HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA93-23 Manthey Variance
J i
u~ 68' I 5 .U
Appl-ieam:. rD ,J'- \ ~""\ 1"'), ~y
Address: /s:;)JO ~JJicd' L ~"- \~U .s \vt \-,n~.()
Property Owner: .. rv\f
Address: ,( A rVI .p
Type of Ownership: Fee Contract
Consultant/~ng:tor: J-I..orst- G ra.-S-e.(
VA q3 -23
PIDi.P3-2oLt- 003-0
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
Existing Use . .L-
of property:~Ot +<41 ~-eC..1 ~B;R Present Zoning:
Legal Description Bl,O~ 1
of Variance Site:'-f,.o+ 3# ~a.{c( L h.. ~-b tee ~
Variance Requested: 'd.O f+ F(CM.+ \{'l"'t'.trd. t.~ e ~ f.2::;:J.. F-t- -t'f.o""
./
.Home Phone: c...ICj~ - (X.{? (., (
Work Phone:~-~
Home Phone: r /1 \"'\/J I:::;
l'<<>rk Phone: 0' ,~
Purchase Agreement
Phone: <..ti::CJ - 4 ~(J <L-
A-I'
~
(.. f-..
Has the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone" ~tain a variance or conditional
use permit on the subject; site or an~ pa~ of it? X Yes N:>
What was r~ested: To tfpnt1~
When: {lpr I~- q I Disposition: ~"l+<ed
Describe the type of improvanen~ proposed:::!O fe r\ovQ. $Ox4oPole bAtt') 1\-
-k> ~ut- ur c.\ ~.2 0t1'~~ 0.-, hj~.( rs<<Js)~j .
roBMISSION ~REMENrS: - l\~~
(A)Completed application fonn. ~Filing fee. l-(cJProperty SUrvey indicating the
proposed developnent in relation to property lines and/or ordinary-higlrwater mark;
proposed building elevations and drainage plan. L-(a)Certified from abstract finn,
names and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of
the subject property. L(.E)Complete legal description & Property Identification NlmIber
(PID). (F)Deed restrictions or private covenants, if applicable. (G)A parcel map
at 1"-20'-50' showing: The site developnent plan, buildings: parking, loading,
access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service.
ONLY COMPLEl'E APPLICATIONS SHALL BE AL~.rJ:llJ AND REVIEWED BY THE PIANNIt'G CCM1ISSION.
To the best of I'l'!Y knowledge the information presented on this fonn is correct. In
addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies
requirements for variance procedures. I agree to provide informatio and follow the
procedures as outlined in the Ordinance. ~ ;.
" APPlicants -Signat~re
SUbmitted this ....i:Lday of .s-e~ 19..2) ~ _ '- '"
Fee Owners Signature -
THIS SPAgi IS 'ID BE FILLED OUT BY THE PIANNIN; DIREX:TOR
PIANNIN; <::n1MISSION V APPWlED DENIED J..D.tJJ q,:; IY\TE OF HFARIt'G
LJ.:.rf COUN:IL APPEAL AP.I:"l'<l.J'lED DENIED DATE OF HFARIt'G
CONDITIONS:
~1YJ. '1Yir1ll&U- ~s:cua.tu Pltl1Lf1J /)
Signature of the Planning Director Date
, D / rJ 13
. .
2~-~o~- 003-0
VARIANCE CHECK LIST
"VARFM"
15210 \--\OV\J{)(C{ LQKe- 1<0 (it ol, Sho. KOrxv"
MfA r IZ M(;lV'\. tv\~y
I
CHECK
SUBJECT SITE:
APPLICANT:
SCHEDULE HEARING DATE:
DNR NOTICE IF SHORELAND:
PREPARE AREA MAP:
APPLICANT NOTICE:
PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE:
NOTICE TO DOUG - ENGINEERING
NOTIFY OTHERS:/
V Scott County
Watershed District
COMMISSION AGENDA PACKETS:
V Staff Memo
V / Application Form
y/ Copy of Public Notice
v
V
V
V/
V
V
41J7/q3
, .
q Jz$Jq?
'1}:2-$-1. q~
c'I32'lft't
"'~' '=l
vr 7 ~1'
I
MNDOT
Other
~ Applicable Maps
V / Copy of Parcel Info.
\/' Other Applicable Info.
STAFF ACTIVITIES_
MAIL COPY OF APPLICATION AND
REQUIRED CONDITIONS TO APPLICANT:
MAIL COPY OF APPLICATION AND
CONDITIONS TO DNR:
GIVE COPY OF APPLICAITON AND
CONDITIONS TO BLD. INSPECTOR
ASSIGN FILE NUMBER:
AMEND VARIANCE SUMMARY SHEET:
ADD PERMIT TO PROPERTY MGMT:
v
{/
V
V
V/
V
/ 0 ~ (J... ft;- f ;;
ItJ-~7 2
/6 - J-& - C; 3
q/22/03
JO'/ ~ ( 13
. .
