HomeMy WebLinkAbout11C - Planning Dept. Projects
AGENDA NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
BACKGROUND:
DISCUSSION:
RECOMMENDATION:
11 C
DEB GARROSS, ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER
RESPONSE TO COUNCIL REQUEST FOR SCHEDULE TO
COMPLETE DEPARTMENT PROJECTS
MARCH 1, 1993
This item is an update for the Council
relative to the direction given on February
16, 1992. Staff was directed to develop a
schedule for completion of the projects
pending before the Planning Department.
The attached four pages indicate 39 projects,
includin~ several zoning ordinance amendments.
In additl.on to these projects, staff will
processes approximately 30 variance
applications, 5 conditional use, 3 home
occupation, several administrative ~lats,
rezonings, subdivisions, zoning certifl.cates
and review building permits for zoning
compliance. These items are processed in
addition to substantial daily contact with the
general public to answer questions, or
provide research and assistance related to
Comprehensive Plan, zoning, Subdivision,
Floodplain and sign ordinance provisions.
Staff was not able to complete a schedule for
completion of all of the projects. There are
several constraints which inhibit staff from
accomplishing the directive from the Council
including, limited time, lack of
prioritization of multiple issues, and limited
staff resources.
The recommendation is to allow the Planning
Director the opportunity to fully discuss each
item on the project list with city Manager,
Frank Boyles. It is the opinion of staff that
the city Manager and Council must review the
attached projects and define priorities based
upon existing personnel and service levels.
At that point, it will be possible to develop
a schedule and budget to complete the items as
per the request by the city council.
4629 Dakota 51. 5.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
ACTION REQUIRED:
A motion from the City Council outlining the
desired process to implement the attached
project list. The Council may wish to
determine a date by which a project review
meeting should be scheduled before the
Council.
"PROJ1"
DATE: 2-23-93
PAGE 1
1993 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
ACTION TAKEN
1 I Forest Oaks Preliminary Plat
I
I
I
2 I Shoreland Manaoement Ordinance
I Adopt ion.
I
I
3 I Comp Plan Transportation Plan
I
I
I
4 I Comp Plan Mappino Changes
I
I
I
5 I Comp Plan - Wilds Plannino District
I
I
New Submi Hal
C.C. Public Hearing
Assinned to Staoar
Roscoe. . .
On hold for Text
Completion
No action to date
STATUS
RESPONSIBILITY
Deb - Jim
Anticipated adoption
3-1-93
Deb - Steve Grittmann
Northwest Assoc. Cons.
Draft Received
Larry - Horst
Preliminary Maps Done -
Finalized after Text is
determined.
Deb - Jim
Onooino
Horst - Bob Hoffman
6 Westbury Ponds Subdivision
P.C. P/H 3-4-93
Horst- Deb - Jim
Preliminary Plat
7 Develop Street Li oht Policy Preliminary Research Onooino as time permits H.:>rst - Jim
I
I
I
e Sidewalk Policy Preliminary Research I Onooino as time permits Deb - Jim
I
I
I
9 Sinn Ordinance Redraft Staff Draft COfnpletel Initiate Hearino Process Deb - Steve Grittman
I I
I I
I J
10 The Wi Ids PUD Preliminary staff I Expect Submission I Horst - Bob Hoffman
input given I 2-93 J
I I
I I
PAGE _2_
NUMBER
11
DESCRIPTION
ACT! ON TAKEN
STATUS
RESPONSIBILITY
EZ Stop SiQn Violation
Court Action Pending I Resolution anticipated
by 3-93.
Deb - Steve Rathke
12
Horst - Larry
Industrial Park Subdivision
Preliminary Plat
Design complete.
OnooinEl
13
Kay/Horst/Consultant
Industrial Park Standards/RezoninEl
Draft Prepared
Onooino
14
Horst
Rural Service Area Subdivision
Requirements amendment.
No action to date
Open
15
Landscape Ordinance
Horst - Greo Kopischke
City Council Public
Hear i ngs.
Adoption anticipated
3-93
16
Staff
I The Wilds EAW - EIS
No action to date
Open
17
Deb
Amend Zone Ord. to delete/change
standards consistent with SMO adopt.
18
Undesionated
Citizen Forum - Lot Size ChanQes
" Research.
