Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBuilding Permit 06.0590 Plans z 9 7 bp aa to 8ArnNv CA05S J;9 yS:F. (BASED ON t OCC ANT PSR OATpNG �. DACE' + ' t PER 5O S OF STAGING ARCA) 6 3 MINI GULF WATE FALL � t z 1--Q''� 8;7S:F J 72 OCC.. BATriNG_GAGE i ElA,TnNG CACP 2 SAUNG CACE 3 SATIING CAGE 4 fJ (tlASED tlN OCCUPANTS .PE HI)LE % 18 HOLE COURSE) ' OWING CAGt S. ACING AEA `T 44 4 ' t6 13 MINI GULF 2 t7 POND 1 P \j PZ �► �� W 4:r Floor �40 ;.I 1 1. '1 — -- � X� 110I F IF OF . r' :! t:,'" . e:.:•�:n.H _ - .:r ..ae . . _.._ ,: .. FoI _ PooTo 'a•r v-r. :vf ' r,�^'.` ::x sr++' : f."%'"- _ r - C IFF r r, :w.. • Y P i r .'fCs., . G; �t� t. .n ,' J : . . .. .- om .. ,rte :: , - ,. . . � ::' . '= r .m' t ;� -FJ4J . 1 -Al(D T r40 1. FFFI _7. /1 . IF A`P too . n �. . , _.ftottpv FI.I a. .1<'J - ak s _+4�c� • r s - s It c .,,�,fiee .+r ? }p FIX r• - r �_ - :t • ' : C`1' sem•- -fir of J:FFr '. a .L - x.e1r : S' � r �" ' % " ;:�. FF•1�o . a..,.>. . It M .o-w1 . _ , l IF tore I . .1 04 4. M - Y- . :t+ rY " xta' . Sl^ J" E ®rro y,! SHS - ' Z•'� r fII h .p-' ,�- . iP '.ra•- 1 r , .Ni. x tfo f/ C 1 4tcr ' 7 V. T. - ' y pi IF i^ YA .� � 1,tf�° WlIF, IF r ti�•r 4- u"/ � O� A w a '" +J J �,+J i , 3IMI. I x.- •,sa' : ' :�'' •" -• F. <:>� r :• >• ir . �' . : ^ .: . - . ,.,_- .-itµ,. s ,ter ..IF .1wj+ . r lXr .0±;f'x • FIFF 0. ..tiT.• . r.• 4<' .r F . a ' f 1 r I40 ..Y' }f '_µms .f.: `fl- . c J r' ' IF t i- p w� ' IF 401 sIo' Too, F•.. •: ic. ' 1. .y . .J' . . . ! ' . . _ • .i 'fir nt'r � � ' - - .� y,� I IF , ,��For � Yom; 1 -11 . .,.� . Ria' i v V Y � \ N " s t ja40 Ar 64f ,IIIII, 0 Ade � r♦ � I ,`+ � . Ll rim eof0 r ` y K U.4 ,R« c t vJ•t+Y+�G4yl, CJG �•l.�� �.` �r -s.�•i..or r Sin f 'Y ' i � ' ts � 00 ♦ / ♦ / fr CITY OF PRI R LAKE 1 .� « .�rINN DATEe ihti C J ''5 4 r ' f f 4CCEFTED AS SUBMiTfED CCEPTED WiTH CORR] Cnn ON AS NOTED �. �.� NOT ACCFPTED-CQRAECT & RESUBMIT Thee mmments ora for your itri MMfon, AD rk slotaD' be dm 1tt fu4 campt tts:e a�ifft aq appfimwe km7drrg & zoning torte �g not spQct�caQy rated In tfu, redma ..__. THIS PLAN SETON SITEATALLMMES. ;;, A Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Final Report Triple Play Sports Complex Industrial Lane Prior Lake, Minnesota Prepared for R J Ryan Construction Project BL-06-03139 November 6 , 2006 Braun Intertec Corporation BRAUN Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 952 .995. 2000 INTERTEC 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Fax: 952 .995 . 2020 Minneapolis, AAN 55438 Web: brounintertec.com November 6 , 2006 Project BL-06-03139 Mr. Jason Miller R J Ryan Construction 1100 Mendota Heights Road Mendota Heights , MN 55120 Re : Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal Triple Play Sports Complex Industrial Lane Prior Lake, Minnesota Dear Mr. Miller: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Final Report for the Triple Play Sports Complex and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports . Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1700 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications . The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractors work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents . The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to , nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them, judge, or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this . As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. Copies of this report were provided to the contractor' s site representative for their review and records . As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. As needed, we also contacted the project structural engineer for additional direction and clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. Plans and Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections . From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received, these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Examination of Field Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in general accordance with American Welding Society (AWS ) D 1 . 1 -2006, Figure 5 .4 and Table 6. 1 requirements and the requirements of the project pians and specifications . so Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 R J Ryan Construction Project BL-06-03139 November 6 , 2006 Page 2 Bolted Connection Observations Bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled and if the splined end of the tension control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. In addition, each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Deck Weld Observations Deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1 . 3 - 1998 , Section 6 . 0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications . In addition, the location and the completeness of the side lap fasteners were observed and evaluated. Anchor Bolt Observations The anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed, fully engaged and snug tight. If required by the construction documents , we also observed if the plate washers were installed. General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality . No warranty, express or A mplied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952 . 995 . 2524 or Mary Denne at 952 . 995 . 25 100 Sincerely , BRAUN I TERTEC CORPORATION Daniel P . Graham ICC Certified Special Inspect24teel and Welding M . a PEichael M. euer, PE �" • 15571 := e Vice Pres * res dent- Principal L er 0�0 Attachment: Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Final Report c : Mr. Scott Weistling, Finn Daniels Mr. Richard Johnson, McConkey, Johnson, Soltermann Mr. Bob Hutchins, City of Prior Lake Inspections Department Mr. Greg Bialon, Braun Intertec BRAUN Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 952 .995 . 2000 1100 1 Hampshire ,Avenue S Fox: 952 .Q95. 2020 NTERTEC Minneapolis, J'AN 55438 Web: brouniniertecCom Structural Steel and Precast Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of 1 City of: Prior Lake Minnesota Date : November 6 2006 Attention: Mr. Jason Miller Project: Triple PlU Sports Complex Industrial Lane Prior Lake Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-06-03139 In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services, special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items : Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications . Discrepancies were noted and documented. Following the required corrections or review with the structural engineer, the connections were found to be acceptable . There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection related issues . Structural Welding . The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications . Discrepancies were noted and documented. Following the required corrections or review with the structural engineer, the connections were found to be acceptable . There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding related issues . The deck welding and side- lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking-related issues . Conclusion Based upon the inspections performed and the attached reports , it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans , specifications , structural engineer provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code , Inspecting Firm : Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engine under the laws of the State of Minnesota. c ael M. euer, P Vice Pres ent-Princ pal Engineer License umber: 15571 November 6 , 2006 Attachments : Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 6 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page . of BRAUN RA SIDRPT I NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report cIty Of Report No . : rt 14 ;c; ` Date of This Report: Project Name: ` `` raQ �C. .7 `' ' ��, kw Project No . : Project Address : Client: .`I � : dl. t Client Project No . : 1 Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection : Inspection Coverage : ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans ? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed : N -A ( { v List tests performed : • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations ? Yes F1 No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No i @eta, ALt. ,4r, • If yes , see attached Summary Sheet. 5o asVe4� sv 9 �t 13 2, To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans , specs ications and applicab e workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed : a Date : 31.r ;' ;a Print Full Name : � ,���,. > � -�t I . D . No. : White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of _ RAU N SIDRP7 I NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Icar' Ci Report No . : "tat tit.;, �t , l ! Date of This Report: Project Name : ) fga.i s tfvs roject No . : t � ` �• s =' Project Address : Client: Client Project No . : Weather: v. e Temperature: 0 Q Type of Inspection : Inspection Coverage : ❑ Continuous Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases 'Periodic Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans ? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ De gription and location of work completed : r e List tests performed : • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations ? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans , specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC , except as noted above. Signed : Date : r2> C Print Full Name : �� . �3 1 . D . No . : � � a White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 - _ Page � of B RAUIN SIDRPT NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Report No. : �f •� , i� � � l•� ( M -� Date of This Report: � " � . ,DL Project Name: 1 ` eQl ct:�3 ' %q!sk2 .6 -Vam r �4 0; Project No . : l "i Project Address : Client: Client Project No . : Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection : Inspection Coverage : ❑ Continuous ❑_Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special 141� Periodic elding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans ? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ pesv and location of work completed : PJ C Z ' 34 t e� List tests performed : • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations ? Yes ❑ N • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes , see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed : �1--_- —� gDate : Print Full Name : ( fa�9l ® I . D . No. : e� White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of BRAUNRAN SIDRPT I NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of , •� .:;.; Report No . : Date of This Report: Project Name: - ) -' , A �v '� ) � fc � Bty : 1Z Ces . . nt Project No. : Project Address : Client: ! � �t cit Client Project No . : Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection : Inspection Coverage : ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases OPeriodic t7Welcling & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans ? Yes ❑ ( Listed Below) No ❑ Descrirn and location of work completed : f� ti • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations ? Ye No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ❑ • if yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC , except as noted above. Signed : Date : Print Full Name : ` 60uttuQ 11 {� v ( � I . D . No. : L/OSY04 White copy to Braun tntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of BRAUN SIDRPT2 I NTERTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of � � P ( p Report No . : A"uC hAzat \ S t"C'G ! Date of This Report: Project Name : 0 ( Project No . . lL ! 4` Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) L5 )� r _ C3u'� � � ► t Yt� 1'��� t� �- `� G �t� `5 � �} � +�Srt � � � `�r.�� h~., � t�'2 `(L 1 To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed : - - - Date : ' s S� Print Full Name : cI . D. No : White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of BRAUN SIDRPT I NTERTEC Special Inspection» Daily Report City of ; Report No . : Segal " '4 Date of This Report: S 7 Project Name: 114 i Q 01 ��, tr 1" � �5j _ Project No . : &f.- into Project Address: Client: Client Project No . : Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection : Inspection Coverage : ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases 'W-' Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans ? Yes ❑ ( Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed : OL ® 9ia Lim ci. 1 List tests performed : • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations ? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above . Signed : Aakkc Date : ®""? • 1„ Print Full Name : QLLA .QN9yJ + ®,�, 1 . D . No . : � y �jpg White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of BRAUN RAUN SIDRPT INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Report No. : i ��ir ttJ.� �, + Date of This Report: i o Project Name: Ott- Project No . . Project Address : dd�"t Client Project No . : Weather: Temperature : Type of Inspection : Inspection Coverage : ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases PeriodicJWelding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans ? Yes ❑ ( Listed Below) No ❑ Dpscription and location of work completed : L Ric List tests performed : • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations ? Yes No ❑ � j � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ❑ • If yes , see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans , specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed : Date : 1taA� S— moi„ Print Full Name: o P, 6 I . D . No . : White copy to Braun lntertec file . Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page . of _ BRAUN SIDRPT I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ` r `� +^; � •fes_ Report No . : `aej�� -rr S i 5` Date of This Report: Project Name: 11 640 low 5Fr� r Project No . : � � cj Project Address : -mss Client: %1� Client Project No . : if Weather: Temperature: Type of Inspection : Inspection Coverage : ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ' Periodic AR4 Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans ? Yes ❑ ( Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed : " tom AG �r � 1 L % *' S #,teas " ed : Z/'- t lav e c "tcj hyN V,% i/ �IQg ;s Goo yy ( meg .+ ` H^gv 14 til • Are there any d screpancies noted from this day's obs ations ? Yes EJ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes F] No • If yes , see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above . Signed : 4�au Date : Print Full Name : , M I � 1 ._ I . D. No . : White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 HUa-U' r —�00b 14 : �� c_ I I Y U(- PR I UR LHKE '35244 ' r'424 > F . U2 M1NNJ?SOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Division. of Construction Codes and Licensing RESORT ON PLANS Plans and spectf cations on plumbing: `Triple Play Sports , 58321ndustrial Laos ND, prior Lake , Scott County, Minnesota, Plan No . 075040 OvtR•tERSI7IP : Mr• Mark Kretssler , EB Leasing, 14561 Alabama Avenue , Savage , Minnesota. 55378 SUgM I ER(S) : Century Plumbing , Ino . , 1324 Helmo Avenue North, Oa)cdalc, Minnesota 55128 Plans Dated: March 24, 2006 (Rev June 6 , 2006 ; Isometrics : July 6 , 2006 ; Site Plan : April 19 , 2006 (Rev, July 24j2006) Date Received: July 24, 2006 , July 7, 2006 Date Reviewed: July 25 , 2006 SCOPE : This review is limited to the design of this particular project only insofar as the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code, as amended , apply, and does not cover the water satpply or sewerage system to which this plumbing system Is connected . The review is based upon the supposition that the data on which the design is based are correct, and that necessary legRl authority has been obtained to consiTuct the project. The ign o [ structural features and the efficiency of equipment must be taken by the project responsibility for the des is contingent upon satisfactory disposition of any requirements included in this report designer. Approval . Special care ons of thd be eMjnnc ota Plumbing Codekon to insure that the alA. opytof tlt�e approved p1Ans and on of the plumbing sspe iBc � ions should with the provi be retaincd at the project location for future reference. INSPECTIONS : All plumbing irpta ) lations must be tested and inspected in accordance with the req ttiremepts of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. As sptcified in Minnesota Rul.cs, part 4715 .2830 , no plumbing work may be covered prior to completing the required tests and inspections . Provisions must be made for applying an air test at the t:irrtc of the roughing-in inspection as outlined in Minnesota Rules , part 4715 .2820 . subpart 2, of the code . A manometer test, as specified in Minnesota Rules , part 4715 .2820, subpart 3 , is required at the time of the fnis)7ed plumbing inspection . Itis the responsibility of the contractor/installer to notify the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry When an installation for a state contract job , licensed facility, or project in an arca where there is no local administrative authority is ready for an inspection and test . To schedule inspections , ntativc Cor your region.. or ca) ) Jim. Peterson at 651 /284-5889 . contact the state plumbing standards rcpresc REQ1J1UMENT(S) : 1 . The buried water supply still appears to be within 10 feet ora manhole (MI4101 ) and also crosses the building scwcr. .A minimum horizontal separation of 10 fcct must be maintained bEtwccn the water service and any sewer, whenever possible . All underground sections of building drain band building sewer pipe located within 10 feet horizontally of underground water service pipe must be constructed in accordance with Minnesota Rulcs , part all 5 A 710 , subpart, 2 . Wb ere the building sewer crosses the water service , the sewer shall be constructed as specified in Minnesota Rules , pact 4715 . 17 10 , subpart 2 (E) . 2 . The flammable waste trap shall be constructed in accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules , part 4715 . 1120 . The interceptor shall include: a. A minimum holding capacity of 35 cubic feet . b . At least 3 feet of depth below the invert of the discharge pipe * c . A water seal OF not 1 ess than 3 inches on the (nisi and not less than 18 inches on the outlet. d, The vent must Ti Re vertically or within 45 degrees of the vertical to a, point at least 6 inches above the interceptor. The vent shall be constructed of approved metallic pipe material . AUG-07 -2006 14 : 22 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 95244Y4245 H . U. Triple Play Sports Plumbing p ) an No , 075040 Page 2 July 25 , 2006 C. The interceptor shall be located so it is readily accessible for service and maintenance. 3 , It is unclear from the floor plan. if the outlet branch drain. sezvirig the flammable waste interceptor is within 25 feet of the vented drainage branch serving the mop sink and floor drain in the mechanical room . If it is not within 25 feet of this branch, the discharge line serving the flammable waste interceptor must be provided with a 2 inch vest pipe within 25 feet of the interceptor (see Minnesota Rules , part 4715 . 1120) . 4 . Water heaters must be installed so that they are readily accessible for inspection, repair, or tcplacement (sce Minnesota Rules, part 4715 . 2240 ) . A Water heater with a tank capacity of 6 gallons or less maybe concealed in a ceiling space provided the water heatez has been Set in an overflow pan. The overflow pan must be constructed of a corrosion regigtant material , have side walls extenditlg at least 4 inches upward. and have an outlet size that is not less than the si?c of the supply line to the water beater. The outlet must continue undiminished in size to a point-of=safe disposal below the ceilln.g axca . Tools must not be required to gain access to the water hcatcr (sec Minnesota Rules , part 4715 .2240 ) , Itis recommended that the relief valve discharge pipc be routed independently to a point-of--safe disposal below the ceiling. 5 . Changes in direction. in drainage piping must be made by appropriate use of wyes and bends . Sanitnxy tees are not allowed where the direction of flow changes from either vertical to horizontal or horizontal to horizontal (see Minnesota Rules , part 4715 . 2.410) . 6 . The size of the supply branch to the back-to -back water closets was not noted on the submitted riser diagram. A water distribution branch serving two tank-type water closets must be at least '/.-inch in size (see Minnesota Rules, pant 471. 5 . 3800) . 7 , Verify that the vent sertiing each Water closet is a minimum of 2 inches in diameter ( see Minnesota Rules , part 4715 , 2520 , subpart 6) . 8 , Ductile iron pipes used for the water service system must meet ANSI Standards A21 . 15 or A21 . 51 or AWWA Standards C 115 or C 151 . 9 , high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe is approved for site storm drainage in 12-inch to 60 -incli sizes only. The pipe must comply with AASIITO M294 or AASHTO MP7 with ASTM D3212 fittings (see Minnesota Rules , part 4715 . 0540) , The installation must comply with ASTM Standard D2321 . Water-tight joints must be used. 10 . The copper water distribution piping must meet .ASTM Standard B 88 (see Minnesota Rules , part 4715 .0520). 11 . PVC plastic pipe used for the drain , waste, and vent system shall comply with ASTM Standard D 2665 , D 2949 or >~ 891 (see Minnesota Rules , part 4715 . 0570 through part 4715 . 0600) . 12 . In all buildings other than dwellings, shutoff valves sliall be installed which permit the water supply to all equipment in each separate room or to each individual fixture to be shut off without ititerference with the water supply to any other room or portion of the building (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715 . 1800 , subpart 6) . 13 . The plumbing systcm shall be tested in accordance with Minnesota Rules , part 4715 . 2820 , This shall include all portions of the store n sewer u�iil, in 10 feet of the buriod water service • RUG-O? -2006 14 : 22 CIT` ' OF PRIOR LRKE 95244' 4245 P . 04 Triple Play Sports Plumbing Plan No . 075040 Page 3 July 25 , 2006 NOTE(S) , 1 . The scope of this project consists of the construction of anew building. The plumbing installation includes watcr closets , urinals, lavatories, a mop sink, a drinking fountain, a water heater, a flammable waste interccptor, pan drains, floor drains , roof drains , and site storm drainage . 2 . This facility will be saved by new municipal water and sewer se�viec connections . Authorization for construction in accordance with the approved plans may be withdrawn if consmtetion is not undertaken within a period of two years . The fact that the plans have been approved does not necessarily mean tbat recommendations of acquirements for changc will not be made at some later time when changed conditions, additional information, or advanced knowledge make improvements necessary. A roved ; Todd Schac er Public Health E ineer Plumbing and Engineering Unit 443 Lafayette Road North St. Paul , Minnesota 55155 -4343 6511284-5884 TDS : sas � cc : Century Plumbing, Inc . Mr. Mark Kreiesler Render & Associates , Inc . Mr. Robert Hutchins , Building Official Mir mesota Department of Health Environmental Health Services Section File � L Dew cw� L � � JEW rt�IN � Q ACCO s MMa bACCUD I'M CORREOONS AS N� 13 NOTACGEF IJED�tORRECT & RESUBMrr 7 h com .i are for your hn 7n"on, All � ork shall be done ull li all Gppficahle building ar zoning cede rX g iBms not sped;ally noted in this review MU' IS PSI SET ON SITE AT ALL i it�9ES, I [: KISTING 4 'MAi1\J I i � lea ICE MAIM J ` �0 3 — COMP SINS /o C (a) P- 1 three compartment sink P- 2 hand sink P-3 2 tell tale floor drain C � P- 4 2 " floor drain Triple Play Sports Concession Axea 5832 Industrial Lane NE PLUMBING DRAWINGS / Prior Lake , MDI I Eby artuy that this plan, speaitloation or report Ver prepared by b OY prrder i�.irwt rupervisim and � �r�y/ i� M ( addition to earlier plans ) that I Ue a y tz"tered Y ccntraetor " .! 0 � ►{ l4uter Ylwber wdar the laws of the state of Nlnnasota. 1324 Helmo Avenue North �j� Oakdale, MN 55128 4";:tc —' 651 -653-9390 Fax : 651 -203- 1307 oetar Lia. Not 000755N I \ \ LXISTING . HoT � ColO wgRf jt ES �\ \ 146T I � ( ZCE MAC4INE To+u i Ftn, C/ Nor- u . 4s 3 CCor, P SINK � a toriet- .r- oZ30 P- 1 three compartment sink P- 2 hand sink P- 3 2 " tell tail floor drain P-4 2 " floor drain Triple Play.. Sports Concession Area PLUMBING DRAWINGS 5832 Industrial Lane NE I l hsraby cartlfy ftt this plan, spwmatim or report rtitlJtUjjj(J Inc. Prior Lake , MN � + vras•d it tt" r`iti�an�otar 'M C [J� tfut S sn a eAtUT ( addition to earlier plans ) Msstar rluabar the laws of the stat. of KUYAsoti. 1324 Helmo Avenue North Oakdale, MN 55128 651 -653-9390 r/ � Fax : 651 -203- 1307 DA tog " � Lio. t3o1_ 0037$ 5PM N O \\ a <>V<> 4ci3 5.F . (,e.Nassiews 3 oC los 1 ,,E, DR OTRED REF, BEVERAGE Lf) 2-DR *44 OPCORN m FRZ. / N -PIZZA WARMER / DISPLAY r1WDRK QW HEIGHT PARTITION WALL 00BLE SD `. rAxHausT (40 1 /2' HIGH), DRY HOOD i i V.C. POP UNE STORAGE ;CQNV. DOG CHASE. 109 CE / POP Lf) OVEN GRILL � . . Oyp.� DISPENSER F.D. P. V.C. POP LINE EEEEISLAND ' ASH REGISTER CHASE. POP 7�AGE WORK i ' SYST. HELVING TABLE OW HEIGHT PARTITION WALL (33 1 /2- HIGH). • CE CREATE HAND HAND MERCHANDISER Z F. F.O. ICE SINK SINK SNACK I i O 91DISPLAY H RONT COUNTER I.- W/ CABINET BASEOt� f� SINK P Tl a TENSIL sroR. 4 Ell ( Z 2-oR. O fR2. 43 UEEEEEEEE Z } 0 C'D.NG. SJ t`1+1 J I C1 tg9CE - � 1a7 9,Q,Ia�Jr`�eAt 'Q ' Q 243 5.F . CiK) "135 S .F . N 41 OCC . TRIPLE PLAY ves(` BURNSVILLE, MN ID PRELIMINARY CONCESSIONS LAYOUT OI O 11 s-s-0s I Q Fire Sprinkler Plan Review L ate : July 27 , 2006 a Owner : Triple Play Sports Co . Location : 5832 Industrial Blvd . Prior Lake MN . 55372 Contractor : Midwest Fire Protection 9950 E . Hwy. 10 Elk River MN 55330 1 . Separate permits are required for the alarm system . The 1999 of NFPA 13 shall be the standard . - 3 . All materials shall be tested and installed per the listing . 4 . All valves controlling water flow shall be monitored and secured including the PIV . 5 . It is the responsibility of the fire sprinkler contractor to flush all main and branch lines . 6 . Provide frost protection for all portions of the wet system . 7 . Field verify all head and device locations . 8 . Secure all valves against tampering . All valves in public areas shall be locked and protected . 9 . Provide a water resistant system plan at the each sprinkler riser to include the following information . a. Total site plan b . All valves c . Riser locations d . Areas served by individual risers e . All main and auxiliary drains f. Location of inspector ' s test g . Location of PIV valve . G 10 . For inspections call (952) 447 - 9850 give the project buildiiig permit number (4&000m r2) 10 . Seal all penetrations in rated walls in an approved manor. 11 . Provide protection for concealed combustible areas . 12 . All materials and products shall be installed and used per the listing .