Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8F - Eagle Creek Villas and Eagle Creek Estates AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND: STAFF AGENDA REPORT SF JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 97-XX APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RESOLUTION 97-XX APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND RESOLUTION 97-XX APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS EAGLE CREEK ESTATES FOR AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY PROJECT IN THE PRIORVIEW PUD SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 The purpose of this item is to consider approval of several applications for the property located directly north of the intersection of Five Hawks Avenue and Priorview Street in the vicinity of Eagle Creek Villas. The first application is an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from the Low to Medium Density Residential designation to the High Density Residential designation. The second application is a Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan to allow the construction of a 61-unit assisted living facility and a 28 unit market rate senior rental building on the vacant portion of the Priorview PUD. The third application is a preliminary plat for the property to be known as Eagle Creek Estates, and consisting of three lots. The original PUD was approved in 1983 and the development to date has occurred prior to 1991. The Priorview PUD was preceded by Council action in 1981 which rezoned the subject property to R-3, High Density residential. This would have permitted 210 units on the 15.05 acres of buildable land on the site. In December of 1982, the Council approved a Schematic PUD plan which provided for 106 units, a street connection from Five Hawks Avenue to Cates Street and preservation of site amenities. In September of 1983, the Council approved the first phase of the development consisting of 48 town homes. Priorview Second Addition consisting of 20 units, was approved in 1991. There has been no construction activity on this site for several years. In September, 1996, the Council approved Resolution 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\prelimcc.doc Page 1 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTL:-iITY E'vIPLOYER. 96-90, approving an amendment to the Schematic Plan for the Priorview PUD, to allow a 61 unit assisted living facility. This amendment was subject to the eight conditions listed in the attached resolution. The developer never submitted the necessary documents for preliminary plan approval of this PUD. In June, 1997, the Council approved Resolution 97-48, approving an amendment to the Schematic Plan to allow a 61- unit assisted living facility and a 28-unit senior rental facility subject to the following conditions: 1. Further action to approve this PUD is conditioned upon the revision of the Comprehensive Plan to permit the requested density on the site. 2. The developer and school district are to install, at their expense, any trails not addressed in the Parks and Trail component of the Comprehensive Plan. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission conducted the public hearing related to these applications on August 11, 1997. The Planning Report and Planning Commission minutes are attached to the agenda packet. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from the Low to Medium Density Residential (R-LMD)designation to the High Density Residential (R-HD) designation, finding the R-HD designation is consistent with the designation of the developed portion of the Priorview PUD, the stated goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan in that it offers a variety of housing and provides open space and the preservation of the site's natural elements, and it is consistent with the City's Livable Community Goal to provide affordable and life-cycle housing. The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Further action to approve this PUD is conditioned upon the revision of the Comprehensive Plan to permit the requested density on the site. 2. The developer and school district are to install, at their expense, any trails not addressed in the Parks and Trail component of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A revised Tree Preservation Plan, which includes all of the disturbed areas, and an accurate count of significant trees, must be submitted. 4. The landscaping plan must be revised so it is consistent with the provisions of 6.10 of the Zoning Ordinance. These 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan \prelimcc. doc Page 2 revisions include the following: · Crabapple trees, or any ornamental or half trees, must be at least 1 3/4 caliper inches. . Twenty-five percent (25%) of the landscaping trees must be evergreen trees. . At least 20% of the landscaping trees must be oversized (8' evergreens or 3 1/2" deciduous canopy trees). . The perimeter of the parking lot must be screened using a combination of shrubs, trees and berming. Berming must be at least 30" in height. . Landscaping around the perimeter of the site must include at least 1 tree per 40' of perimeter. The existing trees on the site may be utilized for this purpose, but an accurate count of those trees is required. . The Landscaping Plan must be signed by a Registered Landscape Architect. 5. Building elevations for the east side of the 61-unit building and the entire 28-unit senior rental building must be provided. These elevations must include the types and colors of building materials. 6. Plan for the trash enclosure must be submitted. The trash enclosure must be constructed of materials similar to the principle buildings, and it must be located at least 25' from any lot line. 7. A lighting plan for the site must be submitted. 8. A signage plan must be submitted. 9. A bridge must installed at the point the pedestrian trail crosses the creek on the north side of the property. The Planning Commission also recommended approved the preliminary plat for Eagle Creek Estates, subject to the following conditions: 1. The legal description for this property must be revised. The legal description submitted seems to include property not depicted on this preliminary plat. 2. Easements for the portion of the pedestrian trail located outside of the existing road easement must be shown on the plat. 3. The engineering items, outlined in the memorandum from Sue McDermott, Assistant City Engineer, dated July 29, 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\prelimcc.doc Page 3 1997, must be addressed prior to the final plat. 4. A bridge must installed at the point the pedestrian trail crosses the creek on the north side of the property. ISSUES: The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment was reviewed based on the goals and objectives for suitable housing. The Planning Commission determined this amendment is consistent with the stated goals. The Preliminary PUD plan was reviewed according to the applicable provisions of Zoning Ordinance 83-6, and found to be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for the development of a PUD, especially the provisions promoting the preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics and open space, and the more efficient use of land and open space. The revisions and/or additions to the plans necessary to meet all the ordinance requirements can be listed as conditions of approval of this application, and addressed prior to approval of the final plan. The preliminary plat also is generally consistent with the requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The necessary revisions can be attached as conditions of approval of the preliminary plat, and addressed prior to final approval of the final plat. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution 97 -XX approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Resolution 97 -XX approving the Preliminary PUD plan subject to the conditions listed therein, or with conditions specified by the Council, and adopt Resolution 97 -XX approving the preliminary plat to be known as Eagle Creek Estates, subject to the conditions listed therein, or with conditions specified by the Council. 2. Continue the review for specific information or reasons per City Council discussion. 3. Find the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the Preliminary PUD plan and the Preliminary Plat inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and/or Comprehensive Plan and deny the project. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Alternative #1. ACTION REQUIRED: Since there are three separate actions involved in this approval, three separate motions are required, as follows: 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\prelimcc.doc Page 4 REPORT ATTACHMENTS: 1. Motion and second to adopt Resolution 97-XX approving the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Motion and second to adopt Resolution 97-XX approving the preliminary PUD plan subject to the listed conditions. 3. Motion and second to adopt Resolution 97-XX approving the preliminary plat subject to the listed conditions. 1. Resolution 97 -XX (Comprehensive Plan) 2. Resolution 97 -xx (Preliminary PUD Plan) 3. Resolution 97 -XX (Preliminary Plat) 4. Planning Report dated August 11, 1997 5. Minutes of August 11, 1997, Planning Commission Meeting 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\prelimcc.doc Page 5 RESOLUTION 97-XX RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLA1~ MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 11, 1997, to consider the request of Eagle Creek Villa, LLC, to amend the land use map of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation of the property legally described in the attached Exhibit A from "Urban Low to Medium Density Residential" to "Urban High Density Residential", and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was duly published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota statutes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found this amendment to be consistent with the Suitable Housing and Environemtn goals and objectioves of the Comprehensive Plan in that it offers a variety of housing, and it provides open space and preservation of the natural elements of the sitem and, recommended approval of the request; and WHEREAS, the Plannign Commission found this amendment to be cnsistent with the City's Livable Ccommunity goal to provide affordable and life- cycel housing, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found the Urban High Density Residential designation consistent with the designation of the developed portion of the adjacent property, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and 1:\97fi1es\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\rs97xxcc.doc Page I 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTL0iITY EMPLOYER WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the staff reports, meeting minutes and Planning Commission recommendation which constitute the record of decision of this matter. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, that it should and hereby does approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the designation of the aforementioned property from Urban Low to Medium Density Residential to Urban High Density Residential of the property described in Exhibit A, subject to the approval ofthe Metropolitan Council. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of September, 1997. YES NO Andren Robbins Kedrowski Schenck Mader Andren Robbins Kedrowski Schenck Mader {Seal} City Manager City of Prior Lake 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan \rs97xxcc.doc Page 2 ~-~"'----. - [-y! RESOLUTION 97-XX RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PUD FOR EAGLE CREEK ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 11, 1997, to consider the application from Eagle Creek Villas LLC, for Preliminary PUD approval for Eagle Creek Villas Assisted Living Facility; and the Planning Commission afforded persons interested in this issue an opportunity to present their views and objections related to the Preliminary PUD of Eagle Creek Villas Assisted Living Facility; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said Preliminary PUD was duly published In accordance with applicable Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the Preliminary PUD is consistent with certain elements of the Comprehensive Plan and inconsistent with others; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the Preliminary PUD of Eagle Creek Villas Assisted Living Facility is in harmony with both existing and proposed development in the area surrounding the project; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the proposed Preliminary PUD of Eagle Creek Villas Assisted Living Facility is compatible with the stated purposes and intent of the PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the proposed Preliminary PUD of Eagle Creek Villas Assisted Living Facility adequately provides for internal organization, uses, circulation, public facilities, recreation areas and open space. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it hereby approves the Preliminary PUD for Eagle Creek Villas Assisted Living Facility as shown on the plans identified as Exhibit A and dated "Received, April 11, 1997" subject to the following conditions: 1. Further action to approve this PUD is conditioned upon the revision of the Comprehensive Plan to permit the requested density on the site. 2. The developer and school district are to install, at their expense, any trails not addressed in the Parks and Trail component of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A revised Tree Preservation Plan, which includes all of the disturbed areas, and an accurate 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\rs97pudc.doc Page 1 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.L Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTLNITY EMPLOYER count of significant trees, must be submitted. 4. The landscaping plan must be revised so it is consistent with the provisions of 6.1 0 of the Zoning Ordinance. These revisions include the following: a) Crabapple trees, or any ornamental or half trees, must be at least 1 3/4 caliper inches. b) Twenty-five percent (25%) of the landscaping trees must be evergreen trees. c) At least 20% of the landscaping trees must be oversized (8' evergreens or 3 1/2" deciduous canopy trees). d) The perimeter of the parking lot must be screened using a combination of shrubs, trees and benning. Benning must be at least 30" in height. e) Landscaping around the perimeter of the site must include at least I tree per 40' of perimeter. The existing trees on the site may be utilized for this purpose, but an accurate count of those trees is required. f) The Landscaping Plan must be signed by a Registered Landscape Architect. 5. Building elevations for the east side of the 61-unit building and the entire 28-unit senior rental building must be provided. These elevations must include the types and colors of building materials. 6. Plan for the trash enclosure must be submitted. The trash enclosure must be constructed of materials similar to the principle buildings, and it must be located at least 25' from any lot line. 7. A lighting plan for the site must be submitted. 8. A signage plan must be submitted. 9. A bridge must installed at the point the pedestrian trail crosses the creek on the north side of the property . MOTION BY: SECOND BY: Passed and adopted this 2nd day of September, 1997. YES NO Andren Andren Robbins Robbins Kedrowski Kedrowski Mader Mader Schenck Schenck {Seal} City Manager City of Prior Lake I :\97fi1es\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\rs97pudc.doc Page 2 RESOLUTION 97-XX RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "EAGLE CREEK ESTATES" SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED HEREIN. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 11, 1997, to consider an application from Eagle Creek Villas, LLC, for the preliminary plat of Eagle Creek Estates; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said preliminary plat has been duly published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS: all persons interested in this issue were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the preliminary plat of Eagle Creek Estates for the record at the Planning Commission hearing; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the preliminary plat according to the applicable provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and found said preliminary plat to be consistent with the provisions of said ordinances; and WHEREAS the Prior Lake City Council considered an application for preliminary plat approval of Eagle Creek Estates on September 2, 1997, and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the preliminary plat of Eagle Creek Estates to be consistent with the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it hereby approves the preliminary plat of Eagle Creek Estates subject to the following conditions: 1. The legal description for this property must be revised. The legal description submitted seems to include property not depicted on this preliminary plat. 2. Easements for the portion of the pedestrian trail located outside of the existing road easement must be shown on the plat. 