The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVA94-27 Carney Variance (Oversize Docs) CITY OF PRIOR LAKE APPLICATION FUR VARIAOCE Applicant:_ #~K/EIV,t/t~ {lh!f ,o~y Address : ~ 0 k' (l'7X EIJ " E sr. .s c- Property CMner: SIJ ),I r- Address:. Sff-U L , Type of CMnership: Fee X Contract Consul tant/Contractor: d-J7 PID# 25 -Oh4 :oG5 - 0 Home Phone:..?.bl-~~42 akZ Work Phone: .Home Phone: SII--N {.- Work Phone: Purchase Agreanent Phone: Existing Use . (' of Property: fES /IJEA/71 ;f~ ' ~LE -FJ-Nli. Y 1Io#E- Present Zoning: ~ -( -.) D Legal Description of Variance Site:~ ~E ~tf&}) Variance Requested: .,2,77 f/r'}"7- SU2,f ~ 1/A-J('I.4A.1<1.Jc___ Has the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, use permit on the subject site or any part of it? What was requested: When: obtain a variance or conditional Yes )G N:) Disposition: I' ,/ Describe the type of improvements proposed: J~ y /'$1' _I~!- --- E.V/,s)-/I'f/G j)~(!,K Id...-.(,_t:'lt~.",'N. c.~^- ;J'-'s'[A5:o to rl:J/f(!..fI l D' Y \ 'l' --{ 1"'-, A €A' .\k: (\ , ~c; &JBMISSION REX1JIREMENl'S: It (A)Completed application form. (B)Filing fee. (C)Property Survey indicating the proposed developnent in relation to property lines and/or ordinary-high-water mark; proposed building elevations and drainage plan. (D) Certified fram abstract firm, names and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. (E)Complete legal description & Property Identification Number (pm). (F)Deed restrictions or private covenants, if applicable. (G) A parcel map at I "-20 '-50' showing: The site developnent plan, buildings: parking, loading, access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service. ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCU'~'.w AND REVIEWED BY THE PLANNINi ~SSION. To the best of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies requirements for variance procedures. I agree to provide information and follow the procedures as outlined in the Ordinance. a-., ' A;'" VJ.-f /l~ _ /1 (//J?tLil4' /q l.IL:. bA' MI' ~ Applicants Signature C7 Submitted thisM day of TLI'-Y 19Y~.A'. ,,' ~ Fee Owners Signature ~ PIANNING <DMMISSION APPROVED CITY COUN:IL APPEAL APPROVED mNDITIONS: 566 A117\0tt5D THIS SPACE IS 'ID BE FILLED OUT BY THE PLANNING DIRll,'.l\;R X DENIED 8- If -cr+ DATE OF HEARIN; DENIED 9 - It?- q Lf- mTE OF HEA,RJ:N; APPU CANt W littpfu itV M~l- Q'-04q I tknvrh.'1r1tthut-fr5S0CL~ PWlnvI/ Signature of the Planning Director Date Q-7-CJlf-- f ':'"l""-~_.,~.--.-_._._-----------~---_.. - -,' ., ---'---'~--~--"~--'--------'---""------'----" -.-.-- ._--- ..--_. .-- , , .. .-a ,. .~r' ... "'.i'l'ri.~ ," ,,:; RECEIPT tiG 241fo 7-20-;7-- ! DATE ~ CITY 0 F PRIOR LAKE 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E., PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 Received of/1drJe/i!7e Ucr re V whose address and/or legal description is ~ o ".I, the sum of ~f 1/'1 rin /-- n- Ve c/ (j OJ (;() i /~ ~o I I ars for the purpose of va t I Cf li {:,Gi (/,Ot) J I C0.-1-; /nl~ /' I / $ 71), ['Z) Ref~rence InvoicerNo,... 0!iLrtvm ,v ,"':/c.fcfuc / - I' Receipt Clerk for the City of Prior Lake II VARFM II 25- 004-- OOS-O VARIANCE CHECK LIST SCHEDULE HEARING DATE: ~wO NM-I~~ ~. S[, Adrlerulfl Cofnev I CH7 7/20/11- - 6/+;<1tfe T20 7- 2..I-tf If 7-Z-{-QIf 1- U --lfLf 7-2-(-qLf ,...u-cN SUBJECT SITE: APPLICANT: DNR NOTICE IF SHORELAND: v:- PREPARE AREA MAP: V APPLICANT NOTICE: V PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE: v/ NOTICE TO ~ - ENGINEERING V Ver--I'In NOTIFY OTHERS: Scott County Watershed District MNOOT Other COMMISSION AGENDA PACKETS: \/ Staff Memo vr Application Form v/ Copy of Public Notice v/ Applicable Maps V / Copy of Parcel Info. i~ Other Applicable Info. STAFF ACTIVITIES MAIL COpy OF APPLICATION AND vi q - 7- Of '-i- REQUIRED CONDITIONS TO APPLICANT: ~/ I MAIL COPY OF APPLICATION AND q-7-~L/ CONDITIONS TO DNR: GIVE COPY OF APPLICAITON AND / q-7-94 CONDITIONS TO BLD. INSPECTOR ASSIGN FILE NUMBER: AMEND VARIANCE SUMMARY SHEET: V q - 7 -11- ADD PERMIT TO PROPERTY MGMT: / 1- ,-qLf FILE BY: File #: VA Cft../-2.7 Applicant: /tdrf'enn.t, fur~ Legal: u.:esf 200' 0:/J.fL8f Address: tf:J...k;() ~.bt1~f1!f/ f)~ :370 ( oJ Tr()..