HomeMy WebLinkAbout7A WSUM Public HearingPhone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / www.cityofpriorlake.com
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: MAY 9TH, 2016
AGENDA #: 7A
PREPARED BY: PETE YOUNG, WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER
PRESENTED
BY:
PETE YOUNG
AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CHANGES TO CITY CODE SECTION
703: RELATING TO WATER SURFACE USE MANAGEMENT
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing to obtain testimony
regarding proposed changes to City Code Section 703: Public Waters
pertaining to Water Surface Use Management.
History
Local governments can enact Water Surface Use Management (WSUM)
rules to regulate activities on water bodies such as lakes. WSUM rules
describe the goals of the rules, require an assessment of the water surface
use conditions, and establish water surface management standards or
parameters, which may be included in a local ordinance. The Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) oversees WSUM at the state level
and works with local government units enacting WSUM ordinances. The City
of Prior Lake has had some form of surface waters regulation on Prior Lake
since the 1980s, with the last substantial WSUM revision coming in 1994.
The need to update local WSUM rules stems from several factors including a
lack of WSUM regulations for Spring Lake, changes in lake use, ongoing
feedback regarding shoreline erosion, and a rise in safety concerns
expressed by the Scott County Sheriff’s Office.
On April 27, 2015 the Spring Lake Town Board and Prior Lake City Council
met to discuss various topics including Water Surface Use Management
regulations. The outcome of this meeting was to create a task force with
representation of key stakeholder groups to evaluate several policy topics
related to WSUM, and to provide recommendations back to the Board and
Council.
The WSUM task force consisted of stakeholders representing a cross section
of the community and lake users. This group met eight times and spent many
hours reviewing information and talking to their constituents about WSUM
issues. Task force members are commended for assisting with a public
process, on a volunteer basis, that resulted in recommendations that meet
the intent of the statewide WSUM program. Lake use is central to this
community; by striving for balanced lake use through its WSUM ordinance,
2
the City will continue to attract a broad range of recreational users to its
public waters while protecting the rights of shoreline owners.
On March 14, 2016, the Town Board and City Council met to discuss the
task force’s preliminary findings, a draft final report (Attachment 1), and
recommended changes to the City’s ordinance dealing with WSUM (City
Code Section 703, Public Waters). During that meeting the City Council
directed staff to move forward with a public process to update City Code
Section 703 and also to form an education task force that will assist lake
users in understating the requirements of City Code 703. In order to enact
WSUM regulations on Spring Lake, the Spring Lake Town Board would have
to adopt an ordinance with matching provisions. Other WSUM task force
recommendations included increasing the enforcement presence on Spring
Lake and creating a mechanism to ensure adequate placement and spacing
of marker buoys around the lakes.
Current Circumstances
On April 28, 2016, City and Township staff hosted a public informational
meeting to present the WSUM task force’s findings and also to solicit
feedback from the community relating to potential ordinance updates. Slides
from the PowerPoint presentation given during the meeting are included as
Attachment 2 and include a summary of the proposed ordinance revisions.
Over 90 residents attended and several provided written comments.
Additional written comments were received after the meeting via email and
mailed forms. These public comments are included as Attachment 3. The
public comments were generally supportive of all recommended changes
except one item dealing with the restriction of sustained, bow-high operation
of a boat in the area south of Twin Isle. This is the only controversial
recommendation brought forth by the WSUM task force. The
recommendation was supported by a narrow majority of task force members.
Conclusion
The City Council and Town Board are asked to hold a public hearing to
receive public testimony on the proposed ordinance revisions. This public
hearing is a necessary step not only for the local processes but also as part
of the state review process. Prior to final adoption the Department of Natural
Resources must review and approve of the ordinance language. A transcript
from the hearing must be submitted with the proposed language for
consideration. It is customary for the Council to consider ordinance revisions
on the same evening as the public hearing. However, due to the additional
requirement for review, the Council and Town Board will be asked to provide
direction to staff as far as proceeding with the process. If the Council or
Town Board would like to make any modifications to the language it would be
appropriate to provide that direction in a motion after the public hearing but
before the proposed ordinance is submitted to the DNR.
ISSUES: The potential ordinance change relating to the restriction of sustained, bow-
high operation of a boat in the area south of Twin Isle was the only issue
among several potential changes receiving a significant amount of negative
3
feedback from the public. Those opposed to this potential ordinance change
generally raised the following issues:
1. Applicability of existing studies and proof of causation.
The WSUM task force reviewed several existing scientific studies dealing
with wave generation and shoreline erosion caused at least in part by wave
action. According to the studies, larger waves containing more energy and
power (regardless of source) have potential to do more damage to shorelines
than smaller waves. Wave frequency is also a major factor in bank erosion.
Wave science appears to be well-established.
Studies conducted all over the world, in many different environments, tend to
reach similar conclusions: while watercraft wake isn’t the only factor in
shoreline erosion, it can be a significant factor in accelerated shoreline
erosion, especially if certain conditions are met including high frequency of
boat passes, proximity of boat passes to the shoreline, and shorelines
susceptible to erosion. No study points to watercraft wake as the primary
driver of shoreline erosion in all cases; rather, it is one potential cause of
shoreline erosion that can be limited by using focused restrictions, while all
other active-use activities may continue unhindered.
The lessons learned from studies undertaken in other areas and situations
can be applied to Prior Lake. Water waves will have similar physical
properties regardless of where they are generated, and Prior Lake has many
of the same depth and shoreline constrictions present in other studied areas
such as rivers, bays, and harbors.
Studies cautioned about over-regulation of watercraft wake because it is not
the only factor in eroding shorelines. Natural waterways are dynamic
environments subject to erosional and/or depositional processes. Therefore,
adding a focused regulation aimed at giving some measure of relief to those
shorelines most susceptible to erosion and located in an area with natural
travel constrictions and heavy use, while allowing all other activities to
continue, is reasonable for Prior Lake.
No single study matched the conditions of Prior Lake exactly, but the
cumulative impact of the study findings make it clear that the task force’s
recommendations will allow for a balanced lake use while providing for some
shoreline protection. Absolute answers in the form of studies come with
disproportionate costs, and the recommended option is to derive operating
criteria that make the problem manageable and then adjust these criteria
over time with the benefit of monitoring.
2. Accelerated Erosion.
The area south of Twin Isle includes several of the compounding factor types
that scientific studies have listed as risk factors for accelerated shoreline
erosion. These factors include high boat frequency (owing in part to the
DNR’s DeWitte Public Access and the southern loop of the typical travel
pattern of boats), potential travel lanes constricted by the island, and
4
shorelines susceptible to erosion. This susceptibility is due to several factors
including shoreline steepness, erodible soils, and varying stabilization
practices.
According to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), it is against the
law “to operate a watercraft so its wash or wake endangers, harasses, or
interferes with any person or property” (MN 6110.1200, Subp. 1.A).
Additionally, the goal of WSUM “shall be to enhance the recreational use,
safety, and enjoyment of the water surface of Minnesota and to preserve
these water resources in a way that reflects the state’s paramount concern
for the protection of its natural resources” (MN 6110.3200). Essentially it is to
strike a balance between what can be competing interests.
To accomplish this goal, the DNR states that an ordinance or rule shall:
A. Where practical and feasible, accommodate all compatible recreational
uses
B. Minimize adverse impact on natural resources
C. Minimize conflicts between users in a way that provides for maximum
use, safety, and enjoyment
D. Conform to the standards set forth in part 6110.3700
After the public information meeting on April 28, 2016, public comments were
received from 6 residents who own shoreline property in this area and who
support the proposed restriction on sustained, bow-high operation. An
additional 12 residents were in support of the restriction but did not provide
an address, bringing the total written comments in support of the proposed
restriction to 18. Common themes in their comments included residents
having to continually rebuild shoreline stabilization practices (including walls
and riprap), the increase in erosion over time, and the inequality that results
from a small group of boaters effectively “taking over” a section of Prior
Lake, making it unusable for others who wish to enjoy the lake due to the
enhanced wake.
Those who oppose the restriction provided approximately 26 written
comments. Common themes of those comments included the applicability of
existing studies to Prior Lake, shifting enhanced wake activities to other
areas of the lake, enforceability, and the concern that this potential regulation
will lead to other similar regulations.
3. Economic impact of decision.
As a recreational lake, Prior Lake is central to the community’s economic
well-being. Many city residents and non-residents choose to spend time
recreating on or around the lake, participating in activities ranging from
kayaking and fishing to water skiing and wake surfing. Prior Lake is also
attractive to new residents. By adopting WSUM rules, the City is responsible
for ensuring that the state’s WSUM goals are being met to the maximum
extent practicable. These goals include balancing recreational uses while
minimizing impact on shorelines and other natural resources.
5
Some shoreline residents have expressed the opinion that actively eroding
shorelines has negatively impacted their property value. Others have stated
that adding more restrictions to the lake negatively impacts property value.
Without expressly performing an in-depth study of the economic factors that
may result from this potential ordinance change, the economic impact of this
decision is unknown. No commenter has produced information to
substantiate claims of economic impact, positive or negative.
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
To date the financial impact has been limited to City staff time, which has
been significant. Additional City staff time is needed to help guide an
education task force regardless of potential ordinance updates. Costs will
also be incurred to share the new ordinance with the public using the most
effective means.
Public comments have included statements about the potential financial
impact of the proposed ordinance changes. Some feel that the potential
changes will positively impact their property value and potentially decrease
the amount of money they spend on repairing shoreline protection practices.
Others feel that the potential changes will negatively impact their property
value.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. The city council and the township board, make a motion and second to
direct staff to submit the proposed ordinance language to the Department
of Natural Resources for review and approval.
2. The city council and the township board make a motion and second to
direct staff to modify the ordinance language prior to submission to the
Department of Natural Resources for review and approval.
3. Table this item.
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
Alternative 1. Approve the updated ordinance language as written and direct
staff to forward the updated ordinance to the DNR for review and approval.
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p1
SECTION 703
PUBLIC WATERS
SUBSECTIONS:
703.100: CHAPTER
703.200: PURPOSE, INTENT AND APPLICATION
703.300: DEFINITIONS
703.400: SPEED LIMITATIONS
703.500: ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS
703.600: EXEMPTIONS
703.700: NOTIFICATION
703.800: ENFORCEMENT
703.900: PENALTIES
703.100: TITLE: This Section shall be known and cited as the PUBLIC WATERS Code.
703.200: PURPOSE, INTENT, AND APPLICATION: As authorized by Minnesota Statutes
86B.201, 86B.205, and 459.20, and Minnesota Rules 6110.3000 – 6110.3800, as now in effect
and as hereafter amended, this Ordinance is enacted for the purpose and with the intent to
control and regulate the use of the waters of Prior Lake and Spring Lake in Scott County,
Minnesota; to promote to the fullest extent possible the public’s use and enjoyment of said
bodies of water; to promote and protect the safety of persons and property in connection with
the use of these waters; to harmonize and integrate the varying uses of these waters; and to
promote the public health, safety and welfare on said bodies of water.
703.300: DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Section, the definitions set out in
Minnesota Statutes Section 86B.005 are incorporated herein and made part of this
Section. Terms not defined by said Statute shall have the following meanings:
High Water: An elevation of 903.9’ or greater above mean sea level on Prior Lake,
as determined by the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District gauge. An
elevation of 912.8’ or greater above mean sea level on Spring Lake, as determined
by the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District gauge.
Prior Lake: The body of water given that name and assigned the lake numbers
70002600 and 70007200 by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Shore: The line separating land and water which shifts as lake levels increase and
decrease.
Slow No-Wake: The operation of a watercraft at the slowest possible speed
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p2
necessary to maintain steerage and in no case greater than five (5) miles per hour.
Ord. Amd. 110-05, publ. 10/9/10)
Spring Lake: The body of water given that name and assigned the lake number
70005400 by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Watercraft: Any contrivance used or designed for navigation on water, except: 1)
a duck boat during the duck hunting season; 2) a rice boat during the harvest
season; or 3) a seaplane.
703.400: WATERCRAFT SPEED LIMITATIONS:
703.401 General Speed Limit: No person shall operate a watercraft, at any time, greater
than a slow no-wake speed within one hundred fifty feet (150’) from shore. Any
watercraft launching or landing a person on water skis, wakeboards, kneeboards, or
barefoot by the most direct and safe route to open water or shore shall be exempt
from this provision.
703.402 Daytime Speed Limit: No person shall operate a watercraft at greater than forty
40) miles per hour, from sunrise to one-half hour after sunset, on all weekends and
legal holidays occurring from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day weekend.
703.403 Nighttime Speed Limit: No person shall operate a watercraft at greater than
twenty (20) miles per hour, from one-half hour after sunset to sunrise the following
day, at any time during the year.
703.404 High Water Slow No-Wake: No person shall operate a watercraft at greater than a
slow no-wake speed on the entire surface of Prior Lake when the water level in said
water body reaches its High Water elevation, as defined in Section 703.300.
No person shall operate a watercraft at greater than a slow no-wake speed on the
entire surface of Spring Lake when the water level in said water body reaches its
High Water elevation, as defined in Section 703.300.
When the water level of Prior Lake and/or Spring Lake reaches a High Water
elevation, as defined in Section 703.300, the City Manager or designee shall
arrange to have notice of the high water slow no-wake restriction posted on the
City’s website. The high water slow no-wake restriction shall become effective as of
the posting. All public water accesses shall be posted during the time the restriction
is in place.
When water levels have subsided and have remained below a High Water
elevation, as defined in Section 703.300, for 72 consecutive hours, said restriction
shall be promptly removed by removing the posting on the City’s website.
703.405 Marked Slow No-Wake Zones: No person shall at any time operate a watercraft
at a speed greater than slow no-wake speed in any marked slow no-wake zone.
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p3
The City of Prior Lake or the Scott County Sheriff’s Office shall install or cause to
be installed buoys marking slow no-wake zones. Marked slow no-wake zones
are intended to maintain a safe lake environment and protect the lives and
property of all lake users and owners. Slow no-wake zones shall be marked at
the following locations on Prior Lake:
The navigational channel located north and south of the County Road
21/Eagle Creek Avenue Bridge.
The navigational channel located to the south of Reed’s Island.
The navigational channel located north and south of the Lords Street
Bridge.
The navigational channel located at the entrance/exit of Boudin’s Bay and
the entire surface of Boudin’s Bay.
The navigational channel located at the entrance/exit of Candy Cove, and
the entire surface of Candy Cove.
The navigational channel located at the entrance/exit of Mud (Crystal) Bay.
The navigational channel located at the entrance/exit of Paradise Bay, and
the entire surface of Paradise Bay.
703.500: ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS:
703.501 Swimming: No person shall use an inflatable water toy, air mattress or inner tube
more than one hundred fifty feet (150') from shore, unless accompanied by a
watercraft. No person shall swim more than one hundred fifty feet (150') from
shore, unless accompanied by a watercraft.
703.502 Prohibited Wake Enhancement Zone: No person may operate a boat in a
sustained, artificially bow-high manner in order to increase or enhance the boat's
wake within the prohibited wake enhancement zone. Prohibited wake
enhancement zone is defined as all areas of Prior Lake south of a line drawn
between the eastern most point and the westernmost point of Twin Isle and
extending said line east and west to the shorelines.
703.503 Towing Restrictions: No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner tube,
aquaplane or similar device shall be operated at any time within a marked slow no-
wake zone
703.600: EXEMPTIONS: All authorized resource management, emergency and enforcement
personnel, while acting in the performance of their assigned duties, are exempt
from the restrictions set forth in this Section.
A temporary exemption from the restrictions set forth in subsection 703.503 may be
allowed under certain circumstances. To qualify for a temporary exemption, an
application for a permit must be completed, which shall include: the purpose of the
exemption, the organization or persons being exempted, the location of the
exemption, and the date and time of the exemption. The temporary exemption
permit shall be issued by the Scott County Sheriff's Office.
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p4
703.700: NOTIFICATION: The City shall notify the public of this Section, which shall include
but not be limited to placing a sign at each public watercraft launching facility
outlining the essential elements of this Section, as well as placing other necessary
buoys and signs.
703.800: ENFORCEMENT: The enforcement of this Section shall be the primary
responsibility of the Scott County Sheriff's Office. Other licensed peace officers,
including conservation officers of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
are also authorized to enforce the provisions of this Section.
703.900: PENALTIES: Any person who violates any provisions of this Section shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not
more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment of not more than
ninety (90) days, or both.
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p1
SECTION 703
PUBLIC WATERS
SUBSECTIONS:
703.100: CHAPTER
703.200: PURPOSE, INTENT AND APPLICATION
703.300: DEFINITIONS
703.400: SPEED LIMITATIONS
703.500: ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS
703.600: EXEMPTIONS
703.700: NOTIFICATION
703.800: ENFORCEMENT
703.900: PENALTIES
703.100: TITLE: This Section shall be known and cited as the PUBLIC WATERS Code.
703.200: PURPOSE, INTENT, AND APPLICATION: Consistent with authority provided to
the City pursuant toAs authorized by Minnesota Statutes 86B.201, 86B.205, and 459.20, and
Minnesota Rules 6110.3000 – 6110.3800, as may benow in effect and as hereafter amended
from time to time,, this Ordinance is enacted for the purpose of this section is intendedand with
the intent to control and regulate the use of the waters of Upper and Lower Prior Lake in the City
of Priorand Spring Lake, in Scott County, Minnesota; to promote to the fullest extent possible
the public’s use and enjoyment of Upper and Lower Prior Lakesaid bodies of water; to promote
and protect the safety of persons and property in connection with the use of these waters; to
harmonize and integrate the varying uses of these waters; and to promote the public health,
safety and welfare on Upper and Lower Prior Lakesaid bodies of water.
703.300: DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Section, the definitions set out in
Minnesota StatuteStatutes Section 86B.005 are incorporated herein and made part
of this Section. Terms not defined by said Statute shall have the following
meanings:
High Water: An elevation of 903.9’ or greater above mean sea level on Prior Lake,
as determined by the Prior Lake/-Spring Lake Watershed District gauge. The
Ordinary High Water (OHW) An elevation of 903.9912.8’ or greater above mean
sea level has been establishedon Spring Lake, as determined by lawthe Prior Lake-
Spring Lake Watershed District gauge.
Prior Lake: The body of water given that name and assigned the lake numbers 72-
26P70002600 and 72-22P70007200 by the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources.
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p2
Ord. Amd. 110-05, publ. 10/9/10)
Shore: The line separating land and water which shifts as lake levels increase and
decrease.
Slow No-Wake: The operation of a watercraft at the slowest possible speed
necessary to maintain steerage and in no case greater than five (5) miles per hour.
Ord. Amd. 110-05, publ. 10/9/10)
Spring Lake: The body of water given that name and assigned the lake number
70005400 by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Watercraft: Any contrivance used or designed for navigation on water, except: 1)
a duck boat during the duck hunting season; 2) a rice boat during the harvest
season; or 3) a seaplane.
703.400: WATERCRAFT SPEED LIMITATIONS:
703.401 Towing Restrictions: No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner tube,
aquaplane or similar device shall be operated at any time within one hundred fifty feet
150’) of shore; provided, however, that any watercraft launching or landing a person
on water skis, inner tube, aquaplane or similar device by the most direct and safe
route to open water or shore shall be exempt from this provision.
703.402
703.401 General Speed Limit: No person shall operate a watercraft, at any time, greater
than a slow no-wake speed within one hundred fifty feet (150’) from shore. Any
watercraft launching or landing a person on water skis, wakeboards, kneeboards, or
barefoot by the most direct and safe route to open water or shore shall be exempt
from this provision.
703.403402 Daytime Speed Limit: No person shall operate a watercraft at greater
than forty (40) miles per hour, from sunrise to one-half hour after sunset, on all
weekends and legal holidays occurring from Memorial Day weekend through Labor
Day weekend.
703.404403 Nighttime Speed Limit: No person shall operate a watercraft at greater
than twenty (20) miles per hour, from one-half hour after sunset to sunrise the
following day, at any time during the year.
703.405404 High Water Slow No-Wake: No person shall operate a watercraft at
greater than a slow no-wake speed on the entire surface of Prior Lake when the
water level in said water body reaches nine hundred four feet (904.0’) sea levelits
High Water elevation, as measured by the City at the Prior Lake/Spring Lake
Watershed District gaugedefined in Section 703.300.
No person shall operate a watercraft at greater than a slow no-wake speed on the
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p3
entire surface of Spring Lake when the water level in said water body reaches its
High Water elevation, as defined in Section 703.300.
When the water level of Prior Lake reaches 904.0’ sea leveland/or Spring Lake
reaches a High Water elevation, as defined in Section 703.300, the City Manager or
designee shall arrangedarrange to have notice of the high water slow no-wake
provision televisedrestriction posted on the City’s cable channel.website. The high
water slow no-wake restriction shall become effective as of the first televised
notification.posting. All public water accesses shall be posted prior to and during
the time the restrictions arerestriction is in place. In addition, notice of said
restrictions shall be posted at Prior Lake City Hall.
When high water levels have subsided and have remained below ana High Water
elevation of nine hundred four feet (904.0’) sea level, as defined in Section 703.300,
for three (3)72 consecutive dayshours, said restriction shall be promptly removed by
removing the posting on the City’s website.
703.406405 Marked Slow No-Wake Zones: No person shall at any time operate a watercraft
at a speed greater than slow no-wake speed in any marked slow no-wake
channel/zone. The City of Prior Lake or the Scott County of Scott Sheriff’s Office
shall install or cause to be installed buoys marking navigable channels and
orslow no-wake zones. These channels andMarked slow no-wake zones are
intended to maintain a safe lake environment and protect the lives and property
of all lake users and owners. These channels/Slow no-wake zones shall be
postedmarked at the following locations on Prior Lake:
The navigational channel located directly north and south of the County
Road 21/Eagle Creek Avenue Bridge starting and ending at the
navigational red and green channel markers placed at both ends.
The navigational channel marked by red and green navigational channel
markers and no-wake buoys located to the Eastsouth of Reed’s Island.
The navigational channel marked by slow no-wake buoys at both
endslocated north and south of the Lords Street Bridge.
The navigational channel located at the entrance/exit of Boudin’s Bay and
the entire surface of Boudin’s Bay.
The navigational channel marked by slow no-wake buoys entering and
exiting from Boudin’s Bay, including the entire surface area of Boudins Bay.
located at the entrance/exit of Candy Cove, and the entire surface area of
Candy Cove, starting and ending at the no-wake buoy placed
approximately one hundred fifty (150) feet West of the entrance point to of
Candy Cove.
The navigational channel located at the entrance/exit point toof Mud
Crystal) Bay, marked by slow no-wake buoys at either end of the
navigable.
The navigational channel located at saidthe entrance/exit pointof Paradise
Bay, and the entire surface of Paradise Bay.
703.500: ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS:
Public Ways & Property
City of Prior Lake
703/p4
703.501 Swimming: No person shall use an inflatable water toy, air mattress or inner tube
more than one hundred fifty feet (150') from shore, unless accompanied by a
watercraft. No person shall swim more than one hundred fifty feet (150') from
shore, unless accompanied by a watercraft.
703.502 Prohibited Wake Enhancement Zone: No person may operate a boat in a
sustained, artificially bow-high manner in order to increase or enhance the boat's
wake within the prohibited wake enhancement zone. Prohibited wake
enhancement zone is defined as all areas of Prior Lake south of a line drawn
between the eastern most point and the westernmost point of Twin Isle and
extending said line east and west to the shorelines.
703.503 Towing Restrictions: No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner tube,
aquaplane or similar device shall be operated at any time within a marked slow no-
wake zone
703.600: EXEMPTIONS: All authorized resource management, emergency and enforcement
personnel, while acting in the performance of their assigned duties, are exempt
from the restrictions set forth in this Section.
A temporary exemption from the restrictions set forth in subsection 703.401503
may be allowed under certain circumstances. To qualify for a temporary
exemption, an application for a permit must be completed, which shall include: the
purpose of the exemption, the organization or persons being exempted, the location
of the exemption, and the date and time of the exemption. The temporary
exemption permit shall be issued by the Scott County Sheriff's DepartmentOffice.
703.700: NOTIFICATION: The City shall notify the public of this Section, which shall include
but not be limited to placing a sign at each public watercraft launching facility
outlining the essential elements of this Section, as well as placing other necessary
buoys and signs.
703.800: ENFORCEMENT: The enforcement of this Section shall be the primary
responsibility of the Scott County Sheriff's DepartmentOffice. Other licensed peace
officers, including conservation officers of the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, are also authorized to enforce the provisions of this Section.
703.900: PENALTIES: Any person who violates any provisions of this Section shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not
more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment of not more than
ninety (90) days, or both.
WSUM Task Force
Final Report
Purpose of Water Surface Use Management (WSUM): To enhance the recreational
use, safety, and enjoyment of water surfaces and to preserve water resources in a
way that reflects the state’s paramount concern for the protection of its natural
resources. (MN DNR)
2 | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 3
2 WSUM Definition & History in Prior Lake ............................................................................................. 5
3 WSUM Policy Issues .............................................................................................................................. 6
3.1 Education ...................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 Enforcement ................................................................................................................................. 8
3.3 Public Safety ................................................................................................................................ 10
3.4 Spring Lake WSUM Regulations .................................................................................................. 12
3.5 Impacts of Watercraft and Wind Wake on Shoreline Erosion and Water Quality ..................... 13
3.6 Preservation of Recreational Opportunities ............................................................................... 15
4 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 15
4.1 Education .................................................................................................................................... 16
4.2 Enforcement ............................................................................................................................... 16
4.3 Public Safety ................................................................................................................................ 16
4.4 Buoys ........................................................................................................................................... 16
4.5 Marked Slow No-Wake Zones ..................................................................................................... 17
4.6 Spring Lake WSUM Regulations .................................................................................................. 17
4.7 Enhanced Watercraft Wake ........................................................................................................ 17
4.8 Public Process ............................................................................................................................. 17
4.9 Summary of Recommend Ordinance Revisions .......................................................................... 18
5 Implementation Plan .......................................................................................................................... 18
6 Appendix ............................................................................................................................................. 19
6.1 Current WSUM Ordinance (City Code Section 703) .................................................................... 19
6.2 Existing WSUM Ordinance Maps ................................................................................................ 24
6.3 WSUM Task Force Meeting Notes .............................................................................................. 26
6.4 Paradise Bay Slow No-Wake Resident Petition ........................................................................... 48
6.5 Public Comments ........................................................................................................................ 51
3 | P a g e
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In September, 2014, the City and Township began considering updates to the Water Surface Use
Management (WSUM) regulations for a number of reasons. First, the flood of 2014 highlighted the lack
of any WSUM regulations on Spring Lake. This led to a disjointed process for implementing an
emergency slow no-wake provision on the lake, resulting in frustrations during the flood. The City and
Township received public input asking for the adoption of permanent emergency no-wake rules for
Spring Lake. In addition there has been ongoing feedback from residents regarding shoreline erosion
issues on Prior Lake at any lake level. These complaints have pointed to new, more intensive use types
on the lake since the last significant ordinance revision in 1994. Finally, the Scott County Sheriff’s Office
provided feedback expressing a rise in safety concerns.
City and Township staff met to discuss these concerns. After gathering additional information and
considering input from DNR officials, Sheriff’s Office staff, and residents, City and Township staff hosted
two public open house meetings to gather additional feedback from community stakeholders regarding
WSUM regulations. During the meetings stakeholders were presented with options for WSUM
regulation changes that would address public safety and shoreline erosion concerns. Stakeholders were
asked to provide input on the potential change options. The public response was deeply divided
between those favoring proposed changes and those opposing a change in WSUM rules. Stakeholder
feedback is included in Appendix 4.7.
The Spring Lake Township Board and Prior Lake City Council created the WSUM Task Force to review
issues that emerged during the public open house meetings and to craft recommendations for
policymakers. Issues brought forward by residents and lake users included lake use conflicts, concern
about restricting boats into congested areas, education about the City’s existing WSUM regulations,
shoreline erosion caused by watercraft, and lake congestion.
Task Force members were selected from a pool of candidates who represent a wide range of
constituencies and perspectives. This group structure was selected to ensure that the policy items in
question could be addressed from different perspectives, and to ensure that these perspectives would
be heard. The following local residents participated as members of the WSUM Task Force:
Name Affiliation
Glenn Kelley Spring Lake Township Board, Spring Lake lakefront owner, Spring Lake
Association member, active Spring Lake user
Dan Kelly Spring Lake Association Board, Spring Lake lakefront owner, water enthusiast
Wes Mader Prior Lake resident, Prior Lake lakefront owner, shoreline protection advocate
Christian
Morkeberg
Spring Lake Township resident, Spring Lake lakefront owner, public
health/safety advocate, environmentalist
4 | P a g e
Mike Myser Prior Lake resident, active/passive use advocate, lakeshore owner,
environmentalist
Tom Stephenson Prior Lake Association, HOA Member
Woody
Spitzmueller
PLSLWD Board, Prior Lake Assn Board, Prior Lake Community Safety Advisory
Committee, and Boating Safety Instructor
Mike Thibault Shakopee Prior Lake Water Ski Association, Prior Lake Lakeshore Owner
Annette
Thompson
Prior Lake City Council, HOA Member
Other occasional meeting attendees included Deputy Todd Beck (Scott County Sheriff’s Office),
Margaret Bergsrud (MN DNR), Conservation Officer Chelsie Leuthardt (MN DNR), Diane Lynch (Prior
Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District), and Meg Rattei (Barr Engineering). Key project staff included Katy
Gehler (City of Prior Lake), Kathy Nielsen (Spring Lake Township), and Pete Young (City of Prior Lake).
The Task Force’s primary purpose was to review a wide range of policy issues and develop a set of
recommendations for regulating WSUM on Spring Lake and Prior Lake. The specific policy issues the
Take Force addressed are:
Education
Enforcement
Public Safety
Spring Lake WSUM Regulations
Impacts of Wake (Watercraft and Wind) on Shoreline Erosion and Water Quality
Preservation of Recreational Opportunities
The Task Force met eight times to consider these policy issues which are discussed in detail under
Section 3. Outside experts were consulted and Task Force members were provided with large amounts
of information to aid in the discussions. Task Force members were also encouraged to research the
topics independently and to speak with other residents about WSUM issues.
The WSUM Task Force has performed a public service by reviewing an ordinance that has not changed
substantially for over 20 years. By thoroughly considering the many complicated factors inherent to
WSUM regulations, listening to community members with different perspectives, and voicing their
opinions throughout the process, the Task Force members produced a valuable set of
recommendations.
Major recommendations of the WSUM Task Force include:
Increase education efforts through the creation of a Task Force to drive the process.
Increase enforcement on Spring Lake and accelerating overall enforcement response time
Create a mechanism to facilitate installation and maintenance of buoys
Add Paradise Bay to the list of marked slow no-wake zones
Add WSUM regulations to Spring Lake (equivalent to Prior Lake WSUM regulations)
Ensure the public is well informed of all WSUM regulation proposals
5 | P a g e
Restrict the use of wake enhanced boating south of Twin Island to address the disproportionate
amount of shoreline damage observed near the DeWitte DNR Public Access
These recommendations represent the best efforts of a dedicated group of individuals and they
should be considered when creating future WSUM policy.
2 WSUM DEFINITION & HISTORY IN PRIOR LAKE
WSUM is one piece of a suite of regulations that apply to Minnesota lakes and rivers. Local zoning, state
and federal water quality rules, and state boating laws all regulate our lakes in different ways.
Specific to use are the state boating laws and WSUM. The state boating laws are focused on the boat
itself and address some lake use aspects. Specifically they address licensing, required safety equipment,
general boat requirements and operation, capacity, Boating While Impaired (BWI), and towing. WSUM
supplements the boating laws by providing a means of regulating water use based on local concerns
specific to a water body.
The goal of water surface use management, as defined by state rules, is to enhance the recreational use,
safety, and enjoyment of the water surfaces and to preserve these water resources in a way that reflects
the state’s paramount concern for the protection of its natural resources. In pursuit of that goal, an
ordinance or rule shall:
A. Accommodate all compatible recreational uses where practical and feasible;
B. Minimize adverse impact on natural resources;
C. Minimize conflicts between users in a way that provides for maximum use, safety, and
enjoyment; and
D. Conform to the state standards.
The DNR is granted the authority by state statutes to oversee the creation of local WSUM regulations. In
turn Counties, Cities, and Towns are given authority to create ordinances to regulate surface uses with
the oversight of the state. These authorities are limited to the following areas:
A. Type and size of watercraft;
B. Type and horsepower of motors;
C. Speed of watercraft;
D. Time of use;
E. Area of use; and
F. The conduct of other activities on the water body where necessary to secure the safety of the
public and the most general public use
The City of Prior Lake has had some form of WSUM regulation in place since the early 1980s. The bulk of
the current regulations were enacted in 1994, with relatively minor updates made in 2009. Spring Lake
Township does not currently have WSUM regulations in place.
6 | P a g e
The current WSUM regulations on Prior Lake are:
Speed Limits &
Effective Time
40 mph maximum, sunrise to 1 hour after sunset (weekends & holidays,
Memorial Day through Labor Day)
20 mph maximum, 1 hour after sunset to sunrise
Area Zoning Slow no-wake within 150 feet of shore at all times
Marked slow no-wake zones defined in ordinance (Wagon Bridge Channel,
Reed’s Island Channel, Lords Street Bridge Channel, Boudin’s Bay, Candy
Cove, Mud Bay Channel)
Activities No inflatable water toys, air mattresses, or inner tubes more than 150 feet
from shore, unless accompanied by a watercraft
No swimming more than 150 feet from shore, unless accompanied by a
watercraft
No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner tube, aquaplane or
similar device shall operate within 150 feet of shore (exception for
launching/landing by direct/safe route)*
High Water
Slow No-Wake
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Prior Lake when water reaches an
elevation of 904.0
Effective as of first televised notification on City’s cable channel
Public access points must be posted during entire restriction period
Removed when water remains below an elevation of 904.0 for 3
consecutive days
The Scott County Sheriff’s Office is responsible for enforcing WSUM regulations and has one full time
deputy occasionally supplemented by temporary employees assigned to provide enforcement services
on all Scott County lakes and rivers.
3 WSUM POLICY ISSUES
Based on community feedback received during and after the two initial public open house meetings, it is
apparent that there are competing interests for lake use and enjoyment. Community feedback indicated
a desire to use Prior Lake and Spring Lake to their fullest potential for recreation, including both passive
and active uses. However, for some, active recreational activities are perceived as having a negative
impact on shoreline stability, docks and certain other privately-owned improvements. WSUM
regulations are intended to strike a balance between competing surface water uses. The Task Force
addressed the major policy issues related to these competing uses.
7 | P a g e
3.1 EDUCATION
Education is key if WSUM, or any regulation, is to be effective. Task Force Meetings #1 and #2 focused
on the use of public education as a means to achieving greater compliance with state boating
regulations and WSUM rules.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS:
There is a general lack of knowledge of state boating regulation and WSUM rules among boaters
using lakes. There is not a specific group that lacks the knowledge but rather boaters of all
experience levels have different understandings.
All personal watercraft are required to have a rules decal.
There is currently no signage at the Spring Lake boat launch advising users of WSUM regulations.
Many people only launch their boat once per year (those who live on the lake or have a dock on
the lake). Different strategies are needed to reach these users.
The My Boat Club rental business on Prior Lake has enhanced their training program and all users
must ride along with a manager around the entire lake (to learn about hazardous areas and WSUM
rules) before using the boats.
The Prior Lake Association and Community Ed and Rec annually holds a DNR sanctioned boating
safety training for youth.
Top 3 WSUM violation issues (from Sheriff’s Office): personal watercraft, watercraft lighting
violations, slow no-wake violations.
TASK FORCE COMMENTS AND POINTS OF DISCUSSION:
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that education relating to WSUM is currently
inadequate and that more education is needed.
There was a viewpoint that enhanced education efforts would not lead to real behavior change.
There was agreement that there should be a central source for education on WSUM rules for area
lakes. This could be a website and/or a hotline
There was a desire to focus on non-traditional methods of education targeting specific
stakeholder groups. The message should be seen often.
Social media should be investigated as a tool for education.
Use creative ideas to gain compliance, not just rely on enforcement. Online tools were suggested,
including a “shaming” model to maintain a list of boat numbers that are violating the rules (this
would need to be a private list).
Would Lake Associations or HOAs be willing to help with education? Possibly use annual meetings
since they are required.
Look at posting a summary of WSUM rules at public launch sites and other lake access sites
including rental businesses. Existing signage is too wordy, confusing. Look at Lake Minnetonka
model.
Coordinate work with the DNR Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) program. Could DNR staff be
providing information on other topics such as boating rules?
Could we require a signed acknowledgement of boating rules for boats using the lake?
Top 3 ideas (targeted education relating to main violation issues):
o Target groups: rental users, boat launch users, and lakeshore residents (outreach at HOAs,
Spring Lake & Prior Lake Associations)
o Create laminated handouts (lake maps or other lake-related handouts)
8 | P a g e
o Install consistent & updated signage at all public boat launch sites, look into posting signs
on CR 21 bridge
RECOMMENDATION: A majority of the Task Force members agreed that many boaters are not
informed regarding boating and water surface use laws which has led to non-compliance. The Task
Force recommends increasing education efforts. The Task Force was not formed to specifically develop
educational materials and, therefore, is recommending that a new task force or similar group take on
the task of creating an educational program that would tap into existing educational efforts and the
resources of lake and homeowner associations. The WSUM Task Force generated the following ideas for
education efforts:
a. Target groups: rental users, boat launch users, and lakeshore residents (outreach at HOAs,
Spring Lake & Prior Lake Associations)
b. Create laminated handouts (lake maps or other lake-related handouts)
c. Install consistent & updated signage at all public boat launch sites; look into posting signs on
CR 21 bridge
d. Create a guidance document for property owners relating to slow no-wake buoys and the
existing County permit program
3.2 ENFORCEMENT
Public Safety is the ultimate goal. To achieve public safety boaters must have knowledge and
compliance with the boating and WSUM rules. Education is the first step in achieving compliance with
boating rules and regulation. Enforcement is the necessary next step to achieve compliance where
education efforts fail to change behavior. Enforcement was included as a discussion topic during Task
Force Meeting #1.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS:
The Sheriff’s Office has exclusive responsibility for water patrol. There are trained reservists but
they must be accompanied by a Sheriff’s Office Deputy at all times.
Prior Lake is one of the 10 most highly used lakes in the state.
Prior Lake generally has enforcement presence 4 days per week.
No lakes, other than Prior Lake, have regularly scheduled patrols. The Sheriff’s Office will respond
to calls on other lakes, but does not actively patrol them.
The DNR filled their Conservation Officer position after a 4 year vacancy and now is able to help
with enforcement (DNR CO is county-wide position).
The Sheriff’s Deputy must see a violation in order to enforce it (photos, reports, etc. are not
enough). That being said if a photo shows a clear violation, he will complete outreach with the
boater.
Prior Lake has a number of regulatory or warning buoys that mark hazards and no-wake zones.
The majority of the buoys were purchased by the County (a few were purchased by Prior Lake
Association). The Sheriff’s Office stores and places these buoys.
The County applies for grants to purchase buoys and other equipment including boats on a regular
basis.
Private property owners can purchase marker buoys (orange ball shaped) to mark the 150’ no
wake Zone. Anyone can apply for a permit to place a buoy in front of their private property. The
permit is free and is automatically renewed each year after the first application. Property owners
9 | P a g e
are responsible for their own buoy, chain/rope, and weight. Residents living on Spring Lake or
other lakes in Scott County can also apply to place buoys but historically have not done so.
Marker buoys are not all placed accurately. In fact some are off quite a bit.
Sheriff’s Deputy, Todd Beck, presented information about ongoing Sheriff’s Office patrols in Scott
County. The majority (90%) of Todd’s time is spent on Prior Lake because it is by far the busiest lake in
the county. About 50% of the violations for Prior Lake are from boaters that live on the lake. Most of
those are for users over 25 years of age; it was noted that the younger users would have had more
recent training requirements which could explain their relatively better rules compliance. Users of
Spring Lake in general are coming from greater distances, and a majority of those are for passive uses
such as fishing.
Complaint calls for boating violations broke down as follows (approximate 2014 numbers):
Prior Lake: 90%
O’Dowd: 3%
Cedar: 2%
MN River: 1%
Others: 4%]
TASK FORCE COMMENTS AND POINTS OF DISCUSSION:
Compliance with the 150’ No-wake zone is of concern. Many felt that if we can achieve better
compliance with this existing rule, this would address many of the safety concerns expressed by
residents.
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that there is currently sufficient enforcement on
Prior Lake. However, there needs to be better delineation of the 150’ no-wake zone to achieve a
higher level of compliance.
Some task force members felt that enforcement is not adequate and that measures should be
undertaken to increase the amount of overall rules enforcement. There was not agreement on
how this would be accomplished.
There was a desire to look into the existing private buoy process; permit requirements, cost of
permits (free), cost of buoys, etc.
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that Spring Lake needs additional enforcement.
Spring Lake now functions as the overflow lake for Prior Lake and watercraft traffic is increasing.
Enforcement is a tool used to achieve compliance; non-compliance is a public safety issue.
There was concern about response time on both Prior Lake and Spring Lake during times when
the lakes are not being actively patrolled.
Would individuals be able to assist with enforcement (volunteers)? Taking photos?
The task force would like the policy makers to explore the opportunities for enforcement.
RECOMMENDATION: Increase enforcement on Spring Lake, and look into accelerating response time in
general for lake surface violation & emergency calls.
To effectively implement this recommendation, increased funding for enforcement will likely be
required. The Sheriff’s Office does not currently have funding for increased WSUM enforcement on Prior
Lake or Spring Lake. Education efforts may address some of the concerns with lack of enforcement on
10 | P a g e
Spring Lake. However, increased education efforts will not address the stated concern about slow
response times.
3.3 PUBLIC SAFETY
Having addressed the issues of education and enforcement to achieve compliance with existing WSUM
rules, the Task Force also considered whether or not existing WSUM rules were sufficient to protect
public safety.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS:
State law was recently changed to prohibit towing ½ hour after sunset. The City ordinance
currently prohibits towing 1 hour after sunset.
Close calls and other towing conflicts during the hour after sunset were a concern of the patrol
officer.
Members noted that towing people through officially marked slow no-wake zones is a potential
safety hazard.
Boat or boat slip renters are a perceived problem because they lack the knowledge or respect for
the rules.
As use on the lake goes up, crowding on the lake and its impact on public safety has become a
concern.
TASK FORCE COMMENTS AND POINTS OF DISCUSSION:
All Task Force members agreed that the WSUM regulations should follow the new state law for
towing (changed from 1 hour after sunset to ½ hour after sunset); this law is currently in place
and supersedes the current Prior Lake rule.
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that towing in congested areas should be addressed
through WSUM regulations.
There was discussion about length of tow ropes, concerns about carbon monoxide when close to
motors, and it was noted that it is illegal for a boat occupant to hold the rope when towing a
person.
There is a safety concern about towing people (especially children) through congested areas
where they could fall off. This causes boat traffic congestion and can lead to injuries.
One concern was voiced stating that changing the regulations will restrict some lake users from
towing through congested areas out to open lake areas. The Sheriff’s Office will be able to address
this concern without additional enforcement efforts. Watercraft operators should ensure that
their watercraft has enough capacity for the person(s) being towed.
The task force suggested reviewing other models that use parking restrictions to limit boats on
the lake (allow one boat per parking space) to address crowding concerns.
RECOMMENDATION: Keep the current WSUM towing rule, apply it to Spring Lake, and also restrict all
towing through the following existing slow no-wake zones on Prior Lake:
The Wagon Bridge
11 | P a g e
Around Reeds Island
Near the conclusion of the Task Force meeting process, the Task Force directed City and Township staff
to discuss their recommendations with Deputy Todd Beck of the Scott County Sheriff’s Office in order to
get additional input relating to the potential WSUM rule updates.
To effectively implement the Task Force’s Public Safety recommendations, the first step would be to
modify the City’s ordinance to reflect the recommended changes. The exemption clause for launching or
landing makes the existing code confusing and it could be difficult for watercraft users to comply; a
similar state watercraft operation exemption only applies to water skiers. For example, a boat towing an
inner tube could create a wake through a slow no-wake zone if they are launching or landing, but
another watercraft with no inner tube could receive a ticket for traveling on the same path and creating
an equivalent wake. Additionally, water skiers are the primary lake users who need to launch or land
from shore while it is common for other users to start from any point in the lake. It would be difficult
for Sheriff’s Office Deputies to enforce a no-towing provision in the specific slow no-wake zones
mentioned during the meeting process if all lake users launching or landing were allowed to create wake
through these areas. For these reasons, the proposed WSUM towing rule is as follows:
Most of the slow no-wake zone areas are already covered by the lake-wide 150-foot slow no-wake
provision in the existing ordinance. The modified towing rule would simply restrict wake in areas that
fall within existing marked slow no-wake areas but are also more than 150 feet from shore. The
following illustration shows an example marked slow no-wake zone (Wagon Bridge).
Revised Towing Rule:
703.401 General Speed Limit: No person shall operate a watercraft, at any time, greater than a
slow no-wake speed within one hundred fifty feet (150’) from shore. Any watercraft
launching or landing a person on water skis, wakeboards, kneeboards, or barefoot by the
most direct and safe route to open water or shore shall be exempt from this provision.
703.503 Towing Restrictions: No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner tube, aquaplane
or similar device shall be operated at any time within a Marked Slow No-Wake Zone.
Current WSUM towing rule:
703.401 General Speed Limit: No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner tube,
aquaplane or similar device shall be operated at any time within one hundred fifty feet
150’) of shore; provided, however, that any watercraft launching or landing a person on
water skis, inner tube, aquaplane or similar device by the most direct and safe route to
open water or shore shall be exempt from this provision.
12 | P a g e
Shaded Yellow Areas: Approximate extents of existing slow no-wake zone
Yellow line: 150’ from the shoreline
Red Hatched Areas: These areas are within slow no-wake zone but outside of 150’ shoreline slow no-
wake zone; towing would no longer be allowed in these areas under the proposed rule revision.
This illustration shows that the existing towing rule is not only confusing, it is difficult to comply with
and to enforce.
Education efforts would include updates on the modified ordinance with respect to public safety.
Updating the ordinance to follow state law would have no impact on enforcement efforts as this
provision needs to be followed anyway. Adding a towing restriction to the two congested areas would
require education and possibly increased enforcement, depending on the effectiveness of the education
and other factors. Some of these areas would have already been considered a “no towing” zone, owing
to their location within 150’ of the shoreline. Education should therefore be prioritized to reach those
who may be accustomed to towing through the two congested areas further than 150’ from shore.
3.4 SPRING LAKE WSUM REGULATIONS
Spring Lake currently has no specific WSUM regulations outside of the standard statewide boating
regulations The Task Force discussed adding Spring Lake WSUM regulations during Meeting #7.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS:
There is currently no mechanism for implementing a high-water no-wake restriction on Spring
Lake.
13 | P a g e
Spring Lake is often used as an overflow lake for Prior Lake.
TASK FORCE COMMENTS AND POINTS OF DISCUSSION:
Spring Lake residents have seen an increase in the amount of boat traffic on the lake.
Spring Lake residents have seen in increase in the intensity of active uses on the lake.
