Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20220504104957011
APfill PID# Toy Rr A114INISTRATIVE LAND DIVISION U I Q APPLICATION FORM phone : � N Property Owner ' Phone : �-- Address : 1j _ G Applicant : - A f, Address : phone : Name of Survey ought obtain a variance or sought to plat , rezone , l icant Previously rt of its Has the APp permit on the subject site or any pa conditional use What was requested • When : No Yes_— S : Identification Number (PID ) . S[1BMISSION � Tlication form and PropI and proposed parcels • A , Completed aPp ion of existing B , Complete Legal description C , Filing fees by a registered land surveyor 'supporting data and 1 set D . rvey p and suPP° copies of the application , survey parcels * E • 15 COp and proposed reduced to 11 " X 17 " • e of existing re footage and or acreage own property contiguous to the F , Total squa Owners who G , Names and addresses of subject site . COMPLETE iCATIONS SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW . ONLY AppL, resented on this form is correct ' knowledge the information p Subdivision Ordinance To the best of uy lon 6-1-3 of the Prior Lake I I have read Sect ' procedures for Adm e 4 strative Plats . in addition , requirements and p the procedures an outlined • which specifies the or tion and follow f agree to provide informs J Date 3l- Applicants " Si ature Date F6e Owners S ' ature NG DIRECTOR THIS SECTION TO BE FILLEDIN BY THE PLANNI DATE APPROVED =D��ID J DATE OF HEAPING SITION OF APPLICATION : DENIED , 1 DISPO CITY COUNCIL ( APPEAL) PROVID L CONDITION Will C ,�J Date Signature of t Planning Director h " 1 T CHECK LIST APFORM " ADMINISTRATIVE PLA ��, / y` SUBJECT SITE : CCU T�_ T APPLICANT * C� Q �� ! m LEGAL DESC : PID : � e ! COMMENT RETURN DATE : DATE TASK COMPLETED SUBMITTAL DATE : � � CHI 113 REVIEW SUBMITTAL MATERIALS : DATE IF VARIANCE ' SET HEARING TO DEFT 3 " RECORDSTAFF " REVIEW C . ATTORNEY vV% HEADS / " U NOTICE TO UTILITY COMPANIES ' F Atit I DNR NOTICE IF SHORELAND : PREPARE AREA MAP * " LOT " PROTO ` APPLICANT NOMRENOTICE " LOT " PROPERTY OWNS NOTIFY OF VARIANCE IF APP 'ERS MNDOT NOT Other Scott County Watershed District COPY OF SURVEY * CES SHOULD INCLUDE : AREA 14AP TTER " LOT " NOTI —� NOTICE n LOTAPP " MAIL APPLICATIONToN APPLICANT@ APPROVAL LETTER AND SURVEY MAIL COPY OF APP . APPLICATION TO DNR IF SHORE USING SUMMARY ASSIGN FILN� E SHEET BINDER AMEND ADPLAT SUMMARY SHEET : — ADD PERNEW FOILERFOR NEW PID : CREATE , l pppl icant : File # : p'p / "�� Address : FILE BY ' Legal : _� Applicable Maps and Documents FILE SHOULD CONTAIN : Copy of public Notice Staff Review Record lication Correspondence Original APP Other Information Copy of Notice LettlIcable AMEND ZONING MAP Council Min . if p'Pp AMEND BASE MAP AMEND LAND USE INDEX AMEND 1 / 2 SEC MAP ASSIGN ADDRESS AMEND CONST . MAP COPY OF 8 1/ 2 x 11 SURVEY TO FINANCE DEP 04 VRIO x V Cz1 " STAFF" N Etio � � CITY OF PP��REVIEW RECORD PLANNING DEPAR�� DI SvMBUI'E TO MNDOT CITY MANAGER _ BUILDING OFFICIAL N� PUBLIC WORKS — SCOW RICE --ASST . CITY MANAGER CITY ENGINEER CITY ATTORNEY --MINNEGASCO _ — _ CITY FINANCE POLICE CHIEF MN VALLEY ELEC CITY PARKSCOUNTY HIGHWAY _ WATERSHED —CITY PLANNER rI —OTHER " n � REVIEW DEADLINE : DATE DISTRIBUTED * tiW i ' , t CI I ' �� TIME NO DATE :` PROJECT REVIEW MEETING : 5 VACATION PUD JHOME OCCUPATION II,I ✓ADM1N PLAT LNA PLAT REZ __ ONING APPLICATION FOR* PRELIMINARY �� USE OOP�IP PLAN AMEND FINAL PLAT --�j�E _EI5/ EAW ms OTHER o APPLICANT : T Y L � J 51 � � � PHONE • . . , . ADDRESS : v ' PHONE * CONTACT PERSON : PROJECT REQUEST : ""- DESCRIPTION . �( Of � v�� SITE LEGAL COMP pI,p,N USE PID : �� ��- O 13 � V ZONING * PLANNING �IISSION REVIEW DATE : i S ro 1 CITY COUNCIL REVIEW DATE : In daR , , I UU . to St. S.E . , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph . (612) 447 - 4230 1 Fax (612) 447 -4245 4629 Dako AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER uest in the following have : I have reviewed the attached proposed req GRADING — — CITY CODE -- SIGNS -- WATER ---�IRONKENr _--CO�,Y ROAD ACCESS __— SEWER iFLOOD PLAINLEGAL ISSUES ZONING -- —NATURAL FEATURES _PARKS — T�SpOFCATION _—_SEPTIC SYSTEM ELECTRIC � WATER ASSES3'4ENTS GAS EROSION CONTROL DER —BLD CODE _— I recorranend : _APPROVAL DENIAL CONDITIONAL APPROVAL CCtuAEN`I'S : TITLESSOC,G DATE : `� q r l 9 /� SIGI�TURE : Q-� �� . IO l l BY DATE • pZffIRN T0 . O� PRIOR x v � �I o3ES °� NOTICE OF HEARING FOR AD MIl`TI TRATNE LAND DIVISI 1 g will be held by the City Council in the Prior Lake Council You are hereby notified that a hearin Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S .E. on : Anri1181994 at 7 : 45 P'M ' To consider an Administrative Land Division for PURPOSE OF HEARING : John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail , Prior Lake , Minnesota . 3437 Sycamore Trail, Outlot C , Maplewood , Prior SUBJECT SITE LOCATION : Lake , Scott County, Minnesota. The applicant proposes to divide Outlot C , REQUESTED ACTION : Maplewood into two parcels , as per attached survey reduction . Objections from neighborhood residents have been received , therefore this item must be considered by the City Council . heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this hearing . Oral and If you desire to be the City Council . For more information , contact Gina written comments will be accepted by y Mitchell in the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447 - 4230 . Prior Lake Planning Department DATE MAILED : April 691994 ta 55372- 1714 Ph . (612) 447 -4230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245 4629 Dakota St . S . E . , Prior Lake , MinAnNeEQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i SIMPSON ADMINISTR ATIVE PLAT SITE LAKE PRIOR 6 ,6 5 4 3 2 5 i _ 5 3 � Q O�tK 4 o �9e 35iy 2 3 a 3`'a G i. 15% 'by m 5l 16 � j N D k a r TRACT ACD in m 1 ti toC0 8 m � ` � 3 a ' S ' t� TRACT B o un 3 g c5 O2 q2 �� zo A TRACT C 51it Z 000, its pd D �`� W� L. Lov�Y s q�)5c>9 353i }5559 3581 0�0 E we�.te 3y8a �4q 2 3 "b"bi3 1 8 A 1 2 1 a q ti•48-bZ 1 7 00 11 12 13 14 15 3 16 9 C 5 3 7 B 5 357.7- 3 ttv �O0 a _ 10 333q vnc . rr�• M . _ 3525 36 � 35 9 S -r -r==ZEST" { 3309 3319 l� g ? 8 4 "R ACT D � TRACT E _ Z 5 4 3 N I M d 2 N � F V� 3 �, 7 3 2w ; D a- 0 �Y 2 3 d gnu, N r O 3 � . t { 6 (� 3 • _ 6 9 rn 4 J K 3 �/ �i � H 358 / 3g9 � y r 1 ��y A 3 2 PARP OUTLOT N ECM DRIVE d rY MM ' 34nr 3 09 3 17L A fsr a F t a 35 a4i V 0� PRIOR _ r x 41INNES0NF� NOTICE OF HEARIN FOR AnMINISTRATIVE LA D D I I You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the City Council in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S . E. on, March 7 . 1994 at 7 : P.M . To consider an Administrative Land Division for PURPOSE OF HEARING : John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail, Prior Lake , Minnesota. SUBJECT SITE LOCATION : 3437 Sycamore Trail, Outlot C, Maplewood, Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota. The applicant proposes to divide Outlot C , REQUESTED ACTION : Maplewood into two parcels , as per attached survey reduction . Objections from neighborhood residents have been received, therefore this item must be considered by the City Council . If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this hearing . Oral and written comments will be accepted by the City t 4474230For more information , contact Gina Mitchell in the Prior Lake Planning Department a Prior Lake Planning Department DATE MAILED : February 28, 1994 4629 Dakota St . S . E . , Prior Lake , Minnesota o37 OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER. 612) 447 -4230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245 AN EQUAL r 0 i John Simpson nt Charles Hall Current Reside 3441 S camore Trail SW or Current Resident Prror take , MN '; 55372 3486 Syycamore Trail SW ' Prior Lake , MN 55372 gavid Johnston or Current Resident 3416 Sycamore Trail SW Ellen Hackett Prior Like , MN 55372 or Current Resident 3508 Sycamore Trail SW Prior t ake , MN 55372 Gary petjen or ' Current Resident 3469 ai SLake° rMNTr55372 Pat Lynch Prior DIVision of Waters 1200 Warner Road St , Paul , MN 56106 , Thomas 5 i chten or Current ResideTail SW nt 3406 s camoreNBr 55372 Prior Ronald Johnson , or Current Res �. den41 al t 3420 S amo MNTr56372W prior akep Mathew Prettyman or Current Rredent e s1 SW 3442 Sy ail S Prior Lake , MN Current Resident #1 SW 3454 S a morMN 55372 Prior Wesley Mader or Current Resident 3470 SycamorMNTrail 5372W Prier Lake , Sidney Rhnehart or Current Resident 3478 S camoreMNTrail 63 SW Prior ake , Robert Kordich or Current Resident 3463 Willow Beach Trail SW ' Prior Lake , Mid Michael Span 'er or Current Resident 3483 stcam , rMNTr5B372all SW . Prior Daniel Bathel or Current Resident 3498 Stake , Trail SW Prior Lake , MN 55372 -7 -27 Isar 01 yL 15 No . U11 r . U2 D N R PiEI 0 REG 10N U TEL : 612 - ( y .. t 0 a jr I CP Ell 3' - -� REGIONQn 1 61 NOTICE OF HEARIII ADMINIA' II V L L�II3 ' �5ION lkou are hereby noti win ed that a he rig will held by the City Council in the Prior e Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S . E . on : a it 1 4 at e P. I I . 5 e` alma8 �� �a s � ArK ARTILT ' To ConSlder an Aartttn35tldtive Land Division SOT John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore ll'rail, Prior ;..a.ke , p Minnesota. 1 E 1 Sg� ,TC`T � '� CT' I : 3437 Sycamore Trail , Guelot C, Iapleood , ricer Lake, Scott County, Minnesota . 1 AR" EQUES 'TED kC EOPd : `T°he applicant proposes to divide Outlot C , Maplewood into two parcels , as per attached survey reduction _ Objections trom neighborhood residents have been received , therefore .his item must De considered by the City Council . If yo-a des=i e to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this hearing _ Oral and AIR � tin rrWi l b cO it gile accepted by the City Council . For more information , contact Gina Mitchell in the l"rior Lake Planning Department at 4471111 nor Labe planning Department ATE MAILEDfu February 28, 1994 Vr`a'KS ccb'l�YQc -� t"i n 4629 Dakota St . S . L _ , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372- 1714 1 Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 4474245 AN EQUAL OPPORIUNITY EMPLOYER I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATER CITY CODE GRADING SEWER ENVIRONMENT SIGNS ZONING FLOOD PLAIN OOUNN ROAD ACCESS PARKS NATURAL, FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION SEPTIC SYSTEM _ — GAS SrOr44 WATER ASSESkg4ENTS — BID CODE EROSION CONMOL OTHER I recorcunend : APPROVAL DENIAL CONDITIONAL APPROVAL COMME PS : _ TITLEsv/4,, OLI G� DATE : 2Z SIGNATURE : � alint / A r l� RETURN T0 . BY DATE • 0 I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATERCITY CODE GRADING ENVIRONMENT SIGNS SEWER ENVIRONMENT PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS _ZONING NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES PARKS TRANSPORTATION SEPTIC SYSTEM ELECTRIC ASSESSMENTS — GAS STOFd�i WATER OTHER BED CODE EROSION CONTROL APPROVAL DENIAL CONDITIONAL APPROVAL I recommend : COMMENTS : VV TITLE;f4 SOCaCL DATE : q SIGNATURE : l BY L1ATE • -----T — REAJRN TO . APR- 19 - 1994 15444 FROM I LO-B`SJ JO I IvT FAX TO915072632913��� F . 02/05 Gene L . Reisinger Construction Inc . 129 / 32745 , 78 Dwg . DELMAR H . SCHWANZ cA"b sunvErowe. Rphhnd Urtd+�' t.i� d TM sfrM d t,lln,�i 14750 SOUTH R08ERT TRAIL. AOSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 660dit d1ti; � � $URVEy0A,S CEF;TIFICATE PROPOSED LEGAL oESCRIPTION l LOts 12r 13 and the North Half of Lot 14r M,APLEWOOD TOWNSITE , Scott County , Minnesota , . according to the plat thereof , on file and of record in the Of £ ice of the County Recorders in and for said County and State . 2 ) That part O £ the platted roadway in the plat of MAPLEWOOD TOWNSITE , Scott County , ' Minnesota tying northwesterly of the plat; thencedsouthwesterly . to the nsoutherly ning at hcorner southwest corner of Lot 8 , of said A and lying southwesterly of the north so thwLot l2 , o £ said plat and there terminating , easterly lot line of Lot 12 , extended southeasterly to the last above described line , and there • terminating . Section 3 .3 ) That part of Governmento st 38eginning at rhenmost northerlYship 114p ecornerGOftLotu12P Minnesota described as £ ol • thence northwesterly along rd o MI+,PLEWOOD ToWNSZTE ► accoing t the recorded plat thereof , l2 to the northwesterly extension of the northeasterly line of said Lot the shoreline of Prior Lake ; thence southwesterly alone said shoreline to the intersection with the westerly extenone of the Nrth Half sion of the slotsouth said westezlYo extension oto thef Lot lwesterly rie4r said wof said TOWNSITE ; thence easterly g along the westerly line of Lots 14 , 13 and 12 to the point Lot 14 ; thence northerly of beginning . s,y Purposes over that part of Lot 12r MApLEW00D TOWNplat TE , Subject to an easement for drivew rt Parthefsthe 40mO outhwesirerlytcorneraof Lot So of ahn sal Scott County , Minnesota , and that said aplat� described as fcllowss Cv>«unen 5to thence along a line drawn from hL� �utheastet of errlycextensi.onmenthofsthehnortheasterly £ lined Lot 12 , to its intersection with of the easement to be described ; thence of said Lot712 , 'the accrual point of beginning northwesterly along said southeasterly extension the to the nortrly eastoflsaid, Lot 12 , said Lot ine 12 ; thence continuing northwest Y `� said distance of � 12 . 00 feet ; thence southeasterly ofthenortheasterly Ggrne >:3. nt on the $ oftsaidYLotnl2ffthence Lot 12 , distant 7 . 00. feet southerly southeasterly parallel to gaud southeasterly romntihen of the southwestexlyecorneryofisaid Lot 1 Lot l2 ',.1;o its inte >: sectidn with a line 8 , to the southerly corner of said Lot 12 ; thence northeasterly along said line tt� the actual point of beginning . I hereby certlh+ that this survey* Plans or report was prepared by me or under my direct evoorvlslon and that I am a duly Regleterdd Land Surveyor under /r / •� ;' ��`f /h the taws of the SUM* Of Mlnn"ota. "a acf+want ` Dated 05 ' � 3 - 89 Mlnnasota Reglslmko No. sm The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street Prior Lake , MN 55372 PRIMARY REASONS FOR DENIAL I . The area of Sycamore Trail S . W . that is being affected by Mr . Simpson ' s proposal is owned by neighboring property owners and not the city of -0 Prior Lake . Although Mr . Simpson ' s proposal may fit city planning commission criteria for development , - it does not have 100 % consent from neighboring property / road owners . This is a private land use problem that is the sole responsibility of the land owners and not the city of Prior Lake . A city has no jurisdiction to grant ingress or egress access to any property located along a private road not owned by the city itself . There are several cases similar to this on record at the Scott County courthouse dating back as far as fifteen ( 15 ) years that will support the argument that the city has no jurisdiction over a private road such as Sycamore Trail . II . On March 7th , 1994 Mr . Simpson was asked to furnish a drainage plan to the city that would guarantee not to " exacerbate " off site drainage con- ditions . After being turned down by the neighbors to the South and West of his residence , Mr . Simpson dropped his initial plans of putting in a decent storm sewer system to handle off site water runoff . Instead , he is : relying on Valley Engineering Company ' s report that states new construction will only "incrementally" add to the existing drainage problem . I must emphasize that Mr . Simpson has hired Valley Engineering to produce such a report making the report ' s contents bias towards Mr . Simpsons proposal . Furthermore , since this is a private road , " road owners " should be allowed to question Mr . Steve Harvey ' s calculations regarding the impact of new construction as stated in the Valley Engineering report regarding their own road . In addition to Valley Engineering ' s report , I have also examined Mr . Larry Anderson ' s report regarding the proposed construction ' s impact on off site drainage . First of all , Mr . Anderson states that the increase in runoff will not cause significant drainage problems in the area but he fails to point out that it may worsen or " exacerbate " the existing problem . He also fails to explain in any detail where he thinks water flowing from a new driveway will exactly go . There is zero curbing directly across from the proposed new driveway and I don ' t think it takes an engineer to figure out where water runoff will go . It will adversely effect a portion of 3442 ' s lot . It will definately exacerbate the existing problem at 3420 , as well as , add to the existing problem in front of 3406 and 3415 . In summation , Mr . Simpson was asked to provide information that would assure the city , as well as , his neighbors that his proposal would not exacerbate the existing drainage problem . Valley Engineering ' s report concludes " incremental" exacerbation while Mr . Anderson ' s report concludes that the problem is " not significant " . Neither report , however , states clearly that development on the proposed site won ' t exacerbate or compound an already bad situation . I do not believe his drainage plan is adequate and I am sure it will exacerbate the present runoff situation in this area . I don ' t feel either report adequately meets the criteria set forth by the city last March 7th , 1994 . III . Another aspect to Mr . Simpson ' s proposal is the fact that the city has to change a decision it made several years ago . The previous owners to Mr . Simpson ' s residence were granted a permit to add on to their home about five ( S ) years ago . At that time the city planning department approved of such permanent construction . Now years later , the city planning department approves of the removal and re - installation of a three ( 3 ) season porch they once deemed as a permanent structure . Recently the city has had to withstand the pressures being applied by the numerous developers it has coming forth with their requests . Standing their ground , the city has had to deny some residential development requests that go against our city ' s long range development plans . Development requests that are surely more significant than Mr . Simpson ' s request . Our city ' s long range goal is to do away with ten thousand square foot lots like Mr . Simpson ' s proposed lot . Why can ' t we hold our ground as a city and uphold previous planning decisions , as well as , continue working on our long range goal for larger lot sizes ? Iv . Packing in another home on this block depreciates the neighboring home values . Some are worse than others , however mine has been estimated to come down in value approximately 10 % . Mr . Simpson ' s potential financial gain comes at the expense of his neighbors . Mr . Simpson ' s existing home will y definately depreciate if he does what he intends to do to it . v . The safety issue is one that is the responsibility of the road owners . All owners , including Mr . Simpson , agree that we have safety issues to address on this curve of Sycamore Trail . By allowing construction and land - scaping that encroaches the streets ' edge will only make this blind corner worse . In order to save trees on the proposed lot we are now jeopardizing the safety of ourselves and our children by having to build closer to the street in order to comply with the proposed covenants that the city has set forth . I feel the city is getting involved in an area where it doesn ' t believe it is getting involved . It is a private road and therefore it ' s owners should have more say as to what is appropriate or not regarding safety . There are numerous complaints already on file with the police department regarding safety on this area of Sycamore Trail . This is a real concern and not an imagined one . Mathew R . Prettyman 3442 Sycamore Trail S . W . f i PRIOR LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT INCIDENTS ON SYCAMORE TRAIL FROM AUGUST 1991 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1993 CASE NUMBER DATE TIME OFF CODE PLACE COMM SYN1 SYN2 SYN3 SYN4 SYN5 SYN5 93004798 08 / 16 / 93 1532 P3110 3385 SYCAMORE COMP RPT VANDALISM , DESTROYED A WISHING WELL IN FRONT YARD $ 700 DMG -- - - -- - - - - -- -- --- ----- -- - - 442 93004809 IVEN RECKLESSLY COMP3BLOCKED RDR TRAIL W / HIS CAR DRI VEH AND VERBAL COMP RPT CAR CONFRONTATION STARTED BETWEEN COMP AND # 37026 , 37027 , 37032 , 37033 , 3703 00 WHITEB83 JEEPBDRIVING CARELESS0ON SYCAMORE * TRL 93005191 09 / 01 / 93 130 9900 170 / SYCAMORE COMP OF BOTTLES LAYING N THE ORONE AROFOUND PART OF A CHAMPAIGN BOTTLE ON THE ROAD . KICKED OFF TO SIDEs NO 93005241 09 / 03 / 93 905 9450 3400 BLK — SYCAMORE COMP SAID AT PC HISP // U WAS HIT BY A CEMENT TRUCK . DAMAGE TO DRIVER SIDE OF FRONT QUARTER AND BUMPERs 93005617 09 / 21 / 93 1535 9301 3203 SYCAMORE COMP REPORTS LOST 4 YR OLD — CHILD RETURNED HOME ON ARRIVAL . 04 / 13 / 94 To : City Planning Commission Mayor of Prior Lake and the City Council . City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street Prior Lake , MN 55372 Re : Neighborhood Subdivision Application . Dear Mayor , Planning Commission , and Council Members , My name is Dave Johnston and I reside at 3415 Sycamore Trail adjacent to Mr . Simpson ' s residence . The purpose for my letter is to explain my concerns regarding Mr . Simpson ' s land division request , as well as , the condition of Sycamore Trail in the area around my home . My concerns involve several aspects to what is being proposed . I have water drainage , road deterioration , density , and safety concerns that are directly I also have a quality of life within my related to Mr . Simpson ' s proposals own neighborhood concern as well . The drainage issue , I feel , is a major concern . My home is directly across from a storm sewer that was installed not too long ago to handle water run off from two new homes that were just built . It is poorly designed and was poorly installed and does not do an effective job of dispersing water run off . I feel it is not adequate to handle any additional run off that may be caused by construction of another new home on Mr . Simpson ' s lot . As it stands now , I always have standing water in front of my home out in the street . I feel that another new home will definately compound the existing problem and therefore shouldn ' t be allowed . The condition of the road is another concern . I am not happy with the way the city allowed the two new homes that were recently built across the street from me to get by without properly repairing the street once they were completed . I am not confident that the city will enforce any street repair on Mr . Simpson nor a new homeowner on his proposed lot . I feel that since this is a private street all " street owners " should have a say in what ' s an adequate street repair job , not the city of Prior Lake . I feel that Mr . Simpson should be asked to get approval for his street repair plans and drain modifications from every individual who owns a portion of the street in writing before his land division should even be considered . I also believe Mr . Simpson should have to guarantee that the road and the road ' s water problems won ' t be worsened by the construction of another new home on this block . The density issue is very basic . My opinion is that the proposed lot is too small to build on properly . I think another house packed in on this street will bring down all neighboring home values , especially Mr . Detjen ' s home . I think it ' s unnecessary to have another home built in this area especially if it depreciates my own investment , as well as , my neighbors . It ' s just simply wrong and unfair to Mr . Simpson ' s neighbors . or The final issue is one of safety . I think safety is a major iss e ficlesposed lot vehicles and pedestrians alike . For the veho traveling � aro nd the a home on tcorner his oat this created an even larger blind spot while point . It ' s bad the way it is now . Additional cars traveling on this road is not what I desire . As a father , I have concerns for my daughters ' own safety while out near this portion of Sycamore . There are this oarea . us ounAdditional g children who live right in this area and who all play together parked cars on this curve combined with more traffic is bound to cause an acc - ident . Perhaps it ' s two cars colliding or a cnt ar tonseegan accident over an ntoe prove ild , in either case , why take the risk ? I don ' t wish that I am correct about this safety osede . I firmly is only going etoeve make that curve at a new even built on that lot the way it is proposed Y more dangerous than it is right now . I am writing you this letter because I am concerned and that I am not going because ofto be able to express myself at the c now n andowilll only tbegworsened by m on truc - schedule . Water drainage is a problem tion of another new home in this area . The road ' s condition itself will be mention new worsened by more construction . Not to ton h ofathetroads surface .ional traffica The resident may bring will add to the deteriora n on this block makes our area too dense additional home packed i for my liking . Not only will it depreciate my home and other ' s , it cuts into our neighborhoods ' quality of life . The granting of a permit last fall at 3406 Sycamore was bad Sim enough . I would hate to see it happenagain onis propertye And hborsoare all being jeopard- finally the safety of myself , my family nei, and my g ized for no good reason at all . Please consider my thoughts as a taxpaying , voting citizen of Prior Lake . I ision request made by Mr . Simpson to be granted . do not want the sub - div Dave Johnston 3415 Sycamore Trail April 11 , 1994 r The Honorable Mayor and e City Council r City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street Prior Lake , MN 55372 RE : John Simpson Subdivision Application 3437 Sycamore Trail SW ti G Dear Madame Mayor and Council Members : We are neighboring property owners to John Simpson , who seeks ` to subdivide his property . A number of us have previously filed written objections and / or appeared at the March 7 , 1994 city council meeting to voice our strong objections to the sub - division request . The purpose of this letter is to summarize our objections to the proposed plan . 