The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4 - Public Hearing TIF District No. 2-1 AGENDA NUMBER: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: CENSUS '90 . 4 KAY SCHMUDLACH, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING ON TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 2-1 FEBRUARY 20, 1990 The Prior Lake Economic Development Authority held its first meeting on January 16, 1990 to review a proposal for a Tax Increment Financing Project. The proposal reviewed by the Economic Development Authority was submitted by Enivid Corporation who is represented by Kathleen Nye-Reiling. A recommendation was made by the Economic Development Authority to the City Council requesting the setting of a Public Hearing date for February 20, 1990. This agenda item has been prepared as background lnformation for the Public Hearing on the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No. 2-1. Prior Lake City staff have worked with Consultant Roger Guenette and Enivid Representative Kathleen Nye-Reiling to put together the details of the proposed Super Va1u project. Staff presented the background information prior to the January 16, 1990 Economic Development Authority meeting. The information distributed is good background, however, staff has compiled a package of supplemental information to further inform the City Council of the project specifics. An update on the Developers Agreement and the supplemental information attached will be described in the discussion section of this memo. The Enivid project proposal has evolved through City/Developer negotiations over the past year. Staff continues to negotiate on minor issues that will be addressed in the Developers Agreement. The financing plan presented in the TIF document has been agreed upon and staff is recommending approval of 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245 this document on February 20. The other minor issues will be resolved and presented for final approval in the Developers A9reement. These include landscape and other slte ~lan issues. Mary Ipel and Jim O'Meara of Brlggs and Morgan have prepared a draft of the Developers Agreement and will be making minor modifications following final negotiations between staff and the developers. These negotiations are expected to take place over the next 30-45 days. The supplemental information has been briefly described below. Councilmembers can refer to the attachments to review the actual documents. A. Letter of Intent dated December 15t 1989 from Super Valu to Enivid Corporatlon City Council members requested to see the letter of intent from Super Va1u Stores Inc., to Enivid regarding the development proposal. Please see attachment A, a copy of the letter of intent from Lyle Fuller, Assistant Manager of Retail Development for Su~er Valu stores Inc., to Kathleen Nye-Re1ling. Letter dated Februa~ 21 1990 from Ronn Hechter to City Offlcia s concerninq the Gateway Center B. Mr. Hechter expressed concerns about the impact the relocation of the Super Valu Store will have on the Gateway Center. Staff wishes to clarify several statements made in the letter from Mr. Hechter. First, the City did not use Tax Increment Financing on the Gateway Center. The Gatewar Center is not in a Tax Increment Distr1ct and is therefore not eligible for Tax Increment Financing. Staff informed Hechter of this on more than one occasion over the past year in our discussions with him. Second, the City is not aware that Mr. Hechter's site of development (Franklin Trail and Highway 13) requires soil corrections because to date no engineering reports have been made available to the City. Staff has encouraged Mr. Hechter to fill out the appropriate TIF applications to initiate the process and as of yet he has failed to do so. 2 C. Resolution of the Planninq Commission findin9 the City of Prior Lake MN, Econom1c Develo~ment Authority Redevelopment Proiect Plan Conforms to the city Plans for Development of the Locality as a Whole The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed TIF project on Thursday, February 1, 1990. Assistant City Mana~er Kay Schmudlach, Developer Representatlve Kathleen Nye-Reiling and City Planner Horst Graser made a presentation to the Planning Commission. The project was found to be in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and a Resolution statin<1 this was passed. The Planning Commisslon did make several recommendations regarding the landscape plan. staff supports most of the recommendations and will negotiate with the developer to ensure their entrance into the project. The developer has withdrawn their request for a sign variance at this time. A variance may be applied for in the future. D. Summary of proiect Hiqhliqhts by Economic Development Committee The Prior Lake Economic Development Committee has worked on this project for many months. The Economic Development Committee has passed a motion of support for this project and prepared a two page summary highlighting the strengths of this project. Chairman, Bob Barsness, will to also discuss the EDC's assist the Gateway Center development needs. E. Scott County Resolution of Support be present intent to and their The Tax Increment Financing project pro~osal was delivered to Scott County Adm1nistrator Joe Reis on January 10, 1990. City Manager Unmacht, Ass1stant City Manager Schmudlach, and Consultant Roger Guenette made a presentation to the 3 RECOMMENDATION: ALTERNATIVES: County TIF Review Team on January 25, 1990. Following the review, the County Board approved a Resolution of Support for this project. The motion was made February 6, 1990 by Mark Stromwa11, seconded by Ed Mackie and supported by all Commissioners. F. Prior Lake/Savage School District #719 Letter of Support The Tax Increment Financing project proposal was delivered to Leslie Sonnabend, Interim Superintendent on January 10, 1990. The School Board took action on February 12, 1990 to support the TIF proposal. G. Editorials and Public Notice copied for your review are 2 editorials from the Prior Lake American and the Public Notice for the Hearing. H. Letter from Priordale Mall to the City This letter outlines the position of the Priorda1e Mall investors regarding this project and its impact on them. Staff recommends the City Council approve the Tax Increment Financing Plan No. 2-1. Staff also recommends that the Council authorize staff to prepare a Developers Agreement that reflects the negotiated elements of the TIF project and other items needed to complete the project. The Prior Lake City Council has the following possible alternatives to consider: The Prior Lake City Council the Tax Increment Financing and direct staff to Developers Agreement. 2. The Prior Lake City Council can table the Tax Increment Financing Plan for a specific reason and set a continuation date for the Public Hearing. 1. can approve Plan No. 2-1 prepare the 4 3. The Prior Lake city council can deny the Tax Increment Financing Plan for specific reasons. ACTION NECESSARY: Motion to pass Tax Increment order. Resolution 90-13 approving the Financing plan would be in Note: Motion to authorize staff to prepare a Developers Agreement would be in order. Staff is revising Resolution documents and Tax Increment Plan Documents to reflect a City Council project as opposed to an EDA project. These will be distributed prior to the meetin9' Staff recommends that until the Council decldes on a s~ecific role for the EDA, it is advisable to mlnimize their formal "approval" role in the development process. Staff would recommend commencing an EDA meeting in the near future to brainstorm on this subject. 5 AGENDA ITEM #4 Attachment A December 15, 1989 1HE REW~PPOKr SUPER VALU STORES, INC. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1451 . MINNEAPOlIS, MN 55440 Ms. Kathleen Nye-Reiling REAL ESTATE SERVICES 300 First Aven~e North Minneapolis. MN 55401 RE: Prior Lake. MN Dear Kathleen. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that it is our intent to continue working with you to place a new 30,000 s.f. Super Valu supplied supermarket in Prior Lake. After reviewing several sites in this city, I continue to feel that the site you have presented to me, located at Prior Dale Mall, continues to be the best location for us. I know we have many issues to overcome, such as, final site plan approval, traffic control approval, zoning verification, street improvements and other usual and customary conditions. It shall be a further condition of Super Valu proceeding with this project, that we receive such environmental reports, tests and evaluations as Super Valu may require in order to confirm the acceptability of the leased premises to a retailer and/or Super Valu with respect to applicable env~ronmental laws, regulations and ordinances. It should be understood and agreed that Super Valu will not have any obligation whatsoever to proceed with any transactions on this project unless all preconditions have been satisfied and have been reduced to writing in definitive documents, approved by all parties duly authorized and mutually executed and delivered. My approval in principle to the project is further subject to approval in the future by Super Valu's Vice President - Market Development and legal counsel. Kathleen, it is my intent to continue working with you on this project, resolve all the issues, so we can start construction in the April-May 1990 time frame. I have thoroughly enjoyed my working relationship with you these past many months, and with special effort by all, I feel we can meet this timing. Sincerely, l le V. Fuller Retail Development Asst. Manager ,_ _'._., ...._..-_....._H__......;.-...........:~~,_.;;;.",_...... _.___ .-,.._~~_,__..........___.. -..; ..'_"- MINNEAPOuS DMSlON: 101 JEFFERSON AVENUE SOUTH. HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343. PHONE (6121932-4300 eit, of Prior Lake ~ lUM 1t4 At:tacbImt B PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES Compl"t M.,..,tmt'" . M.t'ltt,.."ct St"ictr P.O. BOX 3S092 EDINA, MINNESOTA SS43S 0 ~ 9254055 ~ CD - .,., W <..) WCD a:UJ ~ -:. ~ ~.5 ~g o- f 2/2/90 Dear Council Hembers I am writing to let you know my concerns regarding city financing to enable a developer you are dealing with to cost effectively construct a grocery store behind the Priordale Hall. This developer has disclosed that they intend to build for Super Value Stores which is now located in the Gateway Center which I currently own. I do believe that city funding should not be used to interfere with our current lease which does run another 10 years. In fact robbing from Peter to pay Paul puts the entire Gateway development area in disarray and will create loss of other tenants. A Grocery store is the traffic builder to keep an area alive, and Gateway Center itself was built through tax incriment financing also, and is not fully paid of( to this date. r have currently started development on approximately a 16,600 sq. ft. retail support center at the intersection of Franklin Trail and Gateway Avenue, it also requires soil correction although in dealing with Prior Lake in the past year I was aade aware that the City did not intend to help fund any private developments. it therefore took me an additional year to arrange finances to proceed. I have already started an advertising campaign to attract new tenants from the surrounding coaaunities and have budgeted only lOX to advertise within the City of Prior Lake itself. At this tiae City funding to provide another developer to interfere with our current lease with Super Value w9uld be devastating to the Gateway Center and to the new Northgate Center. I have contacted Super Value to make them aware of the misconception they were given by the other developer that we had no room for them to expand, which is also totally untrue and the site is expandable for up to 11,000 sq. ft. for their use. I do believe that City funding ma, be essential for attracting new tenants and business fro. other cities, but not to displace tenant. from one location to another in the city without very good considerations and planning being done. cc: Beat & Flanagan,J.Diracles Gateway Partner. rete NORTHGATE CENTER Now LEASING: 17.000 square feet of new reta1l1ng opportunity near our busy Gateway Center. Super Value and Snyders Drug are enjoying the success of this location. now you can too. LoCATION: One half block ofT Highway 13 on South Franklin Trail. in growing Prior Lake. Minnesota. Population: 13.000. VISABILI1Y: Excellent. ACCESSABILI1Y: Excellent. NEW RETAIL RATES: Pre-construction rates through April '90. $9.25 - $10.00 per square foot. OPERATING EXPENSES: $1.50 per square foot estimated for 1st year. OCCUPANCY: Summer 1990. SPACE A V AILABILI1Y: Spaces starting at 1.000 square feet. For further leasing infonnation. please contact: KEVIN LACASSE Office - 454-1125 Mobile - 723-3294 RONN BEeHTER Office - 929-4319 925-4055 AGENDA ITEM #4 Attachment C CENSUS '90 . RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN CONFORMS TO THE CITY PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOCALITY AS A WHOLE WHEREAS, the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Economic Development Authority Redevelopment Project No. 2 Plan dated February 20, 1990 (the "Plan"), has been submitted to the City Planning Commission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.027, and WHEREAS, the Prior Lake Planning Commission has reviewed said Plan to determine conformity of said plan to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole, and WHEREAS, the Prior Lake Planning Commission is in agreement with the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Redevelopment Authority Project Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Prior Lake Planning Commission as follows: That the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Economic Development Authority Redevelopment Project Plan dated February 20, 1990, conforms to the general plan for the development of the municipality as a whole and the Commission forwards the Plan to the Prior Lake Economic Development Authority and the City Council of the City of Prior Lake. Adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Prior Lake this 1st day of February, 1990. C../Ipn<MJ ? Jr:jJ~. Chalrman Prior Lake Planning Commission 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AGENDA ITEM #4 Attachment D ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF ENIVID CORPORATION PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS The following items summarize briefly the highlights of the Enivid project proposal. The Economic Development Committee believes these items are project stren<1ths and request the City Council to review them carefully pr10r to making a final recommendation on the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Access/Circulation The current Priordale Mall area is characterized by depreciating roadways and a generally deteriorating/rundown Mall building and surrounding area. One of the problems of the area is the lack of adequate circulation system and limited and unorganized access from Highway 13 to the Mall area. The pro~osal before the City Council will improve the circulatlon around the Mall by upgrading the roadway, providing for pedestrian traffic, walkways, and instituting a lighting system. The Enivid ~roject has accelerated the City'S plan for a transportatlon system within the commercial area. The City did study the area with the assistance of strgar-Roscoe-Fausch and prepared a plan for a ring road construction through the property adjacent to the Mall. The construction of the ring road as it continues both north and south of priordale Mall will be completed as projects come in for the surrounding area. With the completion of the entire ring road, the City will see significant access/circulation improvements. The Enivid project provides the impetus for the City to complete one major component of the plan. Parking The Enivid development has been planned specifically for a Super Valu store. The parking requirements for a Super Valu grocery store are more stringent then the City'S. Therefore, the parking provided by this project is more than adequate, and should provide additional parking for the Priordale Mall merchants. Commercial/Retail Enhancement The Priordale Mall has had very mixed results over the years. The anchoring of the Priordale Mall with the grocery store will positively impact the Priordale Mall and it's merchants. The Economic Development Committee anticipates that the Mall will experience more traffic and conversely be able to hold smaller tenants longer. The addition of another tenant, such as, a drug store will strengthen the vitality of the Mall even further. Employment The proposed Super Valu store will add an additional 30-50 full and part-time jobs. The employment mar not be significant in numbers relative to our neighbor1ng cities, however, this increase in employment will make Super Va1u the third largest employer of our city. The jobs created provides a benefit to those persons who are currently commuting to jobs in that they can shorten their travelling time and save on costly commuting. Project Quality The Committee members spent a great deal of time with Kathleen Nye-Reiling as the staff and Committee negotiated the particulars of this project. Nye-Reilin<1 has proven to be an honest, sincere developer representatlve. The staff have spent a great deal of time reviewing the project characteristics to ensure a quality development. During the course of many negotiations, the developer has been very agreeable in their commitment to enhancing the site and making City recommended quality improvements to the Plan. The Economic Development Committee anticipates that the City council and the community will be pleased with the development because of its quality, the enhancement to the commercial area, and the business stimulation that results from this project. ,01).,-, L..,jj.'.LI 4. "'''''''''.1 J. 1/..... Attachment E BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS scon COUNTY, MINNESOTA Page 1 of 3 Date February 6, 1990 Resolution No.. 90015 Motion by Commissioner Str()l1'Wall Seconded by Commissioner Mackie RESOLUTION NO. 90015; COMMENTING ON THE PROPOSED CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 2-1 WHEREAS, a proposed City of Prior Lake Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No. 2-1 was filed with the Scott County Board of Commisioners on January 12, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Scott County Board of Commissioners has adopted Resolution No. 88116; Establishing the Scott County Policy and Procedures Regarding Tax Increment Financing; and WHEREAS, the Prior Lake City Council has set February 20, 1990, as the date for the public hearing regarding the Proposal, at which hearing comments or questions relating to the Proposal will be received; and WHEREAS, the Scott County Tax Increment Financing Review Team (the Team) met with City of Prior Lake representatives regarding the Proposal on January 25, 1990; and WHEREAS, the responsiveness and thoroughness of the presentation by the City of Prior Lake representatives addressed all of the issues contained in the Scott County TIF Policy and Procedures as well as the questions of the Team; and YES NO Koniarski Bohnsack Mertz Stromwall Mackie Koniarski Bohnsack Mertz Stromwall Mackie State of Minnesota } 55. County of Scott I, Joseph F. Ries, Duly appointed, Qualified and acting County Administrator for the County of Scott, State of Minnesota. do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Scott County, Minnesota, at their session held on the day of 19_, now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Shakopee, Minnesota, this day of County Admlnl.'r.'or 01010-2004 Iy Admlnl"rI'or'. 0..11I.... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS scon COUNTY, MINNESOTA Page 2 of 3 Resolution No.. 90015 Date February 6, 1990 Motion by Commissioner Strorrwall Mackie Seconded by Commissioner WHEREAS, the assistance and cooperation of the City of Prior Lake in expediting this TIF review allows the County Board to make its comments available for the public hearing. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that upon the recommendations of the Scott County Tax Increment Financing Review Team (the Team), the Board of Commissioners in and for the County of Scott, Minnesota, goes on record with the following comments regarding the proposal: 1. That the information presented by the City of Prior Lake representatives at the meeting with the Team on January 25, 1990, addressed all of the issues contained in Scott County Resolution No. 88116. 2. That the proposed district consists of parcels whose soil conditions are such that before development can occur, it will be necessary to excavate and backfill with engineered fill. The estimated costs of correcting the existing soil conditions will exceed the anticipated fair market value upon completion of the preparation. 3. That the proposed development is consistent with the City's land use plan which was adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.851 - 473.872 and reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. YES NO Koniarski Bohnsack Mertz Stromwall Mackie Koniarski Bohnsack Mertz Stromwall Mackie State of Minnesota } 55. County of Scott I, Joseph F. Ries, Duly appointed, qualified and acting County Administrator for the County of Scoll, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Scoll County, Minnesota, at their session held on the day of 19 _, now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Shakopee, Minnesota, this day of Counl, Admlnlllrelor 01010-2004 I, Admln..lrelor'. 0..11.... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS scon COUNTY, MINNESOTA Page 3 of 3 Date February 6, 1990 Resolution No.. 90015 Seconded by Commissioner Mackie Strafl\.Vall Motion by Commissioner 4. That the proposed development, in the opInIon of the municipality, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. 5. That the Proposal will not require the issuance of general obligation bonds and that the developer will provide financing for the Proposal 6. That given the present financial prospects of the beneficiary of the Proposal, the opportunity for significantly increased property tax revenues makes for a good return on investment associated with the Proposal. 7. That based upon the presentation of the city of Prior Lake and with the understanding that the district will have a maximum duration of twelve (12) years and thereafter be dissolved, and the full estimated market value will be available as a tax revenue source. 