The lack of a regulated no-wake zone creates a safety hazard for swimmers.
Implementation of a no-wake zone on Spring Lake should not interfere with the use of the ski
jump.
Spring Lake is very shallow. As a result several docks are longer than 150’. What should be the
depth of the no wake zone?
RECOMMENDATION: A majority of the Task Force members living on or using Spring Lake agreed that
Spring Lake should have the same WSUM regulations as Prior Lake. In order to extend these
regulations to Spring Lake, the City of Prior Lake and Spring Lake Township must pass equivalent WSUM
ordinances. The ordinances would include the provision that a temporary, lake-wide slow no-wake
requirement is enacted when the water levels reach the Ordinary High Water elevation for each lake
903.9’ for Prior Lake and 912.8’ for Spring Lake).
3.5 IMPACTS OF WATERCRAFT AND WIND WAKE ON SHORELINE EROSION AND WATER QUALITY
During Meeting #3 the Task Force discussed the impacts of wake and wind on shoreline erosion and water
quality, as it relates to WSUM.
An outside expert, Meg Rattei of Barr Engineering Company, presented information about sediment
resuspension from boat traffic in shallow areas and how this may affect the PLSLWD’s Spring Lake alum
treatment, and water quality in general.
Ms. Rattei presented information on the basics of alum treatment and how a portion of the phosphorus
previously available to plants and algae is permanently bonded to alum during and after the treatment.
In Spring Lake, phosphorus within the top 2.5 inches of sediment was treated along with other phosphorus
within the water column. Alum treatment only occurred in depths greater than 10 feet to target areas
having higher levels of releasable phosphorus. Sediment along the shoreline is not as high in releasable
phosphorus as deeper sediments but there is still a level of releasable phosphorus in shallow areas (less
than 10 feet deep). Finer sediments tend to settle out over the deeper portions of a lake. Wind can carry
fine sediments all over the lake depending on strength and direction. It is likely that areas shallower than
10 feet have higher oxygen content which is called a “mixing zone”, where phosphorus is not releasable
due to the higher oxygen content (higher than 2 mg/l).
Rattei noted that aquatic plants can help to trap fine sediments and stabilize the lake bottom. Removing
aquatic plants can impact a lake by shifting the available phosphorus to planktonic algae, which is the type
of algae that makes the lake green (lower water quality). Boats can have an impact on aquatic vegetation
growth. An updated lake vegetation map would be informative for making decisions based on protecting
plant growth in Spring Lake and Prior Lake. Rattei stated that regulations focused on preserving vegetated
14 | P a g e
areas could be defensible based on the science, whereas sediment-based regulations may not be as
defensible due to the increased number of unknowns.
The Task Force also conducted a tour of the full shoreline of Prior Lake to see first-hand the existing
conditions. Task Force members observed a wide range of shoreline stabilization practices including
natural buffers, rip rap, vertical retention walls (both wood and Keystone), and gently sloping boulder
buffers. The general observation was that vertical structures, whether wood or keystone block, are less
stable than sloping buffers. The newest practice seen on the lake was the placement of large, gently
sloping boulders. These installations are designed to more effectively dissipate wave energy. However,
this type of practice can only be used on lots with lower elevations. The only area where significant
erosion was observed was near the DeWitte Public Access and the area north and east of the Access. This
is a narrow area with lots at higher elevations. Boats in this area are often accelerating or decelerating,
creating greater wave energy. It is also a channel where boats entering Prior Lake often operate close to
shore.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS:
Regardless of the delivery method (e.g., erosion, resuspension, wave action, etc.), sediment
impacts water quality similarly.
Sediment from shallow lake areas and shorelines are low in releasable phosphorus.
Aquatic plants can help to trap fine sediments and stabilize the lake bottom.
Both Spring Lake and Prior Lake are seeing an increase in more intensive uses (wake boarding,
Wake surfing, etc.).
Wave energy is greater when boats are accelerating or decelerating.
The DeWitte Public Access area has more shoreline impacts than other areas of Prior Lake.
Shoreline stabilization practices are changing on Prior Lake.
TASK FORCE COMMENTS AND POINTS OF DISCUSSION:
Increased turbidity due to sediment resuspension may be an issue that impacts plant growth.
A view was expressed that turbidity in near shore areas poses a safety hazard to swimmers.
There was an opinion that wake-enhanced boating is causing greater shoreline erosion. There
was no consensus on this.
A suggestion was made to further study the causes of shoreline erosion before any regulations
are revised.
RECOMMENDATION: The information presented by Ms. Rattei, along with several related studies
presented to the group, lead the Task Force to conclude that WSUM regulations likely have a minimal
impact on overall water quality in Prior Lake and Spring Lake, and that local WSUM regulations should
not be based on water quality. To address the shoreline erosion near the DeWitte DNR Public Access,
the majority of the Task Force recommends restricting the operation of boats in a bow high manner in
the area south of Twin Island. The Task Force also recommends creation of a guidance document for
shoreline stabilization.
15 | P a g e
3.6 PRESERVATION OF RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
Lake recreation is the central issue of WSUM and was crucial to the Task Force’s efforts to review
existing WSUM regulations, consider updating those regulations, and ensure public participation in the
process. Prior Lake and Spring Lake both have a large impact on the local economy. The importance of
the lakes is obvious – they are the namesakes of both the City and Township. The City and Township
acknowledged these economic and social factors by creating a Task Force to look at WSUM before
enacting potential changes to regulations that could impact residents and businesses depending on our
lakes.
Local priorities for Prior Lake, as evidenced by the existing WSUM ordinance (Appendix, Section 4.3),
include increasing public safety, protecting shoreline properties from wave action during periods of high
water, and balancing different lake uses. The residents of Prior Lake have already demonstrated a
commitment to these issues because the regulations have been in place for many years.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS:
Statewide goals for WSUM include accommodating all compatible recreational uses where
practical and feasible, minimizing adverse impacts on natural resources, and minimizing conflicts
between users in a way that promotes maximum use, safety, and enjoyment.
WSUM is administered locally; while statewide watercraft use standards must be followed, local
priorities must also be considered when updating WSUM rules.
During the boat tour Task Force members witnessed both active and passive uses on the lake.
TASK FORCE COMMENTS AND POINTS OF DISCUSSION:
Task Force members noted that passive uses, such as paddle boarding and kayaking take place
in the early morning hours or during the week when there are fewer active users.
Active use boaters are generally respectful of fishing boats.
Some members would like to see a “No Wake Wednesday” when passive users could use the
lake without having to worry about waves from more active uses.
RECOMMENDATION: Recreation was central to all discussions during the Task Force meetings;
therefore, no Task Force recommendations are specific to recreational opportunities alone. Any changes
to the existing Prior Lake WSUM ordinance, including the possible addition of equivalent WSUM rules to
Spring Lake, would have some level of impact on lake recreation.
4 RECOMMENDATIONS
The WSUM Task Force endeavored to make recommendations in response to the major policy issues
listed in Section 3. Topics such as recreation, and water quality were discussed at length but no specific
recommendations were developed regarding these issues as they are intrinsic to other policy issues.
16 | P a g e
4.1 EDUCATION
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that many boaters are not informed regarding boating
and water surface use laws, which has led to non-compliance. The Task Force recommends increasing
education efforts. The Task Force was not formed to specifically develop educational materials and is
recommending that a new task force or similar group take on the task of creating an educational
program that would tap into existing educational efforts and the resources of lake and homeowner
associations. The WSUM Task Force generated ideas for education efforts:
a. Target groups: rental users, boat launch users, and lakeshore residents (outreach at HOAs,
Spring Lake & Prior Lake Associations)
b. Create laminated handouts (lake maps or other lake-related handouts)
c. Install consistent & updated signage at all public boat launch sites; look into posting signs
on CR 21 bridge
d. Create a guidance document for shoreline stabilization (companion to DNR fact sheet)
e. Create a guidance document for property owners relating to slow no-wake buoys and the
existing County permit program
4.2 ENFORCEMENT
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that there is currently sufficient enforcement on Prior
Lake. However, there is a concern that response times are too long when the lake is not being actively
patrolled. A majority of the Task Force members living on or using Spring Lake agreed that Spring Lake
needs additional enforcement. The Task Force recommends increasing enforcement on Spring Lake.
The Task Force recommends looking for ways to accelerate response times for lake surface violation &
emergency calls.
4.3 PUBLIC SAFETY
The Task Force recommends that the WSUM regulations follow the new state law for towing (changed
from 1 hour after sunset to ½ hour after sunset). A majority of the Task Force members agreed that
towing in congested areas should be addressed through WSUM regulations. The Task Force
recommends keeping the current WSUM towing rule, and also restricting towing through the
following existing slow no-wake zones on Prior Lake: The Wagon Bridge and the area around Reeds
Island.
4.4 BUOYS
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that a visual cue is needed marking the existing 150’ slow
no-wake zone in a more uniform manner. A majority of the Task Force members agreed that a
mechanism is needed to report and correct buoy placement (for marked zones and private buoys). The
Task Force recommends creating a mechanism to facilitate the installation and maintenance of buoys
to mark the 150’ no-wake zone. There was a difference of opinion as to whether this should be a public
or private responsibility. However, there was agreement that the mechanism should consider the
purchase, installation, maintenance, removal and storage of the buoys.
17 | P a g e
4.5 MARKED SLOW NO-WAKE ZONES
All existing marked slow no-wake zones were reviewed during the Task Force process, and potential new
zones were considered. No changes were recommended for the existing slow no-wake zones. However,
residents living on Paradise Bay (on Prior Lake) presented a petition to make this bay an official slow no-
wake zone. After reviewing the bay during the boat tour, a majority of the Task Force members agreed
that this bay should be slow no-wake. The Task Force recommends adding Paradise Bay to the list of
marked slow no-wake zones in the Prior Lake City WSUM Ordinance (City Code Chapter 703.406).
4.6 SPRING LAKE WSUM REGULATIONS
The Task Force members living on or using Spring Lake recommend that Spring Lake have the same
WSUM regulations as Prior Lake. In order to extend these regulations to Spring Lake, the City of Prior
Lake and Spring Lake Township must pass equivalent WSUM ordinances. The ordinances would include
the provision that a temporary, lake-wide slow no-wake requirement is enacted when the water levels
reach the Ordinary High Water elevation for each lake (903.9’ for Prior Lake and 912.8’ for Spring Lake).
4.7 ENHANCED WATERCRAFT WAKE
After the boat tour, there was agreement among most of the Task Force members that the shoreline in
the DeWitte DNR Public Access area receives a disproportionate amount of damage due to the
combined impacts of naturally and artificially generated waves. Restricting watercraft that generate
artificially large wakes (for the purpose of wake surfing and similar recreational activities) from this
specific area would eliminate one source of the observed localized shoreline damage.
There was not consensus among the Task Force members about how to address the observed localized
shoreline damage problems. City and Township Staff worked with Sheriff’s Office Deputy Todd Beck to
outline potential ordinance changes that could address this issue. Any change to the ordinance needs to
be both effective and enforceable. The Task Force recommends restricting the operation of boats in a
bow high manner in the area south of Twin Island. This recommendation has the support of 60% of
Task Force members. Most members representing active users opposed making any changes to the
regulations to address enhanced watercraft wake. Suggestions for achieving compliance with this
potential rule include marking the area with distinct buoys, increasing education, working with local
interest groups to get the word out, highlighting the requirement at the public launch, and making the
first season with the rule in place “warnings only” as a way to educate lake users who enjoy this activity.
4.8 PUBLIC PROCESS
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that a public process is needed to update the public on
the group’s findings and recommendations. The deliverables of the WSUM Task Force will include a
presentation (for a joint work session of the City Council and Township Board), a final report, and a draft
ordinance. The Task Force members will be asked to assist in developing the public process framework
and communicating with the public.
18 | P a g e
4.9 SUMMARY OF RECOMMEND ORDINANCE REVISIONS
A summary of the proposed WSUM regulations that would apply to both Prior Lake and Spring Lake are
below. Bold text denotes the recommended revisions.
Speed Limits &
Effective Time
40 mph maximum, sunrise to ½ hour after sunset (weekends & holidays,
Memorial Day through Labor Day)
20 mph maximum, ½ hour after sunset to sunrise
Area Zoning Slow no-wake within 150 feet of shore at all times on both Prior and Spring
Lakes.
Marked slow no-wake zones defined in ordinance (Wagon Bridge Channel,
Reed’s Island Channel, Lords Street Bridge Channel, Boudin’s Bay, Candy
Cove, Mud Bay Channel, and Paradise Bay)
Activities No inflatable water toys, air mattresses, or inner tubes more than 150 feet
from shore, unless accompanied by a watercraft
No swimming more than 150 feet from shore, unless accompanied by a
watercraft
No watercraft towing a person on water skis, wakeboards, kneeboards, or
barefoot shall operate within 150 feet of shore (exception for
launching/landing by direct/safe route)*
No operation of a boat in a sustained, artificially bow-high manner south
of Twin Isle.
High Water
Slow No-Wake
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Prior Lake when water reaches an
elevation of 903.9 (OHW).
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Spring Lake when water reaches an
elevation of 912.8 (OHW).
Effective as of first posting on the City’s website
Public access points must be posted during entire restriction period
Removed when water remains below an high water elevation for 72 hours
5 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The purpose of this Final Report is to document the process and outcomes of the WSUM Task Force.
This section will be completed before adoption or acceptance of this report to document the process
steps that have yet to be completed]
5.1 Council and Board Review and Direction
5.2 Additional Community Input
5.3 Public Hearing
5.4 Ordinance Adoption
5.5 DNR Review and Approval
19 | P a g e
6 APPENDIX
6.1 CURRENT WSUM ORDINANCE (CITY CODE SECTION 703)
20 | P a g e
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e
24 | P a g e
6.2 EXISTING WSUM ORDINANCE MAPS
25 | P a g e
26 | P a g e
6.3 WSUM TASK FORCE MEETING NOTES
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
30 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
32 | P a g e
33 | P a g e
34 | P a g e
35 | P a g e
36 | P a g e
37 | P a g e
38 | P a g e
39 | P a g e
40 | P a g e
41 | P a g e
42 | P a g e
43 | P a g e
44 | P a g e
45 | P a g e
46 | P a g e
47 | P a g e
48 | P a g e
6.4 PARADISE BAY SLOW NO-WAKE RESIDENT PETITION
49 | P a g e
50 | P a g e
51 | P a g e
6.5 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments relating to WSUM, received during and after public information meetings held in 2015.
to be added]
Water Surface Use
Management (WSUM)
Community Information Meeting
April 28, 2016
What is WSUM?
Water Surface Use Management (WSUM)
Compliments State Boating Laws
Regulations to address:
Effective time
Area zoning
Speed Limits
Watercraft/motor size
Conduct of Activities
High water
Goals of WSUM:
Striking a Balance
Accommodate compatible recreational uses
Minimize adverse impacts on natural resources
Minimize conflicts between users
Meet state standards
Why update WSUM?
Lack of regulations on Spring Lake
Last substantial ordinance revision in 1994
Changes in lake use
Ongoing feedback regarding erosion
Sheriff’s Office (lake patrol deputy) expressed
a rise in safety concerns
WSUM Process
Winter/Spring 2015
Reviewed ordinance
Held two community meetings to receive input
Identified issues
April 2015
Joint City Council & Township Board meeting
Council & Board directed formation of WSUM Task Force
Task Force Membership
Name Affiliation
Glenn Kelley Spring Lake Township Board,Spring Lake lakefront owner, Spring Lake
Association member, active Spring Lake user
Dan Kelly Spring Lake Association, Spring Lake lakefront owner, water enthusiast
Wes Mader Shoreline protection advocate, Prior Lake resident,Prior Lake lakeshore owner
Christian Morkeberg Water Quality/Environment advocate, Spring Lake Township, Spring Lake
lakefront owner, public health/safety advocate
Mike Myser Active/passive use advocate, Prior Lake resident, lakeshore owner,
environmentalist
Tom Stephenson Prior Lake Association, HOA Member
Woody Spitzmueller PLSLWD Board, Prior Lake Assn Board, Prior Lake Community Safety Advisory
Committee, and Boating Safety Instructor
Mike Thibault Shakopee Prior Lake Water Ski Association, Prior Lake Lakeshore Owner
Annette Thompson Prior Lake City Council, HOA Member
Education
Enforcement
Public Safety
Lack of WSUM provisions on Spring Lake
Impacts of boat and wind wake
Preservation of recreational opportunities
WSUM Task Force
Policy Issues Addressed
Lack of knowledge of rules. There is not a specific group that lacks the knowledge
but rather boaters of all experience levels have different understandings.
Variety of User Types: Educational materials need to consider all user types.
Boat Renters: The My Boat Club on Prior Lake has enhanced their training
program and all users must ride along with a manager around the entire lake
before using the boats.
Training for Youth: The Prior Lake Association and Community Ed and Rec
annually hold a DNR sanctioned boating safety training for youth.
Top 3 WSUM violation issues (per Sheriff’s Office):personal watercraft, watercraft
lighting, slow no-wake.
Education
Outcomes from WSUM Task Force:
The WSUM Task Force recommends increasing education efforts.
Form a new Task Force to create an educational program that would tap into
existing resources of lake and homeowner associations.
The WSUM Task Force generated some ideas for potential education efforts:
Targeted groups
Install consistent & updated signage at all public boat launch sites; look into
posting signs on CR 21 bridge
Create a guidance document for property owners relating to slow no-wake buoys
and the existing County permit program
Education
Patrol
Prior Lake is one of the 10 most highly used lakes in the state.
The Sheriff’s Office has exclusive responsibility for water patrol.
There are trained reservists but they must be accompanied by a Sheriff’s
Office Deputy at all times.
The Sheriff’s Deputy must see a violation in order to enforce it.
Patrol in Scott County is focused primarily on Prior Lake.
The DNR filled their Conservation Officer position after a 4 year vacancy.
Enforcement
Buoys
The Sheriff’s Office manages regulatory and warning buoys.
The County applies for grants to purchase buoys and other equipment
including boats on a regular basis.
Property owners can purchase marker buoys (orange ball shaped) to mark the
150’ slow no-wake zone.
Free permits required to place marker buoys.
Marker buoys are not all placed accurately.
Marker buoys are not consistently spaced.
Enforcement
Outcomes from WSUM Task Force:
A majority of the Task Force agreed that there is currently sufficient
enforcement presence on Prior Lake
Compliance levels would increase with better delineation of the existing 150’
slow no-wake zone
Enforcement presence will be similar regardless of rules updates
A majority of the Task Force agreed that Spring Lake needs additional
enforcement presence
There was concern about response time when the lakes are not being
actively patrolled
Enforcement
Time of Use
Close calls and other towing conflicts during the hour after sunset were a
concern of the Sheriff’s Office Deputy.
State law was recently changed to prohibit towing ½ hour after sunset.
The City’s ordinance currently prohibits towing 1 hour after sunset.
Outcome from WSUM Task Force:
All Task Force members agreed that the WSUM regulations should follow the
new state law for towing (changed from 1 hour after sunset to ½ hour after
sunset); this law is currently in place and supersedes the current Prior Lake
ordinance.
Public Safety
Towing
Task Force members noted that towing people through marked no-wake
zones is a potential safety hazard.
Outcome from WSUM Task Force:
Restrict all towing through marked no-wake zones on Prior Lake but change
ordinance to allow towing at no-wake speed within other areas that were
previously restricted (150’ slow no-wake zone).
Public Safety
Crowding
As use of the lake increases, crowding on the lake and its impact on public safety has
become a concern.
Outcome from WSUM Task Force:
The task force suggested reviewing other models that use parking restrictions to limit
boats on the lake (allow one boat per parking space). No change to ordinance.
Public Safety
Impact on Water Quality
Regardless of the delivery method (e.g., erosion, resuspension, wave
action, etc.), sediment impacts water quality similarly.
Sediment from shallow lake areas and shorelines are low in releasable
phosphorus.
Aquatic plants can help to trap fine sediments and stabilize the lake
bottom.
Impacts of Waves
Wave Energy
Scientific Study Review
13 Existing Studies relating to wave energy
Lakes are dynamic environments subject to natural and artificial erosional factors
Several studies quantify magnitude of boat wakes and associated energy; potential for
shoreline erosion increases with wave energy/size
Reduction of boat wave energy should focus on areas having large boat passage
frequency and areas where bank erosion is most problematic (US Army Corps of
Engineers, 2008)
This issue is not unique to Prior Lake
Active use changes are an emerging water surface use issue
Impacts of Waves
Outcomes from WSUM Task Force:
Increase in boat traffic
Shift in active use patterns
Wave energy is greater when boats are accelerating or decelerating
Shoreline stabilization practices are changing on Prior Lake
DeWitte Public Access area:
Unique location due to several compounding factors that are not all present
anywhere else on Prior Lake
Lake configuration –narrow available travel areas
Relatively steep shorelines
DNR access point; accelerating & decelerating
Traffic flow patterns on Upper Prior Lake
Impacts of Waves
Outcomes from WSUM Task Force:
DeWitte Public Access area:
Goal was to reduce overall wave impacts in this area
Considered several other options to address the compounding factors
Narrow majority of the WSUM Task Force was in favor of restricting the
operation of boats in a sustained, artificially bow high manner in the area
south of Twin Isle
The Task Force recommends creation of a guidance document for shoreline
stabilization
Impacts of Waves
Outcomes from WSUM Task Force:
Recreation was central to all discussions during the Task Force meetings;
therefore, no Task Force recommendations are specific to recreational
opportunities alone
Acknowledgement that some uses are generally not compatible
Passive uses during off-peak hours
Active users weekends & evenings
Active users generally respectful of fishing boats
Some members would like to see a “No Wake Wednesday ”
Recreational Opportunities
There is currently no high-water no-wake restriction on Spring Lake.
Spring Lake has seen an increase in the amount of boat traffic.
Spring Lake has seen an increase in the intensity of active uses.
The lack of a regulated slow no-wake zone creates a safety hazard for
passive uses such as swimming
It is beneficial for compliance to have consistency of permanent
regulations between Spring Lake and Prior Lake. High-Water provisions
should be based on individual lake characteristics.
Spring Lake Regulations
Outcomes from Task Force:
A majority of the Task Force members agreed that Spring Lake should have
the same WSUM regulations as Prior Lake.
The City of Prior Lake and Spring Lake Township must pass equivalent
WSUM ordinances.
The ordinances would include the provision that a temporary, lake-wide
slow no-wake requirement is enacted when the water levels reach the
Ordinary High Water elevation (912.8’).
Placement of existing ski jump would not be impacted.
Spring Lake Regulations
Major WSUM Task Force
Recommendations
1.Update Ordinance
2.Create Education Task Force
3.Address Buoy Placement
4.Consider Additional Spring Lake
Enforcement
Ordinance Revisions Summary
Speed Limits & Effective Time
Existing Proposed
40 mph maximum,sunrise to 1 hour after
sunset (weekends & holidays, Memorial Day
through Labor Day)
20 mph maximum, 1 hour after sunset to
sunrise
40 mph maximum,sunrise to 1/2 hour after
sunset (weekends & holidays, Memorial Day
through Labor Day)
20 mph maximum, 1/2 hour after sunset to
sunrise
Ordinance Revisions Summary
Area Zoning
Existing Proposed
Slow no-wake within 150 feet of shore at all
times on Prior Lake
Prior Lake marked slow no-wake zones
defined in ordinance (Wagon Bridge Channel,
Reed’s Island Channel, Lords Street Bridge
Channel, Boudin’s Bay, Candy Cove, Mud Bay
Channel)
Slow no-wake within 150 feet of shore at all
times on both Prior and Spring Lakes.
