HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes. 05-13PC 3051 Spring Lake Road SW Dahle - Huberty VAR
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The undersigned, duly qualified and Planning Secretary of the City of Prior Lake, hereby
certifies the attached hereto is the original true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION 05-13PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 33 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE 50
ORDINARY HIGH WATER SETBACK, A 11.9 PERCENT VARIANCE FROM
THE MAXIMUM 30 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, A 6.6 FOOT
VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK, AND
A 7.1 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 15 FOOT SIDEYARD
SETBACK
#05-191
Dahle - Huberty Variance
\U~
Connie Carlson
City of Prior Lake
Dated this 23rd day of September, 2005
(City Seal)
l:\dcptworklblankfrmltruccopy.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
RESOLUTION 05-13PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 33 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE 50 ORDINARY
HIGH WATER SETBACK, A 11.9 PERCENT VARIANCE FROM THE MAXIMUM 30
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING, A 6.6 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 20 FOOT
FRONT YARD SETBACK, AND A 7.1 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 15
FOOT SIDEY ARD SETBACK
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. David Huberty is requesting a variance from the Zoning Ordinance for the
construction of a single-family home on property zoned R-1 (Low Density
Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay District) at the following location, to wit;
3051 Spring Lake Road SW
Lot 31, and the West 6 feet of Lot 30 of SUNSET SHORE, Scott County,
Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for the variance as contained
in Case #05-191 and held a hearing thereon on September 12, 2005.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on
property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on
the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The granting of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light or air to
adjacent properties, or negatively impact public safety.
5. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
reasonable use of the property.
6. The granting of the variances is not merely to serve as a convenience for the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable undue hardship or difficulty.
Due to the size and constraints of the lot there are no legal alternatives for the
construction of a dwelling without variances.
7. Relief from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will not unreasonably impact the
character and development of the Sunset Shore neighborhood.
1:\05 files\05 variances\dahle - huberty\approval resolution.doc
www.cityofpriorlake.com
1
Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
8. The variance is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
9. The contents of Planning Case #05-191 are hereby entered into and made a part of
the public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variances to allow for the construction of a single family home, as shown on
Exhibit A- Certificate of Survey:
1. A 6.6 foot variance from the required 20 foot front yard setback (Section
1102.405(4)).
2. An 11.9% percent variance from the 30 percent maximum impervious surface
coverage (Section 1104.306).
3. A 33 foot variance from the required 50 foot ordinary high water elevation
setback (Section 1104.302(4)).
4. A 7.1 foot variance from the required 15 foot side yard setback (Section
1101.502(8)).
The variance is subject to the following conditions:
1. The resolution must be recorded at Scott County within 60 days of
adoption. Proof of recording, along with the acknowledged City Assent
Form, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
2. The building permit is subject to all other applicable city, county, and
state agency regulations.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on September 12,
An hony Stamson, Commission Chair
ATTEST:
a e Kansier, Director of Planning and Building Inspections
1:\05 files\05 variances\dahle - huberty\approval resolution.doc
2