Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4A 07 10 2017 City Council Minutes 1 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 10, 2017 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Briggs called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Councilors McGuire, Thompson, Burkart and Braid, City Manager Boyles, City Attorney Schwarzhoff, Assistant City Manager Olson, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Poppler, Police Chief Elliott, Fire Chief Steinhaus, Community Development Director McCabe, Public Works Interim Director Wedel, Finance Director Erickson, Planner Matzke, Recreation Coordinator Barstad and Executive Assistant Schroeder. PUBLIC FORUM City Manager Boyles reviewed the process for the public forum and explained that items sched- uled for public hearing or items for which a public hearing has been held but no final action taken, are not eligible for discussion on the public forum. Matthew Muir, Coalition Against Bigger Trucks, 1312 West Farwell, Chicago IL: Presented paperwork from the Coalition Against Bigger Trucks (CABT) organization. Explained CABT op- poses proposals in Congress that would allow any increase in truck length or weight; longer dou- ble-trailer trucks or heavier single-trailer trucks. Noted if these larger trucks are allowed on the In- terstates, they will also be on local roads damaging local communities’ infrastructure. John Gertman, 5417 Brooke Circle, Prior Lake Pickleball Club: Presented paperwork from the Prior Lake Pickleball Club. Explained the history of pickle ball and the history of pickle ball in Prior Lake. Requested more courts in Prior Lake. Noted they are a fast-growing club. Stated they have a goal to put on a tournament in Prior Lake which would bring 300-400 people creating revenue in local businesses. Invited the council to come play pickleball on July 18, 2017 at 6:00 pm. Ron McClain, 6584 Harbor Beach NE, Prior Lake Pickle Ball Club: Added they need dedi- cated facilities for pickle ball in Prior Lake. The participation here and nationally is surpassing ten- nis. Noted there are 18 tennis courts in Prior Lake and zero pickle ball courts; surrounding com- munities have pickle ball courts indoor and outdoor. Stated the court they play on has to be set up and it is a barrier for new players who do not have the code to obtain the equipment nor the knowledge on how to set it up. Jeff Petschl, 3856 Green Heights Trail SW, Charlie’s on Prior: Requested an interim use ap- proval for parking on a local lot. Stated he sent information to the council on Friday, July 7,2017 regarding his request. Explained before November 2015 they worked with the land owner to pur- chase this property or a long-term parking lease but at this time it will not work out; now he was able to work out an interim use on the lot. Stated it is already used as a parking lot; they would trim it out but not take down any large trees, remove garbage, lay down 230 tons of class five for the ability to park 20-30 cars on the lot. Ray Wakeum, 15263 Fairbanks Trail: Stated pickle ball is being played at Lakefront Park. Noted the courts being asked for are seasonal courts that would not be open year-round; the group has also paid for some of their own equipment. Believed parking is overcrowded at Lakefront Park; DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 2 there are a ton of softball parks that are under used that could be utilized better. Noted other parks have poor parking as well. Noted the park on Lords Street would be a great location for the courts and parking could be expanded. Boyles: Explained the city’s capital improvement program is used for infrastructure planning. Stated now that the request is on the table, he requested more information on the cost of a pickle ball court to be built. Noted the city may not be able to plan something this year but it is possible this could be planned for a future year. Briggs: Requested conversation surrounding Petshcl’s comments. McCabe: Noted he spoke with Petschl a month back and worked with the Public Works Staff and Engineering Staff, they concluded they did not support this parking lot due to the run off into the wetland. Schwarzhoff: Stated the council could either make an amendment with the Charlie’s on Prior or- dinance itself or create an interim use in the zoning code which opens this up to everyone. Noted if the council wants to proceed, council needs to direct staff. Braid: Stated staff was concerned about the class five gravel, did they look at track rock that is used in other lake communities. McCabe: Responded staff recommendation is to use concrete or asphalt with gutters and did not approve the class five gravel. Thompson: Asked for an explanation as to what the issue is with the class five. McCabe: Explained the property is located by a wetland and the run off would flow into the wet- land; there are requirements for storm waters to for the protection of wetland so staff does not al- low gravel to be used. McGuire: Asked if there is a way to put a berm around the lot. McCabe: Responded the gravel would track on the street which cannot be controlled; there are state requirements involved