HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda & Minjutes
City Council Work Session - 5:00 - 7:00 p.m.
FORUM: 7:00 P.M. - 7:30 P.M.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
Date: NOVEMBER 2, 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER................................................................................7:30 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
4. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES:
A. October 19, 1998
5. CONSENT AGENDA: Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and
non-controversial are included as part of the Consent Agenda. Unless the Mayor, a Councilmember,
or member of the public specifically requests that an item on the Consent Agenda be removed and
considered separately. Items on the Consent Agenda are considered under one motion, second and a
roll call vote. Any item removed from the "Consent Agenda" shall be placed on the City Council
Agenda as a separate category.
A. Consider Approval of Invoices to Be Paid.
B. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Continuing City Participation in Livable
Communities Program.
C. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Appointing Y2K Coordinator.
D. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Directing Review of Conditional Use
Requirements with Respect to Hours of Operation for Gymnastic Facilities in the
Business Park Zone.
6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA:
7. PRESENTATIONS:
A. Proclamation Declaring the Second Week of November Youth Appreciation Week
B. Consider Approval of a Donation from the Prior Lake VFW for the Purchase of
Emergency Command Post Equipment for Installation at Prior Lake Fire Station 1.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Continuation of Assessment Hearing for 1998 Improvement Projects 98-14 ,Pleasant
Street, Colorado Street, Birch Avenue and West Avenue, 98-15 Pleasant Avenue
Overlay and 98-16 Duluth Avenue Specifically Relating to the Properties at 16430
16~QAI&gle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY Er-.1PLOYER
and 16460 Duluth Avenue and Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Adopting
Assessments Therefore.
B. Continuation of Public Hearing to Consider Approval of a Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance and Zoning Map for the City of Prior Lake.
C. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Ordering the 1999
Improvement Projects and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefore.
D. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Denying the Vacation of
a Utility and Drainage Easement Located in Lots 43 and 44 C.O. Hennen's Maple
Park Shore Acres.
9. OLD BUSINESS:
A. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Accepting Quote for Cates Street Channel
Stabilization Project 98-11.
10. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Consider Approval of Change Order No.1 to the Duluth Avenue Improvement
Project 98-16.
B. Consider Approval of Ordinance 98-XX Amending Prior Lake City Code Section 9-
4-10 to Increase the Water Billing Rate by Fifteen Cents (l5~) for Every One
Thousand (1,000) Gallons of Water.
11. OTHER BUSINESS/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS:
A.
12. ADJOURNMENT
11298.DOC
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Date: October 19 , 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mader called the meeting to order and welcomed everyone to
the meeting. Present were: Mayor Mader, Councilmembers Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck,
and Wuellner, City Manager Boyles, Assistant City Manager Woodson, Assistant City
Attorney Brokl, Planning Director Rye, Planning Coordinator Kansier, Planner Tovar, City
Engineer Ilkka, Recording Secretary Oden.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Mader led the Pledge of Allegiance and welcomed
everyone to the meeting.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION BY WUELLNER, SECOND BY SCHENCK TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
4. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES:
A. October 5, 1998
MOTION BY SCHENCK, SECOND BY WUELLNER TO APPROVE THE MINUTES
OF THE OCTOBER 5, 1998.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
5. CONSENT AGENDA: Those items on the Council Agenda which are considered routine and
non-controversial are included as part of the Consent Agenda. Unless the Mayor, a Councilmember,
or member of the public specifically requests that an item on the Consent Agenda be removed and
considered separately. Items on the Consent Agenda are considered under one motion, second and a
roll call vote. Any item removed from the "Consent Agenda" shall be placed on the City Council
Agenda as a separate category
A. Consider Approval oflnvoices to be Paid.
B. Consider Approval of Treasurer's Report
C. Consider Approval of Building Permit Report.
D. Consider Approval of Animal Warden Monthly Report
E. Consider Approval of Fire Call Report
F. Consider Approval of 1998 Third Quarter Investment Report.
G. Consider Approval of 1998 Third Quarter Budget Report and Overview.
H. Consider Approval of Temporary 3.2 Liquor License for the Church ofSt. Michael.
1. Consider Approval of Temporary Consumption and Display Permit for the Church of
St. Michael.
16~Q~&egle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-42t5
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
J. Consider Approval of Report on 1998 City Council Directives.
K. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-126 Approving the Wetland Replacement Plan
for Coast to Coast Hardware, Project 98-40.
L. Consider Approval of Temporary 3.2 Liquor License for Prior Lake Rotary
M. Consider Approval of Temporary Consumption and Display Permit for Prior Lake
Rotary.
N. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Accepting Quote for Cates Street Channel
Stabilization Project 98-11
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY PETERSEN TO APPROVE CONSENT
AGENDA ITEMS A-M.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA:
A. (5N) Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Accepting Quote for Cates Street
Channel Stabilization Project 98-11.
Mader: There was a question regarding whether all property owners were properly
contacted.
Ilkka: Recommends tabling this item. Letters were sent to property owners but engineering
has not received all ofthem back.
Kedrowski: Estimated time this should be tabled until?
Ilkka: Two weeks.
Boyles: Is this considered a winter project?
Ilkka:It could be completed in the winter.
MOTION BY MADER SECOND BY SCHENCK TO TABLE THIS ITEM UNTIL THE
NOVEMBER 2ND COUNCIL MEETING
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
7. PRESENTATIONS:
A. Presentation: Donationfrom Prior Lake Optimist Club - Jerry Young
Jerry Young, President of the Prior Lake Optimist Club addressed the Council. He indicated
that the Prior Lake Optimist Club has existed since 1978 and its motto is "friend of youth".
The contributions in the past have included $1,000 annually for scholarships and $1,000
annually for Fire Safety camp. Mr. Young presented a check on behalf of the Optimist Club
for $25,000 to be placed in the Capital Park fund and used for youth related programs and
projects.
Mayor Mader accepted the contribution on behalf of the City.
B.
Presentation: Stand by Me - Dick Underferth
l01998.DOC
2
Dick Underferth, representing Stand by Me Volunteer Committee, addressed the Council on
the upcoming referendum and bond issue for the schools.
Schenck: Everyone has an education because someone in the past said yes to a referendum.
You are making an investment in youth, investment in City, investment in future.
Wuellner: Concur
Petersen: Concur
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI SECOND BY WUELLNER THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
SUPPORTS THE EFFORTS OF THE STAND BY ME COMMITTEE.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Continuation of Assessment Hearing for 1998 Improvement Projects 98-14
Specifically Relating to the Properties at 16430 and 16460 Duluth Avenue and
Consider Approval of Resolution 98-XX Adopting Assessments Therefore.
The Public Hearing opened at 8:00 p.m.
Boyles: At the September 21 meeting, the Council approved the assessment roll, with the
exception of these two properties. The Reinboldts are concerned with unit assessment. They
have a sewer connection to the Metropolitan interceptor already. The Nelson home is the
only one in the area with a septic system and they have asked for a credit for the remaining
value of the septic system. Reinboldts were credited 50% for unit sewer assessment, and
reduced to $577.50. The Nelson property was evaluated for the septic system. Because of
increased standards, the septic system would have to be replaced within five years. That was
not reduced. Trunk acreage should have been $875. That was reduced. Recommend hearing
input from Reinboldts and Nelsons and continuing the hearing to November 2.
Mrs. Nelson of 16460 Duluth addressed the Council. Would like to suggest that her fair
market value will not increase more than $16,650 as suggested by the City. Don't see a
judge upholding this amount. Proposed a change in the assessment to $9,025 as she was
advised by a real estate sales person and attorney in order to avoid going to court. Would
like Council to consider this amount.
Schenck: $9,025 came from an attorney and a real estate agent?
Mrs. Nelson: Yes. She expressed her concerns with project problems such as property
damage, and dangers to children.
Kedrowski: Is the contractor responsive to affected property owner concerns?
Ilkka: They are performing. The low bid process is a process the City is required to follow.
Kedrowski: Asked whether City should document problems with contractor.
Brokl: The City would not be in a position to not allow the contractor to bid. However, they
should document these instances. There is a difference between not allowing them to bid and
accepting the most responsible bid.
I01998.DOC
3
4,
Petersen: Did all the other houses go up the same amount in value?
Ilkka: The market determines the benefit to the property.
P~tersen: Residents should understand that someone has to pay for it and it has to be the
property owners. The City can't let the streets fall apart.
Nelson: Wants fairness in the assessment.
Wuellner: What is the process for determining whether it is fair?
Teschner: The Court will look at what the City is providing. The cost to bring the system up
to standard so the property can be marketed in the future is a major consideration. The City's
position is the cost incurred for the benefit received. A first time improvement such as this is
normally assessed at 100%. The judge decides, frequently in the City's favor. The City feels
the benefit is there, with the cost to update the septic system and the fact that the City has
already written down the cost to a 40% assessment.
Mader: Does the resolution keep the hearing open?
Boyles: Staff recommends continuing this to November 2nd without acting upon the
resolution.
Nelson: Said they were not notified in writing 14 days before the hearing. It was in the
newspaper. Received a new letter saying that the hearing was continued. Difficult for them
to be there.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI SECOND BY PETERSEN TO CONTINUE THIS HEARING
TO NOVEMBER 2ND.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
B. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-118 Approving the Vacation of a Drainage and
Utility Easement Located in Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Waterfront Passage Addition.
. The Public Hearing opened at 8:28 p.m.
Bovles: State statute provides that the City must conduct public hearings before vacations.
Easements must be vacated so property is developable. Staff recommends adoption of the
resolution.
Mader: Asked for public comments. None were received.
MOTION BY SCHENCK, SECOND BY PETERSEN TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
.
The Public Hearing closed at 8:29 p.m.
I01998.DOC
4
MOTION BY PETERSEN SECOND BY WUELLNER TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-
118 APPROVING THE VACATION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
LOCATED IN LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, WATEP..FRONT PASSAGE ADDITION.
Brokl: Is this abstract or Torrens property?
Kansier: Abstract.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
C. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Resolution 98-119 Approving the Vacation
of a Portion of the Erie Avenue Right-of-Way Located in Block 4, Prior Lake
Original Town
. Public Hearing opened at 8:31 p.m.
Bovles: This request will provide the appropriate sized parcel for the library/resource center.
Mayor Mader asked for public comments. No comments were received.
MOTION BY SCHENCK SECOND BY WUELLNER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
. The Public Hearing closed at 8:32 p.m.
MOTION BY SCHENCK SECOND BY PETERSEN APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-119
APPROVING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE ERIE AVENUE RIGHT-OF-
WAY LOCATED IN BLOCK 4, PRIOR LAKE ORIGINAL TOWN
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
9. OLD BUSINESS:
A. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-120 Approving an Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan and Ordinance 98-15 Approving the Zone Change Request By
Wensmann Realty and Prior Lake, LLC, for 33 Acres Located at Pike Lake Trail and
CSAH 42, and Approval of Resolution 98-121 Denying a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and Zone Change Request by Wensmann Realty and Prior Lake, LLC,
for 7.4 Acres Located at Pike Lake Trail and CSAH 42.
Boyles: Introduced the item. The proposal includes 33 acres of general business, and 7.4
acres for multi-family purposes. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and
recommends the 7.4 acres be denied because it is premature, and surrounded by
commercial.
J01998.DOC
5
Herb Wensmann introduced Kelly Murray, representing Wensmann and Prior Lake LLC,
co-applicants on the projfWt. They would like to move their corporate headquarters to Prior
Lake. They are proposing to be in the NW corner and would like a senior cooperative in the
SE corner. A study was requested to see the appropriateness of the area. They are not able to
compete with other communities who have their own industrial parks. Lakeville offers free
land, free assessments. Gressers want to build the corporate office here and build it to blend
with the surroundings. They require outside storage which would be screened.
Kedrowski: With high density residential, what type of transition will there be between
commercial and residential?
Murray: Senior housing will be off Pike Lake trail. The lot is significantly higher. There will
be trails within the area for seniors and a separate entrance.
Kedrowski: How much outside storage will be required?
Murray: They will store cement, equipment and three large flatbeds.
Kedrowski: When would they build?
Murray: Spring, after infrastructure is in
Kedrowski: What about other lots?
Murray: It depends on the market.
Wuellner: What sort of senior housing will it be?
Murray: A co-op for active seniors.
Wuellner: Retail as opposed to business park?
Murray: Yes.
Wuellner: Will the road tie in with properties to the West?
Murray: There are 2 wetlands, no plans to do anything to the west yet.
Rye: No specific plans to the west. The Comp plan shows a road to the west to Carriage
Hills parkway to serve those properties.
Schenck: Lot 1 B-3, SW corner, what is the proposed use?
Murray: Retaining it for commercial.
Schenck: Any amenities which would benefit the senior housing?
Murray: Possibly a Gas/Convenience store.
Schenck: One comment was that this 7.4 acre zone change request was premature. How will
this affect the rest of the development?
Murray: Willing to wait for the study to be completed on the 7.4 acres.
Kedrowski: Asked about the proposed study.
Rve: Need to complete a Comp Plan amendment within the next 6 months. Surrounding
property is business park or commercial. The recommendation for denial is because of the
need to look at the whole section.
IOI998.DOC
6
Kedrowski: When would this take place?
Rye: 6 months for it to be completed.
Kedrowski: Will there be a controlled intersection at Pike Lake Trail?
Ilkka: Long term, in 5-10 years. The County would have to evaluate.
Kedrowski: What type of screening would the building have?
Kansier: We would evaluate site conditions which have to be met.
Kedrowski: Support rezoning.
Rye: The study will focus on density of housing, not senior in particular.
MOTION KEDROWSKI SECOND PETERSEN TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-120
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR 33 ACRES
LOCATED AT PIKE LAKE TRAIL AND CSAH 42.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
Mader: Clarification on the resolution and ordinance: One changes the Comprehensive Plan;
one changes the ordinance?
Rye: Comprehensive plan provides overall direction and guidance; it does not regulate land
use. The zoning ordinance regulates land use.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI SECOND BY PETERSEN TO APPROVE ORDINANCE
98-15 APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST TO B-3 BY WENSMANN
REALTY AND PRIOR LAKE, LLC FOR 33 ACRES LOCATED AT PIKE TRAIL AND
CSAH 42.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI SECOND BY WUELLNER TO APPROVE RESOLUTION
98-121 DENYING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE
REQUEST FOR 7.4 ACRES LOCATED AT PIKE LAKE TRAIL AND CSAH 42.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
10. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-122 to Uphold a Decision of the Planning
Commission Denying a Variance to Waive the Forty Two Inch (42'') Maximum
Fence Height in the Front Lot Setback Area for Mr. & Mrs. John Trulson on
Property Located at 14296 Rutgers Street.
Boyles: Introduced the item. Trulson's began installation of a fence. The City received and
investigated a complaint about fence height and found that the fence exceeds front yard
fence standards. The Planning Commission considered a variance and found that the
hardship criteria has not been met. They are appealing the decision to the Council.
t01998.DOC
7
....
Bryce Huemoeller of 16670 Franklin Trail addressed the Council on behalf of the petitioner.
He read ordinance provisions in addition t') the height requirement. Provisions should be
given equal consideration. Described property and fence line. Uniform elevation throughout
the boundaries is the most aesthetic way to have a fence. This is a reasonable use, unique to
the property, which will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Reasonable
use should be the property owner using the property in a reasonable manner. Reasonable use
exists to give flexibility to ordinances. Cost can be one factor in the determination for
reasonableness. He cited some cases where "practical consideration" was the deciding factor.
Wuellner: Were the property owners aware of the ordinance when the fence was put up?
Huemoeller: Not certain.
Wuellner: If they had researched the ordinance, would we be here? They should have looked
for a manufacturer who could provide a product that met the standards. What value is a
zoning ordinance if "reasonable use" makes it so flexible?
Brokl: The cases cited by Mr. Huemoeller stand for the proposition they are being offered
for. Aberrational cases do not stand for a general rule. That is why it is up to the policy
making body to meet provisions of the ordinance.
Comments from Councilmembers:
Wuellner: Would be willing to compromise, how about a raised flower bed. Table to the first
meeting after the zoning ordinance is approved and then apply the new ordinance.
Schenck: Concur. If property owners would have done their homework, it would not be a
problem. That fence in fact adds value to the neighborhood. There are many fences on
Rutgers that should not be approved.
Petersen: Concur with Pete. Still faced with ordinance that is here. Perhaps hold it until
zoning ordinance is approved. Cannot go against planning and zoning.
Kedrowski: Look at fence height issue in relation to zoning issue.
Bovles: Suggested Council could adopt a resolution denying the variance requested. Once
the zoning ordinance is revised, construct a fence according to the new ordinance.
Mader: Applicants would have found another acceptable solution if they had researched the
ordinance. Concerned with overturning a decision of the Planning Commission. That applies
to all ordinances. Purpose is to set a standard that does not meet all property owner needs. If
we arbitrarily waive it, then we do not have to have an ordinance. Variances should be the
exception not the rule. The Planning Commission and Planning Department have done a.
good job in applying the ordinances. Encourage applicants to looking at reasons it should be
changed.
MOTION BY MADER SECOND BY KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE 98-XX UPHOLDING
THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A VARIANCE TO
WAIVE THE FORTY TWO INCH MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT IN THE FRONT LOT
I01998.DOC
8
SETBACK AREA FOR MR. AND MRS. JOHN TRULSON ON PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 14296 RUTGERS.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, and Wuellner, nay Schenck, the motion
carried.
B. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-123 Calling for the Redemption of the
Outstanding General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1991.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI SECOND BY SCHENCK TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-
123 CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF THE OUTSTANDING GENERAL
OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1991.
Bovles: Introduced the item and indicated that this will save $10 - $12,000 in taxpayer
dollars.
Mattson: Outstanding bonds are at over 6% and should be defeased.
Mader: Questioned statement in staff report about refunding bond issue.
Mattson: If the balance of the bonds due had been larger, the City did not have money on
hand, and they would have been refinancing.
Mader: Noted three corrections in the resolution.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
C. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-125 Authorizing Public Sale of $1,275,000
General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1998.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI SECOND BY WUELLNER TO APPROVE RESOLUTION
98-125 AUTHORIZING PUBLIC SALE OF $1,275,000 FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1998.
Mattson: Proposing to sell bonds at a Special Meeting on Wednesday, November 18th.
Kedrowski : Amended the motion to include a special meeting on November 18th at 5 :00
p.m.
Mattson: Securities have changed rules about public sales of bonds. Under current rules, the
firm has to have in evidence a written contract. The fee remains the same as a year ago.
Kedrowski: Amended motion to authorize Mayor and City Manager to enter into such an
agreement as approved by the City Attorney.
Mader: Contract will reflect same services and costs as presently provided?
Mattson: Yes and it spells out what the firm will do for the City.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
IOI998.DOC
9
Mattson: The bonds that were sold in 1993, to finance the Fire Station were $2.1 million
bonds for a 20 year period. The market is getting close to a poss;hle refinancing option
depending on the fluctuations in the tax free bond market. Don't have time to set refunding.
It would not make sense to do a public sale. May be able to save on future debt service,
possibly up to $75,000. In order to do that we need authorization from Council to call a
special meeting within 48 hours if conditions will provide for the contemplated savings. The
Council concurred.
D. Consider Approval of Resolution 98-124 Approving an Exemption from the
Downtown Moratorium to Permit the Issuance of a Building Permit for Joe Chesmer
at 16161 Main Avenue
Boyles: Introduced the item. This is the old furniture store downtown; they are improving
the exterior. Also doing some inside remodeling. Removal of walls is prohibited under the
ordinance. Issuing the exemption is recommended in this case.
MOTION BY SCHENCK SECOND BY PETERSEN TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-
124 APPROVING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE DOWNTOWN MORATORIUM TO
PERMIT THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR JOE CHESMER AT 16161
MAIN AVENUE.
Kedrowski: What can the City do ifhe started without permit?
Rye: Double fee.
Mader: The issue is whether to approve the exemption.
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
11. OTHER BUSINESS:
Wuellner: Requested that the Council defer action on the Zoning Ordinance until November
16th Council meeting when he will be present. Council should have a Joint meeting with
Planning Commission on reasonable use issue. If we can't deny property owner reasonable
use, what is reasonable use, especially as it pertains to lakeshore redevelopment.
Mader: Receptive to meeting with Planning Commission.
Rve: That would be good.
MOTION BY WUELLNER SECOND BY KEDROWSKI TO DIRECT STAFF TO
COORDINATE JOINT MEETING WITH COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND
CITY ATTORNEY TO DISCUSS REASONABLE USE ISSUE AND OTHER
PERTINENT SUBJECTS.
Schenck: Who decides what is reasonable?
Rve: The City Council; the decision is subject to appeal
IOI998.DOC
10
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
12. ANNOUNCEMENTS/CORRESPONDENCE
Bovles: Would Council prefer November and December workshop versus January and
February?
Council agreed on a January workshop.
Boyles: The first installment of disaster aid is $138, 166
Discussion occurred on the process to fill the EDA vacancy. Council concurred that the
Mayor, a Councilmember, EDA President, Planning Director Rye and City Manager would
interview the four candidates and make a recommendation for the November 2 meeting.
13. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION BY WUELLNER SECOND BY SCHENCK TO ADJOURN .
Upon a vote, ayes by Mader, Kedrowski, Petersen, Schenck, and Wuellner, the motion
carried.
Recording Secretary
l01998.DOC
11