Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Super Value Correspondence 1989
i � 1 x U h7 M E M O R A N D U M TO : LARRY J . ANDERSON , DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM : HORST W . GRASER , DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT : T . H . 13 TRAFFIC STUDY DATE : DECEMBER 21 , 1989 I am somewhat disappointed with the detail in this report . The results and conclusions are but minor variations of Charles Tooker ' s Business Strip Study of several years ago . The report omits City objectives and goals of the business community and makes no mention of deficiency or problems with the existing road structure . The conclusions of this report , however , are consistent with what we as Staff have been talking about all along . Also , the report is certainly consistent with Mr . Tooker ' s findings and recommended street improvements in his Highway 13 Business Strip Study . I would imagine that this report would help to solidify and support Mr . Tooker ' s conclusions and Staff ' s assumptions . A small component however , of this report is not consistent with the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan . The inconsistency is in the recommendation that deals with the realignment of County Road 23 . The Comprehensive Plan identifies County Road 23 and its present alignment with a major intersection at Highway 13 . Whereas , this report calls for a realignment of County Road 23 to intersect with Five Hawks Avenue with a traffic signal at that intersection . I totally agree with Mr . Eyler ' s conclusion . I recommend that the signal should be installed prior to any major commercial or industrial realignment on the Hauser and Simpkin ' s properties . I further recommend that the intersection of County Road 12 and Highway 13 should be included in the County Traffic Analysis . I feel that it is S mportant that the decision be made on the alignment of this intersection as quickly as possible . I believe that the objective of this study is to develop a road system that would provide good access to the Priordale Mall area and also provide inter - neighborhood and inter - commercial district access . 4629 Dakota St. S.E ., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . ( 612) 447-4230 / Fax (612 ) 447-4245 4 The author recommends an alignment outlined on Plate 8 , which in my opinion , would do an adequate job in meeting Staff ' s objective . However , my opinion is that Plate 12 , which is Mr . Eyler ' s alternative recommendation could be adapted with a minor modification and in my opinion would be a better solution . The modification that I would make would be to make the intersection of Toronto and Tower Streets a four -way stop intersection . I believe that someday Toronto will generate considerable traffic from the orderly annexation area to the south of the Priordale Shopping District area . Perhaps the most compelling reason for the four -way stop is that a thirty ( 30 ) mile per hour curve as recommended by the author would require the purchase and consume the entire vacant lot directly north of the bowling alley . The locations of the traffic signals and the east and the west connection of the proposed frontage road , or ring road are improvements consistent with the community objectives and my thinking . The ring road connection with Franklin Trail should occur as recommended in Plate 12 . To move the intersection east would require and consume the entire Bohnsack parcel , in addition to creating other land access problems for the gas station and the Velishek Auto Sales lot . i 10 tMn December 20 , 1989 r Ms . Kathleen Nye - Reiling S 300 First Avenue North Minneapolis , MN . 55401 RE : PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR TORONTO AVENUE Dear Kathleen : Enclosed please find the blueline print that you had requested at our December 19 , 1989 meeting . I hope this information will be helpful to you . Also , when the City receives the report from Strgar - Roscoe , Fausch , Inc . , we will be forwarding a copy of it to you . If you have any questions regarding the above information , please feel free to call me . Sincerely yours , 0000 Zrzrry Moo J . Anderson , P . E . Director of Public Works CITY OF PRIOR LAKE LJA : jlp 4629 Dakota St . S .E . , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . ( 612 ) 447 -4230 / Fax ( 612 ) 447-4245 k C I T Y O F P R I O R L A K E 4629 Dakota Street S . E . , Prior Lake , MN 55372 FAX COVER SHEET f � TIME : DATE * ' FAX .TOO FROM : %�" Lt° �-�-' �' � TITLE : FAX : 447 - 4245 r MESSAGE : � NUMBER OF PAGES SENT : i x V � December 13 , 1989 Mr . Patrick J . Hines , P . E . ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY 4000 Beau D ' rue Drive Eagan , MN . 55122 RE : ELEVATIONS FOR SOIL BORINGS ON PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT Dear Pat . Per our previous telephone conversation on December 13 , 1989 I am sending the elevations for the soil borings taken recently . The elevations are as follows . BORING NUMBER COORDINATE POINT NUMBER ELEVATION 5 56 967 . 07 4 57 965 . 11 3 58 968 . 34 2 59 966 . 24 1 60 965 . 35 7 61 966 . 01 8 62 966 . 61 9 63 968 . 54 10 64 967 . 13 11 65 966 . 03 14 66 962 . 50 12 67 964 . 70 13 68 964 . 27 If you have any questions regarding this letter , please feel free to call me . Sincerely yours , C &,(a ;j / Bruce Loney , P . E . Assistant City Engineer CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BL : j 1p 4629 Dakota St. S .E ., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612 ) 447-4245 Associated Brokers Commercial Investment Beal Estate Service 8400 NORMANDALE LAKE BLVD , SUITE 1040 PO BOX 35365 MINNEAPOLIS , MINNESOTA 55435 612 ' 921 - 2455 November 28 , 1989 Mr . Bruce Loney , F . E . Assistant City Engineer City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street , SE Prior Lake , fMN 55372 RE : Soil Investigation OLD DRIVE - IN Property Dear Mir. Loney : Thank you for your letter of November 20 , 1989 requesting permission to survey and conduct soil investigation on the above site owned by Prior West Ltd . Partnership . I have reviewed your proposals with the owners and they have instructed me to grant you approval to undertake the survey and soil investigation , provided that you agree to the following : 1 ) That the City of Prior Lake pay for all the costs associated with the survey and investigation , and , 2 ) That the owners receive a copy of the survey and report from the soils engineers upon completion . If you agree to the above , please sign below , as provided , and return one copy to our office. We are anxious to discuss the proposed road alignment with you and who is going to be participating in the cost to provide this service road through the property . 1 i iVir. Bruce Loney , P . E. November 28 , 1989 Page Two Once you have obtained the soil tests and are in position to discuss the alignment , as well as the improvements, I would appreciated meeting with you to move the progress along . Please let me know when this meeting can be arranged. Sincerely , ASSk':` CIATJED BROKERS, INC. i A rco ASD /sdh Agreed and Approved . Prior Nest Limited Partnership By i\YI -R Properties its general partner City of Prior Lake0: ? p gy . / " f. � By : &Le Michael T . Murray /date dat Partner �Rlp H � OWN V M November 22 , 1989 6; , Mr . Howard Rekstad 5396 North Lexington Shoreview , MN . 55126 RE : DRIVE - IN THEATRE PROPERTY Dear Mr . Rekstad : Please find enclosed three ( 3 ) drawings for the parcel which we discussed on Thursday . I have provided one drawing shaded in pink of the area for the proposed road with soil boring locations . In addition , there are two ( 2 ) other sheets showing the proposed alignments throughout the property . Please review these drawings as to your preference for the alignment . The City of Prior Lake has contracted with a traffic engineer to determine the best roadway system throughout this area . There is a potential that the connection to County Road 39 may be moved to a different location . The traffic engineer has indicated that during the first part of next week he will be able to make the determination as to whether the alignment that is shown is adequate or not . I am looking forward to meeting you on Tuesday , November 28 , 1989 at 2 : 00 P . M . As I indicated to you yesterday , Pat Hines , from Allied Test Drilling will be doing the soil borings for the City of Prior Lake . Additional soil boring tests could be arranged by calling him at 452 - 6913 . The City of Prior Lake will pay for the soil borings as indicated on the attached map and the cost of soil borings located outside of this alignment would be your responsibility . If you have any questions regarding the above information , please feel free to call me . Sincerely yours , La y J . Anderson , P . E . Director of Public Works CITY OF PRIOR LAKE LJA : jlp Enclosure 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 IV 11 Col Y ac e.— Jo - NA ST PKA ' O , , . _ 8 Co . RD . 39 r1n+�• . � N tjs o 9s •r.i 21 3 9 �(I 41 1S . / 673s IG �i7� I Z 24 25 2d A NORMAN BARSNESS L . WIESE t �� tt 10 9 160034 216660 ° ® UNITED STATES I i' BOHNSACK 12 A POSTAL SERVIC \ 1. 223106 19 1 - 23 22 21 20 • �•�t • v 13 8 161266 \ � 0 . VELISHEK Z 4 _ h IT T ,y [j 2131os W / c 9 7 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ti 14 7 174048 X697. 19 i ^ p' u,u, 15 t �y 16 5 A 15 6 '� .J 02 ( �' 9 o roto 11 o 0e 14 12 16 NORMAN BARS-NESS 0 160034 n Y t 8 11 13 `j IT 4 6 V 3 t u a 3 •/ Rhe i v tit I I 18 2 �` \e �"� Yo 208197 o h ' T 2 IOWA J 12 c1 �j m ROWN BUILDERS INC . 1 3 13 170066u ZOO _ � . ^ r 1 TO ES 14 C .� 2 1 ro CO IA `� 2 c �9b 52 ZOe\9 low V , ' " "r o ?,� >5 `� 3 I • � b PIIORDALE ALL y ; m0t2KA k ESTA k ^ 28 En IVONOESTORS 17446 ADO ADO .,.. , 4 I Ommil Pilo w - IST ,.•ro n - 02 - - 27 700 . 0 0 ' �.��.� 16 ti �� S • 412 , 90 - d� s n J v a 5 161619 0o POND �� 6 26 i P�� 1 TOWER HILL i� ® //r 6 ! � 1 192970 N APARTMENT EAST a 2s _ -I /i� 7 • 2 ,� `,G� j 460 . 00 �,, 8 �� 412 . 50 13 14 Q 2 ; 9 24 ; t 8 5 j4 3 9 / 2310 1 � >r O I VILLAGE OF 4 PRIOR LAKE w + Gtr�c• � r Gt • 12 22 ER '((E,� H'N/ y?jt �„ 20 c M Gtl�� Y�7 'I7V a 12 s dob 6 oto S 11 10OEM a 21 2 0 . - 0 13 '- TOWER - Too - yj •7Z. C I ING 138364 - ���` ( w00D 6 7 1 8 9 ' 14 t5 16 17 18 6. 29 I t ,( v Q HIGHWOOD A ` r GBoy So w � Pc� 10 u 18 03 2 COND . NO , LIMITED PARTERSHIP i S 0 IrxcRC.!s - Alp SCHWEICH p a87I 8„ + 73739 1007 s 44935 5 19 17 ' y4Ge 4 3 2 I 24 23 22 21 20 14672 500 . . - - - - 1035 . 39 - - - 29011p IV Co" UNI JO - NA ST PKA ' ., �sN . , Co . RD* 39 ,� 94 "1 � ��"_rl �-.— • 41 1 2t iv � 7r w+�t� 1 2 4 S i • iaati o ss t . s � 3 324 25 26 '► 11 10 9 L . WIESE + NORMAN BARSNESS � 1 160034 216660 ° 18 e CA 12 �� A UNITED STATES i ' � ;� BOHNSAC K 19U POSTAL SERVIC 223 ! 06 19 X23 22 21 20 of ,Ss .� _ 13 8 j . 161266 \ 0 . VELISHEK CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 213105 ' (,� 14y1 � c =9 14 T 174048 \� - 697. 19 - ti ��� is 6 / ,�� ~ 16 i S It�+i ` �'Sy 5 NI - w 6 .� K, bta IS II • 0 �. 9 IO S 16 �'� j--� m� \ 14 12 NORMAN BARSNESS � �-��• •�' O g j17 4 �Aevel160034 � y,,• ^�� V) 18 6 v 8 t 13 4 3All 1 A� kip o � � T 2 � t 1 3 2 �f 208197 . 0 1 12 o w " e h Gr fq aaDD N BUILDERS INC . ? 3 -� 4 13 rU 170066ES , r��, •: ^ \ 1 1 �� g1 Z 1 r+v L4 O ,� 2 ar 14 one 3 H,1.� 1 X661 PlIOFOALE ALL ` a►p ESTA w Jw 28 8 A IV ° $ TORS e17446 ADO 9916,.✓ 4 IST ,.+r. n 700 . 00 ���01 16 N �~ S 27 f 412 . S 0 d� n 161618 PONDe . 5 TOWER HILL // 6 26 • 6 / 1 192970 7 0 APARTMENT EAST N h o 25 2 aeve 460 . 00 — — • 2 QO t 412 . 50 . , 145 ® �0 2 4 1 t 3 13 J 9 a 1 8 2 V J 23 a r 1 �► \ 9 4 .Qyse 3 2 I VILLAGE OF �1-rr.� ~ _ 10 + G \\ �. PRIOR LAKE « � G ` c « 11 C; ;S HAUSER 9 �► O �C ,� 12 2 2 a � 5482 5 , � ' � `f7'p y>> > 20 12 a 8 toP `1 S 11 10 21 mhccr 0 ,y N 4w � ysyp - r 13 ii ® N� oc 19 `• IAENT 138364 C TOWER - `hoo � 90110 � Z ,�� I I NG - 18s 666. 29 Q ^ v w00o 6 T 8 9 14 15 16 17 ,► ` es 0 2 HIGHW000 A AWRE14CE SCHWEICH 'S CONS . NO . LIMITED PARTERSHIP 173739 M 1007v(pl` 174103 5 '� ° GraS _ men 1 `460 (pg," 17 19 yGG8 4 3 2 1 2 4 23 22 21 20 500 - - - 1035 . 39 - • - - - 290 : - , 1 , 44fi� ri73Ir / (i47r 25 26 i Y rE 10 9 NORMAN BARSNESS `4C L . WIESE T • 1 24 G a 160034 �KA + 12 ` ,� UNITED STATES 2 ► 6660 + BOHN A K • V tg POSTAI SERVIC ` 20 7 � 13 6 161266 Ia C S• 223106 19 ' 23 22 21 SRS , � j 0 . VELISHEK Z c 14 7 � CITY 0F PRIOR LAKE . . . � 213103 6 f 17401 d 697. 19 S 16 �� 0 _ i, `• 9 10 ,� •'� NORMAN BARSNESS O �r 4 17 4 rJ 160034 �: tl • B s ; v 1. 3o Is a� • ' H 3 t . � , .Of 206197 . 1, ® 40fir, = 1 m ROWN BUILDERS INC . '` .* , ? Q� 3 � N ` • 170066 1.•� . w w 1 p ♦ • 3 ± ' r > wit ES' � ! 4 %rte 1 19615 106`9T 2 = No o so A40 •1'x'11 ' P ttOROALE ILL STA 6I = SOIL BORING LOCATIONS 40 ' •+� 3 �6 � s l RXA � v1a) IVeSTORS : 17446 AOf1 4 � G r IST VI � 27 `i 70000 i�0, 161614 16 „ �`� S a+ O • 412 . 50 d� w t POND s 6 26 1 Z o TOWER HILL 192970 IS `� 7 i APARTMENT EAST 2s 2 N Nr 9 - 460 . 00 " � � 2 J aOQ ` all 412 SO02 3 • . 14 Q f � . / 13 } 9 24 i • � - ✓ J 23 p 4 �yz' %ft2 ' 1 �,1 10 ♦G�. .r J► t 3 Z VILLAGE OF .fy.Gv'^ * •�trs w �� � PRIOR LAKE G `'L M 11 22 G . J . BROOKS HAUSER '9 t c 165482 S del j 12 3 rawi 6 d� `\ �, G� YN yT ,! 0 12 t0 "Is 21 Oi 13 ems... �� tiSyO ii0 Y7pC • - AD EASEMENT 13e364 TOWER - 666. 29 �.� 1 ING �yv \� w 6 7 0 9 14 13 19 17 7p : r MIGHW000 A ► S� p LAWRENCE 3T 2 39wE ► CN COND . NOTED AARTERSNIP 5 t' h•-IXc.. L 3 . LIMI 1007 yb7` 174103 4taS `S9 1 4 1 2 i 14 t3 22 to ' 900 y` aa 3 • • milimi will III Wilson 1035 . 39 • • • 2900 • S IA COR . 4 pR10 boo U M November 20 , 1989 Mr . Atillo DeMarco PRIOR WEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard Minneapolis , MN . 55437 RE : PRIOR LAKE ' S OLD DRIVE - IN MOVIE PROPERTY Dear Mr . DeMarco : The City of Prior Lake is requesting permission to have subsurface soil investigation work done on the above referenced property . This work consists of drilling soil borings to determine the underlying material condition for the possible construction of sanitary sewer , watermain , concrete curb and gutter , and bituminous surfacing improvements through the property . I am enclosing a drawing showing the preliminary roadway alignment and proposed soil boring locations on your property . This roadway will provide your property access and give better traffic circulation to the Priordale Mall area . If you have any questions regarding this request , please contact either Kay Schmudlach or me at City Hall . Sincerely yours , Bruce Loney , P . . Assistant City Engineer CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BL : jlp 4629 Dakota St. S.E ., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612 ) 447-4245 J ® - NAIST4ICA ' ' MAP ,� , couif . r-- P 9 '` : t..r � � 94 "% � t�l�d-- ' 77!n CO , RD. 39 �� . ae . .� I�'' w >n 21 41 ' , 30 iby3S 1 / 40yY 26 1 2 i � sn Q 24 2S Ito i 8 �A it 10 9 NORMAN BARSNESS � 1 . WIESE TE KA At 12 160034 216660 ! . A UNITED STATES BONSACKv POSTAL SERVIC e IS U 13 8 161266 [.r ` 223106 19 1 - 23 22 21 20 A SR ® , � I 0 . VELISHEK + Z y . . 213105 14 T /� CITY OF PRIOR LAKE cr9 6 ` J 174048 `*b 697. 19 ,f`, ) �y Is15 s 16 9 to AAD NORA4AN BARSNES S 67 - \ d c� 14 l 17 4 � 160034 y 4 1r nv` sr . ^ 1 r B It 13 3 e Vt 18 6 v 1 6 h 3 Is 6 i1� r �b� • ,r T H ADD 3 1 AD&i 2 441 ►{ /r r `/ J . i s 208197 C2 + T ✓ O2 ° i �• .- m lb NImo. ROWN BUILDERS INC . * 1 Q� 3 N U �� 170066 r e 4 w~1` 1 4ES 06, 9, 0 . . 2 •�66^ P110ROALE ALL RKA ` SOIL BORING LOCATIONS � �i STA ... �s ^ v 3 2e y � 7 IVESTORS . 17446 ADD , 4 pp G - I ST 700 . 00 \i��C1 16 ��� S 27 161610 �v f Q 412 , 50 - _ v A a POND 6 26 t o TOWER HILL ,j� r �J � n 192970 " ,� Is , 7 pr "N APARTMENT EAST ,� 25 2 9 j . . 460 . 00 h S 3 2 PQo 412 . SO 14 4 8 9 24 13 I 23 4 + ,1 ♦a �J► �,,`ci 3 2 1 VILLAGE OF or,. � _ 10 A ' Y will G � ^� `C r G � J . BROOKS HAUSER PRIOR LAKE 9 �► O 165482 S �C „� 12 S � qwII 22 lo 6 9 ♦ : G 't� 9111 9)894/6 ,71 will 9,3 20 vowit 10 c 21 'ysvp - 2900 • - 13 AD EASEMENT 138364 KC Typy�y _ wioo - Y'f '► 7� mmmmalm 666. 29 01 `�� I IN0 I • s 000 7��y W 6 T 8 9 14 I s 16 17 S ~ ot G LAWREIiCi73739wEICH 3 2 y�COND . NO . LIMITED PdRTERSHlP 1007 Y47G 174103 S04 6�qS .a , 1 , ie�►" 2 1 _ �i • ADO' / Y f AJ(# - 4 3 2 1 1 24 23 22 21 20 , sooMEAN ADO " AD ., _ 1035 . 39 - • . - - as 290 : - SIM COR ' 1 Y Quality Services Since 1957 BRAUH MINNESOTA CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ Minneapolis ENGINEERING TESTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS Hibbing Incorporated St. Cloud Reply to address/phone #: Rochester St. Paul AFFILIATED OFFICES NORTH DAKOTA RFC Icy FD Bismarck Williston P.O. Box 35108 Minot NOV Mpls, MN 55435 MONTANA Billings ;; t "t (612) 941 -5600 Bozemanf ILLINOIS FAX # 9414151 Chicago J .S. Braun, P. E. November 15, 1989 Cameron G. Kruse, P. E. Geo. D. Kluempke, P.E. Paul H. Anderson David R. Hausler, P.E. Roger V. Blomquist, PhD. James J . Craig , Jr. , P.E. Dale R. Allen, P.E. City of Prior Lake Nomas ReBlumberg E Attn: Mr. Bruce Loney, P. E . Michael M . Heuer, P.E. Kurt E. Dvorak 4629 Dakota Street SE Norman E. Hall Prior Lake MN 55372 Ray A. Huber, P.E. i William K. Cody, P. E. AFFILIATED COMPANIES RE : PROPOSAL FOR SOIL BORINGS AND Braun Environmental Laboratories , Inc. ENGINEERING REPORT SERVICES Braun Pavement Technologies, Inc. Toronto Avenue Reconstruction and Proposed Street through Drive4In Theater Prior Lake, Minnesota Dear Mr. Loney: As requested by your letter of November 8, 1989, we are pleased to furnish this proposal for the taking of soil borings and preparation of an engineering report for the above-referenced project. DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT We understand that you propose to improve Toronto Avenue with the installation of new storm sewer, curb and gutter, and new pavement section . We also understand that a new street will be constructed through the old drive- in movie theater site which will also include the installation of storm sewer, curb and gutter, and pavement section. SCOPE OF SERVICES You indicated that five power auger borings are desired in the existing Toronto Avenue. These borings will be taken to a depth of 5 feet in accordance with ASTM D 1452 procedures . You also indicated that five standard penetration test borings are desired along the alignment for the new street. These borings will be taken to a depth of 15 feet in accordance with ASTM D 1586 procedures so that ' N" values will be recorded . City of Prior Lake -2- November 15, 1989 Laboratory tests will be conducted to provide additional data as a basis for making engineering recommendations . Potential tests include moisture content and classification tests which may include Atterberg limit tests and gradation tests. The engineering report furnished will give recommendations regarding potential subgrade corrections and pavement design considerations . The pavement design considerations will be based on an assumed Hveem stabilometer R-value. We understand that the City will locate the borings and provide necessary stations and elevation information. We also understand that the City will provide all utility clearances . BASIS FOR PROPOSAL We will furnish these services on an hourly or unit cost basis as stated in attached hourly or unit cost SCHEDULE OF CHARGES . We have not seen the site but, from your description, we have assumed the boring areas are accessible to a truck-mounted drill rig . The borings would, thus, be performed with equipment described in sections 201a and 203 . We estimate that the mobilization, demobilization, and drilling will require approximately 11 hours, so the estimated cost of field services is $ 1 ,700. The types of laboratory tests cannot be determined until samples have actually been obtained . Laboratory tests will be conducted in accordance with section 300 . The estimated cost for those services is $75 . We estimate the cost of the engineering services, in accordance with section 100, at $700 . The total projected cost of the field investigation, laboratory tests, and engineering report G s then $2, 475 . This projected cost will not be exceeded by more than 10 % without additional authorization. If additional borings are required, the additional estimated costs will be $75 per 5400t bore hole and $200 per 15400t bore hole. GENERAL Current scheduling will permit us to begin these services within approximately five working days of receipt of authorization. On the order of two weeks would be required for the field investigation and preparation of the engineering report. If your project requires faster scheduling, please contact us at your convenience. Since changes in weather conditions, salary and material costs, or modification of the project may alter the estimated time and / or costs, the projected costs shown above should be verified with us unless authorization is given within 30 days of the date of this proposal . Frozen soils do not significantly impede the investigation . However, snow removal, if necessary, would be billed in accordance with item 203h. BRAU11 M City of Prior Lake -3- November 15, 1989 Terms on payment for services are net 30 days with interest added to unpaid balances in accordance with the attached GENERAL CONDITIONS which are a part of this proposal. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal. This proposal is being presented in duplicate so that one copy may be signed and returned as an authorization to proceed. If there are questions on this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact us at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, BRAUN ENGINEE"YNG TESTING, INC . 4r� Henry Vloo 4Eh A. H e , Pnior Engineer HV / RAH: g e c /W P: PRIOR. PRO Attachments: SCHEDULE OF CHARGES GENERAL CONDITIONS Please proceed according to the above-stated terms : Date Client's Name Authorized Signature Title B � unT r TM TM X y z 800 EXPENSES AM 1 -10 11 -20 21 + 01 . Vehicle charge and mileage applying to Section 100 Samples Samples Samples and other sections when not included in hourly 8 1%" BRA 62a. Solids, Dissolved Total (TDS) $12.00 $10.75 $10.25 rates (other vehicle rates govern where listed) 62b. Solids, Suspended Total (TSS) 15.00 13.50 12.50 a. Per day $15.00 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES ENGINEERING TESTING 62c. Solids, Total 12.00 10.75 10.25 b. Per mile (automobile) 0.35 Incorporated Incorporated c. Per mile (truck or mobile lab) 0.45 62d, Solids, Volatile Suspended (VSS) 15.00 13.50 12.50 02. Per diem expenses when working away from headquarters 62e. Solids, Volatile Total (TVS) 12.00 10.75 10.25 or branch locations, applies to Sections 100, 200 & 400 Cost + 15% ❑ MINNEAPOLIS 6800 S. TH-169, P.O. Box 35108, Mpls. , MN 55435-0108 ❑ 3219 E. 19th Ave. , Hibbing , MN 55746-3541 Additional or affiliated offices in: 63. Specific Gravity 20.00 18.00 17.00 03. Long distance telephone, shipping charges and ❑ 1520 - 24th Ave. N., P.O. Box 189, St. Cloud , MN 56302-0189 ❑ 1061 - 109th Ave. NE, Blaine, MN 55434 Bismarck, Minot & Williston, NO 64. Sulfate (SO4) 15.00 13.50 12.50 miscellaneous expenses Cost + 15% ❑ 310 Service Court N.E. , Rochester, MN 55904 ❑ 6950 W. 146th SL , St. 131 , Apple Valley, MN 55124 Billings & Bozeman , MT El 245 E. Roselawn Ave., St, Paul , MN 55117-1940 El 250 N. Sunnyslope Rd . , St. 355, Brookfield , WI 53005 65a. Sulfide (S-) 25.00 25.00 25.00 04. Subcontracted Professional Service Cost + 15% ❑ 333 W. Wacker Or, , H700, Chicago , IL 60606 ElP.O. Box 262H , R. R. 2, Somerset, WI 54025 65b. Sulfide (S-), Reactive 65.00 58.50 55.25 900 CLERICAL SERVICES 66. Sulfur (S) % 45.00 40.50 38.25 01 . Secretarial services, per hour $25.00 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES 67. Thallium (T1 ) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 02. Data and word processing, per hour 40.00 68. Tin (Sn) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 03. Report copies (3 copies furnished with 100 PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES o. Waste Water Sampling 69. Titanium (Ti) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 initial distribution of report) - Field and Office Services, per hour 1 . ISCO Sampler $50.00/day 70. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 45.00 40.50 38.25 minimum charge for additional copies Reg. Over Double 2. Flow Recorder 20.00/day 71 , Turbidity12.50 11 .25 10.50 after initial report issued 30.00 Time Time Time a. Library p. Field Analysis/Air Quality retrieval for additional copies after 01 . Engineering/Environmental 72. Vanadium (V) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 initial distribution of report 25.00 Technician 1 $29.00 $37.00 $44.00 1 . Organic Vapor Analyzer 16.00/hr. 73. Zinc (Zn) 12.50 11 .25 10.50 b. Report reproduction of extra copies 0.25/per page 02. Level I NDT Technician 33.00 41 .00 49.00 2. H-Nu Photoionization Analyzer 11 .00/hr. 74, Metals Digestion (soils, 14.00 12.50 12.00 c. Postage, Courier, Federal Express, etc. Cost + 15% 03, Eng , Tech. II or Level II NDT 40.00 50.00 60.00 3. Infrared Gas Analyzer 40.00/hr, sludge, solids) d. Facsimile charges 0.35/page + phone costs 04. Environmental/Industrial 4, Petro-lite Tank Tester 125.00/tank 75, Laboratory Analysis - Inorganic Hygienist Technician II 42.00 52.00 62.00 5, Explosimeter 10.00/hr. 05, Environmental/Industrial 6, Surveying Equipment 10.00/hr 700 ORGANIC LABORATORY TESTING x y z Hygienist Technician III 45.00 57.00 67.00 q. Metal Detector/Line Locator 10.00/hr. 1 -10 11 -20 21 + 06. Engineering Assistant, 03, Truck Rental , Mileage, Other Expense Charges Samples Samples Samples Project Engineer 48.00 60.00 72.00 and Misc. Services, 01 , Volatile Organics, both Halogenated 07, Senior Engineering Assistant, a. Auxiliary truck for transporting crew and supplies: and Non-Halogenated Compounds Senior Project Engineer 52.00 64.00 77.00 (EPA Method 601 & 602, or MDH08. Level III NDT or AWS/CWI 49.00 1 . per day 75.00 Method 465) 09, Graduate Engineer, Geologist 2. per mile 0.70 a. 1 -5 parameters $ 90.00 $ 80.00 $ 75.00 Chemist, Industrial Hygienist 58.00 b. Drill Rig Truck: 10. Registered Professional Engineer 1 . da b. 6 or more parameters 150.00 135.00 130.00 per Scientist, Safety Officer, Senior 2, p y 125'00 per mile 0.75 02, Volatile Organics in Soil 11 . Senor Industrial Staff Hydrologist drol gi?t 70.00 c. Flotation Tired Drill Rig Carrier 35.00/hr. a. 1 -5 parameters 100.00 90.00 85.00 g Geologist b. 6 or more parameters 160.00 145.00 135.00 Hydrologist or Scientist, d. Flextrac-Nodwell FN-160 Rubber Tracked Carrier Certified Industrial Hygienist 82.00 (10-foot wide unit) 40.00/hr. 03, Petroleum 12. Principal of Firm 98.00 e. Low-Boy Tractor/Trailer to haul 203c and 203d - a. Benzene, Ethyl Benzene, 13. Services Assisting Litigation (1 ) Metro area $150 per one-way trip not to exceed Toluene Xylenes (BETX) and 14. Computer Analysis (1 ) $ t Total Hydrocarbons as $250/day) . Outside Metro area - 1 .00/mile Gasoline/Fuel b 150.00 135.00 130.00 NOTE: Reduced weekly & monthly rates available for continuous service. (round trip basis) . Stand by - $80/day f. Materials for specialized unrecoverable installations b. Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether 200 SITE EVALUATION SERVICES 1 . with VOC scan 20.00 18.00 17.00 such as piezometers, well-points, settlement plates, 2. without VOC scan 90.00 80.00 75.00 01 , Drill Rig and Personnel Charges' etc. Rental of road signs, special insurance, permits. a. CME 55 or 75 drill rig taking penetration test borings Consumable supplies such as roller bits, drilling 04. Field Blank 110.00 110.00 110.00 (ASTM D1586-7) or power auger borings, using solid fluid additives, grout, level B-C-D protection, etc. Cost = 0.8 05, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB's) or 2'/a" or 3'/a" I. D. hollow-stem augers or rotary drilling g. Replacement of abandoned or ruined equipment a. PCB, oil 40.00 36.00 34.00 methods, with crew chief and drill rig assistant. $110.00/hr. per 201 . Cost b. PCB, sludge, solid 135.00 125.00 115.00 b. Mobile B-24 skid-mounted drill rig - 2 crew people. 110.00/hr. h . Subcontracted specialized services such as snow c. PCB, swab 50.00 45.00 42.50 d. PCB, water 115.00 105.00 100.00 c. CME 45 power auger taking power auger borings plowing, grading for access, towing, etc. Cost = 0.8 O6. Pesticides & PCB's (ASTM D1452) for soil classification and water level i . Welder or shop person on fabricating, steam cleaning, (EPA Method 608) determinations only, with crew chief and drill rig assembly, or loading of specialized equipment. 45.00/hr. a. Soil 150.00 135.00 130.00 assistant. 95.00/hr. d. Two-man field crew on surveying, locating utilities, 300 LABORATORY TESTS OF SOILS Per Test b. Water 130.00 120.00 110.00 taking hand auger probings ooter field tests, 85.00/hr. a. Mechanical-Hydrometer Analysis (ASTM D422) $60.00 07. Herbicides Price available upon request O8. Polynuclear Aromatic e. Additional crew man - when special conditions require b. Moisture Content and Density 24.00 Hydrocarbons (PNAs) Price available upon request (in addition to hourly charges in "a" through "d" above) : c. Moisture Content 9.50 1 , regular time basis 36.00/hr. d. Atterber Limits ASTM D4318 45.00 09. Organics in Air 2. overtime basis 44.00/hr. g ( ) by Charcoal Tube Price available upon request e. Specific Gravity (ASTM D854) 50.00 f. Overtime addition to all 2-man crew operations for 10. Priority Pollutants Price available upon request work on Saturday as necessary or requested by client f. Organic Content (ignition method) 26.00 a. Base/Neutral Extractables or in excess of 8 hours per day on weekdays. 36.00/hr. g. Sample preparation (ASTM D421 or other applicable b. Acid Extractables 'Hourly rates apply for travel and when conducting tests and are for method), if required, hourly basis as in "100" above (1 ) c. Dioxin regular time (8 hours or less on weekdays) and do not include truck h. Unconfined Compression (ASTM D2166) 38.00 11 . Laboratory Analysis - Organic or carrier rental or use, supplies consumed in drilling abandoned pp g or i . Consolidation-primary consolidation curve up in test holes (when more economical than recovering supplies at normal to 32 tsf (ASTM 2435). Cost varies depending upon Charges for parameters not listed above are available upon request, hourly rates) or per diem expenses on projects more than daily travel number of loadings required for a specific soil ( 1 ) distance from location where equipment is based. I Direct Shear (per normal pressure) ( ) Normal turnaround time on all laboratory analysis is 2-4 weeks. All analyses are 02. Equipment Charges for Other Field Testing Services (in addition 1 performed within EPA recommended holding times. to drilling equipment, when required, or field crew). k. Triaxial Compression - ASTM D2850 (per confining pressure) (1 ) a. Thin walled sample tubes (ASTM D1587). $18.00 each I . Hveem Stabilometer ("R" value test) 180.00 (2) Guaranteed and immediate priority analyses are available at an additional charge. b. Diamond core drilling (ASTM D2113) hourly rates m. California Bearing Ratio, per specimen $150.00 to $200.00 (2) Verbal results, available on all projects, are preliminary pending review of all quality plus diamond bit wear. Cost _ 0.8 n. pH determination - by meter 10.00 control measures and issuance of the final written report. c. Dutch friction-cone soundings. 12.00/hr. o. Permeability (falling head) 185.00 (2) d. Vane shear test (ASTM D2573). 7.00/hr. p. Corrosion resistance Minimum charge: $60.00 e. Electrical resistivity testing. 10.00/hr. 1 . Electrical resistivity of soils 31 .00 f. Refraction Seismic surveying. ( 1 ) 2. Oxidation reduction 30.00 g. Digitilt Inclinometer. (1 ) Sulfate 15.00 h. Pore Pressure Indicator. (1 ) q. Shrinkage Limit (ASTM D427) 40.00 r. Extrusion of thinwall sample for visual examination - I, Pressure Meter. $250.00/day No tests conducted 11 .00 j. Surcharge for use of 61/:' I. D. hollow-stem auger 20.00/hr. s. Specialty testing - hourly basis as in 100" above k. Continuous tube sample system (2'/<" x 5') 20.00/hr. t. Topsoil testing (Mn/DOT 3877) 95.00 I. Hydraulic piston sampler 10.00/hr. u. Sample pick-up p p P - hourly basis as in "100" plus mileage m. Steam cleaner use 20.00/hr. n. Groundwater Sampling 1 . Submersible Pump, Bailer, Conductivity Meter, pH Meter 20.00/hr, 2. Data Acquisition System 50.00/hr. ( 1 ) Quoted on an individual basis. 7/1/89 (2) Does not include classification and Proctor Tests or sample preparation (if 4 required). 1 400 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL TESTING & OBSERVATk. . s. Specialty testing of cu, ,.,rete or masonry units ( 1 ) f. Percent crushed (Mn/DOT) $35.00 x y z 01 . Earthwork ( Excavation observations, compaction L Standard curing and testing of 6" x 6" flexural g. Specific Gravity and Absorption Analysis 1 -10 11 -20 21 + control testing, special foundation installations) beams - ASTM C78 and C293, each $25.00 1 . ASTM C127 (coarse agg .) 20.00 Samples Samples Samples a. Engineering consulting services as in "100" above. 1 . Mold rental , includes cleanup per beam 25.00 2. ASTM C128 (fine agg.) 30.00 14a. Cadmium (Cd) , Flame $12.50 $11 .25 $10.50 b. Resident observations and testing services, including u. Chloride ion concentration (FHWA) 30.00 h. Abrasion (ASTM C131 , C535) 60.00 14b. Cadmium (Cd) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 soil compaction control testing , Proctor tests, earth- 1 . Bulk sample preparation 60.00 i . Soundness (ASTM C88) - 5 cycles 110.00 15. Calcium (Ca) 12.50 11 .25 10.50 work observations and/or other field testing of soil. v. Air-void system analysis (ASTM 457) 375.00 j . Flatness and elongation 25.00 16, Calcium Carbonate Equivalence 20.00 18.00 17.00 Hourly rate as shown in "100" above. w. Rapid chloride permeability AASHTO T277 k. Potential reactivity (ASTM C289) 150.00 17. Cation Exchange Capacity 55.00 49.50 46.75 1 . Nuclear moisture-density meter charge in 1 . Single specimen 340.00/each I . Dry Rodded Density 20.00 (soil , water) addition to hourly rates in "100" above $12.50/hr. 2. Triple specimen 300.00/each 18. Cation - Anion Balance 5.00 5.00 5.00 c. Field laboratory rental , if required. (1 ) 03. Bituminous m. Specialized testing or sample preparation ( 1 ) 19. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 d. Intermittent testing services by soils Per test a. Engineering Consulting Services as in 07. Other Testing Services Micro technician or returning to laboratory for except as noted "100" above. a. Pile driving observations or load testing , 20a. Chloride (Cl ) 15.00 13.50 12.75 processing samples. 1 . Engineering Analysis (minimum) observation of caisson installation, hour) 1 . Compaction Test, Sand-Cone Method per mix design 100.00/mix y 21 . Chloride in Cement 25.00 25.00 25.00 ASTM D1556, or Nuclear Method b. Marshall Mix Design Single Point (Mn/DOT) 100.00 basis as in Goble above plus mileage. 21 . Chlorine Residual 30.00 30.00 30.00 1 . Case-Goble Method of Analysis (1 ) 22. Chlorophyll A 20.00 18.00 17.00 ASTM D2922 ( normal conditions) c. Rice Specific Gravity (ASTM D2041 ) 30.00 b. Vibratioh, sound level or specialized testing or (plus standby and travel time) $18.50 d. Extraction (ASTM D2172) 52.00 sample pick up - hourly basis as in "100" above ( 1 ) 23a. Chromium , Hexavalent 30.00 30.00 30.00 2, Laboratory Proctor Test - Standard or 1 . Extracted aggregate gradation 30.00 c. Window testing (1 ) 23b. Chromium , Total (Cr) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 Modified (ASTM D698 or D1557) : e. Marshall stability and flow (set of 3) 40.00 a) Method A 55.00 d. Subcontracted services such as equipment 23c. Chromium , Total (Cr) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 b) Method B, C, or D 67.00 f. Marshall Density Testing rental , special insurance, permits, etc. Cost + 15% 24. Cobalt (Co) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 3. Max-min density of cohesionless soils 1 . Single specimen 40.00 e. Resale or rental of test equipment ( 1 ) 25a. Coliforms, Fecal " 18.00 18.00 18.00 00 2. Triple specimen 50. (ASTM 4253, 4254) 95.00 25b. Coliforms, Total " 18.00 18.00 18.00 4. Sample preparation 25.00-75.00 g. Thickness and density of pavement cores 20.00 500 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE x y z 25c. Coliforms 24 hr. results 36.00 36.00 36.00 h. Moisture content of bituminous 25.00 1 -3 4-10 11 + ( ) e. Origination and Trip Charge ( 1 ) Samples Samples Samples 26. Color 15.00 13.50 12.75 I, Mobile Laboratory i . Cold water abrasion (Mn/DOT) 250.00 01 . Bulk Asbestos Analysis 27a. Conductivity (soil) 20.00 18.00 17.00 1 . Per day 35.00 j . Abson recovery 75.00 a. Regular (each) $30.00 $25.00 $20.00 27b. Conductivity (water) 10.00 9.00 8.50 2. Per mile 0.45 k. Asphalt penetration 25.00 b. Rush (24-hour) (each) 50.00 35.00 25.00 02. Concrete or masonry I • Aggregatecrushing35.00/sample c. Survey (each) 25.00 20.00 ( 1 ) 28a. Copper (Cu) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 Asbestos Air Analysis 28b. Copper (Cu) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 a. Engineering Consulting Services as in m . Bituminous Coring - see 402M 75.00/hr. 02. a. Regular (each) 20.00 19.00 18.00 29. Corrosivity (water) 50.00 45.00 42.50 "100" above. 1 . Bit wear 1 .00/in./in. b. Rush (24-hour) (each) 25.00 20.00 20.00 b. Concrete Mix Design 2, Patching 0.50/pound c. Unanalyzed (set-up) 5.00 5.00 5.00 30a. Cyanide (Cn) , Amenable 65.00 58.50 55.25 1 . Theoretical based on ACI 211 (aggregate 04. Roofing Components to Chlorination ( 99 9ate test 03. TEM Asbestos Air Analysis 30b. Cyanide (Cn) , Reactive 65.00 58.50 55.25 costs or verification of mix design a. Observations of production and placement on job a. AHERA ( 1 ) not included) 50.00/mix site - hourly rates as in " 100" above, minimum b. Other ( 1 ) 30c. Cyanide (Cn ) , Total 45.00 40.50 38.25 2. Laboratorydesign mix and trial batch does 2 hours at project plus mileage. 31 . Flash Point, Closed cup 45.00 40.50 38.25 9 ( 04. Asbestos Abatement Specifications ( 1 ) not include aggregate tests or concrete b. Laboratory analysis of built-up roof sample, 32. Fluoride (F) , probe 25.00 22.50 21 .25 cylinder compression tests) (1 ) including number of plies, top and bottom coat 05. a. Site Asbestos Monitoring c. Observation of concrete production or placement bitumen application interply bitumen and tapping a. Daily (8 hours) M-F ( 1 ) 33. Formaldehyde (per site) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 P P b. Daily ay ( ho ( 1 ) 34. Halogens, Total 45.00 40.50 38.25 including batch plant inspections, slump, air felts and voids analysis (4" x 36" specimen) 70.E c. Saturday (8 hours) ( 1 ) content and cylinder casting at project site, 1 . With glaze 81 .00 d. Saturday (o.t.) ( 1 ) 35. Hardness (calculation) 26.00 23.50 22.00 hourly basis as in "100" above plus mileage. c. Single Ply Membrane Tests e. Sunday (8 hours) ( 1 ) 36. Ignitibility (solid) 15.00 13.50 12.75 d. Laboratory moist-curing and compression testing of 1 . Tension and elongation 25.00 f. Sunday (o.t. ) ( 1 ) 37a. Iron ( Fe) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 concrete cylinders delivered to laboratories. 2. Peel test 25.00 06. Carbon Monoxide Monitor 350.00 (1st day) 37b. Iron ( Fe) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 1 , Standard Curing ASTM C39 7.00 05, Structural Steel and Metals (NDE) 150.00 (each additional day) 38a. Leachate, E. P. Toxicity 90.00 90.00 90.00 2. Accelerated curing and testing ASTM D684 27.00 a. Bolt tension observations (hourly per 100") 07. Radon 40.00 38b. Leachate, ASTM H2O 60.00 60.00 60.00 e. Pullout testing for strength of inplace concrete ( 1 ) b. Visual weld observations (hourly per 100") 08. Gravimetric Analysis ( Particulates) 20.00 15.00 15.00 39a. Lead ( Pb) , Flame 12.50 11 . 25 10.50 f. Concrete cylinder pick-up c. Welding procedure qualifications (hourly per " 100") 09. Organics (Air) 39b. Lead ( Pb) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 1 . Regular route, per stop 15.00 d. Welder qualification (hourly per "100") (1 ) a. Charcoal Tube 35.00 (1st compound) 39c. Lead ( Pb) , Gasoline 24.50 22.00 20.75 2. Hourly rate 25.00 1 . 3/e" plate 15.00 10.00 (each additional compound) g. Sawing of core or concrete cylinder (ASTM C31 ) , 2. 1 " plate 22.50 b. Badge 35.00 (1st compound) 40. Magnesium (Mg) 12.50 11 .25 10.50 per end 10.00 e. Magnetic particle testing ( hourly per "100") (1 ) 10.00 (each additional compound) 41 a. Manganese (Mn) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 h. Concrete cylinder molds (includes labels 1 . Consumable dry powder 5. 25/pound 10, Equipment Rental/Supplies 41 b. Manganese (Mn), Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 and data slips) . 2. Fluorescent oil bath 8.00/gallon a. Asbestos Cassettes (25mm 0.8 m MCEF) 1 .50/each 42. Mercury ( Hg) 30.00 27.00 25.50 1 . 6" x 12" molds 1 .30/each 3. Fluorescent water bath 4.00/gallon (4.50 each if not returned) 43. Metals, 8 RCRA (As, Ba, Cd , 165.00 148.50 139.75 4. Visible MT 8.00/can b. Air Sampling Pumps 25.00/day ( 100.00 week) 2. 3" x 6" molds 0.75/each 5. Fluorescent MT 8.00/can Cr, Pb, Hg, Se, Ag) 3. 4" x 8" molds 1 .00/each c. Charcoal Tubes 44. Moisture, percent 12.00 10.75 10.25 4. 4" x 4" "pop-out" 10.00/each f. Liquid penetrant testing (hourly per "100") ( 1 ) 1 . (50/100 mg) 1 .50/each 5. Rental of steel mold for high strength concrete 5.00/use 1 , Developer 5.60/can 2. (100/200 mg ) 2.00/each 45. Molybdenum (Mo) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 6. Rental of specialty molds (1 ) 2. Cleaner 5.60/can d. Drager Pump 20.00/day 46a. Nickel (Ni) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 6.50/can 6 t Pener . i . Compressive strength of 2" x 2" mortar cube 7.00 3. e. Drager Tubes 5.00-6.00/each 46b. Nickel (Ni) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 1 . Mold rental (includes cleanup for reuse) 20.00/use g• Ultrasonic testing (hourly per "100") ( 1 ) 47a. Nitrogen , Ammonia (NH3) 15.00 13.00 12.50 1 . Cellulose gum 5.75/gallon f. Noise Dosimeter/SLM 40.00/day ( 100.00 week) j . Concrete masonry units 2. Cellulose gum (with certifications) 29.50/gallon g. Velometer 50.00/day 47b, Nitrogen , Kjeldahl (Total) 21 .00 19.00 17 .75 1 . Compressive strength, each 25.00 h. Radiographic testing (2-man crew - regular h. Pump Calibration Kit 15.00/day 47c. Nitrogen , Nitrate Only ( NO3) 22.50 20.25 19.00 2. Physical measurements and absorption , each 25.00 time) (O.T. factor 1 .25, D.T. factor 1 .40) 69.00/hr. k. Compressive strength of concrete block or 1 . 41/2" x 10 film 2,25 ( Bubble Tube) 47d. Nitrogen , Nitrate & Nitrite 15.00 13.50 12.50 ( NO3 & NO2) brick prisms 45.00 2. 41/2" x 17 film 3.85 600 INORGANIC LABORATORY TESTING x y z 47e. Nitrogen, Total Organic 36.00 32.50 30.50 1 . Core-filled Block 65.00 3. 14 x 17 film 11 .90 1 -10 11 -20 21 + I . Brick testing (ASTM C216) 300.00/set 4. 8 x 10 film 4.00 Samples Samples Samples 48. Oil and Grease 25.00 22.50 21 .25 m . Concrete coring - portable core drill with 5. 5 x 7 film 1 .75 01 . Acidity, Total $15.00 $13.50 $12.75 49. Organic Matter 18.00 16.20 15.30 diamond bits at 2 to 12-inch diameter, 2-man 6. 7 x 17 film 5.95 1275 50. Oxygen, Dissolved (Winkler) 20.00 20.00 20.00 crew, and generator. Plus mileage, truck rental 7. Concrete radiography (min. charge + mileage) 200.00 02a. Alkalinity, Total 15.00 13.50 . and bit wear (3 hour minimum) 75.00/hr 8. Concrete radiography - 1 to 5 shots 75.00/shot 02b, Alkalinity, Bicarbonate (with Total) 5.00 5.00 5.00 51 a. pH (soil) 10.00 9.00 8.50 1 . Bit wear, per inch of diameter per inch of 9. Concrete radiography - 6 to 10 shots 65.00/shot 02c. Alkalinity, Carbonate (with Total ) 5.00 5.00 5.00 51 b. pH (water) 5.00 4.50 4.25 core length 1 .00/in./in. 10. Concrete radiography - 11 or more shots 55.00/shot 03. Aluminum (Al ) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 52, Phenols 30.00 27.00 25.50 2. Patch material 0.50/pound 11 . Mobile darkroom (does not apply to 04. Aluminum (AI) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 53, Phosphate, Ortho (PO4) 22.50 22.50 22.50 n. Compressive strength of concrete cores including concrete radiography) 35.00/day physical measurements - includes trimming 30.00 i . Tension testing of specimens ( 1 ) 05. Antimony (Sb) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 54a. Phosphorous, Total ( P) 2 .00 19.00 17.75 o. Physical test of Portland Cement (ASTM C150) ( 1 ) j. Preparation of mechanical specimen Cost + 15% 06. Arsenic (As) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 54b. Phosphorous, Total Dissolved 24.00 22.00 20.75 k. Hardness testing ( 1 ) 07. Ash, % 18.00 16.25 15.25 55. Potassium ( K) 12.50 11 .25 10.50 p. Non-destructive on-site testing of inplace concrete. 08. Barium ( ea) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 56. Potential Reactivity 65.00 58.50 55.25 Hourly basis as in "100" above plus material costs 06. Aggregate Testing for concrete, bituminous, or equipment charge as follows - minimum 3 hours. roofing, etc. 09. Barium ( Ba) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 57. Redox (water) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 1 , Schmidt Hammer, ultrasonics, a. Engineering Consulting Services as in "100" above. 10. Beryllium (Be) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 58. Selenium (Se) 35.00 31 .50 29.75 pull-out tests, maturity method ( 1 ) b. Sieve Analysis (ASTM C136) 36.00 11 . Biochemical Oxygen Demand 35.00 35.00 35.00 59. Silica (Si02) 25.00 22.50 21 .25 2, Windsor Probe Tests material costs 10.00/probe (BOD) 60a, Silver (Ag) , Flame 12.50 11 .25 10.50 3. Equipment rental (1 ) c. Analysis or determination of materials finer q. Computer analysis of concrete cylinder strengths (1 ) than #200 sieve (ASTM C117 or D1140) 20.00 12. Boron ( B) 25.00 25.00 25.00 60b. Silver (Ag) , Furnace 25.00 22.50 21 .25 r. Concrete cylinder "Hot Box" during winter d. Lightweight Particles (ASTM C123) 33.00 13, BTU 45.00 40.50 38.25 61 . Sodium (Na) 12.50 11 .25 10.50 construction per month 35.00 e. Spall Material (Mn/DOT) 50.00 ( 1 ) Quoted on an individual basis. ( 1 ) Quoted on an individual basis. "Coliform samples not accepted on Fridays. 2 3 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING , INC . GENERAL CONDITIONS F Section 1 : Responsibilities . take reasonable precautions to minimize dam- retained to provide continuing services, CLIENT } 1 . 1 CLIENT acknowledges the risk of variation age, BRAUN has not included the cost of agrees to indemnify and hold BRAUN harmless that is inherent in testing by sampling . CLIENT restoration in the estimated charges and will not from all claims , damages , and losses and recognizes that samples or observations may be liable for such damage. The correction of expenses, including attorney's fees , arising out not be representative. If CLIENT directs the damage is the responsibility of CLIENT. At of any interpretations, clarifications, substitu- manner of taking samples or making observa- CLIENT's option , BRAUN will restore the site tions or modifications provided by CLIENT or tions, in number, type, location , depth , or in any and invoice the CLIENT. others. other way, CLIENT accepts all risks associated therewith and agrees to indemnify BRAUN and Section 3 : Samples . Section 8: Insurance. Y hold it harmless from all claims , damages, and All samples remaining after tests are conducted BRAUN will furnish a Certificate of Insurance expenses arising out of that direction . remain the property of CLIENT. They will be upon request. If CLIENT requests increased 1 . 2 Tests and observations will be conducted discarded or returned to CLIENT, at BRAUN's insurance coverage, BRAUN will purchaseaddi- using standard test procedures, where appli- discretion , unless within 60 days of the report tional insurance , if obtainable, at CLIENT 's cable, and BRAUN laboratory protocols. date CLIENT requests , in writing , that BRAUN expense in accordance with the SCHEDULE OF 1 .3 BRAUN will provide CLIENT with written store or ship the samples, at CLIENT's expense. CHARGES , but BRAUN shall have no liability reports containing test results, and when appro- beyond the limits and conditions of the addi- e. Section 4 : Reports and Records . tional insurance coverage. priate, professional opinions and recommenda- p 9 tions regarding conformance to established 4. 1 BRAUN will furnish three copies of each criteria. report to CLIENT without additional charge. Section 9 : Standard Of Care . 1 . 4 BRAUN will not be responsible forthe failure 4. 2 Reports , notes , calculations and other docu- In performing its services, BRAUN will use that of others to perform in accordance with the ments , as instruments of service, shall remain degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised specifications or contract documents , and the property of BRAUN . under similar circumstances by reputable memIt - BRAUN 's services shall in no way relieve others 4 .3 If CLIENT does not pay for BRAUN 's ser- bers of its profession practicing in the same of their responsibilities . locality. No other warranty is made or intended . P vices as agreed , CLIENT agrees that all reports 1 . 5 For work not on BRAUN premises , BRAUN and other work will be returned to BRAUN upon will not be responsible for superintending , super- demand , and that reports and other work will not Section 10: Disputes . vising or directing the work of contractors or be used by CLIENT for any purpose whatsoever. 10. 1 If BRAUN brings a lawsuit against CLIENT others , or for job or site safety, those being the 4. 4 BRAUN will retain principal documents relat- to collect its fees, then all its collection expenses, j sole responsibility of others . ing to the services performed for five years including attorney's fees, will be paid by CLIENT. 1 . 6 BRAUN will not be responsible for either following submission of the report. CLIENT 10.2 If CLIENT brings a lawsuit against BRAUN setting or checking the accuracy of construction agrees to pay reasonable charges for responses which is dismissed or as to which a verdict is staking , or for staking or referencing locations of to legal process in connection with the docu- rendered for BRAUN , in whole or in part , piling , caissons or footings, unless those func- ments. CLIENT will pay BRAUN its costs of defense, t tions ares specifically included in the accompany- includin but not limited to attorney's and expert f P Y � 9 Y P j ing description of services . BRAUN will refer- Section 5: Services and Compensation. witness fees , ence results of tests and observations to control ' Braun Engineering Testing , Inc. , a Minnesota lines and elevations set as part of surveying or business corporation will perform professional Section 11 : Indemnification . construction staking by others. services that are described in this Agreement 11 . 1 BRAUN agrees to hold harmless and indem- j 1 . 7 CLIENT will make available to BRAUN all and which are later requested or necessary. nify CLIENT from and against all claims , losses , known information regarding existing and pro- CLIENT will pay for those services as agreed damages , liability, costs , and reasonable costs of j posed conditions of the site and undertaking . upon , or according to the SCHEDULE OF defense arising out of acts or omissions of CLIENT will immediately provide BRAUN with CHARGES if there is no other agreement. A BRAUN and its subcontractors, if any. any new information which becomes available to statement of probable cost is not a firm figure 11 . 2 CLIENT agrees to hold harmless and it or its contractors which differs materially from unless stated as such . CLIENT agrees to pay indemnify BRAUN from and against all claims, information previously provided, but including invoices unless CLIENT notifies BRAUN in losses, damages , liability, costs , and reasonable all changes in plans. CLIENT will indemnify and writing of a particular item that is alleged to be costs of defense arising out of or in any way hold harmless BRAUN , its affiliates, and their incorrect within 15 days from receipt. If BRAUN connected with the acts or omission of CLIENT, respective directors, officers , employees , agents is delayed by factors beyond its control , it shall CLIENT's employees and subcontractors , and and subcontractors , from and against all claims , receive an equitable adjustment of its compen- others not under direct supervision and control damages , losses , and related expenses involving sation . of BRAUN , whether insured or not, subterranean structures which are not called to BRAUN 's attention and correctly shown on the Section 6 : Payment, Interest, and Section 12 : Limitation of Liability. tans furnished . Breach . p 12. 1 In the event BRAUN is held liable for 1 .8 CLIENTshall be responsible for the coopera- 6. 1 CLIENT agrees to pay invoices on receipt, damages , the total cumulative liability of tion of its employees and contractors in observ- and to pay interest on unpaid balances begin- BRAUN , its affiliates , and their respective direc- ing all radiation safety standards where radio- ning thirty days after invoice date at the rate of tors, officers, employees, agents and subcon- f graphic or gamma ray equipment is employed. 1 . 5% per month , but notto exceed the maximum tractors shall not exceed 100% of the compen- 1 .9 CLIENT shall notify BRAUN of any knowl- rate by law. For extended projects, the billing sation received by BRAUN as its professional fee edge or suspicion of the presence of hazardous rates may increase on each anniversary of the under this Agreement, or $50, 000, whichever is materials at the worksite. If BRAUN observes or date of this Agreement at an annual rate not to greater. suspects the presence of unanticipated haz- exceed 10%. 12 . 2 CLIENT agrees to notify all contractors and ardous materials, it may terminate its work 6 . 2 In the event CLIENT fails to pay BRAUN others who may perform work in connection without liability to CLIENT or others, and it shall within 60 days following the invoice date , with the project of the limitation of liability be paid for services provided according to the BRAUN may consider the default a total breach contained in Section 12. 1 , and to require as a t Schedule of Charges. of this Agreement and may, at its option , termi- condition precedent to performing work , the j 1 . 10 CLIENT shall include BRAUN as a bene- nateallof its duties without liability to CLIENT or acceptance of a like limitation in favor of ficiary in any hold harmless or indemnity agree- others. BRAUN . In the event CLIENT fails to obtain a ments with CLIENT's contractors, like limitation of liability, CLIENT agrees to Section 7 : Continuity Of Services . indemnify BRAUN from and against all liability Section 2 : Access and Restoration . CLIENT acknowledges that it is customary for to contractors and others in excess of the CLIENT will furnish BRAUN with access to the the consultant which provides construction or limitation amount. site. It is understood by CLIENT that in the remediation recommendations to be retained to 12 .3 In the event CLIENT does not wish to limit normal course of the work some damage to the provide inspection and related services during BRAUN 's liability , BRAUN agrees to waive the site or materials may occur. While BRAUN will construction or remedial work. If BRAUN is not limitation provided for in Section 12. 1 upon written notice from CLIENT received within five days after the date this Agreement is executed and payment of additional consideration equiva- lent to ten percent of the total fee , such consi- deration to be called "Waiver of Limitation of Liability Charge. " This charge will in no way be construed as being a charge for insurance of any type but will be increased consideration for the greater risk involved in performing work for which there is no limitation of liability. 12 .4 BRAUN shall not be liable to CLIENT for special , incidental , consequential or penal losses or damages, including but not limited to delay , loss of use, loss of profits or revenue, or cost of capital . 12 .5 BRAUN shall not be liable to CLIENT for losses, damages or claims unless suit is com- menced within two years of the injury or the completion of the services by BRAUN , which- ever .is earlier. In no eventshall BRAUN be liable to CLIENT unless CLIENT has notified BRAUN of the discovery of error or omission within a reasonable time of such discovery, not to exceed 30 days. Section 13 : Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between BRAUN and CLIENT and it supersedes all prior written or oral agreements. Any term , condition , prior course of dealing , course of performance, usage of trade, understanding, purchase order, or agreement purporting to modify, vary, supple- ment or explain any provision of this Agreement is null and void and of no effect unless in writing and signed by representatives of both parties authorized to amend this Agreement. In no event, however, shall the preprinted terms or conditions stated on any CLIENT purchase or work order be considered an amendment or modification of this Agreement, even if such document is signed by both parties . TM IGCSM8 [ HRAU11 M F• November 8 , 1989 Mr . Ray A . Huber , P . E . BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC . P . O . Box 35108 Minneapolis , MN , 55435 RE : PROPOSAL FOR SOIL BORINGS AND ENGINEERING REPORT SERVICES Dear Ray . Per our previous telephone conversation on November 6 , 1989 , the City of Prior Lake is interested in obtaining a proposal for soil borings to investigate the subsurface soils on Toronto Avenue and the old drive - in movie theatre property in Prior Lake . A map is enclosed showing the proposed area tentatively scheduled for City improvements . The area shaded in yellow is Toronto Avenue which currently has sanitary sewer , watermain , and bituminous paving installed . The area shaded in green was previously the drive - in movie theatre and is currently an undeveloped parcel . The City is considering improving these areas . Toronto Avenue would be improved with the installation of storm sewer , concrete curb and gutter , and a new street pavement section . The old drive - in movie theatre parcel would be improved with sanitary sewer , storm sewer , concrete curb and gutter , and a street pavement section . To help us better estimate the improvement costs in these areas , we would like a proposal from you on the following items : 1 . Mobilization to the project site . 2 . Soil Borings - 5 borings at 5 L . F . depth EACH for Toronto Avenue . 3 . Soil Borings - 5 borings at 15 L . F . depth EACH for drive - in movie theatre property . 4 . Additional borings at 5 L . F . and 15 L . F . depths if necessary . 5 . Gradations Tests 6 . Atterberg Limit Tests 7 . Analysis and Report 4629 Dakota St. S .E . , Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . (612 ) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245 The City will designate the soil boring locations and provide the necessary stations and elevation information . We will also call Gopher State One Call for locations of underground utilities in this area . The purpose of the borings will be to assist in evaluating existing subsurface conditions so that recommendations can be made regarding potential subgrade correction requirements and pavement design considerations . If you have any questions regarding this letter , please feel free to call me . Sincerely yours , /x L &7at Bruce Loney , P . E . Assistant City Engineer CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BL : j 1p Enclosure i i J0- NA ST PKA ' Cr 41 1 If NORMAN BARSNE TE KA i0 9 8 ` � 12 � UNITED STATES 160034 POSTAL SERVIC `r 161266 13 SRD 7 ` , � l CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 6 14 7 .j 174048 `*b HI - „ 15 6 ,, J s 16 •; NORMAN BARSNESS b 1 17 4 160034 4 F' v h 18 3 a� b'� Ch1 • 3 old100 01 2 �' \ 1 �'� 2081 2 o I \+ r N O `f� X90 32 406` 91 `lam +jb6 P31ORDALE NLL F IVESTORS X17446 allC \iOld, 161618 o Am � Nis", c T N 00< , 2 9 G� l ` 460 . 00 tu � ` GE�'� 2 �i trhs 2 ( • Sir J . BROOKS HAUSER 165482 5 SP AN `. 1S Woodland `� ysyo AO EASEMENT 158364 GG 666. 29 - , t*4 LAWRENCE SCHWEICH 3 173739 1 wild 9 500 low -dw ' � • - 1035 . 39 SIA COR STRGAR = ROSCOE = FAUSCH , INC . CONSULTING ENGINEERS SRP TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ PARKING ■ LAND SURVEYORS November 7 , 1989 Mr . Larry J . Anderson P . E . 0� Director of Public Works # CITY OF PRIOR LAKE � � }- 4629 Dakota S . E . Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372 RE : REVISED SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR TRAFFIC STUDY IN CONJUNCTION WITH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG T . H . 13 Dear Mr . Anderson . Based on your letter dated November 3 , 1989 , we submit this revised scope of services for professional traffic engineering services in conjunction with the commercial development plans along T . H . 13 in Prior Lake . In order to provide a comprehensive and effective analysis for this project , we see the need for the following work tasks . 1 . Evaluate the existing traffic data and determine if additional counts for daily , peak hour or turning movements will be needed . 4 Hours 2 . Compile future land use and proposed development data . Estimate the new total trips that will be generated in the peak hour and on a daily basis by the proposed development . 8 Hours 3 . Establish the directions of approach to the site by the new traffic . 4 Hours 4 . Assign the projected traffic to the existing roadway network to determine base traffic impacts and roadway needs . 12 Hours 5 . Assign projected traffic to each alternative roadway system and evaluate traffic operations . Six key intersection analysis areas will be evaluated with up to three roadway configurations . The key intersection areas include . 24 Hours T . H . 13 at Franklin Trail T . H . 13 at Toronto Avenue Toronto Avenue at Tower Street Tower Street at Duluth C . S . A . H . 23 at 170th and T . H . 13 170th at T . H . 13 Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North , Minneapolis , Minnesota 55447 612/475=0010 FAX 612/475-2429 Mr . Larry J . Anderson - 2 - November 7 , 1989 6 . Prepare a draft report with graphics describing the results of the traffic analysis , work performed and recommendations . 20 Hours 7 . Meet with City staff to review the draft report and make appropriate revisions . 4 Hours 8 . Prepare the final report ( 20 copies ) . 6 Hours We would propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis at a rate of 2 . 5 times salary cost for the actual time expended , and at actual cost for the out - of - pocket expenses ( printing , reproduction ) and mileage at a rate of $ . 26 per mile . Invoices would be submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month with payment due within 30 days . The total cost for our services on this project is estimated at $ 4 , 100 . 00 and we will not exceed this figure without your approval . The estimate of cost is based on the Scope of Services . It is understood that if the scope or the extent of work should be adjusted at any time , the project cost will be adjusted accordingly . A signed copy of this proposal returned to this office will serve as formal authorization . We will begin the work immediately and will complete the project through the draft report by December 1 , 1989 . We sincerely appreciate your consideration for this work and look forward to working with you on this project . Please feel free to contact us if additional information is required . Very truly yours , STRGAR - ROSCOE - FAUSCH , INC . Peter Aq6! Senior Vice President PAF : bba APPROVED . Name Title ector of Public Works Date 11 / 8 / 89 Alt, `y November 3 , 1989 Mr . Peter A . Fausch , P . E . Senior Vice President STRGAR - ROSCOE - FAUSCH , INC . Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway North Minneapolis , MN . 55447 RE : TRAFFIC STUDY FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG T . H . 13 Dear Mr . Fausch : I have reviewed your proposal dated November 2 , 1989 and have discussed this with Dennis Eyler . The City of Prior Lake accepts your proposal for conducting professional services for a traffic study on the commercial area along Highway 13 . In speaking with Dennis Eyler , he indicated that Item # 2 could be eliminated if the City of Prior Lake conducted the traffic counts . This would eliminate $ 1 , 200 . 00 from the scope of services . Denny will forward the locations for traffic counts to be taken to the City and the City will then provide the traffic count data . This will reduce the scope of services not to exceed $ 4 , 100 . 00 . The billing will be on an hourly basis . The City of Prior Lake is pleased to have your firm provide the services for the City and looking forward to working with you . If you have any questions regarding the above information , please feel free to call me . Sincerely yours , Lar y J . Anderson , P . E . Director of Public Works CITY OF PRIOR LAKE LJA : jlp cc . Dennis Eyler 4629 Dakota St. S.E ., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph . (612 ) 447-4230 / Fax (612 ) 447 -4245 C I T Y O F P R I O R L A K E 4629 Dakota Street S . E . , Prior Lake , MN 55372 FAX COVER SHEET DATE : / 0 / TIME : 4/J TOO FAX # `� 7. S - 7 K4 FROM : TITLE • -Cc UJ FAX : 4444245 MESSAGE : NUMBER OF PAGES SENT : / ' ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 12 , 1989 4 : 00 - 6 : 00 P . M . COMMUNITY ROOM PRIOR LAKE CITY HALL 4 : 00 P . M . I . Approve September 28 Meeting Minutes * See attached September 28 Minutes 4 : 15 P . M . II . Review Star City Business Retention Survey Requirements * See attached Staff Memo 4 : 45 P . M . III . Discuss EDC Interviews * See attached Staff Memo 5 : 00 P . M . IV . Presentation by Kathleen Nye on Proposed Super Valu Relocation A . Discuss process and time frame * See attached Staff Memo 6 : 00 P . M . V . Adjournment AGENDA NUMBER . I PREPARED BY : KAY SCHMUDLACH SUBJECT : MEETING MINUTES DATE . OCTOBER 5 , 1989 INTRODUCTION : Attached please see the September 28 , 1989 Economic Development Committee meeting minutes . ACTION NECESSARY . Motion to approve the minutes . i ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28 , 1989 Members Present : Chairman Hill , Linda Blaisdell , Darcy Running , Rachel VanDenBoom , and Bob Barsness Members Absent : Denny Hanson , Dave Miller , and Dave Unmacht Others Present . Assistant City Manager Kay Schmudlach I . Approve EDC Meeting Minutes of July 13 and July 27 Motion by Rachel VanDenBoom , seconded by Bob Barsness to approve both sets of minutes . II . Update on City Issues Mr . Hill asked Kay several questions regarding recent Council action . Kay clarified the City Council ' s actions or comments . III . Development Project Update Kay Schmudlach updated the EDC on two issues : Industrial Location RFP Process , and the Rick Swenson Project . Business / Office Park Location Study Ms . Schmudlach reported that the City Council had tabled the approval of the contract with Professional Planning and Development to complete the Business/ Office Park Location Study . Subsequent information has been gathered by City Manager Unmacht at Councilmember Fitzgerald ' s request . The information and the proposals will be discussed at the October 2 Council meeting . Jim Hill will be in attendance to support approval of the proposal . Rick Swenson Development Project Mr . Swenson has been given approval to proceed with his development in the Industrial Park . IV . Star City Update Kay announced to the EDC that the Star City Banquet has been postponed because the city ' s new State Representative , David Nelson , is requiring the city to resurvey the local industry prior to recertification . The Star City Subcommittee will continue to work on this requirement , and ask that EDC members be involved in the interviewing . Tentative completion date will be February 1990 . V . Discussion of Revolving Loan Program Jim Hill led a discussion of initiating a revolving loan program to assist local businesses in improving their businesses . EDC member Bob Barsness agreed to research this idea and schedule a meeting with Kay following the research . Kay was asked to contact all EDC members to see if they would like to participate in a brainstorming session to further discuss this effort . VI . Adjournment The EDC meeting adjourned at 9 : 45 A . M . AGENDA NUMBER : II PREPARED BY : KAY SCHMUDLACH SUBJECT : BUSINESS RETENTION SURVEY DATE . OCTOBER 5 , 1989 INTRODUCTION : City ' s applying for Star City status are required to complete a Business Retention Survey . The purpose of the Business Retention Survey ( BRS ) is to strengthen communication between governmental and economic development entities and local businesses . In addition , survey questions anticipate expansion and/ or relocation potentials and the relative health of the local business sector . Prior Lake last completed the survey in March of 1989 . As you may recall the survey was completed in house and consisted of distributing a written survey to approximately 300 businesses and oral interviews of approximately 20 . The city is initiating the Business Retention Survey again , but will be using the state form . If the survey is completed prior to November 15 , the state will be able to provide a series of graphics demonstrating comparisons of Prior Lake to other cities , and the state . In order to use the state ' s survey , only the larger businesses will be surveyed . I have provided a list ( see attachment ) of those businesses interviewed in March and added a few that I believe should be included . Please review the list and be prepared to add or delete any from the list at our October 12 meeting . LOCAL BUSINESS INTERVIEW Name of Business Interviewed J & B Furniture Owner Bonnie Maxwell Hauser ' s IGA Store Manager Bob Engel Hollywood Inn Owner Cindy Boegeman Scott - Rice Telephone Manager Bob Lange Valley Engineering Co - owners Ron Swanson Steve Harvey Prior Lake Post Office Postmaster Dale Arlt McKnight & Associates President John Milde Vice - President Bonnie Milde Monnens Lumber Supply Owner Bob Mertens Rademacher ' s Red Owl Store Manager Dave Chromy Edina Realty Branch Manager R . VanDenBoom Carol ' s Furniture Owner John Schoeller Custom Log Homes Owner Lee Little Ballard Busse Funeral Owner Dick Ballard Home McWillies Owner Jan Ballard Amoco Owner Peter Flink Associated Properties Owner Gary Gibbish & Investments Prior Lake State Bank Vice President Bob Barsness Marquette Bank President Dennis Hanson Norex , Inc . C . E . O . Ron Haberkorn Park Nicollet Med . Beneficiary Doctor Abrams Center Employee * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Little Six Bingo Leonard Prescott * Metro Air Rick Swenson * Autumn Mfg . Craig Colin * C . H . Carpenter Fred Meier * Rainbow Play Systems Charles Foster * Prior Lake Machine Archie Pavek * Prior Lake American Jim Riccioli * Velishek Auto Sales Dave Velishek * E - Z Stop Steve Nielson * Freds Cabinet Shop Fred Bargmann * John Mahoney Construction John Mahone * Prior Lake Marina Jim Sentyrs * Priordale Mall Neil Boderman * Lone Pine Golf Course Don McKush * Coast - Coast Al Wetterlin * Dakota Liquor Joe Geraghty * Metropolitan Federal Bank Carol Scott * Priority Health & Fitness Bill Gilbertson AGENDA NUMBER : III PREPARED BY : KAY SCHMUDLACH SUBJECT . EDC INTERVIEWS DATE . OCTOBER 5 , 1989 INTRODUCTION : Staff has received information from 3 applicants interested in serving on the Economic Development Committee . Interviews will be scheduled for each applicant in the next two weeks . The attached applicant information has been provided for your information . If you know of any other I nterested candidates , please let me know . Mr . Michael J . Crowe Construction Management , Inc . 3558 Basswood Circle Prior La '�. e , Minn . 55372 April 29 , 1989 Ms . Kay Schmudlach City of Prior Lake Economic Development Council Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372 Dear Kay . Based on our recent discussion , I would like to submit my application for the advertised vacancy on your Economic Development Council . While my family and I have been residents of Prior Lake for only two years , we have already seen substantial changes in this area . I firmly believe that Prior Lake as well as the whole northern edge of Scott County is going to experience tremendous growth in the coming years , and that it is important that a city like Prior Lake become involved in and encourage this growth . Prior Lake has several unique opportunities due to it ' s recent development . It will be able to benefit from the successes as well as the mistakes made by other municipalities , and with it ' s lakes andparks has a wonderful potential that other areas cannot match It should be the focus of your Economic Development Council to foster this . Again , I would be very interested in becoming involved with this Council . Attached , you will find a short resume and list of projects that I have recently been involved in . If you have any questions or need additional information , please contact me . Sincerely , Michael J . Crowe enclosure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MICHAEL J . CROWS �� 440 - 5770 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3558 Basswood Circle , Prior Lake , Mn . 55372 Experience President - Michael J . Crowe , Inc . Construction Mgrs . ' resent Prior Lake , Minn . Director of Construction Management - Medici Construction Mgmi 19 5 - Present . Mpls . Minn . Project Manager - Stiglieh Construction Inc . 1984 - 85 * St . Paul , Minn . Owner / President - Kamper - Crowe Construction , Inc . 1975 - 84 . Land 0 Lakes , Wisc . Carpenter - Brunius Construction Co . 1972 - 75 . Chicago , Ill . Customer Relations - Bekins Van Lines 1970 - 72 . Chicago , Ill . Work Study Program - Joliet Health Planning Commission 1972 . Joliet , I11 . Education Health Science Administration . Governors State University , Park Forest South , Illinois . 19 9 - 1975 . Related Board of Directors _ Regional Chapter of the Construction Experience Management Association of America . MIDA Member - Minnesota Industrial Development Assoc . Treasurer - Northwoods Co - Op . Eagle River , Wisc . Community Organizer - Eagles Nest Theater . Eagle RiveV , Wis . Campaign Asisstant - State Assemblyman , Jim Holperin , Interests Sports ( especially running ) , Politics and Theater . Personal Born 7 / 5 / 51 . Married . Three Children . Personal strengths include ; problem solving , communication skills and decision making ability . Have a solid reputation based on quality performance . References Mr . Les Formell . President . Hills Gilbertson Architects , 104 W . Franklin . Mpls . Mn . 870 - 1000 , Mr . Dennis Sherry . Director of Facilities . Hennepin County Medical Center . Mpls . Minn . 347 - 3315 . Dr . Michael Galli . Psychologist . Psychiatric Associates , Rhinelander , Wisconsin . 715 - 362 - 5150 , Mr . Robert Mogenson . Owner / Pharmacist . Vacationland Pharmacy . Land 0 ' Lakes , Wisc . 715 - 547 - 3039 . Projects Recently Completed Tiffany Office Building , Plymouth Minn . $ 1 , 600 , 000 . New office building Metropolitan Medical Center , Mpls . , Minn . $ 11900 , 000 . Emergency Room Expansion & MRI Facility St . Joseph Hospital , St . Paul , Minn . $ 9002000 . Renovation St . John ' s Hospital NorthEast , Maplewood , Minn . $ 1 , 800 , 000 . Expansive remodeling . Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital , So . St . Paul , Mn $ 1507000 . Nursery Remodeling , St . Joseph Hospital , St . Paul , Minn . $ 3802000 . Cardiovascular Suite St . Johns NorthEast Hospital , Maplewood , Minn $ 130 , 000 . MRI Facility Midway Hospital , St . Paul , Minn . $ 1251000 . MRI Facility St . Joseph Hospital , St . Paul , Minn . $ 129 , 000 . MRI Facility Riverside Medical Center , Mpls . Minn . $ 1509000 . Link Bypass Dr . Arthur Thelman , Mpls . Minn . $ 95 , 000 . Obstetrics Office International Hearing Foundation , Mpls . Minn . $ 55 , 000 . Offices New Brighton historical Society , New Brighton , Mn . $ 1309000 . Railroad Museum 1926 Pleasant Ave . Mps , Minn . $ 1002000 . Office Renovation International Hearing Foundation , Mpls . Minn . $ 60 , 000 . Temporal Bone Dissection Lab St . Cloud Hospital , St . Cloud , Minn . $ 502000 . Nrsing Station Remodeling Centennial United Methodist Church , Roseville , Minn $ 90 , 000 . Elevator Installation 104 W . Franklin , Mpls . Minn $ 325 , 000 . Office renovation St . Joseph Hospital , St . Paul , Minn $ 40 , 000 . Lab Remodeling St . Marks Lutheran Church $ 1351000 . Addition and remodeling RANDY DEAN SIMPSON Current Address , 3349 Sycamore Trail Home Telephone : 447 -8087 Prior Lake, MN 55372 Work Telephone : 8944222 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE AND TRAINING MANAGER, October 1982 — Present. Present position: KMart Corporation , 400 East Thvelers Trail , Burnsville, MN 55337 , telephone 8944222 . Duties include complete operation of a high volume auto service center, current sales of $475 ,000. Customer contact and selling, inventory management, expense control, and budgeting. Supervision and training of mechanics and new management hirees. Ranked number one in sales and profits in district, and in the top 100 in the corporation . SECURITY PERSONNEL, September 1980 — December 1982 . Donaldsons Department Store, Highway 100 & Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN, telephone: 561-7500. Duties included loss prevention, safety and enforcement of company policies. Opened and closed retail store. OTHER WORK EXPERIENCE , 1977 — 1980. Held three other jobs while going to high school in the areas of retail hardware and automotive sales, used building materials and salvage sales, and partsman in an auto salvage operation. EDUCATION MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1500 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55403 Currently attending to complete a Bachelor of Arts degree in business management. DUNWOODY INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE , September 1980 — April 1982 . 818 Wayzata Boulevard, Minneapolis, MN 55403 , telephone: 374-5800. Auto Mechanics including complete repair and fundamentals. Rated in upper one third of class, equivalent to 3 . 2 grade point average. LINCOLN SENIOR HIGH , September 1977 — May 1980. 3600 South Cliff Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD. Required courses, welding, woodworking, cabinet mak ing, machine shop, vocational autobody (top in class) . 3 . 0 grade point average. Member of VICA (Vocational Industrial Arts Club of America) in autobody and machine shop. STRONG POINTS Highly motivated self-starter. Strong mechanical and managerial background. 40% sales increase in first year at Burnsville location. Highest sales and profits in district for prior four years. Peo- ple oriented• manager. Hobbies include auto restoration, painting and repair. REFERENCES : Available on request FEBRUARY 1989 APPLICATION THIS APPLICATION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY INDIVIDUALS INTERESTED IN SERVING ON A VOLUNTEER BOARD OR COMMISSION IN THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE . Name : 9ie, L avo/ V' Vd 2r II Address : 3903 /yI� /�ev ClrG6e /Orion LQ /�� Phone # : ( H ) y`I7 - 306 ( W ) yt/D - 61o � S Date : Please state position being sought . c40 -101OW c ve oa woeot co How did you find out about this position ? Lt tey re Ce vc � c KOV11 ay Sc � vvlKal �YG �J S449e3 / tuts an0I Briefly describe your qualifications for the position : O =S i c e /6V a o44 c�S . Al o Z *JL Briefly describe your interest in this position and how you can serve the community : .2' c4z + it /N N°r .n& )" e )v1Qsx1V4e 9yoW � y j ¢ had(/ /o yeays . 4 /e/ 71!r'e c 4a0s2 at oW enol GoV4 44a G✓o 44 pov" ;*1 utzll �0 6c /o - ao yea ✓s c►- oti0*1 vJ o � ✓ . Briefly describe your educational background : � �Li e'C� �i .y a ..a d' ,t,9 • O C( S 1 Vl C 5 / I °� / O V Please list any references that we may contact : peen Ha. � so-,�c -- Mav � u� l9ay (.� �veside�' — ys'7 - �aS"j' U2Ve. M, /�tV — C � a beV Pvett � — 14 7 - 61e/ Lavvy (;Yeevislield — Al,� le �✓ iy � f y3 ;t - 3g3j Please attach a resume . RESUME PERSONAL Name : Richard D . Gross Address . 5903 Miller Circle Prior Lake , Minnesota 55372 Telephone : ( 612 ) 447 - 6306 Birthdate : January 4 , 1948 Marital Status : Married - Two Children Health : Height : 5 ' 10 " Weight : 160 lbs . CAREER OBJECTIVE To further develop my career in the area of sales and management . My qualifications consist of 18 years of business experience and a college background in the areas of management , marketing , finance , business law , accounting , economics , data processing , pyschology and speech . I am a hard worker and have a friendly personality . EDUCATION High School : Washburn High School - Minneapolis , MN Graduated 1966 General and Business Courses College : St . Cloud College - St . Cloud , MN Major in Business 1966 - 1969 Additional : Medical training courses in Military as a Medic Resume of Rict. _ tid D . Gross Page Two 1985 Kransco Group Companies to 5816 Ward Court Present Airport Industrial Park Virginia Beach , VA 23455 I am currently Central Regional Manager with Kransco Group Companies . I am directly involved in all aspects of sales planning , reviewing new products , establishing sales projections , sales policies and incentive programs . I have four sales representative groups re - porting to me which involve 38 sales - men . In this position I establish yearly and quarterly sales goals , require account planning and follow - thru , and make co - calls with each salesman . In 1986 , I had a 38 % sales growth while company sales remained flat . Kransco Group Companies have products in a variety of trade classifications of which the three main classifications are toys , sporting goods , and marine distributors . My plans are to continue my career growth with a good company that needs a qualified man based in Minneapolis . There are a lot of complacent salesmen and managers , I am not one of these and could never be . I work hard and I work effectively to get what my company needs ; increased sales and good customer relationships . Logical planning , hard work , training people to work effec - tively and getting good results are part of what I do for a living . Resume of Ric . rd D . Gross Page Three 1982 Tomy Corporation to 901 E . 233rd Street 1985 Carson , CA 90749 I started with Tomy as their Key Accounts Salesman handling ten of the larger accounts in my area ( Target , LaBelles , Ardans , Coast to Coast , World Wide , United , Our Own , Pamida , Richman Gordman and Western Auto ) . Within one year I was promoted to National Accounts Sales Manager handling Target , Sears and Montgomery Wards . I increased sales the first year from 9 million dollars in 1983 to 16 million dollars in 1984 . But even more important , these accounts grew from 8 % to 10 % of our corporate total dollars . In 1985 , my advertised items increased substantially over previous years . Montogomery Ward advertised 25 retail ads compared to 14 the prior year ; Sears advertised 11 items compared to 1 the prior year . I have a report that shows all of the above in greater detail While working with Tomy Toys , I was fortunate to learn more about the inside picture of what makes the toy industry work from the manufacturing point of view . Establishing new product lines , packaging , advertisement campaigns , securing customer support , estimating year end usage per item a year in advance and at all times keeping bottom line profit in mind is not an easy task , but certainly a challenging one . I am career minded and I work at my job as though it were my own company . Resume of Richard 0 . Gross Page Four 1978 Mattel Corporation to 5150 Rosecrans Avenue 1982 Hawthrone , CA 90250 I was a Senior Salesman with Mattel and covered four and a half states . In - creased sales and building my reputation within the toy industry was my prime goal and one that I did accomplish through hard work . I became Mattel ' s number one salesman the last year that I was with them and won a ten day trip to Greece for my wife and I . My sales professionalism and credibility with my customers had grown strong and when Tomy asked for references for key people for their new sales force , my name came up . Increasing sales is my specialty . I do this through logical planning and hard work that increases SKU listings , ad - vertised items and better retail presen - tation . My biggest success with Mattel was increasing Shopko from $ 300 , 000 to $ 1 , 600 , 000 in three years . I was directly involved in setting up Mattel ' s retail service program with this account and training the people that would call on all their stores . We increased the sales per store from $ 14 , 000 to $ 50 , 000 in two years with this program . I have a report written in January of 1982 that is more specific regarding this subject that you might find interesting . Mattel gave me tremendous sales training and fine tuned by abilities . Resume of Rich _ rd D . Gross Page Five 1975 USM Corporation to Bostik Consumer Division 1978 Reading , Pennsylvania I was a Territory Manager in the Hardware Industry selling hand tools and fasteners . I covered four and a half states and dealt with mass merchants , large co - ops and wholesalers . I enjoyed good sales success and learned a lot in dealing with these customers and their sales forces . In the first year , I was able to increase sales 45 % and the second year , another 14 % , making a total growth of 651 in two years . 1973 Probe International , Inc . to 4249 Linden Hills Blvd . 1975 Minneapolis , Minnesota I started with this company as a salesman and after building up sales , was promoted to Sales Manager . As Sales Manager , I had five salesmen working for me . Probe International was a marketing company and dealt with organizing pro - motional programs for new and existing products . This involved all stages of product development , finding financing , designing packaging and literature , developing advertising programs , finding lines of distribution and selling the product . 1970 Vincent Brass & Aluminum to 700 - 24th Avenue S . E . 1973 Minneapolis , Minnesota I was an Inside Salesman with this company . I received excellent sales training and had a chance to work with some of their larger customers . This company , which deals in non ferrous metals , gave me a chance to further develop my sales and customer relationship skills . Resume of Rict d D . Gross Page Six 1961 B & M Cycle to 9943 Wentworth Avenue 1969 Minneapolis , Minnesota Started as a trainee mechanic , worked into sales and the last three years managed the store and supervised two other employees . This firm handled bicycles , lawn mowers , chain saws and outboard motors . I held the position part time during school and full time every summer . MILITARY National Guard Date of Discharge - January 1975 PREFERRED READING Possibility Thinking , Sales , Management , Investment and Religious books . PERSONAL INTERESTS Enjoy golf , fishing , snow skiing , water skiing and boating . REFERENCES These are available and will be furnished upon request . Richard D . Gross 5903 Miller Circle Prior Lake , MN 55372 SALARY HISTORY Confidential 1985 to 1987 Kransco Group Companies $ 100 , 000 5816 Ward Court Airport Industrial Park Virginia Beach , VA 23455 1982 to 1985 Tomy Corporation $ 48 , 000 to $ 74 , 000 901 E . 233rd Street Carson , CA 90749 1978 to 1982 Mattel Corporation $ 22 , 000 to $ 32 , 000 5150 Rosecrans Avenue Hawthrone , CA 90250 1975 to 1978 USM Corporation $ 14 , 000 to $ 18 , 000 Bostik Consumer Division Reading , Pennsylvania 1973 to 1975 Probe International , Inc . $ 12 , 000 to $ 14 , 000 4249 Linden Hills Blvd . Minneapolis , Minnesota 1970 to 1973 Vincent Brass & Aluminum $ 9 , 600 to $ 12 , 000 700 - 24th Avenue S . E . Minneapolis , Minnesota AGENDA NUMBER : IV PREPARED BY . KAY SCHMUDLACH SUBJECT . PROPOSED SUPER VALU RELOCATION DATE . OCTOBER 5 , 1989 INTRODUCTION : City Staff are currently working with representatives of Super Valu Stores Inc . , and Kathleen Nye , a representative of ENIVID the development corporation , for a proposed relocation of Super Valu . Staff has worked with Kathleen Nye on site plans and is now discussing Tax Increment issues . Kathleen Nye will be attending the October 12 Economic Development Committee meeting to introduce the EDC members to the project and to initiate the Economic Development Authority process . ( See attached memo ) BACKGROUND . Following the financial problems of Brooks Hauser and Scottland Company and the subsequent abandonment of the Hauser ' s proposed expansion , Kathleen Nye has been pursuing alternate development options for the property directly adjacent to the mall site . Radamacher ' s recent transfer from a Red Owl Store to a Super Valu has increased the store ' s business significantly . Super Valu development personnel initiated a market study which indicated a favorable market for a retail grocery store expansion . ENIVID Corporation purchased three parcels ( see map ) from IDS and is proposing to build a 30 , 000 - 40 , 000 sq . ft . store to lease to Super Valu for a 15 year term . Staff have been approached to participate in this development through the use of Tax Increment Financing . Details of the request are not available , however a general discussion has been provided in the following discussion section . DISCUSSION : ENIVID Corporation has indicated that they are anticipating spending slightly more than 2 million dollars on this project . The two million dollars includes : land acquisition , construction , soil corrections , and miscellaneous construction oriented costs . ENIVID has requested $ 350 - 400 , 000 in City assistance to 1 . ) provide soil corrections , and 2 . ) to assist in the completion of the Ring Road System from Center Street to Franklin Trail . Staff has met with Ed Tschida of Professional Planning and Development to determine the viability of a Tax Increment Financing district . Details on the type of district , the increment Venerated , the cost of completing the Ring Road System , and a timetable for completion are not available , but are anticipated to be available by Thursday , October 12 , ACTION NECESSARY : Please review the attached map of the proposed project , and the EDA process flow and description , and be prepared to ask questions on October 12 . ABC Commercial / Industrial Developer I ( A . 1 - 2 ) City Staff , Protects Requesting Projects Not Requesting , City Financing it City Financing r' ( Be 1 - 4 ) EDC ; ( D . 1 - 3 ) EDC Planning Commission ( C . 1 - 2 ) EDA , City Council ( Be 5 - 6 ) Planning EDC Commission Prior Lake Staff ( C . 3 - 4 ) EDAF1 City Council Prior Lake Staff ! PROJECT PARTICIPANTS RESPONSIBILITIES A . City Staff : All Projects 1 . Define project 2 . Identify special considerations A . Planning considerations Be Financial assistance C . Infrastructure needs Be Economic Development Committee Projects Requesting City Financing i . Welcome prospective developer to Prior Lake ( i . e . I nformal lunch , tour , or Star City slide presentation ) 2 . Provide a financial check list of items necessary to review development project 3 . Review submitted materials with staff and Bond Consultant to determine project qualifications for proposed financing 4 . Recommend preliminary project package to EDA 5 . If financing package is acceptable , planning and infrastructure requirements will be processed through correct channels 6 . Upon conclusion of all considerations EDC will prepare a final package for EDA and subsequently City Council approval C . Economic Development Authority Projects Requesting City Financing i . Evaluate project package on the merits of the preliminary financial information submitted by the EDC , Planning Commission , and staff 2 . Recommend project package to EDC for coordination of all requirements 3 . Evaluate final project package 4 . Recommend project package to the City Council for approval D . Economic Development Committee Projects Not Requesting City Financing 1 . Welcome prospective developer to Prior Lake ( i . e . informal lunch , tour , or Star City slide presentation ) 2 . Review site plan and project proposal 3 . Provide recommendation and support to the Planning Commission and the City Council . r6 a • . S : . . _ RL � iIL 4 p 0 4 w 046 5 � d o Maa I - YL ) Q ~ a • • yp•� T Q w �../ •�1 Jci .7 < 'S Q 4 4 U CL 1 11 1 NEW z g 64 CIL a ) o LLL Y 4 to y CL ZL cz 9, LLA CL 4 � ^Iv� Q C r131N3 �) , 3 � a z \ Y S I � Y a � a .l k a iP _ SIJ7 , AGENDA NUMBER . IV PREPARED BY . KAY SCHMUDLACH SUBJECT . PROPOSED SUPER VALU RELOCATION DATE : OCTOBER 5 , 1989 INTRODUCTION . City Staff are currently working with representatives of Super Valu Stores Inc . , and Kathleen Nye , a representative of ENIVID the development corporation , for a proposed relocation of Super Valu . Staff has worked with Kathleen Nye on site plans and is now discussing Tax Increment issues . Kathleen Nye will be attending the October 12 Economic Development Committee meeting to introduce the EDC members to the project and to initiate the Economic Development Authority process . ( See attached memo ) BACKGROUND . Following the financial problems of Brooks Hauser and Scottland Company and the subsequent abandonment of the Hauser ' s proposed expansion , Kathleen Nye has been pursuing alternate development options for the property directly adjacent to the mall site . Radamacher ' s recent transfer from a Red Owl Store to a Super Valu has increased the store ' s business significantly . Super Valu development personnel initiated a market study which indicated a favorable market for a retail grocery store expansion . ENIVID Corporation purchased three parcels ( see map ) from IDS and is proposing to build a 30 , 000 - 40 , 000 sq * ft . store to lease to Super Valu for a 15 year term . Staff have been approached to participate in this development through the use of Tax Increment Financing . Details of the request are not available , however a general discussion has been provided in the following discussion section . DISCUSSION : ENIVID Corporation has indicated that they are anticipating spending slightly more than 2 million dollars on this project . The two million dollars includes : land acquisition , construction , soil corrections , and miscellaneous construction oriented costs . ENIVID has requested $ 350 - 400 , 000 in City assistance to 1 . ) provide soil corrections , and 2 . ) to assist in the completion of the Ring Road System from Center Street to Franklin Trail . Staff has met with Ed Tschida of Professional Planning and Development to determine the viability of a Tax Increment Financing district . Details on the type of district , the increment generated , the cost of completing the Ring Road System , and a timetable for completion are not available , but are anticipated to be available by Thursday , October 12 , ACTION NECESSARY : Please review the attached map of the proposed project , and the EDA process flow and description , and be prepared to ask questions on October 12 . ABC Commercial / Industrial Developer I ( A . 1 - 2 ) City Staff ff Projects Requesting OProjects Not Requesting , City Financing City Financing 1 ( Be 1 - 4 ) EDC : ( D . 1 - 3 ) EDC Planning Commission 'AC . 1 - 2 ) EDA r--1 -- — 1. City Council ` ( Be 5 - 6 ) Planning ' EDC Commission _ - _ V/ T Prior Lake Staff INS Y _ - -- - - - -- f i { ( Co 3 - 4 ) EDA 1 i 7cit�y Council Prior Lake Staff' PROJECT PARTICIPANTS RESPONSIBILITIES A . City Staff All Projects 1 . Define project 2 . Identify special considerations A . Planning considerations Be Financial assistance C . Infrastructure needs Be Economic Development Committee Projects Requesting City Financing 1 . Welcome prospective developer to Prior Lake ( i . e . informal lunch , tour , or Star City slide presentation ) 2 . Provide a financial check list of items necessary to review development project 3 . Review submitted materials with staff and Bond Consultant to determine project qualifications for proposed financing 4 . Recommend preliminary project package to EDA 5 . If financing package is acceptable , planning and infrastructure requirements will be processed through correct channels 6 . Upon conclusion of all considerations EDC will prepare a final package for EDA and subsequently City Council approval C . Economic Development Authority : Projects Requesting City Financing i . Evaluate project package on the merits of the preliminary financial information submitted by the EDC , Planning Commission , and staff 2 . Recommend project package to EDC for coordination of all requirements 3 . Evaluate final project package 4 . Recommend project package to the City Council for approval D . Economic Development Committee Projects Not Requesting City Financing 1 . Welcome prospective developer to Prior Lake ( i . e . informal lunch , tour , or Star City slide presentation ) 2 . Review site plan and project proposal 3 . Provide recommendation and support to the Planning Commission and the City Council F / b Q • � am tLw � iIL 8 ° 6 0N o orsvto o $ Ornv' � ' _ 40M � - Ctct LL) . . . W "' 8�8 J C i � Z Q SI'o d�d 4 33 3 j) %n � aa c� n \77Zon • 3 ^ 0l ^+ o1ie1 No I MAINE William lie 0 , \ \ ` \or , Cb 4 n / 0. \ I \ � 8 too A IL do Ak gloom a \ \ � / Ao ofog � � iA . . . . Z r LL1Soo ogggg) 4 Q cz $ w 0 ? 2d f-- � MIND b31N3 � r OF Id a AND FA Y Single � v d = - " " I ll Planning ani. . 360 pierce avenue , suite 220 Ocievelopment co . 507 - 345. 1290 north mankato , mn 56001 FAX COVER SHEET Please Deliver The Following Pages To: Name : Company /Location: Fax Phone Number : From : \ J Department: Professional Planning Number : 507 - 3874843 TOTAL Number of Pages 9 INCLUDING Cover Sheet Date* 0 e 3 If all pages are not received, please call ( 507 ) 345- 1290 i ADJACENT ?0 PRIORDALE MALL Introduction Enivid Corporation of St . Paul , Minnesota is proposing to develop a 30 , 000 SF facility in Block 1 of Brooksville Center Second Addition . The property is situated immediately south of the Priordale Mall . The developer has represented that the proposed building Will be 1002 leased to Super Valu , Inc . which will operate a super market at this location . Total costs for the development of this facility are estimated at $ 1 , 730 , 000 . The developer is requesting that the EDA and City Council utilize tax increment financing to pay the costs of soils correction and also fund improvements for streets into and out of the site . The cost of these proposed improvements are estimated at $ 250 , 000 and $ respectively . Developer Background Enivid Corporation is a real estate partnership consists of two principals - First Trust Company and Patricia Devine . While Enivid Corporation is a new development entity , they are planning to utilize an experienced contractor to construct the facility . Ankeny Builders , of Blue Earth , Minnesota , has extensive experience in the design , engineering and construction of supermarket facilities ; in fact , Ankeny Builders has previously constructed eight other facilities for Super Valu operators . Lease Arrangements The developer has indicated that Super Valu , Inc . will sign a 15 year , lease to occupy the proposed facility . The lease will have the following base rent ! Years 1 through 4 - $ 5 . 751SF ; and , years 11 through 15 as $ 7 . 75 / $ F . in addition to the base rent there will be a 5 year " window " to adjust for potential increases in mortgage interest rates . The developer has been asked to provide a signed copy of the final lease document . Project Costs Enclosed in Exhibit A are the following documents relating to project costs 1 ) A signed option agreement for the project site ; 2 ) An engineering report which details the soil problems on the proposed site and also provides an estimate of the coats for corrective action ; 3 ) A preliminary construction estimate for the 30 , 000 $ F facility ; and , 4 ) Written estimates from the city engineer relating to options for improving traffic flow to and from the site . A summary of these costs without the roadway improvements is detailed as follows : Use Of Funds Item Amount Land $ 1009000 Soil Correction 2509000 Architectural & Engineering 900000 Legal , Finance , Interim Interest 90 , 000 Building Construction 9309000 Paving 100 , 000 Landscaping 40 , 000 Developer Fee 80 , 000 Signage 50 , 000 Total $ 11730 , 000 Source Of Funds Lender Amount Rate Term Collateral D / S Bank / Insurance $ 195309000 10 . 25 15 yr . / 20 yr . lst Land $ 182 , 800 Company Amort . & Bldg . Developer Equity 200 . 000 - - - - Total $ 197300000 $ 182 , 800 Project Financing The developer has indicated a willingness to invest $ 200 , 000 cash equity and A180 leverage $ 1 , 530 , 000 in private mortgage financing . It is anticipated that interim financing will be provided by TCF and permanent financing via an insurance company . Financing commitment letters stating the amount , rate , term and condi - tions will be provided once the commitments have been formalized ( shortly after execution of the lease with Super Valu ) . Under the proposed financing scenario , the EDA and City would contribute tax increment financing proceeds on an annual basis after the collection of the real estate taxes . The developer will front end the cost of the soil correction and other building expenses . In this manner there is no risk to the City of tax increment shortfalls . Pro Forma Analysis The enclosed pro forma incorporates the previously identified base rent figures and triple net lease characteristics . In the absence of a formal commitment for project financing debt service has been calculated using the following assumptions . Mortgage Amount - $ 1 , 5309000 Interest Rate - 10 . 25x Term - 15 years / 20 year amortization Debt Service - $ 182 . 800 / annum Operating costs including management fees are anticipated to inflate at a rate of 2x / annum beginning in year 3 , with the exception of management fees , operating costa are passed on as tenant contributions . Real estate taxes were estimated by the Scott County Assessor ' s office and are anticipated to significantly increase in year 2 as a result of building construction . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The developer cash flow ranges from a loss of ( $ 15 , 800 ) in year 1 to a maximum profit of $ 17 , 900 year 9 . The payment of $ 40 , 000 ' n tax increment assistance is proposed years 2 - 7 ` A a $ 10 , 000 payment is propose ( . or year S . These contribu - tions represent reimbursement for the $ 250 , 000 soils correction work and enable the project to have a positive cash flow in years 2 . 4 . Given a $ 200 , 000 equity contribution , the escalations in base rent and the availability of the tax increment funds the developer should realize an average cash on cash return of 12 . 372 over the first ten years of the project . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � Cap Ix r t o Q ral c� c e �?MOM C) { b ew �a1 zo nlol a 3y � 3 ^ y oniaG * e N + � A C a. XM O .. O X33 aaa C > > � Q S+' frim ir n r Com © z �i9 Y 7 r '� A � � Pok Can tj2 IM 0 oma 41 MC: far a 00 Can f° a 0 0 1 4 ,.a g ° eti � K � ° mat �' '^ G '��' Z � �I ra at ^ M. � a 70 f? z � >K { Ogoal ff ^ a 44 - ,pNr • too 64 tCA g „ ! e = � � B amn Cam L n : od MOM C an rp .i Y O ., � C Rt fD ROMP = 44 : gn � z CO Q � '� !0 'S 0 V V v ' Oyy N GM s N Z t7 f5 x 0 m I ? 0 ^*a0 ►te Mt N OI �' + �—'`" to OVIDO M i :7 x10 M 3 w on 11 x I MOM oia a + ° I mix N U I to v Gi N I— i V CO N Lh 0% tan my A N Mot 00 04 v 3 t0 W co co C) O �� 0 (an 0 0 0 O Ln 0 CDd0 O . . _ O O Q000 d d OQoO O O d d Q if I V A rn Q CO cwm n as Ln I V N 1 W 1—+ N A 1 N V N N •A OV + I . • i ( I M -S ~ 000 I O O , O y0rma 0 CD CD00 O O O O O K x I2 C „„ Q1 V W W V �rA w Owl r-+ N A �-+ + N I I + 0o I O N N A C) un I I I X W i W G1 a I.-+ w.+ Ot,p i as 00 tCl 1 CD l N O i O O O 00 O CD O C$ O I O O O • � ...,. N N t= y � v l co 01 ++I V W W �, ( �_ N � N I N Q7 I N n tD N y 10001 I r ' M + M V oO co o f a p i Cl c o 04 Ice N O 00 I O CD 00 O V) 0 1 d c o o I1'� A N 1, A Oi 0) t0 Lal Oh O 0) I N %%0 00 � Q+ W 1 W U 1 as V M N NOXI CO N ( W 1 � L I Ln un O • O O O O dO O O + rMl O 40 1 O O N fs ✓a 03 00 1 1 A lD Un N 01 0 0� ( N 1 � & 4h W r r I v • + 00 ( l0 1 t0 O iv © 00 o 0 1 o f o f o 0 0 oao �o o as mm"mmmmr� Nh� C1 LD .A ACQ V T ()'+ N m o m co CLQ N O H O to WO I C NO 00 a 1 Q 470 O Op o 0 O c �' 0000 ( co ,� r 01 O N Co 0 of o AIR I Cn O .� co O G © Co 00 0 00 ID C3 p ( p O O O O 00 , O CD O i N DO 00 W 444 O 00 O 00 1"" V O. ^C M a W kkOl 4�:b 0 ;n) C) :M Pp O O O O O I O O O O a C) Q0 O O G _ N t'q Nco OD 0 co J = I N3 Cl 00 N v l0 CO Oo pt m O C) O C7 p O d I 01 O O O 10/ 24 / 89 09 * 36 coNnDMUL fj001 professional planning 360 pierce avenue , sulte 220 Wnd north mankato , mn 56001 elopment co . 507 -345. 1290 FAX COVER SHEET Please Deliver The Following Pages Ta. N ame: Company /Location : Pax Phone Number : From: - - - Department: Professional Planning Number: 507 - 387 -6843 TOTAL Number of Pages INCLUDING Cover Sheet Date: If all pages are not received, please call ( 507 ) 345- 1290 PROJECT PROPOSAL FOR SUPER MARKET DEVELOPMBNT ADJACENT TO PRIORDALE HALL October , 1989 PROJECT PROPOSAL FJ . SUPER MAMT DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO PRIORDALE MALL Introduction Enivid Corporation of St . Paul , Minnesota is proposing to develop a 30 , 000 STS facility in Block 1 of Brooksville Center Second Addition . The property is situated immediately south of the Priordale Mall . The developer has represented that the proposed building will be 100X leased to Super Valu , Inc . which will operate a super market at this location . Total costs for the development of this facility are estimated at $ 1 , 730 , 000 . The developer is requesting that the EDA and City Council utilize tax increment. financing to pay the costs of soils correction and also fund improvements for streets into and out of the site . The cost of these proposed improvements are estimated at $ 250 , 000 and $ respectively . Developer Background Enivid Corporation is a real estate partnership consisting of two principals - First Trust Company and Patricia Devine . While Enivid Corporation is a new development entity , they are planning to utilize an experienced contractor to construct the facility . Ankeny Builders , of Blue Earth , Minnesota , has extensive experience in the design , engineering and construction of supermarket facilities ; in fact , Ankeny Builders has previously Constructed eight other facilities for Super Valu operators . Lease Arrangements The developer has indicated that Super Valu , Inc . will sign a 15 year , lease to occupy the proposed facility . The lease will have the following base rent : Years 1 through 4 - $ 5 . 75 / SF ; years 5 through 8 - $ 6 . 50 / SF ; years 9 and 10 - $ 6 . 90 / SF and , years 11 through 15 - $ 7 . 75 / SF . In addition to the base rent there will be a 5 year "window " to adjust for potential increases in mortgage interest rates . The developer has been asked to provide a signed copy of the final lease document . Project Costs Enclosed in Exhibit A are the following documents relating to project costs : 1 ) A signed option agreement for the project site ; 2 ) An engineering report which details the soil problems on the proposed site and also provides an estimate of the costs for corrective action ; 3 ) A preliminary construction estimate for the 30 , 000 SF facility ; and . 4 ) Written estimates from the city engineer relating to options for improving traffic flow to and from the site . A summary of these costs excluding the roadway improvements is detailed as follows & Use Of Funds It. Amount Land $ 1000000 Soil Correction 250 . 000 Architectural & Engineering 900000 Legal , Finance , Interim Interest 90 . 000 Building Construction 9309000 Paving 1000000 Landscaping 40 , 000 Developer Fee 800000 Signage 50 , 000 Total $ 1 , 7300000 Source Of Funds Lender Amount Rate Term Collateral DIS Bank / Insurance $ 1 , 5309000 10 . 25 15 yr . / 20 yr . 1st Land $ 182 , 800 Company Amort . & Bldg . Developer Equity 200 , 000 - _ _ Total $ 19730 . 000 $ 182 . 800 Project Financing The developer has indicated a willingness to invest $ 200 , 000 cash equity and also leverage $ 1 , 530 , 000 in private mortgage financing . It is anticipated that interim financing will be provided by TCF and permanent financing via an insurance company . Financing commitment letters stating the amount , rate , term and condi - tions will be provided once the commitments have been formalized ( shortly after execution of the lease with Super Yalu ) , Under the proposed financing scenario , the EDA and City would contribute tax increment financing proceeds on an annual basis after the collection of the real estate taxes . The developer will front end the cost of the soil correction and other building expenses . In this manner there is no risk to the City of tax increment shortfalls . Pro Forma Analysis The enclosed pro forma incorporates the previously identified base rent figures and triple net lease characteristics . In the absence of a formal commitment for project financing , debt service has been calculated using the following assump - tions Mortgage Amount - $ 1 , 530 , 000 Interest Rate - 10 . 252 Term - 15 years / 20 year amortization Debt Service - $ 182 , 8004nnum Operating costs including management fees are anticipated to inflate at a rate of 22 / annum beginning in year 3 , with the exception of management fees , operating costs are passed on as tenant contributions . Real estate taxes were estimated by 10/24/89 09 : 38 005 the Scott County Assessor ' s office and are anticipated to significantly increase in year 2 as a result of building construction . The developer cash flow ranges from a loss of ( $ 15 , 800 ) in year 1 to a maximum profit of $ 17, 900 in year 9 . The payment of $ 40 , 000 in tax increment assistance is proposed years 2 = 7 and a $ 10 , 000 payment is proposed for year S . These contribu - tions represent reimbursement for the $ 250 , 000 soils correction work and enable the project to have a positive net cash flow in years 2 - 4 . Given a $ 200 , 000 equity contribution , the escalations in base rent and the availability of the tax increment funds the developer should realize an average cash on cash return of 12 . 372 over the first ten years of the project . Recommendation The decision to develop a building for use as a supermarket facility os based upon the demographics of the area which translate into attractive market condi tions . Given this situation the EDA and City Council should question why tax increment funds are necessary to promote this project . It is reasonable to assume that a supermarket development will occur in the area at some point in the future regardless of whether public funds are utilized . The basis for a decision to provide public assistance to this particular project stems from an existing need to upgrade roadway access and a desire to aid the Priordale Mall by causing complementary development ( i . e . supermarket ) to occur on adjacent property . 8y establishing a " soils condition " tax increment financing district the EDA and City will have the ability to provide pay as you go assistance to the developer of the proposed supermarket . Tax increment contributions in the amount of $ 250 , 000 ( $ 40 , 000 / year in years 2 - 7 and $ 10 , 000 in year 8 ) would be paid out as the revenues are collected to reimburse the cost of soil correction on the development site . Assuming annual tax increment collections of $ 45 , 000 - $ 500000 there would be between $ 5 , 000 - $ 10 , 000 available in years 2 - 7 and $ 30 , 000 - $ 50 , 000 available in years 8 - 11 to reimburse a portion of the City ' s cost for roadway improvements in the area . The use of tax increment revenues for roadway improvements would be limited to costs resulting from the poor soils conditions in the area . By recognizing the need to upgrade the roadway system and seeking to provide a retail magnet for the existing mall the decision to utilize tax increment funds for a supermarket development becomes a public purpose . Without the use of public funds the development of a supermarket would not occur on the designated site . 10i24i85 05 : 39 - 0 006 lrcs�jco 00O v+O N 00 O .-i i Wwe I O N W cy it - 0 I O CO IVon t C Q O O O .p 1"` co Ol O) Cm w w w w O O 00C%4 ND hh O DO ( O N I 1 t- NI p I O O 000 C p p 0 p co} OD GO 00 O 00 •. O t0 I co co � ttw0Om m to two rwq � ^ V=4 Milli III coo ti O o O O O 000 r+ O N I tV CO rM40 tMA •' w w 00 N tD0 tD N Owl kc i tD r , coHO I d S!' ro N I N ' O O C CS O ; ; � j d 00 00 0 N 1 i MO w Ln d d tP) I awl N tD O w N 01 4O tD 00 O of V '� I C7 a 00 0 LR 1 OLA p O 00 O O I O O i to Q fV M O if / M w w Ida Cf N LO m I M ' et Cn No to m , Ql tD to `•.. h I co CO I d d N . 1 N N rm { .—. . 0 00 O I O N O ( 0 0 cc CV C3 ) N yt t+ In t0 i tD d n C) I O CO 00 w w I 00 ~ I w w tD 0irrko 0i C N I lfl CO v N N N •rm f~ r•i I . O O 'C O O O I O ita 0 I 100 O 4` Cl O I O N 1 p C1 CO Cf10 r•+ _ N co COn-� ( ko � i �d N �--I W r N I N ( ~ �+ 3 Its V o O o o p 0000 o c © 000 >~ O O O 0 0 0 0 0I O ' LOON f",. O O O co 1 w w • s` gal �.' ?+ w w • C7 tf� O b `N Ln Ln t0 6 -I ft G) O•h-• N I N !7 coOC O ( to O I .1 u wo 0000 0 O _ O QO O G M O 0 Ob 0 O I O Cl O O O O LO O Ow 0 O to O to { O o O 00 o v� w n w w w n tt ) to LO N o h r` N j th LO h - en fr Ol I C11 N tD OD r r-d © W � 2 0. E" F- O at CV a• Ot= O > 1 19 ( o + z o U~ w vt t I I i Z roMEN IQ N +Q O E as 6 rr C m as A � » ,� ...w I;d a w • • • = > 1 � W zata � + >K z p `d O O 1 p 96 j N i Csm c U Oi ( m zto' < •p wU m y 23 moi' b V C iQ O d Q 03 m W , Vo < W � ° : � $ S � 0 a y 0 < z z � ca •vc � � '� ' am $ a o wz ^ � � v4c Q � � " > � < � � � 6 r ICU qz < W � Q z I ccmi < r n a ( •W 14 V ROFESSIONAL LANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC . August 4 , 1989 David J . Unmacht City Manager City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake , MN 55372 Dear Mr . Unmacht , over the last several years it has been my pleasure to be associated with Prior Lake ' s economic development efforts . During that time I have become familar with the City of Prior Lake , its economic development organizations , governmental structure and staff . I believe this knowledge puts Professional Planning and Development Company , Inc . in a unique position to respond to the City ' s request for proposal for Prior Lake ' s Industrial Development Location Study . As our proposal will show , PP & D understands the purpose of the study and the necessity to work very closely with City staff and officials to accomplish the task within the allotted timeframe and budget . PP & D will assign several individuals to the preparation of this study . PP & D will use a team approach to completing the study . While I will act as project manager , the scope of the work coupled with the eight to ten week timeframe will require other PP & D staff to work closely on the project . Bruce Eisenhauer will be the second major member of our team . While Roger Guenette will assist in selected parts of the study . It is my hope that Professional Planning and Development Company ' s relationship with the City will continue through the preparation of this study . We look forward to this opportunity with enthusiasm and determination . Sincerely , 4,�OJOLA46 Edward M . Tschida 360 Pierce Avenue , Suite 220 North Mankato , Minnesota 56001 507-345- 1290 Fax 507-387-6843 r.; ' " x'J. � v +�i . _ ra,+ ewID.ri.s .:h:. ch.• . . -: - r.- - ±•e*e+'r3xa+na t'., a..nnae-arati.. . - .'�.:- a. .: .(ham- s . fir,it r--:� x :n.nb . .4>H. . PROPOSAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATION STUDY PRIOR LAKE , MINNESOTA AUGUST 7 , 1989 Submitted by PROFESSIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY , INC . 360 Pierce Avenue , Suite 220 North Mankato , MN 56001 ( 507 ) 345 - 1290 INTRODUCTION Professional Planning and Development Company , Inc . ( PP & D ) is pleased to submit our proposal to the City of Prior Lake for the provision of the Industrial Park Location Study . Industrial development is an integral component of a community ' s comprehensive approach to economic development . PP & D believes that we can provide a valuable service to Prior Lake by identifying the most feasible sites and necessary amenities for the successful development of an industrial park . Since its founding in 1976 , PP & D has established relationships with public and private organizations for the purpose of economic development . PP & D ' s approach to economic development has been to identify the client ' s needs and develop a strategy to accomplish those needs . These strategies have included preparation of business plans , financial packaging , federal / state program packaging , comprehensive plans and specialized studies . Recently , PP & D conducted the analysis and prepared the redevelopment strategy for the Armour Place / Stockyard Industrial Park in South St . Paul . Planning and designing an industrial park is a complex process that requires significant research , vision and understanding of the changing needs of business and industry . Traditionally , industrial parks were areas in the community designated for " heavy " manufacturing . Today , most parks are really business parks with mixed uses varying from high density residential , office complexes , commercial to light industrial . Communities must adopt effective strategies to capitalize on these trends and capture development opportunities . Because of our on - going consulting relationship with the City , PP & D is well aware of Prior Lake ' s successful management of residential growth and of the community ' s efforts to enhance the tax base and provide increased services and job opportunities by planning for increased commercial and industrial development . PP & D ' s knowledge of the community will be advantageous to the successful implemen - tation of the project . PROJECT ORGANIZATION PP & D has reviewed Prior Lake ' s request for proposals for industrial site selection and will prepare the Study in three phases . In all phases , PP & D will take the lead role in coordinating the activities and elements of each task . Phase I will address the implications and identify the components of an industrial park . Phase II will include an analysis of preliminary site feasibility , design alternatives and options for amenities to serve various developments . PP & D will evaluate various locations within the community for the possible development of an this analysis and ensuing discussions will be a industrial park . The outcome of recommendation of the best site with a strategy for implementation . Phase III of the Study will be the preparation and presentation of a final document outlining in detail the Study process and listing action steps for implementation . Presentation of the Study ' s findings and recommendations will be made to City staff and officials . 1 PP & D will encourage and solicit interaction from staff and commission and council members throughout this process . An effective communication channel will be established to disseminate information to appropriate City staff and officials . Study participants will need to be involved in order to understand the rationale of the findings thus allowing for the successful implementation of the program . Through its past relationships with the City , PP & D has been made aware of Prior Lake ' s staff capabilities and resources . Given the Study ' s timeline , budget and goal PP & D believes that much of the work will have to depend on existing informa . tion . The keys to preparing a useful Study under these circumstances will be the ability of the consultant and city staff to identify , research , analyze and present up - to - date , materials and findings on the elements of industrial park development which impact Prior Lake . PP & D expects that the staff will be able to . 1 . Provide past plans , studies and reports useful to the Study . 2 . Update the consultant on the status of current planning and projects affecting industrial park location . 3 . Provide the consultant with insights and contacts as to informative resources in other governmental agencies . For example , the City engineer will have the most knowledge , insight and contacts regarding transportation issues . 4 . Review and comment on Study results throughout the process . While PP & D will take the lead on each Study element and be responsible for the final report , we will rely on the timely provision of materials and cooperation of staff to complete the Study within the timeline . WORK PLAN The goal of the INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATION STUDY is the identification of the most feasible sites for development of an industrial park . This will be ac . complished by preparing a well researched report which provides public officials with the data for making sound industrial location policy decisions . The Study will aid the City in determining if industrial development will be a successful endeavor for Prior Lake , and if so , where when and how it should be developed . rbut rmine the implications of an industrial park . When evaluating the impacts trial development most communities readily recognize the importance of e quality transportation , utilities , land and so forth . Equally important , edingly more difficult to evaluate and rate , are intangibles such as y reputation , organization and commitment . PP & D will undertake the g tasks to determine the implications of developing anindustrial park . . Identify both positive and adverse affects of industrial development . 7 - Research the adverse affects of industrial development , such as , increased traffic , burden on public services , increased demand on public utilities and so forth . All , Research the positive affects of industrial development , such as , more jobs and job opportunities , increased taxes , and so forth . VJ 2 • 2 . Identify the market potential , competition and anticipated level of success . Research industrial growth trends , amenities required to support such growth and the likelihood of attracting industrial development to Prior Lake . Research and identify the competition - most importantly the competi - tion in the Southwest Metro area . The importance of this step is not so much to identify the amount and location of the competition ( for competition will always exist ) , but rather , it will seek to identify the characteristics of successful industrial parks . Location , amenities , price , tenant mix and management are representative of the traits which will be examined . Identify the traits and characteristics of successful industrial parks . By identifying these items the City is in the position to determine if it can provide the fundaments of a successful industrial park . Evaluate the existing community organizational structure responsible for implementing an industrial park development . Determine the adequacy of the structure and recommend changes or a new organization , such as a development corporation , for project implementation . B . Identify the components of an industrial park . In addition to identifying the traditional components of an industrial park - available land , utilities , transpor - tation , labor and so on - PP & D will provide an industrial developer ' s perspective by recognizing the importance of site readiness , investment protection and financial incentives as development prerequisites . PP & D will undertake the following tasks to determine the components of an industrial park . 1 . Identify the physical needs of an industrial park . - Identify physical and natural elements such as , topography , landscap - ing and soil conditions which directly impact development possibili - ties . 2 . Determine infrastructure needs . Research and identify what types of infrastructure improvements should be installed or made available near the site . Industry is typically more interested in developed land versus raw land . 3 . Determine adequacy of transportation networks . Research and identify if inhibiting conditions such as , weight restrictions on bridges and / or roadways exist . Research and identify planned improvements and / or new developments in the transportation system . If improvements are planned , when and where will these occur . By identifying these elements , an assessment can be made as to how this will impact development possibilities . 3 4 . Relate developer ' s perception to traditional site components . Identify and evaluate the developers perception of the modern industrial park . Determine the importance of non - traditional development factors . PHASE II A are reliminar site feasibilit . Alternate sites will be analyzed to A . Prep p y y determine development potential . When making this analysis , it will be important to evaluate such factors as topography , serviceability by utilities , accessibility to transportation and price . Other factors equally important for consideration include , possible future expansion , protection by zoning laws from conflicting uses and freedom from encumbrances such as separately held mineral rights or easements that may restrict maximum use of the site . PP & D will undertake the following tasks in preparation of preliminary site feasibility . 1 . Identify properties meeting the siting criteria and discuss the merits of each site . l� - Research and identify various locations within the community or adjacent areas which could be annexed by the City . U A Identify and analyze both the positive and negative merits of each site such as , topography , soils condition , proximity to existing transportation networks , utilities , complimentary businesses and visibility for marketing . 2 . Identify necessary infrastructure improvements , cost estimates and timeframes for implementation . Identify infrastructure improvements such as , the extension of water and sewer , lift stations , gas and electricity for each site . Identify and compare how infrastructure costs will impact the potential development of each site . Develop a flow chart to illustrate the tasks to be accomplished . Once established , tasks can be assigned with timeframes for completion . 3 . Discuss the City ' s potential financial investment . - Identify who is responsible for development costs such as , land acquisition , site preparation and infrastructure improvements . Identify source and use of funds from such sources as , HUD ( CDBG ) , l�G State Economic Development Loans and Grants and Tax Increment Financing . - Evaluate the possibility of establishing a public / private partnership for this venture . One possibility to investigate would be a coalition with the Indian Reservation and their ability to use Federal funds . 4 4 . Identify regulatory restrictions . Identify and discuss all regulatory restrictions as they relate to sites and industry . The importance of this step is to identify restrictions such as , compliance with land use , zoning , present / poten - tial environmental concerns , flood plain management and Clean Water Act . B . Selection of best site and preparation of implementation strategy . When selecting the site of an industrial park , it is important to give strong considera - tion to the physical elements of the site . But more importantly , the success of the industrial park will depend upon the implementation strategy , management and marketing of the site . PP & D will undertake the following tasks to select the best site and prepare a strategy for implementation of the development of the site . 1 . Identify the site , infrastructure improvements and best use of the site . Selection of the site will be based on the comparative analysis of alternate sites including such elements as , physical features , affordability , potential restrictive measures and projected tenants of the park . The use of the park is a critical element in site selec - tion . For example , a business or office park would not have strong negative impact near a residential area as would heavy manufacturing . In identifying infrastructure improvements , it will be important that these be adequate , efficient and flexible to accommodate potential users . 2 . Discuss potential city policy for financial assistance . - Identify and discuss the city ' s role in providing financial assistance for business expansion and / or relocation . A policy shall be adopted and uniformly applied for such incentives as tax increment financing . This policy should include appropriate use and the extent of City involvement which will be fair and equitable to all . 3 . Identify development organization . Identify the type of local development organization which can be responsible for program implementation . Evaluate if public or private development or some combination is the most feasible arrangement for constructing , financing , marketing and managing the park . PHASE III A . Prepare a final report summarizing the findings . The preparation of the final report is essential for providing sound public policy to implement the development of an industrial park . Success of the park will depend on the City ' s ability to implement , - manage and market the site . PP & D will undertake the following tasks to prepare the final report summarizing the findings of the study . 5 1 . Discuss the study methodology . - Describe the process of the study and provide insight for its rationale of the findings and recommendations . 2 . Provide an executive summary . Briefly highlight the major findings and conclusions of the study . 3 . Clearly outline the information gathered in the study process . Provide a reference manual of all components of the study including such items as , marketing strategies and financing options for implementation of the project . 4 . Provide graphics to support recommendations gathered in the study process . Provides quick reference to such items as , timeframes for implementa - tion , locational preference to land use , zoning and transportation networks . 5 . Provide a timeframe for implementation . Identify in a logical order the steps necessary to implement the project . Provide timeframes and responsibilities to appropriate individuals or agencies for such items as , deadlines for submission of grants to fund eligible activities , engineering reports , installation of services , and marketing of the project . PROJECT STAFFING The following individuals will be assigned to this project : Project Manager - Edward Tschida Bruce Eisenhauer Roger Guenette Enclosed are resumes of these individuals : PERSONAL RESUMES EDWARD M . TSCHIDA , DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST AND PROJECT MANAGER Edward M . Tschida is the senior staff member of PP & D having joined the firm shortly after its founding in 1978 . Since joining the firm Mr . Tschida has worked with numerous communities to boost economic expansion through well thought out commercial , industrial , downtown revitalization , residential and office projects . He has directly participated with over 100 cities and private companies in development efforts generating over 200 million dollars of economic expansion . Central to his efforts has always been a philosophy promoting an efficient public - private partnership . Prior to joining PP & D , Mr . Tschida worked with the City of Mankato and the Mid . Ohio Regional Planning Commission in Columbus , Ohio . Mr . Tschida holds a B . A . and M . A . degrees from St . Cloud and Mankato State Universities , respectively . He has 6 actively pursued continuing education in the area of economic development and maintains professional affiliations with the Minnesota Industrial Development Association and the Minnesota Planning Association . ROGER G . GUENETTE , DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST AND PROJECT MANAGER Roger G . Guenette has served as a development specialist and project manager for PP & D since 1983 . During this period he has successfully implemented numerous marketing , and development projects . He possesses a thorough understanding of the region ' s economy , factors which impact a company ' s locational decision and the tools and resources available to make a deal happen . From 1978 to 1983 he worked as an Employment and Training Planner and Economic Development Coordinator for Region Nine Development Commission . During that period he successfully organized and staffed the Region Nine Development Corporation . In addition to holding B . A . , B . S . and M . S . degrees from Mankato State University he has successfully completed the National Development Council ' s economic development training curriculum . Since 1986 he has taught courses in Community Economic Development as part of the adjunct faculty at Mankato State University . In January , 1988 he presented a seminar on Targeted Marketing For Economic Development at the NAHRO mid -winter conference . BRUCE A . EISENHAUER , DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST AND PROJECT ASSISTANT Bruce A . Eisenhauer has served as a project assistant and housing analyst for PP & D since March , 1989 . During this time he has completed numerous feasibility studies and assisted in the preparation of successful development projects . Through his experience , he had developed the skills , knowledge and understanding to promote economic development . Prior to joining PP & D , Mr . Eisenhauer worked as the Program Director for a downtown revitalization program under the auspices of the National Main Street Program . During that period he successfully organized and coordinated downtown rehabilitation efforts . He holds a B . A . and M . B . A . degrees from Mankato State University . 7 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS The City of Prior Lake is familiar with the skills and expertise of PP & D as a result of an ongoing consultant relationship since 1984 . PP & D provides a wide array of economic development consultant services including research , business development services , financial packaging and development planning . In 1988 , the Minnesota Industrial Development Association presented PP & D with their " Economic Developer Of The Year " award in recognition of our firm ' s accomplishments . Specific projects which PP & D has undertaken that are similar to the proposed work identified herein include : " Study Of Preliminary Factors Affecting The Overall Redevelopment Program For Armour Place / Stockyard Industrial Park " ; " Analysis And Financing Of Infrastructure Needs For Blandin Paper Company Expansion In Grand Rapids , Minnesota " . Following is a corporate resume : CORPORATE RESUME OF PROFESSIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY , INC . Company Background Incorporated in 1978 , Professional Planning and Development Company , Inc . ( PP & D ) is in its tenth year of providing economic development consulting services to both public and private clients . PP & D has worked on behalf of over 100 governmental units and a similar number of private clients . PP & D ' s financial analysis and packaging services , include : tax increment financing ; grant writing ; federal and state loan processing ; limited partnership and syndication offerings ; negotiating private financing , tax exempt mortgages and revenue bonds ; preparing business plans and economic development studies ; and developing over $ 15 , 000 , 000 of real estate . In addition to providing technical skills to clients , PP & D has successfully demonstrated an ability to negotiate and structure significant developments under economic constraints that may be accurately described as difficult ; the majority of the projects which PP & D assisted in 1988 are located in rural Minnesota where new economic development is contrary to general trends . The success of Messrs . Guenette and Tschida in promoting rural development is directly related to their commitment and concern for the people they serve . ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS - 1988 Albert Lea - Negotiated and implement tax increment financing plan for 40 , 000 sq . ft . Port Authority owned industrial spec building . Assisted city in structuring a real estate package which resulted in sale of tax forfeited lots for the construction of a 40 unit apartment to serve Vo - tech population . Restructured the city ' s existing tax increment districts . Over a five year period this restructuring will provide in excess of $ 1 million of economic development capital . These funds will be available through the Port Authority to assist new or expanding businesses in a variety of ways . 8 Big Lake - Negotiated and implemented tax increment financing plan to promote 10 , 000 sq . ft . distribution facility . Crystal Foods - Researched , structured and negotiated , financing package enabling $ 790009000 , 60 , 000 sq . ft . production facility in Gaylord , Mn . Fergus Falls - Researched , analyzed and restructured 11 tax increment financing districts resulting in modifications which will enable additional redevelopment in CBD and industrial expansion in industrial parks . Grand Rapids - Structured , negotiated and implemented comprehensive financing package resulting in $ 10 million in public improvements which enabled $ 350 million expansion by Blandin Paper Company . Kenyon - Structured and negotiated tax increment financing package for 12 , 000 sq . ft . grocery / drug store . Owatonna - Negotiated public financing structure to promote $ 7 . 1 million , 200 , 000 sq . ft . expansion of Owatonna Tool Company . Pine Island - Teamed with Rochester Area Economic Development , Inc . to package redevelopment project for 16 , 000 sqm ft , industrial expansion and future acquisition of up to 20 substandard residences . Prior Lake - Packaged redevelopment project for downtown site . Sartell - Packaged tax increment financing plan for 55 , 000 sq . ft , in - dustrial facility . South St . Paul - Prepared study analyzing factors affecting redevelopment of Armour Place and Stockyards ( 100 acres ) industrial property . Conclusions of study were used to justify purchase of the 46 acres by HRA to promote redevelopment . In addition packaged financing programs to facilitate 78 unit multi - family housing project and 40 , 000 sq , ft . of commercial redevelopment . Wabasso - Structured financing package including Economic Recovery Grant and tax increment financing program to enable construction of $ 4001000 , 21 , 000 sq . ft . manufacturing expansion . This project resulted in creation of 40 new jobs and retention of 35 existing positions . Welcome - Developed proposal which has resulted in commitment of Eagle Engineering and Manufacturing Company to construct $ 2 million , 50 , 000 sq . ft . facility in Welcome , Minnesota . This project will create 70 new jobs and retain 75 existing positions . Total Investments Leveraged - $ 384 , 7709000 Total Number Jobs Created / Retained - 20297 Total Square Footage Constructed / Redeveloped - 1 , 286 , 000 9 CLIENT REFERENCES Included for your review is a copy of the study we conducted for South St . Paul . For additional information regarding our role in projects of similar scope please feel free to contact : Branna Lindell Paul Vanderlinde South St . Paul HRA Executive Director Consulting Engineer 125 North Third Street Rieke , Carroll , Muller Associates , Inc . South St . Paul , MN 55075 15 Northeast Fifth Street ( 612 ) 451 - 1838 Grand Rapids , MN 55744 ( 218 ) 326 - 4508 PROJECT TIMELINE Work on the Phases I and II of the project will commence upon authorization to proceed by the City . Phase I is expected to last approximately 30 days . Phase II will begin at the same time as Phase I and is expected to take 45 to 60 days . Phase III will require 15 - 30 days to complete and will commence approximately 45 - 60 into the project . The estimated timeframe for the entire project is 60 - 75 days . PROJECT BUDGET The project budget is estimated as follows : Phase I $ 5 , 000 85 hrs . Phase II 79000 126 hrs . Phase III 2 , 500 40 hrs . TOTAL $ 14 , 500 251 hrs . $ 57 . 75 / hr . The project manager will bill out at $ 75 per hour ; associates at $ 50 per hour . PP & D services include all expenses and support staff . Copies of documents are included in the project cost . PP & D does not limit the number of meetings in regard to the project . 10 OrSC CTT , BUILDERSINC . A SCOTTLAND COMPANY O February 15 , 1989 Ms . D . Kay Schmudlach City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street S . E . P . O . Box 359 Prior Lake , MN 55372 RE : Prior Lake Shopping Center Kay , Enclosed is a copy of the traffic study you requested . As you will note , this is still in a preliminary draft form . Please call me to arrange a review meeting with the consultant . S n ely , C( ( c ohnso� Enc o ure P. O . Box 509 1244 Canterbury Road Shakopee , Minnesota 55379 ( 612 ) 445 - 3242 Barton - Aschman Associates , Inc . 111 Third Avenue South , Suite 350 Phone : ( 612) 332 -0421 Minneapolis , Minnesota 55401 Fax : (612) 332-6180 USA February 13 , 1989 Mr . Zack Johnson c/o Scott Builders , Inc . P . O . Box 509 Shakopee , MN 55379 Bear Zack : Enclosed you will find three copies of the draft Prior Lake Shopping Center Traffic and Access Study dated February 10 , 1989 . The items that were discussed at our February 7th meeting have been incorporated into the traffic report and are ready for your review and submittal to the city . I believe the only missing item in the traffic report is Figure 2 , the updated site plan . This poses no problem and can be included in the final version of the report when it is ready . If you have any further questions or comments , please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely , ::1 Daniel T . Meyers Associate DIM .e kro 1 � l� \ a�()O S�0 "y � t � ° r C •• � 0,4 VF TRAMC AND ACCESS STUDY FOR PRIOR IARE SElOPPIM CENTER AT TRMM HIGHRAY 1.3 AMID FIVE EAMS AVENUE PRIOR LAKE , MINNESOTA Prepared For : Scott Builders , Inc . Prepared BY ' Associates , Inc . FebnuLry 10 , 1989 =ICK Scott Builders , Inc . , is proposing the drrvelopment of a new shcpping center in the southwest quadrant of Trunk Highway 13 (TH 13 ) and Five Hawks Avenue in Prior Lake , Minnesota . The site is bordered on the north by TH 13 , on the south by 170th Street , and by c=tty State Aid Highway 23 ( MM 23 ) on the east . Five Hawks Avenue runs north- and forms a T intersection with TH 13 at time proposed entrance of the shcpping center . Figure 1 indicates time site location with respect to time existing roadways and the rest of the region . Two driveways for ingress to and egress from the shopping cuter are proposed on TH 13a Time driveway at Five Hawks Avenue will allow for all turning movements and the driveway west of Five Hawks Avenue will allow for only a right4n and a riot-out turning movements TWO driveways will provide access to the shopping center off of 170th Street . The site configuration for the project calls for a total of 52 , 700 gross square feet of retail space consisting of 1 . Festival Foods - 33 , 500 gsf 2 * Walgreens - 11 , 200 gsf 3 . Small Retail - 8 , 000 gsf A total of parking spaces will be provided for vehicles generated to the site . Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan . 1 30. RACINE ST. 0U 1L.{ TS 122" w W INo SONG Q AVE. `(� tP \ ` ~ W ty 22. 14 154th ST. > ' $ �p. ADRIANANO W umu ST. �^ i 21 , CIR. N 01W oN'S A COL 4 ' h a 4 CDL `j� RlJnf < HOPE si . i u LEM%.Ey U " 13 C� 41� N ' F a f 19. OU1NCY ST, CENTENNIAL ST, d 77 9 BASS ST. 20. SUNFISH IR. 9 u 26 19, 21, LAKEVIEW CIR, I'mi +�4 c� C 22. BIANCA CIR. 24. WESTWOOD < 0 O n 23. FA [R8ANK5 TR. 14 160th " ST. it w S 24. GATEWAY ST , c, a 2i i � 25, WALKER AVE. 041t07 OAK St, 4 Q� BOUNTY ST. S ? f y E50 to St . I _ ` � y't, CLI DC H 21 G< � CROSSA A 57. (� Prto/ L_ akA = Vl W i Long Tree � > " Cot ADO 5TT N ©9 RD SINSGN CIF . g < Island O m PLEASANT ST. ST, CATES < 5T. > .�- 1 J� �W < S �'+ ( TR. 29. � < N t 9 NETS AtcE 26. i 13 GREEN z ST . J < P� n trtoo Twln Isle x < � < pRJORVIE ST . g 9 m tP► `Z! 6 ISG 2 r 4C i 12 jy 5T. w Wo U c G u ' OV WI LE gE ,a ` 31. ROOSEVELT ST. too, m . 32. DMADONA BEACH CIR. W �,� 1 IAEA �1,f G`¢��f� t 'tn• -' 31 RauSEr AVE. ii rj i A O A �. - ILO" BEALTI 34. CREEKYIEW CIR. r- TAC�i1 C� O ST. c S' � 35. BASSWOOD RD. 3 TOWEq y ` l iKALE ,"I i m ( 2 • YI ST, HILL T S 34. c1R. N 10+h N 5T. a r — to, ¢ BALSAM ST. 0 � 170th ST. 1 y d IN . 13 � 1�4 a T114N R22W 12 PRIOR LAKE - 1980 POP . 7284Li ro�ti 174th l ST;. 13 Ria 23 17611) s>; L tAw "Po �yv < <. e MAPLE DR, i a 0 1011 o IS IA TITAN R22• w //Y • 180th ST. E. W > W < C H D ' > 182nd ST . E. < < !82nd� ST, E. tool W G N 3 u � a o W < y Y < � tool N < L �tool m W luta LA. [j aka COUNTRY UlA i < i x z s Site Location 20 Barton - Aschman Associates , Inc . Figure 1 Land Use The primary land use around the proposed Prior Lake Stopping Center site is general business and residential . The site is currently vacant with a McDonald ' s restaurant operating just east of the proposed develapnent . The land to the north , south , and west of the site is primarily vacant with scatterings of single-family residential homes and conservation areas . Directly to the north on Five Hawks Avenue is a church arra an elementary school and to the east are strip commercial centers and individual businesses . Street and Hi sties Tnmk Highway 13 is a major east- west arterial street extending through Prior Lake from the east at CSAH 42 and to the west at County Road 81 ( CR 81 ) . Zhis highway is a two-lane facility with turn lanes at major intersectio . Parking is prohibited on both sides of TH 13 . A 45 mph speed limit is posted in this area . CSAR 23 is a north south minor arterial which intersects with ZH 13 from the south opposite Creekside Circle . This roadway is a two-lane rural design facility with gravel shoulders . Parking is prohibited on both sides of CSAR 23 northerly and southerly of 'IIS 13 . Stop signs control access from CSAH 23 3 and Creekside Circle onto TH 13 . A 45 mph speed limit is posted south of TH 13 and a 30 mph speed limit is pasted north of TH 13 . Five Hawks Avenue is a north-south local street which "T ' s" into Zai 13 from the north , opposite the McDor al.d ' s restaurant driveway . This roadway is a two-lane rural design facility with caravel shoulders that allows ams to a church parking lot and an elementary school . During the peak school hours nLxh of the traffic on Five Hawks Avenue is from school buses and during the P . M . school peak ( 3 : 15 to 3 : 30 ) school buses are aided by a traffic guard to efficiently and safely negotiate left turns from Five Hawks Avenue onto TH 13 . A stop sign controls Five Hawks Avenue traffic accessing TH 13 . A 30 speed limit is posted in the vicinity . ExigtjW Traffic Volumes Traffic volume data was obtained from Scott County and the Minnesota D4xulment of Transportation (MnDOT) . Traffic counts (peak hour) cor&r ted at the intersections of TH 13 at (SAH 23/Creekside Circle and TH 13 at Five Hawks Avenue/McDonald ' s restaurant driveway indicate the peak hour of traffic activity is between 4 : 30 and 5 : 30 P . M . Figure 3 illustrates the existing P . M . peak4yxw traffic volumes . The average daily traffic volume data prwided by Scott County and MnDOT is displayed in Figure 4 . 4 U) c') cN m C um O L- £ O t s o � st ccs CD ez 3l0ari 1� HbsC) 301SN3380 —� \ • t - < << �t °Ov co 0) r sa � o< <� CO ,i-- EL W 3Ad SNMVH 3Ai3 Zt _--� 0 Q w � ui y� Q ?iy N Q �y o c �2 E �� v C i m 5 U et ~ tz w ~ Li 41:O >1% ~ � RS _J Q Cc Q Q cC0 0) z CD cz Z ® COCc (D Q 0 " *0 P = 0 ~ uo. ¢ 3 Q ;' pre co m °° c 0) ca r' c C: ca Z rn w- J 310810 301SN3383 E � S `E " EZ Neso ca c » c _ o x � 3AV S )4MVH 3/113w m m Y CW c 3 ®® N o CL `n c o E c m � m E C c o C a i y c = m ►- r o w � c E cmc m o 3 Q m o ° C Z mc N m m v o C V J D o w � L -� ; C Zi Q CDv cis O ^ t U � m fie Capacity and level of servioe analyses were Perform at the ions of TH 13 at CSAH 23/ Creekside Circle and TH 13 at Five Hawks Avemie/ ald ' s restaurant driveway in a000rdance with the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual - Zhe results of the capacity analysis indicate that existing levels of sPxv0 are to with excess capacity on Mi 13 , CSAH 23 , and Five Hawks Avenue . A Level of Service A was calculated for all P . M . peak hour existing eig conditions . Table 1 shows the intersection level of service , the average delays , and the volume to capacity ratio . Capacity analysis worksheets can be found in the Apperdix . TABIE 1 MSTING 'TRAFFIC CAPACrrY AND IEVEL OF SERVICE Level may Volume/ Intersection of Service (Seconds) Capacity I OEM INCOME WINE I OEM MINE WINE= WIN= I I MCI TH 13 at CSAR 23/ Creekside Circle A 4 . 6 . 38 P . M . Peak Dour TH 13 at Five Hawks Avenue/ McDonald ' s Driveway A 3 . 1 • 37 P . M . Peak Figur Level of service of an intersection is the measurement of the average stop delay of a vehicle and is desiccated by a letter A the F , with A r�preseritinq the smallest delay . The delay is a function of a drivers ' frustration , di.s�ort , mel ion and lost time . The illustration 7 below describes each level of service with the associated vehicular delay and V/C ratio . rEscpjpT,cN of Imis of SERVICE Descrintion III MCI WINE Oil The fi flow co�ditian is a ' ed by low A Traffic moves freely • The major vols . All waiting vehicles clear on ceze vehicle is movements have a low pe�� of stops (average delay Per less than 5 ) • B Traffic moves fairly freely . volumes are stills what low . Waiting vehicles will still probably clear on one green phase . Traffic on this major movement can expe�-'t less than a 50 percent chance of stopping ( average delay per vehicle is less than 15 ) . C Traffic moves smoothly Volumes are beginning to i rr�f 6 • Some minor movements may not clear on one green phase , Traffic on the major zent can eupet. a 50 charge Of of stoppuxJ �emc ( average delay Per vehicle is less than 25 seconds) * ur�stable flaw . ale intersection operation D Traffic approaching intersection movements may not clear on one for peak periods . Manyntersee Tr is on the major Can vehcle greater less than 50 percent chance of stappirg ( average delay Per 40 se=eds)* flow . Volumes at or rear caPacity E Unstable traffic f . No vehicles are able to go t1rYxx3h the intersectio without having to stop ( average delay per vehicle is less than 60 seconds) . • volumes are over capacity . All vehicles wi F Saturation condition ll more than one green phase ( average delay stop and will probably regaire per vehicle is greater than 60 seconds) . 8 ANMXM pRIOR T.A.10 swPPnrjC Gmeration Traffic volumes gated by the shWpim miter �elare based on dip generation rates utilized in other similar studiesfor develo�en� of this size . sources of the trip tion rates jnclude0 the Institute of Transportation Engineers ' Tri Generation Manual , fourth edition and historical rates frm Ian files . Tri rates are illustrated for the A . M . and P . M . peak tours . Table 2 displays thetrip �� rates used to derive the developent progran ' s traffic volumes TABLE 2 Vgac E TRITp G UPATIO N RATES Time period A . M . Peak Hour P . M . Peak Hour In Out Out LandUse III: MINE 111 11 1 1111 11 1111 WIN MCI Will: 0 . 55 0 . 24 3 . 18 2 . 93 � * Festival Foals* 0 . 38 0 . 16 4 . 5 4 . 32 0 . 45 0 . 14 2 . 5 2 . 31 Small Retail* *ppY 1 , 000 square feet discussed fie , the resulting development Basedon the level of ted traffic volumes are illus�� in Table 3 . gerexa9 TABLE 3 Ic VOURCS Ron GnW�AM MINI Time period A . M . Peak In P . M . � In ZAnd Use 6 3 36 33 Mlgreems 13 5 151 145 Festival20Foods 1 18 4 S .11 Retail 23 9 207 196 Total 111 11 RIM 11 11 rtuare on of and was based on 4.LA 1 population TL-a f f is dix'ection of approach cation within a f ive-mile radius of t1� proposed Prior Lake shopping centers the This �zus was of to et the trip center • To assess Prior Lake CBD location andtlbe river barriersof the • d 1°ni the population in each traffic asci Twmt zone (TAI to- g�tropolitan bilis forecast was recorded for 1986 (the most UP" papulation data) and the Y� 2000 . P ation was �t� polated to date the ted year 1990 populatil or the Prod s the shopping cent determine opal fora fu11 year • Traffic would have been from each TAZ was then igned to a highwaY or street serving that area . ,s e overall distribution by directional approach and giqure 5 shows the , s Pro")seat traffic . Of the Bevel ...... ........... ....... . . . . .. 10 C ^_ Ln O o d O n S] cYis u.. cc '- m 3 N a o � g U CL Qm C ` a z Q � m o 0 E � � o� v�N P`I CL co O .c Q1 U coQ ® a CL Q o 310810 301SN3380 . >!Z HVSO C V C � C O to O W w 3AV SNMVH 3A13 W t w U) t v o C r w tir 0 sn as a . c �a s J t N o 1 31 C4 3 N I U Traffic hnjgg�zdevelopment site traffic was assigned to the street according to the � �ributIM by direction of approach/dediscussed a 'e • Figure 6 illustrates the P . M . peak�u de traffic . Although trip teas worked out for A . M . peek arra P . M . peak , the "worst case generation stmt sys"t� could be most adversely scenario" or where the affected by dwelopment traffic was found to be during the P . M . Peak hour ( 4 : 30 to 5 : 30 ) . nle 1990 (year of proposed develop full occL4Y ) background street traffic voles were � determir�dby q the existing traffic by an annual growth factor of three Percent Per Year ' Zhis factor is based cn the historical. increase Cbsezv� from MnD0N s AI7r records frog► ic in this area . rMe 1990 total traffic was then 1980. to 1986 of traff vel by t:he p development P k �r traffic to the 1990 rcpOs -})our traffic . Figure 7 illustrates the pro3ec-ted 1990 P . M . ba&gmmid peak: peak4yx= intersection volumes with and without the Pry Prior Ia}ce shopping center . pro� ®cfed Ti�►fficDact Using the 1990 P . M . peak-hcur traffic projections , capacity and level of service analyses were performed at the intersecti�ss of ►� 13 at CSAR 23/C reekside Circle and `IH 13 at Five hawks Avenue,/McD d ' s restaurant driveway . Mm)e analysis , wbm =pared to the capacity analysis for the existing 00MLitions , detexmit ed that no significant CiWW in level of i would occur with the Proposed Prior service , delay , or volume Over capacity 12 LM IU 0 o m LL d � O co ... O O� — 0 �" C 3 � � ar� ez Hds� a? o 30ISN3380 o -i o0e + O CDae0 Gp � O co LM (D 00 1pe �--- Im �— 0 i— ss 3Ad S )iMdH 3A13 0 0 \ 0 ____i 0p �e c N Q W W � W ui y6 a: (If fly � Q �S, o C �2 E t b� � Q C t 13 E Y _cn > m u. CPU ) �� k — Lot Lot 4e \i O 301SA3380 o f £ £ �ew ooa p� . CD �y O '�--- 99t sz ,� es bt 3Ad SAMVH 3AIJ trl � t oAa o V C w m w � ~ 'v �` w O cc mc ma C 0 0 52d� r V C t t0 m 14 z Lake shopping center development traffic added to TH 13 . Table 4 illustrates the projected level of service , delay , and volume over capacity ratios for these intersections . The capacity analysis worksheets can be found in the Appendix . Descriptions of level of service can be found earlier in this report . TABLE 4 1990 PRa7EC1!ED TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND IE'VEL OF SERVICE Level Delay volume/ Intersection of Service (Seconds ) Opacity TH 13 at MAH 23/ Creekside Circle Without Site B+ 6 . 7 . 44 With Site B+ 6 . 9 . 53 TH 13 at Five Hawks Avenue/ McDonald ' s Driveway Without Site A 3 . 2 . 38 With Site B} 7 . 5 . 43 �Itms The cont design for the slapping venter provides Parking spaces . This results in a ratio of spaces per 1 , 000 gross square feet (gsf) . This ratio provides more than erzxxjh parking when ccepared to reocmmnded ratios for spaces per 1 , 000 gsf of snapping venter space . 'Ile Institute of Transportation Engineers , Barkin4 Cex*ration , reocmmids 3 . 2 spaces per 1 , 000 gsf and Barton-Aschman historical parking data shows a more five five spaces per 1 , 000 gsf . The parkingprovided is in accordance with the City of Prior Lake ' s ordinance for parking M MentS at shopping centers ( five spaces per 11000 gsf) . 15 The layout of the parking bays on the concepbjal plan is cotisistent with the aligroent of the access and internal circulation roads * It also provides the site with the most safe and efficient use of parking space . site Appess and Circulation nie current design of the Prior Lake Shopping Ctenter includes access driveways on 'IH 13 aligned with Five Hawks Avenue to the east arra a right- Wright-cxit driveway to the west * TWO driveways will give access to 170th Street . Primary ingress and egress to the site for cxu. t. n s and employees will bevia the ZH 13 driveways . Delivery trite and some employees will use the driveways off of 170th Street . It is a possibility that some customwill utilize the driveways on 170th Street , but this is viewed as being minor and does nort affect the overall traffic assignment and capacity analysis . The crk-site circulation pattern allows for overall swath flaw of vehicular traffic from the external roadway system to the parking areas associated with both the Prior Lake shopping enter and the McDonald * restaurant . At the primary woe/exit of the shopping center (ZH 13 and Five Hawks Avenue) , a median will be constructed so vehicles cannot turn into the exit driveway of McDonald ' s . Truck - deliveries will be made from the driveways off of 170th Street . Zhis will prevent a mixture of truck and passenger vehicle traffic in the main 16 parking area and will provide safe and simple trick maneuvering behind the store`s . The amount of truck traffic entering and exiting the site cn a weekl basis will be as follows : Festival Foods - 12 semi-trailer , 10 beverage , 48 step vans , 4and 20 cargo van trucks . Walgreens - 1 semi-trailer trick with miscellaneous small delivery vans sporadically arriving throughout the week . Zhere would be no more than five of these vehicles per week . Other Retail - Small delivery vans not exceeding 10 vehicles per week . Zhe time of deliveries will be during non-peak tunes and can be arranged in advance so as not to cause cn-site congestion prcblems . We see no problems with on-site circulation or adjacent street capacity from the amount of truck traffic listed above . p2m, y State Aid HiMmV 12 ((SAH 12 ) Ri n4 Q Mie City of Prior Lake ' s proposed land use and circulation plan recoar erxis that CSAH 12 be constructed into a ring road scuth of 01 13 . The road would originate in the wrest where CSAH 12 currently ly terminates into '>1i 139 the ring road would follow the alignment of 170th Street to Vine Street to Tower 17 Street to Franklin Trail and back to the existing CSAH 12 in the east near downtown Prior lake . Mie plan will have many benefits , two of which include : the encu ragaT nt of both residential and comiemial development to take place along a new corridor and the likelihood that some of the traffic now traveling on 7H 13 will reroute to the newly aligned CSAH 12 . The movement of some of TH 13 traffic to the ring road will decrease the amount of vehicles on Zai 13 thereby increasing traffic operations safety along this corridor . County State Aid Highway 23 (CSAH 23 ) Ali t As of now CSAH 23 terminates into 4H 13 just east of the McDonald ' s restaurant site . A new alignment has been proposed to alio CSAH 23 with Five Hawks Avenue just to the west of McDonald ' s and along the east boundary of the proposed shopping center site . Our analysis of existing turning movements taken at CSAH 23/Cree3side Circle and Zai 13 , indicates that the primary direction of traffic cn CSAH 23 either comes from or is going towards downtown Prior Iake . The turning movement count shows that 87 percent of CSAH 23 traffic is to or frcm the east and 13 percent of CSAH 23 traffic is to or from the west . In view of this heavy orientation to the east we see no advantage to realigning the roadway furter to the west . 18 A realigned CSAR 23 also presents a safety problem . At the termination of Five Hawks Avenue is a school and it ' s parking lot . ` he realignMent may increase traffic dawn Five Hawks from vehicles looking for a shorter path around Prior Lake . As of now the primary traffic is school buses which operate during specific hours every day . An alternative to realigning CSAR 23 might be to tete CSAR 23 at its junction with CSAH 12 (the new ring road) . This would keep excess traffic from Zai 13 and at the same time place traffic past new businesses and residential developments along the ring road . Traffic Signal Warrant Peak-hour volume signal warrants were conducted for the intersection of TH 13 arra Five Hawks Avenue . During the peak hour ( 4 : 30 to 5 : 30 ) the intersection did not meet a warrant for a signal . Hever , further study should be made once the center has matured and other proposed transportation changes ( i . e . , ring road ) have been implemented . If no further transportation impravements are implemented , and based on current annual traffic growth rates , it we ld appear that a signal would not be warranted for the next 7 to 10 years . With development of the site the worst Level of Service would be B+ , which indicates an abundance of existing capacity . 19 CChxmmICW 1 . Peak traffic flow in the vicinity of the Prior Lake shopping center will occur between 4 : 30 to 5 : 30 P . M . on TH 13 . 2 . Traffic on rIH 13 , CSAH 23 , and Five Hawks Avenue/ eZcnald ' s restaurant driveway is currently operating at satisfactory levels of service . 3 . Traffic generated by the proposed suing center will not have significant impact on traffic operations or safety during peak hours on IIH 13 , CSAH 23 or Five Hawks Avenue . 7 e level of service and capacity on TH 13 remi.ns satisfactory with existing traffic controls . 4 . The proposed intersections and access from the site to TH 13 are satisfactory . Minor modifications will be made to provide acceleration and deceleration lanes on TH 13 . 20 5 . Prior Lake shopping center will not generate new traffic on adjacent residential streets . 6 . Parking provided on-site will be ate to fulfill the city ' s ordinance of five spaces per 1 , 000 gsf . Ibis number is ccnsistent with BartcrAschman ' s reccmendations for the Iain Cities metropolitan area . 7 . Internal site circulation provides safe and efficient traffic operations for custcmers , employees , and truck deliveries . 8 . Ftarrants for a signal were not met at the intersection of TH 13 and Five Hawks Avenue with the initial development of the shopping center . However , further study should be made after the center has matured . 9 . The City of Prior Lake ' s plan for CSAH 12 will provide a ring road that should encourage both ocmnercial and residential development to the south of TH 13 as well as relieve scene minor conge.stien now occurring on TH 13 , east of (SAH 23 . 10 . The realignment of CSAH 23 with Five Hawks Avenue is not reocumended from a safety point of view as well as from a traffic operation view . 21 APPENDIX Capacir.y Analysis Worksbeets r F' F' IOf; LAKE SHOP' P' ING CENTFI INTERSECTION OF T , H , 13 AND CSAH 23 / CREEKSIDE CIRCLE: EXISTTNG PM PEAT ' HOUR VOLUMES 1 / 25 / 89 SIGNAL85 /TEAPAC - CAPACITY ANALYSIS WOEl, I < SHEET i TNTERSECTION AVERAGES : DEGRL E Or SATURATION 30 VEHICULAR DELAY 4 , 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE A 5FOIN-11CI : 11 ! PHASE 1 ! PHASE 2 ! + + ! ! I + + ':: I 9E 9E k 9( I V ! A + + + + 1 ! ! + + + + V ! a * ! V ! ! G / C = 212 ! GMS_, = . 608 ! ! G - 12 . 7 G = 41 . 3 ! ! 'Y = 3 . 0 ! Y = 3 . 0 ! C = 60 SEC: G = 54 . 0 SEC = 90 . 0 ; Y = Z . 0 SEC = 10 . 0 % PED = . 0 SEC = 0 ;: ! ! WDTH ! G/C ! CAPACITY ! AN ! ! L ! MAr; IMUM ! ! MOVMNT ! /LNS ! REQD USED ! C ( VF' H ) E ! DHV ! DELAY ! S ! QUEUE ! N APPROACH . 14 . 2 B - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! L- Y+ TH ! 12 / 1 ! . 02 ! . 21 ! 289 ! 363 ! 9 ! 14 . 2 ! B ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - E AP' P' ROACH 3 W 5 A -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! TH ! 12 / 1 ! . . 38 ! . 69 ! 121. 5 ! 1225 ! 621 ! 3 . 7 ! * A ! 163 FT ! LT ! 12/ 1 + 1 . 19 I . 69 ! 724 ! 749 ! 149 ! 2 . 6 ! A ! 39 FT ! S AP' P' ROACH l5 , 5 C + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RT ! 12 / 1 + I 12 I 21 ! 244 ! 313 I 114 I 15 . 7 IAC + ! 75 FT ! I LT ! 12/ 1 + 1 03 ! 21 ! 304 ! 379 ! 18 ! 14 . 3 ! B ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W APPROACH 2 . 8 A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! RT ! 12 / 1 + I . 03 I . 69 ! 995 ! 1012 I 19 I 2 . 3 ! A ! 25 FT ! ! L_T + TH ! 12 / 1 ! . 24 ! . 69 ! 1215 ! 1225 ! 359 ! 2 . 8 ! A ! 94 FT ! PRIOP LAKE SHOPPING CEN£ R INTERSECTION OF T . H . 13 AND SSAH 23 / CREEKSIDE CIRCLE EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR QOLUNES 1121tPZ89 SIGNAL8 ,)£ ARAE - MAF OF DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES « • 00008 « « 00002 « + « « « « + « « - 1 2 3 « - « - « « « « 0 0 0 • « « * « « 0 0 0 O O « • « « + * « « * « , « « « « < Z 0000 # 0 0 0 0 u . 0559 5 a 2 } 9 p » 0134 6 12 0002 O @ 0 U 4 3 11 0321 4 4 3 0 1 10 0012 0 O 0 « « « « « « * « « « « « . # • - 0 0 1 . « « 1 0 0 « « « « . 6 0 3 « « ¥ , « 9 8 Z « , # 00152 « « 00119 « « « « , 3 , « PRIOR LACE � , iOPPING CENTEh INTERSECTION OF T . H , 13 AND FIVE HHWI; S AVE /Mc: DONALD ' . $ EXISTING P11 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1 / 2E; 89 SIGHAL85 / TEAPAC - CAPACITY ANALYE , IS WORKSHEE:: T INTERSECTION AVERAGES DEGREE OF SATURATION . 37 VEHICULAR DELAY 3 . 1 LEUEL OF SEF' UICE H SE. (: l.1ENCE_ 1. 1. ! PHASE 1 ! PHASE 2 ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! ! + + + + V ! V + + ! V ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - ! G / C = . 153 ! G / C = . 747 ! ! G = 9 . 2 ! G = 44 . 8 ! ! Y = 3 . 0 ! Y . 3 . 0 ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C == 60 SEC G = 54 . 0 SEC = 9J . 0 % Y = 6 . 0 SEC = 10 . 0 PED = 0 SEC = , OX ! ! WDTH ! G/ C ! CAPACITY ! ADJ ! I L ! ! HXIMUM ! ! NOWINT ! /LNS ! RECD USED ! C ( VPH ) E ! DHU ! DELAY ! S ! QUEUE ! N APPROACH 16 . 5 C + ILT + TH + RT ! - 12/ 1 ! . 03 ! 15 ! 163 ! 225 ! 16 ! 16 . 5 ! * C + I 25 FT It - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E AP' P' ROACH 2 . 5 A ! TH + RT ! 12/ 1 ! . 41 ! . 75 ! 1187 ! 1191 ! 592 ! 2 . 6 ! * A ! 126 FT ! I LT ! 12 / 1 + 1 . 08 ! . 75 ! 830 ! 846 ! 47 ! 1 . 5 ! A ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S AP' P' ROACH 16 . 7 C + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! RT ! 12/ 1 + 1 04 ! . 15 ! 160 ! 221 ! 30 ! 16 . 7 ! C + ! 25 FT ! ! LT ! 12/ 1 + 1 . 02 ! . 15 ! 189 ! 257 ! 13 ! 16 . 5 ! C + I 25 FT ! W AP' P' ROACH 1 . 8 A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RT ! 12/ 1 + 1 . 01 ! 1 . 00 ! 1472 ! 1472 ! 4 ! . 0 ! A ! 25 FT ! ILT + TH ! 12/ 1 ! 23 ! . 75 ! 1332 ! 1332. ! 337 ! 1 . 8 ! A ! 71 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F' RICIR LAKE `` .. , , OF' F' ING CENTER INTERSECTION OF T . H , 13 AND FIUE HAWKS Al) E ./f1cDONALD ' S EXISTING Pf1 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1 ; 2K ! EIY 51GNAL8 `7) ./"ToEAF' AC — MAF' OF DESIGN HOUR UOL. UME5 # # 00014 * 00020 # # # # 1 2 3 # # # # # # 0 0 0 # x # # # 0 0 0 # # # # # # # # # # # * # * # 0 0 1 # # # # # # * # # # # # x # * # # # # # # # # # # 2. 0 2 # # # # * * # # # # # # # # # # 0018 4 0 0 0 0 0515 C F 2 7 9 0041 6 12 00 (' 2 0 0 0 0 4 3 11 0301 3 0 4 7 0 .10 0004 # # # # * # # # # # # # # # # # 0 0 0 # # # # # # # # # # # * # # # # # # # # # # # # # * # # # * 0 0 0 # # # # # f # # # * # # * # # # # 1 0 2 # # # # # # 2 0 7 # * # # # # # # # 00046 # # 00039 # # # # # # # # # # 3 # # PRIOR LAKE SHOPPING CENTER INTERSECTION OF T , H , 17 AND CSAH 23 / CREEKSIDE CIRCLE PROJECTED 1990 FSM PK HR VOLUMES WITHnUT SITE 1 / 25 / x9 SIGNAL. 85 ,/TEAPAC — CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET INTERSECTION AVERAGES * DEGREE OF 5AT1.1RF; TION 44 UEHICULA DELAY 6 , 7 LEVEL OF SERVICE E + SEWIENCE 2 ! PHASE 1 ! F' HF, SE 2 ! PHASE 3 ! A ! V ! + + + + ! + + + ! + ! + + + + + + + ? + ! U ! ! G /C = 152 ! G/C = . 237 ! G / C = , 461 ! ! G = 9 . 1 ! G = 14 , 2 ! G = 27 , 7 ! ! Y = 3 . 0 ! Y = 3 , 0 ! Y = 3 . 0 ! C = 60 SEC G = F1 . 0 SEC = 85 , 0 %: Y = 9 . 0 SEC = 15 , 0 % PED = , 0 SEC 0 % ! WDTH ! G / C I CAPACITY ! ADJ ! ! L ! MAXIMUM ! ! MOVI`1NT ! /LNS ! REQD USED ! C ( VPHl E ! DHV ! DELAY ! S ! QUEUE ! N APPROACH 16 , 6 C + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! LT + TH + RT ! 12/ 1 ! 03 ! 315 ! 172 ! 237 ! 16 ? 16 . 6 ! * C + ? 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E AP' P' ROACH 511 B + ! TH + RT ! 12/ 1 ? 43 ? 75 ? 1197 ? 1200 ! 641 It 2 , 8 ? * A ! 136 FT ! ? LT ! 12 / 1 + 1 13 ? . 24 ! 329 ! 402 ! 153 ! 14 . 9 ? * B ? 98 FT ! S AP' P' ROACH 9 , D B + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - ! RT ! 12 / 1 + 1 12 ! 44 ! 593 ! 646 ! 119 ! 7 . 8 ! B + ! 56 FT ! ! LT ! 12 / 1 + 1 o03 ? 15 ? 198 ? 269 ! 19 ! 16 , 6 ! C + ? 25 FT It - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W APPROACH 8 . 5 B + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! RT ! 12- / 1 + ? 03 ! . 46 ! 628 ! 678 ! 21 ! 6 , 7 ! B + ? 25 FT ! ? L_ T + TH ! 12 / 1 ! 25 ! . 46 ! 771 ! 821 ! 371 ! 8 . 7 ! B + ? 168 FT ! PRIOR LAKE ^ SHOPPING CENTER IN ERGEETION OF T . H , 13 AND ESAH 23ZCREEKSIDE CIRCLE PROJECTED 1990 PM PK HR UOLUMES W11HOUT SITE 1 « 2 § X89 SIGNAL852TEAPAE - MAP OF DESIGN HOUR UOLUNES « « ! « « « « « + « * « « « « 00014 « ® 001J05 « « « « • � - « - « « 1 2 ) « « « « « « 0 0 0 • • « « * 0 0 0 « + « « 0 O 1 • « « « « « « « , « + « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « 1 3 O « « « « « « « « « * « « « « « « 0001 4 0 0 0 0 5 0576 5 Z 2 9 1 4 5 0138 6 12 0004 O 0 0 0 4 3 11 0331 4 . § 4 \ � 10 0019 ' 0 0 O . « « « 1 0 0 « . « . « Z 1 Z « « . « . . 9 8 Z « « « 00160 « « 00125 « + « « 3 « « PRIOR LAKE SHOP' P' ING CENTER INTERSECTION OF T . H . 13 AND FIVE HAWKS AVE /McDONALD ' S PROJECTED 1990 PM P !; HR VOLUMES WITHOUT SITE 1 / 25 / 89 SIGNAL85 ;'TEAPAC - CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET INTERSECTION AVERAGES DEGREE OF SATURATION . 38 VEHICULAR DELAY 3 , 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE: A SEQUENCE 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! PHASE 1 ! PHASE 2 ! ! + + + ! V ! ! GiC = . 149 ! G /C = . 751 ! ! G = 9 . 0 ! G = 45 . 0 ! ! Y = 3 . 0 ! Y = 3 . 0 ! L$ = 60 SEC G = 54 . 0 SEC = 90 . 0 % Y = 6 . 0 SEC = 10 . 0 % PED = . 0 SEC = 0 % ! ! WDTH ! G/C ! CAPACITY ! ADJ ! ! L ! ! 1AXIh1Ur19 ! NOVMN'T ! /LNS ! REQD USED ! C ( VPH ) E ! DHV ! DELAY ! S ! QUEUE ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N RE' P' ROACH 16 . 7 C + ! LT + TH + RT ! 12 / 1 ! . 03 ! 15 ! 166 ! 230 ! 20 ! 16 . 7 ! * C + ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E AP' P' ROACH 2 . 5 A ! TH + RT ! 12/ 1 ! 42 ! . 75 ! 1193 ! 1196 ! 611 ! 2 . 6 ! * A ! 128 FT ! ! LT ! 12/ 1 + 1 . 08 ! . 75 ! 823 ! 839 ! 49 ! 1 . 5 ! A ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S APPROACH 16 . 8 C + - - - RT ! 12 / 1 + 1 . 05 ! . 15 ! 155 ! 216 ! 32 ! 16 . 9 ! C + ! 25 FT ! ! LT ! 12/ 1 + 1 . 02 ! 15 ! 194 ! 265 ! 16 ! 16 . 6 ! C + ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W APPROACH 1 . 8 A ! RT ! 1 "2/ 1 + ! . 01 ! . 75 ! 1098 ! 1105 ! 7 ! 1 . 4 ! A ! 25 FT ! ! LT +TH 1 12/ 1 ! . 24 ! 75 ! 1338 1 1338 1 350 ! 1 . 8 ! A ! 73 FT ! PRIOR LAKE ` _ . iOF' F' ING CENTER I: NTE_ R `=, ECTION OF T . H . 13 AND FIVE HAWE' S AUE /NcDONALD ' S PROJECTED 1990 PH PK HR VOLUMES WITHOUT SITE 1 P. SIGNAI_ 85 /TEAPAC — MAP OF DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES * * 00018 * * 00K4 jt '3f 1 2 3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 1 3 1 4 * * * * * * * * * * 0020 4 0 0 0 0 0530 5 2 4 9 � 4 0044 6 12 0003 0 0 u 3 11. 0312 3 ,y F, 1 5 1G 0006 * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 * * * # * * * # # * * * 1 0 2 * * * * 4 1 9 * * * * * 9 8 7 * * 00051 * * 00044 * a� * * 3 * * PRIOR LAKE. SHOPPING CENTER INTERSECTIoiy OF T . H , 13 AND CSAR 23 / CREEKSIDE CIRCLE PROJECTED 1990 PM PK HR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1 / 25 / 09 SIGNAL85 // TEAPAC - CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET INTERSECTION AVERAGES6 DEGREE OF SATURATION . 53 VEHICULAR DELAY 6 , 9 LEVFL. OF SEFVICE El + SEQUENCE 12 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! PHASE 1 ! PHASE 2 ! F' ! iASE 3 It ! * * ! A ! A ! ! V ! * ! A ! A ! V ! + + + + ! G / C = . 128 ! G/C = . 201 ! G/C . 521 ! ! G = 7 . 7 ! G = 12 . 0 " ! G = 31 . :3 ! Y = 3 . 0 ! Y = 3 . 0 ! Y = 3 . 0 ! C = - 60 SEC G = 51 . 0 SEC = 85 . 0 % Y = 9 . 0 SEC = 15 . 0 % P' ED = 0 SEC = 0 ': ! WDTH ! G / C ! CAPACITY ! ADJ ! ! L ! MAXIMUM ! ! MOUNNT ! / LNS ! REQD USED ! C ( VPH ) E ! DHV ! DELAY ! S ! QUEUE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N APPROACH 17 . 5 C + ILT +TH + RT ! 12/ 1 ! . 03 ! . 13 ! 139 ! 197 ! 16 ! 17 . 5 ! * C + ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E RE' P' ROACH 53 B + ! - - - TH + RT ! 12 / 1 ! . 52 ! . 77 ! 1237 ! 1237 ! 791 ! 3 . 1 ! * A ! 152 FT ! ! LT ! 12/ 1 + 1 13 ! . 20 ! 267 ! 340 ! 153 ! 16 . 7 ! * C + ! 103 FT Is - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S AP' P' ROACH 12 . 2 B ! RT ! 12 / 1 + ! . 12 ! 38 ! 497 ! 557 ! 119 ! 9 . 6 ! B + ! 62 FT ! ! LT ! 12 / 1 + 1 . 06 ! 13 ! 159 ! 224 ! 53 ! 18 . 0 ! C + ! 38 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W APPROACH 7 . 7 B + ! RT ! 12/ 1 + ! 07 ! , 52 ! 725 ! 767 ! 53 ! 5 . 4 ! B + ! 25 FT ! ! LT + TH ! 12 / 1 ! 33 ! 52. ! 889 ! 929 ! 513 ! 7 . 9 ! B + ! 207 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIOR LAKE .3dOPPING CENTER ` INTERSECTION OF T . H . 14 AND ESAH 23ZEREEKSIDE CIRCLE PROJECTED 1990 PM PK HR VOLUMES WITH SITE £ z25ZG9 51GNAL8 § / TEAPAE - MAP OF DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES « « 00014 « ® 0000p . x « « 1 2 ) . « 0 0 0 « « « « « « 0 0 0 « • « « « « < « « « « « « * « « « 0 0 1 1 a 0 « • « - « « « « « « « « « « « _ . 0001 4 O 0 0 0 7 0711 5 8 2 6 5 0 � AIJO K 12 000 ± 0 0 0 0 4 5 11 0459 9 . ! » O 10 0048 « * « « « « + « « « « « « O 0 0 « « « « « « « « « « « « « « O 0 1 + * « « « « « « « « « « . . , 4 0 0 « « « , « « 8 1 7 « « « « 9 8 7 « « « « 00182 « « 00156 « « � « « , » � • PRIOR LAF, E SHOPPING: CENTER INTERSECTION OF T . H . 13 AND FIVE HAWKS AVE /Mc, DONALD ' 5 PROJECTED 1990 PM PK HR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1 / 2 ') / 09 SIGNAL85 /TEAPAC - CAPACITY ANALYSIS WOf%' KSHEE: T INTERSECTION AVERAGESv DEGREE OF SATURATION . 43 VEHICULAR; DELAY 7 . 5 LEVEL OF SE5,) 1 (: E Ili + SEUM ! CE 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! PHASE 1 ! PHASE 2 ! PHASE 3 ! - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! * * ! A ! A ! I * * * I + + 4- + ! + + + 4 ! I V A ! V ! ! I + + + ! + ! + + + + ! ! G ; C = . 141 ! G/ C = 306 ! G /C == . 403 ! ! G = 8 . 5 ! G = 18 , 3 ! G = 24 . 2 ! ! Y = 3 . 0 " ! Y = 3 . 0 " ! Y = 3 . 0 " ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - C = 60 SEC G = 51 . 0 SEC = 85 , 0i Y = 9 . 0 SEC 15 . 07. PED = 0 SEC = 0 % ! ! WDTH ! G /C ! CAPACITY ! ADJ ! ! L ! MAXIMUM ! ! MOVMNT ! /LNS ! REQD USED ! C ( VPH ) E ! DHV ! DELAY ! S ! QUEUE ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- N APPROFaCH 17 . 1 C + ILT + TH + k •I ! 12/ 1 ! 03 ! . 14 ! 153 ! 214 ! 20 ! 17 . 1 ! * C + ! 25 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E APPROACH 5 , 4 F; + loll - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! TH + RT ! 12 / 1 ! . 42 ! . 76 ! 1209 ! 1210 ! 611 ! 2 . 4 ! A ! 124 FT Is ! LT ! 12. / 1 + 1 . 18 ! . 31 ! 449 ! 518 ! 2. 33 ! 13 . 2 I * B ! 136 FT ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S AP' P' ROACH 9 o 2 B + ! - - - RT- - - ! - 12/ 1 + ! . 19 ! . 50 ! 685 ! 731 ! 207 ! 6 . 8 ! B + ! 87 FT Is ! LT ! 1211 + 1 . 06 ! . 14 ! 180 ! 249 ! 59 ! 17 . 5 ! C + ! 42 FT It W APPROACH 10 . 3 B l - - - RT - ! 12/ 1 + 1 07 ! 40 ! 537 ! 594 ! 52 ! 8 . 4 ! B + ! 26 FT I ! LT + TH ! 1211 1 . 24 1 . 40 1 661 1 719 1 350 1 10 . 5 ! * B 1 176 FT ! \ PRIOR LAKE uHOPPING CENTER INTERSECTION OF T . H . 13 AND FIVE HAWKS AVE % cDONALD ` S . PROJECTED 1990 PM PK HR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1 « 2 § x09 SIGNALER /TEARAC - MAP OF DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES - - 00018 « « 00024 - « « - 1 2 « « « « « « « - 0 0 0 « « « « « « 0 0 0 0 0 1 • « « y « 3 1 4 0020 4 0 U 0 0 5 0530 5 2 2 0 6 6 O 0210 6 12 0003 0 0 0 G 4 3 11 0312 5 6 1 2 2 10 0047 « « « « « « « « « « « « « « • 0 0 0 « « « « « « « « « * « « « . • - 0 0 1 « « « . 5 0 8 « « 1 6 « « « . . , 9 8 7 , m « « 00258 « « 00240 « « « « , « • � , « « . 3 « «