Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9D - Dock Location/Regulations MEETING DATE: AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: AGENDA ITEM: DISCUSSION: 4646 Dakota Street S.E. Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MAY 7,2007 9D ROSS BINTNER, WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REPORT RECOMMENDING A PROCESS AND TIMELlNE FOR PREPARING RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DOCK LOCATION REGULATIONS. Introduction The purpose of this agenda item is for the City Council to give feedback on a proposed process to be implemented by the staff and Prior Lake Lake Advisory Committee to consider development of potential dock placement regulations. This process will include a public information meeting to gauge citizen interest and opinion. History The potential regulation of docks has been a persistent issue in recent years as parties to private civil disputes seek direction from the City for standards to direct their dock placement. Current Circumstances The LAC has been directed to once again review the City's position on regulation of private docks. This agenda item proposes a process to review issues previously discussed at the LAC on the topic, take public comment on the need for regulation, and create a report and recommendation for City Council consideration. A tentative schedule for this process is presented below: LAC Meeting May 15, 7:30: LAC will receive a written report from staff and discuss past dock issues, past LAC recommendations, and propose format for notice and public information meeting. DNR and Sheriff will be invited to participate. LAC Meeting June 19, 5:00: Hold Public Information Meeting to garner input on potential dock regulation. Identify most common issues; assess what regulations would address the perceived issues. LAC Meeting July 17, 4:30: LAC receives written report from staff summarizing public meeting input offering alternative regulations for discussion and offering implementation steps and cost. LAC formulates recommendation for incorporation into staff report. CC Meeting August 6, 6:30: Council receives written report with LAC recommendations. LAC chair provides oral report. Council determines most appropriate action. www.cityofpriorlake.com Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 ISSUES: Currently the City uses DNR guidelines as a recommendation in private dock placement disputes; regulation of this issue would set a new level of city involvement. Prior to the informational meeting on June 19th the City would advertise using these methods: Press release to and official public notices in Prior Lake American, City wavelength publication, City cable channel, City website, and direct mail to residents. Information presented in press release and through city publications would summarize the current City position on this issue and indicate that it is up for review. Additional information would summarize typical types of dock regulation in place in the Twin Cities metro area. The wavelength article and mailing would encourage interested citizens to get involved and provide their opinions in writing, on-line, or by participating in person at the meeting. Information would be provided on the process and give dates that public input would be accepted. By presenting an overview of the topic and examples of the potential result of the public process the City would hope to generate interest in the effort to get a broad section of public input at the meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Facilitating this process is estimated to take 120 hours of staff time over the course of 4 months. Salary, benefits and overhead of $50 per hour equate to an estimated cost of $6,000.00 to facilitate the process. Approximately 10,000 notices would go out at an average cost including postage and materials of $0.55, totaling $5,500.00. The total cost for staff time and mailings totals $11,500.00. Funds for this purpose are available from the contingency budget. Costs for potential regulation and enforcement resulting from this process would be assessed in the report to City Council. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the staff and Lake Advisory Committee to proceed using the process and timeline set forth herein. 2. Authorize the staff and Lake Advisory Committee to proceed using the process and timeline set forth herein with amendments. 3. Take no action and provide staff with alternative direction. RECOMMENDED MOTION: As determined appropriate by the City Council. ReVie'7J Frank Boyles,