The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermits for Industrial Condo CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, TEMPORARY CERUf41CATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AND lJ l.u..ITY CONNECTION PERMIT (Please type or prinund silD at '. .'. I, '" ) ADDRESS I T") I J g A ~~ \ VV\o. '^ V\ 5 tv-ee."'r I. While File 2. Pink City ] Yellow Applk:8m 5E LEGAL DESCRu uON (office use only) LOT / BLOCK / ADDITION Oe:e~(;l,O ,pO. /lJ::... +-nt OWNER ~~'" 0 (~;.'" (Name) /{Q'1 Z:...Ju.i\..~..\ P-lt- ~.iJ"'.r\.t Co. LL.c.. (Address) S 00 511(~ fho w\'"...sc..h.. \\ ~J BUIL.ur..l\. /' (Company Name) \)-vc.,,!/ tOCl\ P. Co~+...vc..-tlo", (Contact Name) .R ~v~JL p~ lle t.'c.y.. (Address) ~ 00 S.... th t'L1"...sc:.l..", l( RcR Date Rec' d 9. 2. oS- hi/& wi OSCJ4t3? I PERMIT NO. ()5: 06 & 4- ZONING (oftice use) Xl. PID z.s: 4-3/. 00 1.0 (Phone) ~') ~- 'i~(g - ~ Ol.~ 'I Sk. k otJe.~. (h fl) 5' ':1 "3 7 't . . Co,.,~~ (Phone) 95;).. L{CJ~ - ~ 'J. ~") (Phone) .!j ~ ~ - d. ~~ - ~ st.~, MfII fS'3'1jCc{l Gla, '11(,- 5JeO TYPE OF WORK 0 New Construction ODeck OPorch ORe.Roofing ORe.Siding OLower Level Finish 0 Fireplace OAddition OAlteration OUtility Connection fjiJ Misc. S ,., V\ . CODE: OI.R.C. OI.B.C. Type of Construction: I Occupancy Group: A B E Dil'ision: n F 1 m IV V A B HIM R S U 2 3 4 5 '1. cto J.! PROJECT COST 'VALUE S (excluding land) I hereby certify Ihall have furnished information on Ihis application which is 10 Ihe besl of my knowledge true and COI'I'KI. I also certify thaI) am Ihe OwnlT or authorized agent for the above-menboned property and lhat aU cons . n will conform 10 all existing Slale and local laws and wiD r- ....J in accordance with submilled plans. I am aware Ihat the building :~st ca~ agree that Ihecity official or a designee may enter upon Ihe ~'"~'''J' 10 perform need; I~O:SO 5 , Signature Contractor's License No. Date Permit Fee S Plan Check Fee S State Surcharge S Penalty S Plumbing Permit Fee S Mechanical Permit Fee S Sewer & Water Permit Fee $ Gas Fireplace Permit Fee ($ . : 'our Building-Pmnit When A,(rof . ~ q //7.AIo~- ../ /DJfe ,f - 'I . Permit Valuation Cjoa?- - / 7&~ -7......- il4:cI1 4'0 . Park Support Fee SAC Water Meter Size 5/S"; I"; Pressure Reducer Sewer/Water Connection Fee Water Tower Fee Builder's Deposit Other TOTAL DUE Paid oJ1(',-/o/ Dat< 9 r.dr. I. e f(........j{) \. '1 p) # . $ # $ $ S # $ # $ $ $ S Zf'r/~ /fY~:J(, if :;tt No. () ThIS IS to certify Ihallhe request in the above application and a,w...~..nying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requl'Sted. This ducumenl when signed by the City Planner conslitules a I'---r ....ry Certificate of Zoning compliance and aUows construction to commence. Before occupancy, a C.:rtificale uf Occupancy mUSI be issued Planning DirecIor Date Special Conditions, if any 24 hour notice for all inspections (95:Z) 447-9850, fax (95:Z) 447-4245 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT Date Rec' d White File Pink City Yellow Applicant gJ2-~/or rlL& wi ()S-. o4-e9 PERMIT NO~ ().5-' 0 a zfi (Please type or print and sign at bottom) ADDRESS I? I s-8 /ffJ€L 1I1711#1J Si--f2 €€l- ZONING (office use) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) LOT BLOCK ADDITION PID z.~-. +7 I. 00 (. 0 OWNER (Name) (Phone) (Address) BUILDER (Company Name) (Contact Name) (Address) ~ ()11~nq PL..Ll.u.-r tlLWb- ::r-O~ ~o,J k~t..J~e (Phone) tSI.....<}S<7 ,~C4F (Phone) G.r{- 775-- KG SO e~. /VI,...;. ~S/ 2.2.. IJ t2. . TYPE OF WORK 0 New Construction DDeck OPorch ORe-Roofing OAddition OAlteration OUtility Connection ORe-Siding OLower Level Finish o Fireplace CODE: OLR.C. OLB.C. Type of Construction: I II III IV V A B Occupancy Group: A B E F HIM R S U ,ivision: I 2 3 4 5 I lereby certifY that I have filrnished mformation on this application which is to the best of my knowledge true and COlTec!. I also certifY that I am the owner or authonzed agent for the a ove.mentlOned property a d that all construction will conform to all existing state and locallaws and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans. I am aware that the buildmg :tlcial can revoke this per ::7urthermore. I :erebY agree that the City official or a designee ma~e~n.the;:::rty to perfo~:\pJ::;;:c;n~. as- Signature Contractor's License No. t:.J--' \ ~,p,ilW \/ ~ ,\,{'Y" , I ~,~cr M,'" Si" S/8.tEf ~I : Ifn 5",00 Pressure Reducer J 'li $ z..o"() . 0 tJ Sewer/Water Connection Fee # I $ Water Tower Fee # $ Builder's Deposit $ Other $ TOTAL DUE $ o Misc. W AT$'- ~~~'- PROJECT COST IV ALUE $ (excluding land) Permit Valuation Park Support Fee Sewer & Water Permit Fee $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Permit Fee Plan Check Fee State Surcharge Penalty Plumbing Permit Fee Mechanical Permit Fee Gas Fireplace Permit Fee p";;;:,m.-;;;;;;v<, Buildmg Otlicial Dale Paid Nq 7<;; Oil Date f{ '2..CI ~ Receipt No. '1"( z.... By 11r. ThiS IS to certifY that the request in the above applicatIOn and accompanying documents is m accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requested. ThiS document when signed by the City Planner constItutes a temporary Certificate of Zoning compliance and allows construction to commence. Before occupancy. a Certificate of Occupancy must be issued Planning Director Date 24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447-9850, fax (952) 447-4245 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 Special Conditions, if any CITY OF PRIOR LAKE SEWER AND WATER PERMIT Date Rec'd fJ ~ I ~. oS 1. Green File 2. Yellow City ). Gold Applicant ,c/(.A~ 11.// as. 0 4-89 PERMIT NO. 05_ 0558 (Please type or print and sil;Il at bottom) ADDRESS 17158 Adelmann Street (J /II D. eiJN DO I 3 -P/."c,t) ZONING (office use) r~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) LOT I BLOCK ( ADDITION DE8eYffAL) I NO. PK.-. 4- 71f PIDz5~ 4-3/. 001.0 OWNER (Name) Greystone Construction Company (Phone) 952/496-2227 (Address) 500 South Marschall, Suite 300 (Address) Shakopee. MN 55379 (City) (Zip Code) APPLICANT (N ame) STOCKER EXCAVATING COMPANY, INC. . (Phone) 952/890-4241 rAY ~o - z7~3 APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE B (Zip Code) (Address) 12336 Boone Avenue (Address) Curt ~ (Contact Person) /' I APPLICANT SIGNATURE -t:. .4nvr . Savage, MN same ---~'--- Size of water service inches. Location of any couplings from structure Type of sewer pipe. 0 ABC 0 PVC Estimated length of sewer line feet. Clean out (if required) located at _ feet from structure. feet. o Cast [ron Residential sewer and water line connection Sewer connection only FEE SCHEDULE $35.50 Industrial, Com'\ & Multi-family I % of job cost with a $39.50 minimum $17.50 Water connection only $17.50 Estimated Cost $ / 'ltiJ() I - Building Permit # 05". OSSB $ -12/J . ()O $ .50 $ ---12/) . 511 SEWER AND WATER PERMIT FEE STATE SURCHARGE TOT AL PERMIT FEE I j Bn,fn" Y 0", B~ild ing P'6"l;'i?VOd -=-~ ' Dale Paid 7 .--" / (L~U Da&. / ? os I Receipt No9'? 3~ / BY~ / 24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447-9850, fax (952) 447-4245 e/l/6/c, SItS/vi. Or 5.25:.r/t/~- JUL-19-2005 13:05 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 9524474245 P.02 Date Rec'd CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLUMBING PED....u. I. BI". File 2 Cold all 3. rei"'" AppIiQlIl 7. /f os Ii~c wi #05 04-89 PERMit NO. 0.5 00 9~ (please woe 01' 'Drinr IDd simlll: bottom) .AJ.J.LJAESS {)-t:t:1l.. F=- ~eL ,{;, .::: AJ iJ . /J ~,( '<. /7 ! se .401:1..I"'11f74,J1V Sr-r2.cer ' fJA.E"Qt'l.. L"".Jt.-c- (f-~ sJl) /'it;; tL}/V'J' 77(... w LEGAL DESCRtr .1 J.ON (office: use only) ZONING (otIkeuse) LOT BLOCK ADDmON PID OWNER (Name) (Phone) . (Address) APPLICANT (Name) tJJI1kor19- f7L~""'~" (Address) 3&,$"tJ kWAJ~O€<:' .(}.e. (Address) jOHIV H,q.1V4e", aM#" ~~/, ~-r1'-1f-W JI'I1 IV, (Phone) '$/- f'.s-4, - '-t 4-"," S-S-12.2 (City) (Zip Code) (Phone) (Contact Person) DATE ')- "-05 APPLICANT SIGNATURE , APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLm.l J!- BELOW Quantity Type of Fixture Bath Tub with or without shower Dishwasher Floor Drain Lavatory (Bathroom Sink) Laundry Tray (1 or2 comparnnent sink Shower stall - Sinks Bar Sink Water Closet (Toilet) Quantity Type o'f Fixture Rough. ins Water Heater Water Softner . Stand Pipe (Washing Machine) Sewage Ejector Backflow Assembly Bacldlow Assembly Test Lawn Sprinkler Other f~ FEES~nLDULE Industrial, ommertial Multi-family ~ of job cost with a 539.50 minimum Residential, New One &. Two-Family $99.50 Residential, Additions & Alterations $39.50 Estimated Cost S .If. 2.. <<:Joe - Building Permit # PLUMBING PERMIT FEE $ STATE SURCHARGE $ TOTAL PERMIT FEE S -1:2.G. - .sO 4'Z.~. ~ 't- 2. ,..:. L... F /FIr of ""f'fS: S"O I ReceiptNo. -'14924- IBY~ I (ome\! U.c Onl)') This Application Becomes Your Building Permit When Approved ~~ ~/~.5- 8uildlng Omeial ' Date: Paid +- z O..so Date 7. Z-l. () 5 %4 hour notice for all Inspections (l'5Z) 447-9150, fa (9~Z) 447-4145 16~OO Eagle Creek Ave., S.E., Prior Lake, MN 5537:1-1714 7. 2 O. OS {!;feC;/c / fJ (//fU c--- / TOTAL P.02 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, TEMPORARY CERunCATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE.. AND lJ 1 u..ITY CONNECTION PERMIT Date Rec' d 4- 2Z cS- I. White File 2. Pink City ) Yellow AppliCllnl I PERMIT NOl?).... ~ l ZONING (oftice use) r.l (Please type or print and silD at r. """,,) A....&,.nE;SS //7 /~)8 /10(; L j11 /1 Jl.ft/S772 e E' / 5&: LEGAL DESCRu J.1.0N (office use only) LOT ( BLOCK I ADDITION oW-Fr6u~ IND. fL. 4771 PID 25". 4-3i. 00/.0 OWNER. Ke,v:", 0 'Ij~~e"" I (Name)---L.G>q ~st...~Q. \ ~e..~ O~Vl.t (Address) 500 S. jl\tlYsc.k4. \\ ~c9 SJ/tlt ko4e..Q I I Co.,' L I-. c. flit! (Phone) Cj '5;;..... 'f~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ '7 553'7 ~ BunDEll r (Company Name) \.r~ fo"" C.n.6+"'ve;..+:.l'\ (Contact Name) Lh",""~ p~+~....,,", (Address) ~OO S. M......!.c.kcd\ RJ 5~",k.oDe.<<.. I ~N CD"""PAtIl.L , (phone) if 5:l- 'i'l(p.. ~ a a. ? (Phone) 15;).' '7'l(g. ~ ~ ~ 7 55 ?>'1~ c.. 4?/z. 4l~ .5180 TYPE OF WORK I5New Construction DDeck OPorch ORe-Roofing ORe-Siding OAddition DAlteration DUtility Connection 0 Misc. OLower Level Finish o Fireplace . CODE: DI.R.C. OI.B.C. Type of Construction: I Occupancy Group: A B E Division: n mlVVAB F HI MRSU 1 2 3 4 5 PROJECT COST/VALUE $ '7 S-3>>. ~ _ ...- (excluding land) I Permit Valuation (9:>.~- - Park Support Fee # $ I Permit Fee S ~qZ .'1e;; SAC I1v ~ $ 43$"0. Plan Check Fee S "3050. "1 Water Meter Size 5/8"; I"; $ N'A State Surcharge S 3"1 (P.~O I Pressure Reducer $ #It Penalty S I Sewer/Water Connection F~ #,? S 4S-ao,..... Plumbing Permit Fee $ I Water Tower Fee (O~ #~ $ ~6U? Mechanical Permit Fee S I Builder's Deposit $ Sewer & Water Permit Fee $ Other $ I Gas Fireplace Permit Fee II S TOTAL DUE $ /qJ qM.q / I ~ 5/'Z 1/~..> mo-lJ: Paid /~ 9~~~ ReceiotNQ. 4 ~::s~ ~Z ~ Date ~. J.oJ ByF- I Date nus is 10 certify Ihat rhe request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requL'Slcd. This documenl signed by the City Planner consmutes a t....yv...ry Certificale of Zoning compliance and aUows construction to commence. Before occupancy, a Certificale of Occupancy must be (~~~ S- 2:J ~S "-'-'''' 24 hour notice for all inspections (9~2) 447-9850, fax (9~2) 447-424~ 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 oJlTHU) 08: 51 GOPHER HEATING (FAX)952 890 3585 P 002/002 Deerfield Industrial Park Greystone Condo Balance Report Sep 29.2005 Gopher Heating Sheet Metal AUTO BODY Supply Supply Retu rn/Exhaust Return/Exhaust Location Initial Final Initial Final Offic'e north 195 190 320 350 Office south 171 190 Waiting north 189 190 270 270 Waiting south 80 90 Bathroom north 78 90 89 90 Bathroom south 79 90 90 90 Total Autobody RTU 792 840 769 800 LANDSCAPE Supply Supply Retu rn/Exhaust Return/Exhaust Location Initial FInal Initial . FInal Entry 90 100 Center office 210 200 Center office 145 150 260 260 Bath 90 90 95 95 Back office 275 280 360 350 Bath 0 0 95 95 Total Landscape RTU 810 820 610 800 Supply Supply Return/Exhaust ReturnlExhaust Location Initial Final Initial Final MAU # 1 Autobody 5800 5800 PRV # 1 6000 6000 MAU # 2 Middle 5790 5790 PRV # 2 5990 5990 MAU # 3 Landscape 5810 5810 PRV#3 6010 6010 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND INSPECTION PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION RECORD SITE ADDRESS 11 \ ~ ~ \'1A-NN $, g, E. NATURE OF WORK ~ <. ~J>..j6- ~ USE OF BUILDING \ //r'"' 'l'-\~ f I PERMIT NO. 05 - 4~:1 ~ DATE ISSUED S-/2-1/OS- CONTRACTOR ~[)~- Rt~ PHONE6f2.-4\<O-C;1~ NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT FOR ANY OF THE INSPECTIONS BELOW THE PERMIT IS BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT INSPECTOR, DA?;E " I FOOTING f1/1r/1ti! /IN &/;I/o~ /H I. ~//~tif- FOUNDATIoN (Prior to Backfill) I I PLACE NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED ROUGH - INS I SEWER I WATER I SEPTIC FRAMING INSULATION ELECTRICAL PLUMBING riG M 7/fl(clr HEATING (if required) . FIREPLACE 1/ /14 GAS LINE AIR TEST j:' Ih-t.s- ~ rl1J{ , ~enJu,,~ pvt. R,;(?//~ k 1J/ ~( ?/z.s~k .. '~/ZF-/~5- .. f /?/as- COVER NO WORK UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED I .8Jt'-I~tt-LES(2.- I IJt/1 I ?/??~J FINALS GRADING (Prior to Sodding). ,y.s 9. Z~J~ '.., BUILDI~~/1' ec;,Vr/;/ /t:J/JoA;//iY JYflK P- ~~6 .' :~~~:~N~Ati~PC.O' u.-!-7/tY'W ';Wi . /%:j;;S- HEATING ~ ?/u/CJS- DO NOT OCCUpy UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED NOTICE ' This card must be posted near an electrical service cabinet prior to rough-in inspectior and maintained until all inspections have been approved. On buildings and additiol where no service cabinet is available, card shall be placed near main entrance. FOR ALL INSPECTIONS (952) 447-9850 "".._-"'-,~--~...._-~-~,-"...".~-~-_.._;.......~--'-..... ""'.'-'- CITY OF PRIOR LAKE Date Ref. HEATING/AIR CONDITIONING/FIREPLACE PERMIT ;::/~e 0/#OS,64t$9 ~ :~n ~!~ PERMITNO.a5_0753 3. Yellow Applicant (Please type or print and sil!,tl at bvuv.u) ADDRESS \"1' 5 8 A-d e. \ V'Y'l4: n V\ t> ,...~v- l.Q \<::R.. 1 ('{\ N , ~ t;:;f)37-:J. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) LOT BLOCK ADDITION OWNER (Name) K-e.vt"" f} 8d CA (Address) APPLICANT (Name) hDpka....v- ~(A-~ \'lj l ~~ '3 b o+f6-LV c~ A LULV\LU> (Address) (Contact Person) /)f7 f1lJls f) /1 r~ APPLICANT SIGNATURE ~ [).f;-v-r~ (Address) ZONING (office use) PID (Phone) -3!IiJ. - L{91:r tJ().o1 i (Phone) q~d- - 'CRD.~ ;) 'IbG ,~(,fQ G5:l7 B (ri/ty) (Zip Code) 9/j-J - 890 -3'1-h" 7-d. B -0 L;' . - (Phone) DATE APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE BELOW ~EW CONSTRUCTION 0 REPLACEMENT 0 AL TERA TIONS FURNACE MAKE AND MODEL FUEL FLUE SIZE RETURN OPENINGS INPUT OUTPUT TYPE OF SYSTEM OWarm Air Plants OGravity ~ Mechanical .RfAir Conditioning ~ent. System HEATING OR POWER PLANT o Steam o Hot Water o Radiation o Special Devices o Other Devices FIREPLACE MAKE AND MODEL PLEASE NOTE: Air Conditioner Units Cannot Encroach into Required Side Yard Setbacks FEE SCHEDULE I % of job cost Residential, Gas Fireplace $39.50 minimum $99.50 Residential, Additions & Alterations $64.50 Residential, AC Only Industrial, Commercial & Multi-Family Residential, Heating & AlC (New Construction) Residential, Heating Only (New Construction) $39.50 $39.50 $39.50 Estimated Cost $ 51 000'w. 1 Building Permit # OS, 0753 HEATING PERMIT FEE ST ATE SURCHARGE TOTAL PERMIT FEE (Office Use Only) This Application Becomes Your Building Permit When Approved d~.d~~- o/~~r Building Official ' 'Date $ 51tJ.-- $ .50 $ ;;-1 tJ.. 50 pai<$-/O. SO Date Ii' ",.,.- cO. / z,., u.:> 24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447-9850, fax (952) 447.4245 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, Prior Lake, MN 55372 MUOJ 8.4--05 Receipt N+?f}~ I By !IIi I White - Building Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning NAME OF APPLICANT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST C~~SW~ C~~.. .'l"-cU.A/ o !r ~ /0<; S Eo-a2- f- W/'Hv--fL I APPLICATION RECEIVED The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: \., '<)t? ~A.,?v rV\~ tJ Accepted t~ I Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed By: --::h.;j' Comments: <t: '6 ~ ~ j \, . · _ J'<--., d='..:> -- Pre; eoV' 51 "U C -+- ..' <3__ Date: bl~ (0 ~ @ ~ ~ z - Y'-/7'- q 1'30 ~~.(~ -'" "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." White - Building Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLlSr: NAME OF APPLICANT t!j,ze:V- t:STO tJ 6- Co /Vsir , (!,u. APPLICATION RECEIVED 1~. 25 05 The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: /7/:.)8 floE~;V;r;N s/I2Ec / Denied , Date: r;-h bs- ) ! / /) Comments: ,.. ~..J~(""" 5ro/\.JdOfJ'-/.Jf.vs /:csa-. Pa-~3. f/AM...,~ z..... ~f)/J\ .f r- ~ (Ji.!i2.hl ('f> AAD ~ Fk. ~., Pu.Al 6(,AJ(.... 5~ /IN> ~-(l- ANfl 25f;12-t,^,lG.t-.)-;-z.~S . SC'-S OtsS/5fZ- ~(~ 4r ~Ti~ .~5P,-,~~ Accepted With Corrections " v Accepted Reviewed By: If) ~. ~61')1 I ~ "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." 'f' f ~~ White - Building Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning .. f, BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHI:CKLlST NAME OF APPLICANT APPLICATION RECEIVED , 1/ :' .1/ r Ir A /;::: I I( '~-' '-.- I \/ ~ f ,1 / "r'-,""; l ( /j -' /1'- . I (;.. j 2 ."'-:- / t.-:-' :.r, -- _./, l./-..i The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: / / / ~'y llt'/ t L/'/rl/./ '-7-/ (.--Ei-:-- ,jo,...,'"," Accepted Accepted With Corrections / ..." Denied Reviewed B~ ~ m. ~ Date: S / " IDS Comments~ - ~ ~~. S .~ ~ f ~~. J_l:t4tfJ 1Ii.~u~ ~ , J (:2&".. nAJJ ,.-..i. r~~ 01 ~ w /bo~ t~ .-- · ~ ~~Pb./a..",- ~ 6- ~ ~ ~j. f'1 I . ~ /. o~11 . -LJ ~.aA ..J-...( !~ ~~ ~~~ ~ "'r-'~" ~ 1\ r~. 11 / I . , "'\ .r ~ . ~ l~lJ\L.... '" ,.,.t-,,_:..i. .~ hrA- "" -- u~ . ..JJ~). .1...1' IlL f\ ' ~ ,"'=tI - ~"':.,j "'--.; ~t.~__~ . 11 U ," "f\ \ ~ /1~ ~ ~ wuw ~ ~~. .Q.Q_ ~ ~ · -no ~~ ~"B~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~-~ W\JlO ~ o.DJ~vUt ~ ~tl~ ~ ~-~~-+ ~ (UJ ~~ . J . . --r ~ . -'- "GIow.+ Ja... ./ n~ ( .I1i'.A..f (J -- ,J -;pi{ ''tJ ..... -tfwr 'T' .,- U (J "The Issuan'6e or g nting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." I ~~ · ~ -r- , b ,... f' ~ ~ ..... T "".- :~:.....r.-zr r ~t ..' ,...,{\ ~~ OJl~.Lr~ -.( ~~.#"r t~<V ~ ,~~~- 0 --,- G ~ ~k:.. "'"' ~llo/ OS) . .. PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION RECORD DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND INSPECTION SITE ADDRESS , r I c; rJ A-v.c- VV" ~!'o''''''''' S '- S.. E, TYPE OF WORK ! II"'" N~.-J USE OF BUILDING 5 (o,J ,/ PERMIT NO. ~t1/- DATE ISSUED ". If? (/ v~- BUILDER {-:7/!c-r~~Cv...~.r PHONE# 1<Jl-l1S .(/36 NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT FOR ANY OF THE INSPECTIONS BELOW THE PERMIT IS BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT INSPECT~R I ty.TE " l FOOTING l /f4Y I ty/..z!4s J PLACE NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED J1fAMINO -c~iZ-L- ~(i'1~---vr- I l FINAL Call between 8:00 and 9:00 A.M. for all inspections FOR ALL INSPECTIONS (952) 447-9850 . \,\'1 U~ L C, \__J ~ Date Reviewed ,,~ a5 Permit # PERNifTKE Q U l.H.EMENT Date: '1/I,/oS Request: a.. .tJ;. PlA.. .s~ 10 rot ~~t. ~~ -K)k~. ~ ~ p~ ~~ Date: " ~/6S- Date: Request: ~ "'fcA~ ~ ~ Reply: ""\'"f> .", ~ <.0 ::.:Jt~ V*--~ ~ ~. . ^. . . . I) ~ . ~" -,-' ,Go4.'a" ~...T ~ ' Date: Date: Request: Reply: REPLY DATE Date: Reply: ------- . ,~/ I) (.. / ~ . I .' ) , /' I f-' .A...--,I /I v ....<..... ! ( !- ! 1"1' I ---.- A-I .. ! ....-; " J 1" / ~'j t. I '), 7/ h/ v.I'\.... i-' Il~ _ ! I " jlTI.--; ( ('-f-() 15~r j;~1v ) r Date: Request: Date: Reply: Building/Planning/Engineering Permit Complete D Permit Issued D l:\BUILDING\FORMS\PERMIT INFO REQUEST.doc Accept D Decline D Accept D DeclineD Accept D Decline D Accept D Decline 0 --f!- OS - 0 Iff r White - Building Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT 0,U"-'yS77);J6 /1 r1 ^ I r--;-V;;! 0 /1 / i L./() I V-J l,<-.. ,-"v. APPLICATION RECEIVED /L -t'- I .26. ..../-S The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: /7/58 i.tlOEL-r/'rJA/ :S,//26c/- Accepted X Denied Reviewed By: y~ .- , ~.~~ (iJb~ Accepted With Corrections Comments: Date: J;(zu6~ G...A,~t,.:,'-o 5 h:. v.,; h:.CL.. d11~d "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." White - Building Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHI:CKLlST NAME OF APPLICANT APPLICATION RECEIVED 6ec,.Y~/ON6 ()ONSrte-. 9. z~ os- , The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: Accepted /7/5"6 /. A06LI1Fft1/IV STR..e6/ S.G. Denied Accepted With Corrections k!)~> / Date: q /.'.71.-- I~~ 0 ) / / Reviewed By: Comments: "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." ~--'" T ... ,.. l' ~.... 'f .. J. ." ! ,... --/~i 7~)- Lff~Z;;:~ ., .".". .. \ White - Building Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning aUll..DlNG PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CH..ECKLlST NAME OF APPLICANT APPLICATION RECEIVED I 1 t"_ / '- . I The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: ; I /--.;: /_./' L / j--- / ;' / / {c::.~-..-i--"'.- -. ~~ . Accepted Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed By: Date: (L ~rc:::J~ ~ ~ ~ ~_,_,t:.:..N.. a. ddL Ph..-, ~ ~ ,:t. ~ /DJ_~ r )~ .t .~ ~ ~ . "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." ~ Metropolitan Council March 31, 2005 Environmental Services Bob Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. Prior Lake, MN 55372-1787 Dear Mr. Hutchins: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division has determined SAC for the Deerfield Industrial Park to be located within the City of Prior Lake. This project should be charged 3 SAC Units, as determined below. SAC Units Charges: Landscape Co. Office 1200 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft./SAC Unit Warehouse 4992 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft./SAC Unit Autobody Shop 4 bays @ 14 bays/SAC Unit Lease Space Office 1200 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft./SAC Unit Warehouse 4992 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft./SAC Unit 0.51 0.71 0.29 0.51 0.71 Total Charge: 2.71 or 3 If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1113. Sincerely, , d. ~ JO~dS Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: (425) 050331S1 cc: S. Selby, MCES www.metrocounciLorg Metro Info Line 602-1888 230 East Fifth Street · St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 · (651) 602-1005 · Fax 602-1138 · TTY 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer June 3, 2005 Mr. Jake Kienlen Kato Roofing 321 Lundin Boulevard Mankato, MN 56001 RE: Deerfield Industrial Park - Auto Body Shop Prior Lake, MN Dear Mr. Kienlen: As confirmation, the following roof assembly options for .a Carlisle Sure-Seal Roofmg System meet Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 1256 test criteria under UL Construction number 458, as mentioned in the International Building Code section 1508 and 2603.4.1.5: Sure-Seal Ballasted Roofin~ Svstem 1. 22-gauge or heavier Steel Deck 2. 1.5-inch thick Carlisle Polyisocyanurate insulation loose laid over the steel deck 3. 3.25-inch thick Carlisle Expanded Polystyrene Insulation loose laid over the polyisocyanurate 4. .045-inch thick Sure-Seal membrane sheets loose laid over the insulation and ballasted following Carlisle Ballasted Specification. Please refer to the attached documents from Underwriter Laboratories for additional clarifications. Upon completion of the Membrane System in accordance with our current Carlisle Sure-Seal System Specifications, and acceptance by Carlisle at final inspection, this project will be eligible for a Carlisle Membrane System Warranty. If you have any questions or if! can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, --?dd Brian P. Chamberlain Senior Systems Designer CC: Dale Ladwig - Architectural Consultants, Inc. Robert Hutchins - City of Prior Lake . ROOFlN8AMERlCA:OVER 4OYEARSAlD108lWON SQUARErlCl:1 011111. &lnT.c I .. ...,. od p.a Ib< 7000. CariisIe. PA 17013 F't1one (lolI1nII) 1-800-4-S'VNTFC o 2004 Carlisle SynTec 1.._. .... ~led Prinled in the U.S.A. - ~ T2 ENGINEERING Tom Thompson, :P.E. September 26, 2005 Gopher Heating Attn: Dennis 12330 Ottawa Avenue South Savage, MN 55378 Re: Deerfield Industrial Park Meadow Green Lawn and Landscape Prior Lake, MN Dennis: Regarding combustion air for the unit heaters and radiant heaters for this project, the combustion air is provided using indoor combustion air based on IFGC Section 304.2 as amended by Minnesota Rules Chapter 1346. The volume of the spaces exceeds the minimum required using section 304.2.1 - standard method. Sincerely, &~E 412 Tyler Road North · Red Wing, Minnesota 55066 · (651) 388-0751 Fax: (651) 388-2168 (". q '~;'--5c'1--",'-<, '\;J:,'>'>':"'ik :~_:;:(0< _~" -"y':>, 'c"";H- LKii.r... I ~'i Oi~ ~ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY II t '\0) ~ @ ~ 0 \TI ~ 1 It MAY 2 6 Z005 ~ ,By May 26, 2005 Mr. Steve Albrecht City Engineer City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 RE: 17158 Adelmann St. Deerfield Industrial Park Dear Mr. Albrecht: Enclosed are copies of the SWPPP and NPDES permits for the Greystone Industrial Condominium (Lot 1, Block 1, Deerfield Industrial Park). I have also included a copy of the revised grading, drainage and utility plan that had previously been submitted to the Building Department. Please contact me direct at 952.278.1136 if you need anything else to release this for permitting. I appreciate your assistance and attention to this matter. Sincerely, #~CI10NCOMPANY Richard Pelletier Project Manager RP:jam End: 500 S. Marschall Road, Suite 300 www.greystoneconstruction.com Shakopee, MN 55379 Equal Opportunity Employer/Contractor Phone: (952) 496-2227 Fax: (952) 445-4191 GREI~srI\OI~E CONSTRUCTION COMPANY II 11II May 26, 2005 Robert D. Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 16200 Eage Creek Ave. SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 RE: 17158 Adelmann St. Deerfield Industrial Park Dear Mr. Hutchins: The following are responses to your plan review letter dated May 6, 2005 that were open items from architect David Linner's May 19, 2005 letter (copy attached). 14) Preliminary soils report from the site grading operation is attached. We will have a soils engineer on site for direct observations of the footing excavation. 19) Attached is a letter from the roofing materials supplier. Please call me with any questions and thank you for your assistance and attention to this matter. Sincerely, GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY #~ Richard Pelletier Project Manager RP:jam End: 500 S. Marschall Road, Suite 300 www.greystoneconstruction.com Shakopee, MN 55379 Equal Opportunity Employer/Contractor Phone: (952) 496-2227 Fax: (952) 445-4191 Page 1 of 1 Bob Hutchins From: Danette Moore Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 12:25 PM To: 'Rich Pelletier' Cc: Bob Hutchins Subject: Sample LOC Rich: Hi there. As an FYI, I wanted to let you know that the following is still necessary (in respect to the Planning Dept) for the Greystone Industrial Condos.: . A bid for our review. Once approved, we will need a Letter of Credit for 125% of the landscapinglirrigation cost. I've attached a sample LOC that you will want to refer to for the necessary language. Also, please be sure that it's drawn from a Minnesota bank. . The Wreck-A-Mended Assent Letter signed and returned (Meadow Green Lawns, Inc. has returned theirs). . Provide a receipt showing that the Conditional Use Permit Resolution #05-04PC has been recorded with Scott County. Also, be aware that no rooftop screening plan has been provided. It is staffs understanding that no rooftop equipment will exist at the Greystone Industrial Condo site. Let me know if I can provide any clarification or be of help. Have a good afternoon. Danette Moore (952) 447-9813 5/25/05 MAY-19-2005 21:55 """L'"'~ May 20, 2005 Mr. Jake Kienlen Kato Roofing 321 Lundin Boulevard Mankato. ~ 56001 RE: Deerfield Industrial Par1\. - Auto Body Shop Prior Lake, MN Dear Mr. Kienlen: In response to your recent inquiry. this letter is to 'confirm the Carlisle's Polyisocyanurate Insulation, at a 1.5-inch thickness, meets Factory Mutual (FM) 4450 test criteria. and meets the Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 1256 test criteria. If you have any questions or if I can be of funher assistance, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely. ~dd Brian P. Chamberlain Scmior Systems Designer II ROOFING AMERICA: IVIR' 40 YEARS AND "0 BlLUOI &QuARE FElT CW\l'I.~", ,"1olI1""'.~ pIl.o.!ZN70Q0,l;:wUlia _...au 1D2004 CllI1i". SyIIr.c lncl:l'pQl'~lell PrI"'M .'" Il'ltl UJ5...A. ~ ~ TOTAL'P:02 / DAVID lIN'NER A~CHITECTS 10100 MORGA~ AVE. SOUTH BLOOMI,NGTON.MN 55431 PHONE: 952-884-6455 FAX: 952-884-0860 1-800-529-2685 May 19, 2005 Mr. Robert D. Hutchins . . Building Offici81 City of Prior Lake . . 16200 Eagle Creek Ave; BE . 1m: Greystorie Condommium . '.' 171~8 Adelmann St- . Deerfield Industrial Park . Prior Lake, MN" . Dear Bob, , I ...' The foll~wing areresponses.to your plan review letter dated May 6, 2005.. 1. Separate permits will be applied for each tenant space. . '. ' 2:. See Civil Drawings. . 3. ' See Civil Drawipgs; .' 4. No Parking sign added to Site Plan, Sheet AI.. , 5. Irrigation shown'on Landscape Plan as submitted prior. . .~. _ The north accessible access. stall was ~oved nortlt as far as possible while maintaining a 24' drive, aisle. See 'Site Plan, AI. 7. Accessible parking stalls changed to 20' deep. . . 8. Precast, HV AC, plumbing, fIre protection, lighting, and emergency . lighting plans wUl be subrnitted ~t a fater date.' . . . 9. .The lawn sprinkler details will'be forwarded to you when the design is completed. . 10. Acce~sible parking si~s are &howri on Sheet AI. '. 11. Per our discussion the fIre extinguishers can be included in the tenant _' improvement cJrawings. '. - . 12. The spedal inspection form will be forwarded to you.under separate cover as .soon as its completed. .' l~.The Energy Compliance calculations are. attached. 14.' Rich Pell~tier from Greystone Will call you to discuss the soil report. 15. The'.monument sign design will foilow as' we discusse.d. 16. The F.D. key.box is shown.~n Sheet A3. , . ' 17; The address numbers have been added to the N. Elevation Sheet A3. 18. The requested verbiage for door 118 was added to Sheet A3. 19. Greystone will provide you the roofing material certi.fication. 20. The 60' setback dimension was changed to 52' -6" and recalculated. (The original calculations were based on a 52' setback but were typed in at 60' .) :tTlifu any question~., Thank you for your attention to dUs malrer, . David P. Linner, AlA MN Reg. No. 14819 Copy: Rich Pelletier" Greystone Attached: 2 signed copies of sheets Cl, Tl, AI, A2, A3 Energy Compliance Form 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. Prior Lake. MN 55372 May 6, 2005 Mr. David Linner David L. Linner Architects 10100 Morgan Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55431 RE: Plan review for Greystone Condominium 17158 Adelmann Street Dear David, Following are the results of the plan review for the Greystone Condominium building. Our review was based on the Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) which adopted with amendments the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) with handicap regulations of the Minnesota Accessibility Code Chapter 1341. Also requirements of the 2003 Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) which adopted with amendments the 2000 International Fire Code (IFC). Iseparate permits required for tenant finishes. ~ The building requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the fire department connection and a ~ hydrant(s) within 300 feet of all portions of the exterior. ..,. Provide a Post IndIcator Valve (PIV) on spnnkler supply hne mto bUIldmgs. Locate a mmImum I distance away the height of the building. ~ Provide fire lanes for fire apparatus response. Signage to read:" No Parking Fire Lane by order of Fire Department". Indicate on Site plan. Locate by Fire Hydrant and Siamese Fire Department connection. , IFC 1001.7.1. "'. If provided, indicate means of lawn irrigation. May use separate service and metering for billing purposes. f. Locate North accessible parking stall closer to Door 10 1. MSBC 1341.0428 Subpart 2. ;. Accessible parking stalls are required to be 20 feet deep. MSBC 1341.0428 Subpart 6. r@Submit signed structural plans for Precast panels. Submit signed HV AC, plumbing, fire/smoke alarm, o emergency lighting/exit signs and sprinkler plans. May be submitted at a later date. ~~tJJ Provide detail of lawn sprinkler service stub valve and backflow prevention details. ~. Provide HDCP signage details. www.cityofpriorlake.com Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245 . Submit the Structural Engineers requirements for Special Inspections. Submit special Inspection Agreement. IBC 1701.5. 3. ubmit Energy Envelope Calculations. MN Energy Code 7670.0100 !~~it-~~~iI;;p~A'\ ~ ------.--..--. ..........-.--- 15 Provide plans for the monument sign. 6. Install Fire Department key box by front door. An application is received at time of building permit. 7. Provide address numbers on building. IFC 505. ~ ~. Label exterior of Door 118 with following verbiage: Fire Suppression Room ~ Do Not Block. \~ovide documentation that roofmg materials meet \Be 1508 and 2603.4.1.5. ~. Correct 60-foot dimension in the Area Modification section ofthe Code Review on Sheet T1. The building plans must be reviewed by the Cities Developmental Review Committee (DRC) which consists of representatives of Planning, Engineering, Parks, Finance, and Building Departments. The City Planning and Engineering Departments plan review comments are forthcoming. The DRC must approve the site plans and all items pertaining to the plan review must be addressed before a building permit is issued. Questions, please call me at 952-447-9851 Sincerely, Robert D. Hutchins Building Official cc. Mr. Richard Pelletier, Greystone Construction Company Enc. Memorandum DATE: March 31, 2005 TO: Danette Moore FROM: Robert D. Hutchins RE: Site plan review for DIP Greystone condo Following are the results of the preliminary Site plan review for the DIP Greystone condo building. Our review was based on the Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) which adopted with amendments the 2000 International Building Code (IBC) with handicap regulations of the Minnesota Accessibility Code Chapter 1341. Also requirements of the 2003 Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) which adopted with amendments the 2000 International Fire Code (IFC). .( Complete a Building Code analysis. IBC Chapter 5. Include the following: ;r.- Occupancy Classification. ~. Type of Construction. /c. Location on Property. /d. Allowable Floor Area. .e. Height and Number of stories. if E . . . xltmg. @ The building requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the fire department connection and a hydrant(s) within 300 feet of all portions ofthe exterior. ___ ~ Q) Provide a Post Indicator Valve (PIV) on sprinkler supply line into buildings. Locate a minimum distance away the height of the building. e..1 G> Provide fire lanes for fire apparatus response. Signage to read:" No Parking. Fire Lane by order of Fire Department". Indicate on Site plan. Locate by Fire Hydrant and Siamese Fire Department connection. IFC 1001.7.1. (S) If provided, indicate means of lawn irrigation. May use separate service and metering for billing purposes. /IItJ~ &ocate North accessible parking stall closer to~ bay tenant. MSBC 1341.0428 Subpart 2. (j) Accessible parking stalls are required to be 20 feet deep. MSBC 1341.0428 Subpart 6. C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3103\DIP Greystone condo.DOC "T The following are building plan comments: 8. Submit signed archit'ural, structural plans. Submit signed HV AC, plumbing, fire/smoke alarm, emergency lighting/exit signs and sprinkler plans. May be submitted at a later date. r.::> (_yrovide detail oflawn sprinkler service stub valve and backflow prevention details. "0. Provide HDCP signage details. @ Provide fire extinguishers minimum 2AI0BC rated, within 75 feet travel distance of all areas. IFC 1002. ...J2. An S.A.C. determination must be completed by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Contact Jody Edwardsat 651.602.1113. Presently, there is a charge of $3,950.00 per SAC unit which is collected at the time of the building permit issuance. ~. Submit Energy Envelope Calculations. MN Energy Code 7670.0100 @ Submit a soils report. AJ-.() ALPf2.C, #vL.4V\" E:f'J L.. (9. Submit the Structural Engineers requirements for Special In~ctions UBC 1701.5. ~t>~ Ventilation for the building must meet IBC chapter 12. Provide 15 CFM of ventilation per occupant. This is a preliminary review only on conceptual plans. Other code items will be addressed when the preliminary plans are submitted. The building plans must be reviewed by the Cities Developmental Review Committee (DRC) which consists of representatives of Planning, Engineering, Parks, Finance, and Building Departments. The DRC must approve the site plans before a building permit can be issued. fJlON vt1LG4Vl C;foN. Loc...I'- fx9"f:. rI#5VI'~"> ;4t:7l. ~ "/>o/"or ~ 1/ Fk v ~ i~)(;'.LJtnc./'Vt-71-"'<l..J LAba..., ~tL119 (<c:o ,c. ]V ~ r . I$", . r i 4= ~W(..,. eN&;, f>(dV PlNJ> ON PMcAsr P"lN"~ fJ(6T1"SjJ~ ~~ 2 tij:\ Underwriters \!.y Laboratories Inc.@ NarIIIInak Division 333 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, IL 60062-2096 USA IWNi.Ld.com tel: 1 8472728800 December 10, 2004 Carlisle Syntec Incorporated Mr. Joe Malpezzi 1285 Ritner Hwy. PO Box 7000 Carlisle, P A 17013 OUf Reference: R8103 Dear Mr. Malpezzi: This is to confirm our telephone conversation on December 10, 2004 regarding Construction No. 458. Based on previous test data, it is the judgement of Underwriters Laboratories that a min. of 1.2 in. thick polyisocyanurate insulation, that is Classified for foamed plastic (TJBX) category, may be applied below the specified polystyrene insulation in Construction No. 458 without affecting the fire resistance of the assembly and without the use of a thermal barrier. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the writer. Very truly yours, iliA It IV/~ im=A Robert F. Keogh Manager Fire Protection Division William G Marshall (Ext. 42735) Senior Engineering Associate Fire Protection Division An independenl organilation working lor a safer world with integrity, plecision and knowledge. - ~~Sc-~ ~o ~Ir 6<;; S- { Jtts {8, 570 S .F. r<. [-O~S-~ ::: 753, coo, - 6v~~ ~7kr-- ~ ~!J- ~ ~& /3,4/,MZt!J SvtlP~-2- s~-,,-~ 0."'" 7f~t.-!?L- I Ii I I { 1.;2e? I I c-p~;:>&--- kG-vi 6-vJ p ( /::> Gt2615YZ>~ 1/5$P tl-tJ6? ~~ / ~ L~/'-" ~ CWf-f7,.,...; If /g/S''?b..s?'F !I 10 1-1..:2..:: b~ s,~ ~$ 11 Ii :\ /'"'\ 1i"/0~ ;;;2 ,.t..-rp 1>~ j>" t'I-(/ c:.- p )) ~ ,...c.- L I i ~..'351 (8' ~ . .------1 ,"Y I '3t!> ~ I \\. ~4'c; S-S-f ~''-C'Z,b~ CJcrJ ~ ~ ~ tl i ,. ~ -.-.-.- --'.