Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8A - Deerfield financial data ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF PRIOR LAKE MEETING DATE: AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: AGENDA ITEM: DISCUSSION: ISSUES: ALTERNATIVES: MARCH 22, 1999 SA DONALD RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR CONSIDER APPROVAL OF METHOD FOR PREPARING DEERFlELD FINANCIAL DATA At the EDA workshop, the EDA considered a proposal that the City's economic development consultant, Roger Guenette, assist Deerfield Development in developing their financial analysis to determine if the development would be eligible for tax increment financing. The estimated cost of such an analysis was $15,000. Some concern was expressed that the arrangement which was proposed, which had the developer reimbursing the EDA for Mr. Guenette's fee, created an actual or potential conflict of interest. The EDA decided that perhaps a way could be found through an agreement that would eliminate this problem and allow the work to be done by Mr. Guenette. The EDA has confirmed through discussion that a very small amount of land remains within the City for commercial and industrial development. In the Business Office Park, one 4.5 acre parcel remains. The addition of the 57 acre Deerfield property would provide considerably more property. The question for the EDA is whether it should invest money and effort to assist the developer in adding this property to the inventory. In reviewing this further, staff believes there are 4 alternatives the EDA may consider. These are: 1. Do nothing. This would place the developer in the position of proceeding without City assistance. 2. Commission Advance Resources to conduct the necessary analysis and the EDA pay their fees. 3. Commission Advance Resources to conduct the necessary analysis and arrange to have the EDA and developer split the cost up to some maximum amount (say up to $7,500 each). 162ID~~I)@ltelM.\BDAAStID~mm~~Minnesota $5372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 4. Direct the developer to retain their own consultant to prepare the analysis. The EDA would reimburse the developer for the cost of the analysis if the project reaches the construction stage. Regardless of who conducts the analysis, the developer will need to develop a number of things in order for the analysis to be properly conducted. These include development of plans for infrastructure improvement and related costs, estimates of the amount and types of development and the likely staging of such development and a determination of rent structures or sale proceeds. In order for a determination to be made of the eligibility of this project for tax increment financing, the information needs to be developed in sufficient detail to understand project costs and the income stream to be derived from the project. At that point, the determination can be made as to the level of assistance needed to make the project occur. Conclusion For a variety of reasons, staff favors the fourth alternative. If option I or 4 are chosen, Advance Resources can provide Deerfields' consultant with a description and format for the data we need. REVIEWED BY: ~. MOTION: Frank Bo L:\ECONDEV\EDA \EDAAONDA \322998A.DOC 2