Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3- July 5 2016 PC Meeting Minutes rough draft 1 PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, July 5, 2016 1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Fleming called the Tuesday, July 5, 2016 Prior Lake Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Bryan Fleming, Mark Petersen and Bill Kallberg. Also present were Director Dan Rogness, City Planner Jeff Matzke, Project Engineer Seng Thongvahn and Service Assistant Sandra Woods. 2. Approval of Agenda: MOTION BY PETERSEN, SECONDED BY KALLBERG TO APPROVE THE TUESDAY, JULY 5, 2016 PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. 3. Approval of Monday, June 20, 2016 Meeting Minutes: MOTION BY KALLBERG, SECONDED BY PETERSEN TO APPROVE THE MONDAY, JUNE 20, 2016 PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. 4. Public Hearings: A. DEV16-000006 – Maple Place – Preliminary Plat – The property owner is proposing a preliminary plat on approximately five acres for twelve single family lots within the proposed Low Density (R-1) Zoning District. The subject property is located southeast of Highway 13; north of 176th Street SW and west of Sunray Blvd. SW. PID: 25-801-031-0. Planner Matzke introduced the request for the Preliminary Plat to be known as Maple Place to be developed as a 12 unit, low density residential subdivision. The subject property is located south of Langford Boulevard (State Trunk Highway 13) and west of Skinner Street. He explained the history, current circumstances, issues, alternatives and recommended motion. He presented a location map, development plans dated June 9, 2016, Engineering/Public Works Department memorandum dated October 6, 2014 and Community Development Department memorandum dated June 29, 2016. Project Engineer Thongvahn explained the streets, utilities and grading plans on the project. Commission Comments/Questions: Fleming thanked Planner Matzke for explanation in the reasoning for the delay and he explained the delay. He said the new developer using the same preliminary plat seeking approval tonight. Planner Matzke said that is correct; it is the same plat. Kallberg commented on setbacks exception in the report. Planner Matzke explained the setbacks have been addressed to satisfy the City setbacks. He said there is no variance or exceptions needed for the setbacks; they will meet our standard setbacks. Kallberg commented on sheet eight of the report regarding the proposed/existing are reversed labeled. Petersen asked about the plat being on Highway 13 and the County being involved. Planner Matzke replied it is a State Highway and he explained the State’s comments. Petersen asked if there were any concern about expansion or the size of the or the paths. 2 Planner Matzke explained that the State had no comments on this. He said it was okayed. He explained the right-of-way and the ditch areas for possible underground storm water. Applicant: Adam Ginkel, (7839 Oak Court in Land O’ Lakes, Minnesota). He said he could answer any engineering related questions as he is the consulting engineer for the applicant. Fleming asked about the properties 1-3 being south of the road; how is the water erosion going to flow? Ginkel replied the drainage from lots 3-5 will be directed towards the existing wetland, to the south and east and explained the hydrology. He said Lot 2 is sneaking between Lots 1 and 3 and is draining on the street. Fleming questioned the drainage onto the street. Ginkel clarified there is a catch basin being proposed behind the sidewalk between Lots 1 and 2. Fleming asked if this catch basin has the capcity to handle all the drainage including a serve storm. Ginkel replied yes, we go through some extensive conformations that the City would concur with. Petersen asked about the curb continuing as it is now existing. Ginkel said yes, it is city standards. MOTION BY PETERSEN, SECONDED BY KALLBERG TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 4A AT 6:18 P.M. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. Public Comment: None. MOTION BY KALLBERG, SECONDED BY PETERSEN, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 4A AT 6:19 P.M. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. Commission Comments/Questions: Kallberg said he doesn’t have any concerns; as it was approved previously, and stopped as owner/developer fallout. He commented on reversing the profiles. Petersen said he doesn’t see any reason that it shouldn’t be approved. He said it was approved before, not much has been changed; he would like to encourage the street surface and curbing and construction of the road is similar to what is existing. Fleming said he will be supporting this re-submission of the preliminary plat subject to the three listed conditions that were outlined in the staff report. MOTION BY PETERSEN, SECONDED BY KALLBERG TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MAPLE PLACE SUBJECT TO THE LIST OF CONDITIONS AT 6:22 P.M. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. B. DEV16-001018 - Deerfield MOG Holdings, LLC - Rezone - The property owners of three parcels are proposing an ordinance to amend the Official Zoning Map from C-3 Business Park to I-1 General Industrial. The subject property is located northeast of Adelmann Street SE and south of Credit River Road SE. PID’s: 25-427-001-0, 25-427-002-0, 25-428-002-0 [APPLICANT WITHDREW THIS APPLICATION] C. DEV16-001017 – 14856 Estate Avenue – Variance – The property owner is requesting a variance to the structure setback from the lake to construct a new home in the Low Density 3 Residential Shoreland (R1-SD) District. The subject property is located northeast of Lori Road SE on the northeast side of Highway 13. PID: 25-480-001-0. Planner Matzke introduced the request for a variance in order to allow for the construction of a new home on a property located at 14856 Estate Avenue. The property is located along the southern shores of Lower Prior Lake, west of Lori Road. He explained the history, current circumstances, issues, alternatives and recommended motion. He presented a resolution, location map, survey stamp dated June 16, 2016, survey indicating approximate building area, Eastwood 3rd Addition Plat -grading plan (2011) and written comments from the public. Commission Comments/Questions: Fleming asked how many conversation/opportunities/meetings did staff have with the applicant. Planner Matzke explained the conversations as talked on the phone a couple times, met with applicant once as the second meeting got canceled. He said they have talked 2-4 times at least on this matter. Petersen asked about the 60 by 63 pad layout and asked if this size included a second story deck. Planner Matzke replied yes and explained that second story decks are considered part of the structure as they are attached to the structure. Kallberg asked if the deck was included in the setback. Planner Matzke said yes and explained the upper level deck is connected to the structure and is over thirty inches off the ground; therefore, it is seen as part of the structure of the house and would have to meet the lake setback or any other setback. Kallberg asked about the deck setback on the original drawing is at fifty-four and a half feet. Planner Matzke said yes and explained the proposed setback. Applicant Greg Schwiech, (14198 Commerce Avenue NE). He commented on ordinance requirements, specifically 2A, Minnesota State Statue 2010 Section 394.27 Subsection 7. He stated these were not addressed in the staff report. He explained additional setbacks on the western line due to two City easements, the lift station, manhole and control panel and said these situations do not apply to other properties; there is a great amount of land that cannot be used due to these easements and if not for these easements the house could be redesigned. He commented on item 2B, sight lines, similar housing packages, three car garage, sixty by sixty-three-foot lot, side loading and grading. Fleming asked for clarification where the lift station is located and the approximate distance between the station and the southernmost edge of staff’s recommended pad. Planner Matzke pointed out where the lift station and setbacks were located. Schwiech continued because of this lift station it limits our ingress/egress of the site. He stated his request is alternative number one and possibly compromising. He commented on some comprises they could make, but reiterated the amount of area they need to give up. He said the Hendrickson’s building pad and site survey are completely different than what was proposed back in 2011. He commented on a City Ordinance that changed, infiltration, certificate of survey, designing of homes. Fleming asked if there were any re-designs submitted to the City. Schwiech said no. Scott Erickson, (8915 Carriage Hill Road, Savage, MN). He commented on his wife and him being longtime residents and how they finally, after years of eyeing the property, got the opportunity to purchase it. He commented on two key points; the lift station and the garage, stating they worked hard to minimize the front esthetics of the lift station and created a practical difficulty to reasonably approach the project with keeping street appeal to the property. He commented on the Hendrickson’s concerns, relieving impact on the neighbors to the east, and the need for the three car garage. He proposed a different layout of the house which would compromise a little and be a little more reasonable, amending their 4 proposal by backing the house up five feet, leaving only one area in need of a variance. He explained the compromise with a consistent look, despite the practical difficulties by the lift station. Fleming clarified with Mr. Erickson that his statement was the sixty by sixty-three buildable pad wouldn’t work and asked what the practical implications of his living space inside the sixty by sixty-three buildable pad area. Erickson explained the dining area of the kitchen above it would be a bedroom which is already twelve- feet wide and below is a room that would need to be removed. Fleming asked what would that room be used for. Erickson explained what this area would be used for, bar/entertaining area with a table leading to the outside. Fleming asked when would they be able to re-introduce this proposed compromise. Erickson stated they would be able to re-introduce relatively quickly and explained why. Kallberg said he would like to see the floor plan, as there should be a way to fit a house into the sixty by sixty-three-foot space. Erickson said he needed clarification Kallberg explained where they could square off the house and asked if they would look at that possibility. Erickson said with lake living they are looking to invest in the back of the house for living and dining space. He said they don’t really have a need for more space in front; redesign and make use of the front area would be challenging. Petersen asked how large the house as proposed in total square footage. Erickson said about 6,000 square feet. Petersen asked if it would be all finished. Erickson said yes, it is one hundred percent finished. MOTION BY PETERSEN, SECONDED BY KALLBERG TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 4C AT 6:56 P.M. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. Public Comment: Allen Joscher, (14872 Estate Avenue SE), He said he was the resident to the west to the proposed lot. He commented he has been there for 20 years; moved here in April 1996. He explained this would not be the best way to move in as a neighbor. He commented on it is not a concern for the new owners to think of him, his setbacks, view, etc. He commented on setback averaging, smaller house, views, closer to the shore, subdividing the lot and it not be a good idea, Hendrickson’s house being build small enough, and neighbors not being able to build deck due to the setbacks. Norma Tschida, (14837 Estate Avenue SE), She stated where she lived and said she had some pictures. She stated she got the opportunity to talk to the new neighbors. She explained the neighborhood and made comments of fairness. She commented on the limitation on the lot. She said why the little point was on the lot. She stated she would like this denied. Shelly Schmolrel, (14872 Estate Avenue SE), She said she has lived in Prior Lake her whole life. She stated they would love to have neighbors and explained the bareness and eye sore of the lot as it is now. She extended invitations to the new neighbors to have barbeques with them. She pointed out the site lines and said she will spend most of their time on the deck and the corner of the proposed deck would block their view. She commented on the size of the house, lack of trees and a letter she submitted. She questioned if this was going to be continuous and where does it end. She stated she would like this denied. She said she would like to see a house there, but let’s be more sensible about it. Lori Repinski, (14869 Estate Avenue SE), She said she lives across the street. Her site line is gone regardless of what they build. She commented on the size of her house versus the size of the proposed, stating there is plenty of room for her family of four and believes the proposed house is a little too big for the neighborhood. She commented on the setbacks are there for a reason. 5 MOTION BY KALLBERG, SECONDED BY PETERSEN, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 4C AT 7:07 P.M VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. Commission Comments/Questions: Petersen said the lot was recently platted and was platted for a certain size house and in his opinion this house is too big. He stated the argument of the lift station is not an issue, no hardship there. He stated he will not be supporting this agenda item; there is really no reason to support a variance on a lot given how big the lot is and how recently it was platted. Kallberg agrees with commenters, letter writer and staff, that we are not the victims here of ancient inadequate lot sizes that were platted less than six years ago. It was platted as a nice size lots for houses that would be appropriate for the neighborhood. He said if you look at one of the drawings, it shows the second house to the east/right are similar and they managed to get that house on the lot without a variance which appears to be smaller. He commented on a letter sent in by a neighbor that built their house on the smaller lot without a variance. He said this is a lot that is adequately buildable without any variances and he will not be supporting this agenda item. Fleming said he will not be supporting the variance as proposed. He is pretty strict on the construction of the Statue and be sure to check with the City Attorney to be sure. He said at this time the buildable plat as proposed by the City is reasonable; the proposed home doesn’t meet the five-point threshold in our current Ordinance. He agrees with the neighbor who said they would love to have new neighbors; he thinks there is a way to go on this and that is why he asked for the reasonable reconfiguration. He is not personally interested in impacting your dream/plans for the future or how you want to use spaces in your home; however, there is a preponderance of information that suggest to him that at this point and time the variance request cannot be granted. MOTION BY PETERSEN, SECONDED BY KALLBERT TO DENY THE LAKE SETBACK VARIANCE AT 20.5 FEET WITH A CLARIFYING OPINION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THE STATUES THAT WAS RAISED EARLIER BY THE APPLICANTS DESIGNEE AT 7:13PM. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. D. Charlie’s on Prior – Ordinance Amendment - The City of Prior Lake is proposing an amendment to the ordinance related to limitations on outdoor music at Charlie’s on Prior, further defining what is allowed for live music being played outdoors. The subject property is located northwest of Green Heights Trail SW and southeast of Upper Prior Lake. PID: 25-102-022-0, 25- 102-006-0. Director Rogness introduced the ordinance amending Section 1102 of the Prior Lake City Code as Subsection 1102.1600, expansion of a non-conforming restaurant use related to outdoor music at 3950 Green Heights Trail SW. The current restaurant and marina business is known as Charlie’s on Prior (previously referred to as the Shore Club & Marina). The proposed amendment relates to adding a new provision that would allow outdoor “Dinner Music” with certain restrictions. He explained the history, current circumstances, issues, financial impact, alternatives and recommended motion. He presented a draft Ordinance Amendment proposal by Charlie’s, draft Ordinance Amendment proposal by City Staff and Section 307, Outdoor Event Ordinance. Commission Comments/Questions: Kallberg asked Director Rogness to define the difference in dinner music versus outside music; and how is either differing from outdoor events. Director Rogness explained the difference, stating this is strictly for outdoor music; however, with the seating being outside they would like live music. He commented on speaker and said they can play radio type music and explained the limitations on that. He said they can play without restrictions through the 6 speaker’s typical background music, radio station or other music source. He gave examples and explained outdoor events and how they differ from dinner music. He mentioned it would be hard to hear live music without microphones and the musicians may not want to perform if they were not amplified. Petersen stated it is a little confusing and questioned if we are re-defining what an event is. He asked if someone is to sing into a speaker is that considered an outdoor event, and we want to reword this so this is not necessarily the case. Director Rogness replied that is correct, we are re-defining what an event is, and said this is only being applied to Charlie’s on Prior’s Ordinance. Petersen questioned if Charlie’s on Prior had their own ordinance. Director Rogness explained there is an ordinance that was approved back in February of 2015, specifically for Charlie’s on Prior. Petersen confirmed whatever is applied tonight will only affect Charlie’s on Prior. Director Rogness replied correct. Petersen questioned the testing of decibels. Director Rogness explained the applicant has the ability to test the decibels and this same testing was tested on some other commercial business complaints that the City has had. He has not been a party to the complaints; it was before he worked with the City. Petersen asked if there were specifics of the complaints; certain time, more than one complaint, more than one occasion and how many complaints were there. Director Rogness responded stating from his understanding is that the City Manager received two complaints the evening of the ribbon cutting event. Petersen asked if there were since then. Director Rogness replied no, not to his knowledge. Applicant: Jeff Petschl, (3856 Green Heights Trail SW) He stated he owns Charlie’s on Prior at 3950 Green Heights Trail SW; six houses up the road from Charlie’s on Prior. He handed out some information and wanted to address a couple things that was mentioned by Director Rogness. He thanked the Commissioners and staff for the opportunity to speak tonight and apologized for the need to be here tonight as they didn’t plan on being here as often as they have been. He explained on how they are serious people with a serious business, demonstrating through actions our proper management style. He touched base on the complaints and how they are handled. He commented on how many days they have been in business, lack of complaints, events, parking and parking for events, a letter from their attorney, always working with the City of Prior Lake, their ordinance, building a proper restaurant and bar, serving a good product, employees, limited complaints, acoustic music/shows, decibels and decibels signal meter, location of decibels signal meters, keypads for sound systems and the importance of consideration of noise for neighbors. Fleming asked if the Cities 97 event was an example of an outdoor event. Jeff said yes and explained the permitting process and fee’s for the outdoor event. Fleming asked of a scale of one to ten how popular do you think Charlie’s is right now. Petschl said we had our best week last week. Fleming said so a ten Petschl said yes. Fleming questioned the amenities of Charlie’s begin to impact capacity or fire code violations, etc. He asked if Mr. Petschl had any sense of this right now. Petschl said it is the first summer, so we are still learning and adapting. He stated the events are one thing and we understand the need for permits and processes; but would like more events due to the demand from community groups in town asking to host an event. He commented on the weekly music, stated the start and end time they are requesting, type of music, the reasoning why they would like this type of dinner music, and parking. Kallberg questioned if the noise was monitored and adjustment made if exceeded at all times of the day and night and asked if they are operating at capacity at any time. 7 Petschl said on Thursday through Sunday weather permitting we are near or at most capacity. He explained the business is a seasonal pace; they need the summers to make their numbers for winter. Kallberg asked if the days that they would like the music to play, are they already at capacity. Petschl explained the reasoning for the music; not to draw additional but to keep people there and patient. He explained how the music is played at other restaurant; typically, at their busier times. Kallberg questioned the statement made about the Mayor stating the music wasn’t loud enough; and stated his experience with this typical music is it is so loud that you cannot hear the person next to you, is this what we are talking about. He asked if the everyone understands decibels. Petschl explained the rack and said it would just be music, not concerts; mellow music, elevator music. They control the musician output and measure with their internal readings. He explained the lineup they proposed. Petersen asked if everything worked out as presented; would that be everyday on the calendar. Petschl explained the days, months; Thursdays and Saturdays. He said not a nightly plan. Petersen questioned if it was Thursday and Saturday, not Thursday through Saturday, but would want the flexibility for Thursday through Saturday. Petschl replied correct. Petersen said it is his understanding the Mr. Petschl proposed 20 and the City is proposing 10. Petschl said correct. Fleming asked Staff if the City Attorney had a written responded to the meeting on June 15 or was the meeting in lieu to her written response. Director Rogness said the meeting was in lieu of the City Attorney’s memo. He said the time crunch made two separate meetings; however, have talked back and forth. Petersen asked what are the percussions for complaints. Director Rogness said the City Attorney put in a provision that would give the city council discretion to immediately prohibit all dinner music by written notice to the manager of the restaurant; and could be lifted as well. MOTION BY KALLBERG, SECONDED BY PETERSEN TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 4D AT 7:48 P.M. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. Public Comment: Bill Criego, (16350 Park Avenue SE). Bill said he has lived here twenty-two years, was on the Planning Commission for eight years twelve years ago, worked with the City and previous owners of what is now called Charlie’s and he currently owns a small business. He commented on parking, noise, complaints, variances asked for from the City, peace and quiet and developments over the last ten years. He read Ordinance 605.1 and said they need to close their home windows when the amplification takes place; therefore, they made the call to the City Manager as they can only four amplified outdoor events per year, not only for Charlie’s, but for all activities in the City. He asked why it is okay for Charlie’s but exclude other restaurant’s in town. He commented on Charlie’s being in a residential area and why increase noise. He asked to not approve this at all. The current Section 307 identifies this issue is fine for the City. If Charlie’s wants to take a lawyer and say that this variance or Ordinance that was established for Charlie’s what is stopping them from doing a number of other things; what is stopping them from continuing on. He said consider the people in the City and stated this is the first step. Petersen asked if every time Charlie’s had an event you have to shut the windows. Criego said I invite you to come over to my home; he invited Jeff to come over and he did, but the music was finished by the time he got there. Petersen mentioned they played background music on speakers and asked is that… Criego said they have a great job in keeping that noise down. He stated Jeff and his company have done a great job; fantastic building, nice system and good food. He commented on the current Ordinance 307, stating they can have acoustic music every night and gave his opinion on why the amplification is needed; 8 they have to many people, too much noise, and need the music louder. He talked of this being subjective to the neighborhood for a profit of a business. Jeff Young, (16270 Park Avenue SE). He explained he lives just a few doors down from Mr. Criego and stated his experience is different; music is dull/soft and he likes to open his windows just to hear the music. He commented on liking the experience of events, music and food; it brings people together. He said it is not an annoyance to him, his family or other neighbors. He would like this considered, as Charlie’s owners have been very good to the neighborhood, open minded and cooperative. Pat O’Hara, (16374 Park Avenue SE). He stated he is Mr. Criego’s and Mr. Young’s neighbor. He commented on increasing is infringement on private enjoyment. He said the music starts as mellow but if he has company over it is a concert in his back yard that he didn’t ask for. He is fine with four times a year from three to six. Jay Nemecek, (3880 Green Heights Trail SW). He said he lives three doors down from Charlie’s and he doesn’t hear the music; does hear boats, motor cycles and increased traffic but not music. He said he doesn’t hear the music at night when it is amplified or when there are concerts. He stated they do have amplified music every night, it just comes through a radio; no difference in coming from a radio or microphone. Criego said there is a huge difference from the radio to the amplification. He has no issue with what is being done now. He invited anyone over if they would like to hear it. Petschl said he needed to clarify; the permitted events sparked the complaint. He explained the events and said the weekly music will be no difference from the music they play every day. He said there are many speakers played low and explained the directional speakers. Fleming asked Mr. Petschl, what sort of response he would offer to eight versus four. Petschl said we agreed to provisions, if there are complaints. He commented on their liquor license, provisions and complaints. He reiterated their reasoning for needing additional events. He said the events are the ones that are amplified directionally across the bay, weekly music will be no different than the nightly music. Kallberg asked the direction of the speakers on the big outdoor events. Petschl explained they face east, the direction across the bay. Kallberg asked about the public access area next to Charlie’s. Petschl said yes that is where the speakers point. Mr. O’Hara and Mr. Criego live east of Charlie’s and the speakers point in that direction when the speakers are on live amplified events. Kallberg asked along the shore, parallel to the shore. Petschl said yes and asked Commissioner Kallberg if he has been to Charlie’s. Kallberg replied he was familiar with the sight. Petschl explained the speakers are on the west end of the deck pointing out towards the rest of the restaurant. That is how the stage area is orientated. MOTION BY KALLBERG, SECONDED BY PETERSEN, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 4 AT 8:06 P.M. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. Commission Comments/Questions: Kallberg commented there has been a lot of information presented tonight and may need time to review. He said they haven’t been open a year with experience and there has been numerous requests. He would like to table. Petersen said the amplified dinner type music is not a problem; it sounds like it is just as loud as the music coming over the speakers. He said he would be fine with 20 days of “dinner music”, but is not sure on the four outdoor events moving to eight. He would like more information as he has not been to an event. He stated needs more information. He would like to table the action. Fleming asked Commissioner Petersen if not eight events, does he have a specific number that it should be. 9 Petersen replied he would like more information; he has never been to an event. He reiterated he is fine with the dinner music but would not approve either one without more information. He agrees with Commissioner Kallberg on Tabling this item. Fleming stated comments including Charlie’s has been outstanding newest member of the business community, ownership is responding nimbly to the market demand in prior lake and entities needing events; however, he stated there needs to be more time to read through the documents. He commented on the written response from the City Attorney and the meeting that was set. He stated he would like to give the City Attorney the chance to affirm for us the issues that were raised and extensively reconciled at the meeting and what was in the responsive letter. He said he would be in favor of tabling this item to the next Planning Commission Meeting. He suggested separate field trips to Charlie’s. Petschl suggested some dates. Fleming commented on dialog with the community and shared appreciation for the residence coming tonight. Petersen asked when the next music dinner will be. Petschl explained the days. MOTION BY PETERSEN, SECONDED BY KALLBERG TO TABLE ACTION ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. 5. Old Business: A. Comprehensive Plan Discussion – handout. 6. New Business: None. 7. Announcements / City Council Updates: • June 27, 2016 o Ordinance Rezoning the Summit Preserve property to R-2  Approved as recommended by Planning Commissioners o Resolution regarding the Preliminary Plat for Summit Preserve  Approved as recommended by Planning Commissioners o Andren Preliminary Plat  Approved as recommended by Planning Commissioners o Debate on reconsidering the Commerce avenue extension. 8. Adjournment: MOTION BY KALLBERG, SECONDED BY PETERSEN, TO ADJORN THE TUESDAY, JULY 5, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:18 P.M. VOTE: Ayes by Fleming, Petersen and Kallberg. The Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m. Sandra Woods, Development Services Assistant