HomeMy WebLinkAbout10D - Transit Management Plan
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
June 20, 2005 ~
100 r\J~
Frank Boyles, City Manager ~
Kelly Meyer, Asst. to the City Manager
AGENDA ITEM:
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE UNIFIED
TRANSIT MANAGEMENT PLAN.
DISCUSSION:
Introduction and Historv: In January 2001, the City Council chose to opt-out of
the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVT A) in order to provide improved
local transit services to Prior Lake residents. Since that time, the City has
developed and operated the Laker Lines express commuter, and the Local
Laker Link summer circulator.
In March 2003, Scott County and the cities of Prior Lake, Shakopee, Savage,
Belle Plaine, Elko, Jordan, New Market, New Prague and the Scott County
HRA, created a Transit Review Board and Transit Planning Team. Its mission
is to enhance the transit options of all Scott County residents through an
intergovernmental best management process. This mission is also consistent
with the City Transportation goals in its 2020 (now 2030) Vision and Strategic
Plan.
It is not surprising that as our community continues to grow, so must our
services and how we provide them. In April 2004, the City Council authorized
Prior Lake's participation to cooperatively select a consultant to develop a
unified transit management plan (UTMP). The purpose of the UTMP was to
study existing'services available within Scott County, get feedback from transit
users and transit stakeholders on service needs, and to recommend an action
plan that identifies how Scott County entities could partner to improve the
delivery of transit services and infrastructure over the next 15 years.
The plan has now been completed, distributed and presented to SCALE, and
each of the organizations who are proposed to participate in the Transit
program. The City Council previously heard a presentation of the UTMP by
John Mulcahey of Scott County, and has since conducted a work session on
this topic as well. The City Council is being asked to accept the plan and
provide the staff will direction for its implementation.
Councilmember Fleming is in his first year representing Prior Lake on the
Transit Review Board, and may also have additional comments to offer.
CURRENT
CIRCUMSTANCES: Attached is an Executive Summary of the UTMP. The UTMP has brought
several issues to the forefront that require Council direction, including:
Changes in express, circulator and dial-a-ride services
Park & ride lot(s)
Service Identity
www.cityofpriorlake.com
1:\COUNCIL\AGNRPTS\2005\062005 UT~8W~P~~~~7 .4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
System management
System operator
Funding
ISSUES:
Shown below is a brief summary of the report recommendations and some
staff suggestions regarding each:
1. Chanaes in Express. Circulator and Dial-a-Ride Services:
Express Service - The UTMP proposes that the Laker Lines service change
its routes to utilizes the 169 corridor, and that at least one additional route
be added. The UTMP also recommends that Shakopee initiate at least
three additional commuter routes. The Laker Lines service would also stop
at a 169 park & ride to provide service to Shakopee residents.
Circulator Service - The UTMP proposes that Prior Lake and Shakopee
cooperate to realign their local fixed routes to operate a year-round
circulator that connects the two communities. Currently the only circulator
service offered in Prior Lake is the Local Laker Link which is operated only
during the summer.
Dial-a-Ride - The UTMP recommends that Scott County assume all
responsibility for dial-a-ride service in the County. This service would
remain substantially the same for Prior Lake. Shakopee would discontinue
any dial-a-ride service it is currently providing.
Comments: Staff is already working to realign the Laker Lines express
routes to utilize the 169 corridor. One of the biggest advantages of
operating our own system, is that service changes can happen relatively
quickly. The concept of utilizing 169 is especially timely because bus
shoulders are available, lanes have been added, and stoplights are being
eliminated. As construction concludes, the route should get even quicker.
This change will also allow Shakopee and Savage riders to use our Laker
Lines service. We will also work to add a third bus as demand dictates.
With respect to circulator service, the Council should consider whether a
joint service with Shakopee is necessary at this time. Currently, the Local
Laker Link service is a summer route implemented to address the needs
primarily of Prior Lake youth in reaching summer schools, jobs, and park
destinations. At this time, staff does not believe there is enough year-round
demand for circulator service to justify the associated costs. Staff would
recommend continuing the Local Laker Link summer service until a more
extensive fixed route service is demanded by users. Scott County currently
contracts for the operation of this service. In the future, we should
periodically issue RFPs for providers to assure cost-effectiveness.
That Scott County assume all responsibility for dial-a-ride service seems
appropriate. They are currently providing service throughout the County.
2. Park & Ride Lots: The UTMP proposes an 1100 stall regional park & ride
lot or transit station in the vicinity of 169 between CSAH 83 and CSAH 18.
This lot acquisition and overlay would be funded jointly by Prior Lake,
1:\COUNCIL\AGNRPTS\2005\062005 UTMP adoption.DOC
Shakopee, Scott County, and the Metropolitan Council. Though it is likely
that additional funding for the transit station facility would be needed. While
that facility is being developed, it is also recommended that a temporary lot
be acquired in some fashion so that Laker Lines express routes can stop in
Shakopee to serve additional riders.
The topic of a regional park & ride lot, the opportunity to purchase the
existing Laker Lines lot, realignment of express service, and the concern for
available parking in the downtown Prior Lake area, has led staff to further
question whether the City's local park & ride lot (Colorado Street) is in the
best location.
Comments: Staff believes there is demand for a regional transit station.
From an operations standpoint, for Laker Lines to serve a regional park &
ride in the general area proposed at CSAH 18 & 169, or CSAH 21 extended
& CSAH 16, would be relatively smooth, and the service would reach a
larger number of users. In the short term, staff would recommend
participating in service improvements by serving a temporary park & ride lot.
Prior Lake could provide funding from transit to assist in the acquisition of
the property for a regional park & ride lot. At such time as the lot is
improved with a ramp or other improvements, the City Council would need
to evaluate the appropriateness of funding improvements in another city.
The staff would not recommend eliminating the local park & ride lot. For
Prior Lake residents, a local lot is more convenient than a regional lot - at
least in the short term. Once a regional lot is developed, users may find it
more convenient to drive directly to the regional lot. However, the City has
completed a parking study that indicates there will be parking shortages in
the downtown area both north and south of CSAH 21. To address this
issue, staff would recommend relocation of the park & ride lot to Shepherd's
Path. The downtown lot would be purchased utilizing non-transit funds so it
is unrestricted with regard to users and available during the traditional work
day for business employees and customers. This would be a more
expensive alternative in that relocating the lot would mean leasing parking
space, but from a service standpoint, Shepherd's Path is in a very good
location.
3. Service Identitv: The original report recommended that a single identity for
county-wide transit services would be more appealing to users.
Comments: Staff believes that Laker Lines has established an identity with
our riders and within our community, and that it is possible to retain
individual identity in a regional partnership. We would like to try to refine this
concept before losing the Laker Lines identity.
4. System Manaaement: The UTMP recommends that a formal system of
governance be implemented which might be a joint powers agreement with
discussion open for long-term governance.
Comments: Staff would recommend retaining its current management of
the service. Staff believes that the City should not lose control of its funds or
1:\COUNCIL\AGNRPTS\2005\062005 UTMP adoption. DOC
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
the ability to modify service to meet local transit demands. This does not
preclude the City from entering into partnerships with other transit providers
where appropriate.
5. System Ooerator: The UTMP recommends that a third party be contracted
for the administration and operation of commuter services, and that Scott
County be responsible for local fixed service and dial-a-ride service.
Comments: The Laker Lines service provider, Schmitty & Sons, has done a
very good job serving Prior Lake's needs to this point. The Council may
want to consider if it is necessary to change operators. To assure cost-
effectiveness, it may be appropriate to solicit proposals periodically for all
service types.
6. Fundina: The UTMP suggests initially pooling transit funds with Shakopee,
and in the future seeking a dedicated local funding source if necessary. It
also suggests that future options could include consolidating back into
MVTA or to Southwest Metro.
Comments: The staff is recommending that the City not lose control of its
existing funding, but rather enter into cooperative agreements with
Shakopee on an as-needed basis. In addition, neither seeking a local
funding source or annexing into a larger provider are desirable alternatives
and should be pursued very carefully.
Conclusion. Looking at the report recommendations over the long term, there
are more positives than negatives. From a staff perspective, it would be most
appropriate to move carefully toward some the objectives. Prior Lake sought to
operate its own transit system because other systems could not address our
needs, give us the identity we sought, or the flexibility to modify our system as
we see fit to meet our residents' needs. This is not to say that we cannot work
together in an effort to achieve UTMP objectives - which for the most part are
to provide improved services and transit infrastructure to Scott County
residents. The attached resolution approves the Unified Transit Management
Plan with a number of the conditions outlined herein.
1. Adopt Resolution 05-XX accepting the Unified Transit Management Plan
with the conditions outlined herein.
2. Deny the resolution and provide staff with direction.
Alternative NO.1.
1:\COUNCIL\AGNRPTS\2005\062005 UTMP adoption. DOC
. .- ......... ._.__.__._....__._.....~- I
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
RESOLUTION OS-xx
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE
UNIFIED TRANSIT MANAGEMENT PLAN WITH CONDITIONS
Motion By:
Second By:
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the value of providing quality, cost-effective transit
services in the Prior Lake community; and
WHEREAS, the City values its partnerships with Scott County and other Scott County communities:
and
WHEREAS, in April 2004, Scott County and the communities of Prior Lake, Shakopee, Savage,
Belle Plaine, Elko, Jordan, New Market, New Prague and the Scott County HRA,
partnered to hire a consultant to develop a Unified Transit Management Plan ("UTMP")
to improve the delivery of transit services and infrastructure over the next 15 years;
and
WHEREAS, the Unified Transit Management Plan has been completed and the Council has had
several opportunities for review; and
WHEREAS, the City's 2030 Vision and Strategic Plan identifies objectives for transit service that
are addressed in part by the Unified Transit Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is concerned about relinquishing the identity, funding and governance
of a successful transit service to one that proposes a much larger model that is
unproven; and
WHEREAS, the staff has recommended that the City first implement the service improvements of
the UTMP, and then work to develop the long-term identity, funding and governance
based upon the demand of a successful system.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA as follows:
1) The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2) The recommendations of the Unified Transit Management Plan are hereby adopted with the
following conditions associated with its implementation:
a. The City will remain in control of the management of and funding mechanisms for, City provided
transit services.
www.cityofpriorlake.com
Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
b. Staff is directed, when deemed appropriate based upon demand by Prior Lake residents, to
implement route and service changes recommended by the Unified Transit Management Plan,
including serving a temporary and/or future regional park & ride lot outside the community.
c. The City Council must formally approve the site, any allocation of funds, and any associated
joint powers agreements for the construction of a regional park & ride facility.
d. The identity of the City's Laker Lines commuter service shall be maintained and operated by its
current provider.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2005.
