Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA94-13 Integrity Dev Variance VA9'f -I~ PIDi ~5 0 ;;A&; ()(Jq 0 l....!."J::l OF PRIOR LAKE APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Applicant: -kT.. "/ff,~ /Ju..;.lj~ #~(l J Home Phone: lfLfo ;;),QcF1 Address: ~5 -e:; ; nJ 'steFF+ Pe.;of.. Lp,kE.' Mr\l Work Phone:~O ~3otJO Property Owner:~L'D G:.~1I.1 Home Phone: ~J3 ?&.{3 c2/1~ Address:lflo14 ~A/IoN l'...'l.t'1P ,Poe.+ e.hr.e..lo-He. f{PQ.IDA Work Phone: --e- Type of Ownership: Fee X cOntract Purchase Agreanent Consultant/Contractor: ~tr\ \.1~J05k Phone: 440 - 300(") Existing Use 6uj~}cct Bite: 153/1 Breezv POjrtf Q&, ~~ of Property: \Jft<t\~ _ - I Present Zoning: R l S D Legal Description!. ots N ""tilt:> IS. tof>e-+heR. wl~h Ht'I+ ~/2.t- of- Lot J'7 I LY'''''j vJ~':.+tR.)y' e-f the.. of Variance Site:SoClf^c;~ly ,.:X+CIIJ-j,'w o-f +I)t. W~'fwJe.lr liNE. of 4of/3,'&e-tV2.Y PC/iv?". Variance Requested: ~ jO-:r:."",PerQlOl..4~ ~~h~b ~'En;\:- ':)!- t..Je.,~T- 4:lS L~K~ Has the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional use permit on the subject site or any part of it? Yes V N:> What was requested: When: Disposition: Describe the type of improvements proposed: ~J:X'1.ISSION .N!,\ 1~J.lREMENrS: (A)Completed application fom. (B)Filing fee. (C)Property Survey indicating the proposed developnent in relation to property lines and/or ordinary-high-water mark; proposed building elevations and drainage plan. (D) Certified fram abstract firm, names and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. (E)Carnplete legal description & Property Identification Number (PID). (F)Deed restrictions or private covenants, if applicable. (G)A parcel map at 1"-20'-50' showing: The site developnent plan, buildings: parking, loading, access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service. ONLY COMPLETE APPLI~TIONS SHALL BE ACUil:'.L"ED AND REVIEWED BY THE PLANNIm <Jl.1MISSION. To the best of lIlY knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior Ia.ke Zoning - Ordinance which specifies requirements for variance procedures. I agrl/to Jide information and WO\i the procedures as outlined in the Ordinance. 6)-./l I ^ l . ~ - 1\ .1, ___ Q....., ..f II' l ~ cJU.l' ~ Applican s Signature Submitted this 12.. day of (Y\z... "J 194f r-v / I _ - IV-~ t../. ~ "}, ~ Fee CMners Signature THIS SPACE IS 'ID BE FILLED our BY THE PLANNIro DIRa.;.LvR PLANNIro cn1MISSION ." APPROlED CITY COillOL APPEAL / APPROJID DENIED (rr- 2 -C) Lt DATE OF HEARIm DENIED Dl\TE OF HFARIN:; .- CONDITIONS: 4/' LaKEshOre- (19Yl- NOrth c;ide. oF ~(Doer-tv) 2-tf' (on Sov.th ~(je ofprq:et1v) !l:rb~) i~~~J=vA~~~J~ff,Pj~U;cP;' gfj}p;e~rrf:;t;~.) m,~Jtfl;O(jat.P/ lo-lo-CfLt Signature of the Planning Directorf~ Date 25-02h- ooct-o "VARFM" VARIANCE CHECK LIST SUBJECT SITE: /56/1 Bre~~ Pa((V- t<iJad.-J NS APPLICANT: IVU-U)(fty cWewpy"()tr1~. Inc, I ffopeny ov/r1er :1JoriJ,cL @u!ju{@kl( SCHEDULE HEARING DATE: V' 5/)7/04- (27'?{y'-EYrv fp/2/Q4 . , .V; 6/W/QL/- ~ ~1~444 v_ _ 'lqLj- V ~/"4 DNR NOTICE IF SHORELAND: PREPARE AREA MAP: APPLICANT NOTICE: PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE: NOTICE TO DOUG - ENGINEERING NOTIFY OTHERS: Scott County Watershed District MNDOT Other COMMISSIO~AGENDA PACKETS: Staff Memo v/ Application Form ~/ Copy of Public Notice V-'APplicable Maps v> Copy of Parcel Info. V Other Applicable Info. STAFF ACTIVITIES MAIL COPY OF APPLICATION AND V (o~to-ct tf REQUIRED CONDITIONS TO APPLICANT: MAIL COPY OF APPLICATION AND /' to-{O-~L} CONDITIONS TO DNR: GIVE COpy OF APPLICAITON AND / (f~-L14 CONDITIONS TO BLD. INSPECTOR ASSIGN FILE NUMBER: AMEND VARIANCE SUMMARY SHEET: / {p~(o_CJLt ADD PERMIT TO PROPERTY MGMT: V" (p -(0 -~ Lf FILE BY: File #: VA [3 Legal: L-Ot0 Itf-t It:] Brt.eJJ4f p(YU'l;f FILE SHOULD CONTAIN: UJ vI/ Staff Memo V/ Original Application V Copy of Notice to OWners ~ /Planning Corom. Minutes .\ / Other Informat ion Applicant: )v'\J1-{VirJv rkHlo pfYlU'Vt J 1(},0 ' Address: 1'5-3/~1kU PD"~N0 UU \~--APPlicable Maps and Documents V /Copy of Public Notice v Correspondence Council Minutes if Applicable PLANNlNGCOMMISSION MINU'I'ES June 2, 1994 The June 2, 1994, the Planning CouJl~sion Meeting w~ called to order by Chairman Arnold at 7:25 PM. Those present were Co.u.u.u:"sioners Arnold, Ra;eth, and Kuykendall, Director of Planning Herst Graser, Associate Planner Gina Mitchell, and Acting S"".l'-Wy Dee Birch. CouJl.l';"sioner Loftus arrived dwing the discussion ofltem 1. REVIEW'MINUTES OF PREVIOUS l\i.Il,ll..lll ~G MOTIONBYR~.tHtI, SECOND BY KUYKENDAlL, TOAPPROVETHEMlNlJ1ES AS WRUlbN. Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold, Ra;eth, Kuykendall, ManON CARRIED. .llfu.d I - VARIANCE - CO~",IIJER APPLICA110N FOR IN1EGAI..l i DEVELO~ INe. - .TIM HAT .F.K run Halek, .l'-p.l.;..Sentative of Integrity Deve1ofJualt, Inc., stated that he is fJIOfJu.ill1g to build a home at 15311 Breezy Point Road NE, and is requesting 4 variances. He explained changes in the variance request lIV111 the initial submittal, resulting in a 41' lakeshore variance ~vl.U the 75' lakeshore setback requirement (on the north side of the fJ.lo}"'.l~j), a 24' lakeshore variance lluu.l the 75' lakeshore setback reqlli..,-u..ent, a 5' front yard variance llvl.U the 25' front yard setback requirement, and a .4% L.u}"'.l t'ious surface variance i1vl.U the 30% L.u~ vious surface maximmn. Associate City Planner, Gina Mitchell, presented the inivuuation as per planning report dated June 2, 1994. The subject site w~ part of an administrative land division which w~ afJfJ.lo...ed with a lot area variance in December of 1991. The amended variance requests are consistent with previous actions of the Planning Cvuu....;ssion for lakeshore lots in the subdivision of Breezy Point, observe the character of the area, and if all required setbacks were applied, the lot would be unbuildable. Cy Schweich, 15305 Breezy Point Road NE, Lot 16, eApl'-ssed concern about loss of trees and would have lik~ to have seen the location of the trees indicated on the sUlVey. Doug Thielbar, 15329 Breezy Point Road, Lots 12 & 13, expressed concern that construction equipment will cause damage to two mature trees on his p.lV}"'.lj, located app.loi.dnately 4' iivl.U the CVUJl.lAAl p.lofJ'-.l~j line. MJ: Thielbar questioned whether there is any guarantee that his trees will not be damaged. Planner Grnser stated that this is a civil J:IWU..:,.l and not one for the Planning D'f'c:u.L...ent to become involved with. COllJll~sioner Raieth complimented the develo}M and neighbors for meeting together to settle their differences before this meeting and requested that hardwood trees of significant size be replaced. M:1: Halek stated that he planned to replace any significant removed trees with pine trees and will be sensitive to the tree issue within the confines of the building envelope. PLANNING COMMISSION June 3, 1993 Page 1 MOTION BY LUt"IUS, SECO~vw BY RCh~Irl, TO At1-'KOVE THE FOlLOWING V~~ FOR 15311 B~iPOINTROADNEAS UsIb1J: 1. 41' LAKESHuKJj VARIANCE FROM THE 75' LAKESHORE ::SbHjACK REQUlREMENT (ON lEE NUKlrl SIDE OF THE PRuttJ:u 'l) 2. 24' LAKESHORE VARIANCE FROM THE 75' LAKESHORE ;:SbIJ:iACK REQUlREMENT (ON lEE SOUIH SIDE OF THE PRUt'ht<.1 'l) 3. 5' FRONf YARD VARIANCE FROMTHE 25' FRONfYARDSbIJ:SACKREQUlREMENT 4. .4% ~YIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE FROM THE 30% Il\tJ..t'l:.KYIOUS SURFACE MAXIMUM RATIONAL BEING TIIAT IF AlL ~.t:.1JjACKS WERE APPLIED TO THE Lor IT WOUlD BE UNBUll.DABLE, SIMlLAR VARIANCES HAVE BEEN GRMIW IN THE AREA, AND HARDSHIP IS Nor CAlJ::SblJ BY ACTIONS OF THE APPUCANf, WITH THE COl'lvuI0N THAT AlL HARDWOOD TREES REMOVED BE REPLACED BY2" CAl.J.t'JjK OR GREAJ.J:~..K I~ Votes taken signified ayes by Arnold, Loftus, Kuykendall and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. 