HomeMy WebLinkAbout6 - Appeal of Zonong Code Amendments
AGENDA NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
BACKGROUND:
DISCUSSION:
HER/TAGE
/89/
COMMUNITY
1991
19J$)%
2Q91
6
HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS
MAY 7, 1990
This item includes 8 zoning code amendments
for adoption (see attached hearing notice).
with the exception of Amendments 3 and 5, the
City council has reviewed these items in
conjunction with other amendments last year.
Unfortunately these 8 items were included with
those of a more controversial nature. Because
several amendment related issues were not
resolved, all items failed to pass. The
purpose of this item is to finally adopt the
relatively "minor" zoning code amendments.
For details to each amendment see attached
Planning Report.
The Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on April 19, 1990, and recommended for
adoption all amendments exce~t Number 5. The
commission did not oppose th1s amendment but
decided to leave the decision to the Council.
The reason for this decision was based on a
staff generated Comprehensive Plan discussion
at the Canterbury Inn several weeks ago. The
Council favored a 10 acre lot size with a
redivision overlay versus the 4 per 40 acres,
first come first served concept. Staff has
made the changes to the Comprehensive Plan
goals and is pursuing that direction favored
by the Council.
The question then for the Council is, do you
want to take an intermediate step, such as #5,
prior to the completion of the Comprehensive
4629 Dakota 51. 5.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
ACTION REQUIRED:
Plan process. Staff has
options relating to #5 and will
at the meeting.
identified 4
present them
Approve all the amendments with direction
provided on #5.
2. Confirm the Planning Commission
recommendation approving all amendments
except Number 5.
1.
3. Deny some or all of the amendments.
Staff recommends alternative Number 1.
The action required will depend on
Council's discussion.
the
"ZONCOD"
ITEM:
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
HERITAGE
1891
COMMUNITY
1991
2czgl
W'J5(!)%
PLANNING REPORT
ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS
HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
X YES NO
APRIL 19~990
ANALYSIS
History/Backqround:
The principal purpose of these amendments is to keep the Prior
Lake Zoning Ordinance current and to serve and protect the
investments of the public. Most of these amendments came before
the Plannin~ Commission in June of 1989, in addition to several
others that 1nspired considerable discussion. At the Council
level the discussion was prolonged because of a few controversial
issues. Since the first hearln9 was quite some time ago, Staff
decided to republish the hear1ng notice and eliminate the
possibility of legal complications. A brief description and
analysis of each amendment follows:
AMENDMENT NO.1:
The objective is to make public parking lots a conditional use in
RI-R4 residential districts. This came up when the DNR wanted to
develop a parking lot at their Dewitte access. The principle
issue for this use is control over its installment. A public
parking lot that is built in a residential zone must be well
designed, landscaped, and maintained. It is a use that is seldom
built but needed nevertheless.
AMENDMENT NO.2:
This amendment would add "Nursery school and day care centers for
less than 12 children instead" as a permitted use in R-1 single
familr residential zones. This use is state Law in sin9le family
distr1cts and would bring Prior Lake's laws into compl1ance with
those of the state of Minnesota.
AMENDMENT NO. 3: ~~
This amendment will add\~urseries
conservation zones. The rational
as a permitted use in C-l
for this amendment is that C-l
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
and A-1 zones should be treated similar because they serve the
purpose of recognizing a9ricultural land and hold it for urban
development. A misconcept10n of the C-1 zone is that its
designation can save or conserve natural resources. The only
actual difference between A-1 and C-I districts are lot sizes and
several land uses. Also most all of the C-I districts have
boundaries that do not follow section lines commonly used and
accepted meets and bounds property descriptions. Often C-I
district boundaries will cut one owners parcel in half making it
cumbersome to interpret rural density uses. A rural property
owner should not have to discontinue a use someplace in a field
simply because zoning districts have changed. Therefore uses in
the C-1 and A-1 zones should be similar if not identical. The
ultimate answer to the C-1 zone is total removal from the rural
service area.
AMENDMENT NO.4:
This amendment would increase the size of accessory structures
from 800 square feet to 832 square feet. A number of builders
have requested this amendment. A desirable three stall garage is
26X32. The state of Minnesota uses 832 square feet in their
legislation pertaining to accessory structures.
