HomeMy WebLinkAbout5K - South Lake village
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION:
ISSUES:
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MARCH 5, 2007
5k
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE DEADLINE
FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
FOR SOUTH LAKE VILLAGE
Introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request by Bealmake
Partners, LLC, to extend the deadline for recording the final plat and
Development Contract for South Lake Village. The property is located south of
State Highway 13, east of Duluth Avenue and north of Village Lake Drive. This
property is the current site of the South Lake Village Mall and the Hollywood
restaurant. This report recommends approval of this request.
History
On December 18, 2006, the City Council approved Re~olution 06-213,
approving the final plat and Development Contract for South Lake Village.
This final plat subdivided the existing parcel, which is the current site of the
South Lake Village Mall and the Hollywood restaurant, into 2 lots and one
outlot. The existing buildings will each be located on a separate parcel, which
will enable the owners to sell or finance each parcel individually. The outlot
may be used for parking for the current mall, or for future development.
A condition of approval of the final plat and development contract required the
plat be recorded within 90 days of approval, or by March 18, 2007. Section
1002.305 of the Subdivision Ordinance states the final plat shall be considered
null and void if not recorded within the prescribed time, unless a request for an
time extension is submitted in writing and approved by the City Council prior to
the expiration date.
On February 15, 2007, the Planning staff received the attached letter from
David Knodell, representing the developers requesting an extension of this
deadline to October 18, 2007.
Current Circumstances
Although the developer has received final plat approval, no additional work has
been done on this site. The Development Contract did not require any fees.
There is a $2,000 Letter of Credit required, to guarantee placement of the lot
corner monuments. This LOC can be collected prior to release of the final plat
documents.
The purpose of the application deadline is to keep the platting process moving
forward. The extension of this deadline will allow the developers to delay
recording, until after the property taxes are due in October, 2007. According to
the attached letter, this allows the owners to collect the property taxes from the
www.cityofpriorlake.com
L\06 FILES\06 SUBDIVISIONS\PREf~pf'~1~95Z.'2t4~ :-zt~3cYiI19f:ltgg~~4'41:~~;4S; agenda 1SpOltDOC
tenants. If the owners fail to meet this extended deadline, the final plat
approval becomes null and void, and they will be required to resubmit an
application for combined preliminary and final plat approval.
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
This action has no financial impact on the City.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council has three alternatives:
1. Adopt a resolution approving the request to extend the application deadline
until October 18, 2007, as requested.
2. Continue this item for specific information or reasons per City Council
discussion.
3. Deny the request and direct the staff to prepare a resolution denying the
requested extension.
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
A motion and second adopting Resolution #07 -xx approving an extension of
the deadline for recording the final plat and development contract for South
Lake Village to October 18, 2007.
Reviewed by:
l\06 FllES\06 SUBDI\!ISIONS\PREM & FINAL\South lake
cc
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
RESOLUTION 07 -xx
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXTENSION OF THE DEADLINE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL
AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR SOUTH LAKE VILLAGE UNTIL OCTOBER 18, 2007
Motion By:
Second By:
WHEREAS, The Prior Lake City Council adopted Resolution 06-213 on December 18, 2006,
approving the combined preliminary and final plat and development contract for South
Lake Village; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 06-213 Section requires the applicant to record the final plat and
development contract within 90 days of approval, in this case by March 18, 2007; and
WHEREAS, Bealmake Partners, LLC, the developer, has submitted a request to extend the
recording deadline to October 18, 2007; and
WHEREAS, The City Council finds the extension of this deadline consistent with the intent of the
provisions of Section 1002.305.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. The deadline for recording the final plat and development contract for South Lake Village is
extended from March 18,2007 to October 18, 2007.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2007.
Hauaen Haugen
Hedbera Hedbera
Erickson Erickson
LeMair LeMair
Millar Millar
YES
NO
Frank Boyles, City Manager
t\06 FILES\OG SUBDMSiONS\PREM & FINAL\South ~.ic~~~flifJr1 msolutionOOC
Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
Thursday. February 15, 2007 242 PM
Knodell Law Office 763-416.1696
pm
KNODELL LAW OFFICE
20305 County Rd. 50
Corcoran, Minnesota
Fax
76,).416 -16\)6
email
knolaw@knolaw,com
P.O. Box 99
Hamel, Mt-J 55340-0099
Telephone
763.-416-3636
February 15, 2007
City Council
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Southeast
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Via
United States Mail
and
Fax to 952-447-4245
c/o: Ms, Jane A. Kansier
Planning Director
Re: South lake Village Final Plat
Resolution 06-213
Dear Council Members:
I am writing on bellalf of Bealmake Partners, LLC, the owner of the property being
ptatted as South lake Village.
Clause 3.d) of Resolution 06-213 approving the plat reqLlIfes that Bealrnake
Partners, LlC file the final plat by March 18,2007.
Bealmake Partners, LlC hereby requests that you extend the time for filing the final
plat to October 18, 2007,
Bealmake's property is already developed with a shopping center and a standalone
restaurant and bar. It is commercial, rental property,'
The property taxes are paid by the tenants. Each tenant pays Bealmake one-twelfth
of its allocable share with its monthly rent. By October 15 of each year, Bealmake has
collected from the tenants the amounts necessary to pay the real property taxes payable
that year and has paid them,
Given the requirement that all properry taxes payablf! In rhp. yp.::lr .::l rl;:lt it:: fllprl Q~
paid before filinC1' BeiSllmske pl8nned to file the ,Qlat bcfori thp E'nrl nf ?OOR 81though
Bealmake filed its plat application relatively late in 2006, its expectation that it could file the
final plat by year-end was reasonable because of the excellent cooperation of H1e city
planning staff in' the platting process.
Unfortunately, the Scott County Surveyor's office did not review the final plat until
after Resolution 06-213 was passed. Bealmake's surveyor tells me the Scott County
Thursday, February 15, 2007242 PM
f<nodell LaN Office 763-416-1696
p 03
Prior Lake City Council
February 15, 2007
Page 2
Surveyor raised some issues that made it impossible for the Scott County Surveyor to
complete its review in time to record the plat before the end of 2006 and 11a5 since raised
a number of technical issues that our surveyor is in the process of addressing.
Since Bealmake was unable to file the plat by the end of 2006 as planned, if it lllllst
~Jhe.~Jau)y Mar~..18.,..2.o.oZr4w.i~...t.cLp.aLcall Qf the reaL,Qropertv taxes Davable ill..
2007 be_tore .it GED..Q,o.llecUhe.m..fLR,rnlts _Lenal)t5. That creates a hardship for Bealmake as
'-meearly payment of taxes is not something it could budget In the operation of an already
tfevelopea. l~a~~J fJroperty~~. ...- __w_
,",,--~'-'-
I will come to the council meeting at which you consider this request to answer any
questions you may have.
On behalf of Bealmake Partners, LLC, thank you for your consideration of this
request.
V 1,,- ! /
e~tru{j-yo~rs',~/ . /1..' //__
r .' . .;;.-/. ,J Ii)
t, ,~ ,-?' .~-tL:-"
i........../ '...../ '7:.7; t
David R. KrJode'1I /
/ /
~------
"Bealmake Partners, LLC's reasons for platting the property are:
(1) to eliminate the need for dealing with an awkward, lengthy, metes-and-bounds legal
description:
(2) to comport with the new reality - after the property was bisected by the new Village
Lake Drive - that the property really consists of three distinct parcels: the shopping
center parcel, the restaurant-bar parcel and the triangle on the other side of Village
Lake Drive: and
(3) to have tax parcels that correspond to those three distinct parcels (The property is
presently one parcel for subdivision purposes, but it is divided into three tax parcels.
One of the tax parcels corresponds roughly to the portion being used for the
standalone restaurant and bar. Whatever the historical reason may be for the way
in which the rest of the property is divided into the othel- two current tax parcels, it
no longer makes any sense.).