HomeMy WebLinkAbout11- Hidden Vew Preliminary Plat
"SU02Cl"
AGENDA NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
DISCUSSION:
11
JAMES HAYES, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HIDDEN VIEW
AND RESOLUTION 93-33 SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS
MAY 17, 1993
Mr. Ray Brandt has petitioned for preliminary
plat approval for Hidden View Subdivision in
accordance with section 6-3-3 (B) of the
Subdivision Ordinance. The Council has 120
days to render a decision following a complete
application unless an extension has been
agreed upon by the applicant and the City. The
120 day period expires August 5, 1993.
The 9 acre subject site is currently being
farmed with adjacent ve~etation left idle.
There are several large p1ne trees along the
easterly property line and numerous trees on
the adjacent property to the east. Current
stormwater runoff for the site sheet drains
from the northerly end to the southerly end.
The proposal as presented is for preliminary
plat approval to subdivide the property into
15 single family lots with a density of 2.45
units ~er acre (U/A). The City Code allows for
a dens1ty of 3.5 U/A.
The Planning commission conducted a
preliminary plat hearing on April 15, 1993.
The following motion was recorded in the
minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of
April 15, 1993. A copy of the Planning
commission minutes are attached.
MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO
RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF THE
HIDDEN VIEW PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTINGENT UPON:
A. ACCEPTABLE UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT.
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
B. ACCEPTABLE WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT AND
ACCEPTABLE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN, IF
NECESSARY.
C. ACCEPTABLE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN,
INCLUDING GRADING AND SITE CONSTRUCTION
PLANS.
D. ACCEPTABLE PLANS FOR SANITARY
WATERMAIN, AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
E. ACCEPTABLE STORM WATER DRAINAGE
CALCULATIONS TO MAINTAIN A PRE-DEVELOPMENT
RUNOFF RATE LEAVING THE SITE.
SEWER,
F. THE POND BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY AS AN
OUTLOT.
RATIONALE BEING THAT THE SUBDIVISION FULFILLS
THE REQUIREMENTS AS SETFORTH IN SECTION 6-3-2
OF THE SUBDIVISION 'ORDINANCE 87-10 AND IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH
IS CURRENTLY IN PLACE.
Considerable public testimony was recorded
indicating the following concerns:
1. Lot size is too small.
2. Traffic will increase dramatically.
3. Safety of children relative to traffic
and the design of the pond.
4. Density is too high.
5. Street design.
6. Overall development is not consistent
with the neighborhood and will downgrade
the area.
The issues relative to this plat are all
directly related to the Planning Commission
contingencies. All Planning issues have been
resolved, with only some minor engineering
issues still to be addressed.
Item A has not yet been addressed at this
point, but the contingency states that the
easements must be shown on the final plat.
Staff will assist the developer in completing
these items before for final plat
consideration.
Item B has not been satisfied b~ the developer
at this point. While Engineerlng staff has
determined that no wetlands exist on the site,
no report has been submitted. The developer
will submit an acceptable wetland delineation
report before final plat approval. No wetland
replacement plan is required since no wetlands
are proposed to be filled in any manner.
Item C is partially deficient in that an
acce~table grading plan has not been
subm1tted. The storm water management plan has
been submitted and is being reviewed by
Engineering staff. This plan requires that the
proposed NURP pond be sized according to Best
Management Practices. The proposed pond is
satisfactory and in fact, may decrease in size
after final review. This will not affect the
lot lines shown next to Outlot A. While the
developer may applr for a grading permit after
Council approval, lt will not be granted until
an acceptable grading plan has been
submitted.
Item D has not been finalized, but will be
addressed in detail when the developer's
agreement is signed at the final plat stage.
The plans are close to being acceptable at
this point, but will still be listed as a
contingency of approval.
Item E has not been completely satisifed by
the developer. He has submitted calculations
which show the pre-development runoff rate
compared to the post-development runoff rate.
These figures are in the process of being
reviewed by Engineering staff. Preliminary
review shows that these calculations are well
within City standards.
Item F has been satisfied on the new plat
drawing. The lots that were affected from the
ori~inal drawing are' still consistent with the
Zon1ng and Subdivision Ordinances for the
City.
Another item should be added as a contingency
of City Council approval. The large outlot on
the north end of the site must not request
additional access to C.R. 42. The City
Ordinances require access from a public road,
of which C.R. 42 is not. The plat currently
shows the outlot being divided into three
lots. The dashed line on the easterly
one-third of this lot must be omitted in an
approved plat drawing. This item was
inadvertently omitted from the Planning
Commission's recommendation to the Council. In
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
ACTION REQUIRED:
order to meet the city Ordinances, this item
must be added as a contingency of approval.
The proposed site is currently zoned R-1,
Urban Residential, with the S-D, Shoreland
District in place over ap~roximately 80% of
the southern area of the slte. This site is an
infill property in Prior Lake and development
was expected in this area in the near future.
The Comprehensive Plan has recognized the
growth that will take place in this area and
this development is consistent with the
long-range plan for this neighborhood
district.
1.
Approve the preliminary plat subject to
the Planning commission contingencies A,
B, C, D, and E. In addition to the
contingency of the outlot to the north
eliminating the easterly dashed lot
line.
2. Deny the application based on specific
reasons.
3. Continue the hearin~ for lack of
information or detal1 with specific
direction to the developer and or staff.
Staff recommends alternative number 1.
Action depends on Council discussion.
"RS9333"
RESOLUTION 93-33
RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL SETTING FORTH
CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING AND RELATED TO PRELIMINARY
PLAT FOR HIDDEN VIEW.
MOTION BY:
SECONDED BY:
WHEREAS, the city Council has approved the Preliminary Plat of
Hidden View;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does require the following
conditions to be met, prior to release of, and recording of said
plat:
1. Utility and draina~e easements shown on the final plat
acceptable to the C1ty Engineer.
2. Wetland delineation report acceptable to the city Engineer.
3. Plans for sanitary sewer, watermain, and street improvements
acceptable to the City Engineer at the time of final plat.
4. Storm water management plan, including grading plan
acceptable to the City Engineer.
5. Storm water drainage calculations to maintain a
pre-development runoff rate leaving the site acceptable to
the City Engineer.
6. The illegal lot on the easterly edge of the outlot to the
north should be eliminated to conform to City standards.
Passed and adopted this 17th day of May, 1993.
Yes
No
Andren
Fitzgerald
Kedrowski
Scott
White
Andren
Fitzgerald
Kedrowski
Scott
White
Frank Boyles
City Manager
City of Prior Lake
{Seal}
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPOiITUNITY El'1PLOYER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 15, 1993
The April 15, 1993, Planning commission Meeting was called to
order by Roseth at 7:30 P.M. Those present were Commissioners
Roseth, Arnold, Loftus, and Greenfield, Director of Planning
Horst Graser, Assistant City Planner Deb Garross, Associate
Planner Jim Hayes, and Secretary Rita Schewe. Commissioner
Wuellner was absent.
ITEM I - REVIEW MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS
WRITTEN.
Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Arnold, Greenfield, and
Roseth. MOTION CARRIED.
ITEM II - PUBLIC HEARING - HIDDEN VIEW PRELIMINARY PLAT
The Public Hearing was called to order at 7:35 P.M. The public
was in attendance and a sign-up sheet was circulated.
Ray Brandt, 1600 West 143rd street, Apt. 205, Burnsville,
representing Argus Development of 3459 Washington Drive, Eagan,
MN, presented the information on the Preliminary Plat for Hidden
View. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 15 single
family lots. The northerly 3 lots will not be platted at this
time, but when they are, will conform to this preliminary plat.
A retention pond will be constructed at one end of the project
to address the storm water management issues.
Associate Planner Jim Hayes, presented the information as per
memo. The preliminary plat of Hidden View is being processed as
a standard subdivision with the procedures and requirements
outlined in Section 6-3-2 of Subdivision Ordinance 87-10 and is
consistent with the comprehensive Plan. The property is 9 acres
and an infill site and development was expected in the near
future. The square footage of the lots range from 12,202 to
20,329 which meets the requirements of the ordinance. The
development will have a variety of styles and price ranges and
should be compatible with the existing neighborhoods. The
subject site has previously been assessed for water and sewer
improvements and has no outstanding delinquencies. The
topography is a major feature of the site and home styles have
been created to take advantage of this feature. The Engineering
Department has listed 5 items to be contingent upon approval.
4629 Dakota St. SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph, (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY S"1PLDYER
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
APRIL 15, 1993
PAGE 2
The park dedication requirement for Hidden view will be in the
form of a cash dedication as opposed to a land dedication.
L~nnea Owens-14144 Shady Beach Trail, had comments on
S1zes being too small, traffic concerns, safety issues,
in children for schools, price of homes, and development
fit into the neighborhood.
the lot
increase
does not
Keith Randa-14112 Bayview Circle, was concerned on increased
traffic, wants street changed to a CUl-de-sac, and does not want
tranquility and peace disturbed.
Bret Nrstrom-14220 Shadr Beach, concerned on the
retent10n pond, mosqu1toes, maintenance of
landscaping, and uses part of the subject
purposes.
Wayne Svenby-14248 Shady Beach Trail, should have cul-de-sac,
a neighborhood park, and lot sizes not uniform with the rest of
the neighborhood.
safety by the
~ond, fences,
s1te for his own
Bret Nystrom-14220 Shady Beach Trail, stated that since Aspen and
Shady Beach Trail were joined, traffic and crime became a
problem in the neighborhood. Mr. Nystrom stated he has painted
slow signs on the street to curb the speed of traffic.
Joe Schaefer-14143 Shady Beach Trail, feels the
high, the development would be a downgrade to
and the road is too hilly.
Chris Green-14320 Shady Beach Trail, remarked on the safety for
children, contour of land causes traffic hazards, and subdivision
should be for 8 homes.
density is too
the neighborhood
John Bradley-14190 Bayview circle, noted he too was against the
development as he felt the lot sizes were too small, increase
traffic, drainage, and it would downgrade the neighborhood.
