HomeMy WebLinkAboutVariance 02-029 survey pg 5
cfIoc {)L /
Jtt{~ /11~/
U(O)"{It.?L~
Resolution
and ~inutes
.
Lf-ZZ-t5Z Fe 7r[~n (~~~
!Y (3 - D 2 pf! ~rFl~l/l1x;tt'4---
Ra4. DL- CJDS- ~
L:\TEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
RESOLUTION 02-00SPC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 24-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A I-FOOT FRONT
SETBACK; A 3.SS-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SUM OF SIDE YARDS OF 11.42-
FEET; S.9-FOOTVARIANCE TO BUILDING SEPARATION OF 9.I-FEET; A 4.7-FOOT
AND S-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT AN EAVE/GUTTER ENCROACHMENT IN
FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINES; A 6-FOOT AND 2.IS-FOOT VARIANCE FOR
BUILDING WALLS OVER 50-FEET LONG; A 3.7-FOOT AND 4-FOOT VARIANCES
TO PERMIT A DRIVEWAY WIDTH AND SETBACK TO A FRONT AND SIDE LOT
LINES
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Steven W. & Patricia 1. Mosey (applicant/owner) have applied for variances from the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a garage and room addition to a single
family residence on property located in the R-l (Low Density Residential) District and the
SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at the following location, 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue
SE, and legally described as follows;
Lot 14, Oakland Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in Case
#02-029PC and held hearings thereon on April 22, and May 13,2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,
safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light
and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the
surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, the proposed
variance will result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
properties, umeasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire,
and danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant proposed a garage/room addition with a zero setback to the front lot line and
platted road right-of-way, this creates a potential safety issue for the subject property and use
of the right-of-way.
5. A legal building envelope for a garage addition exists on the subject lot that meets or reduces
the requested variances for setbacks to the front and side yards, sum of side yards, eave
encroachment, building walls over 50-feet, and driveway location. The applicant has control
1:\02fi1es\02variances\02-029\dnyres2.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
over the garage and room addition design and shape, such that the hardship has been created
by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists with a smaller building footprint.
6. There is no justifiable hardship caused by the required building setbacks as reasonable use of
the property exists without the granting of the variances.
7. The granting of the variance, as originally requested, is not necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will serve
merely as a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship. The factors above allow for an alternative structure to be permitted with a reduced
variance or none at all.
8. The contents of Planning Case 02-029PC are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the following
variances for a future garage and room additions to a single-family dwelling as shown in
attached Attachment I - Certificate of Survey;
1. A 24-foot variance to permit a I-foot structure setback to a front property line, rather than
25-feet as required for front yard setbacks [Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional
Standards (3)].
2. A 3.58-foot variance to permit a sum of side yards of 11.42-feet on a nonconforming lot of
record rather than the minimum required 15-feet [Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required
Yards/Open Space (8)].
3. A 5.9-foot variance to permit a building separation of9.I-feet between all structures on the
nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot, rather than the minimum required 15-feet
[Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required Yards/Open Space (8)].
4. A 4.7-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within .3-feet from a side
lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard
encroachments (I)].
5. A 5-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within 0' of the front lot line
rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard
encroachments (I)].
6. A 6-foot variance to permit a building wall 63.8-feet in length to be setback 1.3-feet from a
side lot line rather than the minimum required 7.3-feet for building walls over 50-feet
[Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (6)].
7. A 2.18-foot variance to permit a 63.8-foot building wall to be setback 1O.12-foot to a side lot
line rather than the required minimum 12.3-feet for building walls over 50-feet Ordinance
Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (6)].
1:\02files\02variances\02-029\dnyres2.doc
2
8. A 3.7-foot variance to permit a driveway setback of 1.3-feet, rather than the minimum
required setback of5-feet [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways (1)].
9. A 4' variance to permit a 28' driveway width at the right-of-way line rather than the
maximum allowed 24' [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways (I)].
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on May 13,2002.
l
~EST: ~? ()
l)j~ h
Donald R. Rye, Co rt1'ity Development Director
AntIrony . St mson, Commission Chair
1:\02fi1es\02variances\02-029\dnyres2.doc
3
)0-
w
~
::>>
(IJ
u.
o
w
ti
u
-
LL.
-
t:
w
o
,...
....
z
w
:E
::E:
~
~
t:i
.~~
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
STEVE MOSEY
14524 GLENDALE AVENUE S.E
PRIOR LAKE, MH. 55372
GoO......' -..
~,
.
',~ -' '
Valley S~rveyin9 Co., P A.
16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL SE
PRIOR LAKE. MH. 55372
(9521447- 2570
...
~--.... ---------
-
...,."
~..\o~
..~t. "I
\,....,.01
,,~ .,.t ,"
. <0 ._O,OoOIlc.IIDnoeoo I
-:'-.~.'...."'- ,~ r~;~! r~::r" r~~'~~.=:w .-.:l..\'.
;:::=:'.'.:~"l,:t. ~_.\;::a...__,w.. A\
:~#:-===~~~.:~:. i': '!_:=M'::.: ~&;.:~:':.7:1 :r -- 1 1 !~l\:G
~'.I ~. ~;.i ~. ,.) ~:_ef. ll'i;hn~l r.:~i f . t \ '.~'
i I i 0 '. j, ,. - _. O. 00-' Ie. I I'. \.
I : i .. ;.L.I ...... ,.." ...~ ,~ ',I~lO:", ~";'! j ..Q"Onl' .'
" ) -.1:'- . i ..= ~T--'" - 'y ~ f. _7_ \"0"
L _.._../ ...f..j _...... :--._ 't........
._'...... Aj ~"":-""t ...-, _-Ij' .., ':~.~~.
.. <I' - ....... '..;-- 'tf ~","l' 'oil P"'" '1'0"'
......".IS_. . ,. '-"O~i~""~' .00'
l... ,....," ,...... "'_'" f'*'~..~e _ .&l:" \ 2 -~':'~~., ()6Il\.."
V~ "
. --'-'- iV,
. h
.;'~.,"
..: .
.."..,
PllOP:'!'::~' tlI;.;O..~tl"ft~; '_' ...,.tf>,.
I.ot. l.t, QUL.Yl:1 ~onI, 5mtt ~_. ,'ti~. 'f'o_r "1t/'l1o<< I", '10-':< I.
~'(l.l,,'C' ~' I.,;' ...."(".;-;..7:. ~t a.,.lnt,., '1..........x~. ~,!T tco.r_....,. vit/'l AI. :n.'.~
.....--:: o( ~~ I.<lt.. ._ucr, ,.;.,...,..",(" Il" IQ":". ,:v.... I~ __.:. Sc:Y.:
("....."~i.. ,11~1 1~ ,,",~_, ;Ji'.xl....., _C:l an' ~,I_ _'" 1. Iod:,u::r.
~n.; ':0 ~, 0'10.:.. '"' ~Il<' l.~ U1., 01:(<:<, o! -:."\0' "'-",i.:... 0: ~. :.:.x,
.;:o.".t,. "._3OUI in....... .u<i "",...tf affO sr,.a:.., '-"-c'i.ooo:I.. (ollooll:
I
iMo71n.:I1"" ..: ~ po"": '" :hi' \~..~~ Ii".. o~ :..>': .~, el<>", 1. ClU.I~ _=- 1:<:
-'.<1I:a:;."'" ..;.0 ..,.,,; "...." 1.-.' i...: """':""'~l~' 0' :IY' ....r..l1'4:: CDr.'lOIr ,,~ ..,e
~"" 1-:; u.n....... ....n..rl; ~ H~... v,~, tno. ....,..' 11"" 0:: ~ 1., .....anc: -':"
pnxlI""'" ....n:....:, . d~ 0; ;";'.' .tor.: ':.0 U. ...t.....y litwo 01 a CO '01>:: n-,
in ()o"...,., '-C~: :1\>"-- ~-.:..<:n\' aJon-, to.... _~:""ll ~i.... o. _l~ 7. ;no:
roa;.. .. dista."1CIO o{ .c.,.~ :-<: t/W..,. ....u.r!-; a> :i.Mo v,':;/'> tno> -.t/'l Ii.... :>t l.O:
JC. .JPJ..an<' _'" ~ "'SU<ly A di~... o.i _-0.7 f...~ I;.: a ...i~: ~ tft<,
_: 11...... ,,~ 1.0:. 1:<, ~ I. 00.'<1.....:1 ~ l~t "","~'~lon. N'" ....l.n: :.0-1"- ~7_~
1_: l'IOI"tlM<'li of tlW _t~: o~ ...i~ 1.01: I." u--.c.. .........."""'rly ,1"....,. tnoo
.....: a... 0: ~ot l~. U..... 1. OItd~.:1C! _a> h~ Ad<l1..on. A 4U1~'" 0: "'.1 :..,
t.:>U1.,;>I_oi...-q..........
"""'~"'.al;"isil>:"~:;~
;x"O{'lC'..../ U ......
"":0 ...." o~~ If" ...k
~
..~IO:~_.....:a.......14,;~Il::""'. :,.
.
NOfES ~~ '1).17WIOe..-~--,,,,,(1.oI1"1
"='4 0..-.........__
.
o--.,...,..-~
_ o.e-,...,..-...... "'.......&co:........
".-~.........--
'"
Ul \
I
....
::>. \
z
~
I
...
~
~
'0 'j
'"
Af;\o "._ 'IOo-oGIl _~o ;u.-..:
SIll T~ ....,. ..... ,. _0 ". ~(1~IlC.
AI_ ~'UI'" r. S-" ""'_.UtlU~ ~
S(T1"~' ....~ ~ Zl _~ _I' _,0'
Ilf" ~II'J" TO '''OlO 101'" "",OO'QSl:
Pl,..~r.o..
Ill" ~II'Jt7TQ_"",Ol":'SfO!l:t.
,-...., """"__"'1
_...............___lII1
..., ........._...IflEIfI_
. 4Wt u-..l L8'IlI s.n.,.
............ lit.... ......
_.
o
'0
.0
SCALf 1M 'EET
00--__1_
. o..tft ____
-
riLl NO U6:!>
~1IO.1Ol'-'
1OOIC.l2!.. "'li'
lJ..
I 0
, C'J
I
\ ~ I /1
c V ~\'./
.:::' - ... 0
.. --.. -........._----1 '" Ii J!
, \ ~'VS-eJ'
, "'..
u,A".'....
I, ....,
",," ...
...
24 GLENDALE AVENUE S.E.
)R LAKE, MN. 55372
"
oJ
o
78
r------>7-.- n. ..nr~ .- __'_'__~'_,' -_ __
,~
G:J.roY€
H:leSt
/
,..-..
/
x
u
o
o
-- . ~~____.L..+-~'
,
/
,
HOUSE
~--
/ 1"..,
,
/
'1>>12.6 ,;'
1 North line of lot 14
I' OAK LAND BEACH
';'1
., S8goS0'24"W
;;,
" 100 plot
,1.uloo.01 meos..""
~
,
,
~
.,'
,I
I...
'"
,..
"
'.
Ir.~. ----;;;-.r--....' "~i~i
glJ, I _I G\,I
~ .. - - -' "l.:.'. / ,
'0 ).IJ , r ,0. cJ . V 44. e
CJ 87 * - . .. 101'....
__ ~ 6 ~ . ",eN of., I/}
;-;0.--'- . S".,:J~ .. I "r
I .g life I~!),Z--: HOl)SE
. _- ~ ~ ~" ,..,,:.~J~J_::../~.' :i,o,,c"
L___~ ~ :;lJI~'-~>;:~~~ "';CI' ~
'... - '.ftClr 0" South..! _ ...~C1 - ". SIO_ 0" '.,:", ..... \O~~ '
... - _ ~ .1'8.8! -_ \ --, 0..,. hn.. ""'.'1lI&:' . -'---r'---
_._..' ~_.....:.,~/~ .- ---100.J8meo....r 1 ."
f, , '''',e "iv'. )"
S 89"~6' 13"W ~ r
~ South line of loLI4; j9~,~Lt<~J
"
~I
,
9.'
/ r
,/
~lQ' ,
~~I.<? "'J
.~.,/v '9
:,
'.,
r-- ---'.'-----
H:lUSt
,
L_.___
,
'~_._---'---~---"-
"\63
.0 ^
~~
~u
~:
Solo a:~
.]'9' ~U'l
I~ ~ok~
0:: 'I .~-
LsJ ~.8grSO'24':W
a. <i' ' "",
\. . -'30.50 meos-..
--- ..... 30.S"d"';
~ \all.S.
~ '.,;
.... '0 U'l
. .."
""-0. E"o"
~o -CO QI~~
m !44' N~Z ~
""t 'It' :.=O~ j j
000_0::%00':",
li:f~ I'l"'I .. 'li:f<tm
. Z 0 I
/' - W ;' 30.7 deed
..,.;,-.-.-.......\ ~_.,;r
~T' 3v."meo.-!
-I r..e;;.S6'll'\.[
I . /
, L
I I
.1
/1
f-
<::
...I
a.
..".....j
I
tIi~ cofl"ef
\0' \0
tS"~~-
. .
4.6
-\
iii
:~ 0
Clllll -
~- -
.., 0
. NpI'1-
');'. J/lo___
_ I",' 0
c' I en !
"'! :=
,
,-
.
N
';;
~
~
t.
.L
,
rs~ c:
/01 10
a'EACH
?ROpr:..t~'~'r DS3C:~I?TIO:~ .';..:: :??.OVIDCD:
Lot 1.4 ,
OAKLA.'.1[)
mrt . .ar
OAKLAND ;;EACli, Scott County, !lim:
J.cACH 1S'I' ADD!'fra-:, Scott Count;':
~('\,,~~___~r~___';;
-i~_~":'
RESOLUTION 02-005PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 24-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A I-FOOT FRONT
SETBACK; A 3.5S-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SUM OF SIDE YARDS OF 11.42-
FEET; 5.9-FOOT VARIANCE TO BUILDING SEPARATION OF 9.1-FEET; A 4.7-FOOT
AND 5-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT AN EAVE/GUTTER ENCROACHMENT IN
FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINES; A 6-FOOT AND 2.18-FOOT VARIANCE FOR
BUILDING WALLS OVER 50-FEET LONG; A 3.7-FOOT AND 4-FOOT VARIANCES
TO PERMIT A DRIVEWAY WIDTH AND SETBACK TO A FRONT AND SIDE LOT
LINES
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
L Steven W. & Patricia J. Mosey (applicant/owner) have applied for variances from the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a garage and room addition to a single
family residence on property located in the R-I (Low Density Residential) District and the
SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at the following location, 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue
SE, and legally described as follows;
Lot 14, Oakland Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in Case
#02-029PC and held hearings thereon on April 22, and May 13,2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,
safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light
and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the
surrounding area and the effect ofthe proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, the proposed
variance will result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire,
and danger to the public safety, umeasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant proposed a garage/room addition with a zero setback to the front lot line and
platted road right-of-way, this creates a potential safety issue for the subject property and use
of the right-of-way.
5. A legal building envelope for a garage addition exists on the subject lot that meets or reduces
the requested variances for setbacks to the front and side yards, sum of side yards, eave
encroachment, building walls over 50-feet, and driveway location. The applicant has control
1:I02filesI02variancesI02-029Idnyres2.doc I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
over the garage and room addition design and shape, such that the hardship has been created
by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists with a smaller building footprint.
6. There is no justifiable hardship caused by the required building setbacks as reasonable use of
the property exists without the granting of the variances.
7. The granting of the variance, as originally requested, is not necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will serve
merely as a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship. The factors above allow for an alternative structure to be permitted with a reduced
variance or none at all.
8. The contents of Planning Case 02-029PC are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the following
variances for a future garage and room additions to a single-family dwelling as shown in
attached Attachment I - Certificate of Survey;
1. A 24-foot variance to permit a I-foot structure setback to a front property line, rather than
25-feet as required for front yard setbacks [Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional
Standards (3)].
2. A 3.58-foot variance to permit a sum of side yards of I 1.42-feet on a nonconforming lot of
record rather than the minimum required 15-feet [Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required
Yards/Open Space (8)].
3. A 5.9-foot variance to permit a building separation of9.I-feet between all structures on the
nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot, rather than the minimum required 15-feet
[Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required Yards/Open Space (8)].
4. A 4.7-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within .3-feet from a side
lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard
encroachments (1)].
5. A 5-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within 0' of the front lot line
rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard
encroachments (1)].
6. A 6-foot variance to permit a building wall 63.8-feet in length to be setback 1.3-feet from a
side lot line rather than the minimum required 7.3-feet for building walls over 50-feet
[Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (6)].
7. A 2.18-foot variance to permit a 63.8-foot building wall to be setback 10.12-foot to a side lot
line rather than the required minimum 12.3-feet for building walls over 50-feet Ordinance
Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (6)].
1:\02files\02variances\02-029\dnyres2.doc
2
8. A 3.7-foot variance to permit a driveway setback of L3-feet, rather than the minimum
required setback of5-feet [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways (1)].
9. A 4' variance to permit a 28' driveway width at the right-of-way line rather than the
maximum allowed 24' [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways (1)].
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on May 13, 2002.
C1~p
Donald R Rye, Co
. Stamson, Commission Chair
L
Development Director
1:\OZfiles\OZvariances\OZ-OZ9\dnyresZ.doc
3
iU
&: tI?-'O'-
,...t. .