1 . Private Roadway . Sycamore Trail , in the area of the pro - posed subdivision , is a private 20 foot wide bituminous roadway . There is no association or formal agreement in place which regu - lates the use or maintenance of the road , and the neighboring property owners depend on each others ' honesty and good faith to 3 contribute a fair share toward maintenance and to repair damage that one owner may cause during a construction or remodeling pro - j ect . a 2 . Safety . The private road is quite narrow , hilly and curving and is already at or past its capacity to reasonably carry traffic . The addition of two , three or more vehicles in connection with an additional house , when coupled with the driveway ' s location at a curve in the road , would create an unreasonable hazard to residents and their children , both in the winter when the road is narrowed by snow accumulation and in the summer when greater speeds make going in and out of the driveway an increased risk . $ 3 . Maintenance . Construction of a new home on the subdivided parcel will involve considerable excavation . Certainly the trucks hauling excavated material , plus the construction equipment , will damage the private roadway , which The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Page 2 April 11 , 1994 does not approach city specifications for a public road . We are told the city will not involve itself in requiring the homeowner to repair the damage his contractors or subcontractors may cause , which leaves us having to sue a new onsiowner bilityto get repairs done if he does not acknowledge P 4 . Effect on property values . During the last several years a number of residents have made improvements to their homesites ranging from landscaping to replacement of old cabins with new homes . The new lot that would be created by a subdivision , because of its size and topography , will only allow construction of a small home that is not consistent with the neighborhood as it now exists and will effectively reduce the value of neigh - boring properties . Gary iad withythetarea Deenhthatavebconstructioneof opinion of realtors famil this new home next door to theirs , which now has an excellent lake view , will destroy that view and reduce their property value t from ten to fifteen percent . 5 . Drainage . One of the council ' s concerns at the last hearing , and our continuing worry , is that drainage problems will be aggravated if a new home is built . Sycamore Trail , in this area , has no curbs and owners across the street have already t problems that the new home will only experienced wet basemen r make worse . Also , we believe the additional runoff , to the extent it does not cross the road , will damage the roadway and / or the areas on either side , as yn Raaindicates . Even more than with construction damage it is difficult at best to allocate the repair responsibility to the person causing the damage . We understand an engineering report has been submitted by Mr . Simpson suggesting the proposed construction " will not unduly exacerbate off - site drainage conditions . " We do not know what undue exacerbation is , nor do we share Mr . Simpson ' s confidence based on an engineering report that uses a " windshield survey " of the property as its basis , which the engineer acknowledges does not accurately depict actual field elevations and volumes and considers the effect of only a 10 - year storm event . We have nothing against Mr . Simpson . He has , however , made it clear that his motivation in this matter is strictly one of profit since he intends to sell both lots and move away . We believe his plan would depreciate the value of the neighborhood and diminish its safety , and that there is enough real potential damage to surrounding homes , and the roadway , to deny the appli - cation . If the council does determine to grant the application , we believe the minimum safeguards to be attached as conditions to the approval would include the following : 3 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 3 April 11 , 1994 1 . That any new construction be required to follow the deve - lopment and drainage plan on which the approval is based , including but not limited to the statement in Mr . Simpson ' s March 29 letter that no retaining wall will be built . 2 . That in order to prevent damage to the mature sugar maple tree on Det ens adjoining lo t , the owner be required uired to follow the construction guidelines for protection of trees set forth in the 1993 University of Minnesota Extension publication " Protecting Trees from Construction Damage . " Since the tree is approximately 80 feet high and sugar maples are listed as sensitive to soil compaction and flooding , following this guide there should be no soil disturbance or compaction within 32 feet of the tree ( 40 % of its height ) and the area should be fenced prior to any excavating or construction . 3 . That the above restrictions be placed on the property in permanent fashion so that future owners will be bound by them , and that future owners be advised by the city , in some way prior to issuance of a building permit , that they will be responsible for the cost of repairing damage to the road caused by construc - tion activity . Respectfully submitted , • _ 3 q & Sycamore Trail Sycamore Trail Sycamore Trail _ 3 Sycamore Trail Sycamore Trail Sycamore Trail Sycamore Trail ►� - /r ? ,.,� ��sA , 34D Sycamore Trail 7 Sycamore Trail t Sycamore Trail Sycamore Trail Sycamore Trail 04 / 13 / 94 To : City Planning Commission Mayor of Prior Lake and the City Council . City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street Prior Lake , MN 55372 Re . Neighborhood Subdivision Application . Dear Mayor , Planning Commission , and Council Members , My name is Dave Johnston and I reside at 3415 Sycamore Trail adjacent to Mr . Simpson ' s residence . The purpose for my letter is to explain my concerns regarding Mr . Simpson ' s land division request , as well as , the condition of t Sycamore Trail in the area around my home . My concerns involve several aspects to what is being proposed . I have water drainage , road deterioration , density , and safety concerns that are directly related to Mr . Simpson ' s proposal . I also have a quality of life within my £ own neighborhood concern as well . The drainage issue , I feel , is a major concern . My home is directly across from a storm sewer that was installed not too long ago to handle water run off from two new homes that were just built . It is poorly designed and was poorly installed and does not do an effective job of dispersing water run off . I feel it is not adequate to handle any additional run off that may be caused by construction of another new home on Mr . Simpson ' s lot . As it stands now , I always have standing water in front of my home out in the street . I feel that another new home will definately compound the existing problem and therefore shouldn ' t be allowed . The condition of the road is another concern . I am not happy with the way the city allowe d the two new homes that were recently built across the street from me to get by without properly repairing the street once they were completed . I am not confident that the city will enforce any street repair on Mr . Simpson nor a new homeowner on his proposed lot . I feel that since this is a private street all " street owners " should have a say in what ' s an adequate street repair job , not the city of Prior Lake . I feel that Mr . Simpson should be asked to get approval for his street repair plans and drain modifications from every the street in writing before his land division individual who owns a portion of should even be considered . I also believe Mr . Simpson should have to guarantee that the road and the road ' s water problems won ' t be worsened by the construction of another new home on this block . The density issue is very basic . My opinion is that the proposed lot is too small to build on properly . I think another house packed in on this street will bring down all neighboring home values , especially Mr . Detjenis home . I think it ' s unnecessary to have another home built in this area especially if it depreciates my own investment , as well as , my neighbors . It ' s just simply wrong and unfair to Mr . Simpson ' s neighbors . issue for think ty The final issue is one of safety *tivehiclesa a home onthis proposed majorhe proposed lot vehicles and pedestrians alike . For created an even larger blind spot while traveling around the corner at this it is now . Additional cars traveling on this road is point . It ' s bad the way rns for my daughters ' own safety not what I desire . As a father , I have conce while out near this portion of Sycamore . There are numerous young children who ether in this area . Additional live right in this area and who all play together curve combined with more traffic is bound to cause an acc - parked cars on this } ident . Perhaps it ' s two cars colliding or a car running over an innocent child , } in either case , why take the risk ? I don ' t wish to see an accident to prove u his safety issue . I firmly believe that a new home that I am correct about t 4 it is proposed is only going to make that curve even built on that lot the way more dangerous than it is right now . I am writing You this letter because I am concerned and that I am not going to be able to express myself at the upcoming council meeting because of my own schedule . Water drainage is a problem noworse reae and will i ll only be conditionwitselfdwillby cbestruc - tion of another new home in this a ction . Not to mention the additional traffic a new worsened by more constru resident may bring will add to the deterioration of the roads surface . The on this block makes our area too dense for my liking . additional home packed in it cuts into our neighborhoods ' Not only will it depreciate my home and other ' s , Sycamore was bad quality of life . The granting of a permit last fall at 3406 Sy enough . I would hate to see it happen again on Mr . Simpson ' s property . And finally the safety of myself , my family , and my neighbors are all being jeopard- ized for no good reason at allciizn. f Prior Please consider my thoughts as a taxpaying , votingimpsonttoebeo do not want the sub - div granted . Lake . I ision request ma by Dave Johnston 3415 Sycamore Trail 3470 Sycamore Trail SW Prior Lake , MN 55372 - 2342 ( 612 ) 440 - 1069 March 5 , 1994 Prior Lake City Council City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota St . S . E . Prior Lake , MN 55372 - 1714 Reference : Notice of Hearing for Administrative Land Division , Scheduled for March 7 , 1994 Property of John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail Prior Lake , MN Dear Council Members , Regarding the above referenced Hearing , I am unable to attend because of an out - of - town commitment . However , I have previously voiced my objection to the proposed land division , by letter to the Planning Department . I presume my letter is still on file , and would like it to be entered into the record at your Hearing . Kind regards , MA y ' / We 's Mader cc Gina Mitchell Prior Lake Planning Dept . k r O� P R IOC 4 INTER - OFFICE MEMO J txj . IItyNE 0, ' r MEMO TO : RALPH TESCHNER, FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM : GINA MITCHELL, ASSOCIATE PLANNER REa JOHN SIMPSON APPLICATION REFUND DATE : SEPTEMBER 229 1993 Please refund the amount of $ 35 . 00 to John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail , Prior Lake , MN . This is the fee paid for an Administrative Land Division application . Mr. Simpson has decided to discontinue his application at this time . The account # is 101 - 34103 r : O� PRIO,�, INTER - OFFICE MEMO U � �7 ,. MEMO TO : RALPH TESCHNER, FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM : GINA MITCHELL, ASSOCIATE PLANNER RE : JOHN SIMPSON APPLICATION REFUND DATE : OCTOBER 11 , 1993 Please refund the amount of $40 . 00 to John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail , Prior Lake , MN . The amount of $35 . 00 refunded from a memo of September 22 , 1993 , was only partial refund . The full amount paid by Mr. Simpson was $75900 . Sorry for the inconvenience . The account # is 101 -34103 Te ae re _ C 'tfii S ( 'C TE etti ( 3 % 1- t ") 1"t . Y > .�, 1 +. - ale, 1. 0 .; ' \I � v t. 3,¢l, F a C; C t"7 C. 41 a, n C.: i v' w i t h .P` e I A , t X"l. e .L ,_ Cu; ,,y f. L? e ;:a (e '? i. C,J 't t E S `[ >"3 'E; . _I-i. tJ r o p C ,L E." .` a a 1 out I of C' , Mrer7I r w+? t } oC% Pa .' :: G v rm i,. G # fa }.-w s . te C C.i t .k �) t� C « '� : ;t .s. E C.a.Y oJee i'J, j 3 C? G :L. x., . h t, � �', C7r £,ACC+ �� 1c .� � here £3w � . %C I ��, � 1. C L � , s . E, e Dt "t i' ' c } F;`. . ct � S o ow . �f"J. a t , � ,� C" rs, b Ct .f 1. ne a � C'� ?"f2m, � enCI ?�. 0 at l s £`t 't_� ,wh est� co �� e of "> ae 0ut £ft; j ir � E'nc`e �� 1_ � 4 -1 # GF� on ca :t � , ,:; 17w7tt to LL r _ bec rJ ng a C34'Rg 'the w e tt. L 4. ne o Sa 1 (41 01.1ttt o t C a, d .£st@t ce of. 7 '? _ 00 3f sa li C 3ui . 10E. ° , distant l. 0 2 52 E e e i Eo `; t: itty o t5 < southecas ,i_C: tlrt tt"3ereoE and, there terminating . C" a. -�' t'"' e ss 13 ra '4 . t"t . 'y a ' "� C` � ' - f 0 ,„ ( Map ei E,Y £�� r� e ;: w i t _ �. CL ff J LWe c C f p 11. ca t , t z, . c . P c 0 a e 0_ P }. uv t t" t ,. w r ... o e. r F s cr Cx t. County , M 1 n n e s C) Ta . r r refr i €' o t £ w7 C„ ` z . 0 Q % . c. zwr= ' C`: om-m. e`nc orj at : . 6 C? ' ie7 corner tt ' s0, 1, o t ot, C ; theJ 1 s 49 5tvGe on `' F :F. e�. .- `-;,i aS wt ' f bear. i ;,f a a „� C� .� g �', d�. e .°! e a '�'.. 1 -,d;q t=.�` o � .,x 'S £t (ri'P 2:� C,. ,... o t C ti. £,.1 .3 C ? � w, c E: r s ,a r. 7 00 c_ F « �thence :w 6 ^- 4t " c dlst �lnce of 71 . h _P.. feetY r t tz f` cce o t n iH -i :;3 Ci c distance (J % a _7 feet i , c� o E..,a. point t Cf ,£'1 the .^ c" -. �-i . 1 1. . l ` u. £., :o_,. � a.;? .€� is C._f u t 1 o t,. C , v e o E.. a J t 1. 0 2 5 9 P. e t,. 4:?, o s,� t i e r a . y � f t h F�: f`.:r o j. , L. C z «a s t_:. C: t" �,. xaei:' thereof an '' " t^st ' r c " i[ t 3. < fG " # G � •g. YS E P 1xi E'" :C t lEl �� o Su'b ".' z ij 1 fz Y`nr t acid into 2 parcels , �� � %;. ( rya r r; , .i e`. 5 ' n - 6 h 7 . t51 . t � 1 „ ee 2 of 2 G . Contiguous properties . Mr . D . Johnston Mr . G . Detjen Mr . R Kordich 3415 Sycamore Tr . SW 3469 Sycamore Tr . SW . 3486 Willow Sch . Tr Prior Lake MN . 55372 Prior Lake MN . 55372 Prior Lake MN . 55372 S ' e ir e 1 y ra ohn N . Simpson Tax payer I O� PRIrrr n� x A JNN ESOP July 30 , 1993 Mr. John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail SW Prior Lake, MN 55372 Dear John , I am writing to follow up on our telephone conversation of July 29 , 1993 . After discussions with Horst Graser, Planning Director, and Deb Garross , Assistant City Planner, we came to the following conclusions about your proposed plat: ® The Road Easement on the Northwest corner of the plat shall be dedicated to the City as right- of-way in the event that Sycamore Trail is upgraded to a public street, and thus City standards . The dedicated area may follow a line consistent with the current 40 ' wide street. • The newly created parcels (A & B) shall be equal to or greater than 10 ,000 square feet. • The existing structures on newly created Parcel A shall meet all of the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance including the 10 ' side yard setback requirement. If all of these items are satisfied, the Planning Department would recommend approval of the Administrative Plat. This approval would be subject to review by other City departments and other affected public agencies. After our telephone conversation , we discussed some possible options for platting this property. First, the setback must remain at a minimum of 10 ' . Your proposal of a 9 ' side yard setback would require a variance from the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Department would not recommend approval of any plat that did not conform to the City ' s Zoning Ordinance. Second, The Planning Department would not allow any encroachment onto Parcel B for the existing porch. This would create numerous problems with regard to measuring setbacks and property rights , to name a few. Third, the right-of-way must be dedicated because it is considered a new plat. We require developers of previously undeveloped property to dedicate right- of--way, and this situation is no different with respect to the Subdivision Ordinance . Finally, Horst suggested that the new lot line need not be parallel to the south line. The new line may be parallel to the existing house, or some other configuration to make this plat meet the Ordinances . I have attached a copy of the survey with a possible option for platting. I encourage you to work with your surveyor to plat this property in accordance with all applicable Ordinances . I have attached copies of the pertinent areas of the Ordinances for your 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 4474245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER reference . Please feel free to contact me with any questions about this procedure or requirements at 4474230 . Sincerely, James Hayes Associate Planner City of Prior Lake enclosures cc : Horst Graser Deb Garross Y 'f ^I j r r 4 r_z I Pt�' Im 1 IV VtVm I 'I IV, ` V oTImm' oY_ fre . ir `' t I C _ ; 1i . _. "-Iti1 :. E v o t, C71 � � lC; ox� ri a 1, C J . 10 1 j � [ t t. ,� a C of _ T V C J� To 1 .� �? o C t S?1 v o Y , T } o i ,. .i 3. / e t G. oC. 7VL a. l"� , tr' Ft __ r'�, t. i, ( i -'� " { .. za dC . i e ,.,, �.i P ,:=� _ - s _ : t_ f" 4 .E. �; C '+ C7 fry E" . ' } r ` _. a c l e _, `T': el .7 'i i It n CJ 'fb D e (-�. t .s t s.�'. � �; Q ,. .. a . ... . -. rt _ j o h �xd {"} w . V l " E"' [ (An \f C„, ro ,iYc i i 'CV "3 ? eY1 _ -.> _ Y', Cl y `) iP'1 - F� 1ail i .li (j ,` sY C1- 17 a Ci' ajC* 7 `mV ' -1C" C„ 1C' G VVIp� ,y .f r VI mtII v { 1 o e3 , . tJ" r 11f=? 1t`. l C3 ; i-? f ,. idC i . ;' : r_r t tr 1 -L ' s: C \; ' = - q P t -, F' C G C \� cC � �� n e Ilm- . G `� J Y C3 ow �. C . .I c r C } tis C .v 1 i o fi rle C _� � o C _ , ` � . r � _ � F ,aLa � � . t ._ .. ooV, v � c n n C'' M V o J ( i r1 s c Cr � . % o4- r r 1 e i r3' l rrr "tl rrc r { R C F 4 ( tS C> a s ! m , n C : C FY rat , _> p r 'IT _ Cn. III, L . CR � � f � . Cz — TF 0M - - _ IV to s.. _ , 7I r IV I T' h - r o =" i- :` %,. C! C3 0 - ra o nit � _ i s I t wou .{ r a. € � U r � s z b [JJ T: — — Ji .31. ` f 1L E „ tC "`' v C_ .� >. r A. F' lr . CJ 7 C,, �v ' 7t Asa ox. v Inolt'e _ t �� .�.. `<.3 r nVV -NI n_ rtI I, ; ('"' 1 �} F } o C) C t { Y j'- '3 i ._ '1 r3 ��, i,.. C} i ._. �' 3 -.. _ - - -. G t - v - IV- 3 o r T ;, nn T o rr, , r1 4f i IVV IT IV ohl i II y J[ Q 5 . Av y le "Ve Ve� IV , IV IV V IV V IV qs VI Vll Iv I .r vII L le I Ile It V le • —I y 1 / l / • y r 5• 1VI • f vv ee VIV IV • ' 1 I I lVv IV • t t s � 1 21 I'VT . k , a s VI VV el IV z. " VIA Ve II r ' s 3 } - K . 1 -,r,t` x we V aV IV VV, 1 � r t s t, i st 11 ; 11 Y 1 Z i Y +� VA V, IV I Ve% ` . �x. i k k k �r " > AV, -No addA y ry .e"-� .I'l . z .: » IL r A W Q � e$�0� aeI IN � vount of Valr t` t s F foroQotnQ Gtetrurtimwt rt as aoAttoruleJod Lrfor �ttv Vo tlt% 30th November 10 3 83m iWIvz- 11�,11 z F Gerald Johnson , aka Ge old II�Ar Joh991 ns n R AI�� r � bpi �STIi� QQ� QeIl1 .,.� .ti �TQk>AA.9p1 a a� II- I ,. t� r ) 4 g sa" -„�„ AMi Ot f[0 ON A[KNOWLtf10R 3 9t I�OISr�' h. tIaail x' , ItaI'ldI _' CtOUn i o colt " s .. r y sa ''""� ..rl' .i A. r f � 1 ' {� ffy dbm���.'11 foPfr11 � , ` r -* pigNAWAR Or 11`1 AKI AclINOWL�DtlMiNI' �a. .x ". . . . oAXYVa dub ] iR TNIS INSTRUMENT WAS pRAPTED BY ` a> ' 7rIN4rt*u OR RA r 4 People Savings ? and LoanY � � , wAN I , p v r "t�," " � " w " " (Nam ) a a �G—ZED . A IN � � � � _ Pr ior_Lake , �in . .553T �(Add a r s �IN a � xIN Send Tax Statements tot � I Richard T . and Kathy L . Bellew 3437 Sycamore Trail Prior Lake , Mn . 55372 IN I AlIN It If 14 NINNI S A No a - -r h: f' x aT ? 'w + It. ad INfI +. r �y 7 IN x ra € '' NT bray ., -�m- r ' 3.-sfa �s ` ` If -''.; . x, t x Ij di If eINT " § s � 1' r a • . , "F a w z s. . , n . 1 _ All eel vvv An �Al ( BEDROOM E7 xi BEDROOM EDRO Ever Po ./�■M I] 3. IS-O Sii i uv If-0. 10-0' ✓ 10- -. u l a r 0 1]=5 liE(N I Cl - ET ' I .' � 11 _ door Plan ... - I� IAUIIOtY {T DINING The basic concept of this plan is to KIT provide a simple straight-forward design LIVING RM lo-onl-y- »-i. r=o 14' e "°'" for an uphill site. The plan is available — with either a family room or dining room FHTET - - - _.-- - _ adjacent to the kitchen. Other features _ include a convenient laundry room, three bedrooms and two full baths. The living room features a fireplace and the wrap- ,„ PLAN W20294 around deck has access through the MAIN FLOOR kitchen and laundry room. Total main floor (DINING ROOM VERSION) area is 1 ,664 sq. ft, IVA SQUARE FEET Main floor: 1 ,664 sq . ft. Lower level: 1 , 090 sq . ft. ----- — • ° Total living area: 2, 754 s ft. q . .AT© ° Garage: 573 sq . ft. zM sDf OM 1 BEDRO 'v (Exterior walls are 2c6 construction) LINEN c IY-0 •-0 Ct T CIO EAUN°.Y _ UTILITY FAMILY RM KITOiEN = LIVING RM 44A n-v- ENTRY - _ — — _ _ GARAGE PLAN N-2029-5 RECREATION - - MAIN FLOOR 1•-6 a=i (FAMILY ROOM VERSION) I 1664 SQUARE FEETLtd } I 3 � j BASEMENT 1090 SQUARE FEET i TO ORDER THIS BLUEPRINT, Blueprint Price Code D CALL TOLL -FREE 1400 SaT 557e Plans H11119099 . 4 � H — � n ? (� _ � PRICES AND DETAILS , � F I(, ; b � Vol E f Indoor/out door Livin on �► SI g oping Lot , • The wood siding, the front deck, and the multi-paned exterior of this pant rye eating bar and breakfast Northwest contemporary will • nook with sliders to a rear deck. beckon you up to the entry stairs A fireplace and rear patio highlight � to BED 3 and inside. ry the attached family room. 0 10" X0n • The two-story entry opens up to a • A Washer/dryer in the upper level = '0 vaulted living room with tall bath is convenient to all three IN windows, exposed beam ceiling bedrooms, making laundry a breeze. O w and adjoining dining area which ON accesses the hand-railed deck. " ' °' gll °` "` _ ""- •a• 1 An updated kitchen offers a walk-in ., I lira VAL PATIOu V our, ify MASTER 12/6 15ni NOOK E FAMILY u QAWLSFALF °pQ ti/0 a 1Wi 20/0 ; V/i - ----- ILI* OF POOR �nw Cl KITCHEN _ UPPER FLOOR a 11/4 a W06 � iti@O.STORY till ..� ENTIIY b Plan P- 7737.41) x Bedrooms: 3 Baths: 2 l ` GARAGE 2 6 DINING I Space: 1� ° wo x vm Upper floor. 3f I ; (-- -- - ' 1 Main floor: 802 sq. fit It 1 , 158 sq . ft. Li Total Ilvinq area: 1 , 960 sq . ft.nro Garage/basement: - - lip736 sq . ft. Exterior Wall Framing:IRWIN III 2x6 Foundation apt lonss s ( bus Crawlspace. (Foundation & framing conversion BASEMENT diagram available MAIN FLOOR — see order formIt . } ? Blueprint Price Code: 8 TO ORDER THIS BLUEPRINT if CAL L TOLL -FR EE EE 1-800-547-557D Plan P - 7737- 4D PRICES AND DETAILS TI ON PAGES 12- 15 i a s I _ 3 - 5 i IK MODEL NAME: Food For Thought/Prishon SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2,000 = ESTIMATED COST: $ 24, 500 ( frame) $ 28 ,000 (stress- skins) - - - 4 MARKET AREAS: NE, SE, GL, MW, SC, W, INT — — K <NW E BLUE RIDGE TIMBER FRAME — 2030 Redwood Drive Christianburg, VA 24073 - � - 703 = 382 = 1102 { A master suite with spa and walk- in closet, a vaulted living ] — room with fireplace and a gourmet kitchen are all features - - of this home. A wraparound deck creates a convenient, open living space that blends with the traditional exterior. t Please Circle Reader Service 006 , t ry S" 4 OPEN 70 GREAT ROOM ' 0 0 I N O:i0 Y LOFT w � lto -NI— STUDY i MODEL NAME: The Swan Retreat SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2 ,450 ��/ram ESTIMATED COST: $ 50,000 (timber frame) $ 30.000 ( panels ) oI o � DING L MARKET AREAS: MW, W, WC Xa 4 xis DI9 Q I m CENTENNIAL TIMBER FRAMES 10 1 1396 K. M . Ranch Road Y �� of Whitefish , MT 59937 _ 406- 756- 9315 E ' FOYER ti i l i This compact but spacious home includes a large great o O NOOK / 9 9 �� BATH El � /\ SUNROOM room , a study in the front dormer and a cozy sunroom . ssx12s Exposed exterior timbers on the home's porch and gable (� 0 PORCH j ends are an eye-catching extra . This design by John Jenkins also uses recycled timbers and foam insulation panels . Please Circle Reader Service 008 56 yy}} IN I25IN7 xIN , 3 , IN x NVI. I INIII+ h: � � - n IN IN; r t n IN Nee -AN 11 IV I- I NI 'Ne INN INN I v III IN IV I I IN IN I IV IN I r3 s y 7 �- ,c ' < Nee lee e IFNI fff • ' • • -` . � r e > �lz ell 14 I IN � z mv IN • • • • _ e 'esr• bs yet rm, = .. y - a r= I IN IVN, • . - • A - _ ,'. IN, 1�} NZ,IN I `� IV IV IN IN I I AI s . IN 4Le I- a I IN Nee N� WeI INIV III -WIN I IN I 4 F IN a - m Z } _ 4 . t Ile, N�INj ft . INN- IVe IN I Ve IN 4 IN AN VVPI £ ' £ IN , i NI _tI f �IN _ • • • 3 x ` x r • • • - - t - - - .. , XV - 'IN VK IN • i "• • • •- c t • r 'i — t INN • - "Mow ' • • • • • - so • _ • � UVININIII —'re IV I `� • . . • ,i.+ , . L� a 1 IN New • • • • M }if7SS' S NI re I III ea I a •. _ - _ r . - " ' IN 7 NA- lee I IN -1 `` YIV III x g IN IN ` - put: .. . a �: . .� w._. a" _ _ a - Z� T< I IF IF - p . IN L 4` I up 'purr IF imultm pump ITT NumFW TT fr"a-p ` <s 'z'� 3 z "' FuT101I,I " 7`4?_r IN -IF IF I 5 It IN as I mvkp�WFx SI- FumllmIl Fr Full I ' t } -, FIT «} n y ` TIN pull IN pump ., q. FIT ' Fluu.X, � - � Art � s� IF 4 z ` m It tFull `� FIT I IN '� xSITT pump,y ' 3s -a IAUr _ { It I ' nY + n , Loi sdr, oatter�iai,nIN - 41 r" `3 s� gas. , up , ZIF #iaA_ _ IN z mul IlIlF I aN t�tTcty purposes wilt tithe right tonstail , �{ re air; IN, i . add to or xI ITT I FIT-e Full up ' ta► , ° � , over fir acrpss - dImp r y fI up IF �.I FIT -� { follo�►ia �iescr d plumproperty : Ur up I _ y ' l y ., to INNI ' FA t ' -up IjFp mp� It , CIt 1 III j'rump, tx ' _ '3 j�tj l FI�upm `.3. ea t" . ^ _ r , _ T r c • y . . — - 'd.`' 1. z'• ' Imp ux IT IN mu "put IF 0 ginning- At the '` northwest corner of : OutlotIN C, „ iplewod, Sectian 3 , `" Township. ,:l14N , . Range 22Wup : FI -E z :thence ; north - 89 ° lrs ' : east `39 . 83 East's thence muTm up It I t ` sbuthm54 ° 08 ' 31 " west =.66 . 60 feet : thence north " , 10. ° 30 '_ east` 33 . 19. : feet. ,to : the point of beginning z Ip ul K and there terminating . n . Am FIT I put Together with a temporary construction easement across ,thee ' 'Al fPluotI IT llowing described property : Ill � r u II TT �� 11 �: � - � prpupIpt 'llp , I, IFBeginning at the northeast corner of Outlot ' C , Ill TA pulp 1 % lF `1 Maplewood , Section 3 , Township 114N , Range 22W; v thence due south 20 . 00 feet ; thence south 89 ° ' . .. } 15 ' west 44 . 85 feet ; thence south 54008131 " west IF NI1I . . r ;31 . 25 ` feet to . thewest Line of said lot ; thence ;. . north 10 ° 30 ' east 28 . 98 feet ; thence • north 54° OS ' 31 " east 55 -. 60 ` feet ; thence north_ 89 ° 15 ' , , fx east 51 . 17 feet to the point of beginning and = � ;, there `terminating . IF TIFF, Ill IF IN, up IF- • Said temporary easement to expire December 31 , 19740 I . IN FIT mum up IN DONALD Ke FINKE AND TILLIE N . FINKE pt up All, FIT IN up me I IF IF ITT I IN : IN - e- Ileege a " % e ell Ile 3p. Ile ell All Ile All ell el v el I ell Ile :.;... � I 1 : 10 I ell ell el "ell x m _ %I led lee f . 71 ell ly Ile ell we � • � 3 I f 3 4; i' a z" ell ell I R 11 l { . % i 311 �w-�^-. ' :, r - .. '�z. <r4,..�.:. M „t: -;:.-,*;.. % .., ; ,: kr . 5w; � ��� , CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 4629 Dakota Street S . E . , Prior Lake , MN 55372 FAX # 447 - 4245 - Telephone # ( 612 ) 447 - 4230 FAX COVER SHEET D 2 - 94 ATE : TIME TO : ( / I en- r � � t FAX # FROM * MM t r ��' ✓ Cr ( � ` SUBJECTOW MESSAGE : Odd L/ naznZii kr Avr.Z00*AV L Number of Pages Sent ( Including This Page ) : O� PR.10 - _ �., - Irk storm �� ru 4( V /�9 " STAFF " f In �rl It? �/ �y CITY OF PRIOR LAU PLANNING DEPAIT PROD REVIEW RECORD DISTRIBUTE TO CITY MANAGER BUILDING OFFICIAL I+E`IDO`r ASST . CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS N9Cd'IT RICE CITY ENGINEER CITY ATTORNEY CITY FINANCE POLICE CHIEF MINNEGASCO CITY PARKS DNR MN VALLEY ELEC CITY PLP,ZOTER COUNTY HIGHWAY WATERSHED ETHER REVIEW DEADLINE : DATE DISTRIBUTID : `I yf PROJECT REVIEW MEETING : YES NO DATE : APPLICATION FOR: ArMIN PLAT PUD VACATION PRELIMINARY PLAT REZ0NI!:G HCME OCCUPATION FINAL PLAT COND USE COMP PLAN A4MID MS VARIANCE EIS/ EAW OTHER APPLICANT : V U hn � � SO In PHONE : / I 7 ,2 q ADDRESS .. WII3 C CONTACT PERSON : PHONE •PERSON : PRQ7ECT REQUEST : s U b 1. �'/" 0 p t l o f 1 EII A l e ' '� o � �'� l parctIs /I • I fCMCLI� I/ / o O l SITE LEGALDESCRIFTION PID : ZONING : CCiAP PLAIT USE : PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DATE : CITY COUNCIL REVIEW DATE : 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612 ) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447.4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNrrY EMPLOYER t I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATER CITY CODE GPADING SEWER ENVIRGNMEI`Tr SIGNS ZONING FLOOD PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS PARRS NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES ELECTRIC TRANSPOIMATION SEPTIC SYSTEM GAS STORM WATER ASSEITS BLD CODE EROSION CONTROL, OTHER I recommend : APPROVAL DENIAL CONDITIONAL APPROVAL COMMENTS mill WIN IN NEW III MINIMUM III MEMO MEMO IN Oil SIGNATURE : TITLE : p DATE * BY DATE : Apr 0 9 ? RETURN TO • ---T pl Ll ec se refer 10 le ff rr dale ma �, r / P rorola ; ' h t e cl o Lc ,r i s r�� ecC ad care S se Ck C-rCra Pj \e< *��' � _r'I lie ice / R ;nit 'J d . ` 9 T R f �i yt as•��� .?' vF' • fiK� r 9tt4 vt 1 9t, 4w 14t.4 I 1 it 4y69 , M rab_ i. _�. � �1 •'� Exsh: �.� afv�ta t q.,+� NousE 3469 r f. rcst� OftCivr } —_ � � wt 3 �yr, x b_ , t f j 1 v I qR's rba PJ OUSE I � 3477 9tf.ix 10t I \ t \ v 9YVt i ' r � I I tyt4 6ar79E ,y S K9Sta 955.\ pr.•e+u�' 1 O yyn 9SSL �a r ' \fir tr ? LAE Yen MR — JpHN S = MPSpN " 3411 STcasore Trail Prior bake , 1110 \ -SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION- SIGMA i hereby certify that this survey , plan or SURVEYING report was prepared by ae or under my SERVICES INC. Scale : i " = 20 ' direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered land Surveyor under the Taws of 1 . ig71 5enaca Road 'Suite e' the State of Hinnesota . Eagen. Mwwwnota 55122 -'7�. ony.: . Ph iei21 a52-30T7 Date: • • Mayne Cordes , Him Reg . Xo. 14675 qn A; -y"jw Rt.:,rd w 4 aa\ 0 r4tie E C� . . ,7 , v _ ' x h P �IINNES0� APOM March 11 , 1994 Mr . John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail SW Prior Lake , MN 55372 Dear Mr . Simpson , The City Council has decided to continue your request for Administrative Land Division until April 18 , 1994 , at 7 : 45 . Please note , this is a change from the date given earlier in the meeting. The change of date was due to a motion which was approved by the Council which directed staff to initiate the appropriate procedures to revise the Zoning Ordinance . These revisions , if approved , could effect your property. In order to process your Administrative Land Division before the changes to the Zoning Ordinance have the opportunity to be made , the Council moved your meeting date up . The Council continued the meeting until April 18 , 1994, to allow you the time to provide the lan which confirms that the construction of a following items : drainage information and p house on Parcel B will not exacerbate off site drainage conditions , safeguards be provided assuring that development of Parcel B will not have a substantial negative impact on the property owner to the east , and covenants be placed on the deed so that any subsequent buyer/owner is aware of the restrictions on Parcel B . I've enclosed a draft of the Council minutes from the March 7 , 1994 meeting for specific detail . If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at 4474230 . ( Sincerely Gina M. Mitchell Associate Planner 4629 Dakota St. S . E . , Prior Lake, Minnesota 553724714 / Ph . (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 4474245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER March 29 , 1994 City Council Planning Director 4629 Dakota St . S . E . Prior Lake , MN 55372 Ref : ( a ) City letter dated March 11 , 1994 . Ref : ( b ) City Council meeting March 7 , 1994 . Ref : ( c ) Valley Engineering Co . , Inc . Analysis March 28 , 1994 . Ref : ( d ) Protecting Trees from Construction Damage , Scott County Extension Service , Doc NR- F ) - 6135 - 5 Dear City Council , In order to meet the recommendation and guidelines found in ref . a & bi I contracted Valley Engineering Co . , Inc . to review the drainage situation and to provide factual information concerning site drainage of the proposed property . To paraphrase the project analysis , " it is the opinion of the engineer that the proposed construction can be accommodated by the existing storm drainage system , and will not unduly exacerbate off - site drainage conditions " . To reduce any perceived negative impact to the property owner to the east , a revised development plan has been drawn . The proposed home is forty feet from the adjacent property line , sixty percent further than required setbacks . In the guidelines set forth in ref : ( d ) the 30 " maple tree will have zero grading done under the dripline of the tree ; therefore , there will be no impact whatsoever on the tree . With the revised drawing , the 24 oak on the N . E . corner of parcel B . will be an additional large tree saved . There will be no retaining all required on parcel B . Development covenants of parcel B . will read as follows : 1 . Parcel B . Development plan will conform to the drawing dated 3 / 29 / 94 ; That is on file at the City of Prior Lake and the Scott 3 County Court House . 2 . A staked sod lining along the existing roadway will be placed F at completion of the development . In closing , I would like to reiterate a few facts . I am simply requesting to return the property to its original two parcels . The property was up for public sale in 1987 and will be actain . I have publicly stated that I will give first right of refusal to all neighborhood interested parties * Second ly ,Y , the lot s conform to all city zoning parameters . 1 . I have proven factually the additional run off is non - exacerbating and will place covenants on said property that have been recommended by the professional engineering firm . Thirdly , I have addressed the eastern property owners perceived negative impact by changing the developmental plan to conform to their desires . As a veteran of this great country , and a believer in our Bill of Rights ; to own and dispose of property as deemed) and based on the facts , I find it very capricious in the nature of the City Council not to approve my request for the administrative land division . Res,pej4y , 111 � John N . Simpson sc 2 . Civil Engineering for Public Works VALLEY ENGINEERING CO . , INC . and Private Industry v March 25 , 1994 Mr. John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail Prior Lake , MN 55372 Outlot C , Maplewood , Prior Lake , Minnesota Re : Administrative Land Division : Dear Mr. Simpson : As requested , I have evaluated the impact on stormwater runoff if another house and driveway are added to the divided lot in the subject project . A report that quantifies the stormwater flows is attached . It appears that the present storm drainage facilities are adequate for both the existing and proposed conditions . Even though the impact of one more house and driveway is of the neighborhood development , the addition of any more incrementally small in the context hard surface has high visibility that often become the focus of real and imagined drainage problems in the adjacent areas . In viewing the site , I found no reason to support the argument that the neighbors' basement water problems would worsen . The low driveways along the north and west sides of the street are bermed and storm sewered , thus averting inflow from the street. Often , basement water problems are caused by infiltration from high ground water. Due to the fact that the proposed new lot is already very steep , little chance for seepage into the groundwater exists . When a house and driveway are added , then even less seepage will occur. Any additional design stormwater runoff that is generated from the construction will be collected by the existing catch basin . Thank you for the opportunity to be of service in this matter. If you have questions or need additional information , please contact me . Sincerely , Steven D . Harve&. E ., attachment 7301 Ohms Lane , Suite 500 Minneapolis , Minnesota 55439 (612) 832 - 9475 • Fax 832- 9542 i PR 'to V tx P February 1 , 1994 n?"V N E S O� Mr. John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail SW Prior Lake, MN 55372 Dear Mr. Simpson , It is my intent to reschedule your Administrative Plat for discussion before the City Council on Monday, March 7 , 1994 . It is necessary to bring this item to a close , and notify the adjacent property owners of the revised proposal since they are interested in the proposed subdivision. Your revised proposal will need to be submitted by February 21 , 1994, so that it can be destributed to the appropriate departments, agencies, and property owners . If the necessary information is not submitted by this date staff will recommend that the Council continue the item to a date specific or table it. If the item is tabled, your application will need to be resubmitted with the appropriate fees . If you have any further questions please give me a call at 4474230 , extension 213 . Sin erely, V Gina M . Mitchell Associate Planner 4629 Dakota St . S . E. , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372- 1714 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER r Ito LOMMEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LAW FIRM Southside Office Pima , Suite 2A 1800 [PS Center Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P. A. In [ 0 Crestview Drive 80 South E.inhth Street H ,1 « or, , ��' 1 54016 Minneapolis , Minnesota 55402 tilke (715 ) 196- 8217 (612 ) 339-8131 _, te hen C . : u Twin City Line (612) 436-80S5 Minnesota VATS (800) 752-4297 Attorney at Late FAX (715 ) 386-8219 FAX (612) 339 -8061 Minneapolis Office, (612) 336- 9305 May 2 , 1994 CITY MGR . OFFIOE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE Mr . Frank Boyles MAY 4 1994 City of Prior Lake g pa 4629 Dakota St SE r Prior Lake MN 55372 RE : Private Roads Our File 16772G Dear Frank ; The purpose of this letter s t ,�) comment on the issue of private roads and the April 20 , 1994 memorandum from the planning department . I also understand that John Simpson has reviewed the April 20th memorandum and has requested a rehearing of his application for an administrative land division . For the reasons stated in this letter , I believe that the council acted well within its discretion when it denied Mr . Simpson ' s application for an administrative land division . The council was entitled to base its decision upon -Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) of the ordinance along with the stated opposition of neighboring property owners . . As I understand it , the problem arises in those areas of the city which were acquired by annexation . The previous township government had approved development with access by private roads . Lo7] melt , Nelson , Cole & Stageberg , P .A . Mr , Frank Boyles May 2 , 1994 Page 2 The two provisions of the city code which have been brought to k my attention are as follows : Private streets : Private streets shall not be approved nor shall any public improvements be installed for any private street unless r approved by the council . Private streets may s be permitted in planned unit developments . z ( Section 6 - 6 - 2 ( I ) ) Location : All lots shall have frontage on a publicly dedicated street or a street that has received legal status except that lots in planned unit developments may have frontage on a private road or street . ( Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) ) Both of the sections are included in Title 6 which governs subdivision regulations and Chapter 6 of that title which is entitled " Minimum Design Standards . " These sections , read together , demonstrate a strong public policy on the part of the city discouraging private streets . Section 6 - 6 - 2 ( I ) provides , however , that private streets may be approved by the council . of course , the plat itself must be approved by the council . Thus , asareetspetheeq ouncia hass approval the of a plat which contained private authority to approve the plat . Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) does not prohibit private streets . Instead , it governs the location of lots on a proposed plat . That sect :ILon itself is quite unambiguous except for the reference to " a street that has received legal status . " As I mentioned at the of public meeting , a street may receive legal status by virtue of ` expenditure . As you know , a street that has been continuously utive years maintained bblac mtuhoropghfa �nici e m ent o x o c e tothe extentof the improvement becomes a p without public dedication . Lonunen, Nelson , Cole & Stageberg , P .A . Mr . Frank Boyles May 2 , 1994 Page 3 In order to reconcile the two provisions , " legal status " may also include prior approval of a private street , by agreement between property owners or use as described above , if that prior approval , agreement or use clearly gives a lot owner an unqualified right of access . i T � . . -}• . ., ;.l L. -: •i �.. _ approve _ ` air _ 1'11. v � •F c+ _ nr� f does it then have the authority to approve a lot on that private road ? The answer is in the affirmative . The council has the authority to approve private roads and may approve a lot on a private road that has " legal status . " In the Simpson case , Section 6 - 6 - 2 ( I ) did not apply . The council was not asked to approve a private street ; a private street r already existed . The council was asked to approve an administrative land division ( Section 6 - 1 - 3 ) . I do not know whether the private street in question " has received legal status " by virtue of the fact that it is part of a previously approved subdivision . It is clear , however , that the council could rely on that section to disapprove the division . The council heard testimony that brought into question the legal status of the private road and the right of a buyer of the proposed lot to an unqualified right of access . Based upon that consideration , the council could deny the division until given a clear opinion which satisfies staff and the council regarding the right of access . If the council approves a plat containing a private road pursuant to the authority given it by Section 6 - 6 - 2 ( I ) , the council , in effect , acknowledges the " legal status " of the private road . The council denied the applications submitted by King and Benedict without any reference to Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) . Since those applications were denied , they provide no precedence for reconsidering the Simpson application . I do not know whether the members of the council had Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) in mind when the council either approved or denied similar ads . Even if that section requests with lots fronting on private ro Lomnten , Nelson , Cole & Stageberg , PA . Mr . Frank Boyles May 2 , 1994 Page 4 was over ! C) oked , it does not justify a different result in the Simpson case . Now that the council has Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) in mind , it is not required to deliberately ignore it simply because it was overlooked in the past . To address the broader issue , Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) , is consistent wit1 : C L vrl _ . 1Y cL Jti _ aL 1> Cz � 1 � �7 � e: l: L - interpreted . The cot. ncil has complete discretion to approve a private road but more limited authority with respect to approval of lots which front that private road since it must determine " legal SSSSS status . " To achieve greater consistency , assuming that the council wishes to continue to discourage private roads , the council may want to consider amending Section 6 - 6 - 2 ( I ) by striking the words " unless approved by the council . " The council may also want to consider clarification of the term " received legal status " in Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) . If those amendments were adopted , exceptions to the ordinance would occur only if the council approves a variance . A restrictive policy regarding private roads may have unintended results in those platted areas served by private roads . These older plats may contain impractical lots which need to be ✓ rearranged through the administrative land division procedure . The planning staff may need guidance in addressing those situations . In conclusion , the provisions of Section 6 - 6 - 4 ( A ) provide ample justification for the council ' s denial of the Simpson application since the applicant did not :satisfy the requirement of legal status . The council may , of course , reconsider its decision if it wishes to grant a variance from that section or ii mcne applicant has additional information concerning the " legal status " of the street to the satisfaction of the city . Very truly yours , LOMMEN , NELSON , COLE & STAGEBERG , P . A . Stephen C . Rathke SCR : jrw CC , Glenn_ Kessel , Esq . MGMEW MEMO K BOYLES , CITY MANAGER TO : FRAN FROM : HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING RE : SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SECTION 6-64A (INTERPRETATION BY STEVE RATHKY-CITY ATTORNEY) DATE : APRIL 20, 1994 At the City Council meeting held on April 18 , 1994 , City Attorney Steve Rathky interpreted Subdivision Ordinance Section 6-64A9 to mean that the City may not have jurisdiction to approve administrative plats on lots that are adjacent to a privately dedicated street. Please be advised that there have been three recent, similar administrative plat applications that have been approved and/or reviewed by the City Council. All three applications involved splitting property located adjacent to a private street. 1 . Administrative Plat File 91 -03 , for Douglas and Linda Theilbar located at 15329 Breezy Point Road, that on January 21 , 1992 , the City Council granted approval of an administrative plat and also a variance for lot size and setbacks within the administrative plat . The property is located on a private street of Breezy Point Road . There was no discussion by the City Attorney at that time , nor was there an objection received from the City Attorney related to the City not having an authority to approve the subdivision adjacent to a private street. 2 . Administrative Plat File 94-02, for the Tina and Brad King lot split, which was ultimately denied by the City Council, is a similar situation where Associate Planner Gina Mitchell, discussed in her memo to the City Council dated February 7 , 1994 , that the property in question was located on a private street easement and not a public road. At that hearing, although the administrative plat was denied, there was no objection raised by the City Attorney on the issue related to s Subdivision Ordinance 6- 64A relating to the City ' s authority to approve subdivisions of property adjacent to a private road . e City Council considered an administrative land division application by John 3 . April 18 , 1994, th r variances , the proposed subdivision site was a lot of Simpson . The lot split did not require any record and located on a private street, that being Sycamore Trail . The initial application was brought before the City Council on March 7 , 19944 At tat he attended Council stiby City pulated a number of requirements for the applicant to meet. S was Glen Kessel and there was no objection raised related to the issue of Subdivision Ordinance 6-64A regarding the ability of the City to approve lots on privately dedicated streets . 4 . Subdivision file SU9345 , Michael Benedict received approval for a 3 lot subdivision on private street, Breezy Point. The application was later denied by the City Council based upon the fact that the applicant could not prove that the " wetland" was not part of the lake of Prior Lake . However, in that case, City Attorney, Glenn Kessel interpreted the Subdivision Ordinance to state that the City Council has the authority to approve subdivisions with private streets . Until the interpretation, only PUD ' s were eligible to developed with private street systems . It would seem inconsistent that on the one hand the City has the authority under the Subdivision Ordinance to create a subdivision with a private street yet, on the other hand, the City does not have authority to approve a subdivision of land adjacent to a private street . _ The Planning Department requests that the City Attorney provide a legal opinion related to the issue of the City ' s authority to approve subdivision of lands adjacent to private streets . Staff is concerned that if the opinion of Steve Rathky on April 18 , 1994, is accurate, that perhaps other City approvals related to building permits , variances , etc . , may also be in jeopardy if located on a privately dedicated street. In addition , Staff is concerned about previous applications specifically that of Administrative Plat File 91 -03 for Douglas and Linda Theilbar, under a very comparable situation where the City Council did approve an administrative plat and variance on a subject site located adjacent to a privately dedicated street . athky ' s opinion appears to be that when a private street is involved, individual Another issue related to R property owners may have rights that supersede authority of the governing body, City, to subdivide and aff receives clear direction related to this item in order that we can regulate property. It is important that st continue to accurately process the various applications that come before the Planning and Building Inspections Departments . PR '10 �IINNES0 April 27 , 1994 Mr. John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail SW Prior Lake , MN 55372 Dear Mr . Simpson , I have mailed to you copies of the City Council minutes and the staff reports from some of the Administrative . Land Divisions which relate to the issue of private roads in some fashion or another . Not all of these applications were approved, but not necessarily because of an issue relating to a private road. There are tape recordings of the Council meetings which are available for your review, should you feel that would be necessary . If you have any other questions , please feel free to contact me at 4474230 . Si cerely, Gina M . Mitchell Associate Planner 4629 Dakota St. S . E . , Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372- 1714 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER NOTES FROM THE MEETING April 18, 1994 The following is a summary of the City Council ' s action . 1 . The Council adopted resolutions confirming their denial of a comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning request from Wensmann Realty for the Brandt farm parcel . 2 . An audit of cable television financial records was accepted which will result in the city receiving an additional $ 800 in franchise fees due to errors in crediting customers to the proper municipality. 0 A request by John Simpson , 3437 Sycamore Trail , for an administrative land division was denied on the basis that Title 6 , Section 6-2 of the Subdivision Ordinance prohibits the creation of lots on private streets which are not of public record . 4 . A development agreement responsibilities for Hidden View were assigned from Argus Development to D . R. Horton . The Council will continue to authorize such transfers as a consent agenda item in the future . 5 . A request by New Century Construction for comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning of the old bowling alley site from B -3 to R- 3 for use by the School District was approved. The district will use the building for kindergarten and pre-kindergarten programs . 6 . Lot sizes in the R4 zone were changed from a minimum of 10 ,000 square feet with 80 foot = frontage to 12 ,000 square feet with 86 foot frontage . There will be no minimum lot size for Planned Unit Developments (PUD) . Staff was directed to investigate the appropriateness of including a broader continuum of lot sizes in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan, investigate the impact of this change on fees and review the setbacks of residential properties from county roads . 7 . Staff was directed to revise city ordinances to allow private roads in PUDs provided that they conform with minimum standards set forth by the City Engineer. 8 . The architectural design ordinance was referred back to staff to develop clarifications which would render it more administrable . 90 The Council approved waiver of an outdoor concert permit fee for St. Michael ' s for their April 30 Aprilfest dance . NOTES2.WRT I Prior Lake City Council Minutes April 4, 1994 f) Page 8 , line 13 , " She recited that the land trade for " The Wilds and the fact that the Vierling parcel had been taken out , but that zoning had not changed " . Should be changed to read $ " She recited the land trade for The Wilds and the fact that the Vierling parcel had been taken out was entirely consistent with the Council ' s policy of diversifying the tax base " g ) Page 8 , third paragraph , Motion by Kedrowski : The end of motion should be added : " Because it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan . " MOTION BY, GREENFIELD , SECONDED BY, KEDROWSKI , TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED . Upon a vote taken , yeas by Andren , Greenfield , Kedrowski , Scott and Schenck , the motion passed unanimously. 4 . CONSENT AGENDA : a . Consider Approval of Invoices To Be Paid b . Consider Approval of Animal Warden Report c . Consider Approval of Building Permit Report d . Consider Approval of Fire & Rescue Report e . Consider Approval of Treasurer' s Report f . Consider Approval of First Quarter Budget Report g . Consider Approval of Resolution 94 - 17 Denying the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Resolution 94 - 18 Denying the Rezoning Application by Wensmann Realty for the Brandt Farm . h . Consider Approval of Cable Television Report MOTION BY KEDROWSKI , SECONDED BY GREENFIELD , TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (a ) THRU ( h ) Upon a vote taken , yeas by Andren , Greenfield , Kedrowski , Scott and Schenck , the motion passed unanimously. 5 . PRESENTATIONS : We There were no presentations . 6 . PUBLIC HEARINGS : - There were no public hearings . 7 . OLD BUSINESS A . Continuation of Council Consideration of Administrative Land Division for John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail - City Manager ` Boy es gave a net synopsis of previous actions taken to date , and turned the meeting over to Planning Director Graser who presented - 9 - Prior Lake City Council Minutes April , 1994 an overhead of parcels A and B and discussed details of the which had been presented on March 21 . Mr. proposed lot split Graser then reviewed the concerns of the neighborhood with regard to increased traffic , unsafe location for the driveway, depreciation of property values , overloaded streets , inadequate sewer and water management thereby creating additional drainage as a result of the development . Mr. Graser displayed a sketch of a revised proposal for the dwelling and discussed the history of the Maplewood development which was annexed by Prior Lake in 1973 . Gary Dietjen , 3469 Sycamore Trail , addressed the Council regarding events surrounding the land adjacent to his lot , the maple tree , retaining walls and possible devaluation of his home . Wes Mader, 3470 Sycamore Trail - Expressed the opinion regarding lot splits and their benefit to everyone concerned and not just the individual landowner. His objections were with regard to problems created by the narrow street with a sharp turn to the right , elevation of property, privately maintained street on which construction equipment will degrade the road and adjacent property owners would have to assume cost of repair, displacement of grass with blacktop and building would contribute to runoff problem and accelerate the erosion problem . Eve Eichten , 3406 Sycamore Trail - Expressed additional concern with regard to drainage problems . Matthew Prettymann , 3432 Sycamore Trail , - distributed a letter from a neighbor, Dave Johnston , 3415 Sycamore Trail , and discussed material which he had handed out previously and stated that the Council had several reasons for denial of the request : Mr. Simpson does not have 100% consent from property owners on the private street and stated that there are cases supporting that the City has no jurisdiction over private roads and recited City Code Section - 6-64- A states : "The location of all lots shall have frontage on a publicly dedicated street or a street that has received legal status except that lots in Planned Unit Developments may have frontage on a private road or street . Frontage on a street shall be measured at the set back line . " Mr. Prettyman further discussed the lack of approval from the private street owners . John Simpson , addressed the Council regarding his proposal . Discussion occurred by Council regarding the request and the issue of private roads and Council ' s jurisdiction over them . MOTION BY KEDROWSKI , SECONDED BY GREENFIELD , TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE LOT SPLIT DUE TO THE CONFLICT INDICATED IN CITY CODE TITLE SECTION 6-64 A . -3- t , Prior Lake City Council Minutes April 4 , 1994 Upon a vote taken , yeas by Andren , Greenfield , Kedrowski , Schenck and Scott , the motion carried . A short recess was called . The meeting reconvened at 8 : 50 Be Consider Approval of Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement between the City of Prior Lake and Argus Development , Inc . ME City Manager Boyles introduced the item and discussed details of the agreement , and asked Council to clarify whether future development agreements should provide for this type of transfer through the City Council (which is the present method ) or could that responsibility be delegated to the City Manager, Attorney Rathke stated that in his opinion only the City Council can bind the city to a contract . MOTION BY KEDROWSKI , SECONDED BY GREENFIELD , TO A APPROVE THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF HIDDEN VIEW PLAT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE AND ARGUS DEVELOPMENT TO THE CITY AND D . R . HORTON , INC . , CONTINGENT UPON REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN ARGUS DEVELOPMENT, INC , AND D . R . HORTON , INC BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND CONTINGENT UPON THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT FROM D . R . HORTON , INC . TO THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. (* SECURED BY A LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 411690 . 75 ) * b Scott to add the amount of the letter of friendly amendment A fr Y Y credit which is $41 , 690 . 75 to the motion was accepted by Councilmember Kedrowski . A short discussion occurred regarding details of the motion and whether the dollar amount of the letter of credit should be mentioned . Upon a vote taken , yeas by Andren , Greenfield , Kedrowski , Schenck and Scott , the motion carried . MOTION BY KEDROWSKI , SECONDED BY GREENFIELD , THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY RENDER AN OPINION AS TO WHETHER THE COUNCIL IS ABDICATING THEIR RESPONSIBILITY BY ALLOWING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF SIMILAR ASSIGNMENTS AND AGREEMENTS . Councilmembers Kedrowski and Greenfield withdrew the motion and Council concurred that items of this nature should be placed on the consent agenda in the future . -4 - Prior Lake City Council Minutes March 7, 1994 resident survey which indicated that Prior Lake residents desire a trail system which connects neighborhoods , parks and commercial areas within the city. Mr. Mangan recommended denial of the request . Mr. Stassen , developer, presented a letter signed by residents of West Edge Estates who are opposed to the sidewalk . Mayor Andren requested the letters be entered into the record . Emil Carnes , owner of one of the new units , spoke in opposition to the sidewalk . Discussion occurred regarding the placement of the sidewalk , the trail system connecting to the sidewalk and status of the private street . Mayor Andren noted that Resolution 93 - 85 , paragraph 11 states : "A pedestrian side walk system shall be installed along the entire east/west private road and a connection south to 170th street , acceptable to the City Parks Director" and that Mr. Stassen had been present at the November 1 , 1993 Council meeting when the Final Plat had been approved . MOTION BY KEDROWSKI , SECONDED BY GREENFIELD , TO DENY MR . STASSEN ' S REQUEST TO AMEND THE PUD OF THE FIRST ADDITION TO WEST EDGE ESTATES TO ELIMINATE 415 FEET OF SIDEWALK. Upon a vote taken , yeas by Andren , Greenfield , Kedrowski and Schenck, the motion carried . Scott abstained . B . Consider Approval of Simpson Administrative Land Division - Planning Director Graser distributed copies of letters from - neighborhood residents who are objecting to the Simpson request . Mr. Graser presented an overhead of the plat showing the two lots , and a chart indicating the estimated drainage flow and placement of a house . Mr. Graser indicated location of trees which would be lost or endangered . Mr. Simpson discussed his proposed plans for the lot which included erecting a retaining wall adjacent to the property on the east side of the lot . Several residents addressed the Council to voice their concern regarding water run off from the street onto their property. Mr. Detjen , whose property is adjacent on the east side , expressed concern over the retaining wall and the possible loss of a large maple tree on his property which extends over the lot line of Mr. Simpson 's property. Extensive discussion occurred regarding drainage and extent of damage that could occur x to the adjacent property owner. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI , SECONDED BY SCOTT, TO TABLE MR . SIMPSON ' S REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAND DIVISION UNTIL MAY 2 (at the end of the meeting Council concluded that the date should be changed to April 18 , 1994 i (see motion at end of these minutes) . PENDING RECEIPT OF THE FOLLOWING FROM THE PETITIONER : i 1 . Drainage information and plan which confirms that the construction of the house on the subject parcel will not exacerbate off site drainage conditions . Prior Lake City Council Minutes March 7 , 1994 2 . Safeguards be provided assuring that development of this parcel will not have a substantial negative impact on the property owner to the east . 3 . Covenants be placed in the deed so that any subsequent buyer/owner is aware of the restrictions on the parcel . Upon a vote taken , yeas by Andren , Greenfield , Kedrowski , Schenck and Scott , the motion carried . A short recess was called . The meeting reconvened at 11145 p . m . 9 . OTHER BUSINESS -- City Manager Boyles reminded Council of the special meeting on Tuesday, March 8 at 5 : 00 p . m . -- Mayor Andren reported the results of the Planning Commission Appointment Committee and stated that the Committee recommends the appointment of Dick Kuykendall to complete the term left vacant by Allen Greenfield's resignation . MOTION BY GREENFIELD , SECONDED BY SCOTT, TO APPOINT DICK KUYKENDALL TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF ALLEN GREENFIELD ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION . Upon a vote taken , yeas by Andren , Greenfield , Kedrowski , Schenck and Scott , the motion carried . fi -- Councilmember Kedrowski inquired as to the status of the sign ordinance . f -- City Manager Boyles reported on the status of the Ambulance Study Committee . - - Councilmember Scott requested staff look into the parking situation on Pleasant Street , it appears that used cars for sale are being parked on the street . - - Councilmember Greenfield stated : In order to take a proactive approach towards our future concerns and the implementation of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan as discussed in the Council 's past workshop , changes to the Zoning Ordinance are proposed as follows : O� PR4to A GN7A j. V �INNESONP STAFF AGENDA REPORT AGENDA # : 7A PREPARED BY: HORST W. GRASER , DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: CONTINUATION OF COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF JOHN SIMPSON ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION DATE : APRIL 18 , 1994 INTRODUCTION : This administrative lot division is a continuation from March 7 , 1994 . Mr. John Simpson petitioned the City to administratively divide a parcel of land at 3437 Sycamore Trail into two single family lots . BACKGROUND : This administrative land division was appealed to the Council by concerned residents in the area . Staff received several letters and a petition objecting to the land division . The stated reasons for the objection were as follows : 1 . Increased traffic would create an unsafe curve for the traffic . Any increase of traffic would be detrimental . 2 . Depreciation of property values in the neighborhood . 3 . Private section of Sycamore Trail cannot handle any additional traffic without first upgrading the quality of the street . 4 . Storm water management is inadequate on Sycamore Trail . 5 . The preservation of a 30 inch maple and a 24 inch oak tree . 6 . The construction of a retaining wall along the east property line of Parcel B . The Council discussed the issues and determined that additional information was required before a decision could be made . Specifically the following information was requested from the applicant . 1 . A drainage plan measuring the impact of the additional home on the off - site drainage conditions . 2 . That safeguards be provided assuring the development on Parcel B will not have a substantial impact on the property owner to the east . Specifically, Mr. Detjen wanted assurance that a 30 inch maple tree close to the common property line not be damaged and that a retaining wall not produce a negative visual impression to his home . 3 . That covenants be placed in the deed so that any subsequent buyer/owner is aware of the restrictions on the parcel . 4629 Dakota St . S . E . , Prior Lake, Minnesota 5537i2- 1714 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER DISCUSSION : The applicant has responded to the request for additional information in his letter dated March 29 , 1994 , to the Council ( attached) . He has addressed the issues as follows : 1 . Drainage Ilan : A stormwater runoff analysis was prepared by Steven Harvey of Valley Engineering Co . , Inc . This analysis compares the efforts of the proposed development before and after construction of a new home and driveway. The conclusion by Mr. Harvey is that the effect of the new home on off-site drainage will be minimal . Attached please find a memorandum from Larry Anderson with supporting analysis . 2 . Provide safe uards that the home to the east will not be negatived impacted : The applicant has changed the development plan reorientating his home to the southwest . The proposed home would be a tuck under style that would also eliminate the need for retaining walls along the east property line and save a 24 inch oak tree in the northeast corner of the parcel . The revised lot plan also moves the proposed home 42 feet from the east property line instead of the 15 feet previously proposed . The revised development plan also provides considerably greater protection for Mr. Detjen ' s 30 inch maple tree which is located only a few feet within their common property line . In his cover letter to the Council , Mr. Simpson has agreed to deed restrictions that would bind any owner to the new development plan and no grading within the drip line of the 30 inch maple tree . Park Director, Bill Mangan , stated that by not disturbing the ground within the drip line will protect the tree . 3 . Mr. Kessel has drafted proposed Declaration of Covenants , Conditions , and Restrictions which are attached for your review. These covenants incorporate protection from grading within the drip line of the 30 inch maple tree , require development of Parcel B in accordance with the revised development plan , and a staked sod lining along the road after completion of the development . ALTERNATIVES : 1 . Approve the request for administrative lot split subject to the covenants and restrictions as drafted by Mr. Kessel . 2 . Deny the request . 3 . Continue the request for additional information . ACTION REQUIRED : Depends on Council discussion . -2- March 29 , 1994 City Council Planning Director 4629 Dakota St . S . E . Prior Lake , MN 55372 Ref : ( a ) City letter dated March 11 , 1994 . Ref : ( b ) City Council meeting March 71 1994 . Ref : ( c ) Valley Engineering Co . , Inc . Analysis March 28 , 1994 . Ref : ( d ) Protecting Trees from Construction Damage , Scott County Extension Service , Doc NR-F ) - 6135 - S Dear City Council , In order to meet the recommendation and guidelines found in ref . a & bj I contracted Valley Engineering Co . , Inc . to review the ide factual information concerning drainage situation and to prov site drainage of the proposed property . To paraphrase the project analysis , it is the opinion of the engineer that the proposed construction can be accommodated by the existing storm drainage system , and will not unduly exacerbate off - site drainage conditions " a to To reduce any perceived negative niimp c t theas property een drawn . The the east , a revised develop me p - - proposed home is forty feet from the adjacent property line , sixty percent further than required setbacks . In the guidelines set forth in ref : ( d ) the 30 " maple tree will have zero grading done under the dripline of the tree ; therefore , there will be no impact whatsoever on the tree . With the revised drawing , the 24 " oak on the N . E . corner of parcel Be will be an additional large tree saved . There will be no retaining wall required on parcel Be Development covenants of parcel Be will read as follows : 1 . Parcel Be Diepf i mnt plan will conform o the drawing dated 3 � 29 � 94 , That is on le at the City of Prior Lake and the Scott County Court Houseo he existing roadway will be placed 2 . A staked sod lining along t at completion of the development . In closing , I would like to reiterate a few facts . I am simply requesting to return the property to its original two parcels . The property was up for public sale in 1987 and will be again . I have publicly stated that I will give first right of refusal to all neighborhood interested parties . Secondly , the lots conform to all city zoning parameters . 1 . I have proven factually the additional run off is non - enants on said property that have exacerbating and will place cov been recommended by the professional engineering firm . Thirdly , I have addressed the eastern property owners perceived negative mental plan to conform to their impact by changing the develop desires . a believer in our ll As a veteran of this great country and as deemed and based1on of Rights ; o to own and dispose of p p Y the facts , I find it very capricious in the nature of the City Council not to approve my request for the administrative land division . Re / ec ful , oi1/ I John N . Simpson 2 . SIMPSON ADMINISTRATIVE PLAT SITE Lp, K � PR � � R i I 4 12 y N 2 3 a G � ILA L 1 � /► / �? 3y 3 `j85 3532 35 /D 3 pvJ q 5 B j 12 � 5 �1I 3 6 OCT , � o k J % N 4 kr TRACT Aco s ti �� 56 v C l� � P in ICE B o 0 ob TRACT B A zr TRACT C 5j2 3 "3570 ��4Z 33a ��P 33 T 0 �� WsL � ov.i . y D > — ram•- 3' !�o'� p� 0 3y $� ,� � 5c9 3sar }Ss39 3581 r E P4s�te. 3`18a- � I 2 3 a r3385 q 1 2 3 �, FI ✓ g A 9 co C 11T12 13 14 15 316 3 7 8 3gay I35�21 ,5lip BCD 12533q M p 10 c3P�Sswoa-o -r-zc YK . l7-/4 S —fE� T • 163 '3525 3si � 5 9 33011 33 /9 T c 9 ? B I J 4 5 4 3 TRACT D TRACT E � � � Z A da' ? m r � � 2 Id , � N04, � F V) a M 7 O� � � 3 3 tor� in MW 2 n C ; a- p ��/ 3 car UN . G � � 6 2 g fn K 3 `5C32 3 q m 35 a ! 'yg91 1. 1 = I L I4 OUTLOT 9 ri • e nRIVE d' PARK u'� t i A l � _ a•r� PP y . t}. . . Y x ORE P.,yf y< N race h / H O ,i.a•\ / PP' 1. —� r rCi• 9fl4a as ; Y` } n`�' -Pf sh a9 � � Ex z ^AVI od. i { „ass . 1 �Gi � w 's•�—_-r� u- - ITIU Ate � yl'� 1 _ pea. 9581 l 3. li' `tt 5171G . ' W • ( I rF � 1 Sppt � T//( a A�� I I ,�f_stJ iY I � L \ q,5�• a b � yP S 9411 x— __ a I 4�0 - , 0KE l y3Y37 \ }ftlx gsza, I I 91ra 44asx 6ara5e \ (.�',N e ss ya y�S 89as•1 0 t.<•+y� t \ 71 C3 xq1 t ' 1 \ I i � ` not� P z- (d.TR _ 444q 1 rd X.P. s rT S = MP S ON 3437 Sycaeore Trail Prior Lake , MN . —SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION— I hereby certify that this survey , plan or SIGMA Scale : 1 ° = 201 report was prepared by a or under my SURVEYING direct supervision and that I am a duly �iaafff SERVICES INC. Registered land Surveyor under the laws of 'Y the State of Minnesota . - 1071 Seneca Road *Suite E• " ---- �� � ' � Eagan, Minnesota 55122 (., "`^^` Dater - Phone: (612) 452-3077 Mayne 0 . Cordes , Minn . Reg. No. 14615 — �w,=d ' I 1t gaEtx I Gata9� xvas � � y`>` Oi uew*y gfiBF (es � x � t'l x ur4ace T / r L 9'It•1 �! x /D ato?Oo� � Y � IS / hgNJ / as(5. q� 6x a'..7 ll Y0 .4 I (�aza'1� Ir/. b / 9ts s iHAE agss ExsF; ,9 s- .r RoutE 4e' r, 1 � * 34(O9 t xq o �,�t l u L is V \ g * 3137 \ CHI 3x I Istts�— 1f. i I I 9Yv.8 wl4 6araye \ I. D ' _— Y � N � y MR _ JC) S = MPSON 3437 Sycaeore Trail Prior Lake , NN . f � G r -SURVEYORS CERTiFICATiOW SIGMA I hereby certify that this survey , plan or SURVEYING i _ 201 report Was prepared by me or under my -" 1 Scale : I direct supervision and that I am a duly SERVICES INC Registered land Surveyor under the laws of the State of tllnnesota . 1971 Seneca Road ' Suite Ea�2 1.!rnneFo'a 55122 oV Civil Engineering for Public Works VALLEY ENGINEERING CO . , INC . and Private Industry a March 25 , 1994 Mr. John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail Prior Lake , MN 55372 Re : Administrative Land Division : Outlot C , Maplewood , Prior Lake , Minnesota Dear Mr. Simpson : As requested , I have evaluated the impact on stormwater runoff if another house and driveway are added to the divided lot in the subject project . A report that quantifies the stormwater flows is attached . It appears that the present storm drainage facilities are adequate for both the existing and proposed conditions . Even though the impact of one more house and driveway is incrementally small in the context of the neighborhood development , the addition of any more hard surface has high visibility that often become the focus of real and imagined drainage problems in the adjacent areas . In viewing the site , I found no reason to support the argument that the neighbors ' basement water problems would worsen . The low driveways along the north and west sides of the street are bermed and storm sewered , thus averting inflow from the street . Often , basement water problems are caused by infiltration from high ground water. Due to the fact that the proposed new lot is already very steep , little chance for seepage into the groundwater exists . When a house and driveway are added , then even less seepage will occur. Any additional design stormwater runoff that is generated from the construction will be collected by the existing catch basin . Thank you for the opportunity to be of service in this matter. If you have questions or need additional information , please contact me . Sincerely , 12L Steven D . Harvey , E . attachment 7301 Ohms Lane , Suite 500 Minneapolis , Minnesota 55439 (612) 832 - 9475 • Fax 832 - 9542 l i e STORMWATER RUNOFF ANALYSIS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND DIVISION OUTLOT C , MAPLEWOOD PRIOR LAKE , MINNESOTA March 28 , 1994 VALLEY ENGINEERING CO . , INC . 7301 OHMS LANE , SUITE 500 MINNEAPOLIS , MINNESOTA 55439 (612) 832-9475 FAX (612) 832=9475 Certification : I hereby certify that this plan , specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professiona gineer un the Laws of the state of Minnesota . Date '�J Z8 -9 5� Reg . No . //O.S.Zi 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION : Presently, drainage appears to flow along the north and east edges of Outlot C in a shallow ditch adjacent to the pavement in Sycamore Trail . The ditch shows As the ditch proceeds south to the southernmost driveway evidence of moderate erosions entrance on Outlot C , it feathers out and flows onto Sycamore Trail . The street lacks a crown at this point and drainage appears to spread across the pavement . This drainage collects in a low let on the west side of the street approximately 100 feet point that is drained by a catch basin in inous curb contains the street drainage at the low tv southwest of the property . A hand-formed bitum point on the west side of the street only . The east side drains into a sump that is drained by a 12" diameter PVC culvert connected to the catch basin . Because of the lack of a street crown It is possible that some of the street drainage flows to the east side whenever a headwater condition forms at the catch basin inlet . It is also possible that flow from the larger area east of the street can create a headwater condition at the culvert inlet that overtops the street. In that case a ponding situation would occur in the low point of the street . The curb on the west side of the street then would become the emergency spillway . In order to quantify these possibilities , three issues are addressed : 1 . ) Isolated flow from Area A , 2 . ) Isolated flow from Area B , and 3 . ) Combined flows from areas A & B . A hydrologic model , based on a 10 year storm , was prepared for the purposes of this report to compare the effects of the proposed development before and after construction of a new house and driveway . The assumptions made for developing the rating curves used herein are intended to indicate as best as practicable the prevailing conditions as estimated by a windshield survey and other available maps and surveys . As such , the model does not accurately depict actual field elevations and volumes , but instead compares the effects of increased hard cover against the baseline assumptions . 2 . 0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS : The results from the hydrologic model computations are included in the data attached to this report . A summary of the data is tabulated as follows . HYDROLOGIC MODEL DATA SUMMARY DESCRIPTION EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS AREA A AREA B COMBINED AREA A AREA B COMBINED RUNOFF RATE , IN CFS 3 . 30 2 . 31 4 . 18 3 . 30 2046 4 .23 RUNOFF VOLUME IN 0 . 34 0 .68 0 . 34 0 . 36 0 . 70 ACRE FEET 0 . 34 10 YEAR HIGH 934 . 28 934 .28 933 .20 934 .29 934 .29 WATER LEVEL 933 . 20 PEAK DISCHARGE AT OUTFALL 3 .26 2029 4 . 18 3 . 26 2043 4 . 23 The rate of flow to the catch basin will increase from 2 . 31 cfs to 2 . 46 cfs . Properly placed , staked sod lining of the existing roadside ditch properly maintained can accommodate the new flow rate . The increased flow can be accommodated by the existing catch basin with only 0 . 01 ft . increase in headwater. Hence , no spillover to the culvert inlet on the east side of the street should occur and Area "A" flows will remained unchanged for the proposed condition . The modeled rate of flow from Area "A" can be handled by the existing culvert without overtopping the street. The volume of runoff will increase from 0 . 68 acre feet to 0 . 70 acre feet. This additional volume will flow to the lake and should be considered in the reserve capacity afforded new, incremental development within the overall lake watershed . Since the increase in volume is very small , its impact on lake water level will be less than measurable . Consequently , in consideration of the foregoing it is the opinion of the engineer that the proposed construction can be accommodated by the existing storm drainage system , and will not unduly exacerbate off- site drainage conditions . G f � . . ► • , It It Jilt did I i L ` 35 (P1 g4\ or Y 66 I � Q - ct) 0 In r 943 .9 x f 6 T in o i It 3 + 60 off 945 . 4 ( O / 9190 t � 9 .3 5 14 Fv 90 T !J E } I N .ZC � T r �� a 2 1 p 9 9F f 0� In x 99 1 0�( 7• .�' 9 x9 5 9 i 'V� 93 , tow'" 98 h 85 . 8 — �� r 99. IN b 3 !5 q6C S TLOTlk I ! t i I.IoP j i O� PRIOR ti e x v � 4?I �, N ESoSP INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM : LARRY J . ANDERSON , DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT : JOHN SIMPSON LOT SPLIT DATE : APRIL 12 , 1994 G The City of Prior Lake on March 7 , 1994 tabled Mr . Simpson' s request for Administrative Land Division pending receipt of three conditions . The first condition was Drainage information and plan which confirms that the construction of the house on the subject parcel will not exacerbate off site drainage conditions . " Mr . Simpson has provided a report from Valley Engineering & Company , Inc . which shows that the surface water runoff will have a slight increase in volume and rate compared to pre existing conditions . In Valley Engineering & Company, Inc . and the writer's opinion , this increase in runoff will not cause any significant drainage problems to existing homes in the area . According to the calculations performed by Steve Harvey , the depth of flow at the catch basin at the low point of flow to the catch basif the street will n wse ill provide additional head This increase and the depth on the catch basin to intercept the water into the storm sewer . At the Public Hearing property owners on the north and west side of Sycamore Trail indicated that they have water problems with their houses . These drainage problems were indicated at 3470 , 3454 and 3442 Sycamore Trail . The drainage from this lot appears to stay on the easterly side of the roadway and would not iinage of these houses on these three addresses . The drainage from mpact the dra the street area in general does cross the street in the area of 3420 Sycamore . The driveway for the house at 3420 and 3406 Sycamore were increased in height above the street to provide for positive drainage from the driveway out to the street for the first 10 ' of the driveway . The homes in this area could improve their own surface yard drainage by increasing their height to the curb along these two properties . In summary, it appears that building the offsite house drainage conditions the current plan by Mr . Simpson would not exacerbate The second condition placed was " Safeguards be provided assuring that development of this parcel will not have a substantial negative impact on the property owner to the east. " 4629 Dakota St . S . E . , Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372- 1714 / Ph . (612) 447 -4230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER The revised site plan prepared by Mr . Sim pson has provided that the house be reoriented towards the west with the driveway coming off the west side of the house . This should eliminate any need for a wall along the north of the lot and provide for a much greater distance in protecting a 30 " maple tree which is located at the address of 3469 Sycamore . A compliance with the proposed house style and grading plan should accommodate this item . The third item was regarding covenants and should be addressed by the Planning Department . LMEM43.ENG To : Horst Graser rrom : u [ o DECLARATION OF COVENANTS , CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION , made this day of , 1994 , by JOHN SIMPSON , owner in fee of the land hereinafter described lying in Scott County , Minnesota . WITNESSETH WHEREAS , John Simpson is the fee owner ( " Owner " ) of real property located in the County of Scott , State of Minnesota , described as follows ( the " Property " ) : Outlot C , Maplewood , according to the plat thereof on 1 e file in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Scott County , Minnesota and WHEREAS , Owner , as mortgagor , executed and delivered a Mortgage Deed , dated ( " Mortgage " ) to as mortgagee ( " Mortgagee " ) , which Mortgage was filed in the files of the Registrar of Deeds , Scott County , Minnesota , on , as Document No . and WHEREAS , by the terms of the Mortgage , Owner conveyed the Property to Mortgagee as security for a certain Promissory Note dated and WHEREAS , Owner has made an application to the Citv of Prior Lake ( " City " ) to subdivide Outlot C , Maplewood into two ( 2 ) parcels pursuant to an application for an administrative plat dated 1994 ; and WHEREAS , the Council for the City , as a condition for approval of the administrative plat has required that this ' To : Horst Graser n umm u � u z Declaration of Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions be executed County Recorder ' s Office to place , of and recorded with the Scott record , certain covenants , conditions and restrictions on the Property . NC7W , 'I BBRRFORY , the Owner hereby declares , imposes upon and makes the Property subject to the following covenants , restrictions , and conditions , which shall operate as covenants , restrictions and conditions passing with the conveyance of the ll apply to and bind each and every owner and Property and sha k their .successors in interest until 2024 . 2024 , this Declaration shall be From and after automatically renewed for successive ten ( 10 ) year periods unless prior to the commencement of each ten ( 10 ) year sixty ( 60 ) days renewal period , the owners of each lot included within the to terminate this Declaration . Property agree in writing ARTICLE I . Restrictions on Develo ment Plans of Parcel B Parcel B of the Property as set forth on the certified survey prepared by Sigma Surveying Services , Inc . dated February 12 , 1994 shall conform in all material respects to the 1994 and attached hereto and incorporated drawing dated March 29 , herein as Exhibit " A " ( the " Development Plan " ) No building permit shall be issued by the City unless the proposed improvement to Parcel B conforms in all material respects to the attached Development Plan . 2 - To : Horst iiraser rrour. ULU ARTICLE II . Land Use and Construction Covenants and Restrictions w ction on Parcel B shall have zero Any proposed constru grading done under the dripline of the 30 " maple tree as set A Development Plan . In addition , the 24 " forth on the Exhibit oak on the northeast corner of Parcel B shall not be disturbed and shall be saved in any proposed construction plane . There l installed on Parcel B to the east and shall be no retaining wal to the southeast of the Parcel B Property . Declarants declare ion on Parcel B be done in such a that all proposed construct manner so as not to exacerbate any offelte drainage conditions . ARTICLE III . I General Provisions Section Duration . The conditions , restrictions , reservations and covenants of this Declaration shall run with and ibed above and shall inure to the benefit of bind the land descr and be enforceable by the owner or owners of the lots included I within the Property , the City , and their / its respective legal representatives , heirs , successors , and assigns up to anct including 2024 , and any extension of this Declaration as set forth hereinabove . Section 2 . Enforcement . Enforcement of the conditions , restrictions , reservations , and covenants of this Declaration shall be by any proceeding at law or equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant or restriction , either to restraint such violation or recover damages therefor _ Failure by any owner or owners of the Property - 3 - Irom : utt To : Horst Graser enforce or seek enforcement of the rights or by the City to right to do n no eve ' be deemed a waiver of t n he hereunder shall i ent violation - s o for anY subsequ of the everabilit Invalidation of any f3ection 30 court shall not r iudgment or order of and' provisions herein by full affect any of the other provisions , which shall remain in � force and effect until the date of expiration hereunder - Decl ar to Any reference to declarants herein t� ecti. on 4 �'- legal representatives , shall includ e declarants , respective successors and assigns . gecti ©r� (;overnin Law . 'This Ueclarat � shall e heirs , Governed by and ixiterpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota • this 6HEC}Fr , the parties hereto have caused IN WITNES of the day and Declaration to be duly executed and delivered as year first above written . JohnSimpson STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF this acknowledged before me 1994 by John Simpso - The foregoing i n strument was n ' day of �--- Notary Public 4 - rrom : ULU io : norst eraser CONSENT the The undersigned , Mortgagee under that certain Mortgage dated _ _----. ( ' FNIortgage ° ` ) filed in the files of the Registrar of Deeds , Scott as County , Minnesota , on _ --- Document No & with respect to that certain Property legally described as Outlot C , Maplewood , Scott. County , Minnesota , hereby join in the foregoing Declaration of Cov pants , ( Conditions and Restrictions ( " Declaration " ) dated ) 1994 , to indicate its consent to the ) foregoing Declaration and to subject its interest as Mortgagee thereto . MORTGAGEE : By — I t s --- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was ackno19edged before me this day of of the Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY : LOMNIEN , NELSON , COLE L STAGEBERG , P . A . 1800 IDS Center ( GRK ) 80 S . 8th Street Minneapolis , MN 55402 ( 612 ) 339 - 8131 S : \ SHDATA\ 16772G\GRK\ SIMPSON . DEC - F - Southwest Suburban Office 14198 Commerce Ave. N.E. Prior Lake, MN 55372 Office (612) 4474700 FAX (612) 447.4735 To : Prior Lake City Council Members and other interested parties . From : Randy Simpson Edina Realty After review of properties on Sycamore Trail in Prior Lake, it is in my opinion that it is not in the best interest of the majority of the property owners for subdividing an existing lot. Property f values will be effected directly by the building of a lower valued property on a minimum square footage lot. Many homes in the area are in excess of $300 , 000 . 00 or more in value . The subject property was purchased in the lower $ 100,000 . 00 range after a long market time, and in my opinion the removal of the existing three season porch would effect the curb appeal and marketability of this property, in turn effecting all properties in the area. Also the proposed minimum . lot size, would effect neighboring homes by eliminating open spaces, creating a situation similar to Sand Point addition and the Inguadona Beach area, in which overcrowding has diminished values and buyer appeal . Water runoff from proposed addition roof and driveway could effect properties down hill from new construction . A Metropolitan FinetrW company. 3 mis 11) In summation it is in my opinion that the] proposed lot division would effect neighboring properties and would not be in the best interest of the majority of the home owners and the goal of the city to encourage open spaces and prevent overcrowding. Sincerely, Randy impson { I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATER CITY CODE GRADING SEWER ENVIROMENT SIGNS ZONING FLOOD PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS PARRS NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES ELECTRIC TRAIATION SE IC SYSTEM NSFOF GAS SrOR4 WATER ASSESS4ENTS BLD CODE EROSION CONTROL OTHER I recomend : y APP%7VAL DENIAL CONDITIONAL APPROVAL AJ CCM ENrSle IF OOF Ir AAdkp If W Ina � M n l P / UK � p 9 SIGI�7'URE : TITLE : DATE RETURN TO * BY DATE : � I ecse refer v let� � date Mar, i1, 19 the cob( v r P orm, th &6 addre 5 5e CC randc f r � �- J O� PRI0� v � c �rN N E S O� ' " STAFF " CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANK TING DEPARTMENT PROJECT REVIEW RECORD i DISTRIBUTE TO CITY MANAGER ' BUILDING OFFICIAL MN71rOT ASST . CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS NSP CITY ENGINEER CITY ATTORNEY SCOTT RICE CITY FINANCE POLICE CHIEF MDTNEGASCO CITY PARRS DNR MN VALLEY ELEC CITY PLANNER COUNTY HIGHWAY WATERSHED OTHER REVIEW DEADLINE : — U DATE DISTRIBUTID : `f PRWECT REVIDT MEETING : YES NO DATE : TL%IE 0 APPLICATION FOR: X A MIN PLAT PUD VACATION PRELIMINARY PLAT REZONTINoG HCME OCCUPATION FINAL PLAT COND USE COMP PLAN AMEND RLS VARIANCE EIS/ EAW ETHER APPLICANT 0 Tohn � I SO PHONE : / 4 �' ADDRESS . J CONTACT PERSON : PHONE * PRQ7ECT REQUEST : s (,l b �' Ir out f 1 D f 1 a- l e l oo c 2parctlir y DESCRIPTION : 1, or � SITE LEGAL PID : ) 5 r�) j g � l9 — D ZONING : / -I y !J CCM.P PLAN USE : PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DATE : CITY COUNCIL REVIEW DATE : — � - 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612 ) 4474230 / Fax (612 ) 447.4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNRY EMPLOYER i I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATER CITY CODE GRADING SEWER ENVIRONMENT SIGNS ZONINGG FLOOD PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS PARRS NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL` ISSUES ELECTRIC TpANSPOI=ION SEPTIC SYSTEM CAS SrOFM DER ASSESSAENTS BLD CODE EROSION CONT%)L OTHER I recommend : APPROVAL DE %TIAL CONDITIONAL APPROVAL COMMENTS • _ ,_ n /4A6 r NINE F SIGNATURE : TITLE : C DATE : -- DATE : RrURrr To - e r 1v e � �- � l % 9 � r � I t tr r da t CVl a. r, , plects �e f � ad dre S Se CSCtrarajryll, DATA je y EXISTING CONDITIONS 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 1 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Existing Conditions , Area A [ HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 30 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 34 ( acft ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 69 . 