Marked slow no-wake zones defined in
ordinance (Wagon Bridge Channel, Reed’s
Island Channel, Lords Street Bridge Channel,
Boudin’s Bay, Candy Cove, Mud Bay Channel,
and Paradise Bay)
Ordinance Revisions Summary
Ordinance Revisions Summary
Ordinance Revisions Summary
Activities
Existing Proposed
No inflatable water toys,air mattresses, or
inner tubes more than 150 feet from shore,
unless accompanied by a watercraft
No swimming more than 150 feet from
shore, unless accompanied by a watercraft
No watercraft towing a person on water skis,
inner tube, aquaplane or similar device shall
operate within 150 feet of shore (exception
for launching/landing by direct/safe route)
No inflatable water toys, air mattresses, or
inner tubes more than 150 feet from shore,
unless accompanied by a watercraft
No swimming more than 150 feet from
shore, unless accompanied by a watercraft
No watercraft towing a person on water skis,
wakeboards, kneeboards, or barefoot shall
operate within 150 feet of shore (exception
for launching/landing by direct/safe route)
No watercraft towing a person on water
skis, inner tube, aquaplane or similar device
shall be operated at any time within a
Marked Slow No-Wake Zone.
No operation of a boat in a sustained,
artificially bow-high manner south of Twin
Isle.
Ordinance Revisions Summary
Ordinance Revisions Summary
High Water Slow No-Wake
Existing Proposed
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Prior Lake
when water reaches an elevation of 904.0
Effective as of first televised notification on
City’s cable channel
Public access points must be posted during
entire restriction period
Removed when water remains below an
elevation of 904.0 for 3 consecutive days
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Prior Lake
when water reaches an elevation of 903.9
OHW)
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Spring
Lake when water reaches an elevation of
912.8 (OHW)
Effective as of first posting on the City’s
website
Public access points must be posted during
entire restriction period
Removed when water remains below a high
water elevation for 72 hours
Next Steps
Written comments
Conduct Public Hearing (5/9)
DNR reviews & approves ordinance
City & Township consider adopting ordinance
Education Task Force
5F
R
l
tJ
G {'
LA
K
E
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Pl
e
Pe46
Na
m
e
Ad
d
re
ss
l
f-
0
f
fr
C
V/
e
p
Pr
i
py
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
ti
v
it
ie
s
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
id
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
idg
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
l
a
t
a
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
tt
re
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ied
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ice
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
l
au
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
d
ire
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
t
e
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
or
d
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l,
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
Or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
rc
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
il
a
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wit
hin
L
er
a
tio
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
i
a
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Co
m
m
e
n
tsJl
C
g ""
f
A-
f
v-
o
s
lr
J
t~
k,
k
e
j
r
f1,,,~
v.
R
c..
vr
c
q
f
o
1
t
fJ
s
Q
e
l,
2
l
t
I
lq
k
e
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Q._
ve
tv
tly
I+
f
0
of
yo./
Pu
b
l
ic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
t
ire
re
s
t
r
ic
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
iv
e
da
y
s
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
ti
c
r
e
A
r
o
rc
t
f
J
e
y
1
e)
r
e
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
ins
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
f
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
c
ity
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
f;
v
l
f
J
e
A-
t
r
t
l
Y
l
f
o
i
c..
l
5F
R
l
tJ
G ;
i
AKE
S
r
AC
f
O
l
S
J .
1,
1N
c
N,
1
Jr
ii
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
i
l
28
20
1
6
Pl
ePe
t
46
4
Pr
io
py
o
Na
m
e
Ad
d
re
s
s
3
i
6 +
i>
v
t
l
1
5
f
v
t
Gr
a
e
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
l
a
t
a
b
le
wa
t
e
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
r
a
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tir
e
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
ti
o
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
tire
re
s
tr
ic
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
l
o
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
tt
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
rd
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
ex
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
ing
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
i
c
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
r
a
tio
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
l
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
6:
l
s
i
to
S
c
t
o
U
L
J
o-
VJ
o
L
ID
i
e
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
j
D
L
S
I
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
i
n
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
li
c
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
u
d
d
re
s
t
ric
tio
n
pe
r
io
d
ni
S
C
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
c
ity
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
Sp
ee
d
Li
m
its
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
SF
R
lfJ
G
LA
K
E
Pl
ePe
t
46
4
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
ril
28
20
1
6
Ad
d
re
s
s
3
ti
Y
U
t
u
Pr
io
py
o
Ex
is
tin
g
Ru
le
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
t
e
r
su
n
s
e
t
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
f
N
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
h
t
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
r
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
inf
la
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
tt
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
rcra
f
t
to
w
ing
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
No
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
t
e
wi
th
in
wa
k
e
b
o
a
rd
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
ce
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
di
re
c
U
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
by
di
re
c
U
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
l
a
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
i
c
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
St
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
l
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
on
en
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
en
wa
te
r
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
ti
o
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
St
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
tire
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
i
n
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
r
iod
Pu
bl
ic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
ste
d
du
r
in
g
en
tire
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
re
s
t
ric
tio
n
pe
r
io
d
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
Ad
d
re
s
s
2
8!
JCJ
Z
5
i
J
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
fe
c
t
ive
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
ivi
ti
e
s
Hi
gh
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Ex
is
tin
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xi
mu
m
su
n
r
is
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
imu
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
time
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
l
a
t
a
b
l
e
wa
ter
to
y
s
a
ir
ma
tt
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
i
n
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
ing
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
t
ub
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
o
r
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ice
sh
a
l
l
op
e
r
a
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
lau
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
on
en
tir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
t
ive
as
of
fi
rs
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
t
i
o
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
t
i
re
re
s
t
ri
ct
io
n
pe
r
iod
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
e
lev
a
tio
n
o
f
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
ti
ve
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
sun
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
li
da
ys
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
r
ise
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
t
hi
n
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
ake
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
and
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
inf
la
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
tr
e
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
imm
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ied
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
r
a
ft
No
wa
t
e
rc
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
l
l
op
e
ra
te
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
shor
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
rou
t
e)
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
i
ng
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
il
a
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
t
h
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
e
nt
i
re
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
r
ea
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
ion
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
i
r
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
int
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
ing
en
t
ire
re
s
tr
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
r
em
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts7~
Pl
e
Pe46Prpy
5t
J
v
I
5r
J
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
t
y
o
fp
r
io
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M ~
hp
7
f'
l/
0
SF
R
I
N
G
LA
K
E
S
P
A
G
T
O
t
s
J
J
I
N
G
N
1
m
d·
1
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
ION
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
i
l
28
20
1
6
Na
me
Ad
d
re
ss
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
id
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
l
a
t
a
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
t
tre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
r
a
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
e
xc
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
r
a
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
te
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
icectLsare
mY
te
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
i
o
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tr
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
l
o
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Pl
ePe
t
46
4
Pr
i
py
o
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
c
ity
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
f\)~~#
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
1
L
L
l
f
Ad
dre
ss
I
L/
3
q
J
1
k
f
f
i
2
J
Ex
ist
in
g
Ru
le
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
r
ise
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Da
y
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
rise
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
s
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
Ac
tiv
it
ie
s
No
in
fl
a
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
t
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
No
in
fla
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
om
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
ra
f
t
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
ft
to
1
in
nn
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
No
wa
te
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
a
n
e
Ol.
im
ila
r
de
v
ic
1
g
al
l
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
e
xc
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
au
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
ce
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
t
e
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
i
n
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
c
s
k
i
i
ln
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
i
la
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rf
a
ce
of
Pr
i
o
r
La
k
e
wh
en
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
en
wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
vis
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
t
e
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
re
st
r
ic
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
rs
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Pl
e
Pe46Pr
i
py
i
of
nolu0
s,
r
n
b
r
d.,,\)
u·
r
n
f
cl
W•
Y
l
0vtt
d
A
s
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
t
p
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
r
io
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
ril
28
20
1
6
Pl
e
Pe46
4
Pr
i
py
o
Na
m
e
Y
t
7
v
r
Lc
Ad
d
re
s
s
4
3
Cft3
k
J
k
e/
J
x
z
I
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
itie
s
Hi
gh
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ial
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
l
a
t
a
b
l
e
wa
t
e
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
i
n
g
mo
r
e
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
o
r
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
l
l
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
on
en
ti
re
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
t
i
o
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
t
ire
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
r
a
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttr
e
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
r
a
ft
No
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
rd
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
St
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
tio
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
t
ific
ia
ll
y
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
th
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
St
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
ti
r
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
tin
g
on
th
e
Ci
ty
s
we
b
s
ite
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
t
5
0
v\
O
f
j
c
J
rvi
I
p
r
l
e
f!
f
U
J
C(_
c
f
Sh
c)
f'
e
O
1
k
c
l
d
r
r
f
l
0
1
1
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
r
io
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
5F
R
1
1J
G
LA
K
E
S
r
A
c
r
o
i
s
J
1v
1N
G
l°
1
1J1
t
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Pl
e
Pe46Pr
i
py
Na
m
e
Ad
dre
s
s
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
tiv
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Ex
ist
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
r
i
s
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
fl
a
ta
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttr
e
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
t
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
i
o
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
t
ire
re
s
t
r
ic
t
io
n
pe
r
io
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
ys
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
ri
n
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
te
rc
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
t
h
in
a
Ma
rk
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
i
o
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
l
ly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
i
n
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tir
e
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
t
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
ti
re
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
wh
e
t
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
2L
to
2
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
t
io
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
c
ity
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
tiv
itie
s
Hig
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Pl
e
Pe46
Ad
d
re
s
s
I
S
0
0
3
r
Q
le
t
ll
i
l
L
Pr
i
py
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
id
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
la
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
tre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
t
e
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
r
a
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
e
xc
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
di
re
c
U
s
a
fe
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
t
r
ic
t
io
n
pe
r
io
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
te
rc
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
U
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
St
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tir
e
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
i
r
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
O(
w
OLAL
L
S
1r
W't
c
J.
M
v °'
f
J
f
tl
c
wl
CJA0vY\
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
S
r
A
C
JO
t
S
l
l
I
N
G
Na
1H
lii1
1
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Pl
ePe46
4
Pr
i
py
o
Na
m
e
Ad
d
re
s
s
2,
c
Z
l
MV
M
Z
V
D
Ju
Ex
is
tin
g
Ru
le
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
40
mp
h
ma
x
imu
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
v
i
T7
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
li
d
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Da
y
Da
y
Qi
rdy
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
s
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
St
re
e
t
Br
idg
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
No
in
f
l
a
t
a
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
tt
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
No
in
fl
a
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
i
n
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
ra
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
No
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
r
a
te
wi
th
in
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
ex
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
t
e
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
t
e
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
i
n
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
i
la
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
rk
e
d
St
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
r
a
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
H
igh
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tir
e
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
W
a
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
t
i
o
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
St
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
t
ire
Ef
f
e
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
re
s
t
ric
ti
o
n
pe
rio
d
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
re
s
tr
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
5
F
R
TN
G
r--LA
K
E
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
i
l
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
l
1
1
1
r
vz
v
v
dd
re
s
s
l
k
J
f
r
J
e
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ial
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
r
ise
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
la
t
a
b
le
wa
t
e
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
tre
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
simi
la
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
r
a
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tif
ic
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
t
ire
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
r
iod
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
ys
Pr
o
p
o
se
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
r
a
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
te
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
ing
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
St
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
i
o
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
l
e
Sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
on
en
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
St
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
i
te
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
int
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Pl
e
Pe46
4
Pr
i
py
o
Yc
5jYESit
5
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
Pl
e
Pe46
4
Na
m
e
r
r
k
j
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Ad
dres
s
7i
i
b
f
ve
cf
01
cl
Pr
i
py
o
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
f
e
c
tive
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
tiv
itie
s
Hi
gh
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
ak
e
Ex
isti
ng
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
r
is
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
id
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ial
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
imu
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
r
ke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
ina
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l )
No
in
f
la
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttr
e
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
ing
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ied
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
simi
la
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
ch
ing
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
on
en
t
ire
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
t
i
o
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
t
ire
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
m
a
ins
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
ive
da
ys
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
r
ise
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
r
ise
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
150
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
idg
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
r
t3
L
i:
No
in
f
la
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttr
e
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
r
af
t
No
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
to
w
ing
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is ,
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
dire
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
y
1,
10
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
il
a
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
t
h
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
r
a
tio
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
i
o
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
i
r
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
ri
n
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
Pu
b
li
c
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
ev
VL-
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
SF
R
I
NG
L
AK
E
S
r
A
C
TO
t
S
J
1
1 :-
ic
111
i
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Pl
e
Pe46
4
Pr
i
py
o
Na
me
Ad
d
re
ss
0
3
l
u
J
o
cl
7(
J
fv
v
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
Ex
ist
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
fl
a
ta
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
t
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
I
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
40
mp
h
ma
x
imu
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
r
a
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
inf
l
a
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
o
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
Go
o
d
Go
6
J
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
te
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
ing
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
V1
tf
t
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
No
wa
te
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
t
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
ex
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
NO
I
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
l
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
n
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
J
G
l
a
I
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
h.-
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
rin
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
i
te
I -
G,
t
re
s
t
r
ic
t
ion
pe
rio
d
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
ing
en
tire
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
r
iod
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
t
io
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
5F
R
I
N
G
L
AK
E
SP
A
G
T
O
L
s
L
J \
J:,
J
G.
t
b
u
1
d
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
i
l
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
t
C:
b
Li
r\
o
V
J
4.
Ad
d
re
ss
3
4
c
S
Ex
is
tin
g
Ru
le
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
Sp
eed
Li
m
its
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Da
y
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
bo
th
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
r
a
d
is
e
Ba
y
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
No
in
fl
a
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
t
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
No
in
fla
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
ss
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
sw
im
m
ing
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
No
wa
te
r
c
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
di
re
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
r
a
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
i
n
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
i
o
r
La
k
e
wh
en
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
te
le
vis
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
re
s
t
ric
t
ion
pe
rio
d
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Pl
e
Pe46Prpy
CI
c.
I
so
v.
r-
1
c
l>
T
V
r
t.
L
r
L
t
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
SP
A
c
ro
l
s
J ,
l
1 :-
ic
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
Ad
d
re
ss
Ex
is
tin
g
Ru
le
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ri
se
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Da
y
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ri
s
e
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
lan
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l ,
Lo
rd
s
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
Ac
tiv
itie
s
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttr
e
ss
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
No
inf
la
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
tt
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
imm
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
No
wa
te
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
di
r
e
c
U
sa
fe
ro
u
te
by
di
re
c
U
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
l
e
Hi
gh
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
on
en
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
en
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
en
wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
Wa
k
e
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
tio
n
on
C
ity
s
ca
b
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
ste
d
du
r
in
g
en
tire
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
re
str
ict
io
n
pe
rio
d
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
ys
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Pl
e
Pe46Prpy
f
J
a,
wk
W
wDLk
k,~ ~
4
V
J
D
SfPofL--
O
oa.,(__<
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
r
io
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
SP
A
G
r
o
i
s
I
l\
l
G
J
1
or
lli
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Pl
e
Pe46
Na
m
e
S
e
e
e
1
J
e
r
Ad
d
re
s
s
J;
I
f
v1
T
e
v
T
C.
R,
L
Prpy
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
ivi
t
i
e
s
H
ig
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
Ex
ist
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
ida
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
inf
la
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
t
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
t
e
rc
r
af
t
to
w
ing
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ice
sh
a
l
l
op
e
r
at
e
w
ith
in
1
50
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
d
ire
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
ifi
c
a
t
ion
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
ing
en
tire
re
s
t
r
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
ins
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
ive
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
time
s
on
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
ree
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
i
s
e
Ba
y
No
in
fl
a
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
ra
ft
No
wa
te
r
cr
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
d
ire
ct
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
i
la
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
l
ly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
th
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
i
r
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
t
ive
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tr
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
r
io
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
ril
28
20
1
6
Pl
ePe
t
46
4
Pr
io
py
o
Na
me
Ad
d
re
ss
l
L/:
1
i '?
ac
h
T
r
t
rJ
e
I
P .
L
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
ti
v
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
id
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
la
t
a
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
t
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
il
a
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
li
c
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
t
ire
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
iv
e
da
ys
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
t
e
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
rin
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
ra
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
th
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
vt
y\
l_
a:
f
l
h
r
et
i
A
C
v
t
7
J
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rf
a
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
1 -
t-
v
H
r
J
r
I
s
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
c;
e
T
t
J
z.
t
wa
t
e
r
r
e
a
c
h
e
s
a
n
e
le
v
a
t
io
n
o
f
9
1
2
B
O
H
W
v
o
u
f
Ef
fe
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
1
0
C
H
1
v
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
A
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
o
d
17
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
r
io
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
SP
A
G
r
o
1 ;
s
L
r ,
rNG
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
I
V
J
I
G '\
u
v
Ad
d
re
s
s
LJ
d
5
t
CO
C
c
h
f
f
i
YI
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
it
ie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
Ex
ist
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
fla
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
tr
e
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
ing
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
d
ire
cU
s
a
fe
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
on
en
tir
e
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
t
i
o
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
iv
e
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
inf
l
a
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
ra
ft
No
wa
te
rc
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
ex
ce
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
cU
sa
fe
ro
u
t
e
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
i
n
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
i
la
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
ion
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
rin
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tr
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Pl
e
Pe46Pr
i
py
I
0
e
need ,
v
ev
wo+
ay
e
n\
uf\'
2
G
r
S\
r
o
y
e
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
t
y
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
S
P
A
C
I
OC
S
1 ,
1
I
N
G
Na
ilt
11
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
M
J
t2
Jc
0
h
V ~
Ad
d
re
s
s
J>
U
I.
J
r
n
J'
c
I
D(
c
r
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
tiv
itie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
Wa
ke
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
nr
is
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
id
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ri
s
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
r
ise
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
r
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
t
e
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttr
e
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
r
a
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
di
r
e
c
U
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
on
en
tir
e
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
i
o
r
La
k
e
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
tio
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
t
e
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
t
r
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
l
o
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
iv
e
da
y
s
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
t
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
cU
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
a
t
m
e
wi
t
h
in
a
Mi
u
ked
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
i
i
i
Sl
o
w
n
o
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
i'
e
a
c
li
e
s
a
n
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
low
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Pl
ePe
t
46
4
Pr
io
py
o
L
W
v~
A
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
S
P
A
C
I
O
S
J
l
l :'
J
G
N.
1
1
J
1
d
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
CD
c
bm
e
O
n
2
5
1
c:
Na
m
e
Ad
d
re
s
s
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
l
id
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Da
y
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
bo
t
h
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
rin
g
La
k
e
s
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
Ac
tiv
it
ie
s
No
in
fl
a
ta
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttr
e
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
No
in
f
la
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
t
tr
e
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
l
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
No
wa
te
rc
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
t
e
wi
th
in
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
i
n
g
by
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
il
a
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
t
h
in
a
Ma
rk
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
i
a
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Hi
g
h
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tif
ic
a
tio
n
on
Ci
t
y
s
ca
b
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
i
r
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tir
e
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
re
s
tr
ic
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
iv
e
da
y
s
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
t
p
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
Pl
e
Pe46PrpyQf:
S
r
A
c
r
o
e
s
1 .
1
v
1
N
o
r~
w
a
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Pl
e
Pe46
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
I
Prpy
Na
m
e
6
2
Ad
d
re
s
s
0
p6
7
2
r
AY
L
C
C
I
re
C
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
tiv
itie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
ke
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
i
al
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
t
e
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
r
ise
Sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
wi
t
h
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
ina
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
idg
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
la
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
tt
re
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
imm
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
t
e
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
d
ire
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
t
ire
res
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
I
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Vi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Vi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
rin
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
idg
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
t
a
b
le
wa
t
e
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
te
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
t
h
i
n
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
r
a
tio
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rst
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
r
es
t
ric
tio
n
pe
r
io
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
t
e
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
rf
l
f
P
Y
0
0
1
1
S>
lr
n
W-
1
l
t
L
A
f.
3
c
C
A
U
c
0r
I
I
J
I
r
r:
f
R
6
I ~
l
r
M
IHt
t
J
1:
e
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
t
io
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
c
ity
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
S
P
A
C
TO
t
S
f
l
I
N
G
hJ
1
1
1
1
ltliJ
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Na
m
e
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
Ex
is
t
in
g
Ru
le
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Da
y
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
rise
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
ow
no
w
a
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
bo
th
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
rin
g
La
k
e
s
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
St
r
e
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
Ac
tiv
it
ie
s
No
in
fl
a
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
tre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
t
tre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fro
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
f
t
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rcra
ft
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
inn
e
r
No
wa
te
rc
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
t
e
wi
th
in
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
ch
ing
la
n
d
in
g
di
re
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
rk
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
ra
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
l
ly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
th
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
en
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
en
wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
ak
e
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
te
le
vis
e
d
no
tif
ic
a
tio
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
i
r
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
ch
a
n
n
e
l
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
in
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
re
s
t
r
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
int
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Pl
e
Pe46
4
Pr
i
py
o
HP
w
nv
17
s
e
l,
J
A
J)
0
re
a
r
e
5
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
5F
R
G
LA
K
E
S
r
A
C
TOC
S
J
1
1
NG
J
1
w
i
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
ME
E
T
I
N
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
1
6
L
L)·
h
2A
Na
m
e
t1
JI:
Dru
r\
1
l
U
r
Ad
d
re
s
s
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
it
s
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
tiv
itie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Ex
is
tin
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
rise
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
i
n
a
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
ed
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
l
a
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
t
tr
e
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
an
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
No
wa
te
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
on
en
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
io
r
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
es
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
tio
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
ste
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
ins
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
iv
e
da
ys
Pr
o
p
o
se
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yz
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
i
n
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
ra
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
ys
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
co
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
r
c
ra
f
t
No
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
t
e
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
rd
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
fo
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
t
e
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
f
t
to
w
i
n
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
i
la
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
l
l
be
op
e
ra
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
St
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
J
Op
e
r
a
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
t
a
in
e
d
a
r
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
l
l
y
I
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
t
h
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
tire
su
rfa
ce
of
Pr
io
r
La
ke
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
i
n
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
it
e
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
st
e
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
Pl
ePe
t
46
4
Pr
io
py
o
J
t0
0
e.
v
J
w
l
t.