\.. .01
::> \.....,o1:r..
CD. -.
u.
0
w
lei
CJ
-
u.
-
~
W
0
I
~
t-
Z
w
:E
:c
~
~
ti
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
STEVE MOSEY
14524 GLENDALE AVENUE S.f
PRIOR LAKE. MH. ~5372
.~~
,
roo."""; ',.
............i,'::
,
'.,
Valley 5lJrveying Co., P A
16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL Sf
PRIOR LAKE, MN. 55372
(952) "47-2570
----~.!!-
-
",,"
,
J
._',OOIIt,..o'I-1
r--.~..
..r lIDO'Tl0t0
__0.2'u''''
~.~:;::;... .1.
-'- U
-. -'-:r:~'~' ~ rJ...~ r'::~"
. -f_._..,.... 'J..,-~,. \
): o.-......oM'O'O:"l,.~ :--A':~~.
'__~_-=-.!!.!:.:'-~'-"';' ~m=.7=.~ ~( ~.'i;:,: =,F:r
. .... ~., ': I ~"L""" ::.2
. - -... t.., - ,._
1+," .1- ;: ~t,8 :tI:.~,~~. .j' ~;_0t 1Iii.~~,~i hh. r."~r-
. 1 0 ,\:.. _. ., o;'''}'' I', .
I :: '1. :.... . ~ I ~','." '> ,;. toG:: '"' ~~. i \ t
. I" ..' . ,.' '., ,'" ," z oS ; . .'O'o5'~r
" '.:E.::';'-.-"'- --'</f" -.' ..7_ c'O"
_.._........ ~ _'. C_lll""""
L ..... .~ ---..",. .-.... -, '_"J,
.,.:.' . -'- .' 1 -:"0:':.:-. t I I j'
'........<1.. J I,
L b.." ,.., .. "'_'" r:'.~c _*.10(." \ 2
V~
-~ I.il,
. ... ~
.;'~.,.
..: .
,~1"-'
~'.' .., "....
~~I ;'''';.':, )... '''':,~'":;,.;".tI''
f'-'..oesAc"
-.,
~S.<..._.'
'.'"
..~, .
PIr.Il""1'1';)" DC.A.-rUI"tI::I, '.'PlVlU>,_'
t.OCI4,CIIUaA'f;l.'tDn'l,5alttOlUlcv.,'Ii~t...'l\:I,II'tN'<~'IUI~1",P1""<I,
Qt..'t!.A.'C' JO;AC: t~.;. A..'Y.;-;.:r.. ~t Q.,.",~,..' "'''.Ie''''u, )_1,,,, t<>..':-....~ ...i~ All :no',:
P"-~ ,,~ ~: I.d... ;_t."" . , n.........b 11" tc:I<"':-.... .:....,^ ;~ ....:. 5a>"::
C"-"'J":r, .11~~1 l<>cA:o<" ...t_, :....l.....: .....,,,,, ....... :""d_ _::1'1 1. .\dr::'tl:r.
;::~~~.:.= ~..~ ~:~:<i ';:"~~ :;'~a:"1. ~:;;:::: t":l:::::' ~:
",",lA.......-, .:.: ~ p:>i.,: ~ :hfo ,~,~t H".. or :.n: ..:., !l"", L ou.li>nd ;1M=" 1..~
....-1cl:l<lt', soid 1""": _... l_-.~ t...,: """'~!'><'~Ii <:>, :.n-' ...,............:~ ~r '" ...=
~..x. 1,": t./len.:It ~....~.. ,. l1r~ ....to~ ~. -.:,n 1;".' co:: l.cr.. 1';, ~~ ~<:-,
.".....1CIe<l NDt.....~1 " ci~ 0' ~"~ l"-:: ~ UIoO ....e....'}. 1...... of . X. leer. ........'1
ill OU.l......, .-c'1: :r>o,.,.". !I:U~-..^-:<:n,- ..on-. to.... ..,":.~If li.... ... Mi^ :r. "...:
0:0.... . dj"tMIcot of '"'.~ :.oo.t: t/WlI:> .....t...,... en :u..- ....;1\ er. ......"" Ii.... ,,' \,0,
1-', ;lA~~ _dO ~ M"".'ly . ch"tan<.... <:Ii _"'.7 t...: to:; . ;x>i,,~ en UK
_: Ji.....,'~ ~ l':;, ~ I. cad":>d Ile.Jd\ l"t /od.~.:."", ..ic: pO''':' ~,,,.. ;7.~
t..e: .......t1\ftd, 0': tI'w _e.,.,.....,,. o! sol~ I.ot I," ~ 'IO:"'~~ly '1"",. U'>'>
_: h... <:>: toot IJ, !Joc< L ce~l.".e !I<led'I t~~ Add..."", . d1...~::- 0: '0.1 :_:
t,Ol;I'I.'''l"",oflllf9Uw1......
~
$t'ICwll1',.1; vj"j.bl., ~:: ....c....,,,,,,,,,,",,,,,,,",.c ""~" ..",,,,;: I~", ...l~
~<'t.,.i,,",,/,
,,~I 0: tI>'" .......... ccn:ai.!lA><, 14, ;!<):o ..,. :,.
.
II
MOTES ~E.-- 9IJ.17W.oa.-;.",-..~ClM 1..\
9:! I 4 0...-....... *-
,
o.-..~"""""''''''''''
-+ ~~......t:i........n.z"""
Salw................--
o
'0
00
SCALI: '''' '[[T
oo..-lNn_,...,
. o..r.. _ -,-.a
nL( NO e2~!I
_ ,L.
! ~n~~i
I.".
~ ...-
I,
.'
.. .
\
...
Ul \
I
ILl'
::> \
z
~
, \
ILl
~
~
M '"
.J
.,
.r."'>'011t1~_!.lQ_':;.(
l'UTQ..-.lI.".."_Do.,lOsueAC.
.t. "1<'/0' '"_.."",,,._S(D~"~ ~
K'.V.' '"'0 ....." ~ o<'A~~I. ~.'-'
.[If ",,,)/91' rOI..000..(........~"'L;
DlC_ ~~T.O"
It(V "IS'lr TO PtOlO ~'''',.CS(O ~<;.
........,.....-......"....,
-...........-..-""
..,...~-...,,-
."""~l.#'OIs.r,,.,or
-.......,-....-
_.
....
~NOOU
1lOOIC~ ..G'
Planning Commission Meeting
April 22, 2002
. Has been at the sight, the applicant has done his best to comply.
. It would not interfere with the quality of the lake.
. Questioned the zero lot line. Kansier explained the measurement from the bluff.
They were minimizing the effect as best as they could.
. Good application. In favor.
Lemke:
. Questioned staff what would happen if the surveyor was off a few inches. Kansier
explained private use of public property. It has happened before and that is how it is
addressed.
. McDermott said property boundaries are marked clearly and will make every effort to
make sure it does not happen.
. Agreed with Criego, it is a good application.
. Clarified he had been to the site.
Atwood:
. It is a good use of the property. Approve.
Ringstad:
. It meets all 9 hardships. Approve.
Stamson:
. This lot is clearly unbuildable without variances.
. Support the variances as proposed.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 02-
007PC APPROVING THE REQUESTED VARIANCES TO THE LOT WIDTH AT
THE OHW, THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, THE BLUFF SETBACK AND THE
DRIVEWAY WIDTH.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
Kansier explained the appeal process.
D. Case File #02-029 Steven & Patricia Mosey are requesting variances to
permit a garage and room addition to be setback less than 25 feet to front lot line;
less than 5 feet to side lot line; a sum of side yards less than 15 feet; eave
encroachment less than 5 feet to front and side lot line; a 63.8 foot building wall
setback to side lot line less than required; and a driveway setback less than 5 feet to
side lot line for the property located at 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue SE.
Zoning Administrator Steve Horsman presented the Planning Report dated April 22,
2002, on file in the office ofthe Planning Department.
The Planning Department received a variance application from the property owners for
the construction of an attached garage and second story addition to an existing single-
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MN042202.doc 8
Planning Commission Meeting
April 22, 2002
family dwelling on a nonconforming platted lot of record located at 14620 Oakland
Beach Avenue. The applicant is requesting the following Variances:
L A 24-foot variance to permit a I-foot structure setback to a front property line,
rather than 25- feet as required for front yard setbacks.
2. A 3.58-foot variance to permit a sum of side yards of I L42-feet on a
nonconforming lot of record rather than the minimum required IS-feet
3. A 5.9-foot variance to permit a building separation of9.I-feet between all
structures on the nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot, rather than the
minimum required IS-feet
4. A 4.7-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within .3-feet
from a side lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback.
5. A 5-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within 0' of the
front lot line rather than the minimum required 5- feet setback.
6. A 6-foot variance to permit a building wall 63.8-feet in length to be setback 1.3-
feet from a side lot line rather than the minimum required 7.3-feet for building
walls over 50-feet
7. A 2. I 8-foot variance to permit a 63.8-foot building wall to be setback 10.12-foot
to a side lot line rather than the required minimum 12.3-feet for building walls
over 50-feet
8. A 3.7-foot variance to permit a driveway setback of L3-feet, rather than the
minimum required setback of 5- feet; and,
9. A 4' variance to permit a 28' wide driveway at the right-of-way line rather than
the maximum allowed 24' .
Lot 14, Oakland Beach, was platted in 1926. The subject property is a legal
nonconforming platted lot of record. The property is located within the R-I District
(Low Density Residential) and Shoreland District (SD). The subject lot has dimensions
of 40' front & rear lot lines, by 100' side lot lines, for a total lot area of 4,000 square feet
According to Scott County land records, the applicant does not own the adjoining
properties
Staff received a letter from the adjoining property owner in support of the variance
requests.
The City Engineering Department noted the existing gravel road is on the property east of
the platted R-O-W, along with the sanitary and water utilities. If the road were to be
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MN042202.doc 9
Planning Commission Meeting
April 22. 2002
moved to its platted location as depicted on the survey, the R-O- W would be I' from the
proposed structure.
The Department of Natural Resources responded that as long as the impervious surface
area is OK, the DNR is not opposed to the side and front yard setbacks. They alone will
not have measurable negative impact to the lake.
The staff believes all ofthe variance hardship criteria have been met with respect to
variance requests 1,2,5, & 7, but the criteria is not met for requests 3, 4, 6, 8 & 9. A
legal alternative building site does not appear to exist on the lot to allow for a garage
addition because ofthe location of the existing structure on the nonconforming platted lot
of record.
In addition, staff felt the garage and room additions may be redesigned and reduced in
size to eliminate Variance requests 3, 4, 6, 8 & 9. Therefore, the variance hardship
criteria have not been met with respect to 4 of the variances as proposed by the applicant
and staff recommends denial of these requested variances.
Staff recommended the following conditions be included with approval of any variances
deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission.
1. The Resolutions adopted by the Planning Commission shall be recorded at Scott
County within 60 days of adoption, and proof of recording along with the
acknowledged City Assent Form shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised certificate of survey depicting the approved
additions location, and the subject site shall be developed as shown on the survey to
ensure additional variances are not required.
3. The building permit is subject to all other city ordinances and applicable county and
state agency regulations.
Staff recommended approval of variances #1, 2, 5 & 7, with findings and deny variances
3,4,6, 8 & 9. This action will require the applicant to submit a revised survey and plan.
Stamson questioned staff s recommendation for leaving a vestibule, addition of a garage
and second-story room. Horsman explained the applicant's architect felt the vestibule is
needed to get around the stairway.
Criego felt there was confusion regarding the road. Horsman explained the 20 foot
platted road and where the road actually exists.
Kansier said the roads were private and designed on paper in the 1920's. The actual
roads were always on private property.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MN042202.doc 10
Planning Commission Meeting
April 22, 2002
Lemke questioned the ownership of Lot 14. Horsman explained the ordinance for a
private road between single lot ownership.
Comments from the public:
Applicant Steve Mosey, explained the changes on the survey and the platted road and the
actual road. Others had built on the road therefore causing the problems. He also
explained the proposed garage and entryway. Ifhe didn't have a vestibule he wouldn't
have a front door - all access would be through the garage. Mr. Mosey has worked with
staff and will reduce the driveway making as little pavement as possible.
Stamson questioned the proposed entry. Mosey explained the problem with the stairway.
Criego questioned why the stairway was on that side of the house. Mosey responded
there were trees on the property lines and the close location of the neighbors' homes.
Criego questioned the slab on the lakeside. Mosey said it is an existing patio.
The hearing was closed at 7:59 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Lemke:
. Refreshing to see someone reducing his impervious surface.
. A vestibule is need.
. Will support based on the fact it is reducing impervious surface.
Atwood:
. Questioned the impervious surface. Horsman said a reduction is permitted.
. Would like to see a revised survey and other options.
Ringstad:
. Agreed with Lemke's comments.
. Reduction of impervious surface is important
. The vestibule is necessary for safety.
. Support request
Criego:
. There are a lot of variances requested. Do we want to let a property go on a zero lot
line? Looking at the adjoining properties, it will be sticking out from the other
homes.
. Concern for safety pulling out of the garage. Even though there is 20 feet, it is not the
applicant's property.
. Overall opposed to adding to the home in this method. If additional space does not
solve the parking problems. The previous owner used the garage across the road.
. Hard time allowing construction of a building to the property line.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MN042202.doc 11
Planning Commission Meeting
April 22. 2002
Stamson:
. Concurred with Criego, pushing the building up to the property line does not warrant
approval.
. Not sure the current configuration is the only option.
. The hardship criteria had not been met
. Another concern is the staff report is different than what is in front of them.
. Does not support a two-car garage sitting on a right-of-way.
. The adjoining properties are setback 20 to 25 feet
Open Discussion:
. Lemke questioned if a private right-of-way is so different from a public right-of-way.
There is not a lot of traffic.
. There has been a past tradition to allow a two car garage. Realize it is up the edge of
the platted right-of-way, but it is not a whole lot different than the Candy Cove
property.
. Stamson said it is different from Candy Cove. That property was off90 feet from the
road.
. The adjoining property leaves enough room for the road to be moved.
. By creating a building like this is eliminating the neighbor's ability to reclaim his
property. It is creating a problem.
. The Commission has allowed a two car garage when space allows it
. Atwood felt this will limit the person across the street by allowing construction to the
edge of the right-of-way. Would like to see a revised plan.
. Lemke questioned staff on the existing road and what problems it would cause. Rye
responded it is a platted right-of-way intended as a private street Do not know if an
individual could claim it
. Kansier said in redoing the Candy Cove road, there was a similar problem. Although
there was no platted road, there was an established right-of-way because of use.
. Lemke said the big hang-up is taking something away from the adjoining property
owners. This matter should be continued and get an opinion from the City Attorney.
. Criego felt there were alternatives without infringing on the zero lot line. The
Commission cannot make things worse when there are alternatives. It is a small piece
of property.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO DENY THE APPLIATION
AND HAVE STAFF PREPARE A RESOLUTION INDICATING THE LACK OF
HARDSHIP. THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE METHODS BY NOT INCEASING THE
NUMBER OF VARIANCES.
Vote taken ayes by Stamson, Criego and Atwood, nays by Ringstad and Lemke.
MOTION CARRIED.
Stamson explained the appeal process.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MN042202.doc
12
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MONDAY, MAY 13, 2002
1. Call to Order:
Chairman Stamson called the May 13, 2002, Planning Commission meeting to order at
6:31 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Atwood, Criego, Lemke, Ringstad and
Stamson, Planning Director Don Rye, Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier and Recording
Secretary Connie Carlson.
2. Roll Call:
Atwood
Criego
Lemke
Ringstad
Stamson
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
3. Approval of Minutes:
The Minutes from the April 22, 2002, Planning Commission meeting were approved as
presented.
4. Consent:
A. Case #02-029 Steve Mosey Variance Resolution.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 13, 2002,
on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
The Resolution is consistent with the Planning Commission's direction for the denial of9
variances for the construction of an entryway, garage and room addition to an existing
single family dwelling. On April 29, 2002, the applicant submitted to staff a letter dated
4/27/02 as notice of appeal to the City Council of the Planning Commission's decision to
deny the above described variances as requested by the applicant. The appeal is
scheduled for hearing before the City Council on May 20, 2002.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 02-
005PC DENTYING A 24-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A I-FOOT FRONT SETBACK; A
3.58-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SUM OF SIDE YARDS OF 11.42-FEET; 5.9-FOOT
VARIANCE TO BUILDING SEPARATION OF 9. I-FEET; A4.7-FOOT AND 5-FOOT
VARIANCE TO PERMIT AN EAVE/GUTTER ENCROACHMENT IN FRONT AND SIDE
LOT LINES; A 6-FOOT AND 2.18-FOOT VARIANCE FOR BUILDING WALLS OVER 50-
FEET LONG; A 3.7-FOOT AND 4-FOOT VARIANCES TO PERMIT A DRIVEWAY WIDTH
AND SETBACK TO A FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINES.
Vote taken indicated ayes by Criego, Atwood and Stamson. Nays by Ringstad and
Lemke. MOTION CARRIED.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MN051302.doc 1
Original
Reports
.
L:\TEMPLATE\FILEINFO.DOC
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
4A
CONSIDER A RESOLUTION DENYING A STRUCTURE
SETBACK OF l' TO A FRONT LOT LINE; A 1.3'
SIDEYARD SETBACK; A BUILDING SEPARATION
LESS THAN 15'; A SUM OF SIDE YARDS LESS THAN
15 FEET; AN EAVE ENCROACHMENT INTO A SIDE &
FRONT YARD; A 63.8' BUILDING WALL SETBACK TO
SIDE YARD; AND A DRIVEWAY WIDTH AND
SETBACK TO THE SIDE YARD (Case file #02-029PC)
STEVEN & PATRICIA MOSEY
14620 OAKLAND BEACH AVENUE SE
STEVEN HORSMAN, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES l NO
MAY 13, 2002
The Planning Department held a public hearing on April 22, 2002, to consider a
variance application from the property owners for the construction of an attached
garage and second story addition to an existing single-family dwelling on a
nonconforming platted lot of record located at 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue.
After review of the applicants' request with respect to the variance hardship
criteria, the Planning Commission directed staff to draft Resolution 02-004PC
denying the following Variances:
1. A 24-foot variance to permit a 1-foot structure setback to a front property
line, rather than 25-feet as required for front yard setbacks [Ordinance
Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (3)].
2. A 3.58-foot variance to permit a sum of side yards of 11.42-feet on a
nonconforming lot of record rather than the minimum required 15-feet
[Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required Yards/Open Space (8)].
3. A 5.9-foot variance to permit a building separation of 9.1-feet between all
structures on the nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot, rather than
the minimum required 15-feet [Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required
Yards/Open Space (8)].
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
4. A 4.7-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within
.3-feet from a side lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet
setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard encroachments (1)].
5. A 5-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within 0'
of the front lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback
[Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard encroachments (1)].
6. A 6-foot variance to permit a building wall 63.8-feet in length to be
setback 1.3-feet from a side lot line rather than the minimum required
7.3-feet for building walls over 50-feet [Ordinance Section 1102.405
Dimensional Standards (6)].
7. A 2.18-foot variance to permit a 63.8-foot building wall to be setback
1 0.12-foot to a side lot line rather than the required minimum 12.3-feet for
building walls over 50-feet [Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional
Standards (6)].
8. A 3.7-foot variance to permit a driveway setback of 1.3-feet, rather than
the minimum required setback of 5-feet; and,
9. A 4' variance to permit a 28' wide driveway at the right-of-way line rather
than the maximum allowed 24' [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways
(1 )].
RECOMMENDATION:
The attached Resolution is consistent with the Planning Commission's direction
for the denial of 9 variances for the construction of an entryway, garage and
room addition to an existing single family dwelling.
For your information, on April 29, 2002, the applicant submitted to staff a letter
dated 4/27/02 as notice of appeal to the City Council of the Planning
Commissions decision to deny the above described variances as requested by
the applicant. The appeal is scheduled for hearing before the Council on May
20, 2002.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt the attached Resolution 02-005PC denying the 9 variances as
requested by the applicant because the Planning Commission finds a lack
of demonstrated hardship under the Zoning Code Criteria.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
L:I02FILESI02varlancesI02-029ICnsntAgndRpt.doc
Page 2
ACTION REQUIRED:
The staff recommends alternative # 1 :
1. Motion and second adopting Resolution 02-005PC denying the 9
variances as requested by the applicant.
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029ICnsntAgndRpt.doc Page 3
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
5D
CONSIDER VARIANCES TO ALLOW A STRUCTURE
SETBACK OF l' TO A FRONT LOT LINE; A 1.3'
SIDEYARD SETBACK;A BUILDING SEPARATION
LESS THAN 15'; A SUM OF SIDE YARDS LESS THAN
15 FEET; AN EAVE ENCROACHMENT INTO A SIDE &
FRONT YARD; A 63.8' BUILDING WALL SETBACK TO
SIDE YARD; AND A DRIVEWAY SETBACK TO THE
SIDE YARD ( Case file #02-029PC)
STEVEN & PATRICIA MOSEY
14620 OAKLAND BEACH AVENUE SE
STEVEN HORSMAN, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
_X_ YES NO
APRIL 22, 2002
The Planning Department received a variance application from the property
owners for the construction of an attached garage and second story addition to
an existing single-family dwelling on a nonconforming platted lot of record
located at 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue. The applicant is requesting the
following Variances:
1. A 24-foot variance to permit a 1-foot structure setback to a front property
line, rather than 25-feet as required for front yard setbacks [Ordinance
Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (3)].
2. A 3.58-foot variance to permit a sum of side yards of 11.42-feet on a
nonconforming lot of record rather than the minimum required 15-feet
[Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required Yards/Open Space (8)].
3. A 5.9-foot variance to permit a building separation of 9.1-feet between all
structures on the nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot, rather than
the minimum required 15-feet [Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required
Yards/Open Space (8)].
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
4. A 4.7-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within
.3-feet from a side lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet
setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard encroachments (1)].
5. A 5-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within 0'
of the front lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback
[Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard encroachments (1)].
6. A 6-foot variance to permit a building wall 63.8-feet in length to be
setback 1.3-feet from a side lot line rather than the minimum required
7.3-feet for building walls over 50-feet [Ordinance Section 1102.405
Dimensional Standards (6)].
7. A 2.18-foot variance to permit a 63.8-foot building wall to be setback
10.12-foot to a side lot line rather than the required minimum 12.3-feet for
building walls over 50-feet [Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional
Standards (6)].
8. A 3.7-foot variance to permit a driveway setback of 1.3-feet, rather than
the minimum required setback of 5-feet; and,
9. A 4' variance to permit a 28' wide driveway at the right-of-way line rather
than the maximum allowed 24' [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways
(1 )].
DISCUSSION:
Lot 14, Oakland Beach, was platted in 1926. The subject property is a legal
nonconforming platted lot of record. The property is located within the R-1
District (Low Density Residential) and Shoreland District (SD). The subject lot
has dimensions of 40' front & rear lot lines, by 100' side lot lines, for a total lot
area of 4,000 square feet. According to Scott County land records, the applicant
does not own the adjoining properties (Attachment 1 - Certificate of Survey).
City records indicate in 1976 a previous owner was granted an 8' variance to
construct a room addition within 2' of the south lot line. In 1981, the same owner
was issued a building permit for an addition to the garage on Lot 10. At the same
time, both Lots 10 and 14 were owned by the same person. Lot 14 was
purchased by the applicants in 1996. The current owner and applicant received a
building permit in 1996 to remodel the interior of the existing house, and for a
gas fireplace. In 1997 the applicant was issued a permit for the deck addition.
The applicant now proposes to build a 28' by 19' garage with second story
addition attached to the existing dwelling. The proposed front setback of l'
requires a 24' variance. Setback averaging will allow a 20' setback (16.8'
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029War02.029PC.doc
Page 2
average). The existing house is currently setback 1.3', but the addition is
considered an expansion which is not permitted under City Code. The existing
structure does not have a garage, only a paved driveway/parking area in the
location of the proposed addition. In addition, the applicant is proposing to
remove a portion of the existing driveway in order to reduce the impervious
surface area. (Attachment 2 - Building Plans).
As proposed, the sum of side yards on the subject lot total 11.42' . This requires
an 3.58' variance, as the minimum sum of side yards allowed is 15' on
nonconforming lots. This variance request could be eliminated by reducing the
garage width by 6', and provide for a sum of side yards of 17.42' [Ordinance
Section 1101.502: Required Yards/Open Space (8) Nonconforming Lots].
When the proposed addition setback of 1.3' is combined with the setback of 7.8'
for the existing structure on Lot 15, the building separation of 9.1' is less than the
required minimum separation of 15' between all structures on the subject
nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot. This requires a variance of 5.9' for
the garage/room addition [Ordinance Section 1101.502: Required Yards/Open
Space (8)].
The eave and gutter encroachments will require two variances: a 4.7' variance
to allow the eave/gutter to encroach within .3' of the side lot line, and a 5'
variance to permit an eave/gutter to encroach within 0' of the front property line.
The existing house eaves currently encroach into the same side yard; however,
this addition is considered an expansion of a nonconforming structure and not
permitted by code. The side yard encroachment variance could be eliminated
again by reducing the garage size 6' in width.
The proposed addition will add 19' to both side yard exterior building walls of
44.8' for a total wall length of 63.8'. The Zoning Ordinance requires that two
inches per foot be added to the side yard setback for walls over 50' long (63.8' -
50' = 13.8' x 2" = 27.6" or 2.3'+ 5'= 7.3', & 2.3'+ 10'= 12.3'). This requires a 6'
variance to permit a 1.3' side yard setback on the south line, and a 2.18'
variance for a 10.12' setback on the north line.
The existing driveway area is approximately 22' deep by 39' wide for 858 square
feet of coverage area. The applicant is proposing to eliminate an area along the
north lot line of approximately 10' x 20' for 200 square feet. As proposed, the
driveway would extend out from the addition at 1.3' from the south lot line, and
requires a variance of 3.7' because this does not meet the minimum 5' side yard
setback for driveways. In addition, the proposed driveway is 28' wide at the
private R-O-W line (right-of-way) which requires a 4' variance to exceed the
allowable width of 24' [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways].
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029\Var02-029PC.doc
Page 3
The applicant submitted an impervious surface worksheet which identifies an
existing 2,789 square foot of impervious surface for 41.8% of the total lot area,
including the common area between the rear lot line and the 904' OHWM. The
proposed garage/room addition would be built over existing driveway and would
not add to the impervious surface area. In addition, the applicant is proposing to
remove 200 square feet of existing driveway for a proposed impervious surface
coverage area of 2,589 square feet or 38.8% of total area. The proposed
reduction of impervious surface area is allowed under the City code, as an
existing site that is being altered, remodeled or expanded without expanding the
existing impervious surface (Attachment 3 - Existing Impervious surface
Area).
The applicant submitted a narrative describing their reasons for the requested
variances (Attachment 4 - Applicant Narrative).
In addition, staff received a letter from the adjoining Lot 13 property owner
expressing support for the applicant's variance request (Attachment 5 - Letter
Dated 3-21-02).
The City Engineering Department noted the existing gravel road is on the
property east of the platted R-O-W, along with the sanitary and water utilities. If
the road were to be moved to its platted location as depicted on the survey, the
R-O-W would be l' from the proposed structure.
The Department of Natural Resources responded that as long as the impervious
surface area is OK, the DNR is not opposed to the side and front yard setbacks.
They alone will not have measurable negative impact to the lake.
Staffs recommendation is to reduce the garage width from 28' to 22'. This would
add 6' to the south side setback, and would eliminate four of the variance
requests (3, 4, 6, 8). The proposed garage/room addition will only allow a l'
driveway depth from the 20' platted private road access, and staff has concerns
regarding vehicle parking in the right-of-way, should the existing road be moved
to the platted R-O-W. However, under the current conditions, with some of the
existing garages built in the platted R-O-W, the road may not be moved.
In addition, staff suggests redesigning the garage/room to 22' x 19' to reduce the
impervious surface area by an additional 114 square feet, and remove the
existing paved driveway in this area for reduction of an additional 132 square
feet of impervious surface area (6' x 22'). This variance request could be
reduced or possibly eliminated by resizing the garage width to 22', and recessing
the garage wall 6' away from the south lot for a 7.3' setback.
If Lots 10 and 14 were under single ownership, the garage on Lot 10 would be a
permitted use under Zoning Ordinance 1101.501 Lot Provisions (3, d), Two or
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029IVar02-029PC.doc
Page 4
more nonconforming lots of record under single ownership separated by a
private road or driveway may be combined and used as a single buildable lot
under the following conditions (reads in part). However, Lot 10 is owned by the
applicants father, and therefore this condition does not apply
VARIANCE HARDSHIP STANDARDS
1. Where by reason of narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a lot, or
where by reason of exceptional topographical or water conditions or
other extraordinary and exceptional conditions of such lot, the strict
application of the terms of this Ordinance would result in peculiar and
practical difficulties or exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner
of such lot in developing or using such lot in a manner customary and
legally permissible within the Use District in which said lot is located.
The subject property is a nonconforming lot of record and an existing
condition over which the applicant has no control. Some variances will be
needed to build a garage addition. However, the applicant can control the
design and size of the proposed additions and eliminate the need for half of
the variances requested.
2. Conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to
the property or immediately adjoining property, and do not apply,
generally, to other land or structures in the Use District in which the
land is located.
The lot is a legal nonconforming lot of record and has an existing
nonconforming structure without a garage. Plats of this era (1926)
subdivided lots with smaller dimensions (50 'wide) and are peculiar to the lot
and adjoining properties of the Oakland Beach subdivision. In addition,
because of the structure's location and proximity to the front lot line, this
precludes the ability to build a garage without some form of front setback
variance. However, four of the requested variances can be eliminated or
reduced with a redesign of the proposed addition.
3. The granting of the proposed Variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the owner.
A front setback variance appears necessary for a garage addition of
reasonable size and to preserve a substantial property right of the owner.
However, the variances requested for the setbacks to the side, sum of side
yards, eave encroachment, driveway and building wall, may be reduced or
eliminated with a revised building plan.
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029\Var02-029PC.doc
Page 5
4. The granting of the proposed Variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase
the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, or
endanger the public safety.
The granting of the variances should not impair these stated values, unless
the road were moved to the platted right of way, and within l' of the proposed
garage.
5. The granting of the Variance will not unreasonably impact on the
character and development of the neighborhood, unreasonably
diminish or impair established property values in the surrounding area,
or in any other way impair the health safety, and comfort of the area.
The granting of the requested variances to permit a garage and 2nd story
addition will not unreasonably impact the character of the neighborhood, or
diminish property values or impair health, safety and comfort of the area.
6. The granting of the proposed Variance will not be contrary to the intent
of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
Since this is a platted lot of record, and no garage exists, the granting of 4 of
the requested variances is not contrary to the intent of the Ordinances or the
Comprehensive plan. However, Variance #'s 3, 4, 6, 8 & 9, can be reduced
or eliminated with a redesigned garage/room addition plan, and therefore,
they are contrary to the intent of these Ordinances and the Comprehensive
Plan.
7. The granting of the Variance will not merely serve as a convenience to
the applicant but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable undue
hardship or difficulty.
With respect to variance requests 1,2,5, & 7, a hardship exists and a
variance is required to alleviate a demonstrable undue hardship or difficulty to
build a smaller garage and second story room addition to the existing
structure. However, no hardship exists pertaining to all variances as
requested.
8. The hardship results from the application of the provisions of this
Ordinance to the affected property and does not result from actions of
the owners ofthe property.
A hardship results from the provisions of the Ordinance with regards to four
variances to construct a garage and second story addition to the existing
structure. However, the applicant can reduce the size of the proposed
L:I02FILESI02varlancesI02-029IVar02-029PC.doc
Page 6
garage and room additions to reduce or eliminate all eight requested
variances.
9. Increased development or construction costs or economic hardship
alone shall not be grounds for granting a Variance.
Financial considerations alone are not grounds for the granting of variances.
In this case financial considerations are in addition to the other 8 hardship
criteria half of the variances requested.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff believes that all of the Variance hardship criteria have been met with
respect to variance requests 1, 2, 5, & 7, but the criteria is not met for requests
3, 4, 6, 8 & 9. A legal alternative building site does not appear to exist on the lot
to allow for a garage addition because of the location of the existing structure on
the nonconforming platted lot of record.
In addition, staff feels the garage and room additions may be redesigned and
reduced in size to eliminate Variance requests 3, 4, 6, 8 & 9. Therefore, the
variance hardship criteria have not been met with respect to 4 of the variances
as proposed by the applicant and staff recommends denial of these requested
variances.
Staff recommends the following conditions be included with approval of any
variances deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission.
1. The Resolutions adopted by the Planning Commission shall be recorded at
Scott County within 60 days of adoption, and proof of recording along with
the acknowledged City Assent Form shall be submitted to the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The applicant shall submit a revised certificate of survey depicting the
approved additions location, and the subject site shall be developed as
shown on the survey to ensure additional variances are not required.
3. The building permit is subject to all other city ordinances and applicable
county and state agency regulations.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the variances requested by the applicant, or approve any
variances the Planning Commission deems appropriate in the
circumstances, in this case, the Planning Commission should direct staff
to prepare a resolution with findings approving the variance requests.
L:I02FILESI02varlancesI02-029IVar02-029PC.doc
Page 7
2. Approve variances #1, 2, 5 & 7, with findings and deny variances 3, 4, 6,
8 & 9. This action will require the applicant to submit a revised survey and
plan.
3. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
4. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of
demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The staff recommends alternative # 2:
1. Motion and second adopting Resolution 02-005PC approving variances 1,
2,5& 7.
2. Motion and second adopting Resolution 02-006PC denying the variances
3, 4, 6, 8 & 9, as requested by the applicant.
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029\Var02-029PC.doc
Page 8
RESOLUTION 02-005PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 24-FOOT VARIANCE TO FRONT SETBACK;
A 3.5-FOOT VARIANCE TO SUM OF SIDE YARDS; A 5-FOOT VARIANCE
TO PERMIT AN EAVE/GUTTER ENCROACHMENT IN THE FRONT YARD; A
2.lS-FOOT VARIANCE FOR A BUILDING WALL OVER 50-FEET LONG.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Steven W. & Patricia J. Mosey (applicant/owner) have applied for variances from the
Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a garage and room addition to
a single family residence on property located in the R-I (Low Density Residential)
District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at the following location, 14620
Oakland Beach Avenue SE, and legally described as follows;
Lot 14, Oakland Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #02-029PC and held hearings thereon on April 22, 2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, the
proposed variance will not result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and
air to adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or
impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the
Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
5. A legal building envelope does not exist on the subject lot that eliminates the need for
the requested variances for setbacks to front yard, sum of side yards, eave
encroachment, and driveway location. The applicant has no control over the existing
structures location, such that the hardship has not been created by the applicant.
1:\02fi1es\02variances\02~029\aprvres,doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. There is justifiable hardship caused by the required setbacks and existing structure
location, as reasonable use of the property does not exist without the granting of the
variances requested.
7. The granting of the variance, as originally requested, is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not
serve merely as a convenience to the applicant, and is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship.
8. The contents of Planning Case 02-029PC are hereby entered into and made a part of
the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth aoove, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves with
conditions the following variances for a future garage and room addition attached to a
single-family dwelling as shown in the attached Exhibit 1 - Revised Certificate of
Survey;
1. A 24-foot variance to permit a I-foot structure setback to a front property line, rather
than 25-feet as required for front yard setbacks [Ordinance Section 1102.405
Dimensional Standards (3)].
2. A 3.58-foot variance to permit a sum of side yards of 11.42-feet on a nonconforming
lot of record rather than the minimum required 15-feet [Ordinance Section 1101.502
Required Yards/Open Space (8)].
3. A 5-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within 0' ofthe front
lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503
Yard encroachments (I)].
4. A 2.18-foot variance to permit a 63.8-foot building wall to be setback 10.12-foot to a
side lot line rather than the required minimum 12.3-feet for building walls over 50-
feet [Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (6)].
The following conditions shall be adhered to and subject to the issuance of a building
permit for the proposed garage/room addition:
I. The Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission shall be recorded at Scott
County within 60 days of adoption, and proof of recording along with the
acknowledged City Assent form shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
1:\02filesI02variancesI02-029Iaprvres.doc 2
2. The applicant shall submit a revised certificate of survey depicting the approved
addition location, and the subject site shall be developed as shown on the survey to
ensure additional variances are not required.
3. The building permit is subject to all other city ordinances and applicable county and
state agency regulations.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on April 22, 2002.
Anthony J. Stamson, Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Community Development Director
1:\02files\02variances\02-029\aprvres.doc 3
RESOLUTION 02-006PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 5.9-FOOT VARIANCE TO BUILDING SEPARATION; A
4.7-FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT AN EAVE/GUTTER ENCROACHMENT IN
FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINES; A 6-FOOT VARIANCE FOR BmLDlNG WALLS
OVER 50-FEET LONG; A 3.7-FOOT AND 4-FOOT VARIANCES TO PERMIT A
DRIVEWAY WIDTH AND SETBACK TO A FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINES
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Steven W. & Patricia J. Mosey (applicant/owner) have applied for variances from the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a garage and room addition to a single
family residence on property located in the R-I (Low Density Residential) District and the
SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at the following location, 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue
SE, and legally described as follows;
Lot 14, Oakland Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in Case
#02-029PC and held hearings thereon on April 22, 2002.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,
safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light
and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the
surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, the proposed
variance will result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire,
and danger to the public safety, umeasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
5. A legal building envelope exists on the subject lot that meets or reduces the requested
variances for setbacks to side yard, sum of side yards, eave encroachment, and driveway
location. The applicant has control over the house design and shape, such that the hardship
has been created by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists with a smaller
building footprint.
6. There is no justifiable hardship caused by the required setbacks and impervious surface
coverage area as reasonable use of the property exists without the granting of the variance.
1:\02files\02variances\02-029\dnyres.doc I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
7. The granting of the variance, as originally requested, is not necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will serve
merely as a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship. The factors above allow for an alternative structure to be permitted with a reduced
variance or none at all.
8. The contents of Planning Case 02-029PC are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the following
variances for a future garage and room additions to a single-family dwelling as shown in
attached Attachment I - Certificate of Survey;
I. A 5.9-foot variance to permit a building separation of9.1-feet between all structures on the
nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot, rather than the minimum required IS-feet
[Ordinance Section 1101.502 Required Yards/Open Space (8)].
2. A 4.7-foot variance to permit an eave and gutter encroachment to within .3-feet from a side
lot line rather than the minimum required 5-feet setback [Ordinance Section 1101.503 Yard
encroachments (I)].
3. A 6.foot variance to permit a building wall 63.8.feet in length to be setback I.3-feet from a
side lot line rather than the minimum required 7.3-feet for building walls over 50-feet
[Ordinance Section 1102.405 Dimensional Standards (6)].
4. A 3.7-foot variance to permit a driveway setback of 1.3-feet, rather than the minimum
required setback of 5-feet; and a 4' variance to permit a 28' wide driveway at the right.of.
way line rather than the maximum allowed 24' [Ordinance Section 1107.205 Driveways (I)].
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on April 22, 2002.
Anthony J. Stamson, Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Community Development Director
1:I02files\02variancesI02-029Idnyres.doc
2
>1
w
~ vtl\of\
\."~~l.
:) \~ .1"" ,'"
UJ, --
I.L.
0
W
~
(J
I.L.
~
W
0
I
,..
I-
Z
,
~
~
t(
o
J
I I
I
I
i:
'0
KAl.E '101 Ffn
0.'-"" ... --.. _
I, . o..tw"., """"-"~
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
STEVE MOSEY
14524 GLENOALE AVENUE S.E
PRIOR LAKE. "'N, 5$372
I ;ti~~'"
. I ! ! ,.
~ .. ;..
L . :::~~..
60
-7'
,..~""" ~ ",
-'-----'l ~
,
'\.,'
---r---".
."
'~-~---
",,<,
-
,
l~ ~ ,
L"-:C--
.... .-...-..,....
,- ...'~...t,IIIOIk4G..
=-.,....""c-....
-:-: 'co ~.,
'~m_Ol'_.
P'
..~,,~,
1'IlOP'P':~- DI:3o..-rl1PrI:X, .", fIDI'w'.
Volley Svrveying Co, p A.
1$670 FRANKLIN YRAill Sf
PRIOR lAKE. MN. 55372
(952) "'47.2~10
__..,..'O..'_'.oq...DIl..... J
rp-:;~=:' .1.
~'-11. U~!
,I.
. :i \
t ....,
I ,.;>a1~
~'d ;:;,.oI1r'. 'IC. "... ',;"000
..,,, 'i,aW
j'-::-O,uc"
J ()Io"~.
~ ~~.48 r~;~;--"
,~ I~~b'"
ii~ct l__t\!~ '0"
'~~'LZ~ r
~i; '. t ~
... .~; 1 ''''1}'' ,- ,!i!
':';~;:' ::~, ~'-j t ;igHm r'~i
.',c.1 ."" :.~',," "". r.., ',~lo:lt .....! ; .'C'Ol'H"
. ~1" '.'-
-", . -. - n=>Dr'- .....
---~. .- - -; _J,
..' -1. -:'-0:":,:-: t ... 1 . I 1 1
...."".. J j
L ......... "". ~ "'_'.' r-~"~c *0,(;" I ~ '--;~~_,,"-~'
! ./'~ (
" .'
~ 1,'//
:.....
, "
"':-
Leoe 14, ~ .'<ClfJI, ~t Ct:ult.. ;1.i~-l, ""'~~ "Ith ~ 1;" r..,." J,
~~~; ~,';;'-:~.;.';:;, o...';;;.,,';;~: ,;,;';;. ":,;~':',:'::'t:.,:;;
Ctlu'l:)', ,Il:roo."";'l JI><a:>,<,,,,,"O_, 0.""'.1..."", N,."<::"';"'-"l<l__",,,lIlt;.\cX:it.i.or,
""""'-'"din., ':0 t!\o., ..u~~.., ;il<_ ;,. Ul~ of,,~..- o! '-.". _,.~~.... 0: ~, .~:
~ty, ",""-.....t.> \.n..,...a-_i<i....'It.far.,;..t.~t~, ........".i..:>o<l'....tou.",.:
~~;~~ :';,;' ::,';~' :<>"";:":.;;'~'...'C. :; ,.::~~~:-::' .:;;
~"'" jS): ~ """'t...r~i " li~... ''It.~ {.tv, -.tJl Ii"" !>.:. 1.0::: H. """J.an.d -.,_,
~><>>d -...rt.....:y .. di~ 0: :'<'.~ "Mt to t.I'>o! ...~t,""iy lu... ot . ~ 1<lO':: .....,1
ill 0...i'.10\.-o<1 -~,\, t/'oonc.- -.tnou.':C~ly ",J.,.,., t..... e.,~""rJ.. Ii..... D. ,"i" 1".. .no:
C'IlII.;, .. <Ji$t.o,'Ice of ".~~: ~ ......t..d\. <::n :u..- "1=0 ~ ~ h.....:>l !.o~
H, ;.)U.u.n.; ......'" ....~ "~'Iy " di"UIr><.." of ~'V,7 t...t t.:,.. ;:lOb: .,., tI>o
-: 1;",".., E.o: t;;, i.:..;.. 1. 001"1...'>6 1Iot.:o<:n!1lt .-\4.,;:."". ...i.<ipoint booh....;;>,~
t_: norUlen, 0( tM --~ .....,..,~ 0: "Oie 1.<:<: I.', ~ 'lD:'t.1>otrly '):roc. p><>
_t li~ of i..:.t .\:;, Sl-. t, 00I~1~,-.; Iloa", h:. A<Jdi""". "<:Ii!!""",,,- of w.l':M:
tDtJ\.'..l"""D\'"-9inn.i....
"~l 0: l:t,.. _ <Xl<ltll~ U,;><b so, :~
Sro>,,,,. Ill; "."'11>,,, ---"':;. ~ ....,~<:!'\.."...." ClOt" .."" 'l': Ire:.- "Oj~
?C"O!>rnl i.t ........
1IIOTa. ~e--.. 'l),"".of'
~(lM~1
9:!~14 0............--.
~...-........,...---
- nn................ af.... Ida........
.......,...... ......~
T
"!
VI
I
....
::>
z
~
'j
..
~
~ 'j
'"
.'" ".=>l)~~"ICI.'n~D_1\<o(
"1l1'Q ....".,'......,.~.'...~I.~"'I:,
.Lv ~';2N",." t..:... ""'~,$[DfoA""" ~
$n~-,,::. "'0 .....fo ;tI."""p"C_ ".~1
flf~ ~"i1'", 'O"_Iift:"'''''OP()$(:
Plt" ~('Oe.c."[)fo
IIf~ !olll'i1.TO IH(M I'WOI'Q\fC t:f.tIC
1......., --..... ,,*III/I"W)
-----...-........1IlJ
tIrwt...,...,.,..........I...
.~u-.." l.-.~
...............,"" ......-
-.
Dolt. .u.... '-0.0(3
"'LIE liIO
112$!o 1ClOk..!2!... "'/;'
24 GLENDALE AVENUE S.E.
)R LAKE, MN. 55372
u
w
'"
'--.'-~>7--- . - ".or- __--,_.._._n_. -I.-__
"
Goroqt:
r\:)\JSt
/
r:.
x
o
8 "
"<-
,
,
,
v
/
,
HOUSE
1
lSlI'il1
,
/
,
1 North lin. of lot 14
,', OAK LAND BEACH
"
"?, S890S0'24"W
~: 100 plat
I :_u 100.07 meos -..
~
,9IZ.E. /
?',
1 J ::
r.. ..."'..n~1.: ;:
( --~;. ~H ~"H~~?' '::i' .-:5'.
. == CI q- , \. ''':l.IN N HOUSE N
( ~ ~:, . t!., ~ j \ ::.,,~ 17(1. ~?J. '" ..,
;.. -- or eLl C'1 _ !! _ :.......-1'. ", v
/'~ 'J: '.I_.13.I,l'...... I," ~"" ~ ~ .<..t~."
e- - - ~i '/ '" ,.. .r
..... ;;;'o,..OUttlJ ."~' ''.,,. $..,0" '-...:tIo ...:' \Ii:"
~- ... ~
- H 78.S t -- - /. --. ow... lint' n<<. '11.~. r'"----r- ""
, 1, '- 100 18 1 ,"
..-..;~.-. ,-<;" ~.... ---;' meol.-..
f) ,"" 10(j rio'" v
I S89.!>6'13'W~
i- South line of loi 14;
L._
"
",I.
"
~OA~LA~D
r---
i
!
i
I
I
L__
HOUSE.
,
_~,-i
"
'Ed
7 8
-
I J~
\&j~ ef 0
> ~ .~l cof('\
S' <d(t: ""'f'I
Jo..t .'ik~ ~o, \0
IJ <t ~\
S "I" I
",,,-Q, ~f!: , SHE_
o'fl-.'O '..J ,,'
,~. ';,rJ' a:: I I - - 4 6 ~
,,,, ..~ "
r}' W S89fSO'24'fYo:- - ",',
.. 2"~' 0.. cP 30' 50 ,~.
.. \".- . rneos......." .-' '.
~__ - _. . I l- W '
. . \ 30.S"dH'd ~ ~~ 0
,. /,,_ ::~ \HI,!>>. $Ill -
'. ~ - ~'c .. '0
IV !'" 2 .... "" IS I NJ'l-
- .,...... ..... '.el'"O\ll -:-<:I)'..Jt'to...,__
2 .0Qlo t~~ :,.,~
Q. mCLt~..- iu.. en U'tc:.
L.:iO~"'''j~ ~ :.::
oO!..-a::zoo=:.,. I __
.~ r.~ ~~m ~
I Z Q", 3
I' '" J '
- 9t -..----' 30.7 deeol Jt
'''t' ' 1'- 36,~3m.o'-!
-;- - he9.S6'1J"[
\ I \ .\I
\ \K:
f ;' L SW corn.
I I lot 10
A/
,j
I.~/~
.,prv ~
0'" ..
"'..
" .... ".
V ,'I ....
"
25 :' _"..j
I-
<:
...J
0..
/0'
l'
)
aiEACH
L.L.
o
N
,li :-
'-'-:"""'-
PROPER'cOY DS3CRIPTIO" ,'.,~ t'?OVIDCD:
Lot; lA, OAKLAND 3EACII, Scott County, 1linn.
OA.'<LAND 3C1\CH 1,";'-" ADDI'I'IO!'I, Scott Countv, '
rort of Go'Jot"'Tl!':1('nt":. r.nt-_ A, .'~"'("..; ~~__~i~___..;_.~
tJ\
0-
f'
("
f
~j-
. G
:: j
~
l
,.
-- ~,
1.1
fiB
L
J( EV
1 ~IEd~
-+- ! i
E!
I
('"
f
if;}
~ 3 ;
'/Ir-
, m
~! tJ'.
iff
lr
t
ti
2
~
"I llr
_I ,1 Ii
~ 1 ~
-'
I
f .~
5-
W
"ll
~r
~
~
:~ ---
~t .(
1"\'-0.
, (,I._-'~,
r"......,.
l
w1
~
I
I
i
I
!i!
.G.
~
i!
(')
:E:
3:
m
z
-I
N
;;;[II ~ '
:l t
.:it
8
3
I
i
-4
;0,
i
!
\ Plod
\0''/'....... I ,....o.l...c.
\ (f)
!
\ "
Ii If III
J
1 ,
\ l._________~ I
,
,
,
I I
,
\ I ':'
, ~
I
I '\
I I !i' ~
I ~ ff
I
I I f
I
I
I
I ~
I I
I
~ ________..J
tEl
c:
-
r-
C
-
Z
C)
;5!
)>
z
en
;p
ff;'
't ,
iF
RPR-17-2002 09:49
VRLLEY SURVEYING CO.. P.R
P.01
,'.....-n III.,",'.""IG IWI'
ITa ~_, ~.!.--..) ~
Co./OQpt. (
- ..-
P_.~o....... .:rL I
Fo · '"l?'"",.J
.t:. :~,.. .':
", ,,' TOTALIMPERVIOlJSstiRFACE" "
UNDE~> ,," ,
, Prepar~dBY~~t~ , ' ' Date..1lJ..U_I~'..~'2-
':,' com, P~Y,"':~~\~S,. · "go,,:, :~,. ~, Ca. ",P ~ '. ,Ph, one #L.\~, :...i.s,o_()f).
~~N~'\"",~.~~...t..~ ' ,\\, v\o+- i"~,-e."""\4.",, ~W5Gl~,,~-e~A
~+ '\0;>\ \\ \o<.1o",\\~, OU~r -e~\ , ,,-\-.. ~",ci...,> ~p~, ' " ' ,
", " ',' , '. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE '
, Impervious Surf~ccCaIculations
, ,',' .," "" (1'0 be Submitted w'ith Suildin& Pel1t\it Application) "
" , ',F or All Prope~esLocatedlnthe Shore land Distrlct (S
""Tl).e ~ilqn:i\lmIinpervious SUrface Cov~rage Permitted in 31
Property Address \ l\I..io' t)..:\t.l~...,,85"~ua. 'L....,
,', '
" .' '. " .
. ",' . . . .' .
LotArea : (qU1l1iP~~ ~\.ql)q.OSq. Feet x 30% -..................:J;.coo
.***. *... *.,. * ..*.... ..i'** .*.,..... * ~* ***. ...........* ** '" "'.... .....* '" *...* * "'** "'......... "'''' ..* '
'. ,ir.~i:.. .~
" '.,
HOUSE,
,', '. LENGTH
, q'i.e.