17 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 253 . 63 ( min ) Multiplication factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 00 [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Runoff Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 26651 Receding limb factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 00000 2 [BASIN DESCRIPTION ] s [WEIGHTED WATERSHED AREA] DESCRIPTION AREA CN# RUNOFF COEF Houses 0 . 23 98 0 . 95000 Driveways 0 . 06 98 0 . 95000 Lawns , partially wooded 2 . 98 61 0z20000 Overall Approximation 3 . 27 64 0 . 26651 I 3/ 29/94 Page 2 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 1 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Existing Conditions , Area A [TIME CONCENTRATION - - TR - 551 SHEET FLOW Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 24000 Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 240 . 00 ( ft ) 2 - yr 24 - hr Rainfall ( R ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 80 ( in ) Land Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 05800 Travel Time of Sheet Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 20 . 07 ( min ) SHALLOW FLOW K Coef ( surface description ) ( K ) . . . . . . . . . . = 1950000 Watercourse Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 01700 Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = Is % ( ft /s ) Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 350 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 98 ( min ) CHANNEL FLOW Hydraulic Radius ( R ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Channel Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00000 Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 20000 Channel Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft/s ) Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( min ) TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 23 . 06 ( min ) [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION] Distribution Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = SYNTHETIC Total Precipitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 79 ( in ) Return Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 10 ( yr ) Storm Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 00 ( hr ) 3/29/94 Page 1 OUTLET STRUCTURE REPORT RECORD NUMBER 1 TYPE CIRCULAR PIPE w/ beveled rings 45deg bevels DESCRIPTION 12 " PVC CULVERT INLET , EAST SIDE OF SYCAMORE TRAIL [RATING CURVE LIMIT] 3 Minimum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 931 . 50 ( ft ) Maximum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 00 ( ft ) Elevation Increment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 10 ( ft ) [OUTLET STRUCTURE INFORMATION ] Circular Radius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0a50000 ( ft ) Culvert Invert Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 931 . 50000 ( ft ) Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0000000 �F Manning ' s N - value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0901200 Orifice Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1000000 Tailwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 930s00000 ( ft ) Numberbarrels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 [UNSUBMERGED EQUATION] H/Diam = He/Diam + K * ( Q/A*Diam^D . 5 WM - 0 . 5 * SA 2 Coefficient K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00180 coefficient M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 50000 [SUBMERGED EQUATION ] H/Diam = c* ( Q/ (A*Diam^0 . 5 ) ) AZ + Y - 0 . 5*SA 2 Coefficient c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 03000 Coefficient Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 74000 [DEFINITIONS] H = Headwater depth above inlet control section invert , ( ft ) Diam = Inerior height of culvert barrel , ( ft ) He = Specific head at critical depth ( dc + Vc^2/2g ) , ( ft ) Q = Discharge , ( cuft/s ) A = Full cross sectional area of culvert barrel , ( sqft ) S = Culvert barrel slope , ( ft/ ft ) 3/29/94 Page 1 OUTLET STRUCTURE REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 2 TYPE : RECTANGULAR WEIR SUPPRESSED DESCRIPTION LOW POINT IN SYCAMORE TRAIL [RATING CURVE LIMIT] Minimum Elevation , me as a moves moom a Names * m as = 934 . 00 ( ft ) Maximum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 935 . 00 ( ft ) Elevation Increment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 10 ( ft ) [OUTLET STRUCTURE INFORMATION] Crest Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 30 . 00 ( ft ) Crest Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 00 ( ft ) Coefficient Cw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 33000 S Exponential . 5 [RECTANGULAR SUPPRESSED EQUATION] Q = Cw*L* HAexp H = Headwater depth above inlet control section invert , ( ft ) L = Crest length , ( ft ) 3/ 29/94 Page 1 RESERVOIR REPORT RECORD NUMBER 1 STORAGE TYPE MAN STAGE/AREA DISCHARGE TYPE COMP STAGE/DISC DESCRIPTION SUMP AREA AT INLET TO CULVERT [RATING CURVE LIMIT ] Minimum Elevation . . 931 . 50 ( ft ) Maximum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 935 . 00 ( ft ) Elevation Increment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 10 ( ft ) [STAGE STORAGE INFORMATION] Input file = NULL Output file = NULL r r t [Manual Contour Area vs . Elevation] w: ELEVATION CONTOUR AREA ( ft ) ( sgft ) 932 . 00 20 . 00 933 . 00 50 . 00 934 . 00 100 . 00 935 . 00 150 . 00 [STAGE DISCHARGE INFORMATION ] OUTLET STRUCTURE : STR # 1 TYPE : CIRCULAR PIPE w/ beveled rings 45deg bevels DESCRIPTION : 12 " PVC CULVERT INLET , EAST SIDE OF SYCAMORE TRAIL STR # 2 TYPE : RECTANGULAR WEIR SUPPRESSED DESCRIPTION : LOW POINT IN SYCAMORE TRAIL 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 7 TYPE : RESER STOR . IND DESCRIPTION EXISTING CONDITIONS , AREA A AT CULVERT INLET [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] PeakDischarge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 26 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 34 ( acft ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 70 . 00 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 253 . 00 ( min ) Peak Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 933 . 20 ( ft ) [ INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Hydrograph # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a = 1 Hydrograph Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = Existing Conditions , Area A 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT N= RECORD NUMBER 2 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION : Existing Conditions , Area B [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 31 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 34 ( acft ) Timelnterva [ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 98 . 82 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 362 . 33 ( min ) Multiplication factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 00 [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Runoff Coeficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 40238 Receding limb factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2000000 [BASIN DESCRIPTION] [WEIGHTED WATERSHED AREA] DESCRIPTION AREA CN# RUNOFF COEF Houses 0 . 14 98 0 . 95000 Driveways 0 . 09 98 0 . 95000 Street 0 . 28 98 0 . 95000 Lawns , partially wooded 1 . 38 61 0 . 20000 Overall Approximation 1 . 89 71 MOM 3/29/94 Page 2 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 2 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Existing Conditions , Area B [TIME CONCENTRATION - - TR - 551 SHEET FLOW Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 24000 Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 300 . 00 ( ft ) 2 - yr 24 - hr Rainfall ( R > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 80 ( in ) Land Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 02700 Travel Time of Sheet Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 32 . 58 ( min ) SHALLOW FLOW K_Coef ( surface description ) ( K ) . . . . . . . . . . = 1e50000 r Watercourse Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 14000 Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 5 . 61 ( ft/ s ) s Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 120 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 36 ( min ) CHANNEL FLOW Hydraulic Radius ( R ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Channel Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0000000 Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . a = 0 . 20000 Channel Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft/s ) Flow Length < L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( min ) TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 32 . 94 ( min ) [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION ] Distribution Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = SYNTHETIC Total Precipitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 04 ( in ) Return Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 10 ( yr ) Storm Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 00 00 3/29/94 Page 1 OUTLET STRUCTURE REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 3 TYPE : MANUAL RATING CURVE DESCRIPTION Low point catch basin grate , Neenah R - 3250 -A [RATING CURVE LIMIT] Minimum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 00 ( ft ) Maximum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 60 ( ft ) Elevation Increment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 10 ( ft ) [ FILE INFORMATION] i 3/29/94 Page 1 OUTLET STRUCTURE REPORT RECORD NUMBER 4 TYPE RECTANGULAR WEIR CONTRACTED DESCRIPTION Low point catch basin , curb inlet , Neenah R - 3250 - A [RATING CURVE LIMIT ] Minimum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 00 ( ft ) Maximum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 60 ( ft ) Elevation Increment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 10 ( ft ) [OUTLET STRUCTURE INFORMATION ] Crest Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 00 ( ft ) Crest Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 00 ( ft ) Coefficient Cw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 33000 Exponential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1a50000 [RECTANGULAR CONTRACTED EQUATION ] k } Q = Cw ( L - 0 . 2H ) HA exp H = Headwater depth above inlet control section invert , ( ft ) L = Crest length , ( ft ) 3/29/94 Page 1 RESERVOIR REPORT RECORD NUMBER 2 STORAGE TYPE MAN STAGE/AREA DISCHARGE TYPE : COMP STAGE/DISC DESCRIPTION : Low point in west curb line , Sycamore Trail [RATING CURVE LIMIT] Minimum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 00 ( ft ) Maximum Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 60 ( ft ) Elevation Increment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 10 ( ft ) [STAGE STORAGE INFORMATION] Input file = NULL Output file = NULL [Manual Contour Area vs . Elevation] ELEVATION CONTOUR AREA r ( ft ) ( sgft ) 934 . 25 200 . 00 934 . 50 400 . 00 934 . 60 480 . 00 [STAGE DISCHARGE INFORMATION ] OUTLET STRUCTURE : STR # 3 TYPE : MANUAL RATING CURVE DESCRIPTION : Low point catch basin grate , Neenah R - 3250 - A STR # 04 TYPE : RECTANGULAR WEIR CONTRACTED DESCRIPTION : Low point catch basin , curb inlet , Neenah R - 3250 - A 3/ 29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 9 TYPE RESER STOR . IND DESCRIPTION EXISTING CONDITIONS , LOW POINT AT CURB [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Peak Discharge . = 2 . 29 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 34 ( acft ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . = 98 . 00 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 360 . 00 ( min ) Peak Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 28 ( ft ) [ INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Hydrograph # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 Hydrograph Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = Existing Conditions , Area B 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 5 TYPE COMBINE DESCRIPTION COMBINED RUNOFF , EXISTING CONDITIONS [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 4 . 17 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 68 ( acft ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 69 . 00 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 360 . 0O ( min ) [COMBINE HYDROGRAPH RECORD #] HYDROGRAPH # 1 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Existing Conditions , Area A - Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 30 ( cfs ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 69 . 17 ( min ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) HYDROGRAPH # 2 TYPE : UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Existing Conditions , Area B Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 31 ( cfs ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 98 . 82 ( min ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 11 TYPE RESER STOR . IND DESCRIPTION EXISTING CONDITIONS , COMBINED DISCHARGE AREAS A & B [ HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge . . . . = 4 . 18 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 68 ( acft ) TimeInterval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 70 . 00 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 360 . 00 ( min ) Peak Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 933 . 55 ( ft ) [RESERVOIR STRUCTURE INFORMATION ] Reservoir # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . = SUMP AREA AT INLET TO CULVERT Storage type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = MAN STAGE/AREA Maxstorage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 225 . 25 Cuft Discharge type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = COMP STAGE/DISC Max discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 91 . 43 cfs [RESERVOIR INFORMATION] Reservoir # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 Reservoir Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = SUMP AREA AT INLET TO CULVERT [ INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Hydrograph # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 5 Hydrograph Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = COMBINED RUNOFF , EXISTING CONDITIONS i f 1j E} t f j PROPOSED CONDITIONS 3/ 29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 3 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Proposed Conditions , Area A [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 30 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 34 ( acft ) TimeInterval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 69 . 17 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 253 . 63 ( min ) Multiplication factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 00 [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] y Runoff Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 26651 Receding limb factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 00000 [BASIN DESCRIPTION ] [WEIGHTED WATERSHED AREA] DESCRIPTION AREA CN# RUNOFF COEF Houses 0 . 23 98 0 . 95000 Driveways 0 . 06 98 0 . 95000 Lawns , partially wooded 2 . 98 61 0 . 20000 Overall Approximation 3 . 27 64 0 . 26651 3/29/94 Page 2 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 3 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Proposed conditions , Area A [TIME CONCENTRATION - - TR - 551 SHEET FLOW Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( N . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 24000 Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 240 . 00 ( ft ) 2 - yr 24 - hr Rainfall ( R ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 80 ( in ) Land Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 05800 Travel Time of Sheet Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 20 . 07 ( min ) SHALLOW FLOW K Coef ( surface description ) ( K ) . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 50000 Watercourse Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 01700 Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 96 ( ft/s ) Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 350 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Ftow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 98 ( min ) CHANNEL FLOW Hydraulic Radius ( R ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Channel Slope ( S > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0000000 Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 20000 Channel Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft/ s ) Flow Length ( L > . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( min ) TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 23 . 06 ( min ) [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION ] Distribution Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = SYNTHETIC Total Precipitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 79 ( in ) ReturnPeriod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 10 ( yr ) Storm Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 00 00 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER : 8 TYPE : RESER STOR . IND DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CONDITIONS , AREA A AT CULVERT INLET [ HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 26 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 34 ( acft ) TimeInterval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 70 . 00 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 253 . 00 ( min ) Peak Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 933 . 20 ( ft ) [ INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Hydrograph # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 Hydrograph Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = Proposed Conditions , Area A 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 4 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Proposed Conditions , Area B [ HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 46 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 36 ( acft ) Timeinterval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 98 . 82 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 362 . 33 ( min ) Multiplication factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 00 [RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Runoff Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 41649 Receding limb factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 00000 [BASIN DESCRIPTION] [WEIGHTED WATERSHED AREA] DESCRIPTION AREA CN# RUNOFF COEF Houses 0 . 17 98 0 . 95000 Driveways 0 . 11 98 0 . 95000 Street 0 . 28 98 0 . 95000 Lawns , partially wooded 1 . 38 61 0v20000 Overall Approximation 1 . 94 72 0 . 41649 3/ 29/94 Page 2 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 4 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Proposed Conditions , Area B [TIME CONCENTRATION - - TR - 551 SHEET FLOW Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 24000 Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 300 . 00 ( ft ) 2 - yr 24 - hr Rainfall ( R ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 80 ( in ) Land Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 02700 Travel Time of Sheet flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 32 . 58 ( min ) SHALLOW FLOW K_Coef ( surface description ) ( K ) . . . . . . . . . . = 1w5000O Watercourse Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 14000 Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 5 . 61 ( ft/ s ) Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 120 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Ftow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 36 ( min ) CHANNEL FLOW Hydraulic Radius ( R ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Channel Slope ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00000 Manning ' s Roughness Coef . ( n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 20000 Channel Velocity ( V ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft/ s ) Flow Length ( L ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( ft ) Travel Time of Shallow Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 00 ( min ) TIME OF CONCENTRATION Time of Concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 32 . 94 ( min ) [RAINFALL DESCRIPTION] Distribution Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = SYNTHETIC Total Precipitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 . 67 ( in ) ReturnPeriod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 10 ( yr ) Storm Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 55 ( hr ) I 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT I RECORD NUMBER 10 TYPE RESER STOR . IND DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CONDITIONS , LOW POINT [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 43 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 36 ( acft ) TimeInterval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 98 . 00 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 360 . 00 ( min ) Peak Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 934 . 29 ( ft ) [ INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] k Hydrograph # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 4 Hydrograph Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = Proposed Conditions , Area B 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT RECORD NUMBER 6 TYPE COMBINE DESCRIPTION : COMBINED RUNOFF , PROPOSED CONDITIONS [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION ] Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 4 . 22 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 70 ( acft ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 69 . 00 ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 360 . 00 ( min ) [COMBINE HYDROGRAPH RECORD #] HYDROGRAPH # 3 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Proposed Conditions , Area A Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 3 . 30 ( cfs ) Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 69 . 17 ( min ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 1 ( min ) HYDROGRAPH # 4 TYPE UNIV . RATIONAL DESCRIPTION Proposed Conditions , Area B Peak Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 2 . 46 ( cfs ) s Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 98 . 82 ( min ) Time Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ) 3/29/94 Page 1 HYDROGRAPH REPORT L-L RECORD NUMBER : 12 TYPE : RESER STOR . IND DESCRIPTION : PROPOSED CONDITIONS , COMBINED DISCHARGE , AREAS A & B j [HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Peak Discharge . . . . . . & soso * * 000aaaaw a & & ago = 4 . 23 ( cfs ) Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 0 . 70 ( acft ) TimeInterval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 1 ( min ), Time to Peak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = MOD ( min ) Time of Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = MOM ( min ) Peak Elevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 933 . 56 ( ft ) I a i [RESERVOIR STRUCTURE INFORMATION ] Reservoir # . . . . . . . . . . . . 0a9w0aa009aa9a08a0a = 1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SUMP AREA AT INLET TO CULVERT li Storage type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = MAN STAGE/AREA Max storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 225 . 25 Cuft Discharge type . . . . . . . . . . . . = COMP STAGE/DISC Max discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 91 . 43 cfs t` [RESERVOIR INFORMATION ] Reservoir # . . . . . . 0a09aa0a000a . . . . . . 00000aa = 1 Reservoir Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = SUMP AREA AT INLET TO CULVERT [ INFLOW HYDROGRAPH INFORMATION] Hydrograph # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 6 Hydrograph Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = COMBINED RUNOFF , PROPOSED CONDITIONS O� P RIOT ti e v � AGENDA ITEM : 6A SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF SIMPSON ADMINISTRATIVE LAND DIVISION PRESENTER : HORST GRASER, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE : MARCH 7 , 1994 INTRODUCTION: The Planning Department has received an Administrative Land Division application from Mr. John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail SW, Prior Lake . The applicant proposes to subdivide Outlot C , Maplewood, to create two parcels as per attached survey reduction. The application has been filed pursuant to Section 6- 1-3 : Administrative Land Division process , outlined in the Prior Lake Subdivision Ordinance 87 - 10. SITE CONDITIONS : The subject site contains 22 , 197 square feet and is zoned R- 1 , SD . The minimum lot size in this district is 10 , 000 square feet, and 12 , 000 square feet for corner lots . However, the definition of a corner lot is a lot that is situated at the junction of and abutting two or more intersecting streets . Sycamore Trail bends around Parcel B and therefore is not considered a corner lot . The coverage ratio of 22% for structural coverage and 30% impervious surface also apply. The subject site abuts the private section of Sycamore Trail for 296 feet. The last 550 feet of Sycamore Trail are private . The . road section consists of a 22 foot bituminous mat with no curb . An informal homeowners association maintains the roadway. A utility stub was installed for the proposed lot when the area was served with utilities in anticipation of a future subdivision . The Subdivision Ordinance does not permit the creation of private streets , unless approved by the Council. The City has approved lot splits on private roads before , as long as standards of the Zoning Ordinances and requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance are met . The topography of the site slopes from east to west with approximately 15 feet of relief over the proposed vacant lot. An existing single family home is located on the southern lot with a screen porch that straddles the common property line , which must be removed if the lot split is approved. There are five trees worth noting on the vacant lot, three Ash trees , an unidentified tree , and a 24 inch caliper Oak. The Oak will have to be removed due to the proposed driveway location . A three inch caliper Ash tree at the northwest corner of the house will likely be lost also . However, the development plan may change 4629 Dakota St . S . E. , Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372- 1714 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER likely be lost also . However, the development plan may change somewhat depending on a future owner. The adjacent home owner to the east of the vacant parcel has expressed concern over a 30 inch caliper Maple tree that is within a few feet of the property line . The grading effort to accommodate the proposed home will come within 14 feet of the Maple which may cause damage to the tree . The adjacent home to the east has a picture window that affords a view of the lake . The proposed home is a walkout to the south, and would block that view. Grading is required at the front and rear of the home to accomplish the proposed development plan. Although this plan does not indicate a retaining wall , one maybe required. BACKGROUND : Staff notified in writing the owners of land contiguous to the parcel , and has received numerous letters of objection. Since there were objections , the application has been forwarded to the City Council who shall hear the objections and decide the matter. The following objections and concerns were raised: • Possible loss of a mature Maple tree , as well as possible monetary and aesthetic value loss to the adjacent property to the east , should a retaining wall be constructed along that property line . • Possible drainage problems to adjacent property owners . • A concern regarding the loss of property value to the applicant's home by removing the screened in porch, which would be contrary to some of the neighbors' objectives of improving the value of the neighborhood. • An increase of traffic in the neighborhood. Please see the attached letters for specific information. In addition to the neighborhood objection , the City's Engineering and Building Inspections Departments indicated that a development plan for the proposed lot must be submitted, acceptable to the City, as a condition of approval . A It letter dated January 24, 1994, was sent to the applicant indicating that objections had been received, the necessary components of the development plan that were needed , and the applicant's alternatives . Please see the attached letter and staff reports for further information . The applicant asked staff to set the meeting date on March 7 , 1994 to allow him time to resubmit his plans to address the concerns of the City's Engineering and Building Inspections Departments and the adjacent property owners . DISCUSSION & SUPPORTING ANALYSIS: The City's Engineering, Building Inspections , and Planning Departments have reviewed this application, and it appears that the development plan has addressed all of the concerns that have been made by the departments . The lot split requires no variances , and meets the criteria outlined in Section 64 = 3 of - the Subdivision Ordinance . The concerns with the development plan and potential damage to the 30 inch caliper Maple tree on the lot to the east will be reviewed again at the time of building permit application for Parcel B . This will be done to reduce the negative effects to the adjacent property owners when Parcel B is developed. Verlyn Raaen of the Engineering Department, recommends as a condition of approval that the easement as shown in the northwest corner of Parcel B of the survey be dedicated to the Home Owner's Association or appropriate body which owns the roadway right- of--way, and an executed copy of this document be forwarded to City Hall , prior to filing the Administrative Land Division with Scott County. It is also recommended that a 5' wide side yard and 10' wide front and rear yard drainage and utility easements be dedicated to the City for each parcel, according to Section 6-6- 5 :A of the Subdivision Ordinance , acceptable to the City Engineer. He also stated that storm water runoff from both proposed lots will drain to the west onto Sycamore Trail, and then south to a catch basin, which then conveys the storm water to the lake . Since no curbs exist, some minor erosion problems may occur at times in the roadway right-of-way. This will need to be monitored by the association and corrective action taken when. required. An alternative available is for the applicant to install bituminous curb to convey the runoff to the catch basin within the paved section of Sycamore Trail . Ideally however, all benefitted property owners should contribute to this alternative . Ralph Teschner, Finance Director and Bill Mangan, Director of Parks and Recreation, have reviewed the proposal , and stated that the development fees of $ 287 . 50 for Collector Street Fees , and $ 188 . 70 for the Park Dedication Requirement be collected as a condition of approval of the Administrative Land Division . COMPREHENSIVE � PLAN IMPACT: The Comprehensive Plan indicates low density residential land use for this area. Therefore , the application has no impact with x _ respect to the plan and is consistent with the Land Use Plan . e Administrative Land Division as requested. ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Approve th 2 . Table the item for further discussion. 3 . Deny the application for specific reasons . RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation from staff is to approve the Administrative Land Division as requested, subject to the following conditions : 1 . The existing screened in porch be removed by May 7 , 1994 . 2 . The easement as shown in the northwest corner of Parcel B of the survey be dedicated to the Home Owner's Association or appropriate body which owns the roadway right- of-way, and an executed copy of this document be forwarded to City Hall , prior to filing the Administrative Land Division with Scott County. 3 . 5' wide side yard and 10' wide front and rear yard drainage and utility easements be dedicated to the City - for each parcel, according to Section 6 - 6 -5 :A of the Subdivision Ordinance , acceptable to the City Engineer. 4 . Development Fees of $287 . 50 for Collector Street Fees , and $ 188 . 70 for the Park Dedication Requirement must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit . 5 . The Administrative Land Division has to be filed with Scott County, and the new Parcel Identification Number given to the City of Prior Lake by May 7 , 1994 , or the Administrative Land Division will become null and void. The rationale for granting approval is that the application meets the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements , and it is consistent with the comprehensive plan . ACTION REQUIRED : The action required depends on the outcome of the Councirs discussion . AP " ADPLAT " PID# , C ADMINISTRATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION FORM Property Owner : � � Phone : - Address : 5 � j �c � � , � 1c 0frt , l �" (c- , �. % l � Kz Applicant : Phone : Address : � � . < _• , }�5 Phone : Name of Surveyor : > NL Has the Applicant previously sought to plat , rezone , obtain a variance or conditional use permit on the subject site or any part of it : No Yes What was requested : When : SUBMISSION REQUIR3 ENTS : A . completed application form and Property Identification Number ( PID ) . B . Complete Legal description of existing and proposed parcels . ,;}C . Filing fee . ./ D . Survey prepared by a registered land surveyor . E . 15 copies of the application , survey and supporting data and 1 set reduced to 11 " X 17 " . F . Total square footage and or acreage of existing and proposed parcels . IS G . Names and addresses of owners who own property contiguous to the subject site . ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW . To the best of my kncxvledge the information presented on this form is correct . In addition , I have read Section 6-1 -3 of the Prior Lake Subdivision Ordinance which specifies the requirements and procedures for Administrative Plats . I agr o rov ' e information and follow the procedures an outlinede rit i ature Date - Fe Owners Sigiiature Date THIS SECTION TO BE FILLED IN BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR DISPOSITION OF APPLICATION : APPROVED DENIED DATE CITY COUNCIL (APPEAL ) APPROVED DENIED DATE OF HEARING CONDITIONS • Date Signature of the Planning Director 4 .: CF. %.� 't . t ,,. (_ 4 f , MIS J � � 2 I. I CAI fl VICA � 1. �. t C . :_) J. t7 1 - t_7 1 .f. c t 3 :y1 , 5 I 7 �i E TI Y rr "_ E '� 51 � C) t i. "i � � � � � j f. � L�' ."t F) t4 _ 5 . � l t _ ' k � t taC3ClC ' 3_ 1 f L 3 f} iTClfC7 C7 _c Cf " r �. Q a. � i J.i11'1 Ci .`; 'aI .. C1 .1. 1 "c. ��i ) E Im `i .� t Iv t v C 7 t 1. .. , l. .t i, mac,' s x tl J C} rt i" �`, T'CI CI V _'a E. �, _ r`„�, 2 3 c.. . ,'z, e ti_°. + n 1 . C "S ( t 3 ;fir- C, -^ '{-. �.� %r -' C-`� F n C`s i 1 , e c 1 Cw t_ C..'. .F; i J 1 01 Y, 'f_ CCZe' vr: 1 f. G alc. XTt � ta <7lte �' D , 1Y} C) ` _ t r= `y .1. !, 7 cti :;. i l 1. c3 f , ."71`fl r ? t at7 ) ' %' t . l. C7Xt C E 7 E7 . Lfr � cl Uiv � r n t ti . It - ( f G < J I � c " -{ � ea sc The � }au1h `' �" . 1 � 1 as lte � tu. YCCa i. it t% C t i F? -"`} {' (j .-3 t a ..-`�_ Y ct .$,. � . fa I, .c7 1, t.. k 1 'Iv t .'� 7 1. .t�l. f ! } "t_ t 4.' T�. t r i e 1 � � r Cluj r IA nt C_: . ri� a 3 i P4g0C) ( H, )t E) T' r. X-1 _ y . vnr a.. ma i l ; C `i". " ; .. r-. i i {'� ' 1Y I ,p_C� .;') it �f-r s` . •^ ` (I l). T .`V' P_ r.. Y`} t _. / _ 3 f =,1 .. r. Onp i It ar � _ ry `r_.- I : � (t . r_ c r d. _, ,. _r_ (J r f ..t ("a "P c n n f ..- u . v ... F y J s «� C'1 1.1a > 'C CSC . 't° �,' r �, ..� C ta1:� C7 Y =' "E (' &S J Cri �? ` C' . i1 i C i F. r.s E . r._a r'e i '`zl J. f a r ?Fl i�:'.� .t.r i'... JIL _ _. , Y 1, a �a a Jr. e a t�� N 11� � 1 C71•.' _._. ... �< e � .4'�.'� '� �f .� i' 1. C� ,,. I„r � . r � Fe f , "? Iz t kJ It ` P v .4M � 1. L `t 1i=4T Gara9` \ W% x qas / r1 OHt I } x gss9r I� / ` .� 1 a => N.9' B;Isa..7SLLrEace •vtt 5'�.+ i t/ y TROD q Jta' t No•-- y .w — tsb-- ts F `� 4 4S C / ♦ 1 4}�e�e ase . Ile ft � ' '/ �n.. rq�� � � HIE y1•s � � � Extaft.,y i1469 �� I itx oa t =t r , 4 % i 1 Y„ it 1 T0, Mtj of � I 3 Ouse t ' I K3Y37 \ ,11 % I sst4� eY:{A E 1 ' 1414 6ua9e D t �p ..a qqs xgasa pr:.c�"71 1 O n rgll1• y r � s / 1 \ e I \ sa : r _ 4vt% i rd. z.p na N I -- Y � DlmsYLorminnT LOXAAk" YOUIR Mg _ .3O14N SIMPSON 1437 Sycamore trail Prior 6ake , HH , -SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION- SIGMA I hereby certify that this survey , plan or SURVEYING scale : In - 20 � report was prepared by we or under my 1 SERVICES INC direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of �Minnesota . '/ 1971 S ne aAtRona oz SS to k li I I I I Loll o \ oe 0 x - 94 ell I 1 � VN 945 m - 0 943 .9 Ix 8 'v gC - 3 oo � pp L + elf) + 1 0 3 , - 9 oor Clio 97"o it i t 'k y 9 .3 � r� 2g 90 g -- : T 99 1 - t x 99U" 7. _ _ M 949 . 1 99 93 . 85 . 8 98 999 , o � y 0 3 - 1 tl Z TLOT \ — 970 � - - - zll� o , gel 5 / rL " n 0 PRto ZEv � 411NNES0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : Planning FROM : Ralph Teschner, Finance Director RE : Outlot C Maplewood Townsite (assessment/fee review) DATE , January 7 , 1994 Outlot C Maplewood originally existed as two parcels , N 1/2 Outlot C , Maplewood (PIN# 25 098 012 0) and S1/2 Maplewood (PIN# 25 098 013 0) which were served with water and sewer utilities in 1973 under Project 72.7 and was 100 % assessed for frontage and trunk acreage charges . Subsequently in 1989 , the two parcels were combined . All past applicable assessment amounts have been paid and no special assessment balance remains against the property. The tax status of the property is in a current state with no outstanding delinquencies . Since the proposed administrative land division requires no associated street improvements or storm water facilities , no storm water fee is applicable . The area fee calculation for the Collector Street fee excludes Parcel A because a residential home exists on the parcel and was based upon the 10 , 273 sq. ft . for Parcel B only. A summary of the development fees to be collected upon approval of the administrative lot split is detailed as follows : Trunk Water & Sewer Charge - 0- Storm Water Management Fee - 0 - Collector Street Fee . 23 ac . @ $ 1250 . 00/ac = $ 287 . 50 SPL17.W RT f 4629 Dakota St. S.E ., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER O� PRIp ti e U � �I' 1, NESpt P MEMORANDUM TO : GINA MITCHELL , ASSOCIATE PLANNER FROM : BILL MANGAN , DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE : PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENT FOR JOHN SIMPSON DATE : JANUARY 25 , 1994 Gina, based on the fact that this is a lot split with the end result being an additional lot, the newly created lot would be subject to Park Dedication . To determine the Park Dedication for this example , I use a raw land value of $ 8 ,000 per acre . Applying that figure toward the acreage of Outlot " C " ( 10 ,273 s . f. ) , I have determined a raw land value of $ 1 , 887 . When applying the 10 % Park Dedication to this figure, the cash dedication requirement for this split would be $ 188 . 70 . If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me. Thank you . 4629 Dakota St . S . E . , Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372- 1714 / Ph . (612) 447 -4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : * , CITY CODE L/GPADING -� SE=R _ENVIRONM IT SIGNS _ ZONING FLOOD PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS PARRS NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES ELECTRIC TRANSPOF=ION SEPTIC SYSTEM GAS STORM WATER ASSESSMENTS BED CODE EROSION CONTROL OTHER I recommend : APPROVAL DaTIAL CODIDITIONAL APPROVAL COMMENTS : . )=6L.= dot zee�lo CL ,1 a Z SIGNATURE : TITLE : l' aWP / RETURN TO BY DATE : 2 - � � � /`� I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATER CITY CODE ✓ GRADING — SEWER ENVIRONMENT SIGNS _ ZONING FLOOD PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS PARKS NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION SEPTIC SYSTEM GAS ' STORM WATER ASSESSMENTS BLD CODE — EROSION CONTROL OTHER I recommend : APPROVAL DENIAL V CONDITIONAL APPROVAL COMMENTS : AMA c Q D � nLIA WO like �, � I . � ��/ �/�oa��� !�--- •�'C-oitiYL �Lf/Yi / U.�AA .I� �'1S3'Z,� /�� D/f G GJ SIGNATURE : TITLE ,f4 c U ct� HATE : ! ` R�,'IURN To . BY DATE • a 5t Q 4dr( 55 t h-W �;�'I'1 S Pry J b400k ci 6xt o�eu-L a ��i�rnad ,cn 7Pe 2cha 4?o. 6J . , G3�C?ec�x�y �ue c�i�.�Cve A �e 'm:oa�ecQ ,� �e c - ,PO . LJ . �n.�1 acfcrrn c a,Dh2e�e�Q �d cmec7` /44.Cd L5 cm v�*.. Atic� �/le AZ 7kd CAL �uvn.a�R,ow� Oeo � � � P�w a-�iLe� ea�n�aro bn, �a ,Lo�o , /G � AruCL- C�I� �U �',� � �av+^a�. I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATER CITY CODE 7L GRADING SEWER ENVIRONMETTT SIGNS ZONING FLOOD PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS PARRS NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION SEPTIC SYSTEM GAS STORM WATER ASSESSMENTS �BLD CODE EROSION CONTROL OTHER I recommend : V APPROVAL DENIAL CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Commmso SIGNATURE • TITLE : RETURN TO • BY DATE : — 2 3 q l I have reviewed the attached proposed request in the following areas : WATER CITY CODE GRADING SEKER ENVIRONMENT SIGNS ZONING FLOOD PLAIN COUNTY ROAD ACCESS PARKS NATURAL FEATURES LEGAL ISSUES ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION IO SPORTERION ASSEPTIC SES3�iEItfl'S�GAS BID CODE — EROSION CONTRDL OTHER BID I recomanend : APPROVAL DENIAL T CONDITIONAL APPROVAL COMMENTS • jjr Y C' tA k �' e, . a Nor g TITLEsf (� DATE • SIGNATURE : p / BY DATE : r RETURN TO . C��� DhdR P1E - r 0 REG 11M E TEL : r 12 - ? ? 2 - ? y ? ? filar G 1 y4 15 : 33 hJo . U1 1 P . J o t t PAY CP �5 REGION WATE NOTICE 0 HEARING � .�' 1 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND DrVISION You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the City Council in the Prior lie Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S . E. ow March 7,1294 at 7 : 45 P. M , I' 1RP10j"' Sa O ' AkRA 'C : To consider an Adrriiristrative Land Division for John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail , Prior Lake , Minnesota. SUBJECT SITE L OCATION : 3437 Sycamore Trail , Outlot C, Maplewood , Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota. RE, UESTED ACTION : The applicant proposes to divide Outlot C , Maplewood into two parcels , as per attached survey reduction . Objections from neighborhood residents have been received , therefore this item must be considered by the City Council . If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this hearing" Oral and Avitten comments will be accepted by the City Council_ For more information , contact Gina Mitchell in the Prior Lake Planning Department at 4474230 . Prior Lake planning Department DATA MAILED : February 28, 1994 31, V VA Lk kp ' t �— ���j �C i r� Yi 6c�5 ��f•—�Q � /"-�q � 4629 Dakota St . S . L . , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 - 1714 / Ph (612) 447 -4230 / Fax (612) 4474245) AN EQUAL OPPOR1 UNITY EMPLOYER O� PRIq V � INNESo� P NOTICE OF HEARING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND DIVISION You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the City Council in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S . E. on : March 7 , 1994 at 7 : 45 P.M . PURPOSE OF HEARING : To consider an Administrative Land Division for John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail, Prior Lake , Minnesota. SUBJECT SITE LOCATION : 3437 Sycamore Trail, Outlot C, Maplewood, Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota. REQUESTED ACTION : The applicant proposes to divide Outlot C. Maplewood into two parcels , as per attached survey reduction . Objections from neighborhood residents have been received, therefore this item must be considered by the City Council. If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this hearing. Oral and written comments will be accepted by the City Council . For more information , contact Gina Mitchell in the Prior Lake Planning Department at 4474230 . Prior Lake Planning Department DATE MAILED : February 17 , 1994 4629 Dakota St . S . E . , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372- 1714 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i PRIo� ti y U � P f N N E so *TOTICE OF PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE LAND DIVISION January 4 , 1994 The Prior Lake Planning Department has received an application from Mr. John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail SW, to consider an Administrative Land Division located within the existing plat of Maplewood. The proposal is to subdivide Outlot C , Maplewood , in order to create another lot, as per attached survey reduction . Section 6 - 1 - 3 of the Prior Lake Subdivision Ordinance allows the City Manager or representative to authorize subdivision approval without a public hearing under the following circumstances : 1 . The division of the property will not result in more than three parcels . 2 . The property to be subdivided is a lot of record in the office of the County Recorder of Scott County, 3 . The resulting parcels generally conform to the shape and area of existing or anticipated land subdivisions in the surrounding areas . 4 . The division will not cause any structure to be in violation of setbacks . 5 . Any easements which may be required by the City must be granted. na 6 . The owners of land contiguous to the parcel must be notified in writing, and written objection received within ten da3 followinX notification . T Any written objection shall constitute an appeal. Such an objection shall be forwarded to the City Council who shall hear the objection and decide the matter. A copy of the Administrative Land Division and location map are attached . Please accept this as official notification of this proposed Administrative Land Division . Written comments or objections regarding this matter should be submitted to the Planning Department by January 18 , 1994 . For more information , contact Gina Mitchell at 447= 4230 . Sincerely, Gina M . Mitchell Associate City 'Planner 4629 Dakota St. S.E. , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER J �ffU L V January 12 , 1994 aim 3469 Sycamore Trail Prior Lake , MN 55372 Ms . Gina Mitchell CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 4629 Dakota St . SE Prior Lake , MN 55372 Dear Ms . Mitchell : We have received by mail a copy of the Administrative Land Division proposed subdivision of Outlot C . Maplewood , proposed by Mr . John Simpson of 3437 Sycamore Trail SW , Prior Lake , MN . Please review the following written objections and / or concerns . Our home is adjacent to Mr . Simpson ' s property and our address is 3469 Sycamore Trail SW , Prior Lake , MN . Our house is positioned on a hill with rip - rap retaining wall on the east end , which is approximately eight feet high and 8 feet out from the edge of our garage . This rip - rap wall runs half -way through the lot . The front of our house has a very steep hill and driveway that runs the width of the lot . Our property line on the west end of the house is approximately 14 feet from our house . It is our understanding that excavating and / or putting in a retaining wall could also be put on the property line or very close to the property line , which would adversely effect the aesthetic value of our home . This would leave me with an 8 ' rip - rap wall on one end of our house and a possible retaining wall on the other end . A two - story house sitting in this situation not only worries and concerns us , but would certainly raise questions and doubts of a prospective buyer should we decide to sell our property . The salability as well as the value of our house would be in severe jeopardy . We also have a mature ( 94 " circumferences 30 " diameter ) maple tree adjacent to Mr . Simpson ' s property . The tree is on our property , but is within a foot of the lot line . Should any excavating be done too close to this tree , the tree would be lost due to damage to the root system . The aesthetic value that a tree of this stature gives to our property as well as the entire neighborhood , is unmeasurable , much less what it means to the value of our property . We feel these issues warrant your consideration in this situation . Thank you for your consideration . Sin rely , ` Gary and Cindy Detjen I � elfko� 1 f s , z AzE ,T C o le ry G c P� r, cC / Are v / I �// CG� �-l�G�f ' , GrJ Cala s� ,S / �v c..17C YJ ' 'vier//•v f?