HomeMy WebLinkAbout9C - Brooksview Ctr. 1st Addn.
STAFF AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
9C
JENNI TOVAR, PLANNER
DON RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR, PLANNING
DIRECTOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 98-XX
APPROVING DISPOSAL OF CITY OWNED
PROPERTY LOT 2, BLOCK 3, BROOKSVILLE
CENTER 1ST ADDITION AND DIRECTING STAFF
TO OBTAIN A SURVEY, APPRAISAL, AND
SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY TO PROCEED WITH
PUBLIC SALE, Case #97-118
FEBRUARY 17, 1998
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SUBJECT:
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this item is to consider the sale of city
owned property located on the south east corner of Tower
Street and Toronto Street. The City has received a letter of
interest from the adjacent property owner as to the status of
the lot and the possibility of the city offering the property
for sale.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Prior Lake purchased Lot 2, Block 3
Brooksville Center 1st Addition (2.4 acres) on July 6, 1983.
The purpose for the purchase of the lot was to provide right
of way for Toronto Street to connect with Woodridge
subdivision to the south. The lot is 274.12 feet wide and
the city used 80 feet of this for right-of-way (0.70 acres).
The remaining portion ofthe lot (1.7 acres) was being held
for future use as a dance studio. However, considering the
library referendum, placing the dance studio downtown,
passed last year, the city no longer has a need to hold the
property .
DISCUSSION:
State statute allows for municipalities to dispose of
property, with a 2/3 vote by the City Council, after finding
the disposal of the property to have no relationship to the
comprehensive plan. On January 26, 1998 the Planning
Commission considered this request, and found the sale of
the property to be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Attached are the minutes of the Planning Commission
L:\98FILES\98SUBJEC\97 -118\97 -118CC.DOC Page I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 1 Ph. (612) 447-4230 1 Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
FINANCIAL IMP ACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
discussion. The Planning Commission suggested the
proceeds from the sale be used for future capital
improvements.
The property is guided as R-HD Residential High Density.
The DRC has reviewed the need for the city's use of the
property and found no need for the city to continue to own
the property. The city l1li\ no immediate or long range
plans to develop the property as high density residential (or
as anything else).
Should the City Council find the sale of the property
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, staff will obtain a
survey and through the administrative subdivision
procedure divide the parcel such that the right of way
becomes a separate parcel the city will keep and the
remainder can be sold. An appraisal will be necessary and
the sale of the property will proceed through the bidding
procedure as stated in Section 1-12-1-3 ofthe City Code.
The property does not now generate property taxes since it
is publicly owned. Sale of the property would relieve the
city of periodic mowing expenses and make the property
available for development and place it back on the tax
roles. The city's cost exposure is incurring the cost of the
survey and appraisal (estimated $2500.00). Funds for this
purpose are to be drawn from Professional Services in the
Administration budget. Proceeds from the sale are then
deposited to the general fund, indirectly reimbursing this
account.
1. Adopt Resolution 98-XX approving the disposal of the
property and directing staff to obtain a survey,
appraisal, and administratively divide the property.
2. Deny the request, finding the disposal of the property
not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In this
case, the Council should direct the staff to prepare a
resolution with findings of fact supporting the decision.
3. Other specific action as directed by the Council.
Alternative #1. If approved, the staff would have a survey
and appraisal completed, solicit bids and then return to the
L:\98FILES\98SUBJEC\97-118\97-118CC.DOC
Page 2
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council to receive authorization to actually sell the
property. If the bid prices are too low, the Council can
reject the sale.
Motion and second adopting the attached Resolution
#98-XX, approving the disposal of city owned property
and directing staff to obtain a survey and appraisal,
and to proceed with admini rative subdivision.
L:\98FILES\98SUBJEC\97 -118\97 -118CC.DOC
Page 3
RESOLUTION 98-XX
APPROVING THE DISPOSAL OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
BROOKSVILLE CENTER 1ST ADDITION AND DIRECTING STAFF TO OBTAIN A
SURVEY, APPRAISAL, AND SUBDMDE THE PROPERTY TO PROCEED WITH
PUBLIC SALE
MOTION BY: SECOND BY:
WHEREAS, the Prior Lake Planning Commission considered the request on the 26th day
of January, 1998, of the sale of city owned property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined the disposal of the property is in
compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard the request on February 17, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, upon hearing the facts, has determined the disposal of this
city owned property has no relationship to the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE:
FINDINGS
1. The Planning Commission reviewed the request to dispose of Lot 2, Block 3, Brooksville
Center 1st Addition on January 26, 1998.
2.
3. The Planning Commission has reviewed the request as contained in Case File #97-118, and
determined the disposal of the property is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The Prior Lake City Council reviewed this request on February 17, 1998.
5. The City Council has considered the effect of disposing of Lot 2, Block 3, Brooksville
Center 1st Addition and has determined there is no relationship of the disposal to the
Comprehensive Plan.
6. The contents of Planning Case File #97-118 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of the decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
16200 E!i~~~~~~:i!:~,8~!l~.<l~e, Minnesota 55372-1714 1 Ph. (612) 447-4230 1 Fax (61f~gM7-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the City Council hereby approves of the disposal of Lot
2, Block 3, Brooksville Center 1st Addition and directs staff to :
· Obtain a survey; and
· Obtain an appraisal; and
· Through the administrative subdivision procedure set forth in the City Code, to proceed
with the division of the right-of-way from the remainder of the parcel; and
· Proceed with the public sale of the property.
Passed and adopted this 17th day of February, 1998.
YES
NO
Mader
Kedrowski
Petersen
Schenck
Wuellner
Mader
Kedrowski
Petersen
Schenck
Wuellner
{Seal}
City Manager,
City of Prior Lake
1:\98fi1es\98subjec\97-118\ccres.doc
Page 2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/26/98
Cramer:
Asked for a line of site - possiblely tree height. Give an idea of what the blockage would
be. Right now people are guessing what the line of site would be.
Mr. Kelly asked for the next meeting to extend the 60 day deadline.
. .
Maureen Hermann, 14151 Timothy Avenue, everyone keeps on talking .~~urbmlding
#3. We want the same thing done on building #2. .....:::
...... ..........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ...... ..........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MOTION BY KUYKENDALL MOVE TO CONTINUE THE HEARrNa::tJNTIL THE
, '.:.:.:.:.:. ":':':';':':':':':',
FEBRUARY 23, MEETING WITH THE INTENT TO GIVij::WHEi:PEVELOIU~R..AND
NEIGHBORHOOD TO VIEW THE APPROXIMATE LEMEE''tJli'ELEV ATIONS:OE
THE TOP OF THE FENCE - SO THE ELEV ATION Q~~THEgOST ON THE BERNf...
AND GIVE THE FINAL SUBMISSION TO STAFF("8ECONn:::BY CRAMER. .,(('
.......... .......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.......... .....
Vote taken signified 3 ayes and 1 nay. MOTION CARRIl$;Q;;/i)'.
A recess was called at 7:53 p.m. The me;I1~.r~~~~vened at 8.:o.~.i:~1W::{
~
6.
New Business:
.................
.................
.................
................. .
.................
.................
................ .
................-.
..................
..................
...................
..... ............
..
.......
..... ..... .........
A. Case #97-118 Potentiw:!!!@pfCityPtqp.gfty - Lot~~)Block 3, Brooksville Center
First Addition. ...
Planner Jenni Tova~,:p~'~f.nted the.R.lfuming RepqW:d~ted January 26, 1998.
The City of Prior Lake h~M:.t~t,i~~a:::~:::fgijtl&~it6.sell a piece of property located at the
south east cOffiYL9C:rower Stitlt,;md Toronto Avenue, legally described as Lot 2, Block
~~~~~~~~~~(:i~:,~~:;~~~:p~=~e~~:"ssion
Tl1~:':q-9mprehensive Lan4:.:EJse Guide Plan designates this property as Residential High
Densit}<::::~ile the futu~~hmd uses of a private developer are unknown, it is known that
the city ha~:PQjmmedi~~iror long range plans to develop the property as high density
residentia1.T~~::Gity=::pfuchased this property for the connection of Toronto Avenue to
property that is'li;Qwknown as W oodridge Estates. The City held the property with the
idea the remainipg parcel to the east of Toronto Avenue could be used for a future dance
studio. However, considering the recent referendum and location of the future dance
studio downtown, the need for the City to hold the property has been eliminated.
