Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5M Comprehensive Plan Consultant Report 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 2016 AGENDA #: 5M PREPARED BY: PRESENTED BY: CASEY MCCABE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SELECTION OF A CONSULTANT TO COMPLETE THE LAND USE AND HOUSING CHAP- TERS AS PART OF THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DISCUSSION: Introduction The purpose of this agenda report is to consider approval of a resolution approv- ing the selection of Bolton & Menk, Inc. to complete the Land Use and Housing chapters as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the City’s Standard Agreement for Profes- sional Services with Bolton & Menk. History All cities, counties, and townships within the seven-county metropolitan region must prepare a comprehensive plan and update that plan as needed every 10 years. The City Council previously allocated funds in the 2016 and 2017 City budget to assist with this requirement. In addition, the City of Prior Lake applied for and has been awarded a Metropolitan Council Professional Services grant to assist with the cost of the Comprehensive Plan Update in the amount of $32,000. Current Circumstances City staff sent out a Request for Proposals to complete the Land Use Plan and Housing Plan to nine consulting firms on September 23, 2016. Five responses were received. Proposal costs ranged from $45,806 to $53,700. Staff reviewed the proposals and selected two finalists, Bolton & Menk and WSB and Associ- ates, and conducted phone interviews with both firms. Following the interviews, staff selected Bolton & Menk as the preferred consultant firm to complete the Land Use and Housing components of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Conclusion Based on the written proposals and interviews, staff is recommending Bolton & Menk, Inc. be selected as the consultant to implement Option #2 of their proposal at a cost not to exceed $50,046. City staff provided an approximate budget of $50,000 in the RFP. WSB’s base cost was $53,700. Bolton & Menk’s strengths include: i) a project team that has broad experience with land use and housing planning; ii) familiarity with the City of Prior Lake and the current Comprehensive plan; iii) a clearly defined process to complete the tasks on schedule; iv) effective public meeting skills; and v) a competitive fee to complete the work 2 ISSUES: The City of Prior Lake has worked with Bolton & Menk on previous occasions and staff is confident in Bolton & Menk and their project personnel that they will be able to complete the necessary tasks on deadline and on budget. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Financial impacts include consulting costs and city staff time dedicated to the supporting the Land Use and Housing components of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Bolton & Menk has provided a not to exceed cost of $50,046, of which, $24,000 will be paid with funds secured through a Planning Assistance Grant received from the Metropolitan Council. The remaining consulting costs will be paid with allocated funds in the Community Development budget, includ- ing $26,000 in 2016 and $32,000 in 2017, both for Professional Services. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and a second, as part of the consent agenda, to approve a resolution approving the selection of a consultant to complete the land use and housing chapters as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update. 2. Upon removal of this consent agenda item, motion and a second to table action and to provide direction to staff for more information. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Alternative #1 ATTACHMENT: 1. Request for Proposals 2. Bolton & Menk Proposal 3. Standard Agreement for Professional Services 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 RESOLUTION 16-XXX A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SELECTION OF A CONSULTANT TO COMPLETE THE LAND USE AND HOUSING CHAPTERS AS PART OF THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Motion By: Second By: WHEREAS, City staff sent a Request for Proposals that defines the major responsibilities, scope of work and project schedule related to the completion of the Land Use and Housing chapters as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update to nine consultant firms; and WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, Five proposals were received; and City staff reviewed the proposals and selected Bolton & Menk, Inc. and WSB & Associates for interviews; and Following the interviews, City staff is recommending that the City Council select Bolton & Menk, Inc. at a cost of $50,046, identified as Option #2 in their proposal; and WHEREAS, The Prior Lake City Council has considered the recommendations of City staff and has selected Bolton & Menk, Inc. to complete the Land Use and Housing chapters as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. Bolton & Menk, Inc. is hereby selected to complete the Land Use and Housing chapters as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update. 3. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute a Standard Agreement for Professional Services with Bolton & Menk, Inc. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 VOTE Hedberg Keeney McGuire Morton Thompson Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ______________________________ Frank Boyles, City Manager Submitted by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337-1649 P: 952-890-0509 F: 952-890-8065 Contact: Jane Kansier, AICP C: 952-358-0604 janeka@bolton-menk.com October 21, 2016 Proposal for City of Prior Lake 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update (Land Use & Housing Plans) We live, work, and play where you live, work, and play. Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. October 21, 2016 Casey McCabe Community Development Specialist City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 RE: Proposal for 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update (Land Use & Housing Plans) Dear Mr. McCabe: The update to the Land Use and Housing Elements of the City of Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan is the first step in the process to complete the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan will position the City to grow in an orderly manner, while still retaining the all-important “small town feel.” We believe you will find outstanding value in our approach to your project for the following reasons: Clear Understanding of the Project – Our team knows the requirements of Minnesota Statutes and the Metropolitan Council’s Thrive MSP 2040 and understands what it will take to get a plan approved. We understand the unique challenges in having the Mystic Lake Casino in town and with the many lakes and other natural amenities. Proven and Experienced Project Team – Our project team has been assembled based on their experience working with past planning projects that involved practical experience, creativity, and a commitment to making Minnesota cities environmentally and economically sustainable. I will serve as the Project Manager and have a clear understanding of the community and its issues due to my experience with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update. The Right Approach – Our approach is to provide an open, cooperative, and collaborative process, engaging a range of community members. We will work directly with advisory committees, commissions, staff, and elected officials to design strategies and materials intended to reach Prior Lake residents. Our public engagement strategy will combine traditional methods of engagement with new approaches designed to engage a broader audience. In continued service to the City of Prior Lake, we are excited at the opportunity to complete the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update for you. I will personally serve as your Project Manager and lead client contact on this project. Please contact me at 952-358-0604 or janeka@bolton-menk.com if you have any questions regarding our proposal. Respectfully submitted, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Jane A. Kansier, AICP Senior Urban Planner 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337-1649 Ph: (952) 890-0509 Fax: (952) 890-8065 Bolton-Menk.com Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue, Burnsville, MN 55337-1649 P: 952-890-0509 | F: 952-890-8065 Engineering News-Record Top 500 Ranked #179 among the Top 500 Engineering and Surveying Firms in the United States. Services Provided: Municipal Planning Civil & Municipal Engineering Water & Wastewater Engineering Transportation Planning & Engineering Structural Engineering Aviation Services Water Resources Engineering Landscape Architecture Land Surveying Geographic Information System Services Project Funding & Financing Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Table of Contents Project Understanding and Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Project Personnel ...........................................6 Relative Experience and References .................10 Tasks and Schedule .......................................12 Costs ..........................................................18 Conflict of Interest ........................................20 Project Understanding and Approach Section 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 1Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project Understanding and Approach Project Understanding The City of Prior Lake is seeking to update the Land Use and Housing elements of the Comprehensive Plan. These elements are critical to preparation of the entire Plan, as they will provide the parameters for the other plan elements. As the City of Prior Lake’s 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan states, “it’s hard to build a City.” Doing so requires a vision and a plan. This is especially important for a city like Prior Lake, which has experienced rapid growth and development. Between 1990 and 2010, the population of the City nearly doubled. Population projections indicate the population of the City will increase 50% by 2040. Growth is not without its challenges. In fact, in the City’s last three community surveys, many residents believed growth to be the biggest issue facing the City. It is imperative to develop and implement a comprehensive plan that allows growth to occur in an orderly manner, continues to meet housing and economic development needs, and maintains the City’s small town feel. There are many attributes that make the City of Prior Lake an attractive location for residential and business development: the lakes, the traditional downtown, and access to major State and County Roads. These same attributes can also be challenging. For example, the many lakes and corresponding shoreland districts make meeting density requirements difficult. Additionally, downtown Prior Lake is bisected by CSAH 21, creating mobility challenges, and the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, an active City partner, also owns several hundred acres of land in both fee title and trust within the City. ?±A@ ?±A@ GkWX GuWX GuWX GÜWX GÝWXG±WX G±WX GrWX GrWX GqWX GqWX G|WX G|WX G³WX GÎWX GnWX GØWX GpWX Lower Prior Lake Spring Lake Upper Prior Lake Rice Lake Cleary Lake O'Dowd Lake Howard Lake Campbell Lake Pike Lake Crystal Lake Markley Lake Cate's or Hidden Lake McColl Pond Lake South Twin Lake Featherstone Lake North Twin Lake Locations for New Commercial/ Industrial Development Need for Different Housing Types Town Center and Transitional Town Center Boundaries SMSC Land (In Fee and In Trust) Orderly Annexation Area 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Prior Lake Considerations Map October 21, 2016 We treat each client as if their community is our own. Many times it is. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 2 Project Understanding and Approach Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. The City of Prior Lake has taken a proactive approach to prepare for the Comprehensive Plan Update. The completion of a housing needs study and a commercial and industrial demand analysis will inform land use and housing elements of the plan, and the recent Downtown Development Guide update will help focus in on the issues in the downtown area. The Planning Commission has already begun discussing the land use and housing elements of the plan, and has identified some specific priorities for the planning process including a robust public participation plan and frequent interaction with Metropolitan Council staff. With nearly 20 years of experience serving the City of Prior Lake, the Bolton & Menk, Inc., team offers a rich history and unique perspective of issues and needs in the City. Jane Kansier is exceptionally qualified for this project; having led the City’s last comprehensive plan update, she has a working knowledge of the existing plan, the City in general, and understands the key issues in this effort. However, we know a key component in a comprehensive plan update is to not dwell on what was or what is, but rather to focus on what may be. As City officials look to the future, they look to their Comprehensive Plan to provide clear, workable recommendations and to serve as a framework for the development of future land use policy. The Plan should inspire, guide, and direct the growth of Prior Lake while being sensitive to existing residents and development. Our approach to updating the land use and housing sections of the City of Prior Lake’s Comprehensive Plan is outlined below. Project Approach A successful Comprehensive Plan depends upon a complete understanding of the City’s issues and resources, as well as the culture that makes Prior Lake unique. We have tailored our approach based on conversations with the City, as well as our history working with City staff. We understand public engagement is critical in developing a comprehensive plan that can be supported by the community. Metropolitan Council Compliance As part of the 7-County Twin Cities Metropolitan area, the City of Prior Lake is required to update the community Comprehensive Plan by December 31, 2018. The Comprehensive Plan must address all elements outlined in the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (§473) and contain all of the information necessary for the Metropolitan Council to review the plan for conformance with the regional plan, consistency with regional policies, and compatibility with the plans of adjacent and affected jurisdictions. The Metropolitan Council has prepared a comprehensive checklist identifying the information necessary for each element of the Land Use and Housing Plan to comply with Metropolitan Council requirements. Our team will use this checklist as a basis for developing the framework of the plan. We will work closely with City staff and the Metropolitan Council Sector Representative, Angela Torres, to identify any special provisions or issues for the Plan. Our initial contact with the Met Council will also explore the opportunity to revise forecasts as a result of removing all Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC) land from the calculations. Public Involvement Our overall approach is to provide an open, cooperative, and collaborative process, engaging a range of community members. We will work directly with advisory committees, commissions, staff, and elected officials to develop strategies and materials intended to reach a variety of Prior Lake residents and stakeholders. Our public engagement strategy will combine traditional methods of engagement with new proven approaches designed to engage a broader audience. Our goal is to reach out to all sectors of Prior Lake’s residents and businesses so the City can be confident everyone had a chance to “be at the table” to set a common vision and direction for the community’s future. Our public involvement process, depending on the option the City chooses, is comprised of: •Face-to-Face Outreach in the form of meetings with City staff, a Comprehensive Plan task force, participation in the City’s 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan Update, interviews with government leaders and business leaders, and more informal interaction with all members of the community using pop-up meetings or participation in community events. •Online Outreach including social media, online community issues maps, and a project website with web-based comment forum. •Traditional Outreach including informational open houses and workshops with the Planning Commission and City Council. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 3 Project Understanding and Approach Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. We have included several key elements in our plan that will be essential in conveying information and building support. We will use high quality graphics to help explain complex elements such as trends and future visions. We believe informational graphics are key to helping non-technical people understand technical issues and the implications of various decisions. At public events such as workshops or public informational meetings we will use audience polling to understand the demographics of who is responding, and their perspectives on issues. Audience polling allows for greater participation by supporting anonymous responses that are automatically populated into charts, tables, and word clouds on screen for all participants to see. To support online outreach, we will provide the following tools that serve to both inform and solicit input from the public. •Project Website - We will design and host a project website with a unique URL/web address. The website can be used to post project information, upcoming events, opportunities to get involved, and place to provide comments. All other forms of online outreach methods will also be linked to the project website. •Online GIS Story Map and Surveys - We will create an interactive “story” map which will be unique to Prior Lake. This technology will allow our team to ask specific questions focused on issues identification and allow residents, businesses, and other stakeholders to respond by adding a comment tied to a spatial location on the map. If desired by the City, this could also be accompanied by an online survey. •Social Media - Our team will integrate the plan update into the City’s existing social media accounts. During the project initiation and initial public outreach phases, our team will work with City staff to determine regular discussion forum topics using social media. Input received through this method will be used to supplement the more traditional outreach methods planned. •Online Public Open House - This will not replace the traditional public meetings planned, but will place the same materials available at traditional meetings online with enough background information for people to understand what they are looking at. The information will be joined with a web-based comment forum to allow the project team to ask specific questions and/ or allow general comments on the materials, similar to what would be found at a traditional in-person meeting. Q7. In your opinion, which is more important to you as a business patron? A.Off-street parking (either private or public lot) B.On-street parking directly outside of a business C.On-street parking within 1 block of a business D.On-street parking within a few blocks of a business E.No opinion Off - s t r e e t p a r k i n g ( e i t h e r p r i v a . . On- s t r e e t p a r k i n g d i r e c t l y o u t s . . . On- s t r e e t p a r k i n g w i t h i n 1 b l o c . . . On - s t r e e t p a r k i n g w i t h i n a f e w . . . No o p i n i o n 39%44% 0%0% 17% NUMBERSAROUNDROUNDABOUTS89%reduction in FATAL crashes 75%reduction in INJURY crashes 40%reduction inall crashes Roundabouts eliminate T-Bone and Head-On crashes that occur at traditional intersections and are the lead-ing cause of injury related crashes. Key Characteristics of a Roundabout 7% 15- mph average speeds easier to react to pedestrians and merge with vehicles only8conflict points vs.32 conflict points in a traditional intersection * 20 * A conflict point is any location vehicles interact with another vehicle, pedestrian or bicycle. Less stopping and starting time. Less idling time. Keeps traffic moving: 83%of vehicles yield vs. in a traditional intersection to pedestriansin a roundabout the pedestrian crossing distance1/2vs. a traditional intersection crosswalk2stage crossing allows for shorter crossing distancewith The center island is designed to allow large vehicles/ trucks to drive up and over the curb to proceed through the intersection. pedestrian refuge 1. Driver reacts to pedestrians first 2. Then driver reacts to vehicles in roundabout Pedestrian Safety: Crosswalks setback from intersection traffic Sidewalk/Trail PedestrianRefuge Crosswalk Center Island We believe in the power of face-to-face meetings, friendly conversations, and collaborative decision making. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 4 Project Understanding and Approach Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. The table below outlines three options for the public engagement process, with various levels of complexity and involvement. All options include some form of the key elements listed above, designed to engage multiple segments of the community in a variety of formats. A more thorough description of each of these tasks is contained in our work plan. Public Engagement Process Option #1 Option #2 Option #3 In f o r m •Project website •Social media information •Presentations to selected groups (2 presentations) •Public Open House (1 near the end of the project) •Online Open House •Project website •Social media information •Public Open House (1 near the end of the project) •Online Open House •Project website •Social media information •Public Open House (1 near the end of the project) •Online Open House En g a g e •Public Open House (1 at beginning of project) •Online community story map with comments •Online survey (1) •“Pop-Up” meetings (2 events) •Public Open House (1 at beginning of the project) •Planning Commission workshops (3) •Focus groups °Government leaders (City, County, School, Townships) °Business leaders °Residents (including youth & seniors) •Online community story map with comments •Online survey (1) •“Pop-Up” meetings (2 events) •Public Open House (beginning of the project) •Comprehensive Plan Task Force Workshops (3) •Focus groups °Government leaders (City, County, School, Townships) °Business leaders °Residents (including youth & seniors) •Online community story map with comments •Online survey (1) •“Pop-Up” meetings (2 events) •Incorporate Comprehensive Plan into 2040 Vision & Strategic Plan Update •Incorporate Comprehensive Plan into 2040 Vision & Strategic Plan Update •Downtown Design Charrette •Incorporate Comprehensive Plan into 2040 Vision & Strategic Plan Update El e c t e d a n d A p p o i n t e d Of f i c i a l s •Provide updates to the Planning Commission (3 meetings) •Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop (1 meeting) •Meetings with City Staff (as needed, with a minimum of 4) •Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop (1 meeting) •Meetings with City Staff (as needed, with a minimum of 4) •Provide updates to the Planning Commission (3 meetings) •Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop (1 meeting) •Meetings with City Staff (as needed, with a minimum of 4) Actions highlighted in green are unique to that option. Because of our local ties, we have a true understanding of the people, needs, and resources in the communities we serve. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 5 Project Understanding and Approach Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Planning Services The Bolton & Menk team has reviewed the Metropolitan Council’s Local Planning Handbook, and understands what will be required for each chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. We will use the handbook and the checklist specific to Prior Lake as a guide to ensure all required information, tables, charts, and maps are included in Prior Lake’s Land Use and Housing chapters. However, the end product will be unique to the City of Prior Lake. For each chapter (Land Use and Housing), our team will work through a series of investigations and evaluations to fully understand existing conditions, issues, and trends. Our team will provide an analysis of population and housing data based on historical trends and recent projections. The Land Use chapter will include an evaluation of existing land use categories and definitions in this analysis. The Housing chapter will provide an analysis of housing needs, and the City’s allocation of affordable housing. We will draft housing goals and objectives, and an implementation plan to meet these goals. As we work through our analysis, we will: •Incorporate the findings of the recent Comprehensive Housing Needs Study and Comprehensive Commercial and Industrial demand Analysis into the Plan. •Identify and map all SMSC trust and fee-owned land within the City and the Orderly Annexation Area. These areas will be removed from the developed land area, and the housing and population assigned to these areas will be removed from the Metropolitan Council’s forecasts. •Review the Downtown Development Guide and its recent update, and identify appropriate boundaries for the Town Center and the Transitional Town Center districts. •Review and identify appropriate land uses and development densities within the Orderly Annexation Area. We will work closely with City staff to develop a staging plan for this area consistent with the needs of the City and the renegotiated annexation agreement. •Participate in the City’s 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan as part of our planning analysis and outreach efforts to identify and address issues pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan. •Identify future land use categories including minimum and maximum densities, compare them to the existing Zoning Districts, and provide recommendations for updates to the Zoning Ordinance to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Project Personnel Section 2 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 6Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project Personnel Project Personnel The Bolton & Menk team has extensive experience evaluating and developing successful solutions that meet the needs of our clients, can be supported by stakeholders, and can be effectively implemented. Our proposed team provides the optimum combination of accessibility, local knowledge of the community, and specialized expertise. In addition, we have more than 400 employees, throughout 16 offices, including a professional staff of over 150 engineers, planners, landscape architects, and surveyors we are able to draw from for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Our team is currently under contract to complete two Comprehensive Plans, and currently in negotiations with another community. We anticipate completing three to four complete plans and several technical sections for other communities. Our team will be led by our Project Manager, Jane Kansier, who will be supported by key individuals and support staff as outlined in the organizational chart below. In addition, Bolton & Menk has more than 12 other planners within the firm that can provide assistance, as needed, to meet Prior Lake’s needs for the Comprehensive Plan Update. Jane Kansier, AICP Project Manager Final Plan Ashley Hudson Planner/Public Particiation Dave Breiter Graphic Design Coordinator GIS/Mapping Nick Meyers, GISP GIS/Planner Ashley Hudson Planner/Public Participation Nick Meyers, GISP GIS/Planner Data and Analysis Ashley Hudson Planner/Public Participation Public Involvement Nick Meyers, GISP GIS/Planner Dave Breiter Graphic Design Coordinator Madeline Peck Social Media Specialist Doug Abere (Charrette) Transportation Planner Joel Odens (Charrette) Landscape Architect Brian Hilgardner, P.E. Principal-in-Charge 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 7 Project Personnel Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. The following paragraphs provide the key roles of each team member. These individuals have track records of successful projects and, just as importantly, are enthusiastic and committed to meeting and exceeding client expectations. Brian Hilgardner, P.E. Principal-in-Charge Brian will be assisting a few other communities with the utility section updates of their comprehensive plans. He is currently 30% available. Brian will be responsible for committing sufficient personnel and resources to accomplish the work plan and schedule within the time frame defined. He will monitor progress, schedule, and budget and work closely with the Project Manager to ensure critical issues are addressed in a timely manner. Brian is a Project Manager with experience in municipal engineering. Since beginning his career in 1998, he has gained a range of experience in project administration from conception through construction. His background includes development and design of municipal reconstruction projects including street construction, sanitary sewer systems, lift stations, water distribution systems, stormwater collection systems, and pedestrian facility construction. His administrative duties have included preliminary engineering reports, cost estimates, preliminary and final design, presentations, attendance at city council meetings, bidding assistance, and construction administration. In addition, Brian has assisted in training young EIT’s on proper construction observation skills. He is an expert in trenchless technology techniques. Jane Kansier, AICP Project Manager Jane recently joined Bolton & Menk. She is currently working on a comprehensive plan update for the City of Scandia and anticipates working for up to three additional communities during the update process. Jane is currently 90% available. Jane will serve as the Project Manager and Lead Planner. She will be responsible for providing project supervision, client coordination, and will lead Bolton & Menk staff to ensure a quality Comprehensive Plan Update. Jane will also lead all public involvement efforts. Jane began her planning career in 1984 and has worked in city and county planning, city administration, and public transit. She has extensive experience in the coordination and development of comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, city codes, site plan and development review, and project management. Additionally, Jane has experience with city administration, grant writing, and public transit. Her primary duties include project management for services related to municipal planning, metropolitan area comprehensive plan development, and land use analysis and impacts. Relevant Experience •2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, City of Prior Lake, MN •2020 Comprehensive Plan Update, City of Prior Lake, MN •Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Rewrite, City of Prior Lake, MN •Rochester Land Development Manual, City of Rochester, MN •Northern Scott County Transit Study, Minnesota Valley Transit Authority Ashley Hudson Planner/Public Participation Ashley is anticipated to assist up to two other communities with comprehensive plan and/or transportation plan updates. She is currently 60% available. Ashley will support Jane in all aspects of the Land Use and Housing elements. She joined Bolton & Menk as a Transportation Planner and Landscape Designer in 2011. Her project work and education have given her experience with land use planning, landscape architecture, urban design, street and trail lighting design, and corridor planning projects at varying scales. Ashley has specific experience with stakeholder and public involvement activities, roadway and trail design projects, graphic representation of data and analysis, creative solutions, and research and writing. She is especially interested in incorporating successful and innovative techniques and materials that make for a valuable public involvement process. Relevant Experience •Parks and Trails Master Plan, City of Forest Lake, MN •Highway 10 Study and Anoka Land Use Subarea Study, Anoka County, MN •I-35 AUAR, City of Elko New Market, MN •CSAH 34 Traffic and Transportation Needs Study, Steele County, MN 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 8 Project Personnel Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Nick Meyers, GISP GIS/Planner Nick is anticipated to assist with GIS mapping for up to two comprehensive plan updates and multiple transportation plan updates. Nick is currently 50% available. Nick will be responsible for all GIS mapping including the online community issues map and creation of the GIS Story Maps for the online open houses. Nick will also provide planning support for the land use and housing elements. Nick is a GIS Project Manager with more than 10 years of experience related to Geographical Information Systems and planning. He has a range of experience including project management, public utility and infrastructure mapping, web application development, and municipal planning. Before his time at Bolton & Menk he worked in municipal government where he managed effective and efficient enterprise GIS systems and assisted with zoning ordinance development, zoning administration, and public involvement. Nick has gained extensive knowledge working with ESRI GIS software products including ArcGIS Desktop & Extensions, Model Builder, Python, ArcGIS for Server, and City Engine. Relevant Experience •Comprehensive Plan, City of St. Charles, MN •Comprehensive Plan, City of Luverne, MN •Highway 10 Access Planning Study, Anoka County, MN •County Trail Plan, Winona County, MN Doug Abere Senior Transportation Planner Doug is currently 70% available. Doug will be responsible for assisting in planning and leading the downtown design charrette, if this option is chosen. Doug is a Senior Project Manager and Transportation Planner who began his career in 1986. He has experience in project management, transportation planning, environmental planning, project development, and related research. Doug is currently serving MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council as Project Manager for the Principal Arterial Intersection Conversion Study, a first-of-its-kind project providing strategic guidance on investment priorities for the Twin Cities’ system of non-freeway principal arterials. In the last several years, he has also managed projects or led critical tasks to facilitate decision-making for the Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit project, Highway 61 Hastings Bridge Replacement project, St. Croix River Crossing (Visual Quality Manual and related facilitation), complex freeway system planning/visioning, and several other challenging transportation/environmental projects. Relevant Experience •Twin Cities Principal Arterial Intersection Conversion Study, MnDOT Metro District •I-35 AUAR, City of Elko New Market, MN Joel Odens, PLA, ASLA, LEED AP Landscape Architect Joel is anticipated to assist a few communities with the parks and trails component of their comprehensive plan update. He is currently 50% available. Joel will be responsible for assisting in planning and leading the downtown design charrette, if this option is chosen. Joel has been in the Landscape Architecture industry since 1996. His experience includes streetscape enhancements, park planning and trail