with the DNR on a federal level. Stated the estimate presented to council is for a gravel surface and not any storm water controls. Briggs: Stated he is supportive for staff to look at what can be done. MOTION BY BRIGGS, SECOND BY BURKART DIRECTING STAFF TO COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION Burkart: Asked if Petshcl had not come this evening, would the council have ever seen this. McCabe: Explained Petschl approached staff first and staff did not support this due to our current ordinances. then Petschl decided to go to the next step. Boyles: Added Petshcl did have the option to move the question forward to City Council, so he held off for the time and then decided to move forward. VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 3 Burkart: Noted the water in that area is very poor so he does not know what type of damage the run off would cause. Briggs: Asked for Boyles thoughts regarding the CABT. Boyles: Stated organizations such as League of Minnesota Cities undertake these sorts of ques- tions which is a far more respected way to have a voice heard verses petitions that do not get a great deal of support by elected bodies when you bring them to state and local levels. Added his recommendation is to approach that type of body and have a presentation before one of their pol- icy bodies. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION BY BURKART, SECOND BY THOMPSON TO APPROVE THE AGENDA WITH THE REMOVAL OF AGENDA ITEM 5E TO COME BACK WITH THE CIP WITH CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION LISTED AND COUNCIL’S POSITION ON THE REPORT GOING FOR- WARD VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MOTION BY MCGUIRE, SECOND BY BURKART TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 26, 2017 REGULAR MEETING AS PRESENTED VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA City Manager Boyles reviewed the items on the consent agenda. 5A. Consider Approval of Claims Listing 5B. Consider Approval of a Resolution 17-102 Approving a Liquor License for Prior Lake Ro- tary Lakefront Music Festival 5C. Consider Approval of a Resolution 17-103 Approving a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Prior Lake VFW 5D. Consider Approval of a Resolution 17-104 Approving a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Prior Lake Chamber of Commerce DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 4 5E. Consider Approval of a Resolution Adopting the 2018-2022 Personnel Plan 5F. Consider Approval of a Resolution 17-105 and Resolution 17-106 Approving the Final Plat, Final Planned Unit Development Plan and Development Agreement for Trillium Cove 5G. Consider Approval of a Resolution 17-107 Approving the Deerfield Industrial Park Tenth Addition Final Plat and Development Agreement 5H. Consider Approval of a Resolution 17-108 Approving the Second Amendment to the Common Interest Community Number 1121 MOTION BY MCGUIRE, SECOND BY THOMPSON TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH AGENDA ITEM 5E REMOVED VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. PRESENTATIONS No Presentations Scheduled PUBLIC HEARINGS 7A Public Hearing to Consider Approval of a Resolution Approving the Vacation of Drain- age and Utility Easements at 5832 Industrial Lane SE Planner Matzke presented on this topic dated July 10, 2017. MOTION BY THOMPSON, SECOND BY BRAID TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:36 P.M. VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. No members of the public spoke. Briggs: Closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Asked what the flow of the water is on this lot. Matzke: Responded it is typical to have easements for the allowing of utility and drainage; since they are going to be expanding onto the easement, they will redo the grading of the entire site. MOTION BY MCGUIRE, SECOND BY THOMPSON TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 17-109 AP- PROVING THE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AT 5832 INDUSTRIAL LANE SE DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 5 VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. 7B Public Hearing to Consider Approval of a Resolution Approving the Vacation of Drain- age and Utility Easements at 15286 Edgewater Circle NE Community Development Director McCabe presented on this topic dated July 10, 2017. MOTION BY BURKART, SECOND BY THOMPSON TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:40 P.M. VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. No members of the public spoke. MOTION BY MCGUIRE, SECOND BY THOMPSON TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:41 P.M. VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. MOTION BY BURKART, SECOND BY MCGUIRE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AT 15286 EDGEWATER CIRCLE NE VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 6 OLD BUSINESS 8A Consider Approval of a Resolution Pertaining to Overhead Power/Cable Burial on Sycamore Trail Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Poppler presented on this topic dated July 10, 2017. Braid: Asked how many properties are assessed in this project. Poppler: Responded 16. Braid: Questioned if all 16 accepted the request for line burial with only 12 signing the petition. Poppler: Responded that is correct. Braid: Asked if there is a reduction on the estimated assessment in the feasibility when the pro- ject came in. Poppler: Explained as part of the feasibility study, we estimated a $10,700 with the turnaround and when we received the bids it came down to $10,500 then the turnaround was removed from the project in May for an estimated $1,000 reduction in the assessment. Thompson: Asked why can the lines not be buried by assessment and we have two documents saying they want this completed. Poppler: Noted it could be done by assessment but it does put the city at additional risk for ap- pealing of the assessment because of the private utility installation. Thompson: Stated who would appeal something if they are requested this service. Schwarzhoff: Explained it happens because it makes sense now but then when the project is done they feel like something has changed or the project did not go as well as they had hoped and at that point they appeal. Noted the city assess a lump sum so if one does appeal, the city now needs to prove the total costs area a benefit to the property. Noted anything added makes the assessment riskier. Explained when there are appeals not only does the city pay the reduction of the assessment but you also pay all the costs incurred for the appeal itself. Stated it is not that you cannot do this but there are risks for an appeal as the petition is not binding. Thompson: Noted she understands that argument when the costs were high but now that it is at a lower cost, will someone really take the city to court for $1,600? Schwarzhoff: Responded people appeal small amounts which can go to court; councils are al- lowed to settle but it sets a risky precedent. Thompson: Stated residents cannot afford the cost out of pocket but could if it was assessed; she would like to do something for the residents. McGuire: Noted if they do not have the money, they would have to sign an assessment waiver and if they do have the money, they need to pay it right away. Poppler: Stated they would have to prepay by a certain date; he questions whether certain property owners will not participate. Briggs: Commented he has had three residents who stated they are not going to pay anything towards the burial; there is not a policy in place making line burial part of these projects. Stated he is in support of the staff recommendation as he wants to protect the tax payers of Prior Lake. Asked there are five property owners who have to bury the lines going to their home; does Xcel know what the expenses are for those home owners? Poppler: Responded the property owner is going to have expenses in the restoration of the yard and maybe driveway and additional costs with electrical upgrades. Briggs: Noted material costs and construction in the yard can increase fast. Braid: Noted some roads have driveway replacements, can that be explained? DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 7 Poppler: Responded right now they receive a quote for a remainder of their driveway but then work directly with the contractor. Braid: W ondered if there was a similarity there that could be drawn to this situation. Thompson: Stated if there is no support to roll this into an assessment, she would like the text of “if it is more than the costs computed, the city would request additional funding from the prop- erty owner” removed, requested more time. Poppler: Noted he has reached out to Xcel to hopefully get another week. Burkart: Asked if council can back up in this process to form a work group to ensure we have not missed an option as this will not fly with the residents and he does not think the residents will reach all the requirements to bury the line. Wished staff would have been creating a policy regarding cable burial over this whole time. Stated the council has an appeal process for all work that is done and this is not unique. Listen to the majority and not the minority which is to get this done but he does not think it will get there. McGuire: Supported an extra week and will support the staff recommendation. Schwarzhoff: Noted every city has explored undergrounding but it is extremely expensive, no cities have done this except St. Peter who had a grant funding from tornados that affected the area. Thompson: Asked so other cities do not do this. Schwarzhoff: Correct other cities will do it like Prior Lake does if it affects the project. Thompson: Asked if any cities include it in the assessment. Schwarzhoff: Stated if it needs to be relocated because it affects the project, it can be part of the assessment; she does not know of any cities that have done it as an add on. Briggs: Noted there are some cities who in concert with their road projects build a fund that can be used to offset the burial that is funded through elevated franchise fees in the community or as a small component of the tax levy. Explained 40% have above ground and 60% have below ground; the council build a policy where the fund is built paid by all to help offset those fees. Braid: Noted his big concern is having all the tax