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\rs97plat.doc Page 1 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.L Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 .-\N EQLJAL OPPORTLNITY EMPLOYER 3. The engineering items, outlined in the memorandum from Sue McDermott, Assistant City Engineer, dated July 29,1997, must be addressed prior to thefinal plat. 4. A bridge must installed at the point the pedestrian trail crosses the creek on the north side of the property. 5. The preliminary plat is valid for 12 months from the date of approval by the City Council. Failure to submit the final plat of the within the required time frame shall cause the preliminary plat to become null and void. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of September, 1997. YES NO Andren Andren Robbins Robbins Kedrowski Kedrowski Mader Mader Schenck Schenck {Seal} City Manager City of Prior Lake 1:\97files\97puds\eaglepud\preplan\rs97plat.doc Page 2 AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: SITE: PRESENTER: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: INTRODUCTION: PLANNING REPORT 4A CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS EAGLE CREEK ESTATES FOR AN ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT IN THE PRIORVIEW PUD FIVE HAWKS AVENUE AND PRIORWOOD STREET JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR _X_ YES _NO-N/A AUGUST 11, 1997 Eagle Creek Villas LLC has applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, a Preliminary PUD Plan and a Preliminary Plat for the property located just north of the intersection of Five Hawks Avenue and Priorwood Street. The City Council approved the Schematic Plan for an amendment to the Priorview PUD to add approximately one acre of land (Lots 2,3 and 4, Holly Court) to the original PUD site, to allow the construction of a 61 unit assisted living building and a 28 unit market rate senior rental building on the vacant portion of the site on June 2, 1997, through Resolution 97-48. These applications are the next step in the approval process for this project. BACKGROUND: The original PUD was approved in 1983 and the development to date has occurred prior to 1991. The Priorview PUD was preceded by Council action in 1981 which rezoned the subject property to R-3, High Density residential. This would have permitted 210 units 'on the 15.05 acres of buildable land on the site. In December of 1982, the Council approved a Schematic PUD plan which provided for 106 units, a street connection from Five Hawks Avenue to Cates Street and preservation of site amenities. In September of 1983, the Council approved the first phase of the development consisting of 48 townhomes. Priorview Second Addition consisting of 20 units, was approved in 1991. 1:\97fi1es\97puds\eaglepud\preplanlprelimpc.doc Page I 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.L Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTLJNIT'Y" ErvlPLOYER In 1987, the developer asked the City to consider expansion of the PUD to include the so- called Holly Court property to the north and increase the number of units to 148. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the request and the application was with - drawn. There has been no construction activity on this site for several years. In September, 1996, the Council approved Resolution 96-90, approving an amendment to the Schematic Plan for the Priorview PUD, to allow a 61 unit assisted living facility. This amendment was subject to the eight conditions listed in the attached resolution. The developer never submitted the necessary documents for preliminary plan approval of this PUD. In June, 1997, the Council approved Resolution 97-48, approving an amendment to the Schematic Plan to allow a 61-urut assisted living facility and a 28-unit senior rental facility subject to the following conditions: 1. Further action to approve this PUD is conditioned upon the revision of the Comprehensive Plan to permit the requested density on the site. 2. The developer and school district are to install, at their expense, any trails not addressed in the Parks and Trail component of the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission is considering three applications at this time. The first application is a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for this site from the R-LMD (Urban Low to Medium Density Residential) designation to the R-HD (Urban High Density Residential) designation. The second request is to approve the Preliminary PUD Plan for this project. The third application is for approval of a preliminary plat for this site, to be known as Eagle Creek Estates. Each of these applications is discussed in detail below. PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Total Site Area: The total PUD area (including the developed portion of Priorview) consists of 17.7 acres. The area of the new development includes 12.7 acres. Topography: This site has a varied topography, with elevations ranging from 930' MSL at its highest points to 906' MSL at the lowest point in the northwest corner of the site. The site generally slopes from the outer boundaries inward towards the wetlands and creek running through the site. There are no steep slopes, or slopes in excess of 20% on this site. The eastern portion of the site has also been graded under a grading permit approved as part of the original Priorview PUD. Vegetation: This site, especially the western portion of the site, is very wooded, with a large number of significant trees. The project will be subject to the Tree Preservation requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has submitted a tree preservation plan, and initial estimates indicate tree removal will fall well below the percentage of 1: \97files\97 puds\eaglepud\prep Ian \prel impc. doc Page 2 caliper inches which may be removed. However, the plan does not include the entire area to ;be graded or fIlled. This plan must be expanded to provide the necessary information. Wetlands: There are three wetlands located within this site. Wetland #1 is 3.07 acres in size, and is located in the western portion of this site. The developer is proposing to fill a small portion of this wetland to form a berm,. which will then create a stormwater detention area. Wetland #2 is 0.19 acre in area, and is located just north of Priorwood Street. This entire wetland will be fIlled to provide parking area for the project. Wetland #3 is 0.1 acre, located in the northeast comer of the site. The plan does not indicate any impact on this wetland; however, the parking lot on the site appears to encroach into this area. The developer plans to create a new wetland area to mitigate some of this disturbed area on the site. The remaining mitigation will be deducted from the developer's banked wetland credits. There is also a creek running across the northwest comer of this site. A portion of this area will be disturbed to allow a culvert or other crossing for the pedestrian trail. Access: Access to the site is from Priorwood Street and Five Hawks Avenue. The City currently has a 66' wide roadway easement which connects Five Hawks Avenue from Priorwood Street to the section of Five Hawks Avenue located south of Cates Street. The plan includes a pedestrian trail connecting these two sections of road, rather than a street. PROPOSED PLAN The proposed plan consists of a 61-unit assisted living facility and a 28 unit senior rental building. The assisted living facility is a 3-story structure. The elevations provided tot he staff do not include building materials, although it appears to be of wood frame construction. There are 102 parking spaces, or 1.15 spaces per unit, shown on the plan. The development is concentrated on the eastern half of the site, thus preserving the natural features, including the wetlands and the wooded area, on the western half of the site. The overall density of this development, including both new and existing development, is 10.9 units per acre. The density of the new development only is 9.5 units per acre. The developer is also proposing to stage this development over the next five (5) years. Phase 1 includes the south and east wings of the 61-unit assisted living facility. Phase 2, which will be completed within 3 years of the project's approval, is the west wing of the assisted living facility. Phase 3, which will be completed within 5 years of approval, is the 28-unit senior rental building. The appropriate parking will be constructed with each stage. ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan Amendment: The applicant is proposing to amend the Land Use Plan designation of this property from Low-Medium Density Residential (R-LMD) to I: \97 ti les\ 97 puds \eagl epud\prep I an \prel impc. doc Page 3 High Density Residential (R-HD). The purpose of this amendment is to allow the proposed density in an apartment style development. The R-LMD designation allows densities up to 10 units per acre in a PUD, but in townhouse style developments. The R- HD designation allows densities up to 30 units per acre in a PUD, in townhouse or apartment style development. The Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives which are applicable to this request are as follows: GOAL: SUITABLE HOUSING AND ENVIRONMENT: Encourage the development of suitable housing in a desirable environment. OBJECTIVE No.1: Provide opportunities for a variety of affordable high quality housing. OBJECTIVE No.2: Maintain a choice of and encourage development of quality residential environments. OBJECTIVE No.3: Provide suitable passive open space for the preservation of the natural environment and the enjoyment of residents. The R-HD designation is consistent with the designation of the developed portion of the Priorview PUD. It is also consistent with the above stated goals and objectives in that it offers another variety of housing, and it provides open space and the preservation of the natural elements of the site. Furthermore, this development is consistent with the City's Livable Community Goal to provide affordable and life-cycle housing. Preliminary PUD Plan: The purpose of a Planned Unit Development is to allow flexibility in residential land development, variety in the organization of the site, higher standards of site and building design, preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics, and more efficient and effective use ofland. Section 6.12 of the Zoning Ordinance lists the requirements for a PUD (see attached). This proposal is consistent with the purposes of the PUD in that it preserves and enhances the desirable site characteristics, and provides for a more efficient use of the land. Specifically, this PUD concentrates the development on the eastern portion of the site to preserve the wetlands and wooded area on the west portion of the site. The Preliminary PUD also meets most of the requirements for a PUD. The plans will require some revisions and/or additions in order to meet all of the necessary requirements. These revisions and/or additions can be listed as conditions of approval of the Preliminary PUD. Preliminary Plat: The preliminary plat for this site, known as Eagle Creek Estates, consists of 12.7 acres to be subdivided into 3 lots. Lot 1 is 8.1 acres in area, and is the open space for this development. Lot 2 is 1.9 acres, and is the site of the 28-unit senior I :\97fi1es\97 puds\eaglepud\prepl an \pre I impc. doc Page 4 ---- -,T rental building. Lot 3 is 2.7 acres in area, and is the site of the 6l-unit assisted living facility. There is no public right-of-way or parkland dedicated in this plat. The pedestrian trail on the site is primarily located on the existing road easement. However, the trail does meander off of this easement, so a trail easement must be dedicated over that area. Park dedication for this plat will be satisfied by a cash dedication in lieu of land. There are also some engineering issues, outlined in the memorandum from Sue McDermott, Assistant City Engineer, dated July 29, 1997, which must be addressed prior to approval of the fInal plat. These issues can be attached as conditions of approval of the preliminary plat. At this time, the Planning Commission should make a recommendation on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, the Preliminary PUD Plan and the Preliminary Plat. If the Preliminary PUD Plan is to proceed, it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Further action to approve this PUD is conditioned upon the revision of the Comprehensive Plan to permit the requested density on the site. 2. The developer and school district are to install, at their expense, any trails not addressed in the Parks and Trail component of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A revised Tree Preservation Plan, which includes all of the disturbed areas, and an accurate count of significant trees, must be submitted. 4. The landscaping plan must be revised so it is consistent with the provisions of 6.10 of the Zoning Ordinance. These revisions include the following: . Crabapple trees, or any ornamental or half trees, must be at least I 3/4 caliper inches. . Twenty-five percent (25%) of the landscaping trees must be evergreen trees. . At least 20% of the landscaping trees must be oversized (8' evergreens or 3 1/2" deciduous canopy trees). . The perimeter of the parking lot must be screened using a combination of shrubs, trees and berming. Berming must be at least 30" in height. . Landscaping around the perimeter of the site must include at least I tree per 40' of perimeter. The existing trees on the site may be utilized for this purpose, but an accurate count of those trees is required. . The Landscaping Plan must be signed by a Registered Landscape Architect. 5. Building elevations for the east side of the 6 I-unit building and the entire 28-unit senior rental building must be provided. These elevations must include the types and colors of building materials. I: \97 files\9 7 p uds \eagl epud\preplan \pre Ii mpc. doc Page 5 6. Plan for the trash enclosure must be submitted. The trash enclosure must be constructed of materials similar to the principle buildings, and it must be located at least 25' from any lot line. 7. A lighting plan for the site must be submitted. 8. A signage plan must be submitted. If the Preliminary Plat is to proceed, it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The legal description for this property must be revised. The legal description submitted seems to include property not depicted on this preliminary plat. 2. Easements for the portion of the pedestrian trail located outside of the existing road easement must be shown on the plat. 3. The engineering items, outlined in the memorandum from Sue McDermott, Assistant City Engineer, dated July 29, 1997, must be addressed prior to the final plat. AL TERNA TIVES: 1. Recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the Preliminary PUD Plan subject to the above listed conditions, and the Preliminary Plat subject to the above listed condition. 2. Recommend denial of the request. 3. Other specific action as directed by the Planning Commission RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends Alternative I. ACTION REQUIRED: Since this request includes three separate applications, separate motions are required for each application. These include; 1. A motion and second to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment from the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential designation to the Urban High Density Residential designation. 2. A motion and second to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan, subject to the conditions listed in this report. 3. A motion and second to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat to be known as Eagle Creek Estates, subject to the conditions listed in this staff report. 1: \97files\97 puds\eaglepud\preplan \pre I impc.doc Page 6 EXHIBITS: 1. Section 6.12 of the Zoning Ordinance (PUD Requirements) 2. Location Map 3. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 4. Existing Approved PUD Plan 5. Reduced Copy of Preliminary PUD Plans and Preliminary Plat (8 pages) 6. Letter form Developer (4 pages)\ 7. Engineering Comments, dated July 29, 1997 I: \97fi les\97 puds\eaglepud\preplan \prel impc. doc Page 7 EXHIBIT 1 6.12 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: The provisions of this section of the Zoning Ordinance are intended to provide residential areas which can be developed with some modifications of the strict application of regulations of the R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4 Residential Districts in accordance with the provisions and regulations contained herein. P.U.D.'s can be developed within any Residential District with the overall population density of number of living units permitted to be constructed in general conformance with the provisions of the basic Zoning District in which it is located. Higher densities may be allowed than those permitted in each Zoning District with the specific density determined by the Planning-Commission and Council. Rather than strictly enforcing the concept of uniformity of housing types in each district, this provision will encourage: 1. Flexibility in residential land development to benefit from new technology in building design and construction and land development. 2. Variety in the organization of site elements, building densities and housing types. 3. Higher standards of site and building design through the use of trained and experienced Land Planners, Registered Architects and/or Landscape Architects to prepare plans for all Planned Unit Developments. 4. Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics and open space. 5. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities. A. REQUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall be planned so that it is consistent with the Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan. 2. The tract of land shall be under unified control at the time of application and scheduled to be developed as one unit. In addition the development plan must include provisions for the preservation of natural amenities. 3. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to harmonize with both existing and proposed development in the area surrounding the project. 4. The proposed Planned Unit Development is comprised of at least ten (10) acres of contiguous land. (Ord. 94-09) 5. Permitted uses may include: a) Any combination of dwelling units in single family, two family, town or row houses and apartments. b) Educational, religious, cultural and recreational facilities. Commercial and industrial uses. c) Public and private education facilities. d) Other uses permitted in the Zoning District in which the Planned Unit Development is located. 6. A minimum of twenty (20) percent of the gross land for private or public open air recreational use protected by covenants running with the land or by conveyances or dedicated as the Planning Commission may specify shall be an integral part of the plan. such open space areas shall not include land devoted to streets, parking and private yards. 7. Density increases of up to thirty (30) percent from those outlined in column 7, table 4.2, may be allowed in proportion to the number of conditions listed immediately below which have been fulfilled provided that traffic patterns will not be adversely affected and that public utilities and facilities are adequate. Section 6, Page 13 -.,- .... a) The location, amount and proposed use ot common space (10%). b) The location, design, setting at dwelling units (10%). c) Location adjacent to existing or proposed collectors or arterial street (5%). d) Physical characteristics of the site (5%,). 8. Building setbacks from all property lines which form the perimeter of the total P.U.D. shall be twenty-five (25) feet or the height of the building, whichever is greater. The setback for any building from all interior and exterior dedicated street right-at-way lines or from the streets shall be twenty-five (25) feet or the height of the building, whichever is greater. 9. The height limitation for all buildings in the P.U.D. shall be thirty-five (35) feet. 10. The total coverage by buildings shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the total area in the P.U.D. 11. All P.U.D.'s shall have community sewer and water service available. 12. Building and Site Design. a) More than one (1) building may be placed on one (1) platted lot in a P.U.D. area for single family, detached dwellings must comply with the City Subdivision Ordinance. b) Architectural style of buildings shall not solely be a basis for denial or approval of a plan. However, the overall appearance and compatibility of individual buildings to other site elements or to surrounding development will be primary considerations in the review stages of the Planning Commission and Council. c) No building permit shall be granted for any building on land for which a plan for a P.U.D. has not been finally approved by the City Council. d) Staging of Development: 1. Any P.U.D. plan proposed to be constructed in stages shall include full details relating thereto and the City Council may approve or modify, where necessary, any such proposals. 2. The staging shall include the time for beginning and completion of each stage. Such timing may be modified by the City Council on the showing of good cause by the developer. e) A primary function of the P.U.D. provision is to encourage development which will preserve and enhance the worthwhile, natural terrain characteristics and not force intense development to utilize all portions of a given site in order to arrive at the maximum density allowed. In evaluating each individual proposal the recognition of this objective will be a basic consideration in granting approval or denial. f) The uniqueness of each proposal for a P.U.D. requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities and services shall be subject to minor modifications from the specifications and standards established in this and other City Ordinances governing their construction. The City Council may therefore waive or modify the specifications or standards where it is found that they are not required in the interest of the residents of the entire City. The plans and profiles of all streets, utilities and services shall be reviewed, modified, if necessary, and approved by the City Engineer. Section 6. Page 14 C\I .... -- sa :t ~ Z:-z OIL ~ r ~ c!-J ~~ ""0.. ~~i ~! is ~ ' I >- >- c:; ~ . '"'!.... ~. ," --~ ~, "I-=--~ \~.;~;c~_"" I !; J~_. - J ............ l~. ~ ~~ .:J~' -- '~;~~ -'J .~ L~~~,> !r...:"" -.' ~. ~-~"-~- - " e __ --r ~ ; i!: ~ ~- ~""" ~'-' ~, -----., , " --_.~ ~P( , < --1 --:. ,. . "",= '- --- .~ ',,'f ~> ," i-- ----, ~ L-:- .1, ~ ~ j 1'_-'...2..: 1'"..~. ',t. .t:\, ~'''''S~~.~/ -, \"~,\:,-'.-\ . ,'" I ~ 0;., ~ ?=i d::::,..:- . ': 0~,. ~ -" <"" .~1:~~~nEN~, _E_. ~~ '" ~~ ~~F -~~ ~r%:'. ~r~',T , _:~~" ~ " ~ r J}~~_~r~ ." ..(:::.'~~~'''~ ~0.~~" ~S,,"~, ~~ '-r~ x:-x ,,'~.J~ ~ ,,~"', ;,;: "''''''''''~ ., ,""C .::~ '-rr"k ""~~::: ~'>> " ''''''"'''''"'', ,''''~ A ~. . ..:;/~\\ .....r"~ ~~~~-\\';"'=. III ~ ~~;' "i' "~~' ~::';;'^~C' '" , y . ,~. " , " ~ ,"" ~'^'v.: , ' ". '" ~..: . """" " ~ " ',,,~,,,,,/V .. \'0;" .)) ~~ ~~.:. ~ ~:'> ~~ ~ ~~ "';.'~ ~~~/}. =- ~ -. "". >jP '" ~ -." Co""'" , ,e . __ , 'w W ""'H ~ ' '" '. ~ 85 """"'" S ,," ~ ' :.' 8' ~/" ~ :'~\i;J;~: : · -~",\,: 'f~'."~':."~'u.; s. i".. '-.'-= -0.'~~~ .~~ ~~.'J.r.qfi;. ~.' I!~""", "I~, ~ "'-Y., , ^ If' - ~ '-"c (~.~ ' . ~~ ~ ~.... ''''', ~';IJ.C ~ \\-~. ~ ''<' . ..., ~::?--;~ .a,.. L // r SCN"~ r--7+-- . c"^,,",. - ,- '-~'E . __"1 ___ .....,'~ '~"'-." . '.'.: ^'. ~ .' ." --:::!::;---;-.... "~~, +~;;;!: ~ ~., ~c~_ .~ :.. "1 '. ____..::::::::: ~-:-=-- ~~":~_. . -..,~.~ > I,...." -' , . . . ',~, , ~,'~--- ....... ~_, j':-C'~ ,';:" ,," '.., . . · '-C;:~ '"', '(;:l ,~. ~ ''''-' ~'"' i -,;. - · ;i::!' "".,.". . ,F": .---.'er; :::;:: ~" .. .,,~ , ,-, . --Vi /I II " "-'" a>. ,"'" , = :,~:'--:>~J I. " . ,Ii .. ~,'~, '.. -/1-.. If ~ "i::::,*, c-!. , II A:..... ..".. , 'r~- :~....".,.j'"'!I.. ..... 7r"'- ~.~_~ .-~.,,, .;, . "~," ."......-. 'U". =.., "-L-'.. .. "'''W' _, ~', """~ - ..,..t;-.. y' . 'U:.,i,Of '. - .:.. _ _-.....-:--l . ~... " ...-:. ~ 00'0. .. ."" 'I'" . ""-t . .1.._ .. ,.' .. " ~,"" """"''''", ... , . /;.' "'. :.. . '-:\'/f::;;II. .. . 'r.;;:.... ...""-:.,,..,.:.., ..". ''',...,-.. .. I ... . '" - '. .'.,...,,,...,..... '.........'....._r..... "'-"" j. . ..-- , .. ".'m... 'I.." . ' .. ,ir ,., ',,,...,,,...,, _ _ . . :. ~. ~."':::.:..~._.." .. "-"-",,, , .!- .-I.'..........~.... . . ~l1T~. I~~: I i. =- .. ;".;,,' --,.!.-..-: ~',' - -.' r --'1 :'-.. - Ie . "" ~I~' ''..'': '.- - ,=-- ~ . - - ~::. .C - _ .. .... :::!:a."', ..... r "F",~", r- ....... ' : .....-"'-11~ _ "j-- ,-- .T,;..... =l_;"_. "" ._." ~.....-.-, if;:-1 ~~:~.)[ .",u.." .. ~~..,Lf, C4tt IF-I '~. "~\\..:...-,:' OT'~, I .. ~\I "'N.~. ~TAT[' . COU ..L . .c"1'1'IlO '. r- .................. 'J ,i '." "', ,..~ _' _ oI! ..:>.:,:..... ,_"", ~ " . -:...:., r T' "'j, .. ~" :::.:~.=:~~.: ~ : .:../\ \ ,...... ii~~,~,. R -H:"::'o- ,; i .:.~~:.."?:7f:.:':. ~. ~.., \' '. :-".' ," i ~,,-. ,Fl. -' -::.. . ' :.' :::::; .,.... .