Discussion w/ P.C.
Direction pendino from
P. Commission.
19 Subway Conditional Use & Subdivision Plat and C. U. Permit Approval anticipated by Horst - Larrv
approval by 3-1-93. I 3-1-93 I
J I I
I I I
20 Microfilm Department Documents I Fi 1m out to service I Onooino I Deb
I bureau. I J
I I I
I I I
21 Flood Plain Restudy I MeetinQs w/ FEMA I FEMA ProcessinQ I Horst - Jim
I I I
I I I
I I ,
PAGE 3_
NUMBER
22
23
DESCRIPTION
Amend ZoninQ Code to increase min.
lot size in R.S.A. to 10 acres.
Driveway Ordinance Amendment
ACTION TAKEN
STATUS
SMO Approval I Open
I
I
I
Preliminary Research I Research continuinQ
RESPONSIBILITY
Horst - Deb
Gary - Deb - Bruce
24
Amend Zonino Ordinance for outside
Storage, parking vehicles, wood etc..
Research Completed
Ordinance Drafted
City Manager
25
Deb
26
27
Amend ZoninQ Code to delete 4.1H
Back Lot Common Beach Access
No action to date
I
I
I
I Staff review of
ISubmittal Materials
I
I
Hidden View Preliminary Review
Lake Front Woods
No action
No action to date
Horst - Bruce - Deb
Deb - Jim
28
Deb - Horst
ChanQe min PUD size from 2.5 - 10 ac. Research
29
Horst - Deb
Sienna PUD <Greenbriar PUD>
Preliminary Review
No action to date
NUMBER
35
36
37
38
39
30
31
32
33
34
DESCRIPTION
ACTION TAKEN
I I
I I
I Ao. Preserve ComD Plan Amendment t Preliminary research
I I
I I
I I
I Chanae Ao Lot Size from 1 to 10 Ac. I
I I
I I
I I
I Acc. Structure Definitions and IP.C. 5-15-89
I Setbacks IC.C. 7-17-89
I I
I I
I Chanoe/Research Coveraoe Ratio IC.C. Discussion
I Formula I 7-17-89
I I
I I
I Delete Common Association / back lot I
I access. I
I I
I I
I SMSC Sewer - Comp Plan Amendment I waitino submittal
I I
I I
I I
I Dog Kennel Amendment I Research
I I
I I
I I
I Code enforcement for downtown land I Violation list
I use violations. Iprepared by staff
I I
I I
I Conditional Use for electrical I Research
I substation (SMSC) I
I I
I I
I Conditional Use for SMSC Freestandinol Research
I Sign at 42/Mystic Lake Drive I
I I
I I
I I
I I
STATUS
RESPONSIBILITY
Onooina Deb - Horst
Tabled/Unresolved
Research/Discussion only
Refered to City Mar. & Gary - Horst - Jay
Council/No action
assianed to date.
Deb
Deb
AGENDA NUMBER:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
DISCUSSION:
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
ACTION REQUIRED:
7
HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
CONTINUATION OF LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE 93-02
PUBLIC HEARING
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
This item is a continuation from January 19,
1993. The Landscape Ordinance has had three
previous hearings. The last reading produced
no public comments or response. Council did
make several changes to the proposed Ordinance
and they have been incorporated into the
draft. The underlining in the Ordinance draft
reflects the changes.
The focus of the Council discussion on January
19, 1993 was Section (B) 2 and (E) 5. Minor
chan~es were made in Section (C) 5 and (E) 1.
.Sectl.on (B) 2 deals ~ witl1 _bringing existing.
- uses into compliance with the ordinance after
the exempted threshold has been reached.
Section (E) 5 deals with the installation of
curb wi th . park lot reconstruction
construction.
The City Council
Alternatives:
1. Approve Ordinance 93-02 as submitted.
has
the
following
2. Continue the Public Hearing.
3. Deny Ordinance 93-02.
Alternatives 1 or 2 as may be appropriate.
Motion to approve Ordinance 93-02 and place
this on the Consent Agenda for March 1 for
second reading.
"Z09202"
~ '\:I~OF PRIOR
LAKE
DRAFT 8-5-92
*11-23-92
2-4-93
ORDINANCE NO. 93-02
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PRIOR LAKE CITY CODE AND PRIOR LAKE ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 83-6.
The Council of the City of Prior Lake does hereby ordain:
CITY CODE SECTION 5-5-10: SCREENING: AND PRIOR LAKE ZONING
ORDINANCE 83-5 SECTION 6.10 are hereby amended to add the
following language:
(A) Purpose:
1. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish performance
standards and minimum requirements for landscaping, bUffering
and screening that will enhance the visual, environmental and
aesthetic character of property and site development within
the City. The City Staff, Planning Commission and City
Council will utilize these standards in the review and
evaluation of subdivision and site plans and development
proposals.
2. The objectives of these requirements are to establish and
maintain forestation of the City; to provide appropriate
ground cover vegetation for controlled soil erosion; to
preserve and enhance, when necessary, the natural
environment, particularly in instances where the natural
environment is disturbed during the course of development;
and to establish standards for utilization of natural and
other materials to achieve desired screening, buffering and
landscaping.
3. This ordinance sets forth minimum requirements for
landscaping, reforestation and technical limitations to
assure that the result is consistent with reasonable
maintenance requirements on a long-term basis and to assure
that the results provide landscape amenities to the urban
environment.
4. This ordinance is intended to provide standards that allow
flexibility in design and individual site needs. Designers
are encoura~ed to utilize a variety of site landscape
elements (l..e.; trees, shrubs, ground covers, flowers, berms
and ground form, fences, walls, existing topography and
vegetation, artforms, and other similar items), in creative
ways that are aesthetically pleasing yet functional where
required. In addition to compliance with subse~ent sections
of this ordinance, plan review by the C1ty Planning
Department will include such items as: choice of materials,
especially plantings, to determine if they are functionally
1
(B)
1.
a~propriate for the intended purpose; hardiness;
dlsease-resistance; compatible choice and mix of materials;
do materials complement and/or provide pleasing contrast to
on-site and off-site conditions to maintain interest: and
other issues as site appropriate. Specific site plans may be
required to go beyond the minimum requirements to meet the
purpose and objectives of this ordinance due to unique or
exceptional circumstances and conditions which are existing
or proposed.
Application:
This ordinance applies to all business, industrial,
mUlti-family residential (projects of 3 or more dwelling
units per building), ~ublic and institutional uses as may be
permitted or conditl.onal within their respective zoning
districts. This applies to all new construction within all
zoninq districts.
Existing uses shall also comply with this ordinance (except
as exempted in section (E)~when a building ~ermit is issued
for their expansion. Exceptions include addl.tions in which
the ground building footprints in total are under 10% of the
existing structures gross floor area or 4000 square feet,
whichever is less.
2.
3.
The Downtown Redevelopment
Council Resolution No. 85-07
ordinance
District as defined by City
shall be exempt from this
(C) General provisions and Landscape Requirements:
1. To help assure the best possible results, plans must be
prepared and certified by a Registered Landscape Architect in
the state of Minnesota for:
a)
business, industrial,
development projects with
or gross building area of
whichever is less;
public and institutional
sites over 20,000 square feet
4,000 square feet or more,
mUlti-family residential projects of 8 or more dwelling
units per building.
Projects smaller than identified above shall be prepared by
either a registered landscape architect or a professional
site planner with educational training or work experience in
site analysis and landscape plan preparation.
b)
2. The quantity of plant materials shown on the landscape plans
of proposed developments shall meet or exceed the minimums as
defined herein.
3. The City requires landscape treatment of the whole site to
include the following elements:
a) The site perimeter.
2
The "entrf" focal area(s) of a development (i.e., major
entity drlves, corner areas, signage locations, and
other similar focal points).
The parking lot landscape.
Screening of mechanical equipment, exterior storage,
loading docks, trash storage, or visual clutter as
identified by the City in the plan review process.
4. The plant materials used must meet or exceed the City
standards of size and specie in order to qualify for credit
towards the landscape requirement. Additional plant
materials smaller than required herein may be appropriate and
necessary to achieve the design effect.
b)
c)
d)
5. Preservation of existing vegetation on site, if it can
successfully be incorporated into the landscape plan, is
encouraged and will be credited toward the landscape
requirement. Existin~ ~lant material must meet or exceed the
City standard in o_d_r to qualify for a one to one
substitution credit.