The public portion of the hearing was closed at this time.
commissioners Comments:
commissioner Greenfield asked about sidewalks, park, trail
system, drainage, size of lots, and density of houses.
Commissioner Arnold remarked on the pond requirements, DNR
report, erosion control, traffic, and density of houses.
Commissioner Loftus commented on the pond dimensions, park
availability, the lots on Shady Beach were unsewered when platted
thereby making those lots larger, and the unusual shape of
the ~roposed lots.
Comm1ssioner Roseth commented on the pond, Police should be
involved on the traffic issues, merging the two inside corner
lots into one lot, and status of the northerly 3 lots.
city Engineer Larry Anderson, responded to the Commissioners
questions in his report. The pond is mandated by the State for
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 15, 1993
PAGE 3
stormwater management, Prior Lake is the fee owner, fences are no
longer used as they are more of a hazard than a help, and the
outlot would be dedicated to the city. In the matter of traffic,
it has been found that when the police were asked to patrol the
area which complained on a traffic problem, it turned out to be
the neighbors themselves that were issued citations for the
violations.
Deb Garross reported on future County Road 42 access, and that
the subdivision meets Prior Lake's ordinance requirements.
MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY
COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF THE HIDDEN VIEW PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTINGENT
UPON:
A) ACCEPTABLE UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE FINAL
PLAT.
B) ACCEPTABLE WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT AND ACCEPTABLE WETLAND
REPLACEMENT PLAN, IF NECESSARY.
C) ACCEPTABLE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, INCLUDING GRADING AND
SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
D) ACCEPTABLE PLANS FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS.
E) ACCEPTABLE STORM WATER DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS TO MAINTAIN A
PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF RATE LEAVING THE SITE.
F) THE POND BE DEDICATED TO'THE CITY AS AN OUTLOT.
RATIONALE BEING THAT THE SUBDIVISION FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENTS AS
SETFORTH IN SECTION 6-3-2 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE 87-10 AND
IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH IS CURRENTLY IN
PLACE.
Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold, Greenfield, Roseth, and
Loftus. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO ADJOURN THE PUBLIC
HEARING.
Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold,
Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. The public
P.M. A recess was called at 9:00 P.M.
at 9:02 P.M.
Greenfield, Loftus, and
hearing adjourned at 9:00
The meeting was reconvened
ITEM II - DISCUSS FORMAT SCHEDULE OF DATES FOR PLANNING DISTRICT
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS
commissioner Greenfield suggested
time slot of Other Business - c,
date as Commissioner Wuellner
agreeable with the Commissioners.
that Item II be placed in the
and Item c be moved to a future
was not present. This was
ITEM III - CROWN COCO VARIANCE
David Miller represented Crown CoCo of 319 Ulysses Street
Minneapolis, MN. Mr. Miller stated he is requesting an
variance to accommodate installation of flat fascia wrap
N.E. ,
8 foot
around
"CU9302"
PLANNING REPORT
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
1
PUBLIC HEARING - HIDDEN VIEW PRELIMINARY PLAT
ARGUS DEVELOPMENT, INC., RAY BRANDT, EAGAN, MN
JAMES HAYES, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
X YES NO
APRIL 1S--;-1993
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of the public hearing is to consider Preliminary
Plat approval to subdivide Hidden View. A motion in the form of
a recommendation to the City Council, will be required. The
motion should be supported by findings of fact and performance
criteria relevant to the application.
The attached a~enda packet contains the application for
subdivision, wr1tten proposal prepared by the developer, and
supporting maps and data. The application is followed by a packet
conta~ning memorandums from City staff and other affected
agenc1es received as of April 9, 1993. Finally, the public
hearing notice and map published in the Prior Lake American and
mailed to ap~roximately 70 residents, utility companies, and
affected agencles.
SUBDIVISION REVIEW:
The preliminary plat of Hidden View is being processed as a
standard subdivision with the ~rocedures and requirements
outlined in section 6-3-2 of Subdivlsion Ordinance 87-10. The
subject site consists of approximately 9 acres bounded on the
north by County Road 42, on the west by Bayview Addition, on the
east by Eustice Addition and Eggum and Callahan's First Addition,
and on the south by Shady Beach Trail. See attached subject site
area location map.
The subject site is currently being farmed with adjacent
vegetation left idle. There are several large pine trees along
the easterly property line and numerous trees on the adjacent
property to the east. Current stormwater runoff for the site
sheet drains from the northerly end to the southerly end.
The ~roposal as presented is for preliminary plat approval to
subdlvide the property into 15 single family lots. The northerly
3 lots of this proposed subdivision will not be platted with
this project, but when they are platted, they will conform to
this preliminary plat. Services will be provided to these 3 lots
as they will be for the 15 lots to the south.
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLDYER
The access to the site from County Road 42 will be from Shady
Beach Trail via Conroy street. There will be no direct access to
County Road 42 from the north end of the subject site. The
proposed Hidden View Road will connect with Bayview circle to the
west. Bayview Circle will continue to serve as a local road and
should not see any additional traffic as a result of the
development.