While the request was from a specific person, the property would be sold through the
bidding process. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the request.
1 :\98fi1es\98p1comm\pcrnin\mnO 12698.doc
6
The Planning Commission finding will be forwarded to the City Council. The City
Council will need to determine whether or not to proceed with the sale ofthe property
and to direct staff accordingly. .
Comments from the Commissioners:
Vonhof questioned if there is anything in the Comprehensive Plan addressing this issue?
Rye said no. The sale would go into the general fund."",:::.:...
..::::~t!!!ii!!!!!!i!i!i!ii!!t~I/(
,,::;:;:;:;:;:;
";';':':':';':';':"
.................
~;;:;::e;=~::t:~;:S~ALEFO~ ~
THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE PRQIfi-TY dq~i:&9 THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS, SECOND BY VONHOF. .::r::::.:.:.::::::::::::iii::i:.::'.::iiii:::::::::::::::::J:::iii:::::i/:::::::::::::::.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED. '::)::}:::::::::..
.......... .
.......... ..
.......... ...
.......... ....
.................... ...........
..................
................'................
Cramer questioned the high density and commercial property.
";';':':';';';';';';';';';';':'..
Announcements and Correspondence:::::i:ii!i::;::?)::::::i:iiii::::ii::::::::::::;:::::::::.,...
;.;.;.;.; ...;.::;::;=;=;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;....
...... ...::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;::.....
There was a brief discussion:county ~'~1TimOthy Avenne.
Discussed a Scott CountY..:iJanmHii:~pmmissidg~r workshop. Jenni gave an update.
Tentative dates are 3/24:::~/j.O and 311iif 5:30 to 9~:QQ..Pt:r.n. Vonhofwould like to see 3
times a year. What ~~ _ take time to discuss.
Connie Carlson
Recording Secretary
..::rr:::;=:::=::;....;:;=;=;=;r.
1:\98files\98plcomm\pcmin\mnO 12698.doc
7
PLANNING REPORT
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
6A
CONSIDER REQUEST TO SELL PROPERTY OWNED BY
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
YES _X_NO-N/A
JANUARY 26,1998
INTRODUCTION:
The City of Prior Lake has received a request to sell a piece of property located at the
south east corner of Tower Street and Toronto Avenue, legally described as Lot 2, Block
3, Brooksville Center First Addition. State Statute (attached) requires that the Planning
Commission determine if such a sale of property is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
ANALYSIS:
The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates this property as R-HD.
Residential High Density. While the future land uses of a private developer are
unknown, it is known that the city has no immediate or long range plans to develop the
property as high density residential (or anything else). The City purchased this property
for the connection of Toronto Avenue to property that is now known as Wood ridge
Estates. The City held the property with the idea that the remaining parcel to the east of
Toronto Avenue could be used for a future dance studio. However, considering the
recent referendum and location of the future dance studio downtown, the need for the
City to hold the property has been eliminated.
While .the request was from a specific person, the property would be sold through the
bidding process. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the request.
Attached is a memorandum from Jane Kansier to the City Manager detailing the
necessary requirements including obtaining a survey and appraisal.
The Planning Commission finding will be forwarded to the City Council. The City
Council will need to determine whether or not to proceed with the sale of the property
and to direct staff accordingly.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Find the sale of the property for development consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
2. Find the sale of the property inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
1:\98filE}tl\98$ubjec\98-118PCAdoc PRgljl1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 1 Ph. (612) 447-4230 1 Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative' #1. The proposed sale of public property is consistent
with the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan.
ACTION REQUIRED:
A motion and second finding the sale of City property located at Lot 2, Block 3
Brooksville Center First Addition consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This finding
will be forwarded to the City Council.
REPORT ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
3. Letter of Request
4. DRC memo
5. State Statute
1:\98files\98subjec\98-118pc.doc
Page 2
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP
~!~"RONT
. - ------.
LIND J
,
~
~.
~
,~
....IIU
DRDE
{,.,.1;<7"::::-
~,
-
-
.-
.-
-
'-
~~
-lOCAmm-
en
~
I
/
/ '" / /
77-
/' ,. ,/ /'
/,. ".r /'
, ./ ,.-
// /'
/ /'
/
m
>
(J)
m
i:
m
z
-4
~
a>>
en
-(: ..
O/-.
/
\
:c\
m\
0\
c:: \
-
:c I
m I
C
CO I
o I
- I
:c
~
:e
I
-
o
-
o
I
I.,;.,
~
~
~
o
~
.....
~
i'"f}
"0
o
z
c
til
m
C
lil
m
m
>
J:l...........
!:(
r-
m
>
J:l
Z
Z
lil
o
m
Z
~.L\ n:
~ 'b J:l
O~
C.
~ I I
<"S- , I
/S' I (
)-. , I
"1<J 1 I
f
~ I I \
I \
, \
\ \
N
U!
~ 1
m N
o
170TH STREET
~
Con
o
~IDGE ESTATES 1ST ADDITION
TO:
FROM:
DA TE:
RE:
CC:
Memorandum
Frank Boyles, City Manager
Jane Kansier, Planning COOrdinator/ft,iV
November 10, 1997 U
Request to Purchase City Property
ORC Members
The DRC reviewed the request by Michael FaIk of Weston Real Estate C~~~ration to
purchase the City property legally described as Lot 2, Block 3, Brooksv
Addition. This property Was originally purchased by the City for the ex
Toronto Avenue to I 70th Street. Only a portion of the lot is used for th
residual parcel is vacant and potentially developable.
The DRC members discussed whether or not there is a public use for U,
time, there Was Some discussion about building a dance studio on the s
the construction of the new library, the dance studio will be located in .
bUilding. WE did not identify any other public Use for the site.
If Mr. Falk wishes to pursue the purchase of the site, the fOllowing she
· The property must be surveyed to detennine the precise location 0
necessary right-o-way. An Administrative Land Subdivision or a
prepared to handle the actual subdivision of the site.
· An appraisal of the site should be prepared to detennine a value aJ
property.
· Any sale of public property must be reviewed by the Planning Co
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan prior to the approval 01
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. If you ha~
please contact me.
I: \drc\distmemo\ weston. doc
Weston Real Estate
Corporation
October 27, 1997
Mr. Frank Boyles
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Drive S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 5'372
RE: City Property Lot 2, Block 3, Brooksville Center 1st Addition
Dear Mr. Boyles:
The owners of the Towering 'Woods Condominiums in Prior Lake are contemplating the next
phase of their project for 1998. In researching city standards and requirements, it came to our
attention that the City of Prior Lake acquired property adjacent to ours for right of way for the
extension of Toronto Avenue and that south of this property may be considered surplus. In that
this property is adjacent to ours and may fit in well with our development plans, we would be
interested in purchasing the portion of Lot 2, Block 3 Brooksville Center 1st Addition not needed
for Toronto Avenue right of way.
We are beginning our planning process now and would appreciate a timely response to this
inquiry. I can be reached at 435-5592. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Falk
Phone: (612) 435-5592 . Fax: (612) 435-5058
1000 Hilloway Circle. Burnsville. Minnesota 55306-5487
the powers set forth in section
'\cept as otherwise provided by
-:ere be a separate board of ap-
:ng commission or a committee
J adjustments, and it may pro-
~n such other duties as the gov- -
the board. the governing body
decisions of the board on mat-
Jr are final subject to appeal to
)ry to the council. Hearings by
'1 time and upon such notice to
1e board. The board shall with-
lall serve a copy of such order
r at the hearing in person or by ..,
;ed by the governing body, the
Such rules may include provi-
Itten briefs by the parties. The
lUll include the minutes of its
eard by it. including the final
not act as the board of adjust-
peal or petition until the plan-
has had reasonable opportuni-
adjustments and appeals upon
;ency shall prepare th
: 'lg agency shall consult with
; a-ge~cies- of the municipality
he-comprehensive municipal
Je cognizance of the planning ,
'ublic agencies. The planning
ndments whenever necessary.
Each municipality in the met-
III review and update its com-
ided in section 473.864. sub-
t. The planning agency may,
ith the municipal charter. rec-
'Om time to time of a compre-
~d in sections. each of which
II section of the municipality.
al plan and amendments to it
g the comprehensive murnci-
agency shall hold at least one
~ of the hearing shall be pub-
ten days before the day of the
lrehensive plan or an amend-
las received the recommenda-
the date an amendment pro-
~ agency for its recommenda-
may by resolution by a two-
:nsive plan or portion thereof
Sk-tut~s
HOUSING. REDEVELOPMENT. PLA.t\'NING. ZOMNG 462.357
as the official municipal plan upon such notice and hearing as may be prescribed by ordi-
nance.
Subd. 4. Interim ordinance. If a municipality is conducting studies or has authorized a
study to be conducted or has held or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose of considering
adoption or amendment of a comprehensive plan or official controls as defined in section
462.352. subdivision 15, or if new territory for which plans or controls have not been adopted
is annexed to a municipality, the governing body of the municipality may adopt an interim
ordinance applicable to all or part of its jurisdiction for the purpose of protecting the planning
process and the health. safety and welfare of its citizens. The interim ordinance may regulate.
restlict or prohibit any use. development. or subdivision within the jurisdiction or a portion
thereof for a period not to exceed one year from the date it is effective. and may be extended
for such additional periods as the municipality may deem appropriate. not exceeding a total
additional period of 18 months. No interim ordinance may halt. delay. or impede a subdivi-
sion which has been given preliminary approval prior to the effective date of the interim ordi-
nance.
History: /965 c 670.1' 5; /976 c /27 s 2/; /977 c 3-17 s 68; /9150 c 566 .I' 24; /983 c
216 art / s 67; /9155 c 62 .I' /.2; /995 c /76 s-l
462.356 PROCEDURE FOR PLAN EFFECTUATION; GENERALLY.
Subdivision l. Recommendations for plan execution. Upon the recommendation by
the planning agency of the comprehensive municipal plan or sections thereof. the planning
agency shall study and propose to the governing body reasonable and practicable means for
putting the plan or section of the plan into effect. Subject to the limitations of the following
sections. such means indude. but are not limited to. zoning regulations. regulations for the
subdivision of land, an official map. a program for coordination of the no-nnal public im-
provements and services of the municipality. urban renewal and a capital improvements pro-
gram.
Subd. 2. Compliance with plan. After a com reh or section
thereof has been ommended bv the lannin~ a~ency and a c
~y. no ubliclv owned illterest ill rea ro rtv Wit ill t e municipality shall ac Ulred or
. os t. nor s a any capl a Improvement be authorized by the municipality or specia
district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the
municipality until after the lanning agency has reviewed the proposed ac uisition. dis osa!.
or capital improvement a or e nun ernillg 0 or 0 er s cia lstnct
or agency or political subdivision concerned. i ill (J . to com Iiance of the ro osed
acquisition. disoosal or improvement w'th the . , Ian. allure 0 the
plannIng agency to report on the proposal within -1-5 days after such a reference. or such other
period as may be designated by the governing body shall be deemed to have satisfied the re-
quirements of this subdivision. The governing body may. by resolution adopted by two-
thirds vote dispense with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds
that the proposed acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no rela-
tionship to the comprehensive municipal plan.
History: 1965 c 670 s 6
462.357 PROCEDURE FOR PLAN EFFECTUATION; ZONING.
Subdivision I. Authority for zoning. For the purpose of promoting the public health.
safety, morals, and general welfare, a municipality may by ordinance regulate on the earth's
surface, in the air space above the surface. and in subsurface areas, the locarion. height.
width, bulk. type of foundation, number of stories. size of buildings and other structures. the
- percentage of lot which may be occupied, the size of yards and other open spaces. the density
and distribution of population. the uses of buildings and structures for trade, industry. resi-
dence. recreation. public activities, or other purposes. and the uses of land for trade. industry.
residence, recreation. agriculture, forestry. soil conservation, water supply conservation.
conservation of shorelands. as defined in sections 103E20 I to 103 F. 22 I. access to direct sun-
light for solar energy systems as defined in section 2l6C.06, nood control or other purposes.
and may establish standards and procedures regulating such uses. No regulation may prohib-
~
C.i+~ CDd e.
1-12-1-2 1-12-1-3
PERSONAL PROPERTY:
All property that is not real property, and other than
the property that has come into the hands of the
Police Department through impoundment.
DISPOSE OF:
To sell, alienate, to finish with, bargain ,away or
otherwise conveyor transfer ownership, but, not
including destruction of waste materials or the sale of
supplies and materials or other properties by the City
in the course of a service being performed by the City
in the ordinary scope of its Municipal function. (Ord.
76-5,4-19.76)
1-12-1-3: DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY: The following procedures
shall be followed when real property, that has come into the
possession of the City, is intended to be disposed, subject to the exceptions
contained in subsections (G) and (H) herein:
(A) Process for Approval: The City Manager shall be responsible for preparation
and processing for approval any real property, intended for disposal. At the
time of preparing to dispose of such property, the City Manager shall first
secure comments and recommendations from affected departments. However,
this procedure shall not be applicable when real property is used as a trade-in
on the purchase by the City of real property.
(B)
Notice of Bids: The City Manager shall prepare a notice inviting sealed bids,
to be published for two (2) consecutive weeks in the official newspaper and
at least five (5) calendar days must intervene between the date of the last
publication and the time for filing such sealed bids or proposals. This notice
shall contain a description of the property and the terms and conditions of
sale.
............-.
(C) Form of Bids:
1. All bids shall be filed on forms furnished by the City Manager or his
representative. After receipt of the bids, the City Manager or his
representative shall present a listing of the bids to the City Council for
acceptance. The highest bidder shall be awarded the contract unless
otherwise provided in the notice of bids.
2. In the event the City Council rejects all bids as referred to in the notice
of bids, it may then authorize the City Manager to list the property for
disposition with one or more realtors or it may authorize the City Manager
to negotiate the disposition in a manner that he may deem appropriate. All
final dispositions of real property shall be by Council approval.
384
ol-;S
.....
1-12-1-3
1-12-1-3
(0) Filing of Bond: The City Manager may require that any person who
files a bid must also furnish a bond commonly referred to as a
bidder's bond, or a cash deposit in the amount of not less than five
percent (5%) of his bid.
(E) Auction Sales: In the event that it is determined by the City Manager
that sealed bids should not in the first instance be incorporated for
the disposition of certain property, then the proposed disposition
must be submitted to the City Council for approval of a public
auction sale. All such public auctions shall comply with the same
procedure in that the City Manager shall be responsible for preparing
a notice to the official newspaper for at least two (2) consecutive
weeks which must be at least five (5) days before the actual date of
the sale. Any such notice shall describe the location of the auction
sale and a description of the properties to be sold. At the time of the
public auction, the City shall be responsible for providing the
services of an auctioneer or other personnel necessary to carry out
the public auction. The City Manager, upon completion of the public
auction, shall prepare a record of all transactions and file such
record with the City Clerk.
(G) Through action and approval of the City Council, the City may
dispose of real property in its possession without following the
procedures contained in subsections (B), (C), (0) and (E), when
such real property is intended to be conveyed to another
governmental subdivision, public corporation, the State, an agency of
the State, the Federal government, or an agency of the Federal
government. In such cases, the City may sell or otherwise convey its
land for a nominal consideration, without consideration or for such
consideration as may be agreed upon.
1
i
I
.\
I
1
1
~
l
!
(F) Books and Accounts: The City Manager shall be responsible for
maintaining a record of each sale and the disposition of money
received.
(H) Through action and approval of the City Council, the City may
dispose of real property owned by the City in fee simple and not
restricted by the grant, without following the procedures contained in
subsections (B), (C), (0) and (E) herein, when such real property is
conveyed to encourage and promote industry and provide
employment for citizens by conveying said property to any person
(individual(s), partnership, corporate or other entity) for a nominal
consideration or for such consideration as may be agreed upon.
(Ord. 84-07,4-16-84)
695
City of Prior Lake