HomeMy WebLinkAbout8A - Deerfield Development Zone Change Request
.1
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
BACKGROUND:
STAFF AGENDA REPORT
SA
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 97-XX
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN, AND ORDINANCE 97-XX APPROVING THE ZONE
CHANGE REQUEST BY DEERFIELD DEVELOPMENT FOR
THE 260 ACRES LOCATED DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE
WATERFRONT PASSAGE BUSINESS PARK
OCTOBER 6, 1997
The purpose of this item is to consider approval of two separate
applications for the property located directly south of the Waterfront
Passage Business Park and Wilderness Ponds, east of The Ponds
Athletic Complex and west of CR 21 and Revere Way. The 260
acres involved in this request was annexed to the City in July, 1997,
and is currently zoned A-I (Agricultural).
The first application is an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to
include this property within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) boundary, and to designate 62 acres, located in the
northwest comer of the site to the Urban Low to Medium Density
Residential (R-L/MD) designation, 140 acres to the High Density
Residential (H-DR) designation and 58 acres to the Planned
Industrial (I-PI) designation. The second application is a request for
a rezoning of the easterly 58 acres from the A-I district to the 1-2
(Light Industrial) district.
This property was annexed by order of the Minnesota Municipal
Board on July 9, 1997. During initial discussions with the City staff
and the City Council, the developer indicated he was interested in a
mixed use type development which would include an expansion of
the Waterfront Passage Business Park on the east side of the site, and
a combination of residential uses on the remainder of the property.
These discussions indicated the residential portion of the site would
be developed at a total density of about 5 units per acre, which would
equal about 700 units. The developer is proposing to develop the
property as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which would allow
the mixed use development. The School District has also indicated
an interest in a portion of this site as a potential high school location.
This proposal is the first step in the development of this site. Once
the property has been added to the MUSA and designated for gener~l
1:\97fil~\97rezQne\97-0.B3\91083cC.d9C P~El1
16200 Eagle creek Ave. S.c., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (61L:) '!47-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
use types on the Land Use Plan Map, the developer can begin
designing the specific development for the site.
DISCUSSION:
The Planning Commission conducted the public hearing related to
these applications on September 8, 1997. The Planning Report and
Planning Commission minutes are attached to the agenda packet.
The Planning Commission recommended the property be included
within the MUSA boundary. However, the Planning Commission did
not recommend approval of the specific request. Rather, the
Commission modified this proposal and recommended the westerly
202 acres be designated as Urban Low to Medium Density
Residential on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map, and the
easterly 58 acres be designated as Commercial Business Office Park
on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. The Planning
Commission also recommended the easterly 58 acres be rezoned
from the A-I district to the BP (Business Park) district.
ISSUES:
The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment was reviewed based
on the goals and objectives in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. These
goals and objectives are discussed in more detail in the attached
Planning Report.
The proposed Urban Low to Medium Density Residential designation
allows densities up to 10 units per acre under a planned unit
development. The proposed Urban High Density Residential allows
densities up to 30 units per acre. The Developer's original
presentation suggested the property would be developed with a total
density of about 5 units per acre. This density can be accommodated
with the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential designation, and
the variety of housing styles can be developed through the use of the
PUD process. For this reason, the staff and the Planning
Commission recommend the entire 202 acres be designated as Urban
Low to Medium Density Residential on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan Map.
In addition, the area proposed to be designated as Planned Industrial
and zoned I-2 is directly adjacent to the Waterfront Passage Business
Park. In his original discussions with the City, the Developer
suggested this area would be developed as an extension of the
business park. In order to accomplish this, the Commercial-Business
Office Park designation and the BP (Business Park) zoning district
are more appropriate than those requested. The staff and the
Planning Commission therefore recommended that the easterly 58
acres be designated as Commercial-Business Office Park on the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and rezoned to the BP (Business
Park) district.
The staff has also had several discussions with the Metropolitan
1:\97files\97rezone\97 -083\97083cc.doc
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATIO
N:
ACTION REQUIRED:
REPORT
ATTACHMENTS:
area within our current MUSA boundary without removing any
properties currently within the MUSA. However, we would not be
allowed to develop more than a total of 500 acres. We would most
likely receive an additional allocation upon completion of the
Comprehensive Plan update due in 1998. The Council staff also
indicated they would review this plan as a staged addition to the
MUSA, which also allows some leeway in the way we can develop
the 500 acres.
1. Adopt Resolution 97-XX and Ordinance 97-XX approving the
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Change as
requested.
2. Adopt Resolution 97-XX approving the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to include this site within the City MUSA boundary,
to designate the westerly 202 acres as Low to Medium Density
Residential, and to designate the easterly 58 acres to the
Commercial Business Office Park designation, and adopt
Ordinance 97-XX rezoning this property to the B-P (Business
Park) district.
3. Continue the review for specific information or reasons per City
Council discussion.
4. Find the Comprehensive Plan amendments and the zone change
inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive
Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and deny the request.
Approve Alternative #2.
Since there are two separate actions involved in this approval,
three separate motions are required, as follows:
1. Motion and second to adopt Resolution 97-XX approving the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include this site within
the City MUSA boundary, to designate the westerly 202 acres
as Low to Medium Density Residential, and to designate the
easterly 58 acres to the Commercial Business Office Park
designation.
2. Motion and second to adopt Ordinance 97-XX rezoning this
property to the B-P (Business Park) district.
1. Resolution 97-XX (Comprehensive Plan)
2. Ordinance 97-XX (Zone Change)
3. Planning Report dated September 8, 1997
4. Minutes of Septemb 8, 1997, Planning Commission Meeting
~Jt?
1:\97files\97rezone\97 -083\97083cc.doc
Page 3
RESOLUTION 97-XX
RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE
LAND USE MAP OF THE 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MOTION BY: SECOND BY:
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 8, 1997,
to consider the request of Deerfield Development to amend the land use
map of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan to include the property legally
described in the attached Exhibit A within the Metropolitan Urban
Service (MUS A) Area and to designate the land uses on this property as
Urban Low to Medium Density Residential and Commercial-Business
Office Park as shown on the map in Exhibit B, and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was duly
published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota
statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found this amendment to be consistent with
the Suitable Housing and Environment goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan in that it offers a variety of housing, and it
provides open space and preservation of the natural elements of the site;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found this amendment to be consistent with
the Economic'Vitality goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan
in that it encourages a diversifies economic base, promotes sound land
use, and maintains high standards in the promotion and development of
commerce and industry; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found this amendment to be consistent with
the City's Livable Community goal to provide affordable and life-cycle
housing; and
1:\97fiLes\97rezone\97-083\rs97xxcc.doc Page I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
WHEREAS,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and
WHEREAS,
the City Council has duly considered the staff reports, meeting minutes
and Planning Commission recommendation which constitute the record
of decision of this matter; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council supports the concept of the "floating MUSA" for this
property.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR
LAKE, that it should and hereby does approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
include the aforementioned property within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and to
designate the aforementioned property to the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential
and the Commercial-Business Office Park subject to the approval of the Metropolitan
Council.
Passed and adopted this 6th day of October, 1997.
YES
NO
Andren
Robbins
Kedrowski
Schenck
Mader
Andren
Robbins
Kedrowski
Schenck
Mader
{Seal}
City Manager
City of Prior Lake
1:\97files\97rezone\97 -083\rs97xxcc.doc
Page 2
EXIllBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, which lies southerly and westerly of RLS No. 98, Files of Registrar of Titles, Scott
County, Minnesota, and which lies northerly and westerly of RLS No. 128, Files of Registrar of
Titles, Scott County, Minnesota, and which lies easterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the northwest comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 27
minutes 21 seconds East, along the north line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 24.25 feet
to the point of beginning ofline to be described; thence South 16 degrees 23 minutes 55 seconds
East a distance of 249.70 feet; thence South 34 degrees 17 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of
200.27 feet; thence South 17 degrees 29 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 446.77 feet;
thence South 33 degrees 24 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 642.42 feet; thence South 17
degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 176.54 feet to the northwest comer of said
RLS No. 128 and there said line terminates.
I: \97files\97rezone\97 -083\lega1.doc
m
I-
-
m
-
J:
><
w
r--
!
jWj~~
~ !!l!illll :: j~
~ l:=!~:)~~ !~ ;~.
w ;J;:~i=-;J P: ~.i~
o ~;.~,"E,:i~1! !!~ 5.
~ !!::'?Io).J" ;. l:iJ
e" ;~t;~~.s:i ~~ :!i
~ ~ ~ij~,1i~:; t .~; ;.1
ITIITI]]]]]:-=II
-T1Tr'jl-r-rr-.; i-'
_._.I_.I__LI_, .1. t_oj I
1:
. I
;. I
-
L:;
1:1 /i /
,_ L;-~_
I I ,~
I I:: '/
I Lil/I;:
I! '
_ell
;;7/
............d/
/ll/
I. /
- -'~jl j
" !