The developer does not intend to file protective covenants but
Joe Miller Homes has an Architectural Control Committee that will
make sure that, among other things, no side by side houses will
look the same from the outside, and houses will be earth-toned
colors. The adjacent houses are around 10 years old so there
should not be any compatibility problem with a radical new design
by Joe Miller Homes. The development will have a variety of
styles and price ranges as well. The homes will be frame
construction and will include rambler, split-entry, and two-story
styles. There will also be several rear-walkout designs. The
minimum house size will be 1,100 square feet of finished area
and there will probably be very few, if any, of these.
Assessments:
See memo from Ralph Teschner dated March 15, 1993 for details.
The subject site has been previously assessed for water and
sewer improvements under Project 75-2 in 1975. All past
applicable deferred assessment amounts have been called and
distibuted against the land. The tax status of the property is
in a current state with no outstanding delinquencies. There are
no outstanding special assessments against the property. The
subdivision is subject to a stormwater Management Fee (16.8
cents/sq. ft.) and a Collector street Fee of ($700.00jacre).
Total city fees required for the development of the subdivision
amount to $40,409.04 which will be collected upon entering into
a developer's agreement for the utility improvements.
Comprehensive Plan:
The proposed development site is currentlr zoned R-1 Urban
Residential, with the S-D Shoreland Distrlct in place over
approximately 80% of the southern area of the site. This site is
an infill property in Prior Lake and development was expected in
this area in the near future. The Comprehensive Plan has
recognized the growth that will take place in this area and this
development is consistent with the long-range plan for this
neighborhood district.
Gradinq & utility Plan:
See memo from Bruce Loney dated April 9, 1993 for details.
storm runoff for the proposed project drains from the northerly
end to the southerly end. The lots will have 4 inches of topsoil
and the front yards and side yards will be sodded. Erosion
control fences will be installed along the westerly, southerly,
and easterl~ sides of the project for the 15 lots being platted
in this proJect.
A~proximately 8.12 acres of the total site drains to the south,
w1th 3.24 acres of this total draining to the east. The proposed
project will reduce this drainage area to 1.79 acres. Most of
this drainage area will be sodded or seeded and mulched so the
runoff after construction will contain less erosion sediment
and less total stormwater runoff. The remainder of the ~roject
will go through the ~roposed pond either through catch baslns or
overland via the dra1nage swale along the west line of the site.
The City Engineering staff has been working with the develo~er
on complete submittal requirements and has found that flve
items still need to be submitted as of April 12, 1993. Please
see list of contingencies under Alternative #1. In addition to
these items, Engineerin~ staff has two comments. First, the
street intersection wlth Shady Beach Trail is offset by
a~proximately seventy (70) feet from Orchard Circle. Orchard
C1rc1e serves four residences and this offset intersection would
not be a traffic hazard with the minimal traffic volumes in this
area. Second, the storm sewer at Bayview Circle and Shady Beach
Trail may be undersized at this location. Anal~sis of the system
is needed and any corective work may be added ln the Developer's
agreement.
The general quality of the storm water is not excellent due to
the previous use of the site as farmland. The proposed project
will have a sediment basin to catch and allow contaminants to
settle out of the runoff. The ground will be covered with sod in
the front yards while the rear yards will be either sodded or
seeded and mulched. These measures will inhibit erosion of the
soil as well. Runoff that mar include sand from the street will
still go through the sed1ment basin. Overall, the proposed
project will enhance the quality of the runoff that leaves the
site.
Park Dedication:
See memo from Bill Mangan dated March 29, 1993 for details. The
park dedication requirement for Hidden View will be in the form
of a cash dedication as o~posed to a land dedication. This is a
relatively small subdivlsion which would result in a land
dedication of less than one acre which is not condusive to the
city's overall park system. The cash dedication is figured by
using a raw land value of $7,000.00/acre for dry, upland, 100%
useable land. The gross value of the site amounts to $61,180
under this criteria. The 10% ~ark dedication requirement is then
applied to the gross value Wh1Ch results in a park dedication
cash requirement of $6,118 which is the amount due at the time
of final plat approval.
General Discussion:
The proposed subdivision of Hidden View is an infill property in
Prior Lake and is restricted on all sides by adjacent residential
or transportation system areas. The rectangular shape of the site
also restricts development options. The developer has proposed
Hidden View Road to link with Bayview Circle, the existing road
to the west. This provides good access to the neighbors on the
west, creating a neighborhood feeling. This street layout works
better than having a 500 foot cul-de-sac running south to north
on the site.
Another major feature of the site is the sloping topography. The
site slopes from north to south which creates some stormwater
problems due to its proximity to Prior Lake. This proposal has
addressed this issue by creating home styles that take advantage
of sloped areas. Split-entry and walkout home styles are planned
for some of the sloped areas. In addressing the stormwater
management issue, the developer has created a detention pond on
the southwest area of the site.
The three lots to the north have been included in this plat as
they are part of the subject site. It is the developer's intent
to provide access for the lot on the northwest from Hidden view
Road when it is developed. The other lots will have access from
County Road 42 through an existing double driveway. This design
is efficient because it does not request any additional access
to County Road 42. These are the three major as~ects to the site
and the developer has addressed them very well 1n his design.
