Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4 - Priorwood PUD Phase 3A AGENDA NUMBER: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND: HERITAGE 1891 ~\ // COMMUNITY 1991 -2l(9~ 4 HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PRIORVIEW PUD PHASE 3A PRELIMINARY PLAT AMENDMENT AUGUST 20, 1990 This item appears before the City Council at the request of Mr. Joe Knoblauch, who is petitioning for preliminary plat approval for Phase 3A of the priorwood PUD (see attached planning report). Phase 3A (20 townhouses) of priorwood PUD was approved on April 1, 1985, subject to 19 conditions of which all but 3 have been met. The preliminary approval expired one year after the date of the hearin9' Therefore, in order for Mr. Knoblauch to fl.le a final plat he must first seek preliminary PUD approval. The Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on August 2, 1990. The following are their findings and recommendations: Motion by Commissioner Arnold and seconded by Commissioner Loftus to approve the preliminary PUD contingent on the following items: 1. THE NAME OF THE PLAT BE CHANGED TO PRIORVIEW 2ND ADDITION. 2. CONDITIONS OF THE CITY ENGINEER BE MET AS ORIGINALLY FORMED. 3. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE IMPLEMENTED AS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. 4 . ALL GRASS AND LAWNS MUST BE CUT AND KEPT FREE OF WEEDS. 5. ANY BLACKTOP MUST BE PATCHED AND SEALED. ITEMS 4, 5, AND 14 OF THE ORIGINAL LIST OF CONTINGENCIES BE ELIMINATED. AMENDMENT TO ITEM 3 OF THE MOTION, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY STAFF, IF NOT ACCEPTABLE BY STAFF, RETURNED TO PLANNING COMMISSION. JUSTIFICATION BEING THE GRADING WAS CHANGED, 5 YEARS HAVE PASSED SINCE COMPLETION OF BUILDINGS, AND WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY. THIS MOTION TO BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4629 Dakota S1. SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 4474245 DISCUSSION: ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ACTION REQUIRED: The Council is be~ng asked to ratify a development that l.S for most purposes complete. The priorview PUD approval process will be difficult because the Council is being asked to approve a completed development where the developer has seriously compromised quality. The Council corrective options are limited to primarily visual and aesthetic im~rovements under these circumstances. At/or prl.or to occupancy of the units, the landscaping was in place and looked appealing. But the townhouse management over the past five years has allowed the landscaping and overall maintenance to deteriorate. This past week Mr. Knoblauch has made an effort to sl?ruce up the development. Staff has made fl.ve recommendations for preliminary PUD approval which are part of the attached planning report. 1. Approve the application as recommended by the Planning Commission. Deny the application for specific reasons. Continue the hearing for additional facts or information. 2 . 3 . Staff recommends Alternative 1 Depends on Council discussion. HERITAGE 1891 COMMUNITY 1991 CUTJsrJK 2Q91 PLANNING REPORT APPLICANT: J.W. KNOBLAUCH ITEM: PRIORWOOD PUD PHASE 3A PRELIMINARY AMENDMENT PRESENTER: HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: X YES NO DATE: PLAT REQUESTED ACTION: Staff has received a letter from J.W. Knoblauch (attached), to amend the preliminary ~lat for the priorwood Townhouses (also known as Phase 3A). Specl.fically the a~plicant wants to delete items 4, 5, and 14 from the conditl.onal approval. The three items refer to the construction of sidewalks. Perhaps the application is not technically accurate because the amendments referenced in the letter are part of the preliminary PUD. PROCEDURE: The applicant has filed under Zoning Ordinance section 6.1l.7f(b). This section requires that any changes in the use or arrangement of open space must be approved by the City Council. The approval process follows the amendment process for the Zoning Ordinance which is Section 7.9. The Council granted preliminary PUD approval on April 1, 1985, with 19 conditions of which all but 3 have been met. However, the final plat had to be submitted for approval within one year with extensions of the preliminary PUD or the ~reliminary plat shall be considered abandoned. The attached petl.tion is being considered as a resubmittal of the preliminary PUD. Therefore all elements of the preliminary PUD are open for discussion within reason. It must be kept in mind that this platting effort comes several years after the units have been completed and occupied. Therefore issues such as orientation, utilities, access, landscaping, and architecture have been made previously by the applicant or jointly with the City and are virtually impossible to correct. On the other hand, minor improvements that would improve the residential environment and overall aesthetic qualities are open for discussion. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The active history of this PUD is attached for your consideration. It was given outline development approval in 1982 for a phased development. The townhouse project was the second 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245 ~hase of the PUD. The outline development plan called for 20 1ndividually owned units in a landscaped setting with covenants and deed restrictions. The preliminary plat for this phase was ap~roved by the Planning Commission on March 21, 1985, and Aprl.l 1, 1985, by the City Council. Construction began shortly thereafter for 9 units. What followed was a myriad of extensions, excuses, and false promises, by the developer Mr. Tom Steffens, that has not ended today. The project made many promises to the neighborhood, school district, and the City, in the form of site and archetectural design. For that, Prior Lake gave the developer 23 units as a density bonus. Today Phase 3A is far from deserving a density bonus. It is currently unkempt rental housing. The earlier approved and planted landscaping is either dead, pulled out, not maintained, or was never planted. The grass and weeds are not cut. The blacktop has holes, patches, and bird baths. The individual unit entryways once landscaped, have the appearance of a forlorn backyard. DISCUSSION: Perhaps there are a lot of reasons why this development has not been successful in the eyes of this writer. Each small deviation or extension seemed innocent enough. But the cumulative result is a rapidly deteriorating townhouse development with no end in sight. On the other hand, had the development received final plat 5 years ago, it might look significantly more pleasing. The ori9inal developer, Mr. Steffens, has lost the development and it 1S now in the hands of Mr. Knoblauch. The issue is, how can the development be improved through the requirements of the PUD after it has already been developed and obtain final plat approval without substantial financial burden on the current owner. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend preliminary following: 1. The name of the plat be changed to priorview 2nd Addition. 2. Conditions of the City Engineer. 3. The landscape plan must be implemented as previously submitted. 4. All grass must be cut and kept free of weeds. 5. Any blacktop must be patched as needed. roD approval. Contingent on the The sidewalks as required in items 4, 5, and 6 should be deleted from this project. Because the grade was changed for units 10-20, thereby making elevated wood patios practl.cal. The wood patios that were constructed outside the rear entry serve as private open space for residents. The sidewalks which were to provide pedestrians access for visitors do not appear necessary. An on-site inspection revealed that foot traffic patterns around the side and rear of the units 10-20 were not apparent. To: Horst W. Graser, Director of Planning 4629 Dakota st. SE, Prior Lake, MN 55372 From: Joe Knoblauch 13017 Maywood Lane, Hopkins, MN 55343 Date: July 2, 1990 Subject: priorview Townhome Plats, City Council Minutes 4/1/1985 Please consider this letter as a petition to amend the preliminary plat to delete from the list of 19 contingents, numbers 4, 5 and 14, which refer to sidewalks, Patios, steps and back entries were substituted for sidewalks on each of the units. It was felt that sidewalks behind and between the buildings would detract from the privacy of each individual unit. These changes as built have been well accepted by the renters and provide each unit with individual backyard accessibility. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. 9.ff!~~ I,:, ," iiin'ld I I 'I ; . 1'..1'"1' i I I I' illl'~c!~'I'I!! I i ,I' I,. .'r; '- i . ,1".,"11(1 J i ! i I' .. _-lid ' · · I .= i ii!iJ!ji1,al ! i ! i I ., J i:li!icjIEI j 'i: It . "II.I.:ili' ! I I I f ~.iIJ~ls=! " I I !! ~~ il j l!i!f!!till I I :1 ! e) ~, t Ijef.ftllll f - · Ii ! !!!f!iliJ!! i ! I I ,- II ! i!ljiiil!!! I I j ; .. I~ II I ',"i.!.-,!I., .! I J 1 I I" 'I "'1' I'" II - ! - , ! ~ J ;iJ~. I ili!ill;!ll ii f i i j.! I IJ~ II . 1'lf.11 hl~J .1 ~ f f I J I , !l: i !!i(Mn!,i h r11 j!]' i~l' j i l 11}I_l iii : ill.Jili!.! Ii !.! ! I) i ) : J ii ,i ~ ~ o i ~ " ..~,- ~ .~ ~.. u..... "II 1,..