-' '-'---' . C~O y{~S- 1/ If /4 P6/l- Pi-: e:nz.. Z;; 'k~ .,~1" /iJ. ~ MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division of Environmental Health REPORT ON PLANS Plans and specifications on plumbing: Deerfield Industrial Park, 17158 Adelmann Street, Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota, Plan No. 054569 OWNERSHIP: SUBMUl.hK(S): Dakota Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 3650 Kennebec Drive, Suite 2, Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Plans Dated: Date Received: June 29, 2005 Date Reviewed: July 11,2005 SCOPE: This review is limited to the design of this particular project only insofar as the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code, as amended, apply, and does not cover the water supply or sewerage system to which this plumbing system is connected. The review is based upon the supposition that the data on which the design is based are correct, and that necessary legal authority has b~en obtained to construct the project. The responsibility for the design of structural features and the efficiency of equipment must be taken by the project. designer. Approval is contingent upon satisfactory disposition of any requirements included in this report. Special care should be taken to insure that the material and installation of the plumbing system are in accordance with the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. A copy of the approved plans and specifications should be retained at the project location for future reference. A set of the identified plans and specifications is being returned to Dakota Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Enclosed is a copy of the report and transmittal letter to be forwarded to the project owner. INSPECTIONS: All plumbing installations must be tested and inspected in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. As specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2830, no plumbing work may be covered prior to completing the required tests and inspections. Provisions must be made for applying an air test at the time of the roughing-in inspection as outlined in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 2, of the code. A manometer test, as specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 3, is required at the time of the finished plumbing inspection. It is the responsibility of the contractor/installer to notify the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry when an installation for a state contract job, licensed facility, or project in an area where there is no local administrative authority is ready for an inspection and test. To schedule inspections, contact the state plumbing standards representative for your region, or call the metro office inspection hotline at 1-800-926-6216 (7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m.), or 651/215-0836 (8 a.m. to 9 a.m.) on Monday, Wednesday or Friday. REQUlREMENT(S): 1. The outlet branch drain.serving the flammable waste interceptor is more than 25 feet from a vented drain. Therefore, the discharge line must be provided with a 2-inch vent pipe within 25 feet of the interceptor (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1120). This vent shall not tie-in with the vent serving the flammable waste interceptor and must either connect to the conventional ventilation system or be run separately through the roof. 2. A water distribution branch serving two tank-type water closets must be at least %-inch in size (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.3800). Deerfield Industrial Park Plumbing Plan No. 054569 Page 2 July 11,2005 3. Assuming a maximum developed length of pipe of 230 feet and a building water pressure at the meter between 46 and 60 psi, and using Minnesota Rules, part 4715.3800: a. The building supply line shall be at least 2 inches in size between the water meter and the cold water distribution branch serving the fIrst bathroom. b. The cold water distribution branch serving each back-to-back bathroom group shall be at least l1A inches III SIze. 4. Since no utility plan was submitted for this project, you must verify that the building sewer and the buried water supply are installed in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1710, subpart 2. 5. The minimum slope of a 4-inch sanitary sewer shall be Va-inch per foot (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2400). 6. Cleanouts must be provided at intervals not to exceed 100 feet for sanitary sewers (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1010). Manholes may be placed at intervals not to exceed 200 feet to meet the intent of this requirement. Alternately, manholes may be placed at intervals greater than 200 feet if the owner contracts with a cleaning company which retains equipment capable of cleaning over longer distances. A copy of the contract must be provided to this office indicating. the capabilities of the cleaning equipment prior to installation. NOTE(S): 1. The scope of this project consists of constructing a new building. Installation includes area drains, a flammable waste interceptor, water heaters, floor drains, laundry tubs, water coolers, and bathroom fIxtures. 2. The building is served by new municipal sewer and water services. Authorization for construction in accordance with the approved plans may be withdrawn if construction is not undertaken within a period of two years. The fact that the plans have been approved does not necessarily mean that recommendations or requirements for change will not be made at some later time when changed conditions, additional information, or advanced knowledge make improvements necessary. Approved: ~t.~." Corey A. Frain, P.E. Public Health Engineer Engineering/Plumbing Unit P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975 651/215-0844 CAF:sas cc: Project Owner Dakota Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Mr. Robert Hutchins, Plumbing Inspector Plumbing Unit File / ---... d/~8 REPOR ,'ilM ESR-1184 Issued March 1, 2004 This report is subject to re-examination in one year. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. www.icc-es.org BusinesslRegional Office . 5360 WorI<man MiD Road, Whittier, California 90601 . (562) 699-0543 Regional Office. 900 Montdair Road, Suite A, Birmingham, Alabama 35213 . (205) 599-9800 Regional Office . 4051 West Aossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478 . (708) 799-2305 DIVISION: 07- THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION Section: 07530-Elastomeric Membrane Roofing REPORT HOLDER: CARLISLE SYNTEC INCORPORATED POST OFFICE BOX 7000 CARLISLE, PENNSYLVANIA 17013 (717) 245-7056 www.carlisle-svntec.com EVALUATION SUBJECT: CARLISLE SURE-SEAL BALLASTED SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM ADDITIONAL L1STEE: VERSICO INCORPORATED 3485 FORTUNA DRIVE AKRON, OHIO 44312 1.0 EVALUATION SCOPE Compliance with the following codes: . 2003 International Building Codel/!i (IBC) . BOCAI/!i National Building Code/1999 (BNBC) . 1999 Standard Building Code@ (SBC) . 1997 Uniform Building Code™ (UBC) Properties evaluated: . Weather resistance . Fire classification . Wind resistance 2.0 USES The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-ply Membrane Roofing System is used as a ballasted roof covering system, 3.0 DESCRIPTION The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-Ply Membrane Roofing System includes single-ply EPDM membrane, Sure- Seal EP-951/!i Splicing Cement, In-Seam Sealant, and Sure- Seal SecurTape splice tape. The EPDM membrane is available in thicknesses from 0.045 inch (1.14 mm) to 0.090 inch (2.29 mm). The Sure-Seal Roofing System has a Class A fire classification in accordance with ASTM E 108 (UL Standard 790) when installed in accordance with Section 4.0 and Table 1 of this report. The Carlisle Sure-Seal System is also available as the Versico Versigard System. Information in this report pertaining to the Carlisle membrane system is also applicable to the Versico membrane system. 4.0 INSTALLATION 4.1 General: The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-Ply Membrane Roofing System shall be installed by installers who are properly certified by the manufacturer and equipped to perform this type of installation. The manufacturer's published installation instructions and requirements of the applicable building code shall be strictly adhered to, and a copy of the manufacturer's instructions shall be available at all times on the jobsite during installation. The installation instructions contained within this report and the applicable building code will govern if there are any conflicts with the manufacturer's installation instructions, 4.2 New Construction: All substrates must be clean, smooth, and free of sharp edges, loose foreign materials, oil and grease. All openings through the roof, valleys and parapets must be flashed. For typical details, see Figure 1, The insulation, if required, is loose-laid over or attached to the deck. The membrane is positioned over the insulation without stretching and allowed to relax before splicing. Adjoining sheets are placed with minimum 3-inch (76 mm) side and end laps. The lapped edges are folded back and thoroughly cleaned, and the Sure- Seal EP-951/!i Splicing Cement is roller-applied on the lap joint at the rate of 150 linear feet per gallon (45.7 m/3.8 L). While the splicing cement is drying, a s/32-inch (4.1 mm) bead of In- Seam Sealant is applied along the inside edge of the bottom membrane sheet. The approximate coverage rate is 75 linear feet (22.9 m) per tube. Sure-Seal SecurTape may be used as an alternate method of splicing adjoining sheets, L V-600 or HP-250 Primer is used to clean and prime the membrane before application of the SecurTape. Tape splices shall be a minimum of 21/2 inches (64 mm) wide, with the SecurTape extending 1/8 inch (3.2 mm) to 1/2 inch 12.7 mm) beyond the splice edge. After the splicing cement has dried, or after the application of the Splice Tape, the membrane is unfolded to form the lap or splice joint. Each lap splice is pressed together with a steel roller. EP-95 Splicing Cement laps are further sealed with Sure-Seal Lap Sealant. Smooth river- bottom stone is then placed on the membrane as noted in Section 4.4. 4.3 Fire Classification: The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-Ply Membrane Roofing System has a Class A fire classification, when installed as described in Table 1. All insulation must be UL- classified. Foam plastic insulation must be either recognized In a current ICC-ES evaluation report or justified to the satisfaction of the building official as complying with the labeling and identification, surface-burning characteristics, and thermal barrier requirements of IBC Section 2603 and $ REPORTS'" are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed, nor are they to be construed as an endorsement of the subject of the report or a recommendation for ils use. There is no warranty by ICC Evaluation Service. Inc., express or implied. as to any finding or other matter in this report, or as to any product covered by the report. Copyright @ 2004 I ....__.__......u_.... 'm '...... Page 1 of 5 ~age 2 of 5 classified by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. for roofing applications. When foam plastic insulation is installed directly over a steel deck, without a thermal barrier, the roof assembly must conform to IBC Section 2603.4.1.5. (See Sections 5.4 and 5.5 of this report.) 4.4 Wind Uplift Resistance: The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-Ply Membrane Roofing System shall be designed for wind resistance in accordance with the ANSI/SPRI RP-4 Design Document when the applicable code is the IBC, the BNBC or the SBC. When the applicable code is the UBC, design for wind resistance shall be in accordance with Section 4.5 of this report. 4.5 UBC Wind Uplift Resistance: In areas using the UBC, Tables 2 and 3 apply. These tables are divided into standard (shaded area) systems and systems in high-wind areas. In either standard or high-wind areas, the Sure-Seal membrane is covered with a 11/2-inch (38.1 mm) layer [nominally 3/4 to 13/4 inches (19.05 to 44.45 mm)] of smooth stone complying with ASTM D 448 Size No. 4 requirements, at the minimum rate of 1,000 pounds per 100 square feet (48.8 kg/m2). This roof covering system is noted as Zone One (Standard System) and is indicated in the shaded areas of Tables 2 and 3. In high-wind areas, additional design considerations must be addressed. In addition to the details noted in Zone Two (Alternate System) nonshaded areas in Tables 2 and 3, the installation consists of 21/4-inch (57.15 mm) stone, complying with ASTM D 448 Size No.2 requirements, along a 10-foot- wide (3048 mm) section at the building perimeter. At the building corners, the 21/4-inch (57.15 mm) ballast is distributed in a square configuration with each side equal to 0.5 times the building height, while the field of the roof is ballasted with the standard 11/2-inch (38.1 mm) stone. The 21/4-inch (57.15 mm) stone must be applied at a minimum rate of 1 ,300 pounds per 100 square feet (63.44 kg/m2). No portion of the membrane may be left exposed. Concrete pavers consisting of regular-weight concrete measuring 2 feet (609.6 mm) by 2 feet (609.6 mm) by 2 inches (50.8 mm) thick may be used as an alternate to the 21/4-inch (57.15 mm) stones. The concrete pavers must cover the same areas as specified for the 21/4-inch (57.15 mm) stone. Installation of the ballasted roof covering system is limited to areas with wind velocities up to and including 100 mph (161 km/h) and buildings up to 90 feet (27 432 mm) high. For areas with winds over 100 miles per hour (161 km/h) and for buildings taller than 90 feet (27 432 mm), specific details relating to the building in question must be submitted to the local building official for approval. ESR-1184 5.0 CONDITIONS OF USE The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-Ply Membrane Roofing System as described in this report complies with, or is a suitable alternative to what is specified in, those codes specifically listed in Section 1.0 of this report, subject to the following conditions: 5.1 The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-Ply Membrane Roofing System shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions, and designed to resist wind loads as defined in accordance with the applicable code and this report. 5.2 The Carlisle Sure-Seal Ballasted Single-Ply Membrane Roofing System shall not be installed at slopes exceeding 2:12, or of less than 1/4:12. 5.3 The structural roof system to which the ballasted membrane is to be applied shall be certified as being capable of sustaining the construction, membrane, ballast and ancillary material loads that will be encountered during and subsequent to membrane application. This certification shall be prepared by a registered design professional. 5.4 All insulation materials used in the roofing system shall have a flame-spread rating of not more than 75 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84. 5.5 Foam plastic insulation material shall be separated from the interior of the building by a thermal barrier consisting of minimum %-inch (12.7 mm) gypsum wallboard or an equivalent 15-minute thermal resistance barrier in accordance with the applicable building code, except as noted as Section 4.3 of this report. 5.6 The products are manufactured at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and Greenville, Illinois, under a quality control program with inspections by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (M-668). 6.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED 6.1 Results of tests conducted in accordance with the ICC- ES Interim Criteria for Membrane Roof Covering Systems (AC75), dated June 2003. 6.2 A quality control manual. 7.0 IDENTIFICATION Each roll of Sure-Seal EPDM membrane, and all containers of components, shall bear the manufacturer's name and/or trademark, an Underwriters Laboratory Inc. (M-668) label, and the evaluation report number (ESR-1184). Page 3 of 5 ESR-1184 TABLE 1-SURE-SEAL ROOFING SYSTEM CLASS A ASSEMBLIES # DECK INCLINE INSULATION MEMBRANE 1 Noncombustible 1/4:12 ,; slope,; 2:12 Any UL-c1assified insulation, any thickness Sure-Seal or Sure-Seal Reinforced EPDM Membranes 2 Combustible-15/321 1/4:12 ,; slope,; 2:12 None Sure-Seal or Sure-Seal Reinforced EPDM Membranes 3 Combustible-15/321 1/4:12,; slope,; 2:12 Gypsum board, any thickness Sure-Seal or Sure-Seal Reinforced EPDM Membranes 4 Combustible-15/321 1/4:12,; slope,; 2:12 Any UL-c1assified insulation (any thickness) Sure-Seal or Sure-Seal Reinforced EPDM over any thickness of gypsum board Membranes 1Minimum thickness of plywood. BUILDING HEIGHT (feet) 0-15 15 - 30 30 - 45 45 - 60 60 -75 75 - 90 TABLE 2-UBC BALLASTED ROOF SYSTEM INSTALLATION CHART FOR EXPOSURE C3: MINIMUM PARAPET HEIGHT (inches) WIND VELOCITY AREA (mph)1.2.4 (FASTEST MILE) 80 85 90 GS GS GS GS GS 6 6 12 GS GS GS 12 12 18 95 GS GS 6 18 18 100 6 6 12 1Wind velocity area is defined in USC Figure 16-1 (fastest mile). 2GS-2-inch gravel stop. Zone 0 (shaded area)-Standard system installation as described in the report. Zone @-Altemate system for higher wind areas and taller buildings. Additional installation details are noted in Section 4.4 of this report. 3Exposure C has terrain that is flat and generally open, extending one-half mile or more form the site in any full quadrant. 4Minimum parapet heights noted in Zone 0 may be waived by installation of the alternate system. TABLE 3-UBC BALLASTED ROOF SYSTEM INSTALLATION CHART FOR EXPOSURE B3: MINIMUM PARAPET HEIGHT (inches) BUILDING WIND VELOCITY AREA (mph)1,2.4 (FASTEST MILE) HEIGHT (feet) 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0-15 GS GS GS GS 15 - 30 GS GS GS GS 30 - 45 GS GS GS GS 45 - 60 GS GS GS 6 60 -75 GS GS GS 6@ 12 18 75 - 90 GS GS 6 12 18 1Wind velocity area is defined in UBC Figure 16-1 (fastest mile). 2GS-20-inch Gravel stop. Zone 0 (shaded area)-Standard system installation as described in the report. Zone 49-Alternate system for higher wind areas and taller buildings. Additional installation details are noted in Section 4.4 of this report. 3Exposure B has terrain with building, forest or surface irregularities 20 feet or more in height covering at least 20 percent of the area extending one mile or more from the site. 4Minimum parapet heights noted in Zone 0 may be waived by installation of the altemate system. Page 4 of 5 ~~~~ ~t -..::..-:::=- ~. I I I I I ~I~~ ~ ... *. -T_ - PARAPET/VERTICAL JUNCTION I!J =..w::r-- . _.". ,..,....... " . '..11:. (lMI) ....... II' ,.,. .. ~ ....- ...... IIiIINlf , . ...., ........ QlIllIII) ......... . ...... - ~... .......,_1111tllril.. .. f.- (I 1- o ell '.. . CI .. * - '" eo L . .~:r_... . L_____ .......... ..... ~ CGlIIIl' ESR.1184 ~ .~.,. \ . \.... .... ~ .1ItIt PARAPET/VERTICAL JUNCTION (ALTERNATE) ft1'#:::::1.IIr ,........ IIllllI'Ilf .. 'It' a.o. -. ""'" .........l!II4IIIIiI --...... -- I m,., I ~ 11111111 till ,~. . - .. \: .. .. \: .,~ ..- . ' . . ---. --- U .... CM.lo\lilIZD WI\1IlI CII/Il GRAVEL STOP TERMINATIONS FIGURE 1 Page 5 of 5 Nf1 U-t_ 1UIlE_ __ lIUllI-IIAL IlIPNlSlOM .all' SUI'I'OIlT r:l-~.~"" , 0 P1AM 1U1lE-1IAL EP-N II'UCING _ &o..~'(~" lIUIlI:-1W. -.u._ r--IFAL -- N<<=M=Y ~C 111,1 I II r'11"rll .... .. ...' " II . . -. .. .. .. . .- ~ " " . . M $'11II. _ IllI'AIBOII .all' FUIll (W 0IIII1lS) ROOF EXPANSION JOINTS -- lIt' 1Il I-Vt' ~~ ....Mo~ _ SDI. g-=-.,. g,1IAL~ oo:J? ~:~I (" -It- -. lit' VENT PIPE TERMINATION ~y==.- .~/j/ i:~~~ / //I~_E-SDl.___ //.! tuIIlE-. UP IIllIMT __ _ cur_l6WllC ~..-... ~ 1M IWL.... "'-1UIlE-SDI. _ .... ~. ~i _-trAI. _ lIIIIIarC SUIlE-SDI. _ _ COUNTERF'LASHING MECHANICAL VERTICAL TERMINATION ALTERNATIVES For 51: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. FIGURE 1-(Contlnued) ESR-1184 2001 ROOFING MATERIALS & SYSTEMS:DIRECTORY ROOF DECK-CONSTRUCTIONS (TGKX) 5. Fasteners (Optional) - Fasteners Used to attach foamed plastic and cover board to steel deck,Fasteners'~ self-drilling, self-tapping roof insulation screWs with insulation plates. 6. Roof Covering'>..;o- A max 0.08 in; thick loose laid (ballasted), mechani- cally fastened or adhered. membrane roof coveringOassified by Under- writers LaLv...;vo:es Inc. as "Membrane for Roofing Systems" (TGFU) as described in the Roofing Materials and Systems Directory. 6A. Metal.Roof Deck Panels.(Not shown},..-,In addition to or in lieu of Item 6, the roof covering may consist 1)f a mechanically fastened metal roof deck panel assembly. See Metal Roof Deck Panels (1JPV) as described in the Roofing~terialsandSY.5.tems Directory. .Bearing the UL OassificationMark . ' Construction No. 458 Uplift-Not Investigated Fire-Oassified . . pi 1. Supports - Structural steel or other materials acceptable to authorities having jurisdiction. 2. Steel Deck- No. 22 MSG mill, 1-1/2 in. deep unp,..f"...ted coated steel, fluted on 6 in, centers. Welded or mechai1ically fastened to sup- ports in accordance with deck manufacturer's recommendations. 3. Rigid pol J"; J .4..e insulation, - BPS, loose laid or mechanically fas- tened in one or more layers. rJ~ooified by Underwriters Laboratories Inc, under the Roof Deck Construction Category "Foamed Plastic" as an alternate, to any Oassified polystyrene foamed plastic insulation board (E~) can be used. See Foamed Plastic (BJ{YX) catego,ry in the Building Materials [)irectory or(TGFtJ) category in the Roofing Materi- als and SystelnS Directory. Total thickness an4 density of insulation not to exCeed an equivalent oflO in. at 1 PCF density. Example: an equiva- lent combination would be 8 in. at a 1.25 PCF d~ty. 4. Barrier Board. (Optional) - A !l\in314in.pE!rlite;: 1/2 in. wood fiber, 1/2 in. gypsum board or Ge'orgia-Pacific 1/4 in.:~IJerts:Dec1C" @COver board placed over the.insulatioil' Required when a single ply.mem~ brane is mechanically fastened or fully adhered. 5. Fasteners (Optional)....,. Fasteners used to attach foamed plastic and cover board' to steel deck. Fasteners are self-drilling, self-tapping roof insulation screws with insulation plates. .' 6. Roof Covering" - .A max 0.08 in. thick loose laid (ballasted), mechani- cally fastened or adhered membrane roof covering Oassified by Under- writers Laboratories Inc. as "Membrane for Roofing SystelnS" (TGFU) . as described in the Roofing Materials and Systems Directory. "Bearing the UL Oassification Mark Construction No. 467 Uplift - Oass 90 or 60 (See Item No.1) Fire Not Investigated cp ----,._...m..._ ---J..__.........1 /IF~ , !_.J ~ <1\. / I Trl=--- Q) <!J ".... o.c. :...J I ROOF DECK CONSTRUCTIONS(TGKX) 727 ~ !I"--" I \ I I\7-- I \~7:0 ~11 ......... \ " J j -,. W~ 1. Metal Roof Deck Panels"- No,'24 MSGthick coated steel;'for Oass 90,18 in. wide, for Oass 60,19"1/2 in. wide. Female rib 1-1/2 in, high, male rib, 1-3/8 in. high. Ribs formed to s~p together, Panels continu- ous. over two or more Spans with no end"laps. A bead of sealant may be used at side ribs. . METAL-FAD. INC -"Met-Fab 55O'~ 2. Roof Deck Fasteners. - (panel Oil'S) - One piece assembly, 4 in. long with.a 1,3/8 in.. ..hi. '11th. .l.e~. formed. to en. .gage the male side of the . paneL Fabricated froin 0'.034m. thick stainless steel. . . METAL-FAB INC -:..!'Met-Fab 550" .... . 3. Fasteners (Saews) - Fasteners used to attach'~anel clips to puruns to be No. 10-16 by 1 in.longself-drilling, self-tappmg, No.2 Phillips drive, wafer-head plated steel screws. Two fasteners used per clip inserted through 3716 ill. diamguide holes in clip base. 4. Purlins - No, 16 MSG min steer (50,000 psi min yield strength). Spac- ing to be 3 ft OC. Refer to General Information, Roof Deck Constructions (Roofing Materi- als and System Directory) for items not evaluated. "Bearing the UL ("h.ooi1cation Mark COIlstruction No. 468 . Uplift ';;"Oass 90 Fire Not Investigated < 3~'~? ~,r': ,rIA . ~:"":~' jZ~;~:f. . ~ I I~~ ~:~"~:;~;";"0.~ J".d~~"., .~ . .rz/. 1-0 1. Metal.Roof Deck Panels. - No. 24 MSG min thickness coated steel panels. Panel width 18 in. maxiinum.Panel ribs to be 1-3/4 in; high. Panels continuous over three or morecli,f,s with .no end laps. MCELROY METAL MILL INC - Medallion-Lok" 2. Roof Deck Fasteners. (panel 'Oips) - One piece assembly, No. 18 MSG min thickness, 3-1/2 in. wide, 1-7/8 in.lUgh. Oip spacing to be 48 in. OC. Oil's to interface with Item 3 bearing plate, MCELROY METAL MILL INC -"Medallion-Lok Oip" 3, Dearing Plate - One piece assembly, No..J8 MSG in thickriess steel, 3-7/8 in. wide, 6 in. long. (50,000 psi min yield strengtl:l). . , 4. . PanelFasteners -(Saews) - Fasteners used to attach panel clips and bearing plates (Items 2 and 3)throulth rigid insulation and into lilthtgauge steel deck (Item No.6) to be "No. 14 truss head type with N'o. 3 Phillips drive, self-drilling steel screws, Two screws fer clip to be used, inserted through 1/4 in. diam guide holes. Length 0 screws based on overall insUlation thickness (4 ~.max)l'lus metal deck depth, 5. Foamed Plastic - (Rigid Insulation) - Min thiCkness 1 in., max thickness 4 in. Density to be a min. of 2 pd. As an alternate, 7/16 in. thick oriented strand board (OSB) may 6e placed on top of the rigid LOOK FOR THE UL MARK ON PRODUCT Permit Number Envelope Compliance Certificate Minnesota Commercial Code COMcheck-EZ Software Version 3.0 Release 1 Data filename: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\#0445 Autobody.cck Checked By/Date Project Name: Deerfield Industrial Park Auto Body Shop, Landscape Supply, & Lease Space Greystone Construction Company 500 S. Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shako pee, MN 55379 (952) 496-2227 1:"\ f? :r~ flt Ii [) J L~ I [ I, I "' \ r' MAY 2 0 2005 II '-I.. ._~\ i I i ! ~ 'I !'I uh ..-/ Section 1: Project Information Des igner/Contractor: 8v __....._.____..._....._._.._..___.... , -- Document Author: David Linner Architects 10100 Morgan Ave. S. Bloomington, MN 55431 (952) 884-6455 Section 2: General Information Building Location (for weather data): Climate Zone: Heating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): Cooling Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): Project Type: Window / WaJl Ratio: Scott, Minnesota 15 8499 695 New Construction 0.04 Activity Type( ~) Service:Service Station/Auto Repair Retail Establishments:Type F Common/Misc.:Unlisted Space Floor Awl 6192 6192 6192 Section 3: Requirements Checklist Bldg. I Dept. I Use I I Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements ] I 1. AJI joints and penetrations are caulked, gasketed, weather-stripped, or otherwise sealed. ] I 2. Windows, doors, and skylights certified as meeting leakage requirements. ] I 3. Component R-values & V-factors labeled as certified. Climate-Specific Requirements Comoonent Namp,~l)escri\21iQn. Roof 1: Structural Slab Exterior Wall 1: Other, HC 1.0 Comments: 12" insulated Precast Panels Window I: Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane Tinted, SHGC 0.55 Door 1: Glass, Tinted, SHGC 0.78 Door 2: Solid Comments: Door 3: Overhead Door 4: Overhead Floor I: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, Vertical 3 ft. Gross Cavity Cont. Proposed Budget ~ R-Vah~ R-Value IJ-Fact2r lJ-Fa~ 18576 12312 22.2 0.043 0.090 0.045 0.068 224 0.630 0.520 209 0.660 0.520 144 0.350 0.113 1080 0.110 0.113 240 0.350 0.113 684 12.8 (a) Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONLY, and are not code requirements. Envelope PASSES: Design 21 % better than code Section 4: Compliance Statement The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The pr osed env ope system has been designed to meet the Mint.. ota Comm.reial Cod. ,equirem.nts in COM chec EVen' /2.0 ase 1 and to comply with the mandatory requt T,ents in the R~quirements Checklist. k/AvID ~/A!;VI37i' I < .. , S !b~S- . V' Principal Envelope Designer-Name SIgnature Date - / (- -, " ( I I r I [ I 5--0 I l-?; / \-0 1/ ./ ./ ..., ~_I / r / \ - L.. I/' / .-1 I EX. T~N D FIG UN D&12.. 18M? toWMN AS S+fz) V'J N @., ~ r>s ~A, 4-A,Z g LoE ----- ". ..~ ~n./,IL ' ~ Q\G ~/~ >; \ d-u.\Q';\ / I / 4-..-0 / I-~ r 1-0 / / / /. / I - 2. 1/- - - ...- / /1 / ExTEND FTG UN DSe.. IBM p. Cae-V M rJ A-s S fto V'I N @ ~C'S Z.C t 4.D - -/ I / / f 1..--0 / l-~ /' 1-0 v / /1 /1 I { I /--- ---1 / / )-1- " / / ./ f3XTetJ0 FTG' U N (X~J \E:-rVl P, toLU M tV As strow N @. GtC.A I) la A . 4- i005 MON 12:00 PM LS ENGINEERS FAX NO. 507 665 6818 P. 02 0) 0) ./ /' 43'-0" /-- , " _c'... / - a \ '<;j- r'---'I I I F5 1 -'--I hi.. I 20"XIO" fT6 I . . r;:.y ~ : L (2)~~ WNT._ \J ~~ -(- _ _ _ -I : '-". r-------.~~----_=t L__ _J -' " Q PARTICAL .FOUNDA TION PLAN 1/8" :;; 1'-0" '(F:;..1r ~:n' LS20~~~~~~~t~S .i:: ~ ".,1,;.:. '>. LeSueur. MN 56056 rh" 1- {- ~~; .:J;...i. \.. I ~'i h phone: (507) 665- 6255 , ~I~, (ox: (507) 665-6818 a-moil: I~~nglllil~cnginccrs.com LS JOB#; 05-112 o.-",,,,~ "","", 0!l112 _SRI' ,...~~ PI,,~ dO!.c. 1"a!l.6. 2(0) - 1!o26am DE-ERFIELD IND. PARK SR-1 Engilleers PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA DRAWN; RAM DATE: 5-16-05 ~-2005 MON 12:00 PM LS ENGINEERS FAX NO. 507 665 6818 . 24" . *1:4 Ill> 12" Q,G, I " ~4 DOHELS 24"IAT EA. HAY- r#4XI,~4 DHLS. 12" Q,G. - TYP. 3 SIDE:S ~ @ 16 O.G. ::?7m 1/4" / FT. I ~, '-t. I FFE - SEE PL.-AN ..!....!.-I ,-;-1...!.J.11T fi;=-'~ - _..i-~ _.';i .oS t <1 . <I ~ . - -.......J::I_~.lI- . ~ ::;- i I == I:. II - - -;; J - .:- - . -:. r d~" -"- - ~ 1 I, ,,,-, II: / ." - .'. . · .."A\/ Z% . ." '. -LRAtUAR~AGK~~LL .~ -, Ifl-: Ilc'_~:~~~6..ROU . 16" O,G. 24" ~ ' j ~ I 24"1 8" % **4 @ 12" OL. EA. WAY ~'I Ii ,!', I '~' '..~ I. I i /'./ 8"GMU . 1.11 / Ii' " I I /(. #4x2'-O" DOHELS __oL:--'\. /y /@ 12" O.G. . "J I 16"xIO" FTG. HI <1'4 . f: r(2) #5 CONT. I .4 ... G) SECTION 3/4" = 1'_0" ft~ .;. .; .' J' , -;../- .... .. . . . . . ., .... 1" ....,.... - ,.1..'; \. I . ~ _...; ~ ,'-~' . LS ENGINEERS 200 S. Moin St. LeSueur, MN 56058 DE-ERF ELD IND. PA ~K phone; (507) 665-6255 10"; (507) 665-6816 c-moil; Isang@lsengineers.com LS JOSH: 05-112 PIal ~~.." ~ 16. ~~ - u.:ij'60", PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA Engineers Dr-a...!lng t'lQ'fIdl 0!:i1l..2 _SfoiU:!~ It... p, 03 S~-2 . DRAWN; RAM DATE: 5-16-05 JtN-10-2005 FRI 10:55 AM LS ENGINEERS '-. .. . 'RE:v ,<; cD S E-c...--n 0 N \/S4- ,- / FfE ~ SEE: PLA:t.J ;" ~ }{ ~I / ; FAX NO. 507 665 6818 P. 02 CEt-tF( eLl) IN D. PM r' oS .Il 2- ~/toID"5' :/ / / /~N().I.~& / CMu WA--, I / / / :/ /)\ / x:;;; /' F-FE:. ;. SEE' p~ )t r ,~..~ .. . \~.. X ~D If F-Ib ~ wI (2.) ~+ CAN;. eD1l0M ,JUN-10-2005 FRI 10:55 AM LS ENGINEERS ---... FAX NO. 507 665 6818 P. 03 ~t::-(a.D \f\!D. ~ 05'1\2- It; J I 0 I or::;; MA~Ne..'i WALl- ~ ~0D 5 -)(;:-. x x / :: ~ '/ '/ ~ NON -BEAuN& / t.N\ II W A--w.... ~ ~/1" / v. -r.. '-' ,. / r Ff'c -= SE:.E pLAtJ to" .-- 1--....--- ; . ~ l~lrXIDII FTC:;, . . wI (2..') -il- + C,.oJJ I, BOiIo~ THE DAMA CO. FIRE DEPARTMENT KEY LOCK BOX AUTHORIZATION AND ORDER FORM PLEASE READ --. ORDERING INFORMATION: 1) This order must be signed with the signature of the authorized Fire Department official on file with the DAMA CO. 2) The key box will be shipped to you without any keys and will be locked in the open position. Contact your local Fire Department for specific mounting requirements, 3) Please include 6.5% Minnesota sales tax and shipping charge. 4) Full payment must accompany order. Make check payable to THE DAMA CO. 5) Allow 1-2 weeks for delivery. CUSTOMER INFORMATION SHIP TO: (DO NOT USE A P.O. BOX) Company Address City/St/Zip Attention of: ---------------------- ORDERED BY: DATE: Company Ct~'bfZP#& (k ~. I Address ~ s. ~ 12!J City/St/Zip ~~~Pe6:JAJ ~53'7L Name & Ph # Id~ ~Y- fDf'L..... If ~ D FIRE DEPARTMENT INFORMATION NAME: PRIOR LAKE FIRE DEPT. AUTHORIZED FIRE DEPT. SIGNATURE ORDERS WILL NOTrE P OCESSED WITHOUT AUTH07!Jl}1 D F.D IG U~E \ . ~htk ---- -" INSTALLATION ADDRESS - REQUIRED BY FIRE DEPT. ~~~ - ATTACH LIST IF MORE ROOM IS NEEDED 1715'S ~~/V &-5.6.. PfI-0t(- ~ _/lJ.v Sl.r31Z MAIL TO: ORDER FORM - Payment must be submitted with order ITEM S2-SURFACE MOUNT (NO MTG KIT OPTION AVAilABLE) S3-SURFACE MOUNT S3-SURFACE MOUNT WffAMPER SWITCHES R3-RECESSED MOUNT R3-RECESSED MOUNT WffAMPER SWITCH MOUNTING KIT (OPTIONAL FOR S-3 & R-3 MODELS ONLY) QTY DAMA-MP INC. P.O. BOX 47824 PLYMOUTH, MINN. 55447 PRICE $107.00 $131.00 $168.00 $160.00 $186.00 $ 59.00 TOTAL DARRYL SUNDBERG 763-559-3660 SUB TOTAL SHIPPING & PROCESSING CHG. $9.00 SUB TOTAL WITH SHIPPING CHG. MINNESOTA SALES TAX, 6.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED White & Yellow Copy - DAMA CO. Pink Copy - Customer Jun.13. 2005 6: 13AM Braun No.4427 p. 2 BRAUN,.M INTERTEC DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Project #: Location' 111-0s-- 62-1-/2-? Jl'.~ Lah_ Report #: Date: / ~ -,7 /'" 05' Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours gb aJ'r~ - \;h# EA41h-'-'_ - {/ Areas and work performed thiS day: tJ~;$Ur</J ex:c:-aJ. /,Pvc ~ ~ s. ,b /;" ~ .50vlL-" ""'-'"5 J. t'jJ'--~ J fL /1J/7"'''/ ~/k:'';...., #J. (Jkf"t/~ ~ ~:j ~-J---. ,IV,L.~ JU~. 7f/ 'i~"~ bo~ /~ ~/} ~,4~ ~<"-r/k~t)/~ t/al1~~/ ~ ~.sJ . ~ j, ~ /' ~ / tf;/ -k ~ L d-" Ih ~ ~~ _,.14 ~/YlLr:f~. &~/ -d ;4 ~h~~,.~'/ ~ ~. PJCalJ~ k~ :d,J{ tfd ~hi.., <;t/j~&lLS'"j!" ~ ft//~U ~ ,f'/ J k~ _ Y?l"'-;/ j; ~L{o j;,.;/ df/t/rj,~ ,,/ ~ ~/; ff~ .<l1li k ~ ~stc/C//)/V- -iJ:- ~/ kfi:-J Vt/(a--/L-. r<1C/'J:- .. I rAM b IJkn;f/I'n g. ~J~ lL.~. / . ~ Weather" avi - ~ n<""-,, Submitted To: ~r~ W kre.~ J<'~ I I / Performed By: ~~ F: DAILY 1 Jun.13.2005 6:13AM Bra un No.4427 p. 3 Page_ of_ BRAUN INTERTEC DFNTSTEST Riw :l/O~ Daily Field Notes Project No.: ?;i~~- 6 t0t'2 2-,. (}- . "L .~. [J Location: 0- ( t, .:::;.~,.\t:-C. ~, -""~ ~~ - t~ - c:;; ")" Dote: Client: ...' r I:..-~-"'.~.:- ..s. r<.('""".U/~;dJ'~ ,,_' Report No..: - ,''''..J ~,,' \ .-' ~ C'. ...:..,..... !.~,r \:'?'~ Weather Condition:;: .~~ ~ ~. -,. ~.'t ~ .-~ ..:..,........-:., I.---<..- '"'1 D ~ Arrived On Site At: u Personnel R-c A Classification Arrive Depart S;r \:r---CI ...) J.. I ....,.-' { .-_. ". \ .$cr-... ,\...:. ~... ,,....~ _.....~... .. ~",.~': ..) Compaction Testin~ No. of Tests: <---"' Starting Test No.: Proctor Information: Submitted To: "l--v SC. , p-- <-- </ Ending Test No.:. ). Performed By: (.<.~ Concrete Testing Date Cost: Set: Set: Set: Air: Spec Strength; Slump: Temperature: Slump: Temperature: Slump', Temperature: Slump: Temperature: Slump: Temperature: Supplier: Mix.: Air: Set: Mix..: Mix: Mix: Air: Air: Set: . Mix: Air: Comments: r- I of/It"?l r ....~."'.y. ~ L.x] C.,.- C4" ~ .,r" n U. _ I . r ......~ <:" :4 .....1'. k)( (.J.~ e 1 / -'1- ~ f:,cJ6 ~_ . -r, (.('~/ O:!o] /" (".. ('.. ~. \.ts i '"" Tt':'~..- ~U .,.:~'C~~Ji-~.Y t )~c/~' .~ i (C...-.. ~ Co. ( "t"'t~....... . /l::" t~: c-~ + _L l?ti 6..sr-.$ C..- ~ { ". ..A / ( +6501; L.",.j t'. .. +\. ~,....r""'" '. '. /?. ......../1\: r.C:. I ,,/.. tf':'. ~ ,. ,:.,- ..c. (" r ... ", . '. ~::._vr': c;I".c,.....~... 6"-,..> , \~...,f , .._,c....~ ..,..0 .fl':;,.,;l..,~. --...-,t,/ \~, ~ J . reRk.~{ /' "~. ~~-- ..- +~..,!:- "~ ",' '.- ... .. ',' , ( , .:::>--, ~K' Submitted To: (:," . ,( .",.- r .; c.#\ ('. ': '.~::~~" 'j-;.... Performed By: ~b....h. /~:.-." ,,::; . ~~.-t~". ) White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy fo Project Site Representative. Jun,13,2005 6:12AM BRAUN I NTE RTEC 8 r au n /'^~~ 6- k<-:x", '--{ C::-f Y ;;f Fax N\UIlber: '1 S 2 -. L( vt -:f. - ~ G '-t ~ From: ~ \:::. ~5~ Phone Number: 952..469.3644 To: Fax Number: 952.469..8599 Re: G~"",':j.s-t"'-e ;t:nMS-k(c~( Ct;"'~~ ---' Date: ~ - \ -.s- 0S # of Pages: 3 (indlldlllg co"er): No.4427 p, 1 Fax Transmittal R(,c~ kt~ e\.....~. Please advise ifyuu have received chis cummullication in error. Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way, Suite 101 Lakevi11e,11N 55044 Phone' 952.4693644 Fax: 952,469 8599 cl~2 '-f c; ~ 1 Bg'o . Providing engineering and environmental soltJ.tion.~ siflce 1957 Jun.14. 2005 12:04PM Bra u n No.4465 p. 2 BRAUN'W I NTE RTEC Special Inspector Daily Report Cityof ?l2.tDit LF-.!L.rt Page of Report Number: Project Name:. Project Address: Client: Weather: Date of This Report: (I) / I t..j I {) <" i v . De::t:~Fl~f.,.~ f!-l.\IO. Lft~SLr+{ ,c:.7C.....Ptoject No.: 9 .. I Ol{g hl:>-t::'-I'I,A~,J <:;1 ~,~. {65"" J/~ ~ ("le.~VSrc;:>{.' . Client Project No.: \.. At -0<.- C)A 4&~ Y. /;)rJ~(.;f\.<;T !.f;.Csttlr:f..lEb $"]'!bt~aS?Temperature: /'0 '-s Inspection Coverage: o Masonry ~ Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o Welding '0 Concrete Placement D Fireproofing o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement D Other Did the architect or engineer authori~e changes \0 city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No ~ Description and location of work completed: VIS L\,f..-L b~SiS;f: IJ P".r'\'/J/)6 f) P f:.6&fL t='~~i...., 6:')""'" Type of Inspection: o Continuous )ZI Periodic FT., L 'At (J 'if J:> (-:- S ..l.r.- /_l> r,f\ <. p, c..;;.......~ 1 t-3 10 f',-\ J6-1 ro ;4'-1; It-I Th,4-;s ~,;Jq- 6C~~u.'-{ ~ tt ~ \ !::- b-?.~h 6:t..d~5 C-b).,e..(,,-I A--dA 7 . I " , rJJ~-r, fO~-rJ) (0 ~ "3/,," 1-. H lid t:-~ . fl . / I Jt..j If r (Ll \ .lJ- ....' &::<: / ": - ~ >' 4 ;- <"~ ~ ..15 fTS o~ 'fo'S S I!:..-P:- t.Jfd It -3 .. Fe;,< ~,. y.. {~!- (4ft d (S") ~~ /SA w~..4 j~t.~. n~ }/\ / , ! f=D" '(, rl b:- ~'f2lb f' ') ~ il.'! y' 1'1 (! d. r.t / ('0) -#5 ~ I J / r.?'):P ')"'- <: f..l' ,) ~t, r~ C "1fN.''\ / L C6Jf, t1.\ '("''DrP\.. , / ) r.,..p .<J,If>1-I/.e: Dr: A-I t....Cn~-; ;;;.Bu ,q.,.lb B~ ~t'" rf .~'" ;,'3.".;cL ~'1 .ff u<.t\1;"i 0 rl V c.t.:..r~! (i.1"~ / Lisr tests performed' . Are Iher~ any discrepancics noted from this day's ohservations? Yes 0 Are there any outstanding discrepancics on this project? Yes 0 If y~s, see attached Summary Sheet No, ~ No ~' . . To the nest of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specificatioi1.11. and applicable workmanship provisions of the use cxcept 3.(;, noted ah0Ve ~. (il ,----\ fJ . '. ,'" '__ ~ .. \::>ncd //__~..__ "'-. I",~ " ." /. / - Print Full .~ame' J"Y-~~ H, , t--" Date' (I) / ) '-l / g <;" r ' ...-("~, "',~. 7. ,,' ,/ r -.J.'.,~":.J- - ~ '.. '-'.' . J [) Nurnocr.'. ~.I ;..} 7. (Lj,(j .') (Whi((' copy to Braun Inr~nec file Blue copy rn G!'neral Conlracrnr ) l(ml>I)",i""!,, 4 1/2S!9~ I 8:29AM Bra u n BRAUN INTERTEC To: fVj~'~ G~~ ,--- Fax Numb." q 5 2- - LfL{ 1- Lf v-f S From: eo,!J G :;~ 'h Phone Number: 952.469.3644 ::NG:~S~4:;ZLw Date: G - { L{ ,... 0 ~ # of Pages: I f (including co\'er): 1 Please advi,'e if you /rave received this commun;(:atio/'l in errnr. Braun Tntertec Corporation 21021 HeroD. Way, Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Pnop.e: 952.4693644 Fax,~ 952.4698599 No.4461 p. I Fax Transmittal ..... Providing i!nginetritlg and environmental soluti(}n.~ since 1957 Jun.14. 2005 8:29AM Bra u n No.4461 p. 2 BRAUN~W INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report City of 'P~ L--tr./?~ Page of d Report Number: Project Name' Project Address~ CIlent: Weather: Date of This Repon: D6~',e..C'lb(...:.l\A-Il;'()11 ""::J~~";.<p< ({",f. Project No.: I ~,('" A At--_~', {-J. c..,J,) q, ,c;, {'( i;r{tt::'1 s"/(;~c Client Project No.:. fJuuc.P:S'f' r~!?~~E~:'" SHlA..':'CCS. - Temperature: I' " . I... JI 0)0 {'". .1>.' I, , Ll I.;>L -0~ - O~ 'I ~d Os _. I:' Or , .' rr:' '5 Type of Inspection: o Continuous !S1' Periodic t' Inspection Coverage~ M o Masonry ,e Rebar Placement o Welding D Concrete Placement o Bolting D Tendon Placement Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Y es ~ o Foundations o Fireproofing o Other (Listed Below) No D Description and location of work completed~ .<;~r:- IJ(:-rr:.:5.; r:::.l(-:"':/~~ rl{~ ~;.f>.VC~ "!f:.!"\1.,c,; (..owu.-....J :4S ,~c':-:-'t'~ (Q. (-.r.f2.r6$ ~ .(.,~'..J~ ) I1.'Rf/wS 71.h. ~*,;;, f&( I l'!J""I"llf,tlt,L.{ .. I ~ISI..I.f/.. 6b~tf-.\/-,,'~~~ fiF ~';:.::'~('";I(.().r~':/~( f':ai:.. H:lc-i:":{.-;C -n..u!..Ou.c.~.t.1. (..,.}J.1t:S ~ .'~ _ '< ")'c C - S ['0 t-?" j".('t D ~:;' '1"0 G"- ~ 10 8-"'7 'fD ft,4 -? -rD It l...f - s'" "'10 ,ft - ~ ~,.jc...'-t;i.;.i."":'&. ['}~7. <S..''''o~5 !--L-8'":>.(; 'R.c.-s.f~,-;-!()~ (nt If.:;. '5 , Foe-' r,..) Lr- ! (.H f L. ti t...(. S ~ Ire ( (', 6"1( It... "" <._ ......,/, ) f /(0/1.11 .......-. ....., r:l.. O;)/... III /0-. It,.. / . . C-.~ ( : ft- ~ 5"" ({: I t. oJ! fe'> tf.? r:1("'_(ctl"f7:;'f~'M-r ~ (n\ #.S1<.{(&tt VOP<8c:1f, 1 J) t (..f:.r^ ..-- / ' f-:i;l ~ ("' (" V '/.(( ; 'I' ,<'..,.s:-,.... ..../ -. I z:;... ~ t:. to I o'" )C...... ,.. I.. .... 'jae:.'1 J" ....,. . It'~. ;.. w ~ ': if):/!:!' G~ w~ r List te.st<; performed: .. . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's ohservations? Yes 0 Are there any outst.anding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 If yes. see attached Summary Sheet N 121 NOW: ~, . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in a<..:cordam:e with the approved plans, specificatiop.:, and applicahle workmanship provision:; of the UDC except as noted above ,. / /' Date:. !r J /6 IJ ..s --_. I ,....-'. Sign~j l.J,..,-...:_-.~. ~:~'. -. .-.:- ~?' Print Full ~me~ ;;:!,;..r: ~,~ '..!' 5'1- -....~~c i <; ;:~ " J,,-...., I 0 Numher -:';, I I..! '7, ...... t..r.' , .-" (W71.ile copy LO Braun Inrenec fife Blup. ropy to General Contractor) & j C1 - rs 8 s- S s ~:3 -')- tJ.~ It ; L,.. C" II2Si9.~ r"HI\):.(h.:.,,;ih~1" .:l Jun.14. 2005 8:29AM Bra u n No.4461 p. 3 BRAUN'U INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report City of Pi?!o,.t( L.A ~( Page~ of d Report Number~ Project Name' Project Address: Client We-ather: Date of This Report: DC:C'k..,-::'/ Cr.-L .4-1.<1'0 I LJr,.J.lJ, ;(~."'~ . f::n:.. Project No.: , -=1-1<;P, ~~~,,,~ ...;s;l ~r. ' <, C- t ('f.r:. €/t ('1'"e')Ft:' Client Project No.' DU6fo-1-..-r 1.~c.Prl("t:ect, S" H()tJ;;~S Temperature: t. )/ 0 /6 6" - I ' Iu,,- (;)<... t.J ~ L;~&> G~ w' /1 ~ r-o'r Inspection Coverage: o Masonry N Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other . Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes rzr (Listed Below) No 0 ~C:C F-!:-trl: F r Type of Inspection: o Continuous 'f1" Periodic Description and location of work completed: I A I I' -. '7" ,,1 ~ /' , r' / ( \ - /". ..... f. ;~,.. t (r c..:rlll ~ P.",'i -In, f- u / .., )l.. I Y..I 'i IP r=:) r:-5: (0 - t:, Boo::-: B f':J sr ~ -(" 150'1'(, J " -rsr;E Sl?.d &f{lc.$ ~-L{ e-b,~ I A-,'i-Inl~) hL/-f", : FOr"r!~!.c ~-;-;}oP5: I..lr611}i..{/ w/ (]J)~<;\::> (/JI!T. 6€,,-ra~ I 'I ~ . 'K~~p€:c.nue: 6:f<.-Il:/~ ~ ~,)( FfJt,-rrA&-; '5' ~ J.Lt 1/ uJj 1"3> #$"s (li^~'"r. (-r'r'r. ~ 'PL.frj/S f fooTuJ& (:l.~";~TI(J,J t:,~CP LrR..le, <:."'3t( ~'R{)M, Q'9/ -(0 ~'I"' -(PeE.: ()t.6Gt!E.tU:;{-., I:rfl.. c !r,t.{ - {<) , /9, I( U'lu. rJ~-/...-L.' ';;)!')fl!L fA,1 ~:';6-, ltJ I (:3) {f.t);< ~,.j-r; ~01r, OIf.Gt:..rJC6 f I - L.kl> sf LJ cf:s. !>ff.. r;d V (, c ')(e (., t: 1--' L!ta ~ 1'" "0 e II r..J I () (' C. wt 4. A L..L 1;:;. IS -r fh to 5 /J:.) ~ ,) a-r~~~ ue: f!.!~;{' t._ 4)' L r(! u ,; :'", (.,e. K... i:. t!.~ (;."'1 ..... ~-r',.t. f!.c. S,~ r. ( 1" '-'~,~ (~rK.l c~ $ t' i..",,:~ "f-H i ~ !:: A-' ~ r ~ I''/.. C Lisl lestS performed:. . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's ohservations? Yes 0 Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 If yes, S~ attached Summary Sheet NOm&{ No AJ . . To lht:\ best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with r.he approved plans. spedfication~ a.nd apr1icable workmanship provisions of the UBC except a.c; noted ab(\ve ,.,--. Signed' (J~~.-- ~!.<< ,.-..';:...-:./l 4. f . - (- - Print full ame.~ -6fi-~e<.; f.f. ""\;: (::1;.':: 1'1{" ( Datc' -/-/IC I~~~ ( I D Numoet.. _.~'.,,(:. ~'i ...:- (While c.:opy 10 Braun lnrenec file Blue ropy to General Conrraccor ) ~I~- (c&s- $"~~s --7 l-<r:~.'2 .',-{ 112519 ~ (rl'\\}.I'..:....in.~p 4 Jun.14. 2005 8:29AM Bra u n No.4461 P. 4 BRAUN'W INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report Page I of J City of f>1Z..1 ~R.. l..,.frlL~ Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client.. Weather: Date of This Report; l:>66E..(,{f.,h. All.~, L~.~~t<:,( fI-I>fS &SIC-. Project No.. ~ /1> If. 1'1-'1-:; l1 hI:;. {;U-It. ~",)0 67", S .e. b:t~cf6-re~6 Client Project No..: () tJ6'f..(.ft.1-:f I.~'/'.II ']J'6l.6e. [/:";..,:i '~ Temperature:. I I,.. I., ~jfJ ~ Be '-c. ~- fJ ;;.l..1 ri.;; c{' - !:-o .-., , . ..!"~ Ci Type of Inspection: o Continuous []f Periodic I Inspection Coverage: .; I o Masonry ~ Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o Welding TI Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes~' (Listed Below) No 0 Description and location of work completed' 'f.:.E.(; KC~% K"f' f};J. (elF!; ~[;ll Ll-il\:~h'e~ , \/ISiJf L tfso~ d.~';If-~S !..~;:. Rlf:'6A,~_ '?r...*r:..~Mt{:~-r" t~e. ~~"7';'....)&S P.--r t....P...'b~ f.-.'d-{'" 1Z, . k.-~ A.~t-_ tJ'-,3 n eJ-~ A-~'F{)OTIPI-r 'fll~t..,., fr-r I~I?:\S tB/-I-tol 8.1-5'i~ I I .. is -'d ~ '3.. INc.L.I.A0'1~/~ 6;;~'(~"J& s,-rlrof-$ I'rl...I:i;J.(:J:" ~S.re!:Cfr JlC: 6.fLl~S rDo-rr ~6c ;';I':.l e:;:...V. J .~"S '; (n..., ~ 5 "8'"0 B.... '3 .'16. \ - t..{ e. rI - {"; ~,L} _ (a : F'"l-f ~ 71'1-"1/ 'f. fir/' vJ J (1) i!:'c;. EJt:)t- ';' 6t"(-", 1 I I J . . /' \ '. ." ., !-rfl..t D, 5 It -t{ ~ A - s :F t::; -: )bt,. (/ y.lt,tI ',/)/ {111 -tf'9- t./{ IP tl 1M ~ tOtf .;:: (f1)~ ~~ ~(I w~:- ck-rc Ire-If:;,. A--Ll; r'd-: (' >f..5'1t-It.t(r wI (~) #.( ['fr k"'ro--r I . litH\ (.'d~ rl ~ 'OfJ"'l../O(t vJl (y')1:l:S Eft. t..If~:Y (LjI'f.l..fti:t1..(~\ i (o)#:~Cl:.).1' &~1f7 List te.<;rs performed' 6:R.u.... "" ,a..,~. '-J 1'0 1 '3, 8 ~ c,~ d ~ FCC'"7.!,)tt' .$'r::2'~.s -:- 110(1 T-,tl/' Prt. ()f (o-\,P5'5 c?;.}I, , e.'lfff '. . -r.F,~' YI)R.. e.fsfrC;Trf.)G fOD/,,)6:-S ~ LIt'f> 5rC-lC.tt td....so 1.Jlte.(Fd::.6, rD~r r~D-T"'",,\c.:.;S rr;).-;;'~'A\ ($'\ fr'<{" (/).)-(, f:,.t-"'(i'c;-'/\"_ ,4-<...t,... \1(.~\{.'re''6.) ,,;(;,().)~ Cc;d::.1.0 . ^re there any discrepancies nOted from this day's ohscrvations? Yes 0 Are there any out~tanding disl;repancies on this project? Yes 0 If yes, see attached Summary Sh~et No.j% No ~~ . . To the best of our knowledge, work in!\pccted wa!\ done in accordanc~ with the approved plans, !\pecifications and applicahle workmanship provisions of the UBC except as noted ahovc ... ". ('i" _ r--'.:".. ;.., ..........,../ SIgned ...::::....-._....-~. ..___'1-.- L..<_ c.... ~_ / Date: /" I, - ,.' ~ ..\ .. I ~<; ,0,--, 'l Print Full Name' ;("' ,. , _ _.:!~6_ f/ ,,-(.! . , t ^ ,;.. r: v I ' ... f" --=-r-' , .,"- ~ 1'- ~ [l) Numtler .... "3 0[:;'1 (%il(' copy to Braun lntenec flit' Blue copy trJ General Comraaor ) 1'11I:I'r''':ln,p 4 1f2"!9~ J 7 : lOAM .. _~_0~5 FR.I, 08: 3~..AM L.S ENG INEERS No,3518 FAX NO. 507 665 6818 p, 3 p, 02 U 200 Sourh Main Street te Sueur. MN S605B ~' Phone: (SO-7) 665-6255 Fax: (507) 665-6818 I _\(F~~ INO PA~ Sec.-nON e ~D ~ SHEET NO. IOB DATE DESIGNER to" \c( l (., H- / -<< t~t"'-O"o,<.. ~_6'4 I 10" I . C-,.. ,.. ,.... '" " ~ Yo .( I!' 12. .. .. / (2.)~S (QtJT. 1:,oTTON\ " / " e" , ,/ 8" I / Sa:norJ e., ~D '5 /. / /~ ..... // ,;- / , . 1'.. " ,.. K "'- " '0/ \" \'" .\ 1 , tl. ..... \.' \1 - . J, ~ (2) / ./ . ,; /--........ (2) ~ ~ Lom ,. e/ .; e" " 5" '" &.JTfOM J I ) , A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Prepared for Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Project BL-05-02422 August 30, 2005 Braun Intertec Corporation BRAUN INTERTEC Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone 952995.2000 Fax 9529952020 Web: brounintertec.com August 30, 2005 Project BL-05-02422 Mr. Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc. 500 Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Dear Mr. Pelletier: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Greystone Industrial Condos and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were provided by International Code Council (ICe) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IDe), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the work being performed by the various contractors to determine if it was done according to the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. Copies of this report were provided to the site representative of the contract for his review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. Plans and Specifications The approved plans and project documents were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received, these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Weld Examinations Visual weld examinations were conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (A WS) D1.1-2004, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. II .. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Project BL-05-02422 August 30, 2005 Page 2 Bolted Connection Observations Bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled and if the splined end of the tension-control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. In addition, each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Deck Weld Observations Deck weld observations were conducted in accordance with A WS D 1.3-1998, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. In addition, the location and the completeness of the side-lap fasteners were also observed and evaluated. General Services performed by Braun Intertec personnel on this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Troy Baumann at 952.995.2554 or Ray Huber at 952.995.2260. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION ~ Troy ~";:umann ICC Certified Special Ins ector-Structural Steel and Welding ,(" / Y A. u r, PE Vice President-Principal Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Robert Golish; Braun Intertec, Lakeville Office Rpt-Struc Steel Greystone Condos II BRAUN INTERTEC Braun Interlec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone 952.995.2000 Fax 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of 1 City of: Prior Lake Date: AUl!Ust 30. 2005 Attention: Mr. Rich Pelletier Project: Grevstone Industrial Condos Prior Lake. Minnesota Braun Intertec Proiect: BL-05-02422 In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed according to the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no discrepancies and there are no outstanding bolted connection-related issues. Structural Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed according to the requirements ofthe project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. The deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed according to the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking-related issues. Conclusion Based upon the inspections performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural engineer provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ///? 'A. uber, PE Vice President-Principal Engineer License Number: 15329 Attachment: Special Inspection Daily Report, 1 of 1 Rpt-Struc Steel Greystone Condos · Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of 8RAUN I NTE RTEC SIDRPT Special Inspection Daily Report City of ft,'f)/ L.t fl}JJ SJII:1- Project Name: 4.."'\'" Project Address: Client: ~Jo"-( Weather: --.Jl.. "''' t C.JvdJ....1 C(I.,JII't.l , Date of This Report: 7 -/I':J ,).,. Project No.: jiL' Oj~' oJ't;:l Report No,: Client Project No,: Temperature: ^-I q ~-"r Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: D Continuous D Masonry D Rebar Placement D Foundations D Special Cases % Periodic p"Welding & Bolting D Concrete Placement D Fireproofing D Piles & Piers D Tendon Placement D Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes D (Listed Below) No D Description and location of work completed: nhs.c'''hlID,'tJ I) ~.lrOJA'- J (L)OJ, I iF L "" t9 &'u"' j.J.~ 2) V:,u_1 Jo flIt. -CuI..: AJ:J k J nf :K" A .J) 5" ~por 1L Adh-J th~_''') .. ".., ~4J A""" J.a fol...l"\^ .t ,J 'UO\, ~I t" J.}a/", ) I C ob~()II.JIO ., J tJ ftt . CoL r JI,-~ vJ(.lJ~ Itl .[.) l. 0"'- A{J - in blA J Ii, - J.b ~. il ^t ). )'"''1'-''' l." u List tests performed: ~.:..l H 10 rc-{ ..s,. /( ....,J !t6 [ I) ~JU i.Jt. tl.,,,, J ~i~/'J . .t )J~ f}tL/l eJJt. WLtJ, ~ ~J -)'.<ly,,<t'J ,u",kJ. · Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? . Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? · If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. Yes D Yes D 1~ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: ~ PrintFullNa~ ~'>' .~_.. ':' / Date: J _II-OJ 1.0. No.: .}-~t.'J rtiJ"; ~ White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Proied Site Representative. . Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 SEP-Ol-2005 THU 04:12 PM LS ENGINEERS FAX NO. 507 665 6818 P. 02 t. = S 200 South Main Street Le Sueur, MN 56058 I. , . - Phone: (507) 665-6255 Jllf.114~ Fax: (507) 665-6818 .5J(;.tJ~'~~JJ h(,;NOA-rlvtJ . SHEET NO. .s./~N {;1J,..~/I..~Il.t..nINtJ~r. ~If,c. #- L JOB 08LZ DATE C?-/ - () .~ . . DESIGNER -.1.#/1'- ~ 7! 1)'/ if' SIGN By QVAL./TY ./ ~ /!AVE/}J.jO!?e.VIEW6/J -r;;e '5i~/'I r;IlM/~ CrlNSilf..\Jt.rNN J3 '1' (jVA"1 fr /JIA/JI/f4~~1"f.I~/Nt Gd&tJ ~ ~ Br Rc~ A.,. c1VA'-ITr I'fIl"'f.I'pA~ru/lIJJ~ 11';1) hWJ1> "};;E .5/~M Fii/MIINCr. ~ fV!Ecr qo /I1Pf/ $) J7 1/;3/1 J1/1J1)f)j IJ f ~fJ- r Be:. 2.000 t. .' J"~ j I ,. .I .. , ~ '\ f'-... !11/f\ltJF/tCTfIP./Nt. / ~ ~ ~- ~'<t> )( I~ 2." IHt2e-PJDf:1J RoDS . '.-' 515r /,J Hu..-rl H'T fir l5"b A1JI-IE"IF:. / // (1/" MI,yI"1t1M ~MlJeD M~t:!i) / / /' /?~ '. m!<U H~,,~j IN S,GN rJAsG FUmt , \ ~ \'~ >; :: \ ~, . 1'2" C..M.L1 X G ~e" I.O/J&. '1' 4-A'5'yP.7. 411,,-. ,'. 2~8.i... '~.1 '.2~" \ ~" GENT&'/e.EO IN altt'-(,.. 1#1'I~fl-~ JllowAJ ';'-, -. \ \ \'\ I _ r G';AP~ \'. '., \ (V\ ~ '\. ..z M " .. -. ", " .. , l .. , Q ..., fI\. t A " '. l- , , ~ 't- .., " ........ .\ ""\,,\ ~. 't ~ C"MPAt,i 1J~c~FI/"1. /tlJ.fJUNf) rOvNDI;TloU ""14"'- 'jb 9~~ In) P~~(.TfJ(Z, [)CIJ~/rr 4-Ns)( -Z~(;)" j)OJ,(lC'-S SPI1'~ ~ V~/c,A'~ ~ IEW g:O"X1 '..()''x 12,'/ rOOI/Nu. INSPECTOR . , )....' ~~' - ~ __ '-' 7,/ - 'V'. E CK' . n.~.o CCE" liBMlfti!bT/otr ACCEt' I cu". W, I n \"VI"\I"\C,", IIUh", ,..s NOT EQ,ereby certify that this plan. specification. or report was o NOT ACCEPTEO--CORRECT & RESUBMIT prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I T .... blfol 181IoI a. ~ _... be am a duly licensed Professional ~ the laws ".. comments.. IUI your rm to - _II. --~ the State of Minn~A ~ '11 fuI campIanoe wIh all applicable buIcIng- & zaq ," ~~. JiI.....1ncIucIng Items not spec:ikIIy noIId In till I 9- 1_ () s- William P. lehnertz ICEEP TNS PLAN SET ON .:N Ie AT ALL TIES. Da e . . Reg. No. 14985 ")- ., \,\. <'. ...." \, "''''''1, ". '\ \ \ ". \ , \ '.~ . . \. . \. ",. '\ " ., ", \, \ .\\ '( ... ...-j -- ...- Q) OJ (1j CL :;;;; CL C"J o N ...- LO o o C"J OJ :J <( .~ CO f'-.. ...- f'-.. co CO CO N LO OJ .~ o u c OJ .~ (fJ C Q) .--l 1::. (1j o .. >- Cll +-' x-:<<. p.. rr",,-, D I' ~ B" \ &u~IC.\ R:Gk ~5'\ - d-?J~- ~ \ 5Y f 14.00 - I ~ , (9) 72" T12 CW/HO lAMPS _ . 5f~ . . (ussa 832-16l BAlLAsT ~ A'1.5 ('€. ~.~~. kXf /1.7 AUPS fACH _7v~ 3.4 AMPS TOTAL. 120 VOlT 3 "1' 3" ~ k'; . .. B<4~e l' . . f' " - · r I' i V ~u.~ ;;>,."" ~.. Jr Jy ,/ ~ r -v ~~~ ~FCr - 83.56 fRAME .--.. 0" .. .- '84.00 F ~rr- ilL' -=- I' ' ,/ , - ~ f - III... II." 111110' .,' k- . : I J :1= . -:1--~1 ' .r -,- 3087EXTR. .3635 RErAJNER. -;; r 2849 ONfDER 8~ r/ Al UvVI "VI uW'\ -~06 -! 'FRAME ... , 12.25 I ... J" I' 85_50 ... ?-t.e~.J 3" SQ TUBE WI 2nSQ TUBE VERTICAL fNLAYED . r2u ANGlE TOP, &: 711 X 12t1 . '. MOUNTING PLATE ~/ flUSH INLAYED TO lUBE .. - I . --- ~ c .... VJ -= "" C> <::> U'1 -0 ~ 0::> ::J> :s:::: 10 c: .., -. ~ "< 3: ... ::J C -+. .... .-. ::J CI'Q = ..., = ." - "'-'> "--> '= -.::0 . (,.) ~ ~ 00 U'1 ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ T ..... ,I:lio ~ ZO\::): C-5 --, NO BUILDING <<1a / ;' .;> / . / / MONUMENT SIGN OR ;;. SPACES "- 70 \ ::) : ~ - 5 NO BUILDING CITY'S COP'I CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ORC PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: PROJECT ARCHITECT I DESIGNER: CONTACT PERSON: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: PROJECT REQUEST: GREYSTONE INDUSTRIAL CONDO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT An application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage in the 1-1 (General Industrial) Zoning District. Kevin O'Brien David Linner Architects David Linner 952-884-6455 Kevin O'Brien 952-496-2227 SITE INFORMATION Lot 1, Block 1, Deerfield Industrial 4tn Addition. 1-1, General Industrial I-PI (Planned Industrial) Review proposed request. DISTRIBUTE TO: . Frank Boyles W . Bud Osmundson r . Ralph Teschner ~) . Steve Albrecht f . Kevin Cook (() . Larry Poppler r . Bob Hutchins-F. Fire Chief (R") . Jane Kansier y . Bill O'Rourkec~) . John Sullivan f DNR - Pat Lynch County Hwy. Dept. MNDOT SMDC j r- Met. Council 'f'DateReceived ...... _..m_ Complete Application Date l~:~::;_:;~___ Minnegasco Watershed Dist. Telephone Co. (Qwest) Electric Co. (MVEC) Mediacom Cable 3i1a7bs 3/18/05 Date Distributed Date Distributed to . DRe Tentative PC Date 3/26/05 5/18/05 Review Extension .._.........__".." "....,._.._w._ APPLICATION FOR: Administrative Land Division Comprehensive Plan Amend. . Conditional Use Permit Home Occupation Rezoning Site Plan Preliminary Plat PUD Final Plat Variance Vacation 3/25/05 3/25/05 ~~~-~~:~~~~- - '~~~~~5'-'-"-1 1 Tentative CC NA Date 4/11/05 7/18/05 . "_."---~~"-'''----_.'.' 1:\05 files\05 cup\greystone industrial condo\referral.doc Page 1 I have reviewed the attached proposed request (Grevstone Industrial Condo CUP) for the following: Water Sewer Zonin!=l Parks Assessment Policy Septic System Erosion Control City Code Storm Water Flood Plain Natural Features Electric Il Gradin!=l I Si!=lns County Road Access I Legal Issues Roads/Access Gas Other I Buildin!=l Code I Recommendation: Conditional Approval Comments: Signed: Approval Denial Date: Please return any comments by ADril 4th. 2005, to Danette Moore, Planning Coordinator City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Phone: (952) 447-9813 Fax: (952) 447-4245 e-mail: dmoore@cityofpriorlake.com 1:\05 files\05 cup\greystone industrial condo\referral.doc Page 2 EXHIBIT C, PAGE 1 SITE PLAN APPLICATION PROJECT NAME: Greystone Industrial Condo DEVELOPER: 169 Industrial Park Development Co., LLC REQUIRED INFORMA nON: # I Application Form #2 Owner Representatives: Owner/Applicant: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: Surveyor/Civil Engineer: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: Architect: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: Landscape Architect: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: #3 $300 filing fee 169 Industrial Park Development Co., LLC Kevin O'Brien 500 S. Marschall Rd., Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 952.496.2227 952.445.4191 Rehder & Associates Benton FordlNick Adam 3440 Federal Drive, Suite 240 Eagan, ~ 55122 651.452.5051 651.452.9797 David Linner Architects David Linner 10100 Morgan Ave. S. Bloomington, ~ 55431 952.884.6455 952.884.0860 --.' -:ll.. (i. L 1,u.vJl-I\'V-c~(~ VL..'~ .. Cu""" Indigo Landscape Design Lindsey Scott 4250 Upton Ave. S. Mpls., ~ 55410 612.922.9891 1 Site Plan Application March 14,2005 , 'E'XflTBTT' 'C,' p'a~ge 2 REOUlRED INFORMATION #1 Certificate of Survey #2 Site Plan A-I #3 Landscape plan #4 Tree preservation plan was submitted as part of overall plat (Deerfield Industrial) #5 Lighting Plan E-1 #6 Site plan A-I #7 C-1, Rehder & Assoc. storm sewer cales #8 C-1 #9 #10 A-2, A-3 #11 SUMMARY SHEETS #1 N/A #2 Overall lot size is: Proposed building area is: Parking lot/drive area is: Landscape storage area is: Balance of site is green space of: 151,460 sf 18,576 sf 33,177 sf 9,962 sf 89,745 sf 2 Site Plan Application March 14,2005 EXHIBIT C (3 pages) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATIO~ PROJECT NAME: Greystone Industrial Condo DEVELOPER: 169 Industrial Park Development Co., LLC REQUIRED INFORMATION: #1 Application Form #2 Owner Representatives: Owner/Applicant: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: Surveyor/Civil Engineer: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: Architect: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: Landscape Architect: Name: Contact: Address: Phone: Fax: #3 Kohlrusch Title Services, Inc. 169 Industrial Park Develupwent Co., LLC Kevin O'Brien 500 S. Marschall Rd., Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 952.496.2227 952.445.4191 Rehder & Associates Benton Ford/Nick Adam 3440 Federal Drive, Suite 240 Eagan, ~ 55122 651.452.5051 651.452.9797 David Linner Architects David Linner 10100 Morgan Ave. S. Bloomington, ~ 55431 952.884.6455 952.884.0860 Indigo Landscape Design Lindsey Scott 4250 Upton Ave. S. Mpls., ~ 55410 612.922.9891 1 Conditional Use Pennit Application - Deerfield Industrial March 14,2005 #4 $350 filing fee #5 N/A #6 Lot 1, Blk 1, Deerfield Industrial Park, 4th Addition #7 10 copies preliminary plat & data 11 x 17 reduction of each sheet GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN #1 Rough grading has been completed, utilities have been brought-into the site, curb, gutter, and streets have been completed. No structures currently exist on subject site or adjacent properties. #2 The site will be used for commercial condominiums. Proposed building is an 18,776 sq. ft. pre-cast concrete structure. Identified uses are an auto body repair facility, landscape company, and lease space. Both the landscape company and auto body repair facility will have screened (6' high wood fence) outdoor storage. See site plan A-I. #3 N/A #4 Site plan A-I #5 Site plan A-I #6 Site plan A-I #7 Landscape plan #8 Site plan A-I #9 Site plan A-I, C-l revised 2/25/05. #10 Site plan C-l revised 2/25/05. SUMMARY SHEETS #1 N/A #2 Overalllot size is: Proposed building area is: Parking lot/drive area is: Landscape storage area is: 151,460 sf 18,576 sf 33,177 sf 9,962 sf 2 Conditional Use Permit Application - Deerfield Industrial March 14,2005 Balance of site is green space of: 89,745 sf #3 The conditional use permit is to allow outdoor storage. Currently, (2) businesses will need outdoor storage - an auto body shop and a landscaper. The auto body shop outdoor storage will be on the northwest side of the building. It will be approx. 30'x70' with a 6' high, board on board wooden fence. This will be used for short term storage of vehicles waiting for service or parts and repaired vehicles waiting to be picked up. The landscape company's outdoor storage will have the same style fence as the auto body storage. It will be approximately 15,027 sq.ft. of area. The outdoor storage will be used for temporary storage of landscape material including plant stock, hardscape material (retaining wall block, pavers, ete.), bulk materials (decorative mulch, soil, etc.) and some equipment. There will not be any retail operations or selling of materials on site. The building site was mass graded in the fall of 2004 and is approx. 2' - 4' below the adjoining industrial lots. The building and storage areas are also located in the northern portion of the lot. The rear of the lot consists of a NURP pond and wetland area. In addition, a storm water holding pond is on the adjoining property to the south. Combined, these two ponds create over 480' of separation between the rear of the proposed building and the residential lot lines. The distance and lower elevation will combine to significantly buffer any noise resulting from activity in the outdoor storage areas. #4 Construction to begin as soon as all approvals and permits are received. All construction to be completed simultaneously with anticipated completion within (5) months of permit issuance. OlJ:I.ER INFORMATION #1 Tree preservation plan was submitted as part of overall plat (Deerfield Industrial). #2 Lighting plan E 1 #3 Signage plan - Building elevations A3 and Site Plan A-I 3 Conditional Use Permit Application - Deerfield Industrial March 14,2005 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT Project Name: COMMERCIAL & MULTI-UNIT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST ~~"'~ 3~1 ~o ~l,k A-'\)G-W\~~ Sll. Dl2 Job Address: I. CLASSIFICATION OF BUILDING: ,Avrt? ~?7 S~I - ~(?7-- Use of Building '- ~ r-,;e,S-/ t:Jt-0 r-( 1. Occupancy Group (Table 5-1) t-~ ~I 2. Occupancy Separations (Table 5-B) .-i2 ~ :J"At'I-1'V~ Nt!>N~ B. Type of Construction (Table 5-A) 'Jl.....S A. C. ,J Front Location of Property 50' Rear Wi.f. I r L. Side t,5 R. Side 52- D. Floor Area 1. Actual 1~57b 9.~ S::U:? \ __ ~ 2. Allowable (Table 5-C) r~ .I; , C7f~ -_z;;j" ~ 3. Area Increase 14 ;. ~b& a) Open Area (505) f' 7.. D .,,~_ "Z.1.~ ......- ~~ '~1S <J.~--.:( ~<DO b) Sprinkler (505.3) f'4IP~ t' - t-- ,,~ c) ~Jl1ti 8iv~y (566-) AA.. ~ r~~ f5Z-~ O-(L. 4. Mixed Occupancy Calculation = E. Height and Number of Stories 1. Actual: Stories Height 2. Allowable (Table 5-D): Stories Height 3. Allowable Increase F. Occupancy Load 1. Sq. Ft. per Occupant (Table 33-1) 2. Total Occupant Load II. DETAIL REQUIREMENTS: A. Table 5-NSections 1803, 1903,2003,2103. 1. Opening Protection 2. Wall Protection B. Fire-Resistive Requirements (Table 17-A) C. Type Construction Requirements 1. Chapter D. Occupancy Requirements 1. Chapter E. Exiting (Chapter 33) F. Fire Extinguishing Equipment 1. Sprinkler ~~ 2. Standpipes ttI&' G. Roof Covering Required 1. Fire Retardant Alp 2. Ordinary H. Handicap Requirements I. Sanitation ~f.; J. Ventilation PAtAK ~ Plrevlew ...........-:~-~~-_.-"-"'-,,....--._.....:....^".._\,:.,>',,..~;,~:~."": . .; CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT COMMERCIAL & MULTI-UNIT li'1.KE PLAN REVIEW CI:lECKLIST ProjedName: DIP G~ s~ 3~ G" S730~S- Job Address: ~,,^~;10 5r- . Provide access roadway for fire apparatus in accordance with Section 902 of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC). This includes the following: ( '1" All-weather driving surface. (~ 20 feet of unobstructed width. (Y' 13 feet 6 inches of vertical clearance. (vY Adequate turning radius capable of supporting fire apparatus. The radius is: ~feet for a sprinklered building. ~ feet for a non-sprinklered building. ~ Dead end access in excess of 150 feet ,long shall be provided with a ! I turnaround. ~ Access roadways shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building per UFC Section 902. Where access cannot be provided, an approved fire protection system shall be provided. J . An adequate and approved access for Fire Department equipment must be provided during construction. If on site pavement is not provided when construction begins an approved roadway surface must be installed with approved dimensions which will support fire vehicles and equipment. . Non-sprinklered Building: Fire hydrants are required per UFC Section 903. All portions of the exterior of any non-sprinklered building must be within 150 feet of an approved fire hydrant. I /fhv6-440 _ I4AVI!-Z~ J f) Sprinklered BnOding: Buildings with a sprinkler system re9-uire on~ydrant within(fSO ..) feet of the fire department connection and a hydrant(s) withitGQO feeYof all portions of the exterior. The fire department connection shall be located on the front of the building. The PIV must be located a minimum ofthe height of the building away. .. FlREPLAN · All hydrants shall be accessible to the fire department apparatus by roadways meeting above requirements. Hydrants shall be located within 5 feet of the curb so that apparatus can pull along side for the connection. · Provide fire lanes for fire apparatus response. Signage should read: ''No Parking Fire Lane by order of the Fire Department." Location and number to be determined. · Provide numbers of addresses in such a way to be plainly visible from the street or road fronting the property per UFC Section 901. Numbers shall contrast with their background. · Townhouse projects must have directional signs designating the numbering sequence of units for each individual roadway. · Provide approved key box to be installed in accessible location per UFC Section 902. This is required when access to a structure is unduly difficult or where immediate access is necessary for life safety or fire fighting purposes. Key boxes shall contain keys to gain necessary access. Key boxes also recommended for building where entry may be delayed and to prevent damage as result of forcible entry. Obtain order forms from the Building Inspection Department. · Fire extinguishers are required for this project per UFC Section 1002. Extinguishers are required to be a minimum 2A10BC rated and located within 75 feet travel distance of all areas. This distance decreases for more hazardous occupancies. Location and size to be determined. · Submit plans for required fire protection equipment to the Building Inspection Department per UFC 1001. ReqUirements based on the 1997 Uniform Fire and Building code. Submit two copies of detailed shop drawings before installation to receive approval and permit. (One copy will be returned.) The contractor should submit installation permit application with plans. () Automatic fire extinguishing systems (sprinklers). () Sprinkler systems of more than 20 heads must be monitored by an approved 24-hour station. () Fire hydrant systems. () Wet standpipe systems. () Fire alarm systems. () Cooking appliance and vent extinguishing systems. () Fire pumps. () Other extinguishing systems. · Fire alarm plans must be submitted by State licensed electrician or low voltage contractor. - F1REPLAN · Protection systems installed that are not required are subject to approval by the Fire Department and must meet code requirements. · Submit 8-1/2 x 11 inch site plan for development of emergency response plan. · Submit plans for underground storage tank installation to the State Fire Marshal for approval. Upon approval, submit approved plans to the Building Inspection Department which will conduct the inspection and testing. · Provide information or see instructions as indicated below for special hazards. Please supply information, plans, specifications, as applicable. () Places of assembly, UFC Article 25. () Cellulose nitrate storage in excess of25 lbs., UFC Article 27. () Storage and handling of combustible fibers, UFC Article 28. () Garages, repair, UFC Article 29. () Dry cleaning operation, UFC Articles 36 and 79. () Application of flammable finishes including dip tanks, ~pHI.Y booths, etc., UFC Article 45. ( ) Welding and cutting operations, UFC Article 49. () Refrigeration equipment using other than air or water and more than 20 lbs., UFC Article 63. () Compresses gases, flammable, UFC Article 74. () Compresses gases, non-flammable, UFC article 74. () Cryogenic fluids, UFC Article 75. () Explosives or blasting agents (storage or use), UFC Article 77. () Flammable and combustible liquids, UFC Article 79. () Hazardous chemicals, storing and handling of hazardous materials including toxic chemicals, poisonous gas, hazardous waste as defined by DOT and EP regulations, UFC Article 80. () High piled combustible storage, UFC Article 81. -- This includes requirements for fire sprinklers designed for proposed commodity and storage arrangement, building access, access doors, smoke and heat removal, curtain boards, and hose connections. () Liquefied petroleum gases, UFC Article 82. .. FlREPLAN BRAUN I~TERTEC Rehder and Associates I4J 002 A Geotechnical Evaluation Report for Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. . Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota Professional Certification I hereby certify that this engineering document was p~epared by me or under my direct personal supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. . " ~a1~ Associate - Senior Engineer Registration Number: 24017 Project A V -04-03270 Apri122,2004 Braun Intertec Corporation !;; PT(widing engineeTing and. environmental solutions since 19.57 . OS/23/05 MON 09:27 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~003 ';" BRAUN INTERTEC Braun Intertec Corporotion 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 lckeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.469.3644 Fox: 952.469.8599 Web: brauninterlec.com April 22, 2004 Project A V-04-03270 Mr. John Mesenbrink Eagle Creek Develv}'ment, L.L.C. 7765 East 17th Street Prior Lake, MN 55372 Dear Mr. Mesenbrink: Re: Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park, County Road 21 and County Road 87, Prior Lake, Minnesota We have completed the geotechnical evaluation you authorized for the proposed Deerfield Industrial Park located in Prior Lake, Minnesota. The purpose of the geotechnical evaluation was to provide geotechnical information and recvw.lJ..lendations regarding the design and construction of the proposed buildings and pavements. Our evaluation was completed in general accordance with our cost estimate to you dated March 25, 2004, and General Conditions dated March 1, 2003. Please refer to the attached report for a detailed summary of our analyses and recuuuuendations. We appreciate the oppornmity. to be of service to you on this proj ect. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Jim Samuelson (952) 469-3644 or Greg Bialon at (952) 995-2380. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION I" /' / ames M. Samuelson Associate Principal ~~~ Associate - Senior Engineer Attachment: Geotechnical Evaluation Report c: Mr. Ben Ford; Rehder and Associates' jrns! gjb: skg/spk\0403 270/l]Jt ') Prolliding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 OS/23/05 MON 09:28 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates @004 .~." Table of Contents Description , Page A. Introduction............, ...... ..... ....................... ............... '.................. ................................. .......... ....1 A'I' Project...................................... ................. ............ ,.. .................. .:......, ................... .....1 A.2. Purpose........................ ............................................. ................. ......... .............. ...... .....1 A.3. Scope............. ....... ...... ................. .............. .......... ........... ............. ......... .... .................... 1 A.4. Documents Provided... ............ .......... ..:......... ........................ ...... ...... ........... ........... ....1 A.S. Locations and Elevations ............ ........ ,................ ............ ...... ..... ............. ............... ....2 B. Results............ .............. ......................... ..... ........ ......................... ............... ............. ............... ....2 B .1. Logs. ........,..... ..................... ........ ......... .............................,.. ........ ......... ........ ........... ....2 B ,2. Site Condition ................ .... ......... ........ ................. ............,. ......... ,........................... ....2 B.3. Soil............... .................. ........ .............................. ............,................... ................... ....2 B .4. Groundwater .................... ...................,.... ............ ............. ......... ...... ............ ........... ....3 C. Analyses and Recommendations.. .... .................. ................ .............. ........ .......................... .......3 C.l. Proposed Construction ....... ..,........................ ............... ............... ..... .................... .......3 C.2. Discussion....... ..... ................. .............. ..... ......... .......................... ,................. ........... ....3 C.3. Building Pad Preparations ................ ... ......... ........... ........................ ............ ........ .......4 C.4. Foundations..... .................... .......................... .... ........... ......... .............. ........... .............6 C.5. Floor... ............... ................................................:.......... ..... ............... ............ ...............6 C.6. Exterior Slabs.................. ............ ........ ..... ......... ...... ..... ......... ..... ...... ............ ...............7 C.7. Site Grading and Drainage .......... ..........~.. ......... ........... .................... .............. ...... .......7 C.8. Retaining Walls........ .................. .................. ........ ........ ..... ......... ....... ............. .............8 C.9. Utilities....... ......... ......... ........ .................... .......................... ......... ...... ....... ...... ...... .......9 C.I O. Pavements ......... ........... ........... ..... ........................ ....................... ........ ............... .........9 D. Construction... ...... ............. .................., .... ........... ..... ............. ......... ............. ........... ................ ..11 D.l. Observations ..... ................... ...m.... ...... ........ ........................... ............. .............. ..... ..11 D.2. Excavation.. ........... ....... ............. ................... ............. ...... .............. .......... ................ ..11 D.3. Backfills and Fills ............. ............ ..,.... ....... ...... ............... .............. ......................... ..11 D .4. Testing ....... .......... ..... .................... ........ ...... ....... ...... ......... ...... .................. .............. ..11 E. Procedures...... ........ ....... ..... ................... ....... .............. ..... ................. ........ .................... .......... ..11 E.l. Drilling and Sampling.. .......... ............... ............... ...... ..... ...... ........ ..................... ......... ..11 E.2. Soil Classification.... ................... ............. ........................ .............. ..................... ........ ..12 E.3. Groundwater Observations........... ........... ........... .............. .............. ............................ ..12 F. General Conditions... ....... ..................... ....... .......... ........................ ....................................... ...12 F .1. Basis of Recvu-u.uendations ....................... .............................. ......... ...................... .......12 F ,2. Review of Design..........,............. ...... ............ ......... ................ ..:.. ....... ............. ............ ..13 F.3. Groundwater Fluctuations.................. ............. ....................... ..................... ................ ..13 F .4. Use of Report.... ....... ................. ......... ............. ......... ........... ........... ............................. ..13 . F.5. Level of Care....... ..... .............. .... ................ ...... ............ .... ...........,...... .......... .............. ...13 Appendix Boring Location Sketch Descriptive Terminology Log of Boring Sheets ST-l to ST-15 OS/23/05 MON 09:28 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~005 7 BRAUN INTERTEC Braun Intertse Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 lakeville, MN 55044 Phone; 952.469.3644 Fax: 952.469.8599 Web: brounlntenec.com A.' Introduction A.t. Project The proposed project will include the development of an Industrial Park, which will include a number of building pads for futui-e buildings. The site is located in the southwest quadrant of County Road 21 and . County Road 87. At this time the locations and elevations of the building pads have not been determined. No other structural information was available for preparation of this report. A.2. Purpose The purpose of the evaluation was to provide geotechnical information and recommendations regarding design and construction of the proposed project. A.3. Scope Mr. Ben Ford with Rehder and Associates requested a cost estimate for perfonning soil borings and preparation of a geotechnical evaluation report for the cu.........ercial development on March 24, 2004. We were authorized to proceed with conducting soil borings and preparation of ageotecbnical evaluation report on March 26, 2004. Our services were provided in general accordance with our Cost Estimate dated March 25, 2004, and General Conditions dated March 1, 2003. Our scope of services was limited to: . coordinating the locating of underground utilities near the boring locations; . . conducting 14 penetration test borings to about 20 feet in depth at the locations chosen by Rehder and Associates and 1 additional boring on the hill in Outlot B that you requested; . classifying the samples and preparing boring logs; . conducting a limited laboratory testing program; . analyzing the results of the field and laboratory tests; . formulating recvuuuendations for earthwork and foundation design; and . submitting a geotechnical evaluation report containing logs of the borings, our analysis of the field and laboratory tests, and recoIIUIlendations for building pad J:I'''k'aration, spread footing foundations and ' pavement design recvuuuendations. A.4. Documents Provided Mr. Ben Ford, with Rehder and Associates, provided electronic copies showing the existing buildings on the site with the proposed boring locations, a preliminary site plan showing the locations of the proposed buildings pads. An electronic copy showing topographical features was also provided. The plan was titled Deerfield Industrial Park. .. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 OS/23/05 MON 09:29 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates !4]006 Eagle Creek DevelupUlent, L.L.C. Project A V-04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 2 A.S. Locations and Elevations Rehder and Associates selected the boring locations with the exception of Boring ST-15. Rehder and Associates staked the boring locations and determined surface elevations. The boring locations are shown on the sketch in the Appendix of this report.' B. Results B.!. Logs Log of Boring sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata, penetration resistances, laboratory test data and groundwater observations are attached. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the penetration test samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between the strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions and the depths of the changes vary between the borings. Geologic origins presented for each stratum on the Log of Boring sheets are based on the soil types, blows per foot, and available common knowledge of the depositional history of the site. Because of the complex glacial and post-glacial depositional environments, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. A detailed investigation of the geologic history of the site was not performed. B.2. Site Condition The site currently is occupied by one small metal shed. Some grading has been conducted on the site and there are soil stockpiles on the site from grading activities to the southwest of the site. The topography of the site is rolling hills with elevations ranging from about 944 to 960. A number of wetlands have been identified across the site. D.3. Soil Based on the soil borings, the general soil profile on the site consists of approximately 1 to 3 1/2 feet of topsoil over glacially deposited soils consisting of silt, silty sand, poorly graded sand with silt, clayey sand, poorly graded sand, silty clayey sand, lean clay and sandy lean clay. The exception was Boring ST-14 where possible fill was encountered to a depth of about 6 feet. Penetration resistances within the glacial sand, silt, silty sand, clayey sand, lean clay and sandy lean clays generally ranged from 1 blow per foot (BPF) to 24 BPF indicating the silts and sands are in a very loose to medium dense condition and the clayey soils are very soft to stiff in consistency. Isolated areas of poorly graded sand with silt and poorly graded sand were encountered at Borings ST-12, ST-13, ST-14 and ST-15 taken in the westerly portion of the site. IfbolTowing the sand for pavement OS/23/05 MON 09:29 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates 141007 '" Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Project A V-04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 3. sub grades of floor sub grades is being considered; we recommend digging test pits to further evaluate the quality and quantity of the sand. B.4. Groundwater Groundwater observations were made while drilling and inunediately after withdrawal of the auger. Groundwater was observed in Borings ST-2, ST-5, ST-8, ST-13 and ST-14 at depths oflO to 20 feet during the drilling operations, corresponding to elevations ranging from about 933 1/2 to 938. Groundwater was encountered at depths of 5 to 16 feet in Borings ST-3, ST-5, ST-9, ST-I0 and ST-14 immediately after removal of the auger. This corresponds to elevations ranging from about 934 to 942. Groundwater was not observed in the remaining borings to cave-in depths ranging from 6 to 7 feet in the remaining borings immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater levels should be anticipated, especially following spring thaw or heavy rainfalls. c. Analyses and Recommendations C.I. Proposed Construction At this time, we understand that the site will be developed for light conunerciallindustrial buildings. Building sizes and exact location were not available for preparation of this report. The develv....uent will include the constrUction of Adelmann Street which will traverse the site from the existing Adelmann Street in the northwest comer of the site to County Road 87 along the east side of the site. The site work will include grading of the parking areas for some of the lots in the easterly portion of the site where the approximate building pad locations have been determined. The site work will include utility installation. For the basis of this report, have assumed the proposed building loads will consist of maximum wall loads at 5 kips (5,000 pounds) per lineal foot and maximum column loads at 150 kips. Finished floor grades were not available at the time of this report. If the actual loads exceed these assumed values, we should be informed. Additional analyses and revised reconnnendations may be necessary. C.2. Discussion Based on the results of the borings, the site is judged to be generally suitable for the proposed ~onstruction after some soil correction. We recvulJ.uend that all topsoil, possible fill, very loose silt and silty sand (less than 4 BPF) and soft clay (less than 5 BPF) be removed from the ....uJ:lose~ buildings and oversize areas, prior to fill or foundation placement. Fill, if required, can then be placed in a controlled fashion. The foundations can then be supported on typical spread footings, and the floor can be supported on the natural soils or structural backfill. OS/2~/05 MON 09:30 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~008 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Proj ect A V -04-03270 Apri122,2004 Page 4 Some of the on~site clay and silt soils are moisture sensitive and easily disturbed from construction traffic. If these soils become disturbed they will need to be recompacted or removed and replaced. To limit their disturbance, a bladed bucket backhoe may be required. C.3. Building Pad Preparations C.3.a. Subexcavation. We recv....llLLend the topsoil, existing fill, very loose silt and soft clay be removed from the proposed building and oversize areas. Table 1 below summarizes the anticipated depths of the unsuitable soils at the boring locations. Table 1. Depths and Elevations of Unsuitable Soils Approximate Bottom Approximate Approximate Depth of Elevation of Boring Surface Elevation (feet) Unsuitable Soils (feet) Unsuitable Soils . -------------~~. ST-l 956 1 1/2 954 1/2 ST-2 955 41/2 950 1/2 ST-3 955 1 1/2 to 4* 950 1/2 to 953 1/2 ST-4 950 1 1/2 to 4* 946 to 948 1/2 ST-5 955 11/2 953 1/2 ST-6 952 4 948 ST-7 944 1/2 1 943 1/2 ST-8 949 9 940 ST-9 950 6 944 ST -10 952 9 943 ST -11 957 2 955 ST-12 957 1 956 ST -13 955 1/2 1 954 1/2 ST-14 944 6 to 9* 935 - 938 ST-15 957 4 953 '" The excavation depths should be further evaluated at the time of construction. Some of the soft clay or very loose sand may require removal. OS/23/05 MON 09:30 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates . I4i 009 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C, Project A V -04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 5 The depth of the subexcavation will likely vary between the borings and should be determined in the field at the time of the site grading. The maximum depth of unsuitable soils will likely exceed the depths encountered by the borings. Also, it is typical to excavate 1/2 to 1 foot deeper than the minimum necessary to clean the bottom of a sub excavation. Subexcavations should be oversized to provide lateral stability for the backfill. The bottoms of the subexcavations should be oversized at least I foot beyond the perimeter edges of the footings for each foot of subexcavation below the bottoms of the footings (lH:IV oversizing). C.3.b. Dewatering. It appears that groundwater (either static or perched) may be found in various locations. Where excavations extend only 1 to 2 feet below the groundwater, it is our opinion that water seepage can be collected with sump pumps established at the base of the excavation. Where the excavations extend below the groundwater in clays and silts, sump pumps along side the excavation can be used to control the grou:n.dwater. Where the excavations extend more than 2 feet below the groundwater in sand, well points may be needed to facilitate the excavation and construction work. We rec.....~end a contingency be provided for some dewatering. C.3.c. Backfill and Fill. We recommend backfill be debris free, non-organic, mineral soil placed and compacted as recommended in the following paragraph. Sandy gravel and sand are generally preferred materials, as they are easier to c.......1'ac1. The on-site soils (except the topsoil and soils containing organics) are generally judged to be suitable for reuse as engineered backfill or fill. However, some of . the on-site soils could be dry or wet, depending on soil type and time of year construction takes place and will likely require moisture conditioning before they can be used. We recuUi..uend compacting fills on level surfaces. Therefore, any fill placed on or against sloping gro1Uld should begin from the bottom of the slope where a level surface can be established. Fill that originates on a slope should be properly "keyed" into the slope. The "key" should consist of a level bench excavated to a convenient width for the equipment being used We recommend the fill be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 to 12 inches in thiclmess, depending on the type of material and size of compactor being used. The material should have moisture contents within 3 percentage points of its optimum moisture content. Each lift should be c\.Ju.}'acted to a minimwn of 98 percent of its maximum dry density as determined in accordance with .A..u.....~can Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 698 (standard Proctor). If areas will require more than 10 to 15 feet of fill below footings, we recommend that the type of fill, m~isture content of the fill and construction schedule be reviewed. A construction delay may be required to allow the fill mass and soft or loose natural soils to consolidate. Settlement plates may also be required to monitor the consolidation. This should be reviewed on a case by case basis. OS/23/05 MON 09:31 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~010 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Project A V -04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 6 CA. Foundations C.4.a. .Depth. We recommend that the perimeter footings in heated areas be founded a minimum of 3 1/2 feet below the nearest exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed . immediately beneath the slab. Ifwinter construction is being considered, we recommend that the interior footings also bear a minimum of 3 1/2 feet below grade for frost protection. Foundation elements in unheated areas should be founded at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. C.4.b. Subgrades. At these depths, we anticipate that the footings will bear on native glacial deposits or engineered fill. C.4.c. Bearing Pressure. Depending on fmal building grades, it is our opinion that the footings placed .~ 0 .' natural soils or engineered fill may be designed for a net allowable soil bearing pressure up to G.?Q.)1'ounds per square foot (psf). C.4.d. Settlement. We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and 1/2 inch, respectively under the assumed loads. C.4.e. Exterior Backfill. We recvuJwend backfill placed on the exterior sides of the foundation walls in landscaped areas be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density. . Beneath steps and slabs, it should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent. Soils from the footing excavations may be reused as backfill. Backfill should be brought up uniformly on both sides of the foundation walls to minimize displacement of the foundation walls. C.S. Floor C.5.a. Subgrade. After the building pad preparation has been completed, we anticipate the floor subgrade will be native and/or engineered sandy lean clay soils. These soils should be directly suitable for floor-slab support. Backfill in footing and mechanical trenches should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density within 3 percent of the optimum moisture content. C.5.b. Sand Cushion. We recommend the 6 inches offill placed immediately below the concrete slab consist of sand containing less than 5 percent fines by weight passing a 200 sieve. This sand cushion will provide a leveling base. The sand cushion should be compacted to at least 95 percent ofthe standard Proctor maximum dry density. OS/23/05 MON 09:31 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~011 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Project A V -04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 7 C.S.c. Vapor Retarder. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slabs will be used, or if moisture is a conCern, we recommend that vapor retarders be placed beneath the slabs. (Some coverings, coatings or situations may require a vapor barrier, i.e., a membrane with a permeance less than 0.3 perms.) Indus1ry standards.often recuulluend burying the vapor retarder or barrier beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage of the concrete, but this practice risks trapping water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. C.5.d. Sub grade Modulus. The anticipated floor subgrade is native and/or engineered sandy lean clay soils. It is our opinion that a modulus of sub grade reaction, k, of 100 ponnds per square inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor. If 6 inches of crushed stone or gravel road base is placed immediately beneath the slab, the modulus could be increased by 50 pci. The crushed stone or gravel road base would also provide a more stable subgrade for construction traffic. C.6. Exterior Slabs C.6.a. Subgrades.. We recuuLLuend the vegetation and topsoil be removed from beneath the proposed slabs. Fills and backfills should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density. C.6.b. Frost Protection. The on-site silt, clay and silty sand soils .are frost-susceptible soils. If these soils become saturated and freeze, I to 2 inches of heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance for slabs or steps in front of doors and'at other critical grade areas. . One'way to reduce this heave is to remove the frost-susceptible soils down to bottom-of-footing level and replace them with nonfrost- susceptible sand or sandy gravel. Sand or sandy gravel with less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a number 200 sieve is nonfrost-susceptible. The sand backfill should be draintiled to remove water that could become l.a.}I}led in the sand backfilL An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of two inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending about four feet beyond the slabs. The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying subgrade and thereby reduce heave. Six to twelve inches of granular material is generally placed over the insulation to protect it during construction. Another alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the steps or slabs on frost-depth footings. A void space of at least 4 inches should be provided between the bottoms of the steps/slabs and frost- susceptible soils to allow the soils to heave without affecting the steps/slabs. C.7. Site Grading and Drainage We recuuLLuend the site be graded to provide a positive run-off away from the proposed buildings. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be OS/23/05 MON 09:32 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~012 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Project A V-04-03270 Apri122,2004 Page 8 sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition, we recuUI.u~end gutters and downspouts with long splash biocks or extensions. c.s. Retaining Walls C.8.a. Retaining Wall Preparation. We recv,uwend that the vegetation, topsoil and any previously placed fill be removed from beneath the proposed retaining walls. If excavations extend below the retaining wall grade, the bottoms of the excavations should be oversized 1 foot horizontal for every vertical foot of ex.cavation below the retaining walls. The oversizing is to .provide lateral support to the retaining walls. The fill required to attain the proposed grades should consist of any debris-free, non-organic mineral soil. The previously placed fill soils that are free of organics and debris may be reused as engineered backfill. We recommend that each lift be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Method of Test D 698 (standard Proctor). The fill should have a moisture content within 3 percentage points of optimum moisture. If fill depths exceed 10 feet, we recuulluend that the soils be compacted to at least 98 percent of the max.immn dry density. C.8.b. Lateral Earth Pressure. The lateral earth pressure used for the design of the loading dock or retaining 'walls will depend on the materials used to backfill the walls. The active and passive coefficients of lateral pressure may be employed only if movement of the wall can be tolerated to reach the active state. A translation orrotation of a}'p...u~imately 1/500 of the height of the fill would be . required to develop the active state for granular soils and 1/50 for cohesive soils. If this movement cannot be tolerated, we recommend using the at-rest coefficients to design the wall. Table 2 below, summarizes lateral earth coefficients for the soil types anticipated for this project. These values do not include a factor of safety. Table 2. Lateral Earth Coefficients Wet Unit Coefficient of Weight At-Rest Earth Active Earth Passive Earth Sliding Soil Type (pct) Pressure (K.,) Pressure (K,.) Pressure (Kp) Friction SP and SP-SM 120 0.45 0.30 3.3 0.6 SM and SC 125 0.50 0.33 3,0 0.5 CL 120 0.60 0.45 2.2 0.4 OS/23/05 MON 09:32 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates . 141 013 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Project A V -04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 9 For walls in a truck dock area, we recommend that non-frost susceptible backfill be used within 4 feet (horizontal) of the backs of walls. Sand or sandy gravel with less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve is considered a non-frost susceptible backfill. In landscape areas, we reconunend that the backfill be capped by' about 1 foot of topsoil and clay to reduce infiltration of water. Retaining walls should be provided with a behind wali.:<1rain system or with weep holes to help reduce the development of hydrostatic loads due to collection of water within the backfill. C.9. Utilities C.9.a. Materials. The soil types encOlmtered during installation of utilities will likely be natural silty sand, sand, silt or sandy lean clay soils. Based on the borings, these soils are generally suitable for utility support. If there are areas of soft soils at invert grade, placement of 1/2 to I foot of crushed rock may be required for pipe support. Dependant upon the proposed depth of utility installation, dewatering may be necessary to facilitate installation in a dry condition. Based on our groundwater observations and depending on invert grades, groundwater (either static or perched) may be encoWltered. It may be possible to draw down the groundwater by pumping from sump pits established alongside the trench. We recommend utility trenches not be constructed under footings or within the zone of influence of . footings (1: 1 area). Above footings and below the floor slab; we reconunend backfill be cuwpacted to a minimum of 95 percent cu.....paction. For trench backfill in any parking and drive areas, we recu~1JlUend the backfill soils be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent below the upper 3 feet and 100 percent in the upper 3 feet. c.t O. Pavements C.IO.a. Subgrade Preparation. The optimum method for subgrade preparation would involve the removal of all existing fill, vegetation, topsoil, soft clay and very loose silt. The pavement sub grade should then be brought back to grade with engineered fill. However, since pavement areas are typically more tolerant to settlement, complete removal of the organic, loose or soft soils is not necessary where at least a 3-foot cap of granular borrow or better material is provided. We wish to note, however, that more than normal settlement will likely occur in these areas and the pavements may require more than normal maintenance and have a shorter life expectancy. It is often typical to excavate 1/2 to 1 foot deeper than the minimwn necessary to clean the bottom of a sub excavation. The subexcavation should be oversized 1 foot behind the curb for each foot of fill placed below the curb (lH: 1 V oversizing). OS/23/05 MON 09:32 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~014 Eagle Creek Develv}lwent, L.L.C. Project A V -04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 10 We recommend the resulting subgrade be scarified, moisture conditioned to no more than 1 percent over optimum and recompacted to a minimum. of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. Where fill is required, we recvwwend that it consist of mineral soil. The fill should be placed at no more than 1 percent over optimum moisture and compacted to at least 100 percent of its standard Proctor dry density. For soils more then 3 feet below [mal grades, 95 percent compaction should be sufficient with a moisture content within 3 percentage points of optimum. The finish sub grade should be proofrolled with a loaded tandem axle truck to dekuuille if additional sub grade correction will be required. Based on the soils encountered, we anticipate the soils will be directly suitable for pavement support following subgrade preparation. However, we anticipate limited areas will require deeper sub grade correction. In areas where subgrade correction is deemed necessary, unsuitable soils should be removed to soils of suitable density or to a maximum depth of 3 feet. The subgrade should be brought back to grade with engineered fill consisting of a debris free, non-organic mineral soil. C.I0.b. Anticipated Pavement Subgrade. After the preparation, we anticipate the sub grade will likely be compacted sandy lean clay soils. Laboratory tests to determine the Hveem R-values of these soils were not included in our scope of services. We assumed a value of 12 for our design. C.I0.c. Parking Lot Design Sections. For the above sub grade with some light truck traffic, we . reconimend a minimum of 3 inches of bituminous s\,llface over 10 inches of. cI:Ushed gravel base for . automobile and light truck parking areas. \!n drive-lane and truck areas, we recommend a minimum of 4 inches ofbitumino~ surface over 8 inches of crushed gravel base, over 1 foot of select granular b?ITOW (MnDOT 3149.2b)'1 In low areas, we recommend finger drains be placed to the catch basins, to aid in removing water trapped in the aggregate base or sand sub grade by rain or irrigation of the green areas. This design is based on a 20-year life expectancy. This is the amount of time before major reconstruction is anticipated. This performance assumes proper care, such as seal coating and crack sealing is routinely performed. A thinner pavement section could be used but would likely result in a shorter pavement life with more than nonnal maintenance. We recommend specifying crushed gravel base meeting the requirements ofMn/DOT Specification 3138 for Class 5. We recommend that the bituminous surface and base coarse meet the requirements of Specification 2360 MV. We recommend that the crushed aggregate base be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. We recommend that the bituminous courses be cVlH}lacted to a minimum of95 percent of their Marshall densities (ASTM D 1559). OS/23/05 MON 09:33 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates . 14I 015 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Project A V-04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 11 D. Construction D.l. ObserVations A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation, footing and slab subgrades to evaluate if the sub grade soils are similar to those encountered by the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. Oversize of excavations below perimeter footing grades should be checked. These observations should be conducted prior to placing backfills, fills or forms for footings. After excavating for footings, we recommend that tests be conducted on the sub grades to evaluate if the bearing capacity is at least 2500 psf. Typical instruments used for these tests include hand augers, penetrometers and sample tubes. D.2. Excavation It is our opinion that the native soils encountered by the borings can be excavated with a backhoe, front- end loader or scraper. All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CPR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations and Trenches". This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. References to this OSHA requirement should be included in the job specifications. D.3. Backillls and Fills Site soils which will be excavated and reused as backfills and fills currently appear to be near estimated optimum moisture content. We anticipate it will be necessary to moisture condition or dry these soils to achieve the recvu..u.uended compaction. We recvUJuJ.end that backfills and fills be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending upon the size of the cu....pactor and material used. D.4. Testing We recommend density tests of backfills and fills placed beneath footings and slabs. Samples of proposed backfill and fill materials should be submitted to our testing laboratory at least three days prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and del,;.u...ination oftheir optimum moistUre contents and maximum dry densities. E. Procedures E.l. Drilling and Sampling We performed the penetration test borings on April 6, 2004, with a core and auger drill equipped with 3 l/4-inch inside diameter hollow-stem auger mounted on an off-road drill rig or truck. Sampling for the OS/23/05 MON 09:33 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates @016 Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Project A V-04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 12 borings was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, "Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils." We advanced the boreholes with the hollow-stem auger to the desired test depths. A 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches was then used to drive the standard 2-inch split-barrel sampler a total penetration of 1 1/2 feet below the tip of the hollow-stem auger. The blows for the last foot of penetration were recorded and are an index of soil strength. characteristics. Samples were taken at 2 1/2 foot vertical intervals to approximately 15 feet below existing grade and then at 5-foot intervals to the termination depths of the borings. A representative portion of each sample was then sealed in a glass Jar. E.2. Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure)." A summary of the ASTM classification system is attached. The samples were then returned to our laboratory for review of the field classifications by a soils engineer. Representative samples will remain in our Lakeville office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. E.3. Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottoms of the borings, the holes were probed through the hollow-stem auger to check for the presence of grmmdwater. Inunediately after the auger was withdrawn, the holes were again probed and the depths to water or cave-ins were noted. The borings were then immediately backfilled or grouted. F. General Conditions F.1. Basis of Recommendations The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Often, variations occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which do not become evident until additional exploration or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs, and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program for the site preparation phase of this project. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings, and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. OS/23/05 MON 09:34 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates . ~017 Eagle Creek Develvl'L.uent, L.L.C. Project A V-04-03270 April 22, 2004 Page 13 F.2. Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed development as related to us for pL!;..paration of this report. It is recuuiluended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications. With the review, we will evaluate whether any changes in design have affected the validity of the recommendations, and whether our recommendations have been correctly int\JLpJ.!;..-:'ed and implemented in the design and specifications. F.3. Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level observations in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. These data were interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short, and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. F.4. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Eagle Creek Development and their consultants. In the absence of om written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. F.5. Level of Care Services performed by Braun Intertec Corporation personnel for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area WIder similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied. OS/23/05 MON 09:34 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates [4] 018 Appendix OS/23/05 MON 09:34 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates . I4l 019 .. S DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING /- 1/;1 . ) \ '/ / \. /- ~ ~ ( '..... "-~'" r, r..) -......... ......... "- \ ~. ". ". ". , ---........, . ..~ --......., --.<~ _..-, ---"'-~~~ y 125'.0 250' r-o-.....-.- - SCALE 1~= 250' OS/2.3/05 651 452 9797 MON 09:35 FAX d Associates Rehder an ......,,, -..............,. .'............ -1S..,1;,~ "',..,...,,'........, "...... "., !lIq,'f~ "',,- '~~~ '~1.{) ......,....... "''''::-'''' lr:~ '............. r"~~'-~~:- ~O"'*GO ..,~ ~'<<\~'" .., .....''-.... \,.. '~lf< ~, e \ ' ---./ ""- '1'~ _, , " ,\ ,,/"' /./ >',-"'~ - ",- i "- "'~' ~~, ~ oS"'" · "'~-'n- ,Y."" \ \ "'--. '. '" "''' '--, 'I ~.T(; . ".:"~1*:;:i /~ /J '........~..~ J9. '............--... . ~dln~~i~~!~~~~~~~~~i~~>,n..... .1........1 ........,.........."-"-.........:..f(J90~~'........_ .,.tL . AI...,.......... _ . 'ill!!"",?i', :~" i I ", ,,, " ......, ..1,. , , ' ...., .....,.-"oj. , --- \. oi~g~~~~i' / ". '- \ '''''''1 :'" \ , '., '~ .................... \ """" ~ I \ \.. / i =. ~ ~~~gg~g \i~1 "--"'-'../ ./" I C3)\; \ ___. 0.. ,......, ~ ,. ./ 1 \~.,,, 'U,,\ ~ \ ~ iilllll\U.~ II I ~),I'~Y 1 \ ;r\;1 i\ ijnl~\\\l\ ( / \ '",_, ! i, Ii \~~~'~f 1 ""', ./" " , I'. '0. .' r ~. If '\ . ,I L. ~ , \ \ \ 'I~' " 'if I!JI I ,. \\'1 ----- ~ \ '" . 'f I Ai ! ~~~~~ \\.,(~~'-----.' "" 0 (:0; '\. '\.~.' i 'J ~~' 1 ' '..... '. - ., ~ ",1\ . ,\ I I P.C~, __ '')-.,-~' '-- .,~. '. ( J L' r,,'" . ~ /. ~c::- . '--'/ \ , 'J~L / --/ /' ~~ ~ /..-., I, I " L";:" 1._ . -::k ~I~/ ~ I' , f J . ....----'. u ""iii.-' ~~""-:.,~ -I.. 'I ' .' . r -..........~- I .--....:...~-~ .)\;;:;:o.n \! j I J .1!. -::- . ""-..' ""1 '. I "';" , ~. '~'*"".U . #-7/,t '.' :...,/ ""'--1 ~ ~-.-...-, (..; . i ' / - I /" ........,.'~':' M ',,'In,: n~f '. ...;"~ ::"~--".' 1'1 ~:c-;-- '~r-;' ~'~~I I i!. "'}:~... -'-,/ I (..-..-, SiST'~__. I o;.!LLJ g If I i: ! I 1 )" II '"-... S I ~''"1..- ,~ i. )' ! I "~' I ~I I 1/~~1 " "\L''''-~ fs-r;;V j!lll ; I '-1>"" I f ,.,~ JI: l \ / .{...---,. V r-,/I / I, . (\' ~~ >._';;;;~" 1;.'/, I, 1';/ /, \ '\.G;- --''''r''W'' ~*.'. !l~~),: '.u ')' 1---,,}\7M::~~I{lf) ~ ..-----...--.... . 7Ltllri e:. ..'\ \. / ~~\ \~ ~ li"l)m" r.~ '" lUIP.~1 1 ~/~\i.--_m.H. ~~...,--;;;-.:~, "~ I ..... \ " .. ..J ' ( \'\\,\'1(1--11/'11. If ..~ ( '- ,/ ._~ .0- \\ \, \. " \ ,I illl'l --- ../ -' -~, ~ '" .,1, Y -. - . . " ' . ./'/' [' e. --.... r.::- .:.>:'::::". ----I I "\ '" / ,... -" "". ./, /I "A/,.!_ , ,<"'=" il i I) '/(/ /"'/"\\'1 /f I / f <::; / / \ \ \!\ n '-J. .[ \----,/ I" \........./ ! ~---~-<::?J \... \~ \. /-./- ') \......... ""~_/ ......... --- .' / ,.- I .... ........." ""---.. I4J 020 u Zw :t~ Cw .1- .~ :I: U I- ~ lLJZo::< ~O<t- (/)1=0..0 c( VI Z:::l..Jw O..J~ Z i= ~~ ~ -c( I.&J VI ::E U..J:::l _ O<ow ...J~~~ c>zo..J ~Qi:i:lo:: a:::wG:Q 01-0::0:: CCOwa. ...J~~ o VI ...,....,. l!l ~crcr !;j -< r-- l'- ... C1J.J.giJi ~ 0 O~b ~"'It) <.:l >0", ~ '4 c( ~ ." <.... ~ ;;;; . lD lD 0 !! ... z CI z ..... ~ 'i1. ClI i t3 ~ ~ ~ C ell FIGURE NO. OS/23/05 MON 09:36 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates . I4J 021 Descriptive Terminology Jr~ Standard 0 2487 .00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified.Soil Classiication System~ Criteri__ for Assig.nlng G,oup Symbols and Group Neme. Using ~ratDFY Tests . "I . Gravel. ~ Mor. illan Sll% e$ ... . _~ tile... r~cllon .. i WI re\8ined Dn ~ 51 Ii ~ No. 4 "ev~ "'. H ~ P ~g C" .a 4 and 1 .! C~ ~ :1 c C.. tl; .. BT1d/or 1 > C~.)o, 3. Gravels with.flRIlS Fines classify es Ml or MH MOF. ,l1an l;l.% /ine.' F~ d~lfy .s Cl dr CJ,I 'Cleon Sand. C...!:. 6 6nd 1 .IS. C, ~ J' ~""""'n!>%~n..d C < 6 onel/...l >C.> 3' -Slllnd.. wllb FI..... fines claully as Ml.~ MH Mont Ihon 12% II"..' j ~lOo;'classj!;t~' Cl Of CH inorganic: I PI j. "7 and DIOts on Sf. abDV'B: . Ii. PI 'IIneJ ! ~I.< 4 or 0101S bDIow."A-llnel "'1Ianlc 11J1l1li1l1/nlk' ~drled < 0.7-5 ,III"''' IIml' . .01 dried Ipl pIOu on or Ilbi>ve . A. line - inorganic L!,I.~I~.beI..-. ~f\'I1.... organic I UQ~iCHilnlt woven dr.ied c 0.15 lIq~ldll"J.~'I01'~. '''_''. I.Prlmartty orqonic metler. d';k fn cafar. andGrgsnic a~r I,"PT Ch.." Grav.'. ~s lH.,r.' 5% flM!. Sand5 50% or mOfo <If :O'WH! fraction 'pMSes No~ 04- '1'i.ve .!II! 'Q1l~ ~ '" t ...-01... ~ ~8 . f ~.N 'r~~ liilll .~ Sills and Cloy. Uqtll<lllmk lass lhan sO .slit. ond ~IloY" .uqtll...llm~ .. 50 or moRt' HIcl"'" OrQanlo Soil> Soon 'ClasslflcaUon- Group 'Symbol .GW GP GM ClC SW Sf ISM SC II':I r Ml jot I Cii IMH Lo~. Grouo 'Name II Wen.'9'aded 9"lV.1 r p.Q1Qrty graded grave,r . ,SftIY araysl r"", OaVe~ qravel ~rJi We\1-gradod "",d I 'PbOriy ~dsandl I SillV' land''''' fcl~ya,y sand.... .I~vu.. ISik~. Oqjenic Clay ....... - (:)rge"'''' ,W. ~ hi 'Ci;,v u... tEla..~sI1t"'''' t Orgaql.: clB)' Jr.i., O(9IJnfo ~J~ ~,.. I Peat D. ~ on.1ha '""'letilll .passing lho '3--1n ns.mm) t;leue. h. 111Ldd .mmpta- corVal"ed eo:~bles l;It" bClcilder5". at' beth. .dd "wlrl dabbles. or botJtodc:rs, of both.,." (0 group netne.. e. Gr..""Is.WilIl 5 II> l?% '!h05 rP'I"lro duel.orobo'" GW-GM wal?aded ~;..., .../llt slk GW.GCl wol~do<l9""" wiIh clay G"-GM po"ly 11"'''''' 'll"eva/ """' ,Ib Gp-GC poOrI)' _d... v.... WI" d8y d. 'Sornls willi 5 to 12" nMl roqul,o.dllBJ J)'mbolS: sW.SM wcm.vnlc:ie.d send .",1111 ,'I SW'SC well'l1redcd ..nd wilh Cloy SP-~M ..... :J JIo:,.adCl1 Hnd with .IU SP.SC paody gradad santi wtlh d8Y .. C.. D',.,ID.. '".. ID..l' DIft X 011I r. If ",bll conlalns ~ ,.nl 'iliAd, add "with ~d" kJ ;rcvp nam... II- W".... <I....y ... elM. Usb dual .ymb.oI Gc-GM or $C.SM. h. .. Ones .8rQ ~nic. add "wII1 DC'gat\fc rinas"" 'lG !ltCll.l~ n.me. i. '., IOII@rdatns115"'"a\lIlL.ad1l "wi'" gr8wl"'.o 9rljlup nama. j. tf AMtw~ lirnlU .p1Q1 ~ ~'C"~ 'faa. Iblllw ." et.-Ml.. ..Iiy CIa)' k, h."comolns 1510 i!9%'pIuMo. 200. odd 'wIlIIG....d" or ',,""'gr..Y.~' whlehovur Is prod...,;._ 1. 11 sDUmAlII11lS .!. a,.. plus. Nl2. 200. pteckarnlnaouy send.. add ....erid;y.. 1O group name. B .oil """18;ns ~ 30'1(, "tIS No. 100. """,0,","""1y gr....., add .g""""y'" .. lII"UI>...... n. PI It, .04 in\d plats on Or .bOWl "A" lina. a. PI < 4 OF plots below "A" Una. p. PJ'p1V1S an or abaw "A- Una. .q. PI plOD b<lQW .A" '""" ou' f'orIlA,,;". ,n.'1'ine1,:ained /: . -, / /, .iolj~ -M"d finergrairwd kaetiGn of '. ./ 50... ltCIanI. _ils. - t......... ",'''' ""': / ~~...' .~/ e:. HarlzC!nt.I..,pt-AIQU_ZS.S. . 4'4/ o~ ...:."j/ )( 40 - tM",PI-O,'.3 .lll.2er .'~ 0" ", ~ =:":1l:~-&':'.~"1. / // ~ / ; ~-"'."P"'OJlRl'8l/ ~ /' ;g .' ~/ 'n"" ~ ~ ; 20 - ~ /;" do '" "v ./ MH..r>r OH c: / /' 10 -.-.L.(' . ,/ 7 . u)7.7/- C, .M' '....N/ I ML or QL ~/ 1 I I I o 10 1& 20 30 40 50 60 70 eo liquid limit (ll) Laboratory Tests DD WD MC LL Pl PI P200 Dry density. pcf Wet density. pd Natural moisture contenl. % liquid limit, % Plastic limit. % Plasticity index. % % passing 200 sieve OC Organic content, % S . Percent of saturation. % SG Speciflc gravity C Cohesion, psf o Angle of internal friction qu Unconfined compressive strength, psf q p . Pocket penetrometer strength. tsf / " 90 100 lld Particle Size Identification Boulders ............................ over 12" Cobbles ...........................,3..tb 12" Gravel . Coarse ...........................3/4" to 3" Fine .................."........... No.4 to 3/4" Sand Coarse .:......................... No, 4 to No.. 10 Medium ._....................... No. 10 to No. 40 Fine ..............._............... No. 40 to No. 2QO Silt....................................No. ~OO to .0.05 mm Clay ...................................'Iess than .005 mm .Relative Density of CohesionlessSoiJ-s. very loose leose medium dEmSe dense very dense o to 4 BPF Sto10SPF 11 tQ30BPF 31 lei 50 BPf over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Sc!!ils v.ery soft ..~.............,......._,...O IE) 1 BPI' sdft ......_.....................,..... 2 to 3 BPF rather soft .......................... 4 tli- 5 'BPF medium ............._..............6 to.S BPf rathi:lr StIff .......................... 9 to'12 BPF stiff ....................................13 tQ 16 BPF very st1ff ............................ 17 10 30 BPF hard ....................... .....,..... over 30 BPf Drining Notes Standard penelt8tion test borings were Cldllanced by 3 1/4" Qr 6 1/4" 10 Rolfow-slem atl~ers tmless noted otherwise. Jelling wS!er WlilS .used rei cleCJn oul aliigEl!' priGI' to sampling only where indicated on logs, Standard penetration tt!!st botil1gs are t1eslgnated by tile prefix .ST" (Split TliIpe). Power Bilger tlorlngs were adl/anced by 4" or p" diameter. continuous.flight. solid.stem..augees. Spilcla5sifl~tiQM aOO Stnlla depths were inrer.r~d from (llstl:lrt/ad samples sugered to the SI,lrfsc:e SRO' are. therefore. 5Ornewha-l appro5<lrnate.. J>ower auger borings are. designated by the pr~f1x ".al<. Hand Bilger I'orjngs were adVanced manually with a 11/'2" c;liameler auger MO werelimiled 10 the depth from whicl1lhe aU!'et couid be manll<ll!l withdrawn. HSlJd auger boill1fls are indl~teEl by the prefix H". . . Sampling: All samples were taken with lI1e stendsrQ.2" aD sp.llWub.e $l!lmp.ler. ~oepl where noted. TW indicales thin. walled {undisturbed) tube sample. . . . BPF: Numbers .Indlclilte blows per foal recorded in standard penelrallQA lest. also knoWl1 as "N" value. The sampler was set 6" Inlo. uridistur!;led soil below llie hollOw-$tem aUgllr. Driving resistances were then counted for second.and third 6" increments and added to get BPf. Where they differed significantly. they are reported In the following form: 2/12 for the second and third e" increments, respectively: WH: WH Indicates the sampler penetrated sail under weight of hammer l:Ind rods alone; driving notl'equired. WR: WR Ind'lcates the sampler penetrated soli under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. Nole: AI[ lests w.ere run'ln general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. . . BRAUN'" I NTERTEC Rev. 05/02 OS/23/05 MON 09:37 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates BRAUNSM I NTE RTEC Braun Project A V -04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: GHIMT I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA. Autohmr. Elev. feet 955.7 - 954.4 -r;j' 949.7 g .sa .!<J - ;. u l$ .e- = .... o c:: o "-Iii a- -a >< - '" ... cS ";) '" ,g- ~ o -g- .~- ~ '" - ;. ".j:l c- 'b - '" '" A_ u u rn ...... - 935.2 on on .:.; ~ '" S- f-< Q 0- ~ :1- ~ - .... 0- o .... M '" - o g 0_ o ..J U ~- CQ 5- ~ CQ A V -04-032/0 Depth feet . 0.0 ASTM Symbol CL "I~ 1.3 , CL 6.0 CLI .~ 20.5 I4J 022 LOG OF BORING BORING: ST -1 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. , DATE: Description of Materials (ASTM 02488 or 02487) SANDY LEAN CLAY, black, wet. (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with lense.s of Sand, brown to grayish brown, wet, rather soft to medium. (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace qffine Gravel, grayish brown to about 18 feet then gray, wet, medium to - rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of7 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. Braun lnrertec 4/6/04 BPF WL 5 6 I SCALE: 1" =4' Tests or Notes Boring elevations detennined by Rehder and Associates. 9 <<<<l< The 'xxxx' symbol in the WL column indicates the observed dry cave-in depth after auger withdrawal. 12 9 9 8 ST-l page 1 of 1 OS/23/05 MON 09:37 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates IRAUNSM I NTE RTEC Braun Project A V -04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota Elev. feet 955.4 951.9 950.9 ~- o .~ 'S: - e .r> .r>- <11 .... o d- .~ j- IL Q) ... <S i ~- ~ ..9_ a .~- f-< Q) - .~ Q. .;:: - <> fIJ Q) 0_ .. .. VI ..... - 934.9 '" ; .... ~ 2 ....- !5 CI- ~ ~ - I:Il ... '" CJ- o l:i ~- 8- .... ~ ~- I:Il 5- ;;j I:Il A V-04-03270 BORING: .(4J 023 LOG OF BORING' LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST-2 I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. DATE: 4/6/04 DRILLER: GH/MT Depth feet 0.0 Description of Materials . (ASTM D2488 or D2487) CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained. black, wet. (Topsoil) ASTM Symbol SC .~ ~ ~ ~A SC 7;11":' .: CLAYEY SAND, fme- to medium-grained, brown, wet. - 4.5 .' ".. (Glacial Till) ....._ CL ~ SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace offine Gravel, _ ~ 7 ~ grayish ~rown to about 17 feet then gray, wet, medium to - tm rather stiff. ~ (Glacial Till) BPF WL Me ~ 2 3.5 ~ 10 _~ 11 ~ 11 _~ 10 20.5 _ ~ 12 5l END OF BORING Water down 20 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of6 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfined. Braun Intertec I SCALE: 1" == 4' Tests or Notes % 18 <)QQQ< An open triangle in the water level (WL) column indicates the depth at which groundwater was observed while drilling. ST-2 page 1 of 1 05/2~/05 MON 09:38 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates 'BRAUNSII I NTE RTEC Braun Project A V -04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: MM/MB E]ev. feet 954.7 953.2 -;;;- 948.7 t:I .9 ..., oS' - ILl .. .0 .0' - oj .... o 6 l- "E. X.- ILl ... .g ~ ILl ..c: .,. - >- oc o '0'- .5 s- ~ .~- ~ .....--- c.> '" Q} 0._ u <> CI) -....., 9342 ..... ~ ..,. ~ ~ ..,.- ..... t3- ~ ;:i - a:l .... '" 0- <:0 ..... .... .., - o ;g 0_ o ...l U <ii- <( a:l ?5- ;:i a:l AV-04-03270 Depth feet 0.0 ASTM Symbol CL .~ 15 SC I ~ ~ 6.0 CL ~ 2,0.5 BORING: 14J024 LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST-3 I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autobmr. DATE: BPF WL Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) LEAN CLAY with SAND, black, wet. (Topsoil) CLA YEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, layer of Sand __ at about 4 feet, brown, wet, rather soft to medium. ~ 4 (Glacial Till) - _~ 6 SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace offine Gravel, brown to about 14 feet then gray, wet, medium to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) . 8 I 6 END OF BORING Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down 16 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. Braun Inlertec 4/6/04 I SCALE: 1" =4' Tests or Notes 9 12 ~ A solid triangle in the water level (WL) colwnn indicates the depth at which groundwater was observed immediately after withdrawal of the auger. 10 j 3T -3 page 1 ofl 05/23/05 MON 09:38 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates .I4J025 LOG OF BORING BRAUNS" INTERTEC Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake,Minne~ota BORING: ST-4 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. DRILLER: MM/MB Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM 949.7 0.0 SynllOl SM ..... . '.:;'.:: 948.2 1.5 '. ~. '. SC ~ ~ % 945.7 4.0 ~ CL ..... tIl_ g ",p oS ';>- u .6 ,J:>- oS .... 0 = 0 '.p 01_ a -a ><- u ... oS - u ~ tIl_ .~ 0 g- .~ - u E-< ~ - '-d .~ - ~ cL u u rIl '- - 929.2 20.5 ~ ... ~ ~ s::! ... - ~- ~ - ~ 0:: 0- 0 ... '" ~- 8 - ..J 5d ~- a:l ?j- ~ A V -04-03270 I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autolunr. DATE: 4/6/04 I SCALE: . I" = 4' Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, black, moist. (Topsoil) BPF WL MC % Tests or Notes CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with a trace offine Gravel, brown, wet, rather soft. ~ 5 (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLA Y, with fine GRAVEL, grayish brown to about 14 feet then gray, wet, medium to stiff. -~ 8 (Glacial Till) 17 -X 9 - -~ 12 .~ 16 - -X 14 -QQQQ< ~.x 15 END OF BORING Water not-observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 17 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. Braun Intertec , ST-4 page I of 1 05/2~/05 MON 09:38 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates BRAUNSN I NTE RTEC Braun Project A V -04-03270 GEOTEL111~ICAL EV ALUA TION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: GH/MT. I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. Elev. feet 954.6 - 953.3 950.6 a- o ',l:: os 'S: - e ,&J ,&J- os "'" o d - o .~ &i - '1i >1- d.> .. <B 'ii J! ., - ~ o 0- .!3 ~- d.> .... Ill_ > ',l:: Do '5 - ., a) C:L a) III rn -- 934.1 ~ ~ ~ ~- f- tS- ~ ~- P'l ~ ... \:l- ~ ~- 8- ..l U Vi- <( III ~- ~ P'l AV-04-03270 Depth feet 0.0 ASTM Symbol CL~ ::: :1 20.5 BORING: I4J 026 LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST-5 DATE: Description of Materials {f-STM 02488 or D2487) SANDY LEAN CLAY, black, wet. (Topsoil) LEAN CLAY, with a trace offme Gravel, grayish brown, wet, medium. (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace offme Gravel, grayish brown to about 18 feet then gray, wet, rather soft - to stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING Water down 14.2 feet with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger - in the ground. Water down 16.3 feet with 19 feet of hollow. stem auger in the ground. Water down 15 feet immediately after withdrawal of the - auger. Boring then backfIlled. Braun Intertec _~ 15 4/6/04 BPF WL Me % 6 5 7 8 11 'Sl- 12 ~ I SCALE: 1" =4' Tests or Notes 25 5T-5 page 1 of I 05/23/05 MON 09:39 FAX 651 452 9797 . - 950.6 ASTM Symbol CL .~ 1.2 ~ ML 947,~ 4.0 CL ~- 0 ~ .~ - lS .c' - 0:1 .... 0 d 0 .~ fil- "a ~ - 01 ... ..s 'a; ] fIl, _ ~ '0'- ;S 8- 01 E-o 01. _ :> '.g 'B- ~- g lZI' ""-. -- . 931.3 20.5 S :: ~~ ... (5- ~ ~ - Cll ;: (:1- 0 N '"'- 0 ~ 8 - .... u ;;;- < Cll 5- ;:i III A V -04-03270 Rehder and Associates ,,141 027 LOG OF BORING I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. BRAUNSN I NTE RTEC Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: GH/MT Elev. I Depth . feet feet 951.8 0.0 Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) LEAN CLAY with SAND, black, wet. (Topsoil) SANDY SILT, brown, moist, very loose. (Glaciofluvial) BORING: ST-6 LOCATION: See-Attached Sketch. ~ DATE: 4/6/04 I SCALE: 1" = 4' I BPF WL Me Tests or Notes % ~ 4 SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace affine Gravel, brown _ to grayish brown, wet, medium to rather stiff. _ ~ 6 (Glacial Till) 18 END OF BORING ~ 6 WOO< _~ 7 ~ 7 - _~7 _I~ 10 Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth. of9 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. BraWl Intertec ST -6 page I ofl 05/2~/05 MON 09:39 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates 14I 028 BRAUNSM I NTE RTEC Braun Project A V -04-03270 GEOTEc.i:1.NICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesot~ LOG OF BORING BORING: ST-7 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. DRILLER: MM/.MB I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. I DATE: 4/6/04 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Njtes 944.4 0.0 Symbol (ASTM 02488 or D2487) 943.5 0.9 SM Jf' SILTY SAND, fine-grained, black, moist. ;' :. '.' , (Toysoil) CL ~ SANDY LEAN ~LAY, with Clayey Sand layers, gray to .t= ~ brown, wet, medium. 7 ~ (Glacial Till) I -~ 6 ,- 938.4 6.0 '" Cl SC CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, brown, wet, 0 ~ .~ rather soft to medium. '> - e m (Glacial Till) 6 ,J:l ,J:l- ~ <<l .... 0 1'1 - .~ - al_ m -X 5 ;; ~ p. >< - m u ... oS ~ .... ~; 8 u u ~ ,.l: "'- ~ 930.4 14.0 11 0 '0 Sn.. TY CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, gray, .5 SC- ~. . ~I S- SM ~>:: wet, rather soft. 5 ~ ~. (Glacial Till) %. u _ ~.,: ;> '.j:l ~. p. ~: 'C - <<lOQ< u ~. : '" u 926.4 18.0 ~. . A u CL I SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of Gravel, gray, wet, ~ medium. '- - (Glacial Till) 7 923.9 20.5 END OF BORING ~ s- .... 8- ~ :1- lXl Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 17 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. \0 N ~ .., I>- 0- C <'- N '" - o i! 8- ...J () 0';- < lXl 5- ~ lXl . A V-04-03270 ] Braun Intertec ST-7 page 1 of I 05/23/05 MON 09:40 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~029 LOG OF BORING BRAUNSJA INTERTEC Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: MI/GH I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. Elev. Depth feet. feet 948.7 0.0 947.0 1.7 944.7 4.0 ,- a - o .~ ';> - II) ... ,r, ,r,- <<I ..... o <= o ';! <<1_ Iii 1L ., ... oS ~ ~ '" - ~. o ]- ~- ~ II) _ .~ Ci. 't:: - <.) '" II) 0_ ., II) ~ --- 928.2 20.5 s :: ~ ~- 5 0- ~ ~- lZl ii: 0- o N s- ;; 8- ....l U r;;;- -< lZl ?5- ~ lZl . A V -04-03270 BORING: ST-8 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. DATE: 4/6/04 I SCALE: 1" =4' ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC Tests or Notes Symbol (ASTM D2488 or 02487) . % SC .~ CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, black, wet. ~ (Topsoil) SC ~ CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, grayish 4 brown, wet, rather soft. ~ (Glacial Till) )% CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, lenses of Sand encountered at 12 1/2 feet, grayish brown to 4 about 14 feet then gray, wet, soft to rather stiff. 25 (Glacial Till) ~ 3 .~ -~ 10 -~ 8 'Sl -~ 10 END OF BORING Water down IS feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. . Boring then backfilled. Braun Intertec ST-8 page 1 of 1 .. 05/2a/05 MON 09:40 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates .RAUNSM INTERTEC . Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake,-Minnesota DRILLER: MMIMB Elev. feet 949.9 Depth feet 0.0 948.4 945.9 4.0 ,- :g- o .~ .~ - .0 .0- os ..... 0 I'l 0 .~ a- c >< - 1I) ..s ] "'- ~ 0 0- .8 13 -- ~ ~ - ',c .e 13- '" ~- 3 00 '- - 929.4 20.5 ~ 2- ~ t::: .".- f-o Q CI- ~ ~- "" ~- .,; ~ ,., - o ~ 8- ..< u Ui- ;a ?5- ;;i <Xl A V-04-03270 BORING: 141030 LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST-9 I .METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. DATE: 4/6/04 BPF WL ~ 8 SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace offine Gravel, brown _ to about 12 feet then gray, wet, soft to stiff. _ ~ 2 (Glacial Till) . Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or 02487) CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, black, moist. (Topsoil) END OF BORING Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. Water down 16 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. ..-~ 6 8 I SCALE: 1"=4' ASTM Symbol S(; .~ 1.5 SM ~~:.p SILTY SAND, fine. to medium-grained, grayish brown, :: ::. ':: moist, loose. ...... (Glacial Till) :. :.: =: , . . CL I.. 13 8 9 j Tests or Notes ~ Braun Intertec ST -9 page I of I 05/23/05 MON 09:40 FAX 651 452 9797 DRILLER: :M.M/MB Elev. feet 951.8 950.8 947.8 ,-. ., - 5 "i os: - e .c .c- CIl .... o 5 .~- CIl -a. l< - ILl .. ~ '$ .c: ., - ~ o 0- = .~- ~ 0- ::- 'g '1:; - tJ ~- o o 1:1) '- - 931.3 '"' '!'! ~ "" ~- S 0_ ~ ;2- '" ~- .,; !:; s- ~ 8- ..:l U t;;- -< '" s- :; '" A V-04-03270 Depth feet 0.0 ASTM Symbol 1.0 SC'~ SM (f::. '"0 " 4.0 CL 20.5 Rehder and Associates BORING: ~031 LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST -10 I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. DATE: 416/04 .0 .. .' ...... '0.: '~', :.' .', " Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or 02487) CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, black, wet. (Topsoil) SIL IT SAND, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist, loose. ~ 6 BPF WL (Glacial Till) ::': :~ ~', SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, _ grayish brown to about 11 feet then gray, wet, very soft to.- X 1 rather stiff. ~ (Glacial Till) , ~ 3 -X 6 8 _~ 10 _~ 7 END OF BORING Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. Water down 10 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then baclcfilled. Braun Intertec I SCALE: 1" =4' Tests or Notes ~ 8T.10 page lofl' 05/23/05 MON 09:41 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates BRAUNSM INTERTEC Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County ~oad 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DR.ILLER: GHIMT Elev. feet 956.6 Depth feet 0.0 954.6 2.0 952.6 4.0 ,.... ~ - 0 'p .m .~ - ~- .... 0 I': 0 'p "'.- ;j "E. >< - I> ... oS '0 I> ..c "'- ~ $l_ 0 I': .~- ~ <ll _ .. '.0 '1 - ~- ::l 00 '- - 936.1 20.5 .. .... 2- ~ ~- l- e 0_ !- Ell 0:: 0- o .... N .., - <:> C!; 0_ o ....l ~ "'- -< Ell ?j- ~ A V-04-03270 ASTM Symbol CL .~ I CLI CL ~ I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) SANDY LEAN CLAY, black, wet. (Topsoil) LEAN CLAY, brown, wet, medium. (Glacial Till) BORING: 141 032 LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST-ll DATE: SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, lenses of Sand encountered at about 13 feet, brown, wet, medium to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 10 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. Braun Intertec 4/6/04 BPF WL ~ 7 8 9 10 ~ 7 11 12 ~I I SCALE: 1" =4' Tests or Notes ST.ll page 1 of i OS/23/05 MON 09:41 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates :BRAUNsM INTERTEC Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: GHJMT Elev. ' feet 956.7 955.9 Depth feet 0.0 0.8 -- ~- '~ os: - Jl il- 'a 947.7 = I:) ''':; ~- ~- G.l o. .s 1 0>- ~ 943.2 o l~ ~ 01) _ .~ ,e- o. - <) :l ~- 01) ~ '-- 13.5 936.2 20.5 '" <:'\ 2- ~ ...- '"' Q 0- !- III ~- ~ ~- 8- ...:i U O!I- < al ~- :i al A Y.04-03270 I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. ASTM Description of Materials Spnbol (ASTM 02488 or 02487) SM <tv SIL TV SAND, fine- to medium~grained, black, moist. ;.\,,~. '\ flODSOln SP ::,::.;::: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, :: .;'.::: brown, moist, loose to medium dense. ::\::;.; (Glacial Outwash) :.. .::.... ':.:::.~.::.: ::(::: ,',' " ",'.0:.:. :": :~.:::.: ?)} :::).~': ...... " ':.:.:::.::.: 9.0 ML sp. .:':; .' SM :>": SILT, grayish brown, wet, very loose. (Glaciofluvial) .... ' "..'. :. I, '. """, POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to mediwn-grained, layer of Silt at about 19 feet, brown, moist, medium dense. . (Glacial Outwash) ',', . " '" ~ ' ; . .:'..>: ).:.:: '''. . ::'::: :. '.':". ".: " . .' END OF BORING Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in _ the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 8 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. Braun Intertec ~033 LOG OF BORING BORING: ST -12 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. DATE: I SCALE: 1"=4' 4/6/04 BPF WL Me Tests or Notes % ,c. ~ 7 - -~ 13 ~ 12 <<lQ<I< _~ 4 45 - . -X. 16 - _~ 12 ST-12 page] of] OS/23/05 MON 09:41 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates -BRAUNSM INTERTEC Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTE'-.:.nl~ICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County RoadS7 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota 954.5 951.4 a- o i 948.4 ~ .J:> .;j- ':; 946.4 5 .~ <II a- ]- 944.4 G> .. .a 'U J! '" - ~ 941.4 o ,S eL-- ~ ~ - .+:: .S ti - r.n ., A_ U) G> en '- - 934.9 '" n ~ ~- ~ 0- ~ ~- lXl .... .... 0- .,; l=< .., - o (1; 8- ....l U Uj- < lXl s- < l>l '" A V -04-03270 BORING: ~034 LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST-13 I METIIOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohmr. DATE: 4/6/04 DRILLER: .MMIMB Elev. Depth feet feet 955.4 0.0 ASTM Description of Materials Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) SC ~ CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, black, moist. 0.9 ~ ' (Toosoin CL ~. LEAN CLAY, dark brown to brown, wet, medium. ~. (Glaciofluvial) I SANDY SILT, brown, moist, loose. (Glaciofluvial) BPF WL ',.0:: X 6 4.0 ML 10 7.0 ML SILT, brown, moist to wet, loose. , 8 (Glaciofluvial) 9.0 ML SANDY SILT, brown, moist to wet, loose. I (Glaciofluvial) 8 11.0 CL II LEAN CLAY, with Sand seams, brown, wet, rather soft. (Glaciofluvial) 5 I 14,0 SP- ' ' POORLY GRADED SAND with SIT.. T, fine- to SM ':~:.; : ::- medium-grained, with GRAVEL, brown, moist to 24 " ',';, . waterbearing, medium dense to loose. '::'.:.:1: (Glacial Outwash) ~ " ..... ::',..'-: ,', ..... " . " 5l- ", .... 7 20.5 ...... ;0. .. END OF BORING Water down 19 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in the groWld. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 16 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. 1 Braun Inlertec I SCALE: 1" =4' Tests or Notes ST-13 page I ofl 05/23/05 MON 09:42 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates lIRAUNSM INTERTEC Braun Project A V -04-03270 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: MM/MB Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM 943.8 0.0 Symbol 8M ',.:,:,:.. . .... " . .' ': .: '. 941.8 2.0 "':':"':":, -SC ~ ?& 939.8 4.0 ~ . y 8M .', . ':.: ::: ~': ,'... .' ....,'.. 'rii' 937.8 6.0 '.:,'.:: . ", c: sP- .:':.:~ .~ SM :. :' '" - .' , '> ',', e " ,.Q ....... ,.Q- . .'. .. " ','" .... , . 0 '.:':",' c: 0 " , .~ ',"" - " ] ....... :'".' . ~- ....', C.1 '::'., ' ... :'" . , <S ] ::':~: ,,' , " '" - " , ~ '.' . ' .' -.:.,' 0 " . "0 - . ," . " , 1- ,: I' .' ..... " . ~ .." ' .' , :......' .~.- ....'.. '. . :e- 0." ' " .. - ::": ~ :' . . 0 ~, 925.8 ", '. 18.0 I Ii CL tI.l "-c _ 923.3 20.5 3 -' - ~ ~- f-o o 0_ ~ ;2- I'l rs- o .... ... .., - '" (!; <:1 _ o o.l u ;:j- -< I'l ~- ~ A V-04-03270 BORING: ~~35 LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. ST-14 I. METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autobmr. DATE: 4/6/04 Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) SILTY SAND, fine-grained, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) BPF WI.. . CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, dark brown, ~ 5 wet. (possible Fill) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, dark brown, wet. _ (possible FiU) _ ~ 4 Y POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained; brown, waterbearing, very loose to loose. ~ 2 (Glacial Outwash) _~ 7 51. ~ 6 -:-:~ 10 SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of Gravel, gray, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) - ~~ 9- END OF BORING Water down 10 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in _ the ground. Water down 5 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. Braun Intertec I SCALE: 1"=4' Tests or Notes ST-14 page 1 of 1 _/ 05/23/05 MON 09:42 FAX 651 452 9797 Rehder and Associates ~ . '~'BRAUN'M INTERTEC Braun Project A V-04-03270 GEOTEl...t1l.~ICAL EVALUATION Proposed Deerfield Industrial Park County Road 87 and County Road 21 Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER:' GHIMT Elev. feet 957.0 Depth feet 0.0 ASTM Symbol 1.0 SM JT: CL ~ 7.0 !;A SC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, 956.0 .... '" - .~ 1;l 950.0 :- I\) ,.C; .r;- 0; .... o c .51 Cil_ Ia ~ 946.0 I\) ... .s 4) .,g '" - g 943.0 '0 I:: .~- ~ 1\)_ :> '-g 'C - <,) [3 Q- ., I\) IZl '-- 11.0 14.0 SP- -'0 . SM " , .." ' , ' " '.':.'. ."0,'.. .....'. .... CL 936.5 20.5 .... ~ ~ .., ~- ;.. @- ~- P'l .... .... 0- .:; r:. 8- ! 0_ o ..; u ~- -< <Xl ~- ~ <Xl . AV-04-03270 I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA., Autohmr. Description ofMateriaIs (ASTM D2488 or D2487) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, black, moist. (ToDsoil) LEAN CLAY, brown, wet, rather soft. (Glacial Till) 141036 LOG OF BORING BORING: ST -15 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. DATE: I SCALE: 1" =4' 4/6/04 BPF WL MC % Tests or Notes ~ 4 27 - _~ 5 CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, brown. moist ~ 5 to wet, rather soft to medium. _ _ (Glacial Till) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace offine Gravel, brown, wet, rather stifIto medium. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING Water not observed with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of9 feet immediately after withdrawal of the auger. Boring then backfilled. Braun Intertec >QQQQ< - _~ 6 ~ 12 _~ 11 - _~ 6 ST.15 page 1 oft BRAUN I~TERTEC 1m [~ ~ ~ \1~D ~ \~\ 1\ \ NOV 0 1 2005 \! .J u~ \8 Y -.....--..------- ..-_. ..-.-.-.---.--- A Special Inspection Final Report Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Prepared for Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Project BL-05-02422 October 27,2005 Braun Intertec Corporation . Prot'iding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Phone: 952.469.3644 Fax: 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 lakeville, MN 55044 October 27,2005 Project BL-05-02422 Mr. Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc. 500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee, MN 55379 Re: Special Inspection Final Report Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Dear Mr. Pelletier: Please find attached the Special Inspection Final Report for the Greystone Industrial Condos and the final supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports for your review and records. Special Inspections and Testing Procedures The special inspection services provided for this project were provided by International Code Council (ICe) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of the special inspection services is to provide a review of the work being performed by the various contractors to determine if the work is being done according to the approved construction documents. The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the result of our inspections and testing. Copies of this report were provided to the site representative of the contractor for his review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. Available Information Braun Intertec Corporation (Braun Intertec) performed several borings at the proposed development site. The results of those borings were submitted in our Geotechnical Evaluation Report, dated April 22, 2004 (Braun Intertec project number A V -04-03270) to Mr. John Mesenbrink with Eagle Creek Development, L.L.c. Braun Intertec also performed excavation observations and compaction testing for the proposed development. The results were submitted in our Summary of Excavation Observations and Compaction Testing Report, dated November 10, 2004, Braun Intertec . Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Project BL-05-02422 October 27, 2005 Page 2 project number A V -04-05153, to Mr. John Mesenbrink with Eagle Creek Development, L.L.C. Plans and Specifications The approved plans and specifications were used for our inspections throughout the duration of the project. From time to time, we have received plan modifications from the project structural engineer. When received, these have been used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Soil Observations and Testing Prior to concrete placement the footing sub grade soils were observed. Hand auger borings were drilled with a I l/2-inch-diameter hand auger. The borings were advanced in 2- to 4-inch increments to depths of2 to 4 feet below the bottom of the excavation. The shallower penetrations occurred when the larger gravel cobbles and boulders were enconntered. The auger was then withdrawn from the borehole to obtain cuttings. The soils enconntered in the borings were classified in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual/Manual Procedures)." Preliminary estimates of soil consistency and density were also evaluated based on resistance to penetration of the hand auger and the turning resistance. During placement of backfill for footing and slab support, compaction tests were taken to evaluate if the procedures sued by the contractor were adequate to compact the fill and backfill to meet the proj ect requirements. The results of the compaction tests were forwarded to the interested parties nnder separate cover as they became available. We have, for your reference, included copies of the compaction tests and Proctor tests. Concrete Reinforcement To conduct the required observations, the special inspector initially reviewed the reinforcement and dowel requirements on the project structural and shop drawings. Information reviewed included bar size, bar length, bar spacing, bar location, splice lengths and dowel placement. We also noted if the reinforcement was free of rust, scale and soil prior to placement. Concrete Placement Observations Concrete placement observations were performed to monitor the procedures being used by the contractor and to determine if they were consistent with typical industry standards. Fresh Concrete Testing The contractor cast concrete cylinders at rates specified in the project specifications to evaluate the concrete's compressive strength and dry nnit weight. Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Project BL-05-02422 October '27,2005 Page 3 Concrete Compressive Strength Testing The concrete cylinders cast were temporarily stored at the site and then returned to our laboratory for moist curing and testing. The results ofthe concrete compressive strength testing have been forwarded to the interested parties under a separate cover as they became available. Structural Steel Observations An ICC certified special inspector in accordance with the IDC, the Special Inspection Testing Schedule, project plans and specifications performed observations of the structural steel construction. A separate summary report titled A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report dated August 30, 2005 (Braun Project BL-05-02422) was previously sent out for this section. General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Jason Jaworski or Rob Golish at 952.469.3644. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Robert A. olish, PE Project Engineer Attachments: Special Inspection Final Report Observation Reports; Soils 1 through 3 Observation Reports; Concrete Reinforcing 1 through 3 Compaction Tests; Reports 1 through 3 Proctors; P-l through P-5 Concrete Compressive Strengths; Sets 1 through 6 c: Building Inspector; City of Prior Lake bl0502422/rpt o rrOVlamlT enlTlneennlT ana enVlrnnmentIlL,nLu.tlOn, ,mrp IY~ I BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun Intertec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 lokeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952469.3644 Fox: 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of2 City of: Prior Lake Date: October 27,2005 Attention: Mr. Rich Pelletier Project: Greystone Industrial Condos N,,",p/ ArIrI Prior Lake, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-05-02422 In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the folloWing items: Soils. The required testing in the field and laboratory has been completed. The compaction testing done during the fill placement indicated the procedures used by the contractor were adequate to compact the fill and backfill to meet the proj ect requirements. Observations and testing of the footing excavation bottom indicated the soils are suitable for support of the design loads. No discrepancies were noted and there are no unresolved soils issues. Concrete. The required testing in the field and in the laboratory has been completed. The available results have been forwarded under separate cover. The cUl11plessive strength testing indicates the concrete placed has met the project requirements. The dry unit weights have met the project requirements. The placement procedures used were judged to have met the project requirements. No discrepancies were noted and there are no outstanding issues. Reinforcing Steel. The reinforcement placement detailed in the Special Inspection Daily Reports was observed according to the requirements of the project plans and specifications. No discrepancies were noted and there are no outstanding issues. Conclusion Based upon the inspections performed and our Special Inspection Daily Reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural engineer provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report ~\\~""'~,s! by me or under my direct sup~l~cfIi1.~~~~m a duly Licensed ~~fort~1 E~gm~}U\{er the laws of the SCl::'~'."~" .w.: ~ ~ 1",l".'(,;'~ : _ So I. ~ 44 ,'...::-' . . ~ R . ':GQlisa{~ #' ~ ~Ld.N.~V.,~ Proj~ !lWl11III:t'- ~\\\"" Registratf8H'Ntl~er: 44183 Date: October 27, 2005 . · Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Excavation Oversizing: Hold Down: Groundwater Elevation: Excavation Sidewall Soils: Project #: Pad Dimensions: Excavation Length: Excavation Width: N~ 'It[ 1.- FIELD OBSERV ATION FORM /' . BL-D:> - Doq~~ Lot: Date: Site Plan Information: Block: Addition: (Fr) (Rr) (front) Soil Boring Information: Weather/Site Conditions: Excavating Equipment: Excavating Contractor: Observations Requested by: \ . ~t0~ N () # y ( ) (Lt) (rear) (Rt) j. J. ,'., \ ~7~ ~J;dViC:.A _J '--- " \ foe v ~ ~ 14 1 . .-~ -~- -....... '"--- --- -,-- HAPIDCP Results Test Number Surface Elevation Blows, 0-6" Blows, 6-12" Blows, 12-18" Blows, 18-24" . r Blows, 24-30" I Blows, 30-36" Blows, 36-42" Blows, 42-48" "ttt! . \('iT L \ ~ \! .l.\. 11 f '- \...-' b "j (' t-/fz. \. to!.z~ '- ("jfl-EY' c L ,.v~J I (i "~A \-'-~ ~lb-o<Y,' ".=".-4 Description of Soils Description of Soils rst='il\ 4 (;:;(~ \Nr-\- .~V'w\ ioJf)f2.. CL \4"'f-It~ '$L M ~ H\t"~ 1\Jr~ IS '5' YLL I3L \ . ;:; Yt..'" ~i I , ;''1" 6f....;TS~ C.bYI.vd I, J' bfLtV(L jm~ 6(1....5w,....4;, E5-~ ~..-- ,-- - < Key: xxx Excavation bottom elevation x Staking by contractor _ x Staking by others S Oversizing Excavation limits HAP = Hand Auger Probe DCP = Dynamic -Cone Penetrometer Scale: I" =. frm\fieIdob.frm 3/3/95 B FIELD OBSERVATION FORM [-05"".-- 02-'{22- project# 1iE:~-;-~- 'I';;d P Lot(s) Block Soil Borings? Y( ) Nearest Soil Boring N( ) Page Date Addition Site Conditions/Weather Contractor Staked by of f -: ~~ ~ -- ./ -- c-. :::, C I Ol>~ to'!> /t;..N ( I ) / I' r t_~~M,' 0..,...1,.( ., t;;!'. ___ ..~~.<]~.......t-- ~._ ~ ' ",", l L::' ~ r jl f-+ E :::: JOO hi'lrst-,.e& ~of1 /.,. ~~<Jo~J,;(,....A, -:: ere" --' Write bottom elevations, date excavated, oversizing and type of bottom soils on sketch Notes &~ };,i, tYH~I~W /-/' ~ ~A- C~ /~ ..-..c --iI!- r& ~.~~; ,-r);//: ~~~~s-;I'~7.A.4-r ~,,~~ ~ 5VIh.U ~ -h/! ~ ~/I~ ;ro/rlJr7- '.; , I Lot Number Block Number I House Type Front HD Elev. Back HD Elev, Lowest Elev. iio- .", .,i; .9/,5"' Test Test Elevation No, qlc.j q/V' 1,g pass) Test Test fail Elevation No. passJ Test fail Elevation Test No: pass, Test fail Elevation I' ii Test . pass' I Test No. fail Elevation Test No. passl fail I I ..(J~;~'" r"' ; ..., ~-""', .' .....'...... t1U = hOIO !..JOWI1 BRAUNSM INTERTEC DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Location: 3!--os=- oZ-02--Z__ f?/;;- L~h Report #: Date: I o .--, 7 .,- 0 S Project #: Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours &/; a/fA _ r~~ 6~hJUV-- {/ Areas and work pertormed this day: tJh-.rvJ e;c~;'~ ~4w. 54 I'};. /:n -j(c 5ov/L", ---l J I'Ar71,~____ J -IL /~:T/ ~/d>--, /b /Jb.r{/~ ffi ~:J ,1;-1""1 ~{:'-J: p, ~,7E' 'r=~ 6()~ ?d:J1 Is ~ ~h~ /~~~/)J!s ~t?J ~ ~ J.r ~/ ;J h -. /// ~ a/ -k ~ L- ~ /J-r C( ~ _,-.;(y/' ~:f~. &~/ . u / . / rI . dYI 1<<-< "k,~//)..>--,-, // "'~ /L '.xCdJ;,., k;/L $"'~ "'/lJ .,(;/;'t., _<;"r/~_"L~",l d/"e $//i,U' ~ A'/ ~ ~/~ S;'P'rr k &(0 );.,/! d,lt/rA./L-CL ,,/ ~ ~1; f7~ .<"rJ/i k r/; ~fJt{/C/Ayv- -f-dh:..- J Uk/- tV(~. rtJv!:- (~ be. /)~~/ /~ ~ ~)A-1 i~. 1 / .-/ Submitted To: ac/~ - Son-<- ~r'A/ r/~~7 ~~7,<:L Pertormed By: ~&r' Weather: F: DAILY 1 DOR-01 BRAUNSM I NTE RTEC DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Location: ,k.5c!- -0 S- D Z'-f 2-2- ~;';r- L,j~ Report #: 2- Date: h- 7-CJS- Project #: Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours @b:L j ~ff ~/~r- ~ Areas and work performed Ihis day: :77,~r3 t?X .g ~ "";V/ ,,/ --4 /J~h~~+ -kn./ ~2~ ~ ~~~d' /!L ..)~J~ /de:~ / J,....- " ," ../.'-- ~:/ ~~ '#:Y ~ Pnc7 fltJ" //n-;~ r~ ytr-/.d. ..4'J m, ~vr czb.rJ/4--:f'.-s, /J 'J~rs 4/ g. J'1?/:4 /?p..,- ""cr ~ /r~&/ ~"'/ 41 -:k-- ~~/,,-/ /L r~--/' ~ d?"~ ()f'f'.ur. .j, h.,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.#t'~ p J-~-/ 0/ d -I /J?/fiu"_~5b',~ ~-'7Nnk, /'JX/~ 6-t,.dk/ ~~M/ ~ / ~veJ .5ech...tn~ 61~~,.::." {/ai/ ~~ ~~~ a /~L,;.",~ /2:2~ /-.. 'p/ I' " ,,- .J!; {,o./,'ft ;u.,on -$4H/7~;~/?1'i/~~;?<:')"" ,___ Weather: Submitted To: _ ~r~ ~/c~.f~ / / r/ Performed By: ~4!Y - - F: DAILY 1 DOR-G1 BRAUNSM INTERTEC BL -05..----0 z-422-- DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Project #: ~y5.J.r:r..{L l:I't&ttdJ;,f-~J C:~Jvcs , Location: ~rf7'~J. ~'I~i6tltUJ:J ., 'l ':; -:; 11 .i...., Report #: (:1[-. ,<-- . "'''.......... ( " Date: b ---t.) -65 '? :J Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours J, C\. n ""'-DO S~12- 'L11- Areas and work periormed this day: RePvr--~ -to ";:f\~ ~.s, ~t..<...Q~t:d &::n::.p Rrt:f-'\ t::0 l-- " G-~yL.:'~ -k ~t/~y~ ,~ ~f- ~.~ '"f~r r~:;;P6~wt ~U'tl.di~.p~1/~<;;A..o" It b~5-Q i qaV~q p ai~ 0.... \:Af)')re,){ cSb \ k~=. :1 S L~i~ ~<;i~ ~t.s a... ,/ - . v-" ~{A,\'ld I~ CfcJdJ'+r.~ con. h.Q SC1'A.~, SfCJ..e. ~ ~,Q C'-"'Q.\/~~.Q ::r-hc)i4s/__l',..1 u,>vv":J~ ~ - - - bt",~ lc:A~~~ (li-Jhich 'j 6 (_'Arr,QhU~ !.,e0.9 ('~ <SJ....,.l..ri~r.J ')" ~~k:-~ -.k..~t;+-- ~trf.--s, "J ../ oJ 8 ~~ DbSI2Y-..wd f\.l<:.a.fr '-h....o_ P'~4'-.p,-,~J S-t"'i"v.;f--1..7 .~.'DS f- o..M.A.,j...f;:....~ ("'.tsv~ frO;:. ":"'''7'1 r . I ~~_ kb-f- ?rl--<., ~p1-o 6 ~ Dlc.. &'I"fn..,}i4. ..fo b'-~ &"'If<=;h1-k.. ~->>vt:;-(- t;d . - i.tI i./' - ~5 ~tr./..rl k~ . (/v-0...... ~ '6 \ L~ I e-R tVi1...furoA "'r S / R J),;"" ~ Mo....k..v~al ~ /r- (/jifttl-. 5t:4?f- fp1i2/f4_~J cj~, D4_~ ,-"=,-c...--:t:-~ ~4Vi'VV>. ~f'--f 9J.O~sc-./_l ~ u _ ;...../- .,~ <S7 tt b.f~~,l).. W~ \fl~~ ~ Nc.Br~h/") ~~ ep'~'~ .fi..rr,., H-"fit.c,; p~t)...~<')J ~i.kBn&..seJ On '-rc.c..o:wwv.v.'f- 8+- ;t-;'~,t. ~ ~Mtk2~M:1- #IV~+-ic..--.JL_ OV\'c"'-<2;"'-' ;'<;., \ ' ^ ~ _ f _ r IJ I ) /, "',.,f-, ~ C:' .t;.<;U Vf'l f.?- ../ - (J) {11 fJijjr (.M-t:Aih/VT.\-l-d....Q. , 1Q MtJl~ Cl /if -~"J I (<; 0 ~ ;1,.; :\ 'T'f:jt') x,'J, t-r /f'i.S:u ;kL..t (J fkt Y ~ ., 'i iI' (/~_ . --C) "Ii i, I)! - ,I , ~ , ;'1 ' JPf1fl. I '!! IDT7"-i.X} VOtt...Q- C\ I Uiy;eV f~ c:.n/i.<:..:-J<.c.rJ V-6CY , - . '. v- v . ..J_ , .1._ !i~\/. s:.Ctr-~~ i~ T(~ L1~.:;":;~_f"- Submitted To: f2 " , . ---- .~4{,-tt \"t...., ,- ~ b'>-oy97NZ /)1 t. !/~ Perfonned B7 L Weather: t ~t.:91 ( f, - <<"" /i t\ "- ~_.t...-11 (.--- F: DAILY 1 DOR-01 BRAUNSM INTERTEC DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Project #: ~yf)'~ 'W.~~h-i!:"1 CoY.c~~'S. Report #: d ~~,'1 's--CAr;..f Location: ~-v"~-eiJ t2.e\Jelq1i'C--d- Date: ~,-t!-bS- Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours \~n ~'~.v s.,~;:-e-iL r.....' ..... b~ .....a~~ / -- /L _ _" "-",../.-, ~~:'.(J-.,...lI Areas and work performed this day: -e..x. (4~h:r:;-"'1 bD~-1) ptctCQ. ev\'~';1AQ~~ {:j /I i-o j . ~ f~~ S ~f~ ,Q.~-h~l. C2:) Ccn----~e:..::f_ ~;"'~""'~ <.:. 07>'\ Iv ti~cfl~.~... 61 \ i tb-\'~-F--,-k~t CC"1'hQ.c.4-.~ (6oltlSt(!~Sr'1 ~/ I v '"'I. ~~) ,~ ~\~.v'v, ~+ L~ {:i'l\ (~lCM) -b-.h,A.!""';'::; .. (ASP. Cl ~i--./"\.('_'.-k-<.or~( S[ct.b ,~ ...." ~/ '"-"'. t/~- 'rL-1)i-1\&N\1 ~ 1"'\ sl::. 4, ivvk"lbIL ~l~ ~J{..6_"'--.O"L~f~ '6 uvl1d.E)C-:;/H"J.z~-_li.../ Rtf.. ~t 6-.- ,q-,citc\~~~J.. 54-ill ~M;.r...cLc"C,OIA-. b-<:."~~ nl'i:..c ~i"Lad-:...~/ ./ '- I S't~1 _ ~ o.t- T7..e e ')(.C"'i.;.)<i. '~.f?p.~ . bt; ff&-~.;. . (j:;i;J) ~.lire(;f- ~~;",s~..ol L.-:r-......-P.v- ~j(.\ lts. '*0 <p-l.lo...0 {'e.-r Ji'1'1 "11rJ l~ I ~ ~ \. 50~ t cev~ck a.13, 1-:'2\~ P-ect.:../ c ~f~ <;;; ~~ fl,)t"J1.4.JJ s-w n be.. ;~.:a-;''1a ,~ ~ ~~,~;;f t:;;....Q... 'Pue_ Gv--L7 I'Jc-J--t-~.1 c.l.?-r~/ (, p+--Gotk4~ 5;et~ i VI 'ita e):CAucj:I&-r bn4b-,...u?, iJ2.q.-I.--e.. rh-.(2 l..{\'",c1e("I~~tl/...Qd' {J.'ii / k.k=cf 'IS &su/.e;r l14 ~ TL-€ EJ-Wt"eV- ,. II<..JuvtlJ tJ...'b.5iAi"<e_ +1g f't'sfc-o't- C(Mt/ >~l/-bt"~;'1l-c~rf--w .5lahet~~ if-tf4t"':r , v m.~f7'1~?;.i I.J;. ~ V- '7:4J I .c; .r.' .. .' . I . 1 {, .,r"O, 1/;''- ~ !,,-"'.l'- \ "', ().:~ I 1:' j l-;d; 1J~ \ \ \ Viti \~ ,k....;. \t (j .qJ.I_~f w; h"'L- (.<; ! I (:0+, 'tyr '.:... '7 I Weather: . ~~ (\c/o.r('..- Submitted To: i2Je l /1-<?/.J2-"? 4~!2 r t ,- . /J Performed By: '----.,6..v~ ~. F: DAILY 1 DOR-01 BRAUN'M INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report City of fewtL l-k!t-lF Page of -, Gl Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Date of This Report: Dtf.~;2.t::', ~L(', .f);,\-rn, 1 t1-::u,-"r",,<p? ~T( _ Project No.: I?-I<'"H Irf'~~.' ;J,~ijI'J ~, '5i~' &'e..'K'-! S-rCNC Client Project No.: IlU&ttAS'i rt;,lfl.-Y~E~b. <:'MtNf;ts.... Temperature: ~ w-, . .-' f I",}folc~ ok' ! ".-'() f I.;;L-():', - ~Yda D5- u a \ Yt;, <; Type of Inspection: o Continuous 51 Periodic r Inspection Coverage: c.l/ o Masonry ~ Rebar Placement 0 FoundationS o Welding D Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other, Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes..IZJ (Listed Below) No 0 Description and location of work completed: ..;;(€ bJo!E$ ~ EX7~jj.~ ~T!r ai,);'('~ it..-;Mt~ ~.OUfl"'l,.J . . ? ~ S """.'t1 I@ /..;pz. , r.:"S 'a. G ,~' ~ t6 , ftR! 6 5 d A. , 'i#.o!~' ~!r (, rrR I ^ t.. It. '-l . I . ,. Jr SUA r...bbsr ~\I~Tt~~i5 f);: tt:!j.),-;:'f)iC6/!~ ~(';S( ~f?'/:. fc~7!)b ~ -r~iZ,ou&M 4.e,r65 5.f- <; 1'0 C-"3 "'rc b-~ I," b -5 ["0 €-!: Ie E,'-"";f 'fo 1f.~I~1' "If) ff,~-~ 1'0 It-r;: t \, "" .,' I l'jo.lr;..,,_.t...~.~t("....\ (..'( €'>:'T, '&T~o;5 h'UJ),,6:: Re:~fe(If(Jl:S' Cr!'(,...!t;.S, F'OC1'"I....J Lr- oS C-H E t.. u, lAf' s: ~ f:r t ((:':;' &Rlf-... {JfU l::. G-- '3 ;- ( <{' ': ) &/ 1- 0 f Kltr {t / G-~? {t--s' F'5: / tj J /&) J; ~:..., t:1' "r' /'" t. .' '~b ~{c nt ,i #.c-r ~ J} ~ 6'1\ 1fS'",..{-;.c.,," ~f ~\$6rr. . , i I!",_ / ' f~ ~ /.; // ILl r( wJ /,.--..... JJ< ./ ...,.f " f' t lo.. - I ~ y.. Y y.. i ~l ~ 'T--::,. F-'.;D' or iL, t;! c -t f I - If) ~.f' Glt wtltr List tests performed: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes D Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes D If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. l " r:;;J NQ ~. No E2[ { .' . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the USe. except as noted above_ ,..----... \...J!, .r --;. - 7~./'., ._ ..,,-/ "-'- -- -- (--'-" Signed: n-. -~~~. / / Print Full Name: --(.c-Sr,',) Date: ,I /~/ It' , I 6 I 0 ..s 1 I 5' A L':~-C L. 5 ,.:: ( J.D. Number: , - ? <'c"1 -S (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor,) l r,.." _ f" Q ('" c'~ t - ~'> ,'..r ,"",' 'I C, u: t 0: i..J;'(".. -' ~ ..) S (r ...s .' '.. /::; I _ '"' rnn\sr,,~insr.4 1/25/95 ,1 r-. r<' \",.., '\ /~.Ii I~ fL., '-' "",, fJ G ';-.' , /"".r;' r- ~ __ ,. . -~. BRAUN'M INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report Page a of d City of PR-{f:-[<- l-A-;L{' Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Date of This Report: DC:6R:.r:-,Ct..c. 4-lj"-o.' LIWcF fir?-""!' , f~7\."Project No.: tilt/eb I I!?lj- ()c-~:, L'b~ , -=t- ic;/? \ f-f;.;.{;, y,,,...:SrJ :;-r. ~ [ ~; -"~(. (.dZ;;V i...-c":;C Client Project No.: Duefj:k$-r I.)o+"({ac(::, ~H,owF,.eS Temperature: G;~ ~ tr '). ro'-r Type of Inspection: o Continuous If1 Periodic Inspection Coverage: o Masonry N Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o . Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing o Bolting D Tendon Placement D Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ~ (Listed Below) No D $~c t--ttt..re ;+ r Description and location of work completed: ttKt ~ ,) - ~ I "" {' I ,4-(1-(0.', f- 3., L/ )<.1 J/'-f' u]' I I {. ~-Lj 'C-'b,P'. A-,--l~ln/~ 1 k,4-lp I . t ( '\ ~,.-- ~ / !( 1)~ ~' E^ \.1fr ! (i- "-r ~) tt"'~.tD -I:: O1;;..,rr, UH' ~ 1-' <; -(." p!!;,{, I. ' ~ SGE 512..d ~ F()ti!l~~ S10 cPS ~ 4..( ~ II.$< 5/ w) (0) -#'<~::i U;,JT.. 6@;r,,1-'\ , , . &(( (C S 'i(tS~P6'c.:r!V€: tn'2...(6$,-- c..~-;J-r Foo"r(,J&-'3'){/.y" uJll~)ttK's. (l'A!'. (1'(1;\ f>7-tt-~/S~ . , r J frJo""uJIr su~b,J/(.),'J b,.Df:- L"",(Z!f::. C"'3d Ff<..lH-i\ q"7'"(O, q," -(Pe: {)~f;6F:.l.76"-t\ lrfe..lt:. !r,L-{ - {,>'" / ~ I( c...M.U. IJA-/..L' ,:;>"tf,'t..f6,1;;:-r&r,. wI (3) .,Jf:~\ [o~-r;,It,!)fT, f{)15S6k..VCCc" r I' ~ LM> ,C,'f'Llc..t::T; {i)lM:;d.ueb ;0 -(S,(( f,--r U!:f!'""AT o,gf( (J/';)'( G~ L AL-L biG'Tfht.S .4,.,) t::. 1)~rf:S lle:-R'~rCf\, 4~ L. F'ou ,.lIb (,,0 ~ K. C't. -r .., .f-!'.lt orsn-(-"n,- kJ:::..... ~ ~". ~ , i P t-<l r-.. (.1"'~ I ~ $ (' ?~ ""';-t~6 t~k-r~ f -rffil\~C List tests performed: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes D Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes D If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. N~0 NoN . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted above_ ....---..... /- (, /"1' Signed: '-).t'-"~............. "_Lf;,....-<;,--7' ,-' /,/ I f...,....' /". Print Full Name: ..6f:-~~',,) I-l, ~,;1CJci:. <;;,t:" ( Date: /' '----- /r: /- / c~ ,/0 ~ { J.D. Number: >(661':; (White copy to Braun lntertec file, Blue copy to General Contractor.) 1) '" _ /,- CJ If( _ {"''( r'< __ -. 1--",(" i!:o!( .::: !t;~, ~. Iw,> -. - -~, r..,; I i ~-"""- t-....) , -.-'L..i rrm \sp~c insp .4 1/25/95 BRAUNS~ INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report City of PR-\l.J!2- L-k'L~ Page of J Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: b66r....HCd~ A-r,l1"Q, L-h0;"c::(/',f.,:;- €Te-, I ( 11-{.(R /"-Cbb...J'-r.,...,,)/.'j $1, 5.e:, b:e.6u?&1'0/~ 6' II. . ~ ?P r ",,,,,if' J e_,. '. """"'k" /I R".. U wo........L-:...__.../: (~,~ /').r_,-~ ~<i- '-.../I:-v_ I ' Date of This Report: Project No.: /,.,11 ~ j{) ~ - I .. 12,f -F\""'-_ A"" c...j--...... LJ. _ . 6i :>.. C' c; r;. C/f.. Client Project No.: Temperature: oe;' ~ .! r ;;.. -;:-i;:~ S Type of Inspection: o Continuous 121 Periodic I Inspection Coverage: . / o Masonry 9U Rebar Placement D Foundations D Welding TI Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing D Bolting D Tendon Placement D Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes pg (Listed Below) No 0 Description and location of work completed: se;~ {(.€'?'aKI fJ:> {c,/to rfi,#€ LHi'c::Jt"rE~ I . \/1 Su,~ LC:6.51f..;k 11ft. la~S (Tt >;:' 12... ~f, ;ti( ....' -P~C.~MCp-r" r8~ ~e-r-:;.J;&S Pr-r (rILl e:.~ A-. d- - ~ T2> _" -:i A-') J--. e: .. ,3 i"1' fL - ?i 1.:0,~ "FOOT1~b; 'f I~e...~ kI f-rl?.lt-,S '..1 In It..! -" I 8.1 -) <' I ,. t 16 -'d ~ '3 - INLLtAl'''';-'!$'' FOb-("r,.jb:- Ei1j,o?S frz..:D,J.&- ~S~~(...TrcJe; &f'-(-t::-s rDO'l1 ~&: ~('l-I:6".!---.U I.a '; 0:t...\ ~ $ 'B ~ 0- it, ~ '3. :g d -"-\, fh rI - (' ~. 1&, Li - {a ~ F LI ~ 7/;t 1- /'1-- Jfo {{ ..,} J [1"} t', ~ti; W1.:-f Bg-rr, I' I. I . , /,. I . '- ( ... , --1-rR...t c. 6 ft -5' ~ A~ '6 :P <' i Il:/ r ~ l )' t(;,u ;,J LfJJ f;':1 J(I~ IP 1 ref f150If ~ . Ir)'#r Jt~ (/ 11>~ ! d~1"( ) - . rrtu::::. A--l.1 ~ t'd- ~ {~:t-5' ~!~II wI (~) #< Err vJ~'-r I 1r'K,1t-, G-~ '/ r-t? (}t)tt)( /0 (I &J I (l()i:\: 5' 6ft WA:Y (,t;/;'.lfl KHll) {(d)~5 cZ:;f,..'{ 8B-ff: , -r. f. ~ Fe R.. f..~sf':::GT(() ~ fOetl.J,&-S ~ Lfrf' 5f-L.! ceC , tr~tt-,~ A-..'rl- ~lt~. 3.8 ~ c.-r1;! ~ Fca-r,i)t.,. s,"/7}(i.1':5 -: Jlt/lf(tr/~ n-tr vJl (a-yff55 coX. - B~ List tests performed: frl-SO tJ ce ( r ( t.:- C:: CD":', ;:::QbTr,.)C;:tS rD~ ";-A"rJ (.,. \ t1F<'" I' ^ \ -( . . k t' -riA .1"">"\ :J.' ..- -.-l '" ~:~r -1....-....!..-J. : ':..:.- _ A-u... \16R\ r: ({.~c} 'R');().,.J-l::;; Co i?:.eJ:q . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. No.M No ~l . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: Ct~-~G~~u'_f--j~/L' I ,;,. j , Print Full Name: 5.fic,..) fA,. .:i'L""d 6 6"1::.( Date: . , ./ If'; ! r <: j f~ ~ - '.' - ~ , t-r l '.,,/ "-"' I J.D. Number: 'r,...u 7 Ol.l.r !....) (White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) rrm\'ro~insp.4 1125/95 BRAU N'M INTERTEC 5~T To (cZ..rc ~ LA.fC[: ~ - l~l-o s: ./ /(.4, ,,( ~if:,"'>..~ Special Inspector Daily Report Page of City of ?R.' D ., .",./ 'I. f"--V~' ". _. ~-'- -'~ i'1"t<B. f.-bfi."'!.-it'/\A.-~,"'j o::;--r- ! (-re...r;.<I Siv,:';[ Client Project No.: \. .r:-.~ ~/?.Gl'\<: J" c-C_<'::;-P ';-;1... < '/.it, ,,2,cp<Temperature: UV&I ~ "_"{. :::: ...:.-~ -I 'L..-'-'_~ v~,""" '_~ . Date of This Report: A-L\I'U 1 Ur./;bScH-{ ;-::f~ Project No.: J , I /" I J /'/ (I), ,""1/0-:; t v Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: D~ ~K-F 1 ~ Lr-D .N S,r::: (J 3- J {;; ----.... FSL..-O';- ()H'-I8~ r 005 Type of Inspection: o Continuous )ZI Periodic Inspection Coverage: D Masonry A2 Rebar Placement D Foundations D Welding D Concrete Placement D Fireproofing o Bolting D Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No J?j Description and location of work completed: VI5 UAL bAsE'r:... ;,ik-('tt;J$ I~P: l?:.6"5f-f:- 'Pti';,c,Ef/:.6/)7!. Fr, L F1Jn"rl lJ/-r S ft-V tx-efL'\ C - '3 To [, - I 1 (., - t ro A- - f. It - I TEJ 1'1'- ~ I ' f0v-r ,I) 6. 601c..t> U tk : '" / I &:t... \ ~ f; - d:. F I : L.j 1-4 i- J~ I d, 1 'a ,,<) ETS C;: I!.{ \ -t 5 's l:,;, LJr'c' 4:.~-~ .....v- i' .. / J 8,)-(-, E,z"tlf)n'\..../ &t?-1h' it - d. { f'o <;, ~,.- f- 5'" }((1..\;lf d / (~t\:s 6:'4 W;i':<f L ,\ !...... II ., rr I J ( \ -l-t,.-\ ca, (b, 5 c.. - d. I IS, (.? '-' I A - d , '-'\ ~r F=D \l? 'f! ~ b::- S'fZ>c f> '5 ~ ,1 j( r '; 0, I~ 0' I -n S S , I .' , . (1J;J<C fCoTI,~1.6 ~ st/f 1-- H"d. rJ/ (-6) ~S''-<; o;JT. 150TIDI--'"\ / t ~j\../\ Lft<f> 6'f'LI/"t: fj? f1-T C6'~T a.8" A-.Jb BamM CI E"'-L.G;/)u a;:: k-rU.:-r..S7 9'( V ~e... (P:: ! €:,j'-., vi' List tests performed: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. NO\~ No JZ! · . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the USe. except as noted above. Signed: O-:,..:~-?--- 0"/",,-'-7,"- / / Pro t Full N! arne' i--C.k~ \ r:.--, In .. ,.",' ,,,1'- '_,_ " ;.........--- Date: (0/ J 4, / fJ.r,- I S~[J:JCt2-~..~-f l.D. Numher: -, "';z DU/ \..1 (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) i'rm\spccinspA 1125/95 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun Intertec Corporation 2102 i heron Way Suite 10 1 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.469.3644 Fcx: 952.469.8599 Web: braunintertec.com Report of Field Compaction Tests Client: :Mr. Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc. 500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,1illN 55379 1 Test -Date T1- 6/7/05 I 2 6/9/05 2A 6/9/05 2B 6/9/05 3 6/10/05 Date: June 13,2005 Project: BL-05-02422 Report: 1 Project Description: Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Type Soil ill and Classification Max. Lab Inplace Specified Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum Moistuh* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. (%) (pet) (%) (pet) (%) (%) CommentsJ 9.4 128.3 7 130 101 98 A 1 12.1 120.9 12 117. 97 98 B j 12.1 120.9 13 116 96 98 B 12.1 120.9 13 120 99 98 A 12.1 120.9 12 119 98 98 A N N N N N P-l: SP-SM P-2: SC P-2: SC P-2: SC P-2: SC L__-_ N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rOlll1ded to nearest 0.1 A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria, .1 ~ I 2A I 2B I 3 'I L Test Test Location I ElevationJ 940 l 9421 940 942 944 Footing comer fill, 10'W of SE pad comer Footing comer fill, 10 'N, 10'W of SE pad comer Retest of #2 Retest of#2 Building pad fill, 10'N of SE building comer J Elevation Reference: . Technician: TIvfB/RDA bl0502422\cts-l Braun Intertec Corporation ~$ Robert A. Golish, EIT Staff Engi..neer " Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 . rs~A~~ INTERTEe Braun Intertec ~orporation 21021 Heron Woy Suiie 10 1 Lokeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952,469.3644 r= 952.469.8599 Web: brauninierrec.com Report of Field Compaction Tests "REVISED" Date: October 10, 2005 Project: BL-05-02422 Report: 2 Client: Project Description: Mr. Rich Pelletier Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Greystone Industrial Condos 500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300 Prior Lake, Minnesota Shakopee,1{N 55379' I Tort ~e_ Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil - Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ill and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. ' Type Classification (%) (pd) (%) (pef) (%) (%) , Comments -- ! I 4 7/27/05 , N P-3: SC 12.2 120,6 118 95 11 98 A I 5 7/27/05 N P-3: SC 12.2 120.6 11 118 98 95 A I 6 7/27/05 N P-3: SC 12.2 120.6 12 119 99 95 A j I 7 7/27/05 N P-3: SC 12.2 120.6 14 115 95 95 A 8 7/27/05 N P-3: SC 12.2 120.6 12 121 100 95 A J 9 7/29/05 N P-4: SC 12.5 112.6 . 12 112 100 95 A I 10 7/29/05 N P-4: SC 12.5 112.6 11 114 101 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A= Test results complywith specifications. SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * . = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 C = Test results meet zero airvoids criteria. I Test Test Location ~ Interior Plumbing"tren, ch backfill, 35'E, 15'S ofNW comer I 5 Interior plumbing trench backfill, 70'S, 20'E ofNW corner I 6 Interior pl11Dlbing trench backfill, I 00' S, 25'E ofNW comer I 7 I 8 I 9 ~ Eleyatio~ I SG SG SG SG SG SG SG Interior plumbing trench bark-fill, ISO'S, 25'E ofNW comer Interior plumbing trench backfill, 100'S, 50'E ofNW comer Floor slab sand cushion, 55'N, 30'E ofSW building comer Floor slab sand cushion, 90'N, 30'W of SW building comer Elevation Reference: Technician: lMJ' b10502422\cts-2 Braun Intertec Corporation ~~ / - , . Robert A. Golish, PE Project Engineer .. FTOviding engineering and environmentaL soLutions since 1957 . ~~A~~ I NTE RTEe Braun lntertec Corporation 21021 He~on Way Suite 101 Lokeville, MN 55044 Phone 952.469,3644 rex: 952.469.8599 'Neb: brauninteriec.com Report of Field Compaction Tests "REVISED" Date: October 10,2005 Project: BL-05-02422 Report: 3 Client: Mr. Rich Pelletier Gieystone Construction Company, me. 500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,1fN 55379 I Project Description: Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Greystone mdustrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified l Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. (%) (pet) (%) (pet) , (o/~ (%) Comments ---- - -- 9.1 127.1 2 126 99 95 A 9.1 127.1 2 127 100 95 A 9.1 127.1 3 123 97 95 A 9.1 127.1 3 125 99 95 A Soil I, Test_ ill and Date Type Classification -,'- III 8/1/05 N P-5: SP I 12 8/1/05 N P-5: SP I 13 8/1/05 N P-5: SP I 14 8/1/05 N P-5: SP I L Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 A = Test results comply with specifications. B Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. Elevation ]1 Test Test Location 11 Floor slab sand cushion, 170' S, 50'E ofNW building comer 12 Floor slab sand cushion, 140'S, 50'E ofNW building corner 13 Floor slab sand cushion, 80'S, 40'E ofNW building corner 14 Floor slab sand.cushion, 10'S, 40'E ofNW building corner SG SG SG I SG I J Elevation Reference: Technician: JMJ b10502422\ots-3 Braun mtertec Corporation ~~'l/h/ ~~~~ Robert A. Golish:"PE v' Project Engilleer ... Providing engineeTing and environmental solutions since 1957 128 Moisture-Density Relationship ! 1261 I I I I I I I I I I W ! I /1 I ',- I I 124 II I \J I ...... I /1 I I \1 () 0. , I I I '\ ~ ) en ~I I I I \ I c \ Q) I "0 I I I III C:- o 122\ I i I I I I I I l"t 1\ I \ I \ \1 . I It 1201 I \ I r i\ ZA V for 1\ Sp.G. = 118 I \1 2.65 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method B Standard Oversize correction applied to final results Elevl Classification Depth USCS AASHTO SP-SM Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL PI %> %< 3/8 in. No.200 2.65 11.0 7,8 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 128.3 pef Optimum moisture = 9.4 % Project No.: BL-05-02422 Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Project: Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, MN RAG Poorly Graded Sand with Gravel, fine-medium grained, brown I Remarks: I I Specific Gravity was assumed. . Source: Sample No.: poOl BRAUN'" INTERTEC Minneapolis Lab MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOilS \ \ \ ~ ...... \ ~ " / ~ \ I~ '\ / \.\ I \ I \ J \ \ / \ l \ I I \\ II \ 1241 I 122' I 1201 - u c.. >; - "00 c Q) u ~ o 118 116, 1141 6 8 10 12 Water content, % 14 Test specification: AS1M D 698-00a Method B Standard Elevl Depth Classification USCS AASHTO Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL SC TEST RESULTS Maximum dry density = 120.9 pef Optimum moisture = 12.1 % Project No. bl0502422 Client: Greystone Construction Co., Inc. Project: Greystone Industrial Condo, Prior Lake, MN \ \ \ 16 PI %> ZA V for Sp.G. = 2.65 18 %< No.200 15.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SC- Clayey sand. Fine to medium grain. Grey I Remarks: Date: 06.10.05 . Location: Greystone Industrial Condo, Prior Lake, MN MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOilS BRAUNINTERTEC 3/8 in. 3.0 Figure P-2 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOilS I I \1 I I I \ '\.. \ \ \ \\ . 1221 I 1201 I / / ( / I ;' I / I 118' ..... t.> a. ~ '00 c ~ I o 1161 114 112 7 9 11 Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method A Standard Elevl Depth Classification USCS AASHTO SC ~~ 13 Water content, % \ , \ , \ \ \ ZA V for Sp.G. = 1\ 2.65 15 17 19 Nat. Moist. %> No.4 %< No.200 Sp.G. LL PI 4.0 32 TEST RESULTS Maximum dry density = 120.6 pef Optimum moisture = 12.2 % Project No. b10502422 Client: Greystone Construction Co. Project: Greystone Industrial Condos, Prior Lake, MN MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SC- Clayey sand. Fine to medium grain. I Remarks: Plumbing Trench backfill Date: 07.28.05 · Location: Greystone Industrial Condos, Prior Lake, MN MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOILS BRAUNINTERTEC Figure P-3 OGT. 6,2005 9:20AM 116' I \ I I '\ \ I ! I 114 'R 112 J ;5 '00 >= Q) "C C o 110 -I 108 106 7 BRAUN INTETEC CENTRAL FAX NO, 7645 P. 3 Moisture-Density Relationship I....u 1- ..j . -~-~-I \ ..\~_I I [\ . - \ ... ____.J \ \..- -~ t.A V for .- Sp.G. = 2.65 I I I I I ! I I I . "'1 r-! ! - 1-' 1-'" ... -- -." I .- J ...i.___~.... i......---....~ i. -1-- I .. _' . ' .....J , _ .. i I I i I I I I I I I ._1 1....1,._ \ I I I i \ I 1_.. . _ .-' I ~ _._ '-71..'1~= - '. , ",,' I . 'l \ l. '--T~J .--~I__..... ,-: ~ I J .--i~. 1.1---- _ / . .-J L. 1-- i. I . \ ' I I . 1 r- I i I --I , I I ---~. I' I , '-. I I \ "I ... ..' ._1 I .. J I - 1 I , i __ . _I_~-.-\.. I " ._____1- I \ I f' I I 9 11 13 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-00a Method A Standard Elevl , Depth ClassificatIon uscs I AASHTO Nat Moist. Sp.G. SP-SM 2.65 8.0 TEST RESULTS Maximum dry density = 112.6 pef Optimum moisture =' 12.5 % .. Project No.: BL-05-02422 Client: Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Project: Gre)'stone industrial Condos Prior Lake, MN RAG Ie Source: Sample No.: P-04 BRAUN~ INTERTEC I 1-' . 15 17 LL PI I I - ! I 'Yo> NO.4 3.0 \ I \ 1--' I 1 19 %< No.20D MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fIne grained, light brown Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed, Sand oushlon Minneapolis Lab OCT, 6. 2005 9: 20AM BRAUN iNTETEC CENTRAL FAX ~]O, 7645 p, 2 120.0 1- I \ Moisture-Density Relationship I I " \ i I I i I~:\I I ~- I I 1 j' \- I 1"1 I ill i\ --j I~,~ l I IV --I ..-.-7--.- -- --\ I . U_ /. -\ n. . '\- ----... .----, J7--- . u' \t- II ," ____n_ J. i\ ... \_. ------ ---=-=I-'~-\ I \_:- ~___i L \ I \___.. ! \.- i I~ .\ \ 'I I .. --I , 130_0 127.5 I --I II I I j I 12.5.0 _..-I - o 0.. ~ '00 t:: Q) "0 -c::- o 1L2.5 I I -i- '\'- I I --- I (-... I i .J -~-~T' ' i ---I- I j I I I 1 I r- I '_ij- I -j 117.5 I 4 6 B 10 Water content, % 12 14 LA V for ._ Sp.G. "' 2.65 16 Test specification: ASTM D 69S-00a Method B Standard Elevl Classification Nat. LL PI %> %< Depth useS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. 3/8 in. No.200 SP-SM 2.65 3.0 7.7 TEST RESULTS Maximum dry density;:: 127.1 pef Optimum moisture;;;;: 9.1 % Project No.: BL-05-02422 Client: Project: Greystone Industrial Condos RAG MA TERIA.L DESCRIPTION Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, tine-medium grained, brown !I Remarks: Specific Gravity was assumed. North 1/3 of Floor Sand Cushion. Greystone Construction Company, Inc. Prior Lake, MN a Source: Sample No.; P-05 BRAUN~ INTERTEC Minneapolis Lab .- .._~ ".-- . - --- . ~ - - ----......... BRAUN fNTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 7/11/05 Work Order: 0504147 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, ~ Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. COF): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: 1 6/10/05 12:00 pm 6/13/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 3000 Cemstone Not Required 3000 4 Client Sample Location/Notes: None Building Interior, Footing, gridsb.8-3 to c-3 to d-3 to d-5 to 3-5 to e-7 to a.4-7 to a.4-5 to a-5 including exterior stoops along respective grids cylinders cast by superintendent wi greystone Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 1-01 3 4 7 54920 6.00 28.27 1,940 C N C2 1-02 3 25 28 103060 6.00 28.27 3,650 C N E1 1-03 3 25 28 100080 6.00 28.27 3,540 B N E1 * Capping Method: N = ASTM C123l, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C6l7, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: C2 E1 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE X/\I/ A Cone B Cone & Split C D Cone Shear & Shear ~~ Columnar Robert A Golish BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 7/11/05 Work Order: 0504167 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, :MN Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. COF): Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: 2 6/13/05 Not Given 6/14/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 3067 Cemstone Not Required 3000 356 01060250 4 Client Building Interior, Footing, grids a.2-5 to a-3 and c-3 to c-2 and footing piers at grids bA, b.1-5,4 and b-2,3 including footing stoops along respective grids Sample Location/Notes: Superintendent w/Greystone cast the cylinders, no air or slump measured Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in. ) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 2-01 1 6 7 75400 5.99 28.18 2,680 D N B2 2-02 1 6 7 98680 5.99 28.18 3,500 B N D2 2-03 1 27 28 124140 5,99 28.18 4,410 D N E1 2-04 1 27 28 126520 5.99 28.18 4,490 C N E1 * Capping Method: N = AS1M C1231, Unhonded Caps _ S = AS1M C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. D2 E1 TYPES OF FRACTURE X /\ A / A 8 C 0 - Cone Cone Cone. Shear Columnar & & Spiit Shear ~G RobertA dolish BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 7/15/05 Work Order: 0504210 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL~05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, ~ Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in,): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp, (OF): (ASTM C 1064) All- Temp. ("F): Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing grids C-3 to C-l and C-I to A-I and A-I to A-3 ' 3 6/14/05 Not Given 6/15/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 30003/4 FA cemstone 0.1 Not Required 3000 387 4 Client Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code( s) 3-01 1 6 7 88560 6.00 28.27 3,130 C N D2 3-02 1 27 28 132300 6.00 28.27 4,680 C N E1 3-03 1 27 28 136580 6.00 28.27 4,830 B N El 3-04 1 2 3 52800 6.00 28.27 1,870 C N Al * Capping Method: N = AS1M C 1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: Al D2 El The sample is reported per contractor request. The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified .:sL.C,llgth. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE X/\I/ A B C 0 - Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar & & Split Shear ~$ v Robert A Gorish BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C23l) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. ("F): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: Sample Location/Notes: 4 8/2/05 7 :20 am 8/3/05 o 0,0 o o Report Date: 8/31/05 Work Order: 0506053 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, J\..1N Field Test Conditions and Results Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 4067 Cemstone Not Required 4000 521 4 Contractor None Building Interior, Slab on Grade, Cylinders Cast by Contractor, No test results No Data Available for tests, Cast by Contractor Sample No. 4-01 4-02 4-03 Field Cure (days) 1 1 1 Test Age (days) 7 28 28 Lab Cure (days) 6 27 27 Compression Test Results Max. Cylinder Cylinder Load Diameter Area (pounds) (in.) (sq, in.) 93170 6.00 28.27 150120 6.00 28.27 142840 6.00 28.27 , Strength (psi) 3,300 5,310 5,050 Fracture Type C C B Capping Method * N N N Remarks Code(s) B2 E1 E1 Break Remarks: B2 * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C6l7, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength. relationship. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. E1 TYPES OF FRACTURE XA^/ ABC D E Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar & & Split Shear ~ Robert A Golish BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 8/31/05 Work Order: 0506102 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,1fN 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, :MN Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. COF): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: Sample LocationINotes: 5 8/3/05 12:00 pm 8/4/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: . Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 6BEQ 3/4 FP Retarder Cemstone Not Required 3000 388 4 Contractor None Building Interior, Slab on Grade, No data available; Cast by Contractor Sample No. 5-01 5-02 5-03 Field Cure (days) 1 1 1 Lab Cure (days) 6 27 27 Test Age (days) 7 28 28 Compression Test Results Max. Cylinder Cylinder Load Diameter Area (pounds) (in.) (sq, in.) 99120 6.00 28.27 138040 6.00 28.27 145190 6.00 28.27 Strength (psi) 3,510 4,880 5,140 Fracture Type B C B Capping Method * N N N Remarks Code(s) D2 El El Break Remarks: D2 El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C 1231, Unbanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE X/\A/ ~$ ABC D E Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar & & Split Shear Robert A Golish BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 8/31/05 Work Order: 0506103 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,1fN 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, :MJ:\[ Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. COF): Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Building Interior, Slab on Grade, Sample Location/Notes: No data available; Cylinders Cast by Contractor 6 8/3/05 6:45 am 8/4/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 6BEQ 3/4 FP Retarder Cernstone Not Required 3000 748 4 Contractor Sample No. 6-01 6-02 6-03 Field Cure (days) 1 1 1 Lab Cure (days) 6 27 27 Test Age . (days) 7 28 28 Compression Test Results Max:. Cylinder Cylinder Load Diameter Area , (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) 98790 6.00 28.27 139830 6,00 28.27 146970 6,00 28.27 Strength (psi) 3,490 4,950 5,200 Fracture Type C C B Capping Method * N N N Remarks Code(s) D2 E1 E1 Break Remarks: D2 E1 * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE X/\A/ A 8 C D E Cone C;one Cone Shear Columnar & & Split Shear a ,~ ~J12/ RObert A Golish v- SEP-27-2005 TUE 10:10 AM LS ENGINEERS FAX NO. 507 665 6818 P. 02 Engineers September 27, 2005 Rob O'Brien Greystone Construction 500 S. Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Re: Rooftop Mechanical Units Deerfield Industrial Park Auto Body Shop, Landscape Supply. and Lease Space Prior Lake, MN Dear Rob: We have reviewed the capability of the existing roof deck to carry the roof top units without additional support angles under the roof deck as per 5/S4 of the working drawings. The roof deck will work to carry the units as a cantilever. As you have field verified, there are no splices in tbe roof deck in joists adjacent to the units. The units on the roof are as follows: Typical Power Roof Ventilators: 37S#/unit set on 39" by 39" curbs centered between two bar joists Typical Rooftop Unit: 600#/unit set on 56" east-west by 44" north-south curbs centered between two bar joists Typical Make-up Air Unit: 1100#/unit set 01). 35" east-west by 84" north-south curbs centered between two bar joists Please advise if you need additional information. Yours truly, William P. Lehnertz P.E. WPL/bsk 200 Sourh !l.lain Steec:r LeSueur, MN 56058 (507) 665-6255 . Fax: (507) 665-6818 , '8 e P . 27. 2005 2 : 20 PM Bra u n 'BRAUN f NTE RTEC No.5465 p. 1 Fax Transmittal To: G,rJ; Fax Number: ~ ~z.,1 Lfl6 ~ <Irq ( From: llb r; tIS L Phone Number: 952.469.3644 Fax Number: 952.469.8599 Re: Date: 1/Z1-/(}7 # of Pages: I CJt (including cover): I Go~~, If(%( ~ a (f ()d via;!; okrv~t~ 7~~ tJ;n~( ,~+ rc;vlh J c:7~~ 4f ~,Jk tlu 5~;;J 5~/''''~ ~rl WM fvvl ~ j3'.,/' ~!kl,.o' rr->-- 4vrJ 30 I 50 7'" 5t,JI k ~ ILl #< rJY;t,'J MaH 1~j rr"rf ~ ~ er Crt-kl- tL,~ tf1~ PV"'- 5 ~f ",,/ M tJ-",---L J; Zlo'l 7h jlJ "Y.rrr "",I( Pc. ~ dull:" fL ~f- /Vuf-. Ji.t4 .~ b.aU,,-; '''~ J ~ I'-/' . lease advISe if you have received thi/communication in error. ~ 'f ~ '/ / /l, I Braun Intertec Corporation //:'" 21021 Heron Way, Suite 101 Stiff; ce. Lakeville, :MN 55044 Phone: 952..469.3644 Fax: 952.469,8599 #6 . Providing engineering and environmental solutfrms since 1957 Sep,27. 2005 2:20PM Braun No.5465 p. 2 BRAUN$M INTERTEC Project #: Location: DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT 6l.-oS:--0?0?-? Report#: I ./h,,~ La~ Date: ~ '-, 7 .-- 0 ~ Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours ~h c'lfj - ('~/? &~/~-- (/ Areas and work performed this day: &~vJ eK~/'~ ."L 5t1, t /!n .;Iu5ov-/L.. ......s -J t'.Ar~ J..4 /o/:r/~';//l-. ~ ~___v.L- ~ ~:Y ~I~ Jv.{;.~ fn~ 7f{'I"'Jt-A-- bo~ ~ _/) ~A~ :-.k~tI~:& n/J6~/ L /1L.. ~ ~ b -'/ ~,'d7 10 ~ ~ d.-, Ih ~ ~ ~~;('4 ~l'':--,. ~ d}f ~ ~~~_'V:'/ ~ :(L ~mJ~ I-~ -:"& AK/ ~hi- <;"ul44-dL _~e1//~ ~ $//~U ,? A'/ J ~/~ ~rrr~% ~ k/I ai/wit",.., d/ -4 .,t;~ ~~ <I?,i k ~ r~f)tu~~;n-- -h/t':.- J ~/- ~a/L-. rdC/',L -. I ~ ~ ab-/ /'n g ~,~ ~. - / .-/ Weather: a~i -.lOl<<..- nv~ Submitted To: t;r,t, t.V ~~<L ( /0'/ _. Performed By: ~4Z/ F: DAILY 1 DOR-01 Sep.27. No.5465 I ..~'" Soil Borings? Y( ) Nearest Soil Boring Date Block Addition Site ConditionsJWeather Contractor Staked by N( ) "N LaV\JscQ. p< C~. - /P. 3 of I (p - 1--0S- Clo~ lol~ H- t:. :: 100 Prnis/,v.t9, ~cf:; "',~ ~<Jo.~tJV' ~ 1<., Write bottom elevations, date excavated, oversizing and type of bottom soils on sketch Notes &~it I!htf/?V;,c.d UA-- ~k ,,'"' ..,.-c .....,.~ '?~.-Y'. .or.J.L'.t:; ~~~d,. .A~ ~~_~ ~~..___ FVllaU ~ .h// ~ _~y J~"II"~ " I, Lot Number Block Number House Type . Front HD Elev. -. I I 'I Back HD Elev. Lowest Elev. III~ .tl' J .~ '7/~~ I Test Test passJ Test Test passl Test Test passl Test Test passl Test Test passl Elevation No. fail Elevation No. fail Elevation No, fail Elevation No. fail Elevation No. fail crt.{ q(f7 "'ur /00 I I I I I j I II l! I I HU = MOIO Wown Sep,27. 2005 2:20PM Braun No.5465 P.4 BRAUN'M INTERTEC BL -05---02.-422- DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Project#: ~y}~TNlu.sf~,/ ~ Report#:. ll~ 2. n~! Location: ~-e\e1.. tJal41a!,fU/lJ Date: -" ---17-05' Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours .J~B >'12- ~.A- Areas and work performed this day: ~~ -to Sf.k> ~& ~v..osJd ~ t<it~ LO Cn..oyL.:7~O- -b cl,e~YW:' ,~i- Pt-h? .fb,.... ~o~ bU:dd~ ~-"'J ~-.!..:..,.,,-.'"'IO /'j'av'G..j..J) ctv'42o.... <ADYe" ~\~.. .is &tal~ (:~~i~ (ltS a... - · v ~ ~u.,' Id.;:" Cf~"-h.~ ~. p.fJ $~A~. SI'c/..e. ~ ~ e:;...Cl\i~~ ;:p,..di4Si"'l~ I CbrA;-Jv ~ ~ ~\.\~ lJ.I~~~J.j I/I..JA1J. ',6 clA.r^qhll/ {.,e~.y ('...., c,/......J.l'ka/ ')" ~~ .-kLc:."'I- ?,rJ...s. -~\...Q DbSQy-~ 1'\R.a./r;""A..." ~p~..;J scu:f-1r1)'KO \ 1- (':u:lA..t~;~ rb'v~ V~. -L"l, ~.$.t>- -ie.&--I- tprl-< '" CAp-!-o 6'~ J)k: i3~t'l ~ blQ..rk .<It)''''1-~~~ ~ill \NA5 €1-'LCfh4./') k~ ~ ~'k>' t~ ' ef!, tVi1~f '7-S / R ~~ M4-~1 ~V"" .t/lfI. S...bI- 5P~..k.d c-l~u./ d-"f"QA. ~ 6.a"vl'~I'-t ~~t:kt:J$A...-l i~ .... <;;'C'" I , '/" ---,.- ~{(+ IM~lt \,VQ. \,U1)~tJ. (\I2c:~....,..J f1..~ep'~Be-..$ .~~/I':; ~~j o.J.ctd..t.Bn~..J '"' i1e, Q 'V<If ~d1 +- ~.f.. ~ 'tc.J::.. """6 ~ 1:I1Dl.tLJM:f- ~ -{... ~ ^" \~Q';'-'" ;' <. l)Jj)i/~ ...f..n G'C~~L-t~P .I ' - - ri) fJ1()fjf-(.h'l~"iJQ..I-.,,.p, '/a?mll..LO aJl.~')I'-;e2lJ~ ) ~5t.;J . t..{k.StA; kt{~n i' fCIl,'< <-- ~'. /- {1JEMf. -i-e/ 7lJ.iJ 1 pht..Q. a I '/Ay;.e/;.-' .~ r:..hA.e..l..cd 1/'ocf f'J.,; ~ ~JA ~ I~j- " , t V Weather: ~<'l~ (f.:;;,../L. Performed By: ~ / Submitted To: l2iL" i1:. ~y~ F: DAILY 1 DOR-o, Sep,27. 2005 2:21PM Braun No.5465 p. 5 BRAUNsM I NTE RTEC DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT Project #: ~~ ~~i cd C~<<=.> Report #:, ~ e\ " HJ~o-'! Location: CA:4;w-~eip\ IleVel~ Date: ~-l7'-6S"" Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours Jz;B ~;-97'1.- S~~ ~~ Areas and work periormed this day: -42..')( ~l,:~ bo~) plGtCl2... e&.-\.~~......~~ +411 ~ .pYl:1j)~ S l4bQ..~ -h~. CZJ Cor~c:.:t- ~-I-.~ <:; ('>>1 (y ,'" d~ A I' ffev......kI Drrkf'-cJ..i... (6t';~'~ ~ \ ~'~\J.Q.vv, ~+ I~ .fi'l\ ~(O".AJ ~~"-o,~ . L,.t~ Ct Si-Av_.tc.cV"Cllf S'{q,(., +c ..., ) v LI-p t./ , M)"'ilMl~ aI'\sk:. ~ j-vt.Je~,btl.. f=-/~ ~_~L,t..--j..k io 1.A'~C_t4~~ r:;i/ ~ ~ t:rJ, T'2-t, c.. k:-~{.J. S'f.111 bQ. ~c,so",.,- ~ <~~ I/~ -+1L. ;..r-~.wJ S' OLI c; J o.f-IlL e"J...c"fJti.i,.a- bo~c';,.. @ &.v.ecf- ~-+-'~,s. ~ ~Py Wt\tls ~~lt~{6,..- lNJ'n",~J ~ Sf)~l Cevl\Qc.ft&.~. 1-21~ R.a:.~lc~__';:;"L~/uou-iJ ~ll ~}~(as.~ ~ ~. b;, L'~ .L... ~I~-tl C~ / ~ ~ 4- &o,t+.I#~ ~1~;tfS -ItA ~ e}.:.CCi.rJc-'-; ~~ - rl/L c , , I 6D~'7. ~,-e. rft.rJ i-'liAc1ea~44..od CiI / k)cJ. 'IS !..D,_v.Q'.;' tl-1 I Tl.e Bv.'J~....ei/ , k}cn-tkA A.lb,5L>lJ~ +16 v"ls/c o'~ aVL~/ ~ltkl/ll)~.'tf- r~ ~ .stah<< ~,<; i f- ~f{,u'~ fJV) irh/JJ 1.J4 I., u..-~, 5-~)\"WI.~I.,.Dr- 1~,cAl:l/".'; \,....,. \\ Weather: ~ (~t1- 11t" . ~ ,t.-J \ l r.) lr~ h_:T-'1 \,Ui '-YL c; f' Performed B~ ~"" . , . ! .~#. Submitted To:/Zi( Li"~~ ~f1 F: DAILY 1 , I I I I I DOR-01 Sep.27. 2005 2:21PM Braun FIELD OBSERVATION FORM No.5465 P, 6 Project #: Pad Dimensions: Excavation Length: Excavation Width: Excavation Oversizing: Hold Down: Groundwater Elevation: Excavation Sidewall Soils: N~ " T\t l... (Fr) (Rr) (Lt) (Rt) (front) (rear) Lot: Date: Site Plan Information: Soil Boring Information: Weather/Site Conditions: N () # Block: Addition: y ( ) ~?~ ~ch,'4\ Excavating Equipment: Excavating Contractor: Observations Requested by: I ~'1 L I I r . , bC: - -7 --- - . --- ------1'-- -.-- . I , I J, ~1l-j I \1 . ~I;.'~'--"'- HAPIDCP Results Test Number Surface Elevation Blows, 0-6" Blows, 6-12" Blows, 12-18" Blows, 18-24" Blows, 24-30" Blows, 30-36" Blows, 36-42" Blows, 42-48" Key: ;~I . f1+ z. 1 $ .lA. 7 i'- ~~~ 5U~LBL , Description of Soils Des.....~~~on of Soils 'fLJ ~~ ~ Lrr.,. ~\- .~V"w\ l,J6f2..CL U\Y6n.~ ;L~ ~H\r~ . .. ; 1'z- \ ,I &-TS~ c.f:...YI~ I$~ (~fltz~~~~~fL$W\ ul'.Ji({~ , xxx = Excavation bottom elevation Scale: 1" =, x = Staking by contractor x Staking by others S = Oversizing = Excavation limits HAP = Hand Auger Probe DCP = Dynamic Cone Penetrometer . b ~ !.., '12- " tO~~ l (~f2.EY' CL ~ . Cr._';'+'1 \~ ec~ > frm\ficldob.ftm 313/95 Sep.27. 2005 2:21PM Braun No,5465 P.7 BRAUN1M INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report City of 'f".IDtz. L..JU!.';- Page of d Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Date of This Report: D€t:>/Z..t:'JI::L~IJi.'1to,l A-;u~SrIt'Pt:", ~Tl.. Project No.: 'T'5'~ A-t:>~, M.4,J~ g: 5.tt~c. lr't..~" ti'1'D~(" Client Project No.: fJUU.C.A~T" ) !ir.A-1f~Il..~b. SHDt,J€iS.' Temperature: ,. , .~().~ tJL-a5"- O~+f~;) fJs- - "a Yn'~ Type of Inspection: o Continuous rj4 Periodic Inspection Coverage: M D Masonry 'e Rebar Placement D Foundations o Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofmg D Bolting 0 Tendon Placement D Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes % (Listed Below) No D Description and location of work completed: ,C; ~r: Alo(E~: EXTt:~ ~ FTlr 1J&l'i. 1t:.1'\~, (OL/\.k1.,.) ..A S ::; PDt",;} ~ ~I bS d G ,{:t t\ J IrR., 6$ r;;lA- J 'i~. ~ f ~ L; tz..&.,^ ~A.~ --1ISUAL. llASl'.~"I4TltJ~S IJF thl~~OiCF:!IlE:~r ~o~ roo7,,)6.' -Qliou'*"'tL..(a.216S Ji.~- ~ '-0 C-~ To b-T 'T'n b..<,..o E-(,..o E:.'-~ 'fo /r.c.,-~"7"0 Il.&./-S,..-O It-~ )JL.t.l.lC.I;)l:c {")IT, ~r(}oP5 JrlA~~ 'Re:ih:cnui! (ytl.le:.S. F"DO'l',...) lr- ~ (:.1'-\ f ~ l\ L.-("S ~ , { I \~. /' II . &t..(b C-.- '3: F ~; )(;; )t tn' X I~' .J. lB. J rr'~ XJ~ -(s, nf! 13n, .f:r&u... 6-~! ~- s' (< ~ 1 ~l J I . Ire.,~ t"-tD ~ r'Dl: ('}(.1")(p.,r( w!,,*-~~'~'.J/.';/' tVI~ !-' (f) 'If!, t;1t wltr , , t ~ (,,\ 1t~~(~~ If Te, ~'J3t>1f. t List tests performed:. . Are there any discrepam:ies noted from this day's ohservations? Yes 0 Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes D [f yes, see attached Summary Sheet N<L('g No ~ . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBe, except a'\ noted anovc SigntX.!. ~,~ 9~,-~-- Datc' /r. JI6 / ~s'" I I , Print Full r4'ame: .:1'frSo...) ~,5'~..Jl)e.$f(" ( I D Numher' 7)le~/3 frlll\,,,""insp 4 J 12.V9~ (Whitt' copy to Braun Intenec file Blue copy to General Contractor) lDlo -(PSS~ ~3~3 ~ MO~}(",~ . ~ ~~f"~ ko~ 6:/11 IV 1?', DO Sep.27. 2005 2:21PM Braun No.5465 p. 8 BRAUN'U INTERTEC Special Inspector Daily Report City of PR.1111t LA~~ Page a of d Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Date of This Report: ~J() 6' De"6t.'::-IC~ A-u:ro.' Ur1)lo.bfA-I>r., e;~ProjectNo.: ....!.lj- Q~""IJ~q~'21 .....l3:.! \"Il ~'\....~;! 5'1. <. ~ c. 1-rIl.EII '.,..a..)C Client Project No.: DOc(f.c.ksr 15orrra.~l'I ~HotJ;;~~ Temperature: {)!{'... II~ TO '.r Type of Inspection: o Continuous ~ Periodic Inspection Coverage: o Masonry N Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes [Xf (Listed Below) No D 5r;e- ~^-hr€ #-, Description and location of worle. completed: / . ~fb ~'. "'3~ L./'jl..7"~1'-I" ull (r:::) #-~fo_~/f BDrr r (8)1f'5'"1(~~l..'" &"ff. ., " -,r $~ SP..Gl ~o5 ~-Ll -c-kLP. .A- ~_L.q. 1r.4./-{, , r{)orl~~ S-rooPS: I..('/'Jt.~/ wJ (u)#,c;'~ t.JJAT. 8tJ1fol-\ , ,~, , . 'K ~SPe:L n vE: t:rp..f bS '.. U~' FD'C1" fA 1=-' "3')( 1-'-1 I, oJ} 1'3 ~ 1t S-\ (BAr. (,#(/,:) 'PWtJ / S I , r' J f'ooTuJlr If:L"VfrT'IO,) /J"'~~ 1:r~1~ <..... 3" (P..OM.. q'''"f'n ",/ -(F. ~ (),gl\~,e.u66 --':rILl ~ It. L.{ - <C) , / ~ If C-/"lu. Wtr'-L' ~', ~JL~-r~. IN I ('i.,) -If~ '<. ~~T. tJOff. ~st:"~vC~ ( 1"- --1.::.M> ~"'L'L~ ~f:;dU~b ;(b ~;: Jr, LJCIt~r 7JfJff wJr;" (...LR. . AL-L ~b"lh t.$ A-.J C:l. A) OT"C!) 11~~1~"l'~ A-~ /::;. F~ o/),l ~ (~o It ~ t'C,,--(" - ""J)/~ f.(,.SP':,l fl/J ~ (r~ l ~S " Ir-r "-.,H," b.A:-f l' (' -r,ll/( C List tests performed: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes D Nu D(' Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes D No ~ If yes, see attached Summary Sheet . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted ahove Signoo' ~041.--.n:_/l. Print Full 'me: ~ftsi,M. :::'fit-woK. s ~ ( Date' InJIO /05 .., f I D Number" "rlloL./3 (While copy to Braun lncenec file, Blue copy to General Contractor.) "'d.-lo85- S"'1''3 --7 MO/S/(..;{ frl1l\sp<~insp 4 I 12.~i9~ Sep.27. 2005 2:21PM Braun No.5465 p. 9 BRAUN'W I NTE RTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Special Inspector Daily Report City of f>lttAR... ~A-IL{{ Date of This Report: 4/' ~JtJ ~ , r P~&B6t..~ Au.~. L/b~f-.,c:.{,fd>~ g(c.,. Project No.: -&.. -r() ~- 0 aLl ri"d. I I 17-{~~Jt-t>bL-M.A-",',j tiT, s.E!. /rt6'ib-re~€ Client Project No.: ~""'I/o tJcJ6fL1ts1' ) !5LAJ(eL~ olb';be~ Temperature: 7i1's I Page I of J Inspection Coverage: o Masonry M Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o Welding TI Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes [XI" (Listed Below) No D Description and location of work completed: -5C~ ~€*,i((.1 fl.;) te.jl() W LHMlTe~ ", SUA L /)A5~i. ,lAi 'D~F' ll.r~^R, "PLAC."::-M&r~, i='OL ~Dl)..,.,.Ja-S A--r ty-{Llt:::.~ A-. ;;1- S' T2> Type of Inspection: o Continuous ?f Periodic ;L-~ I'r~", t"'3 "t"V) ~d /+,JA FODT.1E..lx 'Fla.~ ft-t ~5 ~d-",- 6.1-S"~...J I . j - d ! '3, 1,\)(..L.uwA/r POl)""'-~& &-rDM'S ~f.r USl'-~c..r I Jt:- &t.I-bS . rDO'TI):,t:.c ~~UL~'6 ":. trt..\~5 P., -~ fb-?, ~.\ - Ll (611 -~ ...: P",y'-lo: i=''-t ~ -:r';(1/'~J"''' vJJ iT):t, Elf LJA-f 8arr'. " I I . -1rftl f:) S PI -r;" ~ A - ~, ~ ~ ~ )6/,. t. I )L Ii/' ~! fR) #"1 Jl./{Io II -rof i 1>011 { (Ir)1t! ~~,tr TD, !'~-rr tre.\1:::. A--L\: r-a.~ (")t.5"~J~'I wi (~) #z;' ~tt ...Jt\.-( , --':rk.'~ C. - ~', ~ I) of) If I( 10 ~ vJ / (l{);! S . I . List test'\ performed: -Lr~It-,,~ ft.rl - ~ I~ 1 "3. 6 ~ . I~ f. t( volt. f.~5P'::;CTtU(; roD,'~~S ~ LPrf :5tLI c..C J't'L-SO diCt.(r rt:~ Eft tJ 1\ Y (Li 1'1<4' II i"t q ) t (0) t:f:-S- Cl)~~-r Btnr~ C.'i'd; FcO'n~lI' snorS: ,ft,u 1<11/' fTtr t;Jlldyff5"5 o>r. - 8rt1f I (D ~ 7' rOI> Ti ,.)(;(5 r (),\ ,. A ,....) ($ \ f4=-!:' ~ I),) 7, @.;l} '1'ro r'\.. A-LL.. \J('~\ r; r{:e ~ ~()(..I.,.)~ CD f?J.tct . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes D Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 If yes, see attached Summary Sheet No.J5( No ~t ' . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. except as noted above Signoo' 9~ C),..LL....rV-/,'L' Date. tp/,3 J()$" / I I Print Full ame: 5A'(j~ M. .::!'At.AJ6K.Ot::..1 J D Numher" olD 'I 3 (Whitt' copy (0 Braun /ntenec file Blue copy (0 General Contractor) frmlsp""in.1' 4 112~/95 Sep,27.2005 2:22PM Bra un No.5465 p. 10 / 5c})r 10 rlZ..fo~ LAtt::C {() - I~ -0 ~ V ~,~ Special Inspector Daily Report Page I of I City of 'PI<.IDtz.. l.-fttL,{ BRAUN'W INTERTEC Report Number: Project Name: Project Address: Client: Weather: Date of This Report: 4./J:lI 0 <(' D~~ILFI~(...b tlulo: U'c)bSc.lrN,: ~Project No.: ;q 1"7--,(g Al:>~LMA;::'~ <;T :;.~. ( o!""- Jld _____ -.&e.:r;.v~it);)L Client Project No.: \. "&-0.<"- OAt.f821 r /)rJ~c..t\:S1 / & Cfrtfr:tU ~Hb~a5femperature: 60....5 , Inspection Coverage: o Masonry ~ Rebar Placement 0 Foundations o Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing o Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No ~ Description and location of work completed: VISUAL- l:>ASe."oJA-f1lJ;JS ~ eiCe./tL PLAC{.M6AJ-r Type of Inspection: o Continuous )Z1 Periodic ~ (CD"" jj/r s tt,- frK-/r)<., t.. - '3 ,- () r: - , J G -I fi) t1- - I ; A. -, Th 14-:~ r:~llj)l:r 6O\6Puu{ ~ &:~\!:, & ~ll'> tIt-It:. S 1p~-r\ ~ - d' F,: L.()L t{)'- JLl" r4~. o.'~ €:TS 0 ~ (LI \ '5 's ~A- wt\Y 1 . A - a'" F~.. S....l'. {r X (LI/( ~, (() -tt::( 6.4 Wf!<t iJf)-rfD)-,,\ { f e-d~ B.lo--', f\--d't..\: F=oO'l,,3lr~1Z>of'')i 17"l</&.j"ct ~/ta)1t'S\ f1>>(,~b:-S ~ "34" 1-./'-llfcL ,ill (-r,) :l=ts\ (..D;JT, ~07fn~ / . - ~-rr: / ~ 6Jr. 6Zl71~rI\.., /' Lit'/> 5'PLlt'_t nf: AT Len:;. ~B" A-..3t> Be_Tle),,- r..L~~rtLA~cL l>~ tt-ru;tr;f ~(' VLe..a"CJ-.. / List tests performed: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's ohservations? Yes 0 Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 If yes, see attached Summary Sheet N()~. . No )XJ . - . . To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the USe. except as noted ahove SigntXI' o./~~ q~:-'''i'_..~.L--~ Print Full ~ame: (~ K. :::(fh>>oeS"K::.1 Date' to / J Li / fJ ~ I I I D Numh~r' d to ,-t~ (While copy to Braun lntenec file. Blue copy to General Contractor) rnl1"p~"in.p ,4 112<,195 Sep.27. 2005 2:22PM BRAUN INTERTEC Braun No.5465 p. 11 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 7/11/05 Work Order: 0504147 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, IDe 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project BL-OS-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, MN Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM. C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. ("F): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: 1 6/10/05 12:00 pm 6/13/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier. Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number. Cylinders per Set Cylinders Cast By: 3000 Cemstone Not Required 3000 4 Client Sample LocationINotes: None Building Interior, Footing, gridsb.8-3 to c-3 to d-3 to d-S to 3-5 to e-7 to a.4-7 to a.4-5 to a-S including exterior stoops along respective grids cylinders cast by superintendent wi greystone Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in,) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method '" Code(s) 1-01 3 4 7 54920 6.00 28.27 1,940 C N C2 1-02 3 25 28 103060 6.00 28.27 3,650 C N E1 1-03 3 25 28 100080 6.00 2827 3,540 B N EI '" Capping Method~ N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break. Remarks: C2 E1 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength may not be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship, The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified ";"''''llgtb. TYPES OF FRACTURE XA// A 8 C D E Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar & & Sp.t Shear Robert A Golish Sep.27. 2005 2:22PM BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun No.5465 p. 12 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6xl2 Cylinder Report Date: 7/11/05 Work Order. 0504167 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Gre'ystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, MN Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (AS1M C 1064) Air Temp. eF): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: 2 6/13/05 Not Given 6/14/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 3067 Cemstone Not Required 3000 356 01060250 4 Client Sample Location/Notes: None Building Interior, Footing, grids a.2-5 to a-3 and c-3 to c-2 and footing piers at grids bA, b.l-5,4 and b-2,3 including footing stoops along respective grids Superintendent w/Greystone cast the cylinders, no air or slump measured Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max.. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code(s) 2-01 1 6 7 75400 5.99 28.18 2,680 D N B2 2-02 1 6 7 98680 5,99 28,18 3,500 B N D2 2-03 1 27 28 124140 5.99 28.18 4,410 D N E1 2-04 1 27 28 126520 5.99 28.18 4,490 C N EI * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength, D2 EI TYPES OF FRACTURE X/\^/ ABC D E Cone Cone Cone. Shear Columnar & & Split Shear ~p Robert A Golish Sep.27. 2005 2:22PM BRAUN INTERTEC Braun No.5465 p. 13 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 7/15/05 Work Order: 0504210 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Ine 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, MN Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OP): (ASTM C 1064) AU: Temp. (OP): Liquid Added On Site: None Pour Location: Building Interior, Footing grids C-3 to C-l and C-1 to A-I and A-I to A-3 ' 3 6/14/05 Not Given 6/15/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi)~ Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set Cylinders Cast By~ 3000 3/4 FA cemstone 0.1 Not Required 3000 387 4 Client Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method '" Code(s) 3-01 1 6 7 88560 6.00 28..27 3,130 C N D2 3-02 1 27 28 132300 6.00 28.27 4,680 C N El 3-03 I 27 28 136580 6.00 28.27 4,830 B N EI 3-04 1 2 3 52800 6.00 28.27 1,870 C N Al '" Capping Method~ N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break. Remarks: Al D2 El The sample is reported per contractor request. The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE XAI/ ABC D .. E Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar & & Spilt Shear Robert A Golish Sep.27. 2005 2:22PM BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun No.5465 p. 14 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder TestMethod: ASTM C39, 6xl2 Cylinder Report Date: 8/31/05 Work Order: 0506053 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, ~ Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. (OF): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: Sample LocationINotes~ 4 8/2/05 7:20 am 8/3/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By 4067 Cemstone Not Required 4000 521 4 Contractor None Building Interior, Slab on Grade, Cylinders Cast by Cu........ctor, No test results No Data Available for tests, Cast by Contractor Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method * Code( s) 4-01 1 6 7 93170 6.00 28.27 3,300 C N B2 4-02 I 27 28 150120 6,,00 28.27 5,310 C N El 4-03 1 27 28 142840 6..00 28.27 5,050 B N El * Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break. Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. EI TYPES OF FRACTURE X/\A/ ABC D E Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnar & & Split Shear Robert A Golish >._MH'__...______.__"._____.H~"__"_,.,'~"......__..,.-,____..,,....._,,._,_,_.-.--.~_."..~."._"_.H,"'_.,~.. ..._,."~,_~_~,~__.~.._"__..,~....___...''',,".__"_~~.~..~"_,,M.'''__'''''_'_'___''~__' Sep.27. 2005 2:23PM BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun No.5465 p. 15 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6x12 Cylinder Report Date: 8/31/05 Work Order: 0506102 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone ConstIuction Company, Inc 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, MN Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (in.): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OP): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. (DF): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: Sample LocationINotes: 5 8/3/05 12:00 pm 8/4/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set Cylinders Cast By: 6BEQ 3/4 FP Retarder Cemstone Not Required 3000 388 4 Contractor None Building Interior, Slab on Grade, No data available; Cast by Contractor Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ... Code(s) 5-01 1 6 7 99120 6.00 28.27 3,510 B N D2 5-02 1 27 28 138040 6.00 28.27 4,880 C N El 5-03 1 27 28 145190 6.00 28.27 5,140 B N EI Break Remarks: D2 EI ... Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unhanded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE x/\^"/. . ABC D E Cone Cone Cone Shear Columnor & & sprlt Shear ~$ Robert A GoIish Sep.27. 2005 2:23PM BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun No.5465 p. 16 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C39, 6xl2 Cylinder Report Date: 8/31/05 Work Order: 0506103 Client: Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Ine 500 S Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 Project: BL-05-02422 Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake Prior Lake, ~ Field Test Conditions and Results Set Number: Date Cast: Time Cast: Date Received: Measured Slump (ia): (ASTM C143) Measured Air (%): (ASTM C231) Concrete Temp. (OF): (ASTM C 1064) Air Temp. eF): Liquid Added On Site: Pour Location: Sample LocationINotes: 6 8/3/05 6:45 am 8/4/05 o 0.0 o o Mix Design: Supplier: Specified Air (%): Specified Strength (psi): Truck Number: Ticket Number: Cylinders per Set: Cylinders Cast By: 6BEQ 3/4 FP Retarder Cemstone Not Required 3000 748 4 Cv...;""ctor None Building Interior, Slab on Grade, No data available; Cylinders Cast by Contractor Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracmre Capping Remarks Sample No. (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq. in.) (psi) Type Method ., Code(s) 6-01 1 6 7 98790 600 28.27 3,490 C N D2 6-02 1 27 28 139830 6.00 28.27 4,950 C N El 6-03 1 27 28 146970 6.00 28.27 5,200 B N EI ., Capping Method: N = ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S = ASTM C617, Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. EI The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. TYPES OF FRACTURE X/\ 1/ ABC 0 E Cone ,<one Cone Shear CoILllllnar & & Spl~ Shear ~;1t/ Ro~ert A Golish V Sep,27. 2005 2:23PM Braun No.5465 p. 17 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun Inlerlec Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite 101 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.4693644 Fax: 952.469.8599 Web: brauninlertec.com Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 13, 2005 Project: BL-05-02422 Report: 1 Client: Mr. Rich Pelletier Project Description: Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Greystone Construction Cu...upany, Inc. 500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shako-:>ee, MN 55379 I Max. Lab Dry Density~ (Std.Proc.) (pet) 128.3 120.9 120.9 120.9 120.9 Inplace Specified Inplace Dry Relative Minimum Moisture Density Compaction Compact. co:."" 1 (%) (pct) (%) (%) "--- - 7 130 101 98 12 117. 97 98 B 13 116 96 98 B 13 120 99 98 A 12 119 98 98 A I _I OptimUm Moistu~e* (%) Soil ID and . Type Classification Test Date 6/7/05 6/9/05 6/9/05 6/9/05 6/10/05 1 2 2A 2B 3 L N P-l: SP-SM N P-2: SC N P-2: SC N P-2: SC N P-2: SC 9.4 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 ----1_.. N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = O.M. and M.L.D.D, rounded to nearest 0.1 A = Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not cuuq...ly with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. _L EI~vation 940 942 940 942 944 Test Test Location 1 Footing comer fill, 10 'W of SE pad comer 2 Footing comer fill, 10'N, 10'W of SE pad comer 2A Retest of #2 2B Retest of #2 3 Building pad fill, 10'N of SE building comer I I I. I J Technician: TMBIRDA Elevation Reference: Braun Intertec Corporation $t(/71! Robert A. Golish., Err Staff Engineer .. bl0502422\cts-1 .. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 . Sep.27. 2005 2:23PM Bra un No.5465 p. 18 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Braun Inlerlec Corporation 21021 Heren Way Suite 101 lcke'lille, MN 55044 Pnone: 9524693644 Fox: 952.469.8599 Web: brouninlertec.com Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: August 2, 2005 Project: BL-05-02422 Report: 2 Client: Mr. Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc. 500 South. Marschall Road, Suite 300 Shakopee,~ 55379 1 Proj ect Description: Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Greystone Industrial Condos Prior Lake, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. (%) (pel) (%) (pet) (%) (%) Comments - --.....-"'. -.- --_. I____~_,--- 12.2 120.6 11 118 98 95 A 12.2 120.6 11 118 98 95 A 12.2 120.6 12 119 99 95 A 12.2 120.6 14 115 95 95 A 12.2 120.6 12 121 100 95 A 12.5 112.6 12 112 100 95 A 12.5 112.6 11 114 101 95 A Soil ID and Date Type Classification 4 7/27/05 5 7/27/05 6 7/27/05 7 7/27/05 8 7/27/05 9 7/29/05 10 7/29/05 N P-3: SC N P-3: SC N P-4: SC N P-3: SC N P-3: SC N P-5: SP-SM N P-5: SP-SM N = Nuclear, AS1M D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 * = a.M. andM.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 A = Test results comply with specifications. B Test results do not comply with specifications. C = Test results meet zero air voids criteria. . Test Test Location Elevation ., 4 Interior plumbing trench backfill, 35'E, 15'S ofNW comer 5 Interior plumbing trench backfill, 70'S, 20'E ofNW comer 6 Interior plumbing trench backfill, 100'S, 25'E ofNW comer 7 Interior plumbing trench backfill, 150'S, 25'E ofNW comer 8 InteD.or plumbing trench backfill, 100'S, SO'E ofNW comer 9 Floor slab sand cushion, 55 'N, 30'E of SW building comer 10 PlOO! slab sand cushion, 90'N, 30'W ofSWbuilding comer Elevation Reference: b10502422\cts-2 SG SG sG SG SG SG SG Technician: 1MJ Brann Intertec Corporation ~Lt2/ Robert A GOlis~ PE Project Engineer . Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 . Sep.27.2005 2:24PM No.5465 p. 1 9 Bra un BRAUN INTERTEC Braun Intel1ec: Corporation 21021 Heron Way Suite lOJ lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952.4693644 Fox: 952469,8599 Web: brauninlertec.com Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: August 2, 2005 Project: BL-05-02422 Report: 3 Client: Mr. Rich Pelletier Greystone Construction Company, Inc. 500 South Marschall Road, Suite 300 Sbako)ee,~ 55379 Project Description: Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Greystone Industrial Condos . Prior Lake, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Test Date Type Classification (%) (pet) (%) (pet) 11 8/1105 N P-6: SP 9.1 127.1 2 126 12 8/1/05 N P-6: SP 9.1 127.1 2 127 13 8/1/05 N P-6: SP 9.1 127.1 3 123 14 8/1/05 N P-6: SP 9.1 127.1 3 125 Relative Compaction (%) 99 100 97 99 Specified Minimum Compact. (%) Comments 95 A 95 A 95 A 95 A i I ._...._~ N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 SC= Sand Cone, ASlM D 1556 * = a.M. and M.LD.D. rounded to nearest 0.1 A= Test results comply with specifications. B = Test results do not comply with specifications. C Test results meet zero air voids criteria. L Elevation SG SG SG SG Test Test Location 11 Floor slab sand cushion, 170'S, 50'E ofNW building corner 12 Floor slab sand cushion, 140'S, 50'E ofNW building comer 13 Floor slab sand cushion, 80'S, 40'E ofNWbuilding comer 14 Floor slab sand cushion, 10'S, 40'E ofNWbuilding comer Technician: 1MJ Elevation Reference: bl0502422\cts-3 B~~ Robert A. Golish, PE Proj ect Engineer .) Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILJJINlY YEKM.U, TEMPORARY CERl.lJ:llCATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT -b> D b ~, /~. 0 S- ,;::;(.,6" iJ/ ~.s. u 4-B9 I. WIlli. Fil. I PERMIT NG. ~ ~ ~~\~.. ~~~h"N . 05. O-.J / ~ 10:04 9524474245 P.01/01 Lll:lU; 1'.~\.o u (Plcilse tYpe or prim and si~n ilf bonom) ADDRESS /7/28 Ilf)ELIrlf).N ST/(ECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) LOT BLOCK ADDITION OWNER (Name) (Address) , ZONING (<lfficc UIC) PID '2..6. 4-31. (Jot. G (Phone) __ ~Cr:~: Name) CASCAD EVES 1 G Nt I f\J C. (Contact Name) 130B yv\, C CAn..u.LH\.. .. (Addfess) /576 7 2.2..8 t:!'" All e. N ()J (Phone) 657..13S5- 320 I (Phone)6S1 - 2 'if!> .. 70'l. '-f eLK f<.,II/IS"/lt I?1N 65330 - , - TYPE OF WORK 0 New Constnlcnon ODeck o Porch ORe-Roofing ORe-Siding DLower Levc:l Finish 0 Fi~eplace OAddition DAlteration DUtiliry Connection CODE: oI.R.C. Or.B.C. Type of Con$b11aion: Occupancy Group: A B Division: J E nIIV H I 2 3 V M 4 A B R S U 5 o Mi<r PROJECT COST IV ALOE (excluding land) ~ /7 ZtJ.O ~ , n F 1 I hereby cenify thar I Mv.! Iumi~he<l Iniormauon Iln Ihis appliulion which 11 III lhe be.1 of my lCn\Jwlcdge lnle ~nd corrCCl I alsQ c~nify lh.t I am Ihe IlWn~T ur aUlhllnz~-d all~'I11 for lhe above'lII~'IDned p p lY And that ,\11 COOSI iOll will conform 10 all exisung Slale and locall.\W$ and will proceed in acclJI'dallct wilh rubmltl(d plans. I am (\war~ rhatthc building :'1ict'...., -. 0 ~~: call FLIllhcrmorc, 11Iereby agrec tl1allllt ellY offici.1\ or a designee C ;;77 Ihe propmy to perfo(J:7~ D.L .. Sign~ COn[l'aCIOr's Lil:ense No. Dale, I Permit ValuBtion I Permit F~e I Plan Check Fee I State Surcharge I PenaltY' Plumbing Permit Fee MechanicafPermit Fee I Sewer-&: Water Permit Fee _u ,. Gas Fireplace Permit Fee ./'I (' sA. onB $ $ S S S $ S S 17$ ~. (!)CJ 'QcttJ .il) J f ,.. 5fj 8. TD -. Yom .~"'P:-~~^Z~ -L1~tc r l'ark Support Fee SAC # # S $ S $ S Water Meter Size 5/8"; In; I PressurcReducer I Sewer/Water ConneCtion Fe~ I Water Tower Fee I Builder's Deposit S I Ocher FI nlE p no T t.C.tJON $ I TOTAL DUE Paid ~89--f:f ~ Da.te t; . z.::r or # # s s tfM. 8"1 Receipt No. BY~ This IS 10 cenify thallllc I'cque~l in Ihe abuvc appl~t1on and .cellmp;lnYlnQ doeumcnls IS an Jceordanc~ wllh Ill~ CilY Zunin" Ordlnallcc and m~y proceed ~S rC'IIU:.'lcd. TIlls dllcumclIl when Signed by Ihe City PI~nn~r conslll\He$ J ltmporan' C;~I'llicJle or ZUllln!: cumplmnce .nd all\Jw! cunSlrUClIon to comm~nce, Before \lCCUpJncy. a C~'l1lric.11t: nf OC~'\lp\llley mUSI be i.~ucd Planning Dire~ltlr DOlc Special Condiliol\.~. if:lllY :14 hour n<llkc fuc all inspectil/n~ (9$2).&47-98:;0, rllJ (1)52) 447.-1245 TOTAL P.01 d ~Rll6 t:O~ U t!j ~NNESV 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714 Fire Sprinkler Plan Review Date: June 22, 2005 . Owner: Greystone Location: 17158 Adelman. Prior Lake MN. Contractor: Cascade Design In. 15767 228th Ave. MW Elk River MN 55330 Contact: Bob McCargan (651) 248-7024 1. Separate permits are required for the alarm system. 2. Separate Permits required for temate finishes 3. The 1999 ofNFPA 13 shall be the standard. 4. All materials shall be tested and installed per the listing. 5. All valves controlling water flow shall be monitored and secured including the PIV. 6. It is the responsibility of the fire sprinkler contractor to flush all main and branch lines. 7. Provide frost protection for all portions of the wet system. 8. Field verify all head locations. 9. Secure all valves against tampering. All valves in public areas shall be locked 10. Provide a water resistant system plan at the each sprinkler riser to include the following information. . Total site plan . All valves . Riser locations . Areas served by individual risers . All main and auxiliary drains . Location of inspector's test 10. For inspections call (952) 447-9850 give the project permit number (05-0483) www.cityofpriorlake.com Phone 952,447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245 SYsTC:M ACCEPTANCE 13-03 Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for A boveground Piping PROCeDURE UJ:on comcleuon 01 'Hork. insoeClon and ,es:s snail ce maoe oy r/'1e conrrac:or's represenlauve and 'N'lnessad oy an owner'S recresenraove. All deiec:s snail be corre<::e<l and sys:em leit In sal"'/lce oe/ore. conlrac:or's personnel finally leave rne iCO. A certificate shall be tilled out and saqned by coltl reoresenratives. Cooles snail be preoared lor aoorevlng aultlonries. owners. ana conrrac:cr. It is understood tlle owner's recresanraave's slgnallJre In no 'Hay prejudices any calm a.;a.ns: c:nrrac:cr lor taulty malenal. ;loor workmans:1io. or tatlure to comoly 'Hltll accrov,ng autllonl'(s reoUlremencs or local ordinances. DA,= PROP:RTYNAME OEER.F/EtO 111I0. PAIlK PROP:RIf ADDRESS /7 I j-aJ) DE /"/YJ h IV S r : ACCE?TED BY APPAO'/IN<iAUTrlCRI;IJ1;.S (NAMES) Jt'J1/ I Clt" Y (J F rn,1 on L.q <- t ; ADDRESS PUoNS : INSTALLATION CONFORMS ,0 AC:::E?TEO PLANS : EOUIPMENT USED IS APPROVED : IF NO. EXPLAIN DEVIATIONS ~ Y:S .~ v:s NO ,'lO . HAS PERSON IN CHARGe: OF FIRE EQUIPMENT aEEN INSTRUCTEO AS I TO LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES AND CARE AND MArNTENANCS : OF THIS ,'lEW SQUIPMENT? .,. ! IF NO, EXPLAIN .~ YES NO .' INSTRUCTIONS ! HAVE COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING aE=N L=~ ON IHE PREMISES: : 1. SYSTEM C:JMPONENTS INSTRUCTIONS 2. CARE AND MAINT=NANCS INSTRUCTIONS 3. NF."A 2S yo::- ,'lO -:> ';,L '-'0::- NO '-:> - ~ ,-,0::- - NO .-:> - ~ ,-,0::- ~ NO , -:> - MAKe ,'I CO MODEL : "TY~ L I'. L I /J(/ILLJ/N~ Y:AR OF OFiIF!C: MANUFACTURE SIZE 21'JDS 'Y L- CUANII,y It..! '-I . . T=MPE~ATURE RATING I~ r LOCATION OF SYSTEM : SUPPLIES SUILDINGS I EA/i/Il.t S?RINKL::."lS r PIPE AND FITTINGS i Type 0/ Pipe I Type 01 Finings srct:<- C4Sf/" I/Ul;v I f-F-J . (I (f'/ ! TYPE ALARM DEVICE I . MAKE !,PdTTt'h. MODEL V5!~ MAXIMUM TIME ,0 OPSRAT:: .. THRCuGH T::sr CONNECTION MIN. Se:C. ALARM VALVE OR FLOW INDICATOR ~ I Milt I MAKE I DRY VALVE I MODEL SERIAL NO. MAKE 0.0.0 MODEL SERIAL NO. I \Wilhouti 0.0.0,1 .1 With I 0,0.0,; IIF NO. EXPLAIN TIME TO TRIP I THROUGH TEST CONNECTlON" MIN. I SEC. I I WATe:R PRESSURE PSI AIR PRESSURE PSI TRIP POINT AIR PRESSURE PSI TIME WA,Ci'l REACHED TEST OUTLS'. MIN. SEC. ALARM OPERATED PROP:RLY YES NO "MEASURED FROM TIME INSPECTOR'S TEST CONNECTION IS OPENED. fi~re 3-1(~). I OP'!:i'lATlC,N ;>NEI.JM..nc: ~ EL.Ecr;l1C n HYC"'..ul.:C I "'P'NG SUP~RVISEO YES ':-: NO I CETECilNG MEDIA SUP~RVISEO ~I ooes 'JAWE CP~~Are ;ReM nie MA~AL ~IP ANO/CA i'lEMOTe ~ thCONTflOL SiATlCNS ;~e . N IS ~ei'lE"'N "C::ESS:8l" ;"C:UTY IN CAC;! C:AC:JIT I IF .'40. "XP......,N A I FaA rcSOING . = '/ES = NO ! i cces SACH C:FlCUITCP~i'lA.e :ces CAC;! C:RC:.;'T .'.IAKE : .IofOCE~ :;UP~.~VISlCN lOSS "UAM OP!:i'lArE "AL'IE .:;e~SlSe '/~S .\40 "ES "'0 '"",~",_~'lv'.'"Jr ., c....,..__I~.Jo.~.c....."" "ES I .'10 = Y!:S = .'40 ',u,XIMU,1.4 ;';.I.4E -0 .:i2'E.=lA ia :;eL.:.'\Sc '_'1'1, ie':. " l rj/): LCC..nCN, MAXe ~ ' ;>q ~'S Fl ..1 ':=LCOA : "'COEL ' :; !J: :. I - '/ ',.;- S i . . I o .:JESCRIPrrCN :"cS;"S SUNK TESTiNG G~Si(~7S WE~CING cuoours (OISCSI HYDRAULIC o...r... N...ME?UTE RE........;:;KS SIGNATUAES 3ET1CNG : S....TlC pqESSUAE ;!ESICU"L ;>qESSUAE IFI_~WINGI Ii'lL", (PSII CUR,,: :P5111 .=!"CW;:!..lTZ 'NLCo'IPS/) OUTL:, (PSIJ ;toW'G?'_1 iSSi' J.fYr!~nST.J.n~. Hydl'a3QOC :.~LS smld be m.Jcf. ~r not re-s.s trI;n 2CO as! (I J.S b.rsl!a:,""'O Mours ~!O::sa 13.... oalll ~Qov., SQOC eteUUt. 1/'1 'ICe:sJ ot r ~o 0$1 f t 0.2' bus) lOt :""0 noy,s. Cin.,ennal cryo.QlC. vaN., -:.:l:CO.tS J,.'~" :'e I,,, o~..., C<Jnnq le,llo ",...", d.m.q". "Y .oo-."9'Guncl C100nq 'ul<OIq" ,nail O. SIOl>~e<I. ;:JN~rlM~nl.~ :sQO'isn.u] e31 12.;" o.vs. .a... :t~.suilt ;11<1 mea,ut~ dtoo. """,mG." sn;:d "or ~:rc~eoa I.:rz :" fO.1 ~;tSI in 24 hours. :-.sr ::tn.sUl. IVl)u ]I nOf'mal w'a'e1' 1.'Vet ,,"a ,aU' ".~.sU(. ana m'!...SUle IJI ;:tu.suu ClCQ. wnac:'l sn;l& no( ~;IC:eed '.1/2 :.$1 fO.1 :3,slln 241'10U1"5. ALL ?IPoNG HYOAOs;"..nC"lLY TcSTi:O..r Z-DS:L- ?SI ~CA 2- ;.!AS. OAY PIPING i'Nel.JM....nC.:.LL.( rasn:a i::J YES C ."0 ;CUIPYENT CPE.'I,4rcS ;:>qOP!:.:;LY ; , '(:S U NO pt. 7)~~ IF .'JO. STAi"E .~E."S(;N 00 you C::.:;TlF'(.lS:");E S?A'NKLE;:; CCNr::t"CrOfl r.....r ..comVES "NO C::':;;;OS:VE C:"E!olIOLS. SOOIUM S:uC,>.rE CA OE3,v..nves CF SCCIUM SIL;C.>..<=. 3AINE. OA 0 r"'E.'l C::;;:;F;CSiVE .::..e.'-'C':'L5 WE,:;E NOT USeD ;CR TcSOING SYS.e....S CR srCPPING L:..lKS? !25 YES :~.'l() OA':"N IAE),OII'lG CF GACe ~cc...rco NE;.A 'N...rEn ; AESIOUAL ;>RESSU;:;E Wlni "AL''ioIlL?ES. .EST I SUPPLY rcSTC::;NNE.:nCN: .a::z:.....,?SI! CONNEC7iCN CP!:N WIOE / ~ ;>:1 UNOEnG::tOUNO ."'A'NS "NO LSlO IN CCNNEC7iCNS TO S"S.".-:I AISe,:;S '=~us;,e:J =e.~ CONNECTION M"OE TO S?RINKL:i'l ?IPING. i VE,:;IFIEO ay CCP'" CF ;-";E 'J '=OAM NO. 3~a YES 'C.'lO : orHE.:; FLUSHEO 3Y INS.AlL::.'I CF IJNOER. G::tOUNO S;>AINKlE::l ;>'PING '} _/ :.~PU'N :=:] YES CJ NO n NO 'F .'10. "X?'.....IN IF ?OWOE.'! OAIVEN ':A5T::."E.'IS "AE US eO IN CCNC;;Ej"'e. HAS ;tEi'~E3e.~T..\rrvE S~MPl= TESTING aEEN S...i1S;:AC7CAIL'( C:JMPLSTi:D? YES , . '- NUMBE.=! usee ~ : Lcc...nCNS ~ ....uM6a.~ MEMOV!O WELDED PIPING ;K YES ;.....J NO IFYES.,. OC YCU CERTIFY AS ;-";E S;>qINXL:R CCNT;:;ACTOR ;"H..r WELCING :g Y:5 PRCCEDUAES CCMPlY Wlni !'HE MECUIRE~ENTS OF....r LSlST - .\40 "'WS 0 10.9. LE"E~....;:;.J? CO YOU c::.qTIFY !'H....r ;-";E WE~OING w"S ?Ei'lFOAMEO BY WELOEi'lS CUAUFIED IN CCMPLIANCS 'Nlni THE i'lECUIAE.',IENTS OF"T LE),ST A ve- 0 NO .-> ....WS 010.9. LEVEL"M')? 00 you CE.'!nFY ;'HAT WELOING w..s C...AAIEO OUT iN CCMP~IANCe WITH.... OOCUMENiED CUAUTY C:JNT;:;OL PROCeOURE TO INSUAE il! YES ,--. Tl-I.:.T ....LL OISCS "'IE MEi";:;IEVEO. rH"TCPENINGS IN PIPING "AE --' .\40 SMeOrH. !'H...r SUG "NO orHE.'l WELOING ilES:OUE ),;:;E .:;EMOVEo, '>'1'10 Tl-IA r!'HE INrEilNAl Of.oloMETi:ilS OF ?IPING ....AE Nor PENE.;!.... T,,(J? ..- 00 '(OU ce::tTlFY ;-";..T YCU HAVE'" CONT;:;OL ;e),T1JAE TO jK:. Y:5 =:J NO ENSURE rHAT "'lL C:JTCUTS (OISCS) MIE ilEi"illE'IEO? N),ME?Ure ?ROVlOEO IF NO. EXPl),IN J(J YES 0 NO OAre L:rT IN Sc::lVICS 'Nlni ALL CONTACL VALVES OPEN: '1"'2tj~r CAS ci/IJcoNri3t!s/ t:A/ I M(. ~ TESTS WITNESSEO BY ~:~~~ ,_-' g -0$ Fr.fl S?RIf'lKLS'l ,t.;.. -' ..OOIT:CN....L EXPUN....T1CN "NO N Alarm/Fire Sprinkler Inspection Check list Project: \11st> W~ eJ Address: Occupancy type: Date: Pennit # Final Inspection: Turn around test: Call Scott Co. Dispatch (952) 445-1411 (PLST) set up test. ( new dispatchers may need instruction) Flow Test: Local alarm in (1) minute flY Dispatch call in 5 minutes: t> t.c.. Door hold opens relersf plt-' Fire dampers closeQJ4\ Additional Alarms and detectors: Smoke detector at panel~other _ Duct detectorsM t:.- Horn & strobe at the Fire Department connection L Horns & strobes through the building In rest rooms ~? ~ 7.3 auxiliary drains over 5 gal: test (40 lbs.- 24hr., max. loss 2lbs) ) minute to inspector's test_ Other items: All valves and drains Marked System map a risers N~- Secured riser location and valves: 6 L __, / No Parking Fire Zone signs at F.D.C. fIJ-eevr te.s. 73 - $\d\.L- 82 Job Name Building Location System Contract Data File II _ _ _ Fi re Protecti on by Computer Oesi gn CASCADE DESIGN, INC 15767 228TH AVE NW ELK RIVER, MN 55330 651-855-3201 . Deerfield 17158 ADELMAN STREET PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA DeerfielWX1 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield Page Date Hvdraulic Desian Information Sheet Name - DEERFIELD INDUSTRIAL PARK Location - 17158 ADELMAN STREET PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA Building - Contractor - CASCADE DESIGN, INC Calculated By - RGM Construction: ( ) Combustible (X) Non-Combustible Occupancy - MERCANTILE Date - 6-10-05 System No. - Contract No. - Drawing No. - 1 of 1 Ceiling Height - 17' S Y S T E M (Xl NFPA ( 1 NFPA Other Specific 13 231 Lt. Haz. NFPA 231C Ord.Haz.Gp. ( ) Figure ( ) 1 (X) 2 ( ) 3 Curve ( ) Ex. Haz. Ruling Made By Date -~---._- Spr i nkl-er-7N-c;.z z 1 e Make TYCO Model TY-L Size 1/2" NPT K-Factor 5.6 Temp.Rat.165 --------.,----. Area of Sprinkler Operation - 1500 Density - .20 Area Per Sprinkler - 125 Elevation at Highest Outlet - 17' Hose Allowance - Inside Rack Sprinkler Allowance Hose Allowance - Outside - 250 System Type (X) Wet ( ) Dry ( ) Deluge ( ) Pre action ( ) Other D E S I G N Note Calculation Summary Flow Required - C-Factor Used: 120 Press Required - Overhead 140 Underground W A T E R Water Flow Test: Pump Data: Date of Test - 4-13-05 Time of Test - 10:00 ~~ated Cap.- Static Press tttd 0 -:-p ~ Press - Residual Press 56 1" Elev. - Flow 0 Elevation - 0 Tank or Reservoir: Cap. - Elev.- Well Proof Flow S U P P L Y Location - AT THE SITE Source of Information - CITY OF PRIOR LAKE WATER DEPARTMENT C o M M Commodity Storage Ht. Storage Method: Class Area Location Aisle W. Palletized % Rack Solid Piled % ~- - ) Conven. Pallet ) Slave Pallet ( ) Auto. Storage ( ) Solid Shelf ( ) Open Shelf ) Encap. ) Non S T o R A G E R A C K Single Row Double Row Mult. Row Flue Spacing Longitudinal Clearance:Storage to Ceiling Transverse Horizontal Barriers Provided: Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 1 061005 Water Supply Curve (C) CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield Page 2 Date 061005 City Water Supply: C1 - Static Pressure . 80 C2 - Residual Pressure: 56 C2 - Residual Flow 3160 150 I 01 - Elevation 7.363 , 140 02 - System Flow : 283.729 I I 02 - System Pressure 36.561 I 130 Hose ( Adj City) - Hose ( Demand) P 120 03 - System Demand : 283.729 I Safety Margin 43.162 ! R 110 i I E 100 I I S 90 - C1 i S 80 ,e '- -- I u 70 r I I R 60 -' ,.. " L I &-- E 50 40 n., r 30 20 10 (0 Lq1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 FLOW ( N ^ 1.85 ) Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Flow Diagram CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield 25 19 <- 16 25.1 18 <- 12 25 17<-4 22,9 69,5 13 <- 14 <- 15 <- 16 <- 6 46 94S I 189 23 69,7 I 9 <- 10 <- 11 <- 12 <-7 46,1 94,7 22.9 69.5 94.5 283.7 <-2 <-3 <-4 <- 5 <- 6 <-7 <-8 <- TEST 46 94,5 189 283,7 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Page Date 3 061005 Fittings Used Summary CASCADE DESIGN, INC Page 4 Deerfield Date 061005 Fitting Legend Abbrev Name '12 :y. 1 1% 1'12 2 2'12 3 3'12 4 5 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 -"---- ----- ---- --- -------- -- ---- ---- B Generic Butterfly Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 12 9 10 12 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 E 90' Standard Elbow 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 18 22 27 35 40 45 50 61 G Generic Gate Valve 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 13 S Generic Swing Check Vlv 4 5 5 7 9 11 14 16 19 22 27 32 45 55 65 76 87 98 109 130 T 90' Flow Thru Tee 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 17 20 25 30 35 50 60 71 81 91 101 121 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Pressure I Flow Summary - STANDARD CASCADE DESIGN, INC Page 5 Deerfield Date 061005 Node Elevation K-Fact pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual Actual ReQ. -- -- .------------ --,..------ - -~-_._---- ---"---"_. 19 17.0 5.6 19.93 na 25.0 .2000 125.00 7.000 18 17.0 5.6 20.02 na 25.06 .2000 125.00 7000 17 17.0 5.6 19.9 na 24.98 .2000 125.00 7.000 13 17,0 5.6 16.76 na 22.93 .2000 125.00 7.000 14 17,0 5.6 16.96 na 23.06 ,2000 125.00 7.000 15 170 5.6 17.67 na 23.54 ,2000 125.00 7,000 16 17,0 20.17 na 9 17.0 5.6 16.84 na 22.98 .2000 125.00 7.000 10 170 5.6 1704 na 23.11 .2000 125.00 7.000 11 17.0 5.6 17.75 na 23.59 .2000 125.00 7.000 12 17.0 20.27 na 1 17.0 5.6 16.74 na 22.91 .2000 125.00 7.000 2 17.0 5.6 16.93 na 23.04 .2000 125.00 7.000 3 17.0 5.6 17.64 na 23.52 .2000 125.00 7.000 4 17.0 20.15 na 5 17.0 21.06 na 6 17.0 2109 na 7 17,0 21.18 na 8 17.0 28.88 na TEST 0.0 36.56 na The maximum velocity is 10.06 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 11 and 12 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final 'Calculations - Standard CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield Page 6 Date 061005 Qt Pf/UL Fitting or Eqv. Ln. Pipe Ftng's Total pt Pe Pf pt Pv Pn ******* Notes ****** Hyd. Ref. Point Qa Dia. lie" 19 25.00 1.682 1T 9.9 2.410 19.930 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 16 25.0 0.0197 0.0 12.310 0.243 Vel = 3.61 ------_._~-- - -- -~---~_._-,--_._---- 0.0 25.00 20.173 K Factor = 5.57 ---- ------_...._~-. --~------,- -.---.-.-.,--' . 18 25.06 1.682 1T 9.9 2.410 20.022 K Factor = 5,60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 12 25.06 0.0198 0.0 12.310 0,244 Vel = 3.62 _._-~- ------_.__._--~-,.._.._---_._---~-_._.------ ._-_.~-_. ---~.__._----- 0.0 25.06 20.266 K Factor = 5.57 17 24.98 1.682 1T 9.9 2.410 19.904 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 4 24.98 0.0197 0.0 12.310 0.243 Vel = 3.61 ----------_...-,-.--------- -'. 0.0 24.98 20.147 K Factor = 5.57 --- -.---.----- .-.--- ___n__ _ _____ ____,_,..._.______ --...-----.-.---.~---- 13 22.93 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.760 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 22.93 0.0168 0.0 11.660 0.196 Vel = 3.31 14 23.06 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.956 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 45.99 0.0610 0.0 11.660 0.711 Vel = 6.64 -'- 15 23.53 1.682 1T 9.9 9.250 17.667 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 16 69.52 0.1309 0.0 19.150 2.506 Vel = 10.04 __..____n__.___ -------..--..--" -~_. ....-------- ....----.-- ---- ------- ---- - ----------'--- ---.-- - -- ----~.._--._--_.~- .._--- .'-. 16 25.00 2.157 1T 12.307 1.000 20.173 to 120 0.0 12.307 0.0 6 94.52 0.0688 0.0 13.307 0.915 Vel = 8,30 0.0 94.52 21.088 K Factor = 20.58 9 22.98 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.839 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 22.98 0.0168 0.0 11.660 0.196 Vel = 3.32 ___u_____ __.n --,----- _____._.n___.. - ...------.. _____u_.______..... 10 23.11 1.682 0.0 11 .660 17.035 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 46.09 0.0612 0.0 11.660 0.714 Vel = 6.65 _"__ .._. ____ .n. .-._------" 11 23.60 1.682 1T 9.9 9.250 17.749 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 12 69.69 0.1314 0.0 19.150 2.517 Vel = 10.06 12 25.05 2.157 1T 12.307 1.000 20.266 to 120 0.0 12.307 0.0 7 94.74 0.0691 0.0 13,307 0.919 Vel = 8.32 _ _____n______..______"_~"____ 0.0 94.74 21.185 K Factor = 20.58 ____uo__ ------ . -----~-_.-------------------- ---~. ,,--- ----- ---.-"--.- ------- 1 22.91 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.739 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 22.91 0.0167 0.0 11.660 0.195 Vel = 3.31 2 2305 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.934 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 45.96 0.0609 0.0 11.660 0.710 Vel = 6.64 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Standard CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield Page 7 Date 061005 Qt Pf/UL Fitting or Eqv. Ln. Pipe Ftng's Total Pt Pe Pf pt Pv Pn ******* Notes ****** Hyd. Ref. Point Qa Dia. II e" 3 23.52 1.682 1T 9.9 9.250 17.644 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 4 69.48 0.1307 0.0 19.150 2.503 Vel = 10.03 --- 4 24.98 2.157 1T 12.307 1,000 20.147 to 120 0.0 12.307 0.0 5 94.46 0.0687 0.0 13.307 0.914 Vel = 8.29 -- ~-----'--'----~--- ~~---_.~- ..... 5 0.0 4.26 0.0 10.750 21.061 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 94.46 0.0025 0.0 10.750 0.027 Vel = 2.13 --....---- .-- --.-- ---- 6 94.53 4.26 0.0 10.750 21.088 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 188.99 0.0090 0.0 10.750 0.097 Vel = 4.25 _._---~--_._---_._._. 7 94.74 4.26 6E 79.002 276.410 21.185 to 120 18 15.8 126.404 0.0 8 283.73 0.0191 1G 2.633 402.814 7.699 Vel = 6.39 1S 28.968 -- -------~.. ----- --.-------- ~---~-_._--_.._._..- 8 0.0 6.09 0.0 80.000 28.884 to 140 1G 4.071 44.778 7.363 TEST 283.73 0.0025 1T 40.707 124.778 0.314 Vel = 3.13 .0 283.73 36.561 K Factor = 46.92 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Job Name Building Location System Contract Data File II _ _ _ Fi re Prolecli on by Compuler Desi gn CASCADE DESIGN, INC 15767 228TH AVE NW ELK RIVER, MN 55330 651-855-3201 . Deerfield 17158 ADELMAN STREET PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA Deerfiel.WX1 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield Page Date Hvdraulic Desiqn Information Sheet Date - 6-10-05 Name - DEERFIELD INDUSTRIAL PARK Location - 17158 ADELMAN STREET PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA Building - Contractor - CASCADE DESIGN, INC Calculated By - RGM Construction: ( ) Combustible (X) Non-Combustible Occupancy - MERCANTILE S y S T E M (X) NFPA ( ) NFPA Other Specific 13 231 Lt. Haz. NFPA 231C Ord.Haz.Gp. ( ) Figure Ruling Area of Sprinkler Operation - 1500 Density - .20 Area Per Sprinkler - 125 Elevation at Highest Outlet - 17' Hose Allowance - Inside Rack Sprinkler Allowance Hose Allowance - Outside D E S I G N - 250 Note System No. - Contract No. - Drawing No. - 1 of 1 Ceiling Height - 17' ( ) 1 (X) 2 ( ) 3 Curve ( ) Ex. Haz . Made By Date ------ Sprinkler/Nozzle Make TYCO Model TY-L Size 1/2" NPT K-Factor 5.6 Temp.Rat.165 System Type (X) Wet ( ) Dry ( ) Deluge ( ) preaction ( ) Other Calculation Surrunary Flow Required - C-Factor Used: 120 Press Required - Overhead 140 Underground Water Flow Test: Date of Test - 4-13-05 Time of Test - 10:00 Static Press - 80 Residual Press - 56 Flow - 3160 Elevation - 0 Pump Data: W A T E R S U P P L Y C 0 M M S R T A 0 C R K A G E Rated Cap.- @ Press Elev. Location - AT THE SITE Tank or Reservoir: Cap. - E1ev.- Well Proof Flow Source of Information - CITY OF PRIOR LAKE WATER DEPARTMENT Class Area Corrunodity Storage Ht. Storage Method: Solid Piled Single Row Double Row Mult. Row --_..~--_._--- ) Conven. Pallet ) Slave Pallet Fl ue Spacing Longitudinal Horizontal Barriers Provided: % Location Aisle W. Palletized % Rack ( ) Auto. Storage ( ) Solid Shelf ( ) Open Shelf Encap. Non Clearance:Storage to Ceiling Transverse Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 1 061005 Water Supply Curve (C) CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield City Water Supply: C1 - Static Pressure . 80 C2 - Residual Pressure: 56 C2 - Residual Flow 3160 150 t 140 130 P 120 i R 110 E 1 00 f S 90 C1 80 --_ S U 70 R 60 t E 50 ~ r n? :: I-I - 20 10 . 01 400 800 1600 1200 ..:.- --- 2000 2400 FLOW ( N ^ 1.85 ) 01 - Elevation 02 - System Flow 02 - System Pressure Hose (Adj City) Hose ( Demand) 03 - System Demand Safety Margin ,.. " Page 2 Da~ 061005 7.363 283.729 36.561 283.729 43.162 2800 3200 I I I 3600 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Flow Diagram CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield 25 19 .-- 16 25.1 18 .-- 12 25 17 .--4 22.9 69.5 13 .-- 14 .-- 15 .-- 16 .-- 6 46 94.!t I 189 23 69,7 I 9 .-- 10 .-- 11 .-- 12 .--7 46.1 94,7 22.9 69.5 94.5 283.7 .--2 .--3 .--4 .-- 5 .-- 6 .--7 .--8 .-- TEST 46 94,5 189 283,7 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Page Date 3 061005 Fittings Used Summary CASCADE DESIGN, INC Page 4 Deerfield Date 061005 Fitting Legend Abbrev Name '12 % 1 1'/. 1'12 2 2'12 3 3'12 4 5 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 ,-- ---_.~-_._--~._- ----------------- -------- -- B Generic Butterfly Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 12 9 10 12 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 E 90' Standard Elbow 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 18 22 27 35 40 45 50 61 G Generic Gate Valve 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 13 S Generic Swing Check Vlv 4 5 5 7 9 11 14 16 19 22 27 32 45 55 65 76 87 98 109 130 T 90' Flow Thru Tee 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 17 20 25 30 35 50 60 71 81 91 101 121 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Pressure I Flow Summary - STANDARD CASCADE DESIGN, INC Page 5 Deerfield Date 061005 Node Elevation K-Fact pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual _.~~-. -,--- Actual Req. .._.~-_.--'- ----------- - - - 19 17.0 5.6 19.93 na 25.0 .2000 125.00 7.000 18 17.0 5.6 20.02 na 25.06 .2000 125.00 7.000 17 17.0 5.6 19.9 na 24.98 .2000 125.00 7.000 13 17.0 56 16.76 na 22.93 .2000 125.00 7.000 14 17.0 5.6 16.96 na 23.06 .2000 125.00 7.000 15 17.0 5.6 17.67 na 23.54 .2000 125.00 7,000 16 170 20,17 na 9 17.0 56 16.84 na 22.98 .2000 125.00 7.000 10 17,0 5.6 17.04 na 23.11 .2000 125.00 7.000 11 17.0 5.6 17.75 na 23.59 .2000 125.00 7.000 12 17.0 20.27 na 1 17.0 5.6 16.74 na 22.91 .2000 125.00 7.000 2 17.0 5.6 16.93 na 23.04 .2000 125.00 7.000 3 17.0 5.6 17.64 na 23.52 .2000 125.00 7.000 4 17.0 20.15 na 5 17.0 21.06 na 6 17.0 21.09 na 7 17.0 21.18 na 8 17.0 28.88 na TEST 0.0 36.56 na The maximum velocity is 10.06 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 11 and 12 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Standard CASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield Page 6 Date 061005 Qt Pf/UL Fitting or Eqv. Ln. Pipe Ftng's Total Pt Pe Pf pt Pv Pn ******* Notes ****** Hyd. Ref. Point Qa Dia. "C" 19 25.00 1.682 1T 9.9 2.410 19.930 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 16 25.0 0.0197 0.0 12.310 0.243 Vel = 3.61 .---_...---_..-_. --- -.'-"------ 0.0 25.00 20.173 K Factor = 5.57 .__ u___.__..____ ---- _.-~--_...~- -- ---.---.--...--.------ -- 18 25.06 1.682 1T 9.9 2.410 20.022 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 12 25.06 0.0198 0.0 12.310 0.244 Vel = 3.62 - , - --------.--....- ~-_._.- -------.---.-'.'.'. 0.0 25.06 20.266 K Factor = 5.57 17 24.98 1.682 1T 9.9 2.410 19.904 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 4 24.98 0.0197 0.0 12.310 0.243 Vel = 3.61 .-----.- ._--~.._--- 0.0 24.98 20.147 K Factor = 5.57 . ---- --...------.---- .----- _.---- .---........ --- -_.~-- -~--~ m_____. ______..__ 13 22.93 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.760 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 22.93 0.0168 0.0 11.660 0.196 Vel = 3.31 - 14 23.06 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.956 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 45.99 0.0610 0.0 11.660 0.711 Vel = 6.64 _ ________u_.'__ ,.__ - 15 23.53 1.682 1T 9.9 9.250 17.667 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 16 69.52 0.1309 0.0 19.150 2.506 Vel = 10.04 ----_._-----~-- - ----~._-_. -----------. --- --------.--- 16 25.00 2.157 1T 12.307 1.000 20.173 to 120 0.0 12.307 0.0 6 94.52 0.0688 0.0 13.307 0.915 Vel = 8.30 0.0 94.52 21 .088 K Factor = 20.58 9 22.98 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.839 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 22.98 0.0168 0.0 11.660 0.196 Vel = 3.32 -_.------ .-' _.-- ---... ~._-_._._----_._- __._n._ _____.__________..'._ 10 23.11 1.682 0.0 11.660 17,035 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 46.09 0.0612 0.0 11.660 0.714 Vel = 6.65 -----...--...- - 11 23.60 1.682 1T 9.9 9.250 17.749 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 12 69.69 0.1314 0.0 19.150 2.517 Vel = 10.06 12 25.05 2.157 1T 12.307 1.000 20.266 to 120 0.0 12.307 0.0 7 94.74 0.0691 0.0 13.307 0.919 Vel = 8.32 0.0 94.74 21.185 K Factor = 20.58 ----~--- ---- '.-.._- --.--..------.'-- 1 22.91 1.682 0.0 11 .660 16.739 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 22.91 0.0167 0.0 11.660 0.195 Vel = 3.31 2 2305 1.682 0.0 11.660 16.934 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 45.96 0.0609 0.0 11.660 0.710 Vel = 6.64 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Standard GASCADE DESIGN, INC Deerfield Page 7 Date 061005 Qt Pf/UL Fitting or Eqv. Ln. Pipe Ftng's Total Pt Pe Pf pt Pv Pn ******* Notes ****** Hyd. Ref. Point Qa Dia. II e" 3 23.52 1.682 1T 9.9 9.250 17.644 K Factor = 5.60 to 120 0.0 9.900 0.0 4 69.48 0.1307 0.0 19.150 2.503 Vel = 10.03 4 24.98 2.157 1T 12.307 1.000 20.147 to 120 0.0 12.307 0.0 5 94.46 0.0687 0.0 13.307 0.914 Vel = 8.29 -.....- ---~-,...--_._--_.__..._~ ---~--_._--_. ___.0"__- 5 0.0 4.26 0.0 10.750 21.061 to 120 0,0 0.0 0.0 6 94.46 0.0025 0.0 10.750 0.027 Vel = 2.13 ------- ----~_._--_. .. ___ "0" ___.~.~_____.______..__ _..__..~-- 6 94.53 4.26 0.0 10.750 21.088 to 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 7 188.99 0.0090 0.0 10.750 0.097 Vel = 4.25 7 94.74 4.26 6E 79.002 276.410 21.185 to 120 18 15.8 126.404 0.0 8 283.73 0.0191 1G 2,633 402.814 7,699 Vel = 6.39 1S 28.968 - ---- -----.- ---.,.----- _____.u____ __________.....n_. 8 0.0 6.09 0.0 80.000 28.884 to 140 1G 4.071 44.778 7.363 TEST 283.73 0.0025 1T 40.707 124.778 0.314 Vel = 3.13 .0 283.73 36.561 K Factor = 46.92 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 tlleol Fire & Building / Products Technical Services: Tel: (800) 381-9312/ Fax: (800) 791-5500 Series TY-L - 5.6 and 8.0 K-factor Upright, Pendent, and Recessed Pendent Sprinklers Standard Response, Standard Coverage General Description The Series TY-L, 5.6 and 8.0 K-factor, Upright and Pendent Sprinklers de- scribed in this data sheet are standard response - standard coverage, solder type spray sprinklers designed for use in light, ordinary, and extra hazard, commercial occupancies such as banks, hotels, shopping malls, facto- ries, refineries, chemical plants, etc. The recessed version of the Series TY-L Pendent Sprinkler, where appli- cable, is intended for use in areas with a finished ceiling. It uses a two-piece Style 20 (1/2 inch NPT) or Style 30 (3/4 inch NPT) Recessed Escutcheon. The Recessed Escutcheon provides 1/4 inch (6,4 mm) of recessed adjustment or up to 1/2 inch (12,7 mm) of total adjustment from the flush pendent po- sition. The adjustment provided by the Recessed Escutcheon reduces the ac- curacy to which the fixed pipe drops to the sprinklers must be cut. Corrosion resistant coatings, where applicable, are utilized to extend the life of copper alloy sprinklers beyond that which would otherwise be ob- tained when exposed to corrosive at- mospheres. Although corrosion resis- tant coated sprinklers have passed the standard corrosion tests of the appli- cable approval agencies, the testing is not representative of all possible cor- IMPORTANT Always refer to Technical Data Sheet TFP700 for the "INSTALLER WARNING" that provides cautions with respect to handling and instal- lation of sprinkler systems and com- ponents. Improper handling and in- stallation can permanently damage a sprinkler system or its compo- nents and cause the sprinkler to fail to operate in a fire situation or cause it to operate prematurely. Page 1 of 8 rosive atmospheres. Consequently, it is recommended that the end user be consulted with respect to the suitability of these coatings for any given corro- sive environment. The effects of ambi- ent temperature, concentration of chemicals, and gas/chemical velocity, should be considered, as a minimum, along with the corrosive nature of the chemical to which the sprinklers will be exposed, An intermediate level version of the Series TY-L Pendent Sprinkler can be obtained by utilizing the Series TY-L Pendent Sprinkler in combination with the Model S Shield. WARNINGS The Series TY-L Sprinklers described herein must be installed and main- tained in compliance with this docu- ment, as well as with the applicable standards of the National Fire Protec- tion Association, in addition to the standards of any other authorities hav- ing jurisdiction. Failure to do so may impair the performance of these de- vices. The owner is responsible for maintain- ing their fire protection system and de- vices in proper operating condition. The installing contractor or sprinkler manufacturer should be contacted with any questions, Model/Sprinkler Identification Numbers TY3111 - TY3211 - TY 4111 - TY4211. Upright 5.6K,1/2"NPT Pendent 5.6K, 1/2"NPT Upright 8.0K,3/4"NPT Pendent a.OK, 3/4"NPT JULY, 2004 TY4811 . Upright 8.0K,1/2"NPT TY4911 - Pendent 8.0K, 1/2"NPT TY3111 is a redesignation for S1800 and G3111 . TY3211 is a redesignation for S1801 and G3112. TY4111 is a redesignation for S1810 and G31 01, TY4211 is a redesignation for S1811 and G3102. TY4811 is a redesignation for S1805. TY 4911 is a redesignation for S 1806 TFP110 Page 2 of 8 TFP110 WRENCH 1/2" ESCUTCHEON STYLE 20 FLANGES NPT PLATE SEATING RECESSED \~:~ SURFACE ESCUTCHEON V\\ / 11(< / / WRENCH 2-5/8" AREA 2 (66,7 mm) f': 1 1 11:\ ~, ltj. 2-5/8" 7/16" (66,7 mm) 4 [t=J] (11,1 mm) 3 NOMINAL 2" -5 ~JJ IfJ MAKE.IN ~ (50,8 mm) W ~... t 6 r~ ~ UPRIGHT PENDENT 1 - Frame 2 - Sealing Button 4 - Fusible Element 5 - Strut 3 - Ejection Spring 6 - Hook 7 - Deflector 2-7/8" (73,0 mm) DIA. RECESSED PENDENT 7 CROSS SECTION * Temperature rating is indicated on deflector. ** Pipe thread connections per ISO 7/1 can be provided on special request. FIGURE 1 STANDARD RESPONSE SERIES TY-L UPRIGHT (TY3111) AND PENDENT (TY3211) SPRINKLERS 5.6 K-FACTOR, 1/2 INCH NPT ~ rn;=;ID WRENCH 3/4" FLANGES NPT \__1= ~~ ~~ '(" 1:"11 II~ ltj. W 2-11/16" (68,3 mm) 1/2" (12,7mm) NOMINAL MAKE-IN .I,J \.. I I I f../ ~ ~ '- 1 ~ -'-----r__~___ UPRIGHT PENDENT 1 - Frame 2 - Sealing Button 3 - Ejection Spring 4 - Fusible Element 5 - Strut ESCUTCHEON PLATE SEATING SURFACE / 2-11/16" (68,3 mm) 2" (50,8 mm) 6 - Hook 7 - Deflector STYLE 30 RECESSED ESCUTCHEON =--0=1 / U1 "~ / WRENCH: ' ~ AREA ,2 --.JJ~ '3 ~r--: w L' 2-7/8" (73,0 mm) DIA. 7 RECESSED PENDENT CROSS SECTION * Temperature rating is indicated on deflector, **Pipe thread connections per ISO 7/1 can be provided on special request. FIGURE 2 STANDARD RESPONSE SERIES TY-L UPRIGHT (TY4111) AND PENDENT (TY4211) SPRINKLERS 8.0 K-FACTOR, 3/4 INCH NPT TFP110 ESCUTCHEON PLATE SEATING SURFACE / Page 3 of 8 WRENCH 1/2" FLANGES NPT \r=~~ 2-5/8" ,,- \ ~ (66,7 mm) f. I I r r:\ 7/16" ~ (11,1 mm) lR.-~ NOMINAL MAI'.,N W ~ ~ .,....~ ~II II~ ~ ~".