HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-73 Griffith VA Survey pg 32
APPLICA TIONS
&
APPLICA TION
MA TERIALS
.
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
Planning Case File No.
Property Identification No.
r:
03-73
::Z^--/~Z- OlS--O
\, ~".;
'-1
I
',-.
City of Prior Lake . ,
, .
ZONINGILAND USE APPLICATIONa 2 ~ .
'U \~'-
j 1)1
:j /:
JL/ '
j' - '--'-'-'-"'-"'~-.__.". - J
Brief d of ed oroied
Type of Application (Please describe the proposed amendment, project, or variance
request. Attach additional sheets if necessary).
0 Amendment to Zoning Map
0 Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Text
0 Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
0 Conditional Use Permit
[RJ Variance
0 Planned Unit Development
0 Senior Care Overlay District
0 Home Occupation
0 Amendment or Modification to approved CUP or PUD
0 Other
Applicant:
Address:
Telephone:
~.thU ssa~ ~
(work)
(fax)
Property Owners (if different than applicant):
Address:
Telephone:
Type of Ownership:
1/
/JI Fee
(home)
(work)
o Contract for Deed
(fax)
o Purchase Agreement
.
To the best of my knowledge the information provided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition, I have read the relevant sections of the Prior Lake Ordinance and procedural guidelines, and understand that
applic ions will not be pr. sed until deemed complete by the Planning Director or assignee.
-;?- /03
Date
Fee Owner's Signature
Date
ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION
(Required forPUD,CUPandSC Overlay District applications)
Will the developers request financial assistance frollltheCity?
o Yes
o No
If yes, please describe the amount and type ofassistance requested (attach additional pages if necessary).
Will anyone other thantheapplicantbe involved in the ownership, development & management ofthisproject?
o Yes (If yes, please attach a list of the namesandthe.role.ofaU.persons.involvedintheproject.) 0 No
1:\handouts\2001 handouts\zoning\zoning app.doc
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 EAGLE CREEK AVE SE
PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
(952) 447-4230, FAX (952) 447-4245
RECEIPT # 43398
DATE:~~'03
ReC8ived~It'h~~J
the sum of _~ ~L _ _ "' VtV __ I,(JD ..
\
for the purpose of
dollars
'j)mQriU/2, fe-
$
1 'D{) tifD
Invoice #
,L~
City of Prior Lake
June 23, 2003
Request for Variance
Property: 17274 Sunset Trail SW, Prior Lake, Minnesota
Owners: Danette and Steve Griffith
Request: Remove existing one-car garage, replace with same
Request:
The current garage is approximately 30 years old and is in need of new siding, a new
door and to be straightened on its foundation. Weare requesting permission to remove
the existing garage and replace it with the same size and type one-car garage on the same
site.
Zoning Issues:
I have learned that the current garage is within the required 15 feet separation from my
neighbor to the north's summer cabin. It may be that when the garage was built years
ago, the requirements were different or they were ignored by a previous owner. Given the
other various setback requirements for the lot, the current location is the only location
feasible to have a garage. I cannot bring the garage forward to allow more space between
it and my neighbor's cabin because to do so would eliminate the ability to park a car
outside, in front of the garage on our property and still leave room for my neighbor to the
south to access his property behind the parked car. Likewise, it would be impossible to
locate the garage in front of my house and meet the setback requirements from the lot
sides, the street and again leave room for my neighbor to the south to access his property.
I have had an architect and several builders look into this situation and all have suggested
that my only option is to re-build the garage on the current site.
I have learned that my property is out of compliance with the current impervious surface
maximum for lakeshore. The asphalt that causes this overage was put into place before I
bought the property in 1992. Replacing the current garage with a new one would have a
zero net effect on amount of impervious surface. The footprint for the new garage would
be the same as for the old one. I can't reduce the impervious surface and still have room
to park our two cars and provide access for my neighbor to the south.
Given the climate in Minnesota, I think that we need to have at least one of our two cars
in a garage during the winter. As you can see from the survey, the placement ofthe house
on the lot precludes many options that may be available to other homeowners. For this
reason, we respectfully request the variances necessary to replace our garage.
Thank you for your time.
k
Steven Griffith
"~,_.~__"~___'"'_____.______..-'~...__,_..__,_____"__. ._~,._~~_._..,._...,..,_. _" " '_,~._.,~_~_._._,"_~ _,.__~..~.,..,~_.__~M.,~__,,,___.....,+,,,.~_,.~.'.,.___,_._..~__.____._._...._,_.,_..
03-73
~~
Resolution
and Minutes
1-- /r-!)3 ;J l-,J1;nwth-.
f!M. f)3~(/1~
-
L\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MONDAY, JULY 28, 2003
1. Call to Order:
Chairman Stamson called the July 28, 2003, Planning Commission meeting to order at
6:30 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Criego, Lemke, Ringstad and Stamson,
Community Development Director Don Rye, Planner Cynthia Kirchoff and Recording
Secretary Connie Carlson.
2. Roll Call:
Atwood
Criego
Lemke
Ringstad
Stamson
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
3. Approval of Minutes:
The Minutes from the July 14,2003, Planning Commission meeting were approved as
presented.
4. Consent:
5. Public Hearings:
Commissioner Stamson read the Public Hearing Statement and opened the meeting.
A. #03-73 Steve Griffith is requesting a 7.4 foot variance from the required 11.6
foot sum of side yard setback for the reconstruction of a detached garage located at
17274 Sunset Trail SW.
Planner Cynthia Kirchoff presented the Planning Report dated July 28,2003, on file in
the office ofthe City Planning Department.
Steven Griffith is requesting a variance from the Zoning Ordinance for the reconstruction
of a 216 square foot detached garage on property zoned R-l (Low Density Residential)
and SD (Shoreland Overlay District) and located at 17274 Sunset Trail SW. In order to
reconstruct the detached garage the following variance is required: A 5.9 foot variance
from the required 11.6 foot side yard setback required so the sum of the side yards equal
15 feet (Section 1101.502 (8)).
The subject property is a riparian lot on Spring Lake. A single family dwelling,
constructed in 1973, and single stall detached garage currently occupy the site. The lot is
7,898 square feet in area above the ordinary high water level of Spring Lake and
L:\03 Files\03 Planning Comm\03pcMinutes\MN072803.doc 1
Planning Commission Meeting
July 28,2003
approximately 50 feet in width at the front yard setback. A driveway easement extends
across the subject property to serve Lot 20, the property to the south, due to the
topography change from Sunset Trail.
The shape of the lot and required 11.6 foot sum of side yard setback creates an undue
hardship. Staff supports the variance because without relief the applicant would not have
a reasonable use ofthe property.
Stamson questioned the sum total of side yard variances. Kirchoff explained.
Comments from the public:
Applicant Steve Griffith, 17274 Sunset Trail, said the distance between the house and
garage to the north is 11.5 feet. This is a very difficult due to the lot shape. They have
been working with contractors and architects to figure out a way to do this and meet the
City's requirements. Everyone agrees this is the location to have the garage. The garage
size is minimal at 12 x 18 feet. It will give him 2 feet of space for his 16 foot car. The on
site parking is also an issue. Sunset Trail has "No Parking" on both sides. It is very
difficult for guests to park as there is no space. Griffith is also asking the Commissioners
to delete staff's recommendation to reduce the bituminous surface. It will make the
entrance to the home very difficult and hard to plow around. The impervious surface is
less than 1 percent of the lot size. He felt the removal ofthe area is a hardship as it leaves
less parking area and changes the use of the property.
Stamson clarified the garage is the same size as the existing garage. Griffith said it was
the same size and went on to explain the problems with moving the garage.
Criego questioned if the applicant's house was on the side yard property border. Griffith
responded a privacy fence encroaches.
Maureen Doheny, 17264 Sunset Trail, the adjacent property owner questioned if the
garage can be slightly repositioned by 3 or 4 feet and reduce the variance. Stamson
explained he would not be able to park a car ifit's moved forward. Doheny explained
another neighbor closed part of the road off and suggested possible parking areas. She
felt the Griffiths should have their garage but if there was another alternative she would
prefer that over a variance. The home is her summer residence and is concerned the
variance could affect them in the future when they want to add on.
Ringstad questioned if cutting into the bank on Sunset Trail would have to be pretty
creative engineering. Doheny responded what she felt would work.
Stamson asked if there was a dedicated easement or an agreement. Kirchoff felt there
was a driveway easement. There currently is no access from the south.
Criego felt the problem will not be solved by moving the garage closer to the street.
Kirchoff explained the potential setback issues from moving the garage in other
L:\03 Files\03 Planning Comm\03pcMinutes\MN072803.doc 2
Planning Commission Meeting
July 28,2003
locations. All of the lots have problems because they are substandard. If the neighbors
try to rebuild or add on, they will require variances.
Curt Hennes, lives on the other side of the Griffiths, stated he had no problems with the
proposed project. Hennes wanted to point out that the easement is to be used by all 5
houses and he needed access. The topography is extremely high up to Sunset Trail. He
explained the street easement to Sunset Trail is 10 feet. The bank is approximately 3 feet
wide and drops down to the easement.
Stamson asked where Hennes parked. He said he parks on the very edge of the tarred
easement near the bank. Everyone uses it. He does not have a garage, he just parks in
the small space. Hennes said the residents have all lived there for at least 10 years and
get along well with the current setup despite the odd shaped lots.
The public hearing was closed.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Criego:
. Felt another variance is required.
. Does not see any problem replacing the garage. Recommend approving the
request. The property is very difficult.
. As long as the impervious surface is not increased, the 37.5 square feet is okay
because of the multi-use of the neighbors. Leave it the way it is.
Lemke:
. Concurred with Criego.
Ringstad:
. Visited the property and concurred with the Commissioners, especially removing
condition #3 at the suggestion of the DNR to try and create less impervious
surface.
. Since the applicant is replacing the existing structure and not adding to the
existing structure.
. This easement is critical to all five residents.
. Support the variances.
Stamson:
. Very unique property and situation. We usually see larger 2 car garages.
. Concern in this particular one is the closeness to the adjoining property. This is a
detached garage and under current building codes does not meet the fire code.
There is a risk factor that is much greater next to a summer home that does not
have current fire codes.
. If there was not an existing garage I would not recommend. The variance is there
if we try to mitigate it.
L:\03 Files\03 Planning Comm\03pcMinutes\MN072803.doc 3
Planning Commission Meeting
July 28, 2003
. Would support the variance but add a condition to build the garage to meet the
fire codes to provide protection.
. There is 10 feet between structures. Garages are more fire prone than most
houses. The seasonal home probably lacks fire protection.
. Staffs condition on removing the impervious surface should be to allow
rebuilding without removing the impervious surface. It should not be a condition
of the variance as it is a hardship without the removal of impervious surface.
Criego:
. Do we know the distance between the structures? Kirchoff said the separation on
the northern side is 11.5 feet.
. There is a 3.5 foot variance required.
Ringstad:
. Asked staff about the fire code issue. Rye said he believes if it is 5 feet from the
property line it would have to be a rated wall. It doesn't hurt to add a condition.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY RINGSAD, RECOMMEND MODIFIYING
RESOLUTION 03-07PC GRANTING A 5.9 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIRED 11.6 FOOT SUM OF SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR THE
RECONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE. ALSO APPROVE A 3.5 FOOT
VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 15 FOOT DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS.
MODIFY THE RESOLUTION TO EXCLUDE CONDITION #3 AND ADD THE
GARAGE MEET BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO MEET FIRE CODE
REQUIREMENTS.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY RINGSTAD ADOPTING RES. 03-07PC AS
AMENDED.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
Stamson explained the appeal process.
B. #03-65 Shiela Blickhan is requesting a 12 foot variance from the required 25
foot rear yard setback for the construction of a deck addition located at 3361
Fremont Circle NW.
Planner Cynthia Kirchoffpresented the Planning Report dated July 28,2003, on file in
the office of the City Planning Department.
Sheila Blickhan is requesting a variance from the zoning ordinance for the construction
of a 14 foot by 18 foot (252 square foot) deck addition on property zoned R-l (Low
Density Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay District) and located at 3361 Fremont
L:\03 Files\03 Planning Comm\03pcMinutes\MN072803.doc 4
I. _ "
Doc. No. A 618825
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Certified Rled and/or Recorded on
08-13-2003 at 11 :30 Receipt: 309704
Pat Boeckman, County Recorder 01
Fee: $20.00
State of Minnesota )
)ss.
County of Scott )
I, Kelly Meyer, being duly sworn, as Deputy City Clerk for the City of Prior Lake, do hereby
certify that the attached RESOLUTION 03-07PC is a true and correct copy of the original as
passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Pr"or Lake at its JU,ly 28, 2003
regular meeting. ..1
~ ... ", ~ '-"~ -if . '
Date: O'rtJ!()3
" ,_...... ,,-to
~ ~." ) #
""' ",' ~
I.
.
~ "'" .. .
. .
..',..,,,,,.'
-j :
h:\certify.doc
----..._,._.>......".~-_._.,'"~.~,-"~---_._._---.._.~,..._~~--~;...----,~-"----,~"._-"..,.....,.._..._.~_._..__._"_.~".,,.~~.---.-..*-,.-
RESOLUTION 03-07PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 5.9 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIRED 11.6 FOOT SUM OF SIDE YARD SETBACK AND A 3.5 FOOT
VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 15 FOOT SIDE YARD SEPARATION
SETBACK FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake,
Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Steven Griffith is requesting variances from the Zoning Ordinance for the
reconstruction of a detached garage on property zoned R-1 (Low Density
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay District) at the following location, to
wit;
17472 Sunset Trail SW
Lot 21, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variance as
contained in Case #03-73PC and held a hearing thereon on July 28,2003.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of
the prcposed variance on the Compreh'~n5ivo Plan.
4. The narrowness and shape of the subject lot create a difficulty in complying
with the strict application of the sum of the side yards setback provision of the
Zoning Ordinance. Given the location of the existing dwelling and the
driveway easement, the buildable area is limited.
5. The property lines are not perpendicular, which creates an oddly shaped
buildable area. Also, the location of the existing dwelling dictates the location
of any accessory structure on this property. The garage cannot be replaced
in any other location due to the aforementioned constraints.
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\approval resolution.doc
1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. The granting of the setback variances is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a reasonable use of the property. Without relief the applicant
will not be able to construct a garage on the property, which has historically
been considered a reasonable use.
7. Relief from the setback provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will not
unreasonably impact the character and development of the Fairview Beach
neighborhood because the variance is for the reconstruction of a garage
currently on the property. Furthermore, a detached garage is a customary
accessory use within this neighborhood.
8. One purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to "provide adequate off-street
parking and loading facilities." The variances are consistent with the intent of
the zoning ordinance. That is, to allow the storage of '/ehicles and other
materials within an enclosed structure, outside of the public right-of-way.
9. The contents of Planning Case #03-73PC are hereby entered into and made
a part of the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby
approves the following variance to allow for the reconstruction of a detached
garage, as shown on Exhibit A- Certificate of Survey:
(1) A 5.9 foot variance from the required 11.6 sum of side yard setback
and a 3.5 foot variance from the required 15 foot side yard separation
setback for the reconstruction of a detached garage, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of
adoption. Proof of recording, along with the acknowledged City
Assent Form, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county,
and state agency regulations.
3. The garage must be constructed to meet Fire and Building Code
standards for an attached garage.
4. The garage shall be compatible in design and materials with the
principal structure.
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\approval resolution.doc
2
Correspondence
L\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
FILE COpy
August8,2003
Steven Griffith
17472 Sunset Trail SW
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Variances for detached garage
Case File No.: 03-73
Dear Mr. Griffith:
This letter is to officially inform you that on July 28, 2003, the Planning Commission
approved setback variances for the reconstruction of a detached garage subject to the
following conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption. Proof
of recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be submitted to
the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state agency
regulations.
3. The garage must be constructed to meet Fire and Building Code standards for an
attached garage.
4. The garage shall be compatible in design and materials with the principal structure.
Enclosed are two copies of Resolution 03-07PC approving the setback variances. The
certified copy must be recorded at Scott County and the other is a copy for your records.
I have also enclosed an assent form that must be executed and returned to my attention
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 447-9813.
Sincerely,
cqp'lfhixj:i'5-'IZtf5tj
Cynthia R. Kirc~~ff, ~p (;L
Planner
Enclosures
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
---_-...._--~.._-,_._,_._,,~~.~,-----~.._-~,,""'...._~,--_.~...~._,_..-+-~---~-.. '~'---~""""""'''----'''----''-~'''-~-~''''._''''''''''''-'~-'~~-'---''-----''-
I have reviewed the attached proposed request (Griffith Variance) for the following:
Water City Code Grading
Sewer Storm Water Signs
Zoning Flood Plain County Road Access
Parks Natural Features Legal Issues
Assessment Electric Roads! Access
Policy
Septic System Gas Building Code
Erosion Control Other
Recommendation:
Approval
Denial
Conditional Approval
Comments:
6fMe 'if ~ ~ fA.liL~ @ A(JJ('tt...L. ~
~b hb+ ~~'\ ~~ oti,^" ~t.V~~L
Signed:
~
Date:
~/ 3/6-3
~ t
Please return any comments by Thursday, July 17, 2003, to
Cynthia Kirchoff
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (952) 447-9813
Fax: (952) 447-4245
e-mail: ckirchoff@cityofpriorlake.com
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\referral.doc
Page 2
FILE COpy
June 30, 2003
Steven Griffith
17274 Sunset Trail SW
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Variances for the construction of a detached garage
17274 Sunset Trail SW (Lot 21, Fairview Beach)
Case File No.: 03-73
Dear Mr. Griffith:
On June 24, 2003, the City of Prior Lake received the above referenced
development review application. This letter serves as your official notification
that all of the necessary submittals have been received and the application is
complete. At this time, your variance application is scheduled for the Monday,
July 28, 2003, Planning Commission meeting. You or your representative must
attend this meeting.
The City review process can be substantially less than 120 days, and we intend
to progress in a timely manner that provides a complete and professional review.
Occasionally, however, due to meeting schedules, it is sometimes necessary to
extend the 60-day review period. This letter also serves as your official notice
that the City is extending the 60-day deadline for an additional 60 days from
August 23,2003, to October 23,2003.
If you have questions relative to the review process or related issues, please feel
free to contact me at (952) 447-9813.
Sincerely,
. 5ff'
~'U:<-ffC<f ZIVL;
Cynthia R. Kirchoff', AICP ,
Planner
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.L Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
ORC PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST
PROJECT NAME: GRIFFITH VARIANCE (Case #03-70)
REQUESTS: The applicant is requesting 3.8 foot variance from the required
9.5 side yard separation setback for the reconstruction of a
detached garage.
APPLICANT: Steven Griffith
CONTACT PERSON: Same
440-1396
SITE INFORMATION
PID#: 25-132-015-0
LOCATION: 17274 Sunset Trail SW
EXISTING ZONING: R-1SD
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: R-L1MD
PROJECT REQUEST: Review and comment on variance application.
DISTRIBUTE TO: APPLICATION FOR:
. Frank Boyles Bud Osmundson Administrative Land Division
Sue Walsh . Sue McDermott Comprehensive Plan Amend.
Ralph Teschner . Larry Poppler Conditional Use Permit
Chris Esser Fire Chief Home Occupation
. Bob Hutchins Bill O'Rourke Rezoning
. Don Rye Site Plan
. Jane Kansier Preliminary Plat
PUD
. ONR - Pat Lynch Minnegasco Final Plat
County Hwy. Dept. Watershed Oist. . Variance
MNOOT Telephone Co. Vacation
SMOC Electric Co.
Mediacom Cable Met. Council
"
i
Date Received 6/24/03 Date Distributed 6/30/03 Date Due 7/17/03
Complete Application 6/24/03 Date Distributed to 6/30/03 DRC Meeting NA
Date DRC
Publication Date 7/12/03 Tentative PC Date 7/28/03 Tentative CC NA
Date
60 Day Review Date 8/23/03 Review Extension 10/23/03
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\referral.doc
Page 1
I have reviewed the attached proposed request (Griffith Variance) for the following:
Water City Code Grading
Sewer Storm Water Signs
Zoning Flood Plain County Road Access
Parks Natural Features Legal Issues
Assessment Electric Roads/Access
Policy
Septic System Gas Building Code
Erosion Control Other
Recommendation:
Approval
Denial
Conditional Approval
Comments:
Signed:
Date:
Please return any comments by Thursday. Julv 17. 2003, to
Cynthia Kirchoff
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Phone: (952) 447-9813
Fax: (952) 447-4245
e-mail: ckirchoff@cityofpriorlake.com
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\referral.doc
Page 2
July 23,2003
Steven Griffith
17274 Sunset Trail SW
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Agenda and Agenda Report
Attached is a Planning Commission Agenda and Staff Report for the July 28, 2003,
Planning Commission meeting. You or your representatives are expected to attend the
meeting. You will be given the opportunity to speak regarding your proposal and the
staff report. The meeting begins at 6:30 p.m. and is held at the Fire Station located at
16776 Fish Point Road (east of HWY 13 on the south side of CR 21). If you cannot
attend the meeting, please call me so your item can be deferred to the next Planning
Commission meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me at 447-9810.
Sincerely,
Connie Cart:son
Connie Carlson
Planning Dept. Secretary
Enclosure
I:\deptwork\blankfrm\meetltr.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
July 30, 2003
Anthony Stamson
16095 Wren Court SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Dear Tony:
Enclosed please find Resolutions 03-07PC, 03-08PC, and 03-09PC adopted by
the Planning Commission on July 28, 2003. Please review and sign the
resolutions and return them in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 447-9813.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
~OtA"r~
Cynt~ia 'R. Kircho\t, A~jp tJ\-}-
Planner
Enclosures
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
CASE FILE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
5A
CONSIDER A VARIANCE FROM THE ZONING
ORDINANCE FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A
216 SQUARE FOOT DETACHED GARAGE
17274 SUNSET TRAIL SW
CYNTHIA KIRCHOFF, AICP, PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
X YES NO-N/A
JULY 28, 2003
03-73
Steven Griffith is requesting a variance from the Zoning Ordinance for the
reconstruction of a 216 square foot detached garage on property zoned R-1 (Low
Density Residential) and SO (Shoreland Overlay District) and located at 17274
Sunset Trail SW (Lot 21, Fairview Beach). The property is guided Urban
Low/Medium Density Residential in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
In order to reconstruct the detached garage shown on Attachment 3, the
following variance is required:
1. A 5.9 foot variance from the required 11.6 foot side yard setback required
so the sum of the side yards equa/15 feet (Section 1101.502 (8)).
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is a riparian lot on Spring Lake. A single family dwelling,
constructed in 1973, and single stall detached garage currently occupy the site.
The property was platted as Lot 21, Fairview Beach in 1926. The lot is 7,898
square feet in area above the ordinary high water level of Spring Lake and
approximately 50 feet in width at the front yard setback. A driveway easement
extends across the subject property to serve Lot 20, the property to the south,
due to the topography change from Sunset Trail.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
According to the survey, the existing dwelling is 50 feet from the property line
abutting Sunset Trail and is 47 feet from the ordinary high water level of Spring
Lake (912.8'). Existing impervious surface is 36.8 percent.
Since the property is zoned R-1, a
reasonable use is a single family
dwelling with a two stall garage.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant would like to reconstruct
a 12 foot by 18 foot (216 square feet)
detached accessory structure on the
property. The existing garage is in
need of repair and the applicant would
like to reconstruct it in the same
location. The following table compares the proposed garage to minimum
ordinance requirements:
TABLE 1
Existing accessory structure compared to R-1 setback requirements
Front Side - South Side - North
Required 28.4' N/A 11.6'
Proposed 39' -- 5.7'
Side yard setbacks on nonconforming shoreland lots of record (lots less than 90
feet in width at the front yard setback) are permitted to be a minimum of 5 feet
provided that that (1) sum of the side yards is 15 feet and (2) a minimum 15 foot
separation is maintained from structures on adjacent lots. Yard encroachments
(Le., eaves, gutters, and basement egress windows) are prohibited within a 5 foot
setback.
The above referenced ordinance provisions apply to the reconstruction of the
garage on this property. The existing south side yard setback is 3.4 feet, so in
order for the sum of the side yard setbacks to equal 15 feet, the garage would
have to be set back 11.6 feet from the north side property line. The
existing/proposed north side yard setback is shown on the survey as 5.7 feet.
Since the dwelling on the adjacent lot to the north is only 5.8 feet from the
common property line, the required side yard setback for the garage is 9.2 feet to
maintain the 15 foot separation. Since the 11.6 foot sum of side yards setback is
more restrictive than the 9.2 foot side yard separation setback, the former will
require the variance.
Other Zoning Ordinance Requirements
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\PC Report.DOT
2
Impervious Surface
The existing impervious surface coverage is 37.8 percent, so the property is
already non-compliant. However, the shoreland ordinance states "an existing
site which is being altered, remodeled, or expanded without expanding the
existing impervious surface may be allowed, provided that where appropriate and
where necessary, structures and practices for the treatment of storm water runoff
are in compliance with the Prior Lake Storm Water Management Plan and
approved by the City Engineer" (Section 11 04.306( 1)). Since the applicant is not
proposing to increase impervious surface, a variance will not be required. The
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) was notified of this variance request,
and the area hydrologist recommends that the amount of impervious surface be
reduced to 30 percent. However, given that this reduction is impracticable, it was
just recommended that a portion of the driveway be removed to reduce the
amount of hard cover. Staff recommends that enough bituminous surface be
removed on the subject site to allow a 20 foot wide driveway for Lot 20.
Detached accessory structures, in general
In the R-1 use district, a single family dwelling is a permitted use, and a detached
private garage is an accessory use. A private garage is defined as "a detached
accessory building or portion of the principal building which is situated on the
same lot as the principal building used primarily for storing motor vehicles..."
The zoning ordinance requires 2 parking stalls for a single family dwelling. A
single stall detached garage is currently on the site. Although the zoning
ordinance does not require parking for a single family dwelling to be completely
enclosed, a two-stall garage is customarily considered a reasonable use in a
residential use district, particularly in Minnesota.
On riparian lots, detached accessory structures are permitted between the front
building wall and the street offering access to the lot provided it complies with
required front and side yard setbacks and is compatible in design and materials
with the principal structure. The proposed garage meets the required front yard
setback, but encroaches into the north side yard setback. It will be a condition of
approval that the garage be compatible in appearance with existing dwelling.
Also, detached accessory structures in residential use districts are limited to 832
square feet in area. The proposal is only 216 square feet, so it complies with that
provision.
The zoning ordinance requires driveways to maintain a 5 foot setback from side
property lines. The existing driveway encroaches into the south side yard
setback. Staff recommends that a portion of the driveway be removed to meet
the 5 foot side yard setback and reduce the amount of impervious surface.
VARIANCE HARDSHIP FINDINGS
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\PC Report.DOT
3
Section 1108.400 states that the Board of Adjustment may grant a Variance from
the strict application of the provisions of the zoning ordinance, provided that:
1. Where by reason of narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a lot, or
where by reason of exceptional topographical or water conditions or
other extraordinary and exceptional conditions of such lot, the strict
application of the terms of this Ordinance would result in peculiar and
practical difficulties or exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner of
such lot in developing or using such lot in a manner customary and
legally permissible within the Use District in which said lot is located.
The narrowness and shape of the subject lot create a difficulty in complying
with the strict application of the side yard setback provision of the Zoning
Ordinance. Given the location of the existing dwelling and the neighbor's
driveway, the buildable area is limited.
2. Conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to
the property or immediately adjoining property, and do not apply,
generally, to other land or structures in the Use District in which the
land is located.
The property lines are not perpendicular, which creates an oddly shaped
buildable area. Also, the location of the existing dwelling dictates the location
of any accessory structure on this property. The garage cannot be replaced
in any other location due to the aforementioned constraints.
3. The granting of the proposed Variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the owner.
Relief from the ordinance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a reasonable use of the property. Without relief the applicant will not be able
to construct a garage on the property, which has historically been considered
a reasonable use.
4. The granting of the proposed Variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase
the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, or
endanger the public safety.
It does not appear as though the variance will impair an adequate supply of
light and air to adjacent property or negatively impact public safety.
5. The granting of the Variance will not unreasonably impact on the
character and development of the neighborhood, unreasonably diminish
or impair established property values in the surrounding area, or in any
other way impair the health, safety, and comfort of the area.
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\PC Report.DOT
4
Relief from the setback provision of the zoning ordinance will not
unreasonably impact the character and development of the Fairview Beach
neighborhood because the variance is for the reconstruction of a garage
currently on the property. Furthermore, a detached garage is a customary
accessory use within this neighborhood.
6. The granting of the proposed Variance will not be contrary to the intent
of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
One purpose of the zoning ordinance is to "provide adequate off-street
parking and loading facilities." The variance is consistent with the intent of
the zoning ordinance. That is, to allow the storage of vehicles and other
materials within an enclosed structure, outside of the public right-of-way.
7. The granting of the Variance will not merely serve as a convenience to
the applicant but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable undue
hardship or difficulty.
The requested setback variance is not a convenience. There are no other
options for the reconstruction of a garage on the property within the buildable
area. It is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable undue hardship.
8. The hardship results from the application of the provisions of this
Ordinance to the affected property and does not result from actions of
the owners of the property.
The shape of the lot, existing dwelling location, and required 11.6 foot sum of
side yards setback created the difficulty.
9. Increased development or construction costs or economic hardship
alone shall not be grounds for granting a Variance.
Increased development costs are not the basis for the variance requests.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant would like to reconstruct a 12 foot by 18 foot (216 square feet)
detached garage on property zoned R-1 and SO. In order to do such, a sum of
the side yards setback variance is required.
The shape of the lot and required 11.6 foot sum of side yard setback creates an
undue hardship. Staff supports the variance because without relief the applicant
would not have a reasonable use of the property.
ALTERNATIVES:
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\PC Report.DOT
5
1. Approve the variance requested by the applicant, or approve any variance the
Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of
demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of a 5.9 foot variance from the required 11.6 sum of
side yards setback for the reconstruction of a detached garage, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of adoption.
Proof of recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent Form, shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and state
agency regulations.
3. Portions of the existing driveway along the south property line shall be
removed to comply with the minimum 5 foot side yard setback and to allow
Lot 20 to have a 20 foot wide driveway.
4. The garage shall be compatible in design and materials with the principal
structure.
ACTION REQUIRED:
This request requires the following motions:
1. A motion and second adopting Resolution 03-07PC approving a 5.9 foot
variance from 11.6 foot sum of side yards setback for the reconstruction of a
detached garage.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Resolution 03-07PC
2. Location map
3. Survey
4. Applicant's letter
5. Applicable regulation
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\PC Report.DOT
6
RESOLUTION 03-07PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 5.9 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE
REQUIRED 11.6 FOOT SUM OF SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR THE
RECONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake,
Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Steven Griffith is requesting a variance from the Zoning Ordinance for the
reconstruction of a detached garage on property zoned R-1 (Low Density
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay District) at the following location, to
wit;
17472 Sunset Trail SW
Lot 21, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variance as
contained in Case #03-73PC and held a hearing thereon on July 28,2003.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of
the proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The narrowness and shape of the subject lot create a difficulty in complying
with the strict application of the sum of the side yards setback provision of the
Zoning Ordinance. Given the location of the existing dwelling and the
driveway easement, the buildable area is limited.
5. The property lines are not perpendicular, which creates an oddly shaped
buildable area. Also, the location of the existing dwelling dictates the location
of any accessory structure on this property. The garage cannot be replaced
in any other location due to the aforementioned constraints.
6. The granting of the setback variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a reasonable use of the property. Without relief the applicant
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\approval resolution.doc
1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
will not be able to construct a garage on the property, which has historically
been considered a reasonable use.
7. Relief from the setback provision of the Zoning Ordinance will not
unreasonably impact the character and development of the Fairview Beach
neighborhood because the variance is for the reconstruction of a garage
currently on the property. Furthermore, a detached garage is a customary
accessory use within this neighborhood.
8. One purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to "provide adequate off-street
parking and loading facilities." The variance is consistent with the intent of
the zoning ordinance. That is, to allow the storage of vehicles and other
materials within an enclosed structure, outside of the public right-of-way.
9. The contents of Planning Case #03-73PC are hereby entered into and made
a part of the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby
approves the following variance to allow for the reconstruction of a detached
garage, as shown on Exhibit A- Certificate of Survey:
(1) A 5.9 foot variance from the required 11.6 sum of side yard setback
for the reconstruction of a detached garage, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of
adoption. Proof of recording, along with the acknowledged City
Assent Form, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county,
and state agency regulations.
3. Portions of the existing driveway along the south property line shall
be removed to comply with the minimum 5 foot side yard setback
and to allow Lot 20 to have a 20 foot wide driveway.
4. The garage shall be compatible in design and materials with the
principal structure.
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\approval resolution.doc
2
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on July 28, 2003.
Anthony Stamson, Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Community Development Director
1:\03 files\03 variances\griffith\approval resolution.doc
3
*-"' -.... ...
ITEVI Mt",,""
171'" 1UNiIcr,.....
""lOW t...Ulf:..... san
I.y Surveying Co.. P A .
:I "'. I'IWIIIL.I't T1WL GI'W'1a QlNDlMIlUI
IM10 f'ltMl(LJN TMIL "I.
I'ItIOlt LMa. ~A llMTZ
ltUPMONl -.z1447 -257'0 .
1
+ ',w
__ _ f<l''1'
. ----::r---~-
"1~:"._t~.-:;~
~-;-.:;:; .~IT I
-- '"1'''
~
'-"'k" ~'-
l "'~ V'.,::. /"
., . ~,
........ j.. ~
.~. z:...... ~'.:..:::t
~.. ...~"' '", 7/ I
...'-..... 'y /
\~, "' "-
" )" .>-.... /
"V ;j:
,p. /
,.0/'
t=- r
I ,;
.-
--.- r;------
.
i
,
...
,.,
-~
ru
~
-J
.
I~ I
C!) ~~ i
.. .. P I-
f
,
I
I"
I
~\
~:I lr. :. ij
.... . *'
.....---
1- e ..... ... ~ ~ .
,,...
,..;Ii' ~~
..' -' of'
it. ....",.
..'f
/"
/
/
.;.....;...........,
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
-:::;::::::::::::::::
:.:.:.:;:.:.:.:.:.:.