Alternatives:
1. Find the preliminarr plat of Hidden View in compliance with
the Subdivision Ord1nance contingent upon:
a) Acceptable utility and drainage easements shown on the
final plat.
b) Acceptable Wetland Delineation Report and acceptable
Wetland Replacement Plan, if necessary.
c) Acce~table storm Water Management Plan, including
grad1ng and site construction plans.
d) Acceptable plans for sanitary sewer, watermain, and
street improvements.
e) Acceptable storm water drainage calculations to
maintain a pre-development runoff rate leaving the
site.
(The ~receding contingencies are all subject to the a~proval of
the C1tr Engineer, see memo from Bruce Loney dated Aprl1 9, 1993
for add1tional details.)
2. Deny the plat based upon specific findings.
3. continue the hearing for specific purposes or lack of
information or detail.
's\
-,7
~ ~ ~ - / I
'A
L:. '~~~~.J C/)
~(\ " Q;
\ '" . 1....
."_ ,'U
c,
"
j ~i ' :; : :
... ~-,'
h7
'Ci
Ci
;~~-\
;0
,;/
, '
>
QJ
?
CJ
~l~
(',,,.,,l,,
"".. .' I
F~,;, J: J
~ ~().
or,"nl
llli'J,.,,'I"" I
\ 1M ,"
"'~'.
I I .~
I: \,
I ~
~
I
I o...Uol
il.lIa IqU.
III
/:l1J
, /
- - / I
' --
'./ " ---
(....____...r-l ~.
'I '~
" ,
'C___.:-~-j 0
I
I
9t46.IJ 'h
, ,
z
0'"
~~~
4V
"
.,'
1 ~d i(J
'..-. "'.f" ~' ::.. ~'j
""OJ ",'\
~ _~ l~~~'~.; \
:0
~', (~: 1
/'ql~~; I" j
, ,
, .
;~2
,
I
I
,
I
,
,
,
I
I
,
,
I
:-...
,
,
I ,,'
I -<,1'1\ '"
I (" \ \'-' I
~ - __ - "-'0,,,,-, n -- - n/
~( (' "
,...-<\~~\.." /
(",J-':;': :
\:...: :
:
I
, ,
___________________~________________,t
,
,
,
I
,
~
~
o
~Z3
5~
~
~
------r------~---------------
I \ r_
\ \ ,"-...)
I \ .,.. ~
.. \ ,"r'
I \ ',"
\ ... \:r
I .... ~\
" _ t-r" ~'
" IJ Jj\~
c' ,;(... \
~ '-lo~ cJ',,,, \
'r' '1(,J \
"( ,
~
8
,
,
I
, ~
6
8
, \
,f/~' ..<
_t-=-') , ,..1;")'"
It") ..
( -
~,
__0'-1
c..) r'\ oJ
, ',~
,\(0'.
c'0
''J.eo
'v
GIUPHIC SCAU:
~~--_.'~
j
,
I
,/
~ lJ @ ~U[hJl)U[JuCill IT' W
l}~ lJ [ill U
il@[j'
HIDDEN VIEW
"",....."""
t
,... ...1 laO_CO f..1 0' "'It H.I 1!U,41 ,..I 01 II.. "OIU> !lJl.I~ JHI 0' I'" ,..., 1/4 01 1ft. N. 1/. (Go_........I lot I)
.f SoctiGl> JO. ,.......,.;P II~ R...,. 31. Scoll '_I). IoIM...lo, ..copl C.......I, RlHld N.. .3.
ALso., thol pGrt 01 GeI...........1 lot I. S..,.11on JO. To_"''P Il~, /l"",. 31, xoll Co...nl~. Iollonlloto, d."",Ib.d o. lollo.~
Comm..."irl, It "'It "OIUtMII "or"1I" O' Mi4 Co_IIm..11 Loll; 1114"'" ...1 oIOI'lI 1111 norU> Iir>. o' .0'41 CO.."......I lol I
. di.lon". 01 414... ,..I 10 Ut. ..-11.... 01 ltl. ..11 19441 '..1 01 IQ~ Ca...........1 lOI I. I""'''' ....1" poroll.. .o.tto
I". .011 lin..t 114" Go.............1 lol I a dill"'''' or ~lJ.U '"I 10 In. OCh,oI p.....l .f b'9"''''''~ 1"....CI ....I poi'otIo1
.ilh 1M ,ulfUl ~. . d1llonGo 01 J&o,O t..1 10 '''. ...1 lin.. oj U>I 11I11 191.11 rllt 01 la;d (;o..ornm....1 lOI I; ,,,....co
_I" ,.,011. .iUt "oil lOll llrI.. a dl.IOIIGo Q' ..., n I...t 10 In.. 11011".'(_ ."'.. 01 S/lodJ 8.odl Rood; 111"'0;. ""1111011"')
0I0f1" t4lCI lIorlllwt, liII. 10 114 1rl1...0;1'oft .1111 . (in. Oroo" lHlfollol 10 ond .14.48 1111 ...1 0' Nid 100.1 ....... lh...Go "01'11'I
......'....p..lIII...,......lanc.oIJ.7~ 'nllol/'l..._1 olh,,,,,,,,,,
OirltdR ANa I)('w(LOP(Jl
ENGlN[ER AM) $t.'h'(YOR
.....,... O....opm...t. onc.
J4~1 -'011;",101\ Orl..
[Olon, "'N ~~IH
AOJ 8<1.'''11
J4~1".",in.,10"I 0.;..
Eo,o;Ion. 1011'4 ~~lH
(AISr.NC AHO PROPQS(D ZONIhC.; Rl-SO
''--+'"'''~
i~\~
"Jll~L~ ~
.Q SnOoO/'Ocr$" ~
i
lOT .,...-OR"'....ltCt.,;
1"0;'0;1 .... 1/0..1'01 .. 8.J4 <Kfll
Pro,;.cl ""0 ./0 0,)..1101 . 611 (KIn
A_a.,. 101 I;U . "'.~OJ o.q. fl.
Uinim..m tol I'U' 12.102 Iq.. It
N..mb... 01 Jo~. .. 1)
0......., ./0 o...~IOl .. 1.1~ .."'U/OCl'
Ofo......,. ..d lJl~;I, .0..,.,.....1" p... Cil, 01 P.igI lOlo.
'.OCI\lION
I ,,"nn,
I........ to "
I h.-'..... tl".'. lh", ,"". ,~,._.. ..:_..,.
'"P"" "01 ~"PQo""o.l Il, m. .." ..~.;., "" <1...1
..~pc......... <l~" '''...1 I r.m . .~.I, R..~ "'.'.'1
,..,-,oJ S~""'''' ~"J,... I~. ! 'I., ... 1"01 S'"I,
ar;:;:;nc.; _
'--'-:. f<', ~.,.,,._.
':\otl. .~)"_ /lh..1- 1.ILJ. _ ....1 'I. <il ~'"'
BRANDT ENGINEERING. SURVEYING
1100 W... 14Jld 111..1. lull. 20t
.ulMvl.... MlnnelOt. un'
(112) ~"'1'" . 'u CIU) 43...2121
Preliminar Pial
for
HIDDEN VIEW
'&'21-26-92 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
I '
. I
, (I I
~/~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9~ '6 eJ
,
~'l'~
~--Ls----J
: ; ~ J '~( i
~"I
~
Typical
Street
1~1~\~~'.~ ::'-l__J
,', e_ , .",...'e ... (IQO:I _~
",-.._ ......_ 1--. ..... .-.
.... ...... ..........
GIl'Pllle ~e,u;
~.......&.;..-.....; __ .7
l!)Iftn)
1_..... III.
,.,' ",~:"'. 1,(
;"~P"'" "..:>......, .
,,11"1 ~,)t"~"" ..f.... -->>
"'Cp9U<! ':..;~ I"t, .......: ___.
i...."IJ"'<lI..."'~.".--
",~",.<I"...l..""g:n 0__
~""''I ...""....... .,
ho"...... ...,,"".... .
....c,,,..... .cl., e,,", ,..... ,.. ..~.
n~;."..l c...t." '>0'.' ;.
Section
l"~
-:r-
i
~
tIf>-
Snnitury SCvVf:1 Cine! \-I/o(crr'nuin
Grodin and utilities
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1600 w... 14:t,d SIr..I, Suit. 201
.um....UIl'. Wlnn..oll 11117
CIU) 4U..lIH .. 'U ('12) 431-2121
HIDDEN VIEW
A21-26-92 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
r
J\ \
I, \ //
I ...... _ _-/
II ,-/ _ _ _
1\ "r-'l
I....~
I
I
I
--
--
-,,'
,Ii
1;'(
,I
I .9\",l>~
bf It
~ I
-\
- 1\
\~Ih
" \\1
\ \ III
\ \ \11
\ \11
\ \ Itl
\ hit
I 1\\
III
iii
Ii
II
II
\'0
.. ,
..
,- '
landscape Plan on
_Joding loyout
. ,. ~;r~-:",:":-~' .~~.:..;_ ~t.~..~.-.:::< :\~:")'~-;~~~:::~:'~rl~~(l>: iJ07.~: ~'~."~ '::'~~:1'-";~'.
Typical Street Section
~(I
~
.................
or
~ t::" ~ ..... '-- o-t-4
.' e .-::::::. '=. c;:o;: --0
...-........~-.-.
... ...,.. ~)
...
1':~
~
.,. u
""" II
- II
". QlI.&
..-. .......
..-. ...
UJ' QIlI ~..... IOI'NUc;N. ... .,ia IMXJ7
---------..----------------------
QUDCUt ra.utn'lil' I.'. ~.
ACDI Pt.A1. 'ac:a.u.a C*.. I.'. ."a
,u.al-.J,l...... '.....". ~.I...a
~. AU. r1lCIWW .... .,Ga ~ 10 --=aJVI. .. .. ..,.,.. (W .
'rW.oll. o\110 ~.
.I. ~. ~ aaau. ~ AU. 1'1l&U
rea QQ ro.a A.rTU. IU'Dol.U.nml.
~
~ '
Ji~ 'l_:.~::ITAL
-~~~..--
.------
.'---
, -
.. - -.:...-.;:.~-
~- '''_0'
-'~.:;;...r:=:.--
o
TRU
b.-.;.-LW
C RAPHIC SC ALE
.~
( Ult'U'T)
I.... .... ft.
:.M '= ~:;::'-=:l.:-=1:.T.:~
~ Ii -~Jl!tll~l" lU.
~ m~
:-~~o:; __ /1 .....m.u..
Il....-..u..ft_..,1
...-- ....-.- """"" L l.__~
i
, . ,.,
'j
';
,p1
-J
~
'I
',;\
, J
j
:i
,1
--a-"': .
Q--' <----:~.~.
\ -=:=-.- -'
Sanitary Sewer and Watermoin
BRANDT ENGINEERING. SURVEYING
1100 W... IUId 611"1, '1.111. 201
lkur\tww., "lnN~'. tUJ7
CIU. UI-1NI . ,.. llU) 4:11-2'21
Grodin and utilities
HIDDEN VIEW
A21-26-92 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
,j
r----------,
I I
I I
I I
L________~-----------------------,
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I CI> .', ' )
: I , '. ;'
I I /
:1 i-~~,---?~,~~,-:.:.'-'------~/
~ ---------~ I, 1
o ", i I
'" ',1-' I
" I
I I
I I
I ,
, I
, I
: I
----------------___~________________IJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ I
~ ------r------r------,-'--------~~----~
i:o I \ \ _ :..... 'I
N \ \ I .
\ \ \ I
I \. _ 1
I \' '.' I
I \ I
I \ '..:' , :
I ",\ '" I
I Y I
I '\ I
\ .. . ,:\':,;" !
I ' '.' .., I
I \ ' \ I
\ ,...'i' \ ,.)
, \ \ ..."'"
I \. \,"'"
I ~ ,,: . \ .........
I (, ),'
t'" \ "
",I \,'
, ',/" ',' , " . \
.-,'. "'\ '.// 0\\
I / \\,
I ' \" '
I ,,' C \ ,,'
I' 0 '
,--)/" 0 e .- "",
""~~()~:, """"
1 '
,'l,'6~~ ,__--'
'O1.~?-; ,/
\tl-9 /
13079 //~,~:///
s 86'3,'54" W "....'
----'"'-----/
\
,\
" \
" \
, \
" \
. ..;!~~ '\
//" ,". '; ):. \
/ \
/ \
// )
/ ,
/ (
/
---------------------
r-----------------~-
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
~ \
, \
I .......... \ /
I ~
~ -- ,/
I /
I -- 1
I __ I
I ___I
I 1
, I
I 1
I 1
\-..- "
I " 1
I I
I _ 1
I -_' 1
I 1
1 -_ 1
I ----J
I I
I I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I 1
i-- -_ /
I.......... I
I -_ 1
I 1
I _ 1
I -1
I I
I /
I I
I I
I I
: I
I I
I I
I I
~----------------i
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I ,
I I
~----------------~
: ,- :
I :<:' I
: l,,) , :
I '" -" I
I .~;;;'/ ~ I
I ',;.:._ I
I ~~ ~,! I
I ' ..",! I
i-------l~5~----i
I .u:;' :
: '~i I
I I I
I I I
1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
: i______~_________
-------'-----
'I-.....J
o
Qj
G
3:
CD
>
>-,
o
m
1
I
1
I
1
" z
/ g~::
I '-...JO
: ~~~
I ___ viOl
~---------- ~
I
-I
I
1'.-
I
,
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I , "
I------'-~~-------
I ,;,'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
L_______________
I
I
I
I
Shady
Beach
Trail
------T--------------T
---- I I
I I
! , ~'"
I "I
I I
I )
I /
I /
I /
I ;'
I /
I /
/
/
/
.,,: ."', :'~ .' ";
: ..... .....-1
N
'"
S
\ I
I '\ /~/llJ
I '-~----' /
I \\0 C:;-==-=':;'~l ",I
~ I I ~'~I
"'I \.. I I
S '-C___J-,-_J
~
Outiot
91,118 Iq.t\.
'"
"
Co
'"
::E
~
8
'"
"
'"
lO
'"
!"
'"
'"
"
"
Co
o
,
,
,
/
!:?
N
'"
'"
lO
:,..
'"
Ul
OlO
Olq
~t.I
'Ol
~ -
OOl
Ol
.
li:
Co
"
g;
8
--
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
GRAPmc SCALE
~ :
- -
- -
':'
':'
( Di ruT )
Ibleb-eo It.
[P)[(@~DmD[[j)@[(W ~~~U
g@[J'
HIDDEN VIEW
DESCRIPTlON
The west 380,00 feet of tho eost 794.48 feet of the north 573.15 feet of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 (Covomment Lot 1l
of Section 30, Township 115, Rong. 21, Scott County, Minnesota, except County Rood No. 42.
