HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-38PC 5360 Candy Cove Trail VarianceRESOLUTION 9538PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A REQUEST FOR A 2.62 FOOT VARIANCE TO
PERMIT A 7.38 FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK iNSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 10
FEET TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A HOUSE WITH ATTACHED 3-CAR
GARAGE IN THE R-1 SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND SD
SHORELAND DISTRICT AT 5360 CANDY COVE TRAIL.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
Christopher Pearson has applied for a variance from Section 4.2 of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit construction of a single-family house with an
attached 3-car garage on property located in the RI-Suburban Residential and
SD - Shoreland Districts at the following location, to wit;
5360 Candy Cove Trail, legally described as Lot 4 and part of the West
1/2 of Lot 5, Candy Cove Park, Scott County, Minnesota
The Board of Adjust~nent has reviewed the Application for Variance as contained
in Case #VA95-38, and held a hearing thereon on November 13, 1995.
The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan.
There are other, alternative locations or configurations for the proposed house
and garage which would not require a variance. For that reason, literal
enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would not result in undue hardship with
respect to the property.
The basis for the request is convenience and cost of other alternatives, and does
not result from circumstances unique to the subject property.
16200 ~![D~eq. Sg~.,Cp~l~, Minnesota S5372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 4~17 4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. For the reasons stated in numbers 4 and 5 above, the granting of the variance is
not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment ora substantial property right of
the applicant.
7. The contents of Planning Case VA95-38 are hereby entered into and made a part
of the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
requested variances as set forth above.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on November 13, 1995.
ATTEST:
mD~[dngRD~rYe Jtor
RiChard' Ku~ykerl~l~ll, Chair-
RESOLUTION 9538PC - DENIAL 2