payers to pay for this when other areas have not had the opportunity to do this. Suggested this to be tabled for staff to have a conversation with the five homeowners who may potentially have more costs involved with this project. Briggs: Stated to provide the neighbors additional time, address the five property owners un- derstand what is all involved with their portion and if Xcel and Mediacom put a cap on this writ- ten quote. MOTION BY MCGUIRE, LACK OF SECOND TO APPROVE RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO BURIAL OF OVERHEAD POWER/CABLE FOR THE SYCAMORE TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS REPORT IN ADDITION THAT THEY RECEIVE ONE MORE WEEK, A WRITTEN ESTIMATE FROM ME- DIACOM AND XCEL TO BE PROVIDED IN WRITING WITH A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT LISTED AND STAFF TO CONTACT THE FIVE OVERHEAD PROPERTIES Motion failed for lack of second. Thompson: Asked if that means we are removing the additional costs from around the neighbor- hood. Briggs: Noted this motion would not remove that. Poppler: Asked what if neither company approve this. Braid: Responded then it would have to come back to the council. Boyles: Explained the more complex this gets the less likely it will be successful. Asked what happens when the week is up and nothing has been resolved, at some point it is over. Braid: Asked that if Boyles thinks the not to exceed language should not be included. Boyles: Responded the more options you provide the harder it is DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 8 Thompson: Noted she is ready to approve as presented with item 5 removed from the resolution and giving them another week. MOTION BY THOMPSON, LACK OF SECOND TO APPROVE RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO BURIAL OF OVERHEAD POWER/CABLE FOR THE SYCAMORE TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PRO- JECT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS REPORT, THE RE- MOVAL OF ITEM 5 AND AN ADDITIONAL W EEK Motion failed for lack of second. MOTION BY MCGUIRE, SECOND BY BRIGGS DIRECTING STAFF TO CONTACT THE 5 OVERHEADS TO ENSURE THEY ARE FULLY AWARE OF THE COSTS THEY WILL HAVE IN- DEPENDTLY AND A QUOTE FROM MEDIACOM AND XCEL THAT IS IN WRITING AND HAS A NOT TO EXCEED ESTIMATE Burkart: Stated this has moved in the wrong direction for residents. Thompson: Noted she disagrees and there are some who will pitch in to pay for the difference. VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. MOTION BY THOMPSON, SECOND BY MCGUIRE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION PERTAIN- ING TO BURIAL OF OVERHEAD POWER/CABLE FOR THE SYCAMORE TRAIL IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS RE- PORT IN ADDITION THAT THEY RECEIVE ONE MORE WEEK AND ITEM FIVE REMOVED VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. Boyles: Requested clarification on what happens if these requirements are not met. Briggs: Noted if the five property owners cannot be contacted and the quotes from Xcel and Mediacom do not have a not to exceed amount quoted, that would kill the resolution. Thompson: Stated that is not the way it was voted. Schwarzhoff: Explained the motion for contacting the five residents and the quotes stating a not to exceed amount was just direction to staff. Continued if staff is unable to do either, prop- erty owners will know that and can put the money forward by the day. Poppler: Asked if Thompson was striking item three from the resolution or staff report. DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 9 Thompson: Responded it was three from the staff report and five from the resolution. NEW BUSINESS 9A Consider Approval of a Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan for Haven Ridge Planner Matzke and Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Poppler presented on this topic dated July 10, 2017. Braid: Asked if the two phases on opposite sides of the plan will cause more disruption to the neighborhoods. Poppler: Noted phase one on the east side would need to gain access through Kensington neigh- borhood. Burkart: Asked if splitting the two phases up the middle is a cause of concern if the economy has a hiccup, would you have blight? Matzke: Stated these are two different product types; as part of the PUD agreement you can put in place the phasing plan areas and if they do not meet those timelines it provides an opportunity for this to be revisited. Noted this happened in Jeffers W aterfront which had adjustments but it never experienced blight. Thompson: Explained her concerns with the pace of development in Prior Lake, growth costs money to the taxpayers; staff has been requesting personnel for years and the answer is always no. Asked if there is a mechanism that the council could put in place on neighborhood develop- ment. Believed managed growth is a smarter move. Schwarzhoff: Stated you cannot do anything with applications already received but the city can do a moratorium for one year. Explained council needs to focus on what the moratorium would in- volve related to a study or a goal the city is trying to accomplish. Briggs: Stated this is the Shakopee school district; asked who is