J
l(
t
A
c
r
S.
i
f
f
l
J/
e
J
f:
o~
f
ru
l
o
Jc
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
r
io
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
S
P
A
C
f
O
t
S
J
J
J :-
JG
1
111
11li
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
PlPe46
Na
m
e
1
1
1
f(
Q
5
A
2
Ad
d
re
ss
1)
5
7
Ctx
c
h
m/
J
v
Lf
Af
J
f
Prpy
Sp
eed
Li
m
its
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
Ti
m
e
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
in
g
Ac
t
i
v
itie
s
Hi
gh
Wa
t
e
r
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Ex
is
tin
g
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
t
e
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
rise
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
fin
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
v
e
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
No
in
f
l
a
t
a
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
tt
re
ss
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
ra
ft
No
wa
te
r
cra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
il
a
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
x
c
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
t
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
ke
on
en
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
i
o
r
La
k
e
wh
en
wa
t
e
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
t
if
ic
a
t
i
o
n
on
Ci
ty
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
t
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
t
ric
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
t
iv
e
da
ys
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
su
n
ris
e
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
ria
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
x
im
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
rise
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
io
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
rk
e
d
sl
ow
no
w
a
ke
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
r
a
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
le
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
te
rc
ra
ft
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
No
wa
te
r
c
ra
f
t
to
w
in
g
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
LJ ()
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
in
g
by
di
re
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
2
Jo
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
th
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
1
Op
e
r
a
t
io
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
lif
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
5
l,
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
th
of
Tw
in
Is
l
e
pe
1
Sl
o
w
no
wa
k
e
on
en
tire
su
r
fa
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
ke
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
rin
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
91
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
as
of
fi
rs
t
po
s
t
i
n
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
in
g
en
tire
re
s
tr
ic
tio
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Fo
r
mo
re
in
f
o
rm
a
tio
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
ty
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
co
m
W
S
U
M
ph
p
I
5F
R
l
h,'
JG
LA
K
E
WS
U
M
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
IO
N
A
L
ME
E
T
IN
G
Ap
r
il
28
20
1
6
Pl
e
Pe46Prpy
o
Na
me
Ad
d
re
s
s
p
C
f
7
11
t
f
v
h
W
t
J
o
d
C
d
A
J
1
t
Sp
e
e
d
Li
m
its
Ef
f
e
c
t
iv
e
T
ime
Ar
e
a
Zo
n
ing
Ac
tiv
i
tie
s
Hi
g
h
Wa
te
r
Sl
o
w
No
Wa
k
e
E
xi
st
ing
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xi
mu
m
su
n
ris
e
to
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
we
e
k
e
n
ds
ho
l
ida
y
s
Me
m
o
r
ia
l
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
m
ph
ma
x
im
u
m
1
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
r
is
e
Sl
o
w
no
wa
ke
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
Ma
rke
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
in
a
n
c
e
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
el
No
inf
la
ta
b
le
wa
t
e
r
to
y
s
a
ir
ma
t
tre
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
o
r
sw
im
m
in
g
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
r
e
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ie
d
by
a
wa
t
e
rc
raf
t
No
wa
t
e
r
c
ra
f
t
to
w
ing
a
pe
rso
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
i
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ice
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
t
e
w
ith
in
150
fe
e
t
of
sh
or
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
io
n
fo
r
lau
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
ing
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
f
e
ro
u
te
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
e
nt
i
re
su
rf
a
c
e
o
f
Pr
ior
L
ak
e
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
4
0
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
te
le
v
is
e
d
no
tific
a
t
io
n
on
C
ity
s
ca
b
le
ch
a
n
n
e
l
Pu
b
lic
ac
ce
s
s
po
in
ts
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
r
ing
en
tire
re
s
tr
ic
t
io
n
pe
rio
d
Re
m
o
ve
d
wh
en
wa
te
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
el
e
v
a
t
ion
of
90
4
0
fo
r
3
co
n
s
e
c
u
tiv
e
da
y
s
Pr
o
p
o
se
d
Ru
le
40
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
su
n
rise
to
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
ho
lid
a
y
s
Me
m
o
r
i
al
Da
y
th
ro
u
g
h
La
b
o
r
Da
y
20
mp
h
ma
xim
u
m
Yi
ho
u
r
af
te
r
su
n
s
e
t
to
su
n
ris
e
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
wi
th
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
r
e
at
al
l
ti
m
e
s
on
bo
th
Pr
i
o
r
an
d
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
s
Ma
r
k
e
d
sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
zo
n
e
s
de
f
in
e
d
in
or
d
ina
n
ce
W
a
g
o
n
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Re
e
d
s
Is
la
n
d
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Lo
rd
s
St
re
e
t
Br
id
g
e
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
Bo
u
d
in
s
Ba
y
Ca
n
d
y
Co
ve
Mu
d
Ba
y
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
an
d
Pa
r
a
d
is
e
Ba
y
No
in
fla
ta
b
l
e
wa
te
r
to
y
s
ai
r
ma
ttre
s
s
e
s
inn
e
r
tu
b
e
s
or
sw
imm
ing
mo
re
th
a
n
15
0
fe
e
t
fr
o
m
sh
o
re
un
le
s
s
ac
c
o
m
p
a
n
ied
by
a
wa
te
rc
r
a
ft
No
wa
te
rc
ra
f
t
to
w
ing
a
pe
rs
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is ,
wa
k
e
b
o
a
r
d
s
kn
e
e
b
o
a
rd
s
or
ba
r
e
f
o
o
t
sh
a
ll
op
e
ra
te
w
ith
in
15
0
fe
e
t
of
sh
o
re
e
xc
e
p
tio
n
fo
r
la
u
n
c
h
in
g
la
n
d
ing
by
di
r
e
c
t
s
a
fe
ro
u
te
No
wa
t
e
r
c
r
a
ft
to
w
in
g
a
pe
r
s
o
n
on
wa
te
r
sk
is
in
n
e
r
tu
b
e
aq
u
a
p
la
n
e
or
si
m
ila
r
de
v
ic
e
sh
a
ll
be
op
e
r
a
te
d
at
an
y
ti
m
e
wi
t
h
in
a
Ma
r
k
e
d
Sl
o
w
No
W
a
k
e
Zo
n
e
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
of
a
bo
a
t
in
a
su
s
ta
in
e
d
ar
t
if
ic
ia
lly
bo
w
hi
g
h
ma
n
n
e
r
so
u
th
of
Tw
in
Is
le
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
ti
re
su
rfa
c
e
of
Pr
ior
La
ke
wh
e
n
wa
te
r
re
a
ch
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
tio
n
of
90
3
9
O
H
W
Sl
o
w
no
w
a
k
e
on
en
t
ir
e
su
r
f
a
c
e
of
Sp
r
in
g
La
k
e
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
r
e
a
c
h
e
s
an
el
e
v
a
t
io
n
of
9
1
2
8
O
H
W
Ef
fe
c
tiv
e
as
of
fi
r
s
t
po
s
t
i
n
g
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
s
we
b
s
ite
Pu
b
lic
ac
c
e
s
s
po
int
s
mu
s
t
be
po
s
te
d
du
rin
g
en
tire
re
s
tric
tio
n
pe
r
io
d
Re
m
o
v
e
d
wh
e
n
wa
t
e
r
re
m
a
in
s
be
lo
w
an
hi
g
h
wa
te
r
el
e
v
a
tio
n
fo
r
72
ho
u
r
s
Co
m
m
e
n
ts
f
t}
I
J
I
j
t
o
d
t
t
t
9
J
b
tJ
r
A
b1
1
A
f
b
w
h
y
n
YV
1
J
t
i
v~
1
t
t
N
f
y
Ju
v
k
v
a
n
t
i
A
k
t
S
a
v
fo
W
Y
J
v
h1
1
J
u
tt
J
r
t'
t
b
l
j
UJ
U
o
o
d
k
t
Fo
r
mo
re
in
fo
r
m
a
t
io
n
pl
e
a
s
e
se
e
th
e
WS
U
M
We
b
p
a
g
e
ht
tp
w
w
w
ci
t
y
o
fp
rio
rla
k
e
c
o
m
W
S
U
M
p
h
p
I I I I
NGKEWSUMINFORMATIONALMEETINGApril282016Address1112lnJsliJY1dnriseto1houraftersunsetsMemorialDaythroughLaborhouraftersunsettosunrise150feetofshoreatalltimesezonesdefinedinordinancenelReedsIslandChannelLordselBoudinsBayCandyCoveysairmattressesinnertubesor150feetfromshoreunlessatercraftapersononwaterskisinnermilardeviceshalloperatewithinceptionforlaunchinglandingbythCVJuiresurfaceofPriorLakewhenvationof9040levisednotificationonCityscablemustbepostedduringentireerremainsbelowanelevationofvedaysProposedRule40mphmaximumsunrisetoYihouraftersunsetweekendsholidaysMemorialDaythroughLaborDay20mphmaximumYihouraftersunsettosunriseSlownowakewithin150feetofshoreatalltimesonbothPriorandSpringLakesMarkedslownowakezonesdefinedinordinanceWagonBridgeChannelReedsIslandChannelLordsStreetBridgeChannelBoudinsBayCandyCoveMudBayChannelandParadiseBayNoinflatablewatertoysairmattressesinnertubesorswimmingmorethan150feetfromshoreunlessaccompaniedbyawatercraftNowatercrafttowingapersononwaterskiswakeboardskneeboardsorbarefootshalloperatewithin150feetofshoreexceptionforlaunchinglandinbydirecUsaferouteNowatercrafttowingapersononwaterskisinnertubeaquaplaneorsimilardeviceshallbeoperatedatanytimewithinaMarkedSlowNoWakeZoneOperationofaboatinasustainedartificiallybowhighmannersouthofTwinIsleSlownowakeonentiresurfaceofPriorLakewhenwaterreachesanelevationof9039OHWSlownowakeonentiresurfaceofSpringLakewhenwaterreachesanelevationof9128OHWEffectiveasoffirstpostingontheCityswebsitePublicaccesspointsmustbepostedduringentirerestrictionperiodRemovedwhenwaterremainsbelowanhighwaterelevationfor72hoursComments PleaseReturnbyMay2d2016toPeteYoungWaterResourcesEngineer4646DakotaStreetSEPriorLakeMN55372pyounq@cityofpriorlakecomGtrL01hiw0wIODLfornJOAsCLIlLrQOWYlQACGVLfedoftQshoreliw@0tot1toooomlwbIWismoh0CwYoflillAYclviottQlct1v13ILnibcrclboctUnctifovn0x1yurCLuGeQunchiICVlcQhiuSfY7jlotsQfosioYtwxeisNOSCLe0cl1vvotbktJeJiYanshOveHvwSYlJlJfDILMilQtqo39d1wafhasolrcuuedrhiwntLviJiJuvirqoCfhortsutdavnSLiOUmlfofeosooiatC63sJo6tCtsFormoreinformationpleaseseetheWSUMWebpagehttpwwwcityofpriorlakecomWSUMphp
WSUM INFORMATIONAL MEETING – COMMENT CARD
April 28, 2016
Please Return by May 2nd, 2016 to:
Pete Young, Water Resources Engineer
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
pyoung@cityofpriorlake.com
Name_________________________________________________ Address_______________________________________________
Existing Rule Proposed Rule Comments
Speed Limits
Effective Time
40 mph maximum, sunrise to 1 hour after sunset
weekends & holidays, Memorial Day through Labor
Day)
20 mph maximum, 1 hour after sunset to sunrise
40 mph maximum, sunrise to ½ hour after sunset
weekends & holidays, Memorial Day through Labor
Day)
20 mph maximum, ½ hour after sunset to sunrise
Area Zoning Slow no-wake within 150 feet of shore at all times
Marked slow no-wake zones defined in ordinance
Wagon Bridge Channel, Reed’s Island Channel, Lords
Street Bridge Channel, Boudin’s Bay, Candy Cove,
Mud Bay Channel)
Slow no-wake within 150 feet of shore at all times on
both Prior and Spring Lakes.
Marked slow no-wake zones defined in ordinance
Wagon Bridge Channel, Reed’s Island Channel, Lords
Street Bridge Channel, Boudin’s Bay, Candy Cove, Mud
Bay Channel, and Paradise Bay)
Activities No inflatable water toys, air mattresses, inner tubes, or
swimming more than 150 feet from shore, unless
accompanied by a watercraft
No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner
tube, aquaplane or similar device shall operate within
150 feet of shore (exception for launching/landing by
direct/safe route)
No inflatable water toys, air mattresses, inner tubes, or
swimming more than 150 feet from shore, unless
accompanied by a watercraft
No watercraft towing a person on water skis,
wakeboards, kneeboards, or barefoot shall operate
within 150 feet of shore (exception for launching/landing
by direct/safe route)
No watercraft towing a person on water skis, inner
tube, aquaplane or similar device shall be operated
at any time within a Marked Slow No-Wake Zone
No operation of a boat in a sustained, artificially
bow-high manner south of Twin Isle.
High Water
Slow No-Wake
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Prior Lake when
water reaches an elevation of 904.0
Effective as of first televised notification on City’s cable
channel
Public access points must be posted during entire
restriction period
Removed when water remains below an elevation of
904.0 for 3 consecutive days
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Prior Lake when water
reaches an elevation of 903.9 (OHW).
Slow no-wake on entire surface of Spring Lake when
water reaches an elevation of 912.8 (OHW).
Effective as of first posting on the City’s website
Public access points must be posted during entire
restriction period
Removed when water remains below an high water
elevation for 72 hours
For more information please visit the WSUM Webpage: http://www.cityofpriorlake.com/WSUM.php
The existing rule is perfect for what we currently have
on Prior Lake and has served to work well. Some of
our best private enjoyment such as water skiing
happens at sunrise and 1 hour after sunset.
I would agree with the new proposed
rule in adding Paradise Bay.
I agree with the proposed rule
except for the last bullet point,
No operation of a boat in a
sustained, artificially bow-high
manner south of Twin Isle”, this is
absolutely absurd and should be
restricted from consideration.
I believe the existing rule has
worked fine for the homeowners
on Prior Lake and should remain
the same. Spring Lake definitely
needs a restriction.
Jim Slater 5408 Candy Cove Trail
Lower
Prior Lake
Mystic
Lake
Crystal
Lake
Haas
Lake
Spring
Lake
Cleary
Lake
Arctic
Lake
Rice
Lake
Blind
Lake
Jeffers
Pond
Howard
Lake
35
30
2
5
20
15
10
5
2 0
15
1 0
6
5
3
2
5
40
30
15
20
3020
153
0
20
1
5
4
1
3 0
5
15
1 0
1 0 5
3
020
30
2 5
15
2 0
15
1
0
20
50
15
2 0
10
15
3 0
10
10
5
5
3 0
5
1 5
City of Prior Lake²
Minnesota
2016
500 0 5001,0001,500
Feet
150 ft Propopsed No-Wake Ordinance
Proposed Wake Enhancement Zone
Proposed No-Wake Zones
Existing No-Wake Zones in Ordinance
Proposed No-Tow Zones
150 ft Existing No-Wake Ordinance
No-Wake Zone Buoys
City No-Wake Regulations
Bathymetry contours from MN DNR
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Davenport, Griff <gdavenport@DLRGROUP.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:08 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Bow high ordinance off DeWitte access
Mr. Young,
My name is Griff Davenport and I am a full-time resident add 3478 Sycamore Trail on prior Lake.
Due to travel constraints I have not been able to make it to any of the recent conversations or tonight's hearing
regarding the above proposed ordinance.
I want to offer my support for any of the proposed ordinances that provides for control of the use of bow high
boats in the area adjacent to the DeWitte access and twin Island.
In my opinion the shoreline and shoreline structures along these stretches of the lake are unusually impacted by
the extraordinary waves that hit our shoreline as a result of the use of these boats.
In my 2 1/2 years on the lake, I have repaired my Lake wall twice due to the ravages of mother nature as well as
the "vandalism" contributed by excessive wake from these boats. Additionally, I had to replace a floating dock
that was so adversely affected by the wave action of these boats that the hinges holding dock sections together
had to be replaced and ultimately could not be replaced any further necessitating the purchase of a new dock.
I can completely understand my responsibility for maintenance and repair on my shoreline caused by mother
nature. I have a much more difficult time excepting responsibility for damages offered by the wave action of
these boats for purely recreational reasons.
In conclusion, I am very much in support of any ordinance that would restrict the use of these bow high boats in
the area between the DeWitte launch and Twin Island.
Sincerely,
Griff Davenport
Resident
Griff Davenport, AIA
DLR GROUP, CEO
O: 612-977-3500
D: 612-977-3501
M: 612-875-9055
Listen.DESIGN.Deliver
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Peter Erickson <peterjerickson@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:04 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Lake Ordinances
Pete -
I attended the recent overview of the proposed lake ordinances but I am not able to attend the public hearing
tonight. I am a homeowner on Prior Lake and wanted to pass along that I support the various ordinances
proposed with the exception of the no-wake zone south of Twin Isle. I understand the rationale and it can be
hard at times battling the massive waves heavy wave boats emit but after weighing the pros and cons, I believe
that creating such a restriction will cause greater problems going forward to all individuals who enjoy the
lake. Thus, I would advocate that suggested change be removed. What I would advocate for is education for
big wakesurfing and wakeboard boats. I think they are great activities to be enjoyed; however, many
participants drive all over the lake in circles and thus ruin the water from all directions for other recreational
boaters, skiers, paddle boarders, etc. It's not about restricting where such boats go or their equal ability to
enjoy the lake - hence being opposed to the ordinance restriction - but rather common courtesy to pick an open
area while pulling an individual versus wandering everywhere and crossing into the spaces others are using at
the time.
Thank you.
Peter Erickson
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Mike Baldwin <Mike.Baldwin@integra.net>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:18 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:WSUM comments
I have lived on Spring Lake for 28 years
The only part of the WSUM proposal I am in favor of is the High water slow no wake
ordinance.
All the others can be kept in place on Prior but NOT on Spring.
Spring and Prior are two totally different lakes what might be good for Prior is not good for
Spring.
If Prior in one to the top 10 busiest lake in MN then where does Spring rate???I am sure not
in the top 100.
A 150 ft no wake zone is not enforceable with a few bouys scattered around the lake and I
don’t the sheriff is going to patrol spring lake any more than before.
If you want to do something constructive with water quality then do a study to see how much
the sea gull shit goes in the lake when the thousands of sea gulls sit on the lake for months
during the spring and fall
migration.
Have the city council pass an ordinance keeping them from shiting in the lake.It would be
about as enforceable as a 150ft no wake zone on Spring Lake.
2743 Spring Lake Rd Sw.
Mike Baldwin
Home Email account
Right-clickdownloadhelpprotecOutlookprautomaticdthispictureInternet.Avastlogo
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Jeff Petschl <jeff@powerplaymn.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:56 AM
To:Frank Boyles
Cc:Ken Hedberg; Mike McGuire; Rick Keeney; Monique Morton; Annette Thompson; Katy
Gehler; Pete Young
Subject:5/9 Public Hearing follow-up
Mayor Helberg,City Council,Frank,Pete,and Katy Thank you for your dedication,hard work,and consideration during this
entire process.The Twin Island proposed restriction definitely would’ve impacted my family and my business on Upper Prior
Lake in a negative way,and therefore I could not support it.The other restrictions appear to have support from the property
owners and lake users affected by the changes,so I am not concerned.I know this was not easy work,and I know you have
people on multiple sides of the arguments.I appreciate being included in the process,and I appreciate last nights decision by
the City Council.
I would like to make an additional clarification.Councilor Thompson asked a great question last night regarding ones ability to
pull a tube out from their residence in a no wake zone such as the channel in front of wagon bridge/knotty oar.Sheriff Beck
answered the question;NO,they cannot under the proposed new restriction currently they can).That is why Mike Thibault
raised the point and is against it.Although I am not personally affected by this restriction,I do agree it should not apply to a
property owner taking a direct route through the channel to open water.I just want to be sure everyone is connecting the
dots on that clarification…
THANK YOU!
JP
From:Jeff Petschl jeff@powerplaymn.com>
Date:Monday,May 2,2016 at 11:08 AM
To:Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Cc:Ken Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,
Rick Keeney rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Monique Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,
Annette Thompson athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>,Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Pete
Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:4/28 Public Comment Card
Pete In addition to my previous feedback,directly below are my responses for the 4/28 Public Comment Card:
Speed Limits Effective Time;as previously stated,I am against any further restrictions on Prior Lake.The Prior Lake
Association has information regarding the amount of incidents/citations/arrests that the Sheriff’s Office has
reported.The numbers are shockingly low for a MN Top 10 Busiest Lake”.
Area Zoning;again,I am against any further restrictions on Prior Lake.
Activities;vehemently against these 4 restrictions.Operation of a boat in a sustained,artificially bow high manner
south of Twin Isle”I do not believe can be legally implemented nor enforced.Please review the PLA information
regarding the Sheriff’s Office inability to enforce current wake related violations,and the Task Force wants to add
MORE restrictions?Without further research,education,and funding,how will this new restriction be implemented
and enforced?
High Water/Slow No Wake;I would like to see information and studies conducted on lowering the water level on
Prior Lake.As I stated previously,I did not start to incur erosion issues until the lake consistently remained high like it
has the last 3 years.I believe draining the lake down will help solve the problem.
2
I hope from my previous feedback you were able to conclude that I am extremely disappointed in the entire WSUM
process.From the selection of the task force members,people with clear bias and agendas.Recommendations based on
complaints vs.research/science/studies/measurements from PRIOR LAKE.Personally I would like to restrict bass fishing on
the lake to only the middle of the day because of their loud/fast boats waking up my kids every morning).Where/when does
it stop?Kicking the can down the road on EDUCATION while the Task Force acknowledges EDUCATION as a central issue.Not
having a clear plan on who is going to pay for the new restrictions,how the new restrictions will be enforced or not),and how
the new restrictions will be measured for effectiveness.The collateral damage to other areas of the lake public
safety/crowding)and to other lakeshore owners.I’ve rebuilt my shoreline each of the last 3 years,why isn’t the Task Force
concerned about helping me?Again,where/when does it stop?
Until there is serious research conducted,complete with measurements on before and after results,it is irresponsible for the
City of Prior Lake and DNR to implement restrictions based solely on complaints.It is fine to not like ski/wake/surf boats,just
as I do not like bass boats,but to draw conclusions without scientific evidence is wrong.
My advice to the complainants is to do what the rest of us do;invest in your shoreline with proper boulders and buffering.If
you can afford to live on the lake,you should be able to afford the necessary proper maintenance.Ignorance of lakeshore
maintenance and/or attempts to pass along one’s individual accountability should not equal this amount of time and energy
from so many individuals like yourselves and result in unprecedented restrictions on our lake.
Thank you for your consideration.
JP
jeffpetschl
7642 Washington Avenue South | Eden Prairie, MN 55344
50 South 9th Street Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55402
www.powerplaymn.com
cell | 612-860-6978
From:Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Date:Thursday,April 28,2016 at 5:01 PM
To:Jeff Petschl jeff@powerplaymn.com>
Cc:Ken Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,
3
Rick Keeney rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Monique Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,
Annette Thompson athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>,Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Pete
Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:FW:WSUM concerns
Jeff,Thanks for your e mail.
Tonight's meeting is to explain the recommended ordinance changes,give you an opportunity in small groups to talk
about specific provisions and receive your written input.Our intent is to provide answers to tonight's written questions
to the two policy making bodies for the May 9 public hearing.
The public hearing on the proposed ordinance is 7pm Monday May 9.That is the meeting at which public input will be
taken by both the Prior Lake City Council and the Spring Lake Township Board so please be there to make a statement
should you desire.Please time your statement for seven minutes or less.
Following the public hearing,the two bodies may direct their staffs to prepare more information or prepare
amendments to the proposed ordinance or even to forward the proposed ordinance to the DNR as they must approve
anything adopted by the two bodies.
In any case your e mail is being forwarded to my staff to assure that it is part of the record of comments we have
received.
From:Jeff Petschl mailto:jeff@powerplaymn.com]
Sent:Thursday,April 28,2016 2:39 PM
To:Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Ken Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Rick Keeney
rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Monique Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Annette Thompson
athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>;Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Cc:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:RE:WSUM concerns
Hi Frank I did not hear from anyone.Below are additional questions/concerns:
1 The 9 questions/concerns listed below in my original email are still a concern that I would like answered via email or
this evening or at the May 9th Public Hearing.
2 After reviewing the WSUM Final Report;http://www.cityofpriorlake.com/documents/WSUM/FinalReportDraft.pdfI
have the following questions/concerns that I would like answered via email or this evening or at the May 9th Public
Hearing.
Education;the word education is the first bullet of the specific policy issues the Task Force addressed page
4).The word education appears in the final report over 30 times,not including the table of contents or the
appendix.In the Enforcement section 3.2 page 8)of the final report it states;education is the first step in
achieving compliance with boating rules and regulation.”In section 4.1,Recommendations page 16),the Task
Force recommends increasing education efforts.Despite those findings,the current Task Force determined
education should be passed along to another not yet created Task Force or similar group.How does the current
Task Force explain recommending more restrictions,that will obviously require education,while not
addressing the current lack of education outlined in their own report?
Enforcement and Enforcement Response time;in section 2,WSUM Definition and History page 6)it states;with
1 full time deputy occasionally supplemented by temporary employees assigned to ALL Scott County lakes and
rivers,how does the Task Force foresee the new restrictions being trained to the sheriff’s office?How will the
new restrictions help with improving response times?