AMENDMENT NO.5:
The focus of this amendment is to make the minimum residential
lot size in both A-1 and C-1 districts 2.5 acres by adding
residential use in the C-1 zone. Gary Staber, Prior Lake
Building Official, feels strongly that the current 1 acre lot
size in A-I districts is too small for adequate on-site sewage
treatment options. The minimum lot size in the C-1 district is
currently 10 acres for all uses. Because the districts serve the
same purpose, it is recommended that a consistent size of 2.5
acres be established for all C-1 and A-I zones with a minimum
width of 150 feet.
AMENDMENTS NO'S 6 and 7:
These are housekeeping items. Staff has an administrative policy
of requiring name searches from a certified abstract company for
many years. Establishing this policy in advance in ordinance
form increases its validity and confirms Staff policy and
operating procedure.
AMENDMENT NO.8:
This amendment would add the word "principle" after the first
word in the second sentence. The ordinance allows setback
averages in some situations but is not clear what structures are
to be used as the basis for determining the average. The
addition of the word "principle" would require setbacks to be
taken from the home and not from an accessory structure.
NOTICE OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Notice is hereby given that the Prior Lake Planning Commission
will conduct a Public Hearing on the 19th day of April, 1990, at
8:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota street
S.E.
The purpose of this hearing is to consider amendments to the
Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance and City Code as follows:
AMENDMENT NO.1:
Section 3.2 of Prior Lake zoning Ordinance No.
5-3-3 of the Prior Lake City Code is proposed to
include pUblic parking lots as a conditional
Residential, R-2 Urban Residential, R-3 Multiple
R-4 Mixed Code Residential Districts.
83-6 and Section
be amended to
use in R-1 Urban
Residential, and
AMENDMENT NO.2:
Section 3.2 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance No.83-6 and
section 5-3-3 of the Prior Lake City Code is proposed to be
amended by adding "Nursery Schools and day care centers for more
than twelve (12) children", as a permitted use in the R-1 Urban
Residential District.
AMENDMENT NO.3:
Section 3.2 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance No. 83-6 and
section 5-3-3 of the Prior Lake City Code is proposed to be
amended to include "Nurseries" as a permitted use in the C-1
Conservation District.
AMENDMENT NO.4:
Section 6.2A(3) of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance No. 83-6 and
Section 5-5-2:(A)3 of the City Code is proposed to be amended
increasing the size for accessory structures from eight hundred
(800) square feet to eight hundred thirty two (832) square feet.
AMENDMENT NO.5:
section 4.2 of the Prior Lake Zonin~ Ordinance No. 83-6 and
section 5-4-1 Lot and Yard Requ1rements of the City Code is
pro~osed to be amended by adding the classification of
resldential under C-1 Conservation; by addi~g 2.5 acres for
Residential Uses under Minimum Lot size 1n Conservation
Districts; by adding 150 feet under Width for residential uses in
Conservation Districts.
The minimum lot size in A-1 Agricultural Districts is proposed to
be increased from one (1) acre to 2.5 acres.
4629 Dakota St. SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447.4245
,- - I
AMENDMENT NO.6:
section 7.5A of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance No.83-6 and
Section 5-6-S1A) of the Prior Lake City Code are proposed to be
amended by add ng the following paragraph:
4. The names and addresses of all property owners
five hundred (500) feet shall be provided
certified abstract company so that the Zoning
may provide notification of the conditional use
within
from a
Officer
permit.
AMENDMENT NO.7:
Section 7.6A(1) of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance No. 83-6 and
Section 5-6-6(A)1 of Prior Lake City Code are proposed to be
amended to require an applicant for a variance to submit property
owners within one hundred (100) feet of the boundaries of the
variance site that are certified by an abstract company.
AMENDMENT NO.8:
Section 4.1J of Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance No.83-6 and section
5-4-1(J) of the Prior Lake City Code are proposed to be amended
to add the word "principle" after the first word in the second
sentence of paragraph J. The second sentence would read as
follows: "Where principle structures on adjacent lots have yard
setbacks different from these requirements, the minimum setback
from the lake shall be the average setback of such adjacent
structures to a minimum of fifty (50) feet.
Anyone interested in this matter should plan to attend this public hearing.
The Planni~;st:;;;;;;oral or written comments.
Horst W. Graser
Director of Planning
City of Prior Lake
To be published in the Prior Lake American Monday April 9, 1990 and April
16, 1990.