YES
NO
Haugen Haugen
Fleming Fleming
LeMair LeMair
Petersen Petersen
Zieska Zieska
Frank Boyles, City Manager
R:\RESOLUTI\ADMINRES\UTMP .DOC
~
<(
::::a:
:E
::)
en
oes
en
w
::)
en
~
z
<(
-oJ
a..
I-
z
w
:::E
w
C)
<(
z
<(
:::E
l-
e;;
Z
~
l-
e
w
u:
Z
::)
en
c:
o
:+:::i
c..
o
en
+-' a>
c: c..>
~.~
:::J a>
()(/)
c::t:
o ~
1:5~
~J-
E~
<::5
c::-g~
'ffi co -
- - 0
~ >.-
"'C~~
C::._
g ~ 2:
(,).- Q)
(]) CI) 00
...::.::(])oo
rot:::t::
--.J:.:J
..... L..
.g~
o...~
.....
co 5 (])
:5Q)Q)
"'Co..
'~'OO ~
....- "5 ~
.g0Cf)
'C 0.. c::
0.9 .-
(,) (/) c:
"'C (])o
c:: m ..... . OJ
co CD ~ Q)
~..- -S ....
(]) --
_ "'C
Oro.sa
c: c: ro
"'C .Q ~
"3 0> (,)
o ~ Q)
;:;:.0
CI)(])"'C
(])c:"3
.S: <( 0
-J ;:
a> ~ ~
~x~
-J(])Q)
:-2
en
a>
en
o
c..
e
a..
a..
~
J-
::::>
-
c:
:Q. ~ <C
~;::gS:
.:;: Q) "":;E
O c:: 0__
..... (,) 0
o..Q5m
o"'CCD't::
-c:"-~
(]) ~.5: 00
(]) (]) co
0..(,)Q)
~ '2: "'C c:
co Q) o'ffi
..c:(/)EE
Cf)OOQ)~
~~g.9
~a.~(])
COx.....O>
--.JQ)Q)ro
..... > >
o 0 ro
. i:: 0> Cf)
a..
en
a>
c..>
'S;
L-
a>
(/)
CI) a>
(]) (,)
.S: '2:
-J (])
~a>Cf)
~c:<(
co Or-
-JZ>
I I:;E
~~I
ro 0.. a>
--.JOO>
..... ...::.:: co
o co >
. i:: ..c: co
a.. Cf) Cf)
+-'
c:
~
L-
:::J
()
(u "'C 00
~ C::a>Cf)
@-E2-r-
-rox~CCl
~o..a>e
"'CO-~
C6C:-~Q)
gro~..Qt6
-J (]) - 0.. (]) --.J
c:(,)o.........
'(ij .~ t6 oE .Q
-(])..c: .....
.5: 00 Cf) ;: 0...
ro a> 0
:;E~..c:--......
:.5 ~ co.5:
....
a>
32E>
~ co
0-
;:'0
~ ....
.S: ~
-Jco
~ --
~ .5: ....
co 1Q 0
:::x1O
co (]) ~
g (5 ~
-J c:'u
E
a>
en
>.
00
a>
"'C
'i::
I
ro
I
ro
:.a
0..0 a>
o ;:.~
a> ~ c:
> a> .....
a>a>~
"'C~CCl
ro .9a>~
(]) (]) .0 . en
"'C "'::'::(])oo
.:;: ~.~ 0
e .....2:0..
0.. oa>"'C
o 'i:: 00 c:
- o......coc:
>. ~.9 00 0
C a> ro~15
5 en (]) ~ 'c U5
Oa>o..~~......
...... .~ ~'u E '00
o2:rocEC:
~ ~ c7j :Q. 8 ~
"'C
c:
~
e
~
ro
a>
>-
I
a> .....
(]) 0
0.. ......
o ro
...::.::-
co ~
..c:~
Cf) 'u
(])
"'C
a:::
I
.... co
(]) I
E ro
E (5
~ I
>.
I c
a>....~
"'::'::00
~1Oo
0"315
'i:: ~ (,)
a.. 'u Cf)
~"'C 0..;
-5-s~g~ ;.2
ro 0._ .... .- a> 0:::
"'C a>...,!....... > 92~
c: __ 0.. a>.E e - a..
ro S 0 c 00 0.. "'C
~ 8 'ffi ~ g> ~ ~ g ~
-.J (]) :5 c:: (]). S2 .5: ;: Co
.... a> c: co .2: 2: .Q a> ro
.g g- 2 ~ ~ ~ t6 (])
0... -ffi .5: ...... (]) (]) -.J . ==
..c: ro c: 0.. (/) .... ~
,.,.. E Q) 0 0 0 CT
VJ :!2 0 ..c: 'C u
u - 0... co
~ a>a> ...::.::_
'n~:5a"EO~
"""ro co;: 0
OOEt5~O(])"'C
o co .o>(])
"'C ~ Eo.. ~ Q5 15 ~
"3 (,) .- 0 0> J::; .....
~ .~ 10 ;: ..... 00 "E
;> __,- co'c 0
a> '-' ..... Q) ro . - (,)
~ ~ .~Q'- c: ~ a>
-' __ aj 0<(.0
:t:: (/) , ",n "'C
.... - .:: ~ !l> -
o :c .~ 2: 0 0 5
(t ro "'C ~ >:;E ;:
"E
roO>
o.~
.0 x
_co
c:-
:Q. ~
ro 0
00 00
"'C:t:::
a3€
E ;:
E:=:
o 00
(,) c::
~ ~
~-;,:>.
.sa . ~ :t::
ro - ....
E co 0
.- Q5 :5
== 0.. ~
=>oro
..... .....
a> a>
:-2"'C
>':;:
e e
0..0..
--
~ ~
00
Q.Q.<(
oar-
I I>
a>a>:;E
a>"'::':: I
o..roa>
o --.J 0>
...::.::....co
co 0 >
..c: . i:: ro
Cf) a.. Cf)
(/) ~ g>
~~.~
..... ro a>
~:e 00
a>c:ooC:::
.- a> ~
CI)"'C 00 0...
(])-~
.S: 5 .0 a>
~ ;: ~:5
(]) 00 c:
~a>0
co - (])
-J~..c:
e-
>'c:
~~
o~
00...
--
- ro
o c:
(,) 0
Cf) .-
_O>aj
(]) ~ (])
-ffi.....0"
I ro 0
-'(,)...::.::
..... co
oO..c:
'i:: 0 Cf)
o..LO
- co
a>"'C
a> c::
o..~
0__
...::.::-
co c::
..c: .-
Cf).Q,
ro
00
(])
00
ro
a>
00
...2:'- (5
c a>
~ ~g
(,) ci I :;E
~~ ~ I
~o.. g-~
..... -...::.:: ro
ococo>
. i:: (,) ..c: ro
0....QCf)Cf)
(])OO ro
__ c: . en c:: :t:::
0'- co'- 0..
E.o (]) co .
p~ 10(,).$
- ~ a> 0..- c:
c a> (/) 'u ~ a>
O"'C ~ .- <5 E
(,)"'C I 't::. _ a>
c:: c: >. co 0> >
'(ij ro -9 0.. ~ e
co>~.9O>Q..
'm.5: co :> c:: E
W"'C (,) :> :.a .-
:;Ec:c:.,gc:
..2 0 ..2
__00.....
O"'CO
..c:s(t
(,) -- (])
E~2:E
a>>a>Q)
OO'oo:::::OO"'C
0":::: 0 . en
:;'O::;~
"30.sa~
o .:=: ro ro
;:C:C:--.J
>. 0 .2>
:t:::(,)~
O~"'C
"'C
c:
a> co
"'::'::a>
~(,)
..... .~
.Q a> en
Q:~c
a>
~~E
(]).Q ~
~g>e
0""0..
"'::'::(])E
~ :-2 .-
Cf)~j9
a a.'o.
o>oro
c: - (,)
:.:: 0>
o c:
d::.a
c:
..2
(])"'C
a> c:
o..~
0::
-ffi . 00
..c:C:
Cf)~
"'Ca>
c: >
ro ro
a>..c:
t6>.~
--.Jc(')
..... ~ c:
o ..... co
'i:: ~ co
0..(,).0
00 >.
(]) >
0> 00 (])
c: a> --.J
ro 0>
..c: c:: ro
0 ro c:
a> ..c: 00 g
(,) 0 ~
.~ a> :.a
(,) a> 'u "'C
a> .~ (,) <(
Cf) c:: co -
00 a> ro Ll.. 0>
00 Cf) c: j9 c:
~ ....
ro Q) :.a
0.. (,) > '0. c:
x 0 0 ro ~
W --.J <.9 0 Ll..
-,...---.._,....----'"'_._....,_."-,'"+.~_....._-".....,."~--,,-.........,..*""',.,,'""'~"~,,~,..._............__.
