Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8B - Red Oaks Second Addn. STAFF AGENDA REPORT DATE: INTRODUCTION: 8B JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 98.XX APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPERS CONTRACT FOR "RED OAKS SECOND ADDITION" MARCH 2,1998 AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of the final plat and Developer's Contract for Red Oaks Second Addition. On January 5, 1998, the City Council approved Resolution 98-08, approving the preliminary plat for Red Oaks Second Addition. The final plat consists of 2.42 acres to be subdivided into 3 lots for single family dwellings. One of the lots includes an existing dwelling, so only two new lots will be created. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The developer has also requested that the City Council reimburse the preliminary plat fee of $530.00. This request is based on discussion with the City Council when the original preliminary plat for this area was denied in 1994. DISCUSSION: The principal requirements for final plat approval include a signed developer's contract with surety for the installation of utilities and streets and the satisfactory completion of all preliminary plat conditions. Staff has reviewed the final plat and finds it to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. The conditions placed upon the preliminary plat approval have been satisfied. City charges for sewer and water, storm water management, collector streets and parkland dedication at the current rates are detailed in the attached development contract. The developer's contract specifies the improvements to be made by the developer, and a signed copy of the contract is attached to this report. Staff will be available to discuss the details of this contract with the Council. As mentioned above, the Developer is also requesting the City reimburse the application fee for the preliminary plat. The Developer paid this fee in order to start the application 1:\97files\97~ubdiv\fi~l\redQ.€lk2\fprep.t.doc . ~g~ 1 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. ~,E" Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (61z) q47-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ISSUES: AL TERNA TIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ACTION REQUIRED: process, but requested reimbursement at the same time. This request is based on discussions at the City Council meeting in 1994. The Developer submitted an application for a preliminary plat for this property in 1993. The City Council originally approved the preliminary plat, subject to the condition that the applicant obtain the necessary variances and that the DNR make a determination as to whether the pond area is a part of the lake bed. The Council subsequently adopted Resolution 94-09 on February 7, 1994, denying the preliminary plat. Once again, the issue was due to the determination that the pond area was a part of the lake bed, and thus created the need for several variances. At that meeting, the members of the City Council indicated they would be willing to waive the preliminary plat fee when this issue was resolved, and a new application was submitted. A transcript of the discussion on this topic is attached to this report for your review. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat and all conditions have been met. There is no issue involved in the final plat. The issue in this case is the reimbursement of the preliminary plat fee. The request is based on the previous actions of the City Council. 1. Adopt Resolution 98-XX, approving the final plat and the Developer's Contract for Red Oaks Second Addition, and direct the staff to reimburse the Developer the $530.00 preliminary plat application fee. 2. Adopt Resolution 98-XX, approving the final plat and the Developer's Contract for Red Oaks Second Addition, and deny the Developer's request to reimburse the $530.00 preliminary plat application fee. 3. Deny Resolution 98-XX 4. Defer consideration of this item for specific reasons. Alternative #1 opt Resolution 98-XX, and to rse the Developer the $530.00 Ion fee. les, City Manager 1:\97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\fprept.doc Page 2 RESOLUTION 98-XX RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF "RED OAKS SECOND ADDITION" AND DEVELOPER'S CONTRACT AND SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE FINAL PLAT. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: the City Council held a hearing on and approved, subject to conditions identified in the Resolution 98-08, the preliminary plat on January 5, 1998; and WHEREAS: the City Council has found that the final plat of "Red Oaks Second Addition" is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat; and WHEREAS: The City Council has approved the final plat of "Red Oaks Second Addition". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFltlE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does require the following conditions to be met, prior to release of, and recording of said plat: 1. A current title opinion or commitment of title insurance be submitted acceptable to the City Attorney. 2. Payment of all fees prior to release of the final plat mylars. 3. Reductions of the entire final plat be submitted, to the following scales: 1" = 800'; 1" = 200'; and one reduction which fits onto an 81/2" x 11" sheet of paper. 4. Four mylar sets of the final plat with all required signatures be submitted. 5. The developer provide financial security, acceptable to the City Engineer prior to release of the final plat mylars. 6. The final plat and all pertinent documents must be filed with Scott County within 60 days from the date of final plat approval. Failure to record the documents by May 2, 1998, will render the final plat null and void. BE IT FURl UJ!,R RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'lUJ!, CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that upon satisfaction of the above conditions, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and sign the Development Contract and the final plat documents for the final plat of "Red Oaks Second Addition". Passed and adopted this 2nd day of March, 1998. 1:\97fi1esI97subdiv\final\redoak2\rs98xxcc,doc Page 1 16200 Eagle Creek Ave, S,E" Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) Zl47-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I Mader I Kedrowski I Petersen I Schenck I Wuellner {Seal} 1:\97files\97subdiv\finallredoak2\Is98xxcc,doc YES NO Mader Kedrowski Petersen Schenck Wuellner Frank Boyles, City Manager City of Prior Lake Page 2 ~ r ~ ~ ! . 'I ; ~ I' " -:1 '! ! I il! '. I ,/1 ! l'lll <'l , I 'il ,,' , ; l ~ : , iT. i I , I if! , I i J , .~:1 /lj If' i Iii :...... , , l:.;c , r~"1 C :Ci .~.~. ~~ '''~')~I ~ il i , ;1" ~~.:.==:: :'~li' ':"'"" ..;;,.')",s..-:- .J .,.V 1 /.:....--\ I( I~~ ( ~ '-....; II I I F . . ~----.- ~ .i ,~ ~ " i ~ > I ,---; I I 'l'li~ ~r'~' 0~' . - 'J,. .. Ilt-.' . ;. ; i Ii "i~~\ '<j~l ,-[ r---f-~ ' I ; ~ 'I: , r!. . \' ( = , I , l l"^-i/~~ I ~j I I~ '\. ur-:. . I" r ~---,J ~', , I " I \,1" I . ,~v 1 j ~: '~ ~y~ .~~ i,! /fil ! ~d:; ! 'r.-::;J . I .",'. \-lit UAi . ;~&~"- ~r"I..I: ".:"."~"r- 1/"" ""!: :~=~~ II ,....;--:-,'-...... _:It,~ I ,/. ~<{I ~~l ~~~'[ :~ 'h; --........--;-r ":. ~ ';"',~i ...;....':!_,c I ':;,/ . -;/:::: I ..~'. -, i ~' il Ii l: i~i; " , II' ~ ~; J l.. -: . \ j \ ,,, I 'I I ~ I . Ii -::/ =-z. , '-- ,ll .,"'~ j".)Jx:\:l ______."" Ir---' !, . ~ !: :: " ". ,.:_._~- i :.: ~\ ~/d:~ ~~-, 1" .:.... ~ -.. I . ~ fil':i: . , 'J. , I tf\r E~ o t. ~ ,j:l. CI Q 370 ~~ o :IS ~ ''-______1 .~:.:.".:~p- :~! I n =- < 010 >-" 'Jl "'3 ~o ...'" r- > " '" ~ RED OAKS SECOND ADDITION \"\" ,.J 9 ~..."'\ \ ';~ \ '."'0\ \ >I-~ \ \/ "fl. ....-.- J \ \ \ t', o ~ ..' ' ......, \ ~~\ tl..'f.,\o,.1 ~l . ' =~ .' ~, ... , , , .' .-....-- .--- ..--... /", '~\~ '0,:, '\ 3 / T'\y " , . z \, 535.53'13 E "''''-7.45 .' \ 1." '.......... .... ~. ..........,~It~tI.~\. .,.... 0....... ',. ? 00.... ..... oQ ,!> ~ "~8'l......,. ...... -,' ,.&?'.1, '" '..80 It .....,. "156\_ 1.& -'''17 ..E> \\, / / / I / \ \ \ \ \ \A' ^\'I " ,) , / (:, (' \.) \ \ J' ' (' '- ~: '-\ V / u ,I':., C L_ / \ \ VA LLEY SURVEYING CO,. p, A. JO "5 0 ~ 5CA..f ~ ~" 4!l - ;. . Off'('J~fS !qcfl .,-,.r*fnl ccr.J"/fJ OD!IW}T!S !PC., ~.'.".r"f"~ SF! ,:,':0 "~I.PKED BY ,;(c....Sf "Ie. :0',': 'J1 HI r.. , D=:':~:"C: E,,:;r":'."-:; S!"!O',-~ :"'~s ..':1).._._....._ J L____.....:t.,. I SE:"G ., "'!!' .... .':0;:'" ".';" $:.' :::''-''.-: S':"l:.rl. ,;.....0 :lC1.& ,C~ .j.'.!"; ~...:. ;. ~i.E- .oN .1!1T" J.NO A.').''':',!",o;; ~.'!,. :-..! .....'; fJlll.!r;:, o~~q.;;~ :,.;:r,,'!.:: ;;.', '.of =...