-
"~~
..-
roo'.'.'.
i'
_!'!'-~
! i
, .
i ·
I 8
, ~-
I 8
---' 8
I "
I . 0
I "
! ~
~,i
"11 i '._
f
I
:
;j-1.',
... --
....21_ .'AJRVIEW 8f.ACH". Scoa.(,~. ~ ............___
..... WIlIIAIt.....- _~ _. (1(.............., II....
."'...,.."'_. .,
_ &'2/05 r..._"'_....
=-.J""'9"A........."_o.
I....., ......, __......,.
- ........ " - . ........
::~..::::~
....... .. .... -.. ;;;"';
~ L"1f..L_
- 1-11-01 ~IIO._
"ll ...~ .... ~ ""..-L-
PROPOSED GARAGE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED
1
--
--
-
'/ {.
I
GJ
. I
-{
OJ
I
I
'0. . If
:- ------ --1 ;
-----<--l
/
I
i
-;"'.~'I
~,
I
I ~
':
I.
EXHIBIT A
June 23, 2003
Request for Variance
Property: 17274 Sunset Trail SW, Prior Lake, Minnesota
Owners: Danette and Steve Griffith
Request: Remove existing one-car garage, replace with same
Request:
The current garage is approximately 30 years old and is in need of new siding, a new
door and to be straightened on its foundation. Weare requesting permission to remove
the existing garage and replace it with the same size and type one-car garage on the same
site.
Zoning Issues:
I have learned that the current garage is within the required 15 feet separation from my
neighbor to the north's summer cabin. It may be that when the garage was built years
ago, the requirements were different or they were ignored by a previous owner. Given the
other various setback requirements for the lot, the current location is the only location
feasible to have a garage. I cannot bring the garage forward to allow more space between
it and my neighbor's cabin because to do so would eliminate the ability to park a car
outside, in front of the garage on our property and still leave room for my neighbor to the
south to access his property behind the parked car. Likewise, it would be impossible to
locate the garage in front of my house and meet the setback requirements from the lot
sides, the street and again leave room for my neighbor to the south to access his property.
I have had an architect and several builders look into this situation and all have suggested
that my only option is to re-build the garage on the current site.
I have learned that my property is out of compliance with the current impervious surface
maximum for lakeshore. The asphalt that causes this overage was put into place before I
bought the property in 1992. Replacing the current garage with a new one would have a
zero net effect on amount of impervious surface. The footprint for the new garage would
be the same as for the old one. 1 can"t reduce the impervious surface and still have room
to park our two cars and provide access for my neighbor to the south.
Given the climate in Minnesota, I think that we need to have at least one of our two cars
in a garage during the winter. As you can see from the survey, the placement of the house
on the lot precludes many options that may be available to other homeowners. For this
reason, we respectfully request the variances necessary to replace our garage.
Thank you for your time.
Si7ty' /14lt/'.
.IfI..iLL/1 v?{/} v/ / I
Steven Griffith {t t/
.
APPLICANT'S LETTER
Zoning Code
(7) On a corner lot where the rear yard abuts the side yard of an interior lot, the
setback for a detached accessory building is the same as the required front yard of
the interior lot.
(8) Nonconforming lots of record in the R-1 and R-2 Use Districts may have side yards
of not less than 5 feet if the following criteria are met:
..... ~
~
~
The sum of the side yards on the norconforming lot is at least 15 feet.
No yard encroachments, as permitted in subsection 1101.503, are located
within 5 feet of an adjoining lot.
A minimum separation of 15 feet is maintained between all structures on the
nonconforming lot and on the adjoining lot.
1101.503
Yard Encroachments. The following shall not be encroachments on yard
requirements:
(1) Eaves, gutters and basement egress windows, provided they do not extend more
than 2 feet into a yard; and provided such encroachment is no cbser than 5 feet
from any lot line. (Amd. ord. 01-10, pub. 918101)
(2) Yard lights and nameplate signs for one and two family dwellings in the R-1, R-2,
and R-3 Districts.
(3) Floodlights or other sources of light illuminating authorized illuminated sgns, or
illuminating parking areas, loading areas, or yards for safety and security purposes
if these meet the regulations of subsection 1107.1800.
(4) Flag poles, bird baths and other ornamental features detached from the principal
building which are a minimum of 5 feet from any lot line.
(5) Canopies no more than 12 feet wide are permitted in the "R4", "C-1", "C-2", "C-5"
and "1-1" Districts if they are open at the sides, comply with provisions of subsection
1101.506 and provide 14 feet of clearance if located over any access roadway or
fire lane.
(6) The following shall not be encroachments on front yard requirements:
a. Awnings and door hoods which extend 5 feet or less into the required front
yard.
b. A vestibule which extends 5 feet or less into the required front yard under the
following conditions:
y The vestibule shall be designed, constructed and attached to the principal
structure in compliance with the building code.
y The vestibule shall be constructed of materials compatible wth those of the
principal structure which meet the requirements of subsection 1107.2200.
City of Prior Lake
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
llOl/p35
May 1, 1999
Approved Plans
.
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
:'''"
..'.:
, ",,'
",
...~.
, .
, ",
."\
, .
.,CytY..OF .PRrORLAKE:'
....
...
,....
'.'. '.
.;. ~', "
\
)
.'f.:
. .
... .., ,.;., , "es .. F ;. .. .'.. . O. 0 .. . ./1.. --2..la: '. .,
"'i. :: ."'.'''.~ . .'.,..'.....: .f ~ .' ..q.' ~;~~:::,~. .3. ~...=...~:.............~.,.. ,-'~t ';J.~;... ..... ':>':
+'if!ljI ~+ *"',~l{4 * "'*>{i.>ic**+.*.ljf >li* **** '!'.** >!i** * '\4.* ** ** *:* iIcltiifilfc* ** ** * ** *
.' . .)' . ,'. ". . '.
.WrOTH:...
X..
.:.:x'...;';..:....
. '..:::~:.':<rdT.A':L:~.iu~.dipLEBTR iT CT~...~...........;;i.....
. : .. ...,. '. \. I . ' . . .~'" . '. , .
=
.i: '.,'
:~ijs~,;;
,~trJ:AC~EP dA.Mo"E:..
. 'i . .<:"':.':. .
,~\ ::::
..
'.
I',.'
. '.
'.',
\o~?
\:
". ."
'1..-z..:~
:.
· ..'1. ,z3.'
....
.~ . :::i
.t (eS'i...
AR.ttAS. .:. ~u ~~~~; :!~. ,;. ~",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,..
.,.. -\(;6'2- .:..:'
=
:,'
.'.=.
.. .'
';.,
.: ,"'.
, ':~r"OTA:L:INtPERvloU'S SURFACE.
...J . '., '\ '" .
'.' "
~1:Ii~R. t. ;~;;.';~ .'.~;~... .... ;.~. .:. i.;;. 'i~"': ;..... i......~ ~.l...
...., ".
i '. .
'UNri~R{qy5~tf'\ 2%J ': '.. .... ....
· p~e;aredBY~~~~~.. .... .... . ....... . .
. .kl~\\'i~\~0~~f~i~:~&;\i @,l\ ·
."T
'.. . \1 k l . . I.
'Date~l~i ....
Phon~ #. L\~1,. ~s t' 0
.\..
;. \.
"1i\De>:../ r,;"
. . . ' '.
?~.U:'
'. ".
. j',.
~. "
'.'!
T",,"'.'M
I'
i __28'__>1
) ! i
I .
001.... ..
llUIWn ...-..- .,..
STEVe "t~""
ITlM 1UN8n"""
PRIOIt LMC!.... SMt2
1
I.y Surveying Co., P A .
110. l'MIIIIJN T1WL QPPlC;E ~
"'YO fMMcLJlll TMI\. "I.
NIOIt UlICl. ~A !B51!
ltl.fl"talf _1447-2510 .
....
~--_.-
"
,
.-
~-- ---- t" ;-~---
;;
""lIlt.-
---
-~._----
.----
------
.....
-
1"
tv
!
1:
,..,'
.. '..
I
I
i!
" ~~
. WR
f
r.
t
;..'
,.-~.
e
. I
:/
/ .:
._...&0. jll
~ ---::..::::: _ i
/
I
~'.'----I
~. -"
.R '"
f ~..~ !~" /:
I O~~~~ ,;y. "2;":
;~ ~- /
. ,-' '" "'-A______.. ..J;?
'----.. ;'
.~~;
N'
~
"...... - -_.
.--
'/< .
...,...::
,..:/4"~
.x. ..
/
'Iiii'
.~.
::..iI:.._.;~_~:'
8
~ .
8
8
o
p
~ ~
Loll'. "rAJllvlEw IlEACH". SoollC_._ _--...._
.,.._-.--...__...._.._if""'"
..,.. ......,-....
-.. "'210' '"-..... ",__
='....... . ......... "- ..
,-----
- ....... iii _..__...
-~~~
:.:: oiiOiii1i _ _ ~
~ _Ltf',..L
_ l-n-ell ~Z_
ml _~ _~_...1.-
PROPOSED GARAGE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED
_..._~.~..-....._........._._,_.______"__.~_~..."._~._.~ ,~"".~~....__..,~,~_,.._",."~.",."._,...,_.~,.A
8
3.
g
8
...... .......- ....,
STEVI Mtnf,'n't
171'" IUNKT......
PltlOlt l.AIl(. lIIN. ;eatz
I.y Surveying CO., P. A .
a~. I'tIlIIIUII TMIL GPl'a ~IM
IN7V I'MIIIWN TMIL &.1.
NIOlt LME. ...ac,,, !IBI7I _
m.E~ _)447.15~~. _-- -- -.
--
T.." ,,,-,.
I'
-~:~-----J
! i
1 ---
f=--- '~:
--
--- F;--
.-
-
o
p
---.
---
--
i
~----
~.
_ L.,~-,.
----:f---- 1
"''''~~.~;O;:-;~ I
----.=;-..-;;;:;,..~' I
_____ - .'1' __ I
__ r!
...
-
\"
t
I
,I,.
III I
! I
'2_l
_~ .. i.
.
,.
,
.., ~~
. ..
I
,~\
.-ri:!
~. i
II'
~ --
....21. "'FA,JRVIEWBF.ACH-. ScoaC-,..~ AIIiI............
fJI.......~ ...~_ ..............., 11-"
..,-,...,_. ..
~ .~. :1
... .. *'
~.....--_.
....-- ...~ .
1-. -
, ,,/
,;I ,,'
",".,. ':.,.'"
.x
./
//
.....,210"._"~_
~a.........~..
,-----
-~..-.........
:= ~.::!!!!.!"
........----
~ L";f...L_
_ 1-1"7-01 _.._
~IL( '-I~ .... ~ ","-1.-
l~l!l~ljl~l~l~ljl~l:
PROPOSED GARAGE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED
SURVEY
ASSENT OF APPLICANT
Ie
As Approved by Resolution #03.07PC
The undersigned hereby assents to the following:
1. I have read the conclusions and conditions of said Resolution, and I am
familiar with their contents and with the content of the exhibits.
2. I fully accept all of the terms and conditions of said Resolution.
3. I understand Section 1108.400 of the Prior Lake Ordinance Code provides as
follows:
1108.413 Revocation and Cancellation of a Variance. A Variance may be
revoked and canceled if the Zoning Administrator determines that
the holder of an existing Variance has violated any of the
conditions or requirements imposed as a condition to approval of
the Variance, or has violated any other applicable laws,
ordinances, or enforceable regulation.
1108.414 After One Year, No Construction Required. All Variances shall
be revoked and canceled if 1 year has elapsed from the date of the
adoption of the resolution granting the Variance and the holder of
the Variance has failed to make substantial use of the premises
according to the provisions contained in the Variance.
1108.415 After One Year, New Construction Required. All Variances shall
be revoked and canceled after 1 year has elapsed from the date of
the adoption of the resolution granting the Variance if a new
structure or alteration or substantial repair of an existing building is
required by the Variance and the holder has failed to complete the
work, unless a valid building permit authorizing such work has been
issued and work is progressing in an orderly way.
1108.416 Upon Occurrence of Certain Events. If the holder of a Variance
fails to make actual use of vacant land, or land and structures
which were existing when the Variance was issued and no new
structure, alteration or substantial repair to existing buildings was
required; or if a new structure was required by the Variance and no
building permit has been obtained, the Variance shall be deemed
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\ASSENT.DOC
1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
(1) A change in the Use District for such lands is made by
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance by the City Council.
(2) Eminent domain proceedings have been initiated to take all or
any part of the premises described in the Variance.
(3) The use described in the Variance becomes an illegal activity
under the laws of the United States of America or the State of
Minnesota.
(4) Title to all or part of land described in such Variance is forfeited
to the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of taxes.
(5) The person to whom the Variance was issued files a written
statement in which that person states that the Variance has
been abandoned. The statement shall describe the land
involved or state the resolution number under which the
Variance was granted.
(6) The premises for which the Variance was issued are used by
the person to whom the Variance was issued in a manner
inconsistent with the provisions of such Variance.
4. I understand the granting by the City of this Resolution is in reliance on the
representations that I will fully comply with all of the terms and conditions of
said Resolution. I understand and agree upon notice of non-compliance with
any term or condition, I shall immediately cease conducting activities
pursuant to the notice or will take all actions necessary to accomplish full
compliance with said notice and conditions of the Resolution.
10/17/[)3
DATE
17274 SUNSET TRAIL SW
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\ASSENT.DOC 2
~ ........:J,.
fTfyc.J.
172M .' ... ,..I~
PRIOR ~ .......
...tUt2
'ofo' ~
'>:'~
-~
---r--
My Surveying Co
a~. FMJIIIt TMII.. ., F! A.
t6i1o .....UN -~ CCNOQ.....
.-..oft LNCE · ~ &.1.
....1.1~ .,..~9OrA .572 f4 \,z'\ll
_,447-2570 . /.-....1
~---- -----.-- "
---.-
I
--..---
28"~
I i
! i
J ~i
____.----- I 8
_--- I.g
________---==- .-----/ I :.
..
..
.....,..,"
,",ouse
GatagO
)
!
,',
,.
i--
1i
I
4$"
I'. ..:..
. .
t
'1'\'
oF'
-..
-'"
...
.'
,
I
Iu
.~
..J
t"
r
,..~l..
. ;'".' '.':....
... ., ...~.:o .
I
t
!
.
"
"
" -1~
. .."
I
e
:1
- II
-- --------===:: .'. So. ~ :.:
--- _.~--..<. ~
-..... -- .
.... .,
i
;..,
/
r~ (....
i. "I
L
t
If'"
~ ::'
............, B'
,
"-... '
.., I
"~ l/i
:?;(!
,,/
v,
. '1
LI& 21. -F AJRVIEW
............ BEACH". Seou c..,. t.. ... .
.".. u....,,- ._rr L ,- _.,......*!!::::!"*~
_~.atI. _.......,if_
'. t '
, .~
I ~I
".
~
o .. : ..'."
_&1.1". ..
..
~ .... .. -'r .
........ ._. .l..
';
~.,
.0,./
" ,..-
/;1:
,. *><"..}<
X/ '"
/
_.6/2101 "Ill_
.__ a ".~-....
r-- . ..-... - ...
"~J~ --8.UMI1
~ IIr - .........
:..r ~:iJ~l!~;
~:~~,l_
frILl M)
9117
... .!!L
..... -1-
.....-;.
HEARING
NOTICES
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
Page 1 of 1
Cynthia Kirchoff
From: Cynthia Kirchoff
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Prior Lake American (E-mail)
Cc: Jane Kansier
Subject: July 28th PC Public Hearing Notices; O'Loughlin; Schneider; Blickhan, Griffith; MVEC
Deb-
Please publish the attached public hearing notices in the July 12th edition of the Prior Lake American.
Thanks.
Cynthia Kirchoff, AICP
Planner
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
(952) 447-9813
(952) 447 -4245-fax
717/03
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VARIANCES FROM THE
ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A DETACHED GARAGE
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a
public hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road
SE (Southwest of the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road), on:
Monday, July 28,2003, at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting variances from the Zoning
Ordinance for the construction of a detached garage.
APPLICANT: Steven Griffith
SUBJECT SITE: 17274 Sunset Trail SW, Prior Lake, MN, legally described
as Lot 21, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions
related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department
by calling 447-9810 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written
comments. Oral or written comments should relate to how the proposed
construction and requested variances are or are not consistent with the Zoning
Ordinance and variance hardship criteria.
Prepared this 8th day of July 2003.
Cynthia Kirchoff, AICP, Planner
City of Prior Lake
To be published on Saturday, July12, 2003.
L:\03 Files\03 Variances\Griffith\Public Hearing Notice.doc
Mailing
Information
and Lists
L\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
)ss
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
o the City of Prior Lake County of Scott, State of
Minnesota, being duly s om, says on the ~ day of , 2003, she served
the attached list of persons to have an interest in the . .
~C(L,- ~~ ,. 1'3 ' by mailing to them a copy thereof,
enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and be depositing same in the post office at
Prior Lake, Minnesota, the last known address of the parties.
Subscribed and sworn to be this
_ day of , 2003.
NOTARY PUBLIC
L:IDEPTWORKIBLANKFRM\MAILAFFD.DOC
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VARIANCES FROM THE
ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A DETACHED GARAGE
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a
public hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road
SE (Southwest of the intersection of County Road 21 and Fish Point Road), on:
Monday, July 28, 2003, at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting variances from the Zoning
Ordinance for the construction of a detached garage.
APPLICANT: Steven Griffith
SUBJECT SITE: 17274 Sunset Trail SW, Prior Lake, MN, legally described
as Lot 21, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions
related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department
by calling 447-9810 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written
comments. Oral or written comments should relate to how the proposed
construction and requested variances are or are not consistent with the Zoning
Ordinance and variance hardship criteria.
Prepared this 17th day of July 2003.
Cynthia Kirchoff, AICP, Planner
City of Prior Lake
Mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject site on July 17, 2003.
1: \03 Files \03 Variances \Griffith \Mailed Hearing N otice.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (952) 447-4230 I Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
"'1.
-, , , , ...,
..... r~~".'
J
- I
"'.....
I
---
--... PllIftMIe ..
STEye .Mtm;,...
171M lIUleCr,...,
"",eM LM[. WII...Z
I.y Surveying Co., P A .
I~. FIWR.IN TNIl. 0PI'ICf. ~
IM10 .......UN TMl\. Ill,
I'WOlI LAKE. ~A lI557Z
lIU,"*€ _1447.151'0 . ./.
..,
!
i~
: ~$
I
~
:==--
r-'-- ,",
r- -f'.------
Ii
--
"_~T
1.'~.'''.,.
--- ,
---~-- ...
..fT"~.~..!-- --:-..~
~;;;"I' S"'0fll
~.....".,...
___ "'1'--
-'-
;"
....
j"
-
f'
...,'.
"-. '..
.~
I
I.
'2. 't-
a:
t
~.~:-.; " ,;'
l ...... i
'"\ (..... '............ Iii
: '"..~...... ..... ~:~~~/l
'~o~~)~
.w:.-~;:
,)(/
- -;'~~"
.,.'/' ..,.
."..... ..~
,x
/
T"''''.
_.~
I ,
i I
.
"
8
8~
- 8
8
b
P
)
./
;.1
'I
I
I
.;.,~ ./
,..:....:.-~
.'~ I
'FE
1)
'.i.-.'.
/
./
Ii -
LeI 2'. oFAlIlVIEW BF.ACH'. s-~, _ ....__*_
....-......-..--....._..._if_
..,...,...,-...,
PROPOSED GARAGE
..... ./2/0, ~"-"~_IM
~.................
,_ ...ww_...........,
- ....... " - . .......
-~..=:~
~........ ,J _ Ii*";
~ L'tf1
_1-I'J-ClI ~;:-_
"LI 10) --!!!.!..- _ ~ _-1-.
NEW ABSTRACTS
CONTINUATIONS
CLOSING SERVICE
REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS
TITLE INSURANCE
RECORDING SERVICE
SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
DAVID E. MOON EN
Phone: (952) 445-6246
Fax: (952) 445-0229
June 18, 2003
Steve Griffith
17274 Sunset Trail SW
Prior Lake, MN 55372
To Whom it May Concern:
According to the 2003 tax records in the Scott County Treasurer's Office, the following persons
listed on Exhibit "A" are the owners of the property which lies within 350 feet of the following
described property:
Lot 21, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
~~/1~
David E. Moonen
President
Scott County Abstract & Title, Inc.
MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
DAVID E & CHERIE L BA THEL
2370 SIOUX TRL
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
BONNIE K BROTEN
3090 FAIRVIEW RD
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
THOMAS & JEAN BORGER
3106 FAIRVIEW RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JOHN M & LEONA D SIMONETT
13570 OAKLAND DR
BURNSVILLE MN 55337
CURTIS L HENNES
17286 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
PAUL J & RHONDA L NICHOLS
3080 FAIRVIEW RD SW
PRIORLAKEMN 55372
REBECCA J LEIN
17347 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
eAVERY@ Address labels
PAUL J & RHONDA L NICHOLS
3080 FAIRVIEW RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
WILLIAM D & CAROL J WANGERIN
3096 FAIRVIEW RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
WAYNE MOBERG
3114 FAIRVIEW RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
BETH A KENYON
17310 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
STEVEN P & MAUREEN DOHENY
7160250 ST E
HAMPTON MN 55031
WILLIAM D & CAROL J WANGERIN
3096 FAIRVIEW RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
MICHAEL W REILLY
17339 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
EXIBT..a.-.L.~
laser
5162@
-,--...,.""", ""---~-'----'-"___.""'""'~"'_"_'~_____"'_'__~_"_;"A"".,..,""~___.__,.__.~_,.,_~.
MICHAEL P & KARLA J CADY
17311 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
BERT C STEVENS
17280 SUNRAY CIR
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
TODD J & APRIL J HARTZLER
17294 SUNRAY CIR SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
RICHARD L HERING
17308 SUNRAY CIR SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
KEVIN R LARSON
17326 SUNRAY CIR
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
DELORES A ZWART
17344 SUNRAY CIR
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 EAGLE CREEK AV
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
LYNETTE M ROHE
17254 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
RUTH A MUELLER
17244 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
BRIAN EBRIGHT
17226 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
ROBERT J OLSEN
17214 SUNSET TRL SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
JAMES K SENSTAD
17200 SUNSET TRL
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
P fJV2-
SAVERY@ Address labels
EXHIBIT-1l.~ 'do PAGES
laser
5162@
N 1/2
SEC.
/0
/. I
"060
N'''ICIl McCOMICII
I"-SII
SPRING
LAKE
~
oO~''1
-'S I.AI.I.Y
111040
II
/
I
~
.
:!:C/) I
zZ
0
::i:I-LU
00..0{ .
UOOlD
UJI-UO
Z a..
::::;~3:0
,,-1-(1)1-
og"-(I)
UJ"-O_-
C!)O~~
ZUJCOUJ
-Z~Z
~::::;~::::;
~ZI-~ 1010
"''''
r-ZOE' r-r-
<(<( N OO...JZ 00
:i ~ ...JUJ15Cl ...J ...J
<(~ ~ 1-1- I- Qo{UJZ ~~
ClO::: 0::: 00 0 o..ozg
~~ ~ ...J...J ...J
oil oil oil oIlU::::;<( oil oil
0::
a.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0::: r--r--
oil oil N N 0 0 ~ ~ r-- CO 10 ~ '" CO ~ CO r-- ;;Ii ;;Ii CO 0
a.. CO CO 10 "<t '" N ~ N N N CO ~ ~ r-- ~ ~ '" ~CO '" '" 0> '" ~
Z Z Z Z Z ZZ ZZ
Z 0 0 0 0 0 00 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00
0 I <( I I I I <( I I I <( I I I <( I<( I <( <( I I <(<(
<( UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ I- UI- ~ l- I- ~ U 1-1-
(I) 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: (I) (I) (I) (I) i5~ (I) (I) i5 (1)(1)
...J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
...J I I I I I I I lD :!: lD lD lD lD :!: lD lD lD :!: lD lD lD :!: lD:!: lD :!: :!: lD lD :!::!:
J: (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) :!: UJ ~ ~ ~ :!: UJ :!: :!: :!: UJ :!: :!: :!: UJ :!:!:!:! :!: UJ UJ :!: :!: UJUJ
l- I- l- I- l- I- l- I- UJ ~ UJ :> UJ UJ UJ :> UJ UJ UJ ~ UJ> UJ :> ~ UJ UJ ~~
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~8 ~ 0 ~ ~
(I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 -0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 00
(I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) (I) 3: 3: 3: 3: ~3: 3: 3: 3:3:
N ;;Ii ;;Ii ;;Ii ;;Ii ;;Ii ;;Ii ;;Ii N 10 N N N N 10 N N N 10 N N N 10 N 10 N 10 10 N N 10 10
r-- '" CO '" '" '" '" CO '" '" '" CO '" '" '" CO '" CO '" CO CO '" '" CO CO
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LO LO LO LO LO LOU;
I- 10 10 10 10 ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl 10 ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl ltl 10 ltl IOltl
::s N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N ~ N N
a.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
0:::
a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. 0..0.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. 0..0..
<( C/) C/) C/)C/) C/) C/)C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/)C/) C/)C/) C/)C/)
~ ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J 0::: 0 0 0::: ...J O!!:; ...Jo::: ...Jo:::
0::: 0::: 0:::0::: 0::: 0:::0::: 0::: 0:: 0:: 0:: U 0 U 0 0 0 0::: 0:::- 0:::-
C/) l- I- 1-1- I- 1-1- l- I- l- I- 0::: 0::: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: I- O::U I-U I-U
C/) l- I- 1-1- I- 1-1- l- I- l- I- ~ 3: 3: 3: ~ 3: 3: :!: I- ~>- ~~ ~~
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
Cl UJ UJ UJUJ UJ UJUJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UJ ~~
UJ C/) C/) C/)C/) C/) C/)C/) C/) C/) C/) (I) C/)
0:: Z Z ZZ Z ZZ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z _Z ZZ ZZ
I- ::> ::> ::>::> ::> ::>::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> <C <C <C ::> <C <C <C ::> <(::> ::>::> ::>::>
C/) C/) C/) C/)C/) C/) C/)C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) "- "- "- C/) "- "- "- C/) ,,-C/) (1)(1) (l)C/)
0 0 0 "<t CO 0 ~ ;1; <b 0 "<t CO CO 0 0 "<t "<t CO "<t CO 0 0 ~ o CO 0 0> CO 0 0 ~~
0 0 N N r-- CO CO M CO N ~ 0 0> 0> 0> CO M ~g '" N
N N N N N N N N N N M M M N g g g '" '"
r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- ",r-- r--r-- r--r--
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C/)
Cl
C/)
::>
0
I
N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N r-- N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N
N r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- '" r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r--r--
I '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" g '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
ltl 10 ltl ltl 10 10 10 10 ltl ltl ltl ltl :g 10 10 ltl ltl 10 ltl ltl 10 ltl 1010 10 ltl 10 10 ltl ltllO
(I) ltl ltl ltl ltl 10 ltl 10 ltl ltl 10 ltl 10 10 10 ltl ltl ltl 10 ltl ltl 10 ltl ltllO ltl 10 10 10 10 1010
C/) :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i::i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i::i:
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJUJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJUJ
5 5 5 5 5 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...J 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 55
::s ::s Z ::s ::s ::s ::s ::s ::s ...J ::s ::s ::s ::s ::s
~ 0 :>
0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: I- 0::: 0:: 0:: 0::: 0:: 0::: C/) 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0:::0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: 0:::0:::
a.. Z
U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q :i: Q Q Q Q Q Q 0:: Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QQ 0 0 0 0 0 00
I 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: <( 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: ::> 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::0:: 0::0::: ii: ii: ii: ii: ii: ii:ii:
C/) a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. I a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. lD a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. 0..0.. 0..0.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. 0..0..
~ :!: :!: ~ :!::!: ~ 3: :!: :!::!: :!: :!: :!::!: :!::!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
~ (I) C/) ~ C/) C/) ~ (I) (l)C/) C/) C/) C/)C/) C/)(I) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) C/)
UJ ...J ...J ...J ...J UJ ...J ...J UJ (I) ...J ...J ...J 0::: 0::: 0 0 0:: 0 0 O...J 0::: 0 ...J 0::: 0 0 ...JO:::
UJ 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: UJ 0::: 0:: UJ 0::: 0::: 0::: 0::: U 0 0:: 0::: U 0::: 0::: 0:::0::: D!U 0::: 0::: U 0::: 0::: 0:::-
0::: l- I- l- I- 0::: l- I- 0:: l- I- l- I- 0 :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:I- :!: I- :!: :!: I-U
UJ U l- I- l- I- U l- I- UJ U l- I- l- I- ~ Z UJ UJ ~ UJ UJ UJI- ~~ UJ I- ~ UJ UJ ~~
0:: UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ I- UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ::s ~ ~ ~ ~ -UJ ~ UJ ~ ~
I- ...J C/) C/) C/) C/) ...J C/) C/) C/) ...J C/) C/) C/) C/) 1;::C/) C/)
C/) ~ Z Z Z Z Cl Z Z ~ Z Z Z Z Z ~ Z _Z ::>z Z Z ZZ
I ::> ::> ::> ::> i5 ::> ::> g ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> <( <C <C ::> <C ~ <(::> Q::> <( ::> ::> <( ~ ::>::>
C/) UJ C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) (I) N C/) C/) C/) C/) C/) 0 "- "- C/) "- ,,-(I) C/)C/) "- C/) (I) "- C/)C/)
C/)
::>
0 0 0 0 "<t CO 8 ~ ;1; 8 ;! CO CO 0 0 0 "<t ~ CO 0> CO ~~
I 0 0 0 N N 15 CO CO M CO r-- ~ ~ 0> CO al o ~ ~g CO '" N 0 0
I N N N N N N N N N N N N ltl N 0> co'" 0> '" '" CO CO
CO r-- r-- r-- r-- ~ r-- r-- ;::: CO r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- '" M C;; r-- 0 0 g~ ",r-- 0 ~ ~ 0 0 r--r--
C/) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" N ~ '" '" '"
...., ....,
Z UJ ...J ...J
UJ ~ 0 0 ~....,...J 0 ...J ...J
UJ <( ....,0:: 0::
0::: UJ ...J lS lS i3i3
::> Z Z ~i UJ
0 Z ii: a:
<( i3 i5 oil oil zz
:i: UJ a.. UJ 00
...J <(
oil oll ...., 0 I 0 II
u.. u.. u.. ...., oll oll oll ~ U ~ 0::0::
0 0 a.. 0 ...J <(
~ ~ <( ::::E Z ...J ...J ::::E I ...., ~ olloll oll 0 :!: olloll
~ C/) C/) ...., ~ Z ~ UJ C/) C/) <( U Z UJ 0 ::::; W ....,0.. W ::::; ...J 0::: ....,ffl
~ W ~ 0:: ...., ....,
U w w u 5 ~ u [jj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ...J Z ~~ Q <( ...J ~ Z ..J ..J lSO::
~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ::>
ui w uI ui I- W Z ~ I ~ ~ u9
~ 0:: ~ C/) ::> ::> lD ~ ;;i 0 U ;;i 0
5 ~ ~ 0:: ~ 0{ C/) :5 0 0 II) ui t ci II) ii: ~ WW
lD ~ :r:: ui ui ;;i ~ w ii: ;;i '0 ii: :E z ui ui lDO
Z Z ...: w ..J I- Z ..J w ~:i uf c5 w ~ ..J ..J ~...:
~ 0:: :t: ~ ::l ui 0:: u:: w i ~ w ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ z Cl 0 0 ~
~ C/) w w ffi ~ :t: ~ ~~
C/) 0 z a C!) w :t: :t: 0 u.. 12 !< ii: ~ ...J :t:
I ~ W w ii: ii: ::> ~ g ii: ii: w w 2 ~ w [j U ~
C/) C/) C/) II) a.. ::::E a.. C!) I :t: ~ C/) Ci) CD lD ZU lD I 0:: Z Z
~ g g ; ~ c;; I 0 0 ~ g ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 8 ~ al 0 00 ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 00
8 co ~ N ~ co r--~ '" r-- 0> N N lSl~
co 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 N '" 0 N N
0 ~ ~ 0 g g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 gg
N ;;Ii N ltl ~ N N N N N N N N NIO Nltl N ltl ltl N N
r-- '" co '" '" '" co '" '" '" co '" '" '" co "'co '" co co '" '" coco
LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LOLC; LOU; LO LO LO LO LO LOLO
0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N NN N NN
ii:
o
:2
A
Property owners within 350 feet
of Griffith Variance
I I
~
N
Overheads
Presentation
Materials
L\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
Location Map for
Griffith Variance
Spring Lake
',.
Ie, Surv.,tng Co.,' P. A .
.., ,....... l1IIIIL CIPI'U ~ _
IMftt ~ lMII. &.1.
MOlt UlICI. ~_(A mrz
1IU,.. _)..,.~.~. __ -" ..'-
*-' ~.:
lTEYI ~
17I1"I-.r,....
I'ltICM LAIl[,,,. t8Itz
!
I>
f ,-
I I
I i
I f:
I I
.,.-
III I
~
of 1.
..J
.
I! "
: :$ t
I
---/71'
-- -
1
J
-j
'..T:,."r..
I'
..~
! ;
I !
IL
I II
.-Ja
I b
!P
! ~
----
--
+:...,.
",
----. .
. ~ ...
.." ---;.;:-- .
.fT"~ #~-;o.c. .. .
~:;;...' i
~ ."" I
"'!
-
....
--
.-;t:
~,
~ -
/~"'>.. . .....
4 ..........
'"
I :i
! Z
I-
&..Jt .'AJ.VreW8f.ACH..Sooa(,-,.~ "'-'.............
fII"~~..._______.................., _..
.~.. I._~_..,
.....
I':>
, ~,
/
I
j
.o";<l!::/
../.,>'
,: . ."
,/
,/
/
_.'l/o'r__.,,_
_..... Il~.._..
'iil::.. ~.. _ --.
- ---- It _.....~
-----__1-
:.:: ~ .,~ C':
~ L~1_
_ f-1"-d11 "'--_Del
r
... . ,..,.
'-..... ---
. ..... .. '- .
1_ .
o
.
..
'ILI ..,~ _...!!!... ,...2..-
.
.
PROPOSED GARAGE TO BE RECONSTRuCTED
SURVEY