HomeMy WebLinkAbout7B Fish Point Road Public Hearing Report
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019
AGENDA #: 7B
PREPARED BY: NICK MONSERUD, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
PRESENTED BY: NICK MONSERUD,
AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDER-
ING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FISH POINT ROAD RECLAMATION
PROJECT, CITY PROJECT #TRN19-000003
GOAL AREA AND
OBJECTIVE:
Transportation & Mobility
1. Maintain quality local street system based on a financially stable plan that
meets Overall Condition targets.
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is to receive comments on the Fish Point Road
Reclamation Project and if appropriate order the project. Since the project is initi-
ated by the city council, a 4/5 vote is required to order the project.
History
The City uses the Five Year Capital Improvement Program and its Pavement
Management program to plan its infrastructure improvements and the financing for
capital improvements. The section of Fish Point Road from County Road 21 south
to Fawn Meadows Curve is part of the plan for reclamation in 2019. At its October
15, 2018 meeting the City Council adopted Resolution 18-166 authorizing staff to
prepare a Feasibility Report for the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project as out-
lined in the CIP. The primary purpose for proceeding with the project is to upgrade
the street condition. The pavement condition is poor and requires reconstruction
in accordance with the City’s desire to maintain high overall condition index (OCI)
ratings on its roadways.
At its December 17, 2018 meeting the City Council adopted Resolution 18-203 ac-
cepting the Feasibility Report and ordering the public hearing for the Fish Point
Road Reclamation Project.
The M.S. Chapter 429 process applies to all projects that will be financed in whole
or part through special assessments or bond proceeds.
The Fish Point Road Reclamation Project is considered in the report and includes
a full depth pavement reclamation from County Road 21 south to Fawn Meadows
Curve located in Section 1, Township 114, Range 22. This segment of Fish Point
Road was built in 1994. A map of the project area (Appendix A) is included in the
Feasibility Report. The proposed improvements include full depth pavement rec-
lamation, spot curb replacement, replacement of the existing bituminous trail, and
ADA improvements at the existing curb ramps.
2
Current Circumstances
The properties deemed to specially benefit from the improvements, in most cases
the properties abutting the streets located in the project area, are subject to as-
sessment. Each of the affected property owners have been notified in accordance
with the statute regarding tonight’s Public Hearing.
City staff has contacted each of the three property owners within the project area
to provide an opportunity to discuss the project in an informal setting prior to the
Public Hearing. Staff provided an update on the proposed improvements, project
costs, estimated assessments and answered general questions regarding the pro-
ject. Public hearing notices were sent to all properties located within the Fish Point
Road Reclamation Project area.
Conclusion
Staff is prepared to discuss each of the concerns presented at the Public Hearing.
If the Council deems the issues that have been brought up need to be addressed
in the project plans and specifications, direction can be given to staff.
The purpose of this Public Hearing is to determine project elements or whether the
project should move forward at all. Completion of plans and specifications is the
next step and will provide greater information about expected project cost and,
therefore, the assessments associated with the improvements. Once the plans
and specifications are completed, they will be submitted to the City Council for ap-
proval and authorization to advertise for bids. The Council could decide not to
continue with the project upon receipt of bids. A separate Assessment Hearing
will be conducted following review of the proposed assessments by the City Coun-
cil’s Assessment Review Committee.
In summary, the project is feasible from an engineering and economic standpoint.
If the project is approved, City staff will continue to work on completion of plans
and specifications.
ISSUES: Fish Point Road in this area serves as a commercial/industrial area. Heavy city fire
equipment traverses this roadway daily. By the same token eighteen wheel trucks
supply and service the adjacent and benefited commercial industrial properties.
Accordingly this roadway is built to an 11 ton standard rather than the 9 ton stand-
ard associated with residential streets.
The Assessment Review Work Group met on November 27th, 2018 and recom-
mended the area assessment method and assessment in accordance with the
City’s Assessment Policy of assessing 40% of the street and storm sewer cost.
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
The Fish Point Road Reclamation Project is proposed to be financed by Special
Assessments and Tax Levy. The funding of each option and the corresponding
estimated amounts are shown below:
3
FISH POINT ROAD RECLAMATION
PROJECT - FUNDING
Tax Levy $321,290
Assessment (40%) $124,520
Assessment (Per Acre) – $6,580
Total $445,810
The Capital Improvement Plan estimate for this project was $636,000.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Conduct the public hearing and unless new substantive information is offered
approve a Resolution Ordering the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project, City
Project #TRN19-000003.
2. Deny this item for a specific reason and provide staff with direction.
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
A motion and a second for approval of Alternative #1.
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RESOLUTION 19-___
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE FISH POINT ROAD RECLAMATION PROJECT (PROJECT #TRN19-000003)
Motion By: Second By:
WHEREAS, The Prior Lake City Council on its own initiative has determined that it desires to
complete the Public Improvements for the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project;
and
WHEREAS, On December 17, 2018; the City Council accepted the Feasibility Report and called
for a Public Hearing to be held for the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project which
includes full depth pavement reclamation, spot curb replacement, replacement of
the existing bituminous trail and ADA improvements at the existing curb ramps; and
WHEREAS, Ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given,
and the hearing was held on the 22nd day of January, 2019, at which time all
persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, Since the project was initiated by the City Council it must be approved by 4/5ths
vote in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 429.031 Subdivision 1(f);
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility
report.
3. The City Council by the required statutory 4/5ths vote does hereby order the project as
outlined in the feasibility report.
4. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for these improvements and is
authorized to record engineering expenses in the Construction Fund (#501-43500.00-
55020-TRN19-000003).
5. The Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements
for the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project.
6. The City Council authorizes the following preliminary funding sources and corresponding
transfers to the Construction Fund for the project:
FISH POINT ROAD RECLAMATION
PROJECT - FUNDING
Tax Levy $321,290
Assessment (40%) $124,520
Assessment (Per Acre) – $6,580
Total $445,810
2
7. The City Council authorizes the intent to issue General Obligation Bonds for this project.
8. Proceeds from the bond sale will be deposited in the Construction Fund.
9. The City has determined to make a declaration of official intent (“Declaration”) to reimburse
certain estimated costs for this project from proceeds of bonds expected to be in an amount
not to exceed $455,000 in accordance with the Internal Revenue Service Reimbursement
Regulations (Treasury Reg. 1.150-2).
10. The City may declare other separate statements of reimbursement intent in connection with
specific public improvements projects as they are initiated under Minnesota Statutes
Chapters 429 and 444, or for other capital projects, with the understanding that such
additional declarations of reimbursement intent will supplement this resolution. All
reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the bonds, or
other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the
Reimbursement Regulations.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF JANUARY 2019
VOTE Briggs Thompson Braid Burkart Erickson
Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
______________________________
Frank Boyles, City Manager
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FISH POINT ROAD RECLAMATION
PROJECT
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE | SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 17, 2018
Prepared for:
City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
CITY PROJECT NO. TRN19-000003
WSB PROJECT NO. R-012877-000
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FISH POINT ROAD RECLAMATION PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. TRN19-000003
FOR THE
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
December 17, 2018
Prepared By:
December 17, 2018
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Prior Lake
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Re: Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project NO. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
Transmitted herewith for your review is a feasibility report which addresses improvements
associated with the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project.