8. That the City of Prior Lake has significantly less than ten percent (10%) of its tax capacity subject to TIF. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that given the favorable consideration by the Prior Lake City Council regarding the concern as to the limitation on the duration of the district, the Scott County Board of Commissioners goes on record in support of the Proposal. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the County Administrator is directed to forthwith convey this Resolution to the Prior Lake City Council through its City Manager for placement into the record of the Public Hearing held pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subd. 2, on February 6, 1990. YES NO Koniarski X Koniarski Bohnsack X Bohnsack Mertz X Mertz Stromwall X Stromwall Mackie X Mackie State of Minnesota } ss. County of Scott I, Joseph F. Ries, Duly appointed, qualified and acting County Administrator for the County of Scott, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a reso] llt. i on with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Scott County, Minnesota, at their session held on the 6th dayof FebruaIVl9~, now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Shako pee, Minnesota, this 7th 199 01010-2004 Admlnl,lr,lcw', o.,lll"" AGENDA ITEM #4 Attachment F INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 719 Box 539 · 5300 WestWood Drive Southeast Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 · 447-2185 February 13, 1990 Dave Unmacht, City Manager City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota street S.E. Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 Dear Mr. Unmacht and City Council Members: The Prior Lake School Board has voted unanimously to support the Prior Lake TIF District as outlined under the following conditions: 1. The existing time period as set forth in the proposal would not be extended 2. The proceeds should be used for soil corrections and street improvements onlr and not expanded to other uses or projects not def1ned by this existing pro~osal 3. The overall amount of the TIF valuation w1thin the City of Prior Lake should remain within the guidelines as set forth by Scott County 4. This project is truly a project that meets the test of "what if" re: this project would not be able to proceed without the soil corrections and street improvements being completed with TIF money. The district does have a concern for the realignment of County Road #23 to meet Five Hawks Avenue. In discussions with Citr staff it is understood that this realignment will be a top priorlty when a development project is found for the adjoining areas. Sincerely yf)rs, ~ n ~~~ Dr. Les Sonnabend Interim Superintendent LS:ojr c.c. Bill Schmokel Mel Sauter An Equal Opportunity School District Paee 4/Januarv 29. 1990IPRJOR LA~~~RJ~ #4 o . . IDIOnS EditorlaJ: Yes, a super value At the heart of almost any small town, you 'U find a common character - the local grocery store. In the Midwest, it was that way for decade upon decade, generation. upon generation, _until mass merchandising and centralized shopping patterns developed in a generation which uses a car more readily than its predecessors. Much has changed. Then again, much has stayed the same. The demand remains for a local grocery store, the preference of local residents to shop at home rather than drive many miles for the most basic commodi- ties. But the demand also dictated that the "small" store had to make amends - large amends _ to maintain the loyalty of local residents knowing they could get a better deal elsewhere. A recent proposal which would site a 30,000- to 4O,OOO-square-foot Super Valu supennarket near the Priordale Mall stands tall on its own merits. It would provide Prior Lake with a modem and large enough grocery center, a virtual one-stop food market supe- rior to either the current Radennacher's Super Valu or Hauser's lOA. It would meet and exceed the minimum criteria demanded by residents who increasingly have worked trips to warehouse type supermarkets in Bumsville and elsewhere into their busy, two-in- come schedules. But aside from the basics, the project proposed before the city's new Economic Development Au- thority bas other virtues of signiflClnce _' pluses which only make the idea more attractive. First, it would carry its own weight, for the most part. Tax increment financing - generally using new property tax doUars to pay for site improve. ments needed - would be of the most conservative nature (from the city's standpoint), forcing the de. veloper to provide money up front rather than public bonds leaving the city at risk. The supennarket would be tied to the construc- tion of a new ring road, providing better, safer access to the building as well as the Priordale MaU. The store would be located next to a struggling mall, whose major anchor is a grocery store almost half the size of the Proposed supennarket. As strip malls are increasingly discovering, the trick to . successful center is not always a major department store tenant, whose financial security (Carson, Sears and Bloomingdales come to mind) appear increas- ingly at risk these days. Rather, the draw of a competitive grocery store - an old fashioned ideal - serves as a heavy anchor. If.. .. Let's be honest. Uke any economic development project, the key to success is th.orough planning and a sensible consideration of demographics. Call it common sense-plus. Priordale Mall will continue to struggle if the stores within it serve a clientele too fragmented to cover overhead costs. The mall must market itself as a useful extension of the supennarket. It must do simple things, like improve' its appearance in what currently amounts to a run-down appearance where an attractive "back door" should be. And it must find another significant other - a second anchor to many the two free-standing structures. And plans to build an adequate infrastructure _ roads surrounding the new development _ must be well-planned, encouraging traffic free of snarl-ups and fender-bender mishaps. Parking must be abun- dant, providing maximum space rather than budget. conscious .minimals. The only thing missing from the. project is . promise. That is, a pledge from local residents that they will settle for "big enough" in lieu of the mega- stores already standing and being planned close to Prior Lake. Residents will have a chance to show their sup- port - and list their concerns, too - at a public hearing before the City Council Feb. 20. For now, we'll say we feel the project represents the hybrid of an old-fashioned idea aimed at the heart of a modem generation of shoppers and oonsumers. Let's hope enough of us agree. . 8)' JIM RICCIOU - .. . . Pa2e 4/Feb.,.an 12. 1990IPRlOR lAKE AMERICAN , ~ f . , , . . o . . IDIODS . , ~Editorlal: the role of business . ~ ' ,. . . Short of a surge of people power, Prior Lake's ments is within a realm of POSSibility. . :greatest resource for its future health may be its Small business can also help. Prior Lake's cur- ;businesses. rent Chamber of Commerce would be only to happy We've talked about the importance of people's to see local business owners join the chamber to turn 'concerns and emotional investment in Prior Lake. it into a more viable business voice in the commu- And, as always, that's important. Our greatest abililY nity. . is to support the city in its efforts for long term What can the chamber do? Only make investment ~nomic improvements and to keep ourselves in in the growing community easier, perhaps through ~tune with local current events. . such a simple service as providing JItollps to prospec- ~ But, admittedly, there's some things that peopl~ tive business makers, ~rving as a public relations 1-- at least, as individuals - can't do. voice on such issues as superma.rbt expansion, ~ We can't keep businesses in town. We can't open lobbying for council support for its members, etc. In {the doors of new business. And we can't individually general, a good chamber can provide leadership as ~invest large sums of money or land like businesses no other non-business resident can. . pn. . Investment by business also means giving Prior ~ The prospect of a 3O,OOO-square-foot supermar- Lake the benefit of the doubt during lean times. let in Prior Lake is important for several reasons. But Consider the situation at Gateway Center, current one of the most positive innue'nces Enivid Corp. 's home to Radermacher's. Should Radermacher's :and Super Valu 's project might have, if approved, on choose to move to another iocation in town, Gate- :us is the message that it sends to other businesses: way's remaining tenants might be tempted to jump 'rior Lake is worth investing in. the gun, finding retail space elsewhere rather than : It's DO secret that Prior Lake's economic expan- waiting for tho smoke to clear. · sion has been ooncentrated on strip maD and resideD- If informally .announced plans to expand ,die tial home development, each of which has' played an Gateway co~plex bold true, there may be DO mISOD important role in prepping the city for a better future. . for other tenants to leave the site. In fact, it ~gbt be : Now that the population, which will likely top in the city's (and residents') best interests iftbeySlly 11,000 in this year's census tally, has brought the right where they Ire. :people and strip malls have incubaled growing busi- Or, it mi~tllOt be. But businesses should at least :.nesses (including Radermacher's Super Valu~ busi- assess the SItuatiOn, avoiding I knee jerk reaction. :ness people with the resoUrt:e5 to do so must make. Of OOUJ'SC, residents can help.1ocal businesses by .the investment in Prior Lake. supporting and patronizing' them. After all, I~ . There's business to be bad. And the city, by support increases investor confidence. and Jives itaking inventory on availablecommerclallands, is businesses I more compeUing JeUOIl to mv. In ~iIIing to help investors find useful land. If the expansion in Prior Lake. In the eod, raidenb WiD see ;Pt:Oject is worthy enough, economic assistance in the the benefit in I diversitlcd tax bile. ~orm of taX increment financing for public improve- B! ~ Rlcaou .. ~ . , .. . , , .C . ..' ' .......'lI ). i,; '." ".'., '. ,~ '..~: ~~.~;, ::; . . '~., . .' .... ...... . .", t { . i k" ~ tr~lVtA~ 4~ /.:: /990 County stands behind use of TIF for Super Valu B)' AnD Schwartz Special Correspondent The Scott County Board went on reoord Tuesday backing a proposed 3O,cxx>-square-(oot grocery store to be built in Prior Lake. Under a development proposal which will be the subject of a public hearing inCity Han Feb. 20, the proj- ect would use tax increment rmane- ing (I1F). Since such financing would affect the oounty's tax base, the oounty board was entitled to review and comment OQ the project. Because o( poor soU coodillOOS on the site Dear PriordaJe Man, the developer and the city maintain that the project oould DOt be finaDa:d solely with private denars. With "pay as you go" tax increment dol- lars. tbe city would pay beck a Joan taken out by the developer to pay (or ~a r~'!~'~~.j\nd OC;ber related improvements. In e((ect, the proP- enr. tax dollars generated by the new building would help payoff the loan. Since no general obligation bonds will be issued (or the. eroject, and it is expected to significantly increase the propcny tax revenu~ (or the city, it is a good investment (or Prior Lake, according to the resQ- lution passed by the County Board Feb. 6. ~ The 3O,OOO-square-fOOl storo, which would be expandable te) 40,000 square feet, would employ 8Q to 90 full and pan-time employees, adding 40 to SO new jobs over the present Super Valu grocery store ~ the city, acCordin, to documentatiOl supplied by the Clty. I Annual payroll will be $85O,lXXi Estimated propeny taxes from ~ store, beginning in 1992, are pror I iected at $48,~~ ~.~. .: ., ~.."'f"''lf~' . AGENDA ITEM #4 Attachment H SJ\io'tdalL cMall [fnUE.~tou 12800 !JnJu~h.la.l Pa.t.' !Bou!,.IJQ...d, <::SulU 100 · Plymouth, o'Uc::::N , !J44 1 · (612) !J' 3-9800 February 7, 1990 Dear Dave: I?~c~ f..., r;;;:IVE:D C: - "'!J T5!J(} p~~ ~ Mr. Dave Unmacht City Manager, City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota Street Prior Lake, MN 55372 I attended a recent Planning Commission meeting regarding the proposed Enivid Corporation development of a Super Valu store on land located to the south of the land owned by Priordale Mall Investors. I understand that city staff has made several requests of Priordale Mall Investors in regard to Enivid's grocery development and I would like to reply to those requests. First, Priordale Mall is pleased that development is occurring in the surrounding areas. Indeed, it is this type of supporting retail activity that will strengthen Priordale Mall. We have agreed to provide cross-easements for parking for the new development because it ultimately will benefit the area and because Enivid is planning to pay for the parking lot improvements in return for the cross-easement. Priordale currently has a lease with Gateway for the IGA store at Priordale. At this time we do not know when IGA is planning to terminate their lease which expires in November 1991. If they do vacate early, or if they vacate in 1991, it is our intention to re-anchor the mall with a drug store. At that time, we will address plans to add landscaping to the mall area, restripe the parking lot, and add islands and lighting consistent with the grocery store lot. A new anchor store will probably mean a new entrance to the mall in the southwest corner. Again, we would like to wait until this is in the works before spending money on landscaping, striping, and lighting. Your request for a 12' easement for Toronto road and sidewalks will be granted as long as there are no costs to Priordale Mall for utility burial or for the relocation of the bus shelter. We are now investigating the bus shelter issue. We are willing to pay assessments for lighting, roads, and sidewalks. Finally, we join with Marquette Bank, Hollywood Inn, and many Prior Lake retailers in supporting the expansion of the retail district. It can only mean additional jobs and the opportunity to keep Prior Lake dollars in the community. ~~:;r~ Neil Boderman Priordale Mall Investors ~ IfI1 qO f}"./q... RESOLUTION 90-14 RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2-1 PLAN CENSUS '90 . MOTIONED BY WHITE SECONDED BY SCOTT WHEREAS, the Prior Lake Economic Development Authority (the "Authority"), pursuant to a resolution approved the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No. 2-1, dated February 20, 1990 (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Authority has transmitted the Plan, resolution, has applied to the City Council of Prior Lake, Minnesota (the "City") for the Plan; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the public interest that the City undertake and carry out the Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174 to 469.179, encompassing the area which is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, (which area is herein called "Tax Increment Financing District No 2-1" or the "District"); and and, by of the city approval of WHEREAS, the Plan sets forth the estimate of the economic impact of tax increment financing capacity values of all taxing jurisdictions Districts are located; and WHEREAS, the Board of Scott County, Minnesota, has been notified of the public hearing for the review of the Plan booklet, and fiscal and on the tax in which the WHEREAS, the School Board of Independent School District No. 719 has been notified of the public hearing for the review of the Plan booklet, and WHEREAS, the city has received and considered the Prior Lake County Board, and the School Independent School District No. 719, contents of the Plan booklet, and the City Council on February 20, 1990, published a notice of public hearing in newspaper of the City, conducted a public Plan booklet and received public comments comments of the Board of the respecting the WHEREAS, after having the official hearing on the on the same; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 Section 1. Section 2. section 3. section 4. section 5. Section 6. Section 7. The City finds and determines that there is a need for the activities of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Redevelopment Project to be financed, in part, by the tax increments from the Districts. The City finds and determines that the activities set forth in the Plan booklet will establish, for the City, the opportunity to eliminate blight, promote redevelopment and economic development. This development will create job opportunities and enhance the local tax base. The City finds and determines that for redevelopment activities and benefits are in the public interest the expenditures of the Districts purpose. The tax increment financing plan as set forth in the Plan booklet having been duly reviewed and considered is hereby approved and adopted, and the area contained in Tax Increment District No. 2-1 delineated and described in Exhibit A hereto is hereby designated as a soils condition district pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 19, of Minnesota Statutes. the provisions the resultant of the City and are a public The Citr finds that Tax Increment District No. 2-1 is a sOlls condition district, the specific basis for such determination is that less than 70 ~ercent of the parcels in the district are occupled by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements and that unusual terrain or soils deficiencies for 80 percent of the acreage in the district require substantial filling grading or other physical preparation for use. The estimated cost of the physical preparation excluding costs directly related to roads and local improvements, when added to the fair market value of the land upon inclusion in the district exceeds the fair market value of the land upon inclusion in the district exceeds the fair market value of the land upon completion of the preparation. Facts for this determination are set forth in the Plan booklet and shall be retained and made available to the public until Tax Increment District No. 2-1 has been terminated. That the proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. That the tax increment financing ~lan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent wlth sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project by private enterprise. section 8. section 9. section 10. Section 11. section 12. Section 13. That it is herebf found and determined that the tax increment financ1ng plan set forth in the Plan booklet conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. That the reasons and supporting facts for findings 5, 6, 7 and 8 as set forth on pages 8, 9 and 10 of the Plan booklet are by this reference confirmed and adopted. The Citr does not anticipate that relocation will be re9Ulred as a result of activities in the Distr1ct. If relocation is necessary then assistance will be provided to all persons, unless they desire otherwise, displaced by the implementation of the District. The City Manager shall re9Uest the auditor of Scott County to certify the or1gina1 tax capacity and original tax capacity local tax rate of the District approved by this resolution. That the city hereby states its intention to all of the captured tax capacity for pur~oses tax increment financing as per the conditlons forth in the Plan booklet. use of set That the City Council does hereby ap~rove the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Econom1C Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No. 2-1, dated February 20, 1990. Passed and adopted this 20th day of February, 1990. YES {Seal} NO Andren Fitzgerald Larson Scott White x Abstilned Absent X -X Andren Fitzgerald Larson Scott White EXHIBIT "A" TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 90-14 The following parcels are to be included in District No. 2-1: Parcel #25-177-002-0 Parcel #25-177-003-0 RESOLUTION 90-13 RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2 PLAN CENSUS '90 . MOTIONED BY SCOTT SECONDED BY WHITE WHEREAS, the Prior Lake Economic Development Authority (the "Authority"), ~ursuant to Resolution No. 90-13 approved the City of Prlor Lake, Minnesota, Economic Development Authority Redevelopment Project Plan dated February 20, 1990 (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Authority has transmitted the plan resolution, has applied to the City Council of Prior Lake, Minnesota (the "City"), for the Plan; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the public interest that the City undertake and carry out the Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 469.001 to 469.047, encompassing the area which is more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, (which area is herein called the "City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Economic Development Authority Redevelopment Project" or the "Project"); and and, by of the City approval of WHEREAS, the City on the date hereof, after having notice of public hearing in the official the City, conducted a public hearing on received public comments on the same. published newspaper the Plan a of and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that section 1. That the area described in said Plan is a Redevelopment project within the meaning of Minnesota statutes, section 469.002, Subd. 14, and is described and designated in Exhibit A attached hereto. section 2. That said Plan and project will carry purpose and policy of Minnesota Statutes, 469. out the Chapter 4629 Dakota 51. 5.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 That the land in the Project area would not be made available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought. That the Redevelopment Plan for the Project area will afford maximum op~ortunity, consistent with sound needs of the C1ty as a whole, for the redevelopment of the such area by private enterprise. That is it hereby found and determined that the Redevelopment Plan for the Project area set forth in the Plan booklet conforms to the general plan for the development of the city as a whole. That the City council of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota does hereby approve the Plan as presented in the booklet entitled "City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Economic Development Authority Redevelopment Project Plan", dated February 20, 1990. Passed and adopted this 20th day of February, 1990. section 3. section 4. Section 5. Section 6. {Seal} YES NO Andren Fitzgerald Larson Scott White Andren Fitzgerald Larson Scott White x AbstaIned Absent X X- Lake EXHIBIT A TO PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 90-13 The boundaries of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, Economic Development Authority Redevelopment Project are identified as follows: commencing at the intersection of the northwest right-of-way line of Trunk Highway 13 and the south right-of-way line of 170th street; thence northeasterly along said northwest right-of-way line of Trunk Highway 13 to an intersection with the west right-of-way line of Duluth Avenue; thence north along said west right-of-way line of Duluth Avenue to an intersection with the north ri<1ht-of-way line of Anna Trail; thence east along said north rl<1ht-of-way line of Anna Trail continuing to an intersection wlth the west right-of-way line of Brunswick Avenue; thence south along said west right-of-way line of Brunswick Avenue to an intersection with the north boundary line of the Colonial Estates Subdivisions; thence west along said north boundary line of the Colonial Estates Subdivisions to an intersection with the east boundary line of Parcel #25-902-042-0; thence south along said east boundary line of Parcel #25-902-042-0 and continuing south to an intersection with the south section line of section 2, Township 114, Range 22; thence west along said south section line to an intersection with the northwest right-of-way line of Trunk Highway 13 and there terminating. PRELIMINARY REPORT AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 90-12 STREET IMPROVEMENT - STORM SEWER, GRADING AGGREGATE BASE, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, SIDEWALK, BIKEWAY, LIGHTING, AND APPURTENANT WORK FEBRUARY 20, 1990 I. TYPE OF WORK The general nature of the improvement project is for the upgrading of Toronto Avenue from Tower street to Trunk Highway 13, the realignment of Tower Street and Vine Street, and the realignment of Duluth Avenue to the realignment of Tower Street and Vine Street. Improvements in this project include storm sewer, grading, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, sidewalks, bikeways, lighting, and landscaping. II. LOCATION OF THE PROJECT The project area is located in the south half of Section 2, Township 114, Range 22 in Scott County, Minnesota. Project location of the different project areas are descibed as follows and as shown on the attached map: AREA II The upgrading of Toronto Avenue from Tower Street to Trunk Highway 13. The realignment of Tower Street and Vine Street from CSAH 23 to Toronto Avenue and the realignment and extension of Duluth Avenue to the new alignment of Tower Street and Vine Street. AREA I III.DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA I The improvement will remove and reconstruct the existing street pavement section on Toronto Avenue. storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, lighting, and landscaping improvements will be included with the reconstruction of the pavement section. A portion of Toronto Avenue from Tower street to approximately 600 feet north is designated as a Municipal state Aid (MSA) street and will be built to MSA Standards. From approximately 600 feet north to 800 feet north of Tower street, the street will receive a bituminous overlay with no concrete curb and gutter. This portion of Toronto Avenue is planned eventually to curve to the east and connect with Franklin Trail. When this portion of Toronto Avenue is routed to the east, the street section will be reconstructed to MSA Standards. The remaining portion of Toronto Avenue will be reconstructed to a permanent street pavement section with concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, lighting and defined driveway entrances to adjacent commercial properties. AREA II The improvement in this area includes the realignment of Vine street and Tower Street and the realignment and extension of Duluth Avenue to this new alignment. Vine street and Tower Street have been designated as Municipal State Aid streets and will be built to MSA Standards. The realignment of these streets was required to obtain MSA designation of these streets and Toronto Avenue. Storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, bikeway, and lighting improvements will be included with the construction of the street pavement section. IV: LENGTH OF PROJECT AREA I & II This proposed project area consists of approximately 2,150 lineal feet of bituminous street and sidewalk construction and 1,900 lineal feet of lighting improvements. V. FEASIBILITY From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible and can be accomplished as proposed and not in conjunction with any other project. VI. ESTIMATED COST The following costs were prepared based upon Estimate and are subject to change depending design of the project, bids received, and performed. The method of assessment and determined at the Assessment Hearing. The estimated project cost below includes 25% indirect costs: an Engineer's on the final actual work rate will be The street construction of Toronto Avenue from Tower street to Trunk Highway 13; the sidewalk and bikeway construction on Toronto Avenue, Tower street - Vine Street realignment and Duluth Avenue; and the lighting construction on Toronto Avenue and Tower Street realignment to the Duluth Avenue intersection. PROJECT COST ............... $317,250.00 The estimated project cost below includes 18% indirect costs: This project cost is for the new street construction for the reali9nment of Tower Street to Vine Street and Avenue extenslon to the realignment. Previously both Street and Duluth Avenue were improved and assessed. The indirect costs are less as bonding is not necessary this project area as MSA funds will be utilized to fund project area. The cost estimate for this area was without the benefit of soil borings. This soil boring is currently underway. needed Duluth Tower for this done work PROJECT COST $247,500.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST ......... $564,750.00 VII.PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED The area proposed to be assessed is every lot, piece, and parcel benefitting from said improvement, whether abutting or not, within the following described areas: The south 1/2 of Section 2, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota. Specific property descriptions included in the description area, but not exclusive, are as follows: above The plat of Brooksville Center, 1st Addition The plat of Brooksville Center, 2nd Addition The unplatted pro~erty abutting Toronto Avenue in the City of Prlor Lake, Scott County, Minnesota. VIII.ESTIMATE ASSESSMENTS The improvement cost will be recovered through a combination of special assessments and Municipal State Aid Funds, and excess increment from the tax increment district. Excess increment from the tax increment district may also be used to reduce MSA funds for the project. This improvement area will have three different assessment rates and includes the street improvements to Toronto Avenue from Tower street to Trunk Highway 13, lighting improvement on Tower Street and Toronto Avenue, and sidewalk and bikeway improvement on Duluth Avenue, Tower street, and Toronto Avenue. The project costs for this area will be assessed as follows: 1. Bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, and landscaping improvements will be assessed at 60% of the cost. 2. Sidewalk and bikeway improvements will be assessed at 100% of the cost. 3. Lighting improvements will be assessed at 100% of the cost. street overlay/reconstruction and curb improvements of presently paved streets have been assessed at sixty (60%) of the total project cost against the benefitting properties in past projects. The portion of Toronto Avenue from approximately 600 feet to 800 feet north of Tower Street will not be upgraded to a permanent street section with concrete curb and gutter at this time. Property abutting this portion of Toronto Avenue will not be assessed until the street is reconstructed to a permanent street section in the future. sidewalk and bikeway improvements are to be assessed 100% of the cost and will be assessed to the individual property owner where the improvement is done. Lighting will be assessed at 100% of the cost and concurrently both sides of a street where improvement is done. assessed lighting ASSESSABLE COSTS street Improvement Project Cost (Toronto Ave.).. $244,000.00 Sidewalk Improvement Project Cost .............. $ 38,000.00 Lighting Improvement Project Cost .............. $ 35,250.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST ........................ $317,250.00 60% of $244,000.00 is street Project Cost Assessable $146,400.00 100% of Sidewalk Project Cost is Assessable ........ $ 38,000.00 100% of Lighting Project Cost is Assessable ........ $ 35,250.00 TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST ..................... $219,650.00 NON ASSESSABLE COST ....................... $ 97,600.00 The remainin9 forty percent (40%) of a street resurfacing improvement lS usually recovered by the general ad valorem propertr tax paid by the entire community. A portion of Toronto Avenue lS on the MSA system. It is proposed to collect MSA funds and utilize this money to pay the City's 40% share of the street improvements. AREA I & II ASSESSMENT PROJECT ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT Street, storm sewer, 1,653 $88.57/FF $146,406.21 concrete curb & gutter, and landscaping Sidewalk & bikeway 3,250 $11.69/FF $ 37,992.50 Lighting 3,150 $11. 19/FF $ 35,248.50 TOTAL $219,647.21 Tower Street & Duluth Avenue cost, not including sidewalk utilized on this area. intersection relocation project and lighting. MSA funds to be Street Improvement Project Cost ................. $247,500.00 CITY SHARE (40%)................. .......... $ 97,600.00 TOTAL MSA FUNDS FOR PROJECT 90-12 .......... $345,100.00 COST SUMMARY The costs of the improvements to the project areas will be recovered through Special Assessments, Municipal State Aid Funds and excess tax increment financing. Street Improvement ...... Assessable (60%) ...... $146,406.21 Sidewalk Improvement .... Assessable (100%) ..... $ 37,992.50 Lighting Improvement .... Assessable (100%) ..... $ 35,248.50 Street Improvement ...... City Share (40%) (MSA). $ 97,602.79 SUBTOTAL .................... $317,250.00 Street Realignment Project Cost (MSA)............ $247,500.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST .......... $564,750.00 ASSESSABLE AMOUNT TOTAL .......... $219,647.21 MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS TOTAL.. 345 102.79 TOTAL PROJECT COST .......... 564,750.00 I hereby certify that this plan, specifications, or prepared by me or under my direct supervision and duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of Minnesota: report was that I am a of the state Date: February 20, 1990 ~~~~ P.E. Reg. No. 010609 I hereby certify that this plan, specifications, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota: Br~eY~ Date: February 20, 1990 Reg. No. 017590 .s ....&-~ ~ ------ Project 90-12 Existing Alignment Proposed Alignment TOW€It . "LL A.....T..f!llT EAST 2 ......... " ,.. . uc . "(,4'" .~..... .,... ....- ........ . ...-c .:C I:. a' C- ....n , .-. COIID. 110. 1001 ~... - )ooe(>> . -.... ~. ...... J ..... .I!!. - - - ~... . . .J~ It . I FRAN "'~': -5 . ~ ...... , .... . . f i t 'I' RESOLUTION #90-11 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT #90-12 CENSUS '90 . MOTIONED BY SECONDED BY WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 90-06 of the City Council, on February 5, 1990, a report has been prepared City's Engineering Department with reference improvement of: adopted by the to the 1. Toronto Avenue from Tower street to Trunk Highway 13. 2. Realignment of Vine Street and Tower Street between CSAH 23 and Toronto Avenue. 3. Realignment and extension of Duluth Avenue to the new alignment of Tower Street and Vine Street, by the installation of storm sewer, grading, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk, and appurtenant work, and this report was received by the Council on February 16, 1990. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of property as described in the report for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $564,750.00. 2. A Public Hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 19th day of March in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8:00 (p.m.) and the city Manager shall give mailed and published notice of such hearlng and improvement as required by law. Passed and adopted this th day of , 1990. YES NO Andren Fitzgerald Larson Scott White Andren Fitzgerald Larson Scott White David J. Unmacht City Manager City of Prior Lake {Seal} 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245 "?'~;';,.i,1~, ''; .. .~;~~_\~,\,{ .I~. ., ~' r., I: :'~ , . -::5'," .... oj! 'i .~ '~ I 1 ~ "' I ,. "' I ~ ~ I I ,- '1 2 I .. I I z II ~ , , II ,'. ,. I _. ,I I I I' I I i I I ~ :11 iH I r .,' I I . I , " I , i . . , .'-- I . I' . ~. . 1 ,\... "-'-H, ,. e -~.. T,-. ("]:' . .'.' ~ . \ \ I1J\~ \ rn \ , ,.(I~ \ \ \1\11 1;111 I I I o 1:: II r :' I ~,' \ I . \ - . " , \ \ ~\ \ ~I . I ,I ',I \, \ \ \\ 11111\ I iii i I I i '. , T' ' ,t. ~AR~ ,--.. [- PRIORDALE MA: RET~~ DISTRICT ~~ ELEVATIONS - 1M . -- -- ----~-- - - - .----- --- mviJI'mKXlOi AlCllltttlJ , ~/ .-.............. ....-.. ....... ,..., ..,......... IjA~ ~.~.::r.. . .. -..;."" --. - .- ,-. - '---. . . ' , " " "., ': ~ n Ii II ~ \". "',.~: ";"''1':,.1: 1: q i II ~ ~ , ' :', :>'J:), 'i:;: :;: ':;! is! :.:. . /..'. ."'!\"""i I I 5 ! ".1, ;t,' ',', ,- ~ . , .' i. l~""'" I 5 .. . "', \c . , . , I" .; ~, ~ r, ~ : ~ ' ,: ~ ~ 1\ . . ". J . L:>'f f; '( ; ~ '; 1 \ ;;:,';' ; i ,," i u; H II . I 'J.. <<,... -" \ - - ,,), "..... ~ ~ \ --- ' , I."........ ... _____ -- " Ii.... .... -', Or.._ ._ _ ...- /, ~ " - ..... ___'PI Ih...... ' ~, It....... -... .~ "'( _/i~ 1~';~li;I~~~ 'l ( I 'i A\\':"',) !/ r: C?I' - I I I .."" I l~\\\\\\\i) I ~ /. ,I I I~ .1, I U ,A I I J " ~ ./ I ~,.. I ~ ' ~ \: I', I ~ \' \, , '" . " I. I . I ~ _ \I , , ' i i '.\,.,.....". I ~ : - 'j :: ('\\,,\\\\\\\\ ...\' ... /.>./ . ", ~ ,~':/,'I ' ! J.. :. '\\ r ..\. .\\Ijir ", --:....\ \ ," I' I "J' c:..., . "/", I '.. ., '. \ I I · I ,---- __ II'::;;':~' -:: \ . --: J " '" ' 1 ,'. ./ " .~, I;" ~~"".i i I i 1111111 \\ ' / , ; I' J,' ,.' 't 111 'rGlllllllllillllfV '~:/" \./ /' . i ,lr \; \ . ',; ;! ~ . ,I. (:ljltlllllllllllllltIHIttfl) \ I ! I II !'r;lilll~il'I'I,Ilil'I.:l, (",l~IIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIHII~fi) '\ ~ J ! :tl:,1. ,I: t IIW\; Iii ~IIIII fD ~ Iltlllllllllll Htll H 1'ltHt~ttfl) \\ ~ .I}.x~ I.': , \ I . 15'5*h'IU~~ LJlJillU,,_ "ill UJI~lllllrtU 1~)~,1~~!.I!~~~!~J;n ' - I 'Hn _ ,_ 'I_~ ;. .'-- '~~L!, ~' ' \ I", J . ~. ... ,_ J . , '., :,' .,,'. '. ... _ . fIA-1l:" r--PR..-v -r:~=-~.~. ~TAICf..., . ~,,;~ l --'C" SITE ~ ~". ':"h"... . ~',_" ._",- · _.~, , _~I~~~I.:. 1..~ - - . .- y i " _i;. ;~'~~f;~j'f~ ~'i l_:'i -, :">w ;..- .. l .. ~ I .UI ill i I~ 'I ! 1III ! I! II el ; ~ I !! I I I I il I i I c? i , , -/ I ' 'i . ~ - ~ ./ ,- ,. I I J '\ ( 1QAONTO NEMJE _ua- ~~ =:--...." ~ ~~ 'W" --- "".- . ....~ ........ ........ .... - A1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PRIORDALE MALL RETAL DISTRICT