AlSO, That part of Govemment Lot 1, Section 30, Township 115. Range 21, Scott County, Minnesota. described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast com.. of sold Government Lot 1; thence west along the north line of said Govemmen t Lot 1
a diatonce of 414..a feet to the east line of the wost 794.48 feet of said Government Lot 1; thence south paralle! with
the east line of said Go\/lfTUnent Lot 1 a distonce of 573.15 fe.t to the actual point of beginning; thence w.st parallel
with sold north line a distonc. of 380,0 feet to the w.st line of the ea.t 794.48 feet of .oid Government Lot 1; thence
oauth parallel with laid east line a distonce of 469.29 feet to the northerly line of Shady B.ach Road: thonc. northoa.ter1y
along .ald northoriy line to It I /nt......ctlon with a line drown parallel to and 414.46 f..t we.t of said east lin.: thence north
along said parallel line a di.tance of 347.36 f.et to the point of beginning.
O'M<ER AND DE\'aOPER
ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR
Argul D.velopment, Ino.
3459 Washington DrIve
E"9an, loiN 55124
Ray Brandt
3459 Wa.hlngton Drive
Eogan, l.lN 55124
EXISTlNC AND PROPOSED ZONING: R1-SO
LOT INFORIoIA TlON:
Pro)eet area - 8.74 ocr..
A_ag. lot Ilz. - 14,503 Iq_ It
Number of lots - 15
Drainage and UtUlty easements: per City of Prior Lake
'r
i
I hereby certify that thl. survey. pion. Of
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and thot I om Q duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~ C:ltf2~
Dote ) r::.; ""7h J f oq'" Reg. No. 8140
A21- 26-92
Preliminar
for
HIDDEN VIEW
SHEET 1 OF 2
SHEETS
Plat
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206
Burnsvllle, Minnesota 55337
(612) 435-1966 . Fax (612) 435-2929
1\\ jAil
II \ ./ // LI.J
I '-__ / T
II \-/ _ _ -
1\ '-r--'I
I"~
I
I
I
T yp i c a I
street Section
I
10'
1+
I~
~"I
L F
10'
~
'-
1 1/2' 12341 1lIhm1nou. _ c-.. (Ilodl_l
~7 r_ Coat
3- 12331 Bltun\nau. BOM eour...
.- a.. 5 ~t. 80M (100x aulhecl)
Apptowd Sub9'CMM (inc:tudlng t_t raJlng
.... ~ ~.tlon)
'--
./ '-
\ \ \
~ \ - - -
0, \ _ _ _
..................... ---
'-
GRAPHIC SCALE
/
'\' j
( IX l'UT l
1_.00 tt.
i
J 'r
~I
Grodin 9 I ayou t
1 -
Sanitary Sewer and
Watermain
Grodin and utilities
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1600 West 143rd Street. Suite 206 .
Burnsvllle. Minnesota 55337
(612) 435-1966 . Fax (612) 435.2929
HIDDEN VIEW
A21-26-92 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
r
'-
'-
'-
,/ '-
,]
/ ,
.J ^'
,
/ , \
.-11
\
.-1\ \
I I
\ I
- \
\ \ I I
III I (
II ( ! \
II
l 1
I
,
,
(
\
-\
- II
-,
\ I \I
.,:, ,II
I \ III
\ \ III
\ III
\ \ III
\ 1111
\ III
I 11\
I 1\1
I 1\
~ I \
1\
\ \ \-
.. \ -
'b \
\ - -
................. - ---
---
/
\
Landscape Plan on
Grodin 9 I ayou t
Typical Street Section
+1
L ~
I
,s'
,s'
1 1/2" f2341 Bitumin"", WerilV C4aru (Ilodlllod)
,2J57 TacO CoGI
3- 12331 Bltumlnoua 80M eourM
." COlI 5 "<19"_1. 80M ('OOX crvohod)
Approwd Sub9l"ode (IndudlnQ t..t rot6ln9
and oull~ ptopanl\Joo)
1'~
I~
~:o~:~~-~---------;~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
;;;--;;---;;;-~-------------O~~~~S p~LUSTnIS 2,5. S,S
NORWAY MAPLE ~CER PLAT, 'EMERALD QN,' 2,5" S,S
= ~~ SUMMIT ASH FRAXlNUS PENN, 'SUMMIT' 2,5" B'S
NOTES 1 1) JILL FRONT AND SIDE YAAIlS TO RECEIVE ~ 4" LAYER OF
TOPSOIL AND SOD,
2 I LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUJ>.RJ\NTEE ALL TREES
rOR ONE YEl\R l\F'l'ER INSTALLATION, Qf>
PLANTING DETAIL
o
TREE
GRAPHIC SCALE
. I. o.
~_.J . I
t t I
(D1n:1'r)
11Doh-50 It.
11'......-...'...............--
:r:r:..:;:.J:~..:' ~,i.': ::.= .,
, ~~
D. R, GRISWOLD ..~ 2/18/93 ...... 12384
~~n:::~c. (Landscape Plan only)
-.-
:='".:::'~.~ DENNIS R. GlUSWOLD
li
- --
<.---<Y:::: ~
<- T/. ~.
~ ~~ -.,--=:,
~
San itary Sewer
and
Watermain
Grodin ond utilities
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206
Burnsvllle, Minnesota 55337
(612) 435-1966. Fax (612) 435-2929
HIDDEN VIEW
A21-26-92 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS