Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5G Crystal Bay PUD Amend Report 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 2017 AGENDA #: 5G PREPARED BY: JEFF MATZKE, PLANNER PRESENTED BY: JEFF MATZKE AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR AMEND- MENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL PLAN FOR CRYSTAL BAY DISCUSSION: Introduction DBOW Properties and Crest Exteriors LLC have applied for approval of an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) known as Crystal Bay on property located south of CSAH 82, directly east of Fremont Avenue and ap- proximately ½ mile west of CSAH 21. History The Crystal Bay Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved by the City Council on December 1, 2003. The approved PUD Plan included 24 townhouse units in 12 buildings. The proposed townhouses were a 3-story walkout, attached single family style dwelling with an attached garage. Each of the units in these buildings included a 3-car garage, rear yard decks, and approximately 4,610 square feet of floor area. The buildings are 34’ high at the front, with exteriors consisting of a combination of brick and stucco. In October of 2004, the City Council granted a minor amendment to the origi- nally approved PUD. The proposed amendment affected the style, size and ex- terior elevations of the townhouse units. The 3-story walkout buildings were re- placed with a rambler style unit, with a 3-car attached garage, a rear yard deck and a four season porch. The exterior of the building consisted of Hardie Board siding and shakes, rather than stucco and brick. The ground floor area of the units remained approximately the same, and the units fit into the existing enve- lope lots. In 2008, 2012, 2014, 2015, and 2016 the City Council granted other amend- ments to the PUD which allowed for the remaining residential lots to change construction styles for detached single-family units rather than attached twin- home units. Current Circumstance: The current request involves a minor amendment to redesign one building with two attached townhomes (near CSAH 82) to two separate detached single-fam- ily units with 2-car garages on the same lots. This amendment is like the non- riparian units along Drake Circle (Lots 1 & 2) that were approved last year by a similar PUD amendment. The proposed impervious surface amounts for the area would be lowered by over 200 square feet; the exact impervious surface 2 square footage will be reviewed for compliance with these newly proposed amounts with each individual building permit. Section 1106.607 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the City Council to approve minor amendments to an approved PUD Plan by resolution following notification of all owners of property within the PUD. Minor amendments include “changes that increase conformity with Ordinance requirements; decreases in residential density, leasable floor area, building height, impervious surface and/or required parking provided such decreases have a minimal impact on the overall charac- ter of the approved Final PUD Plan as determined by the Zoning Administrator; minor building additions and floor plan modifications that do not increase park- ing requirements or reduce useable open space; and changes that are specified as minor amendments in the approved Development Contract.” Conclusion City staff believes the overall townhome’s design will be maintained through similar color palette, materials, and scale, except for having space between the individual units and an oversized 2-car garage. No other changes to the ap- proved PUD Plan are proposed which would impact streets, utilities, or number of lots. Therefore, City staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment sub- ject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The developer must obtain the required permits from any other state or local agency prior to any work on the site. 2. Heating and cooling units may encroach into the required side yard setbacks and building separation. ISSUES: The main issue is whether the proposed amendment will change the character of the PUD. The proposed amendment also decreases the amount of impervi- ous surface. It should also be noted that the proposed single-family homes will contain the same design, color palette, materials, and scale, except for having space between the individual units and an oversized 2-car garage. The spacing between the proposed single-family homes will have a 10-foot separation. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and a second, as part of the consent agenda, to approve a resolution approving a minor amendment to the PUD Final Plan for Crystal Bay, subject to the listed conditions. 2. Motion and a second to remove this item from the consent agenda for addi- tional discussion. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Alternative #1. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. PUD Site Plan 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 RESOLUTION 17-___ A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL PLAN FOR CRYSTAL BAY Motion By: Second By: WHEREAS, DBOW Properties and Crest Exteriors LLC applied for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Plan known as Crystal Bay; and WHEREAS, The City Council approved the original PUD Final Plan for Crystal Bay per Resolution 03-203 on December 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, The Prior Lake City Council considered the proposed PUD Final Plan minor amendment on February 27, 2017, changing a 2-unit attached townhome unit to two detached housing units on Lots 23 and 24, Block 1 of the Crystal Bay Townhomes plat; and WHEREAS, The City Council finds the PUD Final Plan to be in substantial compliance with the approved Preliminary PUD Plan; and WHEREAS, The City Council finds the PUD Final Plan is compatible with the stated purposes and intent of the Section 1106 Planned Unit Developments of the Zoning Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The amended Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Crystal Bay is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. The developer must obtain the required permits from any other state or local agency prior to any work on the site. b. Heating and cooling units may encroach into the required side yard setbacks and building separation. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Braid Burkart Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ______________________________ Frank Boyles, City Manager 154TH ST NW F R E M O N T A V N W C R Y S T A L B A Y L N N W Upper Prior Lake Scott County GIS Ü Crystal Bay Planned Unit DevelopmentLocation Map UPPER PRIOR LAKEGD (904) LOWER PRIOR LAKEGD (904) ARTICLAKE NE(906.7) HOWARD LAKENE (957.3) Lower Prior Lake Upper Prior Lake Scott County GIS SUBJECTPROPERTY SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY