HomeMy WebLinkAbout8A - Building Permits Certificate of Survey
"
STAFF AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT:
8~
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
JAY SCHERER, ACTING BUILDING OFFICIAL
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 97-XX
PERTAINING TO CERTIFICATE OF SUR\t'EY
REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMITS
AUGUST 4, 1997
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
The staff and the City Council have recently received several
questions about the need for a certificate of survey when
obtaining a building permit. Support staff have indicated that
this is a common complaint received from homeowners who
wish to improve their homes. The Council directed the staff to
review these requirements to determine if other means could be
employed which are equally effective and less expensive.
BACKGROUND:
The need for surveys was discussed by the Planning and Building
Inspections staff, who then prepared the attached memorandum
outlining the background of the survey requirements. This
memorandum was presented to the City Council on June 23,
1997. The Council directed the staff to prepare an ordinance
which would set forth the requirements for a certificate of survey
in the building permit process.
DISCUSSION:
In 1978, the Council approved Resolution 78-1 which required a
certificate of survey be submitted as part of an application for all
building permits. In 1995, the Council adopted Resolution 95-64
which exempted replacement decks outside of the Shore land or
Flood Plain districts from the survey requirement.
The proposed ordinance is an attempt to clarify \vhen surveys are
truly needed, and to employ means other than surveys when
possible. The ordinance still requires a certificate of survey for
all new construction. It also exempts all replacement decks, not
just those outside of the Shore land or Flood Plain districts.
Finally, the ordinance allows some additions and new
construction without a new certificate survey, subject to certain
limitations, such as size of the structure, the location of property
pins, and so on.
The purpose of this ordinance is to make it very clear when new
I: \ 97 files\ 97 ordamd\citycode\survey\surveyc2. doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
Ai'i EQl)AL OPPORTLi'iITY E:-.1PLOYER
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
ACTION REQUIRED:
1:197 fi 1 es\97 ordamdlci tycodelsurveylsurveyc2. doc
surveys will be required. In the situations where new surveys are
not required, the conditions will still provide some level of
protection to the City that the proposed structure is located
properly.
It is also important the Council and the public be aware that the
City does not have a certificate of survey on file for every
property. In those instances where there is no record of an
existing survey, a new certificate of survey will still be required.
The proposed ordinance also outlines some situations in which
the City may request a new survey, even if the proposed addition
or structure meets the requirements. These criteria are intended
to protect the City in the event the existing survey is inadequate
or incomplete.
1. Adopt Ordinance 97-XX as recommended by staff.
2. Defer action on this ordinance, and direct staff to provide
additional information to the City Council.
3. Deny the proposed amendment.
Alternative # I.
to at or~inance 97-XX
Reviewed By:
Mrx:tc
oyles, City Manager
~.
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
ORDINANCE NO. 97-XX
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 4-1-7 TO THE PRIOR LAKE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Prior Lake does hereby ordain:
Chapter 4 of the Prior Lake City Code is hereby amended to add Section 4-1-7 reading as
follows:
4-1-7 REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF SURVEYS AS PART OF THE
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS
(A) A certified lot survey with all improvements shown thereon, and prepared by a
registered land surveyor, is required as part of the building permit application for
all new construction unless exempted by the provisions listed in this section.
(B) In the case of a replacement deck only, the property owner may, in lieu of the
certificate of survey, provide clear field identification of the lot pins. and a to-scale
drawing of the lot accurately portraying all current construction on the property and
showing all dimensions from the structures to the side, rear and front lot lines,
provided that:
1. The replacement deck must be the exact width, depth and height of the
existing structure.
2. The location and size of the existing deck must be verified by City staff.
3. The site plan must be accurate and specific to the satisfaction of City staff.
4. The new deck must comply with all current Building Code requirements.
5. The City may request a new certificate of survey be provided if. in the City's
discretion, it is considered desirable under the following circumstances:
a) The existing survey shows proposed structures rather than existing
structures.
b) The existing survey does not show all the structures on the property.
c) The topography or other physical characteristics of the site are such that
the City cannot reasonably verify the location of the existing and/or
proposed structures, even though the property pins have been located.