4
Funding;in the Recommendations of Enforcement section 3.2 page 9)the Task Force states;to effectively
implement this recommendation,increased funding for enforcement will likely be required.The Sheriff’s Office
does not currently have funding for increased WSUM enforcement on Prior Lake or Spring Lake.”Who is going
to pay for the additional training and increased personnel the new restrictions will require?
Safety/Crowding;in section 3.3 Public Safety page10)the report states;as use of the lake goes up,crowding
on the lake and its impact on public safety has become a concern”.By restricting certain types of boat traffic in
an already congested,narrow body of water,to one area of the lake,how do the new restrictions address the
safety/crowding concern?
Concerns/Questions from 4/18/16:
Implementation and enforcement of the current provisions,150ft;what percent of lake owners are using
markers,current enforcement,current effectiveness?
What studies/research/science is leading to the new recommendations?The DeWitte Public Access area has
MORE shoreline impacts than other areas of Prior Lake.”How exactly did the Task Force reach this conclusion?
How was it determined which shorelines required protections and which did not?
Are the new proposals temporary or permanent?
What measurements will you use to determine their effectiveness and whether or not to make them
permanent,change,or remove?
How and when will the new proposals be implemented?
How will the new proposals be enforced?
Who pays lakeshore owners,all residents,lake users?)for the new markers,signage,education,and increased
law enforcement assuming there will be)?
Do you foresee the new proposals creating any safety concerns increased crowding”)by moving all towing on
Upper Prior to one area,potentially moving users from Spring to Prior,and perhaps moving all towing to Lower
Prior?
Please advise when you have a moment.THANK YOU!
JP
From:Jeff Petschl
Sent:Wednesday,April 20,2016 4:16 PM
To:Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Ken Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Rick Keeney
rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Monique Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Annette Thompson
athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>;Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Cc:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:Re:WSUM concerns
Thank you,Frank.Unfortunately,I feel left behind…based on the recommendations the task force is proceeding with.I look
forward to being included in the process…
JP
From:Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Date:Wednesday,April 20,2016 at 4:13 PM
To:Jeff Petschl jeff@powerplaymn.com>,Ken Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Rick Keeney
rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Monique Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Annette Thompson
athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>,Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Cc:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>,Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:RE:WSUM concerns
5
Jeff I am responding on behalf of the city council although one or more of them may choose to respond as well.
Thanks for sharing your views.By e mailing them to the city council members you are assured that they have received
them first hand.
As I explained before there is a process underway.By your e mail you have gotten a head start which is certainly ok.
We will make sure that this material is included in our records as we proceed on this topic.
Thanks again.
From:Jeff Petschl mailto:jeff@powerplaymn.com]
Sent:Wednesday,April 20,2016 2:38 PM
To:Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Ken Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Rick Keeney
rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Monique Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Annette Thompson
athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>;Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Cc:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:WSUM concerns
Importance:High
Mayor Hedberg,Prior Lake City Council,Pete,Frank Katy
I am writing you today to inform you of my disappointment with the proposed restrictions for Upper Prior Lake.Please
review attached and below:
For the record,I am against ANY further restrictions on Prior Lake.
The current regulations should be more consistently enforced.There is an under utilized marker system
available to all lakeshore owners.Owners need to take personal accountability for property maintenance and
improvements.The latter is a regular operating necessity of living on any body of water...not something that
requires new regulations in hopes of a zero maintenance plan.
Until ALL lakeshore owners universally adopt the current regulation,and enforcement of that regulation is
applied consistently,what sense does it make to initiate new restrictions?IF…if,you are going to impose a new
mandatory regulation,why not START by making implementation of the current 150ft guideline mandatory?
I am also against any new restrictions that are only applied to a portion of the lake,and are only targeted at
certain users of the lake.This type of policy will only open the door for an ongoing and continued debate about
further restrictions.Once this starts,it won't stop and it will create a level of dissonance amongst lakeshore
owners that could be community changing.
I understand the situation intimately.When we moved to Upper Prior Lake 12 years ago,we had a good 5 yards
of beach before my ramp and dock started.Beginning about 5 years ago the beach receded with the rising
water levels.Since the flood 3 years ago,my ramp and dock either needed to be removed completely or at
minimum my ramp stays on the steps leading down to the lake,with no beach at all.Each of the last 3 years I’ve
needed to repair or fully rebuild my lakeshore access due to the high water level.All this said,it is my opinion,
and that of many of my friends and neighbors that you also will be hearing from,that the biggest issue on the
lake has been the continued high water level,causing fragility and deterioration of the lakeshore,not lake uses
alone.
In summary,I own and co own 4 properties,either on Upper Prior Lake,or across the street with access/easement to
Upper Prior Lake.I am also the majority owner of Charlie’s on Prior Lakers Holdings,LLC)on Upper Prior Lake.I believe
this makes me one of the largest private lakeshore stakeholders on Upper Prior Lake,and most likely one of its highest
6
taxpayers.Any new restriction that is designed to protect”only one portion of the lake and its stakeholders,while
shifting that perceived burden”to my areas of the lake,will be met with FIRM OPPOSITION.
The questions I attempted to discuss with Pete and Frank are below for your review.Attached is the letter I will be
circulating to concerned stakeholders via email,internet,and social media.
My Concerns/Questions:
Implementation and enforcement of the current provisions,150ft;what percent of lake owners are using
markers,current enforcement,current effectiveness?
What studies/research/science is leading to the new recommendations?The DeWitte Public Access area has
MORE shoreline impacts than other areas of Prior Lake.”How exactly did the Task Force reach this conclusion?
How was it determined which shorelines required protections and which did not?
Are the new proposals temporary or permanent?
What measurements will you use to determine their effectiveness and whether or not to make them
permanent,change,or remove?
How and when will the new proposals be implemented?
How will the new proposals be enforced?
Who pays lakeshore owners,all residents,lake users?)for the new markers,signage,education,and increased
law enforcement assuming there will be)?
Do you foresee the new proposals creating any safety concerns increased crowding”)by moving all towing on
Upper Prior to one area,potentially moving users from Spring to Prior,and perhaps moving all towing to Lower
Prior?
I know you all have a very difficult and sometimes thankless job to do.I appreciate your hard work,dedication,and
service to our community.It is not lost on me that this is one of those cases where you can’t make everyone happy”…I
am hopeful that you can appreciate my skin in the game as well.
As always,I am available to discuss these matters personally.I look forward to seeing you on the 28th and May 9th.
Thank you for reading this through.
JP
jeffpetschl
7642 Washington Avenue South | Eden Prairie, MN 55344
50 South 9th Street Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55402
www.powerplaymn.com
cell | 612-860-6978
From:Frank Boyles mailto:FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com]
Sent:Tuesday,April 19,2016 5:31 PM
To:Jeff Petschl jeff@powerplaymn.com>
7
Cc:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:RE:WSUM
Jeff,since I did not have firsthand involvement in this process I really do not have the answers to all of your questions.I
know that a task force of persons with a wide variety of lake interests worked to put the new ordinances and guidelines
together.
The meeting on 4/28 at 6pm in the city council chambers is intended both to provide a presentation on what is being
proposed and to answer questions such as the ones you are posing.
Then on May 9 at 7pm the city council and township board conduct a joint hearing here in the council chambers to once
again hear input from the public.
Ultimately,with the exception of all but a few provisions the ordinances adopted by the city and township will be
identical.They are then sent to the DNR together with the hearing record to learn whether the DNR will approve the
them.
The next step will be implementation and education.There is a task force working on this to see how the word can be
spread most effectively.
I hope you are able to wait until April 28 as this will be a more effective way of distribute this information rather than
person by person.
From:Jeff Petschl mailto:jeff@powerplaymn.com]
Sent:Monday,April 18,2016 9:49 AM
To:Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:WSUM
Frank Do you have time to meet or chat with me this week?I have some questions for Pete/team that I want to run by
you first.Please LMK.THANKS!
JP
The WSUM Task Force decided on a final proposal which includes keeping the existing 150’slow no wake zone,
modifying some of the safety related provisions,creating a zone off of the DeWitte access where bow high operation is
restricted in an attempt to reduce some of the shoreline erosion observed in that area,and adding all of the same
regulations to Spring Lake.You can learn more on the WSUM website;http://www.cityofpriorlake.com/WSUM.php
My Concerns/Questions:
Public Hearing 4/28,Council Vote 5/9?,thenDNR for final approval?not sure I have the sequence of events
after the hearing correct or not?)
Implementation and enforcement of the current provisions,150ft;what percent of lake owners are using
markers,current enforcement,current effectiveness?
What studies/research/science is leading to the new recommendations?The DeWitte Public Access area has
MORE shoreline impacts than other areas of Prior Lake.”How exactly did the Task Force reach this conclusion?
How was it determined which shorelines required protections and which did not?
Are the new proposals temporary or permanent?
What measurements will you use to determine their effectiveness and whether or not to make them
permanent,change,or remove?
How and when will the new proposals be implemented?
How will the new proposals be enforced?
8
Who pays lakeshore owners,all residents,lake users?)for the new markers,signage,education,and increased
law enforcement assuming there will be)?
Do you foresee the new proposals creating any safety concerns increased crowding”)by moving all towing on
Upper Prior to one area,potentially moving users from Spring to Prior,and perhaps moving all towing to Lower
Prior?
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Jim Slater <jim@lakeshoreplus.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 1:47 PM
To:Ken Hedberg; Rick Keeney; Mike McGuire; Monique Morton; Annette Thompson; Pete
Young
Subject:It's all about the water!
Attachments:Comment Card Prior Lake.pdf
Hi everyone,
I hope you're doing well and having a great day. My name is Jim Slater and I wanted to shoot you a quick email
as the Prior Lake lakeshore real estate expert. As you may be aware, I specialize in waterfront property,
particularly on Prior Lake. I have been on Prior Lake since I was 6 years old and have owned 7 different lake
homes on Prior Lake, including one on Willow Beach where my view and my lakeshore privilege was facing
south of Twin Island. When I lived in the Willows, we got to enjoy the ski jump for many years until that was
taken away. They were going to move it but no one wanted the ski jump in front of their house so they took it
away completely.
I feel it's not a good idea to just cut off some water activities (water skis, wakeboards, kneeboards, or barefoot)
on only part of the lake, because then it will just be more concentrated in another part of the lake, and so on. By
taking this privilege away, you are taking away the private enjoyment of the homeowners on the lake who move
to this lake to raise their family and enjoy the full recreational activities that this lake provides. This past
Monday, I was taking my daily Lakefront Park walk and I got to witness a float plane landing on Prior Lake. It
was 8:30am and it was spectacular. We all know how neat that is to watch that happen. To be pilot and live on
Prior Lake and land a plane on your own lake is a dream. It'd be a shame if that got taken away also. I would
also tell you if you take away the private enjoyment in one part of the lake, our property values will be affected.
I have attached my comments on the comment card. I am passionate about Prior Lake and the Lakeshore
Lifestyle it provides. 90% of my buyers come from other cities and parts of the country and I have to educate
them on why Prior Lake is better than Minnetonka. I created a Prior Lake Lake Life video this past summer to
showcase our amazing lake and the opportunities we have on the water and why it's a great place to live. I
encourage you to think of our #1 Prior Lake asset and keep the right of private enjoyment to the individual. In
all actuality, our lake is not as busy as people say it is, especially on the south side of the lake. And the people
enjoying it there, live in proximity to it. The link to the video is below. I encourage you to watch it. This is Prior
Lake and it's all about the water.
https://youtu.be/EXbrsvFHQf0
I encourage you to make a decision that is best for everyone that enjoys our beautiful lake, not just a few
individuals. Thank you for your consideration.
Keep Smilin'
Jim Slater
The Lakeshore Guy"
Lakeshore Plus, Inc.
Cell: 612-590-1802
2
jim@lakeshoreplus.com
http://www.lakeshoreplus.com
Right-clickheretodownloadpictures. Tohelpprotectyourprivacy, OutlookpreventedautomaticdownloadofthispicturefromtheInternet.
Right-clickheretodownloadpictures. Tohelpprotectyourprivacy, OutlookpreventedautomaticdownloadofthispicturefromtheInternet.
Right-clickheretodownloadpictures. Tohelpprotectyourprivacy, OutlookpreventedautomaticdownloadofthispicturefromtheInternet.
Right-clickheretodownloadpictures. Tohelpprotectyourprivacy, OutlookpreventedautomaticdownloadofthispicturefromtheInternet.Right-clickheretodownloadpictures. Tohelpprotectyourprivacy, OutlookpreventedautomaticdownloadofthispicturefromtheInternet.
Lakeshore Plus is a world class high-performance real estate practice that
continues to innovate and advance to upgrade the lifestyles of buyers and
sellers alike. We are here to serve, not to show off. We are here to make
a difference, not to make a name. We are here to give good, not look good.
Keep Smilin'
Sooner or Later, You'll Call Jim Slater"
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Bryan Anderson <bryananderson@mac.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 10:34 PM
To:Pete Young
Cc:Sarah Anderson; Rick Keeney; Katy Gehler; Ken Hedberg; Annette Thompson; Monique
Morton; Mike McGuire; Frank Boyles; Ann Schroeder
Subject:Re: My "Comment Card" from 4/28 Meeting at City Hall
Pete,
Thank you for the your reply and the perspective you provided.
One clarifying point.
I confirmed today with the post office we have no mail held (re: our old address). Also confirmed the
continuation of the forwarding to our new address. We have not had any other problems with this.
Also, we have it documented that we spoke with Kate at the City as well as with Scott County in February
giving our new address (and I believe my wife spoke with you personally then as well re: clarification re: Dolan
Seurer and his request for a variance).
All of this said, I have also confirmed with other island residents that they too, were not sent a letter on behalf
island land owner.
Therefore, we find your explanation below to be completely false.
Again, thank you for taking your time to explain your reasoning, and again, we do not find it reasonable,
enough to justify” or legal. And we will not accept this deficit to our property and it’s value, along with our
enjoyment and safety based upon your proposal.
Respectfully,
Bryan Anderson
On May 5, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Pete Young <pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com> wrote:
Sarah,
Thank you for your comments.Hopefully the following information will be useful.
The list we used for the direct mailing included all Twin Island addresses in addition to about 1500
others including all shoreline parcels,associations,and others who previously expressed an interest in
the process.I found your mailing address on our list 2176 Stanford Ave,Saint Paul,MN 55105)so you
should have received our direct mailing.In addition,the information has been posted on the City’s
WSUM website,online calendar,Facebook,and Twitter,advertised on the City’s electronic message
boards for weeks,and there was an article in the Prior Lake American.
I encourage you to review the contents of the studies and related items which are posted on the City’s
WSUM website http://www.cityofpriorlake.com/WSUM.php)at the bottom of the page.The WSUM
Task Force was able to review this information and reached their conclusions only after careful
2
consideration of the relevant facts.They were also encouraged to locate and review other studies and
information on their own.The purpose of having all of this data available to the WSUM Task Force was
to make sure the group had background information and objective facts that allowed them to reach fair
conclusions.While one of the studies went as far as recommending some regulatory language,all of
them focus on sound science and relevant information about wave theory/behavior,erosion,
shoreline/wave interaction,wind and watercraft generated wake,water quality,and more.Performing
scientific study review was one of the more common recommendations we heard from the community
after the previous public information meetings in 2015 and I believe the WSUM Task Force did a good
job of incorporating this information into their process over the past year.
One of the studies cautioned about over regulation of watercraft wake because it is not the only factor
in eroding shorelines,but watercraft wake is definitely one of the factors in shoreline erosion.Natural
waterways are dynamic environments subject to erosional and/or depositional processes.Therefore,
adding a focused regulation aimed at giving some measure of relief to those shorelines most susceptible
to erosion and located in an area with natural travel constrictions and heavy use,while allowing all other
existing surface water activities to continue,is reasonable for Prior Lake.An additional recommendation
of the Task Force is to create a guidance document for shoreline property owners with information
about proper stabilization techniques.
The area south of Twin Isle is unique on Prior Lake in that it includes several of the compounding factor
types that studies have listed as risk factors for accelerated shoreline erosion.These factors include high
boat frequency owing in part to the DNR’s DeWitte Public Access and the southern loop of the typical
travel pattern of boats),potential travel lanes constricted by the island,and shorelines susceptible to
erosion.This susceptibility is due to several factors including shoreline steepness,erodible soils,and
varying stabilization practices.Other areas of Prior Lake do not have all of these risk factors confined
into one small area and are therefore better suited to any slight increase in enhanced wake watercraft
traffic that may be attributed to the proposed regulations.Activities such as water skiing,tubing,and
general boating would all still continue in the area under the proposed regulations.A relatively small
number of lake users would have to modify their preferred travel patterns to comply with the new zone.
It seems reasonable to conclude that the potential number of boats we’re discussing is low compared
with the total number of boats on Prior Lake at any one point in time.
Regards,
Pete Young,PE,CPESC
Water Resources Engineer City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372
952 447 9831 cityofpriorlake.com
From:Sarah Anderson mailto:saraheanderson@mac.com]
Sent:Wednesday,May 04,2016 7:24 PM
To:Rick Keeney
Cc:Pete Young;Katy Gehler;Ken Hedberg;Bryan Anderson;Annette Thompson;Monique Morton;Mike
McGuire;Frank Boyles;Ann Schroeder
Subject:Re:My Comment Card"from 4/28 Meeting at City Hall
Thank you for your reply Rick.
For clarification sake: We find it convenient, and with purpose, that none of the lakeshore
owners on Twin Island were notified of this.
No one asked us our thoughts or observations.
3
We received no notice of proposal via the mail. Our addresses are all known (the island does not
have mail service), as the proper taxes we are billed for (and paid promptly) make it to us
without a hiccup.
Can you explain why did the city specifically not send the Island land owners notification of this
proposal? We found out by word of mouth only. That alone shows premeditation, bias, and is flat
out unacceptable on any level. And “extensive” community gathering of information frankly was
not enough, biased, and at the moment leaves us only in a better position legally if ever needed
PS- We spoke with Katie, and the city and county on February. Ensured our correct address was
had, and the previous address we had, still has a forward on it. As all the other Prior Lake
residents, we received nothing. We have no reason to believe at this time, especially given the
proposal, that this was purposeful).
Again, the city employee conceded that only 1 of the 13 studies supported boat restrictions
would decrease land erosion. Lots of people have strong opinions about Wake Boats, but City
ordinances and regulations should be based on facts not a select few options/perceptions.
If it’s actual been proven to cause erosion, pushing the issue to other lakeshore owners, and to be
hit stronger with it (as a smaller area possible easily equates that) is not acceptable, or
understandable to us.
Water quality and erosion are lake issues, not certain parts of the lake issues. Increasing
regulations in certain parts of the lake is like giving those lakeshore owners a free pass on
shoreline improvements. There should not be any preferential treatment for certain lakeshore
owners, we should all be treated equally.
It was communicated that one of the key benefits of the proposed regulation was increased safety
South of Twin Island. How does increasing Wake Boat traffic on the other parts of the lake not
decrease safety for everyone North of Twin Island? Having spent nearly every summer weekend
on the lake the past 5 years, I wholeheartedly disagree that boat traffic patterns will remain
unchanged if these regulations are passed. If you honestly believe that the majority of boat traffic
patters will be unchanged, what’s the point of even proposing these regulations?
This year’s proposal clearly gives South of Twin Island “preferred treatment” and distributes the
lake traffic burden to the rest of the lakeshore owners.
Again, Thank you for taking the time to respond with as much detail and explanation as you did.
It was much appreciated. Yet, we will continue to hold out hope for objective facts and fairness,
and a decision that speaks to such on Monday.
Until then,
Sarah and Bryan Anderson
3434 Twin Isles Circle
Prior Lake MN 55372
On May 3, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Rick Keeney <rkeeney@cityofpriorlake.com>
wrote:
Ms.Anderson,
4
Thanks for your input.
One thing to keep in mind is that the proposed ordinance changes were the result of a
lot of study and consensus building with a lot of citizen input,the latest organized group
being the WSUM task force a group of people selected to have diverse points of view
regarding lake usage.City staff is not so much the driving force behind the desire for the
increased regulations as much as other residents of Prior Lake who are experiencing
problems due to wake surf boats in their area of the lake.
For clarification,we are not talking about a complete No Wake”zone South of Twin
island.Normal boat traffic at speed,including skiing,tubing,and even recreational wake
boarding with a normal wake would still be permitted to go around Twin Island.The
intent is to regulate only bow high”boat operation producing an enhanced wake as
employed primarily for wake surfing and advanced wake boarding big air stunts.So the
majority of boat traffic patterns would remain unchanged.I believe there is not a
significant safety risk shift caused by the proposed regulation.
The privilege of owning lakeshore comes with a responsibility to maintain that
lakeshore.Even outside of the issue of enhanced wake boats,I feel that there is
additional regulation and/or enforcement regarding the proper design and installation
of shoreline improvements that would help prevent detrimental impacts on lake water
quality from wave and storm water erosion of the shore.If shore improvements are
properly designed to handle normal boat wake and wind waves,it is not a huge
additional burden to make them also durable against the occasional larger wake surf
wake waves.I intend to be a proponent of additional reugluation,enforcement,and
most importantly education of shore owners regarding best practices for maintaining
the shore.
And boaters also have a responsibility to mitigate the impact they have on shore
owners.Responsible wake surf boat operators would know that their wake can cause
damage to docks and shore improvements and even if not regulated,would take care to
stay as far away from shore as practical.
This issue is similar to many that the City Council faces where certain users of public
resources are causing an unwelcome impact or burden on other residents or
neighborhoods.It is always very difficult to find a good solution when there are directly
conflicting desires.
The Task force did examine the idea of a no enhanced wake zone within 300’from
shore type of ordinance but there are difficulties in enforcing that because 300’is not
marked with buoys.Also,although it would produce a similar result in regards to the
Twin Island area,it would also prohibit wake surfing in many other bays on Upper and
Lower Prior Lake leaving only the central portions of the main parts of the lake open to
that activity which was felt to be too drastic of a change.
In any case,whether we limit wake surfing by designating specific areas of the lake by
bay,etc),or by distance from the shore,or choose not to add any official regulation at
all,there is a large component of any regulation that is going to be a matter of
educating the boaters as to what is allowed and where it is allowed.
Rick
From:Sarah Anderson mailto:saraheanderson@mac.com]
Sent:Monday,May 2,2016 8:34 PM
To:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Katy Gehler
kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Ken Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;
Rick Keeney rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Monique Morton
mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Annette Thompson
athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>;Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
5
Cc:Bryan Anderson bryananderson@mac.com>
Subject:My Comment Card"from 4/28 Meeting at City Hall
Mayor Hedberg, Prior Lake City Council Members, Mr. Young, and Ms. Gehler,
After attending the meeting on 4/28/16 at City Hall I have the following questions. Concerns and
points of reference:
1. The current definition of “South of Twin Isles Island”: This definition opens itself up too
many interpretations including everything south of the most north point of the island.
2. As I understand it, “Education” would be given to me and my husband about shoreline
erosion for lakeshore restoration but no actual funds. This is completely unacceptable,
especially given the representative for the City on Thursday 4/28/16 stated “We
understand that if there is a problem that we are pushing the problem to other lakeshore
owners”.
a. This comment is very problematic for the city of Prior Lake as admitting,
proactively with complete knowledge and/or assumption of “pushing” a
property “damage issue on to other lake shore owners” opens the city up for
lawsuits.
3. I am concerned with what appears to be bias level of information given at the education
hearing on April 28, 2016. Although information was shared it was limited and biased
towards what it appears the city would like to occur. A few of the examples of such are
below:
a. Example #1: it was listed that one boat rental company recently began
demanding tutorial and educational boat driving tours/ lessons for those
renting the water crafts available through their company. Did not mention
contacting, or agreement of the other companies providing the same service
Prior Late Pontoon Rental, Knotty Orr Marina, etc.).
b. Example #2: it was stated that other lakes “including Lake Minnetonka” are
looking at similar ordinances. However, the city representative did not state if
in fact any ordinance similar to what Prior Lake is proposing has ACTUALLY
been passed.
c. It was stated by the city representative conducting the educational information
meeting that 13 studies were reviewed when the task force was coming up with
recommendations. Only one of the 13 studies recommended that a possible
boat restriction or recreational use ordinance be implemented to have the level
of lakeshore erosion decrease. That is only 7.5% of the research conducted,
and hence the such research only recommended this but did not prove that it
would be effective in the city’s ultimate goal of diminishing lakeshore erosion.
4. There were four reasons listed for the proposed area to be part of the new proposed
ordinance, one of which included the high level of boat traffic. When asked, no such
study was actually done regarding the actual full boat traffic levels as it pertained to
upper prior Lake, but rather stated that it was based in perception or opinion alone.
a. The current proposal will put the north side of Twin Isles Island and Lone Tree
Island at great risk for both an increase in traffic as well as shoreline erosion as
boaters will most certainly be utilizing the area for a “turnaround”
recreationally.
b. Prior to any boat traffic statements being stated in a factual manner I the city, is
recommended and requested that actual boat traffic studies be concluded
prior.
6
a. And doing such I believe that the safety concerns of having multiple
recreational boaters moving at high speeds through the north side of
Twin Isles Island will be a very large risk, as many recreational
boaters anchor there and have multiple swimmers in the area.
b. The swimmers from the island, as well as from the anchored boats,
which include my children..... are not at any lower rate of priority
than the swimmers listed at the Willows Beach area. Risk is Risk. A
life is a life. Listing numbers regarding this is nothing but both
repulsive as well as beyond biased. It also again puts the city at yet
another risk.
5. Safety/Crowding; in section 3.3 Public Safety (page10) the report states; “as use of the
lake goes up, crowding on the lake and its impact on public safety has become a
concern”. By restricting certain types of boat traffic in an already congested, narrow
body of water, to one area of the lake, how do the new restrictions address the
safety/crowding concern?
a. What studies/research/science is leading to the new recommendations? “The
DeWitte Public Access area has MORE shoreline impacts than other areas of
Prior Lake.” How exactly did the Task Force reach this conclusion?
b. How was it determined which shorelines required protections and which did
not?
6. Do you foresee the new proposals creating any safety concerns (increased “crowding”) by
moving all towing on Upper Prior to one area, potentially moving users from Spring to
Prior, and perhaps moving all towing to Lower Prior?
7. As resented, it appears a 200 or 250, even 300 foot lakeshore ordinance of no wake board
boats is in order.
Thank you,
Sarah Anderson
3434 Twin Isles Circle
Prior Lake MN 55372
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Frank Boyles
Sent:Friday, May 06, 2016 11:38 AM
To:Ken Hedberg; Mike McGuire; Rick Keeney; Monique Morton
Cc:Annette Thompson; Pete Young; Katy Gehler
Subject:FW: WSUM Question
Councilor Thompson asked this question and since I suspect others of you might appreciate the information,I am
sending it to you as well.
From:Pete Young
Sent:Friday,May 06,2016 11:22 AM
To:Annette Thompson athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>
Cc:Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Subject:RE:WSUM Question
Annette,
Staff suggested that the following stakeholders be represented on the task which both the council and town board
confirmed at the April 2015 work session:
1. Active recreation
2. Passive recreation
3. Water quality Prior Lake
4. Water quality Spring Lake
5. Prior Lake Association
6. Spring Lake Association
7. Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed District
8. Elected officials one liaison for both City and Town)
9. Public safety Scott County Sheriff’s Office)
10. Technical experts may include DNR,consultants,attorney,etc.)
11. City/Town staff
Each of the various organizations that were listed were contacted and asked they select a representative for the Task
Force.In the case of the lake associations,this was the president.The PLSLWD selected Woody Spitzmueller as he also
brings knowledge from the boat safety and community safety roles he serves on other committees.The waterski club is
an active organization with several members using the lake for various active recreation types.This organization was
contacted to represent active recreation.To round out the task force we had several volunteer for the role.From these
volunteers we selected those we felt best to represent the remaining stakeholder groups.Although each task force
member was selected to ensure representation of a specific stakeholder group,many served multiple viewpoints.We felt
all stakeholders were represented well.
In the spring of 2015 we held two community meetings.A mailing was sent to all lakeshore owners about 1500),HOAs
we have record of,and lake associations.These meetings were also advertised on the electronic sign boards and on the
website.Once the Task Force was selected a webpage was created to keep the public informed along the way
http://www.cityofpriorlake.com/WSUM.php).Meeting notes and other information was posted.In addition,the Task
Force members were asked to actively seek feedback from the groups they represented along the way.The last of the
2
community meetings was advertised in a similar manner.The three community meetings were all well attended with
around 100 in attendance each time.
That’s about as brief as we can make it please let me know if you have any other questions.Thanks,and have a nice
weekend.
Pete Katy)
Pete Young,PE,CPESC
Water Resources Engineer City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372
952 447 9831 cityofpriorlake.com
From:Annette Thompson
Sent:Thursday,May 05,2016 9:14 AM
To:Pete Young;Katy Gehler
Cc:Frank Boyles
Subject:Re:WSUM Question
Thanks for your prompt response. It does answer my question.
I have one more.
Can you give me a brief explanation of how task force members were located/identified/selected.
I am aware the City sought diversity and representation of both lakes but how were they located......
meaning did the City put an ad in the paper? Put a request on the website? or did we call & email people we
thought would be good candidates?
AND
How was the public engaged/notified that the City was in the process of reviewing the WSUM regulations?
I hope it's a brief answer.
THANK YOU,
Annette Thompson
952-496-1104
Council Member
City of Prior Lake
From:Pete Young
Sent:Thursday,May 5,2016 8:43:57 AM
To:Annette Thompson;Katy Gehler
Cc:Frank Boyles
Subject:RE:WSUM Question
Hi Annette.The state law was changed to address the timing of towing.Here’s the text from the MN DNR’s boating
guide:
Water-skiing, tubing, wake-surfing and similar acts are prohibited between one half hour after sunset to sunrise of the
following day”
http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/rlp/regulations/boatwater/boatingguide.pdf (see pages 2 and 33)
3
The local Prior Lake speed limits for nights and weekends/holidays currently start 1 hour after sunset,but during the
Task Force meetings I recall that Todd Beck recommended updating the timing of the local speed limits to match the
state towing rule which changed from 1 hour after sunset to hour after sunset.You are correct that the City can’t
propose less restrictive rules than the State the DNR would not approve them.Hope this helps to clarify.Thanks,
Pete
Pete Young,PE,CPESC
Water Resources Engineer City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake,MN 55372
952 447 9831 cityofpriorlake.com
From:Annette Thompson
Sent:Wednesday,May 04,2016 9:36 PM
To:Katy Gehler;Pete Young
Cc:Frank Boyles
Subject:WSUM Question
Katy or Pete,
Since the State has changed their speed limit requirements from 1 hour after sunset to 1/2 hour after sunset
does this mean
we also must do the same?Or can a City have a different regulation?
Did the State change the towing regulation from 1 hour after sunset to 1/2 hour after sunset?
I don't remember discussing that they did but I wanted to verify.
THANK YOU,
Annette Thompson
952 496 1104
Council Member
City of Prior Lake
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Frank Boyles
Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 9:14 AM
To:Katy Gehler
Cc:Pete Young
Subject:FW: My "Comment Card" from 4/28 Meeting at City Hall
We should have an answer.
This will go into the record like the others?
Thanks
From:Sarah Anderson mailto:saraheanderson@mac.com]
Sent:Wednesday,May 04,2016 7:24 PM
To:Rick Keeney rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Cc:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Ken Hedberg
khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Bryan Anderson bryananderson@mac.com>;Annette Thompson
athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>;Monique Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Mike McGuire
mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Frank Boyles FBoyles@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Ann Schroeder
aschroeder@cityofpriorlake.com>
Subject:Re:My Comment Card"from 4/28 Meeting at City Hall
Thank you for your reply Rick.
For clarification sake: We find it convenient, and with purpose, that none of the lakeshore owners on Twin
Island were notified of this.
No one asked us our thoughts or observations.
We received no notice of proposal via the mail. Our addresses are all known (the island does not have mail
service), as the proper taxes we are billed for (and paid promptly) make it to us without a hiccup.
Can you explain why did the city specifically not send the Island land owners notification of this proposal? We
found out by word of mouth only. That alone shows premeditation, bias, and is flat out unacceptable on any
level. And “extensive” community gathering of information frankly was not enough, biased, and at the moment
leaves us only in a better position legally if ever needed (PS- We spoke with Katie, and the city and county on
February. Ensured our correct address was had, and the previous address we had, still has a forward on it. As all
the other Prior Lake residents, we received nothing. We have no reason to believe at this time, especially given
the proposal, that this was purposeful).
Again, the city employee conceded that only 1 of the 13 studies supported boat restrictions would decrease land
erosion. Lots of people have strong opinions about Wake Boats, but City ordinances and regulations should be
based on facts not a select few options/perceptions.
If it’s actual been proven to cause erosion, pushing the issue to other lakeshore owners, and to be hit stronger
with it (as a smaller area possible easily equates that) is not acceptable, or understandable to us.
2
Water quality and erosion are lake issues, not certain parts of the lake issues. Increasing regulations in certain
parts of the lake is like giving those lakeshore owners a free pass on shoreline improvements. There should not
be any preferential treatment for certain lakeshore owners, we should all be treated equally.
It was communicated that one of the key benefits of the proposed regulation was increased safety South of Twin
Island. How does increasing Wake Boat traffic on the other parts of the lake not decrease safety for everyone
North of Twin Island? Having spent nearly every summer weekend on the lake the past 5 years, I
wholeheartedly disagree that boat traffic patterns will remain unchanged if these regulations are passed. If you
honestly believe that the majority of boat traffic patters will be unchanged, what’s the point of even proposing
these regulations?
This year’s proposal clearly gives South of Twin Island “preferred treatment” and distributes the lake traffic
burden to the rest of the lakeshore owners.
Again, Thank you for taking the time to respond with as much detail and explanation as you did. It was much
appreciated. Yet, we will continue to hold out hope for objective facts and fairness, and a decision that speaks to
such on Monday.
Until then,
Sarah and Bryan Anderson
3434 Twin Isles Circle
Prior Lake MN 55372
On May 3, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Rick Keeney <rkeeney@cityofpriorlake.com> wrote:
Ms.Anderson,
Thanks for your input.
One thing to keep in mind is that the proposed ordinance changes were the result of a lot of study and
consensus building with a lot of citizen input,the latest organized group being the WSUM task force a
group of people selected to have diverse points of view regarding lake usage.City staff is not so much
the driving force behind the desire for the increased regulations as much as other residents of Prior Lake
who are experiencing problems due to wake surf boats in their area of the lake.
For clarification,we are not talking about a complete No Wake”zone South of Twin island.Normal
boat traffic at speed,including skiing,tubing,and even recreational wake boarding with a normal wake
would still be permitted to go around Twin Island.The intent is to regulate only bow high”boat
operation producing an enhanced wake as employed primarily for wake surfing and advanced wake
boarding big air stunts.So the majority of boat traffic patterns would remain unchanged.I believe
there is not a significant safety risk shift caused by the proposed regulation.
The privilege of owning lakeshore comes with a responsibility to maintain that lakeshore.Even outside
of the issue of enhanced wake boats,I feel that there is additional regulation and/or enforcement
regarding the proper design and installation of shoreline improvements that would help prevent
detrimental impacts on lake water quality from wave and storm water erosion of the shore.If shore
improvements are properly designed to handle normal boat wake and wind waves,it is not a huge
additional burden to make them also durable against the occasional larger wake surf wake waves.I
intend to be a proponent of additional reugluation,enforcement,and most importantly education of
shore owners regarding best practices for maintaining the shore.
3
And boaters also have a responsibility to mitigate the impact they have on shore owners.Responsible
wake surf boat operators would know that their wake can cause damage to docks and shore
improvements and even if not regulated,would take care to stay as far away from shore as practical.
This issue is similar to many that the City Council faces where certain users of public resources are
causing an unwelcome impact or burden on other residents or neighborhoods.It is always very difficult
to find a good solution when there are directly conflicting desires.
The Task force did examine the idea of a no enhanced wake zone within 300’from shore type of
ordinance but there are difficulties in enforcing that because 300’is not marked with buoys.Also,
although it would produce a similar result in regards to the Twin Island area,it would also prohibit wake
surfing in many other bays on Upper and Lower Prior Lake leaving only the central portions of the main
parts of the lake open to that activity which was felt to be too drastic of a change.
In any case,whether we limit wake surfing by designating specific areas of the lake by bay,etc),or by
distance from the shore,or choose not to add any official regulation at all,there is a large component of
any regulation that is going to be a matter of educating the boaters as to what is allowed and where it is
allowed.
Rick
From:Sarah Anderson mailto:saraheanderson@mac.com]
Sent:Monday,May 2,2016 8:34 PM
To:Pete Young pyoung@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Katy Gehler kgehler@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Ken
Hedberg khedberg@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Rick Keeney rkeeney@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Monique
Morton mmorton@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>;Annette Thompson athompson@cityofpriorlake.com>;
Mike McGuire mmcguire@CityofPRIORLAKE.com>
Cc:Bryan Anderson bryananderson@mac.com>
Subject:My Comment Card"from 4/28 Meeting at City Hall
Mayor Hedberg, Prior Lake City Council Members, Mr. Young, and Ms. Gehler,
After attending the meeting on 4/28/16 at City Hall I have the following questions. Concerns and points of
reference:
1. The current definition of “South of Twin Isles Island”: This definition opens itself up too many
interpretations including everything south of the most north point of the island.
2. As I understand it, “Education” would be given to me and my husband about shoreline erosion for
lakeshore restoration but no actual funds. This is completely unacceptable, especially given the
representative for the City on Thursday 4/28/16 stated “We understand that if there is a problem that we
are pushing the problem to other lakeshore owners”.
a. This comment is very problematic for the city of Prior Lake as admitting, proactively with
complete knowledge and/or assumption of “pushing” a property “damage issue on to other lake
shore owners” opens the city up for lawsuits.
3. I am concerned with what appears to be bias level of information given at the education hearing on April
28, 2016. Although information was shared it was limited and biased towards what it appears the city
would like to occur. A few of the examples of such are below:
4
a. Example #1: it was listed that one boat rental company recently began demanding tutorial and
educational boat driving tours/ lessons for those renting the water crafts available through their
company. Did not mention contacting, or agreement of the other companies providing the same
service (Prior Late Pontoon Rental, Knotty Orr Marina, etc.).
b. Example #2: it was stated that other lakes “including Lake Minnetonka” are looking at similar
ordinances. However, the city representative did not state if in fact any ordinance similar to what
Prior Lake is proposing has ACTUALLY been passed.
c. It was stated by the city representative conducting the educational information meeting that 13
studies were reviewed when the task force was coming up with recommendations. Only one of
the 13 studies recommended that a possible boat restriction or recreational use ordinance be
implemented to have the level of lakeshore erosion decrease. That is only 7.5% of the research
conducted, and hence the such research only recommended this but did not prove that it would
be effective in the city’s ultimate goal of diminishing lakeshore erosion.
4. There were four reasons listed for the proposed area to be part of the new proposed ordinance, one of
which included the high level of boat traffic. When asked, no such study was actually done regarding the
actual full boat traffic levels as it pertained to upper prior Lake, but rather stated that it was based in
perception or opinion alone.
a. The current proposal will put the north side of Twin Isles Island and Lone Tree Island at great
risk for both an increase in traffic as well as shoreline erosion as boaters will most certainly be
utilizing the area for a “turnaround” recreationally.
b. Prior to any boat traffic statements being stated in a factual manner I the city, is recommended
and requested that actual boat traffic studies be concluded prior.
a. And doing such I believe that the safety concerns of having multiple recreational
boaters moving at high speeds through the north side of Twin Isles Island will be a very
large risk, as many recreational boaters anchor there and have multiple swimmers in the
area.
b. The swimmers from the island, as well as from the anchored boats, which include my
children..... are not at any lower rate of priority than the swimmers listed at the Willows
Beach area. Risk is Risk. A life is a life. Listing numbers regarding this is nothing but
both repulsive as well as beyond biased. It also again puts the city at yet another risk.
5. Safety/Crowding; in section 3.3 Public Safety (page10) the report states; “as use of the lake goes up,
crowding on the lake and its impact on public safety has become a concern”. By restricting certain types
of boat traffic in an already congested, narrow body of water, to one area of the lake, how do the new
restrictions address the safety/crowding concern?
a. What studies/research/science is leading to the new recommendations? “The DeWitte Public
Access area has MORE shoreline impacts than other areas of Prior Lake.” How exactly did the
Task Force reach this conclusion?
b. How was it determined which shorelines required protections and which did not?
6. Do you foresee the new proposals creating any safety concerns (increased “crowding”) by moving all
towing on Upper Prior to one area, potentially moving users from Spring to Prior, and perhaps moving all
towing to Lower Prior?
7. As resented, it appears a 200 or 250, even 300 foot lakeshore ordinance of no wake board boats is in order.
Thank you,
Sarah Anderson
3434 Twin Isles Circle
Prior Lake MN 55372
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Andy Larson <anverllarson@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:44 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Prior/Spring Lake restrictions
Mr.Young,
I wanted to send a quick email letting you know I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake.I feel that this issue is
probably caused by a few bad apples and that with proper education and enforcement of the existing rules the problem
could be resolved.
Should Prior Lake choose to limit uses,I will take my boat and tourism dollars elsewhere.
Thanks,
Anver Larson
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Doug McMillan <dmcmillan@tmsmn.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:51 PM
To:Pete Young
Cc:jeffp@rscminnesota.com
Subject:New Boating Regulation
Hello Pete Young,
I have just heard of the new proposal that the Prior Lake City Council is considering. As a veteran of lake shore living
White Bear Lake, Pine Tree Lake, St. Croix River, Lake Minnetonka and now on Twin Lakes in Crystal) I don't even have
to ask to know that a minority (most likely just one individual!) is at the root cause of this rule.
I would like to know if this rule will be put before and voted on by each and every owner of lake shore? This would be
the truly democratic way of moving forward with such a discriminating rule. If the majority of the tax paying owners of
the lake shore find the issue of water tow sports to be an issue, then an impartial vote would be appropriate.
But for the city council to take this matter to hand at the request of one or a minority of individuals without putting the
issue up for a vote by the majority would be a mistake and an injustice.
And how will this rule be interpreted and enforced? Will one be allowed to operate their boats at lower speeds if not
involved in tow sports?
I will welcome your response to my questions that I have asked you above.
Many thanks,
Doug McMillan
Tousley Motorsports
1400 East County Road E
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
651-483-8296 Ext. 184
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Mickey <mickeyk118@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 6:03 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Prior Lake
Peter,I also wonder about the large wake"some boaters produce.However it takes money to buy and operate
those boats.You have a potential cash cow on your hands.If your lake is in the top ten then you already have the
audience.Set up the first annual free ride competition and use their entry fees to protect improve the lake helping to
relieve the tax burden on the residents?
Best regards,Mickey
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Scott B <ScottB@excellmp.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:54 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:FW: Our Fun is Being Threatened! We Need Help!
From: Waterskis.com & Wakeboards.com [mailto:sales@waterskis.ccsend.com] On Behalf Of Waterskis.com &
Wakeboards.com
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 2:39 PM
To: scottb@excellmp.com
Subject: Our Fun is Being Threatened! We Need Help!
Prior Lake Needs Your Help!
We Need Your Help!
As you may be aware, our way of life and fun is being threatened on both Prior and Spring
lakes. There's proposed legislation that
specifically target boats engaged in wake sports. Here's the actual language, this is a
violation: Operation of a boat in a sustained, artificially bow‐high manner south of Twin
Isle.
As a friend of water sports, we're asking you to help oppose this action. Why?
‐ If the water sports community doesn't stand up, local government, the DNR and the state
will think the small group of people who want more rules are the majority. They react to a
consensus.
‐ The proposed rulings specifically targets wake and surf boats, it's important to take the
target off these boats.
‐ Prior lake is a top 10 for boaters in Minnesota. Any toe hold for more rulings bolsters
efforts on other lakes to enact similar, restrictive legislation.
2
‐ The local government doesn't see the economic impact when people don't choose to live
on lakes with restrictions and buy expensive boats and shop elsewhere.
Check out this short video to learn how the negative economic impact is felt with declining
home values, lost business and declining tax revenues for cities when restrictive legislation
causes the people who spend to move elsewhere: https://vimeo.com/75923021
Restrictive legislation can happen anywhere, that's why you need to stand up against it
now. How to do it? Please consider doing both of these.
#1. Right now, please send an email to Pete Young, Prior Lake Water Resources
Engineer:
Email address: pyoung@cityofpriorlake.com
Subject line: I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Copy this body text line: I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South
of Twin Isle
#2. Attend this critical city council meeting:
Their intent is to draft legislative language at this meeting. Please show up to voice your
opposition.
May 9, 7pm
Prior Lake City Hall
4646 Dakota St. SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Waterskis.com & Wakeboards.com, 5160 West Broadway, Crystal, MN 55429
SafeUnsubscribe™ scottb@excellmp.com
Forward this email | Update Profile | About our service provider
Sent by eric@waterskis.com in collaboration with
3
Try it free today
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7596 / Virus Database: 4568/12198 - Release Date: 05/09/16
1
Ann Schroeder
From:erichynnek@comcast.net
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:35 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject: I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Dear sir,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Any legislation such as this proposed that singles out any group and seeks to attack or limit liberties enjoyed by
that group is an attack on all our liberty, and a certainly no business for any government agency to consider.
That would be a violation of the public trust, even if a vast, though very vocal, minority presses any such issue.
There must be several better ways for the council to more appropriately direct it's time and resources.
Respectfully,
Eric Hynnek
651-210-1220
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Davenport, Griff <gdavenport@DLRGROUP.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:08 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Bow high ordinance off DeWitte access
Mr. Young,
My name is Griff Davenport and I am a full-time resident add 3478 Sycamore Trail on prior Lake.
Due to travel constraints I have not been able to make it to any of the recent conversations or tonight's hearing
regarding the above proposed ordinance.
I want to offer my support for any of the proposed ordinances that provides for control of the use of bow high
boats in the area adjacent to the DeWitte access and twin Island.
In my opinion the shoreline and shoreline structures along these stretches of the lake are unusually impacted by
the extraordinary waves that hit our shoreline as a result of the use of these boats.
In my 2 1/2 years on the lake, I have repaired my Lake wall twice due to the ravages of mother nature as well as
the "vandalism" contributed by excessive wake from these boats. Additionally, I had to replace a floating dock
that was so adversely affected by the wave action of these boats that the hinges holding dock sections together
had to be replaced and ultimately could not be replaced any further necessitating the purchase of a new dock.
I can completely understand my responsibility for maintenance and repair on my shoreline caused by mother
nature. I have a much more difficult time excepting responsibility for damages offered by the wave action of
these boats for purely recreational reasons.
In conclusion, I am very much in support of any ordinance that would restrict the use of these bow high boats in
the area between the DeWitte launch and Twin Island.
Sincerely,
Griff Davenport
Resident
Griff Davenport, AIA
DLR GROUP, CEO
O: 612-977-3500
D: 612-977-3501
M: 612-875-9055
Listen.DESIGN.Deliver
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:greg.lori@comcast.net
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:18 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed Prior Lake boating restrictions
Mr Young,
I wanted to write to you in order to voice my opposition to the proposed boating restrictions South of
Twin Isle on Prior Lake. I am an active member of the boating and water sports community and I
think it is unwise to restrict water sports on Minnesota waters. I have just recently (last summer)
taken up the sport of wake surfing at the ripe age of 46. I still try to waterski a few times a year, but in
all honesty, the slow speeds and softer landings from crashes in wake surfing are much more
attractive to me than the grand wipe-outs I still manage when slalom skiing. When we go out we
always bring a group of friends and we tend to spend a fair amount of money in the communities we
boat in.