\__. 'l ""we, jO ~ .;c.".., l.....l~ elit1 ~ 'i'" u. ..\ ,0 ... I \Ill ...~~ ! Q ~ Q: o ~ P. II. f ~'I It!, " It: t -,1 ~ I" <H a, . u~ .n .Iu ~ ,., e' .i; I' ..1 i'. "\. II 'I~ f' .. ~ -I ~ r it' ~ r- i : r:, c n~ I ,,; I iH II i I III .8 J f';l II. _Jl~ I I · ~ 'i.~ , i ' I- :~ .i f' ~ i . I I I i I' !~ I ,1 . I -. ' .., I ,. I,.....' It,.....,'''"'., I'-I\;I,'J. :l.J'tJ v :; ~J';~ (.:J' _:J _'~ ~..,' I .. ... R.. ... ,,-.o_ J." ~.o.. I I J l J . 'I I I i i ~ , i ~ t ~ J 1 : I! ~ I 1, ~I i j I , g . ii , I I , . I . i I I I I . t . 11 . I i t r'l I , J ~ !I , I f ] 11 l I I t , ~ J I ~ , i . I E ~ ~ !~ I ,t , . 11 . 5 I J 1 ~ f ']~3'::"" ~,~ ::1 ....... ^ . '\ ,......._ II, oJ' J '.I . . , - , ~ i . . i - ,. ." . : ., J.R,Ko01t ~_J ~:4.'!'':''1:..::: ,.,.f 8~_, .....:...... '0" 1::.._ I, 'c ',.I ,.....t! ~..,:.; '::.",' ;.. .........f.....' ..,. HERITAGE 1891 COMMUNITY 1991 'l9J$K 2qjl June 18, 1990 Mr. Joe Knoblach K & S Properties 13017 Maywood Lane Hopkins, MN 55343 Dear Mr. Knoblach, This letter is in response to our phone conversation held on Thursday, June 14, 1990. You had requested an update on the review process for the final plat of priorwood Townhomes. A copy of the plat has been distributed to the Finance, Engineering and Planning Departments for review. I have reviewed the priorview PUD files and have conducted a preliminary review of the final plat. Be advised that Director of Planning, Horst Graser will conduct the formal review of the final plat and may require information in addition to the data included in this letter. In addition, the Finance and Engineering Departments have not completed their reviews and may also require additional information, prior to initiating the final plat public hearings. I (P906 W (flwJ l~ On December 16, 1988 Horst Graser submitted a letter to Tom Steffens outlining four contingencies related to the preliminary plat application which have yet to be satisfied. The city council granted preliminary plat approval on April 1, 1985 subject to nineteen conditions. The preliminary plat of priorwood Townhomes is not approved until all nineteen conditions are satisfied. Specifically two additional access walks must be constructed adjacent to units 10 and 20; one diagonal walk from the stairs between units 15 and 16 to the entrance walk for unit 16 must be constructed and a sidewalk must be constructed between units 4 and 5. In addition, a site inspection conducted on Friday, June 15, 1990 indicated that several trees and shrubs indicated on the planting plan for the PUD have died. It is my opinion that these plants be replaced as ~er the preliminary plat planting plan in order to be compliant wl.th the condition of the plat. The final plat cannot be approved unless it is substantially compliant with the preliminary plat and all conditions satisfied. An alternative that is available, if you cannot meet the conditions, is to petition the Cit~ Council to amend the preliminary plat to delete the condl.tions. This option would require that public hearings be conducted and that all persons ownin9 property within 500 feet of the plat boundaries be notifl.ed of the hearing. The amendment public hearing would be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council, who would 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245 render a decision based upon the testimony and hearinq process. If the conditions are removed, it would be possible to continue with the final plat phase of the development. The final plat drawing which was submitted for review should be amended to change the name of the plat from priorwood Townhomes to priorview Second Addition. The City Attorney will also require a title opinion as per subdivision ordinance, in order to identify all owners of any interest in the land being subdivided and holders of any liens or mortgages on the land. In addition, a reduction of the plat to scale which equals 1"- 800", 1" - 200' and one plat at no scale 81/2" x 11" will be required in addition to one copy of the plat with all signatures. The Engineerin9 and Finance De~artments have been requested to review the fl.nal plat subml.ttal and submit comments to the Planning Department by July 6, 1990. At that time the results of the formal staff review will be made available to you. If you have questions concerning the review process, please contact Horst Graser at 447-4230. Sincerely, 1 ~ d (!vfCft()<J/J Deb Garross Assistant City Planner Enclosures cc David Unmache Horst Graser CITY OF PRIOR LAKE December 16, 1988 Mr. Tom Steffens 3400 West 66th st. Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Dear Mr. stettens, Be advised that the final plat of priorwood Townhouses will not be placed on the Council agenda until all contingency items relating to the preliminary plat have been met. I have attached a copy of the April 1, 1985, City Council minutes, and my memorandum to the City Council dated March 15, 1985. The contingency items referenced in the Council motion are found on page two and three of my memo. In reviewing the contingencies I find that you have not satisfied items 4, 5, and 14, on page five of my memo. Please advice as to how ~ou will address them. I believe you have two alternatives; one lS to do the necessary improvements and two is to request the City Council to amend their motion deleting items 4, 5, and 14, as contingency requirements for preliminary plat approval. The City Council meets the first and third Monday of each month. All materials and submittals for Council review must be received at least 10 days prior to the Council meeting. Submission for final plat must include a complete set of mylar copies with all appropriate signatures. In addition, a reduction of the plat to scale which equals 1" - 800', 1" - 200 " and one at no scale to 8 1/2" X 11" paper size. silt' Horst Gra er Director of Planning HG: rIDS enclosures (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S,E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 (r(ll..;\ \..~d) 'lJWN~ Pn~~ . ,:',<;:f~'~", 1:, ,~~:." ~"f;~\. .:.;r. ,. ":~'{~~ ....... .~. f~ ,~~f ..'" "~.I1~' "~_\.,:." fi1. .~ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE MEMORANDUM 'ro: FROM: RE: DATE : PU\NNI~ OOMMISSION HORSI' GRASER PRIORV!El'l PRELIMINARY P.U.D. 2ID PHASE (Phase 3A) MARC! 15, 1985 RIDUFSrED AcrIOO: The developer is requesting Preliminary P.U.D. approval for the 2nd phase of construction for Priorview P.U.D. The preliminary phase of review requires a detailed analysis of the site, improvements and utilities. The schematic plan was approved on 12/6/82 which established a general site deve10pnent program. This preliminary plan is to be in substantial caapliance with the schematic plan. SITE RE.VIEl'l: This proposal is the second phase of developnent consisting of 20 units. The 1st phase consisting of 48 units located directly to the south is nearing completion. The 2nd phase will require the northerly extension of Five Hawks Avenue and easterly extension of Priorwood Drive. Priorwood Drive must be changed to Priorwood Street to conform to the City's uniform street naming system. City utilities will also require extension. Several years ago the low area on the subject site was filled primarily between Five Hawks and units 1-9. Without substantial filling the site would be severely restricted for residential construction. On the other hand the hill in the southeast corner of the site is being severely cut down for units 16-20. The final grading plan indicates the entire site with a snall exception in the southeast corner will be disturbed. As a result erosion control must be part of the construction plan. The plan indicates two rows of hay bales for silt screen. Staff will require two additional rows of hay bales east and south of Five Hawks Avenue and Priorwood Drive shortly after the streets are completed to prevent erosion onto the streets and into the stODm sewers. In addition all graded areas must be sodded as soon as practical. (612) 447-4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E, P,O, BOX 359 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 The housing type in this awlication is townhanes versus condaninilJl\S specified in the concept plan. units 1-9 will be split entry walkouts with a single attached garage. Units 10-20 will have tuck under garages with two floors of living space above the garage. The main entrance for these Wlits will be fran the rear. However, the only access to the sidewalk at the rear of the units is between units 15 and 16. 'lWo additional access sidewalks must be constructed adjacent to unit 20 and 10. In addition it is suggested that a diagonal walk be constructed fran the front entrance walk for unit 16 to the top of the stairs between units 15 and 16. units 1-9 a~r to have access provided through the courtyards except there is no concrete walk indicated. It is recarmended that "u" shaped walks be constructed in the courtyards that will pick up pedestrians in front of the row of cars headed into the townhouse units. '!here should also be a sidewalk between units 4 and 5 for convenience of visitors who are unable to park in front. As part of the 2nd phase construction plans, the awlicant is platting the remainder of the P.U.D. in Outlots A and B. However, Outlot B contains a portion of Holly Court which is not a part of this P.U.D. and therefore cannot be platted as a part of it. Il\NDSCAPIOO : It is recarmended that as much of the existing tree cover in the southeast corner of the site should remain. It seens the individual doing this plan is not familiar with the existing overstory. The Sugar Maple and Marshal Ash could then be moved to open portions of the site. As a general rule the deciduous trees should be clustered either southwest or southeast of the structures to help naturally air condition the new buildings. All shade trees must be 21/2" caliper or better. '!he foundation planting include 24 taxus or ye,i pots. '!he plan should be reviewed to make sure that they will be protected from south and western exposure due to their susceptibility to sun and wind burn. The foundation plantings are spread too thin around the structures. The foundation plantings must be doubled. The courtyards must be defined and more plant material introduced. t1.I'ILITIES : '!he City Engineer has reviewed the utility plans and recanmends preliminary approval subject to the following provision: 1. Specifications for sewer, water, street improvements. 2. The fire hydrant located on Priorwood Drive must be moved about 20 feet to the east. 3. Drainage calculations must be submitted for the construction site. 4. The storm sewer in Five Hawks Avenue must be located deeper to prevent freezing. ~oo: In general the developer has oanplied with the City's requirsnents arK! requests and adjusted the plans prior to subnittal for this hearing. The majority of the items are minor and should not hold up preliminary awroval. staff reccmnends approval contingent upon: ~ @ 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ll. 12. ~ 1. 2. Priorwood Drive be changed to Priorwood street. 'lWo rows of hay bales east and south of Five Hawks Avenue and priorwood Drive. All disturbed areas must be sodded as soon as practical. 'lWo additional access walks must be constructed adjacent to units 10 and 20. Q-le diagonal walk fratl the stairs between units 15 and 16 to the entrance walk for unit 16. The courtyards be defined (concrete vs plantings). Preserve natural overstory in the southeast corner. l'ole deciduous trees to open area with 21/2" caliper minimllll. '!be location of the yew pots should be reviewed. '!be foundation plantings must be doubled. '!be plant material in the courtyards must, at least, be doubled. '!be contingencies as suggested by the City Engineer. Holly Court be excluded. A sidewalk be constructed between Units 4 and 5. A revised landscape plan be acceptable to staff. PRIORVIEW PUD HISTORY This PUD is referenced on the Zoning Map as PUD 82-12. processed under Zoning Ordinance No. 75-12 (red cover). It was The following is an abbreviated record of the PUD. The files should be consulted for greater detail. Outline Development Plan (File reference-Priorview PUD 82-12) The outline Plan was the conceptual stage of the three phase PUD process. PUD size and density: 17.45 acres total land 2.40 acres designated wet land 15.05 acres of wet land which was used to calculate density 15.05 X 5.5 = 83 units The PUD received 27.5% density bonuses 83 X 127.5% = 106 total unit for the PUD Outline Development Approval Planning commission 10-7-82 City Council 12-6-82 Staff comments are in memo form dated 8-12-82. Staff recommended to deny the PUD. In staff memo dated 8-30-82, the denial was reaffirmed. September 15-82, Letter from Cy Kruse to Mike McGuire outlining School District requirements for Tom Steffens to make Five Hawks Avenue public plus other development requirements. November 11-82, Letter from Cy Kruse to Tom Steffens outlining a time frame for the construction of Five Hawks Avenue and cost participation by the School District. Priorview 1st Addition (File reference-Priorview 1st Addition) priorview 1st Addition is the initial development phase of the PUD. At this stage greater detail must be submitted and the development plan must be in substantial compliance with the Outline Development Plan. The 1st Addition called for one 24 unit condominium building and two 12 unit condominium buildings. The plat to implement this phase included Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, priorview 1st Addition (attached). The approval dates were Preliminary Plat: Final Plat as follows: Planning Commission City Council Planning Commission City Council 7-7-83 7-18-83 8-4-83 8-8-83 1 A Developers Agreement was entered into for the construction of utilities and Five Hawks Avenue from Highway 13 to the northern terminus of the 1st Addition. Shortly after the final plat, Tom Steffens dedicated the entire right-of-way within the PUD to construct Five Hawks Avenue to the northern terminus of the PUD. This was a requirement of the School District. I believe they also required the complete construction of Five Hawks Avenue in a given time frame. Prior Lake never made this a contingency item in any approvals. After the final plat approval, Prior Lake issued building permit numbers 261 and 327 to construct two 12 unit buildings on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, respectively. Date of issuance was 9-19-83 for Lot 1 and 11-29-83 for Lot 2. In the fall of 1984, staff received a petition to split Lot 3 into two equal halves and construct two 12 unit buildings instead of one 24 unit building. The split was approved on 11-13-84. For file reference see priorview 1st lot split: Lot 3, Block 1. Building permit number 556 was issued on 9-23-84 for the entire Lot 3 to construct a 12 unit building. After the split was approved, building permit number 616 was issued on 11-14-84 to construct a second 12 unit building. 2 Prl.orvl.ew This phase of development consists of 20 townhouse units and is referred to as phase 3A. It is actually the second phase of construction as defined by the PUD. This development phase received Planning Commission approval for preliminary ~lat on 3-21-85 and from the City Council on 4-1-85. Council's fl.nal approval was contingent on the same nineteen points outlines earlier by the Planning Commission and me. All of these points have not been met, therefore, preliminary plat approval has not been obtained. A Developers Agreement was entered into by Tom Steffens and the City for the construction of roads and utilities. The first building permit for four units was taken out on 7-4-85 and the second one for five units on 10-30-85. Mr. Steffens wanted to plat this phase, however, I believe he ran out of money to obtain the required releases. He wanted to put the foundations in for the first nine units and then plat. Mr. Steffens was aware of our policy to issue permits and plat later in townhome developments. Shortly after the first nine units were completed, Mr. Steffens approached the City Council on 11-12-85 and wanted occupancy permits. The primary issue the Council envisioned was street improvement. The City Council denied occupancy permits until the streets were in place. Nothing was said about final plat requirements. On 12-2-85 I informed the City Council that the street work was completed and occupancy permits would shortly be issued. The building activity for this phase was as follows: # of Units Permit # Expired Date Issued Reissued 4 85-166 7-8-85 5 85-198 8-6-85 5 *85-294 Yes 11-12-85 11-30-87 6 *85-295 Yes 11-12-85 12-4-86 *Conditional Occupancy Permits Issued. Perhaps were: 1. 2. 3. 4. other reasons which complicated the final plat issue City Council granting occupancy before final plat. The street right-of-way was dedicated via easement rather than through the platting process. All internal roadways are private. The units were to be rented and deeds for individual units were not an issue. Mr. Steffens acknowledged the platting requirement and he knew that a final plat was required before continuing to the next phase of the PUD. Perhaps he had trouble getting release from the Simpkins 5. 6. 3 who are fee owners of the property. 7. Staff has followed the procedure of issuing permits and then platting townhomes numerous times without incident. Perhaps Mr. Steffens was given too much latitude? All the buildin9 permits were issued in a four month period but completl.on of the last units were not until 1988. priorview PUD Rezoninq, Comprehensive Plan, and Development Plan Amendment (File reference -"priorview PUD 82-12 Amendment") Mr. Steffens aPl?lied for a ma~or amendment to the PUD. It involved changl.ng the zoning dl.strict of the PUD from R-2 to R-3 in order that the density of remaining vacant land be increased. It also involved the addition of Lots 1-5, Block 2, Holly Court, which was bought from the Schweichs. The addition of the Holly Court land and increased density called for a revised development plan. There was considerable opposition by the public which resulted in the denial of the proposal by the Planning Commission on 3-19-87. Mr. Steffens never took this proposal to the Council. 