1:\97files\97ordamd\citycode\survey\ord97xx.doc Page I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQl'AL OPPORTlNITY E"-,lPLOYER
d) The existing survey does not identify the existing easements on the site.
e) A new certificate of survey is necessary to determine elevations on the
site for the purpose of identifying drainage patterns, wetlands, bluffs,
flood elevations, and/or ordinary high water elevations
f) The City has reason to believe the conditions on the property may have
changed since the date of the original survey.
g) The City believes the proposed project may create aesthetic issues
which require additional information.
h) The City believes the proposed project may impact adjacent property
values in such a manner that additional information is required.
6. Any subsequent addition to the replacement deck in width, depth, steps, roof
or amenities may require that a certificate of survey be completed and
submitted with that permit, unless exempted by the provisions listed in this
section.
(C) A new certificate of survey will not be required for additions to existing structures
or new accessory structures on lots outside of the Shoreland and/or Flood Plain
district, subject to the following provisions:
1. The existing survey must be signed by a registered land surveyor, and must
depict the actual location of the existing structures on the lot.
2. The City will require that property pins be located on the site so staff can
verify the structure setbacks.
3. The addition and/or new structures must be drawn on the survey to scale.
4. The proposed addition or structure does not exceed 480 square feet.
5. The applicant must sign an agreement holding the City harmless from any
damages incurred if the building is placed inaccurately on the site.
6. The City may request a new certificate of survey be provided if, in the City's
discretion, it is considered desirable under the following circumstances:
a) The existing survey shows proposed structures rather than existing
structures.
b) The existing survey does not show all the structures on the property.
c) The topography or other physical characteristics of the site are such that
the City cannot reasonably verify the location of the existing and/or
proposed structures, even though the property pins have been located.
d) The existing survey does not identify the existing easements on the site.
1:\97files\97ordarnd\citycode\survey\ord97xx.doc
Page 2
1, Y
e) A new certificate of survey is necessary to determine elevations on the
site for the purpose of identifying drainage patterns, wetlands, bluffs,
flood elevations, and/or ordinary high water elevations
f) The City has reason to believe the conditions on the property may have
changed since the date of the original survey.
g) The City believes the proposed project may create aesthetic issues
which require additional information.
h) The City believes the proposed project may impact adjacent property
values in such a manner that additional information is required.
(D) A new certificate of survey will not be required for new decks within the Shoreland
and/or Flood Plain Districts, subject to the following provisions:
1. The existing survey must be signed by a registered land surveyor, and must
depict the actual location of the existing structures on the lot.
2. The City will require that property pins be located on the site so staff can
verify the structure setbacks.
3. The addition and/or new structures must be drawn on the survey to scale.
4. The applicant must sign an agreement holding the City harmless from any
damages incurred if the building is placed inaccurately on the site.
5. The City may request a new certificate of survey be provided if. in the City's
discretion, it is considered desirable under the following circumstances:
a) The existing survey shows proposed structures rather than existing
structures.
b) The existing survey does not show all the structures on the property.
c) The topography or other physical characteristics of the site are such that
the City cannot reasonably verify the location of the existing and/or
proposed structures, even though the property pins have been located.
d) The existing survey does not identify the existing easements on the site.
e) A new certificate of survey is necessary to determine elevations on the
site for the purpose of identifying drainage patterns, wetlands, bluffs,
flood elevations, and/or ordinary high water elevations
f) The City has reason to believe the conditions on the property may have
changed since the date of the original survey.
g) The City believes the proposed project may create aesthetic issues
which require additional information.
I: \97 fi les\ 97 ordamd\citycode\surv eylord97xx. doc
Page 3
h) The City believes the proposed project may impact adjacent property
values in such a manner that additional information is required.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Prior Lake this 4th day of August, 1997.
ATTEST:
City Manager
Mayor
Published in the Prior Lake American on the _ day of
,1996.
Drafted By:
City of Prior Lake Planning Department
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
I :\97files\97 ordamd\ci tycode\survey\ord97xx. doc
Page 4
Memorandum
TO: Frank Boyles, City Manager
Don Rye, Planning Director
FROM: Jane Kansier, Planning Coordinator
Jay Scherer, Building Inspector
DATE: June11,1997
RE: Requirements for Certificates of Survey
Recently, there have been several questions about the need for surveys for both new and
replacement decks. We have been asked to review this issue and make some suggestions
about some potential revisions to the current policy. In discussing this issue, we
determined some clarification is necessary on the need for surveys in all instances, not
just the construction of decks. The following is a summary of our review and our
recommendations.