11.I!J.vlID - VARIANCE - MARIYHANSON Marty Hanson, 3068 170th Street SW, addressed the Cvu..u~sion regarding his request for a 14' x 24' deck. and discussed what he believed to be a discrepancy in the distance of the pJ.vl'vsed deck addition to the c'-uk.J.line of County Road 12 that was ll:ipl.:.sented on the smvey. Associate City Planner, Gina Mitchell, presented the information as per planning report dated June 2, 1994. The request is for a 40.5' County Road 12 setback variance L..VUJ. the 85' County Road setback requirement The subject site is a substandard lot and was platted under the jurisdiction of Spring Lake Township. The majority of the construction that has occurred in this area was done before the 85' county road setback re~'-"J.Jent was inwJ.pOrated into the Zoning Ordinance in 1989, resulting m many structures encroaching that setback req1.h..l:iuJf'.Dt Ms. Mitchell stated that staff recoITIID:nds a reduction in the variance request L..VUJ. 40.5' to 36', which would result in a 10' x 24' deck. The pJ.vi^'J.lj would maintain a 25' llvui. yard, consistent with other l'J.vl''-J.L.es in the R-l, Suburban Residential Zone. CvuJJ.J.....J.;s f..vUJ.Brad Larson, Scott County Highway Department were that this l'lV~ is consistent with other pJ.vi^'J.L.es in the area, and that future upgrading of County Road 12 should not be affected by this l'J.Vl'~. CVJ..lJu~uts llVUl the Commissioners were; regarding the setback. future right-of-way acquisition, and that if the applicant could prove (by a registered smveyor) that the distance L..vUJ. County Road 12 is greater than what was l'-pJ.,-sented on the present sUlVey, the applicant may still be able to have a 14' x 24' deck with a 36.5' variance. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOl'lutU BY KUYKENDAlL, TO APPROVE A 36.5' COUNTY ROAD S~IJ:SACK VARIANCE FROM THE 85' COUNTY ROAD 12 S.t:.l.J:SACKREQUlREMEN'T. RATIONAL BEING THAT THE SITE WAS PLAntU BY A PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT, THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH TIlE DEVELOPMENT PA1IJ:.KN" IN THE AREA, AND IS Nor D~I.J:<Jrv1ENTAL TO 1HE GENERALHEAI.JH, SAt-bI i, AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY Votes taken signified by ayes by Arnold, Loftus, Kuykendall and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. ITElVlIV - CONDl1JQ&L USEI' ~ ANDVARIANL~ - EAGlE CRt.tJ{PROr~~.1r.S Jim SentyIZ, 16910 Elm Avenue SW, owner of Wagon Bridge M~a and Eagle Creek F\Vl''-J.L.es addressed the Commission regarding his request for upgrading the non confollIling starns of the marina to a conditional use within the R-2 district PLANNING COMMISSION June 3. 1993 Page 2 VA13PR PLANNING REPORT AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: PRESENTER: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: 1 CONSIDER VARIANCE REQUEST FOR JAMES HALEK GINA MITCHELL, ASSOCIATE CITY PLANNER _YESXNO JUNE 2,1994 INTRODUCTION: The Planning Department has received a variance application from James M. Halek of Integrity Development, Inc. located at 6885 Boudin Street NE. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission to approve the following variances for the property located at 15311 Breezy Point Road NE in order to construct a single family home. 1. 2' east side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement (for the garage). 2. 2' west side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement (for the house). 3. 42.5' lakeshore variance from the 75' lakeshore setback requirement (on the north side of the property). 4. 24' lakeshore variance from the 75' lakeshore setback requirement (on the south side of the property). 5. 5' front yard variance from the 25' front yard setback requirement. 6. 