We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please contact me at
763.762.2843 if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
WSB
Emily Lueth, PE
Project Engineer
Attachment
ar
701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional
engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Emily Lueth, PE
Date: December 17, 2018 Lic. No. 51773
Quality Control Review Completed By:
James Stremel, PE
Date: December 17, 2018 Lic. No. 45782
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE SHEET
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CERTIFICATION SHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1
2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Authorization ................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Data Available ................................................................................................................. 2
2.4 Background ..................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Street ................................................................................................................................ 3
3.2 Bituminous Trail .............................................................................................................. 3
3.3 Concrete Sidewalk ......................................................................................................... 3
3.4 Public Utilities .................................................................................................................. 3
3.4.1 Storm Sewer and Drainage .............................................................................. 3
3.4.2 Sanitary Sewer ................................................................................................... 3
3.4.3 Watermain ........................................................................................................... 4
3.5 Private Utilities ................................................................................................................ 4
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................ 5
4.1 Street ................................................................................................................................ 5
4.2 Bituminous Trail .............................................................................................................. 5
4.3 Concrete Sidewalk ......................................................................................................... 5
4.4 Public Utilities .................................................................................................................. 5
4.5 Permits/Approvals .......................................................................................................... 5
4.6 Construction Access/Staging ........................................................................................ 5
5. FINANCING .............................................................................................................................. 6
5.1 Opinion of Probable Cost .............................................................................................. 6
5.2 Funding ............................................................................................................................ 6
5.3 Preliminary Assessment Roll ........................................................................................ 6
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE .......................................................................................................... 7
7. FEASIBILITY, NECESSITY, AND COST EFFECTIVENESS .......................................... 8
8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION........................................................................ 9
Appendix A
Figures
Appendix B
Geotechnical Report
Appendix C
Opinion of Probable Cost
Appendix D
Assessment Map
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Fish Point Road Reclamation Project includes a full depth reclamation of the bituminous roadway
and spot curb and gutter repairs along Fish Point Road SE between County Road 21 and Fawn Meadow
Curve. The reconstruction of this street was identified in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for
construction in 2019. The proposed improvements along Fish Point Road SE between County Road 21
and Fawn Meadow Curve, total approximately 1,680 feet (0.32 miles). The existing roadway in the project
area is of an urban section.
A map showing the project location can be found on Figure 1 in Appendix A.
In addition to the roadway reconstruction, the existing trail that runs on the west side of the road has
deteriorated and in need of replacement. Replacing this trail, in conjunction with the proposed street
improvements, provides an opportunity to minimize the replacem ent costs and traffic disruptions
associated with the work. The existing sidewalk is overall in good condition but the pedestrian ramps do
not meet current ADA standards and there are small areas of sidewalk in need of repairs. It is
recommended to replace all pedestrian curb ramps and repair the sidewalk as needed.
The proposed improvement cost is estimated to be $445,810.00, which includes a 10% contingency and
28% indirect costs. Funding for the project will be provided through assessments to benefiting properties
and City funds.
The proposed project is scheduled to begin construction during the spring of 2019, with substantial
completion by September 2019. The final wear course of bituminous pavement will be placed in the fall of
2019. This project is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint and should
be constructed as proposed herein.
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 2
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Authorization
On October 15, 2018, the City of Prior Lake City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibilit y report
for the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project in Resolution 18-166. This project has been designated City
Project NO. TRN19-000003.
2.2 Scope
This report investigates the feasibility of proposed improvements to streets and utilities identified wi thin
the City’s Capital Improvement Plan. Fish Point Road SE is proposed for the Fish Point Road
Reclamation Project and was initially considered because of existing pavement conditions along the
street, the concrete sidewalk, and the bituminous trail. Fish Point Road SE between County Road 21 and
Fawn Meadow Curve is the only street proposed for this project.
The project area is shown in Figure 1 of Appendix A.
Improvements within this report include roadway reconstruction, bituminous trail improvements, and
concrete sidewalk and pedestrian access improvements .
2.3 Data Available
Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following:
▪ City of Prior Lake Capital Improvement Plan
▪ City of Prior Lake Assessment Policy
▪ City of Prior Lake Property Index Records
▪ City of Prior Lake Topography Maps
▪ Geotechnical Report prepared by WSB completed in November 2018
▪ Field Observations of the Area and Field Topography Surveys
2.4 Background
The City of Prior Lake has a Capital Improvement Plan to maintain infrastructure within the City. Fish
Point Road SE has been identified as a potential area for a street reconstruction project.
The City of Prior Lake utilizes a Pavement Management Program to rate the condition of the City’s
streets. The pavement rating, known as Overall Condition Index (OCI), is determined based on the
amount of pavement deterioration that is visually evident. The street OCI is a number between 0-100,
with 100 indicating streets that are in the best condition or are newly paved and 0 being the worst. Streets
in need of a mill and overlay generally have an OCI of 45-65 and streets with an OCI between 35-45
usually require a full depth reclamation. When the OCI reaches a range of 0 -35 or when utility repairs are
needed, the street usually requires a full reconstruction. Fish Point Road SE between County Road 21
and Cottonwood Lane SE has an average OCI of 27.88, while Fish Point Road SE between Cottonwood
Lane SE and Fawn Meadow Curve has an average OCI of 33.53.
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 3
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Street
Fish Point Road SE ranges from 28 to 30 feet in width and the project area is approximately 1,680 feet in
length. Fish Point Road SE consists of an urban section with B-style concrete curb and gutter. The OCI
rating for Fish Point Road SE is 27.88 between County Road 21 and Cottonwood Lane SE and 33.53
between Cottonwood Lane SE and Fawn Meadow Curve. With these pavement conditions, it is
recommended that the street receive a full pavement replacement.
The pavement within the proposed improvement area is aging and exhibiting alligator cracking, edge
cracking, transverse cracking, and longitudinal cracking. The bituminous pavement is becoming more
brittle due to age and is showing signs of accelerated deterioration. The concrete curb and gutter is in
overall fair condition, with cracking occurring mostly at valley gutters for the commercial and industrial
driveways.
The existing right-of-way (ROW) width for the project ranges from 66 to 100 feet.
A geotechnical report was completed by WSB in November of 2018. A total of five soil borings were taken
at various locations throughout the project area. The borings indicate bituminous pavement thicknesses
from 4 inches to 6 inches. Underlying the pavement was approximately 8 inches to 14 inches of
aggregate base. The borings showed silty sand material below the aggregate. The full report can be
found in Appendix B.
3.2 Bituminous Trail
An existing 8-foot wide bituminous trail is located on the west side Fish Point Road SE. The trail
pavement is in poor condition with transverse cracking, heaving and spalling.
3.3 Concrete Sidewalk
Existing, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk extends along the east side Fish Point Road SE for the entire
length of the project. The sidewalk pavement is in overall fair condition but include some cracked and
settled panels. Pedestrian ramps at the intersection of Fish Point Road SE and Blind Lake Trail and at the
intersection of Fish Point Road SE and Fawn Meadow Curve are cracked, have settled panels, and do
not meet current ADA standards.
3.4 Public Utilities
The City of Prior Lake owns, operates and maintains storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain within
the project area.
3.4.1 Storm Sewer and Drainage
Existing storm sewer infrastructure exists within the project area. Storm sewer was installed in
1994. Storm sewer in the project area flows to wetlands and ponds adjacent to the project area.
Based on field observations, the existing storm sewer is in fair condition.
3.4.2 Sanitary Sewer
The sanitary sewer system within the project area was constructed in 1994 and consists of 8-inch
PVC pipe. The sanitary sewer for the project area flows north towards the sanitary sewer along
Cottonwood Lane, which then flows east towards the Waterfront Passage Business Park. Based
on field observations, the existing sanitary sewer manholes and castings are in fair condition.
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 4
3.4.3 Watermain
The watermain system within the project area was installed in 1994. The existing watermain
consists of 16-inch ductile iron pipe north of Cottonwood Lane and 12-inch ductile iron pipe south
of Cottonwood Lane. The existing pipe is in fair condition. There is no history of watermain breaks
in the project area.
3.5 Private Utilities
Private utilities that have facilities in or near the project area will be notified during the final design phase
of the project and will be requested to coordinate any necessary repairs and replacements as needed at
their cost. Private utility companies that have facilities within the pro ject area include the following:
▪ Center Point Energy (Gas)
▪ CenturyLink (Telephone)
▪ Mediacom (Fiber Optic/Cable)
▪ Scott Rice/Integra Telephone (Telephone)
▪ Xcel Energy (Electric)
▪ Zayo (Telecom)
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 5
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
4.1 Street
Full depth reclamation of the bituminous roadway with spot curb and gutter repairs is recommended for
Fish Point Road SE. The underlying utility conditions and the existing subgrade beneath the bituminous
pavement do not require a full reconstruction of the roadway. This design is based on soil conditions
found from the soil borings (see Appendix B) and previous project experience.