---= -' UPRIGHT 1 - Frame 2 - Sealing Button 3 - Ejection Spring 2-5/8" (66,7 mm) 2" (50,8 mm) 6 7 PENDENT 2-7/8" (73,0 mm) DIA. RECESSED PENDENT CROSS SECTION 4 - Fusible Element 5 - Strut 6 - Hook 7 - Deflector * Temperature rating is indicated on deflector. **Pipe thread connections per ISO 7/1 can be provided on special request. FIGURE 3 STANDARD RESPONSE SERIES TY-L UPRIGHT (TY4811) AND PENDENT (TY4911) SPRINKLERS 8.0 K-FACTOR, 1/2 INCH NPT Technical Data Approvals UL and C-UL Listed, FM, and LPCB Approved. (Refer to Table A for complete approval information including corrosion resis- tant status.) Maximum Working Pressure 175 psi (12,1 bar) Discharge Coefficient K = 5.6 GPM/psi1/2 (80,6 LPM/bar1/2) K = 8.0 GPM/psi1/2 (115,2 LPM/bar1/2) Temperature Ratings Refer to Table A Finishes Sprinkler: Refer to Table A Recessed Escutcheon: White Coated, Chrome Plated. or Brass Plated Physical Characteristics Frame . . . . ,. .....,. Brass Sealing Button. Bronze w/Teflont Ejection Spring, . Stainless Steel Fusible Element , Solder, Copper . Stainless Steel Strut ..".. ...... Monel Hook . . . , .. . Bronze/Monel Deflector . . .. ...,. Bronze t DuPont Registered Trademark Operation A copper tube sealed by two stainless steel balls holds a fusible alloy. When the rated temperature is reached, the alloy melts, the balls are forced toward each other releasing the tension mechanism, allowing the sprinkler to operate. Design Criteria The Series TY-L Pendent and Upright Sprinklers are intended for fire protec- tion systems designed in accordance with the standard installation rules rec- ognized by the applicable Listing or Approval agency (e.g., UL Listing is based on the requirements of NFPA 13, and FM Approval is based on the requirements of FM's Loss Prevention Data Sheets). Only the Style 20 or 30 Recessed Escutcheon, as applicable, is to be used for recessed pendent installations. Installation The Series TY-L Sprinklers must be installed in accordance with the follow- ing instructions: NOTES A leak tight 1/2 inch NPT sprinkler joint should be obtained with a torque of 7 to 14 fUbs. (9,5 to 19,0 Nm). A maxi- mum of 21 ft. Ibs. (28,5 Nm) of torque may be used to install sprinklers with 1/2 NPT connections. A leak tight 3/4 inch NPT sprinkler joint should be ob- tained with a torque of 10 to 20 fUbs. (13,4 to 26,8 Nm), A maximum of 30 fUbs. (40,7 Nm) of torque is to be used to install sprinklers with 3/4 NPT con- nections. Higher levels of torque may distort the sprinkler inlet and cause leakage or impairment of the sprinkler. 00 not attempt to make-up for insuffi- cient adjustment in the escutcheon plate by under- or over-tightening the sprinkler. Readjust the position of the sprinkler fitting to suit. The Series TY-L Pendent and Up- right Sprinklers must be installed in accordance with the following instruc- tions. Step 1. Pendent sprinklers are to be installed in the pendent position, and upright sprinklers are to be installed in the upright position. Step 2. With pipe thread sealant ap- plied to the pipe threads, hand tighten the sprinkler into the sprinkler fitting. Page 4 of 8 TFP110 SPRINKLER FINISH K TYPE TEMP. FRAME NATURAL CHROME LEAD WAX WAX OVER COLOR BRASS PLATED COATED COATED LEAD COATED RATING CODE PENDENT (TY3211) 165OF/74OC Unpainted 1,2,3 and 2120F/1 OooC White 1,2,3,5 5.6 UPRIGHT (TY3111) 1/2" 280oF/138OC Blue 1,2 4 N/A NPT RECESSED PENDENT 165OF/74OC Unpainted 1,2,3,5 (TY3211 wI Style 20) 2120F/1 OooC White 1,2,3,5 N/A SPRINKLER FINISH K TYPE TEMP. FRAME NATURAL CHROME LEAD WAX WAX OVER COLOR BRASS PLATED COATED COATED LEAD COATED RATING CODE PENDENT (TY4211) 165OF/74OC Unpainted 1,2,3 and 1212OF/100oC White 1,2,3,5 8.0 UPRIGHT (TY4111) 3/4" 280oF/138OC Blue 1,2 4 N/A NPT RECESSED PENDENT 165OF/74OC Unpainted 1,2,5 (TY 4211 wI Style 30) I 2120F/1 OooC White N/A SPRINKLER FINISH K TYPE TEMP. FRAME NATURAL CHROME LEAD WAX WAX OVER COLOR BRASS PLATED COATED COATED LEAD COATED RATING CODE PENDENT (TY4911) 165OF/74OC Unpainted 1,2,3 and I 2120F/1 OooC White 1,2,3,5 8,0 UPRIGHT (TY4811) 1/2" 280oF/138OC Blue 1,2 N/A NPT RECESSED PENDENT 165OF/74OC Unpainted 1,2 (TY4911 wI Style 20) 1212OF/100oC White N/A NOTES: 1. Listed by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL). 2. Listed by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. for lIse in Canada (C-UL). 3. Approved by Factory Mutllal Research Corporation (FM). 4. Approved by Factory MlItual Research Corporation (FM) for maximum 150oF/680C ambient temperatures. 5. Approved by the Loss Prevention Certification Board (LPCB Ref. No. 094a103). N/A: Not Available TABLE A LABORATORY LISTINGS AND APPROVALS TFP110 7/16:1:1/8" (11,1:t3,2 mm) 2-7/8" DIA. (73,0 mm) I 1/2" 112.7 mm) 1/4" (6,4 mm) MOUNTING PLATE 2-1/4" DIA. - (57,2 mm) -I I- FACE OF SPRINKLER FITTING I =--~~ I' ~% \ ' MOUNTING SURFACE ) ;\\\=/; CLOSURE TY~ ~ FIGURE 4 SERIES TY-L (TY3211) RECESSED PENDENT SPRINKLER ASSEMBL Y WITH TWO-PIECE 1/2 INCH TOTAL ADJUSTMENT STYLE 20 RECESSED ESCUTCHEON 5.6 K-FACTOR, 1/2 INCH NPT 1-3/4" 144.5 mm) 1-1/2" (38,1 mm) l 7/16:1:1/8" 2-7/8" DIA. I 1/2" (12.7 mm) (11 ,1:t3,2 mm) (73,0 mm) 1/4" (6,4 mm) FACE OF _ 2-1/4" DIA. _I MOUNTING SPRINKLER (57,2 mm) ~ PLATE FITTING (- Jr 1 1/8" I ,- I '=---""I.i ~~ (3,2mm) ~ ~~~~ MO~NTINY;--' - ~. t SURFACE 1-3/4" (44.5 mm) 0(/\-/' 1-1/2" (38,1 mm) CLOSURE TY-L = _ l FIGURE 5 SERIES TY-L (TY4211) RECESSED PENDENT SPRINKLER ASSEMBL Y WITH TWO-PIECE 1/2 INCH TOTAL ADJUSTMENT STYLE 30 RECESSED ESCUTCHEON 8.0 K-FACTOR, 3/4 INCH NPT 7/16:1:1/8" (11,1:t3,2 mm) 2-7/8" DIA. (73,0 mm) 1/2" 112.7 mm) 1/4" (6,4 mm) MOUNTING PLATE _ 2-1/4"DIA._1 (57,2 mm) t- FACE OF SPRINKLER FITTING I 2]21 ~ / \( MOUNTING ' [tjJ SURFACE /\'\-/J CLOSURE TY~.VV 1-3/4" 144.5 mm) 1-1/2" (38,1 mm) I FIGURE 6 SERIES TY-L (TY 4911) RECESSED PENDENT SPRINKLER ASSEMBL Y WITH TWO-PIECE 1/2 INCH TOTAL ADJUSTMENT STYLE 20 RECESSED ESCUTCHEON 8.0 K-FACTOR, 1/2 INCH NPT Page 5 of 8 FIGURE 7 W- TYPE 9 SPRINKLER WRENCH WRENCH RECESS ~ ~ FIGURE 8 W-TYPE10RECESSED SPRINKLER WRENCH Step 3. Tighten the sprinkler into the sprinkler fitting using only the W-Type 9 Sprinkler Wrench (Ref. Figure 7), except that an 8 or 10 inch adjustable Crescent wrench is to be used for wax coated sprinklers. With reference to Figures 1, 2, and 3, the W-Type 9 Sprinkler Wrench is to be applied to the wrench area, or as applicable, the adjustable Crescent wrench is to be applied to the wrenching flanges. When installing wax coated sprinklers with the adjustable Crescent wrench, additional care needs to be exercised to prevent damage to the wax coating on the sprinkler wrench flats or frame arms and, consequently, exposure of bare metal to the corrosive environ- ment. The jaws of the wrench should be opened sufficiently wide to pass over the wrench flats without damag- ing the wax coating. Before wrench tightening the sprinkler, the jaws of the wrench are to be adjusted to just con- tact the sprinkler wrench flats. After wrench tightening the sprinkler, loosen the wrench jaws before removing the wrench. After installation, the sprinkler wrench flats and frame arms must be in- spected and the wax coating re- touched (repaired) whenever the coat- Page 6 of 8 ing has been damaged and bare metal is exposed. The wax coating on the wrench flats can be retouched by gen- tly applying a heated 1/8 inch diameter steel rod to the areas of wax that have been damaged, to smooth it back over areas where bare metal is exposed. NOTES Only retouching of the wax coating ap- plied to the wrench flats and frame arms is permitted, and the retouching is to be performed only at the time of the initial sprinkler installation, The steel rod should be heated only to the point at which it can begin to melt the wax, and appropriate precautions need to be taken, when handling the heated rod, in order to prevent the installer from being burned. If attempts to retouch the wax coating with complete coverage are unsuc- cessful, additional wax can be ordered in the form of a wax stick (the end of which is color coded). Only the correct color coded wax is to be used, and retouching of wrench flats and frame arms is only permitted at the time of initial sprinkler installation. With the steel rod heated as previously de- scribed, touch the rod to the area re- quiring additional wax with the rod an- gled downward, and then touch the wax stick to the rod approximately one-half inch away from the area re- quiring retouching. The wax will melt and run down onto the sprinkler. The Series TY-L Recessed Pendent Sprinklers must be installed in ac- cordance with the following instruc- tions. Step A. After installing the Style 20 or 30 Mounting Plate, as applicable, over the sprinkler threads and with pipe thread sealant applied to the pipe threads, hand tighten the sprinkler into the sprinkler fitting. Step B. Tighten the sprinkler into the sprinkler fitting using only the W- Type 10 Recessed Sprinkler Wrench (Ref. Figure 8). With reference to Figure 1, 2, or 3, the W- Type 10 Recessed Sprin- kler Wrench is to be applied to the sprinkler wrenching flanges. Step C. After the ceiling has been in- stalled or the finish coat has been ap- plied, slide on the Style 20 or 30 Clo- sure over the Series TY-L Sprinkler and push the Closure over the Mount- ing Plate until its flange comes in con- tact with the ceiling. Care and Maintenance The Series TY-L Sprinklers must be maintained and serviced in accord- ance with the following instructions: NOTES Before closing a fire protection system main control valve for maintenance work on the fire protection system that it controls, permission to shut down the affected fire protection system must be obtained from the proper authorities and all personnel who may be affected by this action must be notified. Absence of an escutcheon, which is used to cover a clearance hole, may delay the time to sprinkler operation in a fire situation. Sprinklers that are found to be leaking or exhibiting visible signs of corrosion must be replaced. Automatic sprinklers must never be painted, plated, coated or otherwise altered after leaving the factory. Modi- fied or over-heated sprinklers must be replaced. Care must be exercised to avoid dam- age to the sprinklers - before, during, and after installation. Sprinklers dam- aged by dropping, striking, wrench twist/slippage, or the like, must be re- placed. Frequent visual inspections are rec- ommended to be initially performed for corrosion resistant coated sprinklers, after the installation has been com- pleted, to verify the integrity of the cor- rosion resistant coating. Thereafter, annual inspections per NFPA 25 should suffice; however, instead of in- specting from the floor level, a random sampling of close-up visual inspec- tions should be made, so as to better determine the exact sprinkler condi- tion and the long term integrity of the corrosion resistant coating, as it may be affected by the corrosive conditions present. The owner is responsible for the in- spection, testing, and maintenance of their fire protection system and de- vices in compliance with this docu- ment, as well as with the applicable standards of the National Fire Protec- tion Association (e,g" NFPA 25), in addition to the standards of any other authorities having jurisdiction. The in- stalling contractor or sprinkler manu- facturer should be contacted relative to any questions. It is recommended that automatic TFP110 sprinkler systems be inspected, tested, and maintained by a qualified Inspection Service in accordance with local requirements and/or national codes. I.imited Warranty Products manufactured by Tyco Fire Products are warranted solely to the original Buyer for ten (10) years against defects in material and work- manship when paid for and properly installed and maintained under normal use and service. This warranty will ex- pire ten (10) years from date of ship- ment by Tyco Fire Products. No war- ranty is given for products or components manufactured by compa- nies not affiliated by ownership with Tyco Fire Products or for products and components which have been subject to misuse, improper installation, corro- sion, or which have not been installed, maintained, modified or repaired in ac- cordance with applicable Standards of the National Fire Protection Associa- tion, and/or the standards of any other Authorities Having Jurisdiction. Mate- rials found by Tyco Fire Products to be defective shall be either repaired or replaced, at Tyco Fire Products' sole option, Tyco Fire Products neither as- sumes, nor authorizes any person to assume for it, any other obligation in connection with the sale of products or parts of products. Tyco Fire Products shall not be responsible for sprinkler system design errors or inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by Buyer or Buyer's representatives. IN NO EVENT SHALL TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS BE LIABLE, IN CON- TRACT, TORT, STRICT LIABILITY OR UNDER ANY OTHER LEGAL THE- ORY, FOR INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LABOR CHARGES, RE- GARDLESS OF WHETHER TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS WAS INFORMED ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, AND IN NO EVENT SHALL TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS' LI- ABILITY EXCEED AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE SALES PRICE. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS MADE IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FIT- NESS FOR A PARTICULAR PUI1:. ~ TFP110 PIN 53 - XXX - X - XXX I I MODEUSIN 111 5.6K UPRIGHT (1/2"NPT) TY3111 112 5.6K PENDENT (1/2"NPT) TY3211 101 8.0K UPRIGHT (3/4"NPT) TY4111 9 102 8.0K PENDENT (3/4"NPT) TY4211 7 106 8.0K UPRIGHT (1/2"NPT) TY4811 6 107 8.0K PENDENT (1/2"NPT) TY 4911 8 SPRINKLER NATURAL BRASS CHROME PLATED LEAD COATED WAX COATED 1650F to 2800F ONLY WAX OVER LEAD 1650F and 2120F ONLY Page 7 of 8 TEMPERATURE RATING 165 1650F1740C 212 2120F/100oC 280 280oF/1380C TABLE B PART NUMBER SELECTION SERIES TY-L PENDENT AND UPRIGHT SPRINKLERS Ordering Procedure When placing an order, indicate the full product name. Refer to the Price List for complete listing of Part Numbers. Contact your local distributor for avail- ability. Sprinkler Assemblies with NPT Thread Connections: Specify: (Specify ModeI/SIN), Stand- ard Response, (specify K-factor), (specify temperature rating), Series TY-L (specify Pendent or Upright) Sprinkler with (specify type of finish or coating), PIN (specify from Table B). Recessed Escutcheon: Specify: Style (specify) Recessed Es- cutcheon with (specify finish), PIN (specify), 1/2" (15 mm) Style 20 Chrome Plated. 1/2" (15 mm) Style 20 White Color Coated 1/2" (15 mm) Style 20 Brass Plated. . 3/4" (20 mm) Style 30 Chrome Plated. . . 3/4" (20 mm) Style 30 White Color Coated . . 3/4" (20 mm) Style 30 Brass Plated. . . PIN 56-705-9-010 PIN 56-705-4-010 . . .. PIN 56-705-2-010 PIN 56-705-9-011 PIN 56-705-4-011 PIN 56-705-2-011 Sprinkler Wrench: Specify: W-Type 9 Sprinkler Wrench, PIN 56-000-1-849, Specify: W-Type 10 Sprinkler Wrench, PIN 56-000-1-948. Wax Sticks: (for retouching wrench damaged wax coating) Specify: (Specify color) color coded Wax Stick for retouching (specify tem- perature rating) temperature rated Se- ries TY-L Sprinklers, PIN (specify). Red for 1650F . Blue for 2120F and 280oF....... . . . .. PIN 56-065-1-155 . PIN 56-065-1-286 NOTES Each wax stick is suitable for retouch- ing up to twenty-five sprinklers. The wax used for 2800F sprinklers is the same as for 2120F sprinklers, and, therefore, the 2800F sprinkler is limited to the same maximum ceiling tempera- ture as the 2120F sprinkler (i.e., 1500F). Page 8 of 8 TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS, 451 North Cannon Avenue, Lansdale, Pennsylvania 19446 TFP110 dt~rfifiraf~ of <IDrrnpaurl! CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ~tparfmtnf of ~uil~ing Jf nspttfion ,)1' Final Permitted 0 Conditional e.O. Expires This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section ii 0 of the 0 Residential / 0 international Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City of Prior Lake regulating building construction or use. For the following: Use Classification (' C I~/ I' iEI:_ C,J II L- _ Bldg. Permit No. G 5.0.489 DE F k: ;:/ ~ U) / IV D v _'S77U 1-) L- f.J 1-1 kK- 4- TH Site Address /7/58. I1UELI?rj IV IJ 51. /;J (,1v/'I- ('lIwOO J:L/J6. ) \ JANE lolNJ; 61C.- i / Occupancy Type Type Construction L /, D /' Legal Description Owner of Building _ Contractor's Name & Address /;" f 1;''::: ( (<Iv E;//ACJP /v :-Th.. . 0) .t1..f57c...T I..J. H v7Ctl /IJ S' #,City Planner. / ~ilding Official Date:. // /r/ c6 Date: / ' _ Zoning District /1. QIerfifieafe nf @entpaney CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ~~parfm~nf of ~uil~ing Jf nsp~tfion ,$J Final Permitted D Conditional e.O. Expires This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 110 of the D Residential / D International Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City of Prior Lake regulating building construction or use. For the following: Use Classification (, 0fll'IEk('lh L- _ Bldg. Permit No. (5 08/7 Occupancy Type Type Construction _ Zoning District I:Z Legal Description 1. / J [;' /, L,[. Elc':/ EL./j / /JU u::::.77G( r) L- f'rr k;<: 4 TH Owner of Building. Site Address 17/'::;~ RVE'LI/i/NN 51. Contractor's Name & Address ('C IcE Y.:-i-{) tV t::.. C 6/J:::TK- (: Ie 6 Ct::. 1-) - /'0jJuF.V TENn~ k.:OC:f7.L7 /) M...I-II;JS~YPlanner Vlttv61C/JtvJ/&12... / "Building Official ' Date: / / / f? / t!':>,h Date: / ~/ POST IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE QI~rfifitaf~ nf @ttupanty CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ~tparftUtnf nf ~uilbing JJnspttfinn ~inal Permitted D Conditional C.O. Expires / This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 110 of the 0 Residential / 0 International Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City of Prior Lake regulating building construction or use. For the following: Use Classification ' ' ( Pi/" / C. k.. C 111 t- _ Bldg, Permit No. ("; 5, eEl B' -,- ..., Occupancy Type _ Type Construction _ Zoning District ..L ~ Legal Description _ L / . L/ I . i....,;F F~: ;::16 L Q / IV U 6 S /7u r; L- ;--' /'-i Ie IC. 4 7H- Owner of Building Site Address / 7/ ..:: A Ii 06t-/~/r7 /'v' Il/ ..:. / . Contractor's Name & Address G ie'!:. v~~TZIV'(=; C eN ::;-0<:'... (lilCrlUO [/ Gf- C EM TE/V/-IIV F) k!()C[lGf U 11U~"f/A)~ City Planner J7-1/Vt.. K'filJf/C.rC ,/ Bg}lding Official Date: ///,Y/Oh Date: / ' DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED 'J::2./' < PHONE NO. 17J5~ 4 Del"'41'\ 5-1. CONTR. --61" e.;rS /-0 ~ PERMIT NO. r..~- L/ g7 x..~ILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GAS LINE AIR TST o o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL ADDRESS OWNER o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION 'fl( FINAL 1'6'SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: (7AAr-ar V,JVf,\- O~ ttrlWORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~ORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspect.o~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH & SAFETYI lNSNOTl .. JDATE q~ .~ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS ill 58 OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION ~NAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL TIME &~4h7 o EXIGRAD/FILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GAS LINE AIR TST o co~~=s: h' """-p ~ t'''i,J...J-- Z. IWcD ,'+'~- ~ ~-Lok- -ik-.cl..... ~~ ~~ ~~ y. ~ ~ Q.- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.P~___ R- S~ II. CS~ ~O ~^- ~J-.- ~~~ ld'"L9~ ~~ ; ,-~ ~ /' =------- ....0 "J'ORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~ORREC ACTION AND PROCEED o CORR CT RK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING J Inspecto :' Owner/Contr: \, ~ CAL _ 447..9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. INSNOTl CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH & SAFETYI %/Zf~s" 17/j-? ~/~~~h/l &"/ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP ~BING FINAL o MECH FINAL DATE TIME ~ ; </19 o EXIGRADIFILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o . j (1 j 1 7-t::~~""" /- ,f/ ~?;t ..L_s COMMEIjTS:j , ?-, d /.e- 8 O.c~ ~ <"/h' j V / / /' H~ ~p rl ~ /1:' /- '7 -rt' S'/- O/c. a<:::.~ 1'/ .k-'" U.l-~ fir' /M/ 'TV r//<ed 7~O '> )- .-- ;:if /-?LV/ j; /t/E, /Ir V/ ~~r //r}'Q4'~"~ / /? / / (- A-ec/( - ( C) g' J ~/ /rI"u / ,~ / /744/ o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~~ECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FO REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. lNSNon CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETYI ~_."'_"___.'''~''_''_'_'~_'''__'_''~_'''._'_~'''~' ,,~___..~~_~_______M.M______"'____> _ _ _ ,_~_"~""~,,,"_.,,_,,",_,,,~____""""__"~'~__'_'_~' CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE DATE T1M(!!:j:J $/~~" /?/Ld dI:~~~ u,L SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER PHONE NO. CONTR. PERMIT NO. ~-</?? o FOOTING ~MBING RI 0 EXIGRADIFILLING o FOUNDATION 0 MECH RI 0 COMPLAINT o FRAMING 0 WATER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE RI o INSULATION 0 SEWER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE FINAL o FINAL 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 GASLlNE AIR TST o SITE INSPECTIO~N, 0 ~ F"L,.., J ,; COMMENTS: C'Z-d L../ rt ( . ~ .JL 4 / / / ,,~ /5S r /'~s 'T U<<- ~) /' ~ # e6Vl/e- 0y~v iI-7 i /Zj?.~ ~/ ql/&/' ";p ~, r,~ .;7/&.-.-- v(,~+ c!~// ~_ ';M 12- -fQ~~t: ~de ' /?\ n .~L' //" o L-~ /1 ~r ~::;et/-e ~k^ re~(/ .- I ~/c - / tA~r o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~RECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ Owner/Contr: - CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY/ INSNOTI CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE DATE ~ 7~rU- -/ J /?/S~ #J;,k&?A'/-7 ~(/ SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION PERMIT NO. ~MBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL ...os-:- 7/j/? PHONE NO. o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLlNE AIR TST o cOIltJME~TS: / [At. ck,Q rC/v"- J / S-'h /{Y ~~J J ~ (..J ") ,,~#rClt:/~ ~g,-,~'-' /' A 1 ./ /~~~:k9 --' - Ok ~rr /-0 J'r ~O /t'.-!: -vrr;P't/C c?k . / , / ~'U);r-e rV- r-'C~V /: ~___ ~~~I;A';;" ~aJ7c ~ 7J;4~ ~~ 'f/~r /t/C ~"'.s -/e " .J 0 ~S l:ha.-r t/~~ r /' ac ~RK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~____ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-985Q FOR TH~ N':X;T 1f<J~PECnON 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS /?/s-? #~k.pA'.n OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL ~CH FINAL COMMENTS: ./"....... ......_.~ , ' ) 4/ ~ I \. / ~ /"// >/ctrS-4 DATE ;/i4 S~ TIME 0-?s"3 o EXIGRADIFILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o ~RK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WO~ ~~'YOR .REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: /" ~L---'" Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. lIiSliOTl CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ~/~lcr /7/ $- ~ ~ / ~4-"'~~ cS/ SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER PHONE NO. CONTR. PERMIT NO.S- ?s3 o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI ~CHRI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLlNE AIR TST o COMMENTS: // "J ." /' /' ~srC'd L' CJ /J~~ kr4" -tY// -/;f/'e ~ a,,-:, /:S //K , //'- . ~ / JZec t't ~t/.., d 4 r7t1r- 4y fi4 _ t:V,h-ib<S -.{b-;{)'/cq CJ// ~f!~'_ //1, {..._ U /~';A d~"c~ .~vc-r,L Ie aPJ;/~e- /- ,,- //,17&7 I' /' ure o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~RECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WO~.:,~/FO~ REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: /~~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! lNSNon CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE DATE TIME SCHEDULED ~~~ , , /:IX / ~4"hh f')~ ADDRESS / ?/,j> OWNER PHONE NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: 0) GfJ CONTR. PERMIT NO. o PLUMBING RI ~ECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL ~M%~;jy / s- -rff o EXIGRAD/FILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o (.\ A"~ /Lf / /.2c~o//- ; /'WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT W~R REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: Owner/Contr: A I ~ //rC;UI de. ..&;..~~~.~ fP ~.k~/ ~sl c/o delec~vs CALL 447.9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH & SAFETY! INSNOTI DATE TIME ,h~r- , /!ck~#f:-Sl CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE (!1J SCHEDULED ADDRESS / 7/5"" ? OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI .A!"MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL ,)- 189 o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL -m-GASLINE AIR TST o cOMMENT~: A / ? --2S/- /9Jr /"~~7 lOr ~~.lJ.-. ~~ ~e~y- ./e T-V eP #- @- P~4!~ 6~y=;~ ,J;. -rj.:~~ ~r ,.-').14., ~ S .J4~' /J-<..- ~ r~';" cis F , ft,~"''/:~1'''~ . .-h.._~' &/rI;i tL/~// ~''-'J- ~~ /Y4, tU J,,_. 4~ ;f6 /t)r/pL/) ~ _/1~ (.1 # q",~k~..r' /- ~ ,Ie, /It ' *" "e.,~ 2f ..--. ~ ~ / .I' /J ,,~ / / ~#~~;d ~c~# ~"~,,.;L #r .~~ flhr!,L ;Z p~d rc""/,,J...e, - ~ ttf)~~ ~ / -/ .' > ;/,A, 'C.-~ .~ o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ! o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED C C1Pl .. ~RECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING ~ Inspector: Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. INSNOTl CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE c#0 SCHEDULED ADDRESS /7/S-~ #~/k..,h;1 OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI ~CHRI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL DATE TIME /h~- &I ~ - '1R7 o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL ~ASLINE AIR TST o U' ~OMMEN]S: I' I ~ _" ~ ~)~~t!!d e~~~d~ ~J- de~ - lJ-.L'~ ~4hre. JS4f#~cf +;'/!..r, e-I l'tti-cl.~~/- A_...n.,r - dY' ~/PC/e "'eI~, _.1 ~~". ..fZ,~ #ee4. ~&;'~~e.r fJ",f ~Ae S~C~ ,~ qcl-e9~~~.. /)~" .rF(;C I)~'I ~4~ / ' / / / I 6J.. /I/o (/'?',:r ~4h4 ,,). ~/o 4t>k c5:/<<LJ ~r-< {/c=lc...> /h ~./:. /~kt;;. d'A (/ T 7 / -~ / ../ ~A . . /' ~ ~r~,'.. (!W~ ~~1V h'-/c.';" ./h ~HcL ~ ~4-~e ~ rA c? ~~~k -Ie~~ / ' ~ fIn A /' CA-// ~,- /4,)...s~-<-cr-~~~ - / o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED ~ECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ,~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. INSNOTl CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! p~ TWIE /7/)r /h~~rl'.ff cSt! CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING l:l !!!SULA TION ~!~L o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL COMMENTS: s-.. YJi7 o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o /)/ -1 / //qH~,,~~ ~,a7.. ~,r YI" r / --1./ '/' /~ StJ -ec.r- /'E?"z.~Se.1P d,.J,..,.p. /L./ r"'" ,,/ ~ r~ ' /,,~C - ~ ;:;;~ / oL ~ ,. Jk.... - ---..- -............... '--. "' /' ,,1'J .~") <. ~/d'.s-e- ~ /e / ~"-- ----- /:,~ORK SA TISFACTORV. ~HOCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WO~;>>}~CTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ./ ~~ Owner/Contr: , .---- CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ADDRESS /7/ Sf" OWNER PHONE NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o JllI8ULA TION ~FINAL o SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: // ~~: ~&/I DATE TIME SCHEDULED ~~ //ck/ ~~ 0/ CONTR. PERMIT NO. (\ - <fR'? ~ o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLlNE AIR TST o -" /; j" / )7A-~S~/~~ / L"#e~~7 -K:C~~ '~G/~r~J e1' '~,</Lk? ~e/~;r U --", ~ // ,/ i C!:J . /d ftr~ T. ~n /' Y"' c;he ~r: ~4'/ ,/'/_ky /; ;,0-1. /#h$1 ~y ~~Q~../tJ' ~ - ~/J- , / ~ .AQ CrU I /r/ / / t::/;t? r /CPr/tJ6 o l"~TISFACTORY, PROCEED ~RRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL F REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: , V CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. Owner/Contr: CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ADDRESS 17/ S.-Y OWNER PHONE NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION -'-' r-...IAL o SITE INSPECTION e:9 DATE TIME zJ'c:fr~ /fIe I~QA'A ,51 SCHEDULED CONTR. PERMIT NO. o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL os- ~f? o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GAS LINE AIR TST o COMMENTS: E~c:/-;tdl r~er~ ~~A~ j I ~ Il ~e -e/(/J <-5d~Ct 'y / $,z,S ~r!U /c. v J ;:::;;;,.., / ~Jt)d';/- / F kH SDrlh~/l:'''' I~~~ / , &tf A ~~/J/. ~J;.~/ ~t:- ./ / P-4~'Z,,~~ A",/.' hh~/ ?:Rf ~ilJ Ssl /h(i~//~/ ?/~~h./c;,~ ~c~ /~ - ~ E~L.k t"V'/k.:y / . ,eev'r q,.~ /.A ~~ ~ / o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~ORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: /4- Owner/Contr: - ~X ~/?r- CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl DATE rfi~s~ /?/S-r:f #~~~#H (y,L CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE &t j; (!!3 SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION ~INAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL TIME ~5--~;>1 o EXIGRAD/FILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLlNE AIR TST o p:N!ME~TS=r f,/ it' #~~ h;'e; / ~~ <Li~-. ~ /6,;/ r %,Cl $I" ,LSt)O * ,- ~,-1 ~f.1 A~' . -k.,t?+';4~ ~~,r~,.f i ~r// kor, j~ ~A/ef~ ~ f..l ~c-.;Lf t..---e.~ Ie t , &/1 k $fJ?<.c7f~ /1C'~T ~t::le. 6,,~~~c;ttl#y- s~"-J ),e tA-~// C~/I' ~ f- r;; r~ A J , __ /), @ f<l2.<-~.f %~,hv~C'n, f ~b"'-' f;').,7/ . --Sf/II ,;-. /r~cers ;/ b::-{'/ie 1t? -J..:9""'- .-e;/'/" IZ,,~ /hf'j) ~CJt de-... t--~./ ~d /<. fc- , , o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED /f.- J ~ORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED C ~ o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. INSNOTl CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! DATE TIME ~k ~ /7/,-~i /I'~/~ sf C~t~ JI fY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE G SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION Qo.f'IffAL "'5 siTE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL cOMFtt!~TS: I /s;) ~U,..~ kr<'/~/tt; L:/ ~ ~.~L A# ,L~ as- - /ff? o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLlNE AIR TST o Av;-.~ ~4-C e S . r- ~~11 -"'" L=a J d'1J7/ / / /o/?"/cS- / ~/C o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~RRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING ~ Inspector: Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. INSNOTl CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH .I SAFETY! ,-~+-._.._,.._.,.__._,-_..-,_._-~.~".,"--_._-".,,".... .....,..,.~_...". ......~'_.."._-~---~,._~-".,"......_-,..,.,'~..^--- (:::ff j);~5- '/ - . / ? / S-o ~/:iM~N~ r5/- CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION ~MING .-e;t1NSULA TION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL ~s--~?,? o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o ~OMMENTS: &I ~) //t'~e1/ /'%c4.: O~'/--<ePG/'V-r fi".(,' c k...,~~r;kef #t!!, _~~?,.~~_e-5~ , r~ ~A- .d49"'- / Sr '. ~/ , , \ -. /' /" ('"'11. / I (3) .#~ed~//A/cJ<<; /2"/6 . \'(jpjttJ~(lr" d~,- J.?'" ' / -:..J'// / _ ./lft / ./'/ ./ /.-/ /, , . ( c:?/"I' fet/ ". "'-y~ L-" ,~ ~ o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED ~RECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE., CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTI ADDRESS /?/5tr DATE SCHEDULED ~~~ ~/~4"".H (5'" (~/J TI~ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. o.r-- ~.P'9 , . . o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING ,......,rsULA TION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GAS LINE AIR TST o COMMENTS: ~// ~ / .. ~~~~c; _ r-Ae~ J, G~~J?'~ ~e,r::--~ ~~~~ --. --VV/4m~ /' /' O~ ~K SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK';fC;'L~ REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: #~/-- Owner/Contr: / CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTI CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ADDRESS /?/s(j OWNER PHONE NO. ~ING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: (7d TIM~ DATE SCHEDULED ~r- ./J~'/bqKH (rr: CONTR. PERMIT NO. o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL "--/ ~ -/ep'/(jr rh:- ~ ~/ (,.-2- \ ~i- ~L:,V'" - -- . c1s-- Y"rf' ? o EXIGRADIFILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLlNE AIR TST o - / ~i' /'I S-- ~,J r - / (f; ./~~ ~r.e 0/ecc~/ ~Sd~h-~ /\ a>&7 (~. ~ ~_ pdr/~6 / ~ ~RK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~ ~~RRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT W~/C~'.:7"OR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: / ~y Owner/Contr: , CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTI (~7J DATE T~ fP~,\ /7/,5-? ~~~4--.H" J>/ ~ ~ r;,-:; <'C'/S- I -; J_ /!d f- ,r~qdYr {q / / ;"A.r b..e/7c ~"- / . CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. A?.TING o FOUNDA liON o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION PERMIT NO. o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL COMMENTS: ..- / ~~ *,1 by A / CJ~- ~?? o EXIGRAD/FILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o f' ,~ o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORREC .,ACTION AND PROCEED CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~er/Contr: CALL 447.9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. INSNOTl CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! /9"d/ DATE ~ ? /2, k- / ' /)'/S-~ #'~/~hH.h s/ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ADDRESS OWNER PHONE NO. ~60TING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION SCHEDULED CONTR. PERMIT NO. o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL c:JS-- ~?9 o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o COMMENTS: J~--hr/&r A 9 _ G:-,'d.J r!-e,- /;g//u.- d,/__ -29'" r'/Iy-/"r 7 ('d-.) .#-r- ~~c,[y- /-: C) /' / ;I//~ e J - 0/7 . / ~C:-I'~/ J~#-<c~ ., 3~ ~ / ~K SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTI "' CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS t}kJ.M~ OWNER PHONE NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: '2 :00 4'.bb PfV\ ~lM ~. TIME J7J~) ~9'n 5-5~ o EXIGRADIFILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL 8 ~jL~U~T ~ \ "Co L 2,~_ (1) l..oh~ y/ 1.Lo~ .2" ll..o \/J't 1 ~":t I~ l oc.eJ[ ~ '^^ ~f t-.c.r ~ ~ ~ ~ \lA~.:~..( ,,. J 4. ~~~ ~~~ CONTR. PERMIT NO. o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL '2.'0 701 ~~~ -+~. o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED )< CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORREl1f'K' CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING . Inspector: L l \ Owner/Contr: . CALL 7 dso FOa4HE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. COD~EQ':nJl~NTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! ~..__. INSNOTI cy DATE TIME SCHEDULED ~~- / 7/ s-~ pt/~~~~ J;L CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ADDRESS OWNER PHONE NO. ~TING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION CONTR. PERMIT NO. as:- z"J>'? o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL o EXIGRAD!FILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GAS LINE AIR TST o COMMENTS: _ .a / '-/' ~/ C;rn,r#\or r--~5 (<),-~ <;d-S c/ / /0 .2" r J ' / / ~ ,4- C ) ,/ ~/ / fa Ar /~t:'"r /~"- /' O/- /) .i/ G ~/C~ /i O....c.. ~~~ ~:.s-/-~.5/1 _C 7€ C~~ ~~ - ~SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447.9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ~ AD~ TIME SCHEDULED ~ ;~- ADDRESS /7/sr /~4~#~ OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. -LJ,): ~,? ~OTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL o EXIGRADIFILLING o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o COMMENTS: .- /" /' ;:;:;t-c/t'~r/ ~ H: if' / .;2,;]7 /0 ./ - /' G.:;,ri :5:S ..dC"r- ~~ /' , @ ~~~ .su,,<_ /S CJvf I J? re ~<<c..~ / <'hr-=L ~-/~r5 ~ATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl (!g/ DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE If//~- INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS /Y/srf OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. c:;s-- cf/'~ ~TING o PLUMBING RI o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o FOUNDATION o MECH RI o COMPLAINT o FRAMING o WATER HOOKUP o FIREPLACE RI o INSULATION o SEWER HOOKUP o FIREPLACE FINAL o FINAL o PLUMBING FINAL o GASLlNE AIR TST o SITE INSPECTION o MECH FINAL 0 COM, ,ME,N N}S S: ~rv~" ~ /~,,- /~~ R*,~:"v ~~ Grel ~ y/?_S r~ ,) ~ /r- /A:?4"-. / /2'er'''~~- Ck..~ r <S~,~.y . / - - / ~1/- ($-) ( 12- ~ ~'~#5 , /:) -// (t ~~e S"r", ,~""';. / ..t.:-V' .r:~ .... /'.5" -- ~ORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED rORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORJ.y.~~ ~PECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ ~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl / W SCHEDULED /J'?sr ~,~~ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE ADDRESS OWNER PHONE NO. ~ING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: CONTR. PERMIT NO. oS-"c;?o:9 o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o (21 ~;{~e JZ~", ~ d';r. /( ~~ G.h~~Te- (Jfc ./ ~ A, I., /' l~J ~O'h/~< ~~y ~ / .... S!t,C/itJ q'/~~ , %t!c~ / ~e~ iv ~ ,4PJ'4/~A9' --4: /' ~~t?c...s / ,(l I 4 / ,.., .~. ~ ~Stt}"-' #O~ ~#t.ltj '- fi;r _<",";rh I~/Y'~ 7)e~~ <?~ ~ /'~J::?tt'r iJ ~/C /0 ~Vr / / , / ~C o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~ORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447.9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl f#~r 4T/sr ~//H~KU s",L cOMMEN}S: / I .G::Te// Or' /r9-.r t:;"r d.s ~~c.k //4~, 7/ /~;bf -I- F / .2, f' ~o 7' cctvr: ~ ..% -rK/~'r -Jf:rJ ~ ~~ /) / . /- / ~ds ~ ;:/S-J ;.c/~ I- P7:? _' / ~}: tl@, ~v"cI~ ~o..;; o.e:e~",-A,,- n/,rr foJ- ~LJ~cl.~1 J;r'7'~ - I I' .1" (JJ h. v :r;J ..;. .s;?- .. d ~~...".~.;., 5> -- Jir d&l~ /d~tf ~ +;;,~-;;~ - -P . ~ ~ORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~~RRECT ACTION AND PROCEED / o CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: ~ Owner/Contr: ~TY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE @ SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER CONTR. PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. ~TING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL , .. DATE TIME as-- ~ o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GAS LINE AIR TST o --/ /// J , , CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.. INSNOTI CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH & SAFETY! CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE DATE TIME SCHEDULED ~~J- 51 ADDRESS /?/s-,r /I.Ie~9N~ OWNER PHONE NO. o FOOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION ~AL o SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: ~/' /' ~ /'lecfr~ c.,/ d;;.) CONTR. PERMIT NO. ir--cf$/ o PLUMBING RI 0 EXIGRAD!FILLING o MECH RI 0 COMPLAINT o WATER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE RI o SEWER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE FINAL o PLUMBING FINAL 0 GASLINE AIR TST t;;;HRh<? ; -f .-: r;~1 / / -/~ct/OS- / j'/ ""'''' /f/~~ ~4"/;'c -( .........., / ~-: .1''/ - "'- -a,..'~ i d4~J /fk~ (,. , /) //~ n / J ',~~. 7:-)'., ./'~J~ //C~-:-\~ h~') ~K'ATISFACTORY, PR~ o CORRE~ I ".." ~IUJ r'ri:vCEED ~ECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING - I~pector: ~ ~ Owner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! INSNOTl CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE DATE TIME SCHEDULED ~~~-- ;/t~~K;1 sl- ADDRESS J 7/Sff OWNER PHONE NO. ~OOTING o FOUNDATION o FRAMING o INSULATION o FINAL o SITE INSPECTION COMMENTS: .... CONTR. PERMIT NO. o PLUMBING RI o MECH RI o WATER HOOKUP o SEWER HOOKUP o PLUMBING FINAL o MECH FINAL// \);9~ /71 -/ ~ ~. " .~ x <? A" ~/r=r) ~ { '---- \ -~\ /; / ~ r-~~c/(" ',~/ t:).5r_~J/ o EXIGRADIFILLlNG o COMPLAINT o FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL o GASLINE AIR TST o r'" /2 h~~ .e-l- b?~ t!?9YS // /' 0/( ~ORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED / 0 CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED l 0 CORRECT WOFJ>t!Lrt# REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: J /I-/' ./ Owner/Contr: CALL k-9850 F~HE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! 1ItSNOTI CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE DATE T1~ S-/.z .. 6'r- / -V'-11 /7/S-~ 4/~~#-l;-' /;~ SCHEDULED ADDRESS OWNER PHONE NO. CONTR. PERMIT NO. ~S -- - r /"7 o FOOTING 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXIGRADIFILLING o FOUNDATION 0 MECH RI 0 COMPLAINT o FRAMING 0 WATER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE RI o INSULATION 0 SEWER HOOKUP 0 FIREPLACE FINAL o FINAL 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 GAS LINE AIR TST ~. ~;; c INSPECTION 0 MECH FINAL 0 COMMENTS: ~,.~~ /~ S;./~, /~ / - , j / /- {;..'-/ ~~~ t! /ley ~ '" ,,~ -1,--'0 A:.-- P/,~n/~~ . .c:2e//"J-h - ---.,/' / ,A\ . (?;J ~ _- 2:1- / (\~~ ~/n ~, ~d' / . // _/A ~r~,. , /:~ 6v~'- ~" L,../....../'/ ~~~rf- Y 4 A..-i o WORK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED ~ ACTION AND PROCEED ~ORRECT WORK, CALL FOR RE NSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: p ----oWner/Contr: CALL 447-9850 FO~EXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH (( SAFETY! lNSNorl