IDlvr/Q1
f . I
M(,t(l< MMt h--cV
1;1.Itl H~Q,rol (..~. ~~j 5ha.~pee-
FILE BY: File #: VA q3-23 Applicant:
Legal: Lot '3 J ~,orJ<.1 Address:
fWv-IaY"ol ~KiY€"stlthS
FILE SHOULD CONTAIN:-
Staff Memo
Original Application
Copy of Notice to OWners
planning Corom. Minutes
Other Information
:0
Appl~cable Maps and Documents
Copy Public Notice
Corre~_ ndence
Council ~inutes if Applicable
I
Ii
i
j
I
.
'116. _.,..*.
'/-""",,,,-
I.t;.
.r-. ,..
,.. \I"
y\~o
,
y
~
.
I ....--.....
I
l I
>
~
I '
t ,.V1
.. /411\
'I> '10
.. i I'""
I I i 'ill
\ :E.~,o /.. ~.~ 7..)" -...1 lfj
AO'..... '... I .J;
\ ,.-................- 11
'- .. . 1 ~-2QOt
~.~~.~ 1 'pllOt<<!~ /1
.... _____ ...~.. ..;.. 70.0 i /
- . /
'" ....... ! - Nno I ~. /' ./ J
........ __.: __--- f/
....."':- .--
.... ,,'\ 0
'- ,"- !~ - -
HiGH IWJTCII MAliK
, _;0
"'/ .,-
" ! -.......::....." - - .-
~,
~~~.~ '~....
~, '. " "
~ " ....
\\ '\
\ '\
\ '\',
. """
~ "
........
/
/
/
/i '"
----
.--
~.
~
~",'
"',
..,
8@' I~K\F;,5 ~I~ ~
~il;MI~
.,
~
3(J. :JfJ
N fI!1"tlt)"(fJ()"E
,
~
4- 'VS-
-&~.1S
0'>0.4,.. / --........:
22.5/...'............... J .____.
!: 71'16'22"w
'~'TA "vi j1jLLEY _....eYORS lINe.
2'2,:Ol;.I111hS'T. ;t.o. BOX ,.. . ~lE. ~"~l ~...:tJ:'
&~I2""TI'9G
~V'9€D '0- Z!I- 91 CHANGE HOUSE LO(;.mON
CERTIFICATE
OF
SUR'VEY
lIMfI1tEy i&.fU~
SCALE: /"=50'
o DENOTeS IRON P/~ MONVMCNr SET
. OENOTF5 IRON P(~ MI!JNlJMENr ~
PROI'€Rrl' [JJf$!:HIPrlON
LOr J . BLOCK I, HI1WARO LAttIE ESTATE'S, ""cord;n/} I. ...
plot on 'i/~ ond of r~CDI'd 'It/h. oHit:r 01 1M CoMfy l1<<:DnIer,
scorr C(J/JNT1', MN.
'iJ
\.~; ~
~t..
't "l! \'
I'" '"
~~~.
AREA: 69,598 I !1I1.11 or 1.6 J ocrn
--------
I nerebv cenltr .h., thIS 'U""'V. p...... or reoon ..... I br me Of ~ .. --
~ane:lI".II.tnaduly' l . ~~und8r:"""'dI'--'"
8-. ~
~ . '-
.' ...' , _..)
OWt. ~~ /~ /~Aog.~I~ ~5
'\,.
N
.
fIlAYI..ANO ....NOfllICI( SON
145170
I
.
I
. -I \ilSI
''- S~ (~t..
j .:
~~ '13)-:...:1-:...,:.
~\
. c.. /"1'
::7'..- - -. ,"
-)~: ;
3._'i ~
t!)
,
~.~ K~U8itl
I".....
"-
....
,
I
I.
\
~
"'
'."2"'"
,
r
- t:C H...~O
'1li::;:rrr'~ 'jd'T...t-L~~ ~ ~
8M.3
4U-2Y
... ..._~ ~
WILiiRT T08IA5
........... 234793
2112 i 5
1
. t -'. ..
/...
24!l?t2
l~ia2
-
I~
..
..~--
~. --
tP'. ~ ." '.
1180:5 7
\
\
.
238:
Q
ftJ} r,' ~~.
I A..! AN;
"" POND "". ~
,,0 "" \.,AKt 2 0 tST~\
. 7r-~ ~ QfU Iftl) tH' \
. \ . \\~ ~AAL C"~l..tf'\
...........,~~\ ., ~.~~'
I, ~~'~ .
...... ........ -=- -=- -..... I ~
l;, !:IQM!Ul J.AIa . '-C~
MANTHEY \tUIANCE
SUBJECT lITE . 2.. MaS
5
~.
--
\
~
.......~,- ---
1
..:.-;:~;J
.......
I'
I
.
AGENDA .L.I.~d::
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
SITE ADDRESS:
PRES~.J.~R:
PUBLIC .l".UAIUNG:
DATE:
PI..ANNING REPORT
2
VARIANCE
MARK MANTHEY
15210 HOWARD LAKE ROAD, SHAKOPEE
GINA MITCHELL
_YES .x.NO
OCTOBER 7, 1993
HISTORYIBACKGROUND:
The Planning Department has received a variance application from Mark Manthey
of 15210 Howard Lake Road, Shakopee. The applicant proposes to construct a 24' x
32' garage. The following variances are requested in order to construct the
improvements as }'... u yosed:
1. 30' north side yard setback variance llum the 10' side yard setback
requirement.
2. 80' setback variance from the 200' natural lake setback requirement.
