The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBldg Permit 06-0584 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, TEMPORARY CERu.a4.1CATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE. . AND L. iAJITY CONNE~ _ION PERMIT Date Rec'd 0. 30. ()fo I. WIIioe File 2."" C'1ly PERMIT NO.O/ . 0584- ) v..... AfpIiaM U CPIeIIIe tTIe or.......... at ~ ADDRESS '385{' Gre(.n 1It'./C/lls 1:1. JIV v PriOr tide / /J?1't/ ZONING (oftioe_) ;e/~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION (oftb ute only) LOT BLOCK ADDmON PID z.G. () tJ~.. (J ~ 8. () '" I U .&.fEll (Name) -;1;/-/ Pe l.rcA / '3856 f'vreen l!e/q46 ~/ J'w, " (Phone) bIZ - ttO-b 1?-t (AddIas) ~:Name) trI/'O 601& (us 10/1'7 R~ocklh4 (Contact Name) MI):e J7e ,e lM1 r ; V' (Address) r2~1 d/Y'I~) /k (~ J)P!orJ J}JA/ JJt1Q/ (Phone) (phone) fJ/J-t/t - J 'l-5]' TYPE OF WORK. 0 New Construction ta6ect [Jpon:b [JRe-RoofinJ ORc-SicliDa OLower Level Finish 0 Fireplace OAddition OAf.... .:., ',. OUtiIity Connection 0 Misc. CODE: ~.R..c. OI.B.C. PR.OJECTCOST/VALUE S /5/ ot/O or,.. of~oa: I n m IV V A B (adwliDJ Iaad) ~Groap. A B E F RIM R. S U Dmsioa: I 2 3 4 5 I ba'eby certify dial I haw IIamisbcd informa1lon 011 ibis appJleadon wbleb II co die bar 01 my IInowIcdIe rrur and .. " '." I Do certify dial I am die 4 , . . " . ,.... IIlClll ... rhr , \ . , . ...,...4 " ... '. and thai II .. ".. ICdon will conIbrm co II exiIIiq stale and IoeaIIaws and will proceed in . ..... nee wirb 11,,,;,,,..1 plans. ' hm aware dlat rhr builllinl ";'~"-i!IZJ'-Pi!;:7-""""'-<<2';;;2;to"i'" ""-?i~'?2, 2()~ . Sipatule CoaIncror's L' .... . No. / Date Permit Valuation 1f (P 0 0 0 . () t) Park Support Pee ## S PennitPee S I.~ z. 50 SAC ## S Plan Check Pee - "'S ~". I ~''WaRr Meter Size 5/8"; I"; $ State Surcharge $ -:S. 0 C Pressure Reducer $ Penalty S Sewer/Water Connection Fee ## S Plumbing Permit Pee S Water Tower Pee ## S Mechanical Permit Pee S Builcler'. Deposit S Sewer & Water Permit Pee S Other S Gu r:.. -r lace Permit Pee S TOTAL DUE $ Z'Z./ . Go, 3 TIds Application IJeeoaIn Yoar BaiWtDI Pemdt WIleD Al'fI'OMI ~~ Iola'/ol", Builclin, OfI'Ieial Dati Paid 'k ZI tfD' Date 'W~o (at. !L~w:"'t No.5'" 2;7 Bv ~. TIuI is co c:crtIl'y dial 1M request in rhr IlJove IPPIieation aad ICCOIIIpMtinl docvmcms II In ~ wirb rhr Ciry Zonina 0rdiIIana and may""". ... J.. . ,.;;., ,'. 1. TbiI docvlllCllt wIIm sipcd by 1M Ciry Planner COIIItirutes a' ...." ." ", CertllkIte 01 ZeIn... CCIIIIpIiaaa and allows .'...... crion co .. . ... Before . .. ".. '. . a Certible 010.., i"', IIIlIIt be ~Cf..~ Jo/74qe. ~1J~'-:t~ V .------~-~ IO~~' *'~. 11co \JSTA \JT -:S---\jG co 1)A \JY 4000 Beau D'Rue Drive · Eagan. Minnesota 55122 Telephone: 651-454-3544 Fax: 651-452-1826 Hansen Construction Company 6737 Apache Road Edina, Minnesota 55439 February 16, 2000 RE: Letter of Compliance - Bluff Impact assessment 3856 Green Heights Trail Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota Dear Jerry: At your request, a site visit was conducted on February 03, 2000 to evaluate the excavation at the subject lake shore property for compliance with our impact assessment dated January 12, 2000. The certificate of survey prepared by Probe Engineering and dated December 21, 1999, which identified the property as lot 9, Greenheights, provided the necessary elevations and dimensional data for this inspection. All observations and opinions set forth in our initial bluff impact letter remain inforce, as a integral part of our assessment for this lot. The site, had been cleared of unsuitable materials and excavated to footing elevation. Handauger probes conducted at random within the footing lines indicated well consolidated clay loam soils, below optimum moisture. The physical dimensions of the residence, its location within the lot and to adjacent structures, including the bluff setback, were taped and found accurate with the certificate of survey. It is our opinion that the observed construction, including erosion control measures are acceptable and comply with the bluff impact assessment, building plans, and Prior Lake city codes and zoning ordinances. ,/2..." , . /1 /J .. ..:Wvc e:-, r-rcv ~ II. C: Carl E. Anderson, P.E. Chief Engineer MN registration no. 10736 -::: Gar S andish Inspe tor Environmental Assessor Charge codes: #605 - 1.0 hours #608 0.5 hours '612 - 34 miles / ('White - BUlldhi9::> cmmr J - engineering Pink - Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DI;f.ARTP(ENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT e{'J~_a h ~ 14 &:s1"7l'>t-- /~OQ.t~ APPLICATION RECEIVED 5/30/0 ~ - 13 1,/2. s/Ol. , , The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: ::53 SG. ..thu.- ~ TJZb. S-:W, . Accepted With Corrections /' Accepted Denied ~ ~ Date: t,/2.,Cj~" . I Comments: ~J::~.( ~ ~ - ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t--rt ,~ n-;! dq 4. /:.. .;t", C.LN. <-4...~ .~ ~ .-I~ ~ d<. .&JJ'IlL~_ ,~. Reviewed By: a-L liThe issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." ... White - Building Canary - Enqlneerlng ~iaJc - P1ann"liib BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT J I " j r t . , f .-' ( / I i -". / APPLICATION RECEIVED ,I / <r I f , ~J l I'" , , I The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: ", (-, r-- i . ! I Accepted v Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed By: 5A-~ Date: V; / z alOin I ' Comments: XJt.Jl:wf'.Jt.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .ru~ ~~ 4J.Qr-ziPc.. AJl) ~ 00 clflr.J~ maw --, , , I JJti J>>rhi,d 1'tJK!U.~~' '().~ ifd ~~. -- liThe issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." --.--. --...- ---,_. ~ ~ .---.:'.~.' " ~,~ ....-' ~ .. . ..... , l.~/ /: />, TII. C..I., .f I'" l.81o. Coni.,. White - Building Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning BUILD'NG PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTNlENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT APPLICATION RECEIVED /' .//:: I' /\ /, ---:-;: . 1\.1 . ,. \/- ._...,,-~. ." . (.~.< ';'... ."T-~-' . " -.. . /-Z./' Z~:... />:~ 0' .' ' , The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: ,':;;- -;.~ ,r' / , \..... _.... 0". '- ..../ lL'..' /':~; I. ~ (.~ /._ / ~ ./ 1/ -:.,! ./_. ,. ,;.:.::. ., Accepted Accepted With Corrections ~ Denied - IV 1 Reviewed By: ~/.,)-~ Date: '/;20/00 Comments: ,\' A-IC iKlif Cal)n6t te. loCM<. (c.ef in Side ya,d'S ' -k Per 17e Sf2.Wh'Df'\S Cj'i - .;;).~f>c... o~ ~, "'d-3 ft:. ... see.. e&tc!(t{u~ ..f ~-h't'"\j ~~ In k re.m()\l~J J- . eo II .. 1JUd. W flevn.;t {g ~ (I~J4'1cJ"6tJ I ;JVJ mi..1- ~iU - 9.A.Jr ON. 3" ~ ~ 3 YV" ~ it) Lrt.~'4,.ar/. i jJo j"'f~J!~~t1J- ~ -r.an ~'SOi1 wrtJ,;.-, Lot, It AliJ \.JRMj.cKf1m ~ _~I~ fhaf eA(ji~ .~~~S hiUJll. ~ ~to jdJrrfu l$vatIU of::..kq. e.l ., 'The issuance or granting of a permit or' approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. II . RESOLUTION 99-22PC APPROVING A 405 SQUARE FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT LOT ARE BE 7,095 SQUARE FEET RAu1J~JR THAN THE MINIMUM LOT AREA REQUIRED TO BE BUILDABLE OF 7,500 SQUARE FEET [CITY CODE 1104.900 NONCONFORMING LOTS); AND A 4.0 FOOT LOT WIDTH VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LOT TO BE BUlL W Un. A LOT WIDTH OF 46.0 FEET, RAln.J!.R THAN THE MINIMUM ~ FOOT LOT WIDTH REQUIRED (\.,11 i CODE 1104.900 NONCONFORM LOTS); AND A 15.3-FOOT VARIANCE TO UtI!. FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERM STRUCTURE TO BE SETBACK 20 FEET FROM In.~ FRONT LOT LIN RATHER THAN 1n.1!. MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK OF 35.3 FEET CODE 1102.405 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS). BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Min FINDINGS 1. Eric and Amy Frank have applied for variances llvUI the Zoning Ordinance to permit the construction of a single family residence with attached gl property located in the R-l (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (S Overlay) District at the following location, to wit; 3856 Green Heights Trail, legally described as Lot 9, Green Heigl County, MN. 2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as con Case #99-063 and held hearings thereon on September 27, 1999. 3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variant the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipat< conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance! Comprehensive Plan. 1:\99fi1es\99var\99-063\re9922pc.doc 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax AN EQUAL OPPORTUNI1Y EMPLOYER 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding prop. possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variancef result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent pI unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordina Comprehensive Plan. 5. Without a variance to lot area and lot width, the lot remains unbuildable. J family residence is a reasonable use for the property. 6. The variance to front yard setback meets the hardship criteria and inter ordinance and further alleviates the variance request to the top of the bit reduced front yard setback will result in reduced impervious surface on the si1 7. There is justifiable hardship caused by existing conditions and reasonable u !'.....!'erty does not exist without the granting of the variances. 8. The lot area, lot width and front yard setback variances are consistent with 1 recommendation. 9. The granting of the variances are necessary for the preservation and enjoyn substantial property right of the applicant. The variances will not serve me convenience to the applicant, and are necessary to alleviate demonstrable hare 10. The contents of Planning Case 99-063 are hereby entered into and made a p~ public record and the record of decision for this case. CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby appI following variances for future single family dwelling and attached garage as pel A' , 1. A 405 square foot variance to permit lot area to be 7,095 square feet rather th~ minimum lot area required to be buildable of7,500 square feet (City Code 11 nonconforming lots); and 2. A 4.0 foot lot width variance to permit a lot to be buildable with a lot width 0 feet, rather than the minimum 50.0 foot lot width required (City Code 1104.9( nonconforming lots); and 3. A 15.3-foot variance to the front yard setback to pennit the structure to be setl feet lium the front lot line rather than the minimum required setback of 35.3 f Code 1102.405 dimensional standards). 1:\99files\99var\99-063\re9922pc.doc .. The following are conditions which must be adhered to prior to the issuance of a permit for the ..."u...osed structure: 1. The existing shed located towards the shoreline must be removed or brol compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. This must be completed prior to the of a building permit for the single family dwelling. 2. The resolution must be recorded and proof of recording submitted to the Department. An Assent Form must be signed and, pursuant to Section 11 C the City Code, the variance will be null and void if the necessary pennib obtained for the ..~v..osed structure within one year after adoption of this reso Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on September 27, 1999. All~ST: Anthony Stamson, Chair Donald R. Rye, Planning Director 1:\99files\99var\99-063\re9922pc.doc ------~ ~ ~......- f eA ) /- I At'"~ ~ / ( /lV- ~ ~ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ADDRESS s~~ ~~ /dt~l,Js OWNER PHONE NO. CONTR. PERMIT NO. o FOOTING [J FOUNDATION [J FRAMING [J INSULATION ~FINAL [J SITE INSPECTION [J PLUMBING RI [J MECH RI [J WATER HOOKUP [J SEWER HOOKUP [J PLUMBING FINAL [J MECH FINAL COMMENTS: /' / I l "'- """"---- ---- DATE TIME 7-/ytZ fY/ 6~1 o EXIGRADIFILLING [J COMPLAINT [J FIREPLACE RI o FIREPLACE FINAL [J GASLINE AIR TST [J ~RK SATISFACTORY, PROCEED o CORRECT ACTION AND PROCEED o CORRECT WORK, CALL REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: Owner/Contr: CALL 447.9850 FOR THE NEXT INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE., CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL HEALTH & SAFETYI _TI