BACKGROUND:
The need for surveys is implied under Section 106 of the Building Code. Specifically,
Section 106.3.3 states "plans and specifications shall be drawn to scale upon substantial
paper or cloth and shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent
of the work proposed and show in detail that it will conform to the provisions of this code
and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. "
In 1978. the Council adopted Resolution #78-1 requiring a "certified lot survey with all
improvements shown thereon, as part of the application for a building permit in the City
of Prior Lake. "
In 1993, the Council adopted the Shoreland District provisions as an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance. Section 5-8-3 (B) of these provisions requires that "impervious
surface coverage shall be documented by a certificate of survey at the time of any zoning
or building permit application..." In addition, Section 5-6-6 of the Zoning Ordinance
requires a certificate of survey with a variance application.
Finally, in 1995, the Council adopted Resolution #95-64 which exempted replacement
decks only lying outside of the Shoreland or Flood Plain districts from the survey
requirements.
REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
A. Allowing Replacement Decks Without Surveys
Resolution #95-64 currently allows permits for replacement decks outside of the
Shoreland District to be issued without surveys, subject to the following conditions:
1) The replacement deck must be the exact width, depth and height of the existing
structure.
2) The property must be located outside of the floodplain or shoreland.
3) The plat plan must be accurate and specific to the satisfaction of City staff.
4) That the City has a right to request a certificate of survey be provided if in the
City staff s sole discretion it is considered desirable under the circumstances.
5) That any subsequent addition to the replacement deck in width, depth, steps, roof
or amenities will require that a certificate of survey be completed and submitted
with that permit.
While evaluating whether a certificate of survey should be required for replacement
decks in the shoreland or flood plain districts, we need to determine what, if any, are
the ramifications of no survey. We suggest the following:
. Increase in impervious surface: there is a possibility of increase in impervious
surface; however, we can monitor whether or not additional impervious
surface will be created through the building permit. If there is additional
impervious surface, we would require a new certificate of survey.
. Increased impact on the flood plain: there is a possibility the structure could
be built below the flood elevation, or additional openings below the flood
elevation may be added. Again, we can monitor this through the building
permit review process.
. No permit for the original deck: this is also a possibility, especially in older
areas. However, this same possibility occurs outside of the shoreland and
flood plain districts.
It should be noted that a property owner could conceivably construct a platform deck
(a deck less than 30" off the ground and not connected to the house) without
obtaining any permits. In our opinion, these decks have the same impact as a
replacement deck.
In conclusion, there is no need for a new certificate of survey for replacement decks
in the shore land or flood plain districts, subject to the five conditions in Resolution
#95-64, except #2, and with the following additional conditions:
6) The location and size of the existing deck must be verified by City staff.
7) The new deck must comply with all current Building Code requirements.
2
B. Allowing Construction of Structures or Additions Other Than Replacement
Decks on Property Outside of the Shoreland or Flood Plain District Without a
New Survey
We also looked at situations where we could allow an addition or new structure
without a new survey. We concluded it would be acceptable subject to the following
criteria:
1) The existing survey must be signed by a registered land surveyor, and must depict
the location of the structures on the lot.
2) The City will require that property pins be located on the site so staff can verify
the structure setbacks.
3) The addition and/or new structures must be drawn on the survey to scale.
4) Any addition or structure exceeding 480 square feet will require a new survey.
5) The City has a right to request a certificate of survey be provided if in the City
staff s sole discretion it is considered desirable under the circumstances.
There are a couple of issues which must be discussed if we are to adopt the above
policy. First of all, many of the surveys we have on file label the structures as
"proposed". If we are to accept these surveys, we make an assumption that the
structure was built in the location shown. If we do not wish to accept these surveys,
we should purge our files so we no longer distribute these to the public. The second
issue is the limitation on the size of new structures or additions. We have suggested
480 square feet because it is the size of a small two car garage. This limitation can be
set higher or lower.
C. Allowing Construction of New Decks Within the Shoreland or Flood Plain
District Without a New Survey
New decks within the shoreland or flood plain areas may also be allowed without a
new certificate of survey with the following conditions:
1) The existing survey must be signed by a registered land surveyor, and must depict
the location of the structures on the lot.
2) The City will require that property pins be located on the site so staff can verify
the structure setbacks.
3) The addition and/or new structures must be drawn on the survey to scale.
4) The City has a right to request a certificate of survey be provided if in the City
staff s sole discretion it is considered desirable under the circumstances.
3
D. Allowing Construction of Structures, Additions or Covered Decks on Property
Within the Shoreland or Flood Plain District Without a New Survey
In no instance should an addition, covered deck or new freestanding structure be
allowed in the Shoreland or Flood Plain district without a new survey. The purpose
of the survey is to obtain accurate impervious surface calculations and to be sure the
structure complies with flood plain elevations and requirements.
E. Variance Applications
The Zoning Ordinance also requires a new certificate of survey for a variance
application. This provision should continue.
CONCLUSION:
If the current City policy is changed to reflect the above recommendations, we would also
recommend that this policy be adopted as an amendment to the City Code rather than as a
resolution. If this is an ordinance, it is more official, and less subject to interpretation
than an amendment.
4
106-106.3.1
1994 UNIFORM BUILDING COOE
SECTION 106 - PERMITS
106.1 Permits Required. Except as specified in Section 106.2 of this section. no buildin!2 or
structure regulated by this code shall be erected. constructed. wlarged. altered. repaired. mo~ed.
improved. removed. converted or demolished unless a separate permit for each building or struc-
ture has first been obtained from the building otTicial.
106.2 Work Exempt from Permit. A building permit shall not be required for the following:
I. One.-story detached accessory buildings used as tool and storage sheds. playhouses and simI-
lar uses. provided the projected roof area does nO[ exceed 120 square feet ( 11.15 m:).
2 Fences nO[ over 6 feet (1829 mm) high.
3. Oil derricks.
-l. ylovable cases. counters and partitions not over 5 feet 9 inc!1es (1753 mm) high.
5. Retaining walls which are nO[ over -l. feet i 1219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of
toe footing to the top of the wall. unless supporting a surc!1arge or impounding Class I. II or III-.-\
liquids.
6. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5.000 gallons
(18 927 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width docs not exceed 2 to I.
7. Platforms. wJ.lks and driveways not more than 30 inches (76:::' mm) above gr:J.de and not over
any basement or story below.
8. Painting. papering and similar finish work.
9. Temporary motion pica:re. television and the:.lter stage sets and scenery.
10. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall of Group R. Division 3. and Group :V[ Occu-
pancies when projecting not more than 54 inches (1372 mm).
11. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R. Division 3 Occupancy in which the
pool walls are entirely above the adjacent grade and if the c:J.pacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons
(18927 L).
Unless otherwise exempted. separate plumbmg. deccric:J.l and mechanical permits will be re-
quired for the above-exempted items.
Exemption from the permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authoriZ:J.tion
for any work to be done in any manner in violatlon of the tJrovisions of thls code or any other laws or
ordinances of this Junsdiction.
106.3 Application for Permit.
106.3.1 Application. To obtain a permit. the applicant shail first fik an application th~~efor in
writing on a form furnished by the code enforcement age:1cy for :hat ;Jurpose. Every such applica-
tion shail:
1. Identify and describe the work to be covered by the permit for which application tS made.
2. Describe the land on which the ;Jroposed work is to be done by legal description. street address
or similar description that will readily identify and definitely locate the proposed building or work.
3. Indicate the use or occupancy for which the proposed work is intended.
4. Be accompanied by plans. diagrams. computations and specifications and other data as re-
quired tn Section 106.3.2.
5. State the valuation of any ne'N building or structure or any addition. remodeling or alteration
to an existing building.
6. Be signed by the applicant. or the applicant's authorized agent.
1~
1305.0106 SECTION 106, PERMITS.
Subpart t. Section 106..2 Work Exempt from Permit. S~ction 106.2 of the UBC is amended by the
addition of item 12 [0 read :lS follows:
12. Agricultural buildings as detined in :Vlinnesota Statutes. section 16B.60, subdivision 5.
Subp.2. Section 106.3..2 Submittal documents. Section 106.3.2 of the UBC, the first paragraph. is
amended to read as follows:
106.3..2 Submittal documents. Plans. specifications. engineering calculations. diagrams. soil investi-
gation reports. special inspection and struCtural observation programs. and other data shall constitute
the submittal documents and shall be submitted in one or more sets with each application for a permit.
The building official may require that the pbns or other data be prepared in accordance with the rules
of the Board of Architecture. Engineering. Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, and Interior
Design. Minnesota Rules. chapter 1800. and Minnesota Statutes. sections 326.02 to 326.15. and other
state laws relating to pian and specification preparation by occupational licenses.
1994 U.B.C. Minnesota Slate Amendments 1-4
1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
106.3.1-106.3.5
-7. Give such orher data 3.l1d information as may be required by the building otficiaL
106.3.2. Submittal documents. Plans. specifications. ~nginee::ng caicuJations. diagrams. soil in-
vestigation reports. special inspection and structural observation progr:J.ms and Other data shall con-
stitute the submittal documents and shall be submitted in one or more sets with ~ach applic:uion for
a permit. When such plans are not prepared by an architect or ~ngineer. the building official mav
require the applicant submitting such plans or other data to demonstrate that state law does not re'-
quire that the plans be prepared by a licensed architect or engineer. The building official mav re-
quire plans. computations and specific:mons to be prepared :lOd designed by :In engineer or
archItect licensed by the state to practice as such even if not required by statel:J.w.
EXCEPTION: The building official may waive the submiSSIOn or plans. calculatIons. construction tnsoec-
[ion requirements and orher data if ir is found char ~he n:Hure of :he 'Nork JDoiied for is such that :-e'lleWm'a of
plans i; nor necessary to obtain compliance WIth thIS code. . . ~
106.3.3 Information on plans and specifications. Plans and specific:uions shall be dr:lwn to
scale upon substantial paper or cloth and shall be of sufficient clarity to indic:ue the [ocnion. nature
and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that it will conform to the provlsions of this code
and all relevant laws. ordinances. rules and regulations_
Plans for buildings more than two stories in height of other than Group R. Division 3 and Group U
Occupancies shall indicate how required structural and fire-resistive integrity will be maintained
where penetrations will be made for electrical. mechanical. plumbing and communication conduits.
pipes and similar systems.
106.3A Architect or engineer of record.
106.3A.1 General. Vvl1en it is required that documents be prepared by an JIchnect or ~nginee:-.
the building official may require the owner to engage and designate on the building permit applica-
tion an JIchitect or enzinee:- who shall act as the JIchitect or enzineer of record. lfthe: circumstances
require. the owner miy designate a substitute JIchitect or engineer of record who shall perform all
of the duties required of the original JIchitect or enginee:- of record. The building official shall be
notified in writing by the owner if the architect or enginee:- of record is changed or is unable to con-
tinue to perform the duties.
The architect or enzineer of record shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinatinz all sub-
mittal documents prepared by others. inc:uding de'ferred submittal items~ for compatibility with the
design of the building.
106.3A.2. Deferred submittals. For the purposes of thIS sec:ion. deferred submirt:lls JIe defined
as those portions of the design which are not submmed at the tIme of the Jpplication Jnd which Jre
to be submitted to the building official withm a specified penod.
Deferral of any submittal items shall have prior approval of the building offici:!!. The architect or
enzineer of record shall list the deferred submittals on the pians and shail submit the deferred sub-
mittal documems for review by the building official. .
Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shail be submitted to the architect or enzineer
of record who shall review them and forNard them to the buildinz official with a notation indi~atinz
that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be i~
zeneral conformance with the desizn of the buildinz. Tne deferred submittal items shail not be in-
;tailed unci I their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official.
106.3.5 Inspection and observation program. When special inspection is required by Section
1701. the architect or engineer of record shall prepare In inspection progr:lm which shall be sub-
mitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building pe:-miL The inspection
progr:!m shall designate the portions of the work that require spec::!! inspec:ion :lnd the name or
names of the individuals or firms who JIe to pe:form the special inspections. and indicate the duties
of the special inspectOrs.
1-5
~
......,;;~.;~~..t..~.l.1f77,~~t,
~.,,- . .~~~~;~.~{;
~~:~~,i;.} "of' --
;~?:Y' ..~~i;~~'~~
~;~.
MOTION BY:
~-_.-...-
,. .__ ; .A:.__
.~
'.
t'Io.:' -
CITY OF
pRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
55372
Watkins
Resolution 78-1
SECONDED BY:
Busse
Resolution requiring the submittal of a certified lot survey upon
the application of a building permit within the City limits of
Pr i or Lake.
Whereas, the City of Prior Lake has ordinances dealing with
and ~ertaining to the size and plJcement of a home
on a lot,
Whereas, in
to
of
Whereas, it
of
., on
order to enfoice such or~inances it is impe~ative
demostrate to the City of Prior lake the dimensions
a lot and access thereto,
is also necessary to de~strate by the appl icant
a building permi~, the placement of improvements
a lot,
THEREFCRE BE IT RESOLVED that the City CouncIl of Prior Lake
hereby' requires a certifIed lot survey wIth all Improvements
shown thereon, as part of the applicntion for a building permit
in the City of Prior Lake.
0.,'
3rd
day of January
Passed and adopted this
1978.
YE:
Stock
Bissonett
Busse
Hafermann
Watkins
NO
x
x
x
--
x
x
Stock
Bissonett
Busse
Hafermann
Watkins
Wi'tness of my hand and official seal of Prior Lake, Minnesota
this 3rd day of January , 1978.
,~
..... ':.
~"
l!t.i
M(/.Il1tU;k~~.
Mic ael A. McGuire
City Manager
---,.'
THE CENTER OF LAKE COUNTRY
.....
"
1
t
t
J
t
r
.
t
t
r
l
t
t
l
J
.i
';4
d-
,9':
,-~'1 .
. -. ..,. , . ~
'::t,i'1
:~~ 1
i:f!11
.... ~ _, I
.~ .,'~! ~-. ~
.._~
:...
:".). ._1
.~:.r :
',:h.
,~~
=<:1
~t
C'J
"r
'~f .
.....
,~ :
H:
it,.,.,.: .....
~';o. :
~..1r :
..,.,(
:~ f
~ '
. ~ / .
.( :
-( ;-:
..~ ~ .
~- ;::;. ; :
-'.. of.
;." '- -.
>:~ -
t t.
RESOL L1IOi'i 9=-<54
A RESOLL1ION REQT.:1RE'.iG Tr~ SL.13iYilTT.-\.L OF A CERTIFIC-\TE
OF SGKV-:EY t-POi'i THE APPLICATION OF A BlTI.DE'iG PER-yilT
\YIT~ THE CITY LE'VilTS OF PRlOR L-\KE
:YI0TION BY:
_ C"r-=~~:~e~d
SECO~l)ED BY: _5c::L:
WHERE.4S,
tile Cir:/ of ?:-:cr Lak~ has or:::~ar..ces de::J~'"':g '}.,-iL.~ ::.r..c. pe:-:.::..0.i..--:g :0 ~e 51=::: 2...:.~c.
p lace:::e::r 0 f a. ~or::e on a lot: a.r:e..
w.tIEREAS,
in oree: ,0 e::Ior:e suc:: orcU:2.nces :! lS U:l!:e:2!:ve :0 c:e:::or..s-=::.te ,0 d:e C:r:; of
P:ior L ."ke :=.e ~;-e:"..sion.s of a 10"( ar::e. ac:ess u.~e:e:o: 2.J.--:c.
WHEREAS,
t! is also ::.e-:essa::/ co c..e:::cc.s::::..:e by tl:e a:;piic~t or a bt.:ilc.i::~ ;e::::l:..
place:::e::t of u:::prove:::e::.tS on a let; a.~e..
._~
c.._~
fVEE.l?.EA.S,
Resoh.:r:cn
73-1
es:.:..c iishe~
c:r:r po lie?
l4... tt...i s
r00'"?"1""""':
'-::=-.......
ar:c: nov.'-
_O.....,."I~O<:::
':''w_ ............._~
;:-e :--~~ e:::. e:: ~..
:'i.Ow., THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL V J:..D ":;:i U.~e ::Vl2.:;cr a.r:e. Cr:i Coc.r:e:l ::'~2.t ::'~e Cir:;
Council af?rior L~k~ ::e:-e~y :-e~:.lires a ':e::i::c~!e of s~/e:f ~;.,-:ili al: imprcve:::.e::rs shc~.~"7l
d:e:e::m. as par: cf :...~e appi:'c2.t:cr: :"or a ':uilC:...--:g ;:e:-::"~! ~ :.~e ::::/ of ?~or L::...,<e ex:ep1: as se:
for.....~ be:ow:
In the o::.se or a re':lace:::e::.c c:e~:< Or:u-=I rer prq:e:::r l;-':.::.g outside of w.':e Shcre~ar:c.
Manage:::e::t or FIcoe. ?~ai.n disc.--:c:s. W.~e prc~e:::r o'.vne: :::ay in lie~ of the ce:-:ific2.!= or
Stlney provie.e c~e2.r ::ele. ie.e::.!iEc2.!:cn of :...':e [ct pir..s me. a. to sc2..le 'e.:"2.';vmg ac::.:r:::.:eI:'-
0"'-"'/1'''''''0 ~ll 0""-'00"'- ~-r:"-'o.;on 0"" ~he -r"'c..-r .0 ;:-..,i.:a. ,;"oW1'ncr all ~;~e""~~o s '::""'C
P 1oU._. ~.= "-' ,"",,_~ul. '-... _....~ _. lo.......:' ". ""'. '. ~'--~ -~ '= -' .........J. .._1 n 1...0'-' u
the SUi.lC~~~S :0 ~~e 5ic.e. re::.r ar:d ::-cr:r lei: li::es.. prcyviced :'~2.!:
1.
T."1e
~o""'l~ro-,::a....""
... '- '-' .."----.-'-.....-
ce~~(
-,'<:-
.;.J._'__!".
ce
ti:e
~:-:.:;.c::
',;:,-rc:::,
"";~-r:""
"-......... '--
ar:e. he: gl:.t 0 r
;"'l"""~
--~
eV" <:-..- ~--,,...- ~"?'"~
4""'_1._: .:l~ _......-..0.--.
- .,.,. -. .- .,. .. , .
l.::e ;rs~e:-::/ =~s~ :e ~cc:.:=::. 'Jc,:s:c.e CI ::.e :':CCC~lal.:! cr S.L:ore:2.!:.c..
1~:S":~:,::~r-; --.. o~ .;l '.....
.:.cL.....C __~.e \.-.a_... .v~.. '.J-,....... ~~:G.
>Er.:-.e~cc::;. =~2~2-~7:;' / ?:-h :6:2~ ~'~7-4220
/ F=x;6 ~2~ ~7 .~2~5
.~.4"'1 ~':L.rl... :;:::=C?:-__~:~:' ~~Ff_::~.
~ Tne pIa! plan musi': ):e aC~:lI':::.te ane. s~es:f.c :0 :.,:e satis:fac:ion of City sl:aE.
~ Ti1a! the ci::..-- has U.~e rig2:r :0 re::lles~ a ce=::r.:C2.!e of sur/e:/ ce prQvlc:e~ if i...~
ti:e c:q _ Si':afr""' 5 so Ie e.isc:-e~io n It IS cc r:sie.e:ed e.esir3.o Ie ur:e.e: t.~e
cirC:.L.':"...5l:aI:C es..
5. Tna! any subseque:lt ade.iticn to the re~lace::1e::! desk L."l '<;\Iidth, depth.. sl:e;:s,
roof or amenities '<;\Iill require that a ce~i:Ecare of s"Ur/ey ce completed ar:.e.
submitted with thaI pe:mit.
Passed and adopted this _.l11lL day of July, 1995.
.Andren
Gree:ille!d
Kedrowski
Scl:enc~<:
Scott
YES
X
X
X
X
X
NO
.~'1cre::
Gree::r1elc
Kedrowski
Sc.henck
Sco~
,'7 (
,l ~4--'-
F~"k BOY~:~ / J Y
CLf Mana:~~ ~
Cir:: 0 f P::or L3..l(e
~
/7
(Seal)
16~C~~fe C:eek .~ve_ S.E.. ?~cr ~Ke. Mi~r:escra =3372-1714 / P~. (6:2) ~7-~230 / Fax ~612' ~'~7.42~S
....N :::.::t.:~.L S??':ii.7_.:':rT:' 2~Fr_c;'~=: