Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout 9A 2020 Preliminary Tax levy and Budget PresentationSeptember 16, 2019 1 By September 30, the City Council must: Adopt a preliminary budget and certify a preliminary property tax levy for pay 2020 Announce the time and place of the meeting when the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed The public budget meeting will be held Dec 2 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers 2020 Preliminary Tax Levy and Budget 2 May –Long Range Plan & Debt Work Session June/July –CIP Work Sessions Aug. 5 –Budget Work Session Sept. 3 –Budget Work Session Sept. 16 –Adopt Preliminary Levy and Budget Nov. 4 –Budget Work Session Dec. 2 –Public Budget meeting 7:00 p.m. Dec. 2 –Adopt Final Tax Levy and Budget Tax Levy and Budget Schedule 3 Overview –2020 Preliminary Budgets 4 General Fund $14,635,111 Debt Service Funds 5,432,317 Rev. Equipment Fund 1,200,000 Facilities Mgmt Fund 114,000 PIR Fund (street overlay) 979,933 EDA 489,635 Other (Parks, Cable)355,200 Water Fund 3,402,180 Sewer Fund 3,560,641 Water Quality Fund 819,861 Total $ 30,988,878 The 2020 proposed tax levy is $13,797,737. The total proposed tax levy change is 7.98% This includes the EDA request for a funding increase of $322,500 to assist with commercial development and expansion. For 64% of city homeowners this is a 2.4% or lower increase in the city portion of their property tax 2020 Proposed Tax Levy Change 5 2020 Proposed Preliminary Budget & Tax Levy Change 6 2.44% 5.54% For taxes payable in 2020 there is a preliminary increase in Gross Tax Capacity of 9%. The city’s general tax levy is spread across city properties based on property tax capacity (tax base) As the tax base increases, the taxes are spread across a larger base. For taxes payable in 2020 there is a preliminary increase in Taxable Market Value of 8% Tax Base and Tax Rate 7 8 2020 Property Tax Levy Comparison Adopted Budget 2019 Proposed Budget 2020 TAX LEVIES General Fund 8,146,555 8,731,199 Debt Service Fund 3,497,188 3,561,288 Equip Revolving Fund 600,000 625,000 Revolving Park Equip Fund 289,292 409,000 EDA Fund 150,000 311,250 PIR (Street Overlay) Fund 95,000 130,000 Facilities Mgmt Fund - 30,000 Total Tax Levies 12,778,035 13,797,737 SUMMARY OF CHANGE IN TAX LEVIES General Fund 367,373 584,644 Debt Service Fund 127,017 64,100 Equip Revolving Fund 50,000 25,000 Revolving Park Equip Fund 51,108 119,708 EDA Fund 10,000 161,250 PIR (Street Overlay) Fund 95,000 35,000 Facilities Mgmt Fund - 30,000 TOTAL $ CHANGE IN TAX LEVIES 700,498 1,019,702 CURRENT YEAR TAX LEVIES ANNUAL % CHANGE General Fund 4.7%7.18% Debt Service Fund 3.8%1.83% Equip Revolv Fund 9.1%4.17% Revolv Park Equip Fund 21.5%41.38% EDA Fund 7.1%107.50% PIR Fund 36.84% Facilities Mgmt Fund TOTAL % CHANGE IN TAX LEVIES 5.80%7.98% TAX CAPACITY TAX RATE 33.020%32.852% Annual % Change -0.06%-0.51% MARKET VALUE TAX RATE 0.006768%0.006480% Annual % Change -2.24%-4.25% Bond Rating –Maintain/improve current rating (AA+) 2019 –S&P Rating AA+ General Fund Reserves –40% to 50% 2019 Year End Estimate –47% 2020 Year End Projection –44% Property Tax Rank –Maintain/improve Property Taxes/HH –Growth plus inflation General Fund Expenditures/HH –Growth plus inflation Budget Objectives/ Metrics 9 City Tax Capacity Rate* 10 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Prior Lake 7-County Metro Average Metro Pop. 10,000 - 24,999 Metro Pop. 25,000 - 49,999 *City Levy/Tax Capacity = Tax Rate Scott County Tax Capacity Rate by City 11*City Levy/Tax Capacity = Tax Rate City 2018 2019 Belle Plaine 84.60%78.62% Elko New Market 46.03%46.07% Jordan 71.62%72.77% New Prague 61.25%57.57% Prior Lake 33.04%33.02% Savage 47.12%44.47% Shakopee 37.21%34.94% Property Tax Levy Per Household 12 General Fund Operating Expenditures Per Household 13 Service Challenges Street infrastructure Costs Street infrastructure fees provide funding for street infrastructure needed for new development. A court challenge of the statutory basis for infrastructure development fees Without this fee, the city is facing a funding gap to build out the transportation system Evaluating options for funding including consideration of a tax levy to fund these infrastructure costs. 14 Service Challenges cont’d Staffing Winter Maintenance Transportation Projects Aging Fleet impact to operations Parks, trails and natural area maintenance Proactive Policing Technology Replacement 15 Residential Impact of City Portion of Proposed Tax Levy Change 16 RESIDENTIAL IMPACTS % Net Net Net Net Net Net of Inc/Dec Difference Inc/Dec Difference Inc/Dec Difference Inc/Dec Total 19 vs 20 % Change 19 vs 20 % Change 19 vs 20 % Change +15.01+%498 5%184.38$ 16.2%363.16$ 17.6%543.69$ 16.5% +10.01-15.00%545 6%152.52$ 13.4%300.59$ 14.6%449.84$ 13.6% +5.01-10.00%2,215 24%88.79$ 7.8%175.45$ 8.5%262.13$ 7.9% +0.01-5.00%4,937 54%25.07$ 2.2%50.32$ 2.4%74.42$ 2.3% No Change 13 0%(6.80)$ -0.6%(12.25)$ -0.6%(19.43)$ -0.6% -0.01-5.00%685 8%(38.66)$ -3.4%(74.82)$ -3.6%(113.28)$ -3.4% -5.01 - 10.00%160 2%(102.38)$ -9.0%(199.96)$ -9.7%(300.99)$ -9.1% -10.00 - 15.00%9 0%(166.11)$ -14.6%(325.10)$ -15.8%(488.70)$ -14.8% -15.01% +7 0%(197.97)$ -17.4%(387.67)$ -18.8%(582.55)$ -17.6% 9,069 100% AVG MV- $349,600 $600,000 HOME $900,000 HOME % EMV Value Range # of affected Properties 17