PREVIOUS PROPOSALS:
Two separate Zoning Ordinance Amendments (Ordinance 87 -07, adoption of
Shoreland Management Regulations, and Ordinance Amendment 88-09, increasing
County Road setbacks) that were adopted after the platting of Howard Lake Estates
in 1982, if applied literally, would render the lot unbuildable. In February of 1992,
due to the hardships of these ordinances, the Planning Commission granted the
applicant a 70' septic system setback variance, and a 115' natural lake setback
variance that allowed him to build a home on the lot (see attached variance
application and staff report for further reference).
PHYSIOG~.nt:
The subject site is a 2.6 acre parcel located in the rural service area. Howard Lake
abuts the property to the south, and County Road 17 lies adjacent to the west.
Howard Lake occupies 38% of the parcel. The remaining 62%, or 1.6 acres consists
of hills and low lying areas unsuitable for building, and a small portion of flat land
which is the location of the home and proposed garage.
ADJACENT USES:
To the north and east of the applicant's property are platted lots. The applicant
owns the vacant northern lots (#4 and #5). The large eastern lot (#1) is developed
with a single family home.
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLDYER
.I(
,. ,.iJ.I-'
r~\O
, ' g\~o 30' No~n\ FRlJ.'-lT 'yARD
.:::.; VAlZJ ANG~
l'l \ \ \ \ \. - - - ~/ - ,. 1)/ ..
lt~ \ \ \ \ N g)Ooo'oo" - - - -_ _ ~
-I \ \ ~\ 328.54 - - - - ,.. j I.V
I : \ \ \ \ \. \ ~ II ...\ ~ / \
: \., \ .." \ ,.'.J. )'24.8 I ~ /~ .\.
..... H....~.\ \ \ \ \ '-. ~ ,: 1jo+'S~ ~ / i. I~
_ _. .,.... . '. \\ \ \ \ \ ; ~ I }'" I..,
, i :, \ '1 ~ .ll \ :' V~;.i1,.~ '/1 '"
1.1. - ~ . i7''fl'..~ Y... I '\~~~ /...UUUUU /~.~.7"".. _.....~
.~\~ ~ ~ 0- i ,
", \ '" ,A. ./ _...... -20.0 '
.....--........ \\ " \ 2:-~ _. _ ~ 70.0
/ ~~ \\ .. '7' "'~'-"_ ill. PFKJPCsEV HOUSC ~ /
\~ , , . .. . .' - 9-'1'...
~)< ~" ,...../ ........... _. ~ 70.0 /
0'\'-' ~ /
. -\"..> 'I. '.. - I~ PAno I 0.;':;;.--:::::1 / /
............ ~ .........." - .,/
/ ~~ ~:2.~:;'-/= - - = - - -
~ J ---- .... .., ORDINAI/Y HIGH WATER MARK ,/ '"
'H:: .."..,. .....\4.. tI eLEVATION.. :958.0__ ,/
'<D .. aO.'Y\ ~ '........'
~-~ ,;Y 5 &/-009.-:-. ,! ............:: - .-
",' / 80' tAKf5 HoR~ ~.....
VAKIAI'lC6 ~~-=-~.>
'b~~~ ".. "-.. '-.
~'. .. ...... "-
~ '..... .....
\\ \,
\ \\
\ '\',
~...
\ "-
........
.......
v
30.58
N 900oo'00"e
e
/
/
/
(.,,'
... .
01'"
. '"
~ ui
"',
'"
'"
..........
;....~l.r#~
<",
'<:~f:.~..,
~
-'1-- _ 9'.=.
"O"~""'6'
o~""
22.57:.:/....'....'
I: 7/o/5'22"W
~
MINNESOTA V ALLEY SURVEYORS INC.
12~O e. nilh ST. ?O. BOX 1189 . BURNSVlllE. .W; 5S33:'
612-89o-n50
OI_IA%
ReVISeD 10 - 29- 91 CHANGe HOUSe LOCATION
CERTIFICATE
OF
SURVEY
MANTHEY VARIANCE
SCALE: /" = SO'
o OeNOTES IIION PIPe MONUMeNT sa
. OeNOTES IRON PIPe MONUMeNT FOUNO
PROPERT,.. UESCR/PT'UN
LOT J, BLOCK I, HOWAf/O LAKe eSTATES, occordiJlf}/o 1M
pial on I;/~ and 01 r,cord ;n 1116 offict ollh, County R<<tJrd,,",
SCOTT COUNTY, MN.
'iJ
~\~~...'
\;~ .
" ~.
L \ \
'- ~
c:~
AREA: 69,598 i sq.lf. or 1.6.f ocrtS
-----
I hereby Cer1ity lnat this suf'VOty. plan. 01' rei)Ort was prepared trr me 0( under my direct
supervisIon and that J am a duly RegtStered Land ~ under :he laws of the Stace of
Minnnola. /7 ~../. 4
~-.-Y . ~ ~~~. . ~
4: &~/ /5 /12L-Reg.",92'13
~
....~....M ill - VARIANCE - MARK MANTHEY
Mark Manthey-1521O Howard Lake Road, Shakopee, stated he is requesting a variance to construct a
garage. He would be removing an existing structure that is larger and deteriorating.
Gina Mitchell, Associate Planner, presented the information as per planning report of October 7, 1993.
The variances requested are for a 30 foot north front yard setback ;.Ulla the 50 foot ;.v.~ yard setback
requirement and a 80 foot variance from the 200 foot lake setback requirement. Two separate Zoning
Ordinance Amendments (Ordinance Amendment 87-07, adoption of Shoreland Management Regulations,
and Ordinance Amendment 88-09, increasing County Road setbacks) were adopted after the platting of
Howard Lake Estates in 1982. If these codes were applied literally, the lot would be rendered
unbuildable. In 1992, the applicant received a 70 foot septic system setback variance and a 115 foot lake
setback variance in order to construct a home.
Commissioner Loftus commented on the location of the existing building and of the p.u}'vsed garage site,
applicant is the owner of the adjacent properties, the previous variances t;u:.uted and he could not support
this request as he felt the applicant has other building options. Commissioner Arnold stated that this
parcel was considered a lot of record and the site selected was the most logical site to build a home due to
the topo!SIClJ:lhy of the site and would be in favor of this variance also.
MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY GREE~t"1J::.LD, TO Ar'I'KOVE A ThllU { (30) FOOT NORI'H
FRONT YARD ~r.loACK VARIANCE FROM THE 50 FOOT FRONT YARD ~r.loACK
REQUIREMENT AND AN EIGHTY (80) FOOT VARIANCE FROM 1 L"lr. 200 FOOT LAKE
~r.l oACK. RATIONAL BEING THE APPLICATION HAS MET THE FOUR HARDSHIP CRur.KIA
OF ll"l.t ZONING ORDINANCE, WOULD NOT BE Dr.udMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND
WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY, AND THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WOULD DECREASE
THE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE.
Vote taken signified ayes by Roseth, Greenfield, and Arnold. Nay by Loftus. MOTION CARRIED.
Discussion followed on the status of the Neighborilood Meeting information compiled by the consultant,
status of McWillies Restaurant, E-Z Stop construction progress, Beaurpre variance "}'}',,a1 granted by the
City Council, and possibly having the applicants sign the variance application stating they understand the
procedures.
Commissioner announced that a new Commissioner has been "}'}'vinted and he is Thomas Vonhof of (correctioN
Lakeville, MN and he should be present at the next meeting. (Lakeville
(changed to
MOTION BY LOFrUS, SECOND BY GREEJl.lt"1J::.LD, TO ADJOURN THE Mr.r.Ul.;rG. (Prior Lak
(10-21-93)
Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Greenfield, Arnold, and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED.
The meeting adjourned at 8:40 P.M. A tape of the meeting is on file at City Hall.
Deb Garross
Assistant City Planner
Rita M. Schewe
Recording Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 7,1993
Page 2
Howard Lake Estates is located on the western periphery of Prior Lake. Adjacent
development in the City of Shakopee allows subdivisions of 2.5 acre lots. A rural,
residential atmosphere has developed over time. The City of Prior Lake no longer
allows this type of platting. The applicant's is one of many lots which have a
grandfathered status in this part of the communit:y.
EXISJ.ll~G COND.I:.I..I.0NS:
The subject site presently contains a home and a 40' x 30' pole barn. This pole barn
is to be removed and replaced with a 24' x 32' garage.
PRECEDENCE:
Precedence was set in 1988 when a variance was granted to Lot 1, Howard Lake
Estates. A 100' lakeshore variance was granted to the lot which had similar
physical characteristics as the applicant's. The previous variance to this lot also
recognized these constraints.
ALTERNATIVES:
1.
Approve the application as submitted.
2.
3.
Table or continue the variance for specific reasons.
Deny the application based upon findings and facts relative to the
hardship criteria of the Zoning Ordinance, inconsistency with
precedent or, other purposes related to the Zoning Code.
HARDSHIP CRll~RIA:
1.
Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
This rural subdivision was platted before Howard Lake was classified
as a Natural Environment Lake. The current Zoning Ordinances, if
applied literally to this lot, render the entire 2.6 acres of the lot
unbuildable.
2.
Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to
the property.
3.
The home has been built in the only location of the 2.6 acres that is
suitable for a septic system. The only buildable location for a garage is
in the location proposed by the applicant.
The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and lot
constraints associated with Howard Lake and the steep slopes on the
property, and are not the result of persons presently having an interest
in the property.
The subject site was platted and purchased prior to Zoning Ordintmce
87 -07 (adoption of Shoreland Management Practices) and Zoning
Ordinance Amendment 88-09 (increasing the County Road setback
requirements).
4.
The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice, and is not contrary to the public interest.
The increased County Road setback requi..:........ents and Shoreland
Management Practices have imposed strict regulations upon the
applicant. Substantial justice would be observed by allowing the
applicant the opportunity to improve his property with the garage in
the location proposed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative number 1 due to the fact that the applicant's request
for a 30' front yard and 80' lakeshore setback variance has met the four hardship
standards of the Zoning Ordinance.
.......:.....
NOTICE OF HEARING
IDR
VARIANCE
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the Planning Commission in the Prior
Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on:
October 7 f 199~ at
8:00
P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING:
To consider a variance application for Mark
Manthey of 15210 Howard Lake Road, Shakopee,
Minnesota.
SUBJECT ~n~ LOCATION:
15210 Howard Lake Road, Lot 3, Block 1, Howard
Lake Estates, Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota.
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant proposes to construct a a 24' x 32'
garage. In order to construct the hu!,J. ovement, the
following variances are requested: a 30' north front
yard setback variance from the 50' front yard
setback requirement, and an 80' lakeshore setback
variance from the 200' setback requirement of the
Shore land District from the ordinary high water
mark.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this meeting. Oral and
written comments will be accepted by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact
the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447-4230.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
DATE MAILED: September 23,1993
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
HERITAGE
1891
COMMUNITY
1991
(1"K~f'on v
". 'fl). A :#~ It
2Q9/
-
"VA22PC"
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
SITE ADDRESS:
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
PLANNING REPORT
Lakeshore and Septic system variance
Mark Manthey
15220 Howard Lake Road
Sam Lucast, Associate Planner
YES X NO
February 20, 1992
SITE ANALYSIS
HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The sUbject slte 1S a 2.6 acre parcel located in the rural
service area adjacent to Howard Lake and County Road 17. Howard
Lake is a natural environment lake which occupies thirty-eight
(38) percent or one acre of the parcel leaving approximately a
1.6 acre lot to develop. The required setbacks are greater for
unsewered ar9as, natural environment lakes, and properties
adjacent to county roads. structure setbacks are 200' from the
ordinary High Water (O-H-W) mark (958' contour) on unsewered,
natural environment lakes and 150' from the centerline of county
roads. Septic system setbacks are 150' from the O-H-W mark.
When these setbacks are applied, there is not a building envelope
present on the lot.
Howard Lake Estates was platted in 1982. Two separate zoning
Ordinance Amendments have bearing on the application. In 1987
Prior Lake adopted Ordinance 87-07, Shoreland Management
Regulations. Shoreland Management established guidelines for
development adjacent to bodies of water. In 1988 zoning
Ordinance Amendment 88-09 increased the setback from County
Roads. These amendments, if applied literally, render the lot
unbuildable. The hardship is then due to the changes in the
ordinance not through actions of the applicant.
The applicant requests a 115' Shoreland variance to build the
house as proposed. The applicant also requests a 70' variance to
install a septic sY9tem.
PREVIOUS PROPOSALS:
There are no prevlous proposals on record at City Hall for this
piece of property.
PHYSIOGRAPHY:
The parcel cont'ins one relatively flat area in the northeast
corner of the lot at the 984' elevation. A pole barn is
located there and the house is proposed for the same area. The
remainder of the lot contains hills or low lying areas
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447.4230 I Fax (612) 447.4245
.Jo.---
unsuitable for building. The hill slopes to the south, east, and
west. The O-H-W mark is approximately ninety (90) feet away, at
the closest distance, from the flat brea. ThIs makes the slope
approximately twenty~nine (29) percent.
Howard Lake is a natural environment lake that is shal.low with
weeds and other vegetation growing in scattered clumps. The
slope between the lake and proposed building site contains a
mixture of volunteer growth and some significant tree species.
This type of lake has been classified with the most restrictive
standards by the DNR intended to protect the fragile
environment. It is imperative to locate the septic system and
structure as far from shore as possible.
ADJACENT USES:
County Road 17 lies to the west of the lot and Howard Lake to the
south. To the north and east of the lot are platted lots. The
applicant owns the vacant northern lot. The eastern lot of over
seven (7) acres is developed with a single family dwelling and
is in separate ownership.
Howard Lake Estates is located on the western periphery of the
city. Adjacent development in the City of Shakopee allows
subdivisions of 2.5 acre lots. A residential/rural atmosphere
has developed over time. The city of prior Lake no longer
allows this type of platting. The applicant's lots are part of a
handful of grand fathered lots of record in this part of the
community.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site contains a 30 x 40 foot pole barn and a small herd of
goats. A bituminous driveway runs from Howard Lake Road south
past lots four (4) and five (5), but the pavement ends before the
drive reaches the subject site.
NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES/IMPACT/CONCERNS:
This is a rural res'idential area w1th a sensitive ecosystem. The
lots were subdivided and development occurred before the lake was
classified as a Natural Environment Lake. Precedence has been
established for development in close proximity to a lake on a
lot substandard by current regulations.
Variance 88-05 granted a 100' Lakeshore variance on Lot 1, Howard
Lake Estates, a lot with similar physical Characteristics. The
site is also located in Howard Lake Estates and had just one area
in which to locate a structure and septic system. Constraints
included County Road, structure, and septic system setbacks
which rendered the lot unbuildable, and slopes which limited
placement choices. The house was built in the only possible area
for development.
Attempts to mitigate the effect of development have been taken.
The drain field trenches run away from the lake. The house is
setback as far as possible from the lake while still leaving a
front yard for the occupant. Minimal amounts of vegetation are
proposed to be removed from the site.
_.,.+,..~~,:t'_"'~''"1~.~..~.~..",-...:'",,":.'.......ro:-'"''':''1;'''''''''''''''~'''.-._,~<...,~......,.,"'!.~~~''Il''.''''''' .
I II.. "- .....
PROBLEMS/OPPORTUNITIES:
The problem Wlth the development site i. that there i. only one
spot on the entire lot to build. The lot is a lot of record,
subdivided and purchased before the Shore1and Ordinance was
adopted. When ~he greater unsewered lake setbacky are applied,
there is n~ place on the lot to build. It is anticipated that
the subject site will not receive citI water and sewer service
for thirty (30) years or ~ore. It s over two miles beyond the
proposed 2010 urban sarvice area. This means the area within
the presently served year 2000 boundaries must be completely
developed before the services will be extended to the 2010 area.
That area must develop completely before services will extend
beyond it.
The opportunity currentlI exists to allow development and protect
the site as much as poss ble. The careful pl~cement of house and
septic system as proposed, observe the spirit and intent of the
ordinance.
...
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY:
Slte area and statistics: 2.6 Acre lot 1.0 Acre pond
1.6 Acre net lot size
Zoning/setback requirement: A1 SO
150' Structure setback from center line of county road
200' structure setback from O-H-W mark of Howard Lake
measured from the 958' contour
150' Septic system setback from O-H-W mark of Howard
Lake measured from the 958' contour
20' Side yard setback from north and east property lines
Building coverage ratio: Maximum 30 , of lot
RECOMMENDATION:
After careful consideration of the unique situation on the lot
due to the slope, topography, legal nonconforming lot sizes, and
recent changes to the zoning setback provisions, Staff recommends
approval of the 115' Shoreland variance and 70' septic system
variance with the condition of filing a perpetual driveway
easement. The easement must be filed with Scott County to ensure
future access across lots four and five if theI are sold. The
rationale for granting the variance is the litera enforcement of
the county road, septic system, and structure setbacks render
the lot unbuildable. The DNR does not object to the variance in
light of the unique circumstances, but wants as great a setback
as possible. The house is proposed in the only buildable spot
on the lot due to the slope and physiography, and is not a danger
to the health, safety, and welfare of the general public.
The hardship is caused by recent changes to the ordinance and is
not the result of actions of the property owner. The lot is
unique with respect to lot shape and is a legal nonconforming lot
of record. There are few remaining vacant lots of record
adjacent to Howard Lake. Thereforel the variance would not
likely create precedent for future appl cations.
)
"
~
.
- .,
,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 20, 1992 PAGE 3
MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO C7JOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON REZONING.
Vote taken signitied ales by Roseth, Arnold, Lottus,
MOTION CARRIED. Publ c Hearing closed at 8:50 P.M.
ITEM II - JON MCLAIN - S~Q~YARD ANQ ~KE~HORE VARIANCE
Julie MCLain, 5426 Fairlawn Shores Trail, stated they are
requesting a sideyard, lakeshore, and lot coveraq. varianc. to
conatruct additional living spac..
Sam Lucast presented the intormation as per memo at February 20,
1992. The applicant is requesting a 4.5' aideyardl 42.5'
lake.hore! and a 9. lot coverage variance. The subject s te was
platted n 1923 and a home built in the 1940's. The area is
developed with single tamily dwellings located at a distance
which today would require variances. The area in the rear ot the
house is very steep as is typical in neighboring lots. Variance.
were granted to the previous owner. DNR has no objections to the
application. Recommendation tram Staft is to approve the
requested variances.
and Wella.
Comments trom the Commissioners were on, impervious surface
coverag., construction time frame and .no objectiona to
variancea.
;
MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY WELLS, TO APPROVE THE 4.5 FOOT
SIDEYARD, 42.5 FOOT LAKESHORE AND A 9. LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR
5426 FAIRLAWN SHORES TRAIL. RATIONALE BEING THE DECREASE IN
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE, THE CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT RESTRICT
THE VIEW OF THE LARE FOR ADJACENT HOMES, THE LOT IS A SUBSTANDARD
LOT WITH A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE SETBACR, LARGER
SETBACRS FROM THE LAKESHORE AND SlOE PROPERTY LINES WILL BE
CREATED WITH THE ADDITION AND ELIMINATION OF PART OF THE EXISTING
DECR, IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING CODE AND WOULD NOT BE
DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY.
Vote taken signified ayes from Roseth, WellS, Loftus, and Arnold.
MOTION CARRIED.
ITEM III - MARK MANTHEY - LAKESHORE AND SEPTIC SYSTEM VARIANCE
Mark Manthey, 609 South Market Street, Shakopee, MN, stated he is
requesting the variances for Lot 3, Howard Lake Estates, to
build a new home. Due to the setback requirements now in force
and that Howard Lake occupies one acre of the subject site,
variances are needed in order to build.
Sam Lucast presented the information a. per memo ot February 20,
1992. The application i. for a 115 foot lakeshore variance and a
70 toot septic system setback variance tor 15220 Howard Lake
Road. The subject site is a 2.6 acre parcel located in the rural
service area adjacent to Howard Lake and County Road 17. Two
separate Zoning Ordinances Amendments have impacted the building
requirements for this lot. As a result, the hardship is
)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 20, 1992
PAGE 4
created by the ordinance and not by the applicant. If all
setbacks and requirements were entorced the lot would not be
buildable. The parcel contains one relatively flat area on which
a pole barn is located and the house is proposed tor the same
area. Lot 1, Howard Lake Estates, was granted a 100 toot
lakeshore variance for construction of a new single family home.
This lot is similar in topography and restrictions as the subject
site. DNR has no objections to the requested variances due to
the unique circumstances, howeverl the greatest setback possible
should be required. Recommendat on trom statt is to approve the
variance application with the condition ot tiling a perpetual
driveway easement to ensure future access across Lots 4 and 5
trom Howard Lake Road. The proposed location is a logical
building site and the variances would not be detrimental to the
health and welfare of the community.
Comments trom the Commissioners were on, combining of Lots 3 and
4, location of house, road easement, and other options should be
explored.
MOTION BY WELLS, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO APPROVE THE 115 FOOT
LAKE SHORE VARIANCE AND A 70 FOOT SEPTIC SYSTEM SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR 15220 HOWARD LAKE ROAD WITH THE CONDITION THAT A PERPETUAL
ROAD EASEMENT BE FILED. RATIONALE BEING THAT THE LOT IS
UNBUILDABLE WITHOUT THE VARIANCES, HARDSHIP IS CAUSED BY THE
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES 87-07 AND 88-09 AND NOT THE ACTIONS OF THE
APPLICANT, AND THE VARIANCES WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE
HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY.
Vote taken signified ayes by Wells, Roseth and Arnold. Nay by
Loftus. MOTION CARRIED.
Recess called at 9:30 P.M. Meeting reconvened at 9:35 P.M.
ITEM IV - DR. CHARLES SCHWANTES-PET HOSPITAL-SIDEYARD VAR!ANC~
Dr. Schwantes, 4136 West 132nd st. Savage, MN, representing the
Prior Lake Pet Hospital located at 16680 Franklin Trail S.E.,
stated that due to the tact they have increased statt and
business, an expansion to the hospital is anticipated and he is
requesting a 40 foot east sideyard variance.
Deb Garross presented the information as per memo of February 20,
1992. The required sideyard setback in the B-3t General Buslness
District, is 20 feet. However, when a bUSlness is located
adjacent to a residential zoned lot, the setback is increased to
60 feet. The building was built under another government
jurisdiction and has a legal non-conforming setback. The
Irregular, triangular shaped lot combined with the 50 foot front
nard setback and the 60 foot sideyard setback severely limits
~evelopment options. The site does have a legal non-conforming
17 foot setback to the side property line.
Staff's recommendation is to approve the 40 foot sideyard
variance. The hardship is not caused by the applicant but by the
shape of the lot. The applicant has researched all options
RECEIPT
DATE
7 -~~-? ::i..
r .
No21997
~
CITY 0 F
PRIOR LAKE
4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E., PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
Received of ~a1/f Sm~
whose address and/or legal "description iSY
-
the sum Of~
for the purpose of
- ..........~ ~.
. <:P/I P/dALJ _______~s
//~.A ".A~/.?"~ ~
. '14+' 1'/ ~
~
$
70--: ~
Reference Invoice No.
!i&$ir4j ~~~~rl0r Lake
'~_"_'~o,._"'_'''''N.-~--'''''-'''~
l rurat 6 ~dJ vi%flJ L
. krqrv
; plr/v haJt/V wu.s P1tIJ tm:J i:b bld- hhYLv
U/Lp6ra.,nd. 10 f- y./hrm N/W ~ 6(,;r-e(Mr1 fY)Qmt 40&5 inro
effed- he- DwnS /ors P N 1 w~ h()/e)tni{Jtf;m/:;ined Jr
. v/OYl'+ d bldJM?w
; I,/n,te{) fpp by hfo/j tD places -Iv rid flJ()JPje--
i~hs. f!M
Ii' ~ plat -ru,raLMJ. &.1SubW)
:, ~fI4J ri!Jt- row
i!UJ1,r~ ~
I
)
/
"L1; Uft5eMl{YCd
') ( ~. { 1AiLlI/v. if(.
. t.r. 17 ~()J 'f!.
30' ~ mhu N)
~~0
"VA23PN"
NOTICE OF HEARING
EOR
VARIANCE
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the Planning Commission in the Prior
Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on:
October 7, 199~ at
Ram
P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING:
To consider a variance application for Mark
Manthey of 15210 Howard Lake Road, Shakopee,
Minnesota.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION:
15210 Howard Lake Road, Lot 3, Block 1, Howard
Lake Estates, Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota.
REQUESTED AL uON:
The applicant proposes to construct a a 24' x 32'
garage. In order to construct the iuq.'" ovement, the
following variances are requested: a 30' north front
yard setback variance flv... the 50' front yard
setback requirement, and an 80' lakeshore setback
variance from the 200' setback requirement of the
Shoreland District from the ordinary high water
mark.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this meeting. Oral and
written comments will be accepted by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact
the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447-4230.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
DATE MAILED: September 23, 1993
NOTICE OF HEARING
IDB.
VARIANCE
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the Planning Commission in the Prior
Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on:
October 7. 1993 at
R,illO
P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING:
To consider a variance application for Mark
Manthey of 15210 Howard Lake Road. Shakopee.
Minnesota.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION:
15210 Howard Lake Road. Lot 3. Block 1, Howard
Lake Estates. Shakopee, Scott County, Minnesota.
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant proposes to construct. a a 24' x 32'
garage. In order to construct the iUlt'A vvement, the
following variances are requested: a 30' north front
yard setback variance from the 50' front yard
setback requirement, and an 80' lakeshore setback
variance from the 200' setback requirement of the
Shoreland District from the ordinary high water
mark.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this meeting. Oral and
written comments will be accepted by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact
the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447-4230.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
DATE MAILED: September 23, 1993
4629 Dakota S1. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLDYER
VA a..JJ /fit--
NEW ABSTRACTS
CONTINUATIONS
CLOSING SERVICE
REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS
TITLE INSURANCE
RECORDING SERVICE
SCO I I COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
David Moonen and Dale Kutter
Kerry Meagher, General Counsel
TELEPHONE: (612) 445.a246
FAX: (612) 445-0229
September 14, 1993
Mark Manthey
15210 Howard Lake Road
!f.A~' ~ ~&~~?
To Whom it may concern:
According to the 1993 tax records in the Scott County Treasurer's office the
following persons are listed as the owners of the property which lies within
100 feet of the following described property:
Lot 3, Block 1, Howard Lake Estates, according to the recorded plat
thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder
in and for Scott County, Minnesota.
TERRY W & MARLENE M EGE
2075 EAGLEWOOD LANE
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
JOHN C & KATHLEEN SCHIFFMAN
15520 HOWARD LAKE RD
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
ROSE M MEND EN
2087 EAGLEWOOD LANE
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
MARK MANTHEY
609 S MARKET
SHAKOPEE MN
113
55379
VERNON C & AUDREY DOCKENDORF
2917 W 92ND ST
BLOOMINGTON MN 55431
JOHN A & DIANE LISTERUD
3876 MARSCHALL ROAD
SHAKOPEE MN 55379
DUWADE N & NANCY J HARRIS
6574 HARBOR BEACH NE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
IY!~
David E. Koonen
President
MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
".
!~.. )
."',
. ..
. ....
"';'"
. .
....,
. .
....-.
.~
C" ,.,
.... ",
. ....
........
.......1
.
. ~.(.
.,j J..: ,.,
,. ..,.
t~\O
301 NO~TH FNr jAgD
VAR-\ AN Gr.
----...... -. ".". )/ ~
,.-- V
,.,,, I
\ . ~
\ t / ~ .
I _ \ ~ /J.p.
\ ,,-" ". 7. ;
~ ~ ~.~ .. .9. ~. \ \ \ ~ ~ / . I ~
, ..' '. " '. " -"~\ \ \ \ ~ I /1 f;~
"il"" ~.. = J \ I:
" .-; -- . \ I I. I............... 93.4 .....,...... ~".'. !
4. ~..., .... , - - - ,9. :b fBARtVll/J..' / Y
i7. 'I \" ;r~ \ ~ Gl ^-.O:...... ..................L.......__ 2Q .'
\ ..... 'K L...-.J' -.. .0-
\ \ \ \ ~'.~ '- _. _ ~ 70.0 o.
\ \ \ .-... \ \: ~. __ ~ PROPCSED HOUSE ~ J
~~ ,\, " ../ '" '":c. - . 9:1.~/1 / .
.. , , i " . . -. -
A- I..D:\ ...... ............... _.. Iv 70.0
\ /f. ~ ",,' _ f-~ .....-.... L._....: /
.\ ~" " ........... ! PATIO r DCCK /'..
'" "" '-- / --
" , -:-
, ............ :
.9~ " ", ........ .... :
o ........ ,,'\ C? _..,
~ ~ ""........ ,,'-- !~--
............ ~.. .. .., ORDINARY HiGH WATER MARK
.' . ~LEVATION : 958.0
...................... 'o, ,,_
~ ---...;. i ........... .... - - -.-
- ..~...; ...................
~,
"1--~":':~ "
~:~~ ~ ,."" "-
~. '. "... "
- " ....
<.. \ '\,
\ \~\
\ \>,
~"
.....
n
II)
V'I
\T\
c
30. 58
N 9Oocxlexl'E
.....
/
/
'/
-
......
/
/
/
tt)
/'
-
t.lo
~I\.l
OlIO
~ 0,'
10:
I">)
80' tAK85 H DR (
VARIANC6
.-
.,<::~!:::?~::)
----
"
'"
'"
,.
,.
< ......
,....\~f~.~>.
----
MINNESOTA VALLEY SURVEYORS INC.
22~O E. 117th ST.. ?O. BOX 1169 . BURNSVILlE. ~,'~i 5',337
612-89o-nSO
C\ _ I .II "Z
-
REV/SED /0- 29- 9/ .CHANGE HOUSE LOCATiON
CERT/F/CJ- / E
OF
SUR /EY
MANTHEY VARIANCE
SCALE: / /I = 50 I
o DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET
. DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND
PROPERTy' UESCRIPTlON
LOT 3 I BLOCK I, HOWARD LAKE ESTATES, according 10 the
pIal on file ond of record in tile office of the County Record,r,
SCOTT COUNTY, MN.
'II
AREA : 69,598 :I SQ. ft.
,J
\;,
~':13 ~\
or 1.6:1 ocres
I hereby cenify that thiS survey. pia
superviSion and that I am a duly Re
Minnesota.
I
~ ~.A...-t:;;~~
&~ /5. /9CJ/ R€..c.~h 9Z0;3
". - - -. .-