responsible for the maintenance of the trails. Matzke: Responded the main regional trails are public, the construction is at the developer’s ex- pense but maintaining falls to the city. Noted there was talk about them assisting with mainte- nance but a plan would need to be put in place. Briggs: Believed that maintenance assistance should be persued. Questioned if the city has looked at addressing the utility needs through what is now the Summit Preserve area with Prior Lake infrastructure. Poppler: Responded the geography does not work; part of it would naturally flow to Prior Lake but the majority would flow the wrong direction and require a lift station to bring it back to Prior Lake. Briggs: Noted the east side will be served by Prior Lake utilities but not the west side. Asked where phase two would flow. Poppler: Stated a portion of phase one has the gravity flowing to Prior Lake and phase two needs a lift station or through the City of Shakopee. Briggs: Commented it raises the issue of orderly development that we cannot serve with our cur- rent infrastructure. Noted his concern with the trees being removed right away and replanting tak- ing place at a later time. Asked if there are any issues with the high-pressure gas line and what is the benefit of the city to allow development before it can be served with our utilities. Matzke: Stated the mix of housing they offer is different from what we currently have; the growing community we are has the desire for these housing styles; the regional trail connections, park and DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 10 local amenities will be a benefit. Noted even when the area is fully developed would still need a lift station or the connection with Shakopee. Thompson: Asked if the connection to Shakopee is temporary. Poppler: Responded staff is recommending it to be temporary. Added there are no concerns as the city of Shakopee is investing in their infrastructure right now and has said they have the ca- pacity to serve this area. Braid: Noted his concern with trucks going up and own this area; asked if there is a way for the street to be developed earlier. John Rask, M/I Homes: Explained they plan to start this fall because there is a lot of grading to occur and it is being broken up due to the time of year; the road and landscaping can be ad- dressed as well as the landscaping if the tree removal is a concern. Noted this parcel is in your comp plan and is ready to be developed today; regarding the sewer Shakopee is bringing a lift station offline to gravity feed this station and it is a win-win to develop a system. Braid: Noted he will support this with the additional neighborhood connection and working out trail details. MOTION BY BRAID, SECOND BY MCGUIRE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS HAVEN RIDGE SUBJECT TO THE LISTED CONDI- TIONS AND DEVLEOPMENT OF THE ACCESS ROADWAY AND DISCUSSION FOR TRAIL MAINTENANCE; ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO DESIGNATE THE PROP- ERTY AS THE HAVEN RIDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY; INCULDING Briggs: Stated he wants to continue the discussion of trails and worked out the landscaping con- cerns. VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. 9B Consider Approval of a Resolution Accepting the Donation of Property Described as Outlot A, Universal One Addition Community Development Director McCabe and Assistant Public Works Director/City Engi- neer Poppler presented on this topic dated July 10, 2017. Briggs: Asked if there are any drainage easements on the property. Poppler: Responded there are other city easements on the property but he is not aware of private easements. Thompson: Questioned how many acres is this for. McCabe: Replied approximately 2.8 acres. DRAFT 07 10 17 City Council Meeting Minutes 11 MOTION BY THOMPSON, SECOND BY MCGUIRE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS OUTLOT A, UNIVERSAL ONE ADDITION VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA No Items Removed from the Consent Agenda COUNCILMEMBER LIAISON UPDATES No Councilmember Liaison Updates OTHER BUSINESS / COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS 12A TH13/CR21 Intersection Project Status Report Poppler: Noted an open house was held on June 29, 2017 with good participation; the CH21/TH13 website has a speak up section for people interested in providing their commentary on the intersection. Stated the next open house will be in September and they will have con- cepts for people to view. Briggs: Stated if council has not taken the survey, please do; social media efforts have in- creased and we need as much participation from the public as possible. Boyles: Announced that Cathy Erickson is our new Finance Director; she was our Accounting manager and served as the interim Finance Director. ADJOURNMENT With no further business brought before the Council, a motion was made by Thompson and se- conded by Braid to adjourn. The motion carried and the meeting adjourned at 9:22 p.m. VOTE Briggs McGuire Thompson Burkart Braid Aye ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ The motion carried. _______________________ Frank Boyles, City Manager