All proposed improvements are located within platted right-of-way so no permanent easements will be
required. Temporary construction easements or waivers of trespass may be required for grading
purposes while replacing cracked curb and gutter near driveway entrances.
4.2 Bituminous Trail
Removal and replacement of the bituminous trail is recommended for the entire length of the project.
4.3 Concrete Sidewalk
Spot replacement of concrete sidewalk is proposed. All pedestrian ramps are proposed to be
reconstructed to meet current ADA regulations.
4.4 Public Utilities
Due to the condition of the City owned and operated utilities, all existing ut ilities are to remain in-place.
Casting adjustments may be necessary for catch basins and manholes within the project area.
4.5 Permits/Approvals
The anticipated permits and approvals required, and the respective regulatory agencies are listed below:
▪ Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES) ............................... Erosion/Storm Water Permit
4.6 Construction Access/Staging
The contractor will be responsible for providing access to all properties throughout the project. Access to
driveways is restricted during and after concrete curb and aprons are constructed. Parking on the street is
not allowed so access to parking lots will be maintained throughout construction. Access to the Prior Lake
Fire Station located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE needs to be maintained throughout the project and the
contractor shall coordinate work around the entrances to the station as needed. Adequately signed
detours will be identified to direct traffic around the construction zones and notify users of the increased
truck and construction activity.
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 6
5. FINANCING
5.1 Opinion of Probable Cost
A detailed opinion of probable cost is included in Appendix C of this report. The opinion of probable cost
is based on projected construction costs for 2019 and includes a 10% contingency and 28% indirect
costs. The indirect costs include engineering, legal, and administrative costs associated with the project.
The project costs are summarized as follows:
Table 2
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
Improvement Estimated Cost
Street Improvements $311,500.00
Bituminous Trail Improvements $134,310.00
GRAND TOTAL $445,810.00
5.2 Funding
The proposed funding for the improvements is a combination of funding from City funds and assessment
to benefiting properties. The City’s funding is from the tax levy. The proposed funding source for each
improvement is identified below:
Table 3
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
Funding Summary
Funding Source Amount
Assessments $124,600.00*
Tax Levy $321,210.00
GRAND TOTAL $445,810.00
*40% of the street costs
5.3 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Assessments will be levied to the benefiting properties as outlined in Minnesota Statute 429 and the City
of Prior Lake’s Assessment Policy. Special Assessments to benefiting properties are proposed to fund
40% of the street improvements identified for the project, with the remaining 60% paid for with a tax levy.
Trail and sidewalk improvements will be funded using only City funds.
The Assessment Review Committee met on November 27, 2018, and reviewed both the front footage and
lot area assessment methods. Due to the small difference in cost per property between the two methods
and the City’s use of the lot area method on several recent projects, the Assessment Review Committee
determined it was most appropriate to use the lot area assessment method for this project. The proposed
assessment roll is included in Appendix D of this report, along with an assessment map identifying the
benefiting properties. The area assessment is calculated as shown below:
Amount to be Assessed = $124,600.00
Total Parcel Area = 18.94 acres
Proposed per Acre Assessment = $6,580.56
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 7
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The proposed project schedule for the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project is as follows:
Accept Feasibility Report/Set Public Hearing ........................................................... December 17, 2018
Public Improvement Hearing/Order Project ........................................................................ January 2019
Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Ad for Bid .................................................... February 2019
Open Bids .............................................................................................................................. March 2019
Accept Bids/Award Construction Contract ............................................................................... April 2019
Begin Construction ................................................................................................................... May 2019
Substantial Completion .................................................................................................. September 2019
Conduct Assessment Hearing/Adopt Assessment Roll................................................. September 2019
Final Completion (Final Lift of Bituminous Wear Course) .................................................. October 2019
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 8
7. FEASIBILITY, NECESSITY, AND COST EFFECTIVENESS
The improvements proposed in this study are necessary for a number of reasons. The reconstruction of
the streets provides the City with a cost-effective means of continuing the City’s street improvement
efforts and ensuring an adequate means of transportation for local residents. The reconstruction of
sidewalk and trail within the area is ideal at this time due to the reconstruction of the roads and the
worsening state of the pedestrian ramps at the intersections on the project. These improvements will
provide a longer lasting product needing less maintenance over time.
The proposed improvements constitute a project large enough to ensure a competitive bidding
environment, economy of scale, and are deemed to be cost-effective. Based on the information
contained within this report, the proposed project is deemed necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from
an engineering standpoint. The project feasibility is subject to financial review by the City.
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000 Page 9
8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Fish Point Road Reclamation Project was identified in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The
project area extends along Fish Point Road SE between County Road 21 and Fawn Meadow Curve.
The roadway improvements include full depth reclamation of the bituminous roadway and spot curb and
gutter repairs. The existing trail that runs on the west side of the road has deteriorated and in need of
replacement. Replacing this trail, in conjunction with the proposed street improvements, provides an
opportunity to minimize the replacement costs and traffic disruptions associated with the work. It is also
recommended that all pedestrian curb ramps on the project be replaced to current ADA standards and
repairs made to the existing sidewalk.
The total estimate cost for the Fish Point Road Reclamation Project is $445,810.00. Funding for the
project will be provided through assessments to benefiting properties and City funds.
The proposed improvements constitute a project large enough to ensure a competitive bidding
environment, economy of scale, and are deemed to be cost-effective. Based on the information contained
within this report, the proposed improvements as described can be consid ered necessary, cost-effective,
and feasible from an engineering standpoint.
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
APPENDIX A
Figures
N
SCALE IN FEET
0 300150
WSB PROJECT NO.:K:\012877-000\Cad\Exhibits\012877-000 Feasibility Report Figures.dwg 12/10/2018 4:12:06 PM12877-000
Figure 1: Project Location
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake, MN
PROJECT LOCATION
B
L
I
N
D
L
A
K
E
T
R
L
S
E
FISH POINT RD SEC
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
L
N
S
E
CURVEFAWN MEAD
CRE
D
I
T
RIVER
RD
SE
EA
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
E
S
E
O
W
WSB PROJECT NO.:K:\012877-000\Cad\Exhibits\012877-000 Feasibility Report Figures.dwg 12/10/2018 4:12:07 PM12877-000
Figure 2: Typical Section
City of Prior Lake, MN
EXISTING
B618 CURB
& GUTTER
EXISTING
B618 CURB
& GUTTER
33' TO 50' R/W 33' TO 50' R/W
14' TO 15' DRIVING LANE 14' TO 15' DRIVING LANE8' TRAIL 8'
BLVD
10'
BLVD
5' CONC WALK
℄
1.5" TYPE 9.5 SP WEAR COURSE MIX (SPWEA240C)
2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT
2" TYPE 12.5 SP NON WEAR COURSE MIX (SPNWB230C)
11" RECLAIMED AGGREGATE BASE
1.5" TYPE 9.5 SP WEAR COURSE MIX (SPWEA240C)
2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT
6" AGGREGATE BASE CL 5
100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE
2.5" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
6" CONCRETE
SIDEWALK
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
WSB PROJECT NO.:K:\012877-000\Cad\Exhibits\012877-000 Feasibility Report Figures.dwg 12/10/2018 4:12:07 PM12877-000
Figure 3: Existing Trail and Sidewalk Condition
City of Prior Lake, MN
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
APPENDIX B
Geotechnical Report
GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT
2019 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FISH POINT ROAD SE | PRIOR LAKE, MN
November 8, 2018
Prepared for:
City of Prior Lake
17073 Adelmann Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
WSB PROJECT NO. 012877-000
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000
2019 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FISH POINT ROAD SE
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
FOR
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
NOVEMBER 8, 2018
CERTIFICATION
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Mark W. Osborn, PE
Date: November 8, 2018 Lic. No. 41362
540 Gateway Boulevard | Suite 100 | Burnsville, MN 55337 | (952) 737-4660
Building a legacy – your legacy.
Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com
November 8, 2018
Mr. Jason Wedel, PE
City Engineer
City of Prior Lake
17073 Adelmann Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Re: Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
Fish Point Road SE
Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No.: 012877-000
We have conducted a geotechnical subsurface exploration program for the above referenced project.
This report contains our soil boring logs, an evaluation of the conditions encountered in the borings and
our recommendations for reconstruction of the street and related construction considerations.
If you have any questions concerning this report or our recommendations, or for construction material
testing for this project, please call us at (952) 737-4660.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Mark Osborn, PE Darin Hyatt, PE
Geotechnical Project Engineer Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Attachment:
Geotechnical Report
MWO/tw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000
TITLE SHEET
CERTIFICATION SHEET
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1
Project Location ......................................................................................................................... 1
Project Description .................................................................................................................... 1
Purpose and Project Scope of Services .................................................................................... 1
2. PROCEDURES ..................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Boring Layout and Soil Sampling Procedures ........................................................................... 2
2.2 Groundwater Measurements and Borehole Abandonment ....................................................... 2
2.3 Boring Log Procedures and Qualifications ................................................................................ 2
3. EXPLORATION RESULTS .................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Site and Geology ....................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater Conditions .......................................................................... 3
3.3 Strength Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 3
3.4 Groundwater Conditions ............................................................................................................ 3
4. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. 5
4.1 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 5
4.2 Pavement Areas ........................................................................................................................ 5
4.3 Frost Free Pavement Design ..................................................................................................... 6
4.4 Backfill and Fill Selection and Compaction ............................................................................... 7
4.5 Construction Considerations ..................................................................................................... 7
4.6 Construction Safety ................................................................................................................... 7
4.7 Cold Weather Construction ....................................................................................................... 7
4.8 Field Observation and Testing................................................................................................... 8
4.9 Plan Review and Remarks ........................................................................................................ 8
5. STANDARD OF CARE ......................................................................................................................... 9
Appendix A
Soil Boring Exhibit
Logs of Test Borings
Symbols and Terminology on Test Boring Log
Notice to Report Users Boring Log Information
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION
Project Location
The site is located along Fish Point Road SE between Eagle Creek Avenue SE and Fawn Meadow Curve
SE, within the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota. The approximate soil boring locations can be found on the
Soil Boring Exhibit in Appendix A.
Project Description
The roadway is 2-lanes and bituminous surfaced, with concrete curb and gutters.
It is proposed to reconstruct the roadway including spot replacement of the concrete curb and gutter, soil
corrections below the pavement section where necessary, and all new bituminous pavement. We
understand that no sanitary or watermain utility reconstruction is planned, other than replacement of
some gate valves and repair of manholes.
We understand that the horizontal and vertical alignment of the roadway will not be changed from existing
conditions.
WSB has developed recommendations for this project in consideration of the proposed layout and
configurations as understood at this time. When the City of Prior Lake (City) develops additional
information, the recommendations presented herein may no longer apply. WSB must be made aware of
the revised or additional information in order to evaluate the recommendations for continued applicability.
Purpose and Project Scope of Services
Emily Lueth with WSB authorized this scope of service. In order to assist the design team in preparing
plans and specifications, we have developed recommendations for subgrade improvements and
pavement section design. As such, we have completed a subsurface exploration program and prepared
a geotechnical report for the referenced site. This stated purpose was a significant factor in determining
the scope and level of service provided. Should the purpose of the report change the report immediately
ceases to be valid and use of it without WSB’s prior review and written authorization shall be at the user’s
sole risk.
Our authorized scope of work has been limited to:
1. Mobilization / demobilization of a truck mounted drill rig.
2. Clearing underground utilities utilizing Gopher State One Call.
3. Drilling 5 standard penetration borings to about 5 foot depths.
4. Sealing the borings per Minnesota Department of Health procedures.
5. Perform soil classification and analysis.
6. Review of readily available project information and geologic data.
7. Providing this geotechnical report containing:
a. Summary of our findings.
b. Discussion of subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and how they may affect the
proposed pavements.
c. Estimated R-value of the soils.
d. Recommended pavement section.
e. A discussion of soils for use as structural fill and site fill.
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 2
2. PROCEDURES
2.1 Boring Layout and Soil Sampling Procedures
WSB proposed to complete 5 standard penetration soil borings along the proposed roadway
reconstruction area. WSB recommended the boring depths and selected the desired locations. Borings
were located based on review of existing aerial maps. The approximate boring locations are shown on
the Soil Boring Exhibit in Appendix A which is an aerial photo. The ground surface elevations at the
borings were not determined.
The borings were performed on November 2, 2018. The drilling was subcontracted to Glacial Ridge
Drilling due to the project schedule. The drill crew advanced the borings using continuous hollow stem
augers. Drilling methods, crew chief, depths, sampling interval, casing usage, groundwater observations,
test data, and other drilling information are indicated on the boring logs.
Generally, the drill crew sampled the soil in advance of the auger tip at two foot intervals to the boring
termination depth. The soil samples were obtained using a split-barrel sampler which was driven into the
ground during standard penetration tests in accordance with ASTM D 1586, Standard Method of
Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils. The materials encountered were described on field
logs and representative samples were containerized, and transported to our laboratory for fur ther
examination and testing.
The samples were visually examined to estimate the distribution of grain sizes, plasticity, consistency,
moisture condition, color, presence of lenses and seams, and apparent geologic origin. We classified the
soils according to type using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A chart describing the USCS
is included in Appendix A.
2.2 Groundwater Measurements and Borehole Abandonment
The drill crew observed the borings for free groundwater while drilling and after completion of the borings.
These observations and measurements are noted on the boring logs. The crew then backfilled the
borings to comply with Minnesota Department of Health regulations.
2.3 Boring Log Procedures and Qualifications
The subsurface conditions encountered by the test borings are illustrated on the Logs of Test Borings in
Appendix A. Similar soils were grouped into the strata shown on the boring logs, and the appropriate
estimated USCS classification symbols were also added. The depths and t hickness of the subsurface
strata indicated on the boring logs were estimated from the drilling results.
The transition between materials (horizontal and vertical) is approximate and is usually far more gradual
than shown. Information on actual subsurface conditions exists only at the specific locations indicated
and is relevant only to the time exploration was performed. Subsurface conditions and groundwater
levels at other locations may differ from conditions found at the indicated locations. The nature and
extent of these conditions would not become evident until exposed by construction excavation. These
stratification lines were used for our analytical purposes and, due to the aforementioned limitations,
should not be used as a basis of design or construction cost estimates.
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 3
3. EXPLORATION RESULTS
3.1 Site and Geology
The borings were completed through the existing bituminous pavement sections.
The Scott County Geologic Atlas indicates that the surficial geology of the area is mostly glacial till
deposits. The glacial tills are unsorted deposits of clays, silts, and sands. Gravel and cobbles may be
encountered in areas as well.
3.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater Conditions
The boring profile generally consisted of the existing pavement sections overlying fills and glacial till
deposits.
Existing Pavements
The existing bituminous pavement ranged in thickness from about 4 to 6 inches, and averaged about 5
inches. The aggregate base material ranged in thickness from about 8 to 14 inches and averaged 10 ½
inches.
Fills
Borings PB-2 and PB-3 encountered clayey sands, sands with clay, and silty sand that appeared to be fill
materials. These soils were brown to dark brown in color and generally moist. The fills extended to
depths of up to 4 feet below grade.
Glacial Till
The glacial till deposits encountered in the borings generally consisted of silt, sands with silt, silty sands,
sandy lean clays, lean clays with sand, and lean clays. These soils were brown to gray in co lor, and were
generally moist and in some instances wet.
3.3 Strength Characteristics
The penetration resistance N-values of the materials encountered were recorded during drilling and are
indicated as blows per foot (BPF). Those values provide an indication of soil strength characteristics and
are located on the boring log sheets. Also, visual-manual classification techniques and apparent moisture
contents were also utilized to make an engineering judgment of the consistency of the materials.