~ AJ ft. L. S. Ii'JOj U FILE SHOULD CONTAIN: v' Staff Memo v/. Original Application v Copy of Notice to OWners V' Planning Corom. Minutes ~ Other Information ~. Applicable Maps and Documents V/ Copy of Public Notice V Correspondence Council Minutes if Applicable .,/ Prior Lake City Council Minutes September 6, 1994 volume, screening and buffering of property adjacent to the roadway, etc. After much debate, Council then directed staff to explore various alternatives to mitigate impact on adjacent property owners and return with their findings for further Council consideration. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECONDED BY SCHENCK, TO TABLE DISCUSSION ON CR 44 UNTIL THE OCTOBER 3, COUNCIL MEETING. Upon a vote taken, yeas by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Scott and Schenck. The motion carried. A short recess was called. The meeting was reconvened at 10:35 p.m. B. Consider Petition to Prohibit Motorized Boats from Pike Lake. City Manager Boyles asked whether the Council would like additional information regarding the request. Mona Leppla, 4250 140th Street, spoke on behalf of Chuck Pavlish who could not attend the meeting, to expound further on their request. Ms. Leppla outlined the following reasons for the resident's request for an ordinance to ban motorized vehicles from Pike Lake: High water level created due to the lake being an overflow from Prior Lake. Erosion created by the high water and which had increased when water skiing took place. Pike Lake is an environmental lake and water skiing would negatively affect the numerous quantities of water fowl presently on the lake. 3. Bill Mangan had indicated that it would be an asset to have an environmental lake within the city to provide for a natural setting. 4. Concern has been expressed by the YMCA over motorized vehicles on Pike Lake and safety to their students during canoeing instructions. 5. Enforcement has not been a problem. Council discussion occurred on the DNR's position on the City's authority over lake issues and the cost of developing an ordinance for Pike lake. Tom Watkins, Lake Advisory Committee member, stated that the process of preparing the Milfoil and Water Surface Management ordinances had consumed a considerable amount of staff time not only to prepare the ordinances, but to oversee the -3- September 7,1994 Adrienne Carney 4960 Rutledge Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Dear Ms. Carney, Your request for a 2.77' west side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement was denied by the Prior Lake Planning Commission on August 4, 1994. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 447-4230. Sincerely, iiLrLv mYrdtiuJL;' -' Gina M. Mitchell enc. cc. File 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ElVlPLOYER r: t " '1 ,'..- (..<,. /' ,/' ',,' '1< r' /' I <.!---' Adrienne Carney li9(,O Hutl 8"10e '?, t. s. :c: . Pyi.OT Lake. M~. 55372 AUF':w-ot , , , c , 1991-+- Prior lalce City Counci.l: II10uld -:. iJr8 tote pJaced or' the ae;enCla 0= the Cj ty Council meet.ing to appeal the deciciioL of the pic<nning commission to deLY my reqw'?fJ.; for u. "',i t ~).:.; E' ya.!_'d f".etback variance ~. , ~l ncere.L.