design, mobility studies, highway landscape design, monumentation, commercial and mixed-use development, transit oriented development, and public memorials. Joel’s skills include client relations, marketing, presentation and facilitation, cost estimation, master planning, conceptual design, preparation of construction documents, and construction management. Joel enjoys working in multi-disciplinary atmospheres, focusing on serving the needs of clients while creating responsible, sustainable, and successful spaces. Relevant Experience •Parks and Trails Master Plan, City of Forest Lake, MN •Garden Park Trail Master Plan, City of Edina, MN •River Oaks Park Master Plan, City of Big Lake, MN Dave Breiter Graphic Design Coordinator Dave is currently 40% available. Dave will provide all graphic materials, website development, project branding, and support for online open houses for the Comprehensive Plan Update. Dave has a range of experience in graphic design, project branding, multimedia, and website production. His responsibilities include project management, design, and implementation of print materials; websites; 2D, 3D, and 4D project visualizations; project considerations maps and display panels; as well as video production. Dave 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 9 Project Personnel Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. is proficient in the use of Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Premiere Pro, After Effects, Audition & Dreamweaver, as well as SketchUp Pro, 3D Studio Max, and the Microsoft Office suite of programs. Relevant Experience •Comprehensive Plan Updates, City of Wabasha, MN •Comprehensive Plan Updates, City of Luverne, MN •Highway 10 Access Planning Study, Anoka County, MN •TH 25 Downtown Reconstruction, City of Buffalo, MN Madeline Peck, LEED GA Social Media Specialist Madeline is currently 60% available. Madeline will work closely with Jane to develop a social media strategy for the Comprehensive Plan Update. This includes identifying specific content and a schedule for posting materials/questions. She joined Bolton & Menk as a Landscape Designer in 2015. Her project work and education have given her experience with landscape architecture, urban design, and planning projects. Madeline has specific experience integrating social media into transportation planning projects. She is currently working on a project in South St. Paul that is transitioning from a planning stage to construction. Madeline’s Facebook outreach has been very successful with this project to inform a broader audience than just those attending traditional open house meetings. Relevant Experience •Southview Boulevard in South St. Paul, Dakota County, MN •Parks and Trails Master Plan Update, City of Big Lake, MN •Riverfront Drive Corridor Study, Mankato/North Mankato Area Planning Organization Relative Experience and References Section 3 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 10Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Relative Experience and References Relative Experience and References The following projects include recent and related experience completed by members of our team. Client satisfaction through quality deliverables, cost-effective rates, and timely project delivery are top priorities on all projects. Please feel free to contact the references that are included for each project. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, City of Prior Lake, Minnesota Reference: Frank Boyles, City Manager, 952-447-9801 Between 1996 and 2006, the City of Prior Lake experienced unprecedented growth and development. In 2003, the City entered into an Orderly Annexation Agreement with Spring Lake Township to annex nearly 700 acres of developable land over the next 20 years. This area was not included in any of the City’s long-range planning documents, so an overall update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan was required. This update included all elements of the plan, from land use and housing to infrastructure. Jane Kansier was the Planning Director for the City of Prior Lake during this time. It was her responsibility to coordinate all aspects of the Comprehensive Plan update. She was responsible for the preparation of the land use and housing elements, as well as for coordinating development of the technical plan elements by a series of consultants, and combining all the plans into a single document. Ultimately, Jane was responsible for guiding this document through the Metropolitan Council approval process. Downtown Development Guide, City of Prior Lake, Minnesota Reference: Frank Boyles, City Manager, 952-447-9801 Jane Kansier was part of a team that created a Downtown Development Guide for the City of Prior Lake. The purpose of this guide was to build on previous design and redevelopment recommendations to formulate specific recommendations for the downtown area as well as an action plan for implementation. The approved guidelines were used to define the downtown Main Avenue reconstruction project. These guidelines were also used as a basis for updated Zoning Ordinance requirements for the downtown district. Comprehensive Planning and Consulting, City of Wabasha, Minnesota Reference: Chad Springer, City Administrator, 651-565-4568 As Wabasha’s Planning Consultant, Bolton & Menk has been working on an update to their Comprehensive Plan. This includes a wide- ranging analysis of population, economic, and socio-economic trends, three steering committee workshops, completion of multiple community surveys for residents, non-residents, and students, City website updates, and small group discussions to define City-wide issues, opportunities, and strengths with key stakeholders. The Plan helped determine community goals and aspirations for the City of Wabasha and recommended policy in terms of land use, transportation, parks, trails, open space, natural resources, utilities, growth management, and land use. A final draft of the Plan has been completed. I-35 AUAR, Elko New Market, Minnesota Reference: Tom Terry, City Administrator, 952-467-2777 The Elko New Market Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) addressed a 265-acre study area which includes a proposed 125-acre warehousing/distribution project (the Ryan Companies Development) and 140 acres of surrounding land with potential for more industrial or commercial development. In nine months, as originally proposed, Bolton & Menk developed the complete EIS- level Draft AUAR and a Traffic Impact Study (TIS). The timely completion of the AUAR was essential to facilitate the economic development opportunities at the CSAH 2/I-35 interchange. Bolton & Menk completed the traffic studies in consultation with MnDOT Metro and Scott County, as well as extensive environmental data gathering and analyses. The result is an AUAR, traffic impact study, and Mitigation Plan that are coordinated with proposed transportation project development and other staged impacts and mitigations. ST87 ST87 GVX21 GVX27 GVX44 GVX27 ?A@13 GVX16 ST79 ST79 ?A@282 ?A@282 ?A@13 GVX17 GVX17 GVX12 ?A@13 ?A@13 ST81 GVX23 ?A@13 ST81 GVX21 GVX83 GVX42 GVX82 GVX44 GVX17 GVX12 GVX18 GVX23 GVX82 GVX83 GVX82 GVX83 GVX21 GVX21 ?A@13 ?A@13 GVX42 GVX42 ?A@13 GVX21 CLEARY LAKE RICE LAKE CRYSTAL LAKESPRING LAKE UPPER PRIOR LAKE ARCTIC LAKE LOWER PRIOR LAKE PIKE LAKE HAAS LAKE JEFFERS POND HOWARD LAKE MARKLEY LAKE BLIND LAKE CAMPBELL LAKE MYSTIC LAKE This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a surveyand is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information and data from various city,county and state offices and other sources. This documentshould be used for reference only. No representation is made that features presented accurately reflect true location. The City of Prior Lake, or any other entity from which data wasobtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissionsherein. If discrepancies are found, please contact theCity of Prior Lake. 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet APPROVED OCTOBER 2006Last Updated March 2011 Community Development & Natural Resources DepartmentX:/Planning/Comp_Plan/CompPlan2030_2011_11x17.mxd City of Prior Lake Minnesota 2011 .2030 COMPREHENSIVELAND USE PLAN Land Use Designations R-OS Recreation & Open Space Right-of-Way Lake SMSC Trust Land Park Public Classifications R-MD Urban Medium Density (4.1-7 U/AC) R-HD Urban High Density (7.1-20 U/AC) R-LD Urban Low Density (0-4 U/AC) R-RD Rural Density Residential Classifications I-PI Planned Industrial C-BO Business Office Park Office / Industrial Classifications C-HG Hospitality General Business T-TC Transitional Town Center C-TC Town Center C-CC Community Retail Shopping C-NR Neighborhood Retail Shopping Commercial Classifications City of Wabasha 2016-2035 Comprehensive Plan Adopted September 6, 2016 PREPARED FOR: City of Wabasha PREPARED BY: Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 11 Relative Experience and References Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Bolton & Menk also facilitated comprehensive stakeholder outreach to capture and respond to input from agencies, property owners, residents, and the general public. Several agencies, including MnDOT, were regularly engaged throughout as members of the Study Advisory Committee to address the need for interchange improvements. Today, the City continues to engage with MnDOT and other agencies to address plans to upgrade the I-35/CSAH 2 interchange, which was the major transportation planning focus of the AUAR. Bolton & Menk is also continuing work on the interchange, with a leadership role in addressing traffic and interchange configuration alternatives. CSAH 34 Corridor Study, Steele County, Minnesota Anita Benson, County Engineer, 507-444-7400 CSAH 34 is a developing corridor with changing traffic demands on a County minor arterial roadway. A hospital along the corridor is a major traffic generator. Future land use changes are expected in the area, including over 300 acres of future development. Additionally, there are capacity concerns with the I-35 interchange. Economic development goals are limited by the roadway capacity. There was a lack of access control to guide decisions and a lack of a unified plan for Steele County, the City of Owatonna, and MnDOT. Bolton & Menk studied a three-mile stretch of CSAH 34 from 24th Avenue NW to CSAH 8 to develop an implementation plan consisting of capacity and safety improvement projects required to accommodate the traffic growth and development for the next 15 years. The study resulted in a blueprint that was provided to guide future access decisions. The ARTery, City of Hopkins, Minnesota Reference: Nate Stanley, City Engineer, 952-935-8474 The City of Hopkins desired a plan and design for a vibrant and interactive, “pedestrian seductive,” 8th Avenue between the proposed Downtown Hopkins Light Rail Transit (LRT) station and historic Mainstreet. The process for achieving this goal was a visioning plan to create a corridor that is sensitive to the rich history of downtown, coupled with the progressive multimodal connection opportunities of the LRT station. Bolton & Menk designed and facilitated engagement between the community, artists, City staff, and technical experts to create an optimal plan using art. Through the use of innovative public outreach and a collaborative design process, a successful vision was developed for the ARTery. The success of this project lies in the flexible design approach to develop a multimodal, pedestrian-friendly corridor that also serves as an art-centric, urban linear park. $$ $ $ $ !"`$ GaWX !"