review,geotechnical review and testing,and construction observation of the retaining walls,as the city policy is any wall in a bluff requires engineering. The project includes reviewing the engineering drawings provided by the Contractor/Owner,on-site inspection of the retaining walls during construction and geotechnical analysis and testing of the soils supporting and being retained by the mechanically stabilized earth(MSE)retaining walls. Project Scope We propose to review the engineering design and review the geotechnical reports with in-house services. We propose to have the site field testing completed by a local geotechnical testing firm(Braun). PLAN REVIEW • Review plans provided by the Contractor. • Plan review completed by Professional Engineer licensed in Minnesota. • Provide comments on the plans as needed • Prepare a letter of recommendation upon completion of plan review and response to comments CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS • Provide periodic site inspection prior to placement of base units and during wall construction. Inspections will be done by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. • Provide final review report of the retaining walls based on: o Geotechnical inspection reports o Field observations o Final review of the walls GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW • Review local site conditions confirming the design assumptions are confirmed by local conditions (geometry,ground water conditions,and soil properties). Civil Design Professionals • 8609 Lyndale Ave. S., Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55420 • Office 952-303-5312 • www.cdp-us.com • Review proctor densities of proposed and placed fill materials. • Provide final report summarizing field testing reports and observations. • No borings are anticipated or budgeted due to site access restrictions and MSE wall type. Project Schedule Below is a list of major work tasks and proposed dates for achievement. June 22,2015 Receive plans and calculations for review June22,2015 Provide City with Comments on Plans and calculations June 23,2015 Approve Revised Plans for Construction June 24 2015 Construction Begins July 1,2015 Construction Completed Review Team The review and inspection will be completed by Michael R.Johnson,P.E. MN PE#25493 Estimated Fees The estimated fees for this project are based on the items and time for items listed above. ENGINEERING REVIEW 1) Site visit confirming assumptions made in design 1 visit $300/ea. $300 2) Review of design layout and structural calculations 2 hrs. $150/hr. $300 i) MSE calculations,global review 3) Review design changes requested 1 hr. $150/hr. $150 4) Prepare letter of recommendation 1 hr. $150/hr. $150 5) Site inspections during construction lvisits/wall(3) $600/ea. $1,800 6) Final Site Visit 1 visit $300/ea. $300 Subtotal $3,000 GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW 1) Review soil types(in visit 1 above) 0 hr. $150/hr. $0 2) Review Proctor curves 0.5 hr. $150/hr. $75 3) Review on-site testing Reports 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 4) Prepare final report 1 hrs. $150/hr. $150 Subtotal $375 Total $3,375 If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Respectfull, I .0.1 Michae ' ohnson, PE 2 Civil Design Professionals • 8609 Lyndale Ave. S., Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55420 • Office 952-303-5312 • www.cdp-us.com