HomeMy WebLinkAbout9A Summit Preserve Prelim Plat Presentation6/29/2016
1
June 27, 2016
Summary of Actions Required by the
Planning Commission and City Council:
PC and CC: Approve rezoning the property from PUD to R-2 (a
Comp Plan amendment to 100% medium density residential in the
Planned Use District was approved by the Met Council).
PC and CC: Approve a Preliminary Plat for Summit Preserve.
PC: Approved a Conditional Use Permit for Cluster Housing in the
R-2 Use District.
PC: Approved two variances related to the Cluster Housing design,
including front yard setbacks and minimum lot depth.
6/29/2016
2
6/29/2016
3
6/29/2016
4
The Basics of the Proposed Preliminary Plat for
Summit Preserve:
Total gross acreage = 54.8; total net acreage = 39.0 (71% of gross).
Total units = 193 (71 single family lots + 122 townhome units).
Single family lots: 23 @ 60’ width + 48 @ 70’ width.
Net density = 4.95 dwelling units per acre (R-2 range = 4.1 – 7.0)
All public streets; north/south street is a minor collector.
Park dedication = 10% x 39 net acres = 3.9 acres; 1 acre dedicated,
to be combined into a larger park for the expanded 140-acre area.
Utilities: sewer/water to connect with existing system south of CSAH
42 and west of CSAH 18 (two sewer options are still under review);
water booster station to be installed.
Trees: 69% allowable removal; 21% saved (with heritage tree
credit); 10% to be replaced.
6/29/2016
5
6/29/2016
6
6/29/2016
7
Conditions of Plat Approval:
The applicant shall obtain the required permits from other state or
local agencies prior to any work on the site.
The applicant shall revise the plans in accordance with the
requirements contained in the memorandum from the
Engineering/Public Works Departments dated May 26, 2016.
The applicant shall revise the plans in accordance with the
requirements contained in the memorandum from the Community
Development Department dated May 26, 2016.
The applicant shall revise the plans in accordance with the
recommendations of Scott County in its letter dated June 7, 2016;
however, further discussion needs to take place regarding the
closure of Kensington Ave. at CSAH 42 before a final decision is
made on that issue.
Questions
6/29/2016
8
6/29/2016
9
6/29/2016
10
6/29/2016
11