`$ GaWX G¸WX A C B Ryan Companies Development Parcels S c o t t C o u n t y D a k o t a C o u n t y City ofElko NewMarket M a p D o c u m e n t : \\a r c s e r v e r 1 \g i s \E L N M \T 1 6 1 0 8 3 9 2 \E S R I \M a p s \F i g u r e 8 _1 0 8 3 9 2 _F u t u r e D e v e l o p m e n t A r e a s _1 1 x 1 7 .m x d D a t e S a v e d : 3 /1 1 /2 0 1 5 5 :3 6 :4 4 P M I-35 AUAR City of Elko New Market FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREAS FIGURE 8 Legend 0 700Feet I Source: Scott County, MnDNR, MnDOT, MnGeo Ryan Companies Development Parcels Environmental Study Area Potential New Public Street $Future Street Connection Future Commercial Future Industrial March 2015 A Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. – T42.108407 ^,ϯϰdƌĂĸĐΘ/ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐEĞĞĚƐ^ƚƵĚLJ /ŶƚƌŽĚƵĐƟŽŶ Page 4 Figure 1 - Study Area Un i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d DM&E R a i l r o a d S t r a igh t River S t r a i g h t Ri ver W F r o n t a g e R d D e e r T r a i l L a N E 3 r d A v e N W He m lo c k A v e Ce d a r A v e 4t h A v e N W NE 26th St NW 1 2th A v e K e ny on R d Ce d a r Av e WFrontag e R d Ke n yo n R d M SA S 1 3 2 NE 24th A v e E F r o n t a g e R d St P a u l R d 7t h A v e N E St P a u l R d 24 t h A v e N W ?x ? ? ? ?x ?x ?¦ ? ?l ?l ?¦? ?y !"`$ !"`$ 4 dWW?????? Won 4 t h h A A A v v A A e N N W W NNE 2266thh SSt W WWWWo dW??????????? N N N W WWFFrro Study AreaAllina Health Owatonna Clinic & Mayo Clinic Health Sytem SMC Quarry Owatonna Degner Regional Airport Willow Creek Intermediate School Waterpark El Shaddai Private School Owatonna Christian School There is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all solution. We recognize that every project and client are unique and we treat them that way Tasks and Schedule Section 4 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 12Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Tasks and Schedule Tasks and Schedule Task 1: Project Initiation A key to a successful project is making sure it starts off on the right foot. We will: Meet with City staff and the Planning Commission to finalize the schedule and scope of work. Conduct a community visit and inventory existing conditions. Review previously adopted planning documents from various City departments. Task 2: Public Outreach There are many ways to incorporate public interest and participation in a Comprehensive Plan project. A public participation process should serve to inform, engage, and provide an opportunity to collaborate with stakeholders. Each of the three options we are proposing includes elements in each of the three categories. Whichever option the City chooses, we expect this effort will provide an extensive opportunity for those interested to participate, and provide City Officials with a sufficient level of confidence there are no unanticipated issues, not yet raised to public consciousness, that need to be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan process. City Staff Involvement. Bolton & Menk staff will lead the effort, relying on City staff for feedback and interpretation of local issues and choices. We will work closely with City staff in a shared lead role for purposes of correspondence with the public and with public officials. Public Official Roles. With a history of working for local government in planning and zoning and engineering, we fully understand the role of public officials and the information they need to make informed and effective decisions. We work hard to build our relationship with the community so we can quickly absorb the issues to be addressed. This requires regular interaction with the Planning Commission and City Council members to understand their approaches to local government and land use policy, and to ensure that the new Comprehensive Plan truly captures the objectives they envision. Public Role. Public participation will engage the public through a combination of face-to-face interaction and online communication. The specific tasks included in the public outreach plan for all three options are listed below. Subtask 2.1: Online Outreach Online outreach is necessary to reach more community members. All tasks listed below are included in all three public outreach options as detailed in the Project Approach section: Subtask 2.1.1: Develop a Comprehensive Plan website - The website will be used for project information and updates. Subtask 2.1.2: Create an interactive “story” map - The map will be unique to Prior Lake. This technology will allow our team to ask specific questions focused on issues identification and allow stakeholders to respond by adding a comment tied to a location on the map. Subtask 2.1.3: Create an online survey - An online survey will be posted on the project website. We will work with staff to develop specific questions and topics for this survey. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 13 Tasks and Schedule Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Subtask 2.1.4: Social Media for the Comprehensive Plan - We will work with City staff to determine regular discussion forum topics to be integrated into the City’s existing social media accounts. Subtask 2.1.5: Online Public Open House - We will post materials provided at the traditional open house meetings for those unable to attend. Subtask 2.2: Face-to-Face Outreach (Option #1) Subtask 2.2.1: Meetings with City Staff - meetings will be conducted to review plan progress and provide input on project strategy and direction on an as needed basis. A minimum of four meetings are planned. Subtask 2.2.2: Public Open Houses - Our team will provide two open houses, open to all members of the public. The first will be an educational and informational gathering early in the process to identify issues and areas of importance. The second will occur later in the process to provide preliminary plans and exhibits for public comment. (Two meetings) Subtask 2.2.3: Presentations to Selected Groups - Our team will provide a presentation on the Comprehensive Plan to selected groups such as the Chamber of Commerce, service organizations or others recommended by the City. (Two presentations) Subtask 2.2.4: “Pop-Up” Meetings - Unlike traditional public meetings, “pop-up” meetings go where the public is already gathering such as community events, local farmers market, or the library. People are provided with written materials, asked to complete a short survey, and have the opportunity to ask questions. Our proposal includes two “pop-up” meetings at times and locations recommended by the City. (Two events) Subtask 2.2.5: 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan Update - Our team will participate in the 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan update to provide input on the Comprehensive Plan. (One meeting) Subtask 2.2.6: Planning Commission - Throughout the process, our team will provide regular updates to the Planning Commission. (Three meetings) Subtask 2.2.7: Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop - Upon completion of both the Land Use and Housing elements, our team will conduct a joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop to outline the plan and solicit input. (One meeting) Subtask 2.2: Face-to-Face Outreach (Option #2) The face-to face outreach in Option #2 expands on the outreach included in Option #1. Subtask 2.2.1: Meetings with City Staff - meetings will be conducted to review plan progress and provide input on project strategy and direction on an as needed basis. A minimum of four meetings are planned. Subtask 2.2.2: Public Open Houses - Our team will provide two open houses, open to all members of the public. The first will be an educational and informational gathering early in the process to identify issues and areas 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 14 Tasks and Schedule Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. of importance. The second will occur later in the process to provide preliminary plans and exhibits for public comment. (Two meetings) Subtask 2.2.3: Planning Commission Workshops - Our team will facilitate three workshops with the Planning Commission. The first workshop will include background on the Comprehensive Plan process and City data and projections. The Commissioners will complete a SWOT analysis to identify critical issues. The second workshop will review the results of the SWOT analysis and the initial open house, and provide input on the content of the online community survey. At the third workshop, the Commissioners will review the results of the online survey and provide recommendations on the Land Use Plan. (Three workshops) Subtask 2.2.4: Focus Groups - We will conduct personal interviews with community leaders utilizing a focus group approach. We anticipate three focus groups including: •Government leaders (City, County, School, Townships) •Business leaders •Residents (including youth and seniors) Subtask 2.2.5: “Pop-Up” Meetings - Unlike traditional public meetings, “pop-up” meetings go where the public is already gathering such as community events, local farmers market, or the library. People are provided with written materials, asked to complete a short survey, and have the opportunity to ask questions. Our proposal includes two “pop-up” meetings at times and locations recommended by the City. (Two events) Subtask 2.2.6: 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan Update - Our team will participate in the 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan update to provide input on the Comprehensive Plan. (One meeting) Subtask 2.2.7: Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop - Upon completion of both the Land Use and Housing elements, our team will conduct a joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop to outline the plan and solicit input. (One meeting) Subtask 2.2: Face-to-Face Outreach (Option #3) The face-to face outreach in Option #3 provides additional outreach and a design charrette specific to the downtown. Subtask 2.2.1: Meetings with City Staff - meetings will be conducted to review plan progress and provide input on project strategy and direction on an as needed basis. A minimum of four meetings are planners. Subtask 2.2.2: Public Open Houses - Our team will provide two open houses, open to all members of the public. The first will be an educational and informational gathering early in the process to identify issues and areas of importance. The second will occur later in the process to provide preliminary plans and exhibits for public comment. (Two meetings) Subtask 2.2.3: Establish a Comprehensive Plan Task Force - The task force will consist of 10-12 members from a mix of staff, elected and appointed officials, and community volunteers. This committee will provide overall direction on the Comprehensive Plan. Our team will facilitate three workshops with the Task Force. The first workshop will include background on the Comprehensive Plan process and City data and projections. Task Force members will complete a SWOT analysis to identify critical issues. The second workshop will review the results of the SWOT analysis and the initial open house, and provide input on the content of the online community survey. At the third workshop, the Task Force will review the results of the online survey and provide recommendations on the Land Use Plan. (Three meetings) Subtask 2.2.4: Focus Groups - We will conduct personal interviews with community leaders utilizing a focus group approach. We anticipate three focus groups including: •Government leaders (City, County, School, Townships) •Business leaders •Residents (including youth and seniors) 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 15 Tasks and Schedule Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Subtask 2.2.5: “Pop-Up” Meetings - Unlike traditional public meetings, “pop-up” meetings go where the public is already gathering such as community events, local farmers market, or the library. People are provided with written materials, asked to complete a short survey, and have the opportunity to ask questions. Our proposal includes two “pop-up” meetings at times