I would appreciate it if you could inform the Council of any opposition to this proposed legislation that
you are receiving.
Regards,
Greg Ackerson
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Josh Schafer <joman13@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:46 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions.
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Josh Schafer
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Johnson, Luke <Luke.Johnson@optum.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:58 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Dear Pete,
I am opposed to the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Thanks for your attention and for listening to all of the people involved, even those that use the lake for recreation.
Sincerely,
Luke Johnson
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Chad Devereaux <chad.devereaux@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:54 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake.
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Best Regards
Chad Devereaux
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Empire HydroSports <sales@empirehydrosports.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:21 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Adam Hagen
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Peterson, Matthew <Matthew.Peterson@karlstorz.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 9:20 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Matt Peterson
Karl Storz Endoscopy
Senior Field Service Technician
Cell: 763‐370‐5174
Email: matthew.peterson@karlstorz.com
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Adam Krause <akrause75@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 9:04 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Adam Krause #75
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Aaron <aarong248@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 7:14 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
I use the lake weekly in the summer and don't support these initiatives. I believe lake property owners should be
responsible for maintaining their property with properly designed lakeshore.
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Jeff Christensen <jeffpeterchristensen@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 11:35 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. My family trailers our boat every week
to Prior Lake. Following the traffic flow at low speeds for wake surfing is not a danger. I've witnessed multiple boats
traveling at high speeds in tight spaces on plane, which is much more dangerous that a high wake.
Jeff Christensen
Rosemount, MN
651‐336‐2289
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Dan Iler <dzsprocket@hotmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 9:22 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Dan Iler
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Mikey <wakemikey@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:57 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. Homeowners who object to erosion
almost always lack vegetation near the shoreline along with fertilized grass down to the shore. THIS is a REAL problem
that should be dealt with, not a small population who object to boat wakes.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:ahansondpt@gmail.com
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:51 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Les Hamilton <Les.Hamilton@comcast.net>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:44 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Les Hamilton
1
Ann Schroeder
From:cdk.jk@comcast.net
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:43 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Pete, I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Roy Knafla
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Chris n Cheryl Helget <helgets@msn.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:41 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Helget, Chris <chris.helget@orbitalatk.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:38 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Sent from my iPhone
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Notice: This e‐mail is intended solely for use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader is not the
intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. This communication may
also contain data subject to U.S. export laws. If so, that data subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulation
cannot be disseminated, distributed or copied to foreign nationals, residing in the U.S. or abroad, absent the express
prior approval of the U.S. Department of State. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the
sender by reply e‐mail and destroy the e‐mail message and any physical copies made of the communication. Thank you.
********** **********
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Brian Block <briankblock@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:36 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Paul,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. I believe this proposal will result in a
lawsuit related to public access lakes that will cost the city more than any water restrictions value. Look no further than
the ongoing public litigation cost to the DNR to implement muskie in public access lakes and you can appreciate that
trying to implement restrictions will only result in lawyers making money.
Regards,
Brian Block
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Kevin <kevind131@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:33 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Rider, Jacob <Jacob.Rider@deluxe.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:23 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Thanks.
Jacob Rider | Executive Director, Client Delivery
3660 Victoria St N | Shoreview, MN 55126
p 651.490.8013 | x528013 | c 715.529.2963
Jacob.Rider@deluxe.com
Deluxe | fi.deluxe.com
NOTE: The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by
persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Jeff Reistad <jeffreistad@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:11 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Nici Ahrenholz <toddnici@hotmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:50 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I suppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Please take this into consideration when making decisions pertaining to his issue.
Thank You.
Mrs. Nici Ahrenholz
Willmar, MN
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Tom Belisle <thomasbelisle@me.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:50 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
These ridiculous restrictions pave the way for people to complain about and try to stop any activity they don't care for. If
there is a real problem with the shoreline then restrict all boating and wakes on the lake all together. The people
complaining about wakeboard boats will rescind their complaints fairly quickly if all wakes and boat types are all
included.
Regards,
Tom Belisle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Chris Rust <cerust@dannysconstruction.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:49 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Pete:
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Regards,
Christopher E. Rust P.E. | Vice President
Danny's Construction Company, LLC | 1066 W. 3rd Ave, Shakopee, MN
55379
952.445.4143 tel | 952.403.5610 dir | 612.366.4901 cell
www.dannysconstruction.com
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Dena Hoffman <hoffman.dena@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:41 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
We moved here 6 years ago and have found a home in Prior Lake. The possible restrictions to be put on the
lake have me and my young family very worried. We moved here to enjoy the recreation of the lake and all that
it has to offer. We feel as though the city just keeps trying to put restrictions on recreation at the lake. Our
community needs to realize that activities are going to evolve and change and our city needs to change with
it. We have invested a lot of our time and money into our home on Prior Lake. If these changes go into effect,
this will only deter guests and possible residents from moving onto Prior. I beg you to consider opposing the
potential changes.
Sincerely,
Dena Hoffman
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Nancy Olsen <olsen.nancy1@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:14 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on prior lake
I live on Prior Lake and oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on prior lake south of twin isle Sent from my iPad
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Jim Ross <Jim.Ross@peregrine.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:11 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Dear Mr. Young,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake south of Twin Isle. Restricting
recreational use of Minnesota’s greatest asset, it’s lakes, seems inconsistent with Minnesota
values and resource management.
Sincerely,
Jim Ross
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Tim Wicks <wixworx@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:12 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Thank you,
Tim Wicks
Sent from my iPad
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Eric Chinnock <emchinnock@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:04 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Hi Pete,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Thanks much for your time,
Eric Chinnock
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Mercil, Timothy <timothy.c.mercil@medtronic.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:03 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
[CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to
Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are
not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you
are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases,
please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the
following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser:
http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com
1
Ann Schroeder
From:brad mitchell <bradmitch1@hotmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:59 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Brad Mitchell
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Brady Anderson <bradycanderson@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:38 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Brady Anderson
1
Ann Schroeder
From:BrianDahl <bdahl01@comcast.net>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:24 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
BrianDahl
bdahl01@comcast.net
952‐356‐2334
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Darin Knapp <knapphome@me.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:22 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake south of Twin Isle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:John Ryan <jryan.55364@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:20 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Cory Lenz <corylenz8@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:07 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. Make sure this law does not go through.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Corey King <corey@waterskis.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:04 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. Please do not pass legislation that a
minority of the community are pushing for. Both Prior and Spring Lake are excellent places for recreation of all sorts.
Restricting the usage of these waters will have a negative impact of the vast majority of water enthusiasts. Personally
the lake is one of my favorite places to be in the summer. I cannot express to you how much this will be a detriment to
my family. The Lakes of Minnesota are what bring us together, please do not allow a minority of individuals ruin this
asset for the majority of responsible boat owners.
Sincerely,
Corey King
Sales Manager
Midwest MasterCraft
5160 West Broadway Ave
Crystal, MN 55429
E - corey@waterskis.com
P - 800.625.9666 Ext. 303
F - 763.537.7299 Ext. 303
please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE : This e‐mail is intended for the sole use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any
dissemination, duplication, or distribution of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated
agent is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e‐mail in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this e‐mail.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Chris McLean <christophermclean@hotmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:01 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Corey King <coreyjking@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:59 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Pete,
I am writing to let you know that I am opposed to restrictions on Prior Lake. I work HARD to ensure that my
family has a boat to use in the summer and restricting the time we can use our boat means less time with family
and friends. Boating is our passion and one that includes our ENTIRE family. The lakes are a treasure for our
state, I am appalled at the notion of restricting the usage on one of our very best. Shall we start restricting biking
on designated trails? Hiking? This is a senseless proposition that will negatively impact not only my family but
the economic welfare of our community.
Sincerely,
Corey King
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Erik Saari <driven_esaari@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:59 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Pete,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Thank you,
Erik Saari
1
Ann Schroeder
From:John W. Meara <John@meara.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:55 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I personally own two MasterCraft boats in Minnesota and I oppose watercraft restrictions on
all Minnesota Lakes…. John W. Meara
John W. Meara, CPA, ABV, CFE, CFF
John@Meara.com
(816) 561-3838 Direct
(816) 210-6900 Cell Phone
Meara Welch Browne, P.C.
1239 Orange Court
Marco Island, FL 34145
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Ryan Bielat <ryan.bielat@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:52 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Pete,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Thank you,
--
Ryan Bielat
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Chad Beckius <cbeckius@crenlo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:51 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. I am a conscious boat owner who enjoys
all boating water sports activities, and would hate to see restrictions added to your lake.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Darren Envall <denvall@nmma.org>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:50 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Hi Pete:
Please note I strongly oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. Both wake surfing
and wake boarding are activities I enjoy and should be able to participate in on Prior Lake. Feel free to contact me at
612.360.5107 if you would like to discuss in greater detail.
Regards,
Darren Envall
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Tim <happyharryjr@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:50 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Pete,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Tim Harris
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Fred Lang <flang@consultingit.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:48 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Hello City officials,
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Fred Lang
flang@consultingit.com
612.590.8549 (C)
763.390.1460 (W)
763.486.1369 (Fax)
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Braden Dent <bradydent007@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:47 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
i oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Braden Dent 586-925-0847
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Nick Gargaro IV <nick4@northernwholesale.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:43 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Nick Gargaro IV
Phone: 651‐407‐1450
www.extrememax.com
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Andrew Davidson <davidsona1991@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:26 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on prior lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on prior lake south of twin isle.
Andrew Davidson
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Eric Sakowski <emsakowski@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:20 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
Eric Sakowski
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Christopher Tadevich <ctadevich@hotmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 7:54 AM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Chris Tadevich
612‐730‐1079
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Conrad Ketelsen <conradksemail@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:54 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake and Spring lake
Regards,
Conrad Ketelsen
2300 Raymond Ave
Jordan, MN 55352
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:dennis.surkamp@buhlergroup.com
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:02 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:: I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Pete Young
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle. Prior Lake has been a great water sport
resource for myself and family. There are plenty of restrictions already in place, and I am opposed of new restrictions
being proposed by the city or county. Thanks You Dennis Surkamp
Dennis Surkamp
Field Service Technician
BuhlerPrince, Inc.
Holland, Michigan USA
T +1 616 394 8210
F +1 616 394 1247
mailto:dennis.surkamp@buhlergroup.com
www.buhlerprince.com
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential,
may be legally privileged and is designated exclusively
for the intended recipient. Access by any other person is
not authorised. Any disclosure of this e-mail or of names
of persons mentioned therein as well as any storing,
copying, distribution and dissemination is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
delete this e-mail and notify the sender by phone or by e-mail.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Willander, Scott <Scott.Willander@adm.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:48 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on prior lake
I oppose the proposed water craft restrictions on prior lake south of Twin Isle
Confidentiality Notice:
This message may contain confidential or privileged information, or information that is otherwise
exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you should promptly delete it and
should not disclose, copy or distribute it to others.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Ken Zylstra <KZylstra@LifeTimeFitness.com>
Sent:Friday, May 06, 2016 11:23 AM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Hello Mr. Young
I’ve lived on Prior Lake for +20 years and enjoy all elements of lake life (motorized & non-motorized). I’m a skier, a paddler, a fisherman
and someone who enjoys and respects others. Please do not put restrictions on our lake.
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Regards
Ken Zylstra
1579 Fairbanks trail ne
Life Time – The Healthy Way of Life Company, 2902 Corporate Place, Chanhassen, MN 55317.
Life Time Fitness: https://www.lifetimefitness.com/en.html
Unsubscribe: https://www.lifetimefitness.com/en/membership/unsubscribe.html
Privacy Policy: https://www.lifetimefitness.com/en/policy/privacy-policy.html
Life Time Fitness may monitor email communications. This email may contain confidential or proprietary information.
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Rick Eberhart <rickeberhart@yahoo.com>
Sent:Friday, May 06, 2016 8:45 AM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Thanks
Rick Eberhart
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Dustin Vaverek <DVaverek@boserconstruction.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 9:30 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on prior lake
I oppose the propised watercraft restrictions on prior lake south of twin
Dustin Vaverek
Sent from my cellular phone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:David Overbo <davidoverbo@hotmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 7:57 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
Best regards,
David
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Dan Hoffman <danwhoffman@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:17 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Al Lerberg <al@cybersecurityrecruiters.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:09 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I oppose the propped water restrictions on Prior lake!
We went through this same exercise with jet skis a few years back. How will you enforce, what will that cost?
Al LERBERG
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Mike Parks <mparks@northerningredients.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:51 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I strongly oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
There are many boat that move much faster than wake surfers and create more of a danger then somebody enjoying a
sport that moves at 11‐13 miles per hr. on very short rope.
Tubing? Monstrous tubes, multiple tubes. Whipping around making major wakes turning in circles.
It is too bad it is all the things my kids enjoy the most!
Thank you
Mike Parks
Northern Ingredients/Northwestern Foods/Oziama
1260 Grey Fox rd. Arden Hills, MN 55112
mparks@northerningredients.com
763.228.2001 Mobile Number
651.789.6690 Main number
651.789.5486 Direct to desk
651.789.6699 Fax
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Dave Haas <dwhaas@comcast.net>
Sent:Friday, May 06, 2016 12:04 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:I support the proposed wake restrictions on Prior Lake
Hi Pete,
I am a resident of another TC lake and received a bulk mail request from mnwaterski.org asking me to email you to
register my concern with the new Prior Lake ordinance. Little did they know that I not only enjoy water sports but I am
also concerned about the environment.
Our Lake Assoc is considering suggesting a similar ordinance in our city for our lake. Many of us love water sports and
don't want to limit use of the lake unless the activities are really harmful to the environment.
The question we are struggling with is how much damage are the big wakes really inflicting on our shorelines. If we can
prove it's having a significant effect than we'll move forward. But if it's just one group not agreeing with another's
definition of recreation than the battle becomes much more complicated.
I support your battle to save our environment. We will be watching your situation closely to see if we can learn from
your effort.
Good Luck!
David W. Haas
(763) 416‐2000
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Peter Erickson <peterjerickson@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:04 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Lake Ordinances
Pete -
I attended the recent overview of the proposed lake ordinances but I am not able to attend the public hearing
tonight. I am a homeowner on Prior Lake and wanted to pass along that I support the various ordinances
proposed with the exception of the no-wake zone south of Twin Isle. I understand the rationale and it can be
hard at times battling the massive waves heavy wave boats emit but after weighing the pros and cons, I believe
that creating such a restriction will cause greater problems going forward to all individuals who enjoy the
lake. Thus, I would advocate that suggested change be removed. What I would advocate for is education for
big wakesurfing and wakeboard boats. I think they are great activities to be enjoyed; however, many
participants drive all over the lake in circles and thus ruin the water from all directions for other recreational
boaters, skiers, paddle boarders, etc. It's not about restricting where such boats go or their equal ability to
enjoy the lake - hence being opposed to the ordinance restriction - but rather common courtesy to pick an open
area while pulling an individual versus wandering everywhere and crossing into the spaces others are using at
the time.
Thank you.
Peter Erickson
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Hilton McDonald <hiltonmc@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:31 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:lake restrictions
Subject line: I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake
Copy this body text line: I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle
I moved from a private lake for this very reason. I find it very inapprpopriate to impose new unecessary regulations and
rules on the masses to appease a few.
This is something that effect water sports every where!
Sincerely
R H McDonald
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Doug McMillan <dmcmillan@tmsmn.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 5:51 PM
To:Pete Young
Cc:jeffp@rscminnesota.com
Subject:New Boating Regulation
Hello Pete Young,
I have just heard of the new proposal that the Prior Lake City Council is considering. As a veteran of lake shore living
(White Bear Lake, Pine Tree Lake, St. Croix River, Lake Minnetonka and now on Twin Lakes in Crystal) I don't even have
to ask to know that a minority (most likely just one individual!) is at the root cause of this rule.
I would like to know if this rule will be put before and voted on by each and every owner of lake shore? This would be
the truly democratic way of moving forward with such a discriminating rule. If the majority of the tax paying owners of
the lake shore find the issue of water tow sports to be an issue, then an impartial vote would be appropriate.
But for the city council to take this matter to hand at the request of one or a minority of individuals without putting the
issue up for a vote by the majority would be a mistake and an injustice.
And how will this rule be interpreted and enforced? Will one be allowed to operate their boats at lower speeds if not
involved in tow sports?
I will welcome your response to my questions that I have asked you above.
Many thanks,
Doug McMillan
Tousley Motorsports
1400 East County Road E
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
651-483-8296 Ext. 184
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Andy Larson <anverllarson@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:44 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Prior/Spring Lake restrictions
Mr. Young,
I wanted to send a quick email letting you know I oppose the proposed restrictions on Prior Lake. I feel that this issue is
probably caused by a few bad apples and that with proper education and enforcement of the existing rules the problem
could be resolved.
Should Prior Lake choose to limit uses, I will take my boat and tourism dollars elsewhere.
Thanks,
Anver Larson
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Mickey <mickeyk118@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 6:03 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Prior Lake
Peter, I also wonder about the "large wake" some boaters produce. However it takes money to buy and operate
those boats. You have a potential cash cow on your hands. If your lake is in the top ten then you already have the
audience. Set up the first annual free ride competition and use their entry fees to protect / improve the lake helping to
relieve the tax burden on the residents?
Best regards, Mickey
Sent from my iPhone
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Timothy Robb <tgrobb@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:24 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Ridiculous waste of taxpayer money.
Any ban on wakeboard boats on any public water is an abuse of power by the government.
Let these people live their life and have fun.
Sent from my iPhone F7
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Jeff Krall <jeff@kralleyeclinic.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:13 PM
To:Pete Young
I oppose the proposed watercraft restrictions on Prior Lake South of Twin Isle.
This is a bad idea and unneeded restriction of lake use
Jeff krall
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Corniea, James <James.Corniea@smith-nephew.com>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:53 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:Wave restrictions are short sighted and ineffective
Unless the effect is to pat yourself on the back thinking you accomplished something beneficial to your community. Prior
Lake is a recreational lake and that's that. It gets packed and busy and crowded and even a little nerve wracking at times.
But you know what? That train has left the station. If you want to unload your canoe from your Suburu Outback and
here the birds and smell the breeze YOU CAN DO IT IN 90% OF MINNESOTA LAKES! The percentage of lakes that can be
utilized for fuel powered water sports is tiny in comparison. If the small group of homeowners that are somewhat
confused about where they purchased property are able to make decisions for the rest of us, the damage will be clearly
felt. Water sports helped establish that lake to what it is, and surfing isn't going away. So learn to surf!
It's like going to an AC/DC concert and asking the people in front of to to sit down. Awareness...meet situation.
I have a 5 week old daughter (that I hope is surfing Prior Lake in 4 years) so I will not be able to attend the city council
meeting tonight. But if you do a head count don't pass me over. I'm going to be on this until it disappears.
Thanks for your effort and consideration.
James
James Corniea
Adult Reconstruction Sales
Smith & Nephew
952 220 2610
1
Ann Schroeder
From:Mike Baldwin <Mike.Baldwin@integra.net>
Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 4:18 PM
To:Pete Young
Subject:WSUM comments
I have lived on Spring Lake for 28 years –
The only part of the WSUM proposal I am in favor of is the High water –slow no wake
ordinance.
All the others can be kept in place on Prior but NOT on Spring.
Spring and Prior are two totally different lakes – what might be good for Prior is not good for
Spring.
If Prior in one to the top 10 busiest lake in MN then where does Spring rate??? – I am sure not
in the top 100.
A 150 ft no wake zone is not enforceable with a few bouys scattered around the lake and I
don’t the sheriff is going to patrol spring lake any more than before.
If you want to do something constructive with water quality then do a study to see how much
the sea gull shit goes in the lake when the thousands of sea gulls sit on the lake for months
during the spring and fall
migration.
Have the city council pass an ordinance keeping them from shiting in the lake. It would be
about as enforceable as a 150ft no wake zone on Spring Lake.
2743 Spring Lake Rd Sw.
Mike Baldwin
Home Email account
Right-click download help protecOutlook prautomatic dthi s pi ctu reIn ternet.Avast logo
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
2
1- 3856 Green Heights Trl SW, 3859 Green Heights Trl SW, 3950 Green Heights Trl SW, 3915 Green
Heights Trl SW, Lot 7 Green Heights First Addition. ALL on or across street from UPPER PRIOR.
2- Proposed Restrictions are Complaint Driven, NOT based on Prior Lake Research &
Measurements.
3- EDUCATION was mentioned >30X in the Final Report yet the task force isn't recommending
EDUCATION,COMMUNICATION, &SIGNAGE.
4- INCONSISTENT implementation &enforcement of Current 150ft marker buoys,<10 on Sunday in
the area south of Twin Island.
5- ENFORCEMENT of Current& Proposed Restrictions. See PLA Stats on Sheriffs current
capabilities. Shockingly low for a Top 10 Busiest MN Lake.
6- FUNDING; who pays for new markers,education,sheriffs office training& personnel? Page 6
final report;with 1 full time deputy occasionally supplemented by temporary employees
assigned to ALL Scott County lakes and rivers, how does the Task Force foresee the new
restrictions being trained to the sheriff's office? How will the new restrictions help with
improving response times?
7- Crowding/Public Safety; Page 10 final report; "as use of the lake goes up, crowding on the lake
and its impact on public safety has become a concern". By restricting certain types of boat
traffic in an already congested, narrow body of water,to one area of the lake, how do the new
restrictions address the safety/crowding concern?
8- Property Owner Responsibility; Owners need to take personal accountability for property
maintenance and improvements.The latter is a regular operating necessity of living on any body
of water...not something that requires new regulations in hopes of a zero maintenance
plan. My advice to the complainants is to do what the rest of us do; invest in your shoreline
with proper boulders and buffering.
9- Slippery Slope; WSUM task force is a wolf in sheeps clothing. LY WSUM wanted 300ft,TY its
Twin Island. NY based on complaints,who knows and when does it stop?
10- Legal Scope of WSUM vs Property Owners Rights vs Lake Users Rights.
11- High Water Levels; personal observation, started 3 yrs ago with floods.
PR/04,
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
4zNNESO e
PUBLIC HEARING
Public Hearing for Revisions to City Code 703 Public Water Relating to Water Surface Use
Management
SIGN BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK
Name Address
C PAS rQ/2it G Ow .u1 S i c('C p f,eV w
6/er 72/e/ • t?i'/ L9 / /56
rik i S S17)(3/- (--- 5 ve
c:.t 0vio r-c it
iµ4 L-16\ 00 ( n r\ 119, _ LkA erc. __6‘
NrMcciciccs 3666 LC)LC; 60-4C 11 S vCelt1 4r ICI L kc—=
2-,--Pc -5 c- k,3e57;/Sct)
you./1 „.._40270 p.„(4_ 4u.e cE
I
e GLk.)
14(L5A-6,. /LoA_
1A i B 14,a 4257 C0.4„, b5E-, / Aiz
1 , 11 1c VVv /\
Phone 952.447.9800/Fax 952.447.4245/www.cityofpriorlake.
cc
om
r .• --Dt___ ( c_- H ( - c( /2 (N,i --)
4 4 1 '1.•,---
7 --
j (,? /--,t 1 6,, c/ 3 (, ,, ,6-' „ ---
a n
2 s C
4 /fA ) ,--) 3
7 ,,oci2,/, -,3 ,, , r
rd, 57.
i7 , ,_ , _7 \L„.,,, , ,„_ , .._, ,_ c v__ --,, L .