- SHEET 2 OF 2 $'-EETS HUEMOELLER & BATES ATIORNEYS AT LAW 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL POST OFFICE BOX 67 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 lAMES D. BATES BRYCE D. HUEMOELLER November 7, 1997 Telephone (612) 447-2131 Telecopier (612) 447-5628 Mr. Donald R. Rye Prior Lake Planning Director l6200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Re: Benedict Subdivision Application Dear Mr. Rye: I enclose for filing a revised application to subdivide the Benedict property into 3 lots. I am also enclosing a check payable to the City of Prior Lake for $695.00, in payment of the $530.00 preliminary plat application fee and the $l65.00 final plat application fee. When Mike's previous application was denied, the Mayor recognized our difficulty with DNR and said that if we were able to resolve our dispute with DNR over the wetland on Lot 3 (which we have done), the application could be resubmitted and the fees waived. Accordingly, I am requesting a waiver of the preliminary plat application fee in accordance with the Mayor's directions. v I understand that this application will be considered by the Planning Commission at its November 24 meeting. Sincerely yours, \*~~1l~~R Bryce D. Huemoeller BDH:ab Enclosures cc: Michael S. Benedict TRANSCRIPT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 7, 1994 Mayor Andren ...agenda is to consider a resolution to deny the preliminary plat of Red Oaks Second Addition. Boyles: Madam Mayor, City Council, on December 7, excuse me, on December 20, the City Council took action to adopt a motion which had three contingencies in it. One ofthe contingencies was that the lake, the water of body within the flat not be determined to be lake bed by the Department of Natural Resources. Pat Lynch of the Department of Natural Resources issued a Ietter on December 14, which indicated that in his opinion that the property was indeed lake bed. Not wetland. He then confirmed that finding in a February 2, letter, which I think you have in your packet. Recently however, we did receive, and that was on February 4, I believe, we received a letter from Bryce Huemoeller which requests that this item be extended to March 7, rather than denied this evening. We have talked to Mr. Huemoeller previously and indicated to him that the item was scheduled for action on February 7. His rationale I believe, is another meeting with the DNR scheduled for tomorrow. So the Council has two options, 1) to adopt Resolution 94-09, which would deny the petition on the basis that the contingencies set forth in the December 20th motion have not been met. Or to continue this until March 7, as requested. Mayor Andren: Thank you. Is there anyone present that wishes to speak on this Issue. Bryce Huemoeller: My name is Bryce Huemoeller. I am here on behalf of the applicant, Mike Benedict. This issue tonight, I guess is scheduled as "Consider Resolution to Deny the Preliminary Plat" but we have asked for a continuance of this matter for a month for the following reasons. The key issue for this plat is the status of the pond...(end of tape) or not. The determination of this issue in part, perhaps even exclusively is the question of whether or not, historically, the pond was physically separated from the lake by a piece of land that was higher than the ordinary-high-water line, which is 904. When I appeared before the Council in December, I had a series of photographs and maps and historical information that indicated that the 904 line did not historically extend into the pond but rather followed the shoreline around the lake and initially we used the L:\97FILES\97CORRES\CONNIE\REDOAKS,DOC 1 r-:-~ '!i" -----.- original plat of Red Oaks for proof of that. We also used some aerial photos and other information that I had gotten from our surveyor and the County Surveyor's office. The hearing was in late December. Early in January we met with Pat Lynch. We being, myself, city staff and Ron Swanson, the surveyor for the applicant. At that meeting Ron Swanson produced an additional piece of information that we thought would be conclusive in that Ron found through the Scott County Surveyor's office a drawing prepared by a man named Don Childs, who at the time was the County Surveyor and County Highway Engineer. In 1945 he prepared, actually July 30, 1945, he prepared a drawing of this exact area in which he showed the pond and showed that it was in fact separate and did not connect to Prior Lake. We showed this to Pat Lynch and his concerned that he expressed at that time was that the drawing did not show lake elevations. Because of that in his mind, didn't prove that, that lake was at or above 904 at the time of the drawing. So arguably the land between the pond and the lake could have been less than 904 which would have made the pond lake bed. We then adjourned the meeting with the mission that we were going to try to pin down the lake levels and contact him, which we did. In that first week of January we found information from the Prior Lake Association and Watershed District which indicated that in July of 1945 the lake was higher than 904. The DNR reviewed that and about mid-January told us that they were concerned that the Watershed District and Lake Association information was too general for the purposes of specifying the lake level on a specific day and that indicated that unless they could find a better indicator of the level at that time they would have to conclude that our position didn't have merit. We talked to Pat Lynch a couple oftimes in the interim and he basically told my partner, Jim Bates, that he was researching DNR files to come up with more information. I talked to Frank, I guess it was the first week in February and found that this had been scheduled for tonight. He told me that the DNR had made a determination and it was adverse to us which we had not be notified of. And so it was then we found out that on the second the DNR had issued a letter. We got the letter I believe on the fourth, and found that while DNR had conclusively determined through United States Department oflnterior records that on July 20, 1945, the lake was 904.75. They had for other reasons which they called a "hydrologic connection", potentially a hydrologic connection between the pond and lake. L:\97FILES\97CORRES\CONNIE\REDOAKS,DOC 2 So for that reason, they decided even though they approved what they wanted, they decided for other reasons to deny our request. We called them and made the earliest possible appointment that we could to meet with Pat Lynch and his supervisor to discuss the February 2, letter that we got on the forth. The meeting is scheduled for the eighth and at that meeting we expect to have one of two things happen. Either we expect the DNR to amend its position or to establish a procedure for resolving this dispute that we have with the DNR over whether or not this is part of the lake bed. We see options that include to either mediate this or arbitrate it or possibly go to an administrative law judge. We think that the procedure has to be established because actually the DNR is not charged by statute with determining what is or what is not lake bed. It has a statutory charge to determine ordinary highs and it has statutory powers to designate public waters but not necessary to determine the exact issue the way City Council framed it. So we feel there has to be some extraordinary procedures adopted to do this in an expedited and equitable way. We think that a continuance for one month makes sense because it allows us to confront the DNR which we did not have an opportunity to do because of the fact we did not actually get notice ofthe DNR's decision until the fourth. The decision that was rendered was one that was adverse to us for a reason that had not previously been disclosed. And it allows us to avoid starting an action to appeal an adverse decision or an inverse condemnation action or something like that, that would involve extraordinary expenses for the City and applicant. We're hoping that the final decision on this can be deferred until we have an opportunity to challenge the DNR's decision we received on the fourth. Mayor Andren: Thank you very much. Do you have any questions for Mr. Huemoeller? Okay. Thank you. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this particular issue. Hearing none, I'll start with Councilmember Scott. Scott: I guess I have a concern not only on this contingency but on the other contingencies and I don't believe staffhas worked on the other contingencies because this one has not been met. To me, at least one of the contingencies is very ambiguous and I think staff has had a very rough time considering how they are going to deal with it. '" the applicants spending more money if we cannot .. L:\97FILES\97CORRES\CONNIE\REDOAKS,DOC 3 Mayor Andren: Scott: Mayor Andren: Greenfield: Mayor Andren: Schenck: Mayor Andren: Huemoeller: Mayor Andren: Huemoeller: I didn't hear your last part. I guess I would hate to have the applicant spend any more money continuing on with this if staff does not feel we can meet the other contingencies because of the ambiguouness of the motion. Councilmember Greenfield. I would echo the comments of Councilmember Scott. One issue which I am concerned about in addition to that is the second condition of the motion that was proposed which places the preliminary plat "subject to the applicant's submitting a proper variance request." I'll put that in quotes because I feel very uncomfortable with that condition being set forth and continued on the books. The variance process requires certain conditions and its not simply placing a request on file. It requires certain conditions being met, performance in lieu of or in addition to filing that request. So I find it to be a little bit awkward as well as vague as part of the performance as it relates to the conditions set forth in our zoning ordinance in the condition subparagraph 7.6 which is the variance process. So the condition ... just putting a request or submitting a request is a bit vague and I find the suggestion to staff to make note of that and I would like to add that one point to the Resolution. And the fact that the other portion is very difficult is run through the process to take care of also leaves me with a great concern as well as the findings of the DNR at this point. That is my comments. Councilmember Schenck. I have been following this with you most of the way. I attended several meetings... Right now I just don't see anything that the DNR is going to change in their opinion of that time being anything but the lake bed. Unfortunately we have a beautiful piece of property out there. Its just beautiful. But I don't see any evidence that the DNR is going to change their opinion on that. Mr. Huemoeller, like I said, with all due respect, we have about three minutes. Okay. Fine, I'll use them. You did have an opportunity to speak other times as well. We feel that. We feel we are entitled to a hearing and that we want this proceeding suspended until we can have a hearing with the L:\97FILES\97CORRES\CONNIE\REDOAKS,DOC 4 Mayor Andren: Inaudible: Mayor Andren: Huemoeller: Mayor Andren: Huemoeller: Mayor Andren: Greenfield: Unknown: Greenfield: Mayor Andren: DNR. If the DNR has the authority to make this decision then we have some right of appeal. If the DNR does not have this authority to make this decision then we can concoct with the DNR's consent and with the City's consent that some reasonable process to have this issue detennined on an equitable, fair basis by some qualified hearing examiner. And that's what we expect to accomplish. Mr. Huemoeller, I didn't support the original motion to begin with and I support Resolution 94-09, but it seems that your issue is with the DNR and if the DNR changes their mind. And it doesn't look to me from Mr. Lynch's letter that they are going to be prone to do that. I think what you can do is resubmit your preliminary plat. I think if that is clarified, the Council will have no problem waiving the fees on that case. Am I incorrect on that? Uh-hu. I think you need to deal with the DNR. Are you saying... If the DNR changes their mind and if they say "Yes, this is lake bed", you can resubmit your preliminary plat and then we can review it and we can waive the fees for the applicant. What about zoning standards that have changed in the interim? That's an option for you. That's an option for you. I'mjust throwing that out for you, Mr. Huemoeller. The Chair is in want of a Motion on this issue. I'll make the Motion for adoption of Resolution 94-09. I'd like to add one section on there. Whereas, the second condition of the preliminary plat which states "subject to the applicant submitting proper variance request" is in violation of Zoning Ordinance 7.6 requiring proper process for filing and reviewing the whole vanance process. I'm sorry. It's... It's 7.6. L:\97FILES\97CORRES\CONNIE\REDOAKS,DOC 5 Greenfield: Mayor Andren: Scott: Mayor Andren: All: Mayor Andren: Second condition of the preliminary plat, the Motion, which states the subject is.. "the condition is subject to the applicant submitting proper variance request". It is incomplete and in violation of Zoning Ordinance 7.6 which requires applicant to not only file the request but go through the proper variance procedures to get granted. Thanks. Motion by Councilmember Greenfield, is there a second? I'll second the Motion. It's second. Discussion. All in favor of the Motion say "aye" Aye. Opposed. Motion carried. The Motion is approved. L:\97FILES\97CORRES\CONNIE\REDOAKS.DOC 6 DEVELOPMENT CO~T.KACT RED OAKS SECOND ADDITION PROJECT #97-53 AGREEMENT dated March 2, 1998, by and between the CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and Michael S. Benedict (the "Developer"). 1. REOUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a Plat for Red Oaks Second Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "Plat"). The land is legally described as shown on attached ExhibitA which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the Plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the Plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 60 days after the City Council approves the final Plat. 3. fUGHT TO PROCEED. Within the Plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Contract has been fully executed by both parties, 2) the necessary security, development fees and insurance have been received by the City, and 3) the City Engineer or Designee has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. The foregoing restriction on the Developer's "Right To Proceed" does not apply to grading or other approvals set forth in Resolution No. 98-08, dated January 5, 1998, approving the Preliminary Plat for Red Oaks Second Addition. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If the Plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary Plat, the City may refuse to approve [mal Plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract or the Resolution approving the Final Plat and the breach has not been remedied. Development of I: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 02/13/98 1 ~if subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Fees and charges collected by the City in connection with infrastructure and public improvements are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the Plat that are designated in an approved preliminary Plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are subdivided into lots and blocks. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS,. If the Plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary Plat, the Developer shall submit a Staging Plan for City Council approval which may allow the Developer more than one (1) year to subdivide the property into lots and blocks. 6. DEVELOPMENT PLANS,. The Plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract, but are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Contract as if fully set forth herein. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A -- Approved Final Plat Dated 1/23/98 (Prepared by Valley Surveying) Plan B -- Final Grading, Development, and Erosion Control Planes). The soil erosion plan must also be approved by the Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District. Dated 2/12/98 (Prepared by William R. Englehardt Associates) Plan C -- Tree Preservation and Replacement Plans and Landscaping Plan Dated 1/12/98 (Prepared by William R. Englehardt, Associates) Plan D -- One set of mylar reproducible Plans and Specifications for Developer Improvements (Prepared by William R. Englehardt Associates) 7. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS.. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B . Water System C. Storm Sewer I: \97fi1es\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 2 02/13/98 D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading and Ponding H. Underground Utilities I. Setting of Iron Monuments J. Sidewalks and Trails K Landscaping The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; the City's Public Works Design Manual and any other applicable City ordinances, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. The Developer sh~l submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a Minnesota registered professional civil engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council and other agencies before proceeding with construction. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's authorized personnel. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, iron monuments must be installed in accordance with Minn. Stat. ~ 505.02. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 8. r;ONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION., a. The City's authorized personnel shall inspect the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. Inspection services by the City shall include: 1: \97files\97subdi v\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 3 02/13/98 1. Inspection of required improvements which include grading, sanitary sewer, watennain, storm sewer/ponding and street system. 2. Documentation of construction work and all testing of improvements. 3. As-built location dimensions for sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities. The City will prepare as-built record drawings. 9. DEVELOPER SERVICES. The Developer shall be responsible for providing all other construction services including, but not limited to: a. Construction surveying b. As-built drawings of grading plans. ., c. As-built elevations of all utility improvements, including but not limited to top nut of hydrants, manhole rims, manhole inverts. (Tie dimensions to sewer and water services from City staff or City consultants.) d. Project Testing: The Developer is responsible through its testing company, at the Developer's cost, to provide testing to certify that Developer Improvements were completed in compliance with the approved fmal plans and specifications. The personnel performing the testing shall be certified by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The City Engineer may require additional testing if in his opinion adequate testing is not being performed. The cost of additional testing is to be paid by the Developer. e. Lot comers and monuments 10. BOULEVARD AND AREA RESTORATION. The Developer shall seed or lay cultured sod in all boulevards within 30 days of the completion of street related improvements and restore all other areas disturbed by the development grading operation in accordance with the approved erosion I: \97fi1es\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 4 02/13/98 control plan. Upon request of the City Engineer, the Developer shall remove the silt fences after turf establishment. 11. SUBDIVISION MONUMENTS. The Developer shall install all subdivision monumentation within one year from the date of recording the plat, or the monumentation shall be installed on a per lot basis at the time the building permit for the subject lot is issued, whichever occurs first. At the end of the one year period from recording of the Plat, the Developer shall submit to the City Engineer written verification by a registered land surveyor that the required monuments have been installed throughout the plat. 12. OCCUPANCY. A permanent Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued for any building in the plat until water and sanitary sewer improvements have been installed and the streets have been completed and the first lift of bituminous has been placed and said improvements have been inspected and determined by the City to be available for use. 13. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by October 31, 1998, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. The [mal wear course on streets shall be installed the first summer after the base layer of asphalt has been in place for one freeze thaw cycle. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be in writing and conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 14. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a non-revocable license to enter the Plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with Plat development. 15. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose I: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 5 02/13/98 .. . additional erosion control requirements if, in the City Engineer's opinion they are necessary to meet erosion control objectives at no cost to the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. All seeded areas shall be mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed unless the Plat is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. 16. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall daily clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer or its agents. Prior to any construction in the Plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweepmg. 17. QRADING PLAN. The Plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading, development and erosion control planes), Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Prior Lake Public Works Design Manual. Before the City releases the security, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as built" grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "as built" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds, b) location and I: \97fi1es\97 subdiv\finaI\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 6 02/13/98 elevations along all swales and ditches, and c) lot corners and house pads. The City may withhold issuance of building pennits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS,. Upon completion of the Developer Improvements required by this Contract and fmal written acceptance by the City Engineer, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 19. CITY ADMINISTRATION. The Developer shall pay a fee for City administration. City administration will include all activities necessary to implement this Developer's Contract. These activities include, but are not limited to, preparation of the Development Contract, consultation with Developer and its engineer on the status of or problems regarding the project, project monitoring durmg the warranty period, processing of requests for reduction in security, and City legal expenses. Fees for this service shall be six percent (6%) of the estimated construction cost as detailed in Exhibit E, less oversizing costs outlined in Exhibit D, Section A, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. The provisions of this paragraph are subject to adjustment pursuant to Paragraph 40 of this Development Contract. 20. CITY CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION,. The Developer shall pay six percent (6%) of the estimated construction cost, less oversizing costs outlined in Exhibit D, Section A, for construction observation performed by the City's authorized personnel. Construction observation shall include, but is not limited to, part or full-time inspection of proposed grading, public utilities and street construction, and preparation of "as-built" drawings. The provisions of this paragraph are subject to adjustment pursuant to Paragraph 40 of this Development Contract. I :\97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 7 02/13/98 21. TRUNK STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Developer shall pay a trunk storm sewer area connection charge of $7,360.00 prior to the City signing the [mal Plat. The amount was calculated as follows: 43,810 square feet at 16.8C per square foot. 22. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN TRUNK AREA CHARGES. A Sanitary sewer and watermain trunk area charge of $0.00 shall be paid by the Developer for sanitary sewer and watermain trunk improvements prior to the City signing the [mal Plat. 23. COUECTOR STREET FEE. This Development Contract requires the Developer to pay a collector street fee of $1,515.00 for collector street improvements prior to the City signing the final Plat. The amount was calculated as follows: 1.01 acres at $1500.00 per acre. 24. fARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION. The Developer shall dedicate to the public'an amount of cash or land or a combination of both as established by the Parks and Recreation Director. In lieu of contributing land for park dedication, the Developer shall pay a cash amount of 1,404.00. This amount was calculated as follows: Gross area of the plat: 1.08 acres X 10% X $13,000.00 (the current fair market value of the land per acre as established by the Prior Lake City Council). The fee shall be paid prior to the City signing the [mal Plat. 25. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS, STREET SIGNS. AND STREET LIGHTS AND OPERATIONAL COSTS. Before the City signs the [mal Plat, the Developer shall pay to the City $0.00 for installation of traffic control signs and street signs. The Developer shall be financially responsible for the installation of street identification signs and non-mechanical and non-electrical traffic control signs. Street signs will be in conformance with the names as indicated on the Plat and pursuant to City standards. The actual number and location of signs to be installed shall be determined by the City and actual installation shall be performed by City authorized personnel. The Developer is responsible for the installation of the street lighting. The Developer shall pay the full capital cost of every light to be I: \97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct. doc 8 02/13/98 installed; this includes poles, fixtures, underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The street light plan must be acceptable to the City Engineer and in accordance with Exhibit F. 26. LANDSCAPING rSini?le-Familv Residential). Each residential lot in the Plat must have at least two (2) front yard trees as required in the Subdivision provisions of the City Code. The Developer or lot purchaser shall plant the two (2) front yard trees on every lot in the Plat which does not already meet this requirement at the time of the building permit. The trees shall be planted according to the requirements for subdivision trees as set forth in the Subdivision provisions of the City Code. The Developer or lot purchaser shall sod the front yard, boulevard, and side yards to the rear of every structure on every lot prior to the issuance of the final occupancy permit. If this section is to be satisfied by existing trees, a tree protection security may also be required. Upon satisfactory completion of the landscaping, the escrow funds, without interest, less any draw made by the City, shall be returned to the person who deposited the funds with the City. If the required landscaping is not installed the City is granted a license to enter upon a lot and install the landscaping using the escrowed funds deposited by the builder at the time the building permit was issued. 27. TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT. Subject to approved Plan C, the Developer shall provide a [mancial guarantee of $1,125.00 based on an amount equal to 125% of the estimated cost to furnish and plant the replacement trees. The estimated cost shall be provided by the Developer subject to approval by the City, and shall be at least as much as the reasonable amount charged by nurseries for the furnishing and planting of replacement trees. The security shall be maintained for a least one (1) year after the date the last replacement tree has been planted. At the end of such year, the portion of the security equal to 125 % of the estimated cost of the replacement trees which are alive and healthy may be released. Any portion of the security not entitled to be released shall be maintained and shall secure the Developer's obligation to remove and replant replacement trees which I: \97files\97subdiv\finaI\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 9 02/13/98 are not alive or are unhealthy, and to replant missing trees. Upon completion of the replanting of these trees, the entire security may be released. 28. SECURITY. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of real estate taxes including interest and penalties, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with an Irrevocable Letter of Credit in an amount equal to 125 % of the estimated Developer Improvement Costs. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("Security") for $25,050.00, plus a cash fee of $12,683.90 for City Development Fees. The amount of the Security was calculated as follows: DEVELOl'~K Il\1PROVEMENTS COSTS: Sanitary Sewer $ 2,000.00 Watermain $ 1,980.00 Storm Sewer $ 0.00 Grading/Culvert/Erosion Control $ 15,160.75 Streets/Sidewalks/Trails $ 0.00 Landscaping $ 0.00 Tree Preservation and Replacement $ 900.00 ESTIMAl'~1J DEVELOPER Il\1PROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 20.040.75 X 1.25 TOTAL FOR IRREVOCABLE LETT~R OF CREDIT AMOUNT $ 25.050.00 CITY DEVELOPMENT FEES: City Administration Fee (6.0%) (19) $ 1,202.45 I: \97fi1es\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 10 02/13/98 City Construction Observation (6 % ) (20) $ 1,202.45 Trunk Storm Sewer Area Charges (21) $ 7,360.00 Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Trunk Area Charges (22) $ 0.00 Collector Street Fees (23) $ 1,515.00 Park Dedication Fee (if in lieu of land) (24) $ 1,404.00 Street and Traffic Control Signs (25) $ 0.00 TOTAL CITY DEVELOPl\1ENT FEES $ 12.683.90 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the Security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. The Security shall be for a term ending December 31, 1999. Individual Security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are replaced at least sixty (60) days prior to their expiration. The City may draw down the Security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the Security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required Developer Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Security, the City may also draw it down. If the Security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. 29. REDUCTION OF SECURITY.. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and fmancial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the Security may be reduced from time to time by seventy-five percent (75 %) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty-five percent (25 %) of the Security shall be retained until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, and the required "as-built" grading plans and information have been received by the City. The City Public Works Design Manual outlines the procedures for Security reductions. 1:\97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 11 02/13/98 .-. . 30. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for streets is one year. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years. The warranty period on streets shall commence after the [mal wear course has been installed and accepted by the City and the warranty period on underground utilities shall commence following their completion and acceptance by the City. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds to secure the warranties. All trees shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12) months after planting. Any replacements shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The City shall retain twenty-five percent (25 %) of the Security posted by the Developer until the Developer Improvements are accepted by the City Engineer and the bonds are furnished to the City. The security retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction identify the procedures for fmal acceptance of streets and utilities. 31. REDUCTION OF SECURITY TO FIVE PERCENT (5%.). The Security guaranteeing satisfactory performance of the Developer Improvements can be reduced to 5 % of the original cost of the construction costs as set forth in Paragraph 28 by the City Engineer in writing and by providing the City a performance bond or a warranty bond from the Developer or its contractors in an amount equal to the construction costs which shall be in force for two (2) years for streets and one (1) year for utilities (the "Warranty Period") following acceptance of all required improvements and shall guarantee satisfactory performance of such improvements. All punch list items must be completed before a reduction in Security will be considered. The Warranty Period for a particular Developer Improvement shall commence on the date the City Engineer issues written acceptance of the Developer Improvement. The City Engineer may establish a lost of the individual Developer Improvements that the Developer will install as part of the Plat. The City Engineer may accept one or more individual Developer I: \97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 12 02/13/98 Improvements prior to the completion of all Developer Improvements. The City Engineer shall determine whether particular Developer Improvements are so integral to one another so as not to make it feasible or practical for the City to accept one Developer Improvement prior to the completion of other related Developer Improvements. The five percent (5 %) Security shall not be released until the Developer provides the City Engineer with a certificate from the Developer's land surveyor stating that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. 32. OVERSIZING. City and Developer agree that the Developer Improvements should be oversized for the benefit of future development. Oversizing is the construction of a Developer Improvement to City specifications that exceeds those that would otherwise be required of the Developer. Oversizing improvements include, but are not limited to, sanitary sewer, water, grading, and road improvements. City and Developer agree that the cost of system oversizing to be reimbursed to the Developer is $0.00 based upon a cost estimate as determined by both quotes received from the Developer's subcontractor and the City Engineer using the City's Assessment Policy based on a fmal engineering design. The calculation for oversizing is attached as Exhibit D. If the City Engineer determines additional work as the result of oversizing is required, the City shall reimburse the Developer for the costs associated with this work. 33. STORM WATER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT.5,. The City will reimburse the Developer for the costs to construct drainage facilities as required for storm water control as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The construction cost of such facilities to be credited shall be limited to catch basins, manholes, conduit, pond excavation, water quality control structures and landscaping around newly constructed water quality treatment ponds. 34. CLAIMS. 1: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 13 02/13/98 A. City Authorized to Commence Interpleader Action. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the Security in an amount up to 125 % of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract. B. Prompt Payment to Subcontractors Required. The Developer shall pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Developer's receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Developer fails within that time to pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the Developer has received payment by the City, the Developer shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the rate of 1 V2 percent (1.5 %) per month or any part of a month. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the Developer shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Developer shall be awarded its costs and disbursement, including attorney's fees. incurred in bringing the action. (See Minn. Stat. ~471.425, Subd. 4a.) 35. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to Plat development: A. Implementation of the conditions listed in the Resolution approving the final plat. I: \97fi1es\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct. doc 14 02/13/98 B. The Developer is required to submit the fmal Plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be compatible with the City's software (AutoCAD Release 13). C. The provisions of Minn. Stat. ~462.358 are incorporated herein as if fully set forth. If any of the provisions, criteria, performance standards or the like in this Development contract or in any City Ordinance applicable to this Development Contract are more stringent than those set forth in Minn. Stat. ~462.358, the more stringent provision, criteria, performance standard or the like shall apply. 36. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Once the City Engineer approves the construction costs or estimates for the developer Improvements, except those that are subject to oversizing as described in Paragraph 32 of this Development Contract, there will not be any reimbursement to the City by the Developer or to the Developer by the City for City Administration or Construction Observation Fees. The Developer shall not be responsible for paying City Administration or Construction Observation Fees on the construction costs or estimates associated with oversizing. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt Plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. 37. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except I: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct. doc 15 02/13/98 in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part against all or any portion of the property within the Plat. The Developer hereby waives any and all procedural or substantive objections to any special assessment levied to pay the cost to remedy a Developer default, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Property. 38. INDEMNIFICATION. Developer shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City, its Council, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives harmless against and in respect of any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, liens, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties, and attorneys' fees, that the City incurs or suffers, which arise out of, result from or relate to this Development Contract. The responsibility to indemnify and hold the City hannless from claims arising out of or resulting from the actions or inactions of the City, its Council, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives does not extend to any willful or intentional misconduct on the part of any of these individuals. 39. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the Plat complies with all county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the Plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. I: \97fi1es\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 16 02/13/98 B. Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until [mal written acceptance by the City of the Developer Improvements. Warning signs and detour signs, if detennined to be necessary by the City Engineer, shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. For the purpose of this subparagraph, "street maintenance" does not include snow plowing or normal sweeping. C. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. D. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including those sold to third parties, and shall be grounds for the City to order all work on the Plat to cease. E. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Grading, curbing, and one lift of bituminous shall be installed and accepted on all public streets prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy, except for model purposes only, a maximum of ten percent (10%) of the total lots in the active phase of the subdivision may be issued building permits prior to utility and street construction. All such lots must be readily accessible for inspection by way of a two wheel drive vehicle, but in no case shall the distance exceed 300 feet of an existing roadway. If certificates of occupancy are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of Developer Improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Developer Improvements and damage to Developer Improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no permanent certificates of occupancy may be issued until the 1:\97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 17 02/13/98 streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the Developer Improvements including utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This Contract shall run with the land. The Developer, at his/her sole expense, shall record this Contract against the title to the property within ten (10) days of the City Council's approval of the Contract. The Developer shall provide the City with a recorded copy of the Contract. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized "in fee title of the property being fmal platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being fma1 platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. I. Developer, at its sole cost and expense, shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained, until the expiration of the warranty period(s) on the Developer Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall ftle with the City a I: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 18 02/13/98 certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the Plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. J. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the prior written approval of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Plat, or any part of it. 40. AMENDMENTS. Developer hereby acknowledges that the City is working with the Developer Community through a series of "Developer Workshops" to standardize its Development Contract. If the City Council approves a standardized Development Contract, and the terms, provisions or conditions thereof differ materially from the terms, provision or conditions herein, City agrees it will amend this Development Contract, if requested by the Developer, to be consistent with the provisions and the approved standardized Development Contract referenced herein. If a standardized Development Contract provides for fees that differ from those set forth in this Development Contract, the fees in this Development Contract will be amended to be consistent with the fees established in a standardized contract. Not withstanding the foregoing, no amendment to this Development Contract shall be made unless both parties agree in writing to the amendment. 41. NOTICES. Required Notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at 1: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 19 02/13/98 the following address: Michael S. Benedict, 15380 Breezy Point Road, Prior Lake, MN, 55372. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care o'f the City Manager at the following address: City of Prior Lake, 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714. Concurrent with providing Notice to the City, Notice(s) shall be served upon the City Attorney Suesan Lea Pace, Esq. at Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A., 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 317, Eagan, Minnesota 55121. 42. INTERPRETATION. This Development Contract shall be interpreted in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. The words herein and hereof and words of similar import, without reference to any particular section or subdivision, refer to this Contract as a whole rather than to any particular section or subdivision hereof. Titles in this Contract are inserted tor convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in constructing or interpreting any of its provisions. 43. JURISDICTION. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE (SEAL) By: Wesley Mader, Mayor By: Frank Boyles, City Manager Reviewed for Form and Execution: By: Suesan Lea Pace City Attorney DEVELOPER: , BY:~.J~ Its:.:...Q.;~ . 1: \97fi1es\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 02/13/98 20 By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF SCOTT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,19 , by Wesley Mader, Mayor, and by Frank Boyles, City Manager, of the City of Prior Lake, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAt< IhD BY: Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (612) 452-5000 SLP:kgm STATE OF MINNESOTA ) L:.. r'~ ( ss COUNTY OF.J-D ~( ). The fOlefto~~ instrument was.. ~'..! ~dged before me Ibis J~ day of k6ri<<V'-1J 19f}bby -lijj[M tlLJ: ~I \U . /l. c::r h /l I ~(I1it~.Ltd /~/A-; Wr~YPUBLIC / ___ ., ..___...-....J,>~l . ~".-A_ .~....!,.........._.... . . .' '^' . CONNIE M. CARLSO~. , . .:~.~." \ NOTARY PUBLlC-M1NNESOIA ~ , : ..,... :: SCOTT COUNTY \, , ..~t~..... My Commission E:p~r:s:~n.2.!3~3~_)~ ~...."i,F':-.-.""'_"""'_.~'.!. f.'4!" , -"....- - :...e.~ I: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 21 02/13/98 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , MAr j~ f5 &~, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this,llt... day of -;j!if'r1f/l11-, 19~ . I ~~ -. '" .. -~ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) _L. --r1 (ss. COUNTY OP~ { ( ) tAli The forego~ ~trument w~ }4now>>!ged befs"e me this / y'tr.-- day of #b/7:r12Lh 19:J{L, by /{/fA c:f/Ulf~r J/ \~-?( CZ;UCf. / (biItiA ff;, iJMaA NOTARY PUBLIc " -- ",/ -~~. "",.e.----- .._" .......,.,..tp~~, ~ ;~~ CONNIE M. CARLSON ~\ : :~~~ NOTARY PUBLlC-t,m:NESOTA ).) : ,y~. ,S~OTT COUNTY ) :) . .,.... My CommiSSion Expires Jan. 31, 2000 .~ .. -- -.- -.. ..----------1"'" -.'.... --- <t::' -~..c_'-'.-'..:e~, DRA.t<ThU BY: Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (612) 452-5000 SLP:kgm I: \97files\97 subdi v\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 22 02/13/98 MORTGAGEE CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT " , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of ,19 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) 19 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFfED BY: Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (612) 452-5000 SLP:kgm I: \97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 23 02/13/98 day of ".. --... CONTRACT PURCHASER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which/who has a contract purchaser's interest in all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, hereby affIrms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property in which there is a contract purchaser's interest. Dated this day of ,19 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) 19 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by day of NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFfED BY: Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (612) 452-5000 SLP:kgm I: \97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 24 02/13/98 ." EXlllBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legal Description of Property Being Final Platted and Copy of Final Plat, Including Title Sheet: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 35, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Starting at a point on the west line of "Breezy Point" driveway 10 feet Southeasterly from the dividing line between Lots 2 and 3 extended Westerly; and running thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes West 14.8 feet to a point on said dividing line between Lots 2 and 3, 10 feet Southwesterly from the West line of said driveway; thence continuing South 61 degrees 28 minutes West 80 feet along said extension of the dividing line between Lots 2 and 3; thence Westerly at an angle of 22 degrees 50 minutes to the right 121 feet to a corner fence post; thence continuing Westerly along this same line about 85 feet to intersect the South line of a 20 foot driveway along "Red Oaks"; thence Northeasterly along the said driveway line to intersect the West line of the driveway along "Breezy Point"; and thence running Southeasterly along said driveway line to a point of beginning. Also, Lots 43, 44, 45, 46, and 47, Red Oaks on Prior Lake, according to the plat thereof filed of record in the Office of the Registrar of Deeds of the County of Scott and State of Minnesota. I: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak:2\dvcntrct.doc 25 02/13/98 RED EXHIBIT IIAII OAKS SECOND ADDITION D<<:)I AU. MDt .er 1W:St: 1'RE.SP.JfT':!~ ht "lI:h... S. IMrMdlet. . 11"91. Pf'"O'1. f" aunec'. .., rint Plenk Ifatlan_! UsoC'llltlm. II Lt11t" !\tat.. ~.tlon. n:'Irt'!M'9"' end T C r ~ O:lc'pX"aUan. .. "lmMOU (<<pontlen. 1IXt989" or the- follori"9 6txrlb<<J pttlprrty altulttd In ttw Ccutt:y of Scott, Stat. of ftlmuou to-vltl J hfonby ewtU, tlMt 1 hIi.. ~ .., platt<<' ttw ~ tlMeTlbe4 en thll plat.... 11m OMS SB::IMJ AtOITttI': thlIt thb plat t. . a::rnd r'l:" .' 10"1 0( tJ'W .....,.: ttwt ,u "n......-c.. ... CMT.al, tftMl en U. plat In t-.t MIS ~ 0( . (~t thIIt _n .....,:.. "-" bMfI ecornctl, plllmd 1" :.ht ~ u thclIIn at" ri1\ M ~l, pl~ .'1 tM ~ .. ~!tlqNtt~~ tlWt. thl!' c:ut.81dl! ~ Itne. ... CMT<<tly &elqMUd CI'I ttw plat' ..., tJwt thin .. fIG VI"; 1.. .. dtU,*, .., ft5 ~.02 S~. 1. 0[' pbUc hlqhway8 UJ be 6nl9"'tl!d ~het' thM'I ~. AU thIIt. .,.rt of ~CY1IIIIftt l.ct 1. Sectlm 35. ~lp 115. Itenqt' 22, SClCltt O:u'lty, "lnne8ota ducdbtd .. (aHew,,: Startl"9 .1. .. pol'll. CI'I tJw Wft. 11M of -lItw:ry Paint- dri,...,.,. 10 f..t lJICIUtheuterlr frm ttw dbldll'llJ llno!' Mt"'"" IoU .2 ~ J ..tt!l'ded V'l!'8t:<<ly: .m ~I"J t.henoI NOl"th 76 ~ 3J .tnut.. tfMt 14.11 leon. to .. point on ..Ii! dhldlrq Urw bltw<<1 Iou .2 -'" 3. 10 (_t IICltJtJwNt:ffly fr;'CIII tJw _1St 11M of .ald ddftW)": thenoI ClOI"Itlnulnq hJth 61 dIIqrMfI 18 IlinutM "'-t. eo (Mt 11cn;1 Mid .,.u...~lcn of ttw dhldlng 11M bt'tvMn l~ .2 .,.., 31 ttwnc. ~stKlr at en wqb of 22 "-';It'MS 50 .lnut_ to ttw r1~ 121 [Mt to . GOrneC' [~ ('08t: ~ Ol:II"ltlnulng wstft"lr .li01'19 tM. ...... 11M ~ M (_t to lfttM'MCt tIw -=M:h line of a JO [00'; 4ri-.y 1I1tn9 -Il:ed OSIut-; thence nort.hl!ta!rtlldr 1110'19 a&1d drlWVllY 11.,. to Intft'1lllct the vut 11M or thr tkhev8Y IIltn;J .B~p'y Point-: tIwnoe nnllnq KlJthN:st.dl' UC1"19 ..id dri.-y line to the point of t:Jfol;Il...,lng. TIeq.UM't' vlth LOU ,4]. ...c, -45, 415 and 47. Il:~ OIIIu en pdcr Lake, 8OCOl'dlnrJ to the plllt thenot en !11. end or ~ In the orrlee o[ the flfl911lt.ft' of DMdiI 0[ thtI Co.rItl' ot SOOtt end Stllte ot "lnnHot.e. Ard 811 thftt plrt oC t~ now Ylleat.d 20 (0Clt drl~ crNt" 1" t:he pllllt of OR'" CIIiIk",.. Iylrq IIlonq the _stlldy 11"" of .-..Id Iota .tJ. 44. "5, 4S and <il7. fto:nald III. ~, ..NkJ ~ r:lfWMltliClU L1CW1M :tl.abft" 10183 ~n: ~ "J~ (X:l1frlY a s:orr 1hII ~ln9 IN~ ~lfiClllt. .. ~I~ berOA .. thb CIiIl,o( by Il::~t A. ~. lM1d ~. Mlnne<<lU tolC'lll'lSie ~ ICIIIJ. .1~. rt:r..-ry J"\n.lc:. :'\QC'C;":. U:I'''':Y, "'~ rty ~.1Nlcn II~'''- J-.-cy ~1. ;"(JX HNI clftJl"lld the _ to bt BUr'W'~ end phtt.d .. Itl:C OUS 5C.(.'I:ND 1dDtTIa1, ~ cb Nniby ~~ and d.dlc:ate to thot rxmllc: tor' pbllc UN tonwc tIW r'Cllld. ard H",,*,bI (CC' utility and ~ prpoeell mly lIS Ihca<<t en toM plllt. I ~ cwtUy tNt 1 he... ",-",iMd thl.!J pili:' ." cb hn:'wby ~ thu pat roc arpc:on.l .. to f~. 1" vlt..-a ut-oIr.,r a&ld ,Udwd S. l4nedict. . "'lnljII111 ..C'8Q't. hell ~to Nt hill '-'d th1a o.yof ...., City At'Xll'1M'y. PTlOt' I.4LU. :".u.....!IOUI OItted thu _ &If or . l~. SI~m I"LI.CS'1IIlIl 5. ~lct ,",ill plat .,. ~ by t"HCluth" br ttw C'lty or Prior c,.Q. ~~ lit II nqul.r -.t.ln9 thPnor ""l~ thb . 1998. at-' 1e in a:rpllance vlth pnwt,lCI'IB at: tU~ IIt8tut_ 5<<:tlG'l 5OS.OJ. ~1Yhlcn 2. ..., or And In vltrM>u ~t _Ie! Pirwt IlInlt NaUO'\IIl AuocillUan. II IInlt-" stilt" OXpcn.tlcn. MIl ~ ~ pr'WMnU to be .IQ1'M'lS by Ie. pn:pK' ottlOKa thla _ ~ of . 1998. SI04mt ."'...... At~1 ''''- SlanDI r:l~t Blnk Miltlonel a-x:lllUcn '''' .... '''' !Iclt:CtCllu'lt:T~1 All c:urnnt 1'19_ tn.. an ~Id lI'l rwl u of thu ..., or .I~. s-n.rtcr..~ ro..Nt'f '" 'to and .-.ocll1Ucn. II lWlU.., sut_ OI:lC'pOnt1clr\. en "-"'11 of _\d QX'pOC'.t1cn. '''' . 1998. by 0( tint a.nt MaUcnal SOXt UJd'itl' ~1IJnlC' 1M rCJt"ll901nl) , t vu ~l~ b.r:~ .. thh _ &rt or , Scot.t Ccunty "lKIt tarl \'to drl~t ta.- .,., u__r<< .,ten05 tft" ...,or .19911. ltoC4Cy P\l)Uc:. ODunty. r;~. Ify Q:rIIIdulcn 'IIPI"" J8nUH'y Jl. 20lXI sc.ttt aUII:, ""'l:(I(' S'D.tt cr 'm~ a::utIIT a SCO'l'T n... r~ lnet('\llllll"lt vu 8CknaIIlI!(t:JId t.t:cn ... thl, "ld1HI s. ~lc:t. II _lnl)1. ptncI\. "'yol . 1998. bf St'ott Ccunty ~: t'I.rMWlt to o.;.t:~ 7. "i"".aotA L.,. 0( 1976. thi' plll~ hu betWI rrrtlWd ft . thl,_dlIyof . It?''. ~..-ry Pli)Uc. SClOt.t ~ry. I'I~. Ify 0:1olI..10'1 'llpll'H ,J....ry 31, 2000 And aho In vlt:Mss l:t'ol!nlOf ...115 T C r 1'Iort9WJt OXpon.tiCll\, II "lMltKlt8 Oocpontlan. has' a\1MO! ~ pl"MlInta ~ be IIlgrwd by IU P"'Pft" oftlwn thlll dilly or . 1998. !ilcmDt ,. C r ftort989W OX'pXatlCl'l ~ CI:l.I!m' PD:lS'nWl at' Ttr..E!it 1 hentIT tIlIrtU, ttwlt thh plat o( Il::m ou:s SflCOC) APJlnClf WIll riled 1n thl. oUlce thlll _o'cloO: .". erd YU Ul.cl _ ~ );0. dIIyor . 1m. 81; 'ts .... .'" :.IoOOI:t. l%Utty. Il.lIlItsu'U 0: ntleft STAT'[ Of "~ """""'" 'I'lw lDn901"9 lnIIt~t vu IIdcnovl~ belen _ thlll ..., or 'ta . 1996. by ita ~ It:rt9. OX'pcntlo''h II l'lt~" QxpontlCl'l. en belVilC or: the --~-'-'. or T C' , ~ry PUblic. O::u'lty. "1I""'1'IOt.II "y CDMI_Icn ..pi I'M .JllnUllry 31. :tOO. VALLEY SURVEYING CO., p, A, SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS RED EXHIBIT IIAII OAKS SECOND ADDITION .' ,,,-. _,J \,.",'f..~ ,0 ~ ..' '\'~ c."''';,,0,.1 . ~ - ~ JIt 1~ (J ~ SCALf ~~ l'J(I ~ IN n(~ . l'E1oO~lS IRe" I'I(}Y~N7 ~0fJN'J oDC1I(JTCS 1~ -::...:~tli SE' AI" H,.pf(fO 8" (;(C.\'S[ No. ro .~! v.,........ _/ZI~. 15--- /S8Z' ~I' Z6''II /1 / uTILI'" I O=I.I':~cr !..:;p'n'(j ..qr SHa'''' TKo'S t:\ f"' '-1 0..- - \ \ (....J \' ~, ;\ '"' / /\ \ '-./ It;" C' I.. _,:r.l!.._,............ J L,---'-:f- 8CIIl,(j " "ep ;f, 11-;':- ..'-Q Il..::;'.:...... ST~rY ....., lit'/:. ,e: ,1'..!5 6.~ ~ oCL!- ,,,. ..tOT"! 'NO C~!nt',r..!i !!N" !~. f!~S l,JIIUSS G'~""Sf j,.J;{.~!.r "'" ~"'! r~,T VALLEY SURVEYING CO, , P. A. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS EXlllBIT "B" SAMPLE IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1715 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ sight on the undersigned bank. (Name of Develooer) and in your favor, our , available to you by your draft drawn on The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. 19_, of (Name of Bank\ "; , dated b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Prior Lake. c) Be presented for payment at November 30, 19_. (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Prior Lake City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Prior Lake City Manager, Prior Lake City Hall, 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714, and is actually received by the City Manager at least forty-five (45) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 400. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: Its 1: \97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 26 02/13/98 '. EXHIBIT tiC" CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE, PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Prior lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 INSURED: ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Prior lake AGENT: WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: COVERAGE - Workers' Compensation, Statutory. GENERAL LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: ( ) Claims Made ( ) Occurrence LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury and Death: $500,000 for one person $1,000,000 for each occurrence Property Damage: $200,000 for each occurrence -OR- Combination Single Limit Policy $1,000,000 or more COVERAGE PROVIDED: I: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 27 02/13/98 Operations of Contractor: YES Operations of Sub-Contractor (Contingent): YES Does Personal Injury Include Claims Related to Employment? YES Completed Operations/Products: YES Contractual Liability (Broad Form): YES Governmental Immunity is Waived: YES Property Damage Liability Includes: Damage Due to Blasting YES Damage Due to Collapse YES Damage Due to Underground Facilities YES Broad Form Property Damage YES AUTOMOBilE LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: (X) Any Auto LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury: $500,000 each person $1,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $500,000 each occurrence -OR- Combined Single Limit Policy: $1,000,000 each occurrence ARE ANY DEDUCTIBlES APPLICABLE TO BODilY INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ON ANY OF THE ABOVE COVERAGES: If so, list: Amount: $ [Not to exceed $1,000.00] SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY Will MAil THIRTY (30) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PARTIES TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. Dated at On BY: Authorized Insurance Representative I: \97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 28 02/13/98 EXHIBIT "0" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Oversizing and Storm Sewer Improvements Calculations for Developer Improvements) A. OVERSlZlNG None B. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (from Exhibit E) None 1: \97fi1es\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 29 02/13/98 ,I EXHIBIT IIEII RED OARS SECOND ADDITION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE JANUARY 21, 1998 MOBILIZATION (5% Maximum) Lump Sum = $ 1,287.04 GRADING: COmmon Excavation (Approximately 10 C.Y.) Lump Sum = $ 500.00 Common Borrow 1,010 C.Y. @ $ 6.00/C.Y. = $ 6,060.00 Type 1 silt Fence 795 L.F. @ $ 1.75/L.F. = $ 1,391.25 Floatation silt curtain 77 L.F. @ $ 5.00/L.F. = $ 385.00 Rock Construction Entrance (Class V For Lot 1) 28 Tons @ $ 12.00/Ton = $ 336.00 STORM SEWER:. CL. IV, 18" RCP 38 L.F. @ $ 30.00/L.F. = $ 1,140.00 18" RC Flared End section with Trash Guard 2 Each @ $l,OOO.OO/Each = $ 2,000.00 Class IV Riprap 55 C.Y. @ $ 40.00/C.Y. = $ 2,200.00 Filter Rock (1.-1/2" Clear) 13 Tons @ $ 16.00/Ton = $ 208.00 Geotextile Filter Fabric 127 S.Y. @ $ 1.50/S.Y. = $ 190.50 SANITARY SEWER: 4" PVC, SDR 26 Service pipe 98 L.F. @ $ 15.00/L.F. = $ 1,470.00 Sanitary Sewer Service Cleanout 1 Each @ $ 250.00/Each = $ 250.00 8" x 4" Wye 2 Each @ $ 100.00/Each = $ 200.00 EXHIBIT IIEII Trench Rock 10 Tons @ $ a.OO/Ton = $ ao.oo WATERMAIN: 1" Copper SVC Pipe, Type K 20 L.F. @ $ 10.00/L.F. = $ 200.00 1-1/2" Copper SVC Pipe, Type K 100 L.F. @ $ 15.00/L.F. = $ 1,500.00 1" Service Group 1 Each @ $ 130.00/Each = $ 130.00 1-1/2" Service Group 1 Each @ $ 150.00/Each = $ 150.00 RESTORATION: Retaining Wall (Timber) 570 S.F. @ $ 10.00/S.F. = $ 5,700.00 . Seed and Mulch 0.50 Acres @ $1,500.00/Acre = $ 750.00 Trees (2-1/2" Caliper per Plan) 6 Each @ $ 150.00/Each = $ 900.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST............................ = $ 27,027.79 EXlllBIT "F" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGlnl1~G POLICY BACKGROUND The City intends that this street lighting policy promote the safe travel of city streets in a manner both fair and affordable to the City and its residents. Residential street lighting promotes pedestrian and traffic safety to the extent that the City shall approve street lighting where warranted by such concerns. Lighting requests shall come either by recommendation of the City Engineer or by resident petition. The capital costs of residential street lighting shall be the responsibility of those residents, or any portion of those residents, determined to be affected by the light. NEW SUBDIVISIONS All lighting plans require approval by the City and the utility responsible for street light operation and maintt,:nance. In new subdivisions, street lights shall be placed at intersections, every 300 feet between intersections where intersections are more than 600 feet apart, and at the ends of cul-de-sacs where the distance from said end to the intersection of the cul-de-sac where the street is greater than 300 feet. Within their developments, developers shall also install lights to City standards at the intersections of residential streets with collector streets. The developer shall pay full capital cost of every light to be installed; this includes poles, fixtures, underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The developer shall pay operation and maintenance for the light system ul}til the City accepts the project, at which time the billing shall be transferred to the City. 100 or 150 watt high pressure sodium lights 'in traditional or cobra-head style (as approved by the City and the utility) shall be the standard for new subdivisions. Where a portion of the development is already lit, new lights shall match in style and wattage those already in place. In cases where developers wish to install more lights than warranted by City policy, or wish to install non-standard lights, monthly operation and maintenance becomes the responsibility of the development's residents through their homeowner's association or similar organization. The City will not take over such non-standard systems, though City approval shall still be required, EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS Where traffic safety clearly warrants, a street light may be placed upon the recommendation of the City Engineer's office. The basis of such warrants shall be a minimum Average Daily Traffic of 2000 vehicles or a layout such that, in the City Engineer's estimation, significant improvement in safety might be obtained by the placement of a street light. Since the benefit of such installations extends to the City as a whole, these will be done at City expense, When residents request additional lighting for their neighborhoods, they must do so by petition - signed by 60 % of the neighbors affected by the proposed light. The affected area shall be 100 linear feet on either side of the proposed light, on both sides of the street. The placement of the proposed light shall be specified in the petition. Petitioners shall approach the City prior to circulating their petition to obtain direction as to where street lights are warranted for their neighborhoods. Lights shall be approved only as they meet the following warrants for existing subdivisions: intersections, between intersections at intervals of 300 feet where the distance between intersections is greater than 600 feet, and at the ends of cul-de-sacs where the distance from said end to the intersection of the cul-de-sac where the street is greater than 300 feet. If approved, each street light shall be purchased by the affected residents. Payment shall be made prior to the installation of the light and shall include the cost of the poles, fixtures, underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The method of payment shall be as directed by the City Finance Department. The City shall assume operation and maintenance cost for a light from the time it is energized by the utility. In existing developments, new lights shall match in style and wattage those already in place. If no lights be currently in place, 100 or 150 watt high pressure sodium lights in cobra-head or traditional style shall be the standard. I: \97files\97 subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 32 02/13/98 EXIflBIT "G" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT CONDITIONS OF PLAT Ar rKOV AL 1. The "Declaration of Driveway Easement" must be recorded with the final plat documents, and evidence of recording submitted to the City of Prior Lake Planning Department. 2. A current title opinion or commitment of title insurance be submitted acceptable to the City Attorney. 3. Payment of all fees prior to release of the final plat mylars. 4. Reductions of the entire fma1 plat be submitted, to the following scales: 1" = 800'; 1" = 200'; and one reduction at no scale which fits onto an 81/2" x 11" sheet of paper. 5. Four mylar sets of the fmal plat with all required signatures be submitted. 6. The developer provide financial security, acceptable to the City Engineer prior to release of the fmal plat mylars. 7. The fmal plat and all pertinent documents must be filed with Scott County within 60 days from the date of fmal plat approval. Failure to record the documents by May 2, 1998, will render the fmal plat null and void. . .' 1: \97files\97subdiv\final\redoak2\dvcntrct.doc 33 02/13/98