4 J ' !. i ! ] i II 1 t : ~ It~ti; J:, I f 'Jlh~ f J I · 1-fil'. · , r i !:l~J} 11" I 1 :z: J 1 II!Jjl f ~ o J i I 11. ~J 11 I ~ J J I ii~i:J'! I f I r- 4 J!!J.' · r c:i I i ~ lltlo1ji!J' I I r J C , I I 'In I J J J -=c I ~ " , ~Jl~i J J J I :. fl~: I~J ~ I J ! '~n hdJi J ! " i t;i! :111 a:: - lL. ~ ILl - > a:: o - a:: Q. J" J,J1' ')1 JI ) r . I i J! f: ) , · !:. rI Iljf. I'. I i.J Ji I! I f! I 'JI !! I L if 111- 1 J · If !J,~ i ~ ~11 J il 11J.. 1 , 15 II J I ., 1 · ,I ffi, I IJ',I I 111i I 1!1 I \1' il t 11' I I i II' I!} i 1'1 I IJ 11'1 I ., I 'f i~!1 'J II i IIJ fjlJI, h 1) f~ aa J f t f I aa t I f I II . . , 1 I II i . : NOI1lG"J~ Uo'f. ,'t1~i,~ - I~I S ,tI>lo3J.S ~ - ...... ..~_,._...-u., ... . . I · >- -. ---. - -=..-..r-......... """'- - . . N 8 I " I I q uJ " (.) % ttl ..... 0 0 ... II I CO I · I I~ \ -- . . - .'.... --- ----------------- . - t_~."''' lI:NJllr s1tA4rH JM.:J )..1 - ~ iii I~ fl \ .NN'-Cr \ ~ ~\ ~ "'. ,. -""lIe. 'f s;f. '" ." lilfl \\.. ' sM ~\ ".., " --- . I ~ !. I! 111~i 'lie . .' I I JI J! i Ill, . U --zl.= J ---- J J ) I. i! I I . 1 : ~ 1:111;. J i " I J I I' IJ t ; · i:flil q I :2: II ~ IIIJ:::. I,! <:> f i!j.;J 1 J j:: ! I I Illlj! ! f I i:i f i:j :~'fj!f' I' I ~ I I '111 I J -=c I ! " :':J1;i J I, I J I :. 111 hi · I ~ Ii H 1r:1li P i i (/)1) .111 0:: - La.. ~ L&J - > 0:: o - 0:: 0.. 1 j'l11 , J I II ~ r .'i~! ~ J .J " I: J ,I lif' JI I) Ii I!! Ii f If I! 1'1 I,if fJlli · J ; · I, I 6 I J i I J ~l · · 1 I j:l I I I ~ I ~ I'Iff: I fJ-.1 I fl' J f f I i Ii iln ! I" i I I ~ I 'f. I,! 'I '~!I ') I' I IIJ f;,'" Ii .J f. .' I . 1ft .' Iff I II ~ _ , 1 I II , _ : ~ 81 I! II \ rNN'.or \. \ - ";:~ . .~. ~ Iii. ~ ' · S~!I ~, ~ "", '\ '7 - - NOIJ.I(Jlj~ a~'S: ,M3;/1 - IJ./ S ,~>lo3.J.S ~ J t( o .:.-"'" " 0., ~ ~-~ -.G ~ '" iI~\ ~J ~ ~;U if:: 0 ~ 0 .: '.) -1- ..... r''.i ..J : 0 -.- I -'t--::")CD · ~~1f~~~~ -0 _'" _ '" . s: 5 f'J -:.. \'-" \ ~;~ ~J~ '-.~ -- --- -wi · ~- .. -... -- 1!WJllr IJfAlrH 3M" )/ - - I tD ~ ! ,I to .J p), If ~ - . .' I ~ J it J! i II i '" . u s- -I J ----------------- ~ , /? ~. /J /J v:..LAfe } UJUMJ q-I -f~ Councilm.mb.r 9chw.ich Ind Councilm.mb.r loc.pt.d this Im.ndm.nt to th. motion and I,cond. Mayor Johnlon call.d th. qU'ltion on tht motion and upon a yot. tak.n it WII duly plll.d Th, n.xt it.m on the Ig.nda wal to discuss .stablishing a "Crimi Pr.v.ntion Fund" Polic. Chi.f Powtll and O.t.ctiv. Bot comm.nted on this. Th. fund would b. a Minn.sotl Corporation manag.d by a board of dir.ctorl s.l.ct.d by community p.opl.. All fundi would b. tlX d.ductibl. gifts from th. community its.lf Ind would b. us.d for III phls,s of crimi pr.v.ntion from signs to r,wlrds, .tc. Polic. Chi.f Pow.ll and O.t.ctiv. Bo. furth.r comm.nt.d. I~ ~on Aft.r I l.ngthy discussion by Council and Stiff, motion by Scott to support th. F\ni" utlblishment of a "Crim. Pr.v.ntion Fund", Stcond.d by BUilt and upon a vot. iak.n it was duly plSud. Mayor Johnson call.d a r.cess It this tim.. Th. mt.ting wal called back to ordtr It 9: 30 PM The next item on the Ig.nda WIS to consid.r pr.liminary P.U.O. for Priorvi.w. City Pllnn.r Grlstr comm.nttd on thil it.m. City Pllnner Gras,r stlt.d that the r.qu.st.d Iction by the dev.lop.r is pr.liminary P.U D. approval. H. th.n r.vi.wed the m.morandum r.f.r.ncing th. issue He stlted thlt th. Pllnning Commilsion conduct.d I public h.aring on 3/21/85 Ind r.commend.d Ipprovll of the PU.O. conting.nt upon 19 pointl he stated urlilT Th.re was I generll discussion by Council Ind Stiff. ~ ~otion by Busse to approve P.U.D.for the 19 points outlined ~orview seconded by Thork.lson and the Preliminlry P U 0 for PriorView contIngent upon by Staff Ind the 4 pointl r.garding th. utiliti.s. upon I vote taken it was duly pall.d. Th, n,xt item on the agenda WIS to consider the R.gist.r.d Land Survey. City Planner Graser co~ment.d on this item. I ..-- City Planner Grlser stated that the r.gist.red Ilnd surv.y WIS indir.ctly approved by th. Council in the cours. of s.ttling a p.nding llwluit Igainlt th. City to provide ICC'SS to this landlock.d Plrc.l. Th. two abutting prop.rty owners in Gat,wlY Shores Icquir.d the parc.l and received p.rmission to split it Ind attlch the newly formed parc.ls to th.ir resp.ctiv. lots. The County howev.r did not accept the m.ets & bounds d.scription and r.quir.d I RLS. This proposll is id.ntical to the Igr.ed upon split Ind stiff r,commends Ipproval. H. then ref.rred to the RLS that was attach.d to the ag.nda plcklg.s. There was a geniTal discussion by Council and Staff Reg. Ian:i &.irvey #111 Motion by Thork.lson to approve the R.L.S. .111 IS submitt.d by Staff, s.conded by Scott and upon a vote taken it was duly Plll.d. The next it,m on the agenda was to consid.r the Dlv.lop.rs Agre.ment for Wind Song P.U.O. City Engineer And.rson comm.nt.d on this it.m. HERITAGE 1891 COMMUNITY 1991 VTJ:5f};. t ~ 2qjl NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO PRIORVIEW PUD You are hereby notified that the Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing in the Prior Lake City Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E., on Thursday, August 2, 1990 at 8:30 p.m. The purpose of the hearing is to consider an amendment proposed by developer, Joe Knoblach, to the second phase of Priorview PUD known as priorwood Townhomes Phase 3A. The developer received preliminary plat approval on April 1, 1985 subject to nineteen conditions. All but four conditions have been satisfied however, the developer is requesting the Cit~ to amend the ~reliminary plat to waive the four outstanding condl.tions. Specifl.cally, the conditions are: Two additional access walks must be constructed adjacent to units 10 and 20; one diagonal walk from the stairs between units 15 and 16 to the entrance walk for unit 16 must be constructed; a sidewalk must be constructed between units 4 and 5 and several trees and shrubs indicated on the planting plan for the PUD have died and must be replaced. The developer is requesting that the four conditions be removed by the City Council as conditions of approval for the preliminary plat. It is the request of Mr. Knoblach that the sidewalks required as part of the plat be substituted with patios, steps and back entries. The subject site contains approximately 3 acres and is located approximately one quarter mile northeast of the intersection of Five Hawks Avenue and S.T.H. 13. The property is legally described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said West Half; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds East along the west line of said West Half a distance of 2080.05 feet; thence South 88 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 978.19 feet to an intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 333.0 feet west of the east line of said West Half, the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 88 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds West 30.00 feet; thence northeasterly along a curve concave to the southeast and having a radius of 163.81 feet, a central angle of 21 degrees 07 minutes 26 seconds and a chord of 60.04 feet which 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 bears North 11 degrees 30 minutes 17 seconds East an arc distance of 60.39 feet; thence North 22 degrees 03 minutes 55 seconds East 34.47 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve concave to the northwest and having a radius of 240.66 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 53 minutes and 25 seconds an arc distance of 192.75 feet; thence North 73 de9rees 18 minutes 39 seconds East 140.53; thence on a tangentl.al curve concave to the south and havin9 a radius of 660.17 feet and a central angle of 17 degrees 34 ml.nutes 05 seconds an arc distance of 202.42 feet; thence South 89 degrees 05 minutes 46 seconds East 12.17 feet to the East line of said West Half; thence South 00 degrees 54 minutes 14 seconds West along said east line 418.86 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north line of PRIORVIEW FIRST ADDITION; thence North 89 degrees 05 minutes 46 seconds West along said North line and its extension 300.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 54 minutes 14 seconds East 66.67 feet; thence North 88 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds West 33.00 feet to the point of beginning. If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this hearing. The Planning Commission will acce~t oral and or written comments. If you have questions regard1ng this matter, cont;ct the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447-4230. ~ ;f::hftfC(J-G-d Deb Garross Assistant City Planner To be published in the Prior Lake American on Monday July 23 and July 30, 1990. 8 7 8 9 10 N 6 S'tRt.V:t t)Rl0R'-Il00~ ,,:,,",~'l<"!'~'. 1. . .....".~t '.!i.\:o:;., :';.~:;:.'""'''''~:li1-. ..t;1:~,~t~f!t~~l~i{~1!.~ij:'~;~ ~SUBJECT SITE ' : PRIORVIEW PUD ~AMENDMENT TO : PRIORWOOD :!. OWNHOMES PHASE; (f~'lit't~ll 1" · 200' p .. tol o 6 .,.... ~I'\ ."VI'I.... t. ~ I \;,;~.r:. " N t, "" :tJ i: IJl 2 ~ " ~ \' - , ",, ,...... - ,,~ ,\1 .. ~ 3 " " 0 r '= 16 ,.. oJ w ::! 2 f'4 ....:l U f' ex: H u ! ~~~f-,~fi. 11\ ~ 3"" rh'" Ll.: \1\.,. I' q,...... "/I~ FIVE HAWKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FAITH EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH w ;:J z w :> < rJ) ~ w :> H r... \J w ;:J ~ ~ ~. 'to S.