}' , Ltif~~f );(t~ AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION: DISCUSSION: ALTERNATIVES: ACTION REQUIRED: APPROVED BY: 8(A) GINA M. MITCHELL, ASSOCIATE PLANNER CONSIDER VARIANCE APPEAL REQUEST FOR ADRIENNE CARNEY SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 On August 11, 1994, a written request for an appeal of the denial of a variance request by the Planning Commission to construct a three season porch and deck in the location of an existing deck was received from Adrienne Carney. The applicant requested the Planning Commission to grant a 2.77' west side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement. The Planning Commission discussed the item and ultimately denied the variance request four to one. The following facts were cited: 1. The home was built under the jurisdiction of the City of Prior Lake. The side yard setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have been reduced since construction of the home from 15' to 10'. 2. Approval of the variance would legitimize a location established by the existing deck that was built without a building permit, according to the records on file at the City, which could set a negative precedent in the community. 3. The variance hardship standards of the Zoning Ordinance have not been met. Four members of the Planning Commission felt that approval of the proposed variance could not be granted independently of the existing conditions because the applicant has a lot that exceeds the minimum standards of the Zoning Ordinance in area and width. Commissioner Loftus opposed the motion stating that he felt the Planning Commission may have granted a variance to a property on Northwood Road which involved an existing condition that was created without a permit. Attached please find the application, staff analysis, and Planning Commission Minutes of August 4, 1994. 1. Support the decision of the Planning Commission. 2. Approve the 2.77' west side yard variance as requested by the applicant. ~' 3. Tabl~~ item fo further discussion. oeln S", or, C~Cil dl cussion, .1 l ~/~ LLt- / \ 1 Frank F. rleS. ,9ty I}anager -,~ 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 11.....MII - ADRIENNE CARNEY - VARIANCE Adrienne Carney, 4960 Rutledge Street SE, stated she is applying for a variance to build a three season porch and a deck The existing deck would be removed and the new consnuction would be in the same location. The applicant stated her husband built the house and the deck was on the house when she moved into the home in 1974. Gina Mitchell, Associate Planner presented the information as per planning report of August 4, 1994. The subject site is 200 X 275 feet, containing over 1 acre and was platted under Eagle Creek Township. There are no record of variances nor a record of a building permit for the deck Had the deck been built prior to annexation into the COllllllunity, the setback would be considered a legal non-conforming setback and would be grandfathered in. The building permit was issued in 1974 and showed no plans for a deck Comments from the Commissioners were; define lot lines, demolition or repair of old deck, no building permit for deck was issued, adverse possession, reduce size of porch, the hardship criteria has not been met. and precedent may be set if granted. O.Jlllll~sioner Loftus felt the variance should be granted as the deck has been in existence for 19 years and referred to a situation on Northwood Road. Scott Carney, son of the applicant, gave an explanation of the proposed addition. Leslie Merrinan, Edina Realty, stated a similar situation with one of her clients. Blair Tremel"e, PlioI' Lake Planning Consultant, explained a legal procedure of ex post facto variances and options available to the Commissioners. MOTION BY KUYKENDALL, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO DENY THE 2.77 FOOT WEST SIDE YARD VARIANCE FOR 4960 RUTLEDGE STRJ::,.l::.T SE. RATIONAlE BEING TIIE REQUEST DOES Nor l'vJ.tl: 1 THE HARDSHIP CRITERIA AND A PRECEDENT MAY BE SIT Vote taken signified ayes by Kuykendall, Roseth, Arnold, and Vonhof. Nay by Commissioner Loftus, rationale being that he believed a similar variance was aWluved to a prU}/CILj on Northwood Road. MOrrON CARRIED. Deb GaITOSS stated thel"e has been a request from Scott Clements of the David Carlson CU111~y, if the Planning Commissioners would consider a special meeting for side yard variances on units in the Sterling North at The Wilds. Consensus from the CUllllll;'ssioners were not in favor of a special meeting. MOTION BY LOFTIJS, SECOND BY KUYKENDALL,TO ADJOURNTIIE Nll::.t. 1 lNG. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Kuykendall, Amold, Vonhof, and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting adjoUlned at 8:45 P.M. The tape of the meeting is on file at City Hall. Deb Ganoss Assistant City Planner Rita M. Schewe Recording Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION August 4. 1994 Page 2 PLANNING REPORT AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: PRESENTER: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: 2 CONSIDER VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ADRIENNE CARNEY GINA MITCHELL, ASSOCIATE CITY PLANNER _YES-XNO AUGUST 4, 1994 INTRODUCTION: The Planning Department has received a variance application from Adrienne Carney of 4960 Rutledge Street SE. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission to approve a 2.77' west side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement to construct a 12' x 14' three season porch and a 12' x 12' deck addition in the location of the existing deck as indicated on the attached survey. PHYSIOGRAPHY: The subject site is approximately 200' wide and 275' deep, containing over 1 acre, approximately 55,000 square feet of lot area. A hill exists in the rear of the lot and the site slopes to Rutledge Street. There is quite a difference in elevation from the rear of the lot to the front. Exact elevations were not given on the survey, however an estimate from the topography maps indicate the rear of the lot is approximately 25' higher than the front. The majority of the vegetation on the eastern half and the south third of the property consists of volunteer growth. There are no significant trees that will be effected by the proposed deck or porch addition. ADJACENT USES: The subject site is located on the south side of Rutledge Street. Registered Land Survey No. 39 was platted within Eagle Creek Township in 1967 into three tracts, and annexed into the City of Prior Lake in 1973. These tracts have since been divided resulting in parcels of varying size. The majority of the homes in this area were built after annexation with building pern1its granted by the City of Prior Lake. There are no record of variances granted to any of the parcels, nor is there a record of a building pernlit for the existing deck on file at City Hall. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: A home was built on the subject site by the applicant in 1974, within the City of Prior Lake, meeting the 15' side yard setback requirement of the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the building pernlit. At some time after 1974, a deck was built in the location of the proposed porch and deck addition (see attached survey for the location of the existing deck). The City has no record of a building pernlit being issued for the existing deck which was built 7.23' from the west side property line. The proposed additions will not encroach further into the west side yard than the existing deck. If the existing deck had been built 7.23' from the side property line!1rior to annexation into the community, the setback would be considered a legal non-confornling setback and the deck would be "grandfathered" in. The Planning Commission has often granted variances for grandfathered situations because is considered a hardship that the structure was built to a another government's standard which is different than today's zoning requirements. This situation is different because there is no record of a building pemlit being issued for the existing deck which does not meet the west side yard setback requirement. and the hardship is a result of a property owner, not the Ordinance or the City of Prior Lake. Approval of the variance would legitimize a situation that is not pernliUed by the Zoning Code. 