Table 1 presents a summary of the penetration resistances in the soils for the borings completed and
remarks regarding the material strengths of the soils.
Table 1: Penetration Resistances
Soil Type Classification Penetration
Resistances Remarks
Fill Varies 13 to 36 BPF Generally well compacted
Glacial Till CL 9 to 12 BPF
Average 11 BPF
Soft to firm
Generally firm
Glacial Till SP-SM, SP, ML 6 to 14 BPF
Average 11 BPF
Loose to medium dense
Generally medium dense
The preceding is a generalized description of soil conditions at this site. Variations from the generalized
profile exist and should be assessed from the boring logs, the normal geologic character of the deposits,
and the soils uncovered during site excavation.
3.4 Groundwater Conditions
WSB took groundwater level readings in the exploratory borings, re viewed the data obtained, and
discussed its interpretation of the data in the text of the report. Note that groundwater levels may
fluctuate due to seasonal variations (e.g. precipitation, snowmelt and rainfall) and/or other factors not
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 4
evident at the time of measurement. The bore holes were only left open a short period of time, and
groundwater levels may not have stabilized.
No groundwater was encountered during the drilling process . Gray colored soils were encountered in
Borings PB-3, PB-4, and PB-5. Gray colored soils can be an indication of long term saturation conditions
and could show potential groundwater elevations.
Based on the borings, it is our opinion that groundwater will not be encountered during the proposed
reconstruction of the roadway.
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 5
4. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Discussion
Existing Pavements
We understand the entire bituminous pavement area will be removed during the site reconstruction. The
bituminous asphalt is likely reusable as a part of a new bituminous section or recycled within a MnDOT
Class 5 aggregate base material.
Fills
The fills were likely placed during the previous street construction or installation of utilities. Clay fills are
generally acceptable for pavement support, however where they are wet and soft they should be partially
excavated and replaced with an engineered fill. Granular fills would be suitable subgrade materials below
pavement and utility areas.
Glacial till
The natural clays, silts, and silty sands encountered below the pavements and fills range from poor to
good subgrade soils. Clays are generally acceptable for pavement or utility support, however where they
are wet and soft they should be partially excavated and replaced with an engineered fill. Silts are
generally poorly suited as subgrade soils. Silt soils are not recommended for direct support of pavements
due to their high frost heave potential and because they are sensitive to moisture changes , easily
disturbed by construction traffic, and difficult to compact. Where silt soils are present at the top of grading
grade we expect a partial subcut and replacement with an engineered fill will be required.
General
Generally, the soils in the upper 4 feet of the subgrade influence pavement performance the most. The
soils within the pavement subgrade included clays and silts, which are frost susceptible soils.
Consideration should be given to partially subcutting these soils and replacing with a n on-frost
susceptible granular fill to reduce the potential frost heave below the pavement section.
4.2 Pavement Areas
Table 2 below presents the existing roadway pavement section and subgrade profiles.
Table 2: Roadway Soil Boring Profiles
Boring No. Bituminous
Thickness (inches)
Aggregate Base
Thickness (inches)
Subgrade Soils
(Upper 4 feet)
PB-1 5 12 Silt
PB-2 5 8 Fill (Clayey Sand, Sand with Clay)
PB-3 6 10 ½ Fill (Silty Sand), Sandy Lean Clay
PB-4 5 9 Silty Sand
PB-5 4 14 Silty Sand
General
After removal of the existing aggregate base material, we recommend any silt encountered in the
subgrade be excavated a minimum of 2 feet and replaced by a clay or sand fill. Additionally, any soft, wet
clay should be excavated a minimum of 2 feet and replaced by an engineered clay or sand fill. This will
reduce the risk of frost heave and create a more stable subgrade below the roadway.
Proof roll tests should be utilized to help identify areas that may require additional corrective action such
as scarifying, disking, and compaction or sub-excavations. The proof roll test should generally follow the
requirements of MnDOT 2111, except a fully loaded tandem axle dump truck or a full water truck should
be utilized for the proof roll. We also recommend a proof roll be performed again on the aggregate base
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 6
just prior to placement of the bituminous pavement. Where aggregate base proof roll tests fail to meet
project specifications, we recommend the aggregate base be excavated and subgrade soils be excavated
a minimum of 1 foot and replaced with a granular fill. Deeper excavations may be necessary depending
on the condition of the subgrade soils.
Once the site has been prepared as recommended, we anticipate the subgrade will consist of a mixture of
sandy lean clay, sand with clay, clayey sand, silty sand, and silts. Based on a MnDOT Technical Memo
from June 2014, these soils would have estimated R-values of about 10 to 30. Based on our
recommendations, it is our opinion a design R-value of 15 should be used for this roadway.
Based on MnDOT Traffic Data available online, the roadway has an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
ranging from 3,000 to 3,700 vehicles. Based on traffic counts of 3,700 vehicles in 2015, we used a 3%
growth rate to determine traffic counts for the design period of the roadway (2019 to 2039). We used
MinniESAL Traffic Forecast Program available from MnDOT to determine the Estimated Single Axle
Loads (ESAL’s) of the roadway. Based on an urban vehicle distribution and a 10-ton roadway design, we
calculated the ESAL’s to be approximately 521,000.
We used MnPAVE software (version 6.3) available from MnDOT and utilizing a mechanistic-empirical
design method to determine recommended pavement section thicknesses. Based on the above design
criteria, we recommend the pavement section in Table 3. This pavement section is similar to average
existing pavement conditions.
Table 3: Recommended Flexible Pavement Section
Section Thickness (inches)
Bituminous Wear Course, MnDOT 2360 2 ½
Bituminous Base Course, MnDOT 2360 2 ½
MnDOT Class 5 Aggregate Base 11
Within several years after initial paving, some thermal shrinkage cracks will develop. We recommend
routine maintenance be performed to improve pavement performance and increase pavement life.
Pavement should be sealed with a liquid bitumen sealer to ret ard water intrusion into the base course and
subgrade. Localized patch failures may also develop where trucks or buses turn on the pavement. When
these occur, they should be cut out and patch repaired.
The pavement sections in Table 3 above provides options to meet the requirements per MnPave design.
Other pavement design options would be acceptable as well as long as they meet the minimum
requirements for bituminous thickness, aggregate base thickness, and can meet the ESAL requirements.
4.3 Frost Free Pavement Design
Optionally, the use of a non-frost susceptible sand cushion will help reduce the effects of frost heave.
Based on the design section in Table 3, in our opinion placement of 12 inches of select granular fill below
the Class 5 Aggregate Base should generally provide for a non-frost susceptible subgrade. It should be
noted that any granular fill placed below the pavement section will provide positive benefits for reduced
potential frost heave. The owner should evaluate the costs and benefit of this option.
Drainage of this sand cushion will be necessary. Drain tile wrapped in a sock should be placed at the
base of the sand cushion and tied into catch basins. We recommend the sand cushion contain a select
granular sand with less than 12% passing the #200 sieve. Alternately, a 3 inch minus rock fill could be
placed instead of a select granular sand.
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 7
4.4 Backfill and Fill Selection and Compaction
The on-site non-organic soils may be reused as backfill and fill provided they are moistur e conditioned
and can be compacted to their specified densities. Any wet soils excavated would need to be dried
before reuse as an engineered fill. We recommend use of a minimum of 2 feet of clean coarse sand with
less than 50 percent passing the #40 sieve and less than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve when
backfilling the bottom of a wet excavation.
Backfills with cobbles larger than six inches (6”) should not be placed below pavements. We recommend
that sandy soils be moisture conditioned to meet compaction specifications and clay soils be moisture
conditioned to within 2 percent below to 2 percent above their optimum moisture contents as determined
from their standard Proctor tests (ASTM D-698). Fill should be spread in lifts of 8 to 10 inches for clays
and 10 to 12 inches for sands, depending on the size and type of compaction equipment used.
Table 4 provides the recommended compaction levels.
Table 4: Recommended Level of Compaction for Backfill and Fill
Area Percent of Standard Proctor
Maximum Dry Density
Pavement: Within 3 feet of grading grade 100
Pavement: Greater than 3 feet below grading grade 95
Landscaping (non-structural) 90
4.5 Construction Considerations
Good surface drainage should be maintained throughout the work so that the site is not vulnerable to
ponding during or after a rainfall. The excavation for any soil correction should not encounter
groundwater intrusion. However, if water does enter excavations, it should be promptly removed prior to
further construction activities. Under no circumstances should fill be placed into standing water.
Soil corrections at this site for pavement subgrades may not be continuous in all areas. We recommend
tapering the fills back to native soils at a ten to one (10:1) slope.
4.6 Construction Safety
All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P “Excavations
and Trenches”. This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor.
Reference to this OSHA requirement should be included in the job specifications.
The responsibility to provide safe working conditions on this site, for earthwork, building construction, or
any associated operations is solely that of the contractor. This responsibility is not borne in any manner
by WSB.
4.7 Cold Weather Construction
It is our understanding that construction is unlikely to occur during the winter months. However, if the
construction does continue into the winter months we recommend the following guidelines.
Roadbed embankments should not be constructed during periods when the embankment material freezes
while being placed and compacted, nor should any embankment material be placed on soil that is frozen
to a depth greater than 4 inches. When the soils are frozen to a depth exceeding 4 inches, at a time
when weather conditions are such that embankment construction could be continued without the material
freezing as it is being placed and compacted, the contractor may be permitted to excavate the frozen soil
and proceed with the embankment construction for so long as the weather will permit. The frozen soils
should be pulverized or replaced with other suitable soils, as may be necessary to construct the
embankments as specified. Only unfrozen fill should be used.
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 8
4.8 Field Observation and Testing
The soil conditions illustrated on the Logs of Test Borings in Appendix A are indicative of the conditions
only at the boring locations.
WSB also recommends a representative number of field density tests be taken in all engineere d fill and
backfill placed to aid in judging its suitability. Fill placement and compaction should be monitored and
tested to determine that the resulting fill and backfill conforms to specified density, strength or
compressibility requirements. We recommend at least one compaction test for every 150 feet of roadway
at a vertical interval of two (2) feet. Prior to use, any proposed fill and backfill material should be
submitted to the WSB laboratory for testing to verify compliance with recommendations and project
specifications.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests can be completed in the aggregate base in lieu of density
testing. W e recommend following MnDOT Specification 2211.3.D.2.c.
WSB would be pleased to provide the necessary field observation, monitoring and testing services during
construction.
4.9 Plan Review and Remarks
The observations, recommendations and conclusions described in this report are based primarily on
information provided to WSB, obtained from our subsurface exploration, our experience, several
necessary assumptions and the scopes of service developed for this project and are for the sole use of
our client. We recommend that WSB be retained to perform a review of final design drawing and
specifications to evaluate that the geotechnical engineering report has not been misinterpreted. Should
there be any changes in the design related to this project or if there are any uncertainties in the report we
should be notified. We would be pleased to review any project changes and modify the
recommendations in this report (if necessary) or provide any clarification in writing.
The entire report should be kept together; for example, boring logs should not be removed and placed in
the specifications separately.
The boring logs and related information included in this report are indicators of the subsurface conditions
only at the specific locations indicated on the Soil Boring Exhibit and times noted on the Logs of Test
Boring sheets in Appendix A. The subsurface conditions, including groundwater levels, at other
locations on the site may differ significantly from conditions that existed at the time of sampling and at the
boring locations.
The test borings were put down by WSB solely to obtain indications of subsurface conditions as part of a
geotechnical exploration program. No services were performed to evaluate subsurface environmental
conditions.
WSB has not performed any observations, investigations, studies or testing that is not specifically listed in
the scope of service. WSB shall not be liable for failing to discover any condition whose discovery
required the performance of services not authorized by the Agreement.
Geotechnical Report
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000 Page 9
5. STANDARD OF CARE
The recommendations and opinions contained in this report are based on our professional judgment. The
soil testing and geotechnical engineering services performed for this project have been performed with
the level of skill and diligence ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the same profession under
similar circumstances, at the same time and in the same or a similar locale. No warranty, either
expressed or implied, is made.
Geotechnical Report Appendix A
2019 Street Improvements
City of Prior Lake, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 012877-000
APPENDIX A
Soil Borings Exhibit
Logs of Test Borings
Symbols and Terminology on Test Boring Log
Notice to Report Users Boring Log Information
Unified Soil Classification Sheet (USCS)
E
A
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V S
E
B L IN D L A K E T R L S E
LI
LACLN SEC R ED ITR IVER
R D SEITASCAAV SEWILDERNESS TRL SEFAWN
MEADOW
CURVE SEFAWNMEADOW CURVE SEFISH POINT RD SEWYND
HAMCT SEWE
L
L
I
NGT
ONCT
S
E
CREDITRIVERRD SEFISHPOINTRD SEEAGLE CREE
K AV SE
F AW N M EA D O W C U R VE SELEXINGTONCT SELILAC
LN SE
W IN D SO R
L N S E
BROOKS CIR SE
ADELMANN ST SECRIMSON CT SEFAWN CT SEC
OT
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
L
N
SE
EA
GLE CREEK AV
C
R
E
D
I
T
R
I
V
E
R
R
D
S
E
Project Location
0200Feet¯Project Map
2019 Street Reconstruction Project
Prior Lake, MN Document Path: K:\010344-000\GIS\Maps\JUNK.mxd Date Saved: 9/11/2018 4:23:56 PM1 inch = 382 feet
3 1/4" HSA 0' - 4.5'
ML
SP-SM
Pavement Section
Glacial Till
1
2
3
SB
SB
SB
28
18
13
5" BITUMINOUS ASPHALT
12" BASE: Sand with Gravel and Silt, dark brown, moist
SILT, brown, moist, medium dense
SAND WITH SILT, fine grained, light brown, moist,
medium dense
End of Boring 6.0 ft.
TIME CASING
DEPTH
CAVE-IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
WATER
ELEVATION
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
SAMPLED
DEPTHDATE METHOD
START: 11/02/2018 END: 11/02/2018
Logged By:
MWOGRD
Notes:
Crew Chief:
LABORATORY TESTS
MC
(%)
DD
(pcf)
LL
(%)
PL
(%)
4.5 269:00 am11/02/2018 None
PROJECT NAME: 2019 Street Improvements
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT LOCATION: Prior Lake, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB-1
PAGE 1 OF 1CLIENT/WSB #: 012877-000
DEPTH
(ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
USCS GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
SAMPLE
No.TYPEWLN
WSB BORING LOG - WSB.GDT - 11/5/18 14:28 - C:\USERS\MARKO\DOCUMENTS\PRIOR LAKE - 2019 ST IMP 012877-000.GPJDESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
3 1/4" HSA 0' - 4.5'
Fill
SP-SC
SM
Pavement Section
Fill
Glacial Till
1
2
3
SB
SB
SB
25
20
6
5" BITUMINOUS ASPHALT
8" BASE: Crushed Limestone
FILL, Clayey Sand with Gravel, dark brown, moist
FILL, Sand with a little Clay, dark brown, moist
SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, moist, loose
End of Boring 6.0 ft.
TIME CASING
DEPTH
CAVE-IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
WATER
ELEVATION
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
SAMPLED
DEPTHDATE METHOD
START: 11/02/2018 END: 11/02/2018
Logged By:
MWOGRD
Notes:
Crew Chief:
LABORATORY TESTS
MC
(%)
DD
(pcf)
LL
(%)
PL
(%)
4.5 269:45 am11/02/2018 None
PROJECT NAME: 2019 Street Improvements
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT LOCATION: Prior Lake, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB-2
PAGE 1 OF 1CLIENT/WSB #: 012877-000
DEPTH
(ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
USCS GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
SAMPLE
No.TYPEWLN
WSB BORING LOG - WSB.GDT - 11/5/18 14:28 - C:\USERS\MARKO\DOCUMENTS\PRIOR LAKE - 2019 ST IMP 012877-000.GPJDESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
3 1/4" HSA 0' - 4.5'
SM
CL
Pavement Section
Fill
Glacial Till
1
2
3
SB
SB
SB
26
12
12
6" BITUMINOUS ASPHALT
10 1/2" BASE: Crushed Limestone
FILL, Silty Sand, brown, moist
SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, moist, firm
End of Boring 6.0 ft.
TIME CASING
DEPTH
CAVE-IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
WATER
ELEVATION
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
SAMPLED
DEPTHDATE METHOD
START: 11/02/2018 END: 11/02/2018
Logged By:
MWOGRD
Notes:
Crew Chief:
LABORATORY TESTS
MC
(%)
DD
(pcf)
LL
(%)
PL
(%)
4.5 2610:30 am11/02/2018 None
PROJECT NAME: 2019 Street Improvements
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT LOCATION: Prior Lake, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB-3
PAGE 1 OF 1CLIENT/WSB #: 012877-000
DEPTH
(ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
USCS GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
SAMPLE
No.TYPEWLN
WSB BORING LOG - WSB.GDT - 11/5/18 14:28 - C:\USERS\MARKO\DOCUMENTS\PRIOR LAKE - 2019 ST IMP 012877-000.GPJDESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
3 1/4" HSA 0' - 4.5'
SM
CL
Pavement Section
Glacial Till
1
2
3
SB
SB
SB
13
14
10
5" BITUMINOUS ASPHALT
9" BASE: Crushed Limestone
SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, moist, medium
dense
LEAN CLAY, brownish gray, moist, firm
End of Boring 6.0 ft.
TIME CASING
DEPTH
CAVE-IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
WATER
ELEVATION
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
SAMPLED
DEPTHDATE METHOD
START: 11/02/2018 END: 11/02/2018
Logged By:
MWOGRD
Notes:
Crew Chief:
LABORATORY TESTS
MC
(%)
DD
(pcf)
LL
(%)
PL
(%)
4.5 2611:15 am11/02/2018 None
PROJECT NAME: 2019 Street Improvements
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT LOCATION: Prior Lake, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB-4
PAGE 1 OF 1CLIENT/WSB #: 012877-000
DEPTH
(ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
USCS GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
SAMPLE
No.TYPEWLN
WSB BORING LOG - WSB.GDT - 11/5/18 14:28 - C:\USERS\MARKO\DOCUMENTS\PRIOR LAKE - 2019 ST IMP 012877-000.GPJDESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
3 1/4" HSA 0' - 4.5'
SM
CL
Pavement Section
Glacial Till
1
2
3
SB
SB
SB
36
11
9
4" BITUMINOUS ASPHALT
14" BASE: Crushed Limestone
SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, moist, medium
dense
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND, brown to gray, moist, soft
End of Boring 6.0 ft.
TIME CASING
DEPTH
CAVE-IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
WATER
ELEVATION
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
SAMPLED
DEPTHDATE METHOD
START: 11/02/2018 END: 11/02/2018
Logged By:
MWOGRD
Notes:
Crew Chief:
LABORATORY TESTS
MC
(%)
DD
(pcf)
LL
(%)
PL
(%)
4.5 2612:00 pm11/02/2018 None
PROJECT NAME: 2019 Street Improvements
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT LOCATION: Prior Lake, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB-5
PAGE 1 OF 1CLIENT/WSB #: 012877-000
DEPTH
(ft)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
USCS GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
SAMPLE
No.TYPEWLN
WSB BORING LOG - WSB.GDT - 11/5/18 14:28 - C:\USERS\MARKO\DOCUMENTS\PRIOR LAKE - 2019 ST IMP 012877-000.GPJDESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
SYMBOLS AND TERMINOLOGY ON TEST BORING LOG
SYMBOLS
Drilling and Sampling Laboratory Testing
Symbol Description
HSA 3-1/4” LD. Hollow stem auger
_ FA 4”, 6” or 10” diameter flight auger
_HA 2”, 4”, or 6” hand auger
_DC 2-1/2”, 4”, 5”, or 6” steel drive casing
_RC Size A, B or N rotary casing
PD Pipe drill or cleanout tube
CS Continuous split barrel sampling
DM Drilling mud
JW Jetting water
SB 2” O.D. split barrel sampling
_L 2-1/2” or 3-1/2” O.D. SB liner sampler
_T 2” or 3” thin walled tube sample
3TP 3” thin walled tube using pitcher sampler
_TO 2” or 3” thin walled tube using Osterberg
sampler
W Wash sample
B Bag sample
P Test pit sample
_Q BQ, NQ, or PQ wire line system
_X AX, BX, or NX double tube barrel
N Standard penetration test, blows per foot
CR Core recovery, percent
WL Water level
ź Water level
NMR No measurement recorded, primarily due
to presence of drilling or coring fluid.
Symbol Description
W Water content, % (ASTM** D2216)
D Dry density, pcf
LL Liquid limit (ASTM D4318)
PL Plastic limit (ASTM D4318)
-Inserts in last column (Qu or RQD)-
Qu Unconfined compressive strength, psf (ASTM D2166)
Pq Penetrometer reading, tsf (ASTM D1558)
Ts Torvane reading, tsf
G Specific gravity (ASTM D854)
SL Shrinkage limits (ASTM D427)
OC Organic content-combustion method (ASTM D2974)
SP Swell pressure, tsf (ASTM D4546)
PS Percent swell under pressure (ASTM D4546)
FS Free swell, % (ASTM D4546)
SS Shrink swell, % (ASTM D4546)
pH Hydrogen ion content-Meter Method (ASTM D4972)
SC Sulfate content, parts/million or mg/l
CC Chloride content, parts/million or mg/l
C* One dimensional consolidation (ASTM D2435)
Qc* Triaxial compression (ASSTM D2850 and D4767)
D.S.* Direct Shear (ASTM D3080)
K* Coefficient of permeability, cm/sec (ASTM D2434)
P* Pinhole test (ASTM D4647)
DH* Double hydrometer (ASTM D4221)
MA* Particle size analysis (ASTM D422)
R Laboratory electrical resistivity, ohm-cm (ASTM G57)
E* Pressuremeter deformation modulus, tsf (ASTM D4719)
PM* Pressuremeter test (ASTM D4719)
VS* Field vane shear (ASTM D2573)
IR* Infiltrometer test (ASTM D3385)
RQD Rock quality designation, percent
*Results shown on attached data sheet or graph
**ASTM designates American Society for Testing and Materials
TERMINOLOGY
Particle Sizes Soil layering and Moisture
Type Size Range
Boulders > 12”
Cobbles 3” – 12”
Coarse gravel 3/4” – 3”
Fine gravel #4 sieve – 3/4”
Coarse sand #4 - #10 sieve
Medium sand #10-#40 sieve
Fine sand #40-#200 sieve
Silt 100% passing #200 sieve and > 0.005mm
Clay 100% passing #200 sieve and < 0.005mm
Term Visual Observation
Lamination Up to 1/4” thick stratum
Varved Altering laminations of any combination of
clay, silt, fine sand, or colors
Lenses Small pockets of different soils in a soil mass
Stratified Altering layers of varying materials or colors
Layer 1/4” to 12” thick stratum
Dry Powdery, no noticeable water
Moist Damp, below saturation
Waterbearing Pervious soil below water
Wet Saturated, above liquid limit
Gravel Content Standard Penetration Resistance
Coarse-Grained Soils Fine-Grained Soils Cohesionless Soils Cohesive Soils
% Gravel Description
2-15 A little gravel
16-49 With gravel
% Gravel Description
< 5 Trace of gravel
5-15 A little gravel
16-30 With gravel
31-49 Gravelly
N-Value Relative Density
0-4 Very loose
5-10 Loose
11-30 Medium dense
31-50 Dense
> 50 Very dense
N-Value Consistency
0-4 Very soft
5-8 Soft
9-15 Firm
16-30 Hard
> 30 Very hard
NOTICE TO REPORT USERS BORING LOG INFORMATION
Subsurface Profiles
The subsurface stratification lines on the graphic representation of the test borings show an approximate
boundary between soil types or rock. The transition between materials is approximate and is usually far more
gradual than shown. Estimating excavation depths, soil volumes and other computations relying on the
subsurface strata may not be possible to any degree of accuracy.
Water Level
WSB & Associates, Inc. took groundwater level readings in the exploratory borings, reviewed the data
obtained, and discussed its interpretation of the data in the text of this report. The groundwater level may
fluctuate due to seasonal variations caused by precipitation, snowmelt, rainfalls, construction or remediation
activities, and/or other factors not evident at the time of measurement.
The actual determination of the subsurface water level is an interpretative process. Subsurface water level may
not be accurately depicted by the levels indicated on the boring logs. Normally, a subsurface exploration
obtains general information regarding subsurface features for design purposes. An accurate determination of
subsurface water levels is not possible with a typical scope of work. The use of the subsurface water level
information provided for estimating purposes or other site review can present a moderate to high risk of error.
The following information is obtained in the field and noted under “Water Level Measurements” at the bottom
of the log.
Sampled Depth: The lowest depth of soil sampling at the time a water level measurement is taken.
Casing Depth: The depth to the bottom of the casing or hollow-stem auger at the time of water
level measurement.
Cave-In Depth: The depth at which the measuring tape stops in the bore hole.
Water Level: The point in the bore hole at which free-standing water is encountered by a
measuring tape dropped from the surface inside the casing.
Drilling Fluid Level: Similar to the water level, except the liquid in the bore hole is a drilling fluid.
Obstruction Depths
Obstructions and/or obstruction depths may be noted on the boring logs. Obstruction indicates the sampling
equipment encountered resistance to penetration. It must be realized that continuation of drilling, the use of
other drilling equipment or further exploration may provide information other than that depicted on the logs.
The correlation of obstruction depths on the log with construction features such as rock excavation, foundation
depths, or buried debris cannot normally be determined with any degree of accuracy. For example, penetration
of weathered rock by soil sampling equipment may not correlate with removal by certain types of construction
equipment. Using this information for estimating purposes often results in a high degree of misinterpretation.
Accurately identifying the obstruction or estimating depths where hard rock is present over the site requires a
scope of service beyond the normal geotechnical exploration program. The risk of using the information noted
on the boring logs for estimating purposes must be understood.
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
APPENDIX C
Opinion of Probable Cost
WSB Project:Fish Point Road Reclamation Project Design By:KJG
Project Location:Prior Lake Checked By:EAL
City Project No.:TRN19-000003
WSB Project No:012877-000 Date:12/10/2018
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
Description Unit Estimated Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$
2 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN EACH 22 50.00$ 1,100.00$
3 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 200 3.00$ 600.00$
4 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB L F 235 5.00$ 1,175.00$
5 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 140 10.00$ 1,400.00$
6 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 110 7.50$ 825.00$
7 2104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 1 150.00$ 150.00$
8 2104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX SPECIAL EACH 1 500.00$ 500.00$
9 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 269 22.00$ 5,915.58$
10 2105.507 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)C Y 167 22.00$ 3,674.00$
11 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 40 150.00$ 6,000.00$
12 2130.523 WATER MGAL 40 50.00$ 2,000.00$
13 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 5640 3.00$ 16,920.00$
14 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 600 3.00$ 1,800.00$
15 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(3;B) 3.0" THICK S Y 110 30.00$ 3,300.00$
16 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C)TON 1000 65.00$ 65,000.00$
17 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3;C)TON 760 65.00$ 49,400.00$
18 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE EACH 2 250.00$ 500.00$
19 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 8 350.00$ 2,800.00$
20 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 235 25.00$ 5,875.00$
21 2531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 80 60.00$ 4,800.00$
22 2531.604 8" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER S Y 60 60.00$ 3,600.00$
23 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$
24 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F 171 47.50$ 8,122.50$
25 2565.603 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6'EACH 7 1,000.00$ 7,000.00$
26 2565.603 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X8'EACH 1 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$
27 2565.603 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X10'EACH 1 1,200.00$ 1,200.00$
28 2565.603 3" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT EACH 80 9.25$ 740.00$
29 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$
30 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 150.00$ 1,500.00$
31 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 840 3.50$ 2,940.00$
32 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 20 30.00$ 600.00$
33 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 130 5.00$ 650.00$
34 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 MGAL 3 600.00$ 1,800.00$
35 2575.523 WATER MGAL 30 45.00$ 1,350.00$
36 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 200 1.00$ 200.00$
37 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 980 2.00$ 1,960.00$
38 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 30 8.00$ 240.00$
39 2582.518 CROSSWALK PAINT S F 100 5.00$ 500.00$
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 221,237.08$
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)22,120.00$
SUBTOTAL 243,360.00$
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (28%)68,140.00$
TOTAL 311,500.00$
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
A. SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
40 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$
41 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB L F 160 5.00$ 800.00$
42 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 2050 3.00$ 6,150.00$
43 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK S F 9400 2.00$ 18,800.00$
44 2105.507 COMMON EXCAVATION C Y 220 15.00$ 3,300.00$
45 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 2050 10.00$ 20,500.00$
46 2521.518 3" BITUMINOUS WALK S F 9400 2.50$ 23,500.00$
47 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 160 22.00$ 3,520.00$
48 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 165 40.00$ 6,600.00$
49 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER L F 1175 3.50$ 4,112.50$
50 2574.507 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW C Y 89 30.00$ 2,670.00$
51 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN S Y 523 5.00$ 2,615.00$
52 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 MGAL 1 600.00$ 600.00$
53 2575.523 WATER MGAL 5 45.00$ 225.00$
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 95,392.50$
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)9,540.00$
SUBTOTAL 104,930.00$
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (28%)29,380.00$
TOTAL 134,310.00$
PROJECT TOTAL - 445,810.00$
B. BITUMINOUS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
Feasibility Report
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
City of Prior Lake Project No. TRN19-000003
WSB Project No. R-012877-000
APPENDIX D
Assessment Map
Preliminary Assessment Roll
2
1
5
3
4
FISH POINT RD SEEA
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
BLIND
L
A
K
E
T
R
L
S
E
FAWN CT SE
CO
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
L
N
S
E
EA
G
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
A
V
S
E
C
R
I
M
S
O
N
C
T
S
E CREDIT RIVER RD SELEXIN
G
T
O
N
C
T
S
E
Project Location
Assessed Parcels
0 200Feet¯Assessment Map
Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
Prior Lake, MN Document Path: K:\012877-000\GIS\Maps\AssessmentMap.mxd Date Saved: 12/10/2018 4:34:53 PM1 inch = 200 feet
WSB Project:Fish Point Road Reclamation Project
Project Location:City of Prior Lake 6,580.56$ / ACRE
WSB Project No. :012877-000
Date:12/10/2018
MapID PIN OWNER NAME CITY/STATE ZIP
CODE
LOT AREA
(ACRE)
PROPOSED TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
1 252960040 16776 FISH POINT ROAD SE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 4646 DAKOTA STREET SE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 5.369 35,333.73$
2 253180500 16551 BLIND LAKE TRAIL SE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 4646 DAKOTA STREET SE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 6.519 42,897.37$
3 252960030 17021 FISH POINT ROAD SE H & S INVESTMENTS LLC 17021 FISH POINT ROAD SE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 2.134 14,044.64$
4 252960022 17001 FISH POINT ROAD SE CAL-TEX PROPERTIES LLC 17001 FISH POINT ROAD SE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 1.806 11,881.41$
5 252960021 16873 FISH POINT ROAD SE S & K HOLDINGS LLC 16873 FISH POINT ROAD SE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 3.107 20,442.85$
Total - Fish Point Road Reclamation Project Assessment 124,600.00$
PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER STREET ADDRESS
Assessment Roll
ASSESSMENT RATE