HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-12PCRESOLUTION 9612PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A REQUEST FOR;
1. A 13' LAKESHORE VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LAKESHORE SETBACK
OF 37' INSTEAD OF THE PERMITTED 50' UNDER SECTION 9.3(D)2 OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
2. A 5' FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SETBACK OF
20' INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25';
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE WITH ATTACHED GARAGE ON
PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 6 AND 7, "INGUADONA BEACH",
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AND LOCATED IN THE RI-SUBURBAN
RESIDENTIAL AND SD-SHORELAND DISTRICTS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
Muriel Rounavar has applied for variances fzom Sections 4 and 9 of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a new house with attached garage
on property located in the RI-Suburban Residential zoning district and the SD-
Shoreland District at the following location, to wit;
Lots 6 and 7, "INGUADONA BEACH", Scott County, Minnesota.
The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variance as contained
in Case 96-026VA and held a hearing thereon on April 8, 1996.
The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan.
The request does not meet the Ordinance criteria, in that reasonable use of the
property can be obtained if the Ordinance is literally applied, and legal
alternatives exist for placing a house and garage on the property.
16200 F~lt~e. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
The granting of the variances is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variances would serve merely
as a convenience to the applicant, but is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship.
The contents of Planning Case 96-026VA are hereby entered into and made a part
of the public record and the record of decision for this ease
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
requested variance.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on April 8, 1996, 1996.
ATTEST:
Richard Kuykendall, Chair
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
9612PC.DOC/CC 2