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary
Identified Issues
A number of transit-related issues have been identified in the course of this study,
including the following:
River Crossings
There are three major roadway crossings of the Minnesota River: The Cedar Street
Bridge, Interstate 35W and US Trunk Highway (TH) 169. Of these, two have been
the focus of separate public transportation studies in recent years, the I -35W Bus
Rapid Transit Study and the Cedar Street Transitway Study, that have
recommended significant transit improvements in each of these respective corridors.
The TH 169 corridor is significantly under-utilized as a transit corridor, with no
regular transit crossings of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge, the most direct corridor
connecting northwestern Scott County with the Minneapolis metro area to the
north.
Existing Services
Scott County is served by four separate transit operators: Scott County Transit,
predominantly a dial-a-ride operator, Laker Lines, Shakopee Transit and the
Minnesota Valley Transit Authority CMVTA). The latter three entities are service
providers that "opted out" from Metro Transit's service area, electing to provide
their own services funded, in part, by state Motor Vehicle Sales Tax (MVST) funds.
Of the six Metro area opt-out regions, Prior Lake and Shakopee exhibit the lowest
ridership and highest relative costs for transit services and provide the lowest level
of transit service per capita to their citizenry.
While MVTA does provide significant local and express service out of the Burnsville
Station, that service is remote from much of the western portions of Scott County
and utilized to a much lesser degree by residents of Prior Lake and Shakopee as
compared to residents of Savage, (an IvlVTA member) located further to the east.
While more than 300 regular park-and -ride users, identified as residing in Scott
County, predominantly at Burnsville Station, a significant majority reside in the
eastern third of the County; in part because present transit services are oriented to
the I-35W corridor rather than to the TH 169 corridor.
The more rural portions of Scott County, including the communities of Jordan and
Belle Plaine in the southwestern portion of Scott County and the 'communities of
Elko, New Market and New Prague in southern Scott County, are served exclusive
~1
~ Perteet, Inc.
Page 1
----~-"-..,...."'"-..-.... .~ ~ ,,""".-~;--~~-......_..-..-._<,,+-___.....,~._....____._~,..,."~.,~.._~..,,-,,"_.-_....""."~_.~_,..._-..,......,"'._,..-".__;,~'''''...'.,.,,..._~~_,,_.~H.-............",_,_...,>,~. _..'
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary .
via dial-a-ride services provided by Scott County Transit. Lower developmental and
residential densities in these regions make fixed route transit service impractical at
the present time, but steady rapid growth in this region suggests ,that close
monitoring of densities, population and travel patterns of residents of these
communities should be conducted.
The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC) currently provides its own
fixed route services to multiple origins and destinations throughout the
Metropolitan Area for the purpose of employee transportation. Fourteen buses are
operated by a subcontractor for these purposes.
Study Recommendations
The significant park-and -ride demand identified from Scott County shows the need
for improved transit services, in particular, comm uter express services into
downtown Minneapolis and into suburban areas such as Edina, Bloomington,
Richfield and Eden Prairie. It is recommended that new services focus first on the
Minneapolis commuter market and later expand into other northern and eastern
adjacent commuter markets, downtown St. Paul, the Universality of Minnesota,
Normandale Community College, and Hennepin Technical College.
There are a number of small park-and-ride facilities throughout Scott County that
have inadequate levels of transit service and do not generate any appreciable
transit demand. Scott County needs to develop a large (500-1,000 parking stall)
park-and-ride/transit center that will consolidate commuter transit demand and
focus service on the TH 169 corridor. In order to accomplish these, and other,
objectives, the following recommendations have been made.
Dial-a-Ride
Dial-a-ride services in Scott County ultimately need to be consolidated into one
provider: Scott County Transit. Existing opt-outs in the Cities of Shakopee and
Prior Lake need to focus their efforts and funding instead on big bus fixed route
services. With the impending transfer of Metro Mobility ADA-paratransit services
throughout Scott County to Scott County Transit, that organization will be the sole
provider of demand response services throughout Scott County. Scott County
Transit is encouraged to adopt that role as its mission. The City of Shakopee should
then correspondingly ramp down its provision of additional dial-a-ride services over
the next 1-2 years.
Scott County's 2005 budget for dial-a-ride is $994,000, including $543,000 in
Metropolitan Council funding covering approximately 60 percent of the cost of
providing service. As all county dial-a-ride services come under Scott County
Transit's control, the 25,000 rides currently funded by the City of Shakopee will be
included in Scott County Transit's total, making it eligible for additional funding
under the Council's performance-based funding program. This .could generate
approximately $160,000 in additional funding, with the remainder of the cost of
1!IlIiiO:;
~
~ Perteet, Inc.
Page 2
_~'~______'_"~~'~=_~''''''''''___"''~O'''__''-'~_'~'''''=_'''.'''.___.._,~~_____.~.
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary
Identified Issues
A number of transitarelated issues have been identified in the course of this study,
including the following:
River Crossings
There are three major roadway crossings of the Minnesota River: The Cedar Street
Bridge, Interstate 35W and US Trunk Highway (TH) 169. Of these, two have been
the focus of separate public transportation studies in recent years, the Ia35W Bus
Rapid Transit Study and the Cedar Street Transitway Study, that have
recommended significant transit improvements in each of these respective corridors.
The TH 169 corridor is significantly under-utilized as a transit corridor, with no
regular transit crossings of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge, the most direct corridor
connecting northwestern Scott County with the Minneapolis metro area to the
north.
Existing Services
Scott County is served by four separate transit operators: Scott County Transit,
predominantly a dialaaaride operator, Laker Lines, Shakopee Transit and the
Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA). The latter three entities are service
providers that "opted out" from Metro Transit's service area, electing to provide
their own services funded, in part, by state Motor Vehicle Sales Tax (MVST) funds.
Of the six Metro area opt-out regions, Prior Lake and Shakopee exhibit the lowest
ridership and highest relative costs for transit services and provide the lowest level
of transit service per capita to their citizenry.
While MVTA does provide significant local and express service out of the Burnsville
Station, that service is remote from much of the western portions of Scott County
and utilized to a much lesser degree by residents of Prior Lake and Shakopee as
compared to residents of Savage, (an MVTA member) located further to the east.
While more than 300 regular park-and-ride users, identified as residing in Scott
County, predominantly at Burnsville Station, a significant majority reside in the
eastern third of the County; in part because present transit services are oriented to
the I-35W corridor rather than to the TH 169 corridor.
The more rural portions of Scott County, including the communities of Jordan and
Belle Plaine in the southwestern portion of Scott County and the communities of
Elko, New Market and New Prague in southern Scott County, are served exclusive
~
:~ Perteet, Inc.
Page 1
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executiv~ Summary
these services paid for from the fare box, the increased subsidy from ADA
passengers, and other County funds.
Scott County Transit needs to continually monitor both ridership and travel
patterns of dial-a-ride users. As ridership on these services increases, Scott County
Transit needs to develop a series of service benchmarks to identify high ridership
and high productivity dial-a-ride corridors as candidates for transitioning from dial-
a -ride to route deviation or fixed route services.
Fixed Route
The existing Shakopee and Prior Lake opt-out areas should begin to pool their
transit resources over the near-term (3-4 years) and focus their attention on fixed
route services to their constituents. Services to be provided should include: 1)
commuter express trips to downtown Minneapolis via TH 169 and I -394,
incorporating the existing Laker Lines trips and adding at least three more (for a
minim um of 5) morning and afternoon trips to provide an attractive level of service
to induce expanded ridership, 2) local services connecting the major communities of
Shakopee, Prior Lake and Savage to the Burnsville Station, permitting the
transferring of riders to MVTA services to expand access for Scott County residents
to additional destinations in the Metro area, and 3) connections between the
Burnsville Station and the Mystic Lake Casino complex, Savage, Shakopee, and
Prior Lake to provide improved commuter connections from the Metro region to
employment opportunities in Scott County. The initial year's cost of local service,
assuming continued operation by Scott County Transit at current contracting rates
of about $37 per hour, are estimated to be about $325,000, leaving approximately
$1.4 million for fixed route services.
Initially, at least five morning and five afternoon commuter express transit trips
from Scott County will be needed to help balance commuter growth and generate
additional commuter express transit demand. Within 1-2 years as many as 8
morning and 8 afternoon trips may be needed to satisfy short-term demand until a
permanent park-and-ride facility (see below) is completed. Future service additions,
including commuter express, local and midday express, should respond to increased
demand as it develops.
While combining the two Cities r.esources should result in enhanced transit services
for users, the two entities need not relinquish the identities of the services of their
individual systems. What is needed is to create the appearance of a single system,
enhanced levels of service, coordinated schedules, marketing and planning.
Currently the Cities of Prior Lake and Shakopee are programmed to receive about
$1.39 million in MVST funds in 2005. With a 20 percent fare box recovery, an
additional $345,000 in fare revenues would bring the transit budget for the two
cities to approximately $1. 74 million.
In the longer term, as the transit market matures and the permanent TH 169 park-
and -ride/transit center is in operation, the additional concentration of transit
'I
.tj Perteet, Inc.
Page 3 .
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary .
demand will permit the expansion of commute travel destinations to additional
areas within the Metro region, including the area adjacent to the 1-494 corridor, to
downtown St. Paul, and improved east-west connections to Dakota County. These
improvements will require close cooperation between Scott County transit operators
and Southwest Metro Transit, MVTA, and Metro Transit.
Additionally, developments in southern Scott County should be continually
monitored. While existing developmental and residential densities do not warrant
dedicated fixed route services, a continuation of current growth trends will generate
increasing transit demand from this re gion, which will be best served via the I- 35W
corridor.
Facilities
Scott County needs to immediately begin the process of site selection and
acquisition, design and construction of a new transit center in the area south of the
Bloomington Ferry Bridge near the confluence of CSAH 18, TH 169, TH 13, and the
future CSAH 21 extension. This transit center needs an initial capacity of
approximately 500 parking stalls and should be ultimately expandable to provide
between 1,000 and 1,100 parking stalls within 6-8 years. This facility should take
advantage of commercial and residential joint development opportunities in the
Southbridge area to develop an expanded market for transit services in Scott
County.
The transit center can also serve as office space for transit operators in the Scott
County area, particularly with respect to marketing and promotional activities.
While the transit center is probably not compatible with maintenance and storage
operations, Scott County Transit could also take advantage of this site for
administrative staff as well.
If Scott County Transit chooses to continue providing dial-a-ride services directly, a
separate maintenance and storage facility will need to be developed for dial-a-ride
and local circulator service vehicles. This facility should be located in close
proximity to the transit center in order to minimize deadhead (non-revenue) service
hours and costs.
A temporary facility with parking capacity between 100 and 200 stalls needs to be
developed in the neighborhood of the permanent facility in preparation for
implementation of additional commuter express transit services.
Municipal Participation
In the short term, the primary beneficiaries of improved transit use of the TH 169
corridor will likely be the Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake, although many
residents of western portions of the City of Savage may well decide to take
advantage of improved services in this corridor. The City of Savage should remain
part of MVTA for the short-term, but should be an active participant in the
planning and marketing of all transit services in Scott County. The Cities of
Shakopee and Prior Lake need to open discussions with the MVTA and Southwest
~;..'
~ Perteet, Inc.
Page 4
_""'"-'-"'.-.......,~;~,.~."...~'_N,____.._._""_,.__~,."'..."__.._~N,"-"..''"~._,...._.,..,..,,~...~~.,...~~..-.~,....,.......,...__,.~_.,.~_,.,,,....~,..~,____~._~__...."..,.......~=.~~
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary
these services paid for from the fare box, the increased subsidy from ADA
passengers, and other County funds.
Scott County Transit needs to continually monitor both ridership and travel
patterns of dial-a-ride users. As ridership on these services increases, Scott County
Transit needs to develop a series of service benchmarks to identify high ridership
and high productivity dial-a-ride corridors as candidates for transitioning from dial-
a -ride to route deviation or fixed route services.
Fixed Route
The existing Shakopee and Prior Lake opt-out areas should begin to pool their
tra'nsit resources over the near-term (3-4 years) and focus their attention on fixed
route services to their constituents. Services to be provided should include: 1)
commuter express trips to downtown Minneapolis via TH 169 and 1-394,
incorporating the existing Laker Lines trips and adding at least three more (for a
minimum of 5) morning and afternoon trips to provide an attractive level of service
to induce expanded ridership, 2) local services connecting the major communities of
Shakopee, Prior Lake and Savage to the Burnsville Station, permitting the
transferring of riders to MVTA services to expand access for Scott County residents
to additional destinations in the Metro area, and 3) connections between the
Burnsville Station and the Mystic Lake Casino complex, Savage, Shakopee, and
Prior Lake to provide improved commuter connections from the Metro region to
employment opportunities in Scott County. The initial year's cost of local service,
assuming continued operation by Scott County Transit at current contracting rates
of about $37 per hour, are estimated to be about $325,000, leaving approximately
$1.4 million for fixed route services.
Initially, at least five morning and five afternoon commuter express transit trips
from Scott County will be needed to help balance commuter growth and generate
additional commuter express transit demand. Within 1-2 years as many as 8
morning and 8 afternoon trips may be needed to satisfy short-term demand until a
permanent park-and-ride facility (see below) is completed. Future service additions,
including commuter express, local and midday express, should respond to increased
demand as it develops.
While combining the two Cities resources should result in enhanced transit services
for users, the two entities need not relinquish the identities of the services of their
individual systems. What is needed is to create the appearance of a single system,
enhanced levels of service, coordinated schedules, marketing and planning.
Currently the Cities of Prior Lake and Shakopee are programmed to receive about
$1.39 million in MVST funds in 2005. With a 20 percent fare box recovery, an
additional $345,000 in fare revenues would bring the transit budget for the two
cities to approximately $1.74 million.
In the longer term, as the transit market matures and the permanent TH 169 park-
and -ride/transit center is in operation, the additional concentration of transit
~J
~ Perteet, Inc.
Page 3
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary
Metro Transit concerning the future potential of joining either regional provider as
a long-term strategy.
In the future, as. service levels improve and additional transit facilities are
developed, the Cities of Shakopee, Prior Lake and Savage need to assess joining
together formally to provide transit services throughout the northern portion of
Scott County. Discussions concerning this long term strategy need to begin
immediately so that a long term strategy is in place when the need for formal action
occurs. At that time, the three jurisdictions can re-evaluate the desirability of
joining together in a new opt-out area, or formally joining an existing opt-out such
as Southwest Metro Transit or the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority.
At that time, a dedicated source of local transit funding will also need to be secured
to fund the local portion of enhanced transit services and facilities. It is estimated
that between $2.5 million and $3.5 million will need to be generated locally to
subsidize transit operations and facilities in Scott County by 2020.
There is also a longer-term need to begin identifying a mechanism for expanding
the Transit Taxing District in the future and for annexing areas such as Belle
Plaine, Jordan, New Market, Elko and New Prague. Consider that the residents of
these cities will likely make-up a percent of the transit ridership on the newly
implemented commuter express route system. Currently there is no formal policy
for expanding the District and for assessing tax support for transit improvements in
areas outside the District.
Service Delivery
The Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake should provide transit services to their
constituents by means of contracting with third parties rather than entering into
direct operations themselves. This will result in lower initial capital outlays for
equipment and facilities and take advantage of existing operating expertise and
maintenance and storage capacity in the region. Currently, for local fixed route
small vehicles 35 ft or smaller, Scott County Transit could continue providing this
service through contract, as they have proven to be cost-beneficial.
Additionally, these cities should take advantage of the expertise of the Metropolitan
Council's Regional Transportation Services to identify, negotiate and manage
contracted services. This policy is expected to yield lower contracting prices and
better contractor oversight than either or both jurisdictions electing to "go it alone"
in contracting for services. This will also reduce the administrative overhead while
the two jurisdictions work out the sharing of resources, both financial and human,
enhancing transit services in Scott County.
Finally, Shakopee should transfer operations and administration of its vanpools
over to the Metro Commuter Services and reinvest those finances into fixed route
services. Allowing these passengers to convert to using the new commuter express
route or continue as a vanpool passenger under this agency.
~
"':~",, Perteet, Inc.
PaQe 5
-....."--'-'~',-,.~,,..-....._''"''''~~.
Immediate Needs
Work needs to commence immediately to get the permanent park-and-~ide/transit
center project into the capital grant pipeline. A site needs to be identified and
funding applied for within the next three months.
Additionally, a temporary park-and-ride site needs to be secured in the
neighborhood of the permanent transit center site. A short-term capacity of 100-
250 parking stalls should be provided at a site having excellent visibility from the
major commuter corridors, and possessing easy access for private vehicles and for
buses.
The Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake need to agree to pool their existing opt.out
transit funding to make improvements to the region's transit services and
programs. Additionally, they need to agree to focus on fIXed route services,
particularly commuter express service via TH 169 park-n-ride/transit center to
downtown Minneapolis and leave dial-a-ride exclusively to the purview of Scott
County Transit. Both cities need to formally include Scott County Transit in their
agreements as the designated dial-a-ride operator in Scott County and to include
both SMSC and Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority in planning
and marketing activities to take advantage of potential expanded funding eligibility
by both of these entities. Additionally, the City of Savage is encouraged to continue
to be an active participant in the marketing, planning and development of improved
transit services.
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary
Planning Needs
A number of supporting policies need to be developed and adopted by Scott County and the
municipalities in existing and future opt-out areas. These policy initiatives include the
following:
o Signage - current signage of transit facilities and services is inadequate. Scott County,
MnDoT and the opt-out communities need to work together to develop standards and
warrants for transit signage, including the signing of every bus stop in the urban areas of the
county and adequate signage at park-and-rides and other transit facilities
l:J Shoulder access - while the need for shoulder bus lanes on county and state roads in the
Scott County region will be increasing over time, there is an existing need to provide these
lanes . along SH 13 between CSAH 18 and the Burnsville Station, particularly in the
eastbound direction. Studies need to begin to develop warrants for the future expansion of
this program based on transit and auto volumes, congestion characteristics and potential for
travel time savings
o Transit Oriented Design. Scott County needs to pursue the development of transit-oriented
design standards to guide the development of land uses adjacent to, and nearby transit
facilities. Particular attention should be given to the location of public housing developments
and essential human services in close proximity to major transit developments (such as the
TH 169 Transit Center)
o Comprehensive Planning - The County and the individual cities need to include transit
considerations in their comprehensive planning efforts, including the designation of major
and minor transit corridors in their roadway network and the development of land uses
along these corridors that are compatible with, and supportive of, pedestrian, bicycle and
~'.i
.~ Perteet, Inc.
Page 6
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary
Metro Transit concerning the future potential of joining either regional provider as
a long-term strategy.
In the future, as service levels improve and additional transit facilities are
developed, the Cities of Shakopee, Prior Lake and Savage need to assess joining
together formally to provide transit services throughout the northern portion of
Scott County. Discussions concerning this long term strategy need to begin
immediately so that a long term strategy is in place when the need for formal action
occurs. At that time, the three jurisdictions can re-evaluate the desirability of
joining together in a new opt-out area, or formally joining an existing opt-out such
as Southwest Metro Transit or the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority.
At that time, a dedicated source of local transit funding will also need to be secured
to fund the local portion of enhanced transit services and facilities. It is estimated
that between $2.5 million and $3.5 million will need to be generated locally to
subsidize transit operations and facilities in Scott County by 2020.
There is also a longer-term need to begin identifying a mechanism for expanding
the Transit Taxing District in the future and for annexing areas such as Belle
Plaine, Jordan, New Market, Elko and New Prague. Consider that the residents of
these cities will likely make-up a percent of the transit ridership on the newly
implemented commuter express route system. Currently there is no formal policy
for expanding the District and for assessing tax support for transit improvements in
areas outside the District.
Service Delivery
The Cities of Shakopee and Prior Lake should provide transit services to their
constituents by means of contracting with third parties rather than entering into
direct operations themselves. This will result in lower initial capital outlays for
equipment and facilities and take advantage of existing operating expertise and
maintenance and storage capacity in the region. Currently, for local fixed route
small vehicles 35 ft or smaller, Scott County Transit could continue providing this
service through contract, as they have proven to be cost-beneficial.
Additionally, these cities should take advantage of the expertise of the Metropolitan
Council's Regional Transportation Services to identify, negotiate and manage
contracted services. This policy is expected to yield lower contracting prices and
better contractor oversight than either or both jurisdictions electing to "go it alone"
in contracting for services. This will also reduce the administrative overhead while
the two jurisdictions work out the sharing of resources, both financial and human,
enhancing transit services in Scott County.
Finally, Shakopee should transfer operations and administration of its vanpools
over to the Metro Commuter Services and reinvest those finances into fixed route
services. Allowing these passengers to convert to using the new commuter express
route or continue as a vanpool passenger under this agency.
~
':s...; Perteet, Inc.
Page 5
Unified Transit Management Plan
Executive Summary
transit uses, including lower vehicle speeds, extensive pedestrian and bicycle paths and
traffic control devices
[J Planning - The County and its constituent municipalities need to maintain a.more regional
perspective in planning transit services and improvements. These considerations include
working with transit agencies in other areas (such as MVTA and Southwest Metro Transit)
in the joint planning and development of services between service areas and the potential for
joint funding of services arid facilities benefiting a more regional audience
Q Marketing - The County and its cities need to keep the promotion and marketing of transit
services and facilities at a high priority. This effort includes development and distribution of
promotional and informational materials, encouraging communities to consider transit
impacts in all of the zoning and land use decisions and working with the Metropolitan
Council to integrate transit information with the region-wide information network
Expected Results
The expanded funding and emphasis on transit services in Scott County can be
expected to have widespread results on the economic, mobility and quality of life
throughout the County. A planning model developed by the Transportation
Research Board (TRB) was used to monetize the anticipated benefits of improved
mobility.
Anticipated benefits include:
Cl Economic and Mobility - Based on the TRB model, it is estimated that every dollar spent on
transit improvements in Scott County will return approximately $1.20 on mobility and
economic benefits to Scott County, its municipalities and citizens; benefits from reduced use
of energy and other natural resources accrue to society as a whole.
Cl Improved Transit Ridership - Approximately 2,400 additional daily transit trips will be
taken by transit within Scott County and into Hennepin County.
I:J Mode Split Improvements - The transit mode split of trips between Scott County and
Hennepin County would improve from less than one percent to over five percent.
[J Reduced Congestion - A reduction of approximately 2,400 daily automobile trips from Scott
County to Hennepin County is estimated; reduced costs of accidents due to the relative safety
of bus travel to that of automobile travel accrue to all road users and society as a whole.
[J Improved Air Quality - The estimated annualized air quality benefits of improved transit in
Scott County due to reduced vehicular emissions are approximately $86,000 per year,
including improved hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and NOx emissions; improved mobility
for pedestrians and bicyclists due to reduced vehicle use.
!'ll!lIiii;:......'.....,
'..::']I:~ I
.~ Perteet, Inc.
Page 7
>..... _..,..,."""_,,.,<,.>.,.~,o,_=.....,.,.,.,....._<___~-.,~~~,",., _......._~..-'.._w<,~_~..
c. CD
CD -g ~ ~. 'eg.
. CD - U CIS- O. 0 CD
.=. tJJ ~- GJ0 ~.2._ e=;:,
i.. S It) ~ >-~)( . ':" .' E.g~
o e f1 ClJU.ClJCD e- Ocn_
... ftI - e c.= CUe;; u CD
Q > (It~.!!.s~ ~C' Gl.E...
e '"C_cg 0 u )( ~ -Gl .,,_ oe
Q ftIfij....... == CD lit - '! ::; e '3
; .= e:x: ~ CD. lit U 0 - . ill ell OJ
.!! e ftI e...,5" .a~ -~'U 5 In 5!.5
&..2 ~: -;..2 Ii E CD' ~~ Gl,2 C 0 == 3:!
~ fti ;':2 C ~ ~ .g : -:: .g.2 cu > ~.!! _
CIS ~ ~ ~ E -"> :> > : ">:' i.,c CD ~ ,
f Ii 5 e CD S ;~'o:g u e Cii > ,~ f ~ .
;, ,'c-e 1:~~ "5 g a::l ~ ~.! 2..e = 5 :',
. ''XI::I 0.... ~"O c"O ~ c." ~ 0 CD 0 ,~.
~ 'C-'c."O 8:"'~~e GleCD~liE(JE(J '.
", ~ Ii 0 '0.5 Q. ~ ~ ~ ~7' 'I':'~';;- . '::. ~ .'
.- - - , ~."'; -~: ~~t-~'j -'~ ..,'-'~ .:!-.... -~ ....
..
Ie;;
e
m
..
...
-=
G)
1-
....
I-
e
::)
....
o
CIJ ~
Q)-
-S::::ca
~::-
s:::: 0 0
:: (.) CI)
Ee ::: ~
\I) 0 s::::
:: 0 () "-
~(.)CI):e
~
<(
o
o
~g
~o;
COI
:::,,-\0
-0
t::o
5N
() """
- co
C t::
U :::
c/)""')
~-~~'~+"'---"-'-~"_.'----r"~~--''''''''''''''''''''''~''^",-'-'''''--''~'K''
~
.c
u
.. ,~
II g
CD .~
en __
Q)'aJ
a: v;
~
c......
. ....,. .. ".~:/;:;;
E g: ~:j' ..... ~iiJ"i'~~:rff
- CD 0 >0 s;; ,.., >0 CD '_.:" ~'-fc.,:
C) . ::s .a\"h..2f:..2 .~_',. i ~~?~~~~~t _.
.5 'i'''ii,'''' C:-'.. a.CD'~E"",<CDI:.,
. lilli'''' t!~l~)l~.~",;
, uf . ~ ,:.5 0. ftS. CD: 'C :'''ii a ,. .i<
a. CD -c:"'. "D . E. ~ .i,. CD U U_'''':''
CG' - ::s: .m . CD . 0.... 'ii- ...~ .!!~:::.::
~ 6 ~-1V:11 - alJ c3iL C~.:t,"
en... '0 9...= ,,'.CD ~ f! 0.. ~ "D'-~~.',
. CI) . CD :'" . "C: - . ~., ... _ -CD G:J .' .' ,'" .
u,'u CD CD....... >, >'C\J "'0 .......0.:4),.:-.
~. ,,>:2g o. . -;'-a.ti -. ..~".."6 .;2:,>:
;'CI);.!!ca8 o,cn.o c fL~''>':~:'i.'
rJ) en ::J,. ~ i.,;,E.. -.2 -as:'" c.>:
-I' o;':S_' .g."E i>. '~CD';=:~. ":!'~"'..~';;".
- ... e, 0. - ...., '- '" .-::s- _,.
II) 0 c~ a. CD. c:C." m "",as .,.oC:'~.:
~; .:E :8.cuCD.. .' ~;~~CD'."a.O ~CD ~....uo:;;'.'~.' >.":.
....CD m .' -""C ~ .o.--:,.~,. ''(,):';.
I- "C C "C 3! - CD '''>CD::J ... 15 ,c_, ,
-c .",> ;:..' -. >'.. >o"~., 0..,..... >g-...a.E '.'0."-. m. .15. ..~. 0,.;...,.;.._
': CI) 0 CI)'. O. ,...:cu... CD... Co C). .0.. . .c:'
'I $1ttBi;t~'~i~;?c.I;~~~~~:
'..fi~iif,t~i!'~;ll@~~iili.
. en .:.'-'-.~- >- '. 5 .!! u u i-: _, 1:,,::-
.!!. ' ~. 'E':.;; U.. i ! E ::s: ' ~'c
CI) ; > '~'. a ~- m .~ E c. c u ;:. c :
1:. '.. tr;-' .... ftI 5 0 "ii .e,' . ~ ~ f \
.2 ~ = :':'- :c E t u 1::... t:'.: _ ;:
Q. CI) -8 '.~' '; 0 !. 'ii .! .! '. . CD ,Ci~' >,
. 0, C fI) , .=. i - .u c c '0 "D'''U,'"
.':' ~ t ~ I ~ ~ il ~'; ~;: ~i~ r: .
m. ..!_ ,~, c i.=. . '" '" "'U' 0_ '" ,
".::; i: ::s:. ii ~ ~ ~ ~ tJJ. ~ en ~ ' ;. c: E Y,-,
,.... ,....E 'c':. as CD c ~-CD... CD 'J , .~, ':
- 0 :. E' f. ;:: E .x ~ = .8 ~ ',,"6 l'G .F ~',
...
I _
E c;,'-.u.c - CD.C. .:... >.::s, ::s: ....~/'
.e".s=: ;. H .g.g.e 1i~'li:,t
. 0 ~1:: ... "'c... '-. 00 "C,: a. 'Q." '~"'~'
u =c O:c:x: ~ 3 e' Q. 5!-. CD CD. a. 'a. ..
CD - Q. to- to- ..-- .c. - CD co 0 O.
a."a.. ..: ...., 0 0 z_
~Eo
'ii'
.