6. Plantings at street intersections shall not block visibility
within a clear view triangle.
Plantings shall not interfere with drainage patterns,
unreasonable conflict with utilities (i.e., frequent
near overhead power lines, etc.) or restrict access
utilities.
7.
create
pruning
to any
8. Landscape coverage shall be defined as all ground areas
surrounding the principal building and accessory buildings
which are not garden areas, driveways, parking lots,
sidewalks or patios. All ground areas shall be landscaped
with grass, shrubs, trees or other approved ornamental
landscape material.
(D) Calculation of Requirements, Credits and Sizes:
1. The planting requirement shall be the sum of the following
separate requirements. These formulas are only intended as a
method to generate a quantitative performance level and not a
desi~n instruction. Creativity of design is encouraged to
provl.de specific solutions.
a)
Tree Calculation:
BusinessjlndustrialjPublicjInstitutional sites shall
contain, at a minimum, the greater of:
1. 1 tree required per 40' of site perimeter, or
2. 1 tree per 1000 square feet of ~ross building area.
Multi-residential sites shall contal.n, at a minimum, the
greater of:
1. 1 tree per dwelling unit, or
2. 1 tree required per 40' of site perimeter.
Entry Plantings: Each major entry point, focal point,
etc., (see section (C)2, b), into the project or building
b)
3
shall be treated with landscape development (trees,
shrubs, etc.). No numerical requirement of plants is
offered, but every development project has at least one
such feature, and the landscape ~lan shall reflect the
proposed treatment. Trees requl.red on the perimeter
calculation are not applicable to this design feature.
Parking Lot Landscape: As identified in Section (E)(l
and 4), parking lot islands and screening shall be
provided. No numerical requirement for plants is
provided, but use of canopy trees to provide shade and
shrubs to soften the internal sight lines and screen
small storage areas is required.
Miscellaneous Screenings: As identified in Section (F)
Other Screening, miscellaneous screening shall be
provided. No numerical requirement for plants is
provided and the perimeter tree planting requirement may
be used to provide trees for this purpose but the
effectiveness shall be as described in Section (F),
Other Screening.
2. Plant Sizes: Plants provided by the developer as credit for
meeting the landscape requirement shall meet the fOllowing
size criteria:
d)
e)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
Deciduous Canopy Trees: 2 1/2" caliper B & B (at 6"
above ground).
Coniferous Trees: 6' high B & B
others:
1. Ornamental or half trees: 1-3/4" caliper B & B (can
substitute for canopy trees at a ratio of 2
ornamental/half trees for 1 canopy tree).
2. Other shrubs: No minimum, except that they must
meet the stated purpose (screening; etc.).
All plantings shall be appropriate to the hardiness zone
and physical characteristics of the site. They shall
conform to the size and quality standards in the most
current edition of the American Standard for Nursery
stock as published by the American Association of
Nurserymen.
All deciduous trees proposed to meet the minimum
requirements shall be long-lived, hardwood species. A
list of desirable and ~rohibited plant material species
is incorporated as poll.cy in this ordinance and will be
maintained and kept on file with the City Planning
Department.
The complement of trees fulfilling the minimum
requirements shall typically not be less than 25%
deciduous and not less than 25% coniferous to maintain a
mix of plant t~pes. Anr proposed modification to this
requirement Wl.ll cons~der the site specific design
f)
4
solution if site conditions are deemed appropriate and
other functional requirements (screening, etc.) are
met.
Installation will be in accordance with professional
horticultural standards as established with the most
current edition of the Landscape Construction Reference
Manual as published by the American Nursery and
Landscape Association.
3. Credits for Existing Materials: The developer may request
credit for plant materials preserved on site provided it is
demonstrated that they have accurately identified (by specie)
and located (by survey), their correct location shown on the
grading plan and that appropriate measures will be taken and
are shown and/or noted on the grading plan to ensure their
protection and survival (i.e.; snow fence barrier,
appropriate distance to tree base and root structure,
prunin~, watering, mulching, root protection/pruning, timing,
fertill.zation, tree removal plan/techniques, disease
prevention, method to prevent soil compaction over root
systems, etc.). This tree protection/preservation plan
should be prepared by a qualified forester, registered
landscape architect, or arborist.