2% impervious surface variance from the 30% impervious surface maximum. PREVIOUS PROPOSALS: On December 19, 1991, the City Council granted approval of an administrative land division and lot area variance for the subject site and the adjacent property to the east. 15329 Breezy Point Road NE. Specifically the subject site received a 4.127 sq. ft. lot area variance. The administrative plat re-divided four substandard lot of record into two tracts, reducing the housing density fornl four to two units. PHYSIOGRAPHY: The subject site is approximately 100' wide by 115' deep and. it contains 11.121 square feet of lot area above the ordinary high water mark of Prior Lake. The site is unique in that it is located on a narrow peninsula. The ordinary high water mark encroaches on the north and south sides of the lot. This necessitates the request for two lakeshore variances. a 42.5' lakeshore variance for the rear (north) of the home and a 24' lake shore variance for the front (south) of the home. The site is relatively flat and low lying. It will require some till in order to provide a building pad that is compliant with the Aood Plain Ordinance. The lowest living elevation of the home must be elevated to at least 909.3, and the fill surrounding the structure must be at an elevation of 908.3 for a distance of 15' beyond the structure. The Flood Plain Ordinance is enforced at the time of building permit to insure that the structure and adjacent fill complies with the regulations. There are several trees on the lot (butternut. oak. ash. willow. boxelder. and cOl1onwood) which are located within or near the building pad of the home, and may be lost due to construction. It appears that there are very few trees which will be saved due to the size and location 01 the building pad. 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ADJACENT USES: This single family neighborhood is part of Breezy Point subdivision which was platted in 1923 within Eagle Creek Township. This area was annexed into the community in 1973. The lots in this subdivision are substandard by current Zoning regulations. Any new construction or additions to existing structures have required extensive setback and coverage variances. Staff researched this area and found that lakeshore variances have been granted to allow structures within 9' - 50' of the ordinary high water mark. There is no building envelope on the site that meets the required setbacks from the 904. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: The applicant is requesting a 42.5' lake shore variance (north side of garage) and a 24' lake shore variance (south side of the home) from the 75' setback requirement. These lakeshore variance requests are consistent with what has been approved within the study area. A 5' front yard variance is requested. This request is necessary because if all the necessary setbacks were applied to this lot there would not be a building pad which creates a hardship. This lot is approximately 115' deep, and the applicant is trying to reduce the lake shore setback on the north side of the home, which is the main part of the lake. A small bay is located on the south side of the proposed home. Newly created lots within the Shoreland District need to be 90' wide measured at the front yard setback. The Planning Commission has generally granted one, 5' side yard setback for substandard lots of record. The applicant's lot is not substandard in width, it is 100' wide. Staff is of the opinion that another home style could be explored to eliminate the need for any side yard setback variances. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the variances as requested, or with some modifications as per Planning Commission discussion. 2. Continue or table discussion for specific reasons. 3. Deny the variances finding lack of demonstrated hardship. RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation from staff is Alternative #1. Staff recommends approval of the 42.5' and 24' lake shore variances, 5' front yard and 2% impervious surface variances as requested. Staff does not recommend approval of the 2' east and 2' west side yard variances because the lot exceeds the minimum lot width standards for lake shore lots. If it is the intent of the Planning Commission to approve the requested variances, staff recommends requiring that one front yard and one boulevard tree be planted. Once a building is constructed on site, there will be little room for tree replacement outside of the flood plain. Variance Hardship Standards: 1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to the property. If current setback and lot size standards are applied to the subject site, it would be rendered unbuildable. Other similar size lots are developed and/or have been granted similar variances by the City of Prior Lake to build. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to the property. The Shoreland District's minimum requirements for a lakeshore lot width, measured at the front yard setback, is 90'. There is no hardship for granting the side yard setback variances that are requested because the applicant's lot is 100' wide. 2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the property. The subject site is unique in that it is located on a peninsula. The lakeshore encroaches this property on two sides, creating a unique circumstance with respect to the site. 3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property. Due to the fact that the lake shore surrounds the property on two sides, increased setbacks are required for the site that are not required for other lake shore lots which typically have only one lake shore setback applied. The hardship is caused by the application of a 75' setback requirement on the north and south sides of the property. 4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. The proposed the lakeshore, impervious surface, and front yard variances are reasonable under the circumstances. These variances observe the character of the area and are not detrimental to the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. Rationale for not granting the side yard variances is so that the applicant has adequate space to comply with the flood plain fill requirement 15' beyond the limits of the structure. Building encroachment into the side yard setback would exasperate the problem of limiting the fill area adjacent to the building. Granting the side yard variances would be inconsistent with the intent of the Flood Plain Ordinance. GUSTUFSON VARIANCE SUBJECT SITE \ tI ~ VARIANCES If STUDY AREA _,..,...., t "NA1"" It.C6,8s-.1 w"',............r. "JIIC,I'\1I.1J A..s. -,q..... 3 4 lilt / / . I / SCHMIDT EAST "/4 AI JD . AI" CORNeR 2 - J:'RSTRC..Jr 4 3...1 I 1ST ~uD~ . .. - . SURVEY PREPARED FOR: JIM HALEK /4869 MANITOU ROAD PRIOR LAKE. MN. 5537Z Valley Surveying Co., P. A. SUITE 120-C, FRANKLIN TRAIL OFACE CONDOMINIUM 16670 FRANKUN TRAIL S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 5!5372 TELEPHONE (612)447-2570 VARIANCES REQUIRED: I. Z' EAST SlOB YARD WdUANCB FROW THE tit' SIDB YAIU) SETaAClC. ..BQUIUWIINT PR lOR IEL .0'.' 51' ," LAKE ). 41." UKBSHORB \klU.ANCB '10M THB 7" u.l:ESHOIUI SETBACK REQUJ....ENT (ON THE HOIlTH SIDE) .. 2<1' ~~S::) FIOM THB lS' LAKESHORII SETBACIt. RllQUIIlBWEKI' S. " FRONT YARD w.JU4NCE FROM THE 2" f'1lONT YAJU) SIlTaACIC. IlEQUIRIlMBNT 6. 2" I:=~ ~;:~':'IOUS SUUACE ~E FROM THE 3lMli IMPERVIOUS ~'.;, ~\ , \ \,'" \ I'L- I~ ~-: ------------ \- ___ --'0... "'-.... \ ~"I03"0 $,.,.. , , " : 't ,-r........ .~ .'_-1"" ~--4" } '\..-~ "\---" ~- "'f ..,. ,....,!... \ "-:~ ;~. \ . .....A.1. .., \ ~ '~\ .~o;::t' ~ " '. \ "-~.'-' i \.... 'O__~ ,,0 . \ --\-~--~' \ ,..,- ,0.'" \ :;;r~l~" 00'" ~i \ \ '. :.1 --\---___ -.- \ , ,""",..,- \ -.._-~"ff:f~-----~-~.. ~::'t ..'" _" ."- i; ~."""'-- ~~~ \~.~ BREEZY POINT "~.. ili''''' . . li": RO~p --'-- ~ -~~:,~iJ>-..:~--: -. PRIOR r;-I ...I.r'..... ...,.... ....... ... ...~ '"!.':!!';'--;"-~' LAKE n. ~~_. 5/, ":H ~ ul.::i\:iU?l ION: L.ots 14 ~ 1;, ilfU::l::!~ taINT, Scott. Count.y, K1nRoMote. ll~ ="willing the locati..m 01." thfll ti,"ol"cdflld OOWl8 ad dtakltd tnid 5th dal o{ Mal, 1994. NOTES' 8enohM.rt Elevation 910.00 aplh ,1D power pole.. aholfn on the aurn1 dr.ad.pc. 90;.6 Denot.. ....iIIt1Al &rade elevation ~ Denote. Pftpoaad 11nWb. p-ad.. \ >>-aua pcopoMd. direction at 11n.Labed dra1nal_ SlIt the Caras_ .lab at alavat10n 909.23 Sat the top 01 IIlMb at davat.lon 909.90 tM low.at. lhlna floor 18 at alevaUor. 909.90 ! Net Lot ac_ above 904 b 11,121 sq. Ct. N<Ilt Lot <;ollwC'ag.. bl th. pcopoued. buildil'lolli &; dC'htilllla; '" 3~.0 \I How"" }; dUdS- '" 2176 sq. It Drhtillrlll1 '" 188 lIq. Ct. 20 40 1 I hi'" cer1tfy lIMIt ... Jl.I"Vey was JRPGAld .., .... ot under "'1 direct.. .., and.....tlam . duIr"- ~........ under .... low. 01 1M StcmI 01 . .. 77 -.t:;... ?;!fl.. _ Delle "-~-'io./ ~NO.IClI.3 ALE IN FEET __ Iran ........t Nt. .... iron monumant IouM VARIANCES Wllt1IN BREEZY POINT STUDY AREA (SEE AITACHED MAP #1) 15305 Breezy p()int R()at:! .NE: 1. 66' lakeshore variance (80-14) 15311 Breezv Point Road NE: 1. 4,127 sq. ft.lot area variance (with ad. plat - 91-23) 15329 Breezv Point Road NE: 1. 44' lakeshore variance (91-21) 2. 40 sq. ft. lot area variance (with ad. plat 91-23) 15347 Breezv Point Road NE: 1. 4' front yard variance (75-14) 2. 5' west side yard variance (86-06) 15357 Breezv Point Road NE: 1. 38' lake shore variance (for NW comer of garage 74-22) 2. 33' lake shore variance (for NW comer of home 74-22) 3. 44' lakeshore variance (80-10) 4. 11' front yard variance (80-10) 5. 48' lakeshore variance (86-10) 15365 Breezv Point Road NE: 1. 3' front yard variance (77-01) 2. 5' side yard variance (77-01) 3. 38' lake shore variance (80-10) 4. 38' lake shore variance (86-11) 15379 Breezv Point Road NE: 1. 25' lake shore variance (84-02) 2. 5' south side yard variance (84-02) 3. 10' north side yard variance (84-02) 4. 20' front yard variance (84-02) 5. 8% coverage ratio variance (84-02) 15383 Breezv Point Road NE: 1. 25' lakeshore variance (84-02) 2. 5' north side yard variance (84-02) 3. 10' south side yard variance (84-02) 4. 20' front yard variance (84-02) 5. 8% coverage ratio variance (84-02) 15389 Breezv Point Road NE: I. 20.7 front yard variance (84-29) 2. 3' side yard variance (84-29) 3. 8% coverage ratio variance (84-29) NOTICE OF HEARING FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing in the City Council Chambers located at City Hall, 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on: Date: THURSDAY, JUNE 2. 1994 Time: 7:00 P.M. APPLICANT: James M. Halek Integrity Development, Inc. 6885 Boudin Street NE Prior Lake, MN 55372 SUBJECT SITE: 15311 Breezy Point Road NE Lots 14 & 15. Breezy Point. Scott County. Minnesota REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a single family home on Lots 14 and IS, Breezy Point, as indicated on the attached survey. In order to construct the home as proposed, the applicant requests that the Planning Commission grant the following variances from the requirements of Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance 86-3: 1. 2' east side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement (for the garage). 2. 2' west side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement (for the house). 3. 42.5' lakeshore variance from the 75' lakeshore setback requirement (on the north side of the property). 4. 24' lakeshore variance from the 75' lakeshore setback requirement (on the south side of the property). 5. 5' front yard variance from the 25' front yard setback requirement. 6. 2% impervious surface variance from the 30% impervious surface maximum. If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Questions related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Prior Lake Planning Commission Date Mailed: May 20, 1994 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER / JJdr, J ~v-{ tttJ ~ IIH~ ~ PRI ~~afiZrk~~ 04'~ w~DRf ~ ~ ~ ~2/1Lj NOTICE OF HEARING FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing in the City Council Chambers located at City Hall, 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on: llitte= THURSDAY, .JlJNE..2. 1994 Time= 7:00 P.M. APPLICANT: James M. Halek Integrity Development. Inc. 6885 Boudin Street NE Prior Lake. MN 55372 SUBJECT SITE: 15311 Breezy Point Road NE Lots 14 & 15, Breezy Point, Scott County. Minnesota REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a single family home on Lots 14 and 15. Breezy Point, as indicated on the attached survey. In order to construct the home as proposed, the applicant requests that the Planning Commission grant the following variances from the requirements of Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance 86-3: 1. 2' east side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement (for the garage). 2. 2' west side yard vanance from the 10' side yard setback requirement (for the house). 3. 42.5' lakeshore variance from the 75' lakeshore setback rcquiremcnt (on thc north side of the propcny). 4. 24' lakeshore variance from the 75' lakcshorc setback requirement (on the south side of the property). 5. 5' front yard variance from the 25' front yard setback requirement. 6. 2% impervious surface variance from the 30% impervious surface maximum. If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Questions related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Prior Lake Planning Commission Date Mailed: May 20, 1994 4629 Dakota 51. 5.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER City Property Information System City of Prior Lake, MN Parcel Status Run at 2:16 PM on 05/16/94 PAGE 1 Property Identification Number: 250260090 Previous PIN: 250260090 Street Address: City, State Zip: Fire Code: Occupant: Code: N Est. Area: Number of units: 0 Tax Capacity Value: $1,250 Market Value: $50,000 Year Built: 015311 BREEZY POINT PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 000000 RD 10,873 Land Use: 204 Zoning: R1SD Storm Sewer District: 0000 Election District: 1 School District: 719 Park Dedication Fee: $0 Actual Use: V Census: 809.02-04 Flood District: A7 TIF District: Park Dedication Sq Ft: 0 NEW ABSTRACTS CONTINUATIONS CLOSING SERVICE REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS TITLE INSURANCE RECORDING SERVICE vA\3ML SCO I I COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC. 223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 David Moonen and Dale Kutter Kerry Meagher, General Counsel TELEPHONE: (612) 445-6246 FAX: (612) 445-0229 April 14, 1994 Integrity Development 14869 Manitou Road Prior Lake, MN 55372 To Whom it may concern: According to the 1994 tax records in the Scott County Treasurer's office, the following persons are listed as the owners of the property which lies within 100 feet of the following described property: Lots 14 and 15, together with that part of Lot 17, lying westerly of the southerly extension of the westerly line of Lot 13, Breezy Point, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Scottt County, Minnesota. INEZ M & WILLIAM STEVENS 15337 BREEZY POINT RD SE PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 DOUGLAS B & LINDA M THIELBAR 15329 BREEZY POINT RD SE PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 KATHLEEN SPIELMAN 15305 BREEZY POINT ROAD PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 rYtn --- '- Davic:t'E. Moonen President .~' ~-------_._----~' N scon COUNIY ABSTRACT . f': . AND1PII.- ~. UcenIId........U ' .. NN C1fMlnnesobt ~~c~cco..o..~...~~~~ MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TO: FROM: RE: DATE: HORST GRASER, PLANNING DIRECTOR/\r('/ GARY STABER, BUILDING OFFICIAL U: ,,\ GINA MITCHELL, ASSOCIATE PLANNER iI/, CONDITION OF VARIANCE APPROVAL FdJR 15311 BREEZY POINT ROAD NE JUNE 13, 1994 As a condition of variance approval, the Planning Commission required that all significant trees lost be replaced with a 2" caliper tree. There were 5 trees that I felt were significant on the lot. There are also two ash trees which are located on the property to the east (near the common property line). Please refer to the attached survey for their general location. 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER g04.5 -~Oo.. .....~ " ~~ '\ ~..... \ \ \ \ I':. \ . -.. ~,\ ----~...\ I 40 S 79~~~;- 2?c::: _~ 'I \ , \ ~\ i \ \ \ , \ ~~ ~ -~~ .- --- ~\~-"--. --I . --\ -T q4" · ",to EL j E~'5fl"G HOU,t \ I ~ @ ,'...___ ~~~'~'1 (:tofE- \.:Y ...~--" "\..---;6 / .... \ -;5.....)- .-., ,1 \ r.: .,J I L r G~fU'l.GE fOP to4~~ ,. EL 9 [:- , Co .5LA / gO. _,".: - - -;.- -L ,.- ;080 : \ ,0 o' -""";\ ~ .. _- ----t . '\- .,0' 8 =-----~O) \ ~. . ORIVE \ l i' I I 'f I ~ , , =~'~ ~ :~~~j='ROAD~~..--H~~-- - - ~ ~ - _._~;~Of:~-L..'-".E~~--"""~-:'" ~...... ..,..,. :-~.~.~-~ /~- .,~:::o__. PRIOR LAKE E:L 902 8 5/6 / ~ IJESCRIPT ION: I. ButtV' Y1Llt 2.D~ 3. O0A0 ~ At7~ 5. Ao/h 70 !v? i-v 0 (\ r1f~h be r5 . ;/ f rDP'<<i Lots 14 & 15, BREEZY POINT, Scott County, Minnesota. Also ..howin" the loclltlulI of the proposed house NOTES' Benchmark Elevation 910.00 spike in power put" u.. shown 011 the "'"'V"I drawing. 905.6 Denotea existing grade elevatioJI ( C~(.)9:,I) Denotas proposed finish grade.. Denotes proposed diL'ec tion of finish..d deuinag" Set the Garage slab at elevatioJ9D9.23 Set the top of slab at elevation 909.'!1) the lowest living floor Is at elevation 9U';I. 'JU Net Lot srea abov", 904 is 11,1<>1 '''1. ft. Net Lot coverag" bi the Pl'Opo"",j huj ldi"" rici ~'t!.'r,,~..j 30.../. House & garage = 2,730sq. ft DrlNw"j 664 "4. n. (B) As-built elevations for elevated or flood proofed structures must be certified by ground surveys and flood ~roofing techniques must be desi9ned and certif1ed by a re~istered professional eng1neer or architect as spec1fied in the general provisions of this Ordinance and specifically as stated in Section 9.2(E) of this Ordinance. SECTION 5: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES 5.1 PERMITTED USES: The following uses shall be permitted uses within the Flood Plain District to the extent that they are not prohibited by any other ordinance: (A) (B) (C) (D) Open Space, Recreation, Retaining Walls, Stairs, Platforms and Fill approved in conjunction with a development proposal. Accessory structures provided thef comply with the provision of Section 5.4(E) of th1s Ordinance. Fill may be a permitted use provided that it is part of a development project and is accompanied by an a~proved buildin~ permit and/or grading and fil11ng permit. F1ll shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, rip rap or any other acceptable method, approved in advance by the citf of Prior Lake. All buildin~ permits for lands w1thin the Flood Plain Distr1ct shall be forwarded to the Department of Natural Resources for review and a~proval according to the procedures outlined in Sect10n 9 of this Ordinance. Residence and other structures constructed on fill so that the basement floor or first floor, if there is no basement, is at or 'above the re~latory flood protection elevation. The finished f111 elevation shall be no lower than one (1) foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and shall extend at such elevation at least fifteen (15) feet beyond the limits of any structure or building erected thereon. Fill shall be compacted and the slopes shall be protected by rip rap or vegetative covering, approved in advance by the City of Prior Lake. 5.2 STANDARDS FOR PERMITTED USES: (A) The use shall have low flood damage potential. (B) The use shall be permissible in the underlying zoning district. 6 RECEIPT ~o 23624 DATE 3--/0 - 7Y CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 4629 DAKOTA- STREET S.E., PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 Received of \... Lh.,,/\,./ A ~ ,:,",~ fl.....J~ whose address and/or lei' desfption is c;:/' the sum 01 . ,-I~,~ ~~tJ/<A.- ~;()~ lars for the pu;pos~ --;;;- V/7)/.?;'.-: -A .. e /{,~/,r" ~ '- y~' /' ~ $ /'/. .- C;d /'5.~ Reference Invoice No. R~~:r~o~e{di~:OI Prior Lake . NOTICE The Planning commission Agenda and Planning Report will be available the Tuesday preceding the Thursday Planning commission Meeting. Please check one of the following if you wish a copy. (I> Please mail the Planning commission Agenda and Planning Report. ( > I will pick up the Planning Commission Agenda and Planning Report. NAME ADDRESS ~~ ~~J~ fo22~ &~2it~ fJ/0rV ;(tub/ /7hJS53?:L / -<'t'". .f' <:t-,r .-.... - - ;.,~~ " ":';' -! ~_. - . , . , . fr.