and locations recommended by the City. (Two events) Subtask 2.2.6: Downtown Design Charrette - A charrette is an intensive planning session where citizens, designers, and others collaborate on a vision for development. It provides a forum for ideas and offers the unique advantage of giving immediate feedback to the designers. More importantly, it allows everyone who participates to be a mutual author of the plan. Our team will facilitate a one day charrette focused on Downtown Prior Lake and connections to the South Lake District. Our team will organize the charrette into three focus areas: north downtown, south downtown, and west downtown. Participants will envision downtown boundaries, long range uses, interim uses, and connections. Following the charrette, we will provide a report outlining the vision of the participants. (One meeting) Subtask 2.2.7: 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan Update - Our team will participate in the 2040 Vision and Strategic Plan update to provide input on the Comprehensive Plan. (One meeting) Subtask 2.2.8: Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop - Upon completion of both the Land Use and Housing elements, our team will conduct a joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop to outline the plan and solicit input. (One meeting) Subtask 2.3: Public Hearing Minnesota Statutes require a public hearing on the Draft Comprehensive Plan Update. If requested, we will attend the Planning Commission public hearing on the plan to be scheduled by staff in early 2018. Subtask 2.4: Press Releases, Notices, and Newspaper Articles We will work with City staff to prepare press releases and notices to announce public events both in-person and online. We will also help develop content for newspaper articles to create interest and provide updates on the Comprehensive Plan process. Task 3: Data Gathering and Analysis This task includes review of existing plans and identification of issues and needs. We will also obtain GIS data and develop mapping. Task 4: Land Use Plan Element The purpose of the Land Use Plan element is to define future development and opportunities. Our work plan is designed so the Land Use Plan element will meet all requirements of Minnesota Statutes and the Metropolitan Council. All of the required tables and figures will be included in the Plan. Subtask 4.1: Introduction The Introduction will acknowledge the Metropolitan Council’s population, household, and employment forecasts and the existing community designation and expected density. Subtask 4.2: Existing Land Use •Identify and map existing land uses •Calculate acreage and percentage of each land use •Identify and map vacant or underutilized properties for future development •Identify and map SMSC properties: °Calculate the share of population, households, and employment for SMSC properties and subtract from Metropolitan Council forecasts °Work with the Metropolitan Council for approval of this revision 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 16 Tasks and Schedule Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Subtask 4.3: Future Land Use •Review existing land use designations and recommend changes or modifications •Identify appropriate future, long-term land use designations for all parcels, regardless of existing use •Identify density ranges for each residential land use designation •Provide a vacant land use capacity analysis to identify potential future growth areas in the City •Identify and map location of forecasted residential growth •Identify areas appropriate for more in depth planning studies •Provide a Future Land Use Map •Identify net developable acreage for each residential land use •Review current Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, and identify changes required for consistency with the new Plan Subtask 4.4: Staged Development The Emerging Suburban Edge classification requires a plan for staged development in 10-year increments. The Staging Plan will be carried through all elements of the plan and will: •Provide a table identifying staged development including future land uses, acres, and density ranges for each 10-year increment •Provide a map identifying the staging Subtask 4.5: Orderly Annexation Area •Identify timing of annexation for properties within the Orderly Annexation Area •Provide recommendations for timing of development based on location of existing services Subtask 4.6: Special Resource Protection •Identify areas of special resources including: °Natural resources: incorporate existing natural resource inventory into the Plan °Historic sites °Aggregate resources °Agricultural preserves •Describe the goals and priorities for concerning protection and conservation of these resources Task 5: Housing Element More than 90% of the land uses in Prior Lake are housing- related, so this element of the Comprehensive Plan is important to Prior Lake. Our work plan is designed to meet all requirements of Minnesota Statutes and the Metropolitan Council. Subtask 5.1: Existing Conditions •Complete an existing housing assessment including total number of units, number of units by type, owner occupied and rental units, housing values, number of publicly subsidized units by type, and number of existing households experiencing a housing cost burden •Map owner-occupied housing units by assessed value Subtask 5.2: Future Demand •Provide an analysis of existing housing needs and priorities including a discussion of how the Land Use Plan addresses future needs Subtask 5.3: Affordable Housing Needs Allocation •Identify the City’s allocation of affordable housing •Analyze and provide a recommendation to the City on how to guide sufficient land needed to meet the minimum densities, based on the options provided by the Metropolitan Council Local Planning Handbook Subtask 5.4: Implementation Plan •Draft housing goals, policies and objectives for City approval •Identify public programs, fiscal devices, and other specific actions that could be used to meet existing and projected housing needs including in what circumstance and in what sequence each tool may be used Task 6: Final Plans Bolton & Menk will provide the final Land Use and Housing Plan elements by the end of August 2017. Our staff will provide assistance to City staff in the public hearing process and final adoption of the complete Comprehensive Plan. Tasks and Schedule 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 17Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Month Week of 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 1.0 Project Initiation 1.1 Finalize Contract 1.2 Meet with City staff ‐ Finalize Scope of Work and Schedule 1.3 Meet with Planning Commission ‐ Finalize Outreach Plan 1.4 Community Visit 2.0 Public Outreach (Specific Schedule Depends on Chosen Option) 2.0 Finalize Outreach Plan 2.1 Online Outreach Develop and Update Website Create Interactive Story Map Create Online Survey Social Media Updates Online Public Open House 2.2 Face‐to‐Face Outreach Meetings with City Staff Public Open Houses Selected Group Presentations (Option 1) "Pop‐Up" Meetings 2040 Vision & Strategic Plan Update Planning Commission Updates (Option 1 and Option 3) Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop Planning Commission Workshops (Option 2) Focus Groups (Options 2 and 3) Comprehensive Plan Task Force (Option 3) Downtown Design Charrette (Option 3) 2.3 Public Hearing 2.4 Press Releases, Notices, and Newspaper Articles 3.0 Data Gathering and Analysis 3.1 Data Gathering and Analysis 3.2 Obtain GIS Data and Develop Mapping 4.0 Land Use Element 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Existing Land Use 4.3 Future Land Use 4.4 Staged Development 4.5 Orderly Annexation Area 4.6 Special Resource Protection 4.7 Submit Final Draft 5.0 Housing Element 5.1 Existing Conditions 5.2 Future Demand 5.3 Affordable Housing Needs Allocation 5.4 Implementation Plan 5.5 Submit Final Draft 6.0 Final Product 6.1 Final Plan Edits 6.2 Submit Final Plans 7.0 Plan Approval 7.1 Public Hearing All Options Option 1 Only Option 1 and Option 3 Option 2 Only Option 2 and Option 3 Option 3 Only March April September ‐  December 2017 2018 November 2016 July AugustDecember January February January FebruaryMay June  11 Project Schedule Costs Section 5 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 18 Costs Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Costs Our team understands the importance of delivering a project ontime and within budget. We closely monitor our time and budget to ensure efficiency of our staff and value to our clients. Any issues relating to requested potential budget impacts will be communicated in a timely manner. We have provided three cost proposals. The difference in costs for each proposal is based on the public outreach approach. Our total not-to-exceed fee will depend on the option the City chooses. We have also included the additional 20 hours of work anticipated following the completion of this project under “Final Plan Approval.” Because we understand the proposed scope of work, especially the public outreach component, is dynamic and subject to modification, our scope of services and estimated fee is open to further negotiation. Please note there will be no charge for the services of our Principal-in-Charge. Costs Client: City of Prior Lake Project: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Task No. Work Task Description Pr i n c i p a l ‐in ‐ Ch a r g e Pr o j e c t   Ma n a g e r Pl a n n e r / P u b l i c   Pa r t i c i p a t i o n GI S / P l a n n e r Se n i o r   Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n   Pl a n n e r La n d s c a p e   Ar c h i t e c t Gr a p h i c s   De s i g n   Co o r d i n a t o r So c i a l  Me d i a   Sp e c i a l i s t Cl e r i c a l Total  Hours Total  Cost 1.0 Project Initiation 2 4 10 40000020$1,800 2.0 Public Outreach 12 30 80 50 0 0 34 20 4 230 $21,708 3.0 Data Gathering 0 0 24 24 0000048$4,560 4.0 Land Use Element 2 2 41 39 0000084$7,850 5.0 Housing Element 2 4 38 38 0000082$7,780 6.0 Final Product 2 4640080024$2,376 7.0 Plan Approval 2 6 10 40000022$2,080 Total Hours 22 50 209 163 0 0 42 20 4 510 Average Hourly Rate $148.00 $140.00 $80.00 $110.00 $160.00 $120.00 $112.00 $80.00 $50.00 Subtotal $0 $7,000 $16,720 $17,930 $0 $0 $4,704 $1,600 $200 $48,154 Detailed Cost Estimate Total Not‐to‐Exceed Fee Option #1 Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project Name City of XXX, Minnesota Section X ‐ Page X Client: City of Prior Lake Project: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Task No. Work Task Description Pr i n c i p a l ‐in ‐ Ch a r g e Pr o j e c t   Ma n a g e r Pl a n n e r / P u b l i c   Pa r t i c i p a t i o n GI S / P l a n n e r Se n i o r   Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n   Pl a n n e r La n d s c a p e   Ar c h i t e c t Gr a p h i c s   De s i g n   Co o r d i n a t o r So c i a l  Me d i a   Sp e c i a l i s t Cl e r i c a l Total  Hours Total  Cost 1.0 Project Initiation 2 4 10 40000020$1,800 2.0 Public Outreach 12 32 88 62 0 0 30 20 6 250 $23,600 3.0 Data Gathering 0 0 24 24 0000048$4,560 4.0 Land Use Element 2 2 41 39 0000084$7,850 5.0 Housing Element 2 4 38 38 0000082$7,780 6.0 Final Product 2 4640080024$2,376 7.0 Plan Approval 2 6 10 40000022$2,080 Total Hours 22 52 217 175 0 0 38 20 6 530 Average Hourly Rate $148.00 $140.00 $80.00 $110.00 $160.00 $120.00 $112.00 $80.00 $50.00 Subtotal $0 $7,280 $17,360 $19,250 $0 $0 $4,256 $1,600 $300 Total Not‐to‐Exceed Fee Option #2 $50,046 Detailed Cost Estimate Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project Name City of XXX, Minnesota Section X ‐ Page X Option #1 Option #2 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 19 Costs Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Client: City of Prior Lake Project: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Task No. Work Task Description Pr i n c i p a l ‐in ‐ Ch a r g e Pr o j e c t   Ma n a g e r Pl a n n e r / P u b l i c   Pa r t i c i p a t i o n GI S / P l a n n e r Se n i o r   Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n   Pl a n n e r La n d s c a p e   Ar c h i t e c t Gr a p h i c s   De s i g n   Co o r d i n a t o r So c i a l  Me d i a   Sp e c i a l i s t Cl e r i c a l Total  Hours Total  Cost 1.0 Project Initiation 2 4 10 40000020$1,800 2.0 Public Outreach 12 52 104 78 16 16 42 20 6 346 $35,264 3.0 Data Gathering 0 0 24 24 0000048$4,560 4.0 Land Use Element 2 2 41 39 0000084$7,850 5.0 Housing Element 2 4 38 38 0000082$7,780 6.0 Final Product 2 4640080024$2,376 7.0 Plan Approval 2 6 10 40000022$2,080 Total Hours 22 72 233 191 16 16 50 20 6 626 Average Hourly Rate $148.00 $140.00 $80.00 $110.00 $160.00 $120.00 $112.00 $80.00 $50.00 Subtotal $0 $10,080 $18,640 $21,010 $2,560 $1,920 $5,600 $1,600 $300 Total Not‐to‐Exceed Fee Option #3 $61,710 Detailed Cost Estimate Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project Name City of XXX, Minnesota Section X ‐ Page X Option #3 Conflict of Interest Section 6 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update | City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 20 Conflict of Interest Submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. Conflict of Interest Bolton & Menk, Inc. recognizes the importance of its municipal relationships and is committed to working with all of its municipal clients to minimize actual or perceived conflicts. Although a minor part of the firm’s total business, Bolton & Menk does provide service to some private developers with industrial, commercial, and residential interests. In general, work with real estate developers is less than 3% of the firm’s total billings. At this time, we are not aware of any current clients with active projects within or adjoining the City. In the past, Bolton & Menk has provided service to the Metropolitan Council, including MCES and Metro Transit. We are currently concluding the Arterial Intersection Conversion Study for the Transportation Division of the Metropolitan Council. In providing engineering services to many municipalities and other public agencies in the Upper Midwest, Bolton & Menk occasionally must address competing interests between our public clients. Bolton & Menk has normally been able to ethically and successfully represent the overlapping interests of its public clients by providing internal staff separation for the work performed. Prior to accepting competing public project assignments, it is Bolton & Menk standard policy to notify the City and the other public agency requesting services that a potential conflict may exist. We will then make appropriate arrangements, such as re-assignment, to prevent any actual conflict of interest. Conflict of Interest Standard Agreement for Professional Services This Agreement (“Agreement”) is made on the day of November, 2016, between the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota (hereinafter "City"), whose business address is 4646 Dakota Street SE, Prior Lake, MN 55372, and Bolton & Menk, Inc, whose business address is 12224 Nicollet Avenue, Burnsville, MN 55337-1649. Preliminary Statement The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide a variety of professional services for City projects. That policy requires that persons, firms or corporations providing such services enter into written agreements with the City. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of professional services by Consultant for completion of the Land Use Plan and Housing Plan for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update hereinafter referred to as the "Work". The City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. Scope of Work. The Consultant agrees to provide the professional services shown in Exhibit A Scope of Work in connection with the Work. The terms of this Agreement shall take precedence over any provisions of the Consultants proposal and/or general conditions. If the Consultants proposal is attached as the Exhibit A Scope of Work, City reserves the right to reject any general conditions in such proposal. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from November 15, 2016 to March 1, 2018 the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate, and upon the terms and conditions as herein stated. 3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant on an hourly basis plus expenses in a total amount not to exceed $50,046 for the services as described in Exhibit A. A. Any changes in the scope of the work which may result in an increase to the compensation due the Consultant shall require prior written approval by an authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional compensation for services that do not have prior written authorization. B. Special Consultants may be utilized by the Consultant when required by the complex or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City. C. If Consultant is delayed in performance due to any cause beyond its reasonable control, including but not limited to strikes, riots, fires, acts of God, governmental actions, actions of a third party, or actions or inactions of City, the time for performance shall be extended by a period of time lost by reason of the delay. Consultant will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due to the delay. Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 2 of 9 4. City Information. The City agrees to provide the Consultant with the complete information concerning the Scope of the Work and to perform the following services: A. Access to the Area. Depending on the nature of the Work, Consultant may from time to time require access to public and private lands or property. As may be necessary, the City shall obtain access to and make all provisions for the Consultant to enter upon public and private lands or property as required for the Consultant to perform such services necessary to complete the Work. B. Consideration of the Consultant's Work. The City shall give thorough consideration to all reports, sketches, estimates, drawings, and other documents presented by the Consultant, and shall inform the Consultant of all decisions required of City within a reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the Consultant. C. Standards. The City shall furnish the Consultant with a copy of any standard or criteria, including but not limited to, design and construction standards that may be required in the preparation of the Work for the Project. D. City's Representative. A person shall be appointed to act as the City's representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. He or she shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret, and define the City's policy and decisions with respect to the services provided or materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the work covered by this Agreement. 5. Method of Payment. The Consultant shall submit to the City, on a monthly basis, an itemized invoice for professional services performed under this Agreement. Invoices submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City for: A. Progress Payment. For work reimbursed on an hourly basis, the Consultant shall indicate for each employee, his or her name, job title, the number of hours worked, rate of pay for each employee, a computation of amounts due for each employee, and the total amount due for each project task. Consultant shall verify all statements submitted for payment in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.38 and 471.391. For reimbursable expenses, if provided for in Exhibit A, the Consultant shall provide an itemized listing and such documentation as reasonably required by the City. Each invoice shall contain the City’s project number and a progress summary showing the original (or amended) amount of the contract, current billing, past payments and unexpended balance of the contract. B. Suspended Work. If any work performed by the Consultant is suspended in whole or in part by the City, the Consultant shall be paid for any services set forth on Exhibit A performed prior to receipt of written notice from the City of such suspension. C. Payments for Special Consultants. The Consultant shall be reimbursed for the work of special consultants, as described herein, and for other items when authorized in writing by the City. D. Claims. To receive any payment on this Agreement, the invoice or bill must include the following signed and dated statement: “I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid.” Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 3 of 9 6. Project Manager and Staffing. The Consultant has designated Jane Kansier, Project Manager, to serve on the Project. She shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Work in accordance with the terms established herein. Consultant may not remove or replace the designated staff from the Project without the approval of the City. 7. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of its services as is ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar circumstances in Scott County, Minnesota. Consultant shall be liable to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss, or damages proximately caused by Consultant's breach of this standard of care. Consultant shall put forth reasonable efforts to complete its duties in a timely manner. Consultant shall not be responsible for delays caused by factors beyond its control or that could not be reasonably foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for costs, delays or damages arising from unreasonable delays in the performance of its duties. 8. Audit Disclosure and Data Practices. Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, or prepared or assembled by the Consultant under this Agreement which the City requests to be kept confidential, shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the City's prior written approval. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six (6) years after the effective date of this Agreement. This Agreement is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Data Practices Act). All government data, as defined in the Data Practices Act Section 13.02, Subd 7, which is created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant in performing any of the functions of the City during performance of this Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Data Practice Act and Consultant shall comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. All subcontracts entered into by Consultant in relation to this Agreement shall contain similar Data Practices Act compliance language. 9. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days written notice delivered to the other party at the address written above. Upon termination under this provision, if there is no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the City terminates the Agreement because the Consultant has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Consultant, and the City may retain another consultant to undertake or complete the W ork identified herein. 10. Subcontractor. The Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement except as noted in the Scope of Work, without the express written consent of the City. The Consultant shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this Agreement within ten (10) days of the Consultant's receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Consultant fails within that time to pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the Consultant has received payment by the City, the Consultant shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the rate of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month. The Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 4 of 9 minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the Consultant shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Consultant shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 11. Independent Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor engaged by City to perform the services described herein and as such (i) shall employ such persons as it shall deem necessary and appropriate for the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Agreement, who shall be employees, and under the direction, of Consultant and in no respect employees of City, and (ii) shall have no authority to employ persons, or make purchases of equipment on behalf of City, or otherwise bind or obligate City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of the City. 12. Insurance. a. General Liability. Prior to starting the Work, Consultant shall procure, maintain and pay for such insurance as will protect against claims or loss which may arise out of operations by Consultant or by any subcontractor or by anyone employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Such insurance shall include, but not be limited to, minimum coverages and limits of liability specified in this Paragraph, or required by law. b. Consultant shall procure and maintain the following minimum insurance coverages and limits of liability for the Work: Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits Employer’s Liability $500,000 each accident $500,000 disease policy limit $500,000 disease each employee Commercial General Liability $1,500,000 property damage and bodily injury per occurrence $2,000,000 general aggregate $2,000,000 Products – Completed Operations Aggregate $100,000 fire legal liability each occurrence $5,000 medical expense Comprehensive Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit each accident (shall include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owed vehicles.) Umbrella or Excess Liability $1,000,000 c. Commercial General Liability. The Commercial General Liability Policy shall be on ISO form CG 00 01 12 07 or CG 00 01 04 13, or the equivalent. Such insurance shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products- completed operations, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract). Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 5 of 9 There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability form arising from pollution, explosion, collapse, underground property damage or work performed by subcontractors. d. Professional Liability Insurance. In addition to the coverages listed above, Consultant shall maintain a professional liability insurance policy in the amount of $2,000,000. Said policy need not name the City as an additional insured. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the professional liability insurance. Consultant agrees to maintain the professional liability insurance for a minimum of two (2) years following termination of this Agreement. e. Consultant shall maintain “stop gap” coverage if Consultant obtains Workers’ Compensation coverage from any state fund if Employer’s liability coverage is not available. f. All policies, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, Automobile Policy, and Professional Liability Policy, shall name the “City of Prior Lake” as an additional insured on ISO forms CG 20 10 07 04 or CG 20 10 04 13; and CG 20 37 07 04 or CG 20 37 04 13, or their equivalent. g. All policies, except the Professional Liability Policy, shall apply on a “per project” basis. h. All polices shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City. i. All policies, except for the Worker’s Compensation Policy and the Professional Liability Policy, shall be primary and non-contributory. j. All polices, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, shall insure the defense and indemnity obligations assumed by Consultant under this Agreement. k. Consultant agrees to maintain all coverage required herein throughout the term of the Agreement and for a minimum of two (2) years following City’s written acceptance of the Work. l. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the coverages required herein. m. All policies shall contain a provision or endorsement that coverages afforded thereunder shall not be cancelled or non-renewed or restrictive modifications added, without thirty (30) days’ prior notice to the City, except that if the cancellation or non - renewal is due to non-payment, the coverages may not be terminated or non-renewed without ten (10) days’ prior notice to the City. n. Consultant shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required under this Paragraph at Consultant’s sole expense and with insurance companies licensed to do business in the state in Minnesota and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A-, unless specifically accepted by City in writing. o. A copy of the Consultant’s Certificate of Insurance which evidences the compliance with this Paragraph, must be filed with City prior to the start of Consultant’s Work. Upon request a copy of the Consultant’s insurance declaration Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 6 of 9 page, Rider and/or Endorsement, as applicable shall be provided. Such documents evidencing Insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide satisfactory evidence that Consultant has complied with all insurance requirements. Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of the required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such Certificate of Insurance, declaration page, Rider, Endorsement or certificates or other evidence of insurance, or to advise Consultant of any deficiencies in such documents and receipt thereof shall not relieve Consultant from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City’s right to enforce the terms of Consultant’s obligations hereunder. City reserves the right to examine any policy provided for under this paragraph. p. Effect of Consultant’s Failure to Provide Insurance. If Consultant fails to provide the specified insurance, then Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City's officials, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability and expense (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation) to the extent necessary to afford the same protection as would have been provided by the specified insurance. Except to the extent prohibited by law, this indemnity applies regardless of any strict liability or negligence attributable to the City (including sole negligence) and regardless of the extent to which the underlying occurrence (i.e., the event giving rise to a claim which would have been covered by the specified insurance) is attributable to the negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission (including breach of contract) of Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees or delegates. Consultant agrees that this indemnity shall be construed and applied in favor of indemnification. Consultant also agrees that if applicable law limits or precludes any aspect of this indemnity, then the indemnity will be considered limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The stated indemnity continues until all applicable statutes of limitation have run. If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity, the City may require Consultant to: i. Furnish and pay for a surety bond, satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing performance of the indemnity obligation; or ii. Furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from Consultant's insurance company. Consultant will take the action required by the City within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice from the City. 13. Indemnification. Consultant will defend and indemnify City, its officers, agents, and employees and hold them harmless from and against all judgments, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including a reasonable amount as and for its attorney’s fees paid, incurred or for which it may be liable resulting from any breach of this Agreement by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, or any negligent or intentional act or omission performed, taken or not performed or taken by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, relative to this Agreement. City will indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from and against any loss for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent acts of the City, its officers, agents or employees. 14. Ownership of Documents. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports and information generated in connection with the performance of the Agreement (“Information”) shall become the property of the City, but Consultant may retain copies of such documents as Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 7 of 9 records of the services provided. The City may use the Information for its purposes and the Consultant also may use the Information for its purposes. Use of the Information for the purposes of the project contemplated by this Agreement (“Project”) does not relieve any liability on the part of the Consultant, but any use of the Information by the City or the Consultant beyond the scope of the Project is without liability to the other, and the party using the Information agrees to defend and indemnify the other from any claims or liability resulting therefrom. 15. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age. The Consultant shall post in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non- discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Consultant shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontract s for program work. The Consultant further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 16. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing services hereunder, the Consultant shall abide by statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. Any violation of statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the services to be provided shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to immediately terminate this Agreement 17. Mediation. Each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to this agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating arbitration or legal or equitable actions by either party. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration Association and the other party. No arbitration or legal or equitable action may be instituted for a period of 90 days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. Mediation shall be held in the City of Prior Lake unless another location is mutually agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall memorialize any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, which agreement shall be enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 18. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 19. Services Not Provided For. No claim for services furnished by the Consultant not specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City. 20. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Agreement. Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 8 of 9 21. Entire Agreement. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 22. Waiver. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 24. Conflicts. No salaried officer or employee of the City and no member of the Council of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement. The violation of this provision renders the Agreement void. 25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original. Executed as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE Mayor City Manager BOLTON & MENK, INC. By: Its: Standard Agreement for Professional Services Bolton & Menk 11/2016 Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT A Scope of Work (Bolton & Menk 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal to be attached)