/ j. .
// ."-., 8 i
;l; l~
'" 't"----
.'~~~'
,
:1
J']^]'~ -. '_u. iI'
'S; " ! I
~ J , ; \ ''-/1/
~><". I
"~~~" J
U' 0 '-."."-...
(..\ ,,~,....
r'>-'" ~ -- ~-=.
1/
. 1
: :
: 1
i ,I
'\
~
~
~
~
~
0-
.>.t, ~
4S. t):. ~
'6 ~'. ~
~ o. -
~ ~.., d)
.~ '& '"
." ~ ';;
iIb.
~
.......
,..
"
~
.'(
-i
...
~
~
~
~ ,.-
~ \1'1 ....;.
.,. ~.
~ t .
~ A I::.
'-";'~ ~
..' '1. C'l
?:
~
'-~\
.;,0
. ,.Y
'~' ~
0,)
,..
1-
u
In
N
VI 00:
..J
<r
...
,..,,:.
...
.'
~.
...
.'
l<:
cr
<(
a.
, .
.. .
ifE
!.~. .
-- . --rm']
~~
i
I i
~7 ,-
~ ! .=
11!!!J,.--' u "II i;
~I' 1 ~~:[ ~?
,. .:oj' q~.
:'f~f ;iil
~ =~_: j I ! Em ;~;:
Ii'-=:JJ I ~'{~I
I '.
f I .,
( ...
., \ "
.{
.-
r-
z
w
2:
o
Z
LL!
~
<(
/-
"
z
<(
-l
a..
w
>
CI)
z
UJ
:c
w
0:
0..
~
o
o
o
UJ
if)
o
a.
o
cc
a..
ti.
1 l--=~~
--T -..-.-
~.,
-,---- --l
l .1
\~{ .
- .\/
--
\. I
/ I
\, ,,:.:/
/ / 7.____-
r-<(.~~.-
..
/.
__ _h
._._ J_
~
1
j r
I
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
ORDINANCE NO. 97-XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5-2-1 OF PRIOR LAKE CITY CODE AND
AMENDING SECTION 2.1 OF PRIOR LAKE ZONING ORDINANCE 83-6.
The City Council of the City of Prior Lake does hereby ordain:
The Prior Lake Zoning map, referred to in Prior Lake City Code Section 5-2-1 and Prior Lake Zoning
Ordinance No. 83-6 Section 2.1, is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the
following legally described property from A-I (Agriculture) to BP (Business Park).
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota,
which lies southerly and westerly of RLS No. 98, Files of Registrar of Titles, Scott County,
Minnesota, and which lies northerly and westerly of RLS No. 128, Files of Registrar of Titles, Scott
County, Minnesota, and which lies easterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the northwest comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 27 minutes
21 seconds East, along the north line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of24.25 feet to the point of
beginning of line to be described; thence South 16 degrees 23 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of
249.70 feet; thence South 34 degrees 17 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 200.27 feet; thence
South 17 degrees 29 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 446.77 feet; thence South 33 degrees 24
minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 642.42 feet; thence South 17 degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds
West a distance of 176.54 feet to the northwest comer of said RLS No. 128 and there said line
terminates.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Prior Lake this 6th day of October, 1997.
ATTEST:
City Manager
Mayor
Published in the Prior Lake American on the _ day of
,1996.
Drafted By:
Prior Lake Planning Department
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
16200 ~~~(:lei~~~zf\~~:~~E:~r~A'grt~ke. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612j~47-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
PLANNING REPORT
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
4A.
CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND A ZONE CHANGE
REQUEST FOR THE RECENTLY ANNEXED AREA
OWNED BY DEERFIELD DEVELOPMENT
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
_X_ YES _NO-N/A
SEPTEMBER 8, 1997
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
Deerfield Development has applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone
Change for the property located directly south of the Waterfront Business Park and
Wilderness Ponds, east of the Ponds Athletic Complex and west of CR 21 and Revere
Way. The 260 acres involved in this request was annexed to the City in July, 1997, and is
currently zoned A-I (Agricultural). The developer is proposing to amend the 2010
Comprehensive Plan to include this property within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) boundary, and to designate 62 acres, located in the northwest comer of the site
to the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential (R-LIMD) designation, 140 acre to the
High Density Residential (H-DR) designation and 58 acres to the Planned Industrial (I-
PI) designation. The developer has also requested a rezoning of the easterly 58 acres
from the A-I district to the 1-2 (Light Industrial) district.
BACKGROUND:
This property was annexed by order of the Minnesota Municipal Board on July 9, 1997.
During initial discussions with the City staff and the City Council, the developer
indicated he was interested in a mixed use type development which would include an
expansion of the Waterfront Passage Business Park on the east side of the site, and a
combination of residential uses on the remainder of the property. These discussions
indicated the residential portion of the site would be developed at a total density of about
5 units per acre, which would equal about 700 units. The developer proposed to develop
the property as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which would allow the mixed use
development. The School District has also indicated an interest in a portion of this site as
a potential high school location.
1:\97fi1es\97rezone\97-083\97083pc.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
-~
This proposal is the first step in the development of this site. Once the property has been
added to the MUSA and designated for general use types on the Land Use Plan Map, the
developer can begin designing the specific development for the site.
The Planning Commission is considering two applications at this time. The first
application is a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to include this
site within the City of Prior Lake MUSA boundaries, and to designate the property as R-
LMD (Urban Low to Medium Density Residential), R-HD (Urban High Density
Residential), and I-PI (Planned Industrial). The second request is to rezone the east 57.76
acres of the property from the A-I district to the 1-2 district.
PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Total Site Area: The total site area consists of approximately 260 acres.
Topography: This site has a varied topography, with elevations ranging from 940' MSL
to 950' MSL. The site generally slopes from the outer boundaries inward towards the
wetland on the site.
Vegetation: Much of this site has been cropland over the past several years. The
western portion of the site is very wooded, with a large number of significant trees. Any
development on this site will be subject to the Tree Preservation requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Wetlands: There are several wetlands located within this site, although they have not
been specifically delineated at this time. Any development of this site will be subject to
the wetland mitigation requirements, which means that any disturbed wetlands must be
mitigated.
Access: There are three existing access points to this site. On the north side are Fish
Point Road and Wilderness Ponds. On the east side is Revere Way (CR 87). The
developer has also indicated his intent to extend Adelman Street from Cottonwood Lane
through the industrial portion of this site.
ANALYSIS:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan has three parts. The first is the addition of
the entire site to the City MUSA boundary. The second is the designation of the west 202
acres to Low-Medium Density Residential (R-LMD) and to High Density Residential (R-
HD). The third aspect of the proposal is the designation of the east 58 acres to Planned
Industrial (I-PI). Each aspect of this request is discussed below.
1:\97 files\97 rezone\97 -083\97083 pc. doc
Page 2
MUSA Extension: The City originally proposed to include this site in the expanded
Metropolitan Urban Service Area when the Comprehensive Plan was updated in 1996;
however, the acreage was removed from the MUSA when the Metropolitan Council
allowed fewer acres in the MUSA than the City had originally proposed. Prior to the
annexation of this property, the City had some preliminary discussions with the
Metropolitan Council staff who indicated the area may be included in the MUSA if some
of the new development can be used to satisfy some of the City's Livable Community
goals. These goals specifically encourage the development and maintenance of a variety
of housing types, from starter homes to senior housing.
The City Engineering staff has also estimated sewage flows for this property if fully
developed. The staff concluded the existing MCES lift station and interceptor can
accommodate these flows.
Residential Designations: The Low to Medium Density Residential Designation is
characterized by a low to medium range of residential densities that provides for a variety
of housing options. The R-LMD designation permits densities up to 10 units per acre
under a Planned Unit Development. The High Density Residential designation is
characterized by dwellings other than single family detached dwellings; the dominant
construction form is attached homes and apartment buildings. The R-HD designation
permits densities up to 30 units per acre under a Planned Unit Development.
The Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives which are applicable to this request are as
follows:
GOAL: SUITABLE HOUSING AND ENVIRONMENT: Encourage the development of
suitable housing in a desirable environment.
OBJECTIVE No.1: Provide opportunities for a variety of affordable high quality
housing.
OBJECTIVE No.2: Maintain a choice of and encourage development of quality
residential environments.
OBJECTIVE No.3: Provide suitable passive open space for the preservation of the
natural environment and the enjoyment of residents.
The proposed designations are consistent with the above stated goals and objectives in
that it offers a variety of housing, and it provides open space and the preservation of the
natural elements of the site. Furthermore, this development is consistent with the City's
Livable Community Goal to provide affordable and life-cycle housing. However, it is the
staff's opinion that these same goals can be accomplished by designating the entire site as
Low to Medium Density Residential.
1:\97 files\97 rezone\97 -083\97083 pc.doc
Page 3
~-""I---
Planned Industrial Designation: The purpose of the Planned Industrial designation is
to establish an industrial base that will utilize appropriate sites for development which
will support both local and regional employment and economic needs. This classification
is characterized by developments in industrial parks with high standards of development,
and allows uses such as manufacturing, storage and distribution of materials.
The Comprehensive Plan goal applicable to this request is the goal of "Economic
Vitality" which states "pursue a prudent use of available resources and the optimum
functioning of economic systems." The objectives associated with this goal are listed
below:
OBJECTIVE No.1: Determine and strive for a balance of commerce, industry and
population.
OBJECTIVE No.2: Encourage a diversified economic base and a broad range of
employment opportunities.
OBJECTIVE No.3: Promote sound land use.
OBJECTIVE No.4: Jvfaintain high standards in the promotion and development of
commerce and industry.
The proposed designation is consistent with the above goals and objectives. However,
the developer previously stated his intention to develop this site as an extension of the
Waterfront Passage Business Park. In that case, the property should be designated as
Commercial-Business and Office Park (CBO). The CBO classification is characterized
by high amenity planned developments which have a low traffic generation rate and a site
utilization that is compatible with natural features. This designation is also consistent
with the designation of the existing business park.
Zone Change Request:
At this time, the applicant is only requesting a rezoning of the east 58 acres to the 1-2
(Light Industrial) district. The remaining portion of the property will remain A-I
(Agricultural) until the applicant submits a rezoning application.
The proposed 1-2 district is consistent with the proposed I-PI designation. However, as
noted above, if the applicant is intending to develop this site as an extension of the
existing business park, it would be more appropriately zoned B-P (Business Park). This
zoning is consistent with the existing business park and the CBO designation.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Change as
requested.
I :\97 files \97 rezone\97 -0 83\97 083 pc. doc
Page 4
2. Recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include this site
within the City MUSA boundary, to designate the westerly 202 acres as Low to
Medium Density Residential, and to designate the easterly 58 acres to the
Commercial Business Office Park designation, and recommend approval of rezoning
this property to the B-P (Business Park) district.
3. Recommend denial of the request.
4. Other specific action as directed by the Planning Commission
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning staff recommends Alternative 2.
ACTION REQmRED:
Since this request includes two separate applications, separate motions are required for
each application. These include;
1. A motion and second to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Amendment to include this area within the City's MUSA Boundary and to designate
the westerly 202 acres as Urban Low to Medium Density Residential and the easterly
58 acres as Commercial Business Office Park.
2. A motion and second to recommend approval of the zone change request from the A-
I district to the B-P district.
EXHIBITS:
1. Location Map
2. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
3. MUSA Maps
4. Applicant's Proposal
5. Staff Recommendation
1:\97 files\97 rezone\97 -083\97 083 pc. doc
Page 5
l2
J
<JQ
~9S
_11\&1
!;~
o
)
~I{-
!ii~1
5 I
~
I:
[j
, .
,,'~
, ' ~ \
-:;:;""
Ii
I I
, I
I
I
:
I
I
I
I'
,
4\
I ' ,
_~~: l
11 ;::;-
I: ) \:'
I,?,' ~
./ ,!Ii
-:- !._) -J
-~i J
_::-:-~: I ~~-~
.~
, .)
~ i '
)~i' ,1: ~
-d:;-' ~'
.,.
.,1
. .. (" i ~
,
, .
'( :: . I'
Lf~
i
II ~II I
~~ .1~ 5 i.
c "I' ~~.~
s3 ~ I : ~
a~s~ . - a
illl I~~ I."
;~ ~ - I
f~~ ~ ~! i
A~...aUUlJUU~ 38
ii 100. imoomm 1m io
...
~ iL.....
-'it ,-
I! I 1:::: ~
~~-
cxn:JD
.....)
. ("'I'
."f"':} ~
.~\\:;'\j01~g;~\ .
.,.... ~ ;
. \ : ...;-
"Z
()
-
~
~
c
-J
~
III
~
i
.";;(:
l.:;;'
ri..:..
I:.
.~
;s .\
.'. '\
.1'.
. .1'
'- ~r. .
.~.-
~
I.
.d.1l4i!~ l
.. ,
-. )..
7:~~~;.........."" .............. .
." t......;. ........ ......... f... .
,f. \., '\=_,__-;__
~ .r; ~
'~....' 7;. 1------
~A I !:
1 l '1
I . "
.1,- '".to.-- i '
.?: I. -j} ,
"I ..... /1' ,. _ I
.: r:5.-------1r:-l-. r-'~:' - I
,: \: :
., :.
, .:. ':0
"\ ~ ..n:. .
.:::!1" ..... ! r
:; ("'~)(... '1
-~!.' '" i"\.
Of" .:/ X,) '.!...... '.
'--:~C.! ",/~'
........ .",
. 't.. ~-""'" .
I. ,
. c ~.. .Ilo~, \'
,
"'...........-....-,..-...,'.' ..
I
,
\
\
\
\
\
,
r-.._i
--,
.~J
I:)
(;fJ
~
. ~
:. ':~/;~
'? .'~;
~,
I.
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
...._________L..--...........
.k"";
: i~ . ..-'
.<- )
"\... .
:'\,l..
~ r
~"i
u :
...... ..:
!1
\"'."1'
~ :....-.::~'I...;.?-..
.~~i
\ ;/ftf'?1.~
.........r.w;:[:.;;/.
. Jf{:(...
l
j ~
: u
!...........
:~~,i
( .
.II.
C>
1
\
~
a
.
<'t ~~.\__
)ii. \ -
I \.
/ .; ..-\,.
l ._0:."...
;1
, .
o
..J
~
- ~
~UJ-<
ZU/""\
::J-~
~~z
.GUJ::J
OC'-lO
Z l:O
_z<
~<UJ
C'-lCQo:::
;<0:::.....
UJ::>......
-
-
-
-
.
.
-
-
-
-
.
.
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-<
<UJ
C'-lcx:
::>-<
~
Ozo
0..-
UJ- 0
C'-l C'-l C"l
OZ I
p... ~ In
0>(0\
g:UJ ~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~it-
j~i ~I
1Ii! I
5 1 .
I r. i
i
, ---!; II
I,"",: .
_ _HI I _
j;I-..
-l~i;
, I
! I:
---,:----
-.-~l ---IL
.. .L_
~ ~ I i ~
ir'!;:-
Ii
;:
, I
J ,
'---,-
, ,
.------, I.
: .
I~,_-, ,
I "' "'.
! I' '.....:..":
l ,.J / '-~.~ .~~: ~ i ~
.~~~ ,"-~'--...-
'. ,~I_.'..,i
~ ,I i ~ ~. i j'.
. J, I/.
,~~ .11...
I .1 f'. '_
Vr~ "\
''':L.::/
I. '.: l
,.
r.---
r"~
I:
--;~,~~ JD.o
~ I . ~ ~ I
- .. _.-~--."1Ii Vl ~<
)-~-l('~" ~ : ..
...... ). \ ~ .
l.:., '.,:: l '~~____~_
~~;@./~~I~'. '-::: :~fl:- 1'-:' ~ "'~">'.:~ '; , I""
:t1Tli : .' " ~ .,' J
,:~I-j1.' 'i' - 't....."'...; '!
r '/tj.a- ,. l, r--.. '
. - .- H/i ':1 ~'I
Fri!,f(i7/.~'1~::}:il
,~ I u e I
L ,I,.,~
-=. ~~~
~!I ~ I ~ ' ? '" ".:l ",
'-~T-,T~'l.';i , IF~:
-.. ~.--~- ';6' : ! ..~~~
,lll t r i
~ :" I '!'
j . ,!
I, ..~
,..
'--'
1._ :
_. _l.'!~_
r ~ ~ .
~ .'
! ,--
~---..-.:
i
r;;:\'-'
I .- \~~ j : . ._
t~~;, c~___
, , II ';rl~~-
'1,,',' 3 "-
t ,-'I1'-"'~. ,--" () ~ '
---~~-r.~. ") r-!
it. .. -!;: .\ _/"7:' ,L.: ~
L-...!-._.; ,
i i
! !
, I
----i;
"
i'
I'
---I~
I,
;;1
I ~i'
iiI
I:
I
"
, I
i ~ :
'-.,-
CD
CD
~
<
CD
0 ""
'S; ...
01
~ 01
CD ...
tJ) .-
C ~
CD
.a 'tI
~
:) .
~
0
CD ..
Q.
Q, Q.
'0 4l:
-
'c
::J
::E
~~ it-
i~; ~I
~ I
..
t:
CJ ! .
PP~~\
i
~..
"
~
"'ldJ
I . . ....':":-
'~'I ~j.
;> - i '.: ~.'
. :1. 'l
, ~ ~ ~'. I
. "
,\, )
---..... .
i
"i
r
.
..--..
, \
i==_.-i~ ~.~= "._
I..__-..!__...
.....
"'-..}
. i
/,
; ,
i
;i
\1
,.
,.
r
"~~
' "
~ I' , \
. t __;.,
I I ~ - ~ ........_
. I ____-,
I .
. \1: ~ . ~'... ':!'o, . _
, . ;. .. ~ l . i
,I
_....a.-:
.
,I
.'
.,
':.' ~
~'. .&.
. ~} .) ,
II
.'i
_/ .~\,..
~;~i~k~~ ~f~
::-:~j:'~i:" ~.,...
~ ~.~:,:~;. J :.!.,.1.~.~~.,;.: ::;~_'.~,:. ~ : ~;;
~ ::;~ ._ .::,( ~::.~;.r_..~
ti i:!.8!:1;;i ~~.
~ :p~i;':~; ~~ ;ii
o :.:=::;};~.: ~! ..~..
~~;;i~.~b:,' Mr. :.'~.i
-' a.-.... C ~i
< ;jt,!~.!Ji w~ i~i
~ ~~:t~~rs:: 9 H ~"l
..oJ "':'~".U"Il"',_ ~... i";i
1/
I /
/' /
/ .'
~
~~
-i ($. O'~,
-a. 0A~' .
.' ~ ~:-
?Q~
~
,r-
/
/
/
/ .,
- '_,
'.'1.'
.....
~
(
).,^).~",. -- ...
~ ~,
"".'- . ol
'~,-'
.......
'... '-'-
"'.,',,--
'-
'" <(
-'
'"
U'
<>
---------.,
\
\
\
'.':' \
" ,
\
\
'_i \
,."" I
~ 1
I
I
I
I
1
T[[[[T~I-]I.I-.I.~ II
-]l=rr r'-rIT,'-1 1-
-- _.1._ U I . 'II
li:.1 ;' /
I ',/
i.:, /
1:1 " ;'
i-L-I LA""
_-~I U~'!r
-- //
- -=- 71
J~--~//;
/f/
--.:'.// ,-
/1/
t<
....
en
1.."':_
"
,-
),
- _. - -- ._~ --- ---- .--.
~
~
9:~
~($.
~0A
~
~~
'f,,<'
~
~
~
-i
,
~
~
~\P
.'i -r~
~0A
~e-1
(:)\P
~
'0
,- . ~
~
:>
>-
1-
u
- -- --- -~--l
l /
'0 /
.\\
\'"
/ -;/
..'/'
.,'" ;,'"
//.
1>/
L'/---
Y'
/..9
d
_---.f.;.
_ .. __ _.!i _.--. . --
t::.
.'i
"
,.
l<:
cr
<(
0..
~
f!E!Jr:~-".7
~'I !.. U'
E:; c.'
~I ;- I
~L:J
cSS~~
1
I
(
,
"
/
(,
II
.\
,,'
'J
/ :.J
T(
"'---./
_" n .::."'-..~~=.
---- [-
----1--.----'-
.. ----
--
--
7. ----./-
I \ J--:LI
,. iU ~~_
i
i
,
. n~:i,j; X
=! i ~
t:61j i.~ \
';;'; HI
~~! !~ i
r-C - !
::;: Ii -
t-
-
~
ill
~
0
Z
UJ
~
<(
Z
<( ..Ji
......J
a.. <(i
(/)1
UJ 01
> 0.1
- 01
CI) a:!
z 0.'
w I
I ~
W
0: Z
a.. <(I
2 01
-,
0 ..J!
0 ~
a;
0 <(!
w !
CJ)
0
a..
0
0::
a..
;
z
j
/-----_. --
t!;~ ~ki~ : ~ {~
~:~~~~~~~ ~:::
~ lllJllm 1! m
a: ~ i:~~~.l:; t~:;;'
~ , ::~i:J:~ ..: ~f:
~ ; !~:t:f! P: :.; ~
~J.:'.'E i~f~! ~~ c..
...J ';-~~:li' ;.. ~zJ
~ ~~lEz;~.!i ~. _l!.'~:
w "'.:~;~~?-r.. ;i ....
...J : ~;.:~(:!::': t .~; ;';J
~
I~rf ~--,~ I
ISW'.' IJI
l!!!!J ,="
@ ::i
l!!!!J "".
c9'____~
--
-DIITI.U"--]J- -'-1-'
- - - ._. . - -- -- - --.
i--r-i -r rn- r-r r-j -.
_._LI__l. U L! _..,
(
I
(
(,
./
1/
,/
: I
.I
"
,I
..\.
"
r"
1.:1
t' :
'-L/ !.
~L1E:/ =---- "'.;'
.~
----- /."
=;-1
1/
- -..':1//1
//
I~
,I
'.
\-...
T(
~
~
~
oil
~
/
","--./
VI ot
-'
~
()o
~'& ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~." Ii
~ IJ'!". d)
-Oil in \tI
...~\
\) 'in
-- ~
...
rr
II' (l
t<
'"
'..":-
"
'..\oJ
~.
,';",
. . - --- [
-i
~
~
\
~ ~ .:.:.
"'= t "
'\ :is. '::.
'..:."b ~
,.' 'to (ol
'*
Q
'-~\
.,~ 0
, .,'1'"
'J' ~
~
I
H!Ii I J
--1 ~~.~~=
...
--- --l
\ ;'
.,.\\/
\ .'.
)
.... ,."
/'/
!)f~._
~-
.,..,'J
---_./!/
_ . ._.. Ii
7.. _____-
...
.'
~.
--
u
l.:
cr
0{
a.
>-
1-
I,. ,~I
~-
i
I
.
,,~I! H
1'1:511 ;.,
;ro: i~ I
~~ I ': I
""iU"- ,..
xc.':' .:~
r-r:;
::;::r:-
f-
Z
w
~
0
z
Ul
2
<(
z
<( z:
-l Oi
0. _I
w ~I
>
- Z,
CI) w,
z =:/
w
:c =:1
w 01
0:: O!
a.. WI
a:1
2 u.!
0 11.1
() ~I
0 (1)1
w
CJ)
0
a.
0
0::
0.
j
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 8, 1997
1. Call to Order:
The September 8, 1 , Planning Commission meetin was called to order by Chairman
Stamson at 6:30 p.m. ose present were Commisso ers Cramer, Criego, Kuykendall,
Stamson and Vonhof, D ctor of Planning Don e, Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier
and Recording Secretary nnie Carlson.
3.
V onhof
Kuykendall
Criego
Cramer
Stamson
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
2. Roll Call:
MOTION BY VO OF, SECOND BY C
1997 MINUTES S SUBMITTED.
R, TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 11,
er, Vonhofand Stamson.
4. Public Hearings:
~
A. Cases #97-082 & 97-083 Consider a proposed Amendment to the City of Prior Lake
Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan and a zone change request for the recently annexed
area owned by Deerfield Development.
The Chair opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. and a sign-up sheet was circulated to
the public in attendance.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the staff report.
Deerfield Development has applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone
Change for the property located directly south of the Waterfront Business Park and
Wilderness Ponds, east of the Ponds Athletic Complex and west of County Road 21 and
Revere Way. The 260 acres involved in this request was annexed to the City in July,
1997, and is currently zoned A-I (Agricultural). The applicant is proposing to amend the
2010 Comprehensive Plan to include this property within the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) boundary, and to designate 62 acres, located in the northwest comer of the
site to the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential designation, 140 acres to the High
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
1
Density Residential designation and 58 acres to the Planned Industrial designation. The
developer has also requested a rezoning ofthe easterly 58 acres from the A-I district to
the Light Industrial district.
This property was annexed by order of the Minnesota Municipal Board on July 9, 1997.
During initial discussions with the City staff and the City Council, the applicant indicated
he was interested in a mixed use type development which would include an expansion of
the Waterfront Passage Business Park on the east side of the site, and a combination of
residential uses on the remainder of the property. These discussions indicated the
residential portion of the site would be developed at a total density of about 5 units per
acre, which would equal about 700 units. The developer proposed to develop the
property as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which would allow the mixed use
development. The School District has also indicated an interest in a portion of this site as
a potential high school location.
This proposal is the first step in the development of this site. Once the property has been
added to the MUSA and designated for general use types on the Land Use Plan Map, the
developer can begin designing the specific development for the site.
The Planning Commission is considering two applications at this time. The first
application is a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to include this
site within the City of Prior Lake MUSA boundaries, and to designate the property as R-
LMD (Urban Low to Medium Density Residential), R-HD (Urban High Density
Residential), and I-PI (Planned Industrial). The second request is to rezone the east 57.76
acres of the property from the A-I district to the 1-2 district.
Comments from the public:
Bryce Huemoeller representing Deerfield Development and Mesenbrink Construction
stated staffhas recommended a slightly different density breakdown than the developer.
The developer met with staff and does not object to the recommendation. Deerfield
Development has continued to talk to the school district about 80 acres and those
discussions are moving along. It is likely they will sign a Purchase Agreement in the near
future. Developers John Mesenbrink and Larry Gensmer were present for questions.
JeffElasky, 16951 Wilderness Trail, said he moved out to Wilderness Ponds a year ago
and received different answers from Scott County and the City of Prior Lake regarding
the development. His main concern is for traffic and the safety for his children. Fish
Point Road will be the main feeder. Mr. Elasky was also expressed concern for his
property value. He asked the Planning Commission to take this into consideration when
making their decisions.
Jim Palmer, 16986 Wilderness Trail, said its concerns were stated by Mr. Elasky.
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
2
--.1-
...~'
Steven Frank, 17410 Revere Way, was concerned for the high housing density and the
wetlands but agreed with the City's proposal.
The public hearing was closed.
Comments from the Commissioners:
V onhof:
. Is the City required to give up any acreage for the MUSA extension? Rye said the
City discussed this with the Metropolitan Council. The City will be doing a general
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to deal with the entire MUSA issue. One
possibility is a "Floating MUSA" where there are no specific lines on the map, the
City would have a basic acreage allocation and allocate to the specific developments
as they come along. It will be an orderly extension of utilities as needed. It has not
been worked out. When the City prepared the Comprehensive Plan, an additional 500
acres were allocated. This would come out of it. If more acreage is needed in the
future the City would have to go back and ask for additional land. The wetlands are
not included in the MUSA acreage.
. Supported the MUSA extension.
. Supported staff recommendation on the density.
. The business park designation is consistent with our plan.
Kuykendall:
. Supported everything stated so far.
. What are other impacts to the City? Rye stated the City still has the remaining
acreage. Current state of affairs is the City has very little acreage left, with the
exception of the Jeffers property on County Road 42 and 21. Metropolitan Council
suggest this could be phased in developers' projects.
. Concerns for traffic are typically handled quite well by the City and does not
anticipate any kind of problem.
. Is there a need for buffering from other developments? Kansier said the zoning
ordinance provides for certain districts. In this case, there is a natural separation of
woods and wetlands. The new ordinance will contain specifics in zoning and
buffering. There are standards in place.
. Supported proposal by staff.
Criego:
. Any information on how much acreage the school district needs? Kansier said
generally high school sites are around 80 acres. The City does not know any of the
arrangements with the school and developer.
. Huemoeller said the school is looking at 80 acres. There is about 30 acres of wetland.
. The low to medium density on this site should be around a total of 70 acres.
. Kansier clarified the maximum number of units (assuming there was no school)
would be 1,500 to 1,700 units under a PUD. That is not saying it would be approved.
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
3
'.
That is allowable. It would also depend on the wetlands. Realistically it would be
around 500 and 700 units, minus the school.
. How does the City achieve affordable high quality housing? Rye explained the
decisions are on land use. When it gets down to the PUD, those specific
determinations will be made.
. Agreed with the City's recommendation.
Cramer:
. Regarding the MUSA line. Will the Metropolitan Council take issue with the types
of housing?
. Rye said at this point the Metropolitan Council suggested they would not get involved
in the zoning process. In the future they will be looking for continuity in the
Comprehensive Plan such as the Livable Community Act.
. Supported staffs recommendation.
Stamson:
. Concurred with the Commissioners and supported staffs recommendation.
MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY KUYKENDALL, TO RECOMMEND
APPROVAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE TmS
SITE WITHIN THE CITY MUSA BOUNDARY, TO DESIGNATE THE WESTERLY
202 ACRES AS URBAN LOW TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND TO
DESIGNATE THE EASTERLY 58 ACRES TO THE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS
OFFICE PARK.
There was no discussion.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY KUYKENDALL, TO RECOMMEND
APPROVAL THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST FROM THE A-I DISTRICT TO THE
BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This item will go before City Council on October 6, 1997.
B. Case #97-080 '
South.
ilds Planned Unit Development known as Sterling
sign-up sheet was circulated to the public in
inator Jane Kansier presented the st
ort.
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
4
RESOLUTION 97-XX
RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE
LAND USE MAP OF THE 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MOTION BY: SECOND BY:
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 8, 1997,
to consider the request of Deerfield Development to amend the land use
map of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan to include the property legally
described in the attached Exhibit A within the Metropolitan Urban
Service (MUS A) Area and to designate the land uses on this property as
Urban Low to Medium Density Residential and Commercial-Business
Office Park as shown on the map in Exhibit B, and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was duly
published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota
statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found this amendment to be consistent with
the Suitable Housing and Environment goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan in that it offers a variety of housing, and it
provides open space and preservation of the natural elements of the site;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found this amendment to be consistent with
the Economic' Vitality goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan
in that it encourages a diversifies economic base, promotes sound land
use, and maintains high standards in the promotion and development of
commerce and industry; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found this amendment to be consistent with
the City's Livable Community goal to provide affordable and life-cycle
housing; and
1:\97files\97rezone\97-083\rs97xxcc.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
WHEREAS,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and
WHEREAS,
the City Council has duly considered the staff reports, meeting minutes
and Planning Commission recommendation which constitute the record
of decision of this matter; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council supports the concept of the "floating MUSA" for this
property .
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR
LAKE, that it should and hereby does approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
include the aforementioned property within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and to
designate the aforementioned property to the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential
and the Commercial-Business Office Park subject to the approval of the Metropolitan
Council.
Passed and adopted this 6th day of October, 1997.
YES
NO
Andren
Robbins
Kedrowski
Schenck
Mader
Andren
Robbins
Kedrowski
Schenck
Mader
{Seal}
City Manager
City of Prior Lake
1:\97files\97rezone\97 -083\rs97xxcc.doc
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota, which lies southerly and westerly of RLS No. 98, Files of Registrar of Titles, Scott
County, Minnesota, and which lies northerly and westerly ofRLS No. 128, Files of Registrar of
Titles, Scott County, Minnesota, and which lies easterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the northwest comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 27
minutes 21 seconds East, along the north line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 24.25 feet
to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence South 16 degrees 23 minutes 55 seconds
East a distance of 249.70 feet; thence South 34 degrees 17 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of
200.27 feet; thence South 17 degrees 29 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 446.77 feet;
thence South 33 degrees 24 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 642.42 feet; thence South 17
degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 176.54 feet to the northwest comer of said
RLS No. 128 and there said line terminates.
I: \97files\97rezone\97 -083\legal.doc
m
t-
-
m
-
::J:
><
W
'1----
~[[[[[TJ]J]I] I
I~ Trrn-rr-, i-'
___.I_.I__l._1_. .i. t__1
t!
! i
: I
:.1
:1
~EL~rt:
_ _ It ..
mW';1= L\~
% ~H~m,:l_:~ o~ ~:;
o - r ~.~ ......;
! ii~~~!J iii
Fl
n~~
~' ,/
I'~I ~ I;i
:LiJ
l~k~iJ
II
:' /
. /
I
I
"
"
.'
/-
'\
"=
~
~
~
JM)^]H~~ 17/
: "1'~,. Ii l /
~ J ",-/'1
"~~, j
U' () ...... ."'"
(.) "~"
T.::.~ -----.1
V1 ..
,/
~
0-
~t ~
~ ~ . ~
\) ~.. ~
~ 0- -
~ II! .-. ~
~~ it!
... ~ ';;.
~
~
-'
Ir
<:<
"
m
r..v,'.
...
......J
"
.'(
-i
...
~
~
~
~ -
~ 11\ ,-
.,. ~-
~ t
~ ;a. ':-'
'. ~ "b ~
.-' 'i Co'
'a
0,
,j\,
,;.0
- Y"
'';''~
0.>
I
l-- -~~r ~~-~~~
."
-- --l
I, ,I
- \\-
.'
"
--
\,
>-
~
cr
0(
a.
\. 'I
\, / /
\, /::/
/ / 7.-----.;-
~~~-
SJ
/--I
___j;f
_ . .__.. '_L.
,-
u
'\ ]
I 1.1
i
i i
l ~
l!/l i ~
'.. i,. !
c ,,;. i
I.::oii
; i; i.l:
, ., s.; I ~
, =-:0'..1
I ,",vi..
, =c.I':'
ir-c
i ;:;::rt-
~-
!-
Z
w
~
o
z:
LU
~
<I:
z:
<I:
...j
a..
LU
>
CI)
Z
w
J:
w
0:
a..
~
o
u
o
w
(j)
o
c..
o
0:
a..
~
.'!
"1f
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
ORDINANCE NO. 97-XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5-2-1 OF PRIOR LAKE CITY CODE AND
AMENDING SECTION 2.1 OF PRIOR LAKE ZONING ORDINANCE 83-6.
The City Council of the City of Prior Lake does hereby ordain:
The Prior Lake Zoning map, referred to in Prior Lake City Code Section 5-2-1 and Prior Lake Zoning
Ordinance No. 83-6 Section 2.1, is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the
following legally described property from A-I (Agriculture) to BP (Business Park).
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota,
which lies southerly and westerly of RLS No. 98, Files of Registrar of Titles, Scott County,
Minnesota, and which lies northerly and westerly of RLS No. 128, Files of Registrar of Titles, Scott
County, Minnesota, and which lies easterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the northwest comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 27 minutes
21 seconds East, along the north line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 24.25 feet to the point of
beginning of line to be described; thence South 16 degrees 23 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of
249.70 feet; thence South 34 degrees 17 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 200.27 feet; thence
South 17 degrees 29 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 446.77 feet; thence South 33 degrees 24
minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 642.42 feet; thence South 17 degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds
West a distance of 176.54 feet to the northwest comer of said RLS No. 128 and there said line
terminates.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Prior Lake this 6th day of October, 1997.
ATTEST:
City Manager
Mayor
Published in the Prior Lake American on the _ day of
,1996.
Drafted By:
Prior Lake Planning Department
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
1:\97fi1~\97f1:zoJle\97-.Q81\ord97xx.dPc fjg~ 1
16200 Eagle UeeK Ave. ~.c., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (61~ '!47-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
PLANNING REPORT
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
4A
CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND A ZONE CHANGE
REQUEST FOR THE RECENTLY ANNEXED AREA
OWNED BY DEERFIELD DEVELOPMENT
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
X YES NO-N/A
-- -
SEPTEMBER 8, 1997
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
Deerfield Development has applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone
Change for the property located directly south of the Waterfront Business Park and
Wilderness Ponds, east of the Ponds Athletic Complex and west of CR 21 and Revere
Way. The 260 acres involved in this request was annexed to the City in July, 1997, and is
currently zoned A-I (Agricultural). The developer is proposing to amend the 2010
Comprehensive Plan to include this property within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) boundary, and to designate 62 acres, located in the northwest comer of the site
to the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential (R-LIMD) designation, 140 acre to the
High Density Residential (H-DR) designation and 58 acres to the Planned Industrial (I-
PI) designation. The developer has also requested a rezoning of the easterly 58 acres
from the A-I district to the 1-2 (Light Industrial) district.
BACKGROUND:
This property was annexed by order of the Minnesota Municipal Board on July 9, 1997.
During initial discussions with the City staff and the City Council, the developer
indicated he was interested in a mixed use type development which would include an
expansion of the Waterfront Passage Business Park on the east side of the site, and a
combination of residential uses on the remainder of the property. These discussions
indicated the residential portion of the site would be developed at a total density of about
5 units per acre, which would equal about 700 units. The developer proposed to develop
the property as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which would allow the mixed use
development. The School District has also indicated an interest in a portion of this site as
a potential high school location.
1:\97files\97rezone\97-083\97083pc.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 I Ph. (612) 447-4230 I Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
This proposal is the first step in the development of this site. Once the property has been
added to the MUSA and designated for general use types on the Land Use Plan Map, the
developer can begin designing the specific development for the site.
The Planning Commission is considering two applications at this time. The first
application is a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to include this
site within the City of Prior Lake MUSA boundaries, and to designate the property as R-
LMD (Urban Low to Medium Density Residential), R-HD (Urban High Density
Residential), and I-PI (Planned Industrial). The second request is to rezone the east 57.76
acres of the property from the A-I district to the 1-2 district.
PHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Total Site Area: The total site area consists of approximately 260 acres.
Topography: This site has a varied topography, with elevations ranging from 940' MSL
to 950' MSL. The site generally slopes from the outer boundaries inward towards the
wetland on the site.
Vegetation: Much of this site has been cropland over the past several years. The
western portion of the site is very wooded, with a large number of significant trees. Any
development on this site will be subject to the Tree Preservation requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Wetlands: There are several wetlands located within this site, although they have not
been specifically delineated at this time. Any development of this site will be subject to
the wetland mitigation requirements, which means that any disturbed wetlands must be
mitigated.
Access: There are three existing access points to this site. On the north side are Fish
Point Road and Wilderness Ponds. On the east side is Revere Way (CR 87). The
developer has also indicated his intent to extend Adelman Street from Cottonwood Lane
through the industrial portion of this site.
ANAL YSIS:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan has three parts. The first is the addition of
the entire site to the City MUSA boundary. The second is the designation of the west 202
acres to Low-Medium Density Residential (R-LMD) and to High Density Residential (R-
HD). The third aspect of the proposal is the designation of the east 58 acres to Planned
Industrial (I-PI). Each aspect ofthis request is discussed below.
I :\97fi1es\97 rezone\97 -083\97083 pc. doc
Page 2
MUSA Extension: The City originally proposed to include this site in the expanded
Metropolitan Urban Service Area when the Comprehensive Plan was updated in 1996;
however, the acreage was removed from the MUSA when the Metropolitan Council
allowed fewer acres in the MUSA than the City had originally proposed. Prior to the
annexation of this property, the City had some preliminary discussions with the
Metropolitan Council staff who indicated the area may be included in the MUSA if some
of the new development can be used to satisfy some of the City's Livable Community
goals. These goals specifically encourage the development and maintenance of a variety
of housing types, from starter homes to senior housing.
The City Engineering staff has also estimated sewage flows for this property if fully
developed. The staff concluded the existing MCES lift station and interceptor can
accommodate these flows.
Residential Designations: The Low to Medium Density Residential Designation is
characterized by a low to medium range of residential densities that provides for a variety
of housing options. The R-LMD designation permits densities up to 10 units per acre
under a Planned Unit Development. The High Density Residential designation is
characterized by dwellings other than single family detached dwellings; the dominant
construction form is attached homes and apartment buildings. The R-HD designation
permits densities up to 30 units per acre under a Planned Unit Development.
The Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives which are applicable to this request are as
follows:
GOAL: SUITABLE HOUSING AND ENVIRONMENT: Encourage the development of
suitable housing in a desirable environment.
OBJECTIVE No.1: Provide opportunities for a variety of affordable high quality
housing.
OBJECTIVE No.2: Maintain a choice of and encourage development of quality
residential environments.
OBJECTIVE No.3: Provide suitable passive open space for the preservation of the
natural environment and the enjoyment of residents.
The proposed designations are consistent with the above stated goals and objectives in
that it offers a variety of housing, and it provides open space and the preservation of the
natural elements of the site. Furthermore, this development is consistent with the City's
Livable Community Goal to provide affordable and life-cycle housing. However, it is the
staff s opinion that these same goals can be accomplished by designating the entire site as
Low to Medium Density Residential.
1 :\97files\97 rezone\97 -083 \97083pc. doc
Page 3
Planned Industrial Designation: The purpose of the Planned Industrial designation is
to establish an industrial base that will utilize appropriate sites for development which
will support both local and regional employment and economic needs. This classification
is characterized by developments in industrial parks with high standards of development,
and allows uses such as manufacturing, storage and distribution of materials.
The Comprehensive Plan goal applicable to this request is the goal of "Economic
Vitality" which states "pursue a prudent use of available resources and the optimum
functioning of economic systems." The objectives associated with this goal are listed
below:
OBJECTIVE No.1: Determine and strive for a balance of commerce, industry and
population.
OBJECTIVE No.2: Encourage a diversified economic base and a broad range of
employment opportunities.
OBJECTIVE No.3: Promote sound land use.
OBJECTIVE No.4: Maintain high standards in the promotion and development of
commerce and industry.
The proposed designation is consistent with the above goals and objectives. However,
the developer previously stated his intention to develop this site as an extension of the
Waterfront Passage Business Park. In that case, the property should be designated as
Commercial-Business and Office Park (CBO). The CBO classification is characterized
by high amenity planned developments which have a low traffic generation rate and a site
utilization that is compatible with natural features. This designation is also consistent
with the designation of the existing business park.
Zone Change Request:
At this time, the applicant is only requesting a rezoning of the east 58 acres to the 1-2
(Light Industrial) district. The remaining portion of the property will remain A-I
(Agricultural) until the applicant submits a rezoning application.
The proposed 1-2 district is consistent with the proposed I-PI designation. However, as
noted above, if the applicant is intending to develop this site as an extension of the
existing business park, it would be more appropriately zoned B-P (Business Park). This
zoning is consistent with the existing business park and the CBO designation.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Change as
requested.
I :\97fi1es\97rezone\97 -083\97083 pc. doc
Page 4
2. Recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include this site
within the City MUSA boundary, to designate the westerly 202 acres as Low to
Medium Density Residential, and to designate the easterly 58 acres to the
Commercial Business Office Park designation, and recommend approval of rezoning
this property to the B-P (Business Park) district.
3. Recommend denial of the request.
4. Other specific action as directed by the Planning Commission
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning staff recommends Alternative 2.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Since this request includes two separate applications, separate motions are required for
each application. These include;
1. A motion and second to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Amendment to include this area within the City's MUSA Boundary and to designate
the westerly 202 acres as Urban Low to Medium Density Residential and the easterly
58 acres as Commercial Business Office Park.
2. A motion and second to recommend approval of the zone change request from the A-
I district to the B-P district.
EXHIBITS:
1. Location Map
2. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
3. MUSA Maps
4. Applicant's Proposal
5. Staff Recommendation
1 :\97 files\97 rezone\97 -083 \97083 pc. doc
Page 5
-- --T~ --. - -
"'-1'
--. - -.1-. ~--rT
--- -"! !
- _l_
I
i-=8h. _C~cO'
~_.-- ,
. - i ~ -
I
, ~ ! ~
i.:)
!
j
I
.1
-~. ..~ .....
. i .h~
LttAfll)N ~~EtJ"
O~1lS11ELC
f'2Dp(2.1 t
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
BASE MAP
..... -y",,~
~-
I'
I
, I'
""J",;
;
~
i.!
~ Ii. ~ i i ~
~~.~~!~i ~i
~~~~~a~~ !~,.
,. .11 ~. .i:. ~-
!~.Ii!,'~'i
~~ i ~ !~i
3 ~ ;.j u
~! ~ u~~~
2 ~O~.. l[Joo~~
:j~ ..: . '-.'"
i '
I "
r.......i... j ,
" li--'
. ' ._/.....
:.: .....J "-....-
r'" ......
: .....
, '.
. ~ .
! ~
~ i
! ~ ~
. ~
.
0
~ 0
l.
n
l'
It
.,
~ ~
~ 0
~ ~ u~
a
~.~ OJ ~ -
-........:.........T" ~ ~.:?--
~ it-
~;I ~: ~
~~
~ ~
&
. ,I
.,\
: .,1
- (l !\
,1.1
,
\
II :.
~r:ft
",;!'
;
, '
i4:\.,. .>'
."...~, ., ..
.:.....~>' -. -'..(
,\ ~
~
.........
:i (.-,.)("
-/ ~ i"\
.'..' '.', \
~ 'J
\:
\..----~-~, ,\
..
\ I
\
\ r~<'
_,-~.J
'---~~;-'-'.' ~ ',:,' ':;..,
, 1'"
'f~-~~-..... .
~ .' ,'\
\',,',.,
.,;;;'; .
'i": ,.,'
'.:::~) -------",--,'.
~
(,tJ.'t'
~
"
, "
.. _I. ,-"
i I ~ j
,.
..:.:
! Ii
: u
t.............1I. .
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
,
__________1.-------..... :
!1
\~t......
\ ~ ~;J~;'
\ ~;f1:~
, u...l%p}1~'
(f;~~ '>,
it
'\.1....
f- :
~
"
.~.
J
T
'i
I
,/~~. j
I' '\.
/1,
, i
C)
1
\
~
_____-..1
,',\\.....-
~
I' : \
/
I __c,
----- .
.1
, '
- ,
...J
~
- ~
S:2tIJ.(
ZU,....
::J-~
~~5
r"'l tIJ 0
'-'CIJ~
~z.(
E- .( fT'
CIJ~_
-""
~~.(
1 I.U:i ~\
. t , U'i:-"l
j,........' 1(1'
,
. \.
., i; ",
__J
I
~;
i.1
I -
'---~-i I
, I
! I:
1'-
-- -,
-- I
~ i I
i
---I~
. ---------,
I~ , I
;l~
II(
I;~
Ii
I!
, ,
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
.
-
-
-
.
.
-
.
-
.
.
-
-
-
.
.(
.(tIJ
ClJjX
::J.(
~z
00::
tIJ-o
CIJ CIJ N
OZ I
c... ~ V)
OoJO\
""" 0\
p.. tIJ -
...~
" .
i~! ~!
tts!1 I
>-
t:
OJ.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
) r'-~
-----.-j--,
. 1-=---l~~~-:_-l- L._~"\~
~
, ) ,-~
-~--
"
; , i
.-~' ~--~ ,
~~.'i
.., ~ K
; _. ~
.1 -
. ,
,I
':
. ..~f ,) :
. .
, ~ I '
: ~ .
--=~"-~IE"'~i""-~~ -:i!
I ~, It-,i.: j
L ~- r
1--- - -~---
.-..-- ~
[
, .-1
-- GJ !
- :It:t~~'~~~r~~~~:~._-----:I .---
.~~r\; . 1 ..' --Co' - -j~-'t'!. -~
,.!, L.;. ._~... .."1" <"- '..... '~..::- ;=tJ[....;:,..~
,': i..---- <,; L-l-. -=- -_.:-~~,11'''''._ -",'
.\1....10-..... .-.
_) !~ ,'. ~...., ~ ..._.._ .- ~- _ ,iJ
, . I:: - i ~-,~
I ;----j(
~ I
-
i
.r--:--:::.-=::'._-~ -
H
I" II
t -:11
- ,
J , -'.-
..
..
- 1 - j
I - I
-- :
\--
j
: ,
.17 0
i j ~'DL'"
I . .
'.'
Ii'
"""'To-.
.
-. - f --:- :
Municipal Urban Service Area
(ApprOlfed June, 1996)
..;
...... ANUIlIlCN -.. . \
i'
---'- --' - ;
--"-
1:/
,____ 6
. .'
'-.: _11'Jl_,
" I \ ~
! .
L~
"""""!': ANEXAIION.-..
r--
[~ .
rl ..
I.". ~I
- lZ,d.
, '_jD _ __
'i-I i
! \-, \ 1- i
I, J ,- 1-"
._ I
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
BASE MAP
~-~
II
:1
-- .- 1-\-'
1\1 L I
I \~ ~I' \~
~,,-
i
i
,
u ~.' t)~
mijn~~
z ~WmH 91 ~;~
! liillilJ j!!
.>.
_ _ _ _ -- ~ _ _ _ _ _. _ --
~
~
9,~
'&~
~ VA
~O
~~
~
'So
~
1/
,I "
. /
~
\ll~
-i ~ ~,c,
'" V ~' .
~ A ~,-
~ <'l;-'
Q'"
~
.,
/"-
/
/
/
/ .,
.- '-}
.../' '~\.'
'~\.'J
"
-
-- - -. -- - - - - -,
\
\
\
,>, \
" "
\
\
'-' \
'," I
- I
I
I
I
I
I
-i
~
~
9,
ill
~\Jl
., '7"~
~VA
~~
()IP
~
"e>
,. . ~
~
::>
>-
,-
u
~ ~
u .
.. .
t~~
~
l!!EJr--....]
'" ,-
G;W1i ~, u: i
~ ",
@ ~
~ .
@3~-;:J
~
;..
I,
"
,,-:'
""^'''~~. l7
~~ ,. J I \''--_.~/
I"~'" '. I
~ ,1\~1
m '_I .. r>=
Vl <t
...J
rtC
-1C
I~V. .
"
"
- --1-
I
l- =:-~-I_~-===-
.- _._-
t:'>
.,
. --- --I
, '
~\/
\',
/ 'J
/'/
,/,~-;,~/
//
,9'
r---
/..9
/.,7'
____/.1
_ __._ '-1__ _._
7.__-
"
"
--
--
'"
lr
<(
a.
.,; :
u i x
;:.. !J
. ~ . I
i iO-.~I' j ;; ·
~ ,. I
~ C'". : t
~~ i ~ t
;;;~ \. ; 1
If, ~ ~. ~
r-C
:::: ,.. -
[-
Z
w
~
0
Z
UJ
:2:
<(
z
<( ...Ji
....J
0... c(:
en'
UJ 01
> 0..1
- 01
CI) 0:,
.L... 0..1
UJ en
J:
w ~
0: z:
a.. c(1
2: 01
-,
0 ..J!
0 0..,
a,;
0 c(\
UJ
CJ)
0
a..
0
0:
a..
,_n --l
" ;'
-- ,\\/
\ .,
"'1
/
!/
.,.. /~'
//
~'~-
/.,')
i/
-=-- --:--=..:-.:-!i
1__.."."-'
;'h~ ~~~i
~r~,u "..~..
~mm~~
Li.:.!'.~J.~j.!\,_!:!. ii lil
....J !g::'f....J:' ;. ~zj'
;3 o~f:~~i:i w~ i~~
~ ; ~i~~Jik~~ i I~; ;;i
JTI[[J]]J~[[.I
-j-ri -1' r-TT r-r Tn.i -.
_._ .1_.Lu I I, i.j
!
1/
/ /
. /
/
".
j,:1
I:L; ,
---1 L___
!l 1j"7/,'" ,.,.].
IL [11/,'/
=c,1/' ~
/7, '\
,;:1//' \ ~~
/.7~ ~ '& ~ o'c
/ I 4S. ~ ~ ~
- - ..;:11/ \\'t>cn ~, ~~
I / ~ '"
.. I ." 0 'Z:
~ I 0 ~
.~ -- ~
VI ..
-'
fr
-0(
,.."".",
'..\.\
. ,~,
."
-i
~
~
\
"" IP ,.,:,
.,. \l,\'
~ t .
'\ 4S. .:-;.
,,':'''6 ~
,,' 't: Co'
"a:
0-
'-~\
,,;,~
'.r' "'i
~
>-
1-
'>::
lr
c(
a.
u
" .
..:.:..
H:
~. l~'~
~ "
"j
'--~ ','
~"",, '....
,,,~, ./
.~
, '"
" ."-..
,., ........" '.
/
U'
(1
<;I
en
"
"
."
"
~l
--~
~r..-'''I
gW.'IJ'
Il!!!J <",
!l::~
I
"
,(
.'
./...J
T( !
"'-/f
.-- .-.::............ -- ...- .-. .
---- ['
'-1 ~~-~~=
z _____-
;11 n
11il:~ H
lEi! .l.::
~o .:.
r-c
~(i-
!-
Z
u.!
~
0
Z i
I..U ,
I
~ I
<t \
- I
.t::.
<( I
z:
....J 0'
a.. _I
LU ~I
>
- ~I
CI)
z :II
w
J: ::E,
w 01
0: frll
a.. a:l
:2
0 "-,
"-I
() ~I
0 (1)\
u.!
(j)
0
a.
0
0:
a..
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 8, 1997
1. Call to Order:
The September 8, 1 , Planning Commission meetin was called to order by Chairman
Stamson at 6:30 p.m. ose present were Commisso ers Cramer, Criego, Kuykendall,
Stamson and Vonhof, Dl ctor of Planning Don e, Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier
and Recording Secretary nnie Carlson.
MOTION BY VO OF, SECOND BY C
1997 MINUTES S SUBMITTED.
V onhof
Kuykendall
Criego
Cramer
Stamson
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
2. Roll Call:
3.
R, TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 11,
Vote taken . fied ayes by Kuykendall, Criego, Cr er, V onhof and Stamson.
MOTION ARRIED.
4. Public Hearings:
j#
A. Cases #97-082 & 97-083 Consider a proposed Amendment to the City of Prior Lake
Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan and a zone change requestfor the recently annexed
area owned by Deerfield Development.
The Chair opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. and a sign-up sheet was circulated to
the public in attendance.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the staff report.
Deerfield Development has applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone
Change for the property located directly south of the Waterfront Business Park and
Wilderness Ponds, east of the Ponds Athletic Complex and west of County Road 21 and
Revere Way. The 260 acres involved in this request was annexed to the City in July,
1997, and is currently zoned A-I (Agricultural). The applicant is proposing to amend the
2010 Comprehensive Plan to include this property within the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) boundary, and to designate 62 acres, located in the northwest comer of the
site to the Urban Low to Medium Density Residential designation, 140 acres to the High
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
Density Residential designation and 58 acres to the Planned Industrial designation. The
developer has also requested a rezoning of the easterly 58 acres from the A-I district to
the Light Industrial district.
This property was annexed by order of the Minnesota Municipal Board on July 9, 1997.
During initial discussions with the City staff and the City Council, the applicant indicated
he was interested in a mixed use type development which would include an expansion of
the Waterfront Passage Business Park on the east side of the site, and a combination of
residential uses on the remainder ofthe property. These discussions indicated the
residential portion of the site would be developed at a total density of about 5 units per
acre, which would equal about 700 units. The developer proposed to develop the
property as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) which would allow the mixed use
development. The School District has also indicated an interest in a portion of this site as
a potential high school location.
This proposal is the first step in the development of this site. Once the property has been
added to the MUSA and designated for general use types on the Land Use Plan Map, the
developer can begin designing the specific development for the site.
The Planning Commission is considering two applications at this time. The first
application is a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to include this
site within the City of Prior Lake MUSA boundaries, and to designate the property as R-
LMD (Urban Low to Medium Density Residential), R-HD (Urban High Density
Residential), and I-PI (Planned Industrial). The second request is to rezone the east 57.76
acres of the property from the A-I district to the I-2 district.
Comments from the public:
Bryce Huemoeller representing Deerfield Development and Mesenbrink Construction
stated staffhas recommended a slightly different density breakdown than the developer.
The developer met with staff and does not object to the recommendation. Deerfield
Development has continued to talk to the school district about 80 acres and those
discussions are moving along. It is likely they will sign a Purchase Agreement in the near
future. Developers John Mesenbrink and Larry Gensmer were present for questions.
JeffElasky, 16951 Wilderness Trail, said he moved out to Wilderness Ponds a year ago
and received different answers from Scott County and the City of Prior Lake regarding
the development. His main concern is for traffic and the safety for his children. Fish
Point Road will be the main feeder. Mr. Elasky was also expressed concern for his
property value. He asked the Planning Commission to take this into consideration when
making their decisions.
Jim Palmer, 16986 Wilderness Trail, said its concerns were stated by Mr. Elasky.
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
2
:~:.e
Steven Frank, 17410 Revere Way, was concerned for the high housing density and the
wetlands but agreed with the City's proposal.
The public hearing was closed.
Comments from the Commissioners:
V onhof:
. Is the City required to give up any acreage for the MUSA extension? Rye said the
City discussed this with the Metropolitan Council. The City will be doing a general
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to deal with the entire MUSA issue. One
possibility is a "Floating MUSA" where there are no specific lines on the map, the
City would have a basic acreage allocation and allocate to the specific developments
as they come along. It will be an orderly extension of utilities as needed. It has not
been worked out. When the City prepared the Comprehensive Plan, an additional 500
acres were allocated. This would come out of it. If more acreage is needed in the
future the City would have to go back and ask for additional land. The wetlands are
not included in the MUSA acreage.
. Supported the MUSA extension.
. Supported staff recommendation on the density.
. The business park designation is consistent with our plan.
Kuykendall:
. Supported everything stated so far.
. What are other impacts to the City? Rye stated the City still has the remaining
acreage. Current state of affairs is the City has very little acreage left, with the
exception of the Jeffers property on County Road 42 and 21. Metropolitan Council
suggest this could be phased in developers' projects.
. Concerns for traffic are typically handled quite well by the City and does not
anticipate any kind of problem.
. Is there a need for buffering from other developments? Kansier said the zoning
ordinance provides for certain districts. In this case, there is a natural separation of
woods and wetlands. The new ordinance will contain specifics in zoning and
buffering. There are standards in place.
. Supported proposal by staff.
Criego:
. Any information on how much acreage the school district needs? Kansier said
generally high school sites are around 80 acres. The City does not know any of the
arrangements with the school and developer.
. Huemoeller said the school is looking at 80 acres. There is about 30 acres of wetland.
. The low to medium density on this site should be around a total of 70 acres.
. Kansier clarified the maximum number of units (assuming there was no school)
would be 1,500 to 1,700 units under a PUD. That is not saying it would be approved.
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
3
That is allowable. It would also depend on the wetlands. Realistically it would be
around 500 and 700 units, minus the school.
. How does the City achieve affordable high quality housing? Rye explained the
decisions are on land use. When it gets down to the PUD, those specific
determinations will be made.
. Agreed with the City's recommendation.
Cramer:
. Regarding the MUSA line. Will the Metropolitan Council take issue with the types
of housing?
. Rye said at this point the Metropolitan Council suggested they would not get involved
in the zoning process. In the future they will be looking for continuity in the
Comprehensive Plan such as the Livable Community Act.
. Supported staffs recommendation.
Stamson:
. Concurred with the Commissioners and supported staffs recommendation.
MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY KUYKENDALL, TO RECOMMEND
APPROVAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE THIS
SITE WITHIN THE CITY MUSA BOUNDARY, TO DESIGNATE THE WESTERLY
202 ACRES AS URBAN LOW TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND TO
DESIGNATE THE EASTERLY 58 ACRES TO THE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS
OFFICE PARK.
There was no discussion.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY KUYKENDALL, TO RECOMMEND
APPROVAL THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST FROM THE A-I DISTRICT TO THE
BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This item will go before City Council on October 6, 1997.
B. Case #97-080
South.
ilds Planned Unit Development known as Sterling
sign-up sheet was circulated to the public in
inator Jane Kansier presented the sta
ort.
L:\97FILES\97PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN090897.DOC
4