~
!
en
c
o
1-
..
m
..
CJ
G)
a.
>C
w
c
o
1-
..
CJ
~
-~f'. ,,~.c i'3 . "g- .. . e:] ".
c.c: ;' 1i' ~~-., or 0.2
...~ ~.~2 f;i...'-_=- .~;
;E .~ CD.:8'~'E .O~' oc."
-o,g ':: ';:6.':: ~,'~ = Co) 0
CGI - __ =>0:1 -
ClSJt:'-QI tl..l.!!! .: _ ... ... c ~
r:;'~=;~ '.(I)"CO CD =
. ".GI'ii c ~ _.2- ca _ O~..c = ca
,'.is'5. c e- ..d;'g';",.O:iii O~-E.'
:.-'Si ~ ~~: -0 ~:: :2': :I~; : aca G)
~. C:::c: t: :;:$:' ",;: ~ CD .5 e E
':.!.e~~ ~.c uf-.! ~'i&.: '!j~
;. 'ii l5 .~ ~ 8-~ Gl"E'~ .c f = 0...: =
"iii ;.. U SO)' ;..,':ID', -... 0 _ g> ,,;.G)
f~~~8~ '!i.c"~E. . ~- ~~g
- "C C. GI :: 0 U.- -' e- =, _ en ..
CD 'i: C. II) 0... .~, ~.- = ftS '. ~ CD G)
... . CD '0 U. CO; 1lI C = > .......' OJ> Co) Co)
.a '.C c: C ~ CI), .~e Ei:c cat-;, "C e- '.
.2 i CD.~ GI go '. U a.: oS =:t:: '0 e :; c. ~ ,
GI ~ c: -co -g i E.'. c: ~ en -.. ~ :: CD '.
:2 ;a 0 ~ =.c. $:2 ~::: fIl CD~" c: = ~
;:, 'c. -0 CD Gl VI" III ~ Z ~. = = 0 ca C>>
en~;a E~:! ' ~c.'- 0 as .2.ECit.,. .';ii:E
.s..! E..~ .!~ .5 e CD:iCDOC' > c=
>oC:oo':' =.---tIl ~ OO=CD
-0 QI.... U.!~. o~ ~o.E joc.cc E;:ca-
.a:g~f'C1: ;.lIIi.5!r~i'S~ ,!'Q.C
rn 0 0 .... = ~. :: ~-! .! III .- CD 0 1ft .2 c~ ~
CD-Eo=Oo=~IllIll!OC~mC-CDc
.r:. 1ii-o i6 I! IUI1iCD'g :s ca1:: CIS~ ~ E CIS 8
- > :> c Gl_ 'C = 0) a. o~~- 0 CD >OC
Q. 2; 2 Gl:=:E: gco . e c....t:;:J! ...~ =
.g ~S 8: u ~ ~ ...J ~;;. ~ a.. g..g ~ ! 8: E '0 '€ ".-'.
~.~~. t..~.::. "-.r~:~~:'f;:.{'. ~~~~~,:~'~~>~i:-.~~'
f
~
!
, . :: :' .' '.., , ,o'...~:: :. .;_:'" E',:'
~ 0 c >. >- - ca .... ,,>' 0
-.~~"'~' ';'E' ~~ {,:~~:~~-":::' '15~'-; .~:~
o c ,'; fl)' 0 CD - >-J:: 0 E - '
-;::: co' rJ) rJ) (I) . == fl). _ (I). 0 i;: ~
','- . Co(l) 0> (6)'' c:c(l)
> ~ ~ :s-' -q--:;::; .' ::1~'!: ,!!!- 8 ij .
ca 5 :.~O~" ~-m:'< ~~ 5 ~ ~ ~-E fl).o , -
g 0 ~ .::::- . CD ... >'i.ij -6 :;::; a; CI> '0 u;
..~o., 15.(1)" <<i Q) '0' -0 ~ g u; "'C E c: c: :
:'t\i= ,en> E:5' Q)"''O C 0 CI> co ~ rJ)'
, ..... 00 ~ e _' :::; 0 :{. .~.s (1)....2 E >0 ~ (1)0
~ '0 0. ..... - - - .- 0
~(/) 0 E :e (I) .~. ~ ~ i..:.~ ~ 0..:5'0 :;
',co.s, E-; 0.::1.:. c:'OCOE ....EOc:o
~~:5 ~:Q ~'C'~. c ~~Q) (I);; E co m =-
')( ~ VI:3 _ rJ) ';" ~ c ~)( J:: en C en ... .-
e.- ~ ~- o~:' "0;:, Q)o - C O~ai
. 0.- ... ;> C lD . (I) 0 ~ c COo~ ...
Co rJ) - C '0 co :- aiooZ Ol:oNCO:3
-=: ~ (I) ~ ,-,;:; t; >, E =0"0 :0 c: . Coa;
r':: J:: c, _;C.) _., -~ 0 q c: CI> 0 tR:U C
>-- t;- ~......-5 0 -;':g (.) CD ~ ~ E >- C ...
.... .Q..c ,_1 c: '(1),(1) ~* UJ CXI Q) ...... ,,, - ::1 Q)
. :c . , rn Q) (I) ~ - .' D ~"C.... - Q) E J::
. U) ~ _J:: t.:l <( ~ ':: J::S >-x" I ~a; <5
'-oX C-Gi. o-!~ ~::!:a;o >o~E.s'O
G) co Q) ~ 0.'-" _:c~ .~ CD - C '_ tt).- - c:
"C- ..' E'" C""'''' ~cmo --)( -co
. - (D ',.. as Q) '0 '8 _ ~ E E = '0 e ~
,~ ~~~;::3 '" =-'x .D'C o.C i;;
_= 0 c.... m'O:' lVoc 0 c.,g ~o.g... -.
.' fI)~ ~.. '- :3 fl) Q) ~ ,,- -:s !: a..g ..:: Q) co U ~ .
diD) "e-8 ~ ~m '. a e g-a"'C ~ E= Q) ~
'-~ _=oo9~~c.Q)o5-~00~
~- _0--0'" CE...--co(l)
'w . _ ._ (.) - -16 - ca c: oJ:: '-C/) Q)
.~~C~(/)~~~~~oVlg-E;=2~
:. > co.Q en c: ~ (1).0.::: > rn c: a CI> ~ fIl 'C
O -0) Q) '" U 0 0 - 0 0 0 - ~ '"
'.- '- - Q) CD (I) C. ~ E rJ) ,-c'en 0 C m-c 0
":' ~... "C ~ ,,, "C 0.0:3 c.. ~.~... 0.5 3 Q) :3
E-- (I) 0;:::; - (1)- E ... E'C U - C:'O
m J:: '-= Q) c: """ :3_ CD >- W muo (I) CD
-""0_ ..::.0 0..... to 0 _.0 Q)J:: (I) ...0...
en
c
o
1-
..
ftS
..
CJ
G)
a.
>C
W
..
;;:
G)
C
G)
r:a
.r .'C.
C\l
'ii'
la
oS
'li
~
...
"
cg
.c
en
-
4>>
>
ca
..
...
cg
...
=
E
E
o
CJ
4>>
~
ca
..I
..
o
Ie
~'
mO)
::SCC
,:"z' .~. ~ ~~',': .'. ~ ~ ,/ ~,',
"C CD '0 CD t-_u,CDm N (I) C'CI
G)_:;:; - c..... .. - j . ->..
rn .~cu ~CD 0 ::S---O': ~ "\,".., ".', ,
; E.: E ~!"C E~ i"E'ii~<
c..E- E ,-"'C'i:Ec .m ECIt)".+<2V'~">',
is 8 ~8 ~;~ ?~~ ~ ~@ ~t,l~;~.;~\,~~~.'k.'.~.~;!1.ti?;. ~;
- ..;. -.' ~"'.~. ", -.,'
"
G)
.c
en
-
G)
>
m
..
I-
..
G)
..
~
E
E
o
U
at
en
m
>
ftS
en
t
..:,::;':"m'4;,':'~'~':C::'.:.' .C
~-;':.~'i~~~.'~;~ ~- : ~ -,
(I)' 0." ..... '"C .2 "';
.c........, C - '"
'"C.. . O'aVO t: a:::
(I) .! ;C-"CD ,0 aG
m :SlV"~'" CJ C.
; E .=':E:'O>
Co E- C;; ;.E E ~ ca
~ 0 G) 0 '. c: CW) g
C U "C O. 0 -:. -oJ
-"(;'~:":
'~':~~~:-> ~,:"::..)fj,~'-:
-. c. ~if::.:'}- . ~ '~':.': ;-i~:F'~ ~
-~. ?'{7'~
t~~~5
o C'CI CW) ,'.
u.; -:'';''"
CU "C' II)
.! ~-c =
j>CU>
E ~. < fI)
'E~'" E
OClS>~
u::.:Em
...,"~
.~i1J
';'
'"
,S
'Ii
t
~~ ~ :.~,~.,;;-~.~;n
. ~t..,--" .... ,'--'~-+" -
'- .".O!,~?-",I.:-v. 14 .
':.f'~.'~ ~~4f ~~~f~ ,~-'~
;~- ~;~i~~~'~; 't~
~~ IlilililllJ l~ \:tS~";l~.\~.~.~.;...~..'l.t.. :.!',('
tli ~~.~ --- . ..-' :.? - :~ - .. ~-:c_-
~~
c
o
.-
..
=
.=
.-
..
..
en
.-
e
..
CI)
en
~
a:
--
A.
.~
Q
o
N
...
'"
,!
'Ii
,S
~
~
a>>
.c
fI)
-
a>>
>
~
..
f-
a>>
..
=
E
E
o
u
a>>
a>>
c.
o
~
m
.c
tn
~ i~:f~l., 1l~'~' t~~:~
"E CD.E m: ~iE.E g. CDS! CD ';~ .. 15 0 ='
- - - ~.=a.. ~e -- '- - I:OCLas
fA =' as en C C ca ~ ='.... 0 =';i '- 3:.. asn.
CD Eo!: ~~~~~.E E:r:~ E; =' an g-~...;
~ E 1;) oow w m:E E!-I:: E I:: m t'l~l:cn
- 0 CD . " ". .... 0'1: 0 O::J I: - ;::'0
C U"l:J . .0' >",,~,O 0 (,), 0 U 0 olS tt) JIIII: -
.:
C")
..,,"<.
'.
'';;'';';':::.'-:'~'-~.
....- .:."~~
:~< ..:-- '.)~. i,~~-
~c:_.'2<l:~-'
-,;:~ ~
...
.
~
.
c
.!!.
;,,-</_t~: .-;,},;.~~:"
. ._ .-i:.~ :.':.
" ~ '- ,-.-
en
a>>
u
.~
a>>
tn
.4:.. .'- - " -
. ... . t .,:;!~,'il'1h{:~
_,' ~ .;<\~~';~'?-~d~~:;~,-~;'"
:f'>~';" '5.: J",?';'~..' .~. ..~;. .~.""
. f':D... aa, ,-....
. e-"~:,;';~:" i-.,~,:, :.:............~.' ~.:.? .
~:'j~~;..:-";.., ~, ~ .'. ' , . , ': .0 C, c ..
'S ~ so' ~o ~ ~ ;' --e'5o,!-f'
E. OCtl::J.= U) oJ'" '0;'
E i! E '5 ~ e i ~ ~ ~
o ~.E Eo. "It 'ii .~ ~~;, CSt:
U 'C:E 0 ~ < u ,.:cg... U ..~
"C :E ~ CD ....2 ~ ~ ~ cn_..,o
= ~ ; i 'i M ~, >. 'i' e ~ CD: CD" ~ ,,'"
as .~ en fA U - -;~ 8. 'i - == "C. 0
~?~~~!~.~~. i tl~J~"cilt,~
~
en
=
m
...
f-
"
a>>
en
o
ca.
o
..
D.
';;'
'"
.e
'Ii
!
en
...
Q)
"
I;
o
..
A.
ae
CI)
u
'E
CI)
en
en
c
.-
..
en
.-
>C
W
: .if !i~J
! \1;;i~R#11
:.;!!iIH!bi
):aY'u~.;
~
~,..
,'CD
";Q .'
1f;.:
~<:.> .
...J- .
11)'
'''S .-
'e:a
o:.g&.. .
~. uC1)'
o o~. 0-
:E en .~ I a.
~:E~~;
f/)fI)c_>
:=. '--~;,.: " - -~~": ~
i:i','
~,
1-''''
lD~
lD_
Q...J
<,0;_
>-=-=
:E~~
.... :,.
~>
~~~
~,.~.
~j;.
.~~
~
" I 8
~~... ._'~ if' ~
II ~
en ! ~ 'l'
G>> i
.. 'ii' ii
.
::s r
0 ... ~ ~ ! ~ !
ra= .\!, ii !
. .
UI en Ii
~ e t I
UI en R Q ~ i i
aa ~ i
.. 0
a- U ~
)C ~ i i
W G) ,'. -
~ U 5 5 -
aa .- i Ii i
.. ~
::s I I I l
E G) IS i ! ; (
E en
0 "
U Q) ,
" ~ ~Ul I ~ ;;
G>> ca P!i ! .. ~
UI' E :!
0 .- 1'1 !,lij.',ir
a- ~
e en ' ~ CI .. iJi ; H
a. W ~ !it! l
G>>
U
.~
aa
en
,"";,:'o':"~"~-"-;~~-"'''''--'''''.''''''_'''''''''-~_ . ;~[.:.'
I t~11fl1,t~1~~~~; ~<'-""::~'
.!!> ._:,:.:~~::/::~~v~-,~~~:-..v.. , .
G)': -c 'T~~"1~gl.::...,:.,; ;'\;c, '
~~;\':~,f:~E~'>E';:~<i~'~~':~' ;:
'~\.::. "".'-',.:.~- - :~"}.". . :~.
;"~,~r<,;i :.;,,+,~~,,:.._ ~:...};,,,',:,
tl~t:tl ~.' ~ "f~~f'~ .
K,.. < :' 0 "lr~1~~:it~
Ilrl'.lif,;i11.llti~~
! c >- - c: .' ',7" ca ~ 'Gl Cii - ......, ,
VI' ~ _ Q'I 0' CD li - 1;;'- ~ Gl 'Ca ~ ,'.,"-
~ B ~ .5 "iii ':l =i ::: "C !i g.>~ - '", ,"
CD.. C Gl E c .c '~- Ul -:s .....:c.'.!! c
~ ~ 0 .! .:c. Gl' C, E 0 au C. GI
~, oc .5! x' 3:.cll "0 e E "t: s;a. "C
:r C~ m u.J ~ ":,,,'~ po.. O'~ en < w
~ ". .... .. .:. ~'.. ~"~ -.(J
:!::
UI
c
m
..
t-
aa
..
::s
....
::s
II.
"
G>>
en
o
Q.
o
..
Q.
'i'
t
~
.\!,
~,
1ft
G)
..
:2
o
a=
"
.
)C
ii:
Ii
u
o
...
"
G)
III
o
a.
o
..
a.
~
r"
~:
fe
t'
f
. i-
t
t~
r
b-
f,
--",-,~-_....,~._.,..._."-,,,",...,.~ " .",-_.."..",~""-,,,"t "-"~.".", ,-+....~~".,,~....~ "_"~,,,"~'_~"""""""--'M.______.._."'_"'-_.... ._""""__,___........................"".~.
... .
.
~
:
~
c: : 0 : 0 :: :goO :; g ::
.!L ~ ~ ~.~~1lI
E:.
'III i
'~l
~L:..._ .'
_..._= ';I',:.~.',.'~ 0 ! 0 ~ ; 5 ~ !
._ Ii fli"1i':..4'
ll;".'~
.\ .
,~t '~ 0 ~ ~ ::::: ::: :; ;:
OJ ~ ,.,- ~ ~ ~ ~ ...
':.ij'
III','
~t,~:-_-
~I,.
~r>8 0 ~ ~ a EE ~ ;
S!. >'" ~ ~ ~ m~ ~
ij:;;."
"L. -.-
a.~;;~': .
~t'>;~i
'" ~
.., co
..,
rtJ~ ~.
'" '"
'" In
,...
~~
'" U'l
N ,...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :
~~';i~N
en
..
en
o
U
i ~ ~ ~ ~
ui'~,..,-,..:
-
~
c
o
.-
..
~.
..
cu
a.
Q.
"
cu
..
~
E
.-
..
en
W
"" 1""1 an .. IZ)
o N N """ ~
.... lD a:II M .....
,..; ::i N ~r-:.
. J! .. . 1 ~ j' c:
.. . c ~
I:J ! ~ j .Il ;:
i ,g
I . r
' ~ c a:
II '1; = I
'" 5 E '!'"
c: i ~ E .. ~
... ~
a: 5 i 0
u oil
i :I I c:
i2 ;;;
5 ~ :5 ~
S = ~
....
:
~i
.
.c:
~,
en
G>>
.-
..
.-
-
.-
u
ca
u.
oe
.',. ._:: ~'z:",_'- -. ":',}.: ,,: . . ~:~,~. '-":_, _ ".::_,' :: .}~ .-..... .:..~
.....~b<E~l,d.EE, "C ~,,';! 1Il=..;':~ .~
CD '_, ,- '0.0' ;".., ~ E '.,'~, ~ l'll _III 1Ill'll c'-;',' "C C
- - '1Il 0-,. ,0 " CD,g:::: >-.c _ '.. C
C CHIJI&') ,~" C 'C .. C1J... CI). Oas lit as as
CD "C u, -. CIJ = _c .:: .::S' ,"CII; 'C Q. ...
U i: &.! 'C C :::= ;:!:: =: = c.-! ~ CD.s.. t-
- m . _ - -;; fI),fI) I&') I&') 0 ::s - 1; III CD >.
-;'>-8 g.g5 f! ~ ~ & U;'Uij g~"5 c
i c I&') ~ .., '::~I- In....., en.E "CJ ..J.cc ::s
... "4J' '. ::S::S. CD 0
I-IL'. · .'.m m m ~
..
C
G>>
E
c.
.-
:s
r:r
w
"
G>>
en
o
c.
o
a-
D.
"--,
L{')
..
.
III
.,
.
.c:
~
G)
u
c
ca
I:
..
at
>
o
o
E
at
..
en
>.
en
!
=
..
=
II.
'a
at
en
o
C-
o
..
~
..
.
t
~
~
.~...---~
"..;~ .-~-, -
fli-;~l~~c': .
'~ ~ X~:; :,,;1; V";;~,:,
- _ c...
8" ~: ~ 'ca.
~:i . ~ ~ '~"
,_' CD -' _. . ~ 0;; - -~.
f~~ '~~ '(~Ig'i
,'~ ~:'. u_~
.'::.i .
cu
u
c
~
c
..
Q)
>
o
C)
E
CU
en .icE ,0 rn , ' .." ;,~-!Q)U) :!'Q).fD ' :,0 ~', C
, t: =a a _:' ~g-;. ':E c:'. _....-
" O.C)~' .... '0 cD 15 ~<a:" ~ . 11) .0' If) 'J!!,)
",fD: C '.:: uu c 1:2.. . ;;c;; ::::I ::s C"
W "5';::.! CD en "> - C)~~-.!~ol':.:
en 0,..".,_,(1) ::s-'::' ~ ~ >.c.:!, CD~ ...., '-. ~a,.'
O >C ,0 'c... -- - c......c." - c
,!'C'-, CDf. 'ii ,Q)..~,c ..~'Q.cOl;:;.,
a. 'aI - "C U -.! E ~-CDC).-In - E'.CD'~
O CD 0 CDC c ::s '- = en ,-C1: ,C),O",...:
'- 0 >c 0 0 0 0 ow ooca CD..., .,
.. 0 D..c;:: (.) q ... LI.. E · u.:o;: m-2'
a.
-'-_.-...-~ .,-"-",",,-~>.>--.
.~ .. 0
CD ,'. rn
,..~. i :",Q ..~l,; '. ,;:g. >
1<:: ~rl--~I;r-:.Ur,.I;]"' ; ·
i . '0 ~ > ~ ' C 1II i...., '.Q,! " lii:; ,., - .
.t Q,o:.E!,.!:s!"GI(i -jlll -!E E"~ .
Cll,c CD'tl ~~"".ll:o .- <<Ill - '0 .. c,':E
i.. ,~ '$ ~;: ~ >.~ ~_: m.!:! ,. l. '.2 f
:I 0 0 ~m _ c~ .... e. ~ &II::s . CII II
.5 -: H ~;, ~~CllgC;;.gii s:' ~:"'~ .e
-= ..' ~.!l - CD .5 U~ a..~ c_ Ji:: :: c. Cll !.
o '.~- :;.: s~ ! Ji'g :~ -~ ~ 8:! '!: ..5
U . lit U ..= 0 :& ~- ~- "i. ':J f.. l!" .! i
~ ::s:::., limE ~clIi'OIlt ... - =. 0 E
_ 0" 'tl ! .... ..JE _ ;0>> i ~. ,-- =:g . c.2 . .c.. ~ ~
c ; ~' 0 E 'ii o. ,co;;.- ~~ ~ a. 'lD: .2
en .E - - """'C 0 C - S rn '- _ CD::S . ill E ,f.' II
G) 1!: ;.-' A..E ~~.5i: ''f~ t:. ,g t_
- ~ i i 'l~ ~:! ~1 ->! ~, ~:. .1: i j
o :Ea.;- :.sS;'gC1>>' i:&.;! CD'S> _
a:: 1!! ::s II c,::S 0 ca _ 1II CD ca U .. :is 0 ;:
'.!' t: o~ C 1It~ i.t"' ii~, c'ii - 1lI~.e-
.... s il J!! i - CDN CD::s' u e- ~; . 'E::: ~
'" . II C f .c f5 ~.!:!. ~en ca..!! :: o! .c
G) < E ~ a." rn:; 1; =s <<10 ~.5 :: CD ~.Ji~ a
en ~,.5 $_ "~. _en:l ~~. '';S.: ~~ .!l'tlll:
O > _ 0 ~Il ~= .5 ~Dl;: c.. 'tl<~ 'tl ::s., 0 CD ti _-"
::E S E C.g''flll -:g Ii .0:e,.'>"'>~O._, s 2~-
a. -- ... e CII;: 0 ;Eo,c g'c ,E>;e ~<~ e.!!!u -'
l !lil~~~~=~~.ff~!~~~~'~~;;~}~:
- ':;i"': <-1-<:';':" --..-
.;1'> : p ~~- _'~._
;~. ....:.. .".~:
....,.;.
-
S~~!.;~;~' "j!
-. ~ '("c &.2
"'p':,~ ~:~.
. - ~., " '':":.5 '. '-E l!
C':.;",' =- . ~,:~., i;ri-,
.. 0 ,~, CO)
.-flj'~Ii=
, CD - #I . 21-~
:..t;:>;~,.- '.-
.- _ :~o }.;:"~'~'~
i 't~t: !~,~ ~; = '"'e'f:'~': i g~ ."8.:
! :~, ~'O~:l; U) :: .. G.I - :: " :: ":: ' ~ 0 g E! .
.l ;~., ii -aa-; -'. CI/J Ie -8 CQ .; ::: ~ en 'ii i...! -D'
en ;~/:!'.s l{,~~ ~ ;~f i~ ~'"'e,~i;;'~ j;.
':"~1ii Il;~." ~ > . ~"1:J" ....,....,..- ,..~..,.;e.
m . >.ll:.!:! ~:- .. e :i .!! at; O.2~ i2 ."' ~"II ~
.0 :& ~ ~ ,c 4'tl > )( 'S 1: II' .- -. .:: 1: '.
- o.E. CII- :: 0 Dl.~ Q...::?,c c.,!:! ".0'; .
o . III ~~ ~ - cu. 2 a 111 0 .E~ ,. Q;
~ oS::::: C1.~ lit In:a ~ c'a :". i CD 1II. . Q..:,
.... 1l!!c~6'g>Gt.2=Q.e .!:!!.,,,~~
~ CII ca c. -::s ()- III Cllle 0 ~ . - CllII u_
~ ~'::,::.2 ~ =::: a~ f_~.:!. ~1I'S....:'ii
C1l"" Dl1: ~ C ca:;.D 3! e' ca cfo>>'tl Ii
G) , 8.3! ~ e Q. .!! 8. ~ E ;: .2 fI) a. . Ii :'tl~ C ::
en .>. 0 II 11.5 'D 'tl c::: E II II ~ III . -1:-0 _ .!
O - -.c > · i CD - co> > - ~Il ~.!!!= c ~ 0 .
c::2c .:8UeeC~Dl~o~~~E
a. 5 ~-: ~'ii ~~ ~.!!:g ~~ 6.g:g e :g~-! e
o ~ ~:3:ZjZ ca 'tl · - - ~ _CD a. c-:_. -=- Q,
Ii: ~:~ '~~.'" ~ .~ . '.
co
en
a.
G)
...
en
....
>C
G)
Z
-a
m
en
o
a.
o
..
A.
::-. -,~:.~>
E - e .! :!:: . . ,':"'" .it;: ,"
t ;I:~f~v I: :1. ~~0~J~h~i}
.5 !~~ i. U tVe - cu ,.' '.\', :,,a'~ .
.. a.; 0 -" ~ - If) a . .'" ~ c.
C )( e.. ClJ - tI:I " '0.2 cu as"- ,- ~,~ ..- ,"
o CD as e, I). U CD . 13 > .",":'" -~. ... ~ -
U ~ 1).2 e.., en CD ,e ..! "".:'.: -;: .,:' .e..
CD e OJ" e... a::: , CD v# .......f. -' ,-".
- 'S e CD . as ' E j E co '. CO) c,.. ..'-
E~a:: :;' ~~. tr o-:;>.:;.-~.i'.~-~'
E fII - -u CD ~c<<lG .~;.~
o~ ~ >-e .. ~ . - ." ~ ~ ''; 'U .
0-- c - = j CD fIl Q, of .c: C'G
U cu g ',' as . as 0 u E: 1: c ,2) ~ a.
"i:E~ .., "ii";O >c;) =~~J:b CD
e~ 0 .: CD .~ C e" ~~ If) a: = Ci:E.5 -,
~ cO c ;,5 B en a: CD ~ ~ A. "C::
- ca e ; u-- _co "'"' CD c: C ~ 5 '
:g~s ~ >-c.o ~ c;;~ e-!: ~.!! Ia,-.,
CO "'"'= - ~ ~ G e a CD <<I aJ C):E"t:J
cae.. 0 tV I) 0 en ca r-- en Ia <<I < I) ,
(I') e.. E fIlJ::; .=cn~"'-- -'
~ ~o '-- -, - G C _~ cg C\I > > ;g as fa
..''''"'~ _ as~Oca ~.Q4DCIt_<J_
~as- . C u.::; CJan ~E1aii.!!:SC
.e s~ '0.: .2..cS ,2(7) g E ~ ~ 'C CD <<DE_
- e.. fIl - - OJ~o ".:!:.~ 4D Q, Q,<'C '"D _ .
CJ e..c CD as E CJ j... a:: 0 0 ~...
ca CJu _ ca 0 e.. >0 Co _~.. ..' - 0> -
~ CU - e..G ~ ~ fI) <<:)... -' - .
1:-S> o-1:..cc "'"';::gco ~co~ c:~~,
OCU~~'tS~o-:l! Q.S o~, ',"!:." cua..
o4S4S~, <( I) ~ 0.... ~.(I) ~.:,.,~.,.:.~:.~:,~:!2~ ':'
Z:....~:;~._.X..~~~.:t.1.~..~~~~- .~"r.: ,~.~~ ..~:L~..~ ~~~f~~.<..:~.':-?. ~. ~.::.~~ :~~;~~~:;;""~! : :-~_:.~ '.t~
..." .~ .:.' .. :... ,"'~., ...... :.~-'''::>
....
0::
!
\I
.t
- .', ..,.;: -~:'..-..;~
, .' .':.i;#'..,
en
a.
G)
...
en
...
>C
G)
Z
~
m
en
o
a.
o
a-
D.
- .~Ec,~..J"u:-CC> t:"o,;.,,::
ii ca o.!!i\;:Q.a:I CDj ~::CD,~a:: E
. G -,. "C.C .."- 0 >- c. - 'CD'... '>'n' "'~o
'S OJ~.E ~~~ . -a; ;; cas> 'g~.tI:I A~ 0(,)
.!! 'tS e..CD >.. >C. C , I) _.~,o ,"C 0)
CD i: C. CD 0 :::::I CD CD.! -=- U.: ..."D":O CD
en m <(m CD o. c :2 c.:::t:.Eo. oct ;E __
':~<: ~ d.'J; >;.-- ,..:..:.._:..
-~"-''''''''''---~~'''''-''--''''''''l'''''~'''--''''''''''''~''''''''-'"'---'~''''"'''''''~----'- ----...-,,"".~,-----