/ Gv/ ��l' , �i G ofl tj� • ir/q �j r�q i?�l� ? eri!' c� LOW C v ti �� 19 `t `Ou rl D 6 e Wa 7 //1 x 1/2,Lill xe::5, �. � rr UT uoc-,1,5:/ c1j;Ie z 4, 0, 74 a C'C 009z d /r�iv, U C� �v� yv� ( � Gc� � � � �i 0 Co /W y o i 7 ovn 01 / 14 / 94 To : Gina M . Mitchell D Prior Lake Planning Commission ' 4629 Dakota St . S . E . Prior Lake , MN 55372 Re : Proposed Administrative Land Division of Mr . John Simpson ' s Land . Dear Planning Department , I am writing you today in response to a letter I received dated January 4 , 1994 from Ms . Gina Mitchell , Associate City Planner . ( see attached ) . My response to the proposed land division of Mr . John Simpson ' s property located at 3437 Sycamore Trail S . W . is that I object . I have several reasons for my objection to Mr . Simpson ' s request . These reasons I have listed in outline form below as follows , Neighborhood Property Values : The area in which I , and the Simpson ' s live , has had many improvements in the quality of the homes made by homeowners over the past ten years that I have lived here . There have been two new homes built at 3402 and 3406 within the past two years . 3406 is actually a replacement of an extremely old cabin that was an eye sore to the entire neighborhood prior to its demolition this past autumn . There have been improvements made at 3420 , 3380 , 3486 , and even 3437 , Mr . Simpson ' s residence prior to his purchase . There have been extensive landscape work done at 3478 , 3470 and 3508 Sycamore Trail within the past two years , dramatically improving these home ' s external appearances . 3415 Sycamore , and my home at 3442 , were both built five years ago . My home , just like 3406 , was a replacement of an old cabin . All of these improvements have gradually increased each other ' s property values . Good looking , well cared for homes all surround Mr . Simpson ' s piece of property enhancing his homes ' value . It is my opinion that Mr . Simpson ' will s proposed land division have a negative impact on all neighboring property values . Any home that could be built on that proposed site would obviously be very small and of lesser market value that its neighboring homes . A residence of this nature will bring down all the home values in the area offsetting the improvements we ' ve all made . I see a home on this proposed site as a giant step backwards in our neighborhood ' s quest towards improving the area and therefore should not be allowed . Granting Mr . Simpson ' s request would not be fair to many of my neighbors , as well as , myself . We have all made large financial commitments to our home ' s and our community by paying increased taxes . I feel this proposed land division seriously tarnishes our reasons for faithfully doing so . f Water Drainage : ' The plat sketch that Mr . Simpson furnished along with his request for land division , I believe , does not accurately tell the whole story . , Mr . Simpson ' s survey is only for the purpose of determining square footage , completely ignoring elevation . The proposed site has a rather steep incline to the north and west sides . Assuming Mr . Simpson ' s proposed site would be a corner lot , both of the street sides would have sharp drop offs to the curb . Once the w property is developed , and ' a home is ' built , where is the run off from rain and melting snow , going to go ? Well I ' ll tell you , it is F going to go, into , my basement and Ron Johnson ' s basement like it has been doing for years . The new homes roof and driveway will divert water downhill out into the street which is not capable of properly ', disposing of it . This past autumn both Ron Johnson and myself had extensive work done on our homes to try and resolve our wet basement problems . Know- I ing that our efforts were only a band aid to a more serious problem , I felt that I had to try something because my five year old home has had a wet basement ever since I built it . I feel the only solution is to improve the street . Widen the F road , : install an adequate storm sewer , (unlike whatever was done this past autumn between 3402 and 3406 ) , and prohibit the development of Mr . Smpson ' s proposed site . I realize this is easier said than done , however , I feel it is the only solution to the existing water run off problem currently in this area . Development of Mr . Simpson ' s F proposed site would only compound the water run- off problem worse . Street Standards : Although , I am not an expert on residential street code requirements , I think it is safe to assume that the street in front of Mr . Simpson ' s proposed site is not up to current Prior Lake residential standards '. This issue , I feel , was overlooked when you granted permits at 3415 and 3406 . The setbacks from the street at ' both . 3415 and 3406 are very close to the minimum requirements . Should this portion of 'Sycamore Trail be upgraded to current Prior Lake residential street codes these two homes will have doorsteps at the curb , or atleast , one of those homes will . Before this proposed land division be granted , I suggest that the 4 residents of Sycamore Trail in this particular area , and the city planning department , mutually agree on a future street plan . Every- one has had their own surveys done by several different surveyors . I have seen a few of my neighbors , I have reviewed Mr . Simpsons survey , and I ' have < one of my own . All of these surveys seem to contradict each other. Also , ' I think the city may need a larger portion of Mr . Simpson ' s proposed site just to create a decent navigable roadway . 1 I 3 Approximately a year and a half ' ago the city granted a change in property lines between 3454 and 3470 . This was done without any notification of contiguous landowners . By doing this the city shrunk the lot size of 3454 , a lot that has an ' old cabin on it Not only did this substantially reduce this parcels buildable area , y it severely , limits this lots ' street access . At 3454 there is an older ;garage built too close to the roadway . ( Actually it is located partially in the vacated roadway ) . My feeling , is that since 3454 now is limited in its street access and buildable surface area , I think the roadway should be changed to cut off a larger corner of Mr . Simpson ' s roadway easement '. If that ; is not possible , then I think the city should condemn the garage at 3454 to accomodate a wider , more navigable turn in the roadway;. The turn in the roadway , as it presently exists , is very unsafe . K There is a huge blind area when driving around Mr . Simpson ' s hill . With the road too narrow , and the absence of any street signs , ' I firmly believe there is going to be an accident at this corner in the k near future . I have also expressed my concerns several times to the Police Department in recent months concerning this very same issue . ' With the increased traffic lately , this is literally " Dead Man ' s Curve " . I ` think the 'safety issue should be seriously evaluated before any further development takes place down on this portion of Sycamore Trail . The road ' s width is only one aspect of the problem . The quality of the pavement is yet another issue . The neighboring homes have privately paid for the asphalt on this segment of Sycamore prior to Mr . Smpson ' s purchase of his home . Neither Mr . Simpson ,' nor the city x have paid a dime towards our streets ' maintenance . Both parties should realize this was paid for by individuals who desire to improve their fi neighborhood . Without our assistance , this street would till be a gravel path . I think both Mr . 'Simpson and the ; city ; take this for granted . This road was improved by the individuals who use it to better our neighborhood ' s quality of life , not to enhance Mr . ' Simpson ' s 1 proposed site , and not to ; take pressure off of the city to improve ; this roadway . Allowing further development on this , portion of Sycamore Trail will ' only ' further deteriorate its condition . I feel the city ; should repair the road in front of 3406 for granting a ` permit without adequate street repair . If the city allows development on Mr . Simpson ' s proposed site , I insist it should upgrade the roadway in advance to meet current Prior Lake development require - ments '. If it does not , I feel it is unfair to other area developers who currently are having to comply with such standards . The Proposed Lot : The proposed lot was declared "un-buildable " by its previous two owners .' Why it is all of a sudden okay to develop it astounds me . Development of this site means drastically changing Mr . Simpson ' s own homes ' value , ' a change that will decrease his home value . 4 r Tearing off his three season porch will reduce his homes value , even if he :plans to re - assemble it in the rear of his home . De - velopment on this proposed site will kill one of the areas largest maple trees that is presently owned by neighbors , Mr . and Mrs . , Gary Detjen: Furthermore , excavation on the proposed site will require extensive retaining wall work around Mr . and Mrs . Detjen ' s home . ' This cost will be out of their control and will be incurred by them just to preserve their homes ' structure . It financially u would be unfair to them to grant Mr . '` S ' son ' s request to divide his land . It would also be unfair to Ron Johnson , as well as , , rt myself in terms of further compounding an already bad water run off situation in this area . I am confident that the city of Prior Lake did not solicite11, Mr . Smpson ' s request '. With the rapid growth our city is incurring ' I am sure there are more serious planning issues to address than this one . This proposed land division not only depreciates the quality improvement efforts made previously by devoted tax paying citizens , it also causes financial hardships on them . I can ' t take anymore wafter in my basement neither can anyone of the westward side of Sycamore Trail in the area . I don ' t believe Mr . and Mrs . Detjen should have to further invest in their property to protect it from foundation erosion just to accomodate Mr . Smpson ' s request . Either our ' children , as well as ourselves shouldn ' t be subject to I unsafe roadway conditions in order to develop this questionable piece of land . And finally , this segment of Sycamore Trail , needs to be R improved just to handle the present traffic safely . ; I think the planning department may need a portion of Mr . Simpson ' s lot in order 0, to make these necessary changes'. ` Mr . SoIMP son ' s objective is tomake a ' quick buck and get out . His goal isn ' t to be a Prior Lake citizen . His goal is short term and money motivated . His plan is to ' sell ' out and move to a hobby farm . ' He has made that public to his surrounding neighbors . I ask ' that ' the city planning department deny or postpone Mr . Pll Simpson ' s land division request . Deny it in the name of creating a quality city , or postpone it until the road be clearly defined and upgraded . I have spent everything I ' ve got on my home . I am ' a good citizen devoted to creating a better ' community . I am here to stay ; and hope that you can appreciate that . I ' firmly believe that Mr . Simpson ' s proposed land division will adversely affect my property value, as well as , my neighbors . I firmly believe that after living ten years at the bottom of his hill that this development will further compound my basements ' water problem. Please do not let this proposal 110 of Mr . Simpson ' s go through . 19 a Sincer ly , hew ' R . ttyman 442 Sycamore Trail S . W . Prior Lake , MN 55372 IE OW) jai W * * * PETITION * * * I hereby object to the proposed land division as requested by Mr . John Simpson . I object on the basis that I believe the proposed land division will depreciate my own propertys ' value , as well as , the value of the entire neighborhood . I also believe that this proposed land division will increase the traffic on this segment of Sycamore Trail , as well as , create an unsafe curve for the traffic to navigate around . Furthermore , I don ' t believe that this segment of Sycamore Trail can handle any added traffic , including construction traffic , without first upgrading the streets ' pavement quality . Along with upgrading the streets ' pavement , I also believe the street needs to have an adequate storm sewer system installed to properly dispose of water run off . Please do not grant Mr . Simpson ' s request for land division on Sycamore Trail . 41 7 s &A r .� CI 3410 TV C . ' - 1 g661 R ! I�i err O � � � v 3470 Sycamore Trail SW Prior Lake , MN 55372 - 2342 ( 612 ) 440 - 1069 January 15 , 1994 Ms . Gina M . Mitchell Associate City Planner City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota St . S . E . Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372 Reference : Mr . John Simpson ' s application for an Administrative Land Division at 3437 Sycamore Trail SW , and your Notice of January 4 , 1994 , regarding it . Dear Ms . Mitchell , We own the property immediately across the street from the lot that is proposed for division , and are vigorously opposed to the division for the following reasons . First , homes on the lake shore side of Sycamore Trail S . W . are already suffering from water drainage problems . The combination of heavy rain , and run - off from the property proposed for division ( and property adjacent to it ) , contributed to the collapse of a retaining wall on our property which had to be reconstructed at a cost of approximately $ 12 , 000 . We also have had to replace the floor in a lower bedroom , and reconstruct a small retaining wall that abuts the house , because of water penetration . It is also my understanding that neighboring properties to the South have had lower level water problems . Adding another house and driveway right across the street will obviously reduce water retention and increase run - off onto our property and / or neighboring property . Second , the street has a sharp curve with limited visibility at the property proposed for division . Adding another house and driveway at this location will substantially increase the risk of accident . Third , the street is currently not maintained by the city , presumably because it is not to City Codes . To further subdivide property in this location prior to developing a plan for upgrading the area , will limit the options that would be available in the future , for current residents . i Therefore , we request that the Proposed Division not be approved at this time . If a plan can be developed and implemented that would bring the street up to City Codes and allow the City to maintain it , and that would deal with water run - off and safety , then I would no longer oppose the division . Kind regards , VIA 0.0, Wesley and Charlotte Mader i O PR ,to x �fI N N E S ON P January 24, 1994 Mr. John Simpson 3437 Sycamore Trail SW Prior Lake, MN 55372 Dear Mr. Simpson, Neighborhood comments related to your Administrative Land Division were due to the City by January 18 , 1994 . If no negative comments had been received from the adjacent property owners, the Administrative Land Division could have been processed without going before the City Council. Please be advised that the following objections and concerns were raised by persons notified of the proposed land division : 1 . Possible loss of a mature Maple tree, as well as possible monetary and aesthetic value loss to the adjacent property to the west, should a retaining wall be constructed r along that property line. h 2 . Possible drainage problems to adjacent property owners . 3 . A concern regarding the loss of property value to your present home by removing the screened in porch, which would be contrary to some of your neighbors ' objectives of improving the value of the neighborhood. 4 . An increase of traffic in the neighborhood. In addition , the City Engineering and Building Inspections Departments will require that a development plan for the proposed new lot be submitted acceptable to the City, as a condition of approval . Specifically, the development plan will need to define a future building pad location ; indicate existing and proposed elevations at all corners of the lot and building at at 25 intervals in all proposed drainage swales , the elevation of the street at the proposed driveway location and existing elevations at the adjacent corners of existing homes on adjacent lots ; a proposed home style (rambler, split entry, two-story etc . . . ) must also be indicated for proposed Parcel B . This information is necessary in order to show that the proposed lot can be developed without causing drainage problems to adjacent properties . In addition , a possible park dedication fee to be determined by the Parks Director may be needed, as well as other associated development fees will be required to be paid at the time of land division approval . In a phone conversation with Mrs . Simpson on January 18 , 1994 it was indicated that you would be out of town on February 7 , 1994. Because the neighborhood objections have been filed, Staff cannot approve the application . It will be necessary for this item to be decided by the City Council. It is my intent to schedule this item for discussion before the City Council on Monday, February 21 , 1994 . If that date poses a problem for you, please contact me by February 4 , 1994 so that an alternate date can be determined. 4629 Dakota St . S . E. , Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372- 1714 / Ph . (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNFTY EMPLOYER At this point there are several alternatives available to you regarding the application . 1 . Attend the hearing before the City Council on February 21 , 1994 and explain the reason for the request. Please be advised that Staff will recommend that the issue be tabled until all of the conditions outlined above by the Engineering and Building Inspection Departments are resolved. 2 . Contact a land surveyor to provide the elevation , house style and drainage information requested by the City, in which case Staff could make a recommendation to approve the Administrative Land Division. 3 . After considering the issues outlined in this letter, the option does exist to withdraw the application without refund. If you have any further questions, or would like a copy of the written comments that have been received, please give me a call at 447 -4230 , extension 213 . Sincerely, Gina M. Mitchell Associate Planner F % '. ir wmtc�7 7 o v- Y t0 rII O L L + ) i-> 0 CD 4ImD 4,.J4I,,* O 111 +) Q7 0 +1) in 913 QJ O eA G+ o o ro / r , %a C� 3 W <V Q, I,I! •1 LLl a a. to L .� }Eid o ' ibl� � � a � a � � N � 'sew (It) ► , QO , LZ o0 S - - H 04J 0 v f"I",zz C i O Qt C \ L Q7 (o N O , ` 1'o 1 d ( ( , vo +s 4 +L ro R H �• U LIJ N t AIR) M � n � o � yam MID _ 1 _ Vf N C Q1 C 0 y. T E 0 U 0 O J+ ;�} :r QJ QJ 4— X � oz ( ) Si i-> Q) L.. O Oro +_ +� s ro +J Q +> > (N A S W w . iG 0 ) ' N N (0 (MQ) M 4� d tr +� _p Rl i� fj `)• 9f. m £ 2Z 0 :3Z J m a. o c -W � o Z l 1 1 N .0 3 •.- L 4J d-) 07 somommot El o / d � kI` 'n �.r _T I f y I c 3 v c ra (a .a cu `p 1 c0 N O QJ +-) i O it F� o 134 �, )) to O' 22 ` 882 w a o cn E - mot 73: rn cm CIO �i 1 — �{ 6 " o a N u N t ` j4}� S Z t7l ,L•1 sm w m ko ro M Oft cl, C1 Ow CD cq Mull CD 30 F-i b Lu l-� / W i'• W L 3 tad > a� � w d^ a �C `� ma's ! L = � e z go v1 � _ 3 � 4m3 C 4) SL Cob O .Iv 0CU OEM "- N rOC �' o ` a�tttltti;t414N1;1f;!; ;, , Ull a (a > o CP No N + , y L t7 S- to r AMEMORMOO (10 Ll! {+ {�` Ste.. f1 i J 4-Ina "� LL C C)FI ,"Opz = v1 T7 o U (!ti fill =•ei >s 3 ( , It g 4 %�4"ys'04 ti5 = L . 1.. V o V) G . . .. . . w CU O Q7 -r S. T7 d' +m) �' 3 7777 - _ - LLL 1 Cl -' t . . in L O N � •• c� Ield 061bl) sepw /�� ' � 02, h�r 1 _S� s - ZI ' � , 0 ) - — ' � - ZS ' ZO ► - - — a) - ^ v � � ,�y �-) ♦ 7D1 ( I C ^ W W N "O Or` � ^ W W Q1 � O w _ �� - - r= m a) - r= LO .--i ro C a "O v Ln � ro IIIIF /6 f ' 'fl N +� t.f) M Q) N C Q) Q) +) r.[') M Q) N S.. V- �` ry - 1 J r+1 . y�1..•� r- E o - - t Ln 4- v c •� E O - - 4- IIIIII0V F U _ �_ -z 1 V I � f "miJl O T •0 •N to 4111) O � � N N O � i V� to a-1 O � � N N ` I ^ 1 U U 4J Q) N 7 0 0 C O S-. U U to 7 0 0 C O i V , U C � 4- roONC O Q) U ^ N 4- (0 C) Nd O Q) I wP� �' O � j c rt3 7 O tD 00 t f0 T o O t0 O .0 O WMW �r ^ , 1 L o C •v +J + + � +� o ro +� + + +� , IMVY ^ U V i N •r Z N C C ^ C S. l0 •r Z N C C Y / � .yam T W O +) Q) C C V) Q) Q) O 4J Q) O O C C C Ln O Q) O +) Q) �- O +1 � S.. O V U a N C O U i 0 U U a. UM C H 0 1., � �J O 'Zl Lrri r w oa) u W OQoi ro v o w o o W OQ1ia) ro v o A h si11111 I 1 L♦1G � 2Z \ DSZ �_ _ - ^ U J + r - 4 L ^ U _D � / GY `r o 1 j f� `� '9f m ` I `n c ) LO C +�+ +L+ o Cl. o 0 +A LD Q) +� o 2 N Lim �S ) A O ! Q ^ 3 vl t [) C III, w ^ i U i U O N t17 C . . ^ + 3 U A III 'ILn N <ZQ mold \%D ' C � O^ � �.. y f+ L l to o f .� % a) m v o �) ^ m t c� Y 7 M "6 U i 0 +� 0 +1 Q) Q) Q) r t U 4- t 4 - 0 +) Q) Q) Q) t rr ^^ 11 ( y I '', LL z 4J C `� o o 43)i 4- v- 4- _ _ +1) 0) + � o o Q�i 4- 4- V .r p/ i ^ _ O O +1 Q) v) 3 0 .--� N O O O i 4- N 3 0 •--r N r� O (.� y • r+ t Z O t!'1 N Q) O Z O O) r2') en ♦y a� ' QI L 1 £ \ ' �:' ,- +., a..) +1 a) a) v rn +� t Q) a v rn rl 7 ro t Q1 t LO r+ 0 •� W C 4J T t Q) t Ln o •r- ar c +� U + ) r� r� ln vroi � +� [ • o'z Z\\` N O mo Trot C O O O 4- 4 C O t rot C O O O 4- 4- C o + + IIIi rn v 0) Q) E +> 0-) a o Q) E 1 i L Q) C • ^ ro U U U Q) T i i 00 O C wo ro U U U ( ) T i _ to O t . r U C C C C Q) ro Q) Z r U C C C C r Q) d U 4J U O) eu (O r0 •r � -P O•� U 0) (0 ro f6 ••- i +� � Q) O C +1 C +1 +1 +1 Q) so Q1 C +� C +� +� +) r— Q) M _ '\ MWIIIIIIII 4J +1 i O Q) O .� to rn •rA t 6) +) O C Q) O ••- vi to yr t 61 / - • d• ,�, C. +1 ro •O LA i Q) /^� - �! O t Q) E +) ro v v v n i al t a) Tcu F+1 1 �j \ 9b J J N �° ' }{`'3 J 57� ` _ a {' 111 a4J c coi o .n o ro ro aroi c r o o o a QOi c +� rn C:) �+ L. C}' 96 # 9oZ a 4 m rs N 54 4 1 3 O I ) 'T lei ' u "' L 03 Z �- '` ' - oT � ° oI M - - ° o roLO o CA Lo III IIIIIIIII � 1� N � � PoolV rya ' Z VCM rRao W vat , f Q v4111,) f� a- �II, SIII, .I a) ry z 1�: l V / up IL `� o + � c Cam ° y , n f +02 H W > I >m) rts to o(a > c i ( F F T CA L v �. v) IIII0 LA CP It • • C r l� ' r aJ • r C /� C! s 4u Q' = 4? : O z� SIIIIs a L � 41111, _ v LL` W�• . (!� •JNI ` S30IAli3S Jivi ,' ) � anS b' WJI . , r' > , 3 In � 0 t� rn d N �S l •M C r (1 y L Om Ql N to i mo � t 3 z z ,. V N U) N * N am � . Lll Q } 'Mob, W>.j atoAJ 0an �/� IUol c000 7,q (itl N 1 e � c ra SJ rY T" o o 1..1 I \ 1 � N, �. � I ' _ icy N —j q° � ,3 dl M Z �- � . � / '� H � � N ('\Lel t ' CD ` , '—x— co S�J i+ QnVP _ _ _ _ _ � x _ _ .r / / 1 / r too w ' \ nEv � No E J Tv. \ LL 5V = \ I � __ IS II a� U NL � � C rt N r - 7 / 3ry C• �. 1�1 yL.( E y p y- a.T cz �10O \ 'fin ' \. \ `Fx _ � / 'fr I — /07 / U r v i v( �' 1 I a N \ \ � :c � — r W to � oo C)tnn a ow Ca. ton `V 00000 �1 4 a� \ O I /� / g f'M�'Sf2 a Q ULJ i a v \ uv: av 0 "Ooo •� \ Y2 \ fir; \ $, \ , 82 X PMs�a.y `M .% \ ,� °�' 7 3 `n 0 m TSe _ _ _ �p / Voli N O 4ltoo, C r .'1�� O l cloo V' h ` h _ _ — J �s A zl on H q� c c` i3 Q \ six x / f - x N aGe,� I Z .°; I I t. = 1YY' -VJ moan FAA _ wr. /_.��/1/1�1 MCI M"l MAN or im� Our Nit 12 rA .� . ��� � i .! ` ' � �► it L � + � � ' . SAWA Ian m FAA y , � - if �� t�• cJ ram ■li _ Wlojl pro ill 7777 vw kk aft � � ,. . . � • ,s ice% �� �rr ; ►' ! rI— It a AL ►�� � . ��. MOW .