Existing trees must conform to the minimum size
requirements (identified in 2 above) to be credited.
Plants must be of approved species as currently recorded
br the City as appropriate materials. Weak wooded and
dl.sease prone species are not suitable for credit.
The extent of credit will be based on staff review of
data (plans and narrative) presented by the developer.
criteria will include t~e of material, size, quality,
location and extent of s~te coverage.
4. variation of Plant Sizes:
g)
a)
b)
c)
a)
For all landscape plans, at least 10% of the coniferous
and/or deciduous canopy trees must exceed the minimum
size (to 8' high and 3 1/2" cali~er B & B respectively)
to establish some diversity in Sl.ze.
For multi-family projects, 20% of the required plants
shall be of the larger sizes. These plants shall be
used in the areas for strategic screening, softening of
buildin~s, focal point enhancement, adjacent to
recreatl.onal areas for shade, etc.
b)
(E) Parking Lot Landscape:
l. To avoid undesirable monotony, heat and wind associated with
large parking lots, such lots shall have lineal and row end
internal landscaped island/traffic delineators in addition to
any required traffic safety islands. Landscape islands shall
be at least 5% of the paved parking lot area in excess of
6000 square feet. A parking island is considered to be 9' x
5
18' or 162 square feet (equivalent of one parking stall),
although the shape and location will be a design option of
the developer. Minimum width shall be 6 feet.
2. Industrial storage yards, outdoor retail display areas or
similar type areas are exempted from the parking lot island
requirement.
3. Landscaping of parking lot islands shall include some
combination of mulch, lawn, shrubs and/or trees. The intent
is to provide shade, focus or promote traffic patterns,
(define drive aisles and rows of parking), limit rows of
visually uninterrupted parking stalls to a maximum of 180
feet, soften ground level views, yet maintain appropriate
visibility for safety.
4. Parking lot screening shall be provided on the perimeter of
any new parking lot.
Screening shall be provided using a combination of
shrubs, coniferous trees, fencing, berming, etc., to
minimize the effect of headlights and reflected light
from bumpers, grills, and headlights. Screening must
attempt to address at least 60% of the perimeter where
views of the parking lot could originate.
Effectiveness of the screening shall be 80% opacity
year-round.
Berming must achieve a 30" height to provide 80% opacity
on 3' high screening. (Berms cannot be used as the only
method of screening. They must be used in combination
with other elements.)
Plant materials must be spaced no more than 30" apart on
single rows of deciduous shrubs, 48" apart on double
staggered rows of deciduous shrubs, with initial planted
height of at least 2' (spacing may vary, subject to
species used).
Coniferous trees must be placed no further than 8'
apart, to be counted as screening.
5. All parking lot islands or landscape areas shall be
from the parking surface by cast in place concrete
an e al or better standard. Bituminous or recast
cur or Sl.ml. a u
for existinq uses that are reauired to comDlv with this
ordinance (Section B-2) unless more than 50% of the existinq
aarking or paved area will be reconstructed to accommodate
rainage or general maintenance.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
(F) Other Screening:
Developers shall make design efforts to fully screen service
areas, trash storage, loading, mechanical equipmentl and
other similar areas, from view by the general publ c or
adjacent residential areas. The screening provisions for
parking lots shall be followed except that berming heights
6
effective screening height of 6'. (Berms cannot be used as
the onlr method of screening. They must be used in
combinatl.on with other elements.) Each site will be evaluated
as to its specific needs and solution which may exceed these
minimum standards.
(G) Grounds and Lawns:
1. All areas must be finished off with a stable landscape
(trees, shrubs, turf, mulch, etc.) or hard constructed
surface (concrete, bituminous, pavers, etc.). No site areas
can be left unfinished, subject to erosion. Landscape rock
or bark/wood chi~ mulch may be substituted for sod in shrub
and flower plantl.ng beds and building maintenance strips.
2. All lawn areas and drainage swales shall be sodded. At least
a 2-foot width of sod shall be provided between all
paved/curbed areas and seeded/natural/native areas to provide
a finished edge and control erosion. Seeding or reseeding is
allowed for less visible or large and remote portions of a
site that are unused or subject to future development. Seed
mixes could include prairie grass or other appropriate
low-maintenance mixes. Athletic fields may be seeded.
3. Slopes in excess of 3:1 will not be allowed in areas intended
for maintained turf. Slopes of up to 1-1/2:1 may be allowed
with a slope stabilization ~lan approved by the city;
otherwise terracing and/or retal.ning walls will be required.
4. All areas to be lawn and landscaped shall have a built-in
irrigation system. An irrigation plan shall be required at
the time of obtaining the building permit. This plan shall
indicate the overlapping pattern, head type, control type and
location, source of water and connection method. The system
plan shall be prepared by a qualified designer with
experience designing systems for similar uses (project type
and size). Permanent underground irrigation is not required
for existing, new or re-established natural or native plant
communities.
5. Undisturbed areas containing existing viable natural or
native vegetation shall be maintained free of foreign or
noxious plant materials. Top seeding or enhancement of these
areas should occur as needed and appropriate to fill in thin
areas and revitalize the existing vegetation.
(H) Maintenance Standards:
1. All cultivated landscape areas shall be maintained by the
property owner to present a healthy, neat and orderly area.
This shall include:
a) Maintain a healthy, pest-free condition.
b) Remove dead, diseased or dangerous trees or shrubs or
7
Association and American Nurserymen Association
standards.
d) Mowing and/or removal of noxious weeds and grasses.
e) Remove trash and other debris.
f) watering to ensure plant growth and survival.
2. Natural or native plant communities shall be managed in
order to maintain the plant community for the ~urpose that it
was preserved or created. This includes trimml.ng as needed
of all noxious vegetation and long grasses, removal of trash
or other debris and other horticulturally appropriate
maintenance methods for the specific type of plant
community.
(I) Performance Guarantee:
1. All plants shall be guaranteed by the developer for one year
after total project acceptance.
2. The irrigation system shall be guaranteed for one year
concurrent with the plant guarantee. This will assure one
winter season with a fall shut down and spring start-up.
3. The developer shall notify the City prior to total project
acceptance, for City concurrence on the acceptabilitr of the
complete landscape and irrigation system installatl.on. The
Citr shall issue a letter accepting the landscape and
irrl.gation system installation and therein fixing the date
for guarantee purposes.
4. The developer shall post a letter of credit with the City for
the complete landscape and irrigation system installation
when the building permit is issued (plants, irrigation,
mulch and edgers). The letter of credit shall be held by the
City and used, if necessary, to effect satisfactory
completion of the project in the event of incomplete or
failed work. The value of the letter of credit shall be 125%
of the estimated construction costs for plants, irrigation
system, mulch and edgers.
5. Release of the letter of credit or unused balance shall occur
followin~ the City review of landscape and irrigation
system wl.thin 10 days prior to the expiration of guarantee,
providing that plants are acceptable and irrigation system is
operable on that date.
(J) Submission Requirements:
1. Landscape plans must be drawn to scale, show all proposed
plants, quantities and sizes, seed/sod areas/limits, etc.
The planes) must include the entire project area. Include
project name, developer, registered landscape architect or
landscape designer, architect, dates, existing site
conditions (to~ography, vegetation, ponding areas or water
bodies, utilit1es, boundary data, walks, etc.), proposed site
8
conditions, (grading plan, tree preservation/protection plan,
etc.), site lighting, off site conditions approximately 100
feet beyond the site, and other site conditions that would be
expected to affect landscaping.
2. Calculations to evaluate compliance with the ordinance
~rovisions including: area in square footage and percentage
l.n total area for building, parking lot (including
driveways), landscape areas and total area; and quantities of
trees and shrubs required and planted or preserved.
3. Supportive plans, details, written narrative notes,
cross-sections or other information as may be required by the
Planning Staff that is reasonable and necessary to
demonstrate the design intent and ~eneral com~liance with
this ordinance, including, but not ll.mited to, l.tems listed
under Section (C) 2.
4. Fifteen copies of all plans shall be submitted.
This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage
and publication.
Passed by the City Council
day of
of the City of Prior Lake this
, 1993.
ATTEST:
City Manager
Mayor
Published in the Prior Lake American on the
, 19____
day of
Drafted By:
Greg Kopischke
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
14180 West Trunk Highway 5
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(612)937-5150
9