-
WIDTH "
SQ. F~ET
\l..e>l
:', ,;~:: "
, , I'
lC~.""
;(
..
, '
,ATTACl1EJ)?,~GE, ,',
x
, -'
TOTALPRINCIl'LE STRUCTIJRE........:............." \'2...~ 1
'DETACHEDI3r..,DGS '
" (OangelSh!:d)
'X
X
......
" "', . .
TOT ALDET ACHED BUILDINGS..................;;.:. '
D~EWAY~AVEDAREAS
, "
(Drivc;vay-pl.v.d o( not)
(Sii:l~",a1k1Parking Ar.....)
'171 ,x 1.1- ,- , o..c" 2i
,x .'
x ,.,
'..
, TOT A.L PAVED AREAS...~....................;................
Bs.e
. ~ .'. .
, 'S\tl,;\:, '" ..", ,,'.',' ,.., ,
P A TIOStPORCHESiDE,CKS
, ,.' """"'" ','. ", '. ....", .,..
(OpeR; cc:~""'W~ m"iril" op,l:id"1 b~r.'Iccn'
baud.. wid\....PCl~iou~ ~dac:.e bc.low,'
ale nat canSidcrccf to be.imp'c:rvic,uu) :
. . , . . . . ~..
.
.-...,/1..:.. X :"2...:1
,"'\.'1X 1.2,.
I..a ~ I
'"
" ,.,
lC
""
, TOTAL DECKS.....~.:......-.......,..........................:......
lDbO
OTHER'
,x . "
'.
'.Co" .
'.. '
;(,
. ~".
",._ .l,..
. . ,',"
" ,. .TOT AL" OTliE'R..,.~._.~~...n......~..~..................~....u..............'...... .
I, '. ;iz_m~)~
I
'eR
TOTRL P.01
.'
~
if
o
:t
s:
m
z
~
w
I
,;:
;$1'
~
(5
c:
~,
en
c:
,,':D
....
..;;.... I
,~
m
)>
':%I
m
:I>
/ ATTACHMENT 4 - APPLICANT NARRATIVE
TO:
STEVE HORSMAN
FROM:
STEVE AND PATRICIA MOSEY
RE:
BUILDING V ARlANCE
DATE:
03-21-02
My family and I are attempting to make improvements to our home. We
currently live at 14620 Oakland Beach Ave S.E. We have been living here
for approximately five and one half years. We are a growing family with
two kids, ages 14 and 10 years old. We love living here, but our home does
not have a garage. We are a two-car family along with many other property
owner items, such as; lawn mower, snow blower, bikes, tools etc. We have
very limited storage space. We would like to build an attached garage onto
our existing home. We would also like to add a room above the garage to
give us more room for our family. We have put a great amount of time and
research into our project and feel we are in need for the addition. We will
be asking for variances consisting of; Front and Side Setback, Combined
Side Yards, Building Separation, A Building Wall Over 50 feet, Eave and
Gutter Setback, and A Driveway Setback. These will be needed to build our
proposed garage on our irregular lot. We are hoping that after you see our
plans, and the survey, and give us some time to explain our need that you
will grant us the variances we need to build our addition. If you have any
questions please feel free to call us.
Steve and Patricia Mosey
Home; 440-6611
Steve work; 612 673-5704
Patricia work; 952 707-3367
1-. .-...-....
i '.l.Sib1.5u',; .
'. 'I W L
:;! I
I . ,
't I ..00
Ii \ IW'l". - 2 2002
ii t
--'-1
iw ~. ~ ..-.
l_..
09/04/1997 19:21
1'.0727741'.31
DAVID FELDSHUH
PAGE 01
ATTACHMENT 5 - LETTER DATED 3-21-02
April 16, 2002
Prior Lake Planning Commission
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Crcc:k Ave S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Dear Planning Commission:
We arc writing in support of Steven W. and Patricia J. Mosey's application for a variance
at 14620 Oakland Beach Ave. SE., lot 14. This addition will not adversely affect the lake
and will be an improvement to the property.
Sincerely,
~
David Feldshuh
o1i~r ~f ~2 Oakland Beach Ave SE.
J'~a~elt
308 Elmwood Avenue
Ithaca, NY 14850
Approved Plans
L:\TEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
\
\
! I
.......
0:
\ !
-
\ I ,__m__
--~
,
\ :
I i
I :
~ \ i
~t , l___h__j
O. ~ i
~r
i!' ,
iF
1 ",i,~Ii\
~ 'I El ~
~ '
( ,
~}- , !
. 0 '
. ~ .
~/I~ I
-i'
~
U
it U\
Of
~ t"
J f
r
if
~
~
r
11 ~
JJ'
~
C-
o
"'-<'
(t)
,
,
i-:>
"'
~
\-:L~O"'
I.......o.l...c. ,
I
l..
.
If
I
II
~
&'
...
11' ~ f
~
'~
::::!!1
[
o
~ L-
! ('l ,~
0:[ .
.---
"';'0.
1'1."00.
(ol.~V''''~.
~
~1
n
~
It
Ji
(f'
0
3
, I
}-
/.
oJ' -- Jr-l'-
6- f. .
.. i' ~ E3 ~
c-.
f . 'I 6:
f'
+ to_ I
~ ij j (I S
:: j
~
IJ
1~1\
; -n-,: ' .' B I'
e "
( ,
~ III :
. ::r
p/p I
~ ~
;;, .;- f
~ .
H f
~ .. &-
~ :r ~
, ~
t "
ti- 2t
@
~ <\
^'
I 11 ~
-I ' I ~
i <
-'-'
0:
\ ".d \l1"n" ~"'*"oJ........c.
\ (f) I
I
\ ! .,...-
I~ III
II
1 -"
\1__________;
I ':"
,
I , &'
I
I ~
I 1 .G' ~ f
I ~
I
\ ,
I
I
I
I ~
I t
I
. __________.J
i"
tC
~
~
;p
~~
'l' ,
IF
.
en
z
<(
..J
no
"
z
-
C
..J
-
:::)
m
'i1i=: ~
~
, 5
f/ \..
j
.;.,
I~
: I ::r
, ]
III I
J
------
'w.:r Q~...? I
,,1...>',""
I
N
I-
Z
w
:E
::E:
~
~
lei:
f
0
c2-
lif
~\f.!.
~ J
J~
!-"
1
.~....-.'1
P.:LoI
~r
. ;.
~l~_
~------- 11
,
: \
,
" I
()
I ::.J
: I i
,
: \
: ----n-11
+----
1 ! \ 9
~ 1\ T
W I
~.~ ,\
1
,
. ---+
-- --
Po-
> , !-
~ ! I
- " !.-.
) --
<1..
~ ~
~
J~ ~
~ ,
l1. ~ l_
~ :I:
oJ .~
JJ 1 l~
. .
~ " ~!
Ii
-rr
,I/o
,. n
8' i:e
I ; , )
, .
\~~i",i
b
ii
1s
LIB
1 "
., c;;
.~ . .
\~ i>
~
'{ . il
~.: ti
:u ~
./
1
.J 1~
i '1i'
---->- 2.
]
,
,
.~.,,,, r
~\o~
~ f.
\....'4-1..
..~...
\'".I,c
o
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
STEVE MOSEY
14f524 GLENDALE AVENUE 5.E.
PRIOR LAKE. 1lW. 55372
I
i
.J.!_-=-~!.:::'-. -""-'
~-r~- ..~ ;-:.-
.,- ... J",
~"-8
! I !~
'f i ;,
1
_.__J
.~ --:.;..;.......
~
'0
00
SCALE .If nn
o~""'_Ml
.O'-IJan_,.....
-..'
."...""
.....""'" ~ ~..
...--4.. ~
,
-,,-,'
Volley Surveying Co., P A,
16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL SE
PRIOR lAKE. MN. 55372
(952) 441~2570
...
---------r-----.... -r--~.--
-
"""<<
i,
_ z~G
T-
_,_IUC"
_.....10._'. ~ I
n~'~
_.12'~"
':..::;::-- .1
U_
;,_.'
~ ~~. J r~:~"
I"';....,~
1:to: ~- ~--..~+
'(/' ~~~,.....,
~: "~.l"
:: ~~ . _ 1~2
:~ ~'} i ,qhh'p:{
: Ig;. ;o!i '" ~
....,.. 'i ~1Ii0:. .... t
': j"'.. r"':I ;..,._ ' ~-,.~.:~z'
!_ ... 1___.~-
- -~';=='.r .1'; -, i-'ll'
::~"6"." ~....., ) J
L,"""" ......, ,",_,,,-, ~u~c _ *.t.. \ ~ '
,V~. '
"~ 1-1,,,
, ':
.;'~,,-"
"'; ~
"
--.,.....
',0'0'.........I:III(AC..1
:v.-5O'Z4.....
~: 000 _
';,.._OT_._
1
'"if:
'.1"'-.-
~ l ,,; ..."!.....r';"~ \ P"'"
, .,...... .....IO".DllIT\CI"
~~"""'[.C""
~~."D
-
,,",,,,,_.,
.."c.
..~,,~\
~""'-Ill:J,.."!lU'l'I::,,'..o,.,...n~.
1.ot.1...ClU1.lIIr.>~,5IDt[~y"'\l."'-"'.'fa\,~dthk'f.1'-',,,l<r.<1,
~u..o.."I:' ~: 1.~;' ~'T,rl'i,:Il, ~l o-...~y, "Iir....",ou_ A1""~: viti> &.I, tn;,:
~<1:,,:(Joy~:l.ot...;.;o,,-tlOl,"'_,""""'''''Il-'H....,..t.~,!.an''''ll.....t,Sc:o'::
Ocu."l~l.' .,1"",,--"0'"_, l<lC6:ool' tJOot_, ~l""" '-e-. ....' I&<J_ _OIl hit Adl;it.io-,
m=>:'tiin.; ':0 ~ ,>1":.5,,, cU.. ill Ul~ ot!iC'f< o! U>r kbter o! dootods, Sco<.:
.::a......t.y. .,.~ in....... fir Mid """'''ltt _ st.t~, --=-"'-d'" follows:
iMo-;l.n:'Il"" ;)t .. po;':>: OIl th<< ''>1~~ !in-' ot :.a: 1':, '1...,~ 1. CW>1M<l "'-=- 1..-;
.'I<)a;.tiOl"a.aidl"'."tb<-ri 1_..~i",,:.....:.rw,d;.l:Ittlr~,tCOt'l'lCto!...c
!.ot 1"; UleooI! -'It....:.- '"" hrH' vit.~ u.-.. aOIJtJl U,... "" t.<< 1~, OakLarlCl -.0,
1""co:Iu".cl _t.....:.,. e di........ 0: ::.J.~ t..:: ~ t/OI! _~...ly 1""" of . ao foct. .......1
in Oall:...,., -"::"l: U>-"",," """'t.n<o.:l..~:Ccly al..... tho. ''''=.<<It :1.... .,.- ...1" 2:: :oe:
n:oe.u .. dl"t.anoo of 4;;...>~; than<>__ _ly.... liao> v,U> U. -.tIl h.... or Lo:
1<t,.:>>.lC.lanc';."d'l....~_"te<ly..diSWo<;1tots:.7r~t<>a;x>1"tantr><o
_~ Ii......" i.ot l~, B.:toi:ll 1, oa'<.l..-.d _dl 1..t M:::1tian, _iel point bioi.... l7.~
t_: .,.,..tt>e<'lt o( tNo __t """"""".. of sal.:'! l.ot. 1.;>; crw.o. ncr.tlM..1y ~1""'i t^"
-,>t }i"" ot t.ot l;J, Illoco 1. OllUIIl'I<I ~ !so;. Addi:1...., a dU""""," 0: <;0.1 :_:
wt.h<,;>l"""ot~innilo<..
"""',,,,.el;'1is1t>1"~~:.&n<!,,,,~.C"'Ul.,,.;ottjrc:r...I,,
;:c<l{l"<1:11tar..;.
-'II of t/>Oo &rXWO! o:Ifltll..... U.20~ sc. ft.
.
__n.-Ml
.:JTl!S:~~'I).l7W.o~
9'!.~" 0--............
o.-~--..s
_ ere- ~...... fIl.......aor.......
s..w~.........__
'ILI IlIO e2fi~
.'
"!
Ul'
\
~:
z:'
~""
\
III
a
~
~ ~
'"
"",".IOi'1D__D_1IoG{
s.u TO ,.'.H'......'._"'..I.[TeIlC~
"['I ~ZUO'E"""'.. ~~S[OG~ ~
UT".C. ....O_/iZ)._O....,..~,
lit.. ~1./ll'tO'_NI..""ClPrl5H
PEC" ~l>CaT'I:I"
IIlv"IJ/f1tTOSNOlI""~lDlU:.
1-..,..,......._...,.
- ...-.. -- -.... ~
.,.,~......I-
.tlulyu.-d L..od Iurw,ao
..........11.........
-
-
'--1lIO.IIOlB3
MlOlC~ ....
Original
surveys and
drawings
L:\TEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
0,:T~ @ rn 0 ~/ ~...-~j
CITYOFPRlORLAKE II;~,! JUN 72002/:.1
Impervious Surface Calculations ,,'\! !Ii/V:
(To be Submitted with Building Permit Application) i ;
For All Properties Located in the Shoreland District (~LJ). --_____1
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted in 30 Percent.
Property Address \4.l.iZ.D 00.\(\..",,, """R"''''''L1. !4-\,)~~".p
Lot Area In. \o\.D~ o..'c..",,- LL.'9D4.o Sq. Feet x 30% = .............. -z..ooo
************************************************************************
LENGTH 'NIDTH SQ. FEET
HOUSE 4l\.~ x 1..P, . tp = l'Zhl
x =
ATTACHED GARAGE x =
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE......................
12..~ I
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
X
. TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.......................
*" tR\..~""""1-tv......+ '-\\\ 'oe. o~ f~~
DRIVEWAYIPAVEDAREAS X = )
(Driveway-paved or not) X = //
(SidewalkIParking Areas) X = /
l
TOTAL PAVED AREAS.................................
Co..! '-
S\~b
p A TIOSIPORCHE~/DECKS
(Open Decks IJ~" min. opening bcC\.veen
boards. with;J. pervious surface bdow,
.. are not considered [0 be impervious)
';..~ ::z" \
~.'i> X '2.\
X
=
y,...u
=
I"
\ .:..
q
x
=
TOTAL DECKS........................................................
1o'S 0
OTHER ~e....." (\.:o~...\<!, I x \ \ = II - e."'\~1
"2..\ x Iq =~, q -j.M.~e..
TOTAL OTHER......................................................
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
UNDE~ ~ c:-;-:)
Prepared By U p...",~ ~\ ~
Comp~y__.:\~~\\~....~~~~_d~~:_.~~~_~,~,....
2"\~~
l\~~
Date lo IS 1 "Z.OCi2_
Phone # l..\. L\I - "Z.S 1. 0
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
Impervious Surface Calculations
(To be Submitted with Building Pennit Application)
For All Properties Located in the Shoreland District (SD).
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted in 30 Percent.
Property Address \ Lll&O Df>.t\~~4 ~E:r--<:~ ~\'\(N\.Ie.,
Lot Area L-\ . DO to Sq. Feet x 30% = .............. \7..-0\. 'C
************************************************************************
HOUSE
LENGTH
l-\.I..\.5
WIDTH
"2.'2> .leo
=
SQ. FEET
\"2..'0\
l
,x
x
x
=
ATTACHED GARAGE
=
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE......................
\~l.,:~-> I
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
x
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.......................
DRIVEWAY!P A VED AREAS
(Driveway"paved or not)
(Sidewalk/Parking Areas)
311
"1.1-
=
1(3 '5 on
x
X
X
=
'"
S\)'l.e "
~,
(P A TIO"&pORCHES/DECKS
(Open Decks '14" min. opening between
boards, with a pervious surface belowj
arc not considered to be impervious)
TOTAL PAVED AREAS..........................................
bS~
"JD.<? X 1..\ = (,pLio, c;
1.1 X \. 'Z.- '" '\ ."Z...
-
X '"
TOTAL DECKS........................................................
l.oYq.1
OTHER
X
X
'"
'"
TOT AL OTHER.......................................................
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE l:zQ E'lt\."1-.J
::~'" ~~J, Do" ':; _ ",_q~ \S0<.-~ I
Company \)u\\~S""""~~:.\cl Cl' p./\. Phone # LJ\'-\1-L.-S"1[) ~ ~
tKE\.I. '5/""-' \ / (:) \ kr';r"" ""-'), \\ 'l2-e"",-,.\....I -tML $p..",,-e. I\~kr ....~v-> J"v-<o.,:/- o.l~.
.....; II b.", b..,'{\+- u...... "" ...\~ ;'t; s......i'<l<.oe. 'D. R.
APR-17-;2002 09:49
VALLEY SURVEY ING CO.. P. A
P.01
,._-u I_In,,.. IWt I
" "CITY OF PRlORLAKE
'd.Illlpenrious Surf~ccCalculations
,', " '.' ' .' : " , ' '(To b. Submitted with Building Pel1llir Application) "
, ' ,ForAllPrope~esLocatedi.nthe Shoreland Distn"ct(S
""Tl;1eMi:<:iII:J:um impervious Surface Coverage Permitted in 31
","- . ",." ",.....,
. "
~..... \.le_...~
FJDopl ~
- -
IP-'~o........ .:I~
IF... t?".,.~
", .
TOT4JlVI:PERV10USSURF ACE
UNDE~,' .,' ,,"
Prepared BY~.w> ~r"'~ , Date S - \1-11..- 0"2-
.comp~Y~6\~~\\O'~"'\~M,;G,'I'~ ~ '. Phone #~~;..i.slO "An,'" N
~N~H\"",,:~.~~~....c...~, M\\\ \I\<l~ 1"~'>(.l.>.:I\"\''''-"","w~G('f'q~r~ ~
-:t.i-, '\.,;.>\ \\' ~ '" '10..\ \~ 0.. ~'(" -e-j.:, j '6.+... ~l"\O"'':> ~..(.... '
, PropertyAddr~ss 'It.\lt2.o D,,;\t.\~...n'8...~~ '~~..',
Lot Area. ',: l..Dl.PlIlPo~,~ e\.QD<4:OSq. Feet' x 30% ='....h....... "1rno, ,
..'"~.. *.'.. ....... ....... .... ~.. '".... ...................... ........................ ...............
....~...,..
, HOUSE., ,,',
. LENGTH '" WIDTIi
, '-\'-I,~' x:.:z.e,;~
-
SQ. FEET
11..e'->1
". ;.,\::",
J:
:<
..
ArrACHEDO~GE
. ".... .1. ,",.
'. , ., '.
"X
-
TOTALPRI1'lCIl'LE STRUCT1JR.E........:............." \"'2..el
.' x
x
. . . '., .
,TOTALDETACH'EDBllILDlNGS..................;:.:. "
DRIVEWAYfPAVEP ~.~S
(Diiy.w..y-p~Y.d or not) ,
(SidewalkIParking Areu)
, ?'1 X '2."1..
.-
, o'~CL
'X
.'
x
~
, TOTAL P A YED AREAS...~..............~.....;................
5se
'.""'\..L .' .", '." ',","
PATJ:~~ORCHESIOECK~ "
(Opcldi.~ks~~ mini opcnins be",...
, bavds. wlch.I.,'pCC'YiGQS ",dice below,',
.' '. . .' , .
, are not c:~n.r"~~~d tel bil:imPcr:~o~l :
~o.c, x. . <":1
"V1 'X 1.2-
-
'-.II -.\ \
"
'7<,'" .
=
TOTAL DECKS....:....;..............................................
Lo50
OTHER X -
.
X ==
A .'
, .,. ,TOTAL OTHER......:...........................;.............:....~.
.c' "
....,.. .
, "L1 e:. 'l
ieR
TOTAL P.01
,!:;
~
o
:I:
s:
m
Z
....
w
I
:3:
"tJ
m
~
6
c:
(f'J
(J)
c:
:D
,j1
.~
m
,',' )>
:D
m
)>
=-vfiscellaneous
L:ITEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
I have reviewed the attached proposed request [VAR 02-029] for the following:
~;
r City Code
I Storm Water
Flood Plain
Natural Features
Electric
Grading
Signs
County Road Access
Legal Issues
Roads/Access
I
I
I
I:
Water
Sewer,
Zoning
Parks
Assessment
Policy
Septic System
Erosion Control
./
Gas
Other
Building Code
Recommendation:
Approval
Denial
Conditional Approval
Comments:
F'L'c;.,:".J(~ Cn.Jhl';='l K4.-:'\D 1<' OlU 1i-tG: P''?_'''HIC'RT-( E~~T tlr- -rt..H=:. P.....4l"T"ED
1<.0. LJ. (ALfl"":'L. ..0ITW ""a.J.l'"1'Alt'1' E W(~TF_'('. iALI..L T"'L<;. fhAO feuF-2 M.r
I'IIMI"" f'.Nj( IAI'1,., PU\>TB-. i2_tl.l.\, ~ ,.(:' ~ (oo..d ,"" ~v.t...V'"
?'^" cd. /0 ta--..-.",+r u. (:),:.u19, ~ a 0 \>..J '-0; 1\ \r:A 1'...-" A"l ,
Signed:
c ?v-t /J... cD~-4-
Date:
L./ J II ! (j 7_
Please return any comments by ADril15. 2002, to :
Steve Horsman, Planning Dept.
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (612) 447-9854
Fax: (612) 447-4245
1:\02files\02variances\02-029\referaI1.doc
Page 2
64/69/2662 68:67
9522263758
INTEGRA TELECOM PL
PAGE 81/BI
I have reviewed the attached proposed request [ VAR 02-029] for the following:
,
i
Water
Stlwer
Zoning
Parks
Assessment
Polio;y
Septic System
Erosion Control
City Cede
Storm Water
Flood Plain
Natural Features
Electric
I Grading
Signs
.County Road Access
Legal Issues
Roads/Access,
II
I
I
IL...-
x
Gas
Other ~~~
Building Code
Recommendation: X Approval
Denial
Conditional Approval
, Comments:
NO C.O~c.E.P",.:t't.~
":(
/tf1. . ..........
// integra
TELECO,",
/
'Don Barlage
, a.s.p. EnolneeMno & Deslon
Dlroct Dial, (i62) 2za.7lI84
4690 Cnlomdb :>1r'" S.E.
f1riot lAke. MN ~5372
Mobile: (6121 919-5887
F"" (951) m-I/58
dbn.boIIageOlnt'llrlllllocom,com
_.inlog"~IooOm,_
'~ ~
'Signed: '\.~~~o_
Date:
~-q-b'L
Please retum any comments by ADr1l15; 2002, to.
Sieve Horsman, Planning Dapt.
City ef Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE,
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (612) 447.9854
Fax: (612) 447-4245
1:I02filesI02variances\02-029\releral1.doc
Page 2
r~ ~~--_"
.":, I L
,. ,-" '::7 1.5_ U \','---_
APR I , aIQ
I have reviewed the attached proposed request [VAR 02-029] for ~I.~ f",i;v,,;,,';'.
L. __
, City Code
Storm Water
Flood Plain
Natural Features
Electric
Water
Sewer
Zoning
Parks
Assessment
Policy
Septic System
Erosion Control
Grading
Signs
County Road Access
Legal Issues
Roads/Access
Gas
Other
Building Code
Recommendation: -* Approval
Comments:
Denial
Conditional Approval
. -
~ ~~ Date:
~/Nr ~t ,lfM~:'e.;
Please return any comments by Aoril15. 2002, to
'1' -/0 """<.-
Signed:
Steve Horsman, Planning Dept.
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (612) 447-9854
Fax: (612) 447-4245
1:I02filesI02variancesI02-02glreferaI1 .doc
I
,
,
,
,
"
it.:..
Page 2
PROJECT NAME:
I
I APPLICANT:
CONTACT PERSON:
I
I PID#:
I LOCATION:
I EXISTING ZONING:
I
l
r~
I
Iy
I
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
DRC PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST
~I~C~ ~J-
~~rf)1
0)v ~ I~
VAR 02-029: Variance's to permit a
garage room addition to be setback l' to
front lot line; 1.3' to side line; eave/gutter
to 0' front line, and .3' to side line; 10.76'
sum of side yards; 63.8' building wall
setback 1.3', and 9.46' to side lines; and a
driveway setback of 1.3' to side lot line
liT - _uAPPLlCATION FOR:
I i- -AdminiStr."ltlve Land Division
Comprehensive Plan Amend.
Conditional Use Permit
Home Occupation
Rezoning
Site Plan
Preliminary Plat
PUD
Final Plat
... Variance
Vacation
Steve & Patricia Mosey
Steve Horsman
SITE INFORMATION
25-115-009-0
14620 Oakland Beach
R1, SD
DISTRIBUTE TO:
Frank Boyles
Sue Walsh
Ralph Teschner
'y Bob Hutchins
Y Don Rye
y Jane Kansier
y
Y DNR - Pat Lynch
County Hwy. Dept.
MNDOT
SMDC
I[ Mediacom Cable
~----------,,--_.._.-
! Date Received . .-----
Complete Application
i Date
I Publication Date
\: 60 Day Rev~_~Date
Y Bud Osmundson
~ Sue McDermott
~ Fire Chief
~ Bill O'Rourke
~ Minnegasco
~ Watershed Dist.
~ Phone Co.
Scott/Rice
~ Electric Co. MN
Valley
Met. Council
Date Distributed 4/5/02
Date Distributed to
DRC
Tentative PC Date
Review Extension
1:102filesI02variancesI02-029IreferaI1.doc
i
Date Due 4/15/02
DRC Meeting
Tentative CC
Date
!
Page 1
PROJECT NAME:
I
I APPLICANT:
I CONTACT PERSON:
I
I PID#:
I LOCATION:
I EXISTING ZONING:
I
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
DRC PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST
fa L 'I\,{.,+
rYv\ [..
VAR 02-029: Variance's tc I l...c ""'Ci/
garage room addition to b '1:; L--
front lot line; 1.3' to side Ii C,G
to 0' front line, and .3' to s _.. ._, . v., u
sum of side yards; 63.8' building wall
setback 1.3', and 9.46' to side lines; and a
driveway setback of 1.3' to side lot line
Steve & Patricia Mosey
Steve Horsman
SITE INFORMATION
. 25-115-009-0
14620 Oakland Beach
R1,SD
-=---- ------ ------
I DISTRIBUTE TO:
r~ Frank Boyles ~ Bud Osmundson
I Sue Walsh ~ Sue McDermott
I ~ Ralph Teschner
i
I ~ Bob Hutchins
I ~ Don Rye
I ~ Jane Kansier
I ~
I ~ DNR - Pat Lynch
County Hwy. Dep!.
MNDOT
SMDC
i_ MedillC~rn Cable
I Date Received
I Complete Application
Date
I Publication Date
I 60 Day Review Date
APPLICATION FOR:
Administrative Land Division
Comprehensive Pian Amend.
Conditional Use Permit
Home Occupation
Rezoning
Site Plan
Preliminary Plat
PUD
Final Plat
.... Variance
Vacation
~ Fire Chief
~ Bill O'Rourke
~ Minnegasco
~ Watershed Dis!.
~ Phone CO.
II ScotURice
~ Electric Co. MN
I Valley
, Met. Council
I
IJL.
Date Distributed 4/5/02
Date Distributed to
DRC
Tentative PC Date
Date Due 4/15/02
DRC Meeting
Tentative CC
Date
Review Extension
1:\02files\02variances\02.029\referaI1.doc
Page 1
I have reviewed the attached proposed request [VAR 02-029] for the following:
Water
Sewer
Zoning
Parks
Assessment
Policy
Septic System
Erosion Control
City Code
Storm Water
Flood Plain
Natural Features
Electric
Gas
Other
Recommendation:
Approval
Denial
Comments:
Signed:
Please return any comments by Aoril15. 2002, to
Steve Horsman, Planning Dept.
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (612) 447-9854
Fax: (612) 447-4245
1:I02fi1esI02variancesI02-029IreferaI1.doc
Grading
Signs
County Road Access
Legal Issues
Roads/Access
Building Code
Conditional Approval
Date:
Page 2
'i~~~;~;" +';:r'r! ,:r:
".i:!ot.i~'\l"'f.t" ~."
'-:~~;;~,;. g''';'~;,:;:'!~~
"
:
, ::
;.~
, ~_...l.
, ''', '~,,".'
:\":~i~
"
.3'.
'~': ~,(t ;:..
~ ""';'-'v '-~",'- "t.1.;..e"":'-' .,.~;-
,.)Jt. _,,t<'l'..,..l....'.;.,......,...,-!'-
':m" ,,'. ,~;. . ,,'" ,
_ll-'::'_:~.:>//~ ,,':....~:.,~',':.:':::.:...: ~ ~,\
-, 'l-, '11;:P~'~' ,... ,
~~~!f:
~~ ,..:r ~t' ~,,~>~
..~~llI";;!";;, ....'l;.~...r."
.~~~;~~-f~~~:,~:~~~',,~,
'7;~t;i . ,~tf t: ;:'4i::: .
'~~~1(' 'V".. ~-.;'
"~~~~!~',--, ,'_ '<'. ~.:r:t,~'l;:f:~".b~"';'J::'
flk\~~'j;:'.(.,,~!\'r;k::'''; ,;
.,;r~~~~l:~::,,,:~,. ,,"',:~;';_1!":~':'
;-' '~,~~~~,{~;~~.;.;'~ .1,';~f~ ;.: J:-,"- '~~,.~" '
.,.~. ", ',- ~, .,;,,,
.;;~;,t~~>~i~.~:~:
. ,';.- ..~', "", ;:. . ..;;
t'i-",,~-:-~ ~ ~ :;.' '~~-Y'-
lii:;.i~&::1~' .
;:~&;~~~,;;X1i ~.:;::
~'-'i.,,,,,,..,lI(<'-'''li~':"!i:::~M'-''
\
\
\
" ',~-,,. "~.'.
.r':,~,,?;
.
...1fl_~c...
Gw'...t>f)
_.
Go" ~.. ,
"
.1 .
11.-
f · -:1~
, ~ :-.!!.. ~a
~$
'" ."
.. Ii'
N.
-4!)-
I
I
I
l~tC-Il~'
I . .:iiiT." ~"~'"
~
I /'(,(. ~ rfa
.L
'or
j
~ G..I W4
~-',.-
I
I
~
..
,
,
-..Q.AdAKD 8f:.AGH~
"
'. ......
"\0
..,~. .
t
. lrlln M~t\.
~I& ".'cIi.,
~:-..
J~
~ Df 11"-,,
Cit1tJ;1fy Df !hJI!
~. II UJI"YUf 4:0#
-........-
'"
,
I....
3",'" ~f1f)'.'"
="W fu" t<iU. "I :
'-:1,," .J '..:. C.
liy-r1V',' ~,.,.." ~
~.,,.,,.,~,,('J.'
~.AtI<<_ /i,.~
." "" ,""I..... ~.j
'4'" .... ,.." ~~
.~~...,...... U. ~
(;fMI".O /XI'/
W:;"",>n
~. t1I I"f""'..
c..:"" , ~
!"..,
"";'11 ........
I.
.v fMJIt flU
...
I
/'IJf
fl"~.:.."=
L
"
..ffil.!;
fly",:.:.,
~
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
STEVE MOS EY
14524 GLENDALE AVENUE S.E.
PRIOR LAKE, MN. 55372
'"
LJ
W
o
Gl'\ ''''7.2\
(;l>!<1>. \ ~ I
.I ),
\, \
I" "
I '\63
!
I
'7 8
r--- ,--
./
-,---
....
/
"
Go(oge
"JI:SE
/
~----...,
~-
/
~
v
, ~ I'
I ,
'----L_j__
1
v
I
/
2.?_~_j
f-
<::
....J
0..
tiOUSE
/
/
/ 1...,
[s'"
! .
'~~~:~ oc I
\}' w ~
_ ~1'W '$ a.. cF
" --,,:-~-I ~
:~4" '
~ ;',,- ~
IV. O!. ~!O'~ l'
_ .0 to
Q. iDGr<t.'
C . '
'"t ~'"'O'"
i~~-;;a:Z
LZ~
,"t9i,-.----~
,~ I '
....
,- I
.'-- ,.~-
. '12.6 . ~ '
,,'
"
''''
,-'
I ,",
,_.... _ _ ---70.3t--- _!O~ ).....~ - 1,1
f:-: - -- 78'- r--.:t-' .n:~!
1.\1 '" I 9.) I 0: .l
0. ~ -- - ;j 'l~
~- 8' . '0 ,)M I ( . 0 : tJ "C""' , "
~ (-,....' I .",. lal' .....
-.--8 I r. ...eN .&
0.- j. s\..... :].. co
....:) ---. ."
,_C_VO I -7.....4
/;).q I \. N- -:J.t1 N N HOiJS E
_<II tI1 I l.) . _ w/o El
U'l' . .' I .\ 91),'7
~ .. 'tLI~___~...~
.-"""-O-rr. I '. . I' '- ,
.J'" #', -. -
"'J / /-~---~ '.. of:
- ..... (,(..7'" ':. /' SUlfI O. ~_ .... ...., ...r 7
""".r hn~ ~.~,., "r:----r-.---r........ ....
./~ -.- ---IOO,18mea'---r 1 '"
fJ-~ r ~~~~~~~:~~w; ~ M '~t )
L South I,ne of loL'4, tOI\~_LI\~D _~:~EI\CH
/
, 1 North line of lot 14
,i OAKLAND BEACH ~
'I '
~, S89050'24"W
~: 100 plat
11...100.01 meos...
,
~\o~
? ~
\ fl."'- -z.."
"" ,,0 Eo
~\..'A./\O ,"
'.
"',
~,
2'
..
:
;;
~
o
'"
VI
44.8
1.1
, r
o:~
" ,
.
..
..
"
,.
,
,
~~I .,
.~...... ,.
.~,.,,/ 19
--
~_ 0 I' ."",,,,)'
___78.9t ....
~"'C\...
,
"..
u..
o
(\J
-~'. h
~, ..
o
1
r- '~-----"-_..._'-- ...
i
,
i "JUSE
I
I
i
L_.__ _ ____~.~_._.__________i
..
'"
PROPEtTl'Y DC:'3CRIPTION .\
_.__.__.__.__._..--~- -.-"
Correspondence
L:lTEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
April 18, 2002
Steven & Patricia Mosey
14620 Oakland Beach Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Agenda and Agenda Report
Attached is a Planning Commission Agenda and Staff Report for the April 22, 2002
Planning Commission meeting. You or your representatives are expected to attend the
meeting. You will be given the opportunity to speak regarding your proposal and the
staff report. The meeting begins at 6:30 p.m. and is held at the Fire Station located at
16776 Fish Point Road (east of HWY 13 on the south side of CR 21). If you cannot
attend the meeting, please call me so your item can be deferred to the next Planning
Commission meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me at 447-9810.
Sincerely,
C~CCU"4o-nt
Connie Carlson
Planning Dept. Secretary
Enclosure
I:\deptworklblankfrmlmeetltr.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
09/04/1997 19:21
6072774631
DAVID FELDSHUH
PAGE 01
April 16, 2002
Prior Lake Planning Commission
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Ave S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Dear Planning Commission:
We are writing in support of Steven W. and Patricia J. Mosey's application for a variance
at 14620 Oakland Beach Ave. SE., lot 14. This addition will not adversely affect the lake
and will be em improvement to the property.
Sincerely,
~
David Feldshuh
oW;;~r ~f ~ 2 Oakland Beach Ave SE.
a!~a~elt
308 Elmwood Avenue
Ithaca, NY 14850
Steve Horsman
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Lynch [pal.lynch@dnr.state.mn.us]
Tuesday, April Og, 2002 2:23 PM
Shorsman@cityofpriorlake.com
Mosey Variances, 14524 Glendale Avenue SE
How much impervious surface area is there (to the 904 contour).
be close to the limit if you include the proposed addition. If
impervious is ok, then DNR is not opposed to the side and front
setbacks. They alone will not have measurable negative impact
lake.
Pat Lynch
DNR South Metro Area Hydrologist
phone 651.772.7917
fax 651.772.7977
pat.1ynch@dnr.state.mn.us
1
It must
the
yard
to the
April 9, 2002
Steven & Pari cia Mosey
14620 Oakland Beach Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Review for Variance Application Completeness
Dear Mr. & Ms. Mosey:
The City of Prior Lake has determined all of the necessary submittals for the above
application have been received. This letter serves as your official notification that the
application is now complete. The City will now begin formal review of this request. At
this time, the variance application is scheduled for the April 22, 2002, Planning
Commission meeting.
The City review process can be substantially less than 120 days, and we intend to
progress in a timely manner that provides a complete and professional review.
Occasionally, however, due to meeting schedules, it is sometimes necessary to extend
the 60-day review period. This letter also serves as your official notice that the City is
extending the 60-day deadline for an additional 60 days from June 1, 2002 to August 1,
2002.
If you have questions relative to the review process or related issues, please contact
direct dial phone number at 952-447-9854.
/i~eIYi' ~
7~~~-1
Steve Horsman
Zoning Administrator
I:\02files\02variances\02..Q27\complete.doc Page 1
16200 Eagie Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
March 8, 2002
Steven & Patricia Mosey
14620 Oakland Beach SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Review For Variance Application Completeness
Dear Mr. & Ms. Mosey:
The Planning Department received a variance application for construction of a attached
garage and room addition on your property at 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue. The
following information is necessary to process your application:
I. Depict on revised survey the actual boundaries for property that you hold the "Fee
Title". The certificate of survey you submitted includes Lots 14 & 10 as being under
your ownership.
2. Include eave/overhang dimensions on the building plans.
3. Applicant narration describing requested variances and hardship.
Once we have received the above information, we will process your application and
schedule this item for a public hearing. If you have any questions, please phone me at
447-9854.
Thank you for your patience in this matter.
Sincerely,
~~~
Steve Horsman
Zoning Administrator/Inspector
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029\INCOMPL T.DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNllY EMPLOYER
APPLICArl'IO~S
&
APPLICArl'IO~
~Arl'bRIALS
L:lTEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
...., ,.
,~~L~f.
),
'; .le.
t
l><
m
Planning Case File No.
Property Identification No.
r:e-~~
:I
il~, i City of Prior Lake
WNING/LAND USE APPLICATION
Type of Application
o Amendment to Zoning Map
o Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Text
o Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
o Conditional Use Permit
[8] Variance
o Planned Unit Development
o Senior Care Overlay District
o Home Occupation
o Amendment or Modification to approved CUP or PUD
o Other
Brief description of proposed project
(Please describe the proposed amendment, project, or variance
request. Attach additional sheets if necessary).
B""/d An A}-IA(hf~ r;'1/~"'f ",,..JI-, A
nlDh t \\o'\) f:OVl. tl C'Am'.I" flll<l'"
} ,
(). P,,!ut +h~_ '11lfl4hf. lIA',-,,!yl/f. h.
Cjf1 O\AJ ).0 F-I- ;Af' -J<J A f'O-fUJ..
11M PI IS J''",J PI iVAif IO"/]. A vtjy,llnU
J~ j/f' f/1llf,1A ~M"'M rt el'1~' ,^,iJ.~"
Ivll~ }h{ "'~I\J;~L how,'" _ On" "Jp
!,Jill he Ir(f -II1A" I (" Fl vm",
rvwf ~ jw,{.
Applicant:
Address:
, Telephone:
J '-e-I/(n d' PA--J-,,-, in /I1D'f y
Nb:J.n 04kL4nd 1$U1u.. A-u/ '\, E,
Cj:jl 'ND -ht/I (home) am.61J- "7~- 0D If
Property Owners (if different than applicant):
Address:
Telephone: (home)
Type of Ownership: 0 Fee
(work)
(fax) ,
(work)
[] Contract for need
(fax)
o Purchase Agreement I
I Legal ~escription of Property (Attach addition,1 sheets if necessary):
t.G/-{JJiI dfl/(Ll1no Bflk}, ( }Yh,fo Mk(A/l1? ileAC/'
I OIO'(I/f" Tf] It ~s / / :>00 C1 0
I' ,
11</-(
S. G. )
To the best of my knowledge the information provided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition, I have read the relevant sections of the Prior Lake Ordinance and procednral guidelines, and understand that
apPIJ~-"tion: ~i11 ~~ ~e ~ocessed until deemed complete by the Planning Director or assignee.
~ v- fIY",,/ 2- 25'-() <-
Applicant's Sign7e Date
Fee Owner's Signature Date
ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION
(Required for PUD, CUP and SC Overlay District applications)
Will the developers request financial assistance from the City?
DYes
o No
If yes, please describe the amount and type of assistance requested (attach additional pages if necessary).
Will anyone other than the applicant be involved in the ownership, development & management of this project?
DYes (If yes, please attach a list of the names and the role of all personsinvolved in the project.) 0 No
1:\handouts\2001 handouts\zoning\zoning app.doc
PROCEDURE FOR AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
Overview: When a person wishes to maintainlbuildlconstruct a structure in a manner that does not
comply with the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a variance is required. Specific
requirements for property in each Zoning Use District are contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Section
1108.400 of the Code sets forth the procedure and requirements for the review of variance requests. The
Code is available for review or purchase from the City's Planning Department.
Pre-Application Procedure: Prior to submitting an application for a variance, applicants are encouraged
to meet with the Planning Staff to discuss the following:
. Zoning requirements that apply to the property.
. Preliminary development or building plans for the property.
. The specific criteria of the Zoning Ordinance applicable to the development or building plan.
. Alternatives to the proposed development.
. Variance procedures.
If a decision is made to proceed after the advisory meeting or meetings, a formal application is made.
Process: Within ten (10) business days of submission of the application, the applicant will receive
formal, written notice from the City about whether the application is complete. Within 30 days of receipt
of a complete application, the Planning Department will schedule a public hearing for review by the
Board of Adjustment (Planning Commission). The Board of Adjustment must approve or deny the
application within 120 days of receipt of a complete application.
Timin!!: Public hearings are scheduled for the Board of Adjustment on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each
month. Complete applications must be submitted to the Planning Department at least thirty (30) days
prior to the scheduled meeting to allow publication of hearing notice. The Planning Department will
publish notices in the Prior Lake American and notify the applicant and other affected property owners of
the date and time the proposal will be heard by the Planning Commission.
Staff Report: The Planning Department will prepare a staff report which: I) explains the request; 2)
reviews the criteria for granting variances as contained in the Zoning Ordinance; and 3) provides a
recommendation.
Hearin!!: A public hearing will be held by the Board of Adjustment (Planning Commission). The
Commission will review the staff report and hear from the applicant. Public testimony on the request will
1:\handouts\2001 handouts\zoning\variance app.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave, S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph, (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
also be taken. The Board of Adjustment, after reviewing all of the information, will make a decision and
may grant a variance from the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance provided that:
1. Where by reason of narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a lot, or where by reason of exceptional
topographical or water conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional conditions of such lot, the
\trict application or the terms of this Code would result in peculiar and practical difficulties or
exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner of such lot in developing or using such lot in a
manner customary and legally permissible within the Use District in which said lot is located.
2. Conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to the property or immediately
adjoining property, and do not apply, generally, to other land or structures in the Use District in
which the land is located.
3. The granting of the proposed Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the owner.
4. The granting of the proposed Variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of
fire, or endanger public safety.
5. The granting of the Variance will not unreasonably impact on the character and development of the
neighborhood, unreasonably diminish or impair established property values in the surrounding area,
or in any other way impair the health safety, and comfort of the area.
6. The granting of the proposed Variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Code and the
Comprehensive Plan.
7. The granting of a Variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary
to alleviate a demonstrable undue hardship or difficulty.
8. The hardship results from the application of the provisions of this Code to the affected property and
does not result from actions of the owners of the property.
9. Increased development or construction costs or economic hardship alone shall not be grounds for
granting a Variance.
Applicants are invited to use the overhead projector provided, and the exhibits prepared by Staff.
Any additional exhibits submitted by the applicant (at the hearing or prior to the hearing) such as
photographs, petitions, etc. must be entered into the public record and submitted to the Planning
Department for the file.
Aooeal: The decision of the Board of Adjustment may be appealed to the City Council by submitting a
letter to the City requesting an appeal within 5 working days ofthe Board of Adjustment hearing. The
applicant, property owner or any affected owner or property within 350 feet of the site may appeal the
decision of the Board of Adjustment. Appeals are considered by the City Council following a public
hearing before the Council. Upon receipt of an appeal, the Planning staff will schedule a public hearing,
publish notice ofthe hearing in the Prior Lake American, and notify owners of property within 350 feet of
the site.
Recordinl!: If the variance or variances are approved, the applicant is responsible for recording a copy of
the certified resolution at the Scott County Recorder's Office. The certified copy of the resolution must
be stamped by the County Recorder as proof of recording and returned to the planning offices of the City
of Prior Lake before the issuance of a building permit for the project. The applicant must provide proof
1:\handouts\2001 handouts\zoning\variance app.doc
Page 2
of recording to the city and received a building permit within one (l) year from the date of approval or
the variance becomes null and void.
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
. Application Fee: Check payable to the "City of Prior Lake". The filing fee is $150.00.
. Signed Application: A completed application form signed by the owner or owners of the property.
Include authorization from the property owner on the application form or by attached letter of
authorization if an agent signs the application.
. Application Checklist: The attached checklist identifies the necessary information. Failure to
provide any of the required information will result in an incomplete application. The Application
Checklist will expedite the review of your application. Attach the checklist with the application
materials.
1:\handouts\200 1 handouts\zoning\variance app.doc
Page 3
VARIANCE APPLICATION CHECKLIST
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
DEVELOPER:
For City Use Only
:~~~lf~~ri~fis;(~i!i~~[~i~i~6fQt1!!~,..
1. A complete Zoning/Land Use Application form, signed by the applicant
and the fee owner of the property.
2. A radius map and a list and 2 sets of labels of the names and addresses
of the owners of property located within 350' of the subject site. These
shall be obtained from and certified by an abstract company.
3. The required filing fee of $150.00.
4. A certificate of survey of the property showing the existing and proposed
development in relation to:
o Property lines
. Structures, both existing and proposed
. Topography
. Easements
o Ordinary High Water Mark and bluff setbacks, where applicable.
o Impervious surface calculations and lot coverage calculations.
o Setbacks for structures on adjacent lots, where setback averaging
applies
5. If the survey is larger than 11" by 17", ten (10) full-scale copies of the
survey and supporting data and one 11"X 17" reduction of each sheet
must be provided.
1
Memorandum
TO: All Applicants for Land Use Applications
FROM: Jane Kansier, Planning Coordinator
DATE: July 18, 2001
RE: Required Information for Notification Requirements
Several Land Development Applications require published notice as well as mailed notice
to nearby property owners. It is the applicant's responsibility to submit a list of the
names and addresses of the property owners. This list must be prepared and certified by a
certified abstract company.
IN ORDER TO ENSURE PROPER NOTIFICATION, ALL PROPERTY
OWNERS LISTS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A MAP IDENTIFYING THE
SUBJECT SITE AND THE REQUIRED NOTIFICATION RADIUS. THE MAP,
AS WELL AS THE LIST, MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STATEMENT
CERTIFYING THE LIST HAS BEEN PREPARED BY A CERTIFIED
ABSTRACT COMPANY. THE STATEMENT MUST BE SIGNED BY THE
ABSTRACT COMPANY.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me
at 447-4230.
1: \handouts\certlist.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave S,E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~~
~NE~
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 EAGLE CREEK AVE SE
PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
(952) 447-4230, FAX (952) 447-4245
RECEIPT # 41605
DAT~~{ l ~,t)7-
Received of ~1,.'-l.. ~I /eI)eu
the sum of (tvtL t(tLl,.tt~ "0 buo
for the purpose of
$
I~O.~
c
~ dollars
. -
11~ . 4PO.)-~
i
Invoice #
t~;I~
TO:
STEVE HORSMAN
FROM:
STEVE AND PAlRICIA MOSEY
RE:
BUILDING VARIANCE
DATE:
03-21-02
My family and I are attempting to make improvements to our home. We
currently live at 14620 Oakland Beach Ave S.E. We have been living here
for approximately five and one half years. We are a growing family with
two kids, ages 14 and 10 years old. We love living here, but our home does
not have a garage. We are a two-car family along with many other property
owner items, such as; lawn mower, snow blower, bikes, tools etc. We have
very limited storage space. We would like to build an attached garage onto
our existing home. We would also like to add a room above the garage to
give us more room for our family. We have put a great amount oftime and
research into our project and feel we are in need for the addition. We will
be asking for variances consisting of; Front and Side Setback, Combined
Side Yards, Building Separation, A Building Wall Over 50 feet, Eave and
Gutter Setback, and A Driveway Setback. These will be needed to build our
proposed garage on our irregular lot. We are hoping that after you see our
plans, and the survey, and give us some time to explain our need that you
will grant us the variances we need to build our addition. If you have any
questions please feel free to call us.
Steve and Patricia Mosey
Home; 440-6611
Steve work; 612 673-5704
Patricia work; 952 707-3367
,~~ -,' :,----...-
'i '~\b lEi u ~ ,
:.~I AM-2m
,
;'-" "".-.
L. ____
TO:
STEVE HORSMAN
FROM:
STEVE AND PATRICIA MOSEY
RE:
BUILDING VARIANCE
DATE:
03-21-02
My family and I are attempting to make improvements to our home. We
currently live at 14620 Oakland Beach Ave S.E. We have been living here
for approximately five and one half years. We are a growing family with
two kids, ages 14 and 10 years old. We love living here, but our home does
not have a garage. We are a two-car family along with many other property
owner items, such as; lawn mower, snow blower, bikes, tools etc. We have
very limited storage space. We would like to build an attached garage onto
our existing home. We would also like to add a room above the garage to
give us more room for our family. We have put a great amount of time and
research into our project and feel we are in need for the addition. We will
be asking for two variances that will be needed to build our proposed
garage. We are hoping that after you see our plans, and the survey, and give
us some time to explain our need that you will grant us the variances we
need to build our addition. If you have any questions please feel free to call
us.
Steve and Patricia Mosey
Home; 440-6611
Steve work; 612 673-5704
Patricia work; 952 707-3367
~~Gl5U~::"'l
:, ), 'I '
" MM25.il
"
1
l.... ------ ,---- ,---- -
Il---
HEAR1_~G
~O'l'ICES
L:lTEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
p~~
V."g;]
"A"Yi//!%!0"Y/ NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
<It ,\'1"
INN E SO VARIANCES TO PERMIT A STRUCTURE TO BE SETBACK LESS
THAN 25 FEET TO FRONT LOT LINE; LESS THAN 5 FEET TO SIDE
LOT LINE; A SUM OF SIDE YARDS LESS THAN 15 FEET; BUILDING
SEPARATION LESS THAN 15 FEET; EAVE ENCROACHMENT LESS
THAN 5 FEET TO FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINE; A 63.8 FOOT
BUILDING WALL SETBACK TO SIDE LOT LINE LESS THAN
REQUIRED; AND A DRIVEWAY SETBACK LESS THAN 5 FEET TO
SIDE LOT LINE
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE AND ROOM ADDITION TO A
SINGLE-F AMIL Y DWELLING ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-I DISTRICT
(LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND THE SHORELAND DISTRICT (SD)
IDENTIFIED AS 14620 OAKLAND BEACH AVENUE SE, PRIOR LAKE, MN.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of
the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, APRIL 22, 2002,
at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANT: Steven W. & Patricia J. Mosey
14620 Oakland Beach Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
SUBJECT SITE: 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN, legally
described as Lot 14, Oakland Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a garage and room addition
to an existing single-family dwelling. The proposed structure is
setback I' from the front property line; 1.3' from the side lot line;
an eave encroachment within .3' of a side lot line, and 0' to the
front lot line; a sum of side yards of 10.76'; a 63.8' building wall
setback of 1.3-feet, and 9.46-feet; and a driveway setback of 1.3'.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this
hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-9810
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning
Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should
relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent
with the Zoning Ordinance and variance hardship criteria.
L:I02FILESI02variancesI02-029IMailnote.doc I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNIll' EMPLOYER
Prepared this 9th day of April, 2002.
Steven Horsman
City of Prior Lake
To be mailed on/or before Aprilll, 2002.
L:I02 FILESI02variancesI02-029IMailnote.doc
2
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
VARIANCES TO PERMIT A STRUCTURE TO BE SETBACK LESS
THAN 25 FEET TO FRONT LOT LINE; LESS THAN 5 FEET TO SIDE
LOT LINE; A SUM OF SIDE YARDS LESS THAN 15 FEET; BUILDING
SEPARATION LESS THAN 15 FEET; EAVE ENCROACHMENT LESS
THAN 5 FEET TO FRONT AND SIDE LOT LINE; A 63.8 FOOT
BUILDING WALL SETBACK TO SIDE LOT LINE LESS THAN
REQUIRED; AND A DRIVEWAY SETBACK LESS THAN 5 FEET TO
SIDE LOT LINE
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE AND ROOM ADDITION TO A
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-I DISTRICT
(LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND THE SHORELAND DISTRICT (SD)
IDEN 111' uoD AS 14620 OAKLAND BEACH AVENUE SE, PRIOR LAKE, MN.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of
the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, APRIL 22, 2002,
at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANT: Steven W. & Patricia J. Mosey
14620 Oakland Beach Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
SUBJECT SITE: 14620 Oakland Beach Avenue SE, Prior Lake, MN, legally
described as Lot 14, Oakland Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a garage and room addition
to an existing single-family dwelling. The proposed structure is
setback I' from the front property line; 1.3' from the side lot line;
an eave encroachment within .3' of a side lot line, and 0' to the
front lot line; a sum of side yards of 10.76'; a 63.8' building wall
setback of 1.3-feet, and 9.46-feet; and a driveway setback of 1.3'.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this
hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-9810
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning
Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should
relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent
with the Zoning Ordinance and variance hardship criteria.
L:I02FlLESI02variancesI02-029IPubnote.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S,E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Prepared this 1st day of April, 2002.
Steven Horsman
City of Prior Lake
To be published in the Prior Lake American on April 6. 2002.
L:I02FI LESI02variancesI02-029IPubnote.doc
2
Steve Horsman
To:
Subject:
legal@swpub.com
Public notice for Prior Lake American on 4/6/02
~
Pubnote.doc
1
-~----_._,,_"'-"-----"-''"" ----_._~,-_...-._---_..__.__...,._-_._.__._-_....."_.-
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
)ss
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
_Urrvvw, Uw /J (}/\ of the City of Prior Lake, COUIit of Scott, State of
Minnesota, being duly sworn, says on the t l day of . 2002, she served
_ th;. at!/1phed list of persons to have an intenlst in the ' -"
vy~U '* (j].;' &t-t\ . by mailing to em a copy thereof,
enclosed in an envelope, poJtage prepaid, and be depositing same in the post office at
Prior Lake, Minnesota, the last known address of the parties.
Subscribed and sworn to be this
day of , 2000.
NOTARY PUBLIC
L:\DEPTWORK\BLANKFRM\MAlLAFFD,DQC
~ailing
Information
and Lists
L:lTEMPLA TEIFILEINFO.DOC
Property Owners Within 350'
lVIosey Variance
400
o
u
,
He:
I ~
J
BOUDI~
~
..-/
~l_l_
''''AV'~ ~ ~
- r--
-- ~\ RUS~ICRO
~~
-----' " -
~
/
\--U, .<<~"
" /,
'''J
(]
,r----T I
400
~
N
800
1200 Feet
PID OWSRTN-'-'
- "1'.;',;';',:'::.r AUMC INC
;..:5.:.:....;-s ALMACINC
.:.... :: II BORMAN,PAUL J
....... . ,i.I',: BORMAN,PAUL J
....;... 1.1.1 CAik;;:VN.~RTF&BuNNIt:
Tl i',I... CHERRlER,JANET J
SHNAM2
PROPERTY OWNER
SHHO SHSTRE
14626 OAKLANO BEACH AV
14626 OAKLAND BEACH AV
14o~( GLENDALE AVr=. SE
14644 GLENDALE AVE SE
:::::::::::::~~~~::~:.. ~ :A~~~:~~USTATTN DENNIS COSTELLO
.... CZECH.AMBROSE J & LORAINE
~........l DAUFPeNBACH,THOMAS & PAMELA--
.. ;; ~,THOMAS&PAMELA
.. . ... :: D!t!fItF1ElD DEVElOPMENT LLC
..... DUOOS,DANtEL E
=~_~~ ~r:' .;GREGORY J
. Je. il,:."..., ,~RYJ
_.............. E~RYJ
. ..: : EI'IlCKSON,DONALD W & HELEN D
:~:i.::.:.::i.I!!~~~ ,- " .,. -,
, ...... IFELDSHUH.DAVID M
mailisl
Property Owners List
Mosey Variance
~RDPERTY ADDRESS
1 SHCITY SH SHZI HOUS STREGS
PRIOR LAKE MN S5372 0
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 0
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 0
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 0
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14597 GLENDAt.E
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14644 GLENDALE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ST AD PRPLAT IPRLIPR ILEGAL1
PLAT.2S171 OAKLAND BEACH 11 11
PLAT.25171 OAKLAND BEACH o-L IA
PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 15 I
I
AV SE PLAT.25136 OAKLAND BEACH 3
AV SE PLAT-25136 OAKLAND BEACH 1
2177 STANFORD AV ST PAUL MN 55105 0
14560 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE PRIOR LAKE MN S5372 14560 OAKLAND BEACH All" SEPLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 4&S
14560 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE
. '14580 GLENDALE AVE SE
14S80 GLENDALE AVE SE
7765 175 ST E
14670 COVE AVE SE
4931 BEACH ST NE
'4931 BEACH ST NE
4931 BEACH ST NE
14613 GLENDALE AVE SE
308 ELMWOOD AVE
----~
,308 ELMWOOD AVE
--- 1308 ELMWOOD AVE
1308 i ELMWOOD AVE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
PRIOR LAKE MN 5S372
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372'
- -
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
o
o
o
o
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14670 COVE
-
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14582 OAKLAND BEACH
- -
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14582 OAKLAND BEACH
PLAT-25120 OAKLAND BEACH 6&7 1
PLAT.25120 OAKLAND BEACH 6&7 1
PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH' 16
AV SE PLAT.25118 SEVEN ACRES 8
AV SE PLAT.25115 OAKLAND BEACH '-li"
AV SE PLAT.25115 OAKLAND BEACH 8
PRIOR LAKE l MN 55372 0
PRIOR LAKE IMN 55372 14613 GLENDALE AV SE IPLAT-25136 OAKLAND BEACH 4 3
ITHACA NY 14850 14612 OAKLANDBEACH AV SE PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 13
ITHACA 'NY 14850 14612 OAKLAND BEACH AV'SE PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 13
ITHACA 'NY 14850- 0 ' .. PLAT-25120 OAKLAND BEACH 9 '1
,
ITHACA
NY:148501
o
SECT.30 TWP-115 RNG-D21
GL6 BET 0 BEACH & 0
BEACH 1ST BEG ON W LINE
10-1 OR 17.4' SW COR LOT
10, W 30.7', SE 40', E 31.8', N
ALONG W LINE LOT 11
3
1
SECT-30 TWP-l1S RNG-021
P/O GOVT LOT 7 COM Sl/4
COR, N390'. E TO ROW. NE
TO PT 430' E OF W LINE. N
TO SHORE. E TO INT OW.
SW TO POB
SECT-30 TWP-115 RNG-021
3011521.12 .12A IN GL6 W
OF LOTS 3 & 4 0 BEACH
1ST
& P/O LOT 9 LYING WOF
LINE COM 47S,42' W OF SE
COR, N TO N LINE & THERE
TERMINATING & P/O LOT 10
COM NW COR. E 30'. S 20'.
WTOWLlNE. NTOP08
& N1/2 LOT 9
& N1/2 LOT 9
SECT-30TWP-11S RNG-021
IN GL6 ADJ TO LOT 6 0
BEACH 1 ST
& Sl/2 OF LOT 12
& Sl/2 OF LOT 12
--r--._________~____._
SECT-30-iWp-i lS RNG-021
3011521.04 .04A IN GL6
EOF LOT 13 & S 1/2 LOT 12
i 0 BEACH
4/11/02
I
PID 10WSRTN
~,: J. 11!~.EDlTHG
no:::. I ~J.IVFQAiDTHG
--:......:.:.::n 111Wl1REY~VIO W & DEBORAH L
I .:.1 If'nIcH;1.~M
SHNAM2
.:.:. 1 1 '*-LER.C H
.... 't.UlJ.ER.C H
I In.:. MltleR.C H
.....! M08&V$TtiVEN W & PI\TRICIA J
1 ......:. ~._VNEF&NATHALEEN
.1.........:.. .. MOIE't';WAVNE F & NA THALEEN
.......i.. 'I'u MQ8EY',WAYNE F & NATHALEEN
.' ,\ MOSEY .WA YNE F & NA THALEEN
...., :.:;;:;" & NATHALEEN
... "", _ " J:A.AUOREY
........ .. P~F&AUDREY
..... . :..... p - -, OLD F & AUDREY
P~ F & AUOREY
...... . ..... PAHL,ARNOLD F & AUDREY
.... 1 RAUSCH,MARK S & PAMELA J
... \ I~::VIPC&JOAN
. ." ",' V&OC&JOAN
~ \ ~DC&JOAN
.. . IREMBOLD.DAVID C & JOAN
'j ,\...1 I ROSZAK.THOMAS A & KELLEY M
~ .111vESE!E8.l!u.::ir"v<ONL&~II:.Vt:N~~
'r '-- _'
mailist
PROPERTY ,WNER
SHHO SHSTRE
14625 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE
14625 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE
14631 GLENDALE AV SE
14676 GLENDALE AVE
PROPERTY ADORESS LEGAL ,)ESCRIPTION
SHCITY SH SHZI HOUSISTREGS ST AD PRPLAT - PRL PR LEGAL 1
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 1462510AKLANO BEACH AV SE PLAT.25120 OAKLAND BEACH 11 1 & LOT 12
PRIORLAKE'MN 553721 1462510AKLAND BEACH AV SEPLAT.251200AKLANDBEACH 11 1 &LOTI2
PRIOR LAKEMN 553721 14631 I GLENDALE AV SE PLAT-25136 OAKLAND BEACH 5 3
PRIOR LAKEMN 55372 14676 GLENDALE AV SE PLAt-25136 OAKLANO BEACH 3 1
Property Owners List
Mosey Variance
1095 POLK CIR MPLS MN 55421 0 PLAT.25118 SEVEN ACRES 9
1095 POLK CIR MPLS MN 55421 0
1095 POLK CIR MPLS MN 55421 0
14620 OAKLANDBEACHAVESE PRIOR LAKE MN 5537214620 OAKLANDBEACH AV SE PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 14
14524 GLENDALEAVESE PRIORlAKE MN 5537214590 OAKLAND BEACH AV SE PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 10
14524 GLENDALEAVESE PRIOR LAKE MN 5537214590 OAKLANjjBEACH AV SE PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 10
14524 GLENDALE AVE SE PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 0 PLAT-25120 OAKLAND BEACH 10
14524 GLENDALE AVE SE
14524 GLENDALE AVE SE
14574 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE
14574 OAKLANO BEACH AVE SE
14S74 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE
14574 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE
14574 OAKLAND BEACH AVE SE
14565 GLENDALE AVE SE
10S35 PARKER DR
10535 PARKER DR
10535 PARKER DR
10535 PARKER DR
14581 GLENDALE AV SE
14662 GLENDALE AVE S~-
LYING E OF LINE COM
475.42' W OF SE COR, N TO
NLlNE.
SECT-30 TWP-115 RNG-Q21
,04A IN GL6 ADJ TO N LINE
LOT 9 SEVEN ACRES
SECT-30 TWP-115 RNG-021
1 ,SA IN GL6
& SI/2 OF LOT 9
& SI/2 OF LOT 9
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 0
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 0
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14574 OAKLAND BEACH
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14574 OAKLAND BEACH
PRIOR LAKE MN S5372 0
PRIOR LAKE MN SS372 0
AV SE PLAT-25115 OAKLAND BEACH 6
AV SE PLAT-2511S OAKLAND BEACH 6
PLAT-251200AKLAND BEACH-4
PLAT.25120 OAKLAND BEACH 4
PRIOR LAKE MN S5372 0
PKIUK LAK~ MN ;;~{~ 14560 i.:ji..~NuALE AV SE PLAT-25136 OAKLAND BEACH 1
EDEN PRAIR,MN 5534714602 OAKLAND BEACH AV SE PLAT.25115 OAKLAND BEACH 11
EOEN PRAIR MN 5S347 14602 OAKLAND BEACH AV SE PLAT.25115 OAKLAND BEACH 11
EDEN PRAIR,MN 5S347 0 -----pLAT-251200AKLAND BEACH 8
-.-- -1'--
EDEN PRAIR,MN 55347 0
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 14581 GLENDALE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372,14662 GLENDALE
i
I
'_ :AviSE iPLAT-25f36 OAKLANO BEACH 2
~AVtSE IPLAT-25136 OAKLAND BEACH 2
2
~t:CT-30 TWP-115 RNG-Q21
P/O GOVT L T 6 BETWEEN
OAKLAND BEACH &
OAKLAND BEACH 1 ST
ADDN
SECT-30 TWP-115 RNG-021,
P/O GOVT LOT 6 LYING W
OF 10-10AKLAND BEACH.
1ST ADDN
&LOT7
&LOT7
&LOT5
&LOT5
SECT-30 TWP-115 RNG-021
49.4' X 80' X 30,1' X 75,18'IN
GOVT LOT 6 LYING ADJ TO
LOT7 OAKLAND BEACH
3
& Nl/2 OF LOT 12 .
,& N1/2 OF Loffi'
;
SECT-30 TWP-115 RNG-021
04A IN GL6 E OF LOT 11 &
Nl/2 OF LOT 12 ON BEACH
3
1
4/11/02
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY does hereby certify that,
according to the records of the Scott County Treasurer's office, the
following is a list of owners of the property lying within 350 feet of
the following described property:
Lot 14, Oakland Beach.
1. Ambrose J & Loraine Czech
14560 Oakland Beach Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251150030
Property ID No. 259301000
Property ID No. 251200030
2. Arnold F & Audrey Pah1
14574 Oakland Beach Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1415
Property ID No. 251150040
Property 1D No. 251200040
Property ID No. 259301060
3. Gregory J Engebos
4931 Beach St NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251150050
Property ID No. 259301110
4. Wayne F & Nathaleen Mosey
14524 Glendale Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property 1D No. 251150060
Property ID No. 251200100
Property ID No. 259301040
5. David C & Joan Rembold
10535 Parker Dr
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
Property ID No. 251150070
Property ID No. 251200080
Property 1D No. 259301030
6. David M Feldshuh
308 Elmwood Ave
Ithaca, NY 14850
Property 1D No. 251150080
Property 1D No. 251200090
Property ID No. 259301020
7. Paul J Borman
14626 Oakland Beach Av
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property 1D No. 251150100
Property ID No. 259301050
8. Deerfield Development LLC
7765 175 ST E
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property 1D No. 251150110
9. Thomas & Pamela Dauffenbach
14580 Glendale Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251200060
10. Edith G Gentry
14625 Oakland Beach Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property 1D No. 251200110
11. Janet J Cherrier
14644 Glendale Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360010
12. Sharon L & Steven R Vespested
14662 Glendale Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360020
13. Margaret M Lynch
14676 Glendale Ave
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360030
14. Mark S & Pamela J Rausch
14565 Glendale Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360120
15. Thomas A & Kelley M Roszak
14581 Glendale Av SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360130
16. Robert F & Bonnie Cameron
14597 Glendale Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360140
17. Donald W & Helen DErickson
14613 Glendale Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360150
18. David W & Deborah L Humphrey
14631 Glendale Av SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360160
19. Bonnie Lurquin
14649 Glendale Ave
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251360170
20. Almac Inc
PO Box 550
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251710010
Property ID No. 251710040
21. Daniel E Duoos
14670 Cove Ave SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Property ID No. 251180081
22. C H Miller
1095 Polk Cir
Minneapolis, MN 55421
Property 1D No. 251180080
Property 1D No. 259301150
Dated at Minneapolis, Minnesota, this 14th day of December, 2001, at 7 a.m.
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
By
'ir (f.'tv Wtwt wu-
CAn Authorized Signature)
Order No. A02-59594
For: Steve Mosey