~. "'ft. ;;j;7',..~$!'.+ --' i 5f'."'-:.....'7 '1 . I""; ^. \ '. \, f,-l.;- _. .......... . ._ .~~-~.L".___.<'c-\ . -/":.\~~'_.. .'_'.:-.__ . "".--' . ~ ", . ~ "- .' ,,",,'. -- .- ~ - "''''', , J.--" .-. _ , : ~'" """" ~ . """-. "-'... ,'. ... ..... .... .... , ~.i";f;~, . '.. ...~ '.::: ',. :..:: .:::\::.... ~0;~'\.~'~~:--. , . ,--=---.jM'-:-_<7/:l?':'-"._. :....:=::::.. ~ ~"", ~ ~ " , .:...-;;. :.:.' " " x, --- " _ "V" "" .;,: . .~" ~ '. ~ ~ ~ :::-VI"M / . .:-:i:i:: . ....T.. '" ". ~ '>& " I;':::'; " ......"" ~. ;. . J: ~ c-cc~._ . I ,.,~ :. ;.:..... ~. .1,' ,~"', .' ~ I "-".,: _:_ _~ .. 'I. .\Iii;.'..~~ . ....... '" --"'L,~ .,r~. r:-..~...r... .r...~.... ~.' "', '1J-:'.. .. ;?,\f\\.-.--. r.:r -,*-",~~, ........:.:' --.'&:~'/..'?~-" :qr_..~~,. 0~~ :1: _"'...;: '-'.'::';'.:'.', ~ ~ .. :.~...'. . ... J . . . ~""':"~~~~ ~ ~.. .::::;: :12... .~ . 'J == .~.un" II . I...... 'u II_ ~~ ,~~.. 'v . ", ", ~~-. ~, "'O'fr~' -.. -..-- ~ .....-; . Io.DC"1<< _ ___. <.,:...,j..... -.:"'-~ ~.~......i~. fiI. ......-/ ,1. ~/ 0,., Y" EXHIBIT 3 LAKE ?o:: ". iiJ~ ~iiIII.__ .' . ..". ..!.....:-;.: ~ '~.~ ~~,.~ ~;:~~~.... "ii<:.~ \~ :0<~~ . tj:!; I~ '; '. ~-;'. )L '\:-, '~~" ul >~\~.~\~~ .. .~""'/ 'x"~~ '\'i" :~:):. ~ \../. .. . ....:: ....~\ '..\... ... .' .:. ';:' .. "". ", . I " ~ II ~u ... .~.r'~: Q~ac;::: ,. '~.,"'"'''' ~ : "". ..' . .... ... ~"',,"\.' ,," :-, .:::., '..;;. ..;.:..... .. . . . ~ r_, ...,...." ., ~: ~.. .... . . . ". - '. ."., ~"'~ ~ : ...::...:.\..... . ~.~C::'-- J.c' "~ ~~ : .2)..... --. I ...- ~"/~~f~~' .",' "." .. , ' ' "~-", ,.".",.. ~ ~ ., '" ,.. ; . '--::"::""''''- . '. r,.. ": ':I..._~, -" C "'"' ~)\~/. /' ~ \. ~ ~ ! :. . "i;..: '",,~ _' " "J ' 0/' "'''-'' ,y "" '" :1;- . "; '-'Y~i-.3'~ ? _ ~ :,._~t_,- ....'CRySTAL.. if~\. "- -.... . ~il~~r-I;'" ~~'~ ~ ~~ - LAKE ~..r;; .. U{' .:""': i.-"- ",,-_ ,[1-'- . 't-,~, ~','C ~ ''1i=.' ,,-L - ::; ~' 'A<:: ~;:; :>t:: )J v A";: ._ I.~:,,,,",,~u~-:---~ ~n-.;/~.~~... '. '~:~~. _ :--\ ~ ~,~. " ."....;..... \ -I ~':' ~ ,~, -0. ,'.;:,......................"....,....... "'....__ ...... -'- ..o.:',,~! : L) i0J~ _'-"--,-;. .,. '''''w, ' ", -' ..- '-'U-" II . _ ~ ' , ""'- ,.t. L... i I - EXHIBIT 4 ( 'T'r'pu....l. e...~. VlI.4~'0lI~2 " [';-(~~:;l"~~, ~:= ~ '. ,- - ---1 I L- ,,.' -1 ~'I .,'~,! . .~.... (~"'" ~ ...,.- I , ~ 'u ---- . J., ~ ~tutAf" ,.,....... ~ CII" .______ \ I , I __ --...__.::.:::;::::-_r.______-\,_, ,I to' J I,.__.j.\ , \ r \ r" -..:;-' .t". /-'- ).. -! '\ ' , \ ! I ".' L : I .' I 0,....,).., ... ., ~l P H A , S , \E 2 ~- '5 '. G U T'\'N ~.J ~' / - ---+-r ';, '. I i " , I . 'p ~, I H IA ''''--)~ ~ ,I ~~ I-~ ~i- .-... w .u " ! 14 ~~~ "Ai;;: :'. C ~- " , (i;' 'f', ':~'. ~;".: i ,'. '':''[1.- .~-~ ~ . .... ,,,'\'~I~I,,, _"'~""':! ',' ,',::,',.:.:~z:i; . ( ~ ~. ---iI " --.... - -... _t .....NTING SnllOl. : o DlCIOUOUS ... SHfnMS {O EXIST. WOODLAND *' CONIFEROUS .... _ EAA'HEN IERMS \'AU[\ t:,a.1:i:OUllO W.. lit: ;;::"~.I.~~'. ;~i';~l~~" ':.." SITE AREA 17.45t AC 104 D,'..J- (:,. t__......... (NJ.;u.._J,....) 2 PAR:"~!G SPACES / UNIT 6.0 UN/~C DEVELOPMENT 4.15. PRIVATe'1 PUBLIC 13.3.., OPEN SPACE 76'li OF TOTAL AREA OF LAN) IN EACH USE: ==l~ ~:tf 5 lie ItAClilJOf"$lftIlCIS J.llle WUUID J.4AC WOOOlAtG ... AC on.. GAttH S"...c. ..S AC ()..'t€A/AI'I"lJCNff Willa.' tNt: I'lIlf'Um&S. nc. }~l'IO 110'.' U,Lh Sl "'rl ~;lI'""..~...li.. ~tt ~~.n LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS & SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN dale ~ I ~y}1AT\C Pu(~ 2Z- I-="_ GolI C, Anociol.' Inc. ; J~~ ~;'':'::: ~:. ;;:.: .'I-)o)'!I)O , ~!-U, '-(10 i'J At......'1tll.,..fVoIt 10 IOIUM. tJ/II U.lO"-ArC. .....- ,.J...... It....",..; 1t) lOt UN_., '" ......... ...-........... Priorview e-Dru:l Prior Lake, MN. 'i~Lj";I' "(-"'-<'->I.,y /) (. .?.;l. {~,,/t ?t.~ 4d-/J. .. It) .... -- m ::t ~ --I \i,':\ -- , I __L __.J I I 1lI I I I J~ I ! .~ t ~I l,Ii3! ;~ dr, I i- l;i~ Ii!! ;ljj:ild HII!I;!'~ e.:-," -h!: II'i1: It'. \.fJ. .Ii U !.l~ r~' l'I"llih ~ j'h:~i; ~ "I"'i,J - I < ~J 'I' ;'5 - II. jlll,LI.I ':' ~ Eo-< 1111!IBI~.' I' I \.fJ. < /:Ijl:~e!i ~ ! j ! i i ~ ,-,...,;9" 1..'- ~ p... iilrl;l!!~@ J I' : ~ ; · · ,. I-I,til , · = ,. h~81~ ~ ~ i = '! ' ~>-<! .'b ~ ~ a iI' 15 d. r~' < i - e 1 · ~Z C d! ~- u::S ~ ~~ ~g: o < ~ h II ~.~ iI' !I~ iH ~!; ~!~ ~ . ! i ' 5; j Ell In J . i JI,. ;. ~!;: J h~ II i !Ii 'I ! i n i . i I j I ~ . " i i i <I i I' .. i ~I i ,li WI ni t.) c') t<- el ;~ " \.0.1 t~ .( vi ~\ ~t I '%', ',1. I ~ v{~ \1 .l ~ vi I ~~ . I ~! I ~ lis : ,1 ...,:a ~ g ~"!... ~~~, \ -~8a- - __L_ " r~ rl 'rq:, It~" Q4, "<'to~l". ~q~s "~1.f '&0, 'O-Q' vl ~J\ ~, ," If) ,~ vI .' .C ." ,,- vI v~, 'i .( l ,I '1 I _----J __---J I I I I ~: n, I ~ I I ~ ~ Cb r-- --~---- ~ __-1 I "~ vl ~l.) II ~ . ~: S! ~ - " iSJ~O O!O.'';v'L L6-81-9 Illi ;1 ~~ _ __ rv- lo!o;; - - I I I I~ " .! I: .i ~ ,. (,' ~i ]~d(lrtO(\EIr"O(\M)-] ,r.WJ\<i\O^,.Jd'lIS!),..,a"'J f CRAPHIC SCAI...E ~---~~ i EAGLE CREEK ESTATES i, -J./ GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN ~':"iS \ I ~ l ...cS ~ I <"~ I <;..s,f"' ---,---------~::- .---~ I ,hh_________h. i I: , I ,/'. I' ,';' ,/" 'I 'j,~~... :IC:>V' </;t,/ .2,':-- 1;-: 'i ~ ~cs., / - \JI,' :; :~S<'j// .I . I " & .~~~<p- ?~ I I 1 I I I I I I ___LL_....ln!!!....___ l "..< <5'''''- ..~~ '- c: --- ..... ---,--T--I-' I I I I I I I I , ",' I I o~"'1 I I I~. I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I J ' I I ~QI 1 I J.-r.a.J__.1- - ~ .' --T~::!!j~I- -,--I-- I I I I" 1 I " I '" I I I "I I I?~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ______.J__ ; ~ ~ ...,:..- - - Jf; *' ~,. AJ.9 2 1t- ~J - -., -,.,:; q; A~~ <7' ---"r'- ""' ./ ./ ./ /" Qt..'itcr A / ':.'tS";'"auR'i' pC~~S ,<~ '-~\""".... 6 \ \ I I \ \ I "-:,H;H=, ~~ DtO ~ . c # Dl511NCfIRICRWQOD ".~""" '1 D1V._t:U07 ~....,.. L. I I I I I MOb ClClIffIUC:fOI IIWJ. NlMOI: .oac ~ ~ DmWIC('AD AT DMl'MT lIf'INMj ClOIMChilIi 10 1M w.wa AWINIt. c:.ucM ~ ':::=:.~=='~. 1--- I I I I I (J fi' ('J ,.y A.s:? <;)-' .,. '1 "K_'~ --- I.tr___ ~............... 1 7 17/17 NO. '"'''' ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ft. -...,....,. 8 c:..7..cr A t;...c:;.~ e-R.J-\f.. .......""'" ~ . ~~- ,~........;...s CITY R IEW -.... ZKIm= ~ SHEET HO. 2 ~/ i.:= ~.~'.: ~ ! ~ _. , .Jj II":; (tl) I -::J --; - -' ]~F.;/ I lfl ~ E-t < ~ lfl Z ~ j ~ I'J.. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ U E-< ~ ~ H C-' < ~ \ --1 i- ,.1 cl ot. '~ i " ~ ; o V:. ,0 .1 ,.) 'I I III .. ! i/ J e / ! I '6 ~t I ~,,-A I \I' I . 1.~ I ~ ~~, 19 AS 3. 'i~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ! ~ U i: I;;: :; ; I h~~ ~h' n :; ~ ~ _ -~~~a- ___L~ tL~ J -- " ~~j d i '~~:"'" ___.._ : ') '\"v.!-- 3 ....,~'...... ~IJJ a. l.,...'~')1'\ ~~ ~ '.:.;z. v :~ ~~ '<l::)~ ~.~ ~ -~ <" ~U ~id ~~tw- ~i~ I : I : I ; I : I : ~~- I: I ' I" .-----~- ~ I I _ ~ ;~ I' ____n_____~ I I L__ I I -------l I I f------ I I ':. - -- "'l:>- "I I 15- ~ ~ I' - -- -- -",-0 _ _ _ _ _ .- -1 I I I I I I I I I I,., I q:~~1 "Q~:'''' I 1"'0 \>-O-~ cC'f l Od&1 '0' 'i:~. I S' I I I ~I ~I I __---J __---J I I I I --h I ~I (\. I I vl 'I), "J ~l ) I I "I I I I I I I v~ '!} .l .l ~ ~ . ~~ I iil ~ " ISJ'o'd ll"O'l t6-11-( n I ~I 1111 ; ~i lJ ~ ~~ ~ ,~ -i ~ . UZ .; <(Z lo.- .- :::IE Ii Cl I zL...i -::,,: I ~:) I 00:: I WQ I f-- VlCt: I (illl.. I VlZ I <- I I I I I I I , \. .~; \ \~ \.1-; \ ~\ \ \\\ \ l \ \ \ \\\\', \ \ '. \ ~\':;\.\- ,\ ".'S< " Ii \ fJ ~~ il ~ \ \ . \ ~ , t- , III ~'~ }~dl"OC\E"O(\IIIJ-)1'J'lL')'.'."'~d'll.e.",,6 1--.- -- -- -- -.-..:. - ---- -..- r___ --....- _....__.__ <4_ .,_.........__ __cr.v_ DCC!OUOU$ . t'VUGIlUH TJI[( PlANT\HG DeTAIL ~._- ~::~ ~=:_- -lj-r ~-::,:r'~~ SHRUI 8[D Pl..J.tffiNG OETAIl ..- SCN[DUL[ ml"'! fIWllE I ....1' !ACP.......1CIrTHIGID' I tOlntlllm ID fW"l..t AS . IIGJt ~tU4 $tLGMllflU" IG 1'3 M.US '.wIltSrT" ....... n "'" ell .0 illlOlCUSJ.lc:a.Ja $WW walt ewe 1tG 14 nUA ~r. 'RDlSPlIIC' CiIlEENSPIIE: UNDDI aD: CDa . ".. ... . ,,.. ... I ",.. ... ..,.. .. . ,,.. ... .' .. .. ,... 1'01 NF~fiIITREE::!: I'GI 21 PlCU Cl..IIUCA IDISAr. ILJlQl: taU.1 SNUX - 'iT II VI-.......e YlULJaIUl NOIC.IIN atMIEJlIItT .YI......... 1.ANDSC:.APf' NOTES (1) LOC:.\1lClN: $CAL[ PUHT$ FDI LOCAnoN 01 KSPtCT STATED DlMDCSIOMS. (l) ru.Hf IMSrEcnoH: NOlWY ARCHITtcr 011 OWNU: 24 HIS NJOR TO PUHT DQNEItY. ARCHmCT IES[INQ .cHI' TO ltJ(CT ANY UNSI.UAaL ru.HT WA~. (3) 11[[ ~nNCi: COOIlOINATt 11lf[ rLNfIWG WIfH OTH(I CONJOACTOI$. (4) MlACH: f'LAC[ WULCH .- oar. lIIUl.CH oW. STIIUl . LAWN lRlD wnH :I n. DIAMtlP CIACW. MULCH SHALJ. I( SHRtDOlD twIDWOOO-AU. PUHIING J(DS. ($) WEm 1AMJ(1; rua: WED ...-. IELQW WLCH .. AU. ......... ...... el) ~ IHCDOED twIDWOOO wuu::H (7) a..ACll: PVoSTK:EDGING: MCHTECT SKAU APPRCM: LOCAlIOH (W DGING rOIl: AU PLJ.NnMO IEDS. Mf.w. EDQHC;: IENIDl SOO AItAS . PI.NmMO.os. DO NOT I:DO[ STlElT OR LAWN TIlES UNLlSS PAIl or A ltD. PIJlKIHG LOT TYPICAL SEenOH ~., ~ I - 1 IIZ" ~ 41 ..... COJnJ; -IZJOITACXc:GAT - ~l/Z'nPEJIIAS(~ /'IoQC.BASE.Cl.ASS1i 1001 CRUSHfI) &.MI1ClHQ , 1 , ' I\i 4 lOB I 31PGO ~r e:' e e :. :. LOT 2 e :. o;j?-.\ o:..:i'..o":' ;.. I '1l::IIIl U . ClUPHlC SCfE ~.....L..--o '._1 "C cJ~..t..;''i, ~}..t.,....... u ~ ;n ~ N ~ ~ ~ M M , M M , ~ ~ ~ '" C . > l " EAGLE CREEK ESTATES UTIlJTY PLAN -lL I I L_____~-~~~~_~--~-------L~- lit ~ ::.;.':ZS .......-n....... ...1I\IIIGPoIS_ -'- ...,.cfUHlll......--IaMlJW..TW'l. -.-~........- ...-...-...~ ~._c.-aM. _-'......-......_a..ou.. CDOJa,ICD _ aD .. ..-....z - ... =--=--~:_.:::.-:.m'" .. ~_~..cr~IIIa1YD_UlCl._ ,. IOU ~ ~ uaa. CIIIICUYI. ..u. _\0111. ---.n..""''''->> ~ ~ ..... ~~_.....,0IlW(~ .-0< ... -.u ClII ..... __ --.c:w. ., ..ClIllI'l....... -- -, ~ I ~ - - -- : J I --- M ,_ .... IS N ___," .....1lolN'I or ......t.._ .........e ftIIf1I:A1IlM I'CIII ~_K~1"'"~llCIOtlll ::-0":.:':-= ~-= - -~. --- II '" /' I ~/. .!' .?' / v' ,/! :2 .<<.to-O.I ~~c: ~ y...cstj'.... \C _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .l..- L _ ~.JJ~ _ _ _ \ 1 ~ \ \ ....cs \ ~S"'.:--'- I \ I \ \ I I ..-cS ,I <t,.S\:'--'''' : I .~r...9~ '....,...\: r:if.ft- '.~. ,,~'f- G~iDC SCALE 'k.,....~_ ..J ---,--T--r--r- \ I 1 I I I I I I c I I I 19'~~-'1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I J I 1 I~q I I .1-....J ...._.1_ - ~ L- nIa't.r.._ r....v:::J([~ --1- -1--1- - T --I-- I I 1 1 I ~ I :J I "I I '" I I I I 0;.1'-"- I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I ____---.J--1 i (--I 1---- -::~,-,,-' #1-:~------- c,. ,1;><1- J: , - ~./[.:: - q:( ,,-9' J --..;.~~---- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. I I I I ./ J--/' r---------r- I // I // I / 1 // I / I // / /:::l l;J'" y - -~ ,;':,.\ r-.":;; - - ::-=---- ----- ~ """n · 1 I '--~H;.H~::~1 HEN! L\$1 D40 ~ I_~~ ~~.}3.~ pRI\(. .. c~c;;-c;. ~ I . . ~ I I I 1 i :l@-G-~ [t~] I ,\ \ I Ii Sl9SJ : U\lL i I I I I 1 717 t7 _________-1 NO. OAIT ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN PRIOR LAKE. MINN. ,c. ,~,:.....",rw ,,~...... .~ s-t" K' ~ .J i")" ,'" q "'" /' / /' ,../ or..'i:"~-;'" CITY R ~ ....-... I .' /C_",_ // '" / '-, / "-. / p...aJ<.\t;CLCT S::H8G~_ G:S"';'"R:C-:- -::9 ~ ~ :! P. ~ ~ ~ ZlQI]):' - WE:S~~'i' ?C:~S SIlEO "0. ~ nl''7=''\ ;"--. -Ie. (;:::.@!1 \'if L~ ~:\ 'Ii \..:0 \~:.: ~ _. -l'l ' flU'! _Ii: ~tJ" 8~" I~\ I 'imJ ~ Sl:AU: 1-.10" NDltIZ. 1-04' vat. ~ WATER SERVICE TO fUTURE BUILDING - :;; Q. ~ .. ... ~ ~ i ~ L - ~ '11:1. !II; ! iii~ ! ~:;I . ~: ~'i:; ~: :':iii II, I lilli = ~-~,& Vl ... ...J i: o '" "- >- ~4 Vl-.. w:c ~Ov ........ ~...:z ~c~ z::l "'- ...> ~ :J~ Uo" ...- ~~o.: " VlC ~ ~a: ..."- ~ ::; 5 [ ~ I ~ ~ "-" 925 i ! 10 ~~ ~ ~: ~ , . ( -::NI: 17, liSP 1120 111 (''' ~ .\04<J CL u >- Z --l l- --l -- 0 --l I- Vl u < c::::c:::: > --l I.L... W --l ....J -~ UJ :> z: - I :..::: ::> l- UJ - :;) UJ --l 0 c:: uo U'J UJ UJ l- --l Vl ~- C::::Vl UJ Vl c:::: , \ ,] ~:.I\J:. f~~."o( ~::u < "(" " 1i , \'.1..,,~ " ~,.,.'t,.. .. ;'~'~ \, . . :~ I ;><., " i '."!"~' !il!I' 1"=1 Ill" ~~. ~11 ~ 'H ij " U >- -II-- -1- -I A_ V'l U Z c:cc:c 0 -I L.l... ;::: --I -~ -< :> :z: > - w ::.:: :> ......l w_ W W --I c:: I- UQ (f) I..l.J W WI-- ~ --I V'l ~- c:c V'l W V'l <: ~Clll rieke carroll muller associates, inc. engineers arcnltects land sUNeyors equal opportunity employer 1955-1996 July 17, 1997 EXHIBIT 6 .~~~." i ~~ ;-:;-,\;2,. \~ \~\\: i'll,',~ 'Ii';" ,1\ i),\1 II: ,,) \ . - (.- \ ' \\ . '. '\ \ (;:). '~;::.' \\\\1\ \-i \ \ - '\ '.- - ; \.\ i' "', '- .'- "D\ ',i ~\ \ ': l; \/ .~ i\\\,\\\ ~ \ wu~ · City of Prior Lake Attn: Jane Kansier 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Re: Eagle Creek Estates Assisted Living Facilities ReM File No. 30443 Dear Jane: The following information is in response to your letter dated July 2, 1997 regarding a complete application. Item #1 : Item #2 & #3b: Item #3a & #3c: Item #3d: It~m #3e: 217 north third street post office box 776 gaylord, minnesota 55334-0776 (507) 237-2924 metro 338-2800 1 (800) 838-8666 fax (507) 237-5516 We have enclosed four full sized plan sheets and one reduced set of plans that have been revised to reflect the comments from the DRC meeting held on July 10, 1997 and to reflect comments from Sue McDermott's memo dated July 15, 1997. John Mesenbrink will be delivering a copy of the plans for the 61- unit building to the City. Plan Sheet #1 shows a summary table of the area calculations for the land area for each use. Lot 3 (2.7 acres) will include the 61-unit assisted living building. Lot 2 (1.9 acres) will include the future 28-unit senior rental building. Lot 1 (8.1 acres) will not include any buildings and will be considered as common open space. The developer is not asking for any modifications to the City's ordinances. The developer intends to construct the majority of the 61-unit building during the fall of 1997. The northwest wing will not be included in the first phase. The developer intends to construct the northwest wing within three years. The 28-unit senior rental building is scheduled to be constructed within 5 years from this date. The proposed parking lot will be phased to match the phasing of the building construction. At least one parking space will be provided for City of Prior Lake Page 2 July 16, 1997 The City has already received a copy of the tree preservation inventory and the wetland mitigation plan. If there is additional information that you require to process this application, please call. Sincerely I RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~ John P. Wingard, P.E. JPW/du c: John Mesenbrink Encls. ~Cll1 rieke carroll muller associates, inc. enqineers arcnltects land surveyors equal opportunity employer July 11, 1997 City of Prior Lake Attn: Jane Kansier 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Re: Tree Preservation for Assisted Living Facility RCM File No. 30443 Dear Jane: Enclosed is a copy of the survey for the Assisted Living Facility in Prior Lake. The survey has been marked-up to show the trees that will be removed and the trees that will be saved. The grading will require the removal of the following significant trees which are identified on the grading plan: 12" Maple 6" Maple 5" Maple 12" Maple 12" Maple 12" Maple 6" Maple 24" Maple 36" Maple 6" Maple 6" Cedar 8" Maple 8" Cedar ~ Cedar 159 Caliper inches of trees to be removed The site contains many other significant trees that will be saved. The percentage of trees that will be removed with the proposed grading will be well below 50% of the total trees on the site. A partial listing of the significant trees that will be saved include: 24" Oak 36" Oak 24" Oak 18" Oak 217 north third street post office box 776 gaylord, minnesota 55334-0776 (507) 237-2924 metro 338-2800 1 (800) 838-8666 fax (507) 237-5516 City of Prior Lake Page 2 July 11, 1997 36" Oak 12" Maple 36" Oak 12" Hackberry 12" Maple 6" Cedar 36" Oak 252 Caliper inches of trees to be saved Many other significant trees will also be saved on this site. The developer, Eagle Creek Villas, LLC, is also planning to add a lot of new trees on the site after the building and parking lot has been built. Sincerely, RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. !\ ~.IY\. ~: ~1'\..,~fJ",--~ John Wingard, P.E. JW/jh c: John Mesenbrink, Eagle Creek Villas Enc!. EXHIBIT 7 Memorandum -- DATE: July 29,1997 TO: Jane Kansier, Planning Coordinator FROM: Sue McDermott, Assistant City Engine7 RE: Eagle Creek Assisted Living Facility - Project #97-41 The Engineering Department has reviewed the plans for the subject project and have the following comments: Plat Provide an easement at the 30" RCP storm drain outlet. Grading and Drainage Plan I. Add silt fence at the west side of the berm. 2. Add the following note: "Protect existing catch basins from sedimentation as a result of construction related dirt and debris." 3. Show all easements (typical all sheets). Wetland Plan 1. There is a wetland impact at the northeast corner of the property that is not shown on the plan. Utility Plan 1. Show existing 6" DIP and valve through the rock dam. 2. Label 6" x 8" reducer - it's shown as an 8" x 8" on the plan. 3. Move the benchmark arrow to point at the hydrant. 4. Provide city details on the plans or in specifications. Utility ProfIles I. On the profile of the culvert for trail crossing for creek, show the slope of the pipe. 2. Show profile of 6" sanitary sewer. In addition, a cost estimate and specifications must be provided. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 11, 1997 1. Call to Order: The August 1, 1997, Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman Stamson at 6: 3 p.m. Those present were Comm~ssj>ners Cramer, Criego, Kuykendall, Stamson and V of, Director of Planning Don Rr: Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier, Assistant City En ineer Sue McDermott and ~ording Secretary Connie Carlson. 2. Roll Call: \ / Stams~ / Present KUYkend\ / Present Criego / Present Cramer /' Present V onhof ' Absent ./ j 3. Approval of Minuies: ,I / MOTION BY KUYKjtNDALL, S OND BY CRIEGO, TO APPROVE THE JULY 28, 1997 MINUTES AS/SUBMITTED. Vote taken Signl ayes by Kuykendall, Criego, Cramer and Stamson. MOTION CARRIED. CommissO ner Vonhof arrived at 6:37 p.m. 4. #: A. Case #97-061, #97-062 and #97-063 Consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary PUD Plan and the Preliminary Plat for the Eagle Creek Assisted Living facility located on the corner of Five Hawks Avenue and Priorwood Street. The hearing was opened and a sign-up sheet was circulated to the public in attendance. Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Staff Report dated August 11, 1997. Eagle Creek Villas LLC has applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, a Preliminary PUD Plan and a Preliminary Plat for the property located just north of the intersection of Five Hawks Avenue and Priorwood Street. The City Council approved the Schematic Plan for an amendment to the Priorview PUD to add approximately one acre of land (Lots 2, 3 and 4, Holly Court) to the original PUD site, to allow the L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN081197.DOC ...-;;-. - construction of a 61 unit assisted living building and a 28 unit market rate senior rental building on the vacant portion of the site on June 2, 1997, through Resolution 97-48. These applications are the next step in the approval process for this project. The original PUD was approved in 1983 and the development to date has occurred prior to 1991. The Priorview PUD was preceded by Council action in 1981 which rezoned the subject property to R-3, High Density residential. This would have permitted 210 units on the 15.05 acres of buildable land on the site. In December of 1982, the Council approved a Schematic PUD plan which provided for 106 units, a street connection from Five Hawks Avenue to Cates Street and preservation of site amenities. In September of 1983, the Council approved the first phase of the development consisting of 48 townhomes. Priorview Second Addition consisting of 20 units, was approved in 1991. There has been no construction activity on this site for several years. In September, 1996, the Council approved Resolution 96-90, approving an amendment to the Schematic Plan for the Priorview PUD, to allow a 61 unit assisted living facility. This amendment was subject to the eight conditions. The developer never submitted the necessary documents for preliminary plan approval of this PUD. In June, 1997, the Council approved Resolution 97-48, approving an amendment to the Schematic Plan to allow a 61-unit assisted living facility and a 28-unit senior rental facility subject to conditions. Comments from the pubic: Charles Cappachino, 4206 Cates Street, felt the grading site for the project has been followed very closely. He went on to express his feelings on the wetland and that no more than 50% of the trees would removed, when in fact, nearly every tree has been removed. There is a proposal for 102 parking spaces. A year ago there was a major parking concern for a 61 facility and now an additional 28 units are being considered. He is not in favor of the additional units and the runoff impact to the wetland. Mr. Cappachino stated he asked his neighbors to ask to sign a petition against the additional units. He said the neighbors felt it was useless. And went on to say City Council, Planning Commissioners and staffbend over backwards to accommodate the developers. Debra Rose, 7725 Jennifer Lane, addressed Mr. Cappachino's concern. A market research has been done indicating the Prior Lake area is lacking in senior health care facility. The number of units are based on the zoning ordinance of Prior Lake. The parking would be for workers and visitors. The majority of residents would not be using the parking facilities. The public hearing was closed. L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN081197.DOC 2 Comments from the Commissioners: Criego: · Assistant City Engineer Sue McDermott explained the engineering conditions and grading site. They are looking at the erosion control until vegetation is established. The wetland plan shows impact to the wetland. She feels confident the proposed berm with help improve the water quality in the creek and wetland. · Rye addressed the parking issue. The ordinance states one parking place per unit. The parking for an assisted living is greater than the demand and will be allocated. · Concern was for over parking. Proposal does not sound excessive. · Supports the assisted living accommodations and the additional apartments. Kuykendall: · Generally supports staff recommendations. · Parking spaces are reasonable. They are not excessive. The engineer group (experts from City and State) felt the design is adequate. . Support no change in the parking. · Questioned the grading permit before approval. Kansier and McDermott said it was approved at the earlier proceeding. . Trails are addressed. V onhof: · Supports the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and feels it is in line with the goals and objectives. · The Preliminary PUD - Confident is a good PUD plan for the site. There was a lot of discussion on many issues. · Preliminary Plat - Kasier explained the City requires underground watering systems. · Supports staff recommendations on all three requests. Cramer: · Questioned property to the east. Rye explained the area was covered in the Eagle Creek Villa Plat. Drainage is directed to the larger wetland. . The concept of the plan meets the city's objectives. . Supports staff's recommendation along with the conditions. Criego: · Questioned the bridge over the wetland. City will work with the developer on an arched bridge. Should be one of the conditions of the approval. Kuykendall: . The bridge should be able to accommodate safety equipment. He felt this was discussed earlier where a police car or fire truck should be able to use the bridge. L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN081197.DOC 3 A discussion followed regarding the bridge. Kansier said the City would be willing to work with the developer to pick up some of the extra cost between a culvert and the bridge. V onhof: . The parks department can design the bridge consistent with other bridges in the City. Cramer: . ADA requirements would have to be met. MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM THE URBAN LOW TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION TO THE URBAN HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION FOR THIS SITE. Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY VONHOF, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN, WITH CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF A BRIDGE. V ote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY CRAMER, SECOND BY KUYKENDALL, TO RECOMMEND APPROV AL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS EAGLE CREEK ESTATES, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED. This item will go to City Council on Tuesday, September 2, 1997. A. Case #97-066 Continued) C ditional Use Request for C. H. Carpenter, 16450 Anna Trail SE. 5. The City received an app . ation for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from C.H. Carpenter Lumber on J y ~1997. The applicant proposes to construct two pole type building in a phasin Ian. Thefroperty is zoned B-2, Community Business. The Prior Lake Zoning Ordi ce requires 3.-conditional use permit for this type of use in the B-2 district. The ap, icant obtained a C65ditional use permit in 1976 for the original building to allow "Su ly Yards" in the B-2 zo ing district (CUP 76-02). The applicants are substantia increasing the structure be nd original approval, thus an amendment to the original UP is necessary. L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN081197.DOC 4