Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda & Minutes 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. Joint CCILAC Meeting , REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Date: April 7, 1997 1. CALL TO ORDER ............................................................................... 7:30 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES A. February 26, 1997 B. March 17, 1997 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Consider Approval of Invoices to be Paid. B. Consider Approval of Building Permit Report for March. C. Consider Approval of Final Change Order and Payment for Maintenance Center. D. Consider Approval of Prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed District Agreement Regarding Control of Eurasian Millfoil. E. Consider Approval of Ordinance 97-XX Revising the Massage Therapy Ordinance to Clarify Inspection of Premises Used for Massage Therapy. F. Consider Approval of Ordinance 97-XX Amending the Tobacco OrdinarJce to Bring Consistency Wi.!Jl Fe<ieral Age Requirements. G. Consider Approval of Resolution 97~ Approving Extension of Time for Buckingham Recyciing, Inc. Conditional Use Permit. 5. PRESENTATIONS: A. Proclamation Recognizing the Contributions of the Prior Lake Volunteer Fire Department. B. The Referendum Passed, "Now the Fun Begins." Jon Gurban, Executive Director of the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association. C. Consider Referendum Financing Strategy. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ; / A. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Resolution 9-1-XX Approving the Formation of Tax Increment Financing District 2-8. 16200 E~tr>&Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNllY EMPLOYER 7. 8. B. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Resolution 97-~ Approving the 1997 Public Improvement Projects and Preparatiorf'\)of Plans and Specifications Therefore. C. Vacation of Holly Court (to be continued). OLD BUSINESS: A. Consider Approval of Annexation Report and Recommendations. B. Consider Approval of Ordinance 97-XX Rezoning Property from the A-I (Agricultural) District to the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District for "Windstar Addition". C. Consider Approval of Mobile Data Terminal Lease Agreement with Scott County . NEW BUSINESS: " ,) ! A. Consider Approval of Resolution 97-XX Authorizing Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik Professional Services to Design Well #6. B. Consider Approval of Resolution ~..xx Approving Conditional Use Permit for Lemke Professional Building: C. Consider Approval of Park and Library,Con,struction Strategy. D. Consider Approval of Resolution 97-XX Approving Final Plat of the Wilds 3rd Addition and Development Contract. E. Consider Approval of Report Regarding Desired form of Watershed Governance for the Credit River WMO and Shakopee Basin WMO 9. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Executive Session to Discuss Pending Litigation. 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS/CORRESPONDENCE A. Update on Status of Mark Michael Home Occupation Permit. 11. ADJOURNMENT 4797.DOC ", Joint City Council / Lake Advisory Committee April 7, 1997, 5:30 p.m. Fire Station Council Chambers 5:30 p.m. - Light Supper 1. Annual Report from Lake Advisory Committee Report from Committee Chair. 2. Discuss 1997 Lake Advisory Committee Top Priority Goals · City Council Top Priority Goals (for information). · Lake Advisory Committee Top Priority Goals (for discussion). 3. Other Business . Upcoming 4. Adjourn - 7:00 p.rn 16200 EaglOOD~'AGe:NiUs.\-t~d...a~ Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 1997 CITY COUNCIL TOP PRIORITY GOALS Adopted February 3, 1997 The following are the City Council's top priorities for completion. They are not listed in priority order. · Complete revision of Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Code. · Complete Annexation Process as Directed. · Adopt a 1998 General Fund Budget which provides needed services with no tax increase, including general fund and Capital Improvement Program Expenditures. · Update Mission Statement for 1997 and development plan for sharing with community stakeholders. · Receive the following new ordinance: (a) Animal Control · Sell at least two acres of business park property. · Acquire Fire Station II property. · Conduct annual meetings with: School Board, Watershed Board, Townships and Scott County to discuss issues of mutual importance. · Provide direction to Advisory Bodies by meeting with them at least once a year. · Consider completion of Scientific Survey of Prior Lake taxpayers to receive feedback on city servIces. · Complete update of Personnel Policy for Council consideration. · Implement a two-year program for construction of City entry monuments at all of our City's permanent points of entry. · Conduct a feasibility and cost study to direct capital planning for water system and City build- out. · Formalize a program of Civic Education to Prior Lake youth as part of our City work. · Examine the cost effectiveness of City service delivery considering one area each year. · Support efforts by the Economic Development Authority to foster a greater business presence in Prior Lake. ccgoaJ97.doc OUTLINE OF THE 1997 LAKE ADVISORY COMMITTEE GOAL AND OBJECTIVES 1. ADVOCACY: Act as an advocate for the City in day to day dealings with the Prior Lake- Spring Lake Watershed District and other Cities. 2. WATER QUALITY: Work with Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District on implementing the District Improvement Projects. The LAC will support the Watershed District by having a member on the.Prior Lake/Spring Lake Advisory Committee. 3. WATER QUALITY: Establish a water quality monitoring program to measure the effectiveness of water quality (NURP) ponds in reducing sediment and nutrient loads from storm water runoff. 4. WATER QUALITY: Continue to use grant money from the DNR for treating eurasian milfoil in Prior Lake. Also, continue to map the existence of eurasian milfoil in Lower and Upper Prior Lakes. 5. WATER LEVEL: Continue to work with the watershed in assisting them with water level control. 6. WATER USE: Work with Scott County Sheriffs Department lobbying for more effective enforcement of the Surface Water Ordinance. 7. PUBLIC EDUCATION: Write at least one article for inclusion in the Prior Lake American and quarterly Wavelength issues, regarding lakeshore erosion issues, lawn care techniques, proper grass disposal, etc. 8. PUBLIC EDUCATION: Develop an educational brochure informing individuals on all basic issues affecting water quality. 9. GOVERNANCE: Review ordinances governing natural environment lakes. 10. GOVERNANCE: Review uses of non-vacated public (non DNR) accesses. Investigate the status of council decisions made concerning the Lake Access Study. 11. GOVERNANCE: Monitor the list of CIP projects which are funded by the stormwater utility fee to be worked on by the water resources coordinator. - ~IT -i 7:00 p.m. FORUM MINUTES OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL Date: March 17, 1997 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Andren called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Present were: Mayor Andren, Councilmembers Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, City Attorneys Pace and Brokl, City Manager Boyles, Assistant City Manager Tremere, Planning Director Rye, Planning Coordinator Kansier, Public Works Director Ilkka, and Executive Secretary Oden. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Andren led the Pledge of Allegiance and welcomed everyone to the meeting. 3. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES: . Counci1member Mader said he was not sure about all the motions, if they were correct or not. He said the motion for staff to meet with Mr. Michaels was made by Mader and seconded by Kedrowski and there was nothing in the motion about meeting with Mr. Michael's attorney. Resolution 97-15 "as revised by staff', should have the exact words of what was changed. On page 6, there was a motion approving the Windstar Addition there should be exact wording of the language developed by the staff and City Attorney which went into the resolution. MOTION KEDROWSKI SECOND SCHENCK TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 3, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS AMENDED. Upon a vote, ayes by Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, abstentions by Greenfield and Andren, the motion carried. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Consider Approval of Invoices to be Paid. B. Consider Approval of Treasurer's Report. C. Consider Approval of Animal Warden Report for February, 1997. D. Consider Approval of Fire Call Report for February, 1997 E. Consider Approval of 1996 Variance Summary Report. F. Consider Approval of 1996 Annual Building Report. G. Consider Approval of Preliminary 1996 Fourth Quarter Budget Report and Overview H. Consider Approval of Recommendation for Appointment of Prior Lake / Spring Lake Watershed District Manager Representing Prior Lake. I. Consider Approval of Building Permit Report for February, 1997 J. Consider Approval of Revised Purchasing Policy Guidelines. K. Consider Approval of Authorization of Advance of Annual Levy to Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVT A). L. Consider Approval of 1996 Planned Unit Development Status Report. 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING . Councilmember Mader requested the removal of items A, E, G, H, J, K from the Consent Agenda for discussion. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY MADER TO APPROVE ITEMS B,C,D,F, I, L OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. Item 4A) Consider Approval of Invoices to be Paid: . Councilmember Mader asked for clarification of some of the invoice items. He said there were a number of items of fairly significant dollar amounts that were not being explained. He asked about a Star and Tribune expenditure of $4,000. Assistant City Manager Tremere explained it was for employment ads. . Councilmember Mader asked about the Ameridata expenditure; he wanted to know what it was for. Assistant City Manager Tremere explained it was for computer equipment. . Councilmember Mader asked about A VW group; he wanted to know what it was. City Manager Boyles explained that it was for an audio visual equipment firm for advanced audio visual equipment for the Council Chambers. . Councilmember Mader asked about the $1,243.95 charge for the parks. He wanted to know what this was for. City Manager Boyles explained the charge was for restroom enclosures. MOTION BY MADER SECOND BY KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 4A, INVOICES TO BE PAID. . Councilmember Greenfield said he appreciates that Councilmember Mader is concerned and asking questions, but that Councilmember Mader should ask clarification questions of staffbefore the meeting in the interest oftime and efficiency. . Councilmember Mader said that he interpreted from the Bylaws changes that he should not contact staff members directly, but should go through the City Manager, and the City Manager was difficult to reach. . Mayor Andren said if a Councilmember is having difficulty communicating with staff, then that could be addressed through the City Manager or the City Council. She said administrative details such as this could be clarified ahead of time, so that half an hour of time of the citizens and the Council was not wasted. . Councilmember Mader said that he has not taken a half hour, and more time has been taken complaining about him asking the questions than him actually asking the questions. . Councilmember Kedrowski said there was a question on table. 31797.DOC 2 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING . Mayor Andren called the question. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. Item 4E) Consider Approval of 1996 Variance Summary Report: · Councilmember Mader asked about variance hardship standards, and asked for a clarification. · Planning Director Rye said before 1995, the variance criteria spelled out in the ordinance were not always followed. · Councilmember Mader asked if that meant if it was more subjective up until 1995, and now was used more literally. · Planning Director Rye said since 1995, the staff and Planning Commission were adhering more closely to the ordinance. MOTION BY MADER SECOND BY KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE ITEM 4E OF THE CONSENT AGENDA, CONSIDER APPROVAL OF 1996 VARIANCE SUMMARY REPORT. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. Item 4G) Consider Approval of 1996 Fourth Quarter Budget Report and Overview: . Councilmember Mader said the fourth quarter budget report should not be considered as a routine item. He asked about the second page of the report, where there was a $24,000 expenditure, and asked if it was for the consultant. City Manager Boyles said yes. . Councilmember Mader asked about the fifth bullet item, and additional labor services. City Manager Boyles said it was for the labor attorney. . Councilmember Mader asked about Data Processing totals, where there was an additional $7,500 purchasing, which was ordered but not yet received. Assistant City Manager Tremere said it was back-ordered through the manufacturer and had not yet arrived. . Councilmember Mader said that they were on a cash flow basis, which should mean goods and services are paid for as they are received. He asked about outstanding encumbrances, and the expenditure summary on the following page. He said one of the issues they had talked about was that expenditures were incurred when the bills were paid, and the budget showed it in a way that it was reserve. MOTION MADER SECOND KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE ITEM 4G, CONSIDER APPROVAL OF FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET REPORT AND OVERVIEW. 31797.DOC 3 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. B. Consider Approval of Ordinance 97-XX Rezoning Property from the A-l (Agricultural) District to the R-l (Suburban Residential) Districtfor "Windstar Addition". . City Manager Boyles introduced the item and reviewed the agenda report for item 7B of the March 17, 1997 City Council meeting. He noted Council had deferred action on this item from the March 3, 1997 meeting for a vote. MOTION KEDROWSKI SECOND BY SCHENCK TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 97-XX REZONING PROPERTY FROM THE A-I DISTRICT TO THE R-1 DISTRICT FOR "WINDSTAR ADDITION". . Councilmember Mader suggested the item be tabled until questions about the plat are addressed. . Mayor Andren said there may be a legal question, since the preliminary plat is contingent upon rezoning, and there was a question raised by some neighboring property owners on whether the Planning Commission recommendation was carried forward. . Councilmember Kedrowski withdrew the motion, Counci1member Schenck withdrew the second. MOTION BY ANDREN SECOND BY KEDROWSKI TO TABLE UNTIL THE APRIL 7TH, 1997 MEETING. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. 8. NEW BUSINESS: A. Consider Approval of Resolution 97-20 Approving the Final Plat and Developers Agreementfor "Wilderness Ponds 2nd Addition". . City Manager Boyles introduced the item and reviewed the agenda report for item 8A of the March 17, 1997 City Council meeting. Resolution 97-20 and the Developers Agreement were included in the report. . Councilmember Mader asked about Resolution 97-20. He said item 6 should say requInng approval in 1997, not 1996. He said in Director Teschner's letter, storm water management fee should be $129,000 not $29,000. On the developer costs, page 5 of agreement, he said it appears the total cost is $352,000-it says the developer owes the City $261,000 and the City owes the Developer $51,000. Exhibit D reflects storm sewer cost, and City Cost. . Public Works Director Ilkka said storm water management fee does not match what is in the agreement and the net lot area is different. He said the total project cost is the developer's costs. The $51,000 is reimbursement of storm sewer. . Councilmember Mader asked is there a cost to the taxpayers, or are all the costs being paid for by the developer? . Public Works Director Ilkka said there is not an additional cost to the taxpayers. 31797.DOC 6 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MOTION KEDROWSKI SECOND SCHENCK TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 97-20 APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT FOR "WILDERNESS PONDS 2ND ADDITION'. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. B. Consider Approval of Resolution 97-21 Authorizing Maier, Stewart, and Assoc. Inc. to Prepare Plans and Specifications for Fish Point Road within Cardinal Ridge Fifth Addition. · City Manager Boyles introduced the item and reviewed the agenda report for item 8B of the March 17, 1997 City Council meeting. MSA was being recommended. . . . . . 31797.DOC MOTION KEDROWSKI SECOND SCHENCK TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 97-21 AUTHORIZING MAIER, STEWART, AND ASSOCIATES, INe. TO PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FISH POINT ROAD WITHIN CARDINAL RIDGE FIFTH ADDITION. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. C. Consider Approval of Resolution 97-XX Denying an Appeal of Variance Request for John Mahoney on Property Located at 15731 Highland Avenue. Mayor Andren left the table, explaining her friendship with the property owner could be construed as conflict of interest. City Manager Boyles introduced the item and reviewed the agenda report for item 8C of the March 17, 1997 City Council meeting. He said the current code provides for a 75 foot setback. The Council could adopt the resolution denying the appeal, or defer action, and direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve the variance. Planning Director Rye addressed the item, The applicant wishes to remove the deck and replace it with an enclosed porch with the same setback. The staff recommendation was denial of variance, and denial of variance does not deny reasonable use of the property. There was an error in surveying the property, but the staff recommendation remained the same. On February 25, Mr. Mahoney appealed the decision of the Planning Commission to the CC. The lot is greater than 15,000 square feet and is 100 feet wide at the lake and 76 feet wide at the front. There are legal alternatives for another deck, and the Planning Commission concluded that compliance with the ordinance would not result in hardship. Staff recommended City Council support PC with adoption. Councilmember Greenfield asked if the existing deck was considered impervious surface. Planning Director Rye said impervious surface was not an issue in this case. . Councilmember Greenfield asked if it was same setback as the existing deck. 7 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING . Planning Director Rye said the existing deck was nonconforming and could stay there, but once removed, it could not be rebuilt. . Councilmember Mader asked if when this resident was in the process of a variance application, was a hardship as defined under current ordinance alluded to? Does anything support the application from standpoint of hardship issue? . Planning Director Rye said there was nothing indicating a hardship. He said there have been a significant number of variances from the ordinary high water mark, and City should consider change in it. He said it would be his recommendation to permit a setback less than 75 feet. He would need to research why there was a 75 foot rather than 50 foot setback. . Councilmember Kedrowski asked if it would be within the next ninety days, and said he was interested in adjusting the setback from 75 to 50. . Planning Director Rye said there was probably a rationale for it, but they had not yet researched it. MOTION KEDROWSKI SECOND SCHENCK TO HAVE STAFF PREP ARE RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS OF FACT TO OVERTURN RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION. . Councilmember Mader said there should not be a variance granted unless there is a hardship. One of the major complaints about the City was that variances were subjectively administered. He said Planning Director Rye said the City frequently applied criteria not in the ordinance prior to 1995. . Councilmember Kedrowski said the reality was that this issue has come about before, as in the example of substandard lots. . City Attorney Pace said the issue that the Council had to decide was whether the Council believed there was a hardship or whether the residents met the criteria for a variance. . Councilmember Greenfield said reviewing variances was not simply an administrative exercise, and it was important for the Council to look at it as a tool. He said what are the concerns facing the community in dealing with high water mark variances? Was there a reason it kept coming up? He referred to Consent Agenda Item 4E, 1996 Variance Summary, in which there were 10 Ordinary High Water setbacks, representing 24% of the variance requests. He said maybe staff needs to be directed that this setback be modified. When looking at a variance, it is always somewhat ~ubjective, as each case is individual. . Councilmember Kedrowski said maybe Council should table this and consider bringing it back with a possible ordinance amendment. . Councilmember Greenfield said there was always a concern on how this would be handled. The situation on the current ordinance is that the same deck could be replaced, and these people want to replace the same deck but with a 3-season porch. He recalled a case when a resident asked for a variance for a two car garage, and two car garage was given because of the winter. This deck 31797.DOC 8 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING would allow use of the property in the summer season, providing a place away from the mosquitoes. · Councilmember Kedrowski said they should provide staff with a specific direction tonight. · City Attorney Pace asked Planning Director Rye about a variance subject to a 60 day rule. If it is denied, can it be brought back? · Planning Director Rye said not under current provisions. He said a resolution could be at next meeting, but an appeal constitutes a separate action. · Councilmember Kedrowski said he would withdraw the motion, and Council could consider ordinance amendment; 120 days additional. · Councilmember Greenfield noted that the City Attorney said with the applicant's approval, it could be extended to any period of time. A change in the high water mark setback would be an amendment to the ordinance. · The Attorney for the Fong's, Ed Christian, said there was no hardships presented on the applications. He said the house was built with approval of City with permit. Guest cottage and house were torn down. He received a permit to build a house and deck, 51 feet from the ordinary high water mark. He questioned whether the CUP had to be obtained, when the setback is the same as the deck. · Mr. Christian stated that the City Staff is saying they could build behind garage. If they did that, it would be to go through the garage. He said the porch should have access to patio doors. A split level home does not lend itself to porch behind deck. He said with the 10 steps going down, this would be 44 feet. Using the setback averaging provisions of 44', 51', and 66' would make the most sense for a setback. The three things he wanted to consider was there is not any additional setbacks being asked for. There is no real feasible alternative. He wants the Council to know, that if it is turned down, it will still be there. · Councilmember Kedrowski withdrew the motion, Councilmember Schenck withdrew the second. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI SECOND BY SCHENCK TO TABLE UNTIL TIME CERTAIN APRIL 21ST. Upon a vote, ayes by Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. Mayor Andren returned to the table. MOTION KEDROWSKI SECOND BY SCHENCK TO DIRECT STAFF TO CONSIDER CHANGING ZONING ORDINANCE FROM A 75 FOOT SETBACK TO A 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK. . Councilmember Mader said Council should direct Staff to look over whole ordinance, and rather than directing Planning Department to revise to 50 feet, it should be recommended that Planning 31797.DOC 9 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Department review the issue and come back to the Council with recommendations for changing setback. . Councilmember Kedrowski said the reason for 50 feet was that it was suggested to him. . Mayor Andren said it was from the DNR minimum, and she was there when it was voted in for 75 feet instead of 50 feet. . Mayor Andren called the question. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, and Schenck, nay Mader, the motion carried. . Councilmember Greenfield said an amendment to the ordinance that replaces existing decks could be that 3 season porches should be considered as part of deck replacement if it is the same dimension of the existing porch. MOTION BY GREENFIELD SECOND BY ANDREN TO ADD THREE SEASON PORCHES AS PART OF REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING DECKS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, and Schenck, nay Mader, the motion carried. D. Consider Approval of Ordinance 97-08 Amending the Zoning Ordinance and City Code Relating to the Definition of Minimum Lot Area in the Shoreland District. . City Manager Boyles introduced the item, which was already in Shoreland Ordinance. MOTION SCHENCK SECOND KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 97-08 AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND CITY CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF MINIMUM LOT AREA IN THE SHORELAND DISTRICT. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. 9. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Councilmember Schenck handed out Prior Lake's Tobacco Ordinance 96-16. He said page number four, age 25 needs to be amended to 26. 1;'he second area should be compliance checks, which should be in the ordinance. . City Attorney Pace said the ordinance did not currently provide for compliance checks; there were a lot of contingencies to go into compliance checks, you do limit yourself when you define a procedure. There needs to be something in the ordinance to ensure that compliance checks should be done. . Counci1member Mader recalled there was general discussion, but it could create a problem not a solution. 31797.DOC 10 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 17, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING · City Attorney Pace said it was her recommendation that everyone should be notified that there would be periodic compliance checks. It would prevent arbitrary enforcement of the ordinance. She did not know how many licensees, but if everyone was put on notice, it would be easier. · Councilmember Mader said how would having compliance checks in the ordinance help? If Police did not enforce it, it would not help. He gave the example of posted speed limits, which are not in City ordinances. MOTION BY SCHENCK SECOND BY KEDROWSKI THAT CITY ATTORNEY CHANGE ITEM 4. LINE 5 YEARS FROM 25 TO 26. Upon a vote, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader, and Schenck, the motion carried. 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS/CORRESPONDENCE 11. ADJOURNMENT The meet' g was adjourned at 9:30 by General Consent. 31797 DOC 11 Special Meeting of Prior Lake City Council February 26, 1997 · Acting Mayor Schenck called the meeting to order at 5:39 p.m. · Present were: Acting Mayor Schenck, Councilmembers Kedrowski, Mader, City Manager Boyles, Finance Director Teschner, and Parks and Recreation Director Hokeness. · Acting Mayor Schenck announced that the purpose of the meeting is to canvas the Special Park and Library Election of Tuesday, February 25, 1997. MOTION KEDROWSKI, SECOND MADER, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 97-09 RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO CANVASS THE RETURNS OF THE SPECIAL PARKS AND LIBRARY REFERENDUM ELECTION. Upon a vote taken, ayes by Schenck, Kedrowski, and Mader, the motion carried. . was adjourned at 5:40 p.m. 16200 ~IZ~\~ek.l~~1f.E?PpHdf(&ke. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQL;AL OPPORTUNITY E.l'vIPLOYER