Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 21 2017 Preliminary 2018 Budget and Tax Levy Report 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: AGENDA #: AUGUST 21, 2017 A1 PREPARED BY: CATHY ERICKSON, FINANCE DIRECTOR JASON ETTER, ACCOUNTING MANAGER PRESENTER: FRANK BOYLES, CITY MANAGER CATHY ERICKSON, FINANCE DIRECTOR WORK SESSION TOPIC: PRELIMINARY 2018 BUDGET/TAX LEVY DISCUSSION DISCUSSION: Introduction State statutes require that each taxing authority adopt a preliminary budget and certify a preliminary tax levy for payable 2018 to the County on or before September 30, 2017. The preliminary tax levy establishes the maximum that the City can levy against properties in 2018. The Council will consider the final tax levy in December at which time the levy can be either be reduced or maintained at the amount established in September. The Council will not be able to increase the tax levy. The purpose of today’s workshop is to continue the discussion started earlier this year and receive direction on the preliminary 2018 budget and tax levy. Additional meetings/workshops are currently scheduled to discuss and adopt 2018 property tax levies and budgets: September 18, 7:00 pm Adopt maximum tax levy and preliminary budget November 6, 5:00 pm Budget work session November 9 (tentative) Town Hall budget meeting December 4, 7:00 pm Public budget meeting December 4, 7:00 pm Adopt final budget and tax levy Staff has included a list of recommended fee changes for Council to consider. Historically this has happened later in the year but should be included in this discussion so any changes may be incorporated into the preliminary budget proposed for adoption on September 18. The final fee schedule will be adopted as an ordinance with the budget in December. History In July, Staff presented the 2018 projects that are part of the 2017-2021 CIP. The impact of these updated and new plans on the debt balance, tax levy, fund balance reserves and utility rates were a part of the Council and Page 2 Staff discussion. On August 7, staff presented the 2018 Preliminary Tax Levy/Budget topic at the Council workshop and held a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) public information meeting at the Council meeting. Based on direction and feedback received from the Council, changes were incorporated into the appropriate budgets. These revisions will be presented to the Council at the August 21 workshop. Current Circumstances Budget Requests This year, the development of the 2018 budget began in April when Staff presented to the Council a summary of the 2016 financial results and an update on what to expect for 2017. Staff also presented the Personnel Plan and Compensation Study in July. A follow-up meeting was held in August when staff presented an overview of the preliminary 2018 budget and projected tax impacts. The overall tax levy (including the general fund) increase also included the CIP impacts on the levy which has been part of the CIP discussions that started in July. Currently, the department budgets have been prepared taking into consideration Council comments as well as City Manager and Finance department direction. Council feedback indicated they could support a levy increase that was less than 5%. To work toward this, several revisions have occurred since the August 7 presentation which have resulted in a reduction of the preliminary tax levy increase from 6.59% to 5.32%. The revisions made are as follows: Revenues Amount Description Totals Net Revenue Increase:28,883 Building Permits & Plan Check Fees 60,972 Budgeted for an additional 15 single family homes City Contract Services 15,000 Updated police contracted services for anticipated events Project Admin/Eng Fees (39,000) Reduced budgeted in-house engineer fee transfer Facility Usage Fee (not taxable)(12,300) Reduced tournament fees per Council direction Other 4,211 Net of other budget updates to various line items Expenditures Net Personnel Decrease:(13,881) Wage (21,754) Removed Police Part-time CSO & added back seasonal Park Patrol Overtime 7,873 Updated police over-time hourly rate/COLA Net Current and Capital Outlay Decrease:(5,275) Professional Services (43,000) Removed laserfiche upgrade costs/utilize general fund reserves Utilities 12,600 Updated after budget review Software Service Contract 3,595 Additional annual service contract for upgraded laserfiche version Other 21,530 Net of other budget updates to various line items Net Decrease in Tax Levy 48,039 Page 3 Expenditures The primary drivers of the change in expenditure levels from the 2017 original budget to the preliminary 2018 General Fund budget are shown on the following table: Estimated Tax Levy The following chart shows the proposed change in the 2018 property tax levy based on the preliminary budgets. The 2019-2021 columns are the long-range forecast. Expenditures Totals Personnel:380,082 Assumptions: 1) Police drug task force officer 10/1/17; Police Officer and Maintenance Worker 1/1/18, 2) COLA increase and health care premiums, 3) No change in PERA, FICA, Medicare rates Current:35,986 Repairs & Maintenance - Building 13,870 Primary increase for repairs at the old/original PW builidng Professional Services 58,934 Engineering consulting for Interim PW Director and development reviews Professional Services 7,400 Increase in Property Assessment Contract with County Maintenance Agreements (194,000) Mill & Overlay in PIR Fund Maintenance Agreements 30,000 Parks sidewalk repairs Maintenance Agreements 19,963 Increase in Cleaning contract Maintenance Agreements 15,150 Building and other Utlities 17,729 Primary increase is Parks lighting/Ponds Training and Employee Development 18,090 Primary increase for additional Police training (legislative mandate) Small Equipment - Technology 23,236 Computer, scanner and copier replacements per CIP Legal 20,000 Increase in estimate Other 5,614 Capital Outlay (38,941) Debt Transfer (790,467) Total (413,340) CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PROPERTY TAX PROJECTION SUMMARY LONG RANGE FORECAST CIP Workshop 08.21.2017 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Tax Levies: General 7,192,792 7,797,976 8,274,435 8,768,429 9,147,304 Equipment Revolving Fund 375,000 500,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 Revolving Park Equip Fund 213,406 318,184 419,292 513,276 607,649 Facilities Management Fund - - - 30,000 80,000 EDA Fund 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 Debt Service 3,646,956 3,427,017 3,595,829 3,652,034 4,113,067 11,568,154 12,183,177 12,979,556 13,653,739 14,638,020 Breakdown of Change in Levies: General 19,999 605,184 476,459 493,994 378,875 Equipment Revolving Fund 50,000 125,000 50,000 - - Revolving Park Equip Fund 213,406 104,778 101,108 93,984 94,373 Facilities Management Fund - - - 30,000 50,000 EDA Fund (15,000) - - - - Debt 221,387 (219,939) 168,812 56,205 461,033 Total Change 489,792 615,023 796,379 674,183 984,281 General 0.28%8.41%6.11%5.97%4.32% Equipment Revolving Fund 15.38%33.33%10.00%0.00%0.00% Revolving Park Equip Fund n/a 49.10%31.78%22.41%18.39% Facilities Management Fund n/a n/a n/a n/a 166.67% EDA Fund -9.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00% Debt 6.46%-6.03%4.93%1.56%12.62% Total Change 4.42%5.32%6.54%5.19%7.21% Projected Page 4 Issues In order for staff to continue preparation of the 2018 budget, city council direction on the following items would be helpful: 1. Preliminary Levy Amount: The city council indicated that the final levy approved in December should be less than 5%. Is the city council comfortable with submitting the maximum tax levy at 5.32% (September 18 meeting) recognizing that it can be reduced, but not increased, when we submit the final tax levy on December 4th? 2. The graphic on page 2 shows revenue and expenditure adjustments to reduce the levy from 6.58% to 5.32%. Building permit and plan check fees, together with police contract services, have been increased. However, significant reductions have been made to project administration/ engineering fee revenues and facility usage charges. With staffing changes in the Engineering department, we expect that a combination of staff and consultants will be needed 2018 which will result in a reduction of project admin/engineering fee revenue. W e have also removed the additional CSO position (The City Clerk position had been previously removed.), and removed the Laserfiche upgrade with the expectation that the upgrade could be acquired using 2017 general fund reserves. Based on Council direction, staff has shifted one of the street improvement projects from 2018 to 2019 (Pershing Area Improvement). Does the council have any questions about these proposed adjustments? 3. There are several items driving the expenditure changes of the 2018 draft budget. Personnel related expenses are the most significant. New positions together with overall wage adjustments and healthcare premiums are the single largest category of expenditure drivers. (The new positions are the Police drug task force officer starting on 10/1/17 and the Police Officer and Maintenance Worker starting on 1/1/18.) 4. There are several potential adjustments which have not been made but deserve some discussion: • Adding daily parking fees at Sand Point Park ($11,000 revenue add) • Reducing the Revolving Park and Equipment funds greater than the $50,000 reduction that has already been made to each fund. • Rely upon an annual General Fund reserve contribution to write down the tax levy annually. • Add revenues such as a technology fee of $1-5 to certain or all classes of city fees. 5. The EDA tax levy is proposed to be $155,000 rather than $140,000. This would further increase the tax levy by $15,000 or .13% bringing the total tax levy to 5.45% 6. The EDA has developed a reserve of almost $200,000 over the last few years. To be an effective body, the EDA recognizes that great Page 5 resources are needed for things like strategic land acquisition, development of “shovel ready” sites and the like. The EDA proposes a measure which would keep the General Fund reserve within the 40-50% target as well as provide additional resources to the EDA. The proposal would establish a maximum General Fund levy amount of, say 47%, rather than the existing 50%. Any reserve amount more than 47% would be automatically transferred to the EDA reserve. For accountability purposes, the EDA would submit a development spending plan for council approval and direction in the expenditure of those resources. What are your thoughts regarding this idea? 7. One of the city council’s initiatives in 2017 is the removal of the dam at the entrance to Candy Cove. We have corresponded with the Watershed, DNR, and the Prior Lake Association representatives. We have received an estimate from a contractor with dam removal experience. Including engineering, permitting and removal, we estimate the price to be $200,000. We have not included this expenditure in the draft budget. Conclusion Direction in these areas, and any other areas as determined by the council, will assist the staff in preparing the budget agenda item for the second meeting in September. Attachments: 1) Budget Overview (2 pages) C i t y o f P r i o r L a k e Council Workshop 08.21.2017 2 0 1 8 P r e l i m i n a r y B u d g e t B u d g e t e d F u n d s De b t C a p i t a l R e v o l v i n g R e v o l v i n g P a r k P e r m a n e n t F a c i l i t i es T o t a l Total Ge n e r a l S e r v i c e C a b l e P a r k E q u i p m e n t E q u i p m e n t I m p r o v e m e n t M a n ag e m e n t E D A G o v e r n m e n t a l W a t e r S e w e r W a t e r Q u a l i t y E n t e r p r i s e B u dgeted Fu n d F u n d s F u n d F u n d F u n d F u n d R e v o l v i n g F u n d F u n d F u n d s F u nd Fund Fund Funds Funds Re v e n u e s / S o u r c e s Pr o p e r t y T a x e s Le v y - T a x C a p a c i t y 7 , 7 9 7 , 9 7 6 $ 3 , 1 9 9 , 4 6 5 $ - $ - $ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 1 8 , 1 8 4 $ - $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 11,955,625 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,955,625 $ Le v y - M a r k e t V a l u e 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 - - - - - - 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 - - - - 227,552 Sp e c i a l A s s e s s m e n t s - 6 6 9 , 6 6 9 - - - - - 6 6 9 , 6 6 9 - - - - 669,669 Li c e n s e s & P e r m i t s 5 9 4 , 2 7 3 - - - - - - 5 9 4 , 2 7 3 - - - - 594,273 Fi n e s & F o r f e i t s - - - - - - - - - - - - - In t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l 1 , 6 0 3 , 2 7 2 - - - 3 0 , 0 0 0 - - 1 , 6 3 3 , 2 7 2 - - - - 1,633,272 Ch a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s 1 , 6 8 2 , 3 1 5 - 3 2 , 0 0 0 4 2 9 , 0 0 0 - - 6 , 2 0 0 2 , 1 4 9 , 5 1 5 4,075,174 3,470,920 916,326 8,462,420 10,611,935 Ot h e r R e v e n u e s 30 9 , 1 5 0 3 0 , 4 9 1 - 1 7 , 0 0 0 1 8 , 0 0 0 4 , 7 0 0 1 , 5 3 8 5 , 4 0 0 2 , 7 0 0 3 8 8 , 9 7 9 35,900 18,500 12,000 66,400 455,379 Bo n d P r o c e e d s - - - - 6 6 5 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 6 2 0 , 0 0 0 - 1 , 8 8 5 , 0 0 0 1,180,000 1,400,000 . 2 , 5 8 0 , 0 0 0 4,465,000 Le a s e P r o c e e d s - - - - - - - - - - Tr a n s f e r s F r o m O t h e r F u n d s Ge n e r a l F u n d - 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 - - - - - 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 - - - - 227,552 W a t e r F u n d 19 0 , 5 0 0 5 3 7 , 3 0 4 - - 7 0 , 0 0 0 47 , 7 4 1 - 8 4 5 , 5 4 5 - - - - 845,545 Se w e r F u n d 19 0 , 5 0 0 - - - 7 0 , 0 0 0 10 , 6 0 9 - 2 7 1 , 1 0 9 - - - - 271,109 W a t e r Q u a l i t y F u n d 6 2 , 0 0 0 - - - 1 5 , 0 0 0 - - 7 7 , 0 0 0 - - - - 77,000 Tr u n k R e s e r v e F u n d - 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 TI F F u n d - 3 0 , 1 3 5 - - - - - 3 0 , 1 3 5 - - - - 30,135 Fa c i l i t i e s M a n a g e m e n t F u n d - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ca p i t a l P a r k F u n d - - To t a l R e v e n u e s / S o u r c e s 1 2 , 6 5 7 , 5 3 8 $ 4 , 6 9 4 , 6 1 6 $ 3 2 , 0 0 0 $ 4 4 6 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 3 6 8 , 0 0 0 $ 3 2 2 , 8 8 4 $ 6 0 1 , 5 3 8 $ 6 8 3 , 7 5 0 $ 1 4 8 , 9 0 0 $ 20,955,226 $ 6,791,074 $ 4,889,420 $ 928,326 $ 12,608,820 $ 33,564,046 $ Ex p e n d i t u r e s / U s e s Em p l o y e e S e r v i c e s 8 , 7 0 7 , 3 9 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1 2 0 , 2 7 7 $ 8,827,668 $ 745,736 $ 718,025 $ 286,917 $ 1,750,678 $ 10,578,346 $ Cu r r e n t E x p e n d i t u r e s 3 , 6 7 8 , 1 4 5 - - 3 , 7 0 0 - - 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 - 3 4 , 0 0 0 4 , 3 6 5 , 8 4 5 1,321,634 1,851,659 225,705 3,398,998 7,764,843 Ca p i t a l O u t l a y 44 , 4 5 0 - 8 0 , 0 0 0 - 1 , 3 9 4 , 0 2 7 3 1 8 , 1 8 4 - 1 , 8 3 6 , 6 6 1 106,090 262,407 110,000 478,497 2,315,158 Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s - - - - - - 8 7 3 , 7 0 4 - 8 7 3 , 7 0 4 3,653,390 1,748,890 279,605 5,681,885 6,555,589 Su b t o t a l 1 2 , 4 2 9 , 9 8 6 $ - $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 7 0 0 $ 1 , 3 9 4 , 0 2 7 $ 3 1 8 , 1 8 4 $ 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 7 3 , 7 0 4 $ 1 5 4 , 2 7 7 $ 15,903,878 $ 5,826,850 $ 4,580,981 $ 902,227 $ 11,310,058 $ 27,213,936 $ Tr a n s f e r s T o O t h e r F u n d s Ge n e r a l F u n d - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 190,500 $ 190,500 $ 62,000 $ 443,000 $ 443,000 $ Tr e a t m e n t P l a n t ( D e b t ) - - - - - - - - 537,304 - - 537,304 537,304 Eq u i p m e n t F u n d - - - - - - - - 70,000 70,000 15,000 155,000 155,000 Pa r k E q u i p m e n t F u n d - - - - - - - - - - - - - De b t S e r v i c e F u n d s 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 - - - - - - 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 - - - - 227,552 Fa c i l i t i e s M a n a g e m e n t F u n d - - - - - - - - 47,741 10,609 - 58,350 58,350 ED A F u n d - - - - - - - - - - - - - De b t S e r v i c e - 4 , 8 9 6 , 0 0 0 - - - - - 4 , 8 9 6 , 0 0 0 - - - - 4,896,000 Su b t o t a l 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 $ 4 , 8 9 6 , 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,123,552 $ 845,545 $ 271,109 $ 77,000 $ 1,193,654 $ 6,317,206 $ To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s / U s e s 1 2 , 6 5 7 , 5 3 8 $ 4 , 8 9 6 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 7 0 0 $ 1 , 3 9 4 , 0 2 7 $ 3 1 8 , 1 8 4 $ 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 7 3 , 7 0 4 $ 1 5 4 , 2 7 7 $ 21,027,430 $ 6,672,395 $ 4,852,090 $ 979,227 $ 12,503,712 $ 33,531,142 $ Ch a n g e i n F u n d B a l a n c e - $ ( 2 0 1 , 3 8 4 ) $ ( 4 8 , 0 0 0 ) $ 4 4 2 , 3 0 0 $ ( 2 6 , 0 2 7 ) $ 4 , 7 0 0 $ ( 4 8 , 4 6 2 ) $ ( 1 8 9 , 9 5 4 ) $ ( 5 , 3 7 7 ) $ (72,204)$ 118,679 $ 37,330 $ (50,901)$ 105,108 $ 32,904 $ 1 o f 2 20 1 8 P r o p e r t y T a x L e v y C o m p a r i s o n Council Workshop 08.21.2017 Ch a n g e 1 7 - 1 8 Pr o p e r t y T a x e s 20 1 7 2 0 1 8 A m o u n t P e r c e n t Le v y - T a x C a p a c i t y G e n e r a l F u n d - O p e r a t i n g 7 , 1 9 2 , 7 9 3 $ 7 , 7 9 7 , 9 7 6 $ 6 0 5 , 1 8 3 $ 8 . 4 1 % D e b t S e r v i c e F u n d s 2 , 6 2 8 , 9 3 7 3 , 1 9 9 , 4 6 5 5 7 0 , 5 2 8 2 1 . 7 0 % R e v o l v i n g E q u i p m e n t F u n d 3 7 5 , 0 0 0 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 3 3 . 3 3 % R e v o l v i n g P a r k E q u i p m e n t F u n d 2 1 3 , 4 0 6 3 1 8 , 1 8 4 1 0 4 , 7 7 8 4 9 . 1 0 % F a c i l i t i e s M a n a g e m e n t F u n d - - - n / a 10 , 4 1 0 , 1 3 6 $ 1 1 , 8 1 5 , 6 2 5 $ 1 , 4 0 5 , 4 8 9 $ 1 3 . 5 0 % Le v y - M a r k e t V a l u e - G e n e r a l F u n d 1 , 0 1 8 , 0 1 9 2 2 7 , 5 5 2 ( 7 9 0 , 4 6 7 ) - 7 7 . 6 5 % Le v y - E c o n o m i c D e v A u t h o r i t y 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 % To t a l L e v y 1 1 , 5 6 8 , 1 5 5 $ 1 2 , 1 8 3 , 1 7 7 $ 6 1 5 , 0 2 2 $ 5 . 3 2 % 7, 4 0 6 , 1 9 9 $ 8 , 1 1 6 , 1 6 0 $ 7 0 9 , 9 6 1 $ 9 . 5 9 % 20 1 8 B u d g e t E x p e n d i t u r e C o m p a r i s o n s ( 2 0 1 7 O r i g i n a l Bu d g e t s ) Ca p i t a l R e v o l v i n g R e v o l v i n g P a r k P e r m a n e n t F a c i l i t i e s T o t al Total Ge n e r a l D e b t S e r v i c e C a b l e P a r k E q u i p m e n t E q u i p m e n t I m p r o v e m e nt M a n a g e m e n t E D A G o v e r n m e n t a l W a t e r S e w e r W a t e r Q u a l i t y E n t e r p rise Budgeted Fu n d Fu n d s Fu n d Fu n d Fu n d Fu n d R e v o l v i n g F u n d Fu n d Funds Fund Fund Fund Funds Funds 20 1 8 T o t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s / U s e s 1 2 , 6 5 7 , 5 3 8 $ 4 , 8 9 6 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 7 0 0 $ 1 , 3 9 4 , 0 2 7 $ 3 1 8 , 1 8 4 $ 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 7 3 , 7 0 4 $ 1 5 4 , 2 7 7 $ 21,027,430 $ 6,672,395 $ 4,852,090 $ 979,227 $ 12,503,712 $ 33,531,142 $ 20 1 7 T o t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s / U s e s 1 3 , 0 7 0 , 8 7 8 $ 5 , 0 1 9 , 3 1 8 $ 1 1 , 2 5 0 $ - $ 8 7 2 , 7 0 4 $ 2 2 3 , 4 0 6 $ - $ 2 3 2 , 1 4 0 $ 1 6 0 , 8 2 5 $ 19,590,521 $ 6,025,897 $ 4,461,398 $ 1,388,206 $ 11,875,501 $ 31,466,022 $ Ch a n g e 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 8 ( $ ) ( 4 1 3 , 3 4 0 ) $ ( 1 2 3 , 3 1 8 ) $ 6 8 , 7 5 0 $ 3 , 7 0 0 $ 5 2 1 , 3 2 3 $ 9 4 , 7 7 8 $ 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 4 1 , 5 6 4 $ ( 6 , 5 4 8 ) $ 1,436,909 $ 646,498 $ 390,692 $ (408,979)$ 628,211 $ 2,065,120 $ Ch a n g e 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 8 ( % ) - 3 . 1 6 % - 2 . 4 6 % 6 1 1 . 1 1 % n / a 5 9 . 7 4 % n/ a n / a 2 7 6 . 3 7 % - 4 . 0 7 % 7 . 3 3 % 1 0 . 7 3 % 8 . 7 6 % - 2 9 . 4 6 % 5 . 2 9 % 6 . 5 6 % 20 1 8 B u d g e t E x p e n d i t u r e C o m p a r i s o n s ( 2 0 1 7 A m e n d e d B ud g e t s ) Ca p i t a l R e v o l v i n g R e v o l v i n g P a r k P e r m a n e n t F a c i l i t i e s T o t al Total Ge n e r a l D e b t S e r v i c e C a b l e P a r k E q u i p m e n t E q u i p m e n t I m p r o v e m e nt M a n a g e m e n t E D A G o v e r n m e n t a l W a t e r S e w e r W a t e r Q u a l i t y E n t e r p rise B u d g e t e d Fu n d Fu n d s Fu n d Fu n d Fu n d Fu n d R e v o l v i n g F u n d Fu n d Funds Fund Fund Fund Funds Funds 20 1 8 T o t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s / U s e s 1 2 , 6 5 7 , 5 3 8 $ 4 , 8 9 6 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 7 0 0 $ 1 , 3 9 4 , 0 2 7 $ 3 1 8 , 1 8 4 $ 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 7 3 , 7 0 4 $ 1 5 4 , 2 7 7 $ 21,027,430 $ 6,672,395 $ 4,852,090 $ 979,227 $ 12,503,712 $ 33,531,142 $ 20 1 7 T o t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s / U s e s 1 2 , 8 6 9 , 6 6 8 $ 5 , 0 1 9 , 4 9 4 $ 1 1 , 2 5 0 $ - $ 8 7 2 , 7 0 4 $ 3 0 8 , 7 3 6 $ - $ 8 5 2 , 1 4 0 $ 1 6 0 , 8 2 5 $ 20,094,817 $ 6,043,932 $ 4,479,433 $ 1,388,206 $ 11,911,571 $ 32,006,388 $ Ch a n g e 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 8 ( $ ) ( 2 1 2 , 1 3 0 ) $ ( 1 2 3 , 4 9 4 ) $ 6 8 , 7 5 0 $ 3 , 7 0 0 $ 5 2 1 , 3 2 3 $ 9 , 4 4 8 $ 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 1 , 5 6 4 $ ( 6 , 5 4 8 ) $ 932,613 $ 628,463 $ 372,657 $ (408,979)$ 592,141 $ 1,524,754 $ Ch a n g e 2 0 1 7 t o 2 0 1 8 ( % ) - 1 . 6 5 % - 2 . 4 6 % 6 1 1 . 1 1 % n / a 5 9 . 7 4 % n/ a n / a 2 . 5 3 % - 4 . 0 7 % 4 . 6 4 % 1 0 . 4 0 % 8 . 3 2 % - 2 9 . 4 6 % 4 . 9 7 % 4 . 7 6 % Co m b i n e d G e n e r a l F u n d & R e v o l v i n g P a r k Eq u i p m e n t F u n d 2 o f 2