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Approve the variances as requested, or with some modifications as per Planning Commission discussion. 2. Continue or table discussion for specific reasons. 3. Deny the variances finding lack of demonstrated hardship. RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation from staff is Alternative #3. Variance Hardship Standards: 1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to the property. This home was built under the jurisdiction of the City of Prior Lake. The side yard setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have been reduced since construction of the home from 15' to 10'. 2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the property. There are no circumstances unique to this property. There are alternatives such as reducing the size of the porch and deck, or relocating the proposed additions which would eliminate the need for a variance. 3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property. The hardship is not caused by the Ordinance, but rather by a private property owner since there is no record of a building permit being issued for the construction of the existing deck. 4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. Approval of the variance as requested would legitimize a deck that was built without a building permit, according to the records on file at the City of Prior Lake. tri ....J ~ J I THIS DRAWING IS TO BE USeD REFERENCE PURPOSES AND Tl TY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOfi ACCUR4CIES HEREIN CONT ~.\....s. It- ,roC' 'Teoct ti .. C~ .. "..1' ,. e sc' e / CARNEY VARIANCE SUBJECT SITE-------- ;. . \..~~E c"'1 <>lE:.f.\~~56 en .. ~ <( o . ..- .:; ~)'.f \ \..J)\ \ \ LIJ... .X: J- -..,,-~ I - r ~ , -......... .... ",' .. .. ~ to c . ..:\ J J .~ VARIANCE REQUESTED: 2.77' WEST SIDE YARD VARIANCE FROM THE 10' SlOE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT N t S 89OI4'00"E RUTELAGE 200.02 1(7~ Of 100. OJ ~ . '" \ I '" ~ ~ . ,~ /OPO/ /PO.O/ STREET wf,co 06e..k.. ".'\ '" ({'r ;~ ~ /-::~~/~ f'_"':" U.7~ '" 3 SEASoN ;: ~ I i'+' POACH ADDf110N """"- . '" ~ ~ 12' JC 14' ~ ~ _, ~~ DECK ,7: x ,: ).; ~~ \ ",,1~,1"e ~~ 5i9';Z _ ~, ' " ~:. re,vC.ii CcA:. O'lZ :V4ST OF .!..IN_ y~ ~~ W :J Z W > <( SCALE IN FEET . - - 0 20 40 80 120 160 ~ . 11-'7.0 ) .f1 ~ >. ~. - ~. ~ ~ .1.0 -0 .' ~ ~ ,...-0 ",0 ~ aj.O '" ,... 0 ~ NO '" l/l o Denotes leon monument set, see note w -0 ON -g~ rJ'f' . '" N o ~ z ~ '" jfZZ Lf;l~ . ~~;;rl' ;.,'~ . . . A, . . Denotes icon monument found c,.-t~ O.r t&7 ,~-,..,....:. ,,# EA..,;!- ,r-,r UA.l,E Denotes concrete slab _ .37()_O f- Z :J o ~ w (!) a a: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (as contained tn Certificate Of Title No. 26210) t<J!Jfl#!'vIN'-f ..w.LL- zoo 0 ~. ------ ----- ---- ...------ ~ ~O?OI Z Z04,? "'N S lS.;1 00 ---- ---- The West 200 feet of the East 37U Eeet of Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 39, Scott County, t-1Lnnesotd, files of the Registrar of titles in and for said county and state. The northerly jj feet to be used for road purposes. PROPOSED PAKCEl. A The West 100 feet of tIle East 470 feet of Teact A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 39, Scott Count,!, ,"11nnesota, files of the Registrar of tl ties Ul and for said county and state. The norttlerl! ~~ feet to be used for road purposes. PKOPOSED PARCEL B The West 100 feet of the East 5~O feet of Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 39, Scott County, Minnesota, files of the Registrar of titles in and toe said county and state. The norttleely 3~ feet to be used for road purpos~s. NOTE prepa red for I hereby c.ertify that thi!'; survey. plan or report wa!'; prepared by me or under my direct superviRion and that I am a duly Re~lsterpd Land Surveyor under the lav9 of the State of Minnesota. a~ fB~~ Jants' E. ~oerhave RLS D't. --1LIIJJP- ZZ_ /9f'f,t- Reg. No. 70Q, 1424) Mitoka Circlt N.E. Prior Lake. Minnt~Ola 55372 612.445-9154 ADMINISTRATIVE Pl.AT BOERHAVE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 24' lONG IRON MONUMENT ANO IOEN1lFJCA TION DtSC (ACTUAL SIZE) SET AT All POfNTS INDICATED. .... REG. lAND SURVEYOR .'095 ADRIENNE CARNEY Whlte.Oll'ee Yellow. Own.r Dluo . I nlpeelor Pink. Allollor VILLAGE OF PRIOR LAKE SCOTT COUNTY PHONE.4<l7,3788 APPLICATION FC.'R BUILDING PERMIT Date / L2..'1 - 74- _ A1 ( , Permit No. ___J7/ Proporty Owno( -/-lM-jiir:;-DL' A nJ'l Addnm 19)4 A ;1/1:.1/A v "'_ '__ .~,'!-. Phon~ ~,; - t, 0 '.2.. Applicant --- -- e'A-J,1,- ~ - Address II Phone _. ------- ---- Contractor ___ ._) jV._ h:-- __ Address __ Phone ___.__ I J _ .!...EG"A~ DESCR,IPTJON-?F ~RO~_RTY (Attac~l..ot Planl /J ., /J :zt:)<'\ -,- ---... Ir-Vt.-..VL.-:J. cc.; /J: (- t/t._--,...~.,~JL'./( f I..........<:..-r /"1 -'Z-L'L j~j ------- -- - -- ___ __ I< __ ___ Characteristics: Zoning District (check box) Re~idontial:~" Commercial: 0 In, dustrlal: 0 Other: 0 (Specily)_ Lot SIZO:~ S~. Ft.: Width at Buildinn Set bock line: Depth of Lot:_2~<l___ Side yard is I5--=:.and.?..'?._feel. Rear yard is . J~j It. Front yard is 1'<2- ft. Building setback from state or county highway is .._, __ feet. Building will be located ____h. feet from septic tank. (Sewage permit requirt'dl. Building will be located _,.__ feet from soil absorption system. Type of Improvement - M New Building ( ) Altoration ( I Repnir ( ) Move ( I Other Residential proposed use - ;xi One family , ( ) Multiple dwelling _ ,_units ( ) Other Size _ _ __. Non Re,idential proposed use - SpeclfV ."~"" C...ot' .....- Estimated Building Costs of Improvement - $ ..L~,_____J-=-::__ 10M IT CENTSI Principal type of frame - ( ) Masonry ~ Wood Frame ( ) Structural Steel ( ) Other. spoclly #Of: Type of sewage disposal - ~ Public ( ) Individual Sewer system approved ____ Sewer system conditional __ (SEE SEWER APPLICATION) Water Supply: (,>(1 Public ( ) Individual well Dimensions - Basement !>4. Yes () No Stories above basement .J Sq. Ft. (OUTSIDE DIMENSIONSI .:1. 'i )( tf'l Bedrooms ..!.~_ Beths .::L Heating: ( ) Electric p(j Gas ( ) Oil ( ) None () Other: ( ) Fireplace How meny ~ Mechanical Air Conditioning ( ) Yes j?tNo ( ) Centrel () Unit A","mlnt: I hereby cenity thlt the in'ormation contlln.,;! herlin II correct Ind 10'" to do the. ...' ~I work In ecc:ord.-w:e with the dncrlptlon Ibove wt forth end aceordlt , to tht' provision. of thl ordlMnCOI of Prior Like. Mi"nftOtl. I furthef.... thlt any pel"' and ~fleetlon. ..bmlttld herewllh '''''III. _. 0 por' or thl, pormlloppllClltlon. 10110 undontond lholthl, PI!JP"JIJ'lId lor 0 ~"'Ipfll 1l~1 ""'..,.... JfD-<~Cf-'7t/ y/~ x...L.. l'~ Dolod $lelIoturo 01 Own.. ~ Fees Paid: Building Permit Sewage System Water System $ J.?:1";~ $-,-- $ Surcharge $ / l, QQ- Surcharge $ Su rcharge $ Metropolitan Service Availability Charge. . . . . . . . Park Fee Dedicated to purchase and maintain Public Parks If fee is waived, why? Sub-total Sub-total Sub.tmal $ $ $ ILl'} ~ $ $ )cE>'~ I,..,O~ TOTAL CHARGE $ ~)/.o; ~ B /l~I!_IJ. 1l7c/L .