HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-11PCRESOLUTION 9611PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES;
1. A 2,302 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LOT AREA OF 5,198
SQU.AP,.E FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 7,500 SQUARE FEET;
2. A 7% VARIANCE TO PERMIT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE
OF 37% INSTEAD OF THE PERMITTED 30%;
3. A 9.25 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A
SETBACK OF 15.75 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET;
4. AND A 2 FOOT VARIANCE ON THE WEST TO PERMIT A SIDE YARD
SETBACK OF 8 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 10 FEET;
ALL RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 16500 INGUADONA BEACH CIRCLE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
LOT 18, INGUADONA BEACH,
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
Gene and Coleen Tremaine have applied for variances from Sections 4 and 9 of
the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a new house with
attached garage on property located in the R1 -Urb.an Residential and SD-
Shoreland Districts at the following location, to wit;
16500 Inguadona Beach, legally described as Lot 18, Inguadona Beach,
Scott County, Minnesota.
The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variance as contained
in Case 96-017VA and held a hearing thereon on March 25, 1996.
The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the cormmunity, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan.
16200 L~kl~cr~ek'nAve. S.E.. Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQCAL OPPORTUblTY EMPLOYER
Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it
is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance
will not result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, un_reasonably
diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be
contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such
property, and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such
land is located. Among the conditions applying to the subject property wi'rich the
Board of Adjustment relied upon are; 1) its small size, 2) its narrowness, 3) the
association property adjacent to the subject site functions as if it were a part of
the subject site for purposes of impervious surface coverage.
The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as
a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship.
The contents of Planning Case 96-017A are hereby entered into and made a part
of the public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section
5-6-8 of the Ordinance Code the variance will be deemed to be abandoned,
and thus will be null and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder
of the variance has failed to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate pen-nits
for the completion of contemplated improvements.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and
approves the following variances;
1. A 2,302 SQUAILE FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LOT AREA OF 5,198
SQUARE FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 7,500 SQUARE FEET;
2. A 7% VARIANCE TO PER,MIT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE
OF 37% INSTEAD OF THE PERMITTED 30%;
3. A 9.25 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A
SETBACK OF 15.75 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET;
4. AND A 2 FOOT VAR/ANCE ON THE WEST TO PERMIT A SIDE YAR/)
SETBACK OF 8 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 10 FEET;
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on April 8, 1996.
961 I.DOC/KML 2