~"' / y VILLAGE CLERK u_ ~-, Application for permit shall be accompanoed bv; 3 copies of a lot plan 2 copies of building plans 2 copies of specifications Four inspections will be required of which the contractor shall notify the !luilding Inspector. 1st . footings before covering 2nd. framing 3rd . dry Will or plllter 4th. final. when building Is complete but before occupemy. ~ Valle~".~!~::ering CO"pr;!.~~"Mlnnesm. 55372 /"' . I I l I I ~ N en r , I , .' ... \ \ \ . ---- rn '" ......." . I ,....... , .... , Sk(~. ,;\.., 4~("", "'r:~~ (~ rn. ,.,. -- 200.00 - - Li TWP RO~DJ I', \. - .... \ , ( \ J ....' , ... , , \ }/~ , ~, ~ ,,'~T..'r"'?" ""..- ."- p~.;,t~.,f;t /\ ,,8,1Jt \/ I' '. ), , . \ , '- ) ,- ~ .- " ,.' Q..., ~ ",. \''\} .' "0 ... - - .~. ~ '<<\ '" ....... . '" <;:~./ p~ / I Jon .-..... " \ '... ~ \~......., <oe) " I 1. \ , \ /fI Cf\ , , t- en ~ (II , --. 1 - \ ^ I " ~ ~-') . .,...., . -' ~ I ~ r I I I"~ Scale - -.,.. " " "VA27PN" NOTICE OF HEARING FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing in the City Council Chambers located at City Hall, 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on: Date: THURSDAY. AUGUST 4.1994 Time: 7:20 P.M. APPLICANT: Adrienne Carney SUBJECT SITE: 4960 Rutledge Street SE The West 200' of the East 370' of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 39, Scott County, Minnesota, files of the Registrar of titles in and for said county and state. The northerly 33' to be used for road purposes. REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a 12' x 14' three season porch, and 12' x 12' deck in the location of the existing deck, as indicated on the attached survey. In order to construct the porch and deck as proposed, the applicant requests that the Planning Commission grant the following variance from the requirements of Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance 83-6: A 2.77' west side yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement. If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Questions related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Prior Lake Planning Commission Date Mailed: July 21, 1994 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER NEW ABSTRACTS CONTINUATIONS CLOSING SERVICE REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS TITLE INSURANCE RECORDING SERVICE SCO I I COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC. vN14--:A-7 ---- ., n'~ C!!J,/~ July 7, 1994 223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 David Moonen and Dale Kutter Kerry Meagher, General Counsel TELEPHONE: (612) 445-6246 FAX: (612) 445.0229 Andrianne Carney 4960 Rutledge Street SE Prior Lake MN 55372 To Whom It May Concern; According to the 1994 tax records in the Scott County Treasurer's Office, the following persons are listed as the owners of property which lies within 100 feet of the following described property: The West 200 feet of the East 370 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 39, Scott County Minnesota. Roy E Abbott & Wife 4893 Rutledge Street SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Ricky L Phillips 4997 Rutledge Street Prior Lake MN 55372 Dirk W & Johnna L Braaten 15630 Ridgemont Avenue SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Ronald E Edwards & Wife 15590 Ridgemont Avenue SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Wayne N & Carlotta Austin 15530 Breezy Point Road Prior Lake MN 55372 ~S1? Df\ffU City of Prior Lake City Administrator 4629 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake MN 55372 /1/171 Gary D & Constance L Perrin 15334 Ridgemont Avenue SE Prior Lake MN 55372 Davd E Moonen President Linda Marie Kasparek 15533 Breezy Point Road SE Prior Lake MN 55372 SlJUll.l,~, >.. ~::';:lA6i'1 I...J I! .1._. I..J. Llcs:,~.j r .-'"'~, _)r !, Sti't'J of, ' 1 